分享两篇SCI发表的经历

合集下载

临床医生的发表SCI文章的经验

临床医生的发表SCI文章的经验

临床医生的发表SCI文章的经验从去年8月份着手准备SCI文章,到今年1篇临床类文章成功接收,一篇小修,一篇大修,均已修回,虽然都是一些低影响因子的杂志(这跟个人水平及所学专业有关,泌尿外科NO 1的杂志european urology也才8点多),但我对这样的结果已相当满足。

通过阅读各位前辈发表在丁香园上的经验贴,我学到了许多东西,对我的选择杂志、投稿及修稿帮助都极大,在此表示感谢。

刚开始酝酿idea的时候,我也是一头雾水,而且我是老板的第一个博士,没有师兄师姐指导,只有自己探索。

我老板没有基础研究,没有课题支持,但是他有个特点,手术做的很好,许多手术都有高质量的录像资料,另外,他对手术的悟性很高,一种新的手术方式(例如传统多孔腹腔镜改为单孔腹腔镜,他通过四五台手术就基本适应了高难度的操作)他能很快适应并进入状态,这跟他多年的手术例数的积累有关。

于是,我决定写写临床方面的文章。

我的第一篇SCI文章是一个病种手术经验的总结。

因为临床方面的文章和基础文章一样,其实也需要数据支持,而常规病种的手术量非常大,随访也相对较难,并且常规手术要想写出新意也非常不容易。

于是我把范围缩小到罕见病例。

实际上,我们医院或者我们科室,基础的科研做的不多,但是我们医院提供了一个非常好的一个平台,即病人非常多(我们科室平均每天手术量在10以上)。

所以,很多罕见病,经过一段时间的积累后的病例数相对较多,也变得不在那么罕见。

瞄准这个方向后,我开始查阅文献,发现有一种罕见疾病(实际上并不是很罕见,只是相对较少而已)只有外国人报道过,最多的病例数10多例,而我查阅我们医院近8年对该病的诊治情况后,发现大约50例左右,当然有一部分最终没有接受手术治疗,而是选择了随访(因该病种手术难度及风险均很大,充分考虑其性价比后选择随访)。

因此我开始着手写我们医院关于该病种手术处理的一些经验,想发篇临床回顾性文章。

罕见病正因为罕见,所以临床资料的收集相对容易。

分享两篇SCI发表的经历(cover letter、response letter)

分享两篇SCI发表的经历(cover letter、response letter)

分享两篇SCI发表的经历三年前对于我来说SCI就是天书一样,在我踏进博士的门槛后我以为自己进入了地狱,也纠结也彷徨,整天刷虫友们对于博士、SCI的帖子,我选择了虫友们鼓励的那一部分来激励自己继续前行。

我告诉自己坚持就是胜利,当然那是积极的坚持。

在好几月之前就有这个想法,今天早上收到第二篇的接收通知后,我便想今天一定要在小木虫上谢谢那些给予我帮助的虫友们。

话不多说,我把自己这两篇投稿的经历与大家共享,希望能给大家带来一点点用处。

第一篇发表在FitoterapiaCover letterDear Editor Verotta:We would like to submit the manuscript entitled "××××××题目" by ××××××所有作者姓名which we wish to be considered for publication in Journal of Fitoterapia.All authors have read and approved this version of the article, and due care has been taken to ensure the integrity of the work. Neither the entire paper nor any part of its content has been published or has been accepted elsewhere. It is not being submitted to any other journal.We believe the paper may be of particular interest to the readers of your journal as it is the first time of ××××××研究的精华所在Thank you very much for your reconsidering our revised manuscript for potential publication in Fitoterapia. We are looking forward to hearing from you soon. Correspondence should be addressed to Jinhui Yu at the following address, phone and fax number, and email address.地址、学院、学校名称Phone: + 86××××××Fax number: + 86571××××××Best wishes for you and your family!Sincerely yours,×××所有作者Response to reviewersDear Editor:Thank you very much for your letter and the comments from the referees about our paper submitted to Journal of Fitoterapia (FITOTE-D-11-01071). The manuscript entitled "××××××" by ××××××所有作者have been revised according to the reviewers’ comments, and we wish it to be reconsidered for publication in Journal of Fitoterapia.A list of changes and responses to reviewers are as follows.List of ActionsLOA1: The key words were changed in page?.LOA2: The name and location of the local biochemistry company have been added in section 2.1 (page 3).LOA3: A paragraph has been added in section 3.1 (page 5) to further explain the determination of the cis and trans configuration of double bonds in polyprenols.LOA4: The language was improved by English language editing of Elsevier webshop.To Reviewer 1#,Thank you very much for pointing out the problems in our manuscript. We have revised it according to your recommendations. We would like to know if there are still somewhere need to be amended.(1) Keywords: general terms should be avoided; I would change some of the keywords (homologues, identification, quantification)The key words have been changed as follows: ××××××修改后关键词(2) In paragraph 2.1 the "local biochemistry company" should be identified byname and location.The name and location of the local biochemistry company have been added in section 2.1 (page 3). NaOH,Pyrogallol,anhydrous Na2SO4 were purchased from Hangzhou ChangqingHuagong CO., LTD.(3) How the cis and trans configuration of double bonds in ××××××were determined? Authors should say something about.The following paragraph has been added in section 3.1 (page 5) to further explain the determination of the cis and trans configuration of double bonds in ××××××.(4) Language should be checked for clarity and correctness.The language was improved by English language editing of Elsevier webshop.To Reviewer 2#,Thank you very much for your recommendation on our paper and we have improved by English language editing of Elsevier webshop.All in all, thank you very much for your reconsidering our revised manuscript for potential publication in Fitoterapia. I'm looking forward to hearing from you soon. Correspondence should be addressed to ****第一作者或通讯作者at the following address, phone and fax number, and email address.地址Phone: + 86571××××××Fax number: + ××××××Best wishes for you and your family!Sincerely yours,××××××所有作者总的来说,第一篇文章没有费很大劲。

SCI论文发表心得体会

SCI论文发表心得体会

SCI论文发表心得体会关于写作顺序先打好框架然后再添血肉。

首先处理好所有的数据,包括做好表格,图形等,然后按顺序插到word中,再去填写文字。

不要写到中间了才发现某些数据还没处理好,这样会打断思路。

写作的过程中不要因为一个单词或者一句话写不出来而纠缠不休,不会的或者是拿不准的先用中文代替,保证思路连贯!如果写作过程中突发灵感,必须赶紧用中文在文章中任何方便的地方先记录下来,否则很和可能不到5分钟就忘记了。

关于英语英文要避免低级错误和中国式英语,例如句子前后单复数是否统一、时态是否一致、词组搭配是否恰当等,这些错误只要认真就一定可以避免。

英语功力的提高并非一朝一夕能完成,但也并非无捷径可循,例如对于有些自己写出来的又不敢确定语法正确与否的句子可以把它粘贴到“google学术”中搜索一下,你很容易发现自己的说法是否得体,因为我们不是写诗歌,如果“google”中没有这样的说法或相近的说法,答案只有一个:你错了!解决的办法很简单,输入几个关键词,临摹欧美作者的句法(当然不是整句copy),不要嫌麻烦,自己要用心积累,多背一些经典的科技句型(几十个足够了),长此以往,语言肯定不会成为论文的障碍!关于introduction(1)高度重视introduction。

introduction是决定成败的至关重要一部分,刚入行的作者并不太在意introduction,而是注重实验呀讨论呀等内容,喜欢将内容堆砌在introduction里凑数,写出来的东西要么词不达意,要么逻混乱。

这样的introduction只能是被拒稿。

反复品读大腕们的经典文章,研究introduction中的每句话,考虑一下他为什么这么说,品读语句中间的逻辑关系。

自己写完后,一定要以读者的身份去反复品读,看看你是否表达出了想表达的意思,或者你的每句话、每个单词有没有存在的必要,如果去掉了它是否还能表达意图。

另外,看看是否有思维跳跃,前后相连的两句话必须有逻辑性,如果读下来不通顺,一定要加以修改,不要心存侥幸,一定要让别人读起来很舒服,不能让人狐疑。

JournalofAdvancedNursing投稿!来自一个新人的经历分享!

JournalofAdvancedNursing投稿!来自一个新人的经历分享!

JournalofAdvancedNursing投稿!来自一个新人的经历分享!研三的时候发表了我的第一篇SCI,收录于JAN(Journal of Advanced Nursing),其影响因子有2.376。

写SCI的时候在研二,当时的我只发表了一篇中文普刊,对于一个科研新人来说这是一个可望而不可即的梦,然而实现了。

在此我想把SCI的发表历程分享给大家,给想发SCI的护理同仁们提供参考和信心。

我的这篇SCI是一项关于临床决策的调查性研究。

起初写成了中文,投稿国内期刊,但失败了,所以不得不再次寻找合适的期刊。

(吐槽:国内的审稿很严(B)格(T)!)根据对临床决策研究的文献回顾,发现国外期刊对此报道很多,加上这是一个临床上普遍存在的国际性问题,于是我决定写成英文,准备投稿SCI 期刊。

首先,我手上已有了中文版论文,但在翻译成英文之前,我决定先确定目标期刊,有利于直接形成符合期刊格式要求的论文,节省时间。

然而护理SCI杂志有100多本,应该如何需选择?我所考虑的内容有:第一,期刊的影响因子。

通常第一次投稿会考虑先投影响因子高的期刊,所以我选择JAN。

第二,期刊收录的研究类型和领域。

结合我的研究方向,查看期刊以往收录的文章。

在JAN官网上,我发现该杂志刊登了数篇临床决策的研究,并且收录了数篇我国作者发表的论文。

第三,出版费用。

我的论文没有基金支持,如果要出版费,会是一笔不小的费用,而JAN不需要版面费。

因此我选择了JAN,它对我来说非常友好。

确定目标期刊后,在JAN官网上仔细浏览了作者投稿指南和论文模板,然后开始翻译论文,对很多学者来说这是一大难点,可以借助翻译软件或找润色公司,这取决于个人英语水平和需求。

完成英文论文的写作后,准备投稿,需要准备的材料有:Cover letter(介绍信:用简洁的语言介绍研究的内容,意义,创新点等,力求能吸引期刊的编辑),Title Page(标题页,包含标题,所有作者,及其贡献说明),Manuscript(稿件:论文主体),Table(表格),Figure(图),Ethical Statement(伦理审查)。

SCI论文写作及投稿技巧

SCI论文写作及投稿技巧

(一)我的第一篇SCI论文发表经历(开篇) 我是一位农林科技工作者,1992年就参加了工作,不过很遗憾,截止到2019年前,还没有发表过SCI文章。

并不是没有能力发表所谓的SCI,我们已经发表的论文也是可以发表到SCI杂志的,因为我们对SCI文章没有追求,也可能因为见识太少,目光短浅吧。

现在情况不同了,业绩需要SCI,考核指标需要SCI,提升成果水平需要SCI,成果报奖需要SCI,报人才需要SCI。

很多,看了SCI还是有很多益处的。

不过,我想SCI最大的益处是交流国际化,这也是我在弄第一篇SCI的时候逐渐认识到的。

因为在查找参考文献过程中,发现同行的国外专家发表了很多SCI文章,从中发现了自己工作中的不足,包括实验设计、研究方法等都可以借鉴。

可能说到这,会有很多人笑话我了。

做这么多年科研工作,怎么才有这样的想法或感悟呢?No problem!谁让我的科研工作的视野就这么小呢?井底之蛙,认为我们的工作参考一下国内同行的文献就ok了,但放眼世界,真是有不一样的收获。

如果你也想发表SCI,无论是要毕业的学生,还是有一定经历的研究工作者,跟着我看一看,怎样弄一篇自己的SCI文章。

我现在的感触是,SCI文章没那么难弄,但也不是轻而易举,一蹴而就的。

言归正传,我把我第一篇SCI的发表经历分享给大家,因为我在弄这篇SCI的时候想找到一些捷径,什么百度,付费的广告公司也好,都努力过了。

但还是得走自己的路,别的信息帮不到太多,也是这样的缘故,我把我的SCI经历分享给大家,希望真的能够帮到大家!关于写作,回过头看,真是走了很多弯路。

照猫画虎!刚开始,就是看到拟要发表的期刊,通过各种渠道下载或在线看到已经发表的文章,做参考,人家怎么写就怎么描,觉得别人能发表,自己描个差不多就OK了。

于是就开笔了,真没有想太多,甚至是把原来的中文直接通过翻译软件翻译成English,再简单的改一改其中的语病,选词,自我觉得尽量通顺。

实际上,SCI杂志的语言要求不是都一样的,我觉得英语国家的SCI语言要求是很高的。

SCI期刊发表朋友圈

SCI期刊发表朋友圈

SCI期刊发表朋友圈大家好,今天我想和大家分享一下我最近在SCI期刊上发表论文的经历。

作为科研工作者,能够在SCI期刊上发表论文是一件非常值得骄傲的事情,也是对自己科研能力的一种认可。

在这篇文档中,我将分享一下我在SCI期刊发表论文的一些心得体会,希望能够对大家有所帮助。

首先,选择合适的期刊非常重要。

在投稿之前,我花了很多时间研究了各个期刊的投稿要求、审稿周期以及影响因子等信息。

我选择了一些与我的研究方向相关并且影响因子较高的SCI期刊进行投稿。

在选择期刊的过程中,我还咨询了一些老师和同行的意见,他们给了我很多宝贵的建议。

其次,撰写高质量的论文是关键。

在撰写论文的过程中,我注重了论文的结构和逻辑性,保证了论文的条理清晰和论证严谨。

同时,我还花了很多时间修改论文,确保语言表达准确、清晰,符合SCI期刊的要求。

此外,我还邀请了一些同行进行论文的审阅和修改,他们提出的意见和建议对我很有帮助。

最后,耐心和毅力同样重要。

在投稿的过程中,我遇到了不少困难和挫折,有时候甚至会觉得自己的研究没有价值。

但是我坚持了下来,不断修改和完善论文,最终成功地在SCI期刊上发表了论文。

这个过程让我深刻体会到科研工作需要耐心和毅力,也让我更加坚定了自己从事科研工作的决心。

总的来说,SCI期刊发表论文是一项需要付出很多心血和努力的工作,但是当看到自己的论文在SCI期刊上发表的那一刻,所有的付出都是值得的。

我希望我的经验和体会能够对大家在SCI期刊发表论文的过程中有所帮助,也希望大家在科研道路上能够坚持不懈,不断前行。

谢谢大家!。

发表sci经验分享

发表sci经验分享

发表sci经验分享我是一名科研人员,在过去的几年里,我积累了很多发表SCI论文的经验。

在这篇文章中,我想与大家分享一些我个人的经历和心得,希望能对正在努力撰写SCI论文的人有所帮助。

我想强调一点,撰写SCI论文需要充分理解和掌握所研究领域的相关知识。

这不仅包括理论知识,还包括实验技术、数据分析和文献查阅等方面。

只有具备扎实的基础知识,才能够做出有质量的研究工作,并将其写成一篇有说服力的SCI论文。

要写好SCI论文,我认为关键是要有清晰的逻辑思维和良好的组织能力。

在写作过程中,要注意论文的结构和段落的衔接。

首先,要明确论文的目的和研究问题,并在引言中清晰地提出研究的背景和意义。

接着,要对相关文献进行综述,指出已有研究的不足之处,并明确自己的研究思路和方法。

然后,要详细描述实验设计和数据分析的过程,以及结果的呈现和讨论。

最后,要得出结论,并对进一步研究提出建议。

我还想提醒大家在写作过程中要注意语言的准确性和流畅度。

要避免使用过于复杂的词汇和句子结构,以免读者产生困惑。

同时,要注意使用合适的科技术语,但同时也要保证通俗易懂,避免晦涩难懂的表达方式。

我想强调一点,写SCI论文是一个艰辛而漫长的过程,需要付出大量的努力和时间。

但只要我们保持对科研的热情和耐心,不断学习和完善自己的写作技巧,相信我们都能够写出优秀的SCI论文,为科学研究做出贡献。

撰写SCI论文是一项需要全身心投入的工作,但只要我们具备扎实的基础知识、清晰的逻辑思维和良好的写作技巧,相信我们都能够成功地完成这一任务。

希望我的经验分享对大家有所帮助,祝愿大家在科研道路上取得更多的成就!。

【交流】一篇SCI的个案报道发表,感谢丁香园,顺便谈谈经验

【交流】一篇SCI的个案报道发表,感谢丁香园,顺便谈谈经验

【交流】一篇SCI的个案报道发表,感谢丁香园,顺便谈谈经验今天上杂志网站看看,文章已经刊出,狂喜。

感谢丁香园!也谈谈自己的经验今年五月,收了一个起搏器感染的病人,细菌很特殊,觉得可以写个个案报道。

因为细菌方面的东西不太懂,相关临床资料收集也不是很全面,而且听说SCI的个案很难发,开始也没想投SCI。

八月份,中文写好,准备投《中华医院感染学杂志》。

后来发现这个杂志连Pubmed都不上,那国外就没人能看到我的文章了。

想想还是投到国外去吧,反正也没有评职称、毕业等压力,文章不急着发,国外不行再国内好了。

于是开始写英文,找了很多国外的文献,包括好几篇国外的类似个案。

大约一个多礼拜,文章写好。

先投了“Clinical Infectious Diseases”,很快被拒,理由大约是不适合发表。

后来看看稿约,这个杂志不太接受个案报道(大约是)。

于是改投“Arch Intern Med”,因为在该杂志看到一个类似的个案,再次被拒,好像没什么特别的理由。

再改投“Journal of Hospital Infection”,编辑让修改格式,重新投稿(该杂志个案都按照Letter to editor的格式发表),按要求修改,大约一周后Accept。

个人经验及教训:1. SCI个案不是很难发,要有足够的信心。

2. 讨论部分非常重要(不像很多国内杂志,讨论部分没什么内容),必需把故事说完整,得体现出你的个案对临床或科研有什么启示,而不仅仅是你的个案如何罕见(国内经常这样),罕见的东西多了去了。

写文章之前除了收集相关文献最好再找几篇类似的个案参考参考,行文方式方面可以套用(决不是抄袭)。

3. 对于临床资料收集不全不要刻意回避,更不要杜撰,可以在讨论部分加以讨论,提出你的看法。

当然不是致命性的资料不全(比如诊断方面的关键性资料),那你的个案就没有价值了。

4.投稿前一定要好好看稿约,有的杂志不接受个案,有的只接受与杂志上已发表的某篇文章相关的个案,有的杂志个案是放在“Letter to editor”栏目,等等。

最完全的投稿经历

最完全的投稿经历

最完全的投稿经历(从投稿到接受),希望对您有用(转载)一直感激在小木虫获得的帮助和资源。

也思忖着为小木虫做点什么。

值第三篇SCI论文将要出版之际,特将其中一篇从投稿到接受的所有细节列出与各位分享。

投的杂志是Polymer (SCI Journal, 2006 IF=2.77),但我觉得所有的杂志都是大同小异。

希望对投稿的虫子有一定的参考价值。

2007/3/4 Submit the manuscript through the online EES (/jpol/)//Cover letter//Dear Editor,Here enclosed is a completely new manuscript entitled "xxxxx", which we wish to be considered. None of the material in the paper has been published or is under consideration for publication elsewhere.In this manusc ript, …………. We believe that this new paper may be also of particular interest to the readers of your journal.Correspondence about the paper should be directed to xx at the following address, phone and fax number, and e-mail address:XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXThanks very much for your attention to our paper.Sincerely yours,The authors******************************************2007/3/4 received a letter ?from jpol@//Submission Confirmation for Polymer//PolymerTitle:Authors:Article Type: Regular ArticleDear, Your submission entitled "xxxxx" has been received by Polymer. You may check on the progress of your paper by logging on to the Elsevier Editorial System as an author. The URL is /jpol/.Your username is:Your password is:Your manuscript will be given a reference number once an Editor has been assigned. Thank you for submitting your work to this journal. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any queries.Kind regards,Polymer******************************************For any technical queries about using EES, please contact Elsevier Author Support at authorsupport@ 2007/3/5 received a letter ?from jpol@//A manuscript number has been assigned to xxxxx//PolymerRef:Title:Authors:Article Type: Regular ArticleDear,Your submission entitled "xxxxx" has been assigned the following manuscript number: xx. You may check on the progress of your paper by logging on to the Elsevier Editorial System as an author. The URL is/jpol/.Your username is:Your password is:Thank you for submitting your work to this journal. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any queries. Kind regards,Caroline JohnsonJournal ManagerPolymer******************************************For any technical queries about using EES, please contact Elsevier Author Support at authorsupport@ 2007/3/5 received a letter ?from jpol@//Editor handles xx//PolymerRef:Title:Authors:Article Type: Regular ArticleDear,Your submission entitled "xxxxx" will be handled by All Papers from China: All Subject Areas Charles Han. You may check on the progress of your paper by logging on to the Elsevier Editorial System as an author. The URL is/jpol/.Your username is:Your password is:Thank you for submitting your work to this journal. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any queries. Kind regards,Charles HanAll Papers from China: All Subject AreasPolymer******************************************For any technical queries about using EES, please contact Elsevier Author Support at authorsupport@ 2007/4/19 received a letter from [email]c.c.han@[/email]//Your Submission to Polymer: xx//Ref.: Ms. No.PolymerDear,Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript substantially. If you send back your revised manuscript along with replies to reviewers, we will re-consider your paper. For your guidance, reviewers' comments are appended below. When you revise your manuscript, please attach a "Response to Reviewers" which sets out in detail how you have responded to the referees' comments.I look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. In an attempt to speed up publication times, revised manuscripts must be returned with 3 months. Otherwise, they will be treated as new submissions.When submitting your revised manuscript, please ensure that you upload the source files (e.g. Word). Uploading only a PDF file at this stage will create delays should your manuscript be finally accepted for publication. If your revised submission does not include the source files, we will contact you to request them.To submit a revision, please go to /jpol/Your username is:Your password is:Choose "Author Login" and the menu "Submissions Needing Revision".Yours sincerelyCharles HanAll Papers from China: All Subject AreasPolymerReviewers' comments:Reviewer #1:Reviewer #2:2007/5/17 submit a revised manuscript through the online EES (/jpol/)//Responds to the reviews//Dear editor,Thank you very much for your attention. The other two reviewers are also acknowledged from the bottom of our hearts for the careful reviews on our manuscript (xx). The affirmation on our work has greatly encouraged us. According to those helpful comments, we make a careful revision on the original manuscript. All revisions are explained as follows: Major comments from referee 1 were abstracted as a following list:1.2.…………………….Answer to referee 1 comments:1.2.……………………….Major comments from referee 2 were abstracted as a following list:1.2.…………………….Answer to referee 2 comments:1.2.……………………….Besides the revision described above, all the references you (the editor) kindly recommended are included in our revised manuscript which are labeled as xxx. These references actually provide good reference …...Sincerely yours,The author2007/5/17 received a letter from jpol@//Your PDF has been built and requires approval?//PolymerDear,The PDF for your submission, "xxxxx", is ready for viewing. Please login to the Elsevier Editorial System as an Author to view and approve the PDF of your submission. url: /jpol/Your username is:Your password is:Your submission must be approved in order to complete the submission process and send the manuscript to the Polymer editorial office. Please view the submission before approving it, to be certain that it is free of any errors. You will also need to confirm that you have read and agree with the Elsevier Ethics in Publishing statement before you can submit your article.Thank you for your time and patience.Kind regards,Editorial OfficePolymer******************************************For any technical queries about using EES, please contact Elsevier Author Support at authorsupport@ 2007/5/17 received a letter from [email]c.c.han@[/email]//Submission Confirmation for xx//PolymerRef:Title:Authors:Article Type: Regular ArticleDear,Your revised manuscript has been received for reconsideration for publication in Polymer. You may check the status of your manuscript by logging onto the Elsevier Editorial System as an Author at /jpol/.Your username is:Your password is:Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any queries.Kind regards,Polymer******************************************For any technical queries about using EES, please contact Elsevier Author Support at authorsupport@ 2007/5/17 received a letter from [email]c.c.han@[/email]//Editor handles xxx//PolymerRef:Title:Authors:Article Type: Regular ArticleDear,Your submission entitled "xxxxx" will be handled by All Papers from China: All Subject Areas Charles Han. You maycheck on the progress of your paper by logging on to the Elsevier Editorial System as an author. The URL is/jpol/.Your username is:Your password is:Thank you for submitting your work to this journal. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any queries. Kind regards,Charles HanAll Papers from China: All Subject AreasPolymer******************************************For any technical queries about using EES, please contact Elsevier Author Support at authorsupport@ 2007/6/15 received a letter from [email]c.c.han@[/email]//Your Submission to Polymer: xx//Ref.:PolymerDear,Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising some minor changes to your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I expect that the paper will be accepted. For your guidance, reviewers' comments are appended below. When you revise your manuscript, please attach a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point which is being raised when you submit the revised manuscript. When submitting your revised manuscript, please ensure that you upload the source files (e.g. Word). Uploading only a PDF file at this stage will create delays should your manuscript be finally accepted for publication. If your revised submission does not include the source files, we will contact you to request them. To submit a revision, go to /jpol/ and log in as an Author.Your username is:Your password is:You will see a menu item call Submission Needing Revision. You will find your submission record there.Yours sincerelyCharles HanAll Papers from China: All Subject AreasPolymerReviewers' comments: Reviewer #2:2007/6/30 submit the revised manuscript through the online EES (/jpol/)//Respond to the reviewers?//Dear editor,Thank you for the continuous attention to our manuscript (POLYMER-07-486R1). We also greatly appreciate the reviewer #2 for the careful review and valuable comments.………………….We wish we had corrected all errors. Thank you and the reviewer again for all efforts spent on our manuscript. Sincerely yours,The authors2007/6/30 received a letter from jpol@//Your PDF has been built and requires approval?//PolymerDear,The PDF for your submission, "xxxxx", is ready for viewing.Please login to the Elsevier Editorial System as an Author to view and approve the PDF of your submission .url: /jpol/Your username is:Your password is:Your submission must be approved in order to complete the submission process and send the manuscript to the Polymer editorial office. Please view the submission before approving it, to be certain that it is free of any errors. You will also need to confirm that you have read and agree with the Elsevier Ethics in Publishing statement before you can submit your article.Thank you for your time and patience.Kind regards,Editorial OfficePolymer******************************************For any technical queries about using EES, please contact Elsevier Author Support at authorsupport@ 2007/6/30 received a letter from [email]c.c.han@[/email]//Submission Confirmation for xx //PolymerRef: xxR2Title: xxxxxAuthors:Article Type: Regular ArticleDear,Your revised manuscript has been received for reconsideration for publication in Polymer.You may check the status of your manuscript by logging onto the Elsevier Editorial System as an Author at/jpol/.Your username is:Your password is:Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any queries.Kind regards,Polymer******************************************For any technical queries about using EES, please contact Elsevier Author Support at authorsupport@ 2007/7/2 received a letter from [email]c.c.han@[/email]//Editor handles xxR2?//PolymerRef: xxR2Title: xxxxxAuthors:Article Type: Regular ArticleDear,Your submission entitled "xxxxx" will be handled by All Papers from China: All Subject Areas Charles Han.You may check on the progress of your paper by logging on to the Elsevier Editorial System as an author. The URL is /jpol/.Your username is:Your password is:Thank you for submitting your work to this journal. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any queries. Kind regards,Charles HanAll Papers from China: All Subject AreasPolymer******************************************For any technical queries about using EES, please contact Elsevier Author Support at authorsupport@ 2007/7/6 received a letter from [email]c.c.han@[/email]//Your Submission *R2?//Ref.: Ms. No. *R2xxxxxPolymerDear,I am pleased to tell you that your work has now been accepted for publication in Polymer.Comments from the Editor and Reviewers can be found below.Thank you for submitting your work to this journal.With kind regardsCharles HanAll Papers from China: All Subject AreasPolymerEditor/Reviewers' comments:。

前辈的投稿经历

前辈的投稿经历

作者: menggang201 发布日期: 2009-03-28【期刊名称】:Materials Science and engineering A【投稿日期】:2008.10.2【返回意见日期】:2009.1.14(Major Revision)【修改稿投出日期】:2009.3.2(过年)【最终接受日期】:2009.3.12【投稿感受和体会】:偶的第一篇一篇SCI,这个杂志在金属领域是比较好的。

其实说不上时间长,最大的感受是写文章一定要精益求精,抱着绝对认真的态度,老外真的是很严谨的,细致到文中参考文献出现的顺序出错都能看出来,写SCI 的过程是对自己严格历练的过程,第一篇写的很困难,接下来就容易些了,第二篇也是投的这个杂志,基本没改,3月20号就接受了。

感慨颇多,三年硕士还是小有收获的。

马上就要走上工作岗位,希望能将所学用于实践,在此与各位虫友共勉!作者: ddup885 发布日期: 2009-03-30【期刊名称】:International Journal of CFD【投稿日期】:7 August 2008【返回意见日期】:5 Nov 2008【最终接受日期】:2 Dec 2008【投稿感受和体会】:这是本人的第一篇SCI也是目前仅有的一篇。

动笔写了一个月,中途又投了其它两个杂志均被以不符合杂志内容拒稿,最终选定这个杂志。

编辑非常认真,推荐审稿人就推荐了三次,直到一个中国人都没有了才可以。

写过一次催稿信,编辑说我推荐的六个审稿人有四个拒绝审稿,一个已经回来意见了,在等另一个。

没过几天,审稿意见就回来了,一个审稿人提了七条意见,另一个完全通过,现在想想好感激第二个审稿人呀,给了我继续下去的信心,虽然我不知道他是谁,只是从其它相关期刊上找的编委。

对第一个审稿人的意见进行了认真的回答,文章本身基本没有什么改动。

修改了一次就成功了,编辑要我加一些该杂志的参考文献,之后就是版权协议等事项了。

只是现在的状态还是ready for publication 呀,真是祈祷赶快发表呀。

第一篇SCI (IF5),心得交流(写的字数很多),希望多多交流!

第一篇SCI (IF5),心得交流(写的字数很多),希望多多交流!

虽然,论文不是科研工作的全部,甚至对于一些横向课题而言,不是最重要的。

但论文确实是科研工作最系统和全面,也最凝练的表达,集中表达了科研工作者的思路、方法和对某一领域的研究进展,以及对成果的梳理和分析,甚至有可能蕴含着对未来的发展指引。

一个很好的例子是:1899-1904年间,居里夫妇共发表了32篇学术论文,集中反映了他们在开拓放射学这个新的科学领域的贡献。

另一个例子关乎华裔:1940-1960年间,杨振宁和李政道合作共同发表了32篇论文(历史是那么的巧合,也是32!),其中包括那篇因发现弱作用下宇称不守恒而获诺贝尔奖的论文。

尽管他们后来分道扬镳,让所有科技界的人扼腕惋惜,这是后话了。

一个反面的例子关乎著名的物理学家泡利,尽管他也获得诺贝尔奖,但后人是这样评价的:“他大量的工作没有发表,而是遗留在私人信件里。

在今天能查到的信件中,我们发现大量这样的例子,他的关于矩阵力学和波动力学的等价性证明是写在给Jordan的信件里,测不准原理首先出现在他给海森堡的信件里,狄拉克的泊松括号量子化被Hendrik Kramers 独立发现,而他指出,泡利早就指出了这种对易关系的表示方法。

”可以想象,如果他的研究成果都发表,可能他的光环更多,当然,更重要的是,量子力学可能进展更快!而据说现在中国每年发表的SCI论文数已经跃居世界第二,仅次于美国,当然,在美国人发表的论文中,也有很多是中国人(或者是华裔)贡献的,本人查文献的时候经常发现华人的名字(名字一看就知道是中国特点),挂在美国的科研单位名下。

当然,据统计,中国的论文被引次数排名第六,落后于论文总数排名.言归正传,本人磕磕碰碰终于写了一篇稿子,并且请一位老师(美籍华人)审了一遍,战战兢兢,小心翼翼地在2012年12月21日(尽管玛雅人的咒语被打破,但我们也不必沾沾自喜,而是要更小心和敬畏的活着),114年前的当天,也即1898年12月21日,居里夫妇发现了具有更大放射强度的新元素—镭,并用物理方法证实了镭的存在;而在104年前的当天,也即1908年12月21日,阿拉伯世界最早创办的大学——开罗大学成立;还有,28年前的当天,也即1984年12月21日,前苏联成功发射“韦加-2号”行星际站,它的主要任务是对金星和哈雷慧星进行考察……把稿件投给了某著名能源类杂志(影响因子>5),现在的杂志一般都有网上投稿系统,刚开始不太熟悉,但是熟悉了觉得非常方便.2013年1月26日(127年前的当天,也即1886年1月26日,卡尔本茨(Karl Benz)发明了第一辆内燃机动力的汽车),一审意见返回,花了整整一个星期(是7天而不是5天,本人基本没甚么周末的概念)修改论文,加了3页左右,加入了5个图,当然,有些曲线还比较复杂。

我一年来的5篇SCI投稿经历和经验

我一年来的5篇SCI投稿经历和经验

我一年来的5篇SCI投稿经历和经验时间过的好快,想想明年就研究生毕业了。

回想这两年多的小硕生涯,感到欣慰的是,已经完成了硕士课题任务,就等着明年的答辩了。

到目前为止,本人已在J Chem Phys,Int J Mass Spectrom,Chem Phys等杂志上发表了5篇SCI论文,下面就详细谈一下我的投稿经历,希望能够给大家一点帮助。

我学的是Quantum Chemistry,主要研究的是Molecular Spectroscopy。

大家都知道,研一主要是上课和查文献,一般到研二才真正进入课题。

记得我第一次练手是从去年9月份帮我师兄修改文章开始。

花了我一个星期的时间,投稿到J Mol Struc (THEOCHEM)。

一个月后收到回信,minor revision。

当天revision返回后第二天中午就accepted。

由于文章很短,是以communication的形式发表的。

我真正开始写文章是从今年2月份开始的。

我1月31日(农历大年初六)从家里返回学校,开始整理数据,到2月底学校开学时,两篇文章已经写出来了。

让老板看过后(说实在的,他都没怎么看),3月初开始投稿,一篇投到了Chem Phys上,另一篇投到了J Mol Spectrosc上。

4月初收到Chem Phys的回信,也是minor revision。

按照审稿人的建议修好后,4月中旬收到结果,accepted。

马上打电话给老板,说CP的文章被接受了。

为此还高兴了好几天,毕竟是第一篇处女作呀,三天后收到J Mol Spectrosc的回信。

Editor said: “The reviewer has made substantive criticisms and recommends that a major revision be carried out.” The reviewer pointed out many problems; finally said: “Recommendation : not suitable for publication in JMS in present form. Very heavy revision required, to be reviewed again.” 幸运的是,这个体系并不大,算起来比较快,半个月后就把所有的修改工作完成,文章也在5月初顺利地accepted。

食品领域sci的综述投稿经验

食品领域sci的综述投稿经验

食品领域sci的综述投稿经验
在食品领域,SCI期刊是学术界公认的高水平期刊,投稿经验
是非常重要的。

首先,选择合适的SCI期刊非常关键。

在食品领域,有一些知名的SCI期刊,如《Food Chemistry》、《Food Research International》、《Journal of Food Engineering》等。

在选择
期刊时,需要考虑期刊的影响因子、审稿周期、期刊的定位和读者
群等因素。

其次,在投稿前需要认真准备稿件。

一篇优质的综述应该有独
特的视角和深入的研究,要对该领域的研究现状有清晰的了解,并
能够提出新的观点或总结出有价值的结论。

另外,语言表达要准确
清晰,结构合理,符合期刊的投稿要求。

在投稿过程中,要严格遵守期刊的投稿规定,包括格式要求、
文献引用规范等。

投稿后需要耐心等待审稿意见,可能会经历多轮
修改和润色。

审稿意见可能涉及到内容的修改、论文结构的调整、
数据的补充等,需要认真对待每一条意见并进行适当的修改。

最后,要注意维护学术诚信,不得有抄袭、篡改数据等行为。

此外,与同行学者保持良好的交流也是很重要的,可以通过参加学
术会议、交流讨论等方式,扩大自己的学术影响力。

总的来说,投稿SCI期刊的综述需要充分准备,选择合适的期刊,认真准备稿件,严格遵守投稿规定,耐心应对审稿意见,维护
学术诚信,保持良好的学术交流,这样才能增加稿件被接受的机会。

希望这些经验对你有所帮助。

分享两篇SCI论文被接收心得

分享两篇SCI论文被接收心得

分享两篇SCI论文被接收心得!做为研究生,不可否认SCI论文在大家心目的地位,三年的硕士,或者再三年的博士,我们一直开为之奋斗着,痛苦着,快乐着.而一些诸如submit,under review,reject,minor revision or maj or revision的字眼则时刻牵动着我们那脆弱而且不自信的心.当稿件投出以后,想必你也像我一样每天不停的刷新邮件,而最害怕的莫过于看到"I regret to have to inform you tha t......."这样的消息了.回想自己的点滴,以及最近小小的成功,我觉得我有必要,也有义务向各位朋友们分享.硕博连读的第三年,具体说来是2008年初,我的两篇SCI论文先后被接收了,下面我想回忆一下两篇论文投稿以及被接收的过程.第一篇:杂志:Talanta(2.8分)Received at Editorial Office: 18-SEP-2007Article revised: 15-JAN-2008Article accepted for publication: 18-JAN-2008专业:生物分析化学类说起这篇文章,可是让我痛苦了一整年,实验很多,做的很辛苦,数据相对繁多,由于这是我第一篇文章,写作方面也是摸石头过河,逐句的模仿.为了写这篇文章,我仔细研读了该领域的大约100篇文献,对别人写的好的句子,类似的句子都做了标记,在写作的过程中想起要表达什么意思的时候马上随时翻阅,这样下来,每天写一小段,有时候甚至每天就写那么几小句,大约一个月后,我发现一篇包含abstract,intrduction,experiment,results and discussion初稿居然完成了.初稿完成后,放了大约个把星期不管,接着做其他的实验,待一个星期过后再来研读,发现文章写的错误百出,句子连贯性,逻辑性,以及整篇文章的通读性都很差,于是又是仔细研读别人的论文,学习再学习,每天读一点,回头看看自己的文章,再改一点,又是将近个把月,一篇有模有样的初稿出现了,这时候我迫不极待的想把文章投出去了,于是放了两三天后,写了个c over letter,花了一晚上时间(想必应该也有人花一整个晚上在Elsevier投稿系统上的痛苦经历吧),把稿件投向了一个本领域的分析杂志.稿件投出去大概半个月,收到了主编的信,主编认为我能回答他的问题,以及按他的意见修改就可能出版.可能是经验欠缺,我在收到信后的一个星期,就把修改稿返回了过去,对其中的提到的不足和问题我只是在文章中引用了其他一些文献和做了自己的说明,显然,这样的举动在主编和认为是很不认真的,过了一个月后,收到了Fi nal Decision,那就是拒绝了.Dear ***,> On behalf of the editor handling your manuscript, I am writing to you in refer ence to your manuscript entitled:************I regret to have to inform you that your manuscript is not suitable for publicatio n in ***. This decision has been reached in light of the comments made by the referees. The detailed remarks are appended below.Reviewers' comments:> Reviewer 1: "*************" seemed to contain sufficient material for publicatio n purpose. However, unfortunately, the authors did not address sufficiently what are the main advantages of this particular detection technique over previously r eported ones.*************Overall, the English language proved to be insufficient for publication purpose a nd needs to be revised. Specific care should be taken with regards to prepositio ns since it can alter the meaning of a statementEditor:> Unfortunately, the reviewer has recommended against publication of this work in ***. In examining the reviewer's specific comments, I note that some of the comments mirror those that I made when the manuscript was initially submitted. In particular, the reviewer indicates that the authors have still not made a convi ncing case for the advantages of the proposed method over earlier techniques. Given these considerations, I must regrettably recommend rejection of this manu script.就因为没有用心写出文章的优点来,就这样被毙掉了,感到非常痛心,教训深刻!接下来,我又挑选了一个杂志,我自认为应该很容易中,因为我在那个杂志上看到有类似的文章,且我自认为内容还不如我的好.可是两本杂志属于不同的出版集团,引用文献的格式完全不同,又痛苦的花了一个晚上把文献格式改了过来,这种工作就和做针线活差不多,睁着眼睛在看,你不能急,一急就郁闷的不得了.于是乎,又是一翻上传的痛苦经历,可是,不到两天,不幸又降临了,居然认为我的稿件不适合该杂志,说白了,就是不想要嘛.Dear Dr***,I am writing to you on behalf of Editor ****.We regret to inform you that **** is unable to accept your manuscript *******, Manuscript No. ABC-00938-2007 for publication in *****.In view of the limited number of pages available to us each year to cover the en tire field of analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, its instrumental advances and its wide range of applications, we can only publish a selection of the papers sub mitted to our journal.We are sorry not to be able to send you better news.这个时候,什么情绪都有了,有时候想,是不是自己的工作还没有够的上档次?是不是文章真的写的很差,因为还没有接收过SCI论文,所以这个时候的自信心真的是非常的差,后来干脆把文章晾在了一边.心情平静下来了又想,花了这么多心思做的东西,是不可能放弃的,况且当初在选这个题目的时候就认为这个工作还是有一定意思和意义的.于是,我根据之前审稿人的意思,又补充了一些实验,在写作上也丰富了一些.过了一个多月,我又开始了新的冲击.这一次,显然,努力得到回报了.Dear professor ***,> We have received expert review of your manuscript. You will see that revision of your manuscript is advised, and suggestions are offered for improving the ma nuscript and it's impact. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I w ould be pleased to consider the paper for publication in Talanta.> For your guidance, reviewers' comments are appended below.Reviewers' comments:> Overall, this is a paper that deserves to be published, but requires revision.(有这一句就够了,当时心情超好,无法形容)象下面这样的意见,也是非常中肯的,感谢审稿人,感谢编辑,感谢CCTV!General comments:> The English used in this paper requires major revision. I do not underestimate the challenge of writing a scientific paper in a language that is not the native t ongue. However, the science is currently being complicated by the grammar of t he paper. In particular, single/plural conflicts and changes of (and inappropriate use of) tenses (see especially section 2.5 where the middle third of the text swit ches to the present tense). Improving the paper in this way would ensure that t he reader can focus upon the science1. The discussions throughout the manuscript is superficial, thus thorough and c omprehensive discussions are required in the section of "Results and Discussion". >2. Conclusion should not be a duplication of the Abstract.当然,也提出了其他的不少意见,这次我可是对待的相当认真,其中有一条审稿意见我不太明白,为此我在某专业论文上发贴和别人讨论了一个多星期.修改了个把月,上传,第三天,刷新邮件,收到来信如下:Dear professor ***,> I am pleased to confirm that your paper "******" has been accepted for public ation in Talanta.> With kind regards,接下来讲讲我的第二篇Journal title: Electrochemistry Communications(3.48分)Received at Editorial Office: 23-DEC-2007Article revised: 29-JAN-2008Article accepted for publication: 30-JAN-2008实际上,在第一篇文章的辗转经历中,第二篇文章的实验已经在进行并且写作了,有了第一次的经历,第二篇文章在写作上显然轻松了许多,考虑到还有不多久快要放寒假,因此我在考虑把稿件要么投一个审稿周期长点的杂志,那么在假期中就不需要为稿件操心了,要么就投一个快点的杂志,干脆在放假前就搞定,最后经过权衡,我选择了后者.2007年12月18日晚,稿件上传,19日,收到回信,还以为是拒了,吓一跳,原来是文章长了,要缩短.> Electrochemistry Communications> Dear professor ***,> This paper is too long for Electrochemistry Communications which aims to pu blish short, urgent communications (see Guide for Authors). Please either submit it elsewhere as a full paper or shorten it to Communication Length and resubm it.> For Communication Length please observe the following formula:> Total number of words + 200 x (No of figures + No of tables) < 3000.> Your paper currently contains 2929 words and 4 figures. According to the for mula above, this is the equivalent of 3729 words, which is too long for this jour nal.> Yours sincerely,> R. Compton> Editor in Chief> Electrochemistry Communications>> Electrochemistry Communications> Physical and Theoretical Chemistry Laboratory> South Parks Road> Oxford> OX1 3QZ> UK按照要求,仔仔细细的缩短,又顺便修改润色了一翻,花了一个星期,在西方的圣诞节的前一天,我把稿件发了出去,当时西方正在放假,可想而知,稿件躺在里面毫无动静,大约到了元月8日,我觉得也应该放假归来了吧,可怎么还没有给我的稿件那怕是分配一个稿件号呢?因为这个杂志向来速度是很快的,通常一个月内完成从稿件接受到接收的过程.于是,我写了封信给编辑:Dear professor R. ComptonWe have shorten our manuscript entitled "*********" to communication length an d resubmitted it to Electrochemistry Communications on 23 December 2007, but have not, as yet, receive the assigned manuscript number. We fear that the ma nuscript may have been lost and should be grateful if you would let us know w hether or not you have received it. If not, we will send our manuscript again. Th ank you in advance for your help.Best regards,第二天,回复了,并且马上分配了稿件号,果然上班了,可能是假期归来,身心疲惫吧.做编辑也不容易.这样半个多月的某天早晨,已经放假了,可是大雪封路,回不了家啊,干脆在床上睡懒觉,师姐的一个电话把我叫醒了,说让我查查邮件,文章要修改,10天之内完成.打开电脑,一个喜庆的邮件展现在我面前.> Electrochemistry Communications> Dear professor ***,> We will be pleased to accept your manuscript after revision in the light of the enclosed referee's comments provided they can be attended to within 10 days. > Please submit a letter fully detailing your response to each point raised by th e referee along with your revised manuscript.> Yours sincerely,> R. Compton> Editor in Chief> Electrochemistry Communications> Reviewers' comments:> Reviewer #1:> The authors of this manuscript reported a new application of electrochemilumi nescence (ECL) method in assaying telomerase activity. In this work, the magneti c beads-based TRAP-ECL assay was found to be a rapid and very sensitive (c.a. 100 fold increase in sensitivity) method to detect telomerase activity in tumor ce lls, as compared with the conventional TRAP method. This is an important work for the developed novel TRAP-ECL assay may become a first line assay for clinic al diagnosis and prognosis of cancer. Additionally, the paper was organized and presented well, and literatures were cited adequately. I recommend publication af ter minor revisions.> Additional Comments:> 1. A previous important work by Miao and Bard (Anal. Chem. 2004, 76, 5379 -5386) on magnetic beads-based ECL for DNA detection should be cited.> 2. The words "?about 100 fold lower than that ?" (page 6, line2) should be ch anged to "?about 100 fold higher than that ?".审稿人很认同我的工作,小小的修改,哪要10天,个把小时就可以完成啊.就这样很快的完成了修改,第二天就接到了录用通知.心里那是相当的高兴的.小小的总结:1英文写作:两篇文章全部是由我一个人操刀写成,期间除了第一篇文章找一位老师改了几个句子,能够得到发表,说明最终英文的写作还是达标了.我的心得那就是模仿,没错,看别人怎么写,再套用,说实话,我们自己写的句子有几句能信的过呢?说到模仿,那也必须阅读过大量的文献,当你写作卡住的时候,你得想得到我在哪里看到过类似的句子才行.我前后看过的文献大概有200篇左右.2投稿杂志的选择:从我的经历来看,显然并不能以自己的主观想法为信条,有时候你认为好的,适合的杂志显然并不适合你,当然,这不一定是你的文章不适合某某杂志,更可信的理由是你的稿件恰好不适合某个审稿人的胃口.3非常认真的对待审稿人的意见:尽可能详细的回答审稿人的问题,那怕是你自己认为都写的有点罗嗦了都没关系.审稿人是有感情的嘛.。

分享两篇SCI发表的经历(cover-letter、response-letter)

分享两篇SCI发表的经历(cover-letter、response-letter)

分享两篇SCI发表的经历(cover-letter、response-letter)分享两篇SCI发表的经历三年前对于我来说SCI就是天书一样,在我踏进博士的门槛后我以为自己进入了地狱,也纠结也彷徨,整天刷虫友们对于博士、SCI的帖子,我选择了虫友们鼓励的那一部分来激励自己继续前行。

我告诉自己坚持就是胜利,当然那是积极的坚持。

在好几月之前就有这个想法,今天早上收到第二篇的接收通知后,我便想今天一定要在小木虫上谢谢那些给予我帮助的虫友们。

话不多说,我把自己这两篇投稿的经历与大家共享,希望能给大家带来一点点用处。

第一篇发表在FitoterapiaCover letterDear Editor Verotta:We would like to submit the manuscript entitled "××××××题目" by ××××××所有作者姓名which we wish to be considered for publication in Journal of Fitoterapia.All authors have read and approved this version of the article, and due care has been taken to ensure the integrity of the work. Neither the entire paper nor any part of its content has been published or has been accepted elsewhere. It is not being submitted to any other journal.We believe the paper may be of particular interest to the readers of your journal as it is the first time of ××××××研究的精华所在Thank you very much for your reconsidering our revised manuscript for potential publication in Fitoterapia. We are looking forward to hearing from you soon. Correspondence should be addressed to Jinhui Yu at the following address, phone and fax number, and email address.地址、学院、学校名称Phone: + 86××××××Fax number: + 86571××××××Email address: ××××××@Best wishes for you and your family!Sincerely yours,×××所有作者Response to reviewersDear Editor:Thank you very much for your letter and the comments from the referees about our paper submitted to Journal of Fitoterapia (FITOTE-D-11-01071). The manuscript entitled "××××××" by ××××××所有作者have been revised according to the reviewers’ comments, and we wish it to be reconsidered for publication in Journal of Fitoterapia.A list of changes and responses to reviewers are as follows.List of ActionsLOA1: The key words were changed in page?.LOA2: The name and location of the local biochemistry company have been added in section 2.1 (page 3).LOA3: A paragraph has been added in section 3.1 (page 5) to further explain the determination of the cis and trans configuration of double bonds in polyprenols.LOA4: The language was improved by English language editing of Elsevier webshop.To Reviewer 1#,Thank you very much for pointing out the problems in our manuscript. We have revised it according to your recommendations. We would like to know if there are still somewhere need to be amended.(1) Keywords: general terms should be avoided; I would changesome of the keywords (homologues, identification, quantification) The key words have been changed as follows: ××××××修改后关键词(2) In paragraph 2.1 the "local biochemistry company" should be identified by name and location.The name and location of the local biochemistry company have been added in section 2.1 (page 3). NaOH,Pyrogallol,anhydrous Na2SO4 were purchased from Hangzhou ChangqingHuagong CO., LTD.(3) How the cis and trans configuration of double bonds in ××××××were determined? Authors should say something about.The following paragraph has been added in section 3.1 (page 5) to further explain the determination of the cis and trans configuration of double bonds in ××××××.(4) Language should be checked for clarity and correctness.The language was improved by English language editing of Elsevier webshop.To Reviewer 2#,Thank you very much for your recommendation on our paper and we have improved by English language editing of Elsevier webshop.All in all, thank you very much for your reconsidering our revised manuscript for potential publication in Fitoterapia. I'm looking forward to hearing from you soon. Correspondence should be addressed to ****第一作者或通讯作者at the following address, phone and fax number, and email address.地址Phone: + 86571××××××Fax number: + ××××××Email address: ××××××@Best wishes for you and your family!××××××which we wish to be considered for publication in Journal of Ethnopharmacology.All authors have read and approved this version of the article, and due care has been taken to ensure the integrity of the work. Neither the entire paper nor any part of its content has been published or has been accepted elsewhere. It is not being submitted to any other journal.We believe the paper may be of particular interest to the readers of your journal as it is the first time of investigating ××××××Correspondence should be addressed to Jinhui Yu at the following address, phone and fax number, and email address.地址Phone: + 86××××××Fax number: + 86571××××××Email address: ××××××@Thank you very much for your considering our manuscript for potential publication. I'm looking forward to hearing from you soon. Best wishes for you and your family!Sincerely yours,××××××大同小异单独提交revisionnotes第一次修改A list of changes and responses to reviewers are as follows.List of ActionsLOA1: The reference on the selection of doses has been adapted in section 2.2 (page 5).LOA2: The details of HPLC data were supplemented in section 2.1 (page 4).LOA3: Figure 3, figure 4 and figure 5 have been redrawn.Replies to the remarks of the reviewer 1:The authors appreciate valuable suggestions and comments from the anonymous reviewers. We have revised our manuscript accordingly. Hope it is satisfactory now.(1) How the doses have been selected? If the doses have been adapted from a previous publication please cite the paper.The doses were selected according to previous studies of ××××××。

SCI 投稿经历

SCI 投稿经历

今天收到邮件,我的一篇Journal of Applied Physics 论文已被接收,心情当时还是有点激动。

虽然这个杂志的影响因子不是很高,大概2.2左右吧,这也不是我的第一篇SCI论文,但回想这一年发文章的坎坎坷坷,以及亲身经历的四川大地震,心里还是有很多的感触。

这篇论文是我在2008年二月份完成的最初稿,于二月九号投到Physics Letters A上,在经历了Technical check,with editor,under review后,于三月二十号收到编辑的决定信,当时就傻了-拒稿!受打击了。

下面是编辑的信以及审稿意见,我想把它贴出来与虫友们分享,一方面我认为,通过看审稿人的意见,可以帮助大家更好地写作,提高自己的科研水平和能力,另一方面也是答谢小木虫上很多无私的虫友们,是他们将自己的投稿经历贴在网上,与大家分享,我想我没有理由不拿出来哈!同时,也希望小木虫的虫子们能继续发扬这种精神,大家同舟共济,共同提高!好了,废话说了一大堆,不说了,下面是Physics Letters A 的审稿意见:Ms. Ref. No.: ××××××Title: ×××××Physics Letters ADear professor ××,Reviewers' comments on your work have now been received. You will see that they are advising against publication of your work. Therefore I must reject it.For your guidance, I append the reviewers' comments below.Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work.Yours sincerely,×××(编辑名)EditorPhysics Letters AReviewers' comments:Reviewer #2: ManuscriptThe authors present results of the 3D electron potential ofa gated quantum point contact in a AlGaAs/GaAs heterostructure.In contrast to earlier studies, it is now possible to derive thepotential landshape without any adjustable parameter. The resultsstill agree with earlier investigations using simpler phenomenologicalmodels. Since the used nextnano3 program is available since acouple of years, I wonder why this has not been done earlier.The authors emphasize an application of their results. Havingthe complete potential landshape might help, in the future,to better understand the quantized acoustoelectric current inSETSAW devices and to improve their performance.However, the authors do not show or even discuss how this canbe achieved. Therefore I believe that in the present form the paperis not suitable for publication.The authors should consider the following suggestions, questions,and remarks.1) Page 1, first paragraph'... due to the negatively applied gate voltage ...'. It is the SAWthat drives the electrons through the contact, not the gate voltage.Maybe replace this sentence by '..., depending on the applied gatevoltage'.2) Page 3, paragraph starting with 'Generally, the quantized ...''... with fixed x = 1050 nm and ...'. Skip the '.0'. One could addthat this is exactly at the center of the device.3) At the end of the same paragraph is '... once the bias is below ...'Should this not be the gate instead of the bias voltage?4) Page 4, paragraph starting with 'As we know, in the ...''... To be different from previous calculations ...' replace by'... In contrast to previous calculations ...'.5) The strongly different behaviour above and below the pinch-offvoltage is not obvious for the non-experts. All curves look moreor less the same. One could, for example, add another figure, orinsert, to show the potential height versus gate voltage.6) How do these theoretical results of potential height versus gatevoltage compare with experiments? There exists at least onereport to determine the potential height of quantum-point contactsbelow pinch-off as function of gate voltage (Gloos et al., Phys.Rev. B 73, 125326 (2006)). Possibly, one could also compare thepresent data with 3D simulations of quantum dots (Vasileska et al., Semicond. Sci. Technol. 13, A37 (1998)).7) Figure 1,It would be better to mark the distance between the two metal gatesas the relevant parameter, and not the size of one gate.8) Figure 3The numbering of the two density axes looks rather odd. Could it notbe done with integers, like 3 instead of 3.2 or 3.0?9) Figure 5 (b)Should there not be an anomaly or kink in the potential near the Fermilevel?在仔细读了审稿人的意见后,我觉得审稿人提出的5)和6)意见非常好,后来自己想想,决定把文章来个彻底的修改。

发表SCI一区二区论文经验分享

发表SCI一区二区论文经验分享

发表SCI论文是很多学术人的目标和理想,近年来,国内发表SCI论文的作者人数越来越多,这主要是由于国内评职晋升中对SCI论文的重视度不断提升而带来的发展趋势,同时SCI论文发表也是众多学术人进行学术交流的主要途径,因此,不论是硬性标准还是学术人自发发表,SCI论文论文的地位和作用都是有目共睹的,但是SCI论文论文发表的难度是阻碍很多作者顺利发表SCI论文的主要障碍,SCI作为学术界顶尖检索工具,对论文的要求和标准肯定是很高的,但并不是高不可攀,国内每年都有很多优秀的作者成功发表SCI论文,因此,SCI论文发表是有一定技巧的,发表SCI一区二区论文经验分享:论文写作论文写作非一日之功。

前期要阅读大量文献,并将阅读文献做一个小记,这样不会出现读完后一点儿印象都没有。

更重要的是为以后的参考文献选用打下良好基础。

因为你引用参考文献时要有针对性,不能乱引用。

在这里我建议大家采用Endnote管理文献,该软件对文献管理与论文写作非常有用。

采用该软件你可将所有的文献进行分类管理,并可在摘要内做适当记录。

在书写论文时,Endnote在参考文献管理方面的优势就体现出来了,一切参考文献都是一键输入,根本不用手写。

使用Endnote很简单,Endnote收录高分期刊的参考文献模板与写作模板。

所以你根本不用愁格式。

论文定位稿件分为综述性文章与实验性文章。

投稿时首先对自己的论文有一个准确的定位,这就需要阅读大量的文献,掌握目前该领域研究到了什么状态,研究的热点是什么。

你的工作对当前研究有什么意义。

期刊是读者交流的主渠道,很多科学家在从事类似研究,有很多未解决问题困扰着他们,如果你的研究能对这些困扰提出一个论据,哪怕是一个细小分支。

你的这篇论文也可以投一篇IF较高的期刊。

如果你对信号通路进行综述,除非是该领域的大牛进行综述,否则该综述不可能被收录,因为信号通路这一领域很难解释一个所以然。

如果能解释所以然,这篇文章可以在Cell上发表。

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

分享两篇SCI发表的经历三年前对于我来说SCI就是天书一样,在我踏进博士的门槛后我以为自己进入了地狱,也纠结也彷徨,整天刷虫友们对于博士、SCI的帖子,我选择了虫友们鼓励的那一部分来激励自己继续前行。

我告诉自己坚持就是胜利,当然那是积极的坚持。

在好几月之前就有这个想法,今天早上收到第二篇的接收通知后,我便想今天一定要在小木虫上谢谢那些给予我帮助的虫友们。

话不多说,我把自己这两篇投稿的经历与大家共享,希望能给大家带来一点点用处。

第一篇发表在FitoterapiaCover letterDear Editor Verotta:We would like to submit the manuscript entitled "××××××题目" by ××××××所有作者姓名which we wish to be considered for publication in Journal of Fitoterapia.All authors have read and approved this version of the article, and due care has been taken to ensure the integrity of the work. Neither the entire paper nor any part of its content has been published or has been accepted elsewhere. It is not being submitted to any other journal.?We believe the paper may be of particular interest to the readers of your journal as it is the first time of ××××××研究的精华所在Thank you very much for your reconsidering our revised manuscript for potential publication in Fitoterapia. We are looking forward to hearing from you soon. Correspondence should be addressed to Jinhui Yu at the following address, phone and fax number, and email address.地址、学院、学校名称Phone: + 86××××××Fax number: + 86571××××××Email address: ××××××@Best wishes for you and your family!Sincerely yours,×××所有作者Response to reviewersDear Editor:Thank you very much for your letter and the comments from the referees about our paper submitted to Journal of Fitoterapia (FITOTE-D-11-01071). The manuscript entitled "××××××" by ××××××所有作者 have been revised according to the reviewers’ comments, and we wish i t to be reconsidered for publication in Journal of Fitoterapia.A list of changes and responses to reviewers are as follows.List of ActionsLOA1: The key words were changed in page.LOA2: The name and location of the local biochemistry company have been added in section (page 3).LOA3: A paragraph has been added in section (page 5) to further explain the determination of the cis and trans configuration of double bonds in polyprenols.LOA4: The language was improved by English language editing of Elsevier webshop.To Reviewer 1#,Thank you very much for pointing out the problems in our manuscript. We have revised it according to your recommendations. We would like to know if there are still somewhere need to be amended.?(1) Keywords: general terms should be avoided; I would change some of the keywords (homologues, identification, quantification)The key words have been changed as follows: ××××××修改后关键词(2) In paragraph the "local biochemistry company" should be identified by name and location.The name and location of the local biochemistry company have been added in section (page 3). NaOH,Pyrogallol,anhydrous Na2SO4 were purchased from Hangzhou ChangqingHuagong CO., LTD.(3) How the cis and trans configuration of double bonds in ×××××× were determined Authors should say something about.The following paragraph has been added in section (page 5) to further explain the determination of the cis and trans configuration of double bonds in ××××××.(4) Language should be checked for clarity and correctness.The language was improved by English language editing of Elsevier webshop.To Reviewer 2#,Thank you very much for your recommendation on our paper and we have improved by English language editing of Elsevier webshop.?All in all, thank you very much for your reconsidering our revised manuscript for potential publication in Fitoterapia. I'm looking forward to hearing from you soon. Correspondence should be addressed to ****第一作者或通讯作者at the following address, phone and fax number, and email address.地址Phone: + 86571××××××Fax number: + ××××××Email address: ××××××@Best wishes for you and your family!Sincerely yours,××××××所有作者总的来说,第一篇文章没有费很大劲。

投稿后二个月左右便有消息,小修后提交,第二天便接收了!那是因为这篇文章是历经磨难后的,之前投了Separationofscience和JPBA,其中第一个期刊当天就给我回复了,那肯定是悲剧的!编辑所谓的与该期刊不符,但我认为主要是因为文章写的太垃圾,那是我第一次写SCI而且是没有任何人指点的情况下,可想而知会有多烂。

随后这篇文章放了将近一年,填补了写数据,又投了第二个期刊,编辑委婉的拒了但给我修改重投的机会。

我按照审稿人的意见和建议修改了几个月后重投(补数据,重新整结构框架,仅次于重写),结果悲剧了。

相关文档
最新文档