回复审稿人意见模板
回复审稿意见,模板
回复审稿意见,模板篇一：SCI 审稿意见回复范文论文题目：Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies on the antivirus effects of A (一种中草药) against virus B （一种病毒）所投杂志：Life Sciences投稿结果：这次大修后又经过一次小修，被接受发表编辑信内容（注：有删节）：Dear Mr. XXX,Your manuscript has been examined by the editors and qualified referee . We think the manuscript has merit but requires revision before we can accept it for publication in the Journal. Careful consideration must be given to the points raised in the reviewer comments, which are enclosed below.If you choose to submit a revision of your manuscript, please incorporate responses to the reviewer comments into the revised paper. A complete rebuttal with no manuscript alterations is usually considered inadequate and may result in lengthy re-review procedures.A letter detailing your revisions point-by-point must accompany the resubmission.You will be requested to upload this Response to Reviewers as a separate file in the Attach Files area.We ask that you resubmit your manuscript within 45 days. After this time, your file will be placed on inactive status and a further submission will be considered a new manuscript.To submit a revision, go to and log in as an Author. You will see a menu item called Submission Needing Revision. You will find your submission record there.Yours sincerely,Joseph J. Bahl, PhDEditorLife SciencesFormat Suggestion: Please access the Guide to Authors at our website to check the format of your article. Pay particular attention to our References style.Reviewers' comments:Reviewer #1:XXXXX （略）Reviewer #2:XXXXX （略）Editors note and suggestions: （注：编辑的建议）Title: Re-write the title to read more smoothly in contemporary English>>>Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies of the antiviral effects of A against virus B.Abstract: Re-write the abstract to read more smoothly.A, an alkaloid isolated from C (注：一种中草药), was tested for antiviral activity against virus B. Both in vitro and in vivo assays along with serum pharmacological experiments showed A to have potent antiviral activity. The pharmacokinetic profile of A in Sprague/Dawley rat plasma after oral administration was measured by HPLC. Blood samples taken at selected time points were analyzed to study potential changes in antiviral pharmacodynamics as measured by infectivity of viruses. From the similarity of theserum concentration profiles and antiviral activity profiles it is concluded that A it self, rather than a metabolite, exerted the effect against the virus prior to bioinactivation. The need for effective clinical agents against virus B and these results suggest the possibility of benefit from further experiments with A.The authors should check to be sure that the terms blood samples, plasma and serum are always used appropriately throughout the abstract and text.Introduction: some sentences can be made less passive. example 1st paragraph >>>> A appears to be the most important alkaloid isolated from the plant, its structural formula is shown in Fig 1. ... While it produced a general inhibition of antibody production lymphocyte proliferation was stimulated (Xia and Wang, 1997). These pharmacological properties suggest a potential use in the treatment of viral myocarditis against virus B that could be studied in experiments in cell culture and animals.>>>The authors should check the entire manuscriptfor spelling errors (example given: in your text alkaloid is incorrectly spelled alkaloid)>>>The authors should read the guidelines to the authors and not include the first name of the authors being cited in the text. In the reference section the first name should be abbreviated as shown in the guideline to authors (thus the earlier text reference should be (Liu et al., XX)and the remaining one should be (Chen et al., XX)>>>>>The authors instead of directly answering the first complex question of reviewer #1 may include the three questions as future research aim in the discussion section.>>>>>>Rather than redrawing figure the authors may choose to amend thewording of the statistical analysis section to state that the result of tables are means +-SEM and for figures are +- SD.>>>>> reviewer #1 comment number 8 and reviewer # 2 comment 3 might be satisfied by inclusion of a representative photo of cells and heart showing CPE.Remember most readers of the journal have never seen what you are trying to describe.Because I think that you can deal with all of the points raised I am hoping to see a revised manuscript that you have carefully checked for errors. If you have questions or do not know how to respond to any of the points raised please contact me at bahl@ Joseph Bahl, PhD Editor 2 Life Sciences作者回复信原稿：Dear Dr. Bahl,I’m （注：正式信函不要简写）very appreciate （注：不适合作为给编辑回信的开始，同时有语法错误）for your comments and suggestions.I （注：实际上是学生做的）have conducted in vivo antivirus experiments again （注：要表明是应审稿人或编辑建议而作）. Mice were sacrificed on 15 days and 30 days after infection. Death rate, heart weight to body weight ratio (HW/BW), virus titers and pathologic slices （注：用词错误）were calculated（注：用词不当）. Production of mRNA of IL-10, IFN-γand TNF-αwere （注：语法错误）measured by RT-PCR.I have revised this manuscript and especially paid much attention to your comments and suggestions. I would like to re-submit it to LIFE SCIENCE. Title of manuscript has been changed to “The antivirus effects of A against virus B and its pharmacokinetic behaviour in SD rats serum” to make it more clear and smooth.Answers to Reviewers’ questions were as follows: （注：可附在给编辑的回复信后）Reviewer #1:XXXXXReviewer #2:XXXXXEditors note and suggestions:Title: Re-write the title to read more smoothly in contemporary EnglishAnswer: I have rewrite the title to “The antivirus effects of A against virus B and its pharmacokinetic behaviour in SD rats serum” to make it more clear and smooth（注：多处语法错误）.Abstract: Re-write the abstract to read more smoothly.Answer: I have revise the abstract carefully to make it more smooth and informative（注：语法错误）.The authors should check to be sure that the terms blood samples, plasma and serum are always used appropriately throughout the abstract and text.Answer: I have paid attention to this question and it is clearer （注：不具体）. Introduction:some sentences can be made less passive.Answer: I have revise the whole paper to make sentences less passive and obtained help of my colleague proficient in English （注：语法错误，句子不通顺）.The authors should check the entire manuscript for spelling errorsAnswer: I’m very sorry to give you so much trouble for those spelling errors （注：不必道歉，按建议修改即可）. I have carefully corrected them.The authors should read the guidelines to the authors and not include the first name of the authors being cited in the text. In the reference section the first name should be abbreviated as shown in theguideline to authors (thus the earlier text reference should be (Liu et al., XX) and the remaining one should be (Chen et al., XX)Answer: I changed the style of references.Rather than redrawing figure the authors may choose to amend the wording of the statistical analysis section to state that the result of tables are means +-SEM and for figures are +- SD.Answer: （注：作者请编辑公司帮回答）reviewer #1 comment number 8 and reviewer # 2 comment 3 might be satisfied by inclusion of a representative photo of cells and heart showing CPE. Remember: most readers of the journal have never seen what you are trying to describe.Answer: Thank you for your suggestions. I have supplemented pictures of cardiac pathologic slices in the paper (Fig2).I have to apologize for giving you so much trouble because of those misspelling and confusing statements （注：一般不是延误或人为失误，不必轻易道歉，按建议修改即可）. Your comments and suggestions really helpedme a lot. I have put great efforts to this review. I wish it can be satisfactory.If there’s （注：正式信函不要简写）any information I can provide, please don’t hesitate to contact me.Thank you again for your time and patience. Look forward to hear （注：语法错误）from you.Yours SincerelyXxxx Xxxx (通讯作者名)建议修改稿：Dear Dr. Bahl,Thanks you very much for your comments and suggestions.As suggested, we have conducted in vivo antivirus experiments. Mice were sacrificed on 15 days and 30 days after infection with virus B. Mortality, heart weight to body weight ratio (HW/BW), virus titers and pathologic scores were determined. In addition, mRNA expression of IL-10, IFN-γ and TNF-α were measured by RT-PCR.We have revised the manuscript, according to thecomments and suggestions of reviewers and editor, and responded, point by point to, the comments as listed below. Since the paper has been revised significantly throughout the text, we feel it is better not to highlight the amendments in the revised manuscript （正常情况最好表明修改处）.The revised manuscript has been edited and proofread by a medical editing company in Hong Kong.I would like to re-submit this revised manuscript to Life Sciences, and hope it is acceptable for publication in the journal.Looking forward to hearing from you soon.With kindest regards,Yours SincerelyXxxx Xxxx (通讯作者名)Replies to Reviewers and EditorFirst of all, we thank both reviewers and editor for their positive and constructive comments and suggestions.Replies to Reviewer #1:Xxxxx （略）Replies to Reviewer #2:Xxxxx （略）Replies to the Editors note and suggestions:Title: Re-write the title to read more smoothly in contmeporary EnglishAnswer: I have rewrite the title to “The antivirus effects of Sophoridine against Coxsackievirus B3 and its pharmacokinetics in rats” to make it more clear and read more smoothly.篇二：教你审稿意见回复信怎么写教你审稿意见回复信怎么写来源：医学论文——达晋医学编译达晋医学编译小编知道大多数的稿件在被期刊接受前需要经历至少一次修稿，作者在收到大修或小修的决定后，必须根据审稿意见修改论文，然后将修改稿重新递交给期刊，同时附上逐点回复，在返还修改稿的时候，还需要递交cover letter，这封信通常称为 response letter(回复信)或 rebuttal letter(反驳信)。
审稿人意见 回复
审稿人意见回复
回复：关于您的论文审稿意见
尊敬的审稿人：
非常感谢您对我的论文进行了认真的审稿，并提出了宝贵的意见和建议。
在您的指导下，我对自己的论文进行了深入的反思和修正，使得论文的质量得到了显著的提升。
我非常感谢您对我的论文提出的批评性意见。
您指出了我的论文在某些方面存在的不足之处，例如研究方法的不够严谨、数据分析的不够全面等等。
这些意见让我认识到了自己的不足之处，也让我更加深入地思考了我的研究问题和研究方法。
在您的指导下，我对我的研究方法进行了重新设计，并对数据进行了更加全面和深入的分析，使得我的研究结论更加准确和可靠。
我非常感谢您对我的论文提出的建设性意见。
您指出了我的论文在某些方面可以进一步完善和改进，例如研究框架的优化、文献综述的深入等等。
这些意见让我认识到了我的研究还有很大的改进空间，也让我更加深入地思考了我的研究问题和研究方法。
在您的指导下，我对我的研究框架进行了重新设计，并对文献综述进行了更加深入和全面的研究，使得我的研究更加完整和系统。
我再次感谢您对我的论文进行的认真审稿和宝贵意见。
您的指导让我受益匪浅，也让我更加深入地认识到了自己的不足之处。
我会认
真对待您的意见和建议，不断完善和改进我的研究，以期取得更加优异的成果。
再次感谢您的认真审稿和宝贵意见！
此致
敬礼。
回复审稿人意见模板
Dear Editor and Reviewers:On behalf of my co-authors, we are very grateful to you for giving us an opportunity to revise our manuscript. we appreciate you very much for your positive and constructive comments and suggestions on our manuscript entitled “Thermal Process and Mechanism of Phase Transition and Detoxification of Glass-ceramics from Asbestos Tailings” (ID: NOC-D-18-01200).We have studied reviewers’ comments carefully and tried our best to revise our manuscript according to the comments. The following are the responses and revisions I have made in response to the reviewers' questions and suggestions on an item-by-item basis. Thanks again to the hard work of the editor and reviewer!Response to the comments of Reviewer #1Comment No. 1: Page number should be included in the manuscript.Response:Thanks to Reviewer for reminder, we added the page number to the manuscript.Comment No. 2: Is it differential thermal analysis or differential scanning calorimetry? (Abstract)Response: The crystallization and phase change of the samples were investigated by thermogravimetry-differential scanning calorimetry (TG-DSC), and the results were shown in figure 2.Comment No. 3: Please clarify: "Asbestos tailings are tailings produced during the mining and beneficiation of chrysotile (fibrid asbestos)" Given the fact that chrysotile is carcinogenic please include in the Introduction part some aspects about health regulations/concerns to take care during synthesis of chrysotile containing materials. For instance, which is the safety/allowed threshold for chrysotile content in building materials? (Introduction)Response: It is really true as Reviewer mentioned that due to the hazards of chrysotile, the use of chrysotile containing materials have been banned completely in many countries, and for the recycling of chrysotile containing materials, there are some legal restrictions which I have added to the section of Introduction. There are some safety hazards in the synthesis and use of asbestos-containing materials inevitably, however this concern doesn't exist in our experiment, because the samples prepared in the experiment are completely free of asbestos, which is explained in the response to Reviewer#2 below.Comment No. 4: Magnification within 1000-500 range included in the experimental part, but x5000 magnification is met in Figs 6. (Experimental characterization) Response: We are very sorry for our negligence of mistakenly writing the magnification range as 500-1000 in the experimental characterization, actually the magnification range is 500-5000.Response to the comments of Reviewer #2Comment No. 1: Manuscript deals with transformation of unhealthy chrysotile (serpentine) into forsterite and /or enstatite-containing materials for decorative building purposes. However, chrysotile content of the obtained materials should be thoroughly controlled.Response: Thank you for your valuable comment, it is definitely a critical issue that chrysotile content of the obtained materials (glass-ceramics) should be thoroughly controlled. Actually, the chrysotile in serpentine starts at 600℃ and completely removes hydroxyl at 700℃ resulting the decomposition of original minerals and the disintegration of structure, and form harmless substances including amorphous silica and forsterite. So in the experiment, the fiber structure chrysotile can be completely destroyed after pre-firing at 700℃. Furthermore, in the thermal treatment of crystallization and sintering at higher temperatures, the residue that has not been completely decomposed can be further decomposed and totally converted into harmless phases including forsterite, enstatite, etc. by solid phase reaction and solid-liquid reaction. Ultimately, the product was entirely asbestos-free and which can be seen from the morphology of the samples in figure 6.Response to the comments of Reviewer #3Comment No. 1: Give some reference for the chemical content of Asbestos tailings for the benefit of the reader. (Introduction)Response: As Reviewer suggested that it is indeed better to give some reference for the chemical content of Asbestos tailings. Two reference (reference 2 and reference 3) were added to confirm the chemical content and phase composition of asbestos tailings. Comment No. 2: How do you distinguish between the main crystal phase and the subcrystalline phase?Response: we are sorry that we may have not expressed it clearly, the word “subcrystalline” used in my manuscript may be not accurate. I think it would be suitable to change it to the word “minor”. The content of different crystal phases in the sample were determined by rietveld refinement using GSAS, and the results are shown below (with the weight fraction of forsterite being 39.44%, enstatite 24.92%, diopside 21.18% and magnesioferrite14.45% respectively). According to the result, it can be seen that the main crystal phases are forsterite and enstatite, and the minor phases are diopside and magnesioferrite.Fig 1. Rietveld refinement of the sample crystallized at 850℃ and sintered at 1200℃Comment No. 3: English has to be immproved.Response : Considering the Reviewer’s suggestion, we will take great effort to modify the sentence to make it more professional. The portion of language modification are marked in green in the revised manuscript, and I hope it can meet with requirement. 10203040506070802 ( )R e l a t i v e i n t e n s i t y (a .u .) × ① ② ③ ④ CalcObsDiff ① ② ③ ④Forsterite 39.44%Enstatite 24.92% Diopside 21.18%Magnesioferrite 14.45%。
sci回复审稿人意见模板
sci回复审稿人意见模板在科学研究中，稿件被审稿人退回需要进行修改，这时需要给审稿人回复并说明哪些地方进行了修改。
下面是SCI回复审稿人意见模板，供广大科研人员参考。
Dear Reviewer [审稿人的姓名],Thank you for your detailed and constructive comments on our manuscript entitled [文章标题]. We appreciate the time and effort you have put into reviewing our manuscript. We have carefully considered your comments, and have made the following revisions to the manuscript:[在此处列出对于审稿人提出的每个问题的修改意见及回复。
每个修改都应标注修改位置，例如：“Modified sentence in the second paragraph of the Introduction (line 14-15) to read a s follows:”（在引言部分第二段（第14-15行）更改句子如下：）]Once again, we would like to express our gratitude to you for your invaluable feedback and constructive comments, which have contributed significantly to the improvement of our manuscript. Wehope that the revised version of our manuscript meets with your approval.Sincerely yours,[你的名字]。
中文审稿人意见模板 -回复
中文审稿人意见模板-回复
[中文审稿意见模板]，以中括号内的内容为主题，写一篇1500-2000字的文章，逐步回答以下问题：
1. 您在文章中提出的主题或问题是什么？
2. 您的文章中引用的相关研究或数据是否准确并可靠？
3. 您的论证是否清晰、有条理？
4. 文章的结构是否合理、有序？
5. 您的语法、拼写和标点符号是否正确？
6. 您的文体是否得当，适合您的目标读者？
7. 您的观点和论据是否充分、有说服力？
8. 文中是否存在模糊或不明确之处？
9. 是否有需要进一步发展或探索的方向？
10. 是否有其他需要注意或改进的方面？
11. 总体而言，您的文章是否具有足够的质量和准确性，对读者有价值？
12. 是否愿意继续审稿或提供进一步的意见？
请根据上述问题回答每个问题，并将回答整理成一篇文稿。
有效回复审稿人的意见模板
有效回复审稿人的意见模板一、修改稿Cover letterDear Dr/ Prof..（写上负责你文章编辑的姓名，显得尊重，因为第一次的投稿不知道具体负责的编辑，只能用通用的Editors）: On behalf of my co-authors, we thank you very much for giving us an opportunity to revise our manuscript, we appreciate editor and reviewers very much for their positive and constructive comments and suggestions on our manuscript entitled “Paper Title”. (ID: 文章稿号).We have studied reviewer’s comments carefully and have made revision which marked in red in the paper. We have tried our best to revise our manuscript according to the comments. Attached please find the revised version, which we would like to submit for your kind consideration.We would like to express our great appreciation to you and reviewers for comments on our paper. Looking forward to hearing from you.Thank you and best regards.Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××E-mail: ××××@××××二、修改稿回答审稿人的意见（最重要的部分）List of ResponsesDear Editors and Reviewers:Th ank you for your letter and for the reviewers’ comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Paper Title” (ID: 文章稿号).Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer’s comments are as flowing:Respond s to the reviewer’s comments:Reviewer #1:1. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)Response: ××××××2. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)Response: ××××××。
sci回复审稿人意见模板
sci回复审稿人意见模板Dear [Reviewer's Name],Thank you for taking the time to review our manuscript entitled [Manuscript Title]. We appreciate your valuable feedback and constructive suggestions, which have been extremely helpful in improving the quality and clarity of our work. Following your suggestions, we have made the necessary revisions, and we believe that these changes have considerably strengthened the manuscript.Below, we address each of your specific comments in detail:1. [Reviewer's Comment]In response to this comment, we have [explain the revisions made]. These changes have [justify how the revisions have addressed the concern] and provide a more comprehensive understanding of the topic.2. [Reviewer's Comment]We have carefully considered this comment and have [explain the revisions made]. This has [describe the impact of the revisions on the manuscript] and has improved the overall flow and organization of the manuscript.3. [Reviewer's Comment]We acknowledge the reviewer's concern and have [describe the actions taken to address the concern]. This has [explain the impactof the revisions on the reported results] and enhances the reliability and validity of our findings.We sincerely appreciate your thorough and thoughtful review, which has undoubtedly enhanced the quality of this manuscript. We hope that the revisions we made have adequately addressed your concerns. If you have any further suggestions, please do not hesitate to let us know.Once again, thank you for your time and expertise in reviewing our manuscript.Best regards,[Your Name]。
sci回复审稿人意见模板 -回复
sci回复审稿人意见模板-回复尊敬的审稿人，非常感谢您对我们的稿件进行审阅，并提供了宝贵的意见和建议。
根据您的反馈，我们对您提出的问题逐一进行了回答，以便进一步改善和完善我们的研究成果。
[问题1：请解释清楚为什么选择该研究主题。
]我们选择这个研究主题是因为它与当前科学社会的重要问题密切相关。
该主题基于对地球气候变化以及环境持续变化的探索。
目前，环境问题受到了人们越来越多的关注，其中气候变化是其中最紧迫且引人注目的问题之一。
我们希望通过研究来深入了解气候变化的根本原因以及与之相关的因素，以帮助我们更好地应对这个全球性的挑战。
[问题2：请更加详细地解释您所使用的研究方法并说明其可靠性。
]在我们的研究中，我们采用了XX方法来分析和解读数据。
这种方法已经被广泛用于类似的研究，并已被科学界公认为有效和可靠的分析工具。
我们通过仔细收集和整理相关数据，并运用适当的统计方法来得出结论。
此外，我们还进行了多次重复实验，以增加结果的可靠性和重复性。
在数据分析方面，我们采用了严格的统计学方法来检验结果的显著性和可信度。
总体来说，我们相信我们所使用的研究方法是可靠的，并能够有效地支持我们的研究结论。
[问题3：请进一步讨论您的研究结果对该领域的意义和影响。
]我们的研究结果对于该领域具有重要的意义和影响。
首先，我们的结果可以帮助科学家和政策制定者更好地了解气候变化的机理和动力学过程。
这种理解是制定有效的气候变化应对策略所必需的。
其次，我们的结果还可以为相关领域的进一步研究提供有价值的参考和基础。
我们的发现可能有助于揭示与气候变化相关的其他未知因素，并为深入研究提供新的思路和方向。
最后，我们的研究结果还对公众有重要意义，因为它可以提高人们对气候变化问题的认识，并推动人们采取积极的环保行动来减轻其影响。
[问题4：请回答如何应对审稿人提出的其他一些具体问题和建议。
]根据您提供的其他建议，我们将按照以下方式来应对：a. 针对您提出的统计方法方面的疑问，我们将进一步详细描述我们所采用的方法，并解释其适用性和优势。
mdpi回复审稿人模板
审稿人回复模板
亲爱的[审稿人姓名]，
非常感谢您对我们期刊的投稿进行审查，并提供了宝贵的意见和建议。
我们非常重视您的评价，并且认真考虑了您的每一条指导意见。
在此信中，我们将详细说明我们对每个问题的解决方案，并展示修改后的论文。
问题1：[问题描述]
回答：[解决方案]
问题2：[问题描述]
回答：[解决方案]
问题3：[问题描述]
回答：[解决方案]
…
请注意，我们对于每个问题所做出的更改都已在论文中进行了标记，以便您能够清楚地看到修改之处。
以下是我们对于每个问题所做出修改的详细说明：
问题1：[问题描述]
在这个部分，我们发现了一个错误/不准确之处。
为了解决这个问题，我们进行了
如下修改…
问题2：[问题描述]
在这个部分，我们发现了一个需要进一步澄清/补充的地方。
为了解决这个问题，
我们进行了如下修改…
问题3：[问题描述]
在这个部分，我们发现了一个需要重新组织/调整结构的地方。
为了解决这个问题，我们进行了如下修改…
…
我们相信，通过这些修改，论文的质量得到了显著提升，并且更加符合MDPI期刊
的要求。
我们再次感谢您的宝贵意见和建议，您的专业知识对于我们的研究工作至关重要。
如果您还有其他任何问题或者需要进一步澄清，请随时与我们联系。
我们将非常愿意与您进行进一步的讨论和交流。
最后，再次感谢您对我们论文的审查和评价。
祝好！
[作者姓名]。
针对审稿人意见的逐条回复
针对审稿人意见的逐条回复：审稿意见一：1、作者在第二页第七行中提到“Serre等人利用这种方法成功地将布洛芬包裹到MIL-100里”是为了说明MOFs有较高的药物运载效率，所以此处应该明确介绍该文章中MIL-100的药物运载效率等信息。
回复：MIL（Materials of Institut Lavoisier）-100/ 101的每个大孔和小孔的负载量分别为92和56个药物分子，从而实现高效的药物运载。
该信息已补充到文章中相应位置。
2、作者在第二页第十三行中提到“Wei等人通过形成席夫碱的方式将具有氨基官能团的DOX 药物分子与金属有机骨架上的醛基官能团共价交联”，应该进一步解释该体系的药物释放机制，这样才能完全符合前文提到的三个特点。
回复：该体系药物释放机制是在酸性pH条件下实现药物释放药物。
该信息已补充到文章中相应位置。
3、作者在第二页第十六行中提到“这些生物大分子本身很难进入细胞，因此需要特定的载体将其运输进入细胞发挥功能”，应该引用相关参考文献。
回复：感谢审稿人的意见，已引用相关文献。
4、作者在第二页第二十行中提到“MOF-蛋白质复合物的形成方式可以分为：表面固定、共价交联、孔渗透、原位生长法等方式”，但是后文没有详细介绍表面固定和共价交联两种方式，因此在此处应该引用相关参考文献。
回复：感谢审稿人的意见，已引用相关文献。
5、文章中多处符号格式不正确，例如“。
”应为“.”、“-”应为“-”，请仔细检查并改正。
回复：感谢审稿人指出，已检查并改正。
6、1.4章节中提到的MOF的表面修饰方法的总结不够全面。
例如，还有利用无机材料进行修饰的方法等未被提及。
请补充。
回复：MOF的表面修饰还包括碳酸钙等无机材料，已补充到文章中相应位置：“此外，在MOF表面包裹无机材料（如CaCO3）,也可以提高材料的稳定性并实现药物的可控释放”。
7、MIL首次出现在第二页第七行中，而不是2.1章节中。
因此，其全称应该在首次出现时给出。
回复审稿意见,模板
回复审稿意见,模板篇一：SCI 审稿意见回复范文论文题目：Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies on the antivirus effects of A (一种中草药) against virus B （一种病毒）所投杂志：Life Sciences投稿结果：这次大修后又经过一次小修，被接受发表编辑信内容（注：有删节）：Dear Mr. XXX,Your manuscript has been examined by the editors and qualified referee . We think the manuscript has merit but requires revision before we can accept it for publication in the Journal. Careful consideration must be given to the points raised in the reviewer comments, which are enclosed below.If you choose to submit a revision of your manuscript, please incorporate responses to the reviewer comments into the revised paper. A complete rebuttal with no manuscript alterations is usually considered inadequate and may result in lengthy re-review procedures.A letter detailing your revisions point-by-point must accompany the resubmission.You will be requested to upload this Response to Reviewers as a separate file in the Attach Files area.We ask that you resubmit your manuscript within 45 days. After this time, your file will be placed on inactive status and a further submission will be considered a new manuscript.To submit a revision, go to and log in as an Author. You will see a menu item called Submission Needing Revision. You will find your submission record there.Yours sincerely,Joseph J. Bahl, PhDEditorLife SciencesFormat Suggestion: Please access the Guide to Authors at our website to check the format of your article. Pay particular attention to our References style.Reviewers' comments:Reviewer #1:XXXXX （略）Reviewer #2:XXXXX （略）Editors note and suggestions: （注：编辑的建议）Title: Re-write the title to read more smoothly in contemporary English>>>Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies of the antiviral effects of A against virus B.Abstract: Re-write the abstract to read more smoothly.A, an alkaloid isolated from C (注：一种中草药), was tested for antiviral activity against virus B. Both in vitro and in vivo assays along with serum pharmacological experiments showed A to have potent antiviral activity. The pharmacokinetic profile of A in Sprague/Dawley rat plasma after oral administration was measured by HPLC. Blood samples taken at selected time points were analyzed to study potential changes in antiviral pharmacodynamics as measured by infectivity of viruses. From the similarity of theserum concentration profiles and antiviral activity profiles it is concluded that A it self, rather than a metabolite, exerted the effect against the virus prior to bioinactivation. The need for effective clinical agents against virus B and these results suggest the possibility of benefit from further experiments with A.The authors should check to be sure that the terms blood samples, plasma and serum are always used appropriately throughout the abstract and text.Introduction: some sentences can be made less passive. example 1st paragraph >>>> A appears to be the most important alkaloid isolated from the plant, its structural formula is shown in Fig 1. ... While it produced a general inhibition of antibody production lymphocyte proliferation was stimulated (Xia and Wang, 1997). These pharmacological properties suggest a potential use in the treatment of viral myocarditis against virus B that could be studied in experiments in cell culture and animals.>>>The authors should check the entire manuscriptfor spelling errors (example given: in your text alkaloid is incorrectly spelled alkaloid)>>>The authors should read the guidelines to the authors and not include the first name of the authors being cited in the text. In the reference section the first name should be abbreviated as shown in the guideline to authors (thus the earlier text reference should be (Liu et al., XX)and the remaining one should be (Chen et al., XX)>>>>>The authors instead of directly answering the first complex question of reviewer #1 may include the three questions as future research aim in the discussion section.>>>>>>Rather than redrawing figure the authors may choose to amend thewording of the statistical analysis section to state that the result of tables are means +-SEM and for figures are +- SD.>>>>> reviewer #1 comment number 8 and reviewer # 2 comment 3 might be satisfied by inclusion of a representative photo of cells and heart showing CPE.Remember most readers of the journal have never seen what you are trying to describe.Because I think that you can deal with all of the points raised I am hoping to see a revised manuscript that you have carefully checked for errors. If you have questions or do not know how to respond to any of the points raised please contact me at bahl@ Joseph Bahl, PhD Editor 2 Life Sciences作者回复信原稿：Dear Dr. Bahl,I’m （注：正式信函不要简写）very appreciate （注：不适合作为给编辑回信的开始，同时有语法错误）for your comments and suggestions.I （注：实际上是学生做的）have conducted in vivo antivirus experiments again （注：要表明是应审稿人或编辑建议而作）. Mice were sacrificed on 15 days and 30 days after infection. Death rate, heart weight to body weight ratio (HW/BW), virus titers and pathologic slices （注：用词错误）were calculated（注：用词不当）. Production of mRNA of IL-10, IFN-γand TNF-αwere （注：语法错误）measured by RT-PCR.I have revised this manuscript and especially paid much attention to your comments and suggestions. I would like to re-submit it to LIFE SCIENCE. Title of manuscript has been changed to “The antivirus effects of A against virus B and its pharmacokinetic behaviour in SD rats serum” to make it more clear and smooth.Answers to Reviewers’ questions were as follows: （注：可附在给编辑的回复信后）Reviewer #1:XXXXXReviewer #2:XXXXXEditors note and suggestions:Title: Re-write the title to read more smoothly in contemporary EnglishAnswer: I have rewrite the title to “The antivirus effects of A against virus B and its pharmacokinetic behaviour in SD rats serum” to make it more clear and smooth（注：多处语法错误）.Abstract: Re-write the abstract to read more smoothly.Answer: I have revise the abstract carefully to make it more smooth and informative（注：语法错误）.The authors should check to be sure that the terms blood samples, plasma and serum are always used appropriately throughout the abstract and text.Answer: I have paid attention to this question and it is clearer （注：不具体）. Introduction:some sentences can be made less passive.Answer: I have revise the whole paper to make sentences less passive and obtained help of my colleague proficient in English （注：语法错误，句子不通顺）.The authors should check the entire manuscript for spelling errorsAnswer: I’m very sorry to give you so much trouble for those spelling errors （注：不必道歉，按建议修改即可）. I have carefully corrected them.The authors should read the guidelines to the authors and not include the first name of the authors being cited in the text. In the reference section the first name should be abbreviated as shown in theguideline to authors (thus the earlier text reference should be (Liu et al., XX) and the remaining one should be (Chen et al., XX)Answer: I changed the style of references.Rather than redrawing figure the authors may choose to amend the wording of the statistical analysis section to state that the result of tables are means +-SEM and for figures are +- SD.Answer: （注：作者请编辑公司帮回答）reviewer #1 comment number 8 and reviewer # 2 comment 3 might be satisfied by inclusion of a representative photo of cells and heart showing CPE. Remember: most readers of the journal have never seen what you are trying to describe.Answer: Thank you for your suggestions. I have supplemented pictures of cardiac pathologic slices in the paper (Fig2).I have to apologize for giving you so much trouble because of those misspelling and confusing statements （注：一般不是延误或人为失误，不必轻易道歉，按建议修改即可）. Your comments and suggestions really helpedme a lot. I have put great efforts to this review. I wish it can be satisfactory.If there’s （注：正式信函不要简写）any information I can provide, please don’t hesitate to contact me.Thank you again for your time and patience. Look forward to hear （注：语法错误）from you.Yours SincerelyXxxx Xxxx (通讯作者名)建议修改稿：Dear Dr. Bahl,Thanks you very much for your comments and suggestions.As suggested, we have conducted in vivo antivirus experiments. Mice were sacrificed on 15 days and 30 days after infection with virus B. Mortality, heart weight to body weight ratio (HW/BW), virus titers and pathologic scores were determined. In addition, mRNA expression of IL-10, IFN-γ and TNF-α were measured by RT-PCR.We have revised the manuscript, according to thecomments and suggestions of reviewers and editor, and responded, point by point to, the comments as listed below. Since the paper has been revised significantly throughout the text, we feel it is better not to highlight the amendments in the revised manuscript （正常情况最好表明修改处）.The revised manuscript has been edited and proofread by a medical editing company in Hong Kong.I would like to re-submit this revised manuscript to Life Sciences, and hope it is acceptable for publication in the journal.Looking forward to hearing from you soon.With kindest regards,Yours SincerelyXxxx Xxxx (通讯作者名)Replies to Reviewers and EditorFirst of all, we thank both reviewers and editor for their positive and constructive comments and suggestions.Replies to Reviewer #1:Xxxxx （略）Replies to Reviewer #2:Xxxxx （略）Replies to the Editors note and suggestions:Title: Re-write the title to read more smoothly in contmeporary EnglishAnswer: I have rewrite the title to “The antivirus effects of Sophoridine against Coxsackievirus B3 and its pharmacokinetics in rats” to make it more clear and read more smoothly.篇二：教你审稿意见回复信怎么写教你审稿意见回复信怎么写来源：医学论文——达晋医学编译达晋医学编译小编知道大多数的稿件在被期刊接受前需要经历至少一次修稿，作者在收到大修或小修的决定后，必须根据审稿意见修改论文，然后将修改稿重新递交给期刊，同时附上逐点回复，在返还修改稿的时候，还需要递交cover letter，这封信通常称为 response letter(回复信)或 rebuttal letter(反驳信)。
回复sci审稿意见模板
回复sci审稿意见模板
在回复SCI审稿意见时，以下是一个模板，可以帮助您组织和回应审稿人的意见：
回复审稿意见模板
标题: 对审稿意见的回应
引言:
简要感谢审稿人提供的宝贵意见，并表达对审稿人付出的时间和努力的感激之情。
审稿意见概述:
简要总结审稿人的主要意见和建议。
回应审稿意见:
1. 审稿意见1:
* 描述审稿人的意见。
* 回应和解释您的观点、改进或调整。
* 提供证据或数据支持您的回应（如果适用）。
2. 审稿意见2:
* 描述审稿人的意见。
* 回应和解释您的观点、改进或调整。
* 针对审稿人的建议，说明您如何修改或完善相关内容。
3. 审稿意见3:
* (依此类推，回应所有审稿人的意见)
结论:
感谢审稿人的意见和建议对提升稿件质量的重要贡献。
总结您的回应，并强调您如何根据审稿人的意见改进和完善了稿件。
如果还有其他遗留问题或需要进一步讨论的内容，请在此处进行说明。
致谢:
再次表达对审稿人工作的感谢，并感谢编辑部给予的机会和考虑。
请注意，以上模板是一个基本的指导，您可以根据具体情况进行适当的调整和修改。
回应审稿人时，保持礼貌、尊重和专业的态度非常重
要。
确保充分理解并认真对待审稿人的意见，提供清晰、有逻辑和准确的回应。
回复审稿人意见模板
回复审稿人意见模板Response: Thank you for pointing out the error in our abstract。
We have corrected it to state that we used XXX.Response to the comments of Reviewer #2Comment No。
1: The n XXX.Response: We have revised the XXX of our research objectives.Comment No。
2: The n XXX analysis of the results.Response: XXX analysis of our results and their XXX.Comment No。
3: Some of the figures are difficult to read and need to be improved.Response: We have XXX.Response to the comments of Reviewer #3Comment No。
1: The language and grammar need to be improved.Response: XXX.Comment No。
2: Some of the XXX.Response: XXX n to make it more clear and understandable.Overall。
XXX to address the reviewers' comments and ns。
and we hope that our revised manuscript will meet the standards of the journal。
Thank you again for your time and XXX.XXX (TG-DSC) method was used to XXX and phase changeof the samples。
sci回复审稿人意见范文
sci回复审稿人意见范文标题：以SCI回复审稿人意见范文尊敬的审稿人：感谢您对我们的研究工作的审阅并提出宝贵的意见。
我们针对您的每条意见进行了认真的思考和修改，现将我们的回复逐条陈述如下：1. 关于您提到的第一点意见，我们已经将文章中的参考文献的引用方式进行了修正，确保每个引用都符合SCI的要求。
2. 在您的第二点意见中，您提到不要输出公式。
我们已经将文章中的公式进行了修改，确保没有输出任何公式，以避免给读者带来困惑。
3. 您所提到的第三点要求内容不能重复，我们已经对文章进行了仔细的检查和修改，确保没有重复的内容出现，以提高文章的整体质量和可读性。
4. 为了使文章的结构更加清晰，我们在文章中使用了恰当的段落和标题，以便读者更好地理解和阅读。
我们还对整体格式进行了规范和整洁的调整，确保文章的排版清晰易读。
5. 您的第五点要求不要包含图片链接，我们已经将文章中的图片链接全部删除，以避免干扰读者的阅读体验。
6. 我们已经注意到您的第六点要求，不会在文章中出现“如图所示”的表达方式，以避免给读者带来困惑。
7. 您所提到的第七点要求不要重复您的问题，我们已经注意到并避免了在回复中重复您的问题。
8. 您的第八点要求不要进行自我介绍，我们在回复中不会进行任何自我介绍。
9. 我们已经对回复中的要点进行了清晰的表达，确保语句通顺，并尽可能使用丰富的词汇，以提高回复的质量。
10. 为了让回复内容更加易于理解，我们尽量使用中文描述，避免使用复杂的专业术语，以确保回复内容准确无误。
11. 最后，我们再次感谢您对我们研究工作的审阅和提出的宝贵意见。
我们已经对您的每条建议进行了认真的修改和改进，相信这样能够进一步提高论文的质量和学术价值。
希望我们的回复能够满足您的要求，如果还有其他任何问题或建议，请随时告知。
再次感谢您的审阅和帮助！谢谢！此致敬礼。
回复审稿意见
回复审稿意见1 感谢与道歉衷心谢谢审稿人提出宝贵的审稿意见，我们非常感激审稿人的支持，能得到审稿人的审查和修改是一件值得珍惜的事情。
首先，我们道歉审稿人可能在审稿过程中遇到的不便和困难，并表示我们的深深歉意。
随着审稿人的深入审查和详细评论，我的文章得以整改和提升，这给我带来了巨大的收获。
我受益匪浅，也将不遗余力去完成这项工作。
接下来，我一一回答审稿人提出的问题，并重新修改文章。
2 审稿意见审稿者提出的意见主要涉及文章架构、方法介绍和使用的材料以及结论和讨论的可读性。
审稿意见的第一点，是对文章架构的改善。
审稿人建议我应在文章开头明确指出实验的目的，方便读者马上了解实验的意义和内容。
而现有的文章架构应扩充并改善，将有助于结构清晰，思路清楚，易于理解和阅读。
其次是审稿人提出的实验方法介绍和使用的材料上的建议。
审稿人建议，在将所使用材料进行详细介绍的同时，也需要添加更为细致的中文说明，使国内外读者都能比较清楚地理解文章。
而在实验方法部分，建议添加更全面和丰富的表格，以提供在实验过程中使用的细节，使整个实验更加精确和完善。
同时，审稿人还提出对结论和讨论的可读性的建议，建议将结果和讨论分开，使文章更加清楚明了，以便读者可以轻而易举地阅读和理解文章的内容。
3 满足审稿意见首先，针对审稿人反馈的文章架构方面的意见，我将增加文章开头的内容和文章架构安排，以及更多细节，清楚明了地表达实验目的，使读者能够轻而易举地了解实验的内容。
其次，在实验方法和使用材料的部分，我将补充更多的中文解释，添加更详细的表格，以及全面说明文章中所用到的材料，使实验过程更详细，更精确。
最后，我将详细阐述实验结果，与讨论分开，根据不同实验结果提出不同建议，使文章能更好地发挥其表达性，以及提升讨论的可读性。
4 总结在收到审稿人的审查意见后，我根据审查意见，对文章做出了更改和完善，使整个文章结构更加清晰，内容更加丰富。
我一如既往地感谢审稿人的精湛工作和宝贵的建议，再次表示由衷的谢意。
给审稿人的回复模板
给审稿人的回复模板
亲爱的审稿人，
首先，非常感谢您对我们论文的审阅和宝贵建议。
我们非常感激您花费时间和精力，帮助我们提高论文的质量和可读性。
以下是针对您的审稿意见的回复：
1. [审稿意见1]：感谢您指出的这个问题。
我们确实在论文中没有提及这一点。
我们已经对论文进行了修改，详细介绍了这个问题，并给出了相应的解释和分析。
2. [审稿意见2]：您提到的这一点是非常对的。
我们忽视了这个重要的细节，现在已经在论文中进行了修正，并给出了更多的数据和实验证据来支持我们的结论。
3. [审稿意见3]：感谢您对我们的方法进行深入的审查。
我们承认我们在描述方法时的确存在不清晰之处。
我们已经重新组织了相关段落，使得方法的步骤更加清晰易懂，并提供了更多的细节来支持我们的解释。
4. [审稿意见4]：非常感谢您提出的这些建议。
我们认真考虑了您的意见，并进行了必要的修改。
我们已经重新分析了我们的结果，确保了我们的结论更加准确、可靠。
再次感谢您对我们的论文进行审阅，并提供了宝贵的建议。
我们对您的支持和指导非常感激。
我们已经根据您提出的意见进行了必要的修改，相信论文的质量得到了极大的提升。
如果您
还有任何其他的意见或建议，我们将非常乐意听取并作出相应的改进。
祝好！
诚挚的作者。
sci审稿人回复模板
sci审稿人回复模板感谢您对我们的研究工作的关注和审稿意见。
我们已经仔细阅读了您的评论，并做出以下回复：1.首先，我们非常感谢您对我们的研究所做出的肯定和鼓励。
这对我们来说是一种巨大的动力。
2.对于您提出的关于方法的问题，我们已经认真考虑并进行了进一步的分析。
我们同意您的观点，目前我们正在重新评估并改进我们的方法。
3.关于数据分析的问题，我们确实意识到了在文章中可能存在的一些不足之处。
我们会重新进行数据分析，以更精确地支持我们的结论。
4.对于您提到的讨论部分缺乏深度的问题，我们感谢您的指出。
我们将在修订中进一步扩展和深化讨论部分，以更全面地解释我们的发现。
5.对于您对我们对比其他研究的不充分的批评，我们非常认同。
我们将在修订中增加更多的参考文献，以更全面地比较我们的研究与现有文献的联系。
6.您提到的实验设计和样本容量的问题已经引起了我们的注意。
我们将重新评估我们的实验设计，并增加样本容量以提高实验的可靠性和泛化性。
7.关于您关于讨论中对潜在机制的解释不足的批评，我们认识到了这一问题，并将在修订中增加和完善对潜在机制的解释。
8.您对我们的结果和结论的质疑提供了一个新的视角。
我们会对我们的结果进行重新分析，并考虑您的观点，以确保我们的结论更具说服力和可靠性。
9.针对您关于我们实验的外部效度的疑虑，我们会重新评估我们的实验方法，并增加更多的外部参照，以确保我们的研究结果更具泛化性。
10.对于您反馈的拼写和语法错误，我们会在修订中进行仔细的校对，以确保文章的语言表达更加正确和流畅。
11.感谢您的建议，我们确实考虑过进行进一步的控制变量。
我们将在修订中补充更详细的控制变量操作，以解决您的疑虑。
12.关于您观察到的样本偏倚，我们会在修订中详细讨论我们的样本招募过程，并考虑您的建议以改进我们的样本代表性。
13.对于您对我们的实证方法的质疑，我们会重新评估我们的数据收集和分析方法，并考虑您的建议以提高实证的可靠性和有效性。
sci回复审稿人的问题模板
sci回复审稿人的问题模板尊敬的审稿人：非常感谢您给予的审稿意见和建议。
在此，我将根据您提供的问题模板，详细回答每一个问题，并希望对您的满意。
1. 对研究方法的选择有何解释？我们选择了这种研究方法是因为它能够有效地回答我们所提出的研究问题并达到研究目的。
该研究方法在过去的研究中已经被广泛应用，并已被证明是有可靠性和有效性的。
我们选择了适当的统计分析方法来验证我们的研究假设，并且遵循了相关的方法和流程。
2. 是否存在潜在的偏倚，如果有的话，对结果的解释会有什么影响？我们意识到研究中存在一些潜在的偏倚，如样本选择偏倚、信息偏倚等。
这些偏倚可能会对我们的研究结果产生一定的影响。
我们已经详细说明了研究的局限性，并尽力减少这些偏倚对结果的影响。
在结果的解释中，我们会谨慎考虑这些潜在的偏倚，并提出合理的解释。
3. 对结果分析的过程进行详细的描述。
我们对结果进行了详细的分析和解释。
首先，我们对数据进行了清理和整理，排除了异常值和缺失数据。
然后，我们使用适当的统计分析方法对数据进行了分析，包括描述性统计分析、相关性分析、回归分析等。
我们对分析结果进行了详细的解释，提供了相应的统计指标和图表来支持我们的结论。
4. 结果如何与已有文献结果的一致性？我们的研究结果与已有文献结果一致。
我们在文献综述中对相关研究进行了系统的梳理和分析，并与我们的结果进行了比较。
我们发现，我们的结果与已有的研究结果具有较高的一致性。
我们对这一点进行了详细的讨论，并提出了可能的解释。
5. 结果的创新性和重要性如何？我们的研究具有一定的创新性和重要性。
首先，我们在研究对象和研究范围上进行了一定的创新，填补了某些领域的研究空白。
其次，我们的研究结果对相关领域的理论和实践具有一定的推动作用，可以为决策者提供科学依据。
我们已经在文章中对创新性和重要性进行了清晰的阐述，并指出了进一步研究的方向。
6. 对未来研究的建议是什么？基于我们的研究结果和发现，我们提出了一些未来研究的建议。
sci审稿回复模板
sci审稿回复模板尊敬的作者，首先，非常感谢您将您的论文提交到我们的SCI期刊进行审稿。
我们对您的研究兴趣浓厚，并认真进行了审阅。
根据我们编辑团队的评估意见以及匿名审稿人的反馈，我们希望能就您的论文提供一些指导性意见。
1. 重点问题讨论：您的论文在研究领域的热点问题上进行独特的探索。
不过，审稿人们提出了一些关于方法和数据分析的主要问题。
首先，审稿人建议您提供更多关于实验设计的细节，以便读者能够更好地理解您的研究方法。
其次，审稿人质疑您在数据分析方法上的选择，并提出了一些改进的建议。
我们希望您能认真考虑这些问题，并在回复中给出详细的解释和讨论。
2. 文章结构调整：虽然您的论文内容十分丰富，但审稿人们认为文章结构还有改进的空间。
建议您重新安排文章的各个部分，确保逻辑清晰且容易阅读。
此外，审稿人们还提出了一些建议，希望您能对一些实验结果的呈现方式进行优化，以增强可读性和图表的清晰度。
3. 参考文献沟通：在您的参考文献部分，审稿人指出了一些需要修改的地方。
特别地，一些相关的文献引用被省略，并且有一些参考文献的缺失。
我们建议您仔细检查您的参考文献，并确保所有引用的文章均已准确列出。
我们需要您对这些问题进行回复，并进行适当的修改。
请注意，在您进行修改时，请使用“修改部分”或其他标记以便审稿人和编辑能够清楚地看到您所做的更改。
在回复中，请您逐一回答审稿人的问题，并解释您对于这些建议的看法。
我们非常期待您在回复中能够充分讨论并回答这些问题，以便我们能够最终决定是否接受您的论文。
希望您能积极参考我们的意见进行修改，并将纸稿在接下来的审稿周期内提交到我们的系统中。
最后，请感谢您对我们SCI期刊的支持和理解。
我们期待您优秀研究的延续，祝您研究顺利！祝好！敬上SCI期刊编辑团队。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
如何回复SCI投稿审稿人意见（精典语句整理）如何回复SCI投稿审稿人意见1.所有问题必须逐条回答。
2.尽量满足意见中需要补充的实验。
3.满足不了的也不要回避，说明不能做的合理理由。
4.审稿人推荐的文献一定要引用，并讨论透彻。
以下是本人对审稿人意见的回复一例，仅供参考。
续两点经验：1. 最重要的是逐条回答，即使你答不了，也要老实交代；不要太狡猾，以至于耽误事；2. 绝大部分实验是不要真追加的，除非你受到启发，而想改投另外高档杂志----因为你既然已经写成文章，从逻辑上肯定是一个完整的“story” 了。
以上指国际杂志修稿。
国内杂志太多，以至于稿源吃紧，基本没有退稿，所以你怎么修都是接受。
我的文章水平都不高，主要是没有明显的创新性，也很苦恼。
但是除了开始几篇投在国内杂志外，其他都在国际杂志（也都是SCI）发表。
以我了解的情况，我单位其他同志给国内杂志投稿，退稿的极少，只有一次被《某某科学进展》拒绝。
究其原因，除了我上面说的，另外可能是我单位写稿子还是比较严肃，导师把关也比较严的缘故。
自我感觉总结（不一定对）：1）国内杂志审稿极慢（少数除外），但现在也有加快趋势；2）国内杂志编辑人员认真负责的人不多，稿子寄去后，少则几个月，多则一年多没有任何消息；3）国内杂志要求修改的稿子，如果你自己不修，他最后也给你发；4）国外杂志要求补充实验的，我均以解释而过关，原因见少帖）。
还因为：很少杂志编辑把你的修改稿再寄给当初审稿人的，除非审稿人特别请求。
编辑不一定懂你的东西，他只是看到你认真修改，回答疑问了，也就接受了（当然高档杂志可能不是这样，我的经验只限定一般杂志（影响因子1-5）。
欢迎大家批评指正。
我常用的回复格式:Dear reviewer:I am very grateful to your comments for the manuscript. According with your advice, we amended the relevant part in manuscript. Some of your questions were answered below.1）2）....引用审稿人推荐的文献的确是很重要的，要想办法和自己的文章有机地结合起来。
至于实验大部分都可以不用补做，关键是你要让审稿人明白你的文章的重点是什么，这个实验对你要强调的重点内容不是很必要，或者你现在所用的方法已经可以达到目的就行了。
最后要注意，审稿人也会犯错误，不仅仅是笔误也有专业知识上的错误，因为编辑找的审稿人未必是你这个领域的专家。
只要自己是正确的就要坚持。
在回复中委婉地表达一下你的意见，不过要注意商讨语气哦！我得回复格式是这样的：Dear Professor xx:Thank you very much for your letter dated xxx xx xxxx, and the referees’ reports. Based on your comment and request, we have made extensive modification on the original manuscript. Here, we attached revised manuscript in the formats of both PDF and MS word, for your approval. A document answering every question from the referees was also summarized and enclosed.A revised manuscript with the correction sections red marked was attached as the supplemental material and for easy check/editing purpose. Should you have any questions, please contact us without hesitate.然后再附上Q/A，基本上嘱条回答，写的越多越好（老师语）。
结果修改一次就接收了：）我的回复，请老外帮忙修改了Dear Editor:Thank you for your kind letter of “......” on November **, 2005. We revised the manuscript in accordance with the reviewers’ comments, and carefully proof-read the manuscript to minimize typographical, grammatical, and bibliographical errors.Here below is our description on revision according to the reviewers’comments.Part A (Reviewer 1)1. The reviewer’s comment: ......The authors’ Answer: .....2. The reviewer’s comment: ......The authors’ Answe r: ...........Part B (Reviewer 2)1. The reviewer’s comment: ......The authors’ Answer: .....2. The reviewer’s comment: ......The authors’ Answer: ...........Many grammatical or typographical errors have been revised.All the lines and pages indicated above are in the revised manuscript. Thank you and all the reviewers for the kind advice.Sincerely yours,***一个回复的例子(已接收)一、最初投稿Cover letterDear editor:We would like to submit the enclosed manuscript entitled “Paper Title”, which we wish to be co nsidered forpublication in “Journal Name”. No conflict of interest exits in the submissionof this manuscript, and manuscript is approved by all authors for would like to declare on behalf of my co-authors that the work described wasoriginal research that has not been published previously, and not underconsideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. All the authorslisted have approved the manuscript that is enclosed.In this work, we evaluated …… (简要介绍一下论文的创新性). I hope this paper is suitable for “Journal Name”.The following is a list of possiblereviewers for your consideration:1) Name A E-mail: ××××@××××2) Name B E-mail: ××××@××××We deeply appreciate your consideration ofour manuscript, and we look forward to receiving comments from the you have any queries, please don’t hesitate to contact me at the addressbelow.Thank you and best regards.Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××E-mail: ××××@××××二、催稿信Dear editor:Sorry for disturbing you. I am not sure ifit is the right time to contact you to inquire about the status of my submittedmanuscript titled “Paper Title”. (ID: 文章稿号), although the status of “With Editor” has been lasting for more than two months, since submitted tojournal three months ago. I am just wondering that my manuscript has been sentto reviewers or notI would be greatly appreciated if you couldspend some of your time check the status for us. I am very pleased to hear fromyou on the reviewer’s comments.Thank you very much for your consideration.Best regards!Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××E-mail: ××××@××××三、修改稿Cover letterDear Dr/ Prof..（写上负责你文章编辑的姓名，显得尊重，因为第一次的投稿不知道具体负责的编辑，只能用通用的editor）:On behalf of my co-authors, we thank you very much for giving us an opportunity to revise our manuscript, we appreciate editor and reviewersvery much for their positive and constructive comments and suggestions on our manuscript entitled “Paper Title”. (ID: 文章稿号).We have studied reviewer’s comments carefully and have made revision which marked in red in the paper. We have tried our best to revise our manuscript according to the comments. Attached please find the revised version, which we would like to submit for your kind consideration. We would like to express our greata ppreciation to you and reviewers for comments on our paper. Looking forward to hearing from you.Thank you and best regards.Yours sincerely,××××××Corresponding author:Name: ×××E-mail: ××××@××××四、修改稿回答审稿人的意见（最重要的部分）List of ResponsesDear Editors and Reviewers:Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers’comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Paper Title” (ID: 文章稿号). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving ourpaper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main correctionsin the paper and the responds to the reviewer’s comments are as flowing:Responds to the revi ewer’s comments:Reviewer #1:1. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)Response: ××××××2. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)Response: ××××××。