莱温斯基TED演讲 中英对照
莱温斯基ted演讲稿（中英文双语文字版）
莱温斯基ted演讲稿（中英文双语文字版）
莱温斯基ted演讲稿陈述了网络语言欺凌受害者的苦楚，这里从莱温斯基22岁的时候担任白宫实习生开始，因为她爱上了她的老板，也就是克林顿总统，然之莱温斯基被贴上了丑恶的标签，这次站在TED演讲上表达了她的想法，以下是整理的莱温斯基ted演讲稿，提供中英文两种版本。
莱温斯基ted演讲稿
站在你们面前的这个女性曾在公众面前沉默了十年。
显然，现在不一样了，不过这只是最近的事。
几个月前在福布斯”30位30岁以下创业者”峰会上,我首次公开发表演讲，峰会上有1500位杰出人士，全部不到30岁。
这就意味着在1998年，其中最年长的人也只有14岁，最年轻的则只有4岁。
我同他们开玩笑，有些人似乎只是从说唱音乐中听过我的名字。
没错，说唱音乐唱过我，几乎有40首这样的说唱音乐。
莱温斯基TED2015演讲稿The price of shame.
The price of shameYou're looking at a woman who was publicly silent for a decade. Obviously, that's changed, but only recently.It was several months ago that I gave my very first major public talk at the Forbes 30 Under 30 summit:1,500 brilliant people, all under the age of 30. That meant that in 1998, the oldest among the group were only 14, and the youngest, just four. I joked with them that some might only have heard of me from rap songs. Yes, I'm in rap songs. Almost 40 rap songs.But the night of my speech, a surprising thing happened. At the age of 41, I was hit on by a 27-year-old guy. I know, right? He was charming and I was flattered, and I declined. You know what his unsuccessful pickup line was? He could make me feel 22 again. I realized later that night, I'm probably the only person over 40 who does not want to be 22 again.At the age of 22, I fell in love with my boss, and at the age of 24, I learned the devastating consequences.Can I see a show of hands of anyone here who didn't make a mistake or do something they regretted at 22? Yep. That's what I thought. So like me, at 22, a few of you may have also taken wrong turns and fallen in love with the wrong person, maybe even your boss. Unlike me, though, your boss probably wasn't the president of the United States of America. Of course, life is full of surprises.Not a day goes by that I'm not reminded of my mistake, and I regret that mistake deeply.In 1998, after having been swept up into an improbable romance, I was then swept up into the eye of a political, legal and media maelstrom like we had never seen before. Remember, just a few years earlier,news was consumed from just three places: reading a newspaper or magazine, listening to the radio, or watching television. That was it. But that wasn't my fate. Instead, this scandal was brought to you by the digital revolution. That meant we could access all the information we wanted, when we wanted it, anytime, anywhere, and when the story broke in January 1998, it broke online. It was the first time the traditional news was usurped by the Internet for a major news story, a click that reverberated around the world.What that meant for me personally was that overnight I went from being a completely private figure to a publicly humiliated one worldwide. I was patient zero of losing a personal reputation on a global scale almost instantaneously.This rush to judgment, enabled by technology, led to mobs of virtual stone-throwers. Granted, it was before social media, but people could still comment online, email stories, and, of course, email cruel jokes. Newssources plastered photos of me all over to sell newspapers, banner ads online, and to keep people tuned to the TV. Do you recall a particular image of me, say, wearing a beret?Now, I admit I made mistakes, especially wearing that beret. But the attention and judgment that I received, not the story, but that I personally received, was unprecedented. I was branded as a tramp, tart, slut, whore, bimbo, and, of course, that woman. I was seen by many but actually known by few. And I get it: it was easy to forget that that woman was dimensional, had a soul, and was once unbroken.When this happened to me 17 years ago, there was no name for it. Now we call it cyberbullying and online harassment. Today, I want to share some of my experience with you, talk about how that experience has helped shape my cultural observations, and how I hope my past experience can lead to a change that results in less suffering for others.In 1998, I lost my reputation and my dignity. I lost almost everything, and I almost lost my life.Let me paint a picture for you. It is September of 1998. I'm sitting in a windowless office room inside the Office of the Independent Counsel underneath humming fluorescent lights. I'm listening to the sound of my voice, my voice on surreptitiously taped phone calls that a supposed friend had made the year before. I'm here because I've been legally required to personally authenticate all 20 hours of taped conversation. For the past eight months, the mysterious content of these tapes has hung like the Sword of Damocles over my head. I mean, who can remember what they said a year ago? Scared and mortified, I listen, listen as I prattle on about the flotsam and jetsam of the day; listen as I confess my love for the president, and, of course, my heartbreak; listen to my sometimes catty, sometimes churlish, sometimes silly self being cruel, unforgiving, uncouth; listen, deeply, deeply ashamed, to the worst version of myself,a self I don't even recognize.A few days later, the Starr Report is released to Congress, and all of those tapes and trans, those stolen words, form a part of it. That people can read the trans is horrific enough, but a few weeks later, the audio tapes are aired on TV, and significant portions made available online. The public humiliation was excruciating. Life was almost unbearable.This was not something that happened with regularity back then in 1998, and by this, I mean the stealing of people's private words, actions, conversations or photos, and then making them public -- public without consent, public without context, and public without compassion.Fast forward 12 years to 2010, and now social media has been born. The landscape has sadly become much more populated with instances like mine, whether or not someone actually make a mistake, and now it's for both public and private people. The consequences for some have become dire, very dire.I was on the phone with my mom in September of 2010, and we were talking about the news of a young college freshman from Rutgers University named Tyler Clementi. Sweet, sensitive, creative Tyler was secretly webcammed by his roommate while being intimate with another man. When the online world learned of this incident, the ridicule and cyberbullying ignited.A few days later, Tyler jumped from the George Washington Bridge to his death. He was 18.My mom was beside herself about what happened to Tyler and his family, and she was gutted with painin a way that I just couldn't quite understand, and then eventually I realized she was reliving 1998, reliving a time when she sat by my bed every night, reliving a time when she made me shower with the bathroom door open, and reliving a time when both of my parents feared that I would be humiliated to death,literally.Today, too many parents haven't had the chance to step in and rescue their loved ones. Too many have learned of their child's suffering and humiliation after it was too late. Tyler's tragic, senseless death was a turning point for me. It served to recontextualize my experiences, and I then began to look at the world of humiliation and bullying around me and see something different. In 1998, we had no way of knowing where this brave new technology called the Internet would take us. Since then, it has connected people in unimaginable ways, joining lost siblings, saving lives, launching revolutions, but the darkness, cyberbullying, and slut-shaming that I experienced had mushroomed. Every day online, people, especially young people who are not developmentally equipped to handle this, are so abused and humiliated that they can't imagine living to the next day, and some, tragically, don't, andthere's nothing virtual about that. ChildLine, a U.K. nonprofit that's focused on helping young people on various issues,released a staggering statistic late last year: From 2012 to 2013, there was an 87 percent increase in calls and emails related to cyberbullying. A meta-analysis done out of the Netherlands showed that for the first time, cyberbullying was leading to suicidal ideations more significantly than offline bullying. And you know what shocked me, although it shouldn't have, was other research last year that determined humiliation was a more intensely felt emotion than either happiness or even anger.Cruelty to others is nothing new, but online, technologically enhanced shaming isamplified, uncontained, and permanently accessible. The echo of embarrassment used to extend only as far as your family, village, school or community, but now it's the online community too. Millions of people, often anonymously, can stab you with their words, and that's a lot of pain, and there are no perimeters around how many people can publicly observe you and put you in a public stockade. There is a very personal price to public humiliation, and the growth of the Internet has jacked up that price.For nearly two decades now, we have slowly been sowing the seeds of shame and public humiliation in our cultural soil, both on- and offline. Gossip websites, paparazzi, reality programming, politics, news outlets and sometimes hackers all traffic in shame. It's led to desensitization and a permissive environment online which lends itself to trolling, invasion of privacy, and cyberbullying. This shift has created what Professor Nicolaus Mills calls a culture of humiliation. Consider a few prominent examples just from the past six months alone. Snapchat, the service which is used mainly by younger generationsand claims that its messages only have the lifespan of a few seconds. You can imagine the range of content that that gets. A third-party app which Snapchatters use to preserve the lifespan of the messages was hacked, and 100,000 personal conversations, photos, and videos were leaked online to now have a lifespan of forever. Jennifer Lawrence and several other actors had their iCloud accounts hacked, and private, intimate, nude photos were plastered across the Internet without their permission.One gossip website had over five million hits for this one story. And what about the Sony Pictures cyberhacking? The documents which received the most attention were private emails that had maximum public embarrassment value.But in this culture of humiliation, there is another kind of price tag attached to public shaming. The price does not measure the cost to the victim, which Tyler and too many others, notably women, minorities,and members of the LGBTQ community have paid, but the price measures the profit of those who prey on them. This invasion of others is a raw material, efficiently and ruthlessly mined, packaged and sold at a profit. A marketplace has emerged where public humiliation is a commodity and shame is an industry.How is the money made? Clicks. The more shame, the more clicks. The more clicks, the more advertising dollars. We're in a dangerous cycle. The more we click on this kind of gossip, the more numb we get to the human lives behind it, and the more numb we get, the more we click. All the while, someone is making money off of the back of someone else's suffering. With every click, we make a choice. The more we saturate our culture with public shaming, the more accepted it is,the more we will see behavior like cyberbullying, trolling, some forms of hacking, and online harassment. Why? Because they all have humiliation at their cores. This behavior is a symptom of the culture we've created. Just think about it.Changing behavior begins with evolving beliefs. We've seen that to be true with racism, homophobia, and plenty of other biases, today and in the past. As we've changed beliefs about same-sex marriage, more people have been offered equal freedoms. When we began valuing sustainability, more people began to recycle. So as far as our culture of humiliation goes, what we need is a cultural revolution. Public shaming as a blood sport has to stop, and it's time for an intervention on the Internet and in our culture.The shift begins with something simple, but it's not easy. We need to return to a long-held value of compassion -- compassion and empathy. Online, we've got a compassion deficit, an empathy crisis.Researcher Brené Brown said, and I quote, "Shame can't survive empathy." Shame cannot survive empathy. I've seen some very dark days in my life, and it was the compassion and empathy from my family, friends, professionals, and sometimes even strangers that saved me. Even empathy from one person can make a difference. The theory of minority influence, proposed by social psychologist Serge Moscovici, says that even in small numbers, when there's consistency over time, change can happen. In the online world, we can foster minority influence by becoming upstanders. To become an upstander means instead of bystander apathy, we can post a positive comment for someone or report a bullying situation. Trust me, compassionate comments help abate the negativity. We can also counteract the culture by supporting organizations that deal with these kinds of issues, like the Tyler Clementi Foundation in the U.S., In the U.K., there's Anti-Bullying Pro, and in Australia, there's Project Rockit.We talk a lot about our right to freedom of expression, but we need to talk more about our responsibility to freedom of expression. We all want to be heard, but let's acknowledge the difference between speaking up with intention and speaking up for attention. The Internet is the superhighway for the id, but online, showing empathy to others benefits us all and helps create a safer and better world. We need to communicate online with compassion, consume news with compassion, and click with compassion. Just imagine walking a mile in someone else's headline. I'd like to end on a personal note. In the past nine months, the question I've been asked the most is why. Why now? Why was I sticking my head above the parapet? You can read between the lines in thosequestions, and the answer has nothing to do with politics.The top note answer was and is because it's time: time to stop tip-toeing around my past; time to stop living a life of opprobrium; and time to take back my narrative. It's also not just about saving myself. Anyone who is suffering from shame and public humiliation needs to know one thing: You can survive it.I know it's hard. It may not be painless, quick or easy, but you can insist on a different ending to your story. Have compassion for yourself. We all deserve compassion, and to live both online and off in a more compassionate world.Thank you for listening.莫妮卡·莱温斯基主讲人：莫妮卡莱温斯基主题：耻辱的代价时间：2015年3月19日主办：Ted大会【编者按】17年前白宫性丑闻事件的当事人，前白宫实习生莫妮卡莱温斯基在沉默了十年之后，走上Ted大会的讲台，呼吁抵制网络欺凌。
莱温斯基TED演讲-中英对照
莱温斯基T E D演讲-中英对照(共18页)--本页仅作为文档封面，使用时请直接删除即可----内页可以根据需求调整合适字体及大小--The price of shame主讲人：莫妮卡莱温斯基主题：耻辱的代价You're looking at a woman who was publicly silent for a decade. Obvious ly, that's changed, but only recently.站在你们面前的是一个在大众面前沉默了十年之久的女人。
当然，现在情况不一样了，不过这只是最近发生的事。
It was several months ago that I gave my very first major public talk at t he Forbes 30 Under 30 summit:1,500 brilliant people, all under the age o f 30. That meant that in 1998, the oldest among the group were only 14, and theyoungest, just four. I joked with them that some might only have heard o f me from rap songs. Yes, I'm in rap songs. Almost 40 rap songs.几个月前，我在《福布斯》杂志举办的“30岁以下”峰会（Under 30 Summit）上发表了首次公开演讲。
现场1500位才华横溢的与会者都不到30岁。
这意味着1998年，他们中最年长的是14岁，而最年轻的只有4岁。
我跟他们开玩笑道，他们中有些人可能只在说唱歌曲里听到过我的名字。
是的，大约有40首说唱歌曲唱过我。
But the night of my speech, a surprising thing happened. At the age of 4 1, I was hit on by a 27-year-old guy. I know, right He was charming and I was flattered, and I declined. You know what his unsuccessful pickup line was He could make me fe el 22 again. I realized later that night, I'm probably the only person over 40 who does not want to be 22 again. 但是，在我演讲当晚，发生了一件令人吃惊的事——我作为一个41岁的女人，被一个27岁的男孩示爱。
【TED】处乱不惊(中英文对照)
Ted演讲标题：处乱不惊A few years ago,I broke into my own house.I had just driven home,it was around midnight in the dead of Montreal winter,I had been visiting my friend,Jeff,across town,and the thermometer on the front porch read minus40degrees,and don’t bother asking if that’s Celsius or Fahrenheit, minus40is where the two scales meet,it was very cold.And as I stood on the front porch fumbling in my pockets,I found I didn’t have my keys.In fact,I could see them through the window,lying on the dining room table where I had left them.So I quickly ran around and tired all the other doors and windows and they were locked tight.I thought about calling a locksmith at least I had my cellphone,but at midnight,it could take a while for a locksmith to show up and it was cold.I couldn’t go back to my friend Jeff’s house for the night because I had an early flight to European the next morning,and I need to get my passport and my suitcase.So,desperate and freezing cold,I found a large rock and I broke through the basement window,clear out the shards of glass,I crawled through,I found a piece of cardboard and taped it up over the opening, figuring that in the morning,on the way to the airport,I could call my contractor and ask him to fix it.This was going to be expensive,but probably no more expensive than a middle-of-the-night locksmith,so I figure,under the circumstances,I was coming out even.几年前，我闯进了我自己的房子。
TED演讲原文和翻译~
TED演讲原⽂和翻译~< your body language shapes who you are > So I want to start by offering you a free no-tech life hack, and all it requires of you is this: that you change your posture for two minutes. But before I give it away, I want to ask you to right now do a little audit of your body and what you're doing with your body. So how many of you are sort of making yourselves smaller? Maybe you're hunching, crossing your legs, maybe wrapping your ankles. Sometimes we hold onto our arms like this. Sometimes we spread out. (Laughter) I see you. (Laughter) So I want you to pay attention to what you're doing right now. We're going to come back to that in a few minutes, and I'm hoping that if you learn to tweak this a little bit, it could significantly change the way your life unfolds.0:58So, we're really fascinated with body language, and we're particularly interested in other people's body language. You know, we're interested in, like, you know —(Laughter) —an awkward interaction, or a smile, or a contemptuous glance, or maybe a very awkward wink, or maybe even something like a handshake.1:22Narrator: Here they are arriving at Number 10, and look at this lucky policeman gets to shake hands with the President of the United States. Oh, and here comes the Prime Minister of the —? No. (Laughter) (Applause) (Laughter) (Applause)1:37Amy Cuddy: So a handshake, or the lack of a handshake, can have us talking for weeks and weeks and weeks. Even the BBC and The New York Times. So obviously when we think about nonverbal behavior, or body language -- but we call it nonverbals as social scientists -- it's language, so we think about communication. When we think about communication, we think about interactions. So what is your body language communicating to me? What's mine communicating to you?2:04And there's a lot of reason to believe that this is a valid way to look at this. So social scientists have spent a lot of time looking at the effects of our body language, or other people's body language, on judgments. And we make sweeping judgments and inferences from body language. And those judgments can predict really meaningful life outcomes like who we hire or promote, who we ask out on a date. For example, Nalini Ambady, a researcher at Tufts University, shows that when people watch 30-second soundless clips of real physician-patient interactions, their judgments of the physician's niceness predict whether or not that physician will be sued. So it doesn't have to do so much with whether or not that physician was incompetent, but do we like that person and how they interacted? Even more dramatic, Alex Todorov at Princeton has shown us that judgments of political candidates' faces in just one second predict 70 percent of U.S. Senate and gubernatorial race outcomes, and even, let's go digital, emoticons used well in online negotiations can lead to you claim more value from that negotiation. If you use them poorly, bad idea. Right? So when we think of nonverbals, we think of how we judge others, how they judge us and what theoutcomes are. We tend to forget, though, the other audience that's influenced by our nonverbals, and that's ourselves.3:31We are also influenced by our nonverbals, our thoughts and our feelings and our physiology. So what nonverbals am I talking about? I'm a social psychologist. I study prejudice, and I teach at a competitive business school, so it was inevitable that I would become interested in power dynamics. I became especially interested in nonverbal expressions of power and dominance.3:56And what are nonverbal expressions of power and dominance? Well, this is what they are. So in the animal kingdom, they are about expanding. So you make yourself big, you stretch out, you take up space, you're basically opening up. It's about opening up. And this is true across the animal kingdom. It's not just limited to primates. And humans do the same thing. (Laughter) So they do this both when they have power sort of chronically, and also when they're feeling powerful in the moment. And this one is especially interesting because it really shows us how universal and old these expressions of power are. This expression, which is known as pride, Jessica Tracy has studied. She shows that people who are born with sight and people who are congenitally blind do this when they win at a physical competition. So when they cross the finish line and they've won, it doesn't matter if they've never seen anyone do it. They do this. So the arms up in the V, the chin is slightly lifted. What do we do when we feel powerless? We do exactly the opposite. We close up. We wrap ourselves up. We make ourselves small. We don't want to bump into the person next to us. So again, both animals and humans do the same thing. And this is what happens when you put together high and low power. So what we tend to do when it comes to power is thatwe complement the other's nonverbals. So if someone is being really powerful with us, we tend to make ourselves smaller. We don't mirror them. We do the opposite of them.5:24So I'm watching this behavior in the classroom, and what do I notice? I notice that MBA students really exhibit the full range of power nonverbals. So you have people who are like caricatures of alphas, really coming into the room, they get right into the middle of the room before class even starts, like they really want to occupy space. When they sit down, they're sort of spread out. They raise their hands like this. You have other people who are virtually collapsing when they come in. As soon they come in, you see it. You see it on their faces and their bodies, and they sit in their chair and they make themselves tiny, and they go like this when they raise their hand. I notice a couple of things about this. One, you're not going to be surprised. It seems to be related to gender. So women are much more likely to do this kind of thing than men. Women feel chronically less powerful than men, so this is not surprising. But the other thing I noticed is that it also seemed to be related to the extent to which the students were participating, and how well they were participating. And this is really important in the MBA classroom, because participation counts for half the grade.6:33So business schools have been struggling with this gender grade gap. You get these equally qualified women and men coming in and then you get these differences in grades, and it seems to be partly attributable to participation. So I started to wonder, you know, okay, so you have these people coming in like this, and they're participating. Is it possible that we could get people to fake it and would it lead them to participate more?6:57So my main collaborator Dana Carney, who's at Berkeley, and I really wanted to know, can you fake it till you make it? Like, can you do this just for a little while and actually experience a behavioral outcome that makes you seem more powerful? So we know that our nonverbals govern how other people think and feel about us. There's a lot of evidence. But our question really was, do our nonverbals govern how we think and feel about ourselves?7:24There's some evidence that they do. So, for example, we smile when we feel happy, but also, when we're forced to smile by holding a pen in our teeth like this, it makes us feel happy. So it goes both ways. When it comes to power, it also goes both ways. So when you feel powerful, you're more likely to do this, but it's also possible that when you pretend to be powerful, you are more likely to actually feel powerful.7:57So the second question really was, you know, so we know that our minds change our bodies, but is it also true that our bodies change our minds? And when I say minds, in the case of the powerful, what am I talking about? So I'm talking about thoughts and feelings and the sort of physiological things that make up our thoughts and feelings, and in my case, that's hormones. I look at hormones. So what do the minds of the powerful versus the powerless look like? So powerful people tend to be, not surprisingly, more assertive and more confident, more optimistic. They actually feel that they're going to win even at games of chance. They also tend to be able to think more abstractly. So there are a lot of differences. They take more risks. There are a lot of differences between powerful and powerless people. Physiologically, there also are differences on two key hormones: testosterone, which is the dominance hormone, and cortisol, which is the stress hormone. So what we find is that high-power alpha males in primate hierarchies have high testosterone and low cortisol, and powerful and effective leaders also have high testosterone and low cortisol. So what does that mean? When you think about power, people tended to think only about testosterone, because that was about dominance. But really, power is also about how you react to stress. So do you want the high-power leader that's dominant, high on testosterone, but really stress reactive? Probably not, right? You want the person who's powerful and assertive and dominant, but not very stress reactive, the person who's laid back. 9:37So we know that in primate hierarchies, if an alpha needs to take over, if an individual needs to take over an alpha role sort of suddenly, within a few days, that individual's testosterone has gone up significantly and his cortisol has dropped significantly. So we have this evidence, both that the body can shape the mind, at least at the faciallevel, and also that role changes can shape the mind. So what happens, okay, you take a role change, what happens if you do that at a really minimal level, like this tiny manipulation, this tiny intervention? "For two minutes," you say, "I want you to stand like this, and it's going to make you feel more powerful."10:19So this is what we did. We decided to bring people into the lab and run a little experiment, and these people adopted, for two minutes, either high-power poses or low-power poses, and I'm just going to show you five of the poses, although they took on only two. So here's one. A couple more. This one has been dubbed the "Wonder Woman" by the media. Here are a couple more. So you can be standing or you can be sitting. And here are the low-power poses. So you're folding up, you're making yourself small. This one is very low-power. When you're touching your neck, you're really protecting yourself. So this is what happens. They come in, they spit into a vial, we for two minutes say, "You need to do this or this." They don't look at pictures of the poses. We don't want to prime them with a concept of power. We want them to be feeling power, right? So two minutes they do this. We then ask them, "How powerful do you feel?" on a series of items, and then we give them an opportunity to gamble, and then we take another saliva sample. That's it. That's the whole experiment.11:28So this is what we find. Risk tolerance, which is the gambling, what we find is that when you're in the high-power pose condition, 86 percent of you will gamble. When you're in the low-power pose condition, only 60 percent, and that's a pretty whopping significant difference. Here's what we find on testosterone. From their baseline when they come in, high-power people experience about a 20-percent increase, and low-power people experience about a 10-percent decrease. So again, two minutes, and you get these changes. Here's what you get on cortisol. High-power people experience about a 25-percent decrease, and the low-power people experience about a 15-percent increase. So two minutes lead to these hormonal changes that configure your brain to basically be either assertive, confident and comfortable, or really stress-reactive, and, you know, feeling sort of shut down. And we've all had the feeling, right? So it seems that our nonverbals do govern how we think and feel about ourselves, so it's not just others, but it's also ourselves. Also, our bodies change our minds.12:36But the next question, of course, is can power posing for a few minutes really change your life in meaningful ways? So this is in the lab. It's this little task, you know, it's just a couple of minutes. Where can you actually apply this? Which we cared about, of course. And so we think it's really, what matters, I mean, where you want to use this is evaluative situations like social threat situations. Where are you being evaluated, either by your friends? Like for teenagers it's at the lunchroom table. It could be, you know, for some people it's speaking at a school board meeting. It might be giving a pitch or giving a talk like this or doing a job interview. We decided that the one that most people could relate to because most people had been through was the job interview.13:20So we published these findings, and the media are all over it, and they say, Okay, so this is what you do when you go in for the job interview, right? (Laughter) You know, so we were of course horrified, and said, Oh my God, no, no, no, that's not what we meant at all. For numerous reasons, no, no, no, don't do that. Again, this is not about you talking to other people. It's you talking to yourself. What do you do before you go into a job interview? You do this. Right? You're sitting down. You're looking at your iPhone -- or your Android, not trying to leave anyone out. You are, you know, you're looking at your notes, you're hunching up, making yourself small, when really what you should be doing maybe is this, like, in the bathroom, right? Do that. Find two minutes. So that's what we want to test. Okay? So we bring people into a lab, and they do either high- or low-power poses again, they go through a very stressful job interview. It's five minutes long. They are being recorded. They're being judged also, and the judges are trained to give no nonverbal feedback, so they look like this. Like, imagine this is the person interviewing you. So for five minutes, nothing, and this is worse than being heckled. People hate this. It's what Marianne LaFrance calls "standing in social quicksand." So this really spikes your cortisol. So this is the job interview we put them through, because we really wanted to see what happened. We then have these coders look at these tapes, four of them. They're blind to the hypothesis. They're blind to the conditions. They have no idea who's been posing in what pose, and they end up looking at these sets of tapes, and they say, "Oh, we want to hire these people," -- all the high-power posers -- "we don't want to hire these people. We also evaluate these people much more positively overall." But what's driving it? It's not about the content of the speech. It's about the presence that they're bringing to the speech. We also, because we rate them on all these variables related to competence, like, how well-structured is the speech? How good is it? What are their qualifications? No effect on those things. This is what's affected. These kinds of things. People are bringing their true selves, basically. They're bringing themselves. They bring their ideas, but as themselves, with no, you know, residue over them. So this is what's driving the effect, or mediating the effect.15:35So when I tell people about this, that our bodies change our minds and our minds can change our behavior, and our behavior can change our outcomes, they say to me, "I don't -- It feels fake." Right? So I said, fake it till you make it. I don't -- It's not me. I don't want to get there and then still feel like a fraud. I don't want to feel like an impostor. I don't want to get there only to feel like I'm not supposed to be here. And that really resonated with me, because I want to tell you a little story about being an impostor and feeling like I'm not supposed to be here.16:06When I was 19, I was in a really bad car accident. I was thrown out of a car, rolled several times. I was thrown from the car. And I woke up in a head injury rehab ward, and I had been withdrawn from college, and I learned that my I.Q. had dropped by two standard deviations, which was very traumatic. I knew my I.Q. because I had identified with being smart, and I had been called gifted as a child. So I'm taken out of college, I keep trying to go back. They say, "You're not going to finish college. Just,you know, there are other things for you to do, but that's not going to work out for you." So I really struggled with this, and I have to say, having your identity taken from you, your core identity, and for me it was being smart, having that taken from you, there's nothing that leaves you feeling more powerless than that. So I felt entirely powerless. I worked and worked and worked, and I got lucky, and worked, and got lucky, and worked.17:01Eventually I graduated from college. It took me four years longer than my peers, and I convinced someone, my angel advisor, Susan Fiske, to take me on, and so I ended up at Princeton, and I was like, I am not supposed to be here. I am an impostor. And the night before my first-year talk, and the first-year talk at Princeton is a 20-minute talk to 20 people. That's it. I was so afraid of being found out the next day that I called her and said, "I'm quitting." She was like, "You are not quitting, because I took a gamble on you, and you're staying. You're going to stay, and this is what you're going to do. You are going to fake it. You're going to do every talk that you ever get asked to do. You're just going to do it and do it and do it, even if you're terrified and just paralyzed and having an out-of-body experience, until you have this moment where you say, 'Oh my gosh, I'm doing it. Like, I have become this. I am actually doing this.'" So that's what I did. Five years in grad school, a few years, you know, I'm at Northwestern, I moved to Harvard, I'm at Harvard, I'm not really thinking about it anymore, but for a long time I had been thinking, "Not supposed to be here. Not supposed to be here." 18:07So at the end of my first year at Harvard, a student who had not talked in class the entire semester, who I had said, "Look, you've gotta participate or else you're going to fail," came into my office. I really didn't know her at all. And she said, she came in totally defeated, and she said, "I'm not supposed to be here." And that was the moment for me. Because two things happened. One was that I realized, oh my gosh, I don't feel like that anymore. You know. I don't feel that anymore, but she does, and I get that feeling. And the second was, she is supposed to be here! Like, she can fake it, she can become it. So I was like, "Yes, you are! You are supposed to be here! And tomorrow you're going to fake it, you're going to make yourself powerful, and, you know, you're gonna —" (Applause) (Applause) "And you're going to go into the classroom, and you are going to give the best comment ever." You know? And she gave the best comment ever, and people turned around and they were like, oh my God, I didn't even notice her sitting there, you know? (Laughter)19:13She comes back to me months later, and I realized that she had not just faked it till she made it, she had actually faked it till she became it. So she had changed. And so I want to say to you, don't fake it till you make it. Fake it till you become it. You know? It's not —Do it enough until you actually become it and internalize.19:33The last thing I'm going to leave you with is this. Tiny tweaks can lead to big changes. So this is two minutes. Two minutes, two minutes, two minutes. Before you go into the next stressful evaluative situation, for two minutes, try doing this, in the elevator,in a bathroom stall, at your desk behind closed doors. That's what you want to do. Configure your brain to cope the best in that situation. Get your testosterone up. Get your cortisol down. Don't leave that situation feeling like, oh, I didn't show them who I am. Leave that situation feeling like, oh, I really feel like I got to say who I am and show who I am.20:09So I want to ask you first, you know, both to try power posing, and also I want to ask you to share the science, because this is simple. I don't have ego involved in this. (Laughter) Give it away. Share it with people, because the people who can use it the most are the ones with no resources and no technology and no status and no power. Give it to them because they can do it in private. They need their bodies, privacy and two minutes, and it can significantly change the outcomes of their life. Thank you. (Applause) (Applause)中⽂翻译：⾸先我想要提供给你们⼀个免费的⾮科技的⼈⽣窍门你只需这样做改变你的姿势⼆分钟时间但在我要把它告诉你们之前，我想要请你们就你们的⾝体和你们⾝体的⾏为做⼀下⾃我审查那么你们之中有多少⼈正蜷缩着⾃⼰? 或许你现在⼸着背，还翘着⼆郎腿? 或者双臂交叉有时候我们像这样抱住⾃⼰有时候展开双臂(笑声) 我看到你了(笑声) 现在请⼤家专⼼在⾃⼰的⾝上我们等⼀下就会回溯刚刚的事希望你们可以稍微改变⼀下这会让你的⽣活变得很不⼀样0:58所以，我们很真的很执着于肢体语⾔特别是对别⼈的肢体语⾔感兴趣你看，我们对(笑声) 尴尬的互动，或⼀个微笑或轻蔑的⼀瞥，或奇怪的眨眼甚⾄是握⼿之类的事情感兴趣1:22解说员:他们来到了唐宁街10号，看看这个这位幸运的警员可以和美国总统握⼿噢，还有来⾃....的总理?不(笑声) (掌声) (笑声) (掌声)1:37Amy Cuddy:所以⼀个握⼿，或没有握⼿我们都可以⼤聊特聊⼀番即使BBC和纽约时报也不例外我们说到肢体⾏为或肢体语⾔时我们将之归纳为社会科学它就是⼀种语⾔，所以我们会想到沟通当我们想到沟通，我们就想到互动所以你现在的⾝体语⾔正在告诉我什么? 我的⾝体⼜是在向你传达什么?2:04有很多理由让我们相信这些是有效的社会科学家花了很多时间求证肢体语⾔的效果或其它⼈的⾝体语⾔在判断⽅⾯的效应⽽我们环视⾝体语⾔中的讯息做决定和推论这些结论可以预测⽣活中很有意义的结果像是我们雇⽤谁或给谁升职，邀请谁出去约会举例⽽⾔，Tufts⼤学的研究员，Nalini Ambady表⽰⼈们观赏⼀部医⽣和患者互动的30秒⽆声影⽚他们对该医⽣的和善观感可⽤来预测该复健师是否会被告上法庭跟这个医⽣能否胜任⼯作没有太⼤关系重点是我们喜不喜欢他和他们是如何与⼈互动的?进⼀步来说，普林斯顿的Alex Todorov 表⽰我们对政治⼈物脸部的喜好判断⼤概可⽤来对美国参议院和美国州长的竞选结果做70%的预测甚⾄就⽹络上在线聊天时使⽤的表情符号可以帮助你从交谈中得到更多信息所以你千万别弄巧成拙，对吧? 当我们提起肢体语⾔，我们就想到我们如何论断别⼈别⼈如何论断我们以及后果会是什么我们往往忘记这点，受到肢体动作所影响的那群观众就是我们⾃⼰3:31我们也往往受⾃⼰的肢体动作，想法感觉和⼼理所影响所以究竟我说的是怎样的⾮语⾔? 我是⼀位社会⼼理学家，我研究偏见我在⼀所极具竞争⼒的商业学院上课因此⽆可避免地对权⼒动⼒学感到着迷特别是在⾮语⾔表达对权⼒和⽀配的领域3:56权⼒和⽀配的⾮语⾔表达究竟是什么? 嗯，让我细细道来在动物王国⾥，它们和扩张有关所以你尽可能的让⾃⼰变⼤，你向外伸展占满空间，基本上就是展开关于展开，我说真的透视动物世界，这不仅局限于灵长类⼈类也⼲同样的事(笑声) 不论是他们长期掌权或是在某个时间点感到权⼒⾼涨他们都这么做特别有趣的原因是它让我们明⽩权⼒的展现从来是如此地⼀致，不管古今世界这种展现，被认为是⼀种荣耀Jessica Tracy研究表⽰视⼒良好⽆碍和先天视障的⼈在赢得⽐赛时都做了同样的事当他们跨过终点线赢得⽐赛之际⽆论能否看的见他们都做这样的动作双臂呈V字型朝上，下巴微微抬起那我们感到⽆助的时候呢?我们的⾏为正相反我们封闭起来。
莫妮卡。莱温斯基——耻辱的代价(汉语英语对照文本)
莫妮卡·莱温斯基主讲人：莫妮卡莱温斯基主题：耻辱的代价时间：2015年3月19日主办：Ted大会【编者按】以下是澎湃新闻()对莱温斯基演讲内容的翻译：站在你们面前的是一个在大众面前沉默了十年之久的女人。
当然，现在情况不一样了，不过这只是最近发生的事。
莱温斯基参加一次演讲。
网络图片不想回到22岁几个月前，我在《福布斯》杂志举办的“30岁以下”峰会（Under 30 Summit）上发表了首次公开演讲。
现场1500位才华横溢的与会者都不到30岁。
这意味着1998年，他们中最年长的是14岁，而最年轻的只有4岁。
我跟他们开玩笑道，他们中有些人可能只在说唱歌曲里听到过我的名字。
是的，大约有40首说唱歌曲唱过我。
但是，在我演讲当晚，发生了一件令人吃惊的事——我作为一个41岁的女人，被一个27岁的男孩示爱。
我知道，这听上去不太可能对吧？他很迷人，说了很多恭维我的话，然后我拒绝了他。
你知道他为何搭讪失败吗？他说，他可以让我感到又回到了22岁。
后来，那晚我意识到，也许我是年过40岁的女人中唯一一个不想重返22岁的人。
22岁时，我爱上了我的老板；24岁的时，我饱受了这场恋爱带来的灾难性的后果。
现场的观众们，如果你们在22岁的时候没有犯过错，或者没有做过让自己后悔的事，请举起手好吗？是的，和我想的一样。
与我一样，22岁时，你们中有一些人也曾走过弯路，爱上了不该爱的人，也许是你们的老板。
但与我不同的是，你们的老板可能不会是美国总统。
当然，人生充满惊奇。
之后的每一天，我都会想起自己所犯的错误，并为之深深感到后悔。
饱受网络欺凌之苦1998年，在卷入一场不可思议的恋情后，我又被卷入了一场前所未有的政治、法律和舆论漩涡的中心。
记得吗？几年前，新闻一般通过三个途径传播：读报纸杂志、听广播、和看电视，仅此而已。
但我的命运并不是仅此而已。
这桩丑闻是通过数字革命传播的。
这意味着我们可以获取任何我们需要的信息，不论何时何地。
这则新闻在1998年1月爆发时，它也在互联网上火了。
莱温斯基ted经典演讲稿中英文版
莱温斯基(Ted)经典演讲稿（中英文版）Introduction莱温斯基（Ted）是一位备受瞩目的演讲家和领导者，他以他的演讲能力和深入的见解而闻名于世。
他的演讲风格充满激情和力量，能够深入人心，并启发观众。
以下是莱温斯基经典演讲稿的中英文版本。
Ted经典演讲稿（中文版）标题：挑战自我，追求卓越大家好，我感到非常荣幸能够站在这个讲台上与大家分享我的经验和观点。
我曾经历过很多困难和挫折，但正是这些经历塑造了我成为今天的自己。
我们每个人都有追求卓越的欲望，但往往在面对困难和逆境时，我们会放弃自己的梦想。
但事实上，只有通过挑战自我，我们才能够发现自己的潜力和实现我们的目标。
我的人生经历告诉我，成功的关键在于如何应对挑战和逆境。
我们不能逃避困难，而是要积极面对，尽力克服它们。
只有当我们不断挑战自我，突破自己的舒适区，我们才能够成长和取得更大的成功。
我们每个人都有不同的才能和激情，但只有通过不断努力和坚持，我们才能够将这些潜力转化为卓越的成就。
我们要明确自己的目标，并制定合理的计划和策略，为达到目标而努力奋斗。
面对困难时，我们要坚持乐观的心态。
困难并不能击败我们，只有我们自己能够决定是否放弃。
我们要相信自己的能力，坚持自己的梦想。
即使失败了，我们也要从中学习并继续前进。
最后，我希望鼓励大家，在追求卓越的道路上不断挑战自我。
面对困难和逆境时，不要害怕失败，而是要相信自己的能力，坚持奋斗。
只有这样，我们才能够获得真正的成功和满足感。
Ted Classic Speech (English Version)Title: Embrace the Challenge, Pursue ExcellenceHello everyone, I feel incredibly honored to stand on this podium and share my experiences and perspectives with all of you. I have gone through many difficulties and setbacks, but it is these experiences that shaped me into who I am today.We all have the desire to pursue excellence, but often, when faced with challenges and adversities, we give up on our dreams. However, the truth is, it isonly through challenging ourselves that we can discover our potential and achieve our goals.My life experiences have taught me that the key to success lies in how we handle challenges and adversities. We cannot avoid difficulties, but instead, we should face them head-on and strive to overcome them. Only when we constantly challenge ourselves and push beyond our comfort zones can we grow and achieve greater success.Each one of us has different talents and passions, but it is only through continuous effort and perseverance that we can turn these potentials into outstanding achievements. We need to clarify our goals and develop reasonable plans and strategies to work towards them.In the face of difficulties, we should mntn an optimistic mindset. Difficulties cannot defeat us; it is only ourselves who can decide whether to give up or not. We should believe in our abilities and persist in pursuing our dreams. Even in the face of flure, we should learn from it and keep moving forward.Lastly, I want to encourage everyone to constantly challenge themselves in the pursuit of excellence. Do not fear flure when faced with difficulties and adversities;instead, believe in your abilities and persevere. Only then can we achieve true success and fulfillment.Conclusion莱温斯基的演讲意味深长，他鼓励我们要不断挑战自我，追求卓越。
小度写范文莱温斯基TED演讲-来自人生的经验与忏悔 莱温斯基的演讲模板
莱温斯基TED演讲:来自人生的经验与忏悔莱温斯基的演讲You are looking at a woman who was publicly silent for a decades. Obviously, that’s changed, but only recently. It was several months ago, that I gave the speech at Forbes 30 under 30 summit, 1,500 pilliant people, all under the age of 30. That meant that in 1998, the oldest among the group were only 14, and the youngest ,just 4. I joked with them that some might only have heard of me from rap songs. Yes, I’m in rap songs. Almost 40 rap songs. But the night of my speech, a surprising thing happened. At the age of 41, I was hit on by a 27-year-old guy. I know, right? He was charming and I was flattered, and I declined. You know what his unsuccessful pickup line was? He could make me feel 22 again. I realized later that night, I’m probably the only person over 40 who does not want to be 22 again. At the age of 22, I fell in love with my boss, and at the age of 24, I learned the devastating consequences. Can I see a show of hands of anyone here who didn’t make a mistake or do something they regretted at 22? Yep. That’s what I thought. So like me, at 22, a few of you may have also taken wrong turns and fallen in love with the wrong person, maybe even your boss. Unlike me, though, your boss probably wasn’t the president of the United States of America. Of course, life is full of surprises. Not a day goes by that I’m not reminded of my mistake, and I regret that mistake deeply. In 1998, after having been swept up into an improbable romance, I was then swept up into the eye of political, legal and media maelstrom like we had never seenbefore. Remember, just a few years earlier, news was consumed from just three places: reading a newspaper or magazine, listening to the radio, or watching television. That was it. But that wasn’t my fate. Instead, this scandal was pought to you by the digital revolution. That meant we could access all the information we wanted, when we wanted it, anytime, anywhere, and when the story poke in January 1998, it poke online. It was the first time the traditional news was usurped by the internet for a major news story, a click that reverberated around the world. What that meant for me personally was the overnight I went from being a completely private figure to a publicly humiliated one worldwide. I was patient zero oflosing a personal reputation on a global scale almost instantaneously. This rush to judgment, enabled by technology, led mobs of virtual stone-throwers. Granted, it was before social media, but people could still comment online, email stories, and of course, email cruel jokes. News sources plastered photos of me all over to sell newspapers, banner ads online, and to keep people tuned to the TV. Do you recall a particular image of me, say, wearing a beret? But the attention and judgment that Ireceived, not the story, but that I personally received, was unprecedented.I was panded as a tramp, tart, whore, bimbo, and, of course, that woman.I was seen by many but actually known by few. And I get it: it was easy to forget that that woman was dimensional had a soul, and was once unpoken. When this happened to me 17 years ago, there was no name for it. Now we callit cyberbullying and online harassment. Today, I want to share some of my experience with you, talk about how that experience has helped shape my cultural observations, and how I hope my past experience can lead to a change that results in less suffering for others. In1998, I lost my reputation and my dignity. I lost almost everything, and I almost lost my life. Let me paint a picture for you. It is September of 1998. I’m sitting in a windowless office room inside the Office of the Independent Counsel underneath humming fluorescent lights. I’m listening to the sound of my voice, my voice on surreptitiously taped phone calls that a supposed friend had made the year before. I’m here because I’ve been legally required to personally authenticate all 20 hours of taped conversation. For the past eight months, the mysterious content of these tapes has hung like the Sword of Damocles over my head. I mean, who can remember what they said a year ago? Scared and mortified, I listen, listen as I prattle on about the flotsam and jetsam of the day; listen as I confess my love for the president, and of course, my heartpeak; listen to my sometimes catty, sometimes churlish, sometimes silly self being cruel, unforgiving, uncouth; listen, deeply, deeply ashamed, to the worst version of myself, a self I don ’t even recognize. A few days later, the Starr Report is released the congress, and all of those tapes and transcripts, those stolen words, from a part of it. That people can read the transcripts ishorrific enough, but a few weeks later, the audio tapes are aired on TV,and significant portions made available online. The public humiliation was excruciating. Life was almost unbearable. This was not something that happened with regularity back then 1998, and by this, I mean the stealing of people’sprivate words, actions, conversations or photos, and making them public—public without consent, public without context, and public without compassion. Fast forward 12 years to 2010, and now social media has been born. The landscape has sadly become much more populated with instances like mine, whether or not someone actually make a mistake, and now it’s for both public and private people. The consequences for some have become dire, very dire. I was on the phone with my mom in September of 2010, and we were talking about the news of a young college freshman from Rutgers University named Tyler Clementi. A sweet sensitive, creative Tyler was secretly webcam med by his roommate while being intimate with another man. When the online world learned of this incident, the ridicule and cyberbullying ignited. A few days later, Tyler jumped from the George Washington Bridge to his death. He was 18. My mom was beside herself about what happened to Tyler and his family, and she was gutted with pain in a way that I just couldn’t quite understand, and then eventually I realized she was reliving 1998, reliving a time when she sat by my bed every night, (sorry) reliving a time when she made me shower with a bathroom door open and reliving a time when both of my parents feared that I would be humiliated to death, literally. Today, too manyparents haven’t had the chance to step in and rescue their loved ones. Too many have learned of their child ’s suffering and humiliation after it was too late. Tyler’s tragic, senseless death was a turning point for me. It served to recontextualize my experiences, and I began to look at the world of humiliation and bullying around me and see something different. In 1998, we had no way of knowing where this pave new technology called the internet would take us. Since then, it hasconnected people in unimaginable ways, joining lost siblings, saving lives, launching revolutions, but the darkness, cyberbullying, and slut-shaming that I experienced had mushroomed. Every day on line, people, especially young people who are not developmentally equipped to handle this, are so abused and humiliated that they can’t imagine living to the next day, and some, tragically, don’t, and there’s nothing virtual about that. Child Line, a UK nonprofit that’s focused on helping young people on various issues, released a staggering statistic late last year: from 2012 to 2013, there was an 87 percent increase in calls and emails related to cyberbullying.A meta-analysis done out of the Netherlands showed that for the first time, cyberbullying was leading to suicidal ideations more significantly than offline bullying. And you know what shocked me, although it shouldn’t have, was other research last year that determined humiliation was more intensely felt emotion than either happiness or even anger. Cruelty to others is nothing new, but online, technologically enhanced shaming is amplified,uncontained, and permanently accessible. The echo of embarrassment used to extend only as far as your family, village, school or community, but now it’s the online community too. Millions of people, often anonymously, can stab you with their words, and that’s a lot of pain, and there are no perimeters around how many people can publicly observe you and put you in a public stockade. There is a very personal price to public humiliation, and the growth of the internet has jacked up that price. For nearly two decades now, we have slowly been sowing the seeds of shame and public humiliation in our cultural soil, both on-and offline. Gossip websites, paparazzi, reality programming, politics, news outlets and sometimes hackers all traffic in shame. It’s led to desensitization and a permissive environment online which lends itself to trolling, invasion of privacy, and cyberbullying. This shift has created what professor Nicolaus Mills calls a culture of humiliation. Consider a few prominent examples just from the past six months alone. Snapchat, the service which is used mainly by younger generations and claims that its messages only have the lifespan of a few seconds. You can imagine the range of content that gets. A third-party app which Snapchatters use to preserve the lifespan of the messages was hacked, and 100,000 personal conversations, photos, and videos were leaked online to now have a lifespan of forever. Jennifer Lawrence and several other actors had their iCloud accounts hacked, and private, nude photos were plastered across the internet without their permission. One gossip website had overfive million hits for this one story. And what about the Sony Pictures cyberhacking? The documents which received the most attention were private emails that had maximum public embarrassment value. But in this culture of humiliation, there is another kind of price tag attached to public shaming. The price doesnot measure the cost to the victim, which Tyler and too many others, notably women, minorities and members of the LGBTQ community have paid, but the price measures that profit of those who prey on them. This invasion of others is a raw material, efficiently and ruthlessly mined, packaged and sold at a profit. A marketplace has emerged where public humiliation is a commodity and shame is an industry. How is the money made? Clicks. The more shame, the more clicks. the more clicks, the more advertising dollars. We’re in a dangerous cycle. The more we click on this kind of gossip, the more numb we get to the human lives behind it, and the more numb we get, the more we click. All the while, someone is making money off the back of someone else’s suffering. With every click, we make a choice. The more we saturate our culture with public shaming, the more accepted it is, the more we will see behavior like cyberbullying, trolling, some forms of hacking, and online harassment. Why? Because they all have humiliation at their cores. This behavior is a symptom of the culture we’ve created. Just think about it. Changing behavior begins with evolving beliefs. We’ve seen that to be true with racism, homophobia, and plenty of other biases, today and in the past.As we ’ve changed beliefs about same-sex marriage, more people have been offered equal freedoms. When we began valuing sustainability, more people began to recycle. So as far as our culture of humiliation goes, what we need is a cultural revolution. Public shaming as a blood sport has to stop, and it’s time for an intervention on the internet and in our culture. The shift begins with something simple, but it’s not easy. We need to return to long-held value of compassion and empathy. Online, we ’ve got a compassion deficit, an empathy crisis. researcher Brenna Brown said, I quote:“shame can ’t survive empathy.“ shame cannot survive empathy. I’ve seen some very dark days in my life, and it was the compassion and empathy from my family, friends, professionals, and sometimes even strangers that saved me. Even empathy from one person can make a difference. The theory of minority influence, proposed by social psychologist Serge Moscovici, says that even in smallnumbers, when there’s consistency over time, change can happen. In the online world, we can foster minority influence by becoming upstanders. To become an upstander apathy, we can post a positive comment for someone or report a bullying situation. Trust me, compassionate comment help abate the negativity. We can also counteract the culture by supporting organizations that deal with these kinds of issues, like the Tyler Clementi foundation in the US. In the UK, there’s anti-bullying pro, and in Australia, there’s project rockit. We talk a lot about our right to freedom of expression,but we need to talk more about our responsibility to freedom of expression. We all want to be heard, but let ’s acknowledge the difference between speaking up with intention and speaking up for attention. The internet is the superhighway for the id, but online, showing empathy to others benefits us all and helps create a safer and better world. We need to communicate online with compassion, consume news with compassion, and click with compassion. Just imagine walking a mile in someone else’s headline. I’d like to end on a personal note. In the past nine months, the question I’ve been asked the most is why. Why now? why was I sticking my head above the parapet? You can read between the lines in those questions, and the answer has nothing to do with politics. The top note answer was and is because it’s time: time to stop tip-toeing around my past; time to stop living a life of oppropium; and time to take back my narrative. It’s also not just about saving myself. Anyone who is suffering from shame and public humiliation needs to know one thing: you can survive it. I know it’s hard. It may not be painless, quick or easy, but you can insist on a different ending to your story. Have compassion for yourself. We all deserve compassion, and to live both online and off in a more compassionate world. Thank you for listening.。
ted演讲稿中英文对照3分钟
ted演讲稿中英文对照3分钟Good morning!大家早上好！It's my great pleasure to have the opportunity to give a speech here today.今天有机会在这里发表演讲真是我的荣幸。
As we all know, life is full of challenges, and there are some we cannot leave aside.众所周知，生活充满挑战，但有些问题我们无法回避。
No matter how hard things seem, we should persist and never give up.无论问题有多难，我们都应该坚持不懈，永不放弃。
At the same time, we should be brave and take appropriate risks in order to explore the unknown.同时，我们要勇敢，作出适当的冒险，以探索未知的事物。
To become successful, we should work hard and have an open attitude towards life.要想成功，我们应该努力工作，与生活保持开放的态度。
Rather than running away from challenges, we should face them with courage and confidence.我们不应该逃避挑战，而应该勇敢地去面对它们，并保持信心。
Finally, we should never abandon the pursuit of our dreams,no matter how difficult it may seem.最后，我们永远不要放弃追求梦想，无论有多么困难。
That's all for my speech. Thank you for your attention.以上就是我的演讲。
莱温斯基 演讲
TED演讲原文和翻译~
< your body language shapes who you are > So I want to start by offering you a free no-tech life hack, and all it requires of you is this: that you change your posture for two minutes. But before I give it away, I want to ask you to right now do a little audit of your body and what you're doing with your body. So how many of you are sort of making yourselves smaller? Maybe you're hunching, crossing your legs, maybe wrapping your ankles. Sometimes we hold onto our arms like this. Sometimes we spread out. (Laughter) I see you. (Laughter) So I want you to pay attention to what you're doing right now. We're going to come back to that in a few minutes, and I'm hoping that if you learn to tweak this a little bit, it could significantly change the way your life unfolds.0:58So, we're really fascinated with body language, and we're particularly interested in other people's body language. You know, we're interested in, like, you know —(Laughter) —an awkward interaction, or a smile, or a contemptuous glance, or maybe a very awkward wink, or maybe even something like a handshake.1:22Narrator: Here they are arriving at Number 10, and look at this lucky policeman gets to shake hands with the President of the United States. Oh, and here comes the Prime Minister of the —? No. (Laughter) (Applause) (Laughter) (Applause)1:37Amy Cuddy: So a handshake, or the lack of a handshake, can have us talking for weeks and weeks and weeks. Even the BBC and The New York Times. So obviously when we think about nonverbal behavior, or body language -- but we call it nonverbals as social scientists -- it's language, so we think about communication. When we think about communication, we think about interactions. So what is your body language communicating to me? What's mine communicating to you?2:04And there's a lot of reason to believe that this is a valid way to look at this. So social scientists have spent a lot of time looking at the effects of our body language, or other people's body language, on judgments. And we make sweeping judgments and inferences from body language. And those judgments can predict really meaningful life outcomes like who we hire or promote, who we ask out on a date. For example, Nalini Ambady, a researcher at Tufts University, shows that when people watch 30-second soundless clips of real physician-patient interactions, their judgments of the physician's niceness predict whether or not that physician will be sued. So it doesn't have to do so much with whether or not that physician was incompetent, but do we like that person and how they interacted? Even more dramatic, Alex Todorov at Princeton has shown us that judgments of political candidates' faces in just one second predict 70 percent of U.S. Senate and gubernatorial race outcomes, and even, let's go digital, emoticons used well in online negotiations can lead to you claim more value from that negotiation. If you use them poorly, bad idea. Right? So when we think of nonverbals, we think of how we judge others, how they judge us and what theoutcomes are. We tend to forget, though, the other audience that's influenced by our nonverbals, and that's ourselves.3:31We are also influenced by our nonverbals, our thoughts and our feelings and our physiology. So what nonverbals am I talking about? I'm a social psychologist. I study prejudice, and I teach at a competitive business school, so it was inevitable that I would become interested in power dynamics. I became especially interested in nonverbal expressions of power and dominance.3:56And what are nonverbal expressions of power and dominance? Well, this is what they are. So in the animal kingdom, they are about expanding. So you make yourself big, you stretch out, you take up space, you're basically opening up. It's about opening up. And this is true across the animal kingdom. It's not just limited to primates. And humans do the same thing. (Laughter) So they do this both when they have power sort of chronically, and also when they're feeling powerful in the moment. And this one is especially interesting because it really shows us how universal and old these expressions of power are. This expression, which is known as pride, Jessica Tracy has studied. She shows that people who are born with sight and people who are congenitally blind do this when they win at a physical competition. So when they cross the finish line and they've won, it doesn't matter if they've never seen anyone do it. They do this. So the arms up in the V, the chin is slightly lifted. What do we do when we feel powerless? We do exactly the opposite. We close up. We wrap ourselves up. We make ourselves small. We don't want to bump into the person next to us. So again, both animals and humans do the same thing. And this is what happens when you put together high and low power. So what we tend to do when it comes to power is that we complement the other's nonverbals. So if someone is being really powerful with us, we tend to make ourselves smaller. We don't mirror them. We do the opposite of them.5:24So I'm watching this behavior in the classroom, and what do I notice? I notice that MBA students really exhibit the full range of power nonverbals. So you have people who are like caricatures of alphas, really coming into the room, they get right into the middle of the room before class even starts, like they really want to occupy space. When they sit down, they're sort of spread out. They raise their hands like this. You have other people who are virtually collapsing when they come in. As soon they come in, you see it. You see it on their faces and their bodies, and they sit in their chair and they make themselves tiny, and they go like this when they raise their hand. I notice a couple of things about this. One, you're not going to be surprised. It seems to be related to gender. So women are much more likely to do this kind of thing than men. Women feel chronically less powerful than men, so this is not surprising. But the other thing I noticed is that it also seemed to be related to the extent to which the students were participating, and how well they were participating. And this is really important in the MBA classroom, because participation counts for half the grade.6:33So business schools have been struggling with this gender grade gap. You get these equally qualified women and men coming in and then you get these differences in grades, and it seems to be partly attributable to participation. So I started to wonder, you know, okay, so you have these people coming in like this, and they're participating. Is it possible that we could get people to fake it and would it lead them to participate more?6:57So my main collaborator Dana Carney, who's at Berkeley, and I really wanted to know, can you fake it till you make it? Like, can you do this just for a little while and actually experience a behavioral outcome that makes you seem more powerful? So we know that our nonverbals govern how other people think and feel about us. There's a lot of evidence. But our question really was, do our nonverbals govern how we think and feel about ourselves?7:24There's some evidence that they do. So, for example, we smile when we feel happy, but also, when we're forced to smile by holding a pen in our teeth like this, it makes us feel happy. So it goes both ways. When it comes to power, it also goes both ways. So when you feel powerful, you're more likely to do this, but it's also possible that when you pretend to be powerful, you are more likely to actually feel powerful.7:57So the second question really was, you know, so we know that our minds change our bodies, but is it also true that our bodies change our minds? And when I say minds, in the case of the powerful, what am I talking about? So I'm talking about thoughts and feelings and the sort of physiological things that make up our thoughts and feelings, and in my case, that's hormones. I look at hormones. So what do the minds of the powerful versus the powerless look like? So powerful people tend to be, not surprisingly, more assertive and more confident, more optimistic. They actually feel that they're going to win even at games of chance. They also tend to be able to think more abstractly. So there are a lot of differences. They take more risks. There are a lot of differences between powerful and powerless people. Physiologically, there also are differences on two key hormones: testosterone, which is the dominance hormone, and cortisol, which is the stress hormone. So what we find is that high-power alpha males in primate hierarchies have high testosterone and low cortisol, and powerful and effective leaders also have high testosterone and low cortisol. So what does that mean? When you think about power, people tended to think only about testosterone, because that was about dominance. But really, power is also about how you react to stress. So do you want the high-power leader that's dominant, high on testosterone, but really stress reactive? Probably not, right? You want the person who's powerful and assertive and dominant, but not very stress reactive, the person who's laid back.9:37So we know that in primate hierarchies, if an alpha needs to take over, if an individual needs to take over an alpha role sort of suddenly, within a few days, that individual's testosterone has gone up significantly and his cortisol has dropped significantly. So we have this evidence, both that the body can shape the mind, at least at the faciallevel, and also that role changes can shape the mind. So what happens, okay, you take a role change, what happens if you do that at a really minimal level, like this tiny manipulation, this tiny intervention? "For two minutes," you say, "I want you to stand like this, and it's going to make you feel more powerful."10:19So this is what we did. We decided to bring people into the lab and run a little experiment, and these people adopted, for two minutes, either high-power poses or low-power poses, and I'm just going to show you five of the poses, although they took on only two. So here's one. A couple more. This one has been dubbed the "Wonder Woman" by the media. Here are a couple more. So you can be standing or you can be sitting. And here are the low-power poses. So you're folding up, you're making yourself small. This one is very low-power. When you're touching your neck, you're really protecting yourself. So this is what happens. They come in, they spit into a vial, we for two minutes say, "You need to do this or this." They don't look at pictures of the poses. We don't want to prime them with a concept of power. We want them to be feeling power, right? So two minutes they do this. We then ask them, "How powerful do you feel?" on a series of items, and then we give them an opportunity to gamble, and then we take another saliva sample. That's it. That's the whole experiment.11:28So this is what we find. Risk tolerance, which is the gambling, what we find is that when you're in the high-power pose condition, 86 percent of you will gamble. When you're in the low-power pose condition, only 60 percent, and that's a pretty whopping significant difference. Here's what we find on testosterone. From their baseline when they come in, high-power people experience about a 20-percent increase, and low-power people experience about a 10-percent decrease. So again, two minutes, and you get these changes. Here's what you get on cortisol. High-power people experience about a 25-percent decrease, and the low-power people experience about a 15-percent increase. So two minutes lead to these hormonal changes that configure your brain to basically be either assertive, confident and comfortable, or really stress-reactive, and, you know, feeling sort of shut down. And we've all had the feeling, right? So it seems that our nonverbals do govern how we think and feel about ourselves, so it's not just others, but it's also ourselves. Also, our bodies change our minds.12:36But the next question, of course, is can power posing for a few minutes really change your life in meaningful ways? So this is in the lab. It's this little task, you know, it's just a couple of minutes. Where can you actually apply this? Which we cared about, of course. And so we think it's really, what matters, I mean, where you want to use this is evaluative situations like social threat situations. Where are you being evaluated, either by your friends? Like for teenagers it's at the lunchroom table. It could be, you know, for some people it's speaking at a school board meeting. It might be giving a pitch or giving a talk like this or doing a job interview. We decided that the one that most people could relate to because most people had been through was the job interview.13:20So we published these findings, and the media are all over it, and they say, Okay, so this is what you do when you go in for the job interview, right? (Laughter) You know, so we were of course horrified, and said, Oh my God, no, no, no, that's not what we meant at all. For numerous reasons, no, no, no, don't do that. Again, this is not about you talking to other people. It's you talking to yourself. What do you do before you go into a job interview? You do this. Right? You're sitting down. You're looking at your iPhone -- or your Android, not trying to leave anyone out. You are, you know, you're looking at your notes, you're hunching up, making yourself small, when really what you should be doing maybe is this, like, in the bathroom, right? Do that. Find two minutes. So that's what we want to test. Okay? So we bring people into a lab, and they do either high- or low-power poses again, they go through a very stressful job interview. It's five minutes long. They are being recorded. They're being judged also, and the judges are trained to give no nonverbal feedback, so they look like this. Like, imagine this is the person interviewing you. So for five minutes, nothing, and this is worse than being heckled. People hate this. It's what Marianne LaFrance calls "standing in social quicksand." So this really spikes your cortisol. So this is the job interview we put them through, because we really wanted to see what happened. We then have these coders look at these tapes, four of them. They're blind to the hypothesis. They're blind to the conditions. They have no idea who's been posing in what pose, and they end up looking at these sets of tapes, and they say, "Oh, we want to hire these people," -- all the high-power posers -- "we don't want to hire these people. We also evaluate these people much more positively overall." But what's driving it? It's not about the content of the speech. It's about the presence that they're bringing to the speech. We also, because we rate them on all these variables related to competence, like, how well-structured is the speech? How good is it? What are their qualifications? No effect on those things. This is what's affected. These kinds of things. People are bringing their true selves, basically. They're bringing themselves. They bring their ideas, but as themselves, with no, you know, residue over them. So this is what's driving the effect, or mediating the effect.15:35So when I tell people about this, that our bodies change our minds and our minds can change our behavior, and our behavior can change our outcomes, they say to me, "I don't -- It feels fake." Right? So I said, fake it till you make it. I don't -- It's not me. I don't want to get there and then still feel like a fraud. I don't want to feel like an impostor. I don't want to get there only to feel like I'm not supposed to be here. And that really resonated with me, because I want to tell you a little story about being an impostor and feeling like I'm not supposed to be here.16:06When I was 19, I was in a really bad car accident. I was thrown out of a car, rolled several times. I was thrown from the car. And I woke up in a head injury rehab ward, and I had been withdrawn from college, and I learned that my I.Q. had dropped by two standard deviations, which was very traumatic. I knew my I.Q. because I had identified with being smart, and I had been called gifted as a child. So I'm taken out of college, I keep trying to go back. They say, "You're not going to finish college. Just,you know, there are other things for you to do, but that's not going to work out for you." So I really struggled with this, and I have to say, having your identity taken from you, your core identity, and for me it was being smart, having that taken from you, there's nothing that leaves you feeling more powerless than that. So I felt entirely powerless. I worked and worked and worked, and I got lucky, and worked, and got lucky, and worked.17:01Eventually I graduated from college. It took me four years longer than my peers, and I convinced someone, my angel advisor, Susan Fiske, to take me on, and so I ended up at Princeton, and I was like, I am not supposed to be here. I am an impostor. And the night before my first-year talk, and the first-year talk at Princeton is a 20-minute talk to 20 people. That's it. I was so afraid of being found out the next day that I called her and said, "I'm quitting." She was like, "You are not quitting, because I took a gamble on you, and you're staying. You're going to stay, and this is what you're going to do. You are going to fake it. You're going to do every talk that you ever get asked to do. You're just going to do it and do it and do it, even if you're terrified and just paralyzed and having an out-of-body experience, until you have this moment where you say, 'Oh my gosh, I'm doing it. Like, I have become this. I am actually doing this.'" So that's what I did. Five years in grad school, a few years, you know, I'm at Northwestern, I moved to Harvard, I'm at Harvard, I'm not really thinking about it anymore, but for a long time I had been thinking, "Not supposed to be here. Not supposed to be here." 18:07So at the end of my first year at Harvard, a student who had not talked in class the entire semester, who I had said, "Look, you've gotta participate or else you're going to fail," came into my office. I really didn't know her at all. And she said, she came in totally defeated, and she said, "I'm not supposed to be here." And that was the moment for me. Because two things happened. One was that I realized, oh my gosh, I don't feel like that anymore. You know. I don't feel that anymore, but she does, and I get that feeling. And the second was, she is supposed to be here! Like, she can fake it, she can become it. So I was like, "Yes, you are! You are supposed to be here! And tomorrow you're going to fake it, you're going to make yourself powerful, and, you know, you're gonna —" (Applause) (Applause) "And you're going to go into the classroom, and you are going to give the best comment ever." You know? And she gave the best comment ever, and people turned around and they were like, oh my God, I didn't even notice her sitting there, you know? (Laughter)19:13She comes back to me months later, and I realized that she had not just faked it till she made it, she had actually faked it till she became it. So she had changed. And so I want to say to you, don't fake it till you make it. Fake it till you become it. You know? It's not —Do it enough until you actually become it and internalize.19:33The last thing I'm going to leave you with is this. Tiny tweaks can lead to big changes. So this is two minutes. Two minutes, two minutes, two minutes. Before you go into the next stressful evaluative situation, for two minutes, try doing this, in the elevator,in a bathroom stall, at your desk behind closed doors. That's what you want to do. Configure your brain to cope the best in that situation. Get your testosterone up. Get your cortisol down. Don't leave that situation feeling like, oh, I didn't show them who I am. Leave that situation feeling like, oh, I really feel like I got to say who I am and show who I am.20:09So I want to ask you first, you know, both to try power posing, and also I want to ask you to share the science, because this is simple. I don't have ego involved in this. (Laughter) Give it away. Share it with people, because the people who can use it the most are the ones with no resources and no technology and no status and no power. Give it to them because they can do it in private. They need their bodies, privacy and two minutes, and it can significantly change the outcomes of their life. Thank you. (Applause) (Applause)中文翻译：首先我想要提供给你们一个免费的非科技的人生窍门你只需这样做改变你的姿势二分钟时间但在我要把它告诉你们之前，我想要请你们就你们的身体和你们身体的行为做一下自我审查那么你们之中有多少人正蜷缩着自己? 或许你现在弓着背，还翘着二郎腿? 或者双臂交叉有时候我们像这样抱住自己有时候展开双臂(笑声) 我看到你了(笑声) 现在请大家专心在自己的身上我们等一下就会回溯刚刚的事希望你们可以稍微改变一下这会让你的生活变得很不一样0:58所以，我们很真的很执着于肢体语言特别是对别人的肢体语言感兴趣你看，我们对(笑声) 尴尬的互动，或一个微笑或轻蔑的一瞥，或奇怪的眨眼甚至是握手之类的事情感兴趣1:22解说员:他们来到了唐宁街10号，看看这个这位幸运的警员可以和美国总统握手噢，还有来自....的总理?不(笑声) (掌声) (笑声) (掌声)1:37Amy Cuddy:所以一个握手，或没有握手我们都可以大聊特聊一番即使BBC和纽约时报也不例外我们说到肢体行为或肢体语言时我们将之归纳为社会科学它就是一种语言，所以我们会想到沟通当我们想到沟通，我们就想到互动所以你现在的身体语言正在告诉我什么? 我的身体又是在向你传达什么?2:04有很多理由让我们相信这些是有效的社会科学家花了很多时间求证肢体语言的效果或其它人的身体语言在判断方面的效应而我们环视身体语言中的讯息做决定和推论这些结论可以预测生活中很有意义的结果像是我们雇用谁或给谁升职，邀请谁出去约会举例而言，Tufts大学的研究员，Nalini Ambady表示人们观赏一部医生和患者互动的30秒无声影片他们对该医生的和善观感可用来预测该复健师是否会被告上法庭跟这个医生能否胜任工作没有太大关系重点是我们喜不喜欢他和他们是如何与人互动的? 进一步来说，普林斯顿的Alex Todorov 表示我们对政治人物脸部的喜好判断大概可用来对美国参议院和美国州长的竞选结果做70%的预测甚至就网络上在线聊天时使用的表情符号可以帮助你从交谈中得到更多信息所以你千万别弄巧成拙，对吧? 当我们提起肢体语言，我们就想到我们如何论断别人别人如何论断我们以及后果会是什么我们往往忘记这点，受到肢体动作所影响的那群观众就是我们自己3:31我们也往往受自己的肢体动作，想法感觉和心理所影响所以究竟我说的是怎样的非语言? 我是一位社会心理学家，我研究偏见我在一所极具竞争力的商业学院上课因此无可避免地对权力动力学感到着迷特别是在非语言表达对权力和支配的领域3:56权力和支配的非语言表达究竟是什么? 嗯，让我细细道来在动物王国里，它们和扩张有关所以你尽可能的让自己变大，你向外伸展占满空间，基本上就是展开关于展开，我说真的透视动物世界，这不仅局限于灵长类人类也干同样的事(笑声) 不论是他们长期掌权或是在某个时间点感到权力高涨他们都这么做特别有趣的原因是它让我们明白权力的展现从来是如此地一致，不管古今世界这种展现，被认为是一种荣耀Jessica Tracy研究表示视力良好无碍和先天视障的人在赢得比赛时都做了同样的事当他们跨过终点线赢得比赛之际无论能否看的见他们都做这样的动作双臂呈V字型朝上，下巴微微抬起那我们感到无助的时候呢?我们的行为正相反我们封闭起来。
莱温斯基ted演讲
莱温斯基ted演讲尊敬的各位观众，大家好。
今天，我很高兴来到这里，和大家分享我的故事和人生经验。
我叫莱温斯基（Monica Lewinsky），是一名曾经在美国政治界引起轩然大波的实习生。
当时，我和时任美国总统克林顿（Bill Clinton）有过肉体关系，这件事被媒体曝光后引起了轰动效应，成为了历史上备受关注的“莱温斯基事件”。
这个事件虽然已经过去了20多年，但对我的生活产生了深远的影响。
当时，我承受着极大的压力和舆论压力，在那个没有社交媒体的时代，我的名字被无数人知晓，我的形象被全球媒体渲染成了一个淫乱的女人。
但是，我并不想在这里重复那段阴暗的历史。
今天，我来到这里，是想告诉大家一些有益的经验和教训。
第一点，我们必须正视自己的错误和缺点。
我承认，当时我做错了事情，并且没有意识到后果的严重性。
但是，与其逃避和否认错误，不如勇敢面对。
在这件事情之后，我反思自己的人生和价值观，找到了自我价值和意义。
对于每个人来说，我们都有自己的优点和缺点，我们必须正视自己的缺点，才能更好地提高自己。
第二点，我们必须保持真诚和坦率。
在这件事情之后，我受到了无数人的嘲讽和攻击，但是我并没有再去掩盖或改变自己的性格和真实感受。
我始终坚信，只有敢于坦诚面对自己的缺点和过错，才能更好地面对人生的挫折和困难，才能更好地实现自己的价值和梦想。
第三点，我们必须拥有自己的梦想和信念。
在那段历史之后，我曾经陷入过自卑和沮丧的情绪，但是我从未放弃对自己的信念和梦想。
无论处于什么环境，我们都必须牢记自己的理想目标，努力追求自己的梦想，并为自己的价值而奋斗。
最后，我想说的是，每一个人都是追求幸福和快乐的个体。
我们不能因为自己犯过错误或者遇到过挫折而放弃希望和努力。
只有敢于去尝试、去冒险，才能实现自己的价值和意义。
希望大家能够好好地珍惜自己的人生，勇敢地面对困难和挑战，拥有美好的未来。
谢谢大家。
莱温斯基ted演讲稿
莱温斯基ted演讲稿尊敬的评委、各位领导、亲爱的听众们，大家好！我今天的演讲题目是《创新力为未来》。
作为一个科技企业的创始人，我深知创新的重要性。
创新力是我们公司成功的关键所在，也是推动整个行业发展的力量。
今天，我想与大家分享一些有关创新力的思考和观点。
首先，创新力是引领社会发展的重要因素。
我们处于科技飞速发展的时代，不断涌现出各种新技术、新产品和新模式。
在这个全球竞争激烈的社会中，一家企业如果没有创新力，就很难在市场上立足。
更重要的是，创新力对于社会的长远发展也有着巨大的推动作用。
只有不断创新，才能适应经济发展的需求，满足人们对高质量生活的追求。
其次，创新力是企业持续发展的根本动力。
在今天这个快速变化的时代，企业面临许多挑战和机遇。
只有不断创新，才能抓住机遇、应对挑战，不断提高企业的竞争力。
而创新力的核心在于创造出与众不同的产品或服务。
正是这些创新产品或服务，让企业有了不可替代的竞争优势，才能在激烈的市场竞争中脱颖而出。
第三，创新力是个人成长的必然选择。
作为个体，我们也需要不断创新，以适应时代的发展。
只有不断学习新知识、掌握新技能，才能不被时代抛弃，保持竞争力，并实现个人价值的最大化。
而创新力的培养离不开思考、实践和勇气。
我们要敢于打破常规，尝试新的方法和思路，不断寻求突破，才能在个人发展中站稳脚跟，向更高更远的目标迈进。
最后，我想强调的是，创新力是源于自由的思考和开放的环境。
创新需要一种人人尊重差异、鼓励表达和交流的氛围。
只有在这样的环境中，每个人才能畅所欲言，提出自己的想法和建议，产生碰撞出新思路的火花。
因此，为了培养创新力，我们需要打破条条框框，鼓励多样化的观点和思维方式，给人们更多发挥和创造的空间。
尊敬的评委、各位领导、亲爱的听众们，创新力是我们赖以生存和发展的基石，是推动社会进步的动力。
无论是企业、个人还是整个社会，都迫切需要更多的创新力。
让我们共同努力，培养创新思维，打造创新型社会，为未来带来更美好的发展。
ted简短演讲稿中英对照
1.TED《为什么我必须站出来》英文演讲稿
2.谁有TED演讲：邹奇奇的演讲稿（英文版）
3.经典英文短篇演讲稿中英文对照
粉嫩的脸，红润的唇，矫健的膝并不是青春。
青春表现在意志的坚强与懦弱。
想象的丰富与苍白、情感的充沛与贫乏等方面。
青春是生命深处清泉的喷涌。
青春是追求。
只有当勇气盖过怯弱、进取压倒苟安之时，青春才存在。
果如此，则60见之长者比20岁之少年更具青春活力。
仅仅岁月的流逝并不能使
他们衰老。
而一旦抛弃理想和信念，则垂垂老也。
岁月只能使皮肤起皱。
而一旦丧失生活的激情，则连灵魂枯老，使人生枯如死水，毫无活力。
60岁长者
也好，16岁少年也罢，每个人的内心深处都渴望奇迹，都如孩子一般眨着期待的
双眼，期待着下一次，期待着生活的情趣，你我灵魂深处都有一座无线电中转站------只有你我年轻，则总能听到希望的呼唤，总能发出喜悦的欢呼，总能传达勇气的讯号，总能表现出青春的活力……… 一旦青春的天线倒下，你的灵魂即为玩世不恭
之雪、悲观厌世之冰覆盖；即使你年方20.其实你已垂垂老也。
而只要你青春的天线高高耸起，就可以随时接收到乐观的电波-----即使你年过八旬，行将就木，而你却仍然拥有青春，你仍然年轻。
谢谢。
4.莱温斯基ted演讲英文版。
莱温斯基ted演讲稿
莱温斯基ted演讲稿尊敬的各位领导、各位老师、亲爱的同学们：大家好！今天我很荣幸能够站在这里，与大家分享一位伟大的演讲家——莱温斯基（Ted Levinskey）的演讲稿。
莱温斯基是一位备受尊敬的演讲家和作家，他的演讲风格深受人们喜爱，他的言辞充满力量和感染力。
今天，我将为大家呈现他在一次TED演讲中的精彩演讲内容，希望能够给大家带来启发和思考。
莱温斯基在演讲中首先提到了人与人之间的情感交流。
他说，情感交流是人类社会中最重要的一环，它不仅可以促进人与人之间的沟通，还可以增进彼此之间的理解和信任。
在现代社会，人们往往忽视了情感交流的重要性，而更多地沉浸在冷冰冰的数字世界中。
莱温斯基呼吁大家要重视情感交流，要学会表达自己的情感，要学会倾听他人的心声，这样才能够建立起更加紧密的人际关系。
其次，莱温斯基谈到了人生的意义和价值观。
他认为，每个人都应该对自己的人生负责，要有自己的价值观和信仰。
在追求成功和财富的过程中，我们往往会迷失自己，会忽视内心的声音。
莱温斯基告诫大家要坚守自己的内心，要明确自己的人生目标和追求，不要被外界的诱惑所左右。
只有在坚持自己的价值观的同时，才能够真正实现人生的价值和意义。
最后，莱温斯基谈到了勇气和决心。
他说，人生中总会遇到各种各样的挑战和困难，而如何面对这些挑战，需要有勇气和决心。
他举了自己的亲身经历为例，讲述了自己在面对挫折和失败时是如何坚持不懈，是如何克服困难，最终取得成功的。
他鼓励大家要有勇气直面困难，要有决心克服挑战，只有这样才能够走出困境，迎接更加美好的未来。
在莱温斯基的演讲中，他用生动的语言，深刻的思想，感人的情感，给人们留下了深刻的印象。
他的演讲内容不仅仅是一堆文字的堆砌，更是对人生的思考和感悟，是对人类情感和精神世界的呼唤。
通过他的演讲，我们不仅仅能够感受到他的热情和真诚，更能够从中汲取到力量和勇气，去迎接人生中的挑战和困难。
最后，我想说，莱温斯基的演讲给了我们很多启发和思考。
Ted中英文双语演讲稿
活在世上做好自己足矣"I used to think the worst thing in life was to end up all alone.“我曾经认为生活中最糟糕的事情就是孤独终老。
It's not.并不是。
The worst thing in life is to end up with people that make you feel all alone." --Robin Williams生活中最糟糕的事情就是和让你感到孤独的人在一起。
”——罗宾·威廉姆斯Codependency is a potentially destructive state to be in.相互依赖是一种潜在的破坏性状态。
At its core, it means that you cannot be alone.本质上，这意味着你无法独处。
And the consequence of this is an ongoing clinging to other people; no matter how bad they treat you. 这样做的结果就是你会持续地依附于他人，不管他们对你有多坏。
But it's an illusion to think that we need someone else to make us feel complete.但是认为我们需要别人来让我们感到完整是一种错觉。
We don't.我们不需要。
When we let our contentment depend on external things, we have given our power away.当我们让自己的满足依赖于外在的东⻄时，我们已经失去了自己的力量。
As humans, we aren't islands.作为人类，我们不是岛屿。
莱温斯基ted演讲
竭诚为您提供优质文档/双击可除莱温斯基ted演讲篇一：莱温斯基TeD演讲呼吁网络正能量莱温斯基TeD演讲呼吁网络正能量【观察者网杨晗轶译文】世界上多数年过四十的女性都愿意回到22岁，但3月19日的“TeD20XX：TruthandDare”（“真心话大冒险”）大会显然迎来了一位与众不同的演讲者。
这名披着过肩卷发、身着海蓝色衬衫和便装长裤的41岁女性一开场便突兀地说：“我22岁的时候，爱上了我的老板。
24岁时，我咽下了这场恋情带来的苦果。
”可想而知，这个最终赢得全场观众起立鼓掌的故事，绝没有落入“霸道总裁爱上我”之类的俗套。
除了拥有《网络欺凌：想象活在别人的新闻头条里》这样发人深省的题目外，另一个相当重要的原因恐怕是这场办公室恋情发生在世界权力中心之一——白宫。
是的，这位演讲者名叫莫妮卡·莱温斯基。
距离那场震撼世界的性丑闻被曝光已过去了近17年，在沉默了十年之后，当年那个与时任美国总统的比尔·克林顿传出桃色新闻的白宫实习生，如今显得自信、稳重，虽然相貌未改，但整体气质明显发生了变化。
1998年，一件沾有克林顿总统精液的蓝色洋装将“白宫拉链门”推向高潮，引发全球媒体地震。
即使多年后人们逐渐淡忘这桩丑闻；即使克林顿卸任总统职位后走穴演讲搞得风生水起；即使希拉里曾祝福自己的情敌“找到生命的意义与乐趣”，出身加利福尼亚州富裕犹太家庭的莱温斯基却从未真正平静过。
20XX年后，她淡出美国公众视线，在伦敦、洛杉矶、纽约和波特兰都生活过一段时间，却因名声狼藉很难找到跟自己专业对口的工作。
1998年的白宫性丑闻是最早在互联网上火起来的新闻之一。
莱温斯基表示，互联网使她本已遭受的屈辱严重了许多倍，因为它创造出一种可怕的文化，将他人的耻辱变为吸睛的利器，人们乐此不疲。
她说：“在被卷入一场荒唐的恋情后，我被拖入了政治、法律和舆论的漩涡中心，这是此前人们从未见过的??而这场丑闻的传播，需归功于数字革命。
莱温斯基TED演讲稿
莱温斯基TED演讲稿大家好，我是莱温斯基，今天我来到这里和大家分享我的故事。
我曾经是一名普通的职业女性，工作稳定，生活平淡。
但一场车祸改变了我的生活。
我不得不辞去工作，开始从事身体治疗，这也是我第一次意识到自己真正的激情所在。
我热爱帮助他人通过运动和身体治疗来减轻疼痛和焦虑。
在我自我治疗和自我探索的过程中，我开始了解到芳疗的奥秘。
我开始探索芳疗的世界，研究各种草药和天然植物。
我把它们混合在一起，创造了我的第一个芳疗配方。
当我开始使用我的配方，我的世界被改变了。
我感觉更健康，更平静，更幸福。
我意识到芳疗的力量，也意识到我有责任将这种力量分享给更多的人。
在这个过程中，我创办了自己的芳疗公司，在我的卧室里开始销售我自己研制的芳疗产品。
虽然起步艰难，但我坚持不懈的努力，让我的公司逐渐成长壮大。
但我的心底始终有一份不满足。
我发现自己在过度关注生意和利润，忽略了自己的最初激情——帮助他人。
作为一家芳疗公司，我的主要目标不应该只是以商业化的方式创造财富，而是应该帮助更多的人。
于是我开始重新审视我的业务模式，寻找一种更有意义的方法来传播芳疗之美。
我找到了一种解决方案——与专业治疗师及非营利组织合作，向那些需要芳疗却无法承担昂贵芳疗费用的人提供免费的治疗。
我也开始与从事自然健康行业的其他企业合作，将芳疗这种天然健康方式引入他们的产品中，以便这种健康方式可以更广泛地传播和实用。
这些决定不仅让我的业务受益，也让我感到更加充实和满足。
我获得了更多的精神上的满足，我的公司也比以前更成功了。
我懂得了企业家的责任不仅是因为他们为自己负责，而是因为他们要为社会和地球负责。
我相信，这种对社会和地球的责任是企业家不容忽视的，因为成功的商业实践应该是建立在帮助他人的基础上的。
我们不仅可以为自己创造成功，更可以帮助他人改善自己的生活。
在这种精神的指导下，我相信我们的世界可以变得更加温暖和美好，每个人都可以获得健康和快乐的生活。
谢谢大家。
TED演讲：别吝啬一声感谢中英文(★)
TED演讲：别吝啬一声感谢中英文（★）正文第一篇：TED演讲：别吝啬一声感谢中英文TED演讲:别吝啬一声感谢【视频链接】：https://www./talks/laura_trice_suggests_we_all_say_t hank_you Hi. I'm here to talk to you about the importance of praise, admiration and thank you, and having it be specific and genuine. And the way I got interested in this was, I noticed in myself, when I was growing up, and until about a few years ago, that I would want to say thank you to someone, I would want to praise them, I would want to take in their praise of me and I'd just stop it. And I asked myself, why? I felt shy, I felt embarrassed. And then my question became, am I the only one who does this? So, I decided to investigate. I'm fortunate enough to work in the rehab facility, so I get to see people who are facing life and death with addiction. And sometimes it comes down to something as simple as, their core wound is their father died without ever saying he's proud of them. But then, they hear from all the family and friends that the father told everybody else that he was proud of him, but he never told the son.It's because he didn't know that his son needed to hear it. So my question is, why don't we ask for the things that we need? I know a gentleman, married for 25 years, who's longing to hear his wife say, Thank you for being the breadwinner, so I can stay home with the kids, but won't ask. I know a woman who's good at this. She, once a week, meets with her husband and says, I'd really like you to thank me for all these things I did in the house and with the kids. And he goes, Oh, this is great, this is great. And praise really does have to be genuine, but she takes responsibility for that. And a friend of mine, April, who I've had since kindergarten, she thanks her children for doing their chores. And she said, Why wouldn't I thank it, even though they're supposed to do it? So, the question is, why was I blocking it? Why were other people blocking it? Why can I say, I'll take my steak medium rare, I need size six shoes, but I won't say, Would you praise me this way? And it's because I'm giving you critical data about me. I'm telling you where I'm insecure. I'm telling you where I need your help. And I'm treating you, my inner circle, like you're the enemy. Because what can you do with that data? You couldneglect me. You could abuse it. Or you could actually meet my need. And I took my bike into the bike store-- I love this -- same bike, and they'd do something called truing the wheels. The guy said, You know, when you true the wheels, it's going to make the bike so much better.I get the same bike back, and they've taken all the little warps out of those same wheels I've had for two and a half years, and my bike is like new. So, I'm going to challenge all of you. I want you to true your wheels: be honest about the praise that you need to hear. What do you need to hear? Go home to your wife -- go ask her, what does she need?Go home to your husband -- what does he need? Go home and ask those questions, and then help the people around you. And it's simple. And why should we care about this? We talk about world peace. How can we have world peace with different cultures, different languages? I think it starts household by household, under the same roof. So, let's make it right in our own backyard. And I want to thank all of you in the audience for being great husbands, great mothers, friends, daughters, sons. And maybe somebody's never said that to you, but you've done a really, really good job.Andthank you for being here, just showing up and changing the world with your ideas. Thank you. (Applause)Dr. Laura Trice is a therapist and coach, devoted to practices that help people find fulfillment. She's created a therapeutic program called Writing in Recovery that uses creative skills such as journaling and music to help people develop better self-awareness and set goals. She's taught this program at such well-known clinics as Betty Ford and Promises. She's the author of the book How to Work Any 12-Step Program. In her other life, she is the head of Laura's Wholesome Junk Food, making healthy cookies and brownies.你好我来这里是要和你谈谈赞美，赞美，感谢你的重要性，并将它具体化和真诚。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
The price of shame主讲人：莫妮卡莱温斯基主题：耻辱的代价You're looking at a woman who was publicly silent for a de cade. Obviously, that's changed, but only recently.站在你们面前的是一个在大众面前沉默了十年之久的女人。
当然，现在情况不一样了，不过这只是最近发生的事。
It was several months ago that I gave my very first major public talk at the Forbes 30 Under 30 summit:1,500 brillian t people, all under the age of 30. That meant that in 1998, the oldest among the group were only 14, and the youngest, just four. I joked with them that some might only have heard of me from rap songs. Yes, I'm in rap songs. Almost 40 rap songs.几个月前，我在《福布斯》杂志举办的“30岁以下”峰会（Under 30 Summit）上发表了首次公开演讲。
现场1500位才华横溢的与会者都不到30岁。
这意味着1998年，他们中最年长的是14岁，而最年轻的只有4岁。
我跟他们开玩笑道，他们中有些人可能只在说唱歌曲里听到过我的名字。
是的，大约有40首说唱歌曲唱过我。
But the night of my speech, a surprising thing happened. At the age of 41, I was hit on by a 27-year-old guy. I know, right? He was charming and I was flattered, and I declin ed. You know what his unsuccessful pickup line was? He c ould make me feel 22 again. I realized later that night, I'm probably the only person over 40 who does not want to be 22 again. 但是，在我演讲当晚，发生了一件令人吃惊的事——我作为一个41岁的女人，被一个27岁的男孩示爱。
我知道，这听上去不太可能对吧？他很迷人，说了很多恭维我的话，然后我拒绝了他。
你知道他为何搭讪失败吗？他说，他可以让我感到又回到了22岁。
后来，那晚我意识到，也许我是年过40岁的女人中唯一一个不想重返22岁的人。
At the age of 22, I fell in love with my boss, and at the age of 24, I learned the devastating consequences. Can I s ee a show of hands of anyone here who didn't make a mis take or do something they regretted at 22? Yep.That's what I thought.So like me, at 22, a few of you may have also t aken wrong turns and fallen in love with the wrong person, maybe even your boss. Unlike me, though, your boss proba bly wasn't the president of the United States of America. Of course, life is full of surprises.Not a day goes by that I'm not reminded of my mistake, and I regret that mistake deep ly. 22岁时，我爱上了我的老板；24岁的时，我饱受了这场恋爱带来的灾难性的后果。
现场的观众们，如果你们在22岁的时候没有犯过错，或者没有做过让自己后悔的事，请举起手好吗？是的，和我想的一样。
与我一样，22岁时，你们中有一些人也曾走过弯路，爱上了不该爱的人，也许是你们的老板。
但与我不同的是，你们的老板可能不会是美国总统。
当然，人生充满惊奇。
之后的每一天，我都会想起自己所犯的错误，并为之深深感到后悔。
In 1998, after having been swept up into an improbable r omance, I was then swept up into the eye of a political, le gal and media maelstrom like we had never seen before. R emember, just a few years earlier,news was consumed from just three places: reading a newspaper or magazine, listeni ng to the radio, or watching television. That was it. But that wasn't my fate. Instead, this scandal was brought to you b y the digital revolution. That meant we could access all the information we wanted, when we wanted it, anytime, anywh ere, and when the story broke in January 1998, it broke onli ne. It was the first time the traditional news was usurped by the Internet for a major news story, a click that reverberate d around the world. 饱受网络欺凌之苦1998年，在卷入一场不可思议的恋情后，我又被卷入了一场前所未有的政治、法律和舆论漩涡的中心。
记得吗？几年前，新闻一般通过三个途径传播：读报纸杂志、听广播、和看电视，仅此而已。
但我的命运并不是仅此而已。
这桩丑闻是通过数字革命传播的。
这意味着我们可以获取任何我们需要的信息，不论何时何地。
这则新闻在1998年1月爆发时，它也在互联网上火了。
这是互联网第一次在重大新闻事件报道中超越了传统媒体。
只要轻点一下鼠标，就会在全世界引起反响。
What that meant for me personally was that overnight I w ent from being a completely private figure to a publicly hum iliated one worldwide. I was patient zero of losing a persona l reputation on a global scale almost instantaneously. This rush to judgment, enabled by technology, led to mobs of v irtual stone-throwers. Granted, it was before social media, b ut people could still comment online, email stories, and, of course, email cruel jokes. News sources plastered photos of me all over to sell newspapers, banner ads online, and to keep people tuned to the TV. Do you recall a particular ima ge of me, say, wearing a beret? 对我个人而言，这则新闻让我一夜之间从一个无名小卒变成了全世界人民公开羞辱的对象。
我成了第一个经历在全世界范围内名誉扫地的“零号病人”。
科技是这场草率审判的始作俑者，无数暴民向我投掷石块。
当然，那时还没有社交媒体，但人们依然可以在网上发表评论，通过电子邮件传播新闻和残酷的玩笑。
新闻媒体贴满了我的照片，借此来兜售报纸，为网页吸引广告商，提高电视收视率。
记得当时的那张照片吗？我戴着贝雷帽的照片。
Now, I admit I made mistakes, especially wearing that ber et. But the attention and judgment that I received, not the s tory, but that I personally received, was unprecedented. I w as branded as a tramp, tart, slut, whore, bimbo, and, of c ourse, that woman. I was seen by many but actually known by few. And I get it: it was easy to forget that that woman was dimensional, had a soul, and was once unbroken. 现在，我承认我犯了错，特别是不该戴那顶贝雷帽。
但是，除了事件本身，我因此受到的关注和审判是前所未有的。
我被贴上“淫妇”、“妓女”，“荡妇”，“婊子”，“蠢女人”的标签，当然，还有“那个女人”。
许多人看到了我，但很少有人真正了解我。
对此我表示理解，因为人们很容易忘记“那个女人”也是一个活生生的人，她也有灵魂，她也曾过着平静的生活。