题目：「国族」到底是什麼碗糕？：定义、理论、以及未来发展

題目：「國族」到底是什麼碗糕？：定義、理論、以及未來發展
許維德
國立交通大學人文社會學系暨族群與文化研究所助理教授
2008/12/02
演講大綱
1. 前言
2. 語彙分析：Nation、國家、民族、國族、族國……
2.1 採用「國族」當作演講題目的理由
2.2 「Nation」這個英文語彙在語義學上的演變情形
2.3 「民族」這個中文語彙的起源和傳播
3. 對「國族」進行研究的基本困難
4. 定義「國族」的嘗試
3.1 從「客觀特質」來定義「國族」
3.2 從「主觀意識」來定義「國族」
3.3 我的初步嘗試
5. 理論化「國族」的嘗試
5.1 和「國族」相關的兩大理論問題：「國族情感(national sentiments)」的「本質」vs. 「國族」的「起源時間」
5.2 原生論(primordialism)
5.3 工具論(instrumentalism)
5.4 接續論(perennialism)
5.5 現代化論(modernism)
5.6 建構論(constructionism)
5.7 解構論(deconstructionism)
6. 代結語：「國族」的未來
相關參考書目
(有*記號者表示主要參考書目)
1. 國族的語彙分析
*Greenfeld, Liah. 1992. Nationalism: Five Roads to Modernity. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. (Introduction, 1-26)
*陳奕麟，1999，解構中國性：論族群意識作為文化認同之曖昧不明。

台灣社會研究季刊，no. 33：103-31。

*沈松僑，1997，我以我血薦軒轅：黃帝神話和晚清的國族建構。

台灣社會研究季刊28 ：1-77。

梁世佑，2005，晚清詞彙的意義轉變：以梁啟超對「民族」一詞為例。

史匯，no.
9：17-55。

納日碧力戈，1995，民族與民族概念再辨正。

民族研究，no. 3：9-16。

王馬克，2006，關於「nation」譯名的一些思考：伽達默的詮釋學給我們的啟示，見彭明輝、唐啟華編，東亞視角下的近代中國，頁329-62。

台北：國立政治大學歷史學系。

郝時遠，2004，中文「民族」一詞源流考辨。

民族研究，no. 6：60-69。

馬戎，2005，中國傳統「族群觀」與先秦文獻「族」字使用淺析，見喬健、李沛良、李友梅、馬戎，文化、族群與社會的反思，頁189-224。

高雄：麗文
文化事業股份有限公司。

2.國族的定義
*Canovan, Margaret. 1996. What Is a Nation? In Nationhood and Political Theory, Margaret Canovan, 50-67. Cheltenham, United Kingdom: Edward Elgar.
Calhoun, Craig. 1997. Nationalism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
(Introduction, 1-8; Ch. 1: The Modernity and Diversity of Nationalisms, 9-28). Renan, Ernest. 1996. What Is a Nation? In Becoming National: A Reader, edited by Geoff Eley, and Ronald Grigor Suny, 42-55. New York: Oxford University
Press.
Smith, Anthony D. 1983. Theories of Nationalism. 2nd ed. New York: Holmes and
Meier Publishers. (Ch. 7: Definitions, 152-191).
3.國族的理論爭議
*Smith, Anthony D.1998. Nationalism and Modernity: A Critical Survey of Recent Theories of Nations and Nationalism. New York: Routledge. (Introduction:
The Modernist Paradigm, 1-7; Ch. 1: The Rise of Classical Modernism, 8-24).
Anderson, Benedict. 1996. Introduction. In Mapping the Nation, edited by Gopal Balakrishnan, 1-16. London: Verso.
Breuilly, John. 1994. Nationalism and the State. 2nd ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. (Appendix: Approaches to Nationalism, 404-424).
Eley, Geoff, and Ronald Grigor Suny. 1996. Introduction: From the Moment of Social History to the Work of Cultural Representation. In Becoming National: A
Reader, edited by Geoff Eley, and Ronald Grigor Suny, 3-37. New York:
Oxford University Press.
Guibernau, Montserrat. 1996. Nationalisms: The Nation-state and Nationalism in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hall, John A. 1995. Nationalism, Classified and Explained. In Notions of Nationalism, edited by Sukumar Periwal, 8-33. New York: Central European University
Press.
Hutchinson, John, and Anthony D. Smith. 1994. Introduction. In Nationalism, edited by John Hutchinson, and Anthony D. Smith, 3-13. New York: Oxford
University Press.
James, Paul. 1996. Nation Formation: Towards a Theory of Abstract Community.
Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications. (Ch. 1: The Nation as an Abstract
Community, 1-17; Ch. 2: National Formation in Theory, 18-46).
4. 國族的未來
Held, David. 1996. The Decline of the Nation State. In Becoming National: A Reader, edited by Geoff Eley, and Ronald Grigor Suny, 407-17. New York: Oxford
University Press.
Habermas, Juergen. 1996. The European Nation-state: Its Achievements and Its
Limits. On the Past and Future of Sovereignty and Citizenship. In Mapping the Nation, edited by Gopal Balakrishnan, 281-94. London: Verso.
Hollinger, David A. 1997. National Solidarity at the End of the Twentieth Century: Reflections on the United States and Liberal Nationalism. The Journal of
American History 84, no. 2: 559-69.
Mann, Michael. 1996. Nation-states in Europe and Other Continents: Diversifying, Developing, Not Dying. In Mapping the Nation, edited by Gopal Balakrishnan, 295-316. London: Verso.。