51CTO下载-ITIL中级课程-风险管理71页资料

合集下载

ITIL资料大全

ITIL资料大全
ITSM—IT Service Management(IT服 务管理)是一个大的概念,ITIL是实现IT服 务管理的一种方式(方法); 除ITIL之外,COBIT、CMMI、6 Sigma 、PMBOK、PRINCE2、SOX、ISO 27000等也都与ITSM有关。
2
创新 诚信 勤奋 双赢 Innovation, Honesty ,Diligence, Win-win
6
创新 诚信 勤奋 双赢 Innovation, Honesty ,Diligence, Win-win
IT项目生命周期 IT项目生命周期
大约80%的时间与IT项目的服务和运营有关 其余20%的时间与规划、建设相关
7
创新 诚信 勤奋 双赢 Innovation, Honesty ,Diligence, Win-win
Release Management
Configuration Management
16
Problem Management
创新 诚信 勤奋 双赢 Innovation, Honesty ,Diligence, Win-win
为什么ITIL需要改变?
CMMI® TOGAF™ eTOM® Six Sigma® PMBOK® PRINCE2™ SOA COBIT® M_o_R®
17 17
CORE
ISO/IEC 20000 SOX
Certified Training
ISO/IEC 27001
创新 诚信 勤奋 双赢 Innovation, Honesty ,Diligence, Win-win
ITIL V2与V3的不同
• V2 强调 强调: IT与业务的整合 服务支持: 支持IT服务的日 常活动 服务交付: 计划并提交IT服 务的质量 • V3 强调 强调: 通过服务生命周期方法把 IT 和业务集成在一起 五本书中有两本致力于服务 战略和服务设计,这些内容 更适合于运营经理或CIO级别 的决策制定者

ITIL知识培训讲义

ITIL知识培训讲义
ITIL知识培训讲义
目录
• ITIL概述与核心思想 • ITIL服务战略 • ITIL服务设计 • ITIL服务转换 • ITIL服务运营 • ITIL持续改进 • ITIL实施方法与案例分析
01
ITIL概述与核心思想
Chapter
ITIL起源与发展
ITIL起源
ITIL(Information Technology Infrastructure Library,信息技术基础架构库)起源于20世纪80 年代,由英国政府计算机与通信局(CCTA)开发 ,旨在提供一套全面、实用的IT服务管理最佳实践 。
请求管理
处理用户提出的IT服务请求,包括服务开通、变更、关闭等,确保服 务满足用户需求。
服务运营流程与工具
流程
包括事件管理、问题管理、请求管理、配置管理、变更管理等关键流程,确保服务运营 的高效和规范。
工具
采用专业的IT服务管理工具,如事件管理系统、问题管理系统、配置管理系统等,支持 服务运营流程的自动化和智能化。
服务转换目标与原则
01
服务转换原则
02
03
04
采用标准化的方法和流程进行 服务转换
强调变更、发布和配置管理的 规范性和一致性
注重团队协作和沟通,确保服 务转换过程的顺利进行
变更、发布与配置管理
变更管理 变更请求的受理、评估和批准流程
变更实施过程中的监控和控制
变更、发布与配置管理
变更后的验证和回顾 发布管理
服务目录与服务级别协违约赔偿等条款。
作用
确保服务提供商按照约定提供高质量服务,保护客户利益。
服务设计流程与工具
1. 确定服务需求
收集业务需求、技术需求和用户需求,明确服务目标。

ITIL内部培训资料

ITIL内部培训资料
该模型将企业服务能力分为五个成熟度级别,分别是初始级 、已管理级、已定义级、已测量级和优化级,每个级别都代 表了企业在服务能力方面的不断进步和发展。
服务能力成熟度模型的分级和评估
服务能力成熟度模型的每个级别都有相应的关键过程和关 键指标,用于评估企业的服务能力水平和成熟度。
评估过程通常采用问卷调查、现场审核、文件审核等方式 ,评估结果可以帮助企业识别自身的优势和不足,找到改 进的方向和重点。
总结词
详细描述
通过对组织业务需求的理 解和分析,制定服务策略 ,确定服务方向和目标, 包括服务范围、质量、成 本等方面的规划
服务设计
制定服务蓝图和规范
总结词
详细描述
根据服务策略,设计服务 蓝图,明确服务流程、标 准和技术规范,确保服务 质量和可用性
服务采购
采购合适的服务和资源
总结词
详细描述
通过市场调研和分析,选 择合适的服务供应商和产 品,协商合同和协议,确 保获得优质的服务和资源
持续优化和创新服务模式和方法,不断改进和提升服务 能力和水平。
04
ITIL最佳实践
ITIL最佳实践的概述
ITIL最佳实践是一种基于IT服务 管理最佳实践的框架和方法论 ,旨在提高IT服务质量和效率

ITIL最佳实践的核心概念包括服 务战略、服务设计、服务转换
、服务运营和持续改进。
ITIL最佳实践适用于不同规模和 类型的组织,可帮助组织提高 IT服务质量、降低成本并提高
持续改进和优化服务
总结词
详细描述
通过收集用户反馈和数据 分析,持续改进和优化服 务,提高服务质量和服务 价值,同时关注新技术和 新应用,推动服务的创新 和发展
03
ITIL服务能力成熟度模型

ITIL内部培训资料

ITIL内部培训资料
制定IT服务目录,列出组 织提供的所有IT服务,并 对其进行分类和描述。
ITIL服务战略实施与控制
服务流程
建立并优化IT服务流程, 确保服务的高效运作和客 户满意度的提高。
监控与评估
通过监控和评估IT服务的 性能和满意度,及时发现 问题并采取改进措施。
持续改进
根据监控和评估结果,持 续改进IT服务流程和技术 ,以适应业务变化和客户 需求。
事件管理:对突发事件、问题和变更请求进行识别、记录 、分类、优先级排序和响应处理。
事故管理:对重大事件进行快速响应和处理,恢复IT服务并防止再 次发生。
问题管理:识别和分析问题根本原因,采取措施消除或减少 潜在问题。
变更管理:对变更请求进行评估、批准和执行,确保变更对 组织内部用户的影响最小化。
配置管理:记录和跟踪IT基础架构中的所有物理和逻辑组 件,确保准确和一致的配置信息。
服务持续改进包括以 下关键步骤
实施改进:根据计划 实施改进措施,确保 改进活动的有效性和 高效性。
目标设定:明确改进 目标和期望结果,制 定可行的计划和时间 表。
ITIL服务持续改进
检查和评估
对改进活动进行跟踪、监控和评估,确保达到预期目标并收集反馈意见。
反馈和调整
根据检查结果和反馈意见进行总结分析,识别改进机会并制定新的改进计划, 持续改进IT服务。
03
04
增强IT业务价值;
降低IT风险;
05
06
提升企业竞争力。
02
ITIL服务战略
ITIL服务战略概述
ITIL服务战略是一种管理框架,旨在帮助组织有效地提供IT服务,以满足业务需求并 提高运营效率。
ITIL服务战略的核心是客户至上,强调与客户的沟通、协作和反馈,以实现服务质量 和客户满意度的提升。

ITIL内部培训资料

ITIL内部培训资料

ITIL是什么?
ITIL是: ITIL不是: 硬件 软件 一个可以直接使用的标准
IT Infrastructure Library的简称;
英国商务办公室(OGC)从20世纪 80年代开始开发的一套IT管理方法;
已成为事实上的行业标准,并以其
为中心在全球形成了完整的产业; 任务单位和个人都可以免费使用的 “公共框架”; 实际上是一系列由所谓“最佳实 践”(Best Practice)形式的图书(共7 本);
问题和已知错误
变更
发布版本
配置项关系
Service Delivery流程
可用性管理 服务级别管理
请求和 需求
业务、 客户和 用户
沟通、更 新和报告
能力管理
需求、目 标和绩效
IT服务财务 管理
警告和期 望调整
IT服务连续 性管理
管理工具和 IT基础设施
关于的ITIL的WHY和WHO
Why 为什么使用ITIL? Who 谁在使用ITIL?
ITSM也是一种IT管理,但与传
统的IT管理不同,它是一种以服 务为中心的IT管理。
ITSM的“三大目标”:
1 以客户为中心 1 服务可计量 3 高质量、低成本的服务
ITSM的“范围”

ITSM VS. ERP/CRM/SCM
— ITSM主要适用于IT管理、而不是企业的业务管理; — 前者面向IT管理,后者面向业务管理
像制造产品一样生产服务
ITSM/ITIL
ITIL提高服务质量 流程(Process Flow)
成本
输入
IT生产车间
工厂生产车间
统一的规格原材料 标准的生产工艺
服务
输出
传统IT服务

2024版年ITIL培训资料课件

2024版年ITIL培训资料课件

2024年ITIL培训资料课件•ITIL概述与基本原理•服务战略制定与实施•服务设计方法与技巧•服务转换过程管理与优化目•服务运营管理及持续改进•ITIL与其他框架融合应用录介绍ITIL 的起源背景和发展历程,包括其作为IT 服务管理最佳实践的地位和影响力。

ITIL 起源ITIL 版本更新ITIL 现状详细阐述ITIL 从V1到V4的版本更新内容,以及每个版本的主要特点和改进。

分析当前ITIL 在全球范围内的应用现状,以及在不同行业和企业的实施情况和成功案例。

030201ITIL 发展历程及现状强调IT 服务应以客户需求为导向,提供高质量、高效率的服务。

以客户为中心介绍ITIL 中的服务价值链概念,包括服务战略、服务设计、服务转换、服务运营和服务持续改进等环节。

服务价值链倡导通过预防性措施降低故障发生的可能性,提高IT 服务的稳定性和可靠性。

预防为主强调企业应不断追求改进和优化IT 服务管理流程,以适应不断变化的市场需求和技术发展。

持续改进ITIL 核心思想与价值观ITIL框架结构及组件关系ITIL框架概述简要介绍ITIL框架的构成和主要组件,包括服务战略、服务设计、服务转换、服务运营和持续服务改进等五个核心流程。

组件关系解析详细解析ITIL框架中各组件之间的关系和相互作用,以及它们在整个IT服务管理体系中的地位和作用。

流程整合与优化探讨如何整合和优化ITIL框架中的各个流程,以实现更高效、更灵活的IT 服务管理。

通过实施ITIL 最佳实践,企业可以提高IT 服务质量,满足客户需求,提升客户满意度。

提高IT 服务质量优化IT 服务管理流程可以降低企业的运营成本,提高资源利用效率。

降低运营成本优秀的IT 服务管理有助于提升企业整体运营效率和市场竞争力,推动企业持续发展。

提升企业竞争力ITIL 在企业中应用意义1 2 3了解组织的核心业务、市场定位和发展目标,明确IT服务对业务发展的支撑作用。

确定组织的核心业务需求和目标对组织现有的IT服务能力进行全面评估,包括基础设施、应用系统、人员技能等方面,找出服务短板和改进方向。

ITIL内部培训资料PPT课件

ITIL内部培训资料PPT课件

02
服务支持流程详解
事件管理流程
事件识别与记录
对发生的事件进行准确识别和 记录,包括事件类型、影响范
围、优先级等信息。
事件分类与初步分析
对事件进行分类,并进行初步 的原因分析,以便快速定位问 题。
事件解决与恢复
根据事件分类和初步分析结果 ,采取相应的解决措施,尽快 恢复服务正常。
事件关闭与总结
在事件解决后,对事件进行关 闭,并对处理过程进行总结,
定期进行评估,收集反馈意见 和数据,分析实施效果,及时 调整实施策略。
与相关利益相关者保持沟通, 报告实施进展和成果,以获得 支持和持续改进的机会。
05
ITIL与其他标准和方 法论关系
ITIL与COBIT关系
01
02
03
04
COBIT(Control Objectives for Information and related Technology)是一个IT治理框 架,关注于企业战略目标与IT
改进与优化
根据服务级别报告,分析 服务不足之处,提出改进 措施并优化服务级别管理 流程。
IT服务财务管理流程
预算与成本计划
根据业务需求,制定IT服 务预算和成本计划,包括 硬件、软件、人力等成本 。
核算与审计
通过财务系统对IT服务实 际成本进行核算,定期进 行内部审计确保财务数据 的准确性。
分析与优化
ITIL起源于1980年代的英国政府计算机与电信中心(CCTA),现已发展 成为全球IT服务管理领域的标准。
ITIL经历了多个版本的演变,从最初的ITIL V1到目前的ITIL 4,不断适应 和引领IT服务管理的发展。
IT服务管理核心思想
以服务为中心

ITIL培训教程(全套课件232P)

ITIL培训教程(全套课件232P)
选取具有代表性的高效IT组织作 为案例,介绍其在服务转换和运
营方面的实践和经验。
案例分析
深入分析该案例的成功因素和实施 过程,提炼出可供借鉴的方法和策 略。
案例启示
结合案例分析结果,探讨高效IT组 织的服务转换和运营实践对其他组 织的启示和借鉴意义。
04
持续服务改进与评估
Chapter
CSI模型介绍及实施步骤
ITIL框架结构及组件关系
ITIL的框架结构
包括服务战略、服务设计、服务转换、服务运营和持续改进五个核心组件。
ITIL组件关系
五个核心组件相互关联,共同构成了一个完整的IT服务管理体系。其中,服务 战略是顶层设计,服务设计、服务转换和服务运营是实施层面,持续改进则贯 穿整个体系。
为什么需要学习和实施ITIL
服务目录管理与需求分析
01
02
03
服务目录管理
建立和维护服务目录,确 保所有服务都得到有效管 理和控制,提高服务质量 和效率。
需求分析
通过市场调研、客户反馈 等方式收集和分析客户需 求信息,为服务设计提供 输入。
服务级别协议
与客户签订服务级别协议, 明确双方的权利和义务, 确保服务质量和客户满意 度。
案例选择与背景介绍
选择具有代表性的优秀企业作为案例,简要介绍其背景和业务情况。
CSI实施过程与成果展示
详细描述该企业如何运用CSI模型进行持续改进,包括目标设定、计划制定、措施实施、效果 评估等环节,并展示其取得的显著成果。
经验总结与启示
总结该企业在CSI实践中的成功经验,提炼出对其他企业具有借鉴意义的启示和建议。
强化沟通与协作
定期召开跨部门沟通会议,分享经验、 解决问题,促进各部门之间的紧密合 作。

ITIL知识培训讲义

ITIL知识培训讲义

※ IT规模原来越大,IT管理越来越复杂; ※ IT维护人员的工作绩效难以考核; ※ 业务对IT越来越依赖,IT投资回报无法量化; ※ IT职能定位问题,上级对IT维护重视度问题; ※ 面对多个供应商,缺乏管理框架进行服务集成; ※ 缺乏系统的运维管理规范,以探索为主进行日常管理;
※ 安全问题突出,合规审计的要求越来越高; ※?
问题控制
主动预防
问题管理
错误控制
协助处理 重大事件
2020年3月3日星期二
38
各功能模块简介_核心模块
配置管理 (Configuration Management)
2020年3月3日星期二
39
各功能模块简介_核心模块
如果没有“配置管理”
问题发生时,怎样快速有效地 定位故障,找出解决方案?
怎样正确了解IT服务的成 本,从而在需要的时候进行 正确决策?
Version 3 — 2004~2007年
基于服务生命周期的ITIL v3整合了v1和v2的精华,并与时俱进地融入了IT服务管理领域当前 的最佳实践。5本生命周期图书形成了ITIL v3的核心,它主要强调ITIL最佳实践的执行支持,以及 在改善过程中需要注意的细节。
2020年3月3日星期二
3
ITIL是什么_SF-IT运维管理面临的挑战
变更
问题跟踪 趋势分析 问题回顾 深入挖掘 审计报告
变更 管理
变更评估 变更授权 变更跟踪
发布 管理
发布定时 访问权限 测试标准
发布
配置 管理
Байду номын сангаас
应用支持组
事件 2020年3月3日星期二
问题 已知错误
变更
CMDB
发布

ITIL培训内容

ITIL培训内容

1.什么是ITILITIL: Information Technology Infrastructure Library 信息技术基础设施库的简称。

ITIL为企业的IT服务管理(ITSM)实践提供了一个客观、严谨、可量化的标准和规范。

实施ITIL的最大意义在于把IT与业务紧密地结合起来了,从而让企业的IT投资回报最大化。

ITIL为企业的IT服务管理实践提供了一个客观、严谨、可量化的标准和规范,企业的IT部门和最终用户可以根据自己的能力和需求定义自己所要求的不同服务水平,参考ITIL来规划和制定其IT基础架构及服务管理,从而确保IT服务管理能为企业的业务运作提供更好的支持。

对企业来说,实施ITIL的最大意义在于把IT与业务紧密地结合起来了,从而让企业的IT投资回报最大化。

目前,ITIL已经在全球IT服务管理领域得到了广泛的认同和支持,四家最领先的IT管理解决方案提供商都宣布了相应的策略:IBM Tivoli推出了“业务影响管理”解决方案、HP公司倡导“IT服务管理”、CA公司强调“管理按需计算环境”、BMC公司则推出了“业务服务管理”理念。

实际上,无论各公司的理念和解决方案有多大差异,但目标都是一致的:把IT 与业务相结合,以业务为核心搭建和管理IT系统。

2.实施ITIL的益处a)对于企业实施ITIL,可以有助于最终进行完善的服务管理。

在ITIL的各个流程管理中,可以直接与各个业务部门相互作用,实现对业务功能及流程进行重新设计,降低成本、缩短周转时间、提高质量和增进客户满意度。

b)ITIL的实施,使信息系统部门能够对发生在财务、销售、市场、制造等业务上的流程改变,做出及时反应。

某些情况下,这还导致了一些相关组织机构的诞生,如变更委员会、紧急变更委员,内部的业务经理等,以增进业务与IT的整合。

c)实施ITIL,可以实现IT对业务支持的精确性和前瞻性。

市场竞争的加剧要求企业能够快速做出决策,并缩短反应时间。

ITIL内部培训资料

ITIL内部培训资料

通过建立和维ห้องสมุดไป่ตู้IT基础 架构的详细目录,确保 服务的配置与客户需求 一致。
02
ITIL服务级别管理
服务级别协议的定义和重要性
服务级别协议(SLA)
服务提供者与用户之间签署的正式协议,明确规定了服务等级、服务内容和 标准。
重要性
确保用户对服务质量和可用性的期望得到满足,是IT服务管理的重要基础。
服务级别的制定和考核标准
服务供应商的合同管理和关系管理
服务供应商的合同管理
合同是服务供应商和企业之间的协议,因此合同管理非常重要。企业需要制定清 晰的合同条款,包括服务范围、质量标准、价格、付款方式、保密协议等。
服务供应商的关系管理
企业需要与供应商建立良好的合作关系,以确保服务供应商能够提供高质量的服 务。为此,企业需要与供应商保持畅通的沟通,及时解决问题,同时还需要对供 应商进行定期的培训和提升。
06
ITIL服务流程管理
服务流程的定义和重要性
服务流程定义
服务流程是ITIL服务管理的核心,是指一系列结构化的、相互 关联、相互依赖的活动和任务,用于提供信息和资源,以满 足客户需求。
服务流程重要性
服务流程能够明确IT服务提供方和客户之间的角色和责任, 确保服务质量和客户满意度,同时降低服务成本和提高运营 效率。
服务质量管理的重要性
服务质量是客户对服务提供商的整体评价,直接影响到客户 的满意度和忠诚度。因此,服务质量是服务提供商生存和发 展的关键因素之一。
服务质量的衡量和评估
服务质量的衡量标准
通常包括可靠性、可用性、可维护性、效率、可定制性、可扩展性、安全性 、隐私保护等方面。
服务质量评估方法
服务质量评估通常采用问卷调查、客户反馈、第三方评估等方式进行。其中 ,问卷调查是最常用的方式之一,可以通过对客户进行定期的满意度调查, 了解客户对服务质量的评价和需求。

ITIL培训资料

ITIL培训资料
the IT organization
C tracing the underlying cause of incidents D providing information on products and
services
Incident Management
Incident Management
IT运营管理
IT战术管理(IT Service Delivery)
服务级别管理(Service Level Management) IT服务财务管理(IT Service Financial Management) IT服务连续性管理(IT Service Continuity Management) 能力管理(Capacity Management) 可用性管理(Availability Management)
练习一
Which ITIL process ensures that the IT Services are restored as soon as possible in the case of a malfunction?
A Change Management B Incident Management C Problem Management D Service Level Management
目标
To restore normal service operation as quickly as possible and minimize the adverse impact on business operations
基本概念
Incident
Any event which is not part of the standard operation of a service

51CTO下载-ITIL中级课程-风险管理71页资料

51CTO下载-ITIL中级课程-风险管理71页资料

Contents•CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION•CHAPTER 2: PRINCIPLES•CHAPTER 3: HOW RISKS ARE MANAGED•CHAPTER 4: MANAGING RISK AT THE STRATEGIC LEVEL•CHAPTER 5: MANAGING RISK AT THE PROGRAMME LEVEL•CHAPTER 6: MANAGING RISKS AT THE PROJECT LEVEL•CHAPTER 7: MANAGING RISK AT THE OPERATIONAL LEVEL•CHAPTER 8: TECHNIQUES•ANNEX A: EXAMPLES OF BENEFITS OF RISK MANAGEMENT•ANNEX B: HEALTHCHECK: HOW WELL IS YOUR ORGANISATION MANAGING RISK?•ANNEX C: CATEGORISING RISK•ANNEX D: SETTING A STANDARD FOR EVALUATION OF RISK•ANNEX E: PROCUREMENT, CONTRACTUAL AND LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS •ANNEX F: BUSINESS CONTINUITY MANAGEMENT•ANNEX G: MANAGING ORGANISATIONAL SAFETY AND SECURITY •ANNEX H: INFORMATION ON FURTHER TECHNIQUES TO SUPPORT MANAGEMENT OF RISK•ANNEX J: LESSONS LEARNED FROM OTHERS•ANNEX K: ASSESSING THE SUITABILITY OF TOOLS•ANNEX L: DOCUMENTATION OUTLINESCHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose of this guide1.2 What is management of risk?1.3 Why management of risk is important1.4 Who is involved in risk management1.5 How to use this guide1.6 The research for this guidance1.1 Purpose of this guideThis guide is intended to help organisations to put in place effective frameworks for taking informed decisions about risk. The guidance provides a route map for risk management, bringing together recommended approaches, checklists and pointers to more detailed sources of advice on tools and techniques. It expands on the OGC Guidelines for Managing Risk.The process of investment appraisal, in which assessments are made of costs, benefits and risks, is outside the scope of this guide. However, many of the principles and techniques described here can be used when developing the business case. The approach described in this guide complements OGC’s guidance on programme and project management and is continually updated to reflect current thinking. This approach, branded by OGC as M_o_R (Management of Risk), is supported by training and qualifications.1.2 What is management of risk?In this guide risk is defined as uncertainty of outcome, whether positive opportunity or negative threat. The term ‘management of risk’ incorporates all the activities required to identify and control the exposure to risk which may have an impact on the achievement of an organisation’s business objectives.Every organisation manages its risk, but not always in a way that is visible, repeatable and consistently applied to support decision making. The task of management of risk is to ensure that the organisation makes cost effective use of a risk process that has a series of well defined steps. The aim is to support better decision making through a good understanding of risks and their likely impact.There are two distinct phases: risk analysis and risk management. Risk analysis is concerned with gathering information about exposure to risk so that the organisation can make appropriate decisions and manage risk appropriately.Management of risk involves having processes in place to monitor risks, access to reliable and up to date information about risks, the right balance of control in place to deal with those risks, and decision making processes supported by a framework of risk analysis and evaluation.Management of risk covers a wide range of topics, including business continuity management, security, programme/project risk management and operational service management. These topics need to be placed in the context of an organisational framework for the management of risk. Some risk-related topics, such as security, are highly specialised and this guidance provides only an overview of such aspects.1.3 Why management of risk is importantA certain amount of risk taking is inevitable if your organisation is to achieve its objectives. Effective management of risk helps you to improve performance by contributing to:•increased certainty and fewer surprises•better service delivery•more effective management of change•more efficient use of resources•better management at all levels through improved decision making•reduced waste and fraud, and better value for money•innovation•management of contingent and maintenance activities.See Annex A for examples of the benefits of more effective management of risk.1.4 Who is involved in risk managementIn practice, everyone in an organisation is involved in risk management to some extent and should be aware of their responsibilities in identifying and managing risk. However, there are some aspects for which responsibility must be assigned to individuals. Without clear responsibility (and the authority to support that responsibility) some risks will be missed or overlooked.In the public sector, there are two major roles with a clear responsibility to ensure risks are managed (there will be equivalents to these roles in private sector organisations). These roles are:•an Accounting Officer (or equivalent senior manager), who is responsible for the organisation’s overall exposure to risk. Typically this person will be the Chief ExecutiveOfficer (CEO); the senior manager in the organisation. They may delegate some of theactions but cannot forgo the responsibility• a senior manager acting as a project ‘owner’, who is responsible for risk relating to a specific programme or project and for the realisation of associated business benefits.Audience for this guidanceBusiness managers, process owners, strategic planners, project and procurement teams, business continuity planners and security teams are the primary audience for this guidance, together with their service providers.It will also be of interest to auditors, with their responsibility for ensuring effective corporate governance.1.5 How to use this guideChapter 1 introduces the structure, process and culture of management of risk, explaining why organisations need to devise and implement effective strategies in order to maximise opportunities and minimise threats to the achievement of their business objectives. It identifies key personnel in the management of risk and the target audience for the guidance.Chapter 2 outlines the key principles underpinning management of risk: establishing a risk management framework, risk ownership, where risks occur, the decision making process, the importance of embedding the risk management culture, and allocating realistic budgets.Chapter 3 describes the main activities of management of risk. It contains practical examples, pointers and checklists for identifying and responding to risk, and monitoring risk responses.Chapters 4–7 explain when and how management of risk should be applied throughout an organisation, at the strategic, programme, project and operational levels.Chapter 8 discusses the range of techniques available to support the risk management process. The Annexes provide supporting detail:•A: Examples of benefits of risk management•B: Healthcheck: how well is your organisation managing risk?•C: Categorising risk•D: Setting a standard for evaluation of risk•E: Procurement, contractual and legal considerations•F: Business continuity management•G: Managing organisational safety and security•H: Information on further techniques to support management of risk•J: Lessons learned from others•K: Assessing the suitability of tools•L: Documentation outlines.1.6 The research for this guidancePrepared by OGC's IT Directorate, this guidance has been developed from extensive research into current thinking and practice in both the public and private sectors, drawing on published papersand interviews/studies with a number of leading organisations involved in major change and with specialist experts in the management of risk. It builds on the recent work of the National Audit Office (NAO), HM Treasury and Cabinet Office, together with OGC's published guidance on best practice in risk management; it also aims to address issues relating to corporate governance.This guidance responds to lessons learned and the experiences of real-world practical issues, as reported by consultants in OGC's Strategic Assignments Consultancy Service and their clients. In addition, it incorporates feedback from contributors to OGC workshops and other review channels. These contributions are acknowledged with thanks.CHAPTER 2: PRINCIPLES2.1 Critical success factors for management of risk2.2 What is at risk and why?2.3 Decisions about risk2.4 Where risks occur2.5 A framework for managing risk2.6 Risk ownership2.7 Embedding the risk management culture2.8 BudgetsThis chapter outlines the key principles underpinning the effective management of risk.2.1 Critical success factors for management of riskThe key elements that need to be in place if risk management is to be effective, and innovation encouraged, include:•clearly identified senior management to support, own and lead on risk management•risk management policies and the benefits of effective management clearly communicated to all staff•existence and adoption of a framework for management of risk that is transparent and repeatable•existence of an organisational culture which supports well thought-through risk taking and innovation•management of risk fully embedded in management processes and consistently applied •management of risk closely linked to achievement of objectives•risks associated with working with other organisations explicitly assessed and managed •risks actively monitor ed and regularly reviewed on a constructive ‘no-blame’ basis.Joint working and partnerships often involve more complex types of risk that can adversely affect the delivery of business services. For example, if part of the service provided by one organisation is delayed or of poor quality, the success of the whole collaboration can be put at risk. You must make sure that your organisation knows about the risk management approaches of your partners. Sharing information about risk management means that risks in collaborative programmes can be identified and managed in a proactive way.Public sector concernsThe Modernising Government initiative seeks to encourage the public sector to adopt well managed risk taking where it is likely to lead to sustainable improvements in service delivery. More effective risk management will improve the public sector’s ability to undertake the increasingly complex and cross-cutting projects that are demanded by the Modernisation agenda. Public sector organisations need to have in place the skills, management structures and organisational structures to take advantage of potential opportunities to perform better and to reduce the possibility of failure.The key areas that have to be addressed are:•the requirements of corporate governance – including more focused and open ways of managing risk (see the section on corporate governance below)•the need for a ‘risk owner’ at senior level, for an activity (strategy, programme or project).He or she is supported by risk owners at everyday working levels as appropriate for theactivity and risk exposure•the need for improved reporting and upward referral of major problems•opportunities and the potential resolution approaches•the need for shared understanding of risk management at all levels in the organisation and with partners, combined with consistent treatment of risk•managing project risk in the wider context of programmes of change and the business.The NAO study of risk management (Supporting Innovation: Managing Risk in Government Departments), the Cabinet Office’s report Successful IT : Modernising Government in Action, and HM Treasury’s Orange Book provide valuable messages that are incorporated in this guidance.Meeting the needs of corporate governanceCorporate governance is the ongoing activity of maintaining a sound system of internal control to safeguard shareholders’ investment and the company’s assets.The Turnbull Report states that:‘a company’s objectives, its internal organisation and the environment which it operate s in are continually evolving and as a result the risks it faces are continually changing. A sound system of control therefore depends on a thorough and regular evaluation of the nature and extent of the risks to which the company is exposed. Since profits [or business results] are in part the reward for successful risk taking in business, the purpose of internal control is to help manage and control risk rather than eliminate it.’Corporate governance frameworks must ensure that management is held accountable for a corporation’s performance and that owners are able to monitor and intervene in the operations of management.These principles apply equally to the public and private sectors. Whereas corporations focus mainly on shareholder returns and the prese rvation of shareholders’ value, the public sector’s role is to implement programmes cost effectively in accordance with Government legislation and policies.The British Standards Institute (BSI) has produced a guidance note on Corporate Governance – PD 6668:2000– relating to the management of strategic risks. It outlines a management framework for identifying the threats, determining the risks, implementation and maintaining control measures and finally reporting annually on the organisation’s commitment t o this process.Policy on management of risk to support corporate governanceTo support corporate governance, there needs to be a risk management policy in place. This policy should:•be appropriate for the size and nature of your organisation, its business and operating environment•be clear about the roles (and, if possible, individuals) that are responsible for risk•be clear about escalation criteria in relation to risk management (i.e., when to refer decision making upwards)•ensure that processes, and the culture/infrastructure, to identify and manage risk are put in place; these processes must be repeatable•set up the mechanism for monitoring the success of the application of the policy (including reports to management, at least annually)•ensure that internal control mechanisms are in place for independent assessment that the policy is implemented (and checked).2.2 What is at risk and why?There are many diverse factors that could place an organisation at risk. Figure 1 outlines the main reasons why there should be a robust risk management process in place.Your organisation will have a set of key objectives. Risks should be identified against these objectives, ideally not more than 10-15 at high level. These high-level risks will then be considered and managed by senior management, increasing the organisation’s ability to meet its objectives. Annex B provides a ‘healthcheck’ to see if an organisation is adopting an effective framework for management of risk and risk management process.Annex C expands on possible categories of risk.Relating management of risk to safety, security and businesscontinuityManagement of risk should be carried out in the wider context of safety concerns, security and business continuity.•Health and safety policy and practice is concerned with ensuring that the workplace is a safe environment.•Security is concerned with protecting the organisation’s assets, including information, buildings and so on.•Business continuity is concerned with ensuring that the organisation could continue to operate in the event of a disaster, such as loss of a service, flood or fire damage.Figure 1: Reasons for a risk management processReducing risk in large scale projectsExperience has shown that programmes and projects attempting a large scale, comprehensive business change are less likely to be successful than those taking a less ambitious, step-by-step approach. Although the latter increases management activity, with each of the elements needing to be controlled and coordinated, the advantages are that activities are:•easier to manage•simpler to implement within the business environment•easier to accept formally as, typically, the specification is easier to document and thus simpler to verify that it has been met•able to offer more options for contingency•more likely to accommodate fast moving changes in technology, or in the political or financial environment•able to offer more decision points, allowing greater control of the project.2.3 Decisions about riskDecisions about risk need to be balanced so that the potential benefits are worth more to the organisation than it costs to address the risk.For example, innovation is inherently risky but could achieve major benefits in improving services. The ability of the organisation to limit its exposure to risk will also be of relevance.You should aim to make an accurate assessment of the risks in a given situation and analyse the potential benefits. The risks and opportunities presented by each course of action should be defined in order to identify appropriate response.Scope of decisionsDecisions about risk will vary depending on whether the risk relates to long, medium or short-term goals.Strategic decisions are primarily concerned with long-term goals; these set the context for decisions at other levels of the organisation. The risks associated with strategic decisions may not become apparent until well into the future. Thus it is essential to review these decisions, and associated risks, on a regular basis.Medium-term goals are usually addressed through programmes and projects to bring about business change. Decisions relating to medium-term goals are narrower in scope than strategic ones, particularly in terms of timeframe and financial responsibilities.At the operational level the emphasis is on short-term goals to ensure ongoing continuity of business services; however, decisions about risk at this level must also support the achievement of long- and medium-term goals. These organisational levels are discussed in more detail in Chapters 4, 5, 6 and 7.There are also considerations about what can realistically be achieved in one change initiative. Delivery of each of the components of a change initiative (whether a programme, project or stage) must provide some direct benefit to the organisation as a result of its delivery. This could be by delivering:• a major component to support/build towards the intended outcome – for example, providing a telephone helpline first as part of a new information service and then addingwebsite services to expand the facilities available to the public•the product to part of the end user community and then ‘rolling out’ to the rest of that community – for example, introducing a new information service in the North-East andgradually making it available nationwide.This is a modular and/or incremental approach that is further discussed in Chapters 5 and 6 and in Annex E.When managing any project it is essential to ensure major decisions are made appropriately. A project will support some business change and so require something to be produced and then put into use.Figure 2 shows the main stages of the procurement process and the decisions to be taken about breaking projects down into manageable ‘packages’. For major projects, there will be formal Gateway Reviews in addition to the normal project decision points; these reviews establish whether the project is ready to proceed to the next stage.Figure 2: Main stages of the procurement process2.4 Where risks occurThe risk management process should be most rigorously applied where critical decisions are being made.Figure 3 shows where risk can occur in an organisation. For convenience, these levels are described as:•strategic or corporate•programme•project•operational.In practice, the levels overlap; however, it is helpful to clarify the occurrence of risks at these levels to inform the kind of decisions you are likely to make.Figure 3: Organisational management hierarchyIt is important to note that a risk may materialise initially at one level but subsequently have a major impact at a different level. A recent example is a High Street bank facing technical faults at the operational level; ultimately customers’ confidence in the bank’s online service became a strategic risk. This highlights the need for relevant information about risks to be shared throughout the organisation.Table 1 shows examples of typical risks occurring at each organisational level.Table 1: Risk related to organisational levelsLevel Examples of typical risks considered at this levelStrategic/corporate Commercial, financial, political, environmental, directional, cultural, acquisition and quality risks. There is a focus on business survival, continuity and growthfor the future.When programme, project and operational risks exceed setcriteria –e.g. not acceptable, outside agreed limits, could affect strategicobjectives, information needs to be escalated to this level so that appropriatedecisions can be taken.Programme Procurement/acquisition, funding, organisational, projects, security, safety, quality and business continuity risks.When project and operational risks exceedset criteria – e.g. not acceptable, outside agreed limits, could affect programmeobjectives, information needs to be escalated to this level so that appropriatedecisions can be taken.Project Personal, technical, cost, schedule, resource, operational support, quality and provider failure.Operational issues/risks should be considered at this level asthey affect the project and how it needs to be run. Information on strategic andprogramme related risks should be communicated to this level where they couldaffect project objectives. Project managers should communicate information onrisks to other projects and operations as appropriate.Operations Personal, technical, cost, schedule, resource, operational support, quality, provider failure, environmental and infrastructure failure.All the higher levelshave input to this level; specific concerns include business continuitymanagement/contingency planning, support for business processes andcustomer relations.Additional factorsAdditional factors may increase the complexity of assessing overall exposure to risk. These include:•interdependencies, or links between projects and/or related issues, where the impact of one or more risks could affect others, possibly creating a ‘domino’ effect. You should ensure that any known interdependencies are identified and assessed so that appropriate actioncan be planned•the relationship between business benefits and risks to delivery, where achievement of benefits is dependent on successful delivery of a project. You should continually checkwhether changing plans affect the achievement of benefits.2.5 A framework for managing riskA framework for management of risk sets the context in which risks will be identified, analysed, controlled, monitored and reviewed. It must be consistent with processes that are embedded in everyday management and operational practices. It addresses:•how risks are identified•how information about their probability and potential impact is obtained•how risks are quantified•how options to deal with them are identified•how decisions on risk management are made, such as further risk reduction•how these decisions are implemented•how actions are evaluated for their effectiveness•how appropriate communication mechanisms are set up and supported•how stakeholders are engaged throughout the process.(See Chapter 3 for more information about the management of risk framework and supporting processes.)2.6 Risk ownershipFor the organisation, ownership of the risk management framework lies with the Accounting Officer (or equivalent senior manager at Board level). Individual senior managers own the programme or project and are responsible for the management of the overall risk of that activity. However, these roles do not own all the individual risks. Risk ownership must be clearly defined, documented and agreed with the individual owners at all levels, so that they understand their various roles, responsibilities and ultimate accountability with regard to the management of risk. The owner of a risk may not be the person tasked with the assessment or management of the risk, but he or she is responsible for ensuring the management of risk process is applied – there may be separate owners to actually deal with the risks.It is important to identify who owns:•the setting policy and the organisation’s willingness to take risk•the management of risk process at the different levels – that is, strategic, programme, project, operational levels•different elements of the management of risk process, such as identifying threats, through to producing risk responses and reporting on decisions•implementation of the actual measures taken in response to the risks•interdependent risks that cross organisational boundaries, whether they are business processes, operational services or projects.For example, for a senior manager with responsibility for a project, ownership of risk could be defined as follows:Senior managers responsible for projects must assure themselves that a number of types of risk are being tracked and dealt with as effectively as possible. The mechanisms in place for monitoring and reporting risk will vary according to the size and complexity of the project or programme, ranging from the use of a simple risk register to the appointment of a risk manager reporting directly to the senior manager. Clearly, the degree of delegation adopted by the senior manager will vary, but he or she must be sure that the critical issues are being addressed; for example, through chairing the project board or by developing strong mechanisms for reporting problems.Checklist: ownership of risk and the process•Have owners been allocated for all the various parts of the complete management of risk process?•Are the various roles and responsibilities associated with ownership well defined?•Do the individuals who have been allocated ownership actually have the authority and capability to fulfil their responsibilities? For example, suppliers may be tasked with riskownership.•Have the various roles and responsibilities been communicated and understood?•Are the nominated owners appropriate and aware of their nomination?•Is ownership reassessed on a periodic basis, or in the event of a change in the situation;and if necessary, can it be quickly and effectively reallocated?•Do all risks, and where appropriate their mitigation actions, have clearly identified owners?Are these owners appropriate?2.7 Embedding the risk management cultureIdentifying appropriate policies, standards and practices is the first stage of creating a risk management culture. Once these are in place they need to be totally embedded in individuals through the enactment of their roles and associated responsibilities.Awareness of and responsibility for risk issues must be linked explicitly to key objectives, in order to build a sustainable risk management culture. There should be delegated responsibility for risks at every level of objectives in the organisation. This is the major support to embedding risk management into the organisation and its culture, with risk management seen as an intrinsic part of the way an organisation works. As the people in an organisation change, it is essential to ensure a continuing understanding of roles and responsibilities related to managing risk.The risk environment is constantly changing too. Your organisation’s priorities and the relative importance of risks will shift and change. Assumptions about risk have to be regularly revisited and reconsidered, perhaps by annual review of the risks associated with each of the key organisational objectives.Establishing appropriate competencies and behavioursAn important aspect of setting up a risk culture is to ensure it is relevant to the organisation. Risk management is a major facet of effective corporate governance.Those responsible for corporate governance need to have knowledge and understanding of:。

中级信息系统监理师之软件项目风险管理

中级信息系统监理师之软件项目风险管理

中级信息系统监理师之软件项目风险管理在软件项目管理中,风险管理是一个至关重要的步骤。

中级信息系统监理师需要具备一定的风险管理知识和技巧,以确保软件项目顺利进行并达到预期的目标。

本文将介绍中级信息系统监理师在软件项目风险管理方面的职责和方法。

风险管理是指通过识别、评估和应对潜在的风险,以减少和控制不确定性对项目目标的影响。

中级信息系统监理师在软件项目的不同阶段都需要参与风险管理工作。

首先,在项目启动阶段,中级信息系统监理师需要与项目团队一起评估项目的可行性和风险情况。

其次,在项目规划阶段,中级信息系统监理师需要与项目经理一起制定风险管理计划,并确定风险评估的方法和工具。

最后,在项目执行和控制阶段,中级信息系统监理师需要进行风险监控和风险应对工作。

在软件项目风险管理中,中级信息系统监理师的职责包括但不限于以下几个方面:一、风险识别和评估中级信息系统监理师需要与项目团队一起识别和分类软件项目可能面临的风险。

通过对项目需求、技术难题、市场变化等进行综合分析,中级信息系统监理师可以帮助项目团队确定潜在的风险。

然后,中级信息系统监理师需要对这些潜在风险进行评估,确定其发生概率和影响程度,以便及时采取相应的风险应对措施。

二、风险应对计划制定基于风险评估结果,中级信息系统监理师需要与项目经理一起制定风险应对计划。

这个计划应该包括风险的优先级和相应的应对策略。

优先级高的风险需要更加紧急和严密的管理,而优先级低的风险则可以适当降低监控力度。

中级信息系统监理师需要根据项目团队的建议和专业知识,为每个风险确定相应的应对策略,比如避免、转移、减轻或接受。

三、风险监控和控制中级信息系统监理师需要在整个软件项目的生命周期中进行风险的持续监控和控制。

通过制定风险指标和监控计划,中级信息系统监理师可以及时发现风险的变化和演化趋势。

当风险状态超出预期时,中级信息系统监理师需要及时采取相应的控制措施,以减轻或避免风险对项目目标的影响。

51CTO下载-ITIL中级课程-风险管理71页资料之欧阳家百创编

51CTO下载-ITIL中级课程-风险管理71页资料之欧阳家百创编

Contents欧阳家百(2021.03.07)CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION1.1 Purpose of this guideThis guide is intended to help organisations to put in place effective frameworks for taking informed decisions about risk. The guidance provides a route map for , bringing together recommended approaches, checklists and pointers to more detailed sources of advice on tools and techniques. It expands on the Guidelines for Managing Risk.The process of investment appraisal, in which assessments are made of costs, and risks, is outside the scope of this guide. However, many of the principles and techniques described here can be used when developing the . The approach described in this guide complements ’s guidance on programme and management and is continually updated to reflect current thinking. This approach, branded by as (), is supported by training and qualifications.1.2 What is management of risk?In this guide risk is defined as uncertainty of outcome, whether positive or negative . The term ‘’ incorporates all the a ctivities required to identify and control the exposure to risk which may have an impact on the achievement of an organisation’s business objectives. Every organisation manages its risk, but not always in a way that is visible, repeatable and consistently applied to support decision making. The task of is to ensure that the organisation makes cost effective use of a that has a series of well defined steps. The aim is to support better decision making through a good understanding of risks and their likely impact.There are two distinct phases: and . Risk analysis is concerned with gathering information about exposure to risk so that the organisation can make appropriate decisions and manage risk appropriately.involves having processes in place to monitor risks, access to reliable and up to date information about risks, the right balance of control in place to deal with those risks, and decision making processes supported by a framework of and evaluation.covers a wide range of topics, including business continuity management, security, / management and operational servicemanagement. These topics need to be placed in the context of an organisational framework for the . Some risk-related topics, such as security, are highly specialised and this guidance provides only an overview of such aspects.1.3 Why management of risk is importantA certain amount of risk taking is inevitable if your organisation is to achieve its objectives. Effective helps you to improve performance by contributing to:•increased certainty and fewer surprises•better service delivery•more effective management of change•more efficient use of resources•better management at all levels through improved decision making•reduced waste and fraud, and better value for money•innovation•management of contingent and maintenance activities.See for examples of the of more effective .1.4 Who is involved in risk managementIn practice, everyone in an organisation is involved in risk management to some extent and should be aware of their responsibilities in identifying and managing risk. However, there are some aspects for which responsibility must be assigned to individuals. Without clear responsibility (and the authority to support that responsibility) some risks will be missed or overlooked.In the public sector, there are two major roles with a clear responsibility to ensure risks are managed (there will be equivalents to these roles in private sector organisations). These roles are:•an Accounting Officer (or equivalent senior manager), who is responsible for the organisation’s overall exposure to risk.Typically this person will be the Chief Executive Officer(CEO); the senior manager in the organisation. They maydelegate some of the actions but cannot forgo the responsibility • a senior m anager acting as a ‘owner’, who is responsible for risk relating to a specific or and for the realisation ofassociated business .Audience for this guidanceBusiness managers, process owners, strategic planners, and teams, business continuity planners and security teams are the primary audience for this guidance, together with their service providers.It will also be of interest to auditors, with their responsibility for ensuring effective .1.5 How to use this guideChapter 1 introduces the structure, process and culture of , explaining why organisations need to devise and implement effective strategies in order to maximise and minimise to the achievement of their business objectives. It identifies key personnel in the and the target audience for the guidance.outlines the key principles underpinning : establishing a framework, risk ownership, where risks occur, the decision making process, the importance of embedding the risk management culture, and allocating realistic budgets.describes the main activities of . It contains practical examples, pointers and checklists for identifying and responding to risk, and monitoring .–7 explain when and how should be applied throughout an organisation, at the strategic, , and operational levels.discusses the range of techniques available to support the process. The Annexes provide supporting detail:•: Examples of of•: Healthcheck: how well is your organisation managing risk?•: Categorising risk•: Setting a standard for evaluation of risk•: , contractual and legal considerations•:•: Managing organisational safety and security•: Information on further techniques to support•: Lessons learned from others•: Assessing the suitability of tools•: Documentation outlines.1.6 The research for this guidancePrepared by OGC's Directorate, this guidance has been developed from extensive research into current thinking and practice in both the public and private sectors, drawing on published papers and interviews/studies with a number of leading organisations involved in major change and with specialist experts in the . It builds on the recent work of the National Audit Office (), HM Treasury and Cabinet Office, together with OGC's published guidance on best practice in ; it also aims to address issues relating to .This guidance responds to lessons learned and the experiences of real-world practical issues, as reported by consultants in 's Strategic Assignments Consultancy Service and their clients. In addition, it incorporates feedback from contributors to workshops and other review channels. These contributions are acknowledged with thanks.CHAPTER 2: PRINCIPLESThis chapter outlines the key principles underpinning the effective .2.1 Critical success factors for management of riskThe key elements that need to be in place if is to be effective, and innovation encouraged, include:•clearly identified senior management to support, own and lead on• policies and the of effective management clearlycommunicated to all staff•existence and adoption of a framework for that is transparent and repeatable•existence of an organisational culture which supports well thought-through risk taking and innovation• fully embedded in management processes and consistently applied• closely linked to achievement of objectives•risks associated with working with other organisations explicitly assessed and managed•risks actively monitored and regularly reviewed on a constructive ‘no-blame’ basis.Joint working and partnerships often involve more complex types of risk that can adversely affect the delivery of business services. For example, if part of the service provided by one organisation is delayed or of poor quality, the success of the whole collaboration can be put at risk. You must make sure that your organisation knows about the approaches of your partners. Sharing information about risk management means that risks in collaborative can be identified and managed in a proactive way.Public sector concernsThe Modernising Government initiative seeks to encourage the public sector to adopt well managed risk taking where it is likely to lead to sustainable improvements in service delivery. More effective will improve the public sector’s ability to undertake the increasingly complex and cross-cutting that are demanded by the Modernisation agenda. Public sector organisations need to have in place the skills, management structures and organisational structures to takeadvantage of potential to perform better and to reduce the possibility of failure.The key areas that have to be addressed are:•the requirements of – including more focused and open ways of managing risk (see the section on below)•the need for a ‘’ at senior level, for an activity (strategy, or ).He or she is supported by at everyday working levels asappropriate for the activity and risk exposure•the need for improved reporting and upward referral of major problems• and the potential resolution approaches•the need for shared understanding of at all levels in the organisation and with partners, combined with consistenttreatment of risk•managing in the wider context of of change and the business.The study of (Supporting Innovation: Managing Risk in Government Departments), the Cabinet Office’s report Successful : Modernising Government in Action, and HM Treasury’s Orange Book provide valuable messages that are incorporated in this guidance.Meeting the needs of corporate governanceCorporate governance is the ongoing activity of maintaining a sound system of internal control to safeguard shareh olders’ investment and the company’s .The states that:‘a company’s objectives, its internal organisation and the environment which it operates in are continually evolving and as a result the risks it faces are continually changing. A sound system of control therefore depends on a thorough and regular evaluation of the nature and extent of the risks to which the company is exposed. Since profits [or business results] are in part the reward for successful risk taking in business, the purpose of internal control is to help manage and control risk rather than eliminate it.’frameworks must ensure that management is held accountable for a corporation’s performance and that owners are able to monitor and intervene in the operations of management.These principles apply equally to the public and private sectors. Whereas corporations focus mainly on shareholder returns and the preservation of shareholders’ value, the public sector’s role is to implement cost effectively in accordance with Government legislation and policies.The British Standards Institute () has produced a guidance note on Corporate Governance – PD 6668:2000– relating to the management of . It outlines a management framework for identifying the , determining the risks, implementation and maintaining control measures and finally reporting annually on the organisation’s commitment to this process.Policy on management of risk to support corporate governance To support , there needs to be a policy in place. This policy should:•be appropriate for the size and nature of your organisation, its business and operating environment•be clear about the roles (and, if possible, individuals) that are responsible for risk•be clear about escalation criteria in relation to (i.e., when to refer decision making upwards)•ensure that processes, and the culture/infrastructure, to identify and manage risk are put in place; these processes must berepeatable•set up the mechanism for monitoring the success of the application of the policy (including reports to management, atleast annually)•ensure that internal control mechanisms are in place for independent assessment that the policy is implemented (andchecked).2.2 What is at risk and why?There are many diverse factors that could place an organisation at risk. outlines the main reasons why there should be a robust process in place.Your organisation will have a set of key objectives. Risks should be identified against these objectives, ideally not more than 10-15 at high level. These high-level risks will then be considered and managed by senior management, increasing the organisation’s ability to meet its objectives. provides a ‘healthcheck’ to see if an organisation is adopting an effective framework for and risk management process.expands on possible categories of risk.Relating management of risk to safety, security and business continuityshould be carried out in the wider context of safety concerns, security and business continuity.•Health and safety policy and practice is concerned with ensuring that the workplace is a safe environment.•Security is concerned with protecting the organisation’s , including information, buildings and so on.•Business continuity is concerned with ensuring that the organisation could continue to operate in the event of a disaster,such as loss of a service, flood or fire damage.Figure 1: Reasons for a processReducing risk in large scale projectsExperience has shown that and attempting a large scale, comprehensive business change are less likely to be successful than those taking a less ambitious, step-by-step approach. Although the latter increases management activity, with each of the elements needing to be controlled and coordinated, the advantages are that activities are:•easier to manage•simpler to implement within the business environment•easier to accept formally as, typically, the specification is easier to document and thus simpler to verify that it has been met•able to offer more options for contingency•more likely to accommodate fast moving changes in technology, or in the political or financial environment•able to offer more decision points, allowing greater control of the .2.3 Decisions about riskDecisions about risk need to be balanced so that the potential are worth more to the organisation than it costs to address the risk.For example, innovation is inherently risky but could achieve major in improving services. The ability of the organisation to limit its exposure to risk will also be of relevance.You should aim to make an accurate assessment of the risks in a given situation and analyse the potential . The risks and presented by each course of action should be defined in order to identify appropriate response.Scope of decisionsDecisions about risk will vary depending on whether the risk relatesto long, medium or short-term goals.Strategic decisions are primarily concerned with long-term goals; these set the context for decisions at other levels of the organisation. The risks associated with strategic decisions may not become apparent until well into the future. Thus it is essential to review these decisions, and associated risks, on a regular basis.Medium-term goals are usually addressed through and to bring about business change. Decisions relating to medium-term goals are narrower in scope than strategic ones, particularly in terms of timeframe and financial responsibilities.At the operational level the emphasis is on short-term goals to ensure ongoing continuity of business services; however, decisions aboutrisk at this level must also support the achievement of long- and medium-term goals. These organisational levels are discussed in more detail in Chapters , , and .There are also considerations about what can realistically be achieved in one change initiative. Delivery of each of the of a change initiative (whether a , or stage) must provide some direct benefit to the organisation as a result of its delivery. This could be by delivering:• a major to support/build towards the intended outcome – forexample, providing a telephone helpline first as part of a newinformation service and then adding website services to expand the facilities available to the public•the to part of the end user community and then ‘rolling out’ to the rest of that community – for example, introducing a newinformation service in the North-East and gradually making itavailable nationwide.This is a modular and/or incremental approach that is further discussed in Chapters and and in .When managing any it is essential to ensure major decisions are made appropriately. A will support some business change and so require something to be produced and then put into use.shows the main stages of the process and the decisions to be taken about breaking projects down into manageable ‘packages’. For major projects, there will be formal in addition to the normal decision points; these reviews establish whether the is ready to proceed to the next stage.Figure 2: Main stages of the process2.4 Where risks occurThe process should be most rigorously applied where critical decisions are being made.shows where risk can occur in an organisation. For convenience, these levels are described as:•strategic or corporate•operational.In practice, the levels overlap; however, it is helpful to clarify the occurrence of risks at these levels to inform the kind of decisions you are likely to make.Figure 3: Organisational management hierarchyIt is important to note that a risk may materialise initially at one level but subsequently have a major impact at a different level. A recent example is a High Street bank facing technical faults at the operational level; ultimately customers’ confidence in the bank’s online service became a . This highlights the need for relevant information about risks to be shared throughout the organisation.shows examples of typical risks occurring at each organisational level.Table 1: related to organisational levelsLevel Examples of typical risks considered at this levelStrategic/corporate Commercial, financial, political, environmental, directional, cultural, acquisition and quality risks. There is a focus on business survival, continuityand growth for the future.When , and exceed set criteria –e.g. notacceptable, outside agreed limits, could affect strategic objectives,information needs to be escalated to this level so that appropriate decisionscan be taken./acquisition, funding, organisational, , security, safety, quality and businesscontinuity risks.When and exceed set criteria – e.g. not acceptable, outsideagreed limits, could affect objectives, information needs to be escalated tothis level so that appropriate decisions can be taken.Personal, technical, cost, schedule, resource, operational support, qualityand provider failure.Operational issues/risks should be considered at thislevel as they affect the and how it needs to be run. Information on strategicand related risks should be communicated to this level where they couldaffect objectives. Project managers should communicate information onrisks to other projects and operations as appropriate.Operations Personal, technical, cost, schedule, resource, operational support, quality, provider failure, environmental and infrastructure failure.All the higher levelshave input to this level; specific concerns include /, support for businessprocesses and customer relations.Additional factorsAdditional factors may increase the complexity of assessing overall exposure to risk. These include:•interdependencies, or links between and/or related issues, where the impact of one or more risks could affect others,possibly creating a ‘domino’ effect. You should ensure that any known interdependencies are identified and assessed so thatappropriate action can be planned•the relationship between business and risks to delivery, where achievement of is dependent on successful delivery of a . Youshould continually check whether changing plans affect theachievement of .2.5 A framework for managing riskA framework for sets the context in which risks will be identified, analysed, controlled, monitored and reviewed. It must be consistent with processes that are embedded in everyday management and operational practices. It addresses:•how risks are identified•how information about their probability and potential impact is obtained•how risks are quantified•how options to deal with them are identified•how decisions on are made, such as further risk reduction•how these decisions are implemented•how actions are evaluated for their effectiveness•how appropriate communication mechanisms are set up and supported•how are engaged throughout the process.(See for more information about the and supporting processes.)2.6 Risk ownershipFor the organisation, ownership of the framework lies with the Accounting Officer (or equivalent senior manager at Board level). Individual senior managers own the or and are responsible for the management of the overall risk of that activity. However, these roles do not own all the individual risks. Risk ownership must be clearly defined, documented and agreed with the individual owners at all levels, so that they understand their various roles, responsibilities andultimate accountability with regard to the . The owner of a risk may not be the person tasked with the assessment or management of the risk, but he or she is responsible for ensuring the process is applied –there may be separate owners to actually deal with the risks.It is important to identify who owns:•the setting policy and the organisation’s willingness to take risk •the process at the different levels – that is, strategic, , , operational levels•different elements of the process, such as identifying , through to producing and reporting on decisions•implementation of the actual measures taken in response to the risks•interdependent risks that cross organisational boundaries, whether they are business processes, operational services or .For example, for a senior manager with responsibility for a , ownership of risk could be defined as follows:Senior managers responsible for projects must assure themselves that a number of types of risk are being tracked and dealt with as effectively as possible. The mechanisms in place for monitoring and reporting risk will vary according to the size and complexity of the or , ranging from the use of a simple to the appointment of a risk manager reporting directly to the senior manager. Clearly, the degree of delegation adopted by the senior manager will vary, but he or she must be sure that the critical issues are being addressed; for example, through chairing the board or by developing strong mechanisms for reporting problems.Checklist: ownership of risk and the process•Have owners been allocated for all the various parts of the complete process?•Are the various roles and responsibilities associated with ownership well defined?•Do the individuals who have been allocated ownership actually have the authority and capability to fulfil their responsibilities?For example, suppliers may be tasked with risk ownership.•Have the various roles and responsibilities been communicated and understood?•Are the nominated owners appropriate and aware of their nomination?•Is ownership reassessed on a periodic basis, or in the event of a change in the situation; and if necessary, can it be quickly andeffectively reallocated?•Do all risks, and where appropriate their mitigation actions, have clearly identified owners? Are these owners appropriate?2.7 Embedding the risk management cultureIdentifying appropriate policies, standards and practices is the first stage of creating a risk management culture. Once these are in place they need to be totally embedded in individuals through the enactment of their roles and associated responsibilities.Awareness of and responsibility for risk issues must be linked explicitly to key objectives, in order to build a sustainable culture. There should be delegated responsibility for risks at every level of objectives in the organisation. This is the major support to embedding risk management into the organisation and its culture, with seen as an intrinsic part of the way an organisation works. As the people in an organisation change, it is essential to ensure a continuing understanding of roles and responsibilities related to managing risk. The risk environm ent is constantly changing too. Your organisation’s priorities and the relative importance of risks will shift and change. Assumptions about risk have to be regularly revisited and reconsidered, perhaps by annual review of the risks associated with each of the key organisational objectives.Establishing appropriate competencies and behavioursAn important aspect of setting up a risk culture is to ensure it is relevant to the organisation. is a major facet of effective .Those responsible for need to have knowledge and understanding of:•strategic planning•legal requirements•agreements and contracts•communication techniques and information management•staff matters, including how staff can be motivated and involved•education and continual professional development•continuous improvement and/or analytical techniques•how the organisation is monitored and evaluated•resource management, including equal opportunities and delegation.Although managers tend to work in specific areas of the organisation, either based on technical specialism or business function, they all need to identify and manage risk. To do this they need to be able to:•ensure that the situation is properly scoped•identify and assess the risk•create valid options for reducing risk to an acceptable level•collect appropriate and meaningful information to assess risk and the options, and then to monitor the risk•use sound reasoning when making a trade-off between the costs and of managing a risk•make a clear commitment to a particular course of action.For planning, the major areas to consider are:•deciding on the likelihood of a specific event occurring•prioritising areas to address/actions to instigate. This requires understanding the implications of the options available•assigning ownership of risks and actions, containment or contingent, to be deployed in a timely manner•ensuring that continuity plans can cope with the current and potential future situation, not with how things were in therecent past.Visible information on riskInformation on risk and its management needs to reach the people who have to take action or make decisions. This information will flow downwards and upwards between the organisational levels. There will also be sideways flows across each level, between or . The vertical flows are the most important as they reflect levels of responsibility for decision making.For example, a decision may be made at the strategic level that affects the progress of current . Conversely, the collective risks relating to the progress of current may have a strategic impact.These examples illustrate why risks should be identified and handled at each level before they are passed up or down to the next level. Good communication mechanisms are essential to avoid the following problems:•inadequate communication from lower levels, where people have ‘hands on’ knowledge, to the level where decisions aremade, leads to unrealistic expectations from senior management•inadequate communication from the top down can mean that are no longer supporting the business direction.CommunicationsTo address these problems you will need to ensure that appropriate communication mechanisms exist and are adopted. Your organisation should:•ensure there is sufficient communication to key , whether internal or external, to support their needs•ensure that people are aware, informed and understand their part in managing risk•consider whether there is a need to improve internalcommunications•consider training needs and how these can be met adequately •ensure people have the right information at the right time to fulfil their responsibilities (and how to recognise if this does not happen).。

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

Contents∙CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION∙CHAPTER 2: PRINCIPLES∙CHAPTER 3: HOW RISKS ARE MANAGED∙CHAPTER 4: MANAGING RISK AT THE STRATEGIC LEVEL∙CHAPTER 5: MANAGING RISK AT THE PROGRAMME LEVEL∙CHAPTER 6: MANAGING RISKS AT THE PROJECT LEVEL∙CHAPTER 7: MANAGING RISK AT THE OPERATIONAL LEVEL∙CHAPTER 8: TECHNIQUES∙ANNEX A: EXAMPLES OF BENEFITS OF RISK MANAGEMENT∙ANNEX B: HEALTHCHECK: HOW WELL IS YOUR ORGANISATION MANAGING RISK?∙ANNEX C: CATEGORISING RISK∙ANNEX D: SETTING A STANDARD FOR EVALUATION OF RISK∙ANNEX E: PROCUREMENT, CONTRACTUAL AND LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS∙ANNEX F: BUSINESS CONTINUITY MANAGEMENT∙ANNEX G: MANAGING ORGANISATIONAL SAFETY AND SECURITY∙ANNEX H: INFORMATION ON FURTHER TECHNIQUES TO SUPPORT MANAGEMENT OF RISK∙ANNEX J: LESSONS LEARNED FROM OTHERS∙ANNEX K: ASSESSING THE SUITABILITY OF TOOLS∙ANNEX L: DOCUMENTATION OUTLINESCHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose of this guide1.2 What is management of risk?1.3 Why management of risk is important1.4 Who is involved in risk management1.5 How to use this guide1.6 The research for this guidance1.1 Purpose of this guideThis guide is intended to help organisations to put in place effective frameworks for taking informed decisions about risk. The guidance provides a route map for risk management, bringing together recommended approaches, checklists and pointers to more detailed sources of advice on tools and techniques. It expands on the OGC Guidelines for Managing Risk.The process of investment appraisal, in which assessments are made of costs, benefits and risks, is outside the scope of this guide. However, many of the principles and techniques described here can be used when developing the business case. The approach described in this guide complements OGC’s guidance on programme and project management and is continually updated to reflect current thinking. This approach, branded by OGC as M_o_R (Management of Risk), is supported by training and qualifications.1.2 What is management of risk?In this guide risk is defined as uncertainty of outcome, whether positive opportunity or negative threat. The term ‘management of risk’ incorporates all the activities required to identify and control the exposure to risk which may have an impact on the achievement of an organisation’s bus iness objectives.Every organisation manages its risk, but not always in a way that is visible, repeatable and consistently applied to support decision making. The task of management of risk is to ensure that the organisation makes cost effective use of a risk process that has a series of well defined steps. The aim is to support better decision making through a good understanding of risks and their likely impact.There are two distinct phases: risk analysis and risk management. Risk analysis is concerned with gathering information about exposure to risk so that the organisation can make appropriate decisions and manage risk appropriately.Management of risk involves having processes in place to monitor risks, access to reliable and up to date information about risks, the right balance of control in place to deal with those risks, and decision making processes supported by a framework of risk analysis and evaluation.Management of risk covers a wide range of topics, including business continuity management, security, programme/project risk management and operational service management. These topics need to be placed in the context of an organisational framework for the management of risk. Some risk-related topics, such as security, are highly specialised and this guidance provides only an overview of such aspects.1.3 Why management of risk is importantA certain amount of risk taking is inevitable if your organisation is to achieve its objectives. Effective management of risk helps you to improve performance by contributing to:∙increased certainty and fewer surprises∙better service delivery∙more effective management of change∙more efficient use of resources∙better management at all levels through improved decision making∙reduced waste and fraud, and better value for money∙innovation∙management of contingent and maintenance activities.See Annex A for examples of the benefits of more effective management of risk.1.4 Who is involved in risk managementIn practice, everyone in an organisation is involved in risk management to some extent and should be aware of their responsibilities in identifying and managing risk. However, there are some aspects for which responsibility must be assigned to individuals. Without clear responsibility (and the authority to support that responsibility) some risks will be missed or overlooked.In the public sector, there are two major roles with a clear responsibility to ensure risks are managed (there will be equivalents to these roles in private sector organisations). These roles are:∙an Accounting Officer (or equivalent senior manager), who is responsible for the organisation’s overall exposure to risk. Typically this person will be the Chief ExecutiveOfficer (CEO); the senior manager in the organisation. They may delegate some of theactions but cannot forgo the responsibility∙ a senior manager acting as a project‘owner’, who is responsible for risk relating to a specific programme or project and for the realisation of associated business benefits.Audience for this guidanceBusiness managers, process owners, strategic planners, project and procurement teams, business continuity planners and security teams are the primary audience for this guidance, together with their service providers.It will also be of interest to auditors, with their responsibility for ensuring effective corporate governance.1.5 How to use this guideChapter 1 introduces the structure, process and culture of management of risk, explaining why organisations need to devise and implement effective strategies in order to maximise opportunities and minimise threats to the achievement of their business objectives. It identifies key personnel in the management of risk and the target audience for the guidance.Chapter 2 outlines the key principles underpinning management of risk: establishing a risk management framework, risk ownership, where risks occur, the decision making process, the importance of embedding the risk management culture, and allocating realistic budgets.Chapter 3 describes the main activities of management of risk. It contains practical examples, pointers and checklists for identifying and responding to risk, and monitoring risk responses.Chapters 4–7 explain when and how management of risk should be applied throughout an organisation, at the strategic, programme, project and operational levels.Chapter 8 discusses the range of techniques available to support the risk management process. The Annexes provide supporting detail:∙A: Examples of benefits of risk management∙B: Healthcheck: how well is your organisation managing risk?∙C: Categorising risk∙D: Setting a standard for evaluation of risk∙E: Procurement, contractual and legal considerations∙F: Business continuity management∙G: Managing organisational safety and security∙H: Information on further techniques to support management of risk∙J: Lessons learned from others∙K: Assessing the suitability of tools∙L: Documentation outlines.1.6 The research for this guidancePrepared by OGC's IT Directorate, this guidance has been developed from extensive research into current thinking and practice in both the public and private sectors, drawing on published papersand interviews/studies with a number of leading organisations involved in major change and with specialist experts in the management of risk. It builds on the recent work of the National Audit Office (NAO), HM Treasury and Cabinet Office, together with OGC's published guidance on best practice in risk management; it also aims to address issues relating to corporate governance.This guidance responds to lessons learned and the experiences of real-world practical issues, as reported by consultants in OGC's Strategic Assignments Consultancy Service and their clients. In addition, it incorporates feedback from contributors to OGC workshops and other review channels. These contributions are acknowledged with thanks.CHAPTER 2: PRINCIPLES2.1 Critical success factors for management of risk2.2 What is at risk and why?2.3 Decisions about risk2.4 Where risks occur2.5 A framework for managing risk2.6 Risk ownership2.7 Embedding the risk management culture2.8 BudgetsThis chapter outlines the key principles underpinning the effective management of risk.2.1 Critical success factors for management of riskThe key elements that need to be in place if risk management is to be effective, and innovation encouraged, include:∙clearly identified senior management to support, own and lead on risk management∙risk management policies and the benefits of effective management clearly communicated to all staff∙existence and adoption of a framework for management of risk that is transparent and repeatable∙existence of an organisational culture which supports well thought-through risk taking and innovation∙management of risk fully embedded in management processes and consistently applied ∙management of risk closely linked to achievement of objectives∙risks associated with working with other organisations explicitly assessed and managed ∙risks actively monitored and regularly reviewed on a constructive ‘no-blame’ basis.Joint working and partnerships often involve more complex types of risk that can adversely affect the delivery of business services. For example, if part of the service provided by one organisation is delayed or of poor quality, the success of the whole collaboration can be put at risk. You must make sure that your organisation knows about the risk management approaches of your partners. Sharing information about risk management means that risks in collaborative programmes can be identified and managed in a proactive way.Public sector concernsThe Modernising Government initiative seeks to encourage the public sector to adopt well managed risk taking where it is likely to lead to sustainable improvements in service delivery. More effective risk management will improve the public sector’s ability to undertake the increasingly complex and cross-cutting projects that are demanded by the Modernisation agenda. Public sector organisations need to have in place the skills, management structures and organisational structures to take advantage of potential opportunities to perform better and to reduce the possibility of failure.The key areas that have to be addressed are:∙the requirements of corporate governance– including more focused and open ways of managing risk (see the section on corporate governance below)∙th e need for a ‘risk owner’ at senior level, for an activity (strategy, programme or project).He or she is supported by risk owners at everyday working levels as appropriate for theactivity and risk exposure∙the need for improved reporting and upward referral of major problems∙opportunities and the potential resolution approaches∙the need for shared understanding of risk management at all levels in the organisation and with partners, combined with consistent treatment of risk∙managing project risk in the wider context of programmes of change and the business.The NAO study of risk management (Supporting Innovation: Managing Risk in Government Departments), the Cabinet Office’s report Successful IT : Modernising Government in Action, and HM Treasury’s Orange Book provide valuable messages that are incorporated in this guidance.Meeting the needs of corporate governanceCorporate governance is the ongoing activity of maintaining a sound system of internal control to safeguard shareholders’ investment and the company’s assets.The Turnbull Report states that:‘a company’s objectives, its internal organisation and the environment which it operates in are continually evolving and as a result the risks it faces are continually changing. A sound system of control therefore depends on a thorough and regular evaluation of the nature and extent of the risks to which the company is exposed. Since profits [or business results] are in part the reward for successful risk taking in business, the purpose of internal control is to help manage and control risk rather than eliminate it.’Corporate governance frameworks must ensure that management is held accountable for a corporation’s performance and that owners are able to monitor and intervene in the operations of management.These principles apply equally to the public and private sectors. Whereas corporations focus mainly on shareholder returns and the preservation of shareholders’ value, the public sector’s role is to implement programmes cost effectively in accordance with Government legislation and policies.The British Standards Institute (BSI) has produced a guidance note on Corporate Governance – PD 6668:2000– relating to the management of strategic risks. It outlines a management framework for identifying the threats, determining the risks, implementation and maintaining control measures and finally reporting annually on the organisation’s commitment to this process.Policy on management of risk to support corporate governanceTo support corporate governance, there needs to be a risk management policy in place. This policy should:∙be appropriate for the size and nature of your organisation, its business and operating environment∙be clear about the roles (and, if possible, individuals) that are responsible for risk∙be clear about escalation criteria in relation to risk management (i.e., when to refer decision making upwards)∙ensure that processes, and the culture/infrastructure, to identify and manage risk are put in place; these processes must be repeatable∙set up the mechanism for monitoring the success of the application of the policy (including reports to management, at least annually)∙ensure that internal control mechanisms are in place for independent assessment that the policy is implemented (and checked).2.2 What is at risk and why?There are many diverse factors that could place an organisation at risk. Figure 1 outlines the main reasons why there should be a robust risk management process in place.Your organisation will have a set of key objectives. Risks should be identified against these objectives, ideally not more than 10-15 at high level. These high-level risks will then be considered and managed by senior management, increasing the organisation’s ability to meet its obj ectives. Annex B provides a ‘healthcheck’ to see if an organisation is adopting an effective framework for management of risk and risk management process.Annex C expands on possible categories of risk.Relating management of risk to safety, security and businesscontinuityManagement of risk should be carried out in the wider context of safety concerns, security and business continuity.∙Health and safety policy and practice is concerned with ensuring that the workplace is a safe environment.∙Security is c oncerned with protecting the organisation’s assets, including information, buildings and so on.∙Business continuity is concerned with ensuring that the organisation could continue to operate in the event of a disaster, such as loss of a service, flood or fire damage.Figure 1: Reasons for a risk management processReducing risk in large scale projectsExperience has shown that programmes and projects attempting a large scale, comprehensive business change are less likely to be successful than those taking a less ambitious, step-by-step approach. Although the latter increases management activity, with each of the elements needing to be controlled and coordinated, the advantages are that activities are:∙easier to manage∙simpler to implement within the business environment∙easier to accept formally as, typically, the specification is easier to document and thus simpler to verify that it has been met∙able to offer more options for contingency∙more likely to accommodate fast moving changes in technology, or in the political or financial environment∙able to offer more decision points, allowing greater control of the project.2.3 Decisions about riskDecisions about risk need to be balanced so that the potential benefits are worth more to the organisation than it costs to address the risk.For example, innovation is inherently risky but could achieve major benefits in improving services. The ability of the organisation to limit its exposure to risk will also be of relevance.You should aim to make an accurate assessment of the risks in a given situation and analyse the potential benefits. The risks and opportunities presented by each course of action should be defined in order to identify appropriate response.Scope of decisionsDecisions about risk will vary depending on whether the risk relates to long, medium or short-term goals.Strategic decisions are primarily concerned with long-term goals; these set the context for decisions at other levels of the organisation. The risks associated with strategic decisions may not become apparent until well into the future. Thus it is essential to review these decisions, and associated risks, on a regular basis.Medium-term goals are usually addressed through programmes and projects to bring about business change. Decisions relating to medium-term goals are narrower in scope than strategic ones, particularly in terms of timeframe and financial responsibilities.At the operational level the emphasis is on short-term goals to ensure ongoing continuity of business services; however, decisions about risk at this level must also support the achievement of long- and medium-term goals. These organisational levels are discussed in more detail in Chapters 4, 5, 6 and 7.There are also considerations about what can realistically be achieved in one change initiative. Delivery of each of the components of a change initiative (whether a programme, project or stage) must provide some direct benefit to the organisation as a result of its delivery. This could be by delivering:∙ a major component to support/build towards the intended outcome – for example, providing a telephone helpline first as part of a new information service and then addingwebsite services to expand the facilities available to the public∙the product to part of the end user community and then ‘rolling out’ to the rest of that community – for example, introducing a new information service in the North-East andgradually making it available nationwide.This is a modular and/or incremental approach that is further discussed in Chapters 5 and 6 and in Annex E.When managing any project it is essential to ensure major decisions are made appropriately. A project will support some business change and so require something to be produced and then put into use.Figure 2 shows the main stages of the procurement process and the decisions to be taken about breaking projects down into manageable ‘packages’. For major projects, there will be formal Gateway Reviews in addition to the normal project decision points; these reviews establish whether the project is ready to proceed to the next stage.Figure 2: Main stages of the procurement process2.4 Where risks occurThe risk management process should be most rigorously applied where critical decisions are being made.Figure 3 shows where risk can occur in an organisation. For convenience, these levels are described as:∙strategic or corporate∙programme∙project∙operational.In practice, the levels overlap; however, it is helpful to clarify the occurrence of risks at these levels to inform the kind of decisions you are likely to make.Figure 3: Organisational management hierarchyIt is important to note that a risk may materialise initially at one level but subsequently have a major impact at a different level. A recent example is a High Street bank facing technical faults at the operational level; ultimately customers’ confidence in the bank’s online service became a strategic risk. This highlights the need for relevant information about risks to be shared throughout the organisation.Table 1 shows examples of typical risks occurring at each organisational level.Table 1: Risk related to organisational levelsLevel Examples of typical risks considered at this levelStrategic/corporate Commercial, financial, political, environmental, directional, cultural, acquisition and quality risks. There is a focus on business survival, continuity and growthfor the future.When programme, project and operational risks exceed setcriteria –e.g. not acceptable, outside agreed limits, could affect strategicobjectives, information needs to be escalated to this level so that appropriatedecisions can be taken.Programme Procurement/acquisition, funding, organisational, projects, security, safety, quality and business continuity risks.When project and operational risks exceedset criteria – e.g. not acceptable, outside agreed limits, could affect programmeobjectives, information needs to be escalated to this level so that appropriatedecisions can be taken.Project Personal, technical, cost, schedule, resource, operational support, quality and provider failure.Operational issues/risks should be considered at this level asthey affect the project and how it needs to be run. Information on strategic andprogramme related risks should be communicated to this level where they couldaffect project objectives. Project managers should communicate information onrisks to other projects and operations as appropriate.Operations Personal, technical, cost, schedule, resource, operational support, quality, provider failure, environmental and infrastructure failure.All the higher levelshave input to this level; specific concerns include business continuitymanagement/contingency planning, support for business processes andcustomer relations.Additional factorsAdditional factors may increase the complexity of assessing overall exposure to risk. These include:∙interdependencies, or links between projects and/or related issues, where the impact of one or more risks could affect others, possibly creating a ‘domino’ effect. You should ensure that any known interdependencies are identified and assessed so that appropriate actioncan be planned∙the relationship between business benefits and risks to delivery, where achievement of benefits is dependent on successful delivery of a project. You should continually checkwhether changing plans affect the achievement of benefits.2.5 A framework for managing riskA framework for management of risk sets the context in which risks will be identified, analysed, controlled, monitored and reviewed. It must be consistent with processes that are embedded in everyday management and operational practices. It addresses:∙how risks are identified∙how information about their probability and potential impact is obtained∙how risks are quantified∙how options to deal with them are identified∙how decisions on risk management are made, such as further risk reduction∙how these decisions are implemented∙how actions are evaluated for their effectiveness∙how appropriate communication mechanisms are set up and supported∙how stakeholders are engaged throughout the process.(See Chapter 3 for more information about the management of risk framework and supporting processes.)2.6 Risk ownershipFor the organisation, ownership of the risk management framework lies with the Accounting Officer (or equivalent senior manager at Board level). Individual senior managers own the programme or project and are responsible for the management of the overall risk of that activity. However, these roles do not own all the individual risks. Risk ownership must be clearly defined, documented and agreed with the individual owners at all levels, so that they understand their various roles, responsibilities and ultimate accountability with regard to the management of risk. The owner of a risk may not be the person tasked with the assessment or management of the risk, but he or she is responsible for ensuring the management of risk process is applied – there may be separate owners to actually deal with the risks.It is important to identify who owns:∙the setting policy and the organisation’s willingness to take risk∙the management of risk process at the different levels – that is, strategic, programme, project, operational levels∙different elements of the management of risk process, such as identifying threats, through to producing risk responses and reporting on decisions∙implementation of the actual measures taken in response to the risks∙interdependent risks that cross organisational boundaries, whether they are business processes, operational services or projects.For example, for a senior manager with responsibility for a project, ownership of risk could be defined as follows:Senior managers responsible for projects must assure themselves that a number of types of risk are being tracked and dealt with as effectively as possible. The mechanisms in place for monitoring and reporting risk will vary according to the size and complexity of the project or programme, ranging from the use of a simple risk register to the appointment of a risk manager reporting directly to the senior manager. Clearly, the degree of delegation adopted by the senior manager will vary, but he or she must be sure that the critical issues are being addressed; for example, through chairing the project board or by developing strong mechanisms for reporting problems.Checklist: ownership of risk and the process∙Have owners been allocated for all the various parts of the complete management of risk process?∙Are the various roles and responsibilities associated with ownership well defined?∙Do the individuals who have been allocated ownership actually have the authority and capability to fulfil their responsibilities? For example, suppliers may be tasked with riskownership.∙Have the various roles and responsibilities been communicated and understood?∙Are the nominated owners appropriate and aware of their nomination?∙Is ownership reassessed on a periodic basis, or in the event of a change in the situation;and if necessary, can it be quickly and effectively reallocated?∙Do all risks, and where appropriate their mitigation actions, have clearly identified owners?Are these owners appropriate?2.7 Embedding the risk management cultureIdentifying appropriate policies, standards and practices is the first stage of creating a risk management culture. Once these are in place they need to be totally embedded in individuals through the enactment of their roles and associated responsibilities.Awareness of and responsibility for risk issues must be linked explicitly to key objectives, in order to build a sustainable risk management culture. There should be delegated responsibility for risks at every level of objectives in the organisation. This is the major support to embedding risk management into the organisation and its culture, with risk management seen as an intrinsic part of the way an organisation works. As the people in an organisation change, it is essential to ensure a continuing understanding of roles and responsibilities related to managing risk.The risk environment is constantly changing too. Your organisation’s priorities and the relative importance of risks will shift and change. Assumptions about risk have to be regularly revisited and reconsidered, perhaps by annual review of the risks associated with each of the key organisational objectives.Establishing appropriate competencies and behavioursAn important aspect of setting up a risk culture is to ensure it is relevant to the organisation. Risk management is a major facet of effective corporate governance.Those responsible for corporate governance need to have knowledge and understanding of:。

相关文档
最新文档