考研英语阅读真题考研英语毙考题
205考研英语阅读真题:考研英语(一)第2篇-毙考题
205考研英语阅读真题:考研英语(一)第2篇-毙考题2015考研英语阅读真题:考研英语(一)第2篇Just how much does the Constitution protect your digital data?The Supreme Court will now considerwhether police can search the contents of a mobile phone without a warrant if the phone is on or around a person during an arrest.California has asked the justices to refrain from a sweeping ruling,particularly one that upsets the old assumptions that authorities may search through the possessions of suspects at the time of their arrest.It is hard, the state argues, for judges to assess the implications of new and rapidly changing technologies.The court would be recklessly modest if it followed California’s advice.Enough of the implications are discernable, even obvious,so that the justice can and should provide updated guidelines to police, lawyers and defendants.They should start by discarding California’s lame argument that exploring the contents of a smart phone —a vast storehouse of digital information is similar to say, going through a suspect’s pur se.The court has ruled that police don’t violate the Fourth Amendment when they go through the wallet or pocket book, of an arrestee without a warrant.But exploring one’s smart phone is more like entering his or her home.A smart phone may contain an arrestee’s reading history, financial history, medical history and comprehensive records of recent correspondence.The development of “cloud computing.” meanwhile, has made that exploration so much the easier.Americans should take steps to protect their digital privacy.But keeping sensitive information on these devices is increasingly a requirement of normal life.Citizens still have a right to expect private documents to remain private and protected by the Constitution’s prohibition on unreaso nable searches.As so often is the case, stating that principle doesn’t ease the challenge of line-drawing.In many cases, it would not be overly onerous for authorities to obtain a warrant to search through phone contents.They could still invalidate Fourth Amendment protections when facing severe, urgent circumstances,and they could take reasonable measures to ensure that phone data are not erased or altered while a warrant is pending.The court, though, may want to allow room for police to cite situations where they are entitled to more freedom.But the justices should not swallow California’s argument whole.New, disruptive technology sometimes demands novel applications of the Constitut ion’s protections.Orin Kerr, a law professor, compares the explosion and accessibility of digital information in the 21st century with the establishment of automobile use as a digital necessity of life in the 20th:The justices had to specify novel rules for the new personaldomain of thepassenger car then;they must sort out how the Fourth Amendment applies to digital information now.宪法对你的数字资料的保护到底有多大?最高法院现在将会考虑如果手机在嫌疑人的身上或身边,警察是否能在未经许可的前提下搜索其手机的内容。
考研英语阅读材料汇编之文教类4毙考题
考研英语阅读材料汇编之文教类(4)-毙考题————————————————————————————————作者: ————————————————————————————————日期:考研英语阅读材料汇编之文教类(4)阅读是考研英语的重要题型之一,也是保障英语成绩的关键题目。
因此,考研学子们要充分重视英语阅读,除了平时多多阅读英语杂志、报纸外,还需要针对阅读进行专项训练。
小编整理了关于考研英语阅读题源的系列文章考研英语阅读材料汇编之文教类(4),请参考!ﻭﻭWhosaNerd,Anyway?ﻭﻪWhat is a nerd? Mary Bucholtz,alinguistat the UniversityofCali fornia, Santa Barbara,has beenworkingonthe questionfor the last 12years.Shehasgoneto high schools andcolleges, mainlyin California,and asked students from different crowdsto thinkaboutt he idea of nerdiness andwho among theirpeers should be consideredanerd; students have also reported themselves. Nerdiness,she has conducted,is largely a matterof racially tingedbehavior. People who are considerednerds tendtoact in ways that are,asshe putsit, hyperwhite .ﻭﻪﻪWhile the word nerdhas been used since the 1950s, its origin remains elusi ve.Nerds,however,are easy to find everywhere. Being a nerd has becom ea widelyaccepted and evenproudidentity,and nerdshave carved out a comfortable niche in popular culture;nerdcore rappers,who wear pocket protectorsandwrite paeans tocomputerroutingdevices,are invogue,and TVnetworkscontinue to run shows withtitleslike Beautyand theGeek . As a linguist, Bucholtz understands nerdiness firstandforemostas away of using language. In a2001paper, TheWhiteness of Nerds: Superstandard Englishand Racial Markedness , and other works,including a bookin progress, Bucholtz notes that the hegemonic coolwhite kidsuse a limited amountof African-AmericanvernacularEnglish;theymay say blood in lieu offriend,ordrop theg inplaying.ﻭﻪBut the nerds she has interviewed, mostlywhitekids,punctiliouslyadhere to StandardEnglish. They oftenfavorGreco-Latinate wordsover Germanic ones ( it s my observation insteadof I think ),a preference that lends an air of scientific detachment. They re aware they speak distinctively andthey use language as abadge of membershipin theircliques. One nerd girl Bucholtz observed performeda typicallynerdyfeat when asked to discuss blood asa slang term;she replied: B-I-O-O-D. The word is b lood,evoking theformat of a spelling bee.She went on,That sthe stuffwhich isinside of your veins,humorously using a literaldefiniti onNerds are not simply victims of the prevailingsocial codesabout what s appropriate and what scool;they actively shapetheirown idenﻭﻭThough Bucholtz uses the termtities and put thosecodes in question.ﻭhyperwhite to describenerd language inparticular,sheclaimsthatthe symbolicresourcesofan extreme whiteness can beused elsewhere.After all, trends in music,dance, fashion, sports and language in a varietyof youth subcultures are often traceable toan African-Americansource, but unlike thestyles ofcool EuropeanAmericanstudents, in nerdiness, African-American culture and languagedo not play even a covert role.Certainly, hyperwhiteseems a good wordforthesartorialchoicesof paradigmatic nerds.While a stereotypical blackyouth, fromthe zoot-suiterathrough the bling years,wearsflashy clothes, chosenfor their aesthetic value,nerdy clothing is purely practical: pocket protectors,belt sheaths for gadgets, shortshorts forexcessiveheat, etc. Indeed,hyperwhiteworks as a description for nearlyeverythingwe intuitively associate with nerds, which is why Hollywood haslongtraded injokes that try to capitalize on the emotionaldissonance of nerdsacting black(EugeneLevy saying, You got mestraight trippin,boo)and black people being nerds(thecharact ersUrkel and Carltonin the sitcoms Family Matters and The FreshPr ince of Bel-Air ).ﻭﻭBycultivatingan identityperceived as white tothepointof e xcess, nerdsdeny themselvestheauraof normalitythatis usuallyone of the perks of being white. Bucholtzseessomethingto admirehere.Indeclining to appropriate African-Americanyouth culture, thereby refusing toexercisethe racial privilegeuponwhichwhiteyouth culturesare founded,she writes, nerds mayeven be viewed astra itors to whiteness.You might say theyknow that a culture based ontheft is a culture not worth having. Onthe otherhand, thecodeof conspicuous intellectualismin the nerd cliquesBucholtz observed mayshut outblackstudents whochose not toopenlydisplay theirabilities. Thisis especially disturbing atatimewhen African-American students can be stigmatized byother African-American students ifthey re too obviouslydiligen tabout school .Even more problematic, Nerdsdismissal of black culturalpracticesoften ledthem to discount the possibility of friendship with blackstudents, even if the nerdswere involved in politicalact ivities like protesting against the dismantlingof affirmativeaction i nCalifornia schools.If nerdiness,asBucholtz suggests, can be a re bellion against the cool whitekids andtheir use ofblack culture,it sarebellion with alimited membership.ﻪﻭﻭﻪ词汇注解ﻭ重点单词ﻭorigin /ɔridʒin /ﻭﻪﻭ【文中释义】n.起源ﻪ【大纲全义】n.起源,由来;出身,来历;血统ﻪﻪelusive/i iju:siv/ﻪﻭ【文中释义】adj.难捉摸的ﻭﻪ【大纲全义】adj.难懂的,易忘的,难捉摸的ﻪﻪﻭforemost /fɔ:məust/ﻪﻭ【文中释义】adj.最初的ﻭﻭ【大纲全义】adj.最先的;最初的;主要的adv.首要的ﻪﻭﻪpunctiliously / pʌŋktiliəsli/ﻪﻭﻪ【文中释义】adv.一丝不苟的ﻭﻪ【大纲全义】adv.一丝不苟的ﻭﻪadhere /adniə/ﻪﻭﻭ【文中释义】v.附ﻪﻪﻭ【大纲全义】v. (to)黏着;坚持,遵宁;依附,追随ﻭﻭﻪdetachment/ dit tʃmənt /ﻭﻭ【文中释义】n.分离ﻪ【大纲全义】n.脱离,分离,拆开ﻪﻭﻭbadge / b dʒ/ﻪﻭﻪﻭﻭ【大纲全义】n.徽章,像章;标记;象征;记号ﻭﻪ【文中释义】n.象征ﻭﻪfeat/fi:t/ﻪﻭ【文中释义】n.壮举ﻪﻭ【大纲全义】n.功绩,伟业,技艺ﻭﻪﻭﻪevoke / ivəuk/ﻭ【文中释义】v.唤起ﻭﻭﻪ【大纲全义】v.换起,引起ﻭformat /fɔ:m t/ﻪ【文中释义】n.设计ﻪﻭ【大纲全义】n.(出版物的)开本,版式,格式v.设计;安排vein/vein/ﻪﻭ【文中释义】n.静脉ﻭﻪ【大纲全义】n.血管;静脉;叶脉;纹理;情绪v.使成脉络ﻪﻭﻭ【文中释义】adj.可追踪的ﻭﻪﻭﻭﻪtraceable / treisəbl/ﻭ【大纲全义】adj.可追踪(追溯)的;起源于的ﻪﻭaesthetic / i:s etik /ﻭﻪ【文中释义】adj.美学的ﻪ【大纲全义】adj.美学的,艺术的;审美的ﻪﻪﻭ超纲单词ﻭﻪtinged adj.有些许的rapper n.交谈者paean n.凯歌ﻪvogue n.时髦vernacular n.本国语clique n.集团ﻭﻪbling n.绚丽的珠宝sheath n.外皮dissonance n.不一致ﻪﻭﻭ重点段落译文ﻭﻭ什么是书呆子?加利福尼亚的圣塔芭芭拉大学的语言学家玛丽布霍尔特兹在过去的12年里一直致力于研究该问题。
考研英语阅读真题:考研英语(一)第1篇_毙考题
2016考研英语阅读真题:考研英语(一)第1篇France, which prides itself as the global innovator of fashion, has decided its fashion industry has lost an absolute right to define physical beauty for woman.Its lawmakers gave preliminary approval last week to a law that would make it a crime to employ ultra-thin models on runways.The parliament also agreed to ban websites that “incite excessive thinness” by promoting extreme dieting.Such measures have a couple of uplifting motives.They suggest beauty should not be defined by looks that end up with impinging on health.That’s a start.And the ban on ultra-thin models seems to go beyond protecting models from starving themselves to death – as some have done.It tells the fashion industry that it must take responsibility for the signal it sends women, especially teenage girls, about the social tape – measure they must use to determine their individual worth.The bans, if fully enforced, would suggest to woman (and many men)that they should not let others be arbiters of their beauty.And perhaps faintly, they hint that people should look to intangible qualities like character and intellect rather than dieting their way to size zero or wasp-waist physiques.The French measures, however, rely too much on severe punishment to change a culture that still regards beauty as skin-deep-and bone-showing.Under the law, using a fashion model that does not meet a government-defined index of body mass could result in a $85,000 fine and six months in prison.The fashion industry knows it has an inherent problem in focusing on material adornment and idealized body types.In Denmark, the United States, and a few other countries, it is trying to set voluntary standard for models and fashion images that rely more on peer pressure for enforcement.In contrast to France’s actions, Denmark’s fashion industry agreed last month on rules and sanctions regarding age, health, and other characteristics of models.The newly revised Danish Fashion Ethical charter clearly states, we are aware of and take responsibility for the impact the fashion industry has on body ideals, especially on young people.The charter’s main tool of enforcement is to deny access for designers and modeling agencies to Copenhagen Fashion Week(CFW), which is run by the Danish Fashion Institute.But in general it relies on a name-and–shame method of compliance.Relying on ethical persuasion rather than law to address the misuse of body ideals may be the best step.Even better would be to help elevate notions of beauty beyond the material standards of a particular industry.法国一向以作为全球时尚革新者为傲,如今它已决定其时尚产业已经失去了定义女性体型美的绝对权力。
考研英语阅读材料汇编之科技类(2)-毙考题
考研英语阅读材料汇编之科技类(2)阅读是考研英语的重要题型之一,也是保障英语成绩的关键题目。
因此,考研学子们要充分重视英语阅读,除了平时多多阅读英语杂志、报纸外,还需要针对阅读进行专项训练。
小编整理了关于考研英语阅读题源的系列文章考研英语阅读材料汇编之科技类(2),请参考! Who s the Smart Sibling? Ten weeks ago, Bo Cleveland and his wife embarked on a highly unscientific experiment- they gave birth to their first child. For now, Cleveland is too exhausted to even consider having考试使用毙考题,不用再报培训班 another baby, but eventually, he will. In fact, hes already planned an egalitarian strategy for raising the rest of his family. Little Arthur won t get any extra attention just because he s the firstborn, and, says his father, he probably won t be much smarter than his future .siblings; either. It s the sort of thing many parents would say, but it s a bit surprising coming from Cleveland, who studies birth order and IQ at Pennsylvania State University. As he knows too well, a study考试使用毙考题,不用再报培训班 published recently in the journal Science suggests that firstborns do turn out sharper than their brothers and sisters, no matter how parents try to compensate. Is Cleveland wrong? Is Arthur destined to be the smart sibling just because he had the good luck to be born first? For decades, scientists have been squabbling over birth order like siblings fighting over a toy. Some of them say being a first-, middle- or lastborn has significant effects on intelligence. Others say that s nonsense, The spat goes back at least as far as Alfred Adler, a Freud-era psychologist who argued that firstborns had an edge. Other psychologists found his theory easy to believe middle and youngest kids already had a bad rap, thanks to everything from primogeniture laws to the Prodigal Son. When they set out to confirm the birth-order effects Adler had考试使用毙考题,不用再报培训班predicted, they found some evidence. Dozens of studies over the next several decades showed small differences in IQ; scholastic-aptitude tests and other measures of achievement So did anecdata suggesting that firstborns were more likely to win Nobel Prizes or become (ahem) prominent psychologists. But even though the scientists were turning up birth-order patterns easily, they couldn t pin down a cause. Perhaps, one theory went, the mother s body was somehow attacking the later offspring in uterus. Maternal antibody levels do increase with each successive pregnancy. But there s no evidence that this leads to differences in intelligence, and the考试使用毙考题,不用再报培训班new study in Silence, based on records from nearly a quarter of a million young Norwegian men, strikes down the antibody hypothesis. It looks at kids who are the eldest by accident-those whose older siblings die in infancy--as well as those who are true firstborns. Both groups rack up the same high scores on IQ tests. Whatever is lowering the latterborns scores, it isn t prenatal biology, since being raised as the firstborn, not actually being the firstborn, is what考试使用毙考题,不用再报培训班counts. The obvious culprits on the nurture side are parents. But it s hard to think that favoritism toward firstborns exists in modem society. Most of us no longer view secondborn as second best, and few parents will admit to treating their kids differently. In surveys, they generally say they give their children equal attention. Kids concur, reporting that they feel they re treated fairly. Maybe, then, the problem with latterborns isn t nature or nurture-maybe there simply isn t a problem. Not all the research shows a difference in intelligence. A pivotal 2000 study by Joe Rodgers ,now a professor emeritus at the University of Oklahoma, found no link between birth order and smarts. And an earlier study of American families found that the youngest kids, not the oldest, did best in school. From that work, say psychologist Judith Rich Harris, a prominent critic of birth-order patterns, it s clear that the impression that the firstborn is more often the academic achiever is false.考试使用毙考题,不用再报培训班 Meanwhile, many of the studies showing a birth-order pattern in IQ have a big, fat, methodological flaw. The Norwegian Science study is an example, says Cleveland: It s comparing Bill, the first child in one family; to Bob, the second child in another family. That would be fine if all families were identical, but of course they aren t. The study controls for variables such as parental education and family size. But Rodgers, the Oklahoma professor,考试使用毙考题,不用再报培训班 notes that there are hundreds of other factors in play; and because it s so hard to discount all of them, he s not sure whether the patterns in the Science article are real. No one is more sensitive to that criticism than the Norwegian scientists. In fact, they already have an answer ready in the form of a second paper. Soon to be published in the journal Intelligence, it s, similar to the Science study except for one big thing: instead of考试使用毙考题,不用再报培训班 comparing Bill to Bob, it compares Bill to younger brothers Barry and Barney. The same birth- order pattern shows up: the firstborns, on average, score about two points higher than their secondborn brothers, and hapless thirdborns do even worse. The purpose of the two papers was exactly the same, says Petter Kristensen of Norway s National Institute of Occupational Health, who led both new studies. But this second one is much more考试使用毙考题,不用再报培训班 comprehensive, and in a sense it s better than the Science paper. The data are there--within families, birth order really does seem linked to brain power. Even the critics have to soften their positions a little. The Intelligence study must be taken very seriously says Rodgers. No one, not even Kristensen, thinks the debate is over For one thing, there s still that argument about what s causing birth-order effects. It s possible, says UC Berkeley researcher考试使用毙考题,不用再报培训班 Frank Sulloway, that trying .to treat kids in an evenhanded way in fact results in inequity. Well-meaning parents may end up shortchanging middleborns because there s one thing they can t equalize: at no point in the middle child s life does he get to be the only kid in the house. Alternatively, says Sulloway; there s the theory he has his money on, the family- niche hypothesis Older kids, whether out of desire or necessity axe often called on to be考试使用毙考题,不用再报培训班 assistant parents, he notes. Getting that early- taste of responsibility may prime them for achievement later on. If they think Oh, I m supposed to be more intelligent so I d better do my homework, it doesn t matter if they actually are more-intelligent, says Sulloway, It becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. If the firstborns homework involves reading Science and Intelligence, there ll be no stopping them now.考试使用毙考题,不用再报培训班 词汇注解 重点单词 embark / im ba:k/ 【文中释义】v.着手,从事 【大纲全义】v. (使)上船(或飞机,汽车等):着手,从事 extra / ekstr / 【文中释义】adj.额外的考试使用毙考题,不用再报培训班 【大纲全义】adj额外的,附加的n.附加物,额外的东西adv.特别地 compensate / kɔmpənseit/ 【文中释义】v.补偿,弥补 【大纲全义】v.(for)补偿,赔偿,抵消 nonsense / nɔnsəns/ 【文中释义】n.荒谬的言行,胡话考试使用毙考题,不用再报培训班 【大纲全义】n.胡说,废话;冒失(或轻浮)的行为 rap / r p/ 【文中释义】n.不公正的判决,苛评 【大纲全义】n.叩击,轻拍,斤责,急敲(声);不公正的判决,苛评,v. 敲,拍,打,斤责,使着迷 predict / pri dikt/ 【文中释义】v.预言 【大纲全义】v.预言,预测,预告考试使用毙考题,不用再报培训班 prominent / prɔminənt/ 【文中释义】adj杰出的 【大纲全义】adj.突起的,凸出的;突出的,杰出的 offspring /ɔfspriŋ; (us) ɔ:f-/ 【文中释义】n..子孙,后代 【大纲全义】n. 子孙,后代,结果,产物;(动物的)崽 考试使用毙考题,不用再报培训班 successive /sək sesiv/ 【文中释义】adj.连续的 【大纲全义】adj.接连的,连续的 pregnancy / Pregnənsi/ 【文中释义】n.怀孕 【大纲全义】n.妊振;怀孕(期);(事件等的)酝酿;(内容)充实,富有意义 nurture / nə:tʃə/考试使用毙考题,不用再报培训班 【文中释义】n.养育,教育 【大纲全义】n.营养品;养育,培养,滋养v. 给予营养物,养育,培养,滋养 超纲单词 egalitarian n. 平等主义sibling n. 兄弟妞妹 squabble v. 为争吵spat n. 争吵 primogeniture n. 长子身份aptitude n. 才能,资质考试使用毙考题,不用再报培训班 anecdata n. 二逸事证据prenatal adj. 产前的,出生前的 重点段落译文 两周前,伯克利夫兰和他的妻子进行了一项非常不科学的实验他们生下了他们的第一个孩子。
2013考研英语阅读真题:考研英语(二)第2篇-毙考题
2013考研英语(yīnɡ yǔ)阅读真题:考研英语(二)第2篇A century ago, the immigrants from across the Atlantic inclued settlers and sojourners.Along with the many folks looking to make a permanent home in the United States came those who had no intention to stay,and who would make some money and then go home.Between 1908 and 1915, about 7 millin people arrived while about 2 million departed.About a quarter of all Italian immigrants, for exanmle, eventually returned to Italy for good.They even had an affectionate nickname, “uccelli di passaggio,” birds of passage. Today, we are much more rigid about immigrants.We divide nemcomers into two categories: legal or illegal, good or bad.We hail them as Americans in the making, or brand them as aliens fit for deportation.That framework has contributed mightily to our broken immigrantion system and the long political paralysis over how to fix it.We don’t need more categories, but we need to change the way we think about categories.We need to look beyond strick definitions of legal and illegal.To start, we can recognize the new birds of passage, those living and thriving in the gray areas.We might then begin to solve our immigration challenges.Crop pickers, violinists, construction workers, entrepreneurs, engineers,home health-care aides and physicists are among today’s birds of passage.They are energetic participants in a global economy driven by the flow of work, money and ideas.They prefer to come and go as opportunity calls them.They can manage to have a job in one place and a family in another.With or without permission, they straddle laws, jurisdictions and identities with ease.We need them to imagine the United States as a placewhere they can be productive for a while without committing themselves to staying forever.We need them to feel that home can be both here and there and that they can belong to two nations honorably.Accommodating this new world of people in motion will require new attitudes on both sides of the immigration battle.Looking beyond the culture war logic of right or wrong means opening up the middle groundand understanding that managing immigration today requires multiple paths and multiple outcomes.Including some that are not easy to accomplish legally in the existing system.一个世纪前,来自大西洋的移民包括定居者和旅居者。
考研英语阅读真题考研英语二毙考题
考研英语阅读真题考研英语二毙考题文档编制序号:[KK8UY-LL9IO69-TTO6M3-MTOL89-FTT688]2013考研英语阅读真题:考研英语(二)第1篇In an essay, entitled “Making It in America,” the author Adam Davidsonrelates a joke from cotton country about just how much a modern textile mill has been automated:The average mill has only two employees today, “a man and a dog.The man is there to feed the dog, and the dog is there to keep the man away from the machines.”Davidson’s article is one of a n umber of pieces that have recently appearedmaking the point that the reason we have such stubbornly high unemployment and declining middle-class incomes todayis largely because of the big drop in demand because of the Great Recession,but it is also because of the advances in both globalization and the information technology revolution,which are more rapidly than ever replacing labor with machines or foreign workers.In the past, workers with average skills, doing an average job, could earn an average lifestyle.But, today, average is officially over. Being average just won’t earn you what it used to.It can’t when so many more employers have so much more access to so much more above average cheap foreign labor,cheap robotics, cheap software, cheap automation and cheap genius.Therefore, everyone needs to find their extratheir unique value contribution that makes them stand out in whatever is their field of employment.Yes, new technology has been eating jobs forever, and always will.But there’s been an acceleration.As Davidson notes, “In the 10 years ending in 2009, US factories shed workers so fastthat they erased almost all the gains of the previous 70 years;roughly one out of every three manufacturing jobs--about 6 million in total--disappeared.”There will always be change —new jobs, new products, new services.But the one thing we know for sure is that with each advance in globalization and the I.T. revolution,the best jobs will require workers to have more and better education to make themselves above average.In a world where average is officially over, there are many things we need to do to support employment,but nothing would be more important than passing some kind of G.I. Bill for the 21st centurythat ensures that every American has access to post-high school education.亚当·戴维森《在美国制造》一文中提到南部种棉地区的一个笑话,内容涉及现代纺织厂自动化的程度:如今的普通工厂只有两个雇员,“一个人外加一条狗。
考研英语阅读真题:考研英语(二)第篇_毙考题
2012考研英语阅读真题:考研英语(二)第1篇Homework has never been terribly popular with students and even many parents, but in recent years it has been particularly scorned. School districts across the country, most recently Los Angeles Unified, are revising their thinking on his educational ritual. Unfortunately, L.A. Unified has produced an inflexible policy which mandates that with the exception of some advanced courses, homework may no longer count for more than 10% of a student’s academic grade.This rule is meant to address the difficulty that students from impoverished or chaotic homes might have in completing their homework. But the policy is unclear and contradictory. Certainly, no homework should be assigned that students cannot do without expensive equipment. But if the district is essentially giving a pass to students who do not do their homework because of complicated family lives, it is going riskily close to the implication that standards need to be lowered for poor children.District administrators say that homework will still be a pat of schooling: teachers are allowed to assign as much of it as they want. But with homework counting for no more than 10% of their grades, students can easily skip half their homework and see vey little difference on their report cards. Some students might do well on state tests without completing their homework, but what about the students who performed well on the tests and did their homework? It is quite possible that the homework helped. Yet rather than empowering teachers to find what works best for their students, the policy imposes a flat, across-the-board rule.At the same time, the policy addresses none of the truly thorny questions about homework. If the district finds homework to be unimportant to its stude nts’ academic achievement, it should move to reduce or eliminate the assignments, not make them count for almost nothing. Conversely, if homework does nothing to ensure that the homework students are not assigning more than they are willing to review and correct.The homework rules should be put on hold while the school board, which is responsible for setting educational policy, looks into the matter and conducts public hearings. It is not too late for L.A. Unified to do homework right.家庭作业从来就没有受到学生甚至家长的真正欢迎,但最近几年来,家庭作业却受到人们的鄙视。
2016考研英语阅读真题:考研英语(一)第4篇-毙考题
2016考研英语阅读真题:考研英语(一)第4篇There will eventually come a day when The New York Times ceases to publish stories on newsprint.Exactly when that day will be is a matter of debate.“Sometime in the future,” the paper’s publisher said back in 2010.Nostalgia for ink on paper and the rustle of pages aside, there’s plenty of incentive to ditch print.The infrastructure required to make a physical newspaper — printing presses, delivery trucks —isn’t just expensive; it’s excessive at a time when o nline —only competitors don’t have the same set of financial constraints.Readers are migrating away from print anyway.And though print ad sales still dwarf their online and mobile counterparts, revenue from print is still declining.Overhead may be high and circulation lower, but rushing to eliminate its print edition would be a mistake, says BuzzFeed CEO Jonah Peretti.Peretti says the Times shouldn’t waste time getting out of the print business, but only if they go about doing it the right way.“Figuring out a way to accelerate that transition would make sense for them,” he said, “but if you discontinue it, you’re going have your most loyal customers really upset with you.”Sometimes that’s worth making a change anyway.Peretti gives the example of Netflix discontinuing its DVD-mailing service to focus on streaming.“It was seen as blunder,” he said.The move turned out to be foresighted.And if Peretti were in charge at the Times?“I wouldn’t pick a year to end print,” he said “I would raise prices and make it into more of a legacy product.”The most loyal customers would still get the product they favor, the idea goes, and they’d feel like they were helping sustain the quality of something they believe in.“So if you’re overpaying for print, you could feel like you were helping,” Peretti said.“Then increase it at a higher rate each year and essentially try to generate additional revenue.”In other words, if you’re going to make a print product, make it for the people who are already obsessed with it.Which may be what the Times is doing already.Getting the print edition seven days a week costs nearly $500 a year — more than twice as much as a digital — only subscription.“It’s a really hard thing to do and it’s a tremendous luxury that BuzzFeed doesn’t have a legacy business,” Peretti remarked.“But we’re going to have questions like that where we have things we’re doing that don’t make sense when the market changes and the world changes.In those situations, it’s better to be more aggressive that less aggressive.”终有那么一天,《纽约时报》会停止在报纸上出版新闻报道。
考研英语阅读真题:考研英语(一)第4篇毙考题
2012考研英语阅读真题:考研英语(一)第4篇If the trade unionist Jimmy Hoffa were alive today, he would probably represent civil servant.When Hoffa’s Teamsters were in their prime in 1960, only one in ten American government workers belonged to a union; now 36% do.In 2009 the number of unionists in America’s public sector passed that of their fellow members in the private sector.In Britain, more than half of public-sector workers but only about 15% of private-sector ones are unionized.There are three reasons for the public-sector unions’ thriving.First, they can shut things down without suffering much in the way of consequences.Second, they are mostly bright and well-educated.A quarter of America’s public-sector workers have a university degree.Third, they now dominate left-of-centre politics.Some of their ties go back a long way.Britain’s Labor Party, as its name implies, has long been associated with trade unionism.Its current leader, Ed Miliband, owes his position to votes from public-sector unions.At the state level their influence can be even more fearsome.Mark Baldassare of the Public Policy Institute of California points out that much of the state’sbudget is patrolled by unions.The teache rs’ unions keep an eye on schools, the CCPOA on prisons and a variety of labor groups on health care.In many rich countries average wages in the state sector are higher than in the private one.But the real gains come in benefits and work practices.Politicians have repeatedly “backloaded” public-sector pay deals,keeping the pay increases modest but adding to holidays and especially pensions that are already generous.Reform has been vigorously opposed, perhaps most egregiously in education,where charter schools, academies and merit pay all faced drawn-out battles.Even though there is plenty of evidence that the quality of the teachers is the most important variable,teachers’ unions have fought against getting rid of bad ones and promoting good ones.As the cost to everyone else has become clearer, politicians have begun to clamp down.In Wisconsin the unions have rallied thousands of supporters against Scott Walker, the hardline Republican governor.But many within the public sector suffer under the current system, too.John Donahue at Harvard’s Kennedy School points out that the norms of culture in Westerncivil servicessuit those who want to stay put but is bad for high achievers.The only American public-sector workers who earn well above $250,000 a year are university sports coaches and the president of the United States.Bankers’ fat pay packets have attracted much criticism,but a public-sector system that does not reward high achievers may be a much bigger problem for America.如果工会会员Jimmy Hoffa今天还活着,他也许会是公务员的代表。
考研英语阅读真题:考研英语(一)第2篇毙考题
2012考研英语阅读真题:考研英语(一)第2篇A deal is a deal—except, apparently, when Entergy is involved.The company, a major energy supplier in New England, provoked justified outrage in Vermont last week when it announcedit was reneging on a longstanding commitment to abide by the strict nuclear regulations.Instead, the company has done precisely what it had long promised it would not:challenge the constitutionality of Vermont’s rules in the federal court,as part of a desperate effort to keep its Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant running.It’s a stunning move.The conflict has been surfacing since 2002, when the corporation bought Vermont’s only nuclear power plant, an aging reactor in Vernon.As a condition of receiving state approval for the sale, the company agreed to seek permission from state regulators to operate past 2012.In 2006, the state went a step further, requiring that any extension of the plant’s license be subject to Vermont legislature’s approval.Then, too, the company went along.Either Entergy never really intended to live by those commitments, or it simply didn’t foresee what would happen next.A string of accidents, including the partial collapse of a cooling tower in 2007 and the discovery of an underground pipe system leakage,raised serious questions about both Vermont Yankee’s safety and Entergy’s managementespecially after the company made misleading statements about the pipe.Enraged by Entergy’s behavior, the Vermont Senate voted 26 to 4 last year against allowing an extension.Now the company is suddenly claiming that the 2002 agreement is invalid because of the 2006 legislation,and that only the federal government has regulatory power over nuclear issues.The legal issues in the case are obscure:whereas the Supreme Court has ruled that states do have some regulatory authority over nuclear power,legal scholars say that Vermont case will offer a precedent-setting test of how far those powers extend.Certainly, there are valid concerns about the patchwork regulations that could result if every state sets its own rules.But had Entergy kept its word, that debate would be beside the point.The company seems to have concluded that its reputation in Vermont is already so damaged that it has noting left to lose by going to war with the state.But there should be consequences. Permission to run a nuclear plant is a public trust.Entergy runs 11 other reactors in the United States, including Pilgrim Nuclear station in Plymouth.Pledging to run Pilgrim safely, the company has applied for federal permission to keep it open for another 20 years.But as the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) reviews the company’s applicat ion, it should keep it mind what promises from Entergy are worth.协议就是协议——但显然的,Entergy公司就是个例外。
204考研英语阅读真题:考研英语(一)第3篇-毙考题
2014考研英语阅读真题:考研英语(一)第3篇The US$3-million Fundamental Physics Prize is indeedan interesting experiment,美国三百万美元的基础物理学奖的确是一项令人觉得有趣的试验,as Alexander Polyakov said when he accepted thisyear’s award in March.正如今年三月Alexander Polyakov领取本年度的基础物理学奖所说。
And it is far from the only one of its type.而且这种类型的奖项可不止只有基础物理学奖。
As a News Feature article in Nature discusses, a stringof lucrative awards for researchers have joined the Nobel Prizes in recent years.正如《自然》杂志的一篇新闻专题文章论述,近年来,一系列给研究者设立的利益丰厚的奖项能与诺贝尔奖相媲美。
Many, like the Fundamental Physics Prize, are funded from the telephone-number-sized bankaccounts of Internet entrepreneurs.许多奖项,比如基础物理学奖,其资金来自于互联网企业家们如电话号码长度般的巨额银行存款。
These benefactors have succeeded in their chosen fields, they say,这些捐助者在他们各自的领域很成功,他们说,and they want to use their wealth to draw attention to those who have succeeded in science.而且他们想用他们的财富让人们注意到那些科学领域的有所成功的人。
考研英语阅读真题:考研英语第篇毙考题
考研英语阅读真题:考研英语第篇毙考题对于众多考研学子来说,考研英语阅读真题无疑是备考过程中的重要资料。
通过对真题的研究和练习,能够更好地了解考试的题型、难度、命题规律,从而提升解题能力和应对考试的信心。
考研英语阅读真题涵盖了丰富多样的主题,包括科技、文化、社会、经济、教育等各个领域。
这些文章不仅考查了考生的英语语言能力,还对考生的知识面、思维能力和逻辑推理能力提出了要求。
在做考研英语阅读真题时,首先要掌握好词汇和语法。
扎实的语言基础是理解文章的关键。
如果在阅读过程中频繁遇到生词或不熟悉的语法结构,必然会影响对文章的理解和答题的准确性。
因此,在备考期间,要不断积累词汇,系统复习语法知识。
同时,要培养良好的阅读习惯。
阅读时不能逐词逐句地翻译,而是要学会快速浏览,抓住文章的主旨大意。
在阅读过程中,可以标记出关键的信息和段落,以便后续答题时能够快速定位。
对于每一道真题,都要认真分析。
不仅要知道正确答案是什么,还要清楚错误选项的错误原因。
通过对错误选项的分析,可以更好地理解命题人的思路,从而在今后的答题中避免类似的错误。
另外,做完真题后要进行总结和反思。
总结自己在哪些题型上容易出错,哪些知识点还存在薄弱环节。
针对这些问题,有针对性地进行强化训练。
在分析考研英语阅读真题的过程中,我们会发现文章的结构和逻辑往往具有一定的规律。
比如,有些文章会采用总分总的结构,先提出观点,然后通过具体的例子和论据进行论证,最后再总结升华。
了解这些规律有助于我们更快地把握文章的重点。
而且,真题中的长难句也是需要重点攻克的部分。
长难句通常包含复杂的语法结构和丰富的信息,理解起来有一定难度。
通过对长难句的分析和拆解,可以提高我们对复杂句子的理解能力。
此外,阅读速度也是在考研英语阅读中取得好成绩的重要因素。
在平时的练习中,要有意识地提高阅读速度,逐渐适应考试的时间要求。
总之,考研英语阅读真题是备考过程中的宝贵资源。
只有充分利用好这些真题,深入分析、总结规律、不断练习,才能在考研英语阅读中取得优异的成绩。
2014考研英语阅读真题考研英语第_毙考题
2014考研英语阅读真题考研英语第_毙考题2014考研英语阅读真题考研英语第_毙考题,我们一起来看一下这道考题以及解析。
这道题是2014年的考研英语阅读真题中的一道典型的毙考题。
这道题目要求考生对一篇科学文献进行阅读,并回答相应的问题。
这种类型的题目在考研英语中非常常见,考察考生的阅读理解能力和科学素养。
首先,让我们来看一下这篇科学文献的主要内容。
这篇文献是关于人类演化的研究的,它提到了现代人类和其他灵长类动物的祖先之间的差异以及这些差异的原因。
文献中指出,现代人类在脑部结构和认知能力方面与其他灵长类动物存在着显著的差异。
通过对不同物种的基因组进行比较,研究人员发现,现代人类的基因组发生了一系列的突变,这些突变导致了人类智力的快速发展。
此外,研究人员还发现,与其他灵长类动物相比,现代人类的视觉和听觉能力也有所提高。
接下来,让我们来看一下问题的要求。
问题一要求考生解释为什么现代人类在脑部结构和认知能力方面与其他灵长类动物存在差异。
问题二要求考生解释现代人类相较于其他灵长类动物在视觉和听觉能力方面的提高的原因。
对于问题一,根据文献的内容可以得出结论,现代人类在脑部结构和认知能力方面与其他灵长类动物存在差异的原因是现代人类的基因发生了突变。
这些基因突变导致了人类智力的快速发展。
为了回答问题一,考生可以简要概括文献中所提到的基本内容,并结合文献中的论据和证据进行分析和解释。
对于问题二,文献中提到现代人类的基因组发生了一系列的突变,这些突变不仅导致了人类智力的快速发展,还提高了人类的视觉和听觉能力。
因此,可以得出结论,现代人类相较于其他灵长类动物在视觉和听觉能力方面提高的原因也是由于基因的突变。
考生可以根据文献中的论据和证据来回答问题二,并进行相应的解释和分析。
综上所述,本篇科学文献讲述了现代人类与其他灵长类动物在脑部结构、认知能力、视觉和听觉能力方面的差异,并通过基因突变来解释这些差异的原因。
对于这道毙考题,考生需要细致阅读文献,理解文献内容,并根据文献中提供的信息来回答相应的问题。
考研英语阅读真题:考研英语(一)第4篇毙考题
考研英语阅读真题:考研英语(一)第4篇毙考题2012考研英语阅读真题:考研英语(一)第4篇If the trade unionist Jimmy Hoffa were alive today, he would probably represent civil servant.When Hoffa’s Teamsters were in their prime in 1960, only one in ten American government workers belonged to a union; now 36% do.In 2009 the number of unionists in America’s public sector passed that of their fellow members in the private sector.In Britain, more than half of public-sector workers but only about 15% of private-sector ones are unionized.There are three reasons for the public-sector unions’ thriving.First, they can shut things down without suffering much in the way of consequences.Second, they are mostly bright and well-educated.A quarter of America’s public-sector workers have a university degree.Third, they now dominate left-of-centre politics.Some of their ties go back a long way.Britain’s Labor Party, as its name implies, has long been associated with trade unionism.Its current leader, Ed Miliband, owes his position to votes from public-sector unions.At the state level their influence can be even more fearsome.Mark Baldassare of the Public Policy Institute of California points out that much of the state’sbudget is patrolled by unions.The teache rs’ unions keep an eye on schools, the CCPOAon prisons and a variety of labor groups on health care.In many rich countries average wages in the state sector are higher than in the private one.But the real gains come in benefits and work practices.Politicians have repeatedly “backloaded” public-sector pay deals,keeping the pay increases modest but adding to holidays and especially pensions that are already generous.Reform has been vigorously opposed, perhaps most egregiously in education,where charter schools, academies and merit pay all faced drawn-out battles.Even though there is plenty of evidence that the quality of the teachers is the most important variable,teachers’ unions have fought against getting rid of bad ones and promoting good ones.As the cost to everyone else has become clearer, politicians have begun to clamp down.In Wisconsin the unions have rallied thousands of supporters against Scott Walker, the hardline Republican governor.But many within the public sector suffer under the current system, too.John Donahue at Harvard’s Kennedy School points out that the norms of culture in Westerncivil servicessuit those who want to stay put but is bad for high achievers.The only American public-sector workers who earn well above $250,000 a year are university sports coaches and the president of the United States.Bankers’ fat pay packets have attracted much criticism,but a public-sector system that does not reward high achievers may be a much bigger problem for America.如果工会会员Jimmy Hoffa今天还活着,他也许会是公务员的代表。
2021考研英语阅读真题:考研英语(一)第3篇 - 毙考题
2021考研英语阅读真题:考研英语(一)第3篇 - 毙考题毙考题APP2021考研英语阅读真题:考研英语(一)第3篇The journal Science is adding an extra round of statistical checks to its peer-review process, editor-in-chief Marcia McNutt announced today.The policy follows similar efforts from other journals, after widespread concern that basic mistakes in data analysis are contributing to the irreproducibility of many published research findings.“Readers must have confidence in the conclusions pu blished in our journal,” writes McNutt in an editorial.Working with the American Statistical Association, the journal has appointed seven experts to a statistics board of reviewing editors(SBoRE).Manuscript will be flagged up for additional scrut iny by the journal’s internal editors, or by its existing Board of Reviewing Editors or by outside peer reviewers.The SBoRE panel will then find external statisticians to review these manuscripts.Asked whether any particular papers had impelled the change, McNutt said:“The creation of the ‘statistics board’ was motivated by concerns broadly with the application of statistics and data analysis in scientific research and is part of Science’s overall drive to increase reproducibility in the rese arch we publish.”Giovanni Parmigiani, a biostatistician at the Harvard School of Public Health, a member of the SBoRE group.He says he expects the board to “play primarily an advisory role.”He agreed to join because he “found the foresight b ehind the establishment of the SBoRE to be novel, unique and likely to have a lasting impact.考试使用毙考题,不用再报培训班邀请码:8806毙考题APPThis impact will not only be through the publications in Science itself, but hopefully through a larger group of publishing places that may want to model their approach after Science.”John Ioannidis, a physician who studies research methodology, says that the policy is “a most welcome step forward” and “long overdue.”“Most journals are weak in stat istical review, and this damages the quality of what they publish.I think that, for the majority of scientific papers nowadays, statistical review is more essential than expert review,” he says.But he noted that biomedical journals such as Annals of Internal Medicine, the Journal of the American Medical Association and The Lancet pay strong attention to statistical review.Professional scientists are expected to know how to analyze data, but statistical errors are alarmingly common in published research, according to David Vaux, a cell biologist.Researchers should improve their standards, he wrote in 2021, but journals should also take a tougher line, “engaging reviewers who are statistically literate and editors who can verify the process”.Vaux says that Science’s idea to pass some papers to statisticians “has some merit,but a weakness is that it relies on the board of reviewing editors to identify ‘the papers that need scrutiny’ in the first place”.总主编马西娅・麦克娜特今天宣布:《科学》杂志在同行评阅之外又增加一轮数据审查。
考研英语阅读真题考研英语第篇毙考题
2013考研英语阅读真题:考研英语(一)第1篇In the 2006 film version of The Devil Wears Prada, Miranda Priestly, played by Meryl Streep, scolds herunattractive assistant for imagining that high fashion doesnt affect her.'Priestly explains how the deep blue color of the assistant ' s sweaterdescended over the years from fashion shows to department stores and to the bargain bin in which the poor girldoubtless found her garment.This top- down conception of the fashion business couldn ' t be more out of dateor at odds with the feverish world described in Overdressed, Elizabeth Cline ' tsree-year indictment of “ fastfashion ".In the last decade or so, advances in technology have allowed mass-market labels such as Zara, H M, and Uniqloto react to trends more quickly and anticipate demand more precisely.Quickier turnarounds mean less wasted inventory, more frequent releases, and more profit.Those labels encourage style conscious consumers to see clothes as disposable - meant to last only a wash ortwo,althoug h they don ' t advertise thand to renew their wardrobe every few weeks.By offering on-trend items at dirt cheap prices, Cline argues, these brands have hijacked fashion cycles, shaking an industry long accustomed to a seasonal pace.The victims of this revolution, of course, are not limited to designers.For H M to offer a $ knit miniskirt in all its 2,300-plus stores around the world,it must rely on low-wage overseas labor, order in volumes that strain natural resources, and use massive amounts of harmful chemicals.Overdressed is the fashion world ' s answer to c ovisumsstsellers like Michael PollanThe Omnivore ' s Dilemma.“Mass)roduced clothing, like fast food, fills a hunger and need, yet is non-durable and wasteful, “ Cangues.Americans, she finds, buy roughly 20 billion garments a year--about 64 items per personand no matter how much they give away, this excess leads to waste.Towards the end of Overdressed, Cline introduced her ideal, a Brooklyn woman named Sarah Kate Beaumont,who since 2008 has made all of her own clothes — and beautifully.But as Cline is the first to note, it took Beaumont decades to perfect her craft; her example can be knocked off.Though several fast-fashion companies have made efforts to curb their impact on labor and the environmentincluding H M, with its green Conscious Collection line.Cline believes lasting change can only be effected by the customer.She exhibits the idealism common to many advocates of sustainability, be it in food or in energy.Vanity is a constant; people will only start shopping more sustainably when they can ' t a not to.在2006年上映的《穿普拉达的女王》中,由Meryl Streep出演的Miranda Priestly臭骂她那个毫无魅力的助手,因为她居然认为高级时尚影响不到她。
考研英语:历年真题阅读要点之1994_毙考题
考研英语:历年真题阅读要点之1994The American economic system is organized around a basically private-enterprise, market-oriented economy in which consumers largely determine what shall be produced by spending their money in the marketplace for those goods and services that they want most.private-enterprise 民营企业的market-oriented 以市场为导向的in which引导定语从句,即在这样的经济环境中largely 主要地,在很大程度上。
Private businessmen, striving to make profits, produce these goods and services in competition with other businessmen; and the profit motive, operating under competitive pressures, largelydetermines how these goods and services are produced.striving to make profits现在分词起到补充说明的作用;strive to do努力做某事;make profits 赚钱in competition with 与...竞争under competitive pressures 在竞争压力下相关表达:compete动词形式,competitor 竞争者,对手,fierce market competition 激烈的市场竞争。
Thus, in the American economic system it is the demand of individual consumers, coupled with the desire of businessmen to maximize profits and the desire of individuals to maximize their incomes, that together determine what shall be produced and how resources are used to produce it.强调句型it is... that...;coupled with相当于and;maximize 使最大化resources 资源,natural resources 自然资源。
考研英语阅读真题考研英语二毙考题修订稿
考研英语阅读真题考研英语二毙考题Document number【AA80KGB-AA98YT-AAT8CB-2A6UT-A18GG】2015考研英语阅读真题:考研英语(二)第1篇A new study suggests that contrary to most surveys, people are actually more stressed at home than at work.Researchers measured people’s cortisol, which is a stress marker, while they were at work and while they were at home and found it higher at what is supposed to be a place of refuge.“Further contradicting conventional wisdom, we found that women as well as men have lower levels of stress at work than at home.” Write one of the researchers, Sarah Damaske.In fact women even say they feel better at work, she notes, “It is men, not women, who report being happier at home than at work.”Another surprise is that the findings hold true for both those with children and without, but more so for nonparents.This is why people who work outside the home have better health.What the study doesn’t measure is whether people are still doing work when they’re at home, whether it is household work or work brought home from the office.For many men, the end of the workday is a time to kick back.For women who say home, they never get to leave the office.And for women who work outside the home, they often are playing catch—up—with—household tasks.With the blurring of roles, and the fact that the home front lags well behind the workplace in making adjustments for working women, it’s not surprising that women are more stressed at home.But it’s not just a ge nder thing.At work, people pretty much know what they’re supposed to be doing: working, making money, doing the tasks they have to do in order to draw an income.The bargain is very pure; Employee puts in hours of physical or mental labor and employee draws out life—sustaining moola.On the home front, however, people have no such clarity.Rare is the household in which the division of labor is soclinically and methodically laid out.There are a lot of tasks to be done, there are inadequate rewardsfor most of them.Your home colleagues—your family—have no clear rewards for their labor;they need to be talked into it, or if they’re teenagers,threatened with complete removal of all electronic devices.Plus, they’re your family.You cannot fire your family.You never really get to go home from home.So it’s not surprising that people are more stressed at home.Not only are the tasks apparently infinite, the co—workers are much harder to motivate.一项与大多数研究相反的新研究表明,人们在家中实际上比在工作中的压力更大。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
2015考研英语阅读真题:考研英语(一)第1篇King Juan Carlos of Spain once insisted “kings don’t abdicate, they die in their sleep.”
But embarrassing scandals and the popularity of the republican left in the recent Euro-elections have forced him to eat his words and stand down.
So does the Spanish crisis suggest that monarchy is seeing its last days?
Does that mean the writing is on the wall for all European royals, with their magnificent uniforms and majestic lifestyles?
The Spanish case provides arguments both for and against monarchy.
When public opinion is particularly polarized,
as it was following the end of the Franco regime, monarchs can rise above “mere” politics and “embody” a spirit of national unity.
It is this apparent transcendence of politics that explains monarchs continuing popularity as heads of state.
And so, the Middle East excepted, Europe is the most monarch-infested region in the world, with 10 kingdoms (not counting Vatican City and Andorra).
But unlike their absolutist counterparts in the Gulf and Asia,
most royal families have survived because they allow voters to avoid the difficult search for a non-controversial but respected public figure.
Even so, kings and queens undoubtedly have a downside.
Symbolic of national unity as they claim to be,
their very history —and sometimes the way they behave today —embodies outdated and indefensible privileges and inequalities.
At a time when Thomas Piketty and other economists are warning of rising inequality and the increasing power of inherited wealth,
it is bizarre that wealthy aristocratic families should still be the symbolic heart of modern democratic states.
The most successful monarchies strive to abandon or hide their old aristocratic ways.
Princes and princesses have day-jobs and ride bicycles, not horses (or helicopters).
Even so, these are wealthy families who party with the international 1%,
and media intrusiveness makes it increasingly difficult to maintain the right image.
While Europe’s monarchies will no doub t be smart enough to survive for some time to come,
it is the British royals who have most to fear from the Spanish example.
It is only the Queen who has preserved the monarchy’s reputation with her rather ordinary (if well-heeled) granny style.
The danger will come with Charles, who has both an expensive taste of lifestyle and a pretty hierarchical view of the world.
He has failed to understand that monarchies have largely survived because they provide a service,
as non-controversial and non-political heads of state.
Charles ought to know that as English history shows, it is kings, not republicans, who are the monarchy’s worst enemies.
西班牙国王胡安·卡洛斯曾坚称“国王不会退位,他们在睡眠中死去。
”
但最近几次欧洲选举中报出的种种尴尬的丑闻、以及共和党人大受欢迎,迫使他食言并退位。
如此说来,西班牙的危急是不是表明君主制已时日不多了?
是否意味着所有衣着华丽、生活高贵的欧洲皇室成员将有大难了?
西班牙这一事例给支持和反对君主制的双方提供了论据。
而公众对此精神“象征”的意见两极分化严重,
佛朗哥政权的终结后,君主可能超越“纯粹的”政治,成为国家统一的精神“象征”。
正是这次明显的超越政治,解释了君主作为国家元首会继续受到欢迎的原因。
正因如此,除中东外,欧洲是世界上君主制最盛行的地区——它有十个王国(这还不算梵蒂冈和安道尔)。
但不像海湾地区和亚洲的专制国家,
欧洲皇室家族得以留存,是因为他们让选民们不用去艰苦地寻找一个不受争议、受人尊重的公众人物。
即使如此,国王和女王毫无疑问有其不足之处。
尽管他们宣称自己是国家统一象征,
但他们的历史和今日的行为都代表着他们享有的特权已经过时、且站不住脚,以及在他们身上体现出的不公平。
托马斯·皮克提和其他经济学家曾警告,皇室享受的特殊待遇和财产继承权在增强,
贵族家族居然仍然是现代民主制国家的核心象征就很荒唐了。
最成功的君主在力图抛弃或隐匿他们老套的贵族做派。
王子和公主白天上班,他们骑自行车出行,而不是骑马(或乘直升飞机)。
尽管如此,他们是世界上百分之一的富裕家族,
媒体的侵扰让他们难以在公众面前维持良好的形象。
尽管欧洲君主们毫无疑问将很明智地留存一时,
但看到西班牙皇室的下场,最担惊受怕的还是英国皇室。
只有英国女王以她平易近人、“老奶奶”式的行为方式(要是穿着考究的话)保住了王室的声誉。
给英国王室带来危险的会是查尔斯亲王,他既有奢侈的生活品味,又有浓重的等级制世界观。
他没能明白君主之所以得以保存是因为他们能提供服务,
他们是既无争议,又不涉及政治的国家元首。
查尔斯亲王本应懂得英国历史所表明的道理:国王才是君主制的死敌,而非共和党人。
strive[straiv]vi. 奋斗,努力,力求
bizarre[bi’zɑ:]adj. 奇异的,怪诞的n. 奇异花
avoid[ə’vɔid]vt. 避免,逃避
preserved[pri’zə:vd]adj. 保藏的;腌制的;[美俚]喝醉的
understand[.ʌndə’stænd]vt. 理解,懂,听说,获悉,将... 理解为,认为
majestic[mə’dʒestik]adj. 宏伟的,高贵的,壮丽的
claim[kleim]n. 要求,要求权;主张,断言,声称;要求物
smart[smɑ:t]adj. 聪明的,时髦的,漂亮的,敏捷的,轻快的,整洁的
regime[rei’ʒi:m]n. 政体,制度
n. 养生法(=regime)
survive[sə’vaiv]vt. 比... 活得长,幸免于难,艰难度过。