作文范文之gre作文issue

gre作文issue
【篇一：gre考试issue写作范文详解】
gre考试issue写作范文详解(1~19)
(1):
issue the reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished.观点陈述型作文/[题目]
被置于媒体审视下的任何人，其名誉终将受毁损。

sample essay
the intensity of todays media coverage has been greatly magnified by the sheer number and types of media outlets that are available today. intense competition for the most revealing photographs and the latest information on a subject has
turned even minor media events into so-called media frenzies. reporters are forced by the nature of the competition to pry
ever deeper for an angle on a story that no one else has been able to uncover. with this type of media coverage, it does become more and more likely that anyone who is subjected to
it will have his or her reputation tarnished, as no individual is perfect. everyone makes mistakes. the advances in technology have made much information easily and instantaneously available. technology has also made it easier to dig further
than ever before into a persons past, increasing the possibility that the subjects reputation may be harmed.
[范文正文]
当今媒体报道的力度，由于当今时代所能获得的媒体渠道那前所未
有的数量和种类，从而被极大地增强。

围绕着对最具暴露性的图片
及对某一题材最新信息所展开的竞争，使哪怕是次要的媒体事件也
转变为所谓的媒体疯狂.由于竞争的本质，记者们被迫就某一项报道
作深度采访，以其窥探到一个任何其他人都无法揭示的视角。

随着
这类媒体报道的出现，任何被置于媒体报道之下的人，其名誉越来
越有可能被玷污，因为金无赤金，人无完人.每个人都有可能犯错误。

技术进步使大量的信息在第一瞬间便被轻易获取。

技术也使媒体得
以比以往任何时候更深入地去挖掘一个人的过去，从而更增加了当
事人名誉受损的可能性。

the above statement is much too broad, however. anyone covers all people all over the world. there are people whose reputations have only been enhanced by media
scrutiny. there are also people whose reputations were already so poor that media scrutiny could not possibly diminish it any further. there may very well be people that have done nothing wrong in the past, at least that can be discovered by the media, whose reputations could not be diminished by media scrutiny. to broadly state that anyone subjected to media coverage will have his or her status sullied implies that everyones reputation worldwide is susceptible to damage under any type of media scrutiny. what about children, particularly newborn children? what about those people whose past is entirely unknown?
然则，上述陈述涵盖面过于宽泛。

任何人涵盖了世界上所有的人。

有些人的名誉反而会因为媒体的聚焦而陡然显赫起来。

也有些人，
其名声早就如此之糟糕，以致于媒体的聚焦再也无法让它受到更坏
的毁损。

笼统地陈述受媒体报道的任何人均会使其地位被玷污，这
暗示着全球每个人的名声在任何种类的媒体聚焦下均易于遭诟病。

那么，对于天真无辜的孩子们，尤其新生婴儿，情况会如何？对于
那些其过去根本无人知晓的人来说，情况又会是什么样呢？
another problem with such a broad statement is that it does not define the particular level of media scrutiny. certainly there are different levels of media coverage. does merely the mention of ones name in a newspaper constitute media scrutiny? what about the coverage of a single event in someones life, for example a wedding or the birth of a baby? is the media coverage of the heroic death of a firefighter or police officer in the line of duty ever going to diminish that persons reputation? it seems highly unlikely that in these examples, although these people may have been subjected to media scrutiny, these individuals reputations are undamaged and potentially enhanced by such exposure.
对于这样一项笼统的陈述而言，它的另一个问题是没能明晰界定媒体聚焦的具体程度。

媒体的报道毫无疑问存在程度上的差别。

只在
报纸上提及一个人的名字，是否算作媒体聚焦？对某人一生中单独
一次事
件（如婚礼或孩子出生）的报道这也算媒介聚焦吗？媒体对消防队
员或警官因公而死的英雄壮举进行报道，难道也会毁损该人的名声吗？在这些实例中，其名声受损的事情极不可能发生。

虽然这些人
可能被置于媒体审视之下，但其名声却会完好无损，且潜在地可因
这些披露而得以提高。

without a doubt, there are many examples of individuals
whose reputations have been diminished by media scrutiny.
the medias uncovering of former u.s. president bill clintons affair with monica lewinsky will most likely overshadow the entire eight years of his administration. basketball superstar michael jordans sterling reputation has been tarnished more than once by the media; first by media coverage of his
gambling habits, then most recently （and in a much more harmful manner） by news reports of his marital infidelities
and the divorce from his wife of thirteen years. fame and
fortune can turn an ordinary individual into a media target where reporters will stop at almost nothing to dig up dirt that
will sell more newspapers or entice more viewers to watch a television program. it could even be argued that media
scrutiny killed princess diana as her car sped away from the privacy-invading cameras of reporters in paris. there is no
doubt that there are a large number of people who have been hurt in one way or another by particularly intense media scrutiny.
毫无疑问，也有许多例子能证明一个人的名声会被媒体审视所毁损。

媒体对美国前总统bill clinton与monica lewinsky的风流韵事的揭露极有可能会将其八年的执政生涯置于阴影之中。

超级篮球明星michael jordan一世英名也被媒体不止一次地玷污，首先是被有关
其赌习的媒体报道，其次是最近——且以一种更具致命性伤害的方式——被有关他婚姻不忠以及与其结婚13年的妻子分道扬镳的报道。

当媒体记者不择手段去挖掘某些可促使其报纸销量大增的猛料时，
或去诱惑更多的观众观看某一电视节目时，名和利就会将一个普通
人转变为媒体追踪的目标。

我们甚至可以提出这样一种论点，即正
是媒体的审视将diana王妃置于死地，随着她的汽车去竭力逃脱巴
黎街头的记者们那侵犯隐私的相机镜头。

毫无疑问，肯定有许多人
被极其强烈的媒体聚焦以一种方式或另一种方式所伤害。

in summary, it seems impossible that for every person that is subjected to media scrutiny, his or her reputation will
eventually be diminished. millions of people are mentioned in the media every day yet still manage to go about their lives unhurt by the media. normal individuals that are subjected to media scrutiny can have their reputation either enhanced or damaged depending on the circumstances surrounding the
media coverage. the likelihood of a diminished reputation from the media rises proportionally with the level of notoriety that an individual possesses and the outrageousness of that persons behavior. the length of time in the spotlight can also be a determining factor, as the longer the person is examined in the media, the greater the possibility that damaging information will be discovered or that the individual will do something to disparage his or her reputation. but to broadly state that media scrutiny will diminish anyones reputation is to overstate the distinct possibility that, given a long enough time and a certain level of intensity of coverage, the media may damage a persons reputation.（766words）
归纳而言，对于每个被置于媒体审视的人来说，其名声将最终受到毁损似乎并不可能。

每天，有数百万人被媒体提到，但他们仍设法
我行我素，不为媒体所伤害。

被置于媒体审视之下的普通人，其名
声或可得到提高，或可蒙受毁损，取决于围绕着媒体报道的具体情况。

一个人的名声受媒体毁损的可能性，与所其拥有的臭名昭著的
程度，及其行为的令人厌恶程度成正比。

受媒体关注的时间长短同
样也是一个决定性因素，因为一个人被媒体审视的时间越长，于他
名声不利的信息越有可能被抖落出来，或者该人越有可能去做出某
些于其名声不利的事情。

但只是笼统地陈述媒体的审视终将毁掉一
个人的名声，即是过分夸大这样一种显著的可能性，即在足够长的
时间和一度程度的报道力度这两个条件下，媒体是有可能毁掉一个
人的名声的。

(2):
issue the study of history has value only to the extent that it is relevant to our daily lives.
sample essay
to state that the study of history is only valuable if it is relevant to our daily lives is to ignore the value that history has beyond the day-to-day activities of human beings. it would seem to be a rather shallow statement that implies that humans only live just to survive rather than planning for the futures of their children and the environment.
first of all, to study history is to look at a road map of human behavior that has led us to where we are today in the world. for example, the lessons learned during all of the past wars can make for more effective wartime leadership by avoiding
mistakes made by past commanders. from the ancient chinese author sun tzus book the art of war, todays military commanders and even business leaders gather valuable information that allows them to operate more efficiently and effectively. the study of this type of history has a value beyond the daily lives of people. it can lead to a military victory or the success of a business that directly affects what happens in the future, including the futures of those that are possibly not even born yet.
another example is that by studying history, parents can help to improve the lives of their children in the future. lessons learned by generations of their ancestors before them could help show them the way to properly raise a child. what worked for others can give guidance to the parents of today and tomorrow to make sure that children are prepared for their own futures beyond their daily lives.
additionally, the study of medical advances made throughout history can be the foundation to build upon to make the medical advances of today and tomorrow to make people live longer and healthier lives. a researchers daily life may not be enhanced by the study of the history of the aids pathogen, but it could certainly bring about a profound effect on the lives of others in the future if ways to control and cure the disease are found. the study of previous research over history has led to many amazing medical discoveries. to study history only to eich ones daily life would here again seem to be incongruous with the truth.
a further example of the value of the study of history beyond its effect on daily life is the treatment of the environment and the earth as a whole. looking back to the past to see the various effects of various human
behaviors on the environment can show valuable lessons on what can happen if proper precautions are not taken. the nuclear accidents at three mile island and chernobyl have been studied to ensure that they do not happen again. certainly the study of the effects of nuclear materials on humans and the environment provides value beyond that of the day-to-day life of people. the study of oil spills and their effects on the environment gives similar guidance on how to avoid or at least minimize the damage of an oil spill on the environment. the
study of the disintegration of the ozone layer over the poles of the earth has given birth to new laws and regulations on certain chemicals that help to preserve this valuable part of
our atmosphere. all of these examples of studying history provide value far beyond its impact on the daily lives of people. to be certain, there are people out there that believe that only what affects them right here and right now is important. for them, the study of history might seem to be a waste of time if it does not affect their day-to-day lives. but for countless other individuals and groups, the study of history leads to improvements in activities that have an effect reaching far into the future, beyond their daily lives. the futures of mankind and the environment depend on these types of people who have enough foresight to study history to make for a better future for everyone.
（690 words）
观点陈述型作文
[题目]
对历史的研究只有与我们日常生活相关才有其价值.
[范文正文]
史学研究只有与我们日常生活相关才有价值这一陈述忽略了历史在
人类日常活动之外的价值。

这似乎是一种甚为浅薄的论点，其言下
之意是，人类生活在这个世界上只是为了得以生存下去，而不是为
着其孩子和环境的未来作规划。

首先，研究历史即是去审视一帧人类行为的指路图，让我们明白我们何以会处于目前的状态。

例如，从过去战争中所吸取的全部教训
能够通过帮助人们避免昔日指挥官们所犯的错误而促进更为有效的
战时领导艺术。

从中国古代的《孙子兵法》一书中，今天的军事指
挥官们甚至是商界领袖们得以获取极有价值的信息，使他们能更有
效地进行战争或商业操控。

这种历史研究所具备的价值已超越了人
们日常生活这一范畴。

它所能导致的军事胜利或商业成功可直接影
响到未来所要发生的一切，包括尚未出生的人的未来。

另一个例子
是通过研究历史，父母们可以改善他们孩子在未来的生活。

父辈之
前的数代祖先们所学到的教训可以向父辈们表明什么才是抚养孩子
的恰当方法。

于他人有效的东西可以为当今和未来的父母们提供有
益的指导，以确保孩子们可为其未来作好准备。

此外，研究历史上所取得的医学进步可以奠定一个基础，为当今和
未来取得医学进步创造条件，使人们得以过上寿命更长且更为健康
的生活。

研究爱滋病病源体的历史，或许并不能改善研究人员的日
常生活，但它却肯定能对其他人在未来的生活产生深远的影响，如
果控制和治疗这一疾病的方法能被找到。

对历史上昔日的研究进行
分析，已导致了许多令人惊喜的医学发现。

只为了丰富一个人日常
生活而去研究历史，在这里将再一次与事实真相不符。

历史研究的价值能超越其对日常生活的直接影响，这方面的另一个
案例是人类是如何对环境及整个地球的。

回顾历史，看清各种人类
行为对环境所造成的各种影响，这样做可以向人们昭示，如果不采
取恰当的防范措施，则后患无穷。

发生在三英里岛和切尔诺贝的核
事故被研究，以便确保此类事故不再发生。

就核物质对人类及环境
的影响展开研究，这无疑会提供超越人们日常生活的价值。

对原油
泄漏及对环境影响进行研究，可以提供类似的指导，让人们懂得如
何去避免或至少是减轻原油泄漏对环境产生的后果。

对地球南北两
极臭氧层遭破坏进行研究，促使人类就某些化学品制定出新的法规，从而有助于保护我们大气层中的有价值的这一部分。

所有这些研究
历史的实例所提供的价值无疑已超越了对人们日常生活所产生的影响。

当然了，社会上有些人相信，只有那些此时此地影响着他们的事情
才是重要的。

对他们而言，对历史的研究如果不能够影响到他们日
常生活的话，就纯粹是在浪费时间。

但对于无数其他个人和群体来说，研究历史可导致其所从事的活动的改善，这些活动所产生的影
响会深入到未来，远远超越其日常生活。

人类和环境的未来就有赖
于这样一些类型的人，他们高瞻远瞩，从历史中获取有益的教训，
以谋求为所有的人创造一个更为美好的未来。

(3):
issue people work more productively in teams than individually. teamwork requires cooperation, which motivates people much more than individual competition does.
sample essay
teamwork as a whole can naturally produce an overall greater productivity through the concept of synergy, where the total of the whole is greater than the sum of its individual parts. but
the idea that people work more productively in teams rather
than as individuals is going to vary greatly between the types
of teams that are organized, the end reward or motivation for
both the team and the individuals, as well as the individuals themselves.
regarding individuals, some people are born with the desire to succeed, no matter what the situation or task that they are facing. these people may evolve into the classic type a personalities that work ferociously
because they are driven by an internal fire that says they must always be doing something, whether individually or as part of a team. other people may desire to be less socially involved or are very highly competitive with other people. for these people, their work is most productive as individuals, because the very idea of cooperating with
other people limits their effectiveness and efficiency because they simply do not want to be a part of the team. whether this mindset is innate or developed over time does not matter, it is merely the state of their being and neither motivation nor rewards can generate inside them the desire to work collectively as a team.
some people are highly motivated by social interaction and the desire to work with others towards a collective effort. obviously these individuals are at their most productive when working as part of a team. organizational behavioral studies have shown that asian cultures are much more likely to develop this type of collective behavior as opposed to the more individualistic behavior associated with western cultures. it could naturally be assumed then that there may be cultural values that can determine whether people are at their most productive individually or as part of a team.
another variable is the end reward that is involved with the task at hand. will the rewards be greater if the team works together towards a common goal, or are the rewards more geared toward individual performance? to the extent that the individual is motivated by the end reward, obviously his or her performance inside of a team may be more or less productive with respect to the entire team, depending on how the performance is rewarded. individual goals may interfere with the group performance. synergies may not be achieved because the individuals are not working towards a whole sum but rather towards an individual reward. productivity thus will vary for each person as a team member or as an individual
depending on the degree to which that person is motivated by an individual or overall team reward.
finally, the degree of productivity of a person will depend
upon the type of team that is organized. is the group
composed of equally contributing individuals? does the group have an outstanding leader that can motivate both the individuals and the team as a whole? from a pure productivity standpoint, the presence or absence of a charismatic and exceptional leader can make all the difference whether a
person would be more productive as a part of a team or as an individual. personality types that work well together can prove
to be much more productive as part of a team than as individuals, and vice versa.
fundamentally, measures of productivity depend greatly on
the individuals themselves. the dilemma facing leaders in all areas of life is how to best assess these individuals to determine how to best harness their capabilities to reach their ultimate productive capabilities. whether a person is more productive alone or while working in concert with others is one of the great challenges that leaders and managers must face to accomplish tasks
effectively and efficiently.
观点陈述型作文/[题目]
当人们以团队的形式工作时，要比以孤军奋战的形式来得更加富有
成效。

团队的协同工作需要相互合作，它比个人竞争更能激励人们。

[范文正文]
总体而言，团队的协同工作自然能通过增效作用（synergy）这一
理念而带来更高程度的整体生产效率，因为在这里，整体大于个体
相加之总和。

然则，当人们以团队的形式工作时，要比以孤军奋战
的形式来得更加富有成效这一观念注定会产生巨大差异，取决于所
组织起来的团队的类别，团队与个人所能获得的终极回报或激励，
以及个人本身。

关于个人，有些人天生就具有获取成功的欲望，无论他们所面临的
情形或任务是什么。

这些人会演变为工作狂这一经典的a类人格，
因为受到一股内心的热火所驱使，这股热火时刻告诉他们必须不停
地有所事事，无论是作为个人抑或是作为团队的一分子。

另一些人
则可能希望不必那么多地介入社会，或者他们倾向于与其他人激烈
竞争。

对这些人而言，作为个人，他们工作起来会最富有成效，因
为由于他们根本就不想成为任何团队的一部分，与他人合作便会限
制他们的效率。

这一思想倾向是否与生俱有，还是随着时间的推移
而形成，这都无关紧要。

这仅仅只是他们的一种生存状态，无论是
动机还是回报，都无法在其
【篇二：新gre作文issue破题方法解析】
智课网gre备考资料
新gre作文issue破题方法解析
以下是新gre作文issue破题方法解析，考生可以根据个人喜好选
择一种方法使用，对于新gre作文issue写作一定不要片面论证。

— write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. in developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
从这个instructions可以看出，我们绝不能单纯地从正负观点去展
开文章。

因为，它明确说了你需要在写作中讨论“命题”中的陈述在
何种情况下成立“true”，在何种情况下不成立”not hold true”。

如果你在写作时仍然持有单一观点，你最后的得分可想而知。

但是，实
际情况是，对于大多数中国考生来讲，他们往往受困于单一观点“黑
白分明”的思维定式，不善于从多角度分析一个问题。

而这里各位考
生需要明白，ets对于gre高分作文有一个很重要也是最基本的要求，那就是complexity，也就是“立场和角度的多样化”。

为了去应对这
样的写作要求，我在这里介绍几种实用且又符合 instructions要求
的破题方式。

(1) 融合对立选项(平衡观点)
很多题目总是会列出两个对象，接受一个抛弃另一个，这个时候可
以找寻题设中两个认为对立的对象之间的联系，指出两者是共存的。

例如：
it is the artist, not the critic, who gives society something of lasting value.
1.艺术品本身实际上就有很深刻的内涵和永恒的价值，同时批评家
可以让大家明白艺术品的价值在哪里。

2. 那些流传远久有永恒价值的艺术都是批评家们帮助筛选出来的。

因此，这两个对象是不矛盾的。

(2) 关键词分离写
很多题目中会出现两个对象，从表面上看，它们似乎是一致的，但
实际上他们之间存在差异。

对于这样的题目，我们可以肯定一个对象，而否定另一个。

例如：
technologies not only influence but actually determine social customs and ethics.
首先，我们可以看出，题目中的两个对象customs (风俗)和
ethics(伦理)实际上是有很大差异的。

因此，科技对他们的影响力也
绝对不会是一样的。

1.肯定customs
customs是可以被科技改变的，比如很多典礼和文化还有迷信都因
为科学的进步而废除了，还是有很多传统被赋予了新的含义。

2.否定 ethics
ethics是很难被科技改变的，无论科技怎么变，道德是数千年以来
人类共同承认的东西，是不会随着科技的发展而改变的，反过来是
道德影响科技的发展。

(3) 定义模糊关键词
很多题目的key point就在于如何定义关键词，题目给出的概念不
够明晰的时候，可以有不同的理解，而不同的理解就可以有不同的
方向破题。

例如：
facts are stubborn things. they cannot be altered by our wishes, or our inclinations.
我们可以看出，本题中的“facts”意义就非常模糊。

因此，我们可以通过对于其不同定义来破解题目。

1.如果fact作为一种自然客观规律，这样的fact是我们无法改变的，比如所有的生物终将死亡。

时间是不能倒退的，这些是我们通过亲
身感受可以感知到的，无论怎么努力，这些事实是不可能改变的。

2.如果把fact理解为记录的史实，那么fact是有可能改变的。

诚然
发生过的事情不可以改变，但是历史本来就不可能完全真实的记录
已经发生的事实。

这样的情况下“fact”很多时候都是被改变的。

以上三种破题方式是笔者在日常教学中同学们使用的最得心应手的。

当然如果你有更好的方法破题，也可以使用。

但关键点有一个，我
们在应对新gre的issue时，一定要从多角度出发，切忌片面论证。

我相信只要各位考生心中明确这一点，你写出的文章一定是高度符
合ets要求的。

【篇三：新gre作文--issue33】
33. as we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and mysterious.
the knowledge we have acquired serves to interpret some phenomenon or problems. and it is universally agreed that the scope of knowledge is infinite. however, when it comes to whether things become more sophisticated with the process of absorbing knowledge, a host of views are held by different people in different areas. granted, the more knowledge we obtain, the more issues we can explain and deal by using it. however, on balance, i fundamentally share the same view with the notion that as we learn more, matters become more elusive and complicated.
the more advanced our technology is, the more mysteries we will discover. another reason for my agreement is that, our thought turns to be more complex in the process of learning. when we are young, the world in our eyes are simple and pure, we can handily tell right from wrong based on our value. nevertheless, as time goes by, we know more about the humanity and the moral standard, the principle of judgment becomes unprecedentedly complex since it involves many subjective factors. hence the complex of problems is thanks to our perspectives on it becomes more intricate.
what is more, the more knowledge we obtain, the more sophisticated problems we are facing with. at primary school, we merely have to tackle the math questions with the simple tools such as subtraction or addition. however, after entering the universities, we learn more knowledge like statistics or calculus, in the mean time the problem we have to solve are rather complex that can not be dealt with by using the methods we acquired in primary school any more. therefore the essence of the question why thing become more complex is owing to the more we learn, and the sophisticated the problems will be. admittedly, there is no denying that the expand of our knowledge can facilitate us to understand something more easily. for instance, we figure out why the apple fails towards the earth after learning the principle of gravity. however, the truth is that after we understand this question, another one might be followed immediately and confound us with more convoluted characteristics.
in a nutshell, even though we understand objects more incisively by acquiring more knowledge, we can not ignore the fact that everything is changing, therefore there will never be an termination of knowledge. what is more, the process of knowledge acquisition enhances our horizon and depth of out thought. as a result, thing are always becoming more complex according to the reasons mentioned above.。