java大学设备管理系统计算机毕业设计英文文献翻译[管理资料]

毕业设计说明书英文文献及中文翻译班级：学号：姓名：学院：软件学院专业：软件工程指导教师：2014 年 6 月An Overview of Servlet and JSP TechnologyNagle and Wiegley，Aug. 2008，953 – 958.Abstract: Servlet program running in the server-side, dynamically generated Web page with the traditional CGI and many other similar compared to CGI technology, Java Servlet with a more efficient, easier to use, more powerful and has better portability, more savings to invest .Key words: JSP Technology, Servlet, HTTP serverA Servlet's JobServlets are Java programs that run on Web or application servers, acting as a middle layer between requests coming from Web browsers or other HTTP clients and databases or applications on the HTTP server. Their job is to perform the following tasks, as illustrated in Figure 1-1.Figure 1-11．Read the explicit data sent by the client.The end user normally enters this data in an HTML form on a Web page. However, the data could also come from an applet or a custom HTTP client program.2．Read the implicit HTTP request data sent by the browser.Figure 1-1 shows a single arrow going from the client to the Web server (the layer where servlets and JSP execute), but there are really two varieties of data: the explicit data that the end user enters in a form and the behind-the-scenes HTTP information. Both varieties are critical. The HTTP information includes cookies, information about media types and compression schemes the browser understands, and so on.3．Generate the results.This process may require talking to a database, executing an RMI or EJB call, invoking a Web service, or computing the response directly. Your real data may be ina relational database. Fine. But your database probably doesn't speak HTTP or return results in HTML, so the Web browser can't talk directly to the database. Even if it could, for security reasons, you probably would not want it to. The same argument applies to most other need the Web middle layer to extract the results inside a document.4．Send the explicit data (., the document) to the client.This document can be sent in a variety of formats, including text (HTML or XML), binary (GIF images), or even a compressed format like gzip that is layered on top of some other underlying format. But, HTML is by far the most common format, so an important servlet/JSP task is to wrap the results inside of HTML.5．Send the implicit HTTP response data.Figure 1-1 shows a single arrow going from the Web middle layer (the servlet or JSP page) to the client. But, there are really two varieties of data sent: the document itself and the behind-the-scenes HTTP information. Again, both varieties are critical to effective development. Sending HTTP response data involves telling the browser or other client what type of document is being returned (., HTML), setting cookies and caching parameters, and other such tasks.Why Build Web Pages Dynamically?many client requests can be satisfied by prebuilt documents, and the server would handle these requests without invoking servlets. In many cases, however, a static result is not sufficient, and a page needs to be generated for each request. There are a number of reasons why Web pages need to be built on-the-fly:1．The Web page is based on data sent by the client.For instance, the results page from search engines and order-confirmation pages at online stores are specific to particular user requests. You don't know what to display until you read the data that the user submits. Just remember that the user submits two kinds of data: explicit (., HTML form data) and implicit (., HTTP request headers). Either kind of input can be used to build the output page. In particular, it is quite common to build a user-specific page based on a cookie value.2．The Web page is derived from data that changes frequently.If the page changes for every request, then you certainly need to build the response at request time. If it changes only periodically, however, you could do it two ways: you could periodically build a new Web page on the server (independently of client requests), or you could wait and only build the page when the user requests it. The right approach depends on the situation, but sometimes it is more convenient to do the latter: wait for the user request. For example, a weather report or news headlines site might build the pages dynamically, perhaps returning a previously built page if that page is still up to date.3．The Web page uses information from corporate databases or other server-side sources.If the information is in a database, you need server-side processing even if the client is using dynamic Web content such as an applet. Imagine using an applet by itself for a search engine site:"Downloading 50 terabyte applet, please wait!" Obviously, that is silly; you need to talk to the database. Going from the client to the Web tier to the database (a three-tier approach) instead of from an applet directly to a database (a two-tier approach) provides increased flexibility and security with little or no performance penalty. After all, the database call is usually the rate-limiting step, so going through the Web server does not slow things down. In fact, a three-tier approach is often faster because the middle tier can perform caching and connection pooling.In principle, servlets are not restricted to Web or application servers that handle HTTP requests but can be used for other types of servers as well. For example, servlets could be embedded in FTP or mail servers to extend their functionality. And, a servlet API for SIP (Session Initiation Protocol) servers was recently standardized (see ). In practice, however, this use of servlets has not caught on, and we'll only be discussing HTTP servlets.The Advantages of Servlets Over "Traditional" CGIJava servlets are more efficient, easier to use, more powerful, more portable, safer, and cheaper than traditional CGI and many alternative CGI-like technologies.1．EfficientWith traditional CGI, a new process is started for each HTTP request. If the CGI program itself is relatively short, the overhead of starting the process can dominate the execution time. With servlets, the Java virtual machine stays running and handles each request with a lightweight Java thread, not a heavyweight operating system process. Similarly, in traditional CGI, if there are N requests to the same CGI program, the code for the CGI program is loaded into memory N times. With servlets, however, there would be N threads, but only a single copy of the servlet class would be loaded. This approach reduces server memory requirements and saves time by instantiating fewer objects. Finally, when a CGI program finishes handling a request, the program terminates. This approach makes it difficult to cache computations, keep database connections open, and perform other optimizations that rely on persistent data. Servlets, however, remain in memory even after they complete a response, so it is straightforward to store arbitrarily complex data between client requests.2．ConvenientServlets have an extensive infrastructure for automatically parsing and decoding HTML form data, reading and setting HTTP headers, handling cookies, tracking sessions, and many other such high-level utilities. In CGI, you have to do much of this yourself. Besides, if you already know the Java programming language, why learn Perl too? You're already convinced that Java technology makes for more reliable and reusable code than does Visual Basic, VBScript, or C++. Why go back to those languages for server-side programming?3．PowerfulServlets support several capabilities that are difficult or impossible to accomplish with regular CGI. Servlets can talk directly to the Web server, whereas regular CGI programs cannot, at least not without using a server-specific API. Communicating with the Web server makes it easier to translate relative URLs into concrete path names, for instance. Multiple servlets can also share data, making it easy to implement database connection pooling and similar resource-sharing optimizations. Servlets can also maintain information from request to request, simplifying techniques like session tracking and caching of previous computations.4．PortableServlets are written in the Java programming language and follow a standard API. Servlets are supported directly or by a plugin on virtually every major Web server. Consequently, servlets written for, say, Macromedia JRun can run virtually unchanged on Apache Tomcat, Microsoft Internet Information Server (with a separate plugin), IBM WebSphere, iPlanet Enterprise Server, Oracle9i AS, or StarNine WebStar. They are part of the Java 2 Platform, Enterprise Edition (J2EE; see ), so industry support for servlets is becoming even more pervasive.5．InexpensiveA number of free or very inexpensive Web servers are good for development use or deployment of low- or medium-volume Web sites. Thus, with servlets and JSP you can start with a free or inexpensive server and migrate to more expensive servers with high-performance capabilities or advanced administration utilities only after your project meets initial success. This is in contrast to many of the other CGI alternatives, which require a significant initial investment for the purchase of a proprietary package.Price and portability are somewhat connected. For example, Marty tries to keep track of the countries of readers that send him questions by email. India was near the top of the list, probably #2 behind the . Marty also taught one of his JSP and servlet training courses (see ) in Manila, and there was great interest in servlet and JSP technology there.Now, why are India and the Philippines both so interested? We surmise that the answer is twofold. First, both countries have large pools of well-educated software developers. Second, both countries have (or had, at that time) highly unfavorable currency exchange rates against the . dollar. So, buying a special-purpose Web server from a . company consumed a large part of early project funds.But, with servlets and JSP, they could start with a free server: Apache Tomcat (either standalone, embedded in the regular Apache Web server, or embedded in Microsoft IIS). Once the project starts to become successful, they could move to a server like Caucho Resin that had higher performance and easier administration but that is not free. But none of their servlets or JSP pages have to be rewritten. If their project becomes even larger, they might want to move to a distributed (clustered)environment. No problem: they could move to Macromedia JRun Professional, which supports distributed applications (Web farms). Again, none of their servlets or JSP pages have to be rewritten. If the project becomes quite large and complex, they might want to use Enterprise JavaBeans (EJB) to encapsulate their business logic. So, they might switch to BEA WebLogic or Oracle9i AS. Again, none of their servlets or JSP pages have to be rewritten. Finally, if their project becomes even bigger, they might move it off of their Linux box and onto an IBM mainframe running IBM WebSphere. But once again, none of their servlets or JSP pages have to be rewritten.6．SecureOne of the main sources of vulnerabilities in traditional CGI stems from the fact that the programs are often executed by general-purpose operating system shells. So, the CGI programmer must be careful to filter out characters such as backquotes and semicolons that are treated specially by the shell. Implementing this precaution is harder than one might think, and weaknesses stemming from this problem are constantly being uncovered in widely used CGI libraries.A second source of problems is the fact that some CGI programs are processed by languages that do not automatically check array or string bounds. For example, in C and C++ it is perfectly legal to allocate a 100-element array and then write into the 999th "element," which is really some random part of program memory. So, programmers who forget to perform this check open up their system to deliberate or accidental buffer overflow attacks.Servlets suffer from neither of these problems. Even if a servlet executes a system call (., with or JNI) to invoke a program on the local operating system, it does not use a shell to do so. And, of course, array bounds checking and other memory protection features are a central part of the Java programming language.7．MainstreamThere are a lot of good technologies out there. But if vendors don't support them and developers don't know how to use them, what good are they? Servlet and JSP technology is supported by servers from Apache, Oracle, IBM, Sybase, BEA, Macromedia, Caucho, Sun/iPlanet, New Atlanta, ATG, Fujitsu, Lutris, Silverstream, the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), and many others. Several low-cost pluginsadd support to Microsoft IIS and Zeus as well. They run on Windows, Unix/Linux, MacOS, VMS, and IBM mainframe operating systems. They are the single most popular application of the Java programming language. They are arguably the most popular choice for developing medium to large Web applications. They are used by the airline industry (most United Airlines and Delta Airlines Web sites), e-commerce (), online banking (First USA Bank, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico), Web search engines/portals (), large financial sites (American Century Investments), and hundreds of other sites that you visit every day.Of course, popularity alone is no proof of good technology. Numerous counter-examples abound. But our point is that you are not experimenting with a new and unproven technology when you work with server-side Java.Before diving into an explanation of presentation technology, it's helpful to fill in some details on the situation that led to the birth of the technology. Just 10 short years ago, the term thin client was a novelty. We still lived in a world of desktop applications, powered by wimpy 286 microprocessors with 14-inch monitors that we squinted at. Boy, have times changed! Now my desktop does nothing but power a Web browser, while servers from Sun, IBM, HP, Compaq, and the rest churn out computations, business logic, and content. And that little monitor? Replaced by flat-screen, plasma, whopping 21- and 25-inch beauties. Why? So we can see the intricate and complex HTML displays that serve as a front-end to these powerful applications. No longer does a clunky interface suffice; now we expect flashy graphics, moving images, color-coordinated presentations that would look good in any room in the house, and speedy rendering to premiseToday, a decade beyond those fledgling Windows applications, we are still dealing with this huge shift in the presentation paradigm. The woeful Visual Basic and C programmers who remain now find themselves working either on back-end systems or Windows-only applications, or they have added a Web-capable language such as the Java language to their toolbox. An application that doesn't support at least three of four ML-isms -- such as HTML, XML, and WML -- is considered shabby, if not an outright failure. And, of course, that means we all care very deeply about the ability to easily develop a Web presentation it turns out, using the new Internet, and all the languages we have at our disposal -- Java, C, Perl, Pascal, and Ada, among others -- hasn't been as easy aswe might have hoped. A number of issues creep up when it comes to taking the programming languages everyone used for back-end systems and leveraging them to generate markup language suitable for a client. With the arrival of more options on the browser (DHTML and JavaScript coding, for example), the increase in graphic artist talent in the Web domain, and tools that could create complex interfaces using standard HTML, the demand for fancy user interfaces has grown faster than our ability to develop these front ends to our applications. And this has given rise to presentation technology was designed to perform a single task: convert content, namely data without display details, into presentation -- meaning the various user interfaces you see on your phone, PalmPilot, or Web browser. What are the problems that these presentation technologies claimed to solve? Let's take a vs. reworkBesides the separation of content and presentation, another measure of a presentation technology's usefulness is the amount of rework that it eliminates. The divergence of presentation and content enforces a divergence in the roles of those developing the content. A programmer can focus on the raw content presented in the examples above, and a graphic artist or webmaster can attend to the presentation. A slight overlap of roles remains, however, in the process of taking the presentation -- or markup -- designed by the artist and applying it to the content the programmer's code the simplest case, the artist supplies the markup, and the developer provides code and also plugs the markup into the presentation technology. The application is "started up," and the content magically becomes a user interface. Of course, as we all know, development rarely ends there. Next come revisions and changes to the interface and new business rules that must be coded. This is where the true test of the presentation technology's flexibility comes into play. While it is usually simple to update the raw content being fed into the presentation layer, rarely can the graphic artists easily edit their original work. Changes to the presentation layer are common (we've all been victim to marketing departments changing this or that). So now a problem arises: what do the designers change to tweak their work? The original markup language page they gave to the developer? Probably not, as that page has most likely had custom tags or code inserted (JSPpages, template engines), converted to a Java servlet, or changed into something totally the designer must rework the original page and resubmit this page to the developer. Then the developer has to reconvert this page to the specificformat needed for use in the presentation technology. Alternatively, the designer has to learn a scripting language or at least know that which areas of the page's source code from the developer are off limits. Of course, this is an error-prone, dangerous way to operate. Once you've determined that a presentation technology allows a clean split between content and presentation, you should try to ensure that a minimum amount of rework is necessary in order to make presentation promise of JSP technologyNow, on to the specifics of JSP coding. The promise of JSP technology is to supply the designer and developer the only presentation technology they will ever need. JSP technology is part of the J2EE platform, which is the strongest show of support Sun can give one of its Java products. To give you an idea of how prevalent this solution is, try running a search on 'JSP' .you'll find more books devoted to JSP technology than about almost any other single Java API. Before I dive into the specific problems that JSP technology presents, you need a clear understanding of what it claims to vs. presentationAbove all, JSP technology is about separating content from presentation, foremost in Sun's published set of goals for JSP pages. In fact, JSP design stemmed directly from the complaints of developers who were tired of typing into their servlet code. This mixing of hard-coded content with runtime variables presented a horrible burden on servlet developers. It also made making even minor changes to the presentation layer difficult for the technology addresses this situation by allowing normal HTML pages (and later, WML or other markup language pages) to be compiled at runtime into a Java servlet, essentially mimicking the () paradigm, without requiring the developer to write this code. And it allows you to insert variables into the page that are not interpreted until vs. markupSecond on the JSP technology's list of features is something that might raise a bit of concern. JSP coding lets you insert Java code directly into a page of markup. To understand why this decision was made, recall that when the JSP specification was being developed, Sun's competition from Microsoft was at an all-time high, primarily due to the success of Microsoft Active Server Pages (ASP). The similarity of the name JavaServer Pages to Active Server Pages was not merely coincidental. And the ability to mimic many of ASP's features was also intentional. So JSP authors were given the option to add Java code into their vs. developerA final (and admirable) goal of JSP technology worth mentioning is that it seeks to establish clearly defined roles in the applicationdevelopment process. By ostensibly breaking content from presentation, JSP technology creates a clearer distinction between the designer and developer. The designer creates markup, using only standard HTML, WML, or whatever language is appropriate, and the developer writes code. Of course, many designers today have learned JavaScript, so it should come as no surprise that many of these same designers have begun to learn JSP coding. Often, instead of just doing pure markup, they encode a complete JSP page and hand it over to the developer. Then the usual tweaking takes place, and the developer puts the JSP page into place as a front-end for some portion of the overall application. The key, though, is that many designers do not learn JSP coding, so it must also be workable in that vs. XMLOne of the most significant disadvantages of JSP technology, and one of the most overlooked, is its incompatibility with XML. More precisely, and particularly in the HTML realm, JSP pages are not required to be XHTML-compatible. XHTML is a World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) specification that is now replacing HTML . XHTML defines the HTML tagset in terms of a well-formed XML document. For example, the <br> tag must be converted toto ensure XML compliance. (If this doesn't make much sense, you can check out the XML specification and the developerWorks article about XHTML, listed in Resources.) Similar rules are applied to image tags, and in XHTML (recently coming of age) most font properties and other styling move into CSS stylesheets. Still, most standard HTML documents convert easily to XHTML , which means they can be read directly with any XML-compliant parser, such as Apache Xerces, and manipulated as XML."What's the big deal?" you ask. The big deal is that XML quickly is becoming the global standard for inter- and intra-application communication. Passing data around in an XML format lets any other application that employs basic XML data-handling facilities use your application's data easily. Imagine being able to communicate with credit card companies for e-commerce simply by moving your data into an XML format! Many times, your presentation of data needs to be exchanged with other companies as well. The most common case is the portal application, which receives content from a variety of providers (weather, stock quotes, and news, for example), often with branding from the provider. JSP pages, however, with their mix of code and custom tag libraries, cannot function well in this pages are rarely well-formed XML documents, never mind conforming toXHTML, a markup language that doesn't allow the various JSP custom tag libraries. More important, though, is that the code snippets inserted in JSP pages are not any form of markup and will create loads of parser errors once they are processed by another you go quoting me on this, let's get the whole story out there. If the application were to allow the JSP page to be evaluated by the original client, the result would be pure HTML (or WML, V oXML, and so on). Most applications that request this data, however, employ some form of caching, as network round-trips are very expensive. In these cases, the cached page returns stale data. In those cases, then, you'd probably prefer to return pure XML-compliant results, preferably in a static form. And it is in those cases that JSP technology cannot help; JSP pages must always be evaluated at runtime to remove the JSP code scriptlets and tag the litmus test: Can some other presentation technology do this? The answer is yes. The decided leader in this arena is the Apache Cocoon project, which is based entirely on XML and an application of XSLT stylesheets (which can be applied either at runtime or statically). Because XML Server Pages (called XSP in the Cocoon framework) are actually XML documents, they are always XML-conformant. Other technologies like Tea and Enhydra XMLC that allow the input of a pure markup language page also allow this, although they do not mandate it. In these cases, the user can use XHTML or standard HTML. Still, this is better than the JSP case, where well-formed XML cannot be accomplished statically.Servlet和JSP技术简述Nagle and Wiegley，Aug. 2008，953 – 958.摘要：Servlet程序在服务器端运行，动态地生成Web页面与传统的CGI和许多其他类似CGI的技术相比，Java Servlet具有更高的效率，更容易使用，功能更强大，具有更好的可移植性，更节省投资。