2015年5月16日雅思写作真题回忆

2015年5月16日雅思写作真题回忆小作文：The diagram shows the stages of processing cocoa beans.大作文：澳洲：Health experts claim that walking is the best exercise. However people are walking less on a daily basis. What has made it happen and how to deal with this?大陆：To improve the quality of education, people think that we should encourage our students to evaluate and criticize their teachers. Others believe that it will result in a loss of respect and discipline in the classroom. Discuss on both sides and give your own opinion.类似旧题:05.04.09Nowadays education quality is very low. Some people think we should encourage our students to evaluate and criticise their teachers. Others believe that it will result in a loss of respect and discipline in the classroom. Discuss on both sides.08.06.21Some people think that children should obey the rules or do what their parents and teachers want them to do. Other people think that children controlled too much can’t deal with problem themselves. Discuss both views and state your own opinion.这次作文的题型为讨论类，题材为教育类，据今天考试的学生反映，今天的大作文难度适中，考生们只要在备考的过程中训练过教育类题材基本上都有能力应对这个题目。

且看名师带来的写作分析和范文：写作基本思路：本文分为四段，考生们需要对“应该”和“不应该”两方观点进行展开论证。

例文中分别对“学生应该对老师进行评价”和“学生不应该对老师进行评价”这两个观点进行了论证，最后结论给出“应该评价”和“不应该评价”的优缺点，保持中立态度。

Para1：紧扣题目，描述题目中所出现的现象，提出中立观点，给出将在接下来段落中所讨论的主题。

Para2：从“学生应该给老师评价”拓展分析，指出学生评价老师这个行为会带给学生和老师什么样的正面效果。

Para3：从“学生不应该给老师评价”拓展分析，指出学生评价老师这个行为会带来的负面效果，从而表现出雅思考试要求考生需要掌握的辩证讨论的能力。

Para4：总结全文并且点题，再一次强调自己中立的观点。

参考词汇：Evaluate v.评价，评估Discipline n.规矩，规则Feedback n.反馈Performance n.表现Downside n.负面，消极面Embolden v.鼓励，使...有胆量Immature adj.不成熟的Entail v.牵涉Counterproductive adj.事与愿违的Disruptive adj.破坏的Impartial adj.公平的，公正的参考范文In order to guarantee the quality of education, many educators propose that students should be entitled to evaluate and criticize their teachers. However, others stand on a different ground. They claim that it will lead to disrespect and a loss of discipline in the classroom.On the one hand, we cannot deny the fact that students' evaluation canguarantee the teaching quality to some extent. Conceivably, if teachers receive feedback with regards to their classroom performance from students, they can adjust the contents or styles accordingly for the purpose of meeting the students' needs. In this sense, it not only facilitates the communication between students and teachers, but also improves the quality of education. On the other hand, however, this policy may entail certain downside. Provided that students are emboldened to criticize their teachers without any limitation or regulation, it may end up counterproductive. Immature or disruptive students who do not respect teachers will take advantage of this chance to criticize their teachers or even utter insults. Under such circumstances, it will definitely discourage teachers and disrupt normal classroom activities, which is not advantageous for improving the quality of education at all.In my point of view, appropriate evaluation about teachers' teaching quality is acceptable, whereas irresponsible criticisms or offensive words, which may afflict teachers' dignity or interrupt classroom order, are neither suitable nor recommendable. In other words, students can be encouraged to give teachers impartial evaluations but it has to be carried out in such a way that causes no trouble to teache r’s normal classroom performance. (257 words 100edu提供) 范文二：For ages, well-acknowledged observation of the nation has fallen on the outcomes of education and the effective ways of improving the quality of schooling. After reforming educational system, amending textbooks and supervising examinations, authorities and schools convert their attention to teachers’ assessment from students. Some enthusiastically advocate that it can be a feasible method to enhance teaching quality while others raise their doubts on the objectivity. To my best knowledge, I contend that appropriate and objective evaluation from students can prompts teachers’ performance. On one hand, students, as the recipients of teaching, are qualified to assess their teachers. The direct result of teaching is, undoubtedly, students’ scores in tests, but it is subject to students’ mood conditions and learning levels. Therefore, teachers’ performance is supposed to be evaluated with accordance to other indicators like teaching methods, teaching attitudes as well as teaching atmosphere. As a result, students, who have the closest and most frequent interactions, should be the ones giving their opinions and suggestions on their teachers. What’s more, the regular and proper feedback is likely to satisfy the needs of different students. The critical response from all of the students can help teachers have a better understanding of their students, and thus, knowing more about their students’ demand, teachers are able to acquire the expected outcomes and avoid students’ disappointment and teaching failures.On the other hand, because some of the students are not objective enough, it might cause inaccurate appraisal about their teachers. In other words, some ofthe students might dislike a certain teacher for his personalities or other unknown reasons. The extreme emotions, in turn, will naturally influence their comments and the feedback could not be reliable or even worse, could be offensive. Under such situations, teaching evaluation loses its origin functions; rather, it becomes a platform to show students’ disrespect to their teachers.In summary, a proper assessment system should be built up, and with reasonable comments and valid feedback, it can be an effective practice to improve teaching quality.（启扬）苏州北京雅思地址：总校地址:苏州市干将西路305号荣利大厦4-6层热线电话：65226422 园区校址:园区苏州大道西229号尼盛尚品汇3楼热线电话：65129512。