2015年考研英语(一)深度解析：完型
2015年考研英语一真题答案及解析
2015年全国硕士研究生入学统一考试（英语一）解析Section I Use of English一、文章题材结构分析本文选自2014年7月15日International Business Times上一篇题为“DNA of Friendship:Study Finds We are Genetically Linked to Our Friends”（DNA友谊：研究发现我们在基因上和我们的朋友有着千丝万缕的联系）的文章。
首段通过一项研究结果引出朋友之间有一定的基因关联；第二段对研究的受试者进行说明；第三段中遗传学家认为朋友之间共享的1%的基因很重要；第四五段指出研究的两项发现；最后研究者发现相似基因发展更快，但人们喜欢与同族人交友还未能做出解释。
二、试题解析1.[A]when何时[B]why为什么[C]how如何[D]what什么【答案】D【考点】从句辨析【解析】该题考查的是语法知识。
根据句子结构和选项的特点，可以判断出空格处应填从属连词引导表语从句；再根据句子的内容，可以看出该从句是一项研究的相关内容，不是指研究的时间（when），原因（why）和方式（how），表示具体内容的表语从句用what引导，因此，该题的答案为what。
2.[A]defended保卫，防守[B]concluded推断，下结论[C]withdrawn撤退，收回[D]advised建议，劝告【答案】B【考点】上下文语义衔接+动词辨析【解析】从此题所在句子的前后内容可以判断出，that is_______中的that是指第一句话的内容（朋友与我们基因上的相关性），很显然是研究得出的结论。
因此，答案为concluded。
3.[A]for为了[B]with和[C]on在…之上，关于，对于[D]by方式【答案】C【考点】上下文语义衔接+介词辨析【解析】根据空格所在句子的内容（研究对1932位独特的受试者进行分析）判断出进行分析的对象是1932unique subjects。
2015全国卷1 完形填空 优秀详细解释 强烈推荐
2015全国卷1 完形填空优秀详细解释强烈推荐！！一份好的试卷应该是一份活的教材，有文化、有思想、有灵魂。
而这主要体现在一份试卷的三个方面：听力、阅读和写作。
如果这三个方面不能体现出文化、思想和灵魂的话，那么，这份“教材”就不是“活的”，因而也就失去了存在的价值，也就不足以承载高考指挥棒的功能（姑将此指挥棒归于正能量）。
完形填空题也是阅读的一个部分。
完形填空题命制的好不好，即可管窥全卷。
本文是对2015年高考英语课标卷I和课标卷II的完形填空两篇的评注。
评注的路径与方法一如对湖北卷的考察：揭示命题规律、解析命题思路。
品题论点也一仍其旧，亦庄亦谐，或详或略，轻松而不随意，嬉笑但不怒骂。
有着三十多年命题训练的教育部考试中心高考英语命题组，对命制完形填空题确有其独到之处，主要表现在选文视角、选点视角与设疑视角等几个方面。
当然，由于时间的作用，也可能会形成某种命题偏好与相对静止的命题定势。
今天咱就来挖掘、分析、破局。
这一次，咱做的不是雷锋，而是山东蓝翔的挖掘机手。
好的东东要挖掘出来公诸同好，不好的东东也会公示于众。
好的发扬之，不好的则希望在今后的高考英语命题中尽量避免之。
毕竟自2016年始，25个省，700多万考生。
儿戏不得，马虎不得，也粗糙不得。
精致一点做，讲究一点做，是上选。
完形填空的命题过程首先得从选文说起。
从选文到定文，一般会有选文、裁剪、简化、压缩、调整、定文等一系列环节。
然后是命题布局与设点谋划。
这个过程包括选点、设空、关联、呼应、回指、以及点与点的比例配置等。
接下来是选项配置与选项设疑。
依据文章，确定与调整主考点与辅考点的关系（20个主考点，60个辅考点。
不同的辅考点会影响文脉走向），确定与调整启发与干扰的布局与设置。
最后是调整文章难度与试题难度所形成的综合难度，这个综合难度将会影响到全卷的难度配置。
2015年教育部考试中心命制的高考英语课标卷I与II两套，因此，今天批注的完形填空试题，也是两套。
2015年考研英语一真题及答案详细解析
2015年考研英语一真题及答案详细解析2015年全国硕士研究生入学统一考试英语（一）试题及答案详细解析Section I Use of English :Directions: Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B,C or D on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)Though not biologically related, friends are as “related” as fourth cousins, sharing about 1% of genes. That is _(1)_a study, published from the University of California and Yale University in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, has__(2)_.The study is a genome-wide analysis conducted _(3)__1,932 unique subjects which __(4)__pairs of unrelated friends and unrelated strangers. The same people were used in both_(5)_.While 1% may seem_(6)_,it is not so to a geneticist. As James Fowler, professor of medical genetics at UC San Diego, says, “Most people do not even _(7)_their fourth cousins but somehow manage to select as friends the people who_(8)_our kin.”The study_(9)_found that the genes for smell were something shared in friends but not genes for immunity .Why this similarity exists in smell genes is difficult to explain, for now,_(10)_,as the team suggests, it draws us to similar environments but there is more_(11)_it. There could be many mechanisms working together that _(12)_us in choosing genetically similar frien ds_(13)_”functional Kinship” of being friends with_(14)_!One of the remarkable findings of the study was the similar genes seem to be evolution_(15)_than other genes Studying this could help_(16)_why human evolution picked pace in the last 30,000 years, with social environment being a major_(17)_factor.The findings do not simply explain people’s_(18)_to befriend those of similar_(19)_backgrounds, say the researchers. Though all the subjects were drawn from a population of European extraction, care was taken to_(20)_that all subjects, friends and strangers, were taken from the same population.1. [A] when [B] why [C] how [D] what2. [A] defended [B] concluded [C] withdrawn [D] advised3. [A] for [B] with [C] on [D] by4. [A] compared [B] sought [C] separated [D] connected5. [A] tests [B] objects [C]samples [D] examples6. [A] insignificant [B] unexpected [C]unbelievable [D] incredible7. [A] visit [B] miss [C] seek [D] know8. [A] resemble [B] influence [C] favor [D] surpass9. [A] again [B] also [C] instead [D] thus10. [A] Meanwhile [B] Furthermore [C] Likewise [D] Perhaps11. [A] about [B] to [C]from [D]like12. [A] drive [B] observe [C] confuse [D]limit13. [A] according to [B] rather than [C] regardless of [D] along with14. [A] chances [B]responses [C]missions [D]benefits15. [A] later [B]slower [C] faster [D] earlier16. [A]forecast [B]remember [C]understand [D]express17. [A] unpredictable [B]contributory [C] controllable [D] disruptive18. [A] endeavor [B]decision [C]arrangement [D] tendency19. [A] political [B] religious [C] ethnic [D] economic20. [A] see [B] show [C] prove [D] tellSection II Reading ComprehensionPart ADirections:Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B, C or D. Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET. (40 points)Text 1King Juan Carlos of Spain once insisted “kings don’t abdicate, they dare in their sleep.” But embarrassing scandals and the popularity of the republican left in the recent Euro-elections have forced him to eat his words and stand down. So, does the Spanish crisis suggest that monarchy is seeing its last days? Does that mean the writing is on the wall for all European royals, with their magnificent uniforms and majestic lifestyle?The Spanish case provides arguments both for and against monarchy. When public opinion is particularly polarised, as it was following the end of the Franco regime, monarchs can rise above “mere” politics and “embody” a spirit of national unity.It is this apparent transcendence of politics that explains monarchs’ continuing popularity polarized. And also, the Middle East excepted, Europe is the most monarch-infested region in the world, with 10 kingdoms (not counting Vatican City and Andorra). But unlike their absolutist counterparts in the Gulf and Asia, most royal families have survived because they allow voters to avoid the difficult search for a non-controversial but respected public figure.Even so, kings and queens undoubtedly have a downside. Symbolic of national unity as they claim to be, their very history—and sometimes the way they behave today –embodies outdated and indefensible privileges and inequalities. At a time when Thomas Piketty and other economists are warning of rising inequality and the increasing power of inherited wealth, it is bizarre that wealthy aristocratic families should still be the symbolic heart of modern democratic states.The most successful monarchies strive to abandon or hide their old aristocratic ways. Princes and princesses have day-jobs and ride bicycles, not horses (or helicopters). Even so, these are wealthy families who party with the international 1%, and media intrusiveness makes it increasingly difficult to maintain the right image.While Europe’s monarchies will no doubt be smart enough to survive for some time to come, it is the British royals who have most to fear from the Spanish example.It is only the Queen who has preserved the monarchy’s reputation with her ratherordinary (if well-heeled) granny style. The danger will come with Charles, who has both an expensive taste of lifestyle and a pretty hierarchical view of the world. He has failed to understand that monarchies have largely survived because they provide a service – as non-controversial and non-political heads of state. Charles ought to know that as English history shows, it is kings, not republicans, who are the monarchy’s worst enemies.21. According to the first two Paragraphs, King Juan Carlos of Spain[A] used turn enjoy high public support[B] was unpopular among European royals[C] cased his relationship with his rivals[D]ended his reign in embarrassment22. Monarchs are kept as heads of state in Europe mostly[A] owing to their undoubted and respectable status[B] to achieve a balance between tradition and reality[C] to give voter more public figures to look up to[D]due to their everlasting political embodiment23. Which of the following is shown to be odd, according to Paragraph 4?[A] Aristocrats’ excessive reliance on inherited wealth[B] The role of the nobility in modern democracies[C] The simple lifestyle of the aristocratic families[D]The nobility’s adherence to their privileges24. The British royals “have most to fear” because Charles[A] takes a rough line on political issues[B] fails to change his lifestyle as advised[C] takes republicans as his potential allies[D] fails to adapt himself to his future role25. Which of the following is the best title of the text?[A] Carlos, Glory and Disgrace Combined[B] Charles, Anxious to Succeed to the Throne[C] Carlos, a Lesson for All European Monarchs[D]Charles, Slow to React to the Coming ThreatsText 2Just how much does the Constitution protect your digital data? The Supreme Court will now consider whether police can search the contents of a mobile phone without a warrant if the phone is on or around a person during an arrest.California has asked the justices to refrain from a sweeping ruling particularly one that upsets the old assumption that authorities may search through the possessions of suspects at the time of their arrest. It is hard, the state argues, for judges to assess the implications of new and rapidly changing technologies.The co urt would be recklessly modest if it followed California’s advice. Enough of the implications are discernable, even obvious, so that the justices can and should provide updated guidelines to police, lawyers and defendants.They should start by discarding California’s lame argument that exploring the contentsof a smart phone — a vast storehouse of digital information — is similar to, say, rifling through a suspect’s purse. The court has ruled that police don’t violate the Fo urth Amendment when they sift through the wallet or pocketbook of an arrestee without a warrant. But exploring one’s smart phone is more like entering his or her home. A smart phone may contain an arrestee’s reading history, financial history, medical history and comprehensive records of recent correspondence. The development of “cloud computing,” meanwhile, has made that exploration so much the easier.Americans should take steps to protect their digital privacy. But keeping sensitive information on these devices is increasingly a requirement of normal life. Citizens still have a right to expect private documents to remain private and protected by the Constitution’s prohibition on unreasonable searches.As so often is the case, stating that principle do esn’t ease the challenge of line-drawing. In many cases, it would not be overly onerous for authorities to obtain a warrant to search through phone contents. They could still invalidate Fourth Amendment protections when facing severe, urgent circumstances, and they could take reasonable measures to ensure that phone data are not erased or altered while a warrant is pending. The court, though, may want to allow room for police to cite situations where they are entitled to more freedom.But the justices sho uld not swallow California’s argument whole. New, disruptive technology sometimes demands novel applications of the Constitution’s protections. Orin Kerr, a law professor, compares the explosion and accessibility of digital information in the 21st century with the establishment of automobile use as a virtual necessity of life in the 20th: The justices had to specify novel rules for the new personal domain of the passenger car then; they must sort out how the Fourth Amendment applies to digital information now.26. The Supreme Court will work out whether, during an arrest, it is legitimate to[A] prevent suspects from deleting their phone contents.[B] search for suspects’ mobile phones without a warrant.[C] check suspects’ phone contents without bei ng authorized.[D]prohibit suspects from using their mobile phones.27. The author’s attitude toward California’s argument is one of[A] disapproval.[B] indifference.[C] tolerance.[D]cautiousness.28. The author believes that exploring one’s phone contents is comparable to[A] getting into one’s residence.[B] handling one’s historical records.[C] scanning one’s correspondences.[D] going through one’s wallet.29. In Paragraph 5 and 6, the author shows his concern that[A] principles are hard to be clearly expressed.[B] the court is giving police less room for action.[C] citizens’ privacy is not effectively protected.[D] phones are used to store sensitive information.30. Orin Kerr’s comparison is quoted to indica te that[A] the Constitution should be implemented flexibly.[B] new technology requires reinterpretation of the Constitution.[C]California’s argument violates principles of the Constitution.[D]principles of the Constitution should never be alteredText 3The journal Science is adding an extra round of statistical checks to its peer-review process, editor-in-chief Marcia McNutt announced today. The policy follows similar efforts from other journals, after widespread concern that basic mistakes in data analysis are contributing to the irreproducibility of many published research findings.“Readers must have confidence in the conclusions published in our journal,” writes McNutt in an editorial. Working with the American Statistical Association, the journal has appointed seven experts to a statistics board of reviewing editors(SBoRE). Manuscript will be flagged up for additional scrutiny by the journal’s internal editors, or by its existing Board of Reviewing Editors or by outside peer reviewers. The SBoRE panel will then find external statisticians to review these manuscripts.Asked whether any particular papers had impelled the change, McNutt said: “The creation of the ‘statistics board’ was motivated by concerns broadly with the applicat ion of statistics and data analysis in scientific research and is part of Science’s overall drive to increase reproducibility in the research we publish.”Giovanni Parmigiani, a biostatistician at the Harvard School of Public Health, a member of the SBoR E group. He says he expects the board to “play primarily an advisory role.” He agreed to join because he “found the foresight behind the establishment of the SBoRE to be novel, unique and likely to have a lasting impact. This impact will not only be through the publications in Science itself, but hopefully through a larger group of publishing places that may want to model their approach after Science.”John Ioannidis, a physician who studies research methodology, says that the policy is “a most welcome st ep forward” and “long overdue.” “Most journals are weak in statistical review, and this damages the quality of what they publish. I think that, for the majority of scientific papers nowadays, statistical review is more essential than expert review,” he say s. But he noted that biomedical journals such as Annals of Internal Medicine, the Journal of the American Medical Association and The Lancet pay strong attention to statistical review.Professional scientists are expected to know how to analyze data, but statistical errors are alarmingly common in published research, according to David Vaux, a cell biologist. Researchers should improve their standards, he wrote in 2012, but journals should also take a tougher line, “engaging reviewers who are statisticall y literate and editors who can verify the process”. Vaux says that Science’s idea to pass some papers to statisticians “has some merit, but a weakness is that it relies on the board of reviewing editors to identify ‘the papers that need scrutiny’ in the first place”.31. It can be learned from Paragraph 1 that[A] Science intends to simplify their peer-review process.[B] journals are strengthening their statistical checks.[C] few journals are blamed for mistakes in data analysis.[D] lack of data analysis is common in research projects.32. The phrase “flagged up” (Para. 2) is the closest in meaning to[A] found.[B] marked.[C] revised.[D] stored.33. Giovanni Parmigiani believes that the establishment of the SBoRE may[A] pose a threat to all its peers.[B] meet with strong opposition.[C] increase Science’s circulation.[D]set an example for other journals.34. David Vaux holds that what Science is doing now[A] adds to researchers’ workload.[B] diminishes the role of reviewers.[C] has room for further improvement.[D]is to fail in the foreseeable future35. Which of the following is the best title of the text?[A] Science Joins Push to Screen Statistics in Papers.[B] Professional Statisticians Deserve More Respect[C] Data Analysis Finds Its Way onto Editors’ Desks[D] Statisticians Are Coming Back with ScienceText 4Two years ago, Rupert Murdoch’s daughter ,Elisabeth ,spoke of the “unsettling dearth of integrity across so many of our instituti ons” Integrity had collapsed, she argued, because of a collective acceptance that the only “sorting mechanism ”in society should be profit and the market .But “it’s us ,human beings ,we the people who create the society we want ,not profit ”.Driving her point home, she continued: “It’s increasingly apparent that the absence of purpose, of a moral language within government, media or business could become one of the most dangerous foals for capitalism and freedom.” This same absence of moral purpose was w ounding companies such as News International ,shield thought ,making it more likely that it would lose its way as it had with widespread illegal telephone hacking .As the hacking trial concludes –finding guilty ones-editor of the News of the World, Andy Coulson, for conspiring to hack phones ,and finding his predecessor, Rebekah Brooks, innocent of the same charge –the winder issue of dearth of integrity still standstill, Journalists are known to have hacked the phones of up to 5,500 people .This is hacking on an industrial scale ,as was acknowledged by Glenn Mulcaire, the man hired by the News of the World in 2001 to be the point person for phone hacking. Others await trial. This long story still unfolds.In many respects, the dearth of moral purpose frames not only the fact of such widespread phone hacking but the terms on which the trial took place .One of the astonishing revelations was how little Rebekah Brooks knew of what went on in her newsroom, wow little she thought to ask and the fact that she never inquired wow the stories arrived. The core of her successful defence was that she knew nothing.In today’s world, title has become normal that well—paid executives should not beaccountable for what happens in the organizations that they run perhaps we should not be so surprised. For a generation, the collective doctrine has been that the sorting mechanism of society should be profit. The words that have mattered are efficiency, flexibility, shareholder value, business–friendly, wealth generation, sales, impact and, in newspapers, circulation. Words degraded to the margin have been justice fairness, tolerance, proportionality and accountability.The purpose of editing the News of the World was not to promote reader understanding to be fair in what was written or to betray any common humanity. It was to ruin lives in the quest for circulation and impact. Ms Brooks may or may not have had suspicions about how her journalists got their stories, but she asked no questions, gave no instructions—nor received traceable, recorded answers.36. According to the first two paragraphs, Elisabeth was upset by[A] the consequences of the current sorting mechanism[B] companies’ financial loss due to immoral practices.[C] governmental ineffectiveness on moral issues.[D]the wide misuse of integrity among institutions.37. It can be inferred from Paragraph 3 that[A] Glem Mulcaire may deny phone hacking as a crime[B] more journalists may be found guilty of phone hacking.[C] Andy Coulson should be held innocent of the charge.[D] phone hacking will be accepted on certain occasions.38. The author believes the Rebekah Books’s deference[A] revealed a cunning personality[B] centered on trivial issues[C] was hardly convincing[D] was part of a conspiracy39. The author holds that the current collective doctrine shows[A] generally distorted values[B] unfair wealth distribution[C] a marginalized lifestyle[D] a rigid moral cote40. Which of the following is suggested in the last paragraph?[A] The quality of writing is of primary importance.[B] Common humanity is central news reporting.[C] Moral awareness matters in exciting a newspaper.[D] Journalists need stricter industrial regulations.Part BDirections:In the following text, some sentences have been removed. For Questions 41-45, choose the most suitable one from the fist A-G to fit into each of the numbered blanks. Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)How does your reading proceed? Clearly you try to comprehend, in the sense of identifying meanings for individual words and working out relationships between them, drawingon your explicit knowledge of English grammar (41) ______you begin to infer a context for the text, for instance, by making decisions about what kind of speech event is involved: who is making the utterance, to whom, when and where.The ways of reading indicated here are without doubt kinds of of comprehension. But they show comprehension to consist not just passive assimilation but of active engagement inference and problem-solving. You infer information you feel the writer has invited you to grasp by presenting you with specific evidence and cues (42) _______Conceived in this way, comprehension will not follow exactly the same track for each reader. What is in question is not the retrieval of an absolute, fixed or “true” meaning that can be read off and clocked for accuracy, or some timeless relation of the text to the world. (43) _______ Such background material inevit ably reflects who we are, (44) _______This doesn’t, however, make interpretation merely relative or even pointless. Precisely because readers from different historical periods, places and social experiences produce different but overlapping readings of the same words on the page-including for texts that engage with fundamental human concerns-debates about texts can play an important role in social discussion of beliefs and values.How we read a given text also depends to some extent on our particular interest in reading it. (45)_______such dimensions of read suggest-as others introduced later in the book will also do-that we bring an implicit (often unacknowledged) agenda to any act of reading. It doesn’t then necessarily follow that one kind of reading is fuller, more advanced or more worthwhile than another. Ideally, different kinds of reading inform each other, and act as useful reference points for and counterbalances to one another. Together, they make up the reading component of your overall literacy or relationship to your surrounding textual environment.[A] Are we studying that text and trying to respond in a way that fulfils the requirement of a given course? Reading it simply for pleasure? Skimming it for information? Ways of reading on a train or in bed are likely to differ considerably from reading in a seminar room.[B] Factors such as the place and period in which we are reading, our gender ethnicity, age and social class will encourage us towards certain interpretation but at the same time obscure or even close off others.[C] If you are unfamiliar with words or idioms, you guess at their meaning, using clues presented in the contest. On the assumption that they will become relevant later, you make a mental note of discourse entities as well as possible links between them.[D]In effect, you try to reconstruct the likely meanings or effects that any given sentence, image or reference might have had: These might be the ones the author intended.[E]You make further inferences, for instance, about how the test may be significant to you, or about its validity—inferences that form the basis of a personal response for which the author will inevitably be far less responsible.[F]In plays，novels and narrative poems, characters speak as constructs created by the author, not necessarily as mouthpieces for the author’s own thoughts.[G]Rather, we ascribe meanings to test on the basis of interaction between what we might call textual and contextual material: between kinds of organization or patterning we perceive in a text’s formal structures (so especially its language structures) and various kinds of background, social knowledge, belief and attitude that we bring to the text.Section III TranslationDirections:Read the following text carefully and then translate the underlined segments into Chinese. Your translation should be written clearly on ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)Within the span of a hundred years, in the seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries, a tide of emigration—one of the great folk wanderings of history—swept from Europe to America.46) This movement, driven by powerful and diverse motivations, built a nation out of a wilderness and, by its nature, shaped the character and destiny of an uncharted continent.47) The United States is the product of two principal forces-the immigration of European peoples with their varied ideas, customs, and national characteristics and the impact of a new country which modified these traits. Of necessity, colonial America was a projection of Europe. Across the Atlantic came successive groups of Englishmen, Frenchmen, Germans, Scots, Irishmen, Dutchmen, Swedes, and many others who attempted to transplant their habits and traditions to the new world.48) But, the force of geographic conditions peculiar to America, the interplay of the varied national groups upon one another, and the sheer difficulty of maintaining old-world ways in a raw, new continent caused significant changes. These changes were gradual and at first scarcely visible. But the result was a new social pattern which, although it resembled European society in many ways, had a character that was distinctly American.49) The first shiploads of immigrants bound for the territory which is now the United States crossed the Atlantic more than a hundred years after the 15th- and 16th-century explorations of North America. In the meantime, thriving Spanish colonies had been established in Mexico, the West Indies, and South America. These travelers to North America came in small, unmercifully overcrowded craft. During their six- to twelve-week voyage, they subsisted on barely enough food allotted to them. Many of the ship were lost in storms, many passengers died of disease, and infants rarely survived the journey. Sometimes storms blew the vessels far off their course, and often calm brought unbearably long delay.“To the anxious travelers the sight of the American shore brought almost inexpressible relief.” said one recorder of events, “The air at twelve leagues’ distance smelt as s weet as a new-blown garden.” The colonists’ first glimpse of the new land was a sight of dense woods. 50) The virgin forest with its richness and variety of trees was a veritable real treasure-house which extended from Maine all the way down to Georgia. Here was abundant fuel and lumber. Here was the raw material of houses and furniture, ships and potash, dyes and naval stores.Section IV WritingPart A51. Directions:You are going to host a club reading session. Write an email of about 100 words recommending a book to the club members.You should state reasons for your recommendation.You should write neatly on the ANSWER SHEET.Do not sign your own name at the end of the letter. Use Li Ming instead.Do not write the address. (10 points)Part B52. Directions:Write an essay of 160-200 words based on the following drawing. In your essay you should1) describe the drawing briefly2) explain its intended meaning, and3) give your commentsYou should write neatly on ANSWER SHEET. (20 points)手机时代的聚会参考答案及详细解析I cloze1. [A] when [B] why [C] how [D] what【答案】[D] what【解析】该题考查的是语法知识。
83-2015年考研英语(一)完形填空题型分类解析
2015年考研英语（一）完形填空题型分类解析来源：文都教育2015年研究生考试如期举行，文都专家第一时间收集整理了今年英语（一）中的完形填空真题及答案，并做了重要解析，以供参考。
考研英语完形填空的文章以说明文和议论文为主，主要是用来考查考生的综合基础能力，要求考生在熟练掌握语法、词语的基础上，认识文章的结构和各部分的逻辑关系。
其中，最常考察的有语义衔接、逻辑衔接、结构衔接和惯用衔接（固定搭配）。
下面小编结合2015年英语（一）的完形填空的选项，分析总结四大完形填空题型。
1.）语义题主要是对实义词的考查，同时又结合了近义词辨析或者形近词辨析。
如真题中的2.concluded，6.significant,8.resemble等。
2.）逻辑题语篇中的逻辑衔接是指句子之间或句子内部各成分之间，通过连接性词语的运用，实现语义上的连贯。
逻辑衔接反映在考题上主要是选择逻辑连接词：包括反映句际逻辑关系的连接词、介词、短语等。
如真题中7.know，9.also,10.perhaps等。
3.）结构题结构衔接主要指一些固定句式、关系从句、主谓一致、倒装结构及平行结构间的衔接关系，也就是对语法关系，尤其是句法关系的考查。
如真题中的1.what，15.faster 等。
4. ）惯用题惯用衔接也可以称之为固定搭配，一般可以分为以名词为中心的固定搭配，以动词为中心的固定搭配和以形容词为中心的固定搭配。
如真题中的11.to（there is more to it，还有更多）13.rather than等。
其中，语义题和逻辑题比重最大，童鞋们除了平时背单词之外，还要多多阅读英文刊物，培养自己的语篇理解能力和语感，这样，完形填空才能拿到一个理想的分数。
2015年考研英语一真题与解析
2015 年考研英语一真题原文及答案解析完整版Section I Use of EnglishDirections:Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or Don ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)Though not biologically related, friends are as “ related ” as fourth cousins, sharing about That is _(1)_a study, published from the University of California and Yale University in the Proceedings ofthe National Academy of Sciences, has__(2)_.The study is a genome-wide analysis conducted _(3)__1,932 unique subjects which __(4)__pairsof unrelated friends and unrelated strangers. The same people were used in both_(5)_.While 1% may seem_(6)_,it is not so to a geneticist. As James Fowler, professor of medical genetics atUC San Diego, says,“ Most people do not even _(7)_their fourth cousins but somehow manage to select as friends the people who_(8)_our kin.”The study_(9)_found that the genes for smell were something shared in friends but not genes forimmunity .Why this similarity exists in smell genes is difficult to explain, for now,_(10)_,as the team suggests,it draws us to similar environments but there is more_(11)_it. There could be many mechanismsworking together that _(12)_us in choosing genetically similar friends_(13)_ ” functional Kin friends with_(14)_!One of the remarkable findings of the study was the similar genes seem to be evolution_(15)_thanother genes Studying this could help_(16)_why human evolution picked pace in the last 30,000 years,with social environment being a major_(17)_factor.The findings do not simply explain people’ s_(18)_to befriend those of similar_(19)_backgrounds the researchers. Though all the subjects were drawn from a population of European extraction, carewas taken to_(20)_that all subjects, friends and strangers, were taken from the same population.1. [A] when [B] why [C] how [D] what【答案】 [D] what【解析】该题考查的是语法知识。
2015年考研英语一完形精读
2015年考研英语一完形精读一、考研英语一完形填空题概述2015年考研英语一完形填空题依然是考察考生对文章整体逻辑和语境的把握能力。
尤其是在词汇量、阅读量和语感方面的考验，多年来，单项选择题的题干和选项都相对宽松一些，而完型填空题的题干和选项往往要求更高的细致阅读，考查对文章深层次内容的理解。
因此考生在备考过程中要重点多练习完形填空题型，增强语感和判断力。
二、 2015年考研英语一完形填空答题技巧1. 通读全文，对文章有一个整体的把握，了解文章的大意和主题。
2. 理解每个空格所在的上下文，抓住文章的逻辑脉络，理解作者的观点和意图。
3. 分析选项，排除干扰项，确定正确选项。
4. 遵循固定搭配，根据词汇语法结构选择最佳答案。
5. 题目之间可以互相印证，有时候可以通过排除法确定答案。
三、 2015年考研英语一完形精读题材内容分析2015年考研英语一完形填空考查了一篇关于心理学的文章，文章主要介绍了一个心理学家的理论，试图从心理学的角度解释人类行为。
涉及了人类的进化心理学、心理学的研究方法和临床心理学等方面的内容，文章较为专业，需要考生具有一定的文化底蕴和知识储备。
四、 2015年考研英语一完形填空备考方法1. 阅读专业的心理学书籍，了解对应领域的专业术语和理论知识。
2. 利用考研英语一专业课辅导资料，针对性的进行练习和训练，拓展词汇量和阅读量。
3. 多看心理学相关的文章，增强对专业内容的理解和把握。
4. 注重平时积累，提高对生词和固定搭配的掌握程度。
五、 2015年考研英语一完形填空阅读策略1. 注重整体把握，第一遍阅读时不用停顿，了解文章的主题和脉络。
2. 第二遍阅读时，注重空格所在的上下文和语境，理解每个空格的词义和句意。
3. 注意排除干扰项，不能被表面的语言现象所迷惑，要注重深层次的理解。
4. 学会灵活应对，做到眼到、手停，排除干扰项，确定最佳答案。
六、结语通过对2015年考研英语一完形填空题的分析，可以得出以下结论：完形填空题的考查点主要在于考察考生对文章整体逻辑和语境的把握能力，需要考生具有较强的阅读理解能力和一定的文化底蕴和知识储备。
2015年研究生考试考研英语一真题试题分析
2015年研究生考试考研英语一真题试题分析2015考研英语一真题总体介绍：较2014年考研英语一真题来说，2015年整体难度持平，整体的感觉就是看似简单的词汇却是理解原文信息的关键。
话题涉及人际关系类、政治类、科技信息类、人文类等。
阅读第二篇文章涉及隐私话题，手机信息是否可以被保护。
2007年text 4是也涉及隐私的话题，主要讨论的是数据泄露问题。
阅读第三篇是关于报刊杂志的发展。
阅读第四篇是关于新闻评论的文章。
而本次阅读涉及的相关话题，我们在以前的真题中也出现了类似的话题。
比如2014年text 3、2010年text 1都是关于报刊新闻类话题的文章。
作文部分出现了和2009年的真题作文同类的话题，都是交流类的，强调人们在享受现代科技带来的便利的同时，不能忽视现实交流的重要性。
在此，考研1号老师提醒广大考生，注重基础，重视真题，亲动笔，常练习，这样才能在考试中取得理想的成绩。
完型原文标题：DNA of Friendship: Study Finds We are Genetically Linked to Our Friends （DNA友谊：研究发现我们在基因上和我们的朋友有着千丝万缕的联系）。
作者：Jayalakshmi K时间：July 15, 2014外刊：外文网站Givology小结：此网站是由沃顿商学院的一群学生建立的，旨在为发展中国家的奖学金和教育项目募集资金。
主要受益群体是需要资助的大学生，所以在大学生群体颇受欢迎，也是广大大学生群里非常喜爱的一个交流的网站。
命题人员选取这类型网站的题源，是真正在测试大家日常所学习的知识。
此次选题告诉我们要在日常学习英语中，不能仅仅局限于最熟悉的那些期刊，要和世界接轨，让语言真正实现无国界的交流与思想沟通。
解题关键：1. 语法题。
答案为what2. 前后信息判断。
答案为concluded3. 固定表达。
conduct analysis on...4. 定语从句限定关系。
2015考研英语一、二新题型及完型深度解析
2015考研英语一、二新题型及完型深度解析新东方在线李玉技2015年全国研究生入学考试今天拉开帷幕。
今天是考研的第1天，下午进行了英语的考试，新东方在线考研辅导名师团队第一时间通过酷学网对考研真题进行直播解析，敬请持续关注。
以下是新东方在线考研名师李玉技为2015考生带来的考研英语新题型及完形填空的深度解析：各位参加2015年考研考试的亲爱学子大家好，这次考试英语顺利的落下了帷幕，大家特别关心今年新题型和完形填空，我用一点时间讲讲新题型和完形填空的情况。
一、新题型考察简单1、英语一：段落句子填空题首先完形填空新题型纯粹是波澜不惊，他基本上保持了考研英语命题稳健的基本优点。
今年在考试过程中，我们说不管是英语一还是英语二的题型，基本上让广大的考生考出自己的水平。
另外，今年的题型比较简单。
比如说在2014年初考试的时候，英语一的新题型考到了培训，而这次新题型考的是常见的段落句子填空题。
这篇文章出题风格和往年不一样，往年往往是五个独立段落，或者是在某一段的最后一段出一道题，比如说42题、43题，都是在我们的段尾出题，但是41、44、45都是段落中间出的题，这一点在降低难度，而不是在提高难度。
这篇文章注意一下来自于马丁所著的一本书《阅读的方法》讲的是高级阅读技巧，这本书的第一单元就是这个。
以下是英语一新题型参考答案：41题正确答案选的是C。
非常简单，只要找到这篇文章只要对一下就全出来了。
这里我们说最主要的是这句话，对于这句话我们41题选择的是C，在这里这个词它也可以对应后面的句子。
42题是E。
你可以做进一步的推理，关于这个课文的重要。
我们之所以选择E，因为E 空前的两句都重复了“推理”这样的字眼。
还有E段的最后也提出了读者的推测。
所以选择E。
43题是G。
这个考点和去年的考点差不多。
44题是B。
B选项的意思是因素。
45题是A。
A具体描述了许多不同的阅读路径和方式，这是对45空前后的细化。
2、英语二：小标题题对于英语二的新题型这次考的小标题题，这一点老师们和同学民都预测到了，而今天考的小标题题又是简单的。
2015年考研英语一真题与解析
2015 年考研英语一真题原文及答案解析完整版Section I Use of EnglishDirections:Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D onANSWER SHEET. (10 points)Though not biologically related, friends are as “related ”as fourth cousins, sharing aboutThat is _(1)_a study, published from the University of California and Yale University in the Proceedings ofthe National Academy of Sciences, has__(2)_.The study is a genome-wide analysis conducted _(3)__1,932 unique subjects which __(4)__pairs ofunrelated friends and unrelated strangers. The same people were used in both_(5)_.While 1% may seem_(6)_,it is not so to a geneticist. As James Fowler, professor of medical genetics atUC San Diego, says, “Most people do not even _(7)_their fourth cousins but somehow manage to select asfriends the people who_(8)_our kin. ”The study_(9)_found that the genes for smell were something shared in friends but not genes forimmunity .Why this similarity exists in smell genes is difficult to explain, for now,_(10)_,as the teamsuggests, it draws us to similar environments but there is more_(11)_it. There could be many mechanismsworking together that _(12)_us in choosing genetically similar friends_(13)_ ”functional Kinfriends with_(14)_!One of the remarkable findings of the study was the similar genes seem to be evolution_(15)_thanother genes Studying this could help_(16)_why human evolution picked pace in the last 30,000 years, withsocial environment being a major_(17)_factor.The findings do not simply explain people ’s_(18)_to befriend those of similar_(19)_backgrounds,the researchers. Though all the subjects were drawn from a population of European extraction, care wastaken to_(20)_that all subjects, friends and strangers, were taken from the same population.1. [A] when [B] why [C] how [D] what【答案】[D] what【解析】该题考查的是语法知识。
2015年考研英语一真题及解析
2015年考研英语一真题原文与答案解析完整版Section I Use of EnglishDirections:Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)Though not biologically related, friends are as “related” as fourth c ousins, sharing about 1% of genes. That is _(1)_a study, published from the University of California and Yale University in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, has__(2)_.The study is a genome-wide analysis conducted _(3)__1,932 unique subjects which __(4)__pairs of unrelated friends and unrelated strangers. The same people were used in both_(5)_.While 1% may seem_(6)_,it is not so to a geneticist. As James Fowler, professor of medical genetics at UC San Diego, says, “Most people do not even _(7)_their fourth cousins but somehow manage to select as friends the people who_(8)_our kin.”The study_(9)_found that the genes for smell were something shared in friends but not genes for immunity .Why this similarity exists in smell genes is difficult to explain, for now,_(10)_,as the team suggests, it draws us to similar environments but there is more_(11)_it. There could be many mechanisms working together that _(12)_us in choosing genetically similar friends_(13)_”functional Kinship” of being friends with_(14)_!One of the remarkable findings of the study was the similar genes seem to be evolution_(15)_than other genes Studying this could help_(16)_why human evolution picked pace in the last 30,000 years, with social environment being a major_(17)_factor.The findings do not simply explain people’s_(18)_to befriend those of similar_(19)_backgrounds, say the researchers. Though all the subjects were drawn from a population of European extraction, care was taken to_(20)_that all subjects, friends and strangers, were taken from the same population.1. [A] when [B] why [C] how [D] what【答案】[D] what【解析】该题考查的是语法知识。
2015年考研英语（1）真题解析完整版
2015年全国硕士研究生入学统一考试英语(一)试题精解S e c t i o n I U s e o fE n g l i s h总体分析来源:I B T i m e s‘国际财经时报“2014.07.15㊂全文以 朋友间有相似基因 这一观点引出一项研究,并对研究方法及研究发现展开介绍㊂试题精解1.]当 时候[B]为什么[C]如何[D]什么[解析]T h a t回指首句观点 朋友间有1%基因相同 ,as t u d y指 某项研究 ,首句观点是这项研究的成果㊂只有w h a t能表现 研究取得的某种成果 ,同时能与首句观点保持一致,因此答案为[D]㊂2.[A]辩护,辩解[B]得出结论,总结;推断[C]收回;撤销[D]建议;劝告[解析]由下文可知,该研究对没有血亲关系的朋友和陌生人等进行了全基因组分析,故可推知,该研究围绕 没有血亲关系的朋友 展开,首句观点应该是这一研究的结论,[B]c o n c l u d e d正确㊂3.[A]为了,表目的[B]和,表伴随[C]在 上,表对象[D]通过,表方式[解析]空格处考查 研究分析 与 实验对象 间的关系,能够与c o n d u c t搭配,且后面能够跟表对象名词的只有[C]o n㊂注:c o n d u c t a ne x p e r i m e n t o n...表示 以 为对象进行一项实验 ㊂4.[A]比较[B]寻找,寻求[C]分开[D]连接[解析]p a i r s o f...表明 (该分析对)没有血缘的朋友和陌生人两两成对(进行 ) ,结合首段 朋友间同有1%基因 可推知该结论应是 两两比较 得出,[A]c o m p a r e d正确㊂5.[A]实验,检验[B]物体;目标[C]样本[D]事例[解析]由首句可知研究操作是 比较两组成对的实验对象 ,故b o t h与p a i r so f...a n d...相对应,即空格词的大范畴为 实验对象 ,[C]s a m p l e s正确㊂b o t ho b j e c t s只涵盖 两个人 ,不合文意㊂6.[A]微不足道的[B]出乎意料的[C]不可靠的[D]难以置信的[解析]由上文 研究发现发表于国家级刊物上 及下文d on o t e v e n...㊁s o m e h o w m a n a g e传达的强烈语气,可推知1%在遗传学上意义重大㊂故空格处应与之相反,表示 微不足道 ,[A]i n s i g n i f i c a n t正确㊂7.[A]拜访;参观[B]错过;想念[C]寻找;请求[D]知道;了解[解析]t h e i r f o u r t hc o u s i n s指第四代表亲,亲属关系得上溯到共同的 玄(外)祖父 ,算是 超远房表亲 ,因此可推断 大部分人 和其 第四代表亲 关系并不亲近,他们之间可能不熟悉,[D]k n o w正确㊂8.[A]类似;像[B]影响[C]较喜欢;有利于[D]超越;胜过[解析]由前文 朋友间亲如第四代表亲,共有1%基因 及本段主旨 1%的共有基因在遗传学家看来很重要 可知,人们挑选的朋友和其亲戚一样,有1%共有基因,故应与亲戚 相似 ,[A]r e s e m b l e正确㊂9.[A]又[B]而且;也[C]反而[D]如此[解析]本段 朋友间的相同基因是嗅觉基因,而非免疫基因 是上文 朋友间有相似基因 这一研究基础上更深层次的研究,因此与上文为并列递进关系,选项中只有[B]a l s o能表达该逻辑关系㊂10.[A]同时(表时间)[B]此外(表递进)[C]同样;也(表类比㊁并列)[D]也许(表推测)[解析]空格前半句 嗅觉基因把我们吸引到相似环境中 是对上文 这种相似性为何存在于嗅觉基因中难以解释 的说明: 气味相投 使大家成为朋友;空格后半句b u t t h e r e i sm o r e...又对该解释补充限制因素,由上句 难以解释 和b u t后的补充限制可知,空格后解释是可能性的一种,[D]P e r h a p s正确㊂11.[A]关于[B]对于[C]从 [D]像[解析]空格句与上句逻辑为:从 难以解释 到 一种可能解释 ,到 可能还有很多机制 ,本题填补第二到三层的逻辑,即 引出更多可能 ,[B]t o正确㊂注:t h e r e i sm o r e t o i t表示 事情没那么简单 ㊂112.[A]驱使;促进[B]观察;注意到[C]使困惑;混淆[D]限制[解析]由前文可知,空格句为对 选择基因相似朋友 的深层原因分析,故 许多起协同作用的机制 是 我们选择基因相似朋友 的原因,[A]d r i v e(驱使(某人做某事))符合这一因果逻辑㊂13.[A]根据;按照[B]而不是[C]不管[D]与 一道[解析]f u n c t i o n a l强调 实用 ,指 能帮助达成特殊目的 的关系; 基因相似的朋友 则是 非刻意为达成某种目的而是自然结成的 关系,两者恰恰相反,含取舍逻辑的[B]r a t h e r t h a n正确㊂14.[A]机会;机遇[B]反应;回应[C]使命;任务[D]利益;好处[解析]o f b e i n g f r i e n d sw i t h 是对f u n c t i o n a l k i n s h i p的说明,两者含义应一致;b e i n g f r i e n d s对应k i n s h i p,w i t h对应f u n c t i o n a l,[D]b e n e f i t s正确,f r i e n d sw i t hb e n e f i t s指 因互利结成的利益朋友 ㊂15.[A]更晚[B]更慢[C]更快[D]更早[解析]空格句指出一项值得注意的发现,下句指出这一发现的意义㊂其中h u m a ne v o l u t i o n对应s i m i l a r g e n e s...e v o l v i n g,空格处则对应p i c k e d p a c e,[C]f a s t e r(更快地)符合文意㊂16.[A]预测;预报[B]记得;记住[C]理解;了解[D]表达[解析]空格句指出研究发现的意义,研究的目的必然是弄清事实背后的原因,只有[C]u n d e r s t a n d 能串联起 w h y...ңh e l p u n d e r s t a n d... 这一问答逻辑㊂ 过去三万年间人类的进化加快 是一个持续发生的动态过程,人们对这一进化的动态过程是不可能 记住(r e m e m b e r) 和 表达(e x p r e s s) 的㊂17.[A]无法预料的[B]促成的;起作用的[C]可控的;能操纵的[D]破坏性的,引起混乱的[解析]由上文及空格前半句可知,推动人类进化加快的是相似基因㊂前文提及 相似基因有助于我们结交朋友 ,形成 朋友圈 ,故由相似基因形成的社交圈促进人类进化,[B]c o n t r i b u t o r y正确㊂18.[A]努力[B]决定[C]安排[D]倾向[解析]T h e f i n d i n g s指代上文 朋友间有相似基因 , 人们与相似 背景交朋友 对应 有许多机制协同作用,驱使我们选择基因相似的朋友 ㊂[D]t e n d e n c y暗示某种趋势和倾向,且该趋势是由体内各种机制作用的,带有 无意识地 含义,为正确项㊂其他三项均含有 主观 意味,与 无意识行为 相矛盾㊂19.[A]政治的[B]宗教的[C]种族的[D]经济的[解析]空格下文t h e s a m e p o p u l a t i o n细化a p o p u l a t i o no f E u r o p e a n e x t r a c t i o n,指 欧洲血统中的同一族群 ㊂ 所有实验对象都来自同一族群 表明,实验尽量排除族群因素的影响,并非简单证明人们和种族背景相似的人做朋友,[C]e t h n i c正确㊂20.[A]看见;确保[B]显示;表明[C]证明;证实[D]判断,辨别[解析]空格句说明,所有实验对象不仅要皆为欧洲血统,还需来自同一族群,从而使结果尽可能少受种族因素的影响㊂[A]s e e契合c a r ew a s t a k e n t o...(小心翼翼地做某事)的逻辑,为正确项㊂全文翻译朋友之间尽管没有血缘关系,但却 亲 如第四代表亲,同有约1%的基因㊂这是由加利福尼亚大学和耶鲁大学共同发表在‘美国国家科学院院刊“上的一项研究所得出的结论㊂这份研究对1932个独特的实验对象进行了全基因组分析,它将没有血亲关系的朋友和陌生人分别分成两人一组进行比较㊂两组抽样中使用了相同的实验对象㊂虽然1%可能看上去微不足道,但遗传学家可不这么认为㊂正如加州大学圣地亚哥分校医学遗传学的教授詹姆斯㊃福勒所说: 大多数人甚至都不认识他们的第四代表亲,但却不知怎么的竟然能够挑选像亲戚一样的人做朋友㊂研究还发现,朋友间同有某些嗅觉基因,却没有免疫基因㊂嗅觉基因为何存有这种相似性目前还难以解释㊂或许,正如该团队所言,是嗅觉基因把我们吸引到相似的环境中去,但事情没有那么简单㊂可能还有许多机制协同作用,驱使我们选择基因相似的朋友而不去结交因利益瓜葛而结成的 实用的亲密关系 ㊂研究中的一项引人注目的发现是:相似的基因似乎比其他基因进化得更快㊂对此加以研究有助于理解为何人类进化在过去的30,000年间加快了步伐,(其中)社会环境是一个主要的促成因素㊂2研究人员称,该发现不是在简单证明人们为何倾向于和种族背景相似的人交朋友㊂尽管所有的实验对象都选自欧洲血统的族群,但(研究人员)还是悉心确保所有的实验对象,不管是朋友还是陌生人,都来自(该血统中的)同一族群㊂S e c t i o n I I R e a d i n g C o m p r e h e n s i o nP a r tAT e x t1总体分析来源:T h e G u a r d i a n‘卫报“2014.06.04㊂作者以近期事件 西班牙国王卡洛斯被迫退位 为切入点,对备受争议的 欧洲王室命运 进行分析㊂行文脉络:引出全文探讨问题 欧洲王室的未来 (第一段) (从历史角度)论述欧洲君主的积极作用(第二㊁三段) (从现实角度)论述欧洲君主的格格不入(第四㊁五段) 聚焦英国王室,指出其面临危机(第六㊁七段)㊂试题精解21.根据前两段可知,西班牙国王胡安㊃卡洛斯㊂[A]缓和了同对手的关系[B]曾经享有很高的公众支持[C]不受欧洲各王室欢迎[D]尴尬地结束了他的统治[锁定答案]第一段②句指出,最近令人尴尬的丑闻及欧洲议会选举中左翼共和党支持率的走高已迫使胡安㊃卡洛斯退位,即:卡洛斯尴尬地结束了他的统治,[D]正确:e n d e dh i s r e i g n替换s t a n dd o w n;i ne m b a r r a s s m e n t对应e m b a r r a s s i n g s c a n d a l s㊂[排除干扰][A]与第一段②句 共和党左翼(其敌对者)迫使卡洛斯下台 相悖㊂[B]将第一段②句 左翼共和党支持率走高(t h e p o p u l a r i t y o f t h e r e p u b l i c a n l e f t) 偷换为 卡洛斯(K i n g J u a nC a r l o s)支持率走高 ㊂[C]利用第一段④句提及的 欧洲王室(a l lE u r o p e a nr o y a l s) 设置干扰,但文中并未提及卡洛斯与其关系㊂[提炼思路]本题针对开篇引子(具体事例)设置事实细节题㊂解题最大难点在于其中关键词s t a n d d o w n难知其意,考生需从o n c e i n s i s t e d k i n g s d o n t a b d i c a t e...r e c e n t l y f o r c e d h i mt o e a t h i sw o r d s...S o,d oe s t h eS p a n i s hc r i s i s s u g g e s t t h a tM o n a r c h y i s s e e i n g i t s l a s t d a y s推知其意为 退位㊁退职 ㊂22.君主作为国家元首在欧洲得以保留主要是㊂[A]为了给选民提供更多可以敬仰的公众人物[B]为了在传统和现实间达成一种平衡[C]由于他们无可争辩㊁受人尊重的地位[D]因为他们具有持久的政治象征意义[锁定答案]第三段①句指出,君主得以保留是因为这种 政治超越性 (回指第二段 超越政治分歧,象征民族统一精神 );②③句进一步指出,欧洲君主得以保留是因为他们为选民提供了一位无争议㊁受尊重的公众人物㊂可见[C]正确:t h e i ru n d o u b t e da n d r e s p e c t a b l e s t a t u s是对an o n-c o n t r o v e r s i a l b u t r e-s p e c t e d p u b l i c f i g u r e的改写㊂[排除干扰][A]将第三段③句an o n-c o n t r o v e r s i a l b u t r e s p e c t e d p u b l i c f i g u r e改为m o r e p u b l i c f i g-u r e s t o l o o ku p t o,既改变 人物数量(一个ң多个) 又遗漏关键信息(无争议㊁受尊重)㊂[B]利用文中事实 欧洲王室跨越传统与现实 形成干扰,但这并非其得以保留的原因,且 达成平衡(a c h i e v e ab a l a n c e) 无中生有㊂[D]将第三段①句君主得以保留的原因 政治超越性/非政治性(t r a n s c e n d e n c e o f p o l i t i c s) 改为与之相反的 政治象征性(p o l i t i c a l e m b o d i m e n t) ㊂[提炼思路]本题针对第二段命制因果事实题㊂解题思路为:首先根据题干与...e x p l a i n sm o n a r c h sc o n t i n u i n gp o p u l a r i t y和r o y a l f a m i l i e s h a v e s u r v i v e db e c a u s e...的近义关系,将解题线索集中到第三段①句t h i s a p p a r e n t t r a n s c e n d e n c e o f p o l i t i c s和③句a n o n-c o n t r o v e r s i a l b u t r e s p e c t e d p u b l i c f i g u r e;然后根据t h i s的回指功能进一步扩大至第二段末句r i s e a b o v e m e r e p o l i t i c s a n d e m b o d y a s p i r i t o f n a t i o n a l3u n i t y;最后结合三处得出答案㊂23.根据第四段内容,下面哪项是怪异的?[A]贵族对继承的财产过度依赖㊂[B]贵族在现代民主政治中的角色㊂[C]贵族世家简单的生活方式㊂[D]贵族对其特权的执意不放㊂[锁定答案]第四段③句指出,在经济学家就 日益加深的不平等和世袭财富权力 发出警告的今日, 贵族世家依然象征着现代民主国家 的核心非常奇怪,可见[B]正确:t h e r o l e㊁t h en o b i l i t y㊁m o d e r nd e m o c-r a c i e s分别对应原文s t i l l b e t h e s y m b o l i c h e a r t㊁w e a l t h y a r i s t o c r a t i c f a m i l i e s㊁m o d e r nd e m o c r a t i c s t a t e s㊂[排除干扰][A]为第四段③句i n c r e a s i n gp o w e r o f i n h e r i t e dw e a l t h暗含事实,[C]符合第五段①②句信息,[D]为第四段②句e m b o d i e s o u t d a t e d a n d i n d e f e n s i b l e p r i v i l e g e s暗示信息,但三者均未体现作者认为的 怪异 之处,文不对题㊂[提炼思路]本题考查 事实细节+作者观点 ,解题关键在于抓取题干核心信息t ob eo d d㊁明确题目所问(第四段作者指出的奇特怪异现象),并通过i t i s b i z a r r e...将解题线索锁定第四段末句t h a t从句㊂最后对比选项:正确项需为t h a t从句的同义表述;选项即便符合他处事实,但非从句所指,也应排除㊂24.英国王室 最应感到恐慌 ,是因为查尔斯王子㊂[A]没能让自己适应未来的角色[B]没能遵从建议改变生活方式[C]把共和主义者当成潜在盟友[D]对政治问题采取了强硬立场[锁定答案]文章末段指出英国王室的危险来自于查尔斯:生活方式奢侈,等级观念强,没能理解君主制之所以能够存续,很大原因在于提供了一位无争议㊁非政治的国家元首,而(行为不当的)君主恰恰是君主制最大的敌人㊂可见,危机来自 没能调整自己,适应未来国王角色 的查尔斯王子,[A]正确㊂[排除干扰][B]利用②句h a s a n e x p e n s i v e t a s t e o f l i f e s t y l e设置干扰,但这不足以概括查尔斯的 错误行为 ,且a s a d v i s e d无中生有㊂[C]利用④句人物r e p u b l i c a n s设置干扰,但该句只暗示这是王室的反对者,并未指出查尔斯将其当做潜在盟友㊂[D]对③句f a i l e d t o...n o n-p o l i t i c a l过度引申,文中并未指出查尔斯政治立场强硬㊂[提炼思路]本题就最后两段设题,要求考生概括英国王室处于危险的原因㊂解题时需 正面概括+反向推导 :一,正确项需能概括关于查尔斯的主要信息;以偏概全以及扭曲事实的选项须排除;二,关于女王的信息 维持了君主声誉(h a s p r e s e r v e d t h em o n a r c h y r e p u t a t i o n) 可作为概括推理的反向依据:查尔斯做法难保君主声誉㊂25.以下哪项最适合做文章题目[A]卡洛斯,光荣与耻辱的合体[B]查尔斯,渴望继承王冠[C]卡洛斯,给所有欧洲君主的教训[D]查尔斯,迟于应对迫近的威胁[锁定答案]本文第一段以 西班牙国王卡洛斯被迫退位 事件引发全文探讨问题:欧洲王室是否行将就木第二至五段分析指出欧洲各王室靠其努力调整将会暂时持续㊂最后两段聚焦英国王室,指出查尔斯不当行为致其面临危机㊂纵观全文,作者实则以卡洛斯事例警示欧洲王室作出调整,[C]为最佳标题㊂[排除干扰][A]偏离主线:文章关注点在 欧洲各君主国 ,而非 卡洛斯个人荣辱 ㊂[B]利用背景信息 查尔斯已做王储多年㊁且登上王位依然遥遥无期 捏造干扰,但非文中信息㊂[D]只在文章末段提及,且将文意 查尔斯给英国王室带来威胁 改为 查尔斯迟于应对面前威胁 ㊂[提炼思路]本题以 文章标题 形式考查考生对全文的把握㊂解题时可采取思路 重在对比分析选项,同时回顾文章内容 :四个选项均为 人物+短语 形式:[B]㊁[D]关注人物C h a r l e s仅出现于最末两段,且随后短语均针对查尔斯个人,故排除;[A]㊁[C]人物C a r l o s为文章切入点,但[A]中短语关注的是C a r l o s个人,排除,[C]A l lE u r o p e a n M o n a r c h s为全文关注对象,a l e s s o n体现以 卡洛斯被迫退位看欧洲王室现状 的视角,故正确㊂全文翻译西班牙国王胡安㊃卡洛斯曾经坚称 国王不会退位,他们只在睡梦中逝去 ㊂但令人尴尬的丑闻及4最近欧洲议会选举中左翼共和党支持率的走高迫使他自食其言并退下王位㊂那么,此次西班牙危机是否暗示君主制已走向穷途末路是否表明所有欧洲王室,连同其华丽的皇室制服和庄严的生活方式,都将面临着消亡的厄运?西班牙的情形为支持和反对君主制的观点都提供了依据㊂当公众舆论特别分化,如佛朗哥统治刚刚结束之时,君主能够超越 纯粹的 政治并 象征 国家团结的精神㊂正是这种应然的政治超越性解释了君主作为国家元首受到持续欢迎的原因㊂也正因此,除中东之外,欧洲是世界上君主最密集的地区,有10个王国之多(不算梵蒂冈城和安道尔)㊂但不同于海湾地区及亚洲地区的专制主义君主,大多数欧洲皇室能够存留下来是因为他们能让选民们避免费力地寻找一个无争议㊁受尊敬的公众人物㊂即便如此,国王和女王们无疑仍有其不利的一面㊂虽然他们声称自己象征着国家团结,但就其历史本身 以及有时他们在当今之行为方式 却都代表了过时的㊁难以捍卫的特权和不平等㊂在托马斯㊃皮凯蒂及其他一些经济学家纷纷就 日益加剧的不平等 和 日益增强的世袭财富权力 发出警告之时,富有的贵族世家依然是现代民主国家的核心象征,这非常怪异㊂最成功君主们在努力摆脱或是隐藏旧有的贵族习气㊂王子王妃们在从事日常的有薪工作,且骑自行车,而不是骑马(或者坐飞机)㊂即便如此,这些也是富有世家,他们只和全球1%的顶级富豪进行社交活动,且媒体的侵扰使他们越来越难保持正面的形象㊂毫无疑问,尽管欧洲的君主们足够聪明,将会继续存留在未来的一些时日里,但正是英国王室成员应从西班牙的儆戒中感受到最大的恐慌㊂只有女王以她极为普通(尽管穿着考究)的老奶奶风格保持了君主的声望㊂危险将随查尔斯而至,他不仅有品味奢侈的生活方式,而且有着很强的等级世界观㊂他没能理解到君主制能够存续,很大部分原因在于他们提供了一种服务 作为无争议㊁非政治的国家元首㊂查尔斯王子应该知道,正如英国历史所示,君主制最大的敌人恰恰是君主,而不是共和党人㊂T e x t2总体分析来源:T h eW a s h i n g t o nP o s t‘华盛顿邮报“2014.04.28㊂脉络:提出问题 逮捕时警方是否可以无证查看嫌疑犯手机信息 (首段)ң分析问题(中间段,其中第二至四段作者驳斥加州观点 警方可无证搜查嫌疑犯手机等随身物品 并提出观点 无证搜查手机犹如入室搜查,有悖隐私权益法案 ;第五六段作者表明担忧 公民隐私未受法律保护 )ң解决问题 最高法院应对第四修正案做出重新解释以适应数字信息领域的发展 (末段)㊂试题精解最高法院将要裁决,逮捕过程中,是否是合法的㊂[A]阻止嫌疑人删除他们的手机内容[B]在没有搜查令的情况下寻找嫌疑人手机[C]在未经批准的情况下检查嫌疑人手机内容[D]禁止嫌疑人使用他们的手机[锁定答案]第一段②句指出:最高法院即将讨论 在逮捕过程中,警方是否可以无证搜查嫌疑犯身边的手机信息 ;意即,最高法院要解决 逮捕中警方不经授权搜查嫌疑犯手机信息的合法性 问题㊂由此可推知,[C]正确㊂[排除干扰][A]将第六段③句所述事实 等候搜查证过程中警方可以采取合理措施以防嫌疑犯删除或更改手机数据 篡改为最高法院将要裁决的问题㊂[B]将首段②句中 搜查手机信息 偷换为 寻找手机 ㊂[D]将首段②句 查看嫌疑犯身边的手机的信息内容 断章取义为 查看手机是否在身边 ㊂[提炼思路]事实细节题重在根据题干锁定位置并寻找与之同义替换的选项㊂题干中w o r ko u t (经过思考㊁讨论后)想出,得到(解决办法) ㊁i s l e g i t i m a t e t o分别对应c o n s i d e r 认真思考㊁仔细考虑ң(最高法院)讨论(以作出裁决) ㊁c a n,由此锁定②句;[C]选项中c h e c k㊁w i t h o u t b e i n g a u t h o r i z e d分别对应句中5s e a r c h㊁w i t h o u t aw a r r a n t㊂27.作者对加利福尼亚州观点的态度是㊂[A]不赞成[B]不关心[C]宽容[D]谨慎[锁定答案]第四段①句作者直接提议最高法院首先要摒弃加州政府的蹩脚言论㊂由此不难推知作者对加州政府观点的不赞成态度,[A]正确㊂[排除干扰][B]与文中 作者对加州政府观点极度忧虑 不符㊂[C]由第七段首句 但最高法院不应该全盘接受加州观点 衍生出 作者部分赞同加州观点 ,而该句仅仅是作者在 担忧最高法院可能会接纳加州观点 状况下(第六段末句 最高法院可能倾向于给警方有更多自主控制的余地 )退而求其次做出的折中期待而已㊂[D]将第三段首句r e c k l e s s l y m o d e s t 用以说明最高法院采纳加州观点的后果 篡改为 用以说明作者对加州观点的态度 ㊂[提炼思路]作者态度题重在借助情感色彩表达词揣摩作者观点态度㊂第四段①句中d i s c a r d 摒弃 ㊁l a m e 蹩脚的,站不住脚的 很明确表明作者对加州观点的态度㊂28.作者认为查看一个人手机内容犹如㊂[A]翻查一个人的钱包[B]处理一个人的历史记录[C]浏览一个人的通信往来[D]进入一个人的住处[锁定答案]第四段③句明确指出:查看手机就犹如进入他或她的家,其中注意m o r e l i k e彰显了作者的倾向性㊂故[D]正确㊂[排除干扰][A]错将第四段①句所述加州政府观点 查看手机内容犹如查看嫌犯钱包 等同于作者观点㊂[B]㊁[C]均利用第四段④句设置干扰,但该句旨在说明手机内容涉及个人生活方方面面,需要加强对手机内容的保护意识 ,而是作者类比查看手机内容的对象㊂[提炼思路]解答事实细节题关键在根据题干锁定位置并寻找与之同义替换的选项㊂[D]项中g e t-t i n g i n t o㊁r e s i d e n c e分别对应③句中的e n t e r i n g㊁h o m e㊂29.第五㊁六段中,作者表达了对的担忧㊂[A]原则很难清楚表达[B]法院将给警察更小行动余地[C]手机被用来储存敏感信息[D]公民隐私没有得到有效保护[锁定答案]第五段首末句指出:美国人应该采取措施以保护自身数据隐私,他们有权要求私人文件不公开㊁不受无理搜查;意即:美国人的数字隐私并未得到合理保护;就此初步判断[D]正确㊂再根据第六段主体内容 手机信息搜查的界限不好划定:一㊁搜查证很好获取,二㊁紧急关头可越过第四修正案进行搜查,三㊁等待搜查证时可采取措施不让嫌犯删除或更改手机内容以确保手机信息保持原始状态以备搜查;不仅如此,最高法院还有可能让警方拥有更多自主权 可知,作者意欲说明手机信息保护的难度,以表明对公民隐私并未受到有效保护的担忧㊂由此确定[D]正确㊂[排除干扰][A]反向曲解第六段首句 (可以申明原则,但)申明原则不能减轻界限划定的难度 ㊂[B]反向曲解第六段末句 最高法院可能想要为警方指出有权行使更多自主行为的情形留下余地(即,留有更多余地) ㊂[C]将第五段②句所述既成事实 人们将敏感信息存储在手机里已成为日常生活的一部分 篡改为作者忧虑㊂[提炼思路]段落推理/主旨题重在找到主题句和关键词并将其与选项一一比对㊂第五六段的主题句均为段首句,关键词分别落在p r o t e c t t h e i r d i g i t a l p r i v a c y,t h e c h a l l e n g e o f l i n e-d r a w i n g㊂其中,第五段首句明显表达出作者对 公民隐私保护 的忧虑,第六段首句则借 手机信息搜查界限很难界定 传递出 公民隐私未得到有效保护 之意㊂30.引用奥林㊃克尔的对比是为了表明㊂[A]宪法应该灵活实施[B]宪法原则应该永不更改[C]加利福尼亚州观点违反了宪法原则[D]新技术需要对宪法重新解释[锁定答案]根据题干定位至末段末句,再根据 所举事例旨在为观点服务 原则,可将作者意图追溯到②句,该句指出:新的颠覆性技术有时需要对宪法保护条例有所新运用㊂由此不难断定,作者列举6O r i nK e r r比较的意图在于说明新技术需要对宪法做出新解释,[D]正确㊂[排除干扰][A]将②③句所讨论 宪法保护条例的新运用问题,即对宪法进行新的阐述以适应新的发展需求 篡改为 宪法的灵活运用问题,即宪法应该灵活运用 ㊂[B]曲解②句,首先将 宪法保护条例 替换为 宪法原则 ;其次将 需要新运用 反向替换为 应该永不改变 ㊂[C]由①句 法官们不应该全盘接受加州观点 曲解出 加州观点违背宪法原则 ,而从第二段可知加州观点实为法律意义上的既定假设㊂[提炼思路]例证题的定位不应该看例子本身而应该找到例子对应的观点或结论,本题例子本身就是末段末句,因此答案只能锁定在其前文㊂全文翻译宪法到底在多大程度上保护你的数字资料?最高法院即将讨论,在没有搜查令的情况下,警察是否可以在逮捕过程中搜查嫌疑人身上或身旁的手机内容㊂加利福尼亚州已请求法官们不要作出一刀切裁决,尤其是 推翻 执法当局在逮捕时可搜查嫌疑犯财物 这一旧有假定 的一刀切裁决㊂该州(政府)认为,法官很难评估快速变化的新技术可能带来的影响㊂若是听从加利福尼亚州的建议,最高法院那真是 谦虚 得不计后果㊂(已经有)足够多的影响现在能够看得出来,甚至很明显,因此,法官们能够也应该向警方㊁律师以及被告提供更新的指导性意见㊂他们应该首先摒弃加利福尼亚州的蹩脚观点,即,翻看智能手机的内容 (那可是)一个庞大的数字信息库 相当于翻查嫌疑犯的钱包㊂最高法院已经裁决:在没有搜查令的情况下,警方搜查被捕人的钱包或钱袋并不违反宪法第四修正案㊂但是查看一个人的智能手机更像是进入他或她的家㊂智能手机里可能存有被捕者的阅读记录㊁财务记录㊁病史记录以及近期通信往来的详细记录㊂与此同时, 云计算 的发展也让那种查看更为容易㊂美国人应当采取措施保护他们的数字隐私㊂但是把敏感信息保存在这些设备上正日渐成为正常生活的一种需要㊂不过(美国)公民有权要求私人文件保持不公开并且受到宪法 禁止无理搜查 条款的保护㊂申明原则并不能减轻界限划定的挑战,这是常有的事㊂很多情况下,当局获得搜查令再搜查手机信息也不会太麻烦㊂在面临严峻㊁紧急情况之时,他们还可以悬置第四修正案的保护条例;在等待搜查令之时,他们也可以采取适当的措施以保证手机数据不被删除或更改㊂尽管如此,最高法院或许还想要为警方提出有权行使更多自主行为的情形留下空间㊂但是法官们不应该轻易接受加利福尼亚州的所有观点㊂新的颠覆性技术有时需要对宪法保护条例进行创新性的应用㊂法学教授奥林㊃克尔把21世纪数字信息的爆炸及其可获取性与20世纪将汽车使用几乎确立为生活必需相比较:当时法官们不得不为小客车这一新兴私人领域明确新规;现在他们也必须解决第四修正案如何去适用数字信息的问题㊂T e x t3总体分析来源:N a t u r e‘自然“2014.07.03㊂全文围绕 ‘科学“加强论文统计审查 这一新举展开论述,分析了举措出台原因,列举了一些学者对举措的看法,说明了此举对于科研发表以及学术研究的意义和它的局限性㊂试题精解31.由第一段得知,㊂[A]‘科学“欲简化其同行评审程序[B]众期刊正加强其统计审查[C]鲜有期刊因为数据分析错误而受诟病[D]研究项目中缺乏数据分析很常见[锁定答案]首句指出‘科学“宣布将对其同行评审程序增加额外的数据审查;②句表明此举是仿效其他期刊并说明背后原因㊂w i d e s p r e a dc o n c e r n t h a t b a s i cm i s t a k e s i nd a t aa n a l y s i s...反映当前科研发表质量堪忧㊂因此首段现象提炼即为:各大期刊正加强统计审查,[B]正确㊂[排除干扰][A]中s i m p l i f y(简化)与①句a d d i n g a n e x t r a r o u n d o f s t a t i s t i c a l c h e c k s...相左㊂[C]与7。
2015年考研【英语一】真题及参考答案详解
11、 B to
介词题，意为：就像这个科研团队所发现的，这个因素不仅把我们带到详细的环境中来，更有一些深层次的影响。
12、D drive
词义题，根据上下文，对我们产生影响，驱使我们……
drive 为最佳选项。
13、B rather than
逻辑题，基因上相似的，功能上相似的，二者对立不能同时存在，
rather than 不是…而是最符合。
14、C benefits
跟“功能”搭配，选个褒义词，带来好处的，最佳。
15、A faster
词义题，根据后半句解释，这就是为什么“ picked pace”加速，这里只能选 faster，一些比另外一些进化得更快，符合文意。
16、D understand
词义题，这个研究可以帮助我们理解一个事实。
(13/20 ）
A owing to their
23 B the role of the nobility in modern democracies
此题属于细节题。 根据关键词定位到第四段最后一句话…
it is bizarre that wealthy aristocratic families should still be the symbolic heart of modern democratic states 奇怪的是有钱的贵族
达济工作室【孙骏】整理编写
17、B contributory
本句意为：社会环境是最主要的一个因素。 Contributory 贡献，最佳。
18、A tendency
结合文章主旨，选择基因相似的人做朋友是普遍现象，
19、C ethnic
同义替换，基因背景相似，种族的，民族的，最符合。
2015年考研英语一真题及答案详细解析
2015年全国硕士研究生入学统一考试英语（一）试题及答案详细解析Section I Use of English :Directions: Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B,C or D on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)Though not biologically related, friends are as ―related‖ as fourth cousins, sharing about 1% of genes. That is _(1)_a study, published from the University of California and Yale University in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, has__(2)_.The study is a genome-wide analysis conducted _(3)__1,932 unique subjects which __(4)__pairs of unrelated friends and unrelated strangers. The same people were used in both_(5)_.While 1% may seem_(6)_,it is not so to a geneticist. As James Fowler, professor of medical genetics at UC San Diego, says, ―Most people do not even _(7)_their fourth cousins but somehow manage to select as friends the people who_(8)_our kin.‖The study_(9)_found that the genes for smell were something shared in friends but not genes for immunity .Why this similarity exists in smell genes is difficult to explain, for now,_(10)_,as the team suggests, it draws us to similar environments but there is more_(11)_it. There could be many mechanisms working together that _(12)_us in choosing genetically similar friends_(13)_‖functional Kinship‖ of being friends with_(14)_!One of the remarkable findings of the study was the similar genes seem to be evolution_(15)_than other genes Studying this could help_(16)_why human evolution picked pace in the last 30,000 years, with social environment being a major_(17)_factor.The findings do not simply explain people‘s_(18)_to befriend those of similar_(19)_backgrounds, say the researchers. Though all the subjects were drawn from a population of European extraction, care was taken to_(20)_that all subjects, friends and strangers, were taken from the same population.1. [A] when [B] why [C] how [D] what2. [A] defended [B] concluded [C] withdrawn [D] advised3. [A] for [B] with [C] on [D] by4. [A] compared [B] sought [C] separated [D] connected5. [A] tests [B] objects [C]samples [D] examples6. [A] insignificant [B] unexpected [C]unbelievable [D] incredible7. [A] visit [B] miss [C] seek [D] know8. [A] resemble [B] influence [C] favor [D] surpass9. [A] again [B] also [C] instead [D] thus10. [A] Meanwhile [B] Furthermore [C] Likewise [D] Perhaps11. [A] about [B] to [C]from [D]like12. [A] drive [B] observe [C] confuse [D]limit13. [A] according to [B] rather than [C] regardless of [D] along with14. [A] chances [B]responses [C]missions [D]benefits15. [A] later [B]slower [C] faster [D] earlier16. [A]forecast [B]remember [C]understand [D]express17. [A] unpredictable [B]contributory [C] controllable [D] disruptive18. [A] endeavor [B]decision [C]arrangement [D] tendency19. [A] political [B] religious [C] ethnic [D] economic20. [A] see [B] show [C] prove [D] tellSection II Reading ComprehensionPart ADirections:Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B, C or D. Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET. (40 points)Text 1King Juan Carlos of Spain once insisted ―kings don‘t abdicate, they dare in their sleep.‖ But embarrassing scandals and the popularity of the republican left in the recent Euro-elections have forced him to eat his words and stand down. So, does the Spanish crisis suggest that monarchy is seeing its last days? Does that mean the writing is on the wall for all European royals, with their magnificent uniforms and majestic lifestyle?The Spanish case provides arguments both for and against monarchy. When public opinion is particularly polarised, as it was following the end of the Franco regime, monarchs can rise above ―mere‖ politics and ―embody‖ a spirit of national unity.It is t his apparent transcendence of politics that explains monarchs‘ continuing popularity polarized. And also, the Middle East excepted, Europe is the most monarch-infested region in the world, with 10 kingdoms (not counting Vatican City and Andorra). But unlike their absolutist counterparts in the Gulf and Asia, most royal families have survived because they allow voters to avoid the difficult search for a non-controversial but respected public figure.Even so, kings and queens undoubtedly have a downside. Symbolic of national unity as they claim to be, their very history—and sometimes the way they behave today –embodies outdated and indefensible privileges and inequalities. At a time when Thomas Piketty and other economists are warning of rising inequality and the increasing power of inherited wealth, it is bizarre that wealthy aristocratic families should still be the symbolic heart of modern democratic states.The most successful monarchies strive to abandon or hide their old aristocratic ways. Princes and princesses have day-jobs and ride bicycles, not horses (or helicopters). Even so, these are wealthy families who party with the international 1%, and media intrusiveness makes it increasingly difficult to maintain the right image.While Europe‘s monarchies will no doubt be smart enough to survive for some time to come, it is the British royals who have most to fear from the Spanish example.It is only the Queen who has preserved the monarchy‘s reputation with her ratherordinary (if well-heeled) granny style. The danger will come with Charles, who has both an expensive taste of lifestyle and a pretty hierarchical view of the world. He has failed to understand that monarchies have largely survived because they provide a service – as non-controversial and non-political heads of state. Charles ought to know that as English history shows, it is kings, not republicans, who are the monarchy‘s worst enemies.21. According to the first two Paragraphs, King Juan Carlos of Spain[A] used turn enjoy high public support[B] was unpopular among European royals[C] cased his relationship with his rivals[D]ended his reign in embarrassment22. Monarchs are kept as heads of state in Europe mostly[A] owing to their undoubted and respectable status[B] to achieve a balance between tradition and reality[C] to give voter more public figures to look up to[D]due to their everlasting political embodiment23. Which of the following is shown to be odd, according to Paragraph 4?[A] Aristocrats‘ excessive reliance on inherited wealth[B] The role of the nobility in modern democracies[C] The simple lifestyle of the aristocratic families[D]The nobi lity‘s adherence to their privileges24. The British royals ―have most to fear‖ because Charles[A] takes a rough line on political issues[B] fails to change his lifestyle as advised[C] takes republicans as his potential allies[D] fails to adapt himself to his future role25. Which of the following is the best title of the text?[A] Carlos, Glory and Disgrace Combined[B] Charles, Anxious to Succeed to the Throne[C] Carlos, a Lesson for All European Monarchs[D]Charles, Slow to React to the Coming ThreatsText 2Just how much does the Constitution protect your digital data? The Supreme Court will now consider whether police can search the contents of a mobile phone without a warrant if the phone is on or around a person during an arrest.California has asked the justices to refrain from a sweeping ruling particularly one that upsets the old assumption that authorities may search through the possessions of suspects at the time of their arrest. It is hard, the state argues, for judges to assess the implications of new and rapidly changing technologies.The court would be recklessly modest if it followed California‘s advice. Enough of the implications are discernable, even obvious, so that the justices can and should provide updated guidelines to police, lawyers and defendants.They should start by discarding California‘s lame argument that exploring the contentsof a smart phone — a vast storehouse of digital information — is similar to, say, rifling through a suspect‘s purse. The court has ruled that police don‘t violate the Fourth Amendment when they sift through the wallet or pocketbook of an arrestee without a warrant. But exploring one‘s smart phone is more like entering his or her home. A smart phone may contain an arrestee‘s reading history, financial history, medical history and comprehensive records of recent correspondence. The development of ―cloud computing,‖ meanwhile, has made that exploration so much the easier.Americans should take steps to protect their digital privacy. But keeping sensitive information on these devices is increasingly a requirement of normal life. Citizens still have a right to expect private documents to remain private and protected by the Constitution‘s prohibition on unreasonable searches.As so often is the case, stating that principle doesn‘t ease the challenge of line-drawing. In many cases, it would not be overly onerous for authorities to obtain a warrant to search through phone contents. They could still invalidate Fourth Amendment protections when facing severe, urgent circumstances, and they could take reasonable measures to ensure that phone data are not erased or altered while a warrant is pending. The court, though, may want to allow room for police to cite situations where they are entitled to more freedom.But the justices should not swallow California‘s argument whole. New, disruptive technology sometimes demands novel applications of the Constitution‘s protections. Orin Kerr, a law professor, compares the explosion and accessibility of digital information in the 21st century with the establishment of automobile use as a virtual necessity of life in the 20th: The justices had to specify novel rules for the new personal domain of the passenger car then; they must sort out how the Fourth Amendment applies to digital information now.26. The Supreme Court will work out whether, during an arrest, it is legitimate to[A] prevent suspects from deleting their phone contents.[B] search for suspects‘ mobile phones without a warrant.[C] check suspects‘ phone contents without being a uthorized.[D]prohibit suspects from using their mobile phones.27. The author‘s attitude toward California‘s argument is one of[A] disapproval.[B] indifference.[C] tolerance.[D]cautiousness.28. The author believes that exploring one‘s p hone contents is comparable to[A] getting into one‘s residence.[B] handling one‘s historical records.[C] scanning one‘s correspondences.[D] going through one‘s wallet.29. In Paragraph 5 and 6, the author shows his concern that[A] principles are hard to be clearly expressed.[B] the court is giving police less room for action.[C] citizens‘ privacy is not effectively protected.[D] phones are used to store sensitive information.30. Orin Kerr‘s comparison is quoted to indicate that[A] the Constitution should be implemented flexibly.[B] new technology requires reinterpretation of the Constitution.[C]California‘s argument violates principles of the Constitution.[D]principles of the Constitution should never be alteredText 3The journal Science is adding an extra round of statistical checks to its peer-review process, editor-in-chief Marcia McNutt announced today. The policy follows similar efforts from other journals, after widespread concern that basic mistakes in data analysis are contributing to the irreproducibility of many published research findings.―Readers must have confidence in the conclusions published in our journal,‖ writes McNutt in an editorial. Working with the American Statistical Association, the journal has appointed seven experts to a statistics board of reviewing editors(SBoRE). Manuscript will be flagged up for additional scrutiny by the journal‘s internal editors, or by its existing Board of Reviewing Editors or by outside peer reviewers. The SBoRE panel will then find external statisticians to review these manuscripts.Asked whether any particular papers had impelled the change, McNutt said: ―The creation of the ‗statistics board‘ was motivated by concerns broadly with the application of statistics and data analysis in scientific research and is part of Science‘s overa ll drive to increase reproducibility in the research we publish.‖Giovanni Parmigiani, a biostatistician at the Harvard School of Public Health, a member of the SBoRE group. He says he expects the board to ―play primarily an advisory role.‖ He agreed to join because he ―found the foresight behind the establishment of the SBoRE to be novel, unique and likely to have a lasting impact. This impact will not only be through the publications in Science itself, but hopefully through a larger group of publishing places that may want to model their approach after Science.‖John Ioannidis, a physician who studies research methodology, says that the policy is ―a most welcome step forward‖ and ―long overdue.‖ ―Most journals are weak in statistical review, and this damages the quality of what they publish. I think that, for the majority of scientific papers nowadays, statistical review is more essential than expert review,‖ he says. But he noted that biomedical journals such as Annals of Internal Medicine, the Journal of the American Medical Association and The Lancet pay strong attention to statistical review.Professional scientists are expected to know how to analyze data, but statistical errors are alarmingly common in published research, according to David Vaux, a cell biologist. Researchers should improve their standards, he wrote in 2012, but journals should also take a tougher line, ―engaging reviewers who are statistically literate and editors who can verify the process‖. Vaux says that Science‘s idea to pass some papers to statisticians ―has some merit, but a weakness is that it relies on the board of reviewing editors to identify ‗the papers that need scrutiny‘ in the first place‖.31. It can be learned from Paragraph 1 that[A] Science intends to simplify their peer-review process.[B] journals are strengthening their statistical checks.[C] few journals are blamed for mistakes in data analysis.[D] lack of data analysis is common in research projects.32. The phrase ―flagged up‖ (Para. 2) is the closest in meaning to[A] found.[B] marked.[C] revised.[D] stored.33. Giovanni Parmigiani believes that the establishment of the SBoRE may[A] pose a threat to all its peers.[B] meet with strong opposition.[C] increase Science‘s circulation.[D]set an example for other journals.34. David Vaux holds that what Science is doing now[A] adds to researchers‘ workload.[B] diminishes the role of reviewers.[C] has room for further improvement.[D]is to fail in the foreseeable future35. Which of the following is the best title of the text?[A] Science Joins Push to Screen Statistics in Papers.[B] Professional Statisticians Deserve More Respect[C] Data Analysis Finds Its Way onto Editors‘ Desks[D] Statisticians Are Coming Back with ScienceText 4Two years ago, Rupert Murdoch‘s daughter ,Elisabeth ,spoke of the ―unsettling dearth of integrity across so many of our institutions‖ Integrity had collapsed, she argued, because of a collective acceptance that the only ―sorting mechanism ‖in society should be profit and the market .But ―it‘s us ,human beings ,we the people who create the society we want ,not profit ‖.Driving her point home, sh e continued: ―It‘s increasingly apparent that the absence of purpose, of a moral language within government, media or business could become one of the most dangerous foals for capitalism and freedom.‖ This same absence of moral purpose was wounding companies such as News International ,shield thought ,making it more likely that it would lose its way as it had with widespread illegal telephone hacking .As the hacking trial concludes –finding guilty ones-editor of the News of the World, Andy Coulson, for conspiring to hack phones ,and finding his predecessor, Rebekah Brooks, innocent of the same charge –the winder issue of dearth of integrity still standstill, Journalists are known to have hacked the phones of up to 5,500 people .This is hacking on an industrial scale ,as was acknowledged by Glenn Mulcaire, the man hired by the News of the World in 2001 to be the point person for phone hacking. Others await trial. This long story still unfolds.In many respects, the dearth of moral purpose frames not only the fact of such widespread phone hacking but the terms on which the trial took place .One of the astonishing revelations was how little Rebekah Brooks knew of what went on in her newsroom, wow little she thought to ask and the fact that she never inquired wow the stories arrived. The core of her successful defence was that she knew nothing.In today‘s world, title has become normal that well—paid executives should not beaccountable for what happens in the organizations that they run perhaps we should not be so surprised. For a generation, the collective doctrine has been that the sorting mechanism of society should be profit. The words that have mattered are efficiency, flexibility, shareholder value, business–friendly, wealth generation, sales, impact and, in newspapers, circulation. Words degraded to the margin have been justice fairness, tolerance, proportionality and accountability.The purpose of editing the News of the World was not to promote reader understanding to be fair in what was written or to betray any common humanity. It was to ruin lives in the quest for circulation and impact. Ms Brooks may or may not have had suspicions about how her journalists got their stories, but she asked no questions, gave no instructions—nor received traceable, recorded answers.36. According to the first two paragraphs, Elisabeth was upset by[A] the consequences of the current sorting mechanism[B] companies‘ financial loss due to immoral practices.[C] governmental ineffectiveness on moral issues.[D]the wide misuse of integrity among institutions.37. It can be inferred from Paragraph 3 that[A] Glem Mulcaire may deny phone hacking as a crime[B] more journalists may be found guilty of phone hacking.[C] Andy Coulson should be held innocent of the charge.[D] phone hacking will be accepted on certain occasions.38. The author believes the Rebekah Books‘s deference[A] revealed a cunning personality[B] centered on trivial issues[C] was hardly convincing[D] was part of a conspiracy39. The author holds that the current collective doctrine shows[A] generally distorted values[B] unfair wealth distribution[C] a marginalized lifestyle[D] a rigid moral cote40. Which of the following is suggested in the last paragraph?[A] The quality of writing is of primary importance.[B] Common humanity is central news reporting.[C] Moral awareness matters in exciting a newspaper.[D] Journalists need stricter industrial regulations.Part BDirections:In the following text, some sentences have been removed. For Questions 41-45, choose the most suitable one from the fist A-G to fit into each of the numbered blanks. Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)How does your reading proceed? Clearly you try to comprehend, in the sense of identifying meanings for individual words and working out relationships between them, drawingon your explicit knowledge of English grammar (41) ______you begin to infer a context for the text, for instance, by making decisions about what kind of speech event is involved: who is making the utterance, to whom, when and where.The ways of reading indicated here are without doubt kinds of of comprehension. But they show comprehension to consist not just passive assimilation but of active engagement inference and problem-solving. You infer information you feel the writer has invited you to grasp by presenting you with specific evidence and cues (42) _______Conceived in this way, comprehension will not follow exactly the same track for each reader. What is in question is not the retrieval of an absolute, fixed or ―true‖ meaning that can be read off and clocked for accuracy, or some timeless relation of the text to the world. (43) _______ Such background material inevitably reflects who we are, (44) _______This doesn‘t, however, make interpretation merely relative or even pointless. Precisely because readers from different historical periods, places and social experiences produce different but overlapping readings of the same words on the page-including for texts that engage with fundamental human concerns-debates about texts can play an important role in social discussion of beliefs and values.How we read a given text also depends to some extent on our particular interest in reading it. (45)_______such dimensions of read suggest-as others introduced later in the book will also do-that we bring an implicit (often unacknowledged) agenda to any act of readin g. It doesn‘t then necessarily follow that one kind of reading is fuller, more advanced or more worthwhile than another. Ideally, different kinds of reading inform each other, and act as useful reference points for and counterbalances to one another. Together, they make up the reading component of your overall literacy or relationship to your surrounding textual environment.[A] Are we studying that text and trying to respond in a way that fulfils the requirement of a given course? Reading it simply for pleasure? Skimming it for information? Ways of reading on a train or in bed are likely to differ considerably from reading in a seminar room.[B] Factors such as the place and period in which we are reading, our gender ethnicity, age and social class will encourage us towards certain interpretation but at the same time obscure or even close off others.[C] If you are unfamiliar with words or idioms, you guess at their meaning, using clues presented in the contest. On the assumption that they will become relevant later, you make a mental note of discourse entities as well as possible links between them.[D]In effect, you try to reconstruct the likely meanings or effects that any given sentence, image or reference might have had: These might be the ones the author intended.[E]You make further inferences, for instance, about how the test may be significant to you, or about its validity—inferences that form the basis of a personal response for which the author will inevitably be far less responsible.[F]In plays，novels and narrative poems, characters speak as constructs created by the author, not necessarily as mouthpieces for the author‘s own thoughts.[G]Rather, we ascribe meanings to test on the basis of interaction between what we might call textual and contextual material: between kinds of organization or patterning we perceive in a text‘s formal structures (so especially its language structures) and various kinds of background, social knowledge, belief and attitude that we bring to the text.Section III TranslationDirections:Read the following text carefully and then translate the underlined segments into Chinese. Your translation should be written clearly on ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)Within the span of a hundred years, in the seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries, a tide of emigration—one of the great folk wanderings of history—swept from Europe to America.46) This movement, driven by powerful and diverse motivations, built a nation out of a wilderness and, by its nature, shaped the character and destiny of an uncharted continent.47) The United States is the product of two principal forces-the immigration of European peoples with their varied ideas, customs, and national characteristics and the impact of a new country which modified these traits. Of necessity, colonial America was a projection of Europe. Across the Atlantic came successive groups of Englishmen, Frenchmen, Germans, Scots, Irishmen, Dutchmen, Swedes, and many others who attempted to transplant their habits and traditions to the new world.48) But, the force of geographic conditions peculiar to America, the interplay of the varied national groups upon one another, and the sheer difficulty of maintaining old-world ways in a raw, new continent caused significant changes. These changes were gradual and at first scarcely visible. But the result was a new social pattern which, although it resembled European society in many ways, had a character that was distinctly American.49) The first shiploads of immigrants bound for the territory which is now the United States crossed the Atlantic more than a hundred years after the 15th- and 16th-century explorations of North America. In the meantime, thriving Spanish colonies had been established in Mexico, the West Indies, and South America. These travelers to North America came in small, unmercifully overcrowded craft. During their six- to twelve-week voyage, they subsisted on barely enough food allotted to them. Many of the ship were lost in storms, many passengers died of disease, and infants rarely survived the journey. Sometimes storms blew the vessels far off their course, and often calm brought unbearably long delay.―To the anxious travelers the sight of the American shore brought almost inexpressible relief.‖ said one recorder of events, ―The air at twelve leagues‘ distance smelt as sweet as a new-blown garden.‖ The colonists‘ first glimpse of the new land was a si ght of dense woods. 50) The virgin forest with its richness and variety of trees was a veritable real treasure-house which extended from Maine all the way down to Georgia. Here was abundant fuel and lumber. Here was the raw material of houses and furniture, ships and potash, dyes and naval stores.Section IV WritingPart A51. Directions:You are going to host a club reading session. Write an email of about 100 words recommending a book to the club members.You should state reasons for your recommendation.You should write neatly on the ANSWER SHEET.Do not sign your own name at the end of the letter. Use Li Ming instead.Do not write the address. (10 points)Part B52. Directions:Write an essay of 160-200 words based on the following drawing. In your essay you should1) describe the drawing briefly2) explain its intended meaning, and3) give your commentsYou should write neatly on ANSWER SHEET. (20 points)手机时代的聚会参考答案及详细解析I cloze1. [A] when [B] why [C] how [D] what【答案】[D] what【解析】该题考查的是语法知识。
2015年考研英语一真题及答案解析
2015年考研英语一真题及答案解析(1~20/共20题)完形填空Though not biologically related, friends are as “related” as fourth cousins, sharing about 1% of genes. That is __1__a study, published from the University of California and Yale University in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, has__2__.The study is a genome-wide analysis conducted __3__1,932 unique subjects which __4__pairs of unrelated friends and unrelated strangers. The same people were used in both__5__.While 1% may seem__6__,it is not so to a geneticist. As James Fowler, professor of medical genetics at UC San Diego, says, “Most people do not even __7__their fourth cousins but somehow manage to select as friends the people who__8__our kin.”The study__9__found that the genes for smell were something shared in friends but not genes for immunity .Why this similarity exists in smell genes is difficult to explain, for now,__10__,as the team suggests, it draws us to similar environments but there is more__11__it. There could be many mechanisms working together that __12__us in choosing genetically similar friends__13__”functional Kinship” of being friends with__14__!One of the remarkable findings of the study was the similar genes seem to be evolution__15__than other genes Studying this could help__16__why human evolution picked pace in the last 30,000 years, with social environment being a major__17__factor.The findings do not simply explain people’s__18__to befriend those of similar__19__backgrounds, say the researchers. Though all the subjects were drawn from a population of European extraction, care was taken to__20__that all subjects, friends and strangers, were taken from the same population.第1题A.whenB.whyC.howD.what第2题A.defendedB.concludedC.withdrawnD.advised第3题A.forB.withC.onD.by第4题paredB.soughtC.separatedD.connected第5题B.objectsC.samplesD.examples第6题A.insignificantB.unexpectedC.unbelievableD.incredible第7题A.visitB.missC.seekD.know第8题A.resembleB.influenceC.favorD.surpass第9题A.againB.alsoC.insteadD.thus第10题A.MeanwhileB.FurthermoreC.LikewiseD.Perhaps第11题A.aboutB.toC.fromD.like第12题A.driveB.observeC.confuseD.limit第13题A.according toB.rather thanC.regardless ofD.along withA.chancesB.responsesC.missionsD.benefits第15题terB.slowerC.fasterD.earlier第16题A.forecastB.rememberC.understandD.express第17题A.unpredictableB.contributoryC.controllableD.disruptive第18题A.endeavorB.decisionC.arrangementD.tendency第19题A.politicalB.religiousC.ethnicD.economic第20题A.seeB.showC.proveD.tell下一题(21~25/共20题)Section ⅡReadingPart ADirections:Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B, C or D. Mark your answers on the ANSWER SHEET. (40 points)King Juan Carlos of Spain once insisted “kings don’t abdicate, they dare in their sleep.” But embarrassing scandals and the popularity of the republican left in the recent Euro-elections have forced him to eat his words and stand down. So, does the Spanish crisis suggest that monarchy isseeing its last days? Does that mean the writing is on the wall for all European royals, with their magnificent uniforms and majestic lifestyle?The Spanish case provides arguments both for and against monarchy. When public opinion is particularly polarised, as it was following the end of the Franco regime, monarchs can rise above “mere” politics and “embody” a spirit of national unity.It is this apparent transcendence of politics that explains monarchs’ continuing popularity polarized. And also, the Middle East excepted, Europe is the most monarch-infested region in the world, with 10 kingdoms (not counting Vatican City and Andorra). But unlike their absolutist counterparts in the Gulf and Asia, most royal families have survived because they allow voters to avoid the difficult search for a non-controversial but respected public figure.Even so, kings and queens undoubtedly have a downside. Symbolic of national unity as they claim to be, their very history—and sometimes the way they behave today – embodies outdated and indefensible privileges and inequalities. At a time when Thomas Piketty and other economists are warning of rising inequality and the increasing power of inherited wealth, it is bizarre that wealthy aristocratic families should still be the symbolic heart of modern democratic states.The most successful monarchies strive to abandon or hide their old aristocratic ways. Princes and princesses have day-jobs and ride bicycles, not horses (or helicopters). Even so, these are wealthy families who party with the international 1%, and media intrusiveness makes it increasingly difficult to maintain the right image.While Europe’s mona rchies will no doubt be smart enough to survive for some time to come, it is the British royals who have most to fear from the Spanish example.It is only the Queen who has preserved the monarchy’s reputation with her rather ordinary (if well-heeled) granny style. The danger will come with Charles, who has both an expensive taste of lifestyle and a pretty hierarchical view of the world. He has failed to understand that monarchies have largely survived because they provide a service –as non-controversial and non-political heads of state. Charles ought to know that as English history shows, it is kings, not republicans, who are the monarchy’s worst enemies.第21题According to the first two Paragraphs, King Juan Carlos of Spained turn enjoy high public supportB.was unpopular among European royalsC.cased his relationship with his rivalsD.ended his reign in embarrassment第22题Monarchs are kept as heads of state in Europe mostlyA.owing to their undoubted and respectable statusB.to achieve a balance between tradition and realityC.to give voter more public figures to look up toD.due to their everlasting political embodiment第23题Which of the following is shown to be odd, according to Paragraph 4?A.Aristocrats’ excessive reliance on inherited we althB.The role of the nobility in modern democraciesC.The simple lifestyle of the aristocratic familiesD.The nobility’s adherence to their privileges第24题The British royals “have most to fear” because CharlesA.takes a rough line on political issuesB.fails to change his lifestyle as advisedC.takes republicans as his potential alliesD.fails to adapt himself to his future role第25题Which of the following is the best title of the text?A.Carlos, Glory and Disgrace CombinedB.Charles, Anxious to Succeed to the ThroneC.Carlos, a Lesson for All European MonarchsD.Charles, Slow to React to the Coming Threats上一题下一题(26~30/共20题)Section ⅡReadingPart ADirections:Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B, C or D. Mark your answers on the ANSWER SHEET. (40 points)Just how much does the Constitution protect your digital data? The Supreme Court will now consider whether police can search the contents of a mobile phone without a warrant if the phone is on or around a person during an arrest.California has asked the justices to refrain from a sweeping ruling particularly one that upsets the old assumption that authorities may search through the possessions of suspects at the time of their arrest. It is hard, the state argues, for judges to assess the implications of new and rapidly changing technologies.The court would be recklessly modest if it followed California’s advice. Enough of the implications are discernable, even obvious, so that the justices can and should provide updated guidelines to police, lawyers and defendants.They should start by discarding California’s lame argument that exploring the contents of a smart phone —a vast storehouse of digital information —is similar to, say, rifling through a suspect’s purse. The court has ruled that police don’t violate the Fourth Amendment when they sift through the wallet or pocketbook of an arrestee without a warrant. But exploring one’s smart phone is more like ent ering his or her home. A smart phone may contain an arrestee’s reading history, financial history, medical history and comprehensive records of recent correspondence. The development of “cloud computing,” meanwhile, has made that exploration so much the easier.Americans should take steps to protect their digital privacy. But keeping sensitive information on these devices is increasingly a requirement of normal life. Citizens still have a right to expect private documents to remain private and protected b y the Constitution’s prohibition on unreasonable searches.As so often is the case, stating that principle doesn’t ease the challenge of line-drawing. In many cases, it would not be overly onerous for authorities to obtain a warrant to search throughphone contents. They could still invalidate Fourth Amendment protections when facing severe, urgent circumstances, and they could take reasonable measures to ensure that phone data are not erased or altered while a warrant is pending. The court, though, may want to allow room for police to cite situations where they are entitled to more freedom.But the justices should not swallow California’s argument whole. New, disruptive technology sometimes demands novel applications of the Constitution’s protections. O rin Kerr, a law professor, compares the explosion and accessibility of digital information in the 21st century with the establishment of automobile use as a virtual necessity of life in the 20th: The justices had to specify novel rules for the new personal domain of the passenger car then; they must sort out how the Fourth Amendment applies to digital information now.第26题The Supreme Court will work out whether, during an arrest, it is legitimate toA.prevent suspects from deleting their phone contents.B.search for suspects’ mobile phones without a warrant.C.check suspects’ phone contents without being authorized.D.prohibit suspects from using their mobile phones.第27题The author’s attitude toward California’s argument is one ofA.disapproval.B.indifference.C.tolerance.D.cautiousness.第28题The author believes that exploring one’s phone contents is comparable toA.getting into one’s residence.B.handling one’s historical records.C.scanning one’s correspondences.D.going through one’s wallet.第29题In Paragraph 5 and 6, the author shows his concern thatA.principles are hard to be clearly expressed.B.the court is giving police less room for action.C.citizens’ privacy is not effectively protected.D.phones are used to store sensitive information.第30题Orin Kerr’s comparison is quoted to indicate thatA.the Constitution should be implemented flexibly.B.new technology requires reinterpretation of the Constitution.C.California’s argument violates principles o f the Constitution.D.principles of the Constitution should never be altered上一题下一题(31~35/共20题)Section ⅡReadingPart ADirections:Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B, C or D. Mark your answers on the ANSWER SHEET. (40 points)The journal Science is adding an extra round of statistical checks to its peer-review process, editor-in-chief Marcia McNutt announced today. The policy follows similar efforts from other journals, after widespread concern that basic mistakes in data analysis are contributing to the irreproducibility of many published research findings.“Readers must have confidence in the conclusions published in our journal,” writes McNutt in an editorial. Working with the American Statistical Association, the journal has appointed seven experts to a statistics board of reviewing editors(SBoRE). Manuscript will be flagged up for additional scrutiny by the journal’s internal editors, or by its existing Board of Reviewing Editors or by outside peer reviewers. The SBoRE panel will then find external statisticians to review these manuscripts.Asked whether any particular papers had impelled the change, McNutt said: “The creation of the ‘statistics board’ was motivated by concerns broadly wi th the application of statistics and data analysis in scientific research and is part of Science’s overall drive to increase reproducibility in the research we publish.”Giovanni Parmigiani, a biostatistician at the Harvard School of Public Health, a member of the SBoRE group. He says he expects the board to “play primarily an advisory role.” He agreed to join because he “found the foresight behind the establishment of the SBoRE to be novel, unique and likely to have a lasting impact. This impact will not only be through the publications in Science itself, but hopefully through a larger group of publishing places that may want to model their approach after Science.”John Ioannidis, a physician who studies research methodology, says that the policy is “a most welcome step forward” and “long overdue.” “Most journals are weak in statistical review, and this damages the quality of what they publish. I think that, for the majority of scientific papers nowadays, statistical review is more essential than expert review,” he says. But he noted that biomedical journals such as Annals of Internal Medicine, the Journal of the American Medical Association and The Lancet pay strong attention to statistical review.Professional scientists are expected to know how to analyze data, but statistical errors are alarmingly common in published research, according to David Vaux, a cell biologist. Researchers should improve their standards, he wrote in 2012, but journals should also take a tougher line, “engaging reviewers who are statistically literate and editors who can verify the process”. Vaux says that Science’s idea to pass some papers to statisticians “has some merit, but a weakness is that it relies on the board of reviewing editors to identify ‘the papers that need scrutiny’ in the first place”.第31题It can be learned from Paragraph 1 thatA.Science intends to simplify their peer-review process.B.journals are strengthening their statistical checks.C.few journals are blamed for mistakes in data analysis.ck of data analysis is common in research projects.第32题The phrase “flagged up” (Para. 2) is the closest in meaning toA.found.B.marked.C.revised.D.stored.第33题Giovanni Parmigiani believes that the establishment of the SBoRE mayA.pose a threat to all its peers.B.meet with strong opposition.C.increase Science’s circulation.D.set an example for other journals.第34题David Vaux holds that what Science is doing nowA.adds to researchers’ workload.B.diminishes the role of reviewers.C.has room for further improvement.D.is to fail in the foreseeable future第35题Which of the following is the best title of the text?A.Science Joins Push to Screen Statistics in Papers.B.Professional Statisticians Deserve More RespectC.Data Analysis Finds Its Way onto Editors’ DesksD.Statisticians Are Coming Back with Science上一题下一题(36~40/共20题)Section ⅡReadingPart ADirections:Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B, C or D. Mark your answers on the ANSWER SHEET. (40 points)Two years ago, Rupert Murdoch’s daughter ,Elisabeth ,spoke of the “unsettling dearth of integrity across so many of our institutions” Integrity had collapsed, she argued, because of a collective acceptan ce that the only “sorting mechanism ”in society should be profit and the market .But “it’s us ,human beings ,we the people who create the society we want ,not profit ”.Driving her point home, she continued: “It’s increasingly apparent that the absence o f purpose, of a moral language within government, media or business could become one of the most dangerous foals for capitalism and freedom.” This same absence of moral purpose was wounding companies such as News International ,shield thought ,making it more likely that it would lose its way as it had with widespread illegal telephone hacking .As the hacking trial concludes – finding guilty ones-editor of the News of the World, Andy Coulson, for conspiring to hack phones ,and finding his predecessor, Rebekah Brooks, innocent of the same charge –the winder issue of dearth of integrity still standstill, Journalists are known to have hacked the phones of up to 5,500 people .This is hacking on an industrial scale ,as was acknowledged by Glenn Mulcaire, the man hired by the News of the World in 2001 to be the point person for phone hacking. Others await trial. This long story still unfolds.In many respects, the dearth of moral purpose frames not only the fact of such widespread phone hacking but the terms on which the trial took place .One of the astonishing revelationswas how little Rebekah Brooks knew of what went on in her newsroom, wow little she thought to ask and the fact that she never inquired wow the stories arrived. The core of her successful defence was that she knew nothing.In today’s world, title has become normal that well—paid executives should not be accountable for what happens in the organizations that they run perhaps we should not be so surprised. For a generation, the collective doctrine has been that the sorting mechanism of society should be profit. The words that have mattered are efficiency, flexibility, shareholder value, business–friendly, wealth generation, sales, impact and, in newspapers, circulation. Words degraded to the margin have been justice fairness, tolerance, proportionality and accountability.The purpose of editing the News of the World was not to promote reader understanding to be fair in what was written or to betray any common humanity. It was to ruin lives in the quest for circulation and impact. Ms Brooks may or may not have had suspicions about how her journalists got their stories, but she asked no questions, gave no instructions—nor received traceable, recorded answers.第36题According to the first two paragraphs, Elisabeth was upset byA.the consequences of the current sorting mechanismpanies’ financial loss due to immoral practices.ernmental ineffectiveness on moral issues.D.the wide misuse of integrity among institutions.第37题It can be inferred from Paragraph 3 thatA.Glem Mulcaire may deny phone hacking as a crimeB.more journalists may be found guilty of phone hacking.C.Andy Coulson should be held innocent of the charge.D.phone hacking will be accepted on certain occasions.第38题The author believes the Rebekah Books’s deferenceA.revealed a cunning personalityB.centered on trivial issuesC.was hardly convincingD.was part of a conspiracy第39题The author holds that the current collective doctrine showsA.generally distorted valuesB.unfair wealth distributionC.a marginalized lifestyleD.a rigid moral cote第40题Which of the following is suggested in the last paragraph?A.The quality of writing is of primary importance.mon humanity is central news reporting.C.Moral awareness matters in exciting a newspaper.D.Journalists need stricter industrial regulations.上一题下一题(41~45/共5题)Part BDirections:In the following article, some sentences have been removed. For Questions 41-45, choose the most suitable one from the list A-G to fit into each of the numbered blank. There are two extra choices, which do not fit in any of the gaps. Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1.How does your reading proceed? Clearly you try to comprehend, in the sense of identifying meanings for individual words and working out relationships between them, drawing on your explicit knowledge of English grammar (41) ______you begin to infer a context for the text, for instance, by making decisions about what kind of speech event is involved: who is making the utterance, to whom, when and where.The ways of reading indicated here are without doubt kinds of of comprehension. But they show comprehension to consist not just passive assimilation but of active engagement inference and problem-solving. You infer information you feel the writer has invited you to grasp by presenting you with specific evidence and cues (42) _______Conceived in this way, comprehension will not follow exactly the same track for each reader. What is in question is not the retrieval of an absolute, fixed or “true” meaning that can be read off and clocked for accuracy, or some timeless relation of the text to the world. (43) _______ Such background material inevitably reflects who we are, (44) _______This doesn’t, however, make interpretation merely relative or even pointless. Precisely because readers from different historical periods, places and social experiences produce different but overlapping readings of the same words on the page-including for texts that engage with fundamental human concerns-debates about texts can play an important role in social discussion of beliefs and values.How we read a given text also depends to some extent on our particular interest in reading it.(45)_______such dimensions of read suggest-as others introduced later in the book will also do-that we bring an implicit (often unacknowledged) agenda to any act of reading. It doesn’t then necessarily follow that one kind of reading is fuller, more advanced or more worthwhile than another. Ideally, different kinds of reading inform each other, and act as useful reference points for and counterbalances to one another. Together, they make up the reading component of your overall literacy or relationship to your surrounding textual environment.[A] Are we studying that text and trying to respond in a way that fulfils the requirement of a given course? Reading it simply for pleasure? Skimming it for information? Ways of reading on a train or in bed are likely to differ considerably from reading in a seminar room.[B] Factors such as the place and period in which we are reading, our gender ethnicity, age and social class will encourage us towards certain interpretation but at the same time obscure or even close off others.[C] If you are unfamiliar with words or idioms, you guess at their meaning, using clues presented in the contest. On the assumption that they will become relevant later, you make a mental note of discourse entities as well as possible links between them.[D]In effect, you try to reconstruct the likely meanings or effects that any given sentence, image or reference might have had: These might be the ones the author intended.[E]You make further inferences, for instance, about how the test may be significant to you, or about its validity—inferences that form the basis of a personal response for which the author will inevitably be far less responsible.[F]In plays，novels and narrative poems, characters speak as constructs created by the author, not nece ssarily as mouthpieces for the author’s own thoughts.[G]Rather, we ascribe meanings to test on the basis of interaction between what we might call textual and contextual material: between kinds of organization or patterning we perceive in a text’s formal structures (so especially its language structures) and various kinds of background, social knowledge, belief and attitude that we bring to the text.第41题第42题第43题第44题第45题上一题下一题(46~50/共5题)Part CDirections: Read the following text carefully and then translate the underlined segments into Chinese. (10 points)Within the span of a hundred years, in the seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries, a tide of emigration—one of the great folk wanderings of history—swept from Europe to America. 46) This movement, driven by powerful and diverse motivations, built a nation out of a wilderness and, by its nature, shaped the character and destiny of an uncharted continent.47) The United States is the product of two principal forces-the immigration of European peoples with their varied ideas, customs, and national characteristics and the impact of a new country which modified these traits. Of necessity, colonial America was a projection of Europe. Across the Atlantic came successive groups of Englishmen, Frenchmen, Germans, Scots, Irishmen, Dutchmen, Swedes, and many others who attempted to transplant their habits and traditions to the new world.48) But, the force of geographic conditions peculiar to America, the interplay of the varied national groups upon one another, and the sheer difficulty of maintaining old-world ways in a raw, new continent caused significant changes.These changes were gradual and at first scarcely visible. But the result was a new social pattern which, although it resembled European society in many ways, had a character that was distinctly American.49) The first shiploads of immigrants bound for the territory which is now the United States crossed the Atlantic more than a hundred years after the 15th- and 16th-century explorations of North America. In the meantime, thriving Spanish colonies had been established in Mexico, the West Indies, and South America. These travelers to North America came in small, unmercifully overcrowded craft. During their six- to twelve-week voyage, they subsisted on barely enough food allotted to them. Many of the ship were lost in storms, many passengers died of disease, and infants rarely survived the journey. Sometimes storms blew the vessels far off their course, and often calm brought unbearably long delay.“To the anxious travelers the sight of the American shore brought almost inexpressible relief.” said one recorder of events, “The air at twelve leagues’ distance smelt as sweet as a new-blown garden.” The colonists’ first glimpse of the new l and was a sight of dense woods. 50) The virgin forest with its richness and variety of trees was a veritable real treasure-house which extended from Maine all the way down to Georgia. Here was abundant fuel and lumber. Here was the raw material of houses and furniture, ships and potash, dyes and naval stores.第46题_____第47题_____第48题_____第49题_____第50题_____上一题下一题(1/1)Section ⅢWritingPart ADirections: Write a composition/letter of no less than 100 words on the following information.(10points)第51题Directions:You are going to host a club reading session. Write an email of about 100 words recommending a book to the club members.You should state reasons for your recommendation.You should write neatly on the ANSWER SHEET.Do not sign your own name at the end of the letter. Use Li Ming instead.Do not write the address. (10 points)________上一题下一题(1/1)Part BDirections: Write an essay of 160 - 200 words based on the following information. (20 points)第52题Directions:Write an essay of 160-200 words based on the following drawing. In your essay you should1) describe the drawing briefly2) explain its intended meaning, and3) give your commentsYou should write neatly on ANSWER SHEET. (20 points)图片___________上一题交卷交卷答题卡答案及解析(1~20/共20题)完形填空Though not biologically related, friends are as “related” as fourth cousins, sharing about 1% of genes. That is __1__a study, published from the University of California and Yale University in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, has__2__.The study is a genome-wide analysis conducted __3__1,932 unique subjects which。
2015考研英语(一)答案及解析
2015考研英语一真题参考答案完形填空参考答案1、What2、Concluded3、On4、Compared5、Samples6、Insignificant7、know8、resemble9、also10、Perhaps11、to12、drive13、rather than14、benefits15、faster16、understand17、contributory18、tendency19、Ethnic20、seeII Reading comprehensionPart A21.D ended his reign in embarrassment.22. C to give voters more public figures to look up to23. A the role of the nobility in modern democracy24. D fails to adapt himself to his future role.25. D Carlos, a lesson for all Monarchies26. C check suspect's phone contents without being authorized.27.A disapproval28.A getting into one's residence29. C citizens' privacy is not effectively protected30.B new technology requires reinterpretation of the constitution31.B journals are strengthening their statistical checks32.B marked33. D set an example for other journals34. C has room for further improvement35.A science joins Push to screen statistics in papers36. D the consequences of the current sorting mechanism37. A more journalists may be found guilty of phone hacking38. C was hardly convincing39. B generally distorted values40. D moral awareness matters in editing a newspaperPart B41.C If you are unfamiliar with words or idioms, you guess at their meaning, using…42.E You make further inferences...43.G Rather ,we ascribe meanings to...44.B factors such as...45.A Are we studying that ...Part C46)受到各种强大的动机所驱使，这场运动在荒野中开创了一个国家;本质使然，它也塑造了这片未知大陆的性格和命运。
2015年考研英语(一)深度解析：完型
2015年考研英语（一）深度解析：完型1. [A] what【解析】此题考查疑问代词辨析：题干中过去分词短语published from the University of California and Yale University…作后置定语，修饰study，而真正的句子主干是That is 1 a study has 2 .简化后的句子可以让我们清晰地看出第一题要说的是研究study的具体内容是what，不是方式how，也不是原因why，更不是时间when。
2. [B] concluded【解析】此题考查动词辨析：同第一题一样，根据简化的句子That is what a study has 2 来解题。
题目选择的动词是说明study怎样才有了上面what表示的内容。
所以此题选择concluded“推断;得出结论”。
其他的动词据不符合要求。
3. [D] on【解析】此题考查介词辨析：根据题干The study is a genome-wide analysis conducted 3 1932 unique subjects的要求，所选择的介词能用在conduct“实施;进行”之后，又得和subject 搭配，所以这个题目应该选择on，构成on some subjects“关于某类主题”。
4. [C] compared【解析】此题考查动词辨析：通过观察题干，我们发现第4题位于which引导的定语从句之内，作从句的谓语动词。
Which修饰主句的主语study“研究”，如此补全定语从句就是：The study 4 pairs of unrelated friends and unrelated strangers…所以正确答案选择C。
该项研究是对比所选择的两个样本。
其他选项都不符合题意。
5. [C] samples【解析】此题考查名词辨析：The same people were used in both 5 .通过观察题干，我们发现第5题空前的单词是both，表示“两者都…”。
2015考研英语一真题完形填空题源解析
2015考研英语一真题完形填空题源解析2015考研英语一的完形填空原文依然是来源于网站。
我们还记得2014年考研英语一的完形就是直接来源于网站，而且竟然还是河北唐山的高三模拟考题。
文都教育老师第一时间找到了今年完形的题源，来自于外文网站Givology，原文题目为：DNA of Friendship: Study Finds We are Genetically Linked to Our Friends，DNA友谊：研究发现我们在基因上和我们的朋友有着千丝万缕的联系。
作者：Jayalakshmi K，发表时间为：July 15, 2014。
文章发表时间为2014年的7月15号，依然延续了近年来时效性强的风格。
无论是考研辅导老师还是考研学子，人们大多认为，近两年的完形文章相对于前几年而言简单了很多，文章的简单与否，其实对于真正最后出来考研英语的分数到底是多少，其间并没有一个非常正相关的关系，本质和核心在什么地方?在透过这些文章的背后，我们要去掌握着什么样的能力?有两点问题是可以明确的：第一，完形填空整体的难度偏简单了，并且出题思路稳定；第二，近四年考研文章的整体趋势就是实效性不断地增强，经常是从前几个月的《经济学人》这样的一些杂志当中或热门学习研究网站当中，摘取文章，并且对它进行改写。
所以还是建议2016考研的考生，养成经常阅读英文的习惯，经常读一些社会科学和自然科学类的杂志或网站文章，真正提高自己的英语阅读理解水平，这才是必经之路！（文都附）Givology网站2015完形原文：We have more genes in common with people we pick to be our friends than with strangers.Though not biologically related, friends are as "related" as fourth cousins, sharing about 1% of genes. That is what astudy publishedfrom the University of California and Yale University in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, has concluded.The study is a genome-wide analysis conducted on 1932 unique subjects which compared pairs of unrelated friends and unrelated strangers. The same people were used in both samples.While 1% may seem insignificant, it is not so to a geneticist. As co-author of the study James Fowler, professor of medical genetics at UC San Diego says, "Most people do not even know their fourth cousins but somehow manage to select as friends the people who resemble our kin."The team also developed a "friendship score" which can predict who will be your friend based on their genes.The study also found that the genes for smell were something shared in friends but not genes for immunity. Why this similarity in olfactory genes is difficult to explain, for now. Perhaps, as the team suggests, it draws us to similar environments but there is more to it. There could be many mechanisms working in tandem that drive us in choosing genetically similar friends rather than "functional kinship" of being friends with benefits!One of the remarkable findings of the study was that the similar genes seem to be evolving faster than other genes. Studying this could help understand why human evolution picked pace in the last 30,000 years, with social environment being a major contributory factor.The findings do not simply corroborate people's tendency to befriend those of similar ethnic backgrounds, say the researchers. Though all the subjects were drawn from a population of European extraction, care was taken to see that all subjects, friends and strangers were taken from the same population. The team also controlled the data to check ancestry of subjects.考研成功难又不难，一旦大家开始准备就要全力以赴。
2015年考研英语一真题及解析
2015年考研英语一真题原文及答案解析完整版Section I Use of EnglishDirections:Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)Though not biologically related, friends are as “related” as fourth cousins, sharing about 1% of genes. That is _(1)_a study, published from the University of California and Yale University in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, has__(2)_.The study is a genome-wide analysis conducted _(3)__1,932 unique subjects which __(4)__pairs of unrelated friends and unrelated strangers. The same people were used in both_(5)_.While 1% may seem_(6)_,it is not so to a geneticist. As James Fowler, professor of medical genetics at UC San Diego, says, “Most people do not even _(7)_their fourth cousins but somehow manage to select as friends the people who_(8)_our kin.”The study_(9)_found that the genes for smell were something shared in friends but not genes for immunity .Why this similarity exists in smell genes is difficult to explain, for now,_(10)_,as the team suggests, it draws us to similar environments but there is more_(11)_it. There could be many mechanisms working together that _(12)_us in choosing genetically similar friends_(13)_”functional Kinship” of being friends with_(14)_!One of the remarkable findings of the study was the similar genes seem to be evolution_(15)_than other genes Studying this could help_(16)_why human evolution picked pace in the last 30,000 years, with social environment being a major_(17)_factor.The findings do not simply explain people’s_(18)_to befriend those of similar_(19)_backgrounds, say the researchers. Though all the subjects were drawn from a population of European extraction, care was taken to_(20)_that all subjects, friends and strangers, were taken from the same population.1. [A] when [B] why [C] how [D] what【答案】[D] what【解析】该题考查的是语法知识。
2015年考研英语一真题与解析
2015 年考研英语一真题原文及答案解析完整版Section I Use of EnglishDirections:Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or Don ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)Though not biologically related, friends are as “ related ” as fourth cousins, sharing about That is _(1)_a study, published from the University of California and Yale University in the Proceedings ofthe National Academy of Sciences, has__(2)_.The study is a genome-wide analysis conducted _(3)__1,932 unique subjects which __(4)__pairsof unrelated friends and unrelated strangers. The same people were used in both_(5)_.While 1% may seem_(6)_,it is not so to a geneticist. As James Fowler, professor of medical genetics atUC San Diego, says,“ Most people do not even _(7)_their fourth cousins but somehow manage to select as friends the people who_(8)_our kin.”The study_(9)_found that the genes for smell were something shared in friends but not genes forimmunity .Why this similarity exists in smell genes is difficult to explain, for now,_(10)_,as the team suggests,it draws us to similar environments but there is more_(11)_it. There could be many mechanismsworking together that _(12)_us in choosing genetically similar friends_(13)_ ” functional Kin friends with_(14)_!One of the remarkable findings of the study was the similar genes seem to be evolution_(15)_thanother genes Studying this could help_(16)_why human evolution picked pace in the last 30,000 years,with social environment being a major_(17)_factor.The findings do not simply explain people’ s_(18)_to befriend those of similar_(19)_backgrounds the researchers. Though all the subjects were drawn from a population of European extraction, carewas taken to_(20)_that all subjects, friends and strangers, were taken from the same population.1. [A] when [B] why [C] how [D] what【答案】 [D] what【解析】该题考查的是语法知识。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
2015年考研英语（一）深度解析：完型1. [A] what【解析】此题考查疑问代词辨析：题干中过去分词短语published from the University of California and Yale University…作后置定语，修饰study，而真正的句子主干是That is 1 a study has 2 .简化后的句子可以让我们清晰地看出第一题要说的是研究study的具体内容是what，不是方式how，也不是原因why，更不是时间when。
2. [B] concluded【解析】此题考查动词辨析：同第一题一样，根据简化的句子That is what a study has 2 来解题。
题目选择的动词是说明study怎样才有了上面what表示的内容。
所以此题选择concluded“推断;得出结论”。
其他的动词据不符合要求。
3. [D] on【解析】此题考查介词辨析：根据题干The study is a genome-wide analysis conducted 3 1932 unique subjects的要求，所选择的介词能用在conduct“实施;进行”之后，又得和subject 搭配，所以这个题目应该选择on，构成on some subjects“关于某类主题”。
4. [C] compared【解析】此题考查动词辨析：通过观察题干，我们发现第4题位于which引导的定语从句之内，作从句的谓语动词。
Which修饰主句的主语study“研究”，如此补全定语从句就是：The study 4 pairs of unrelated friends and unrelated strangers…所以正确答案选择C。
该项研究是对比所选择的两个样本。
其他选项都不符合题意。
5. [C] samples【解析】此题考查名词辨析：The same people were used in both 5 .通过观察题干，我们发现第5题空前的单词是both，表示“两者都…”。
而上文中提到两者的只有“unrelated friends”和“unrelated strangers”，即这项研究的两个样本，所以答案选择C. samples“样本”。
6.[A] insignificant【解析】此题考查形容词辨析和让步关系：题干While 1% may seem 6 , it is not so to a geneticist句首的While引导让步状语从句，同时提示我们逗号后和逗号前的内容形成一定程度上的对立关系，而且作者的表达重点位于逗号之后，1%的数量对于基因研究者来说影响程度很大。
那么对于普通人而言这个数据就显得微不足道了。
正确答案只能选择A。
7. [C] know【解析】此题考查动词辨析和转折关系：题干Most people do not even 7 their fourth cousins but somehow manage to select as friends the people who 8 our kin中说“大多数人甚至不他们的第四代表亲，但是尽量选择和亲属人作为朋友”。
even“甚至”这一个词就提示我们应该本题只能选择know“了解，认识”，其他选项都不符合题目要求。
8. [D] resemble【解析】此题考查动词辨析和转折关系：题干中说“大多数人甚至不了解他们的第四代表亲，但是尽量选择和亲属人作为朋友”，也就是说我们这有的标准是这些人需要和我们的亲属有着这样的关系，所以正确答案选择resemble“相似”。
9. [B] also【解析】此题考查副词辨析：题干要求我们补全一个主干信息完整的句子“研究发现了…”。
题目非常简单，选择also“也，又”。
10. [D] perhaps【解析】此题考查副词辨析：上文说这种相似性很难解释，题目所在的句子表示“我们的目光转向相似的社会环境”，即对上文难以解释的现象的原因的推测。
能表示推测含义的副词只有perhaps“也许”。
11.[A]to【解析】此题考查介词辨析：题干中比较结构省略了than和其后所带的具体比较对象，所以容易使同学误认为此空是要补全more的某种结构。
实际上这里的it作逻辑主语，题目选择to，表示“对于…而言”。
12. [D] drive【解析】此题考查动词辨析：题干要求我们补充定语从句的谓语动词，定语从句修饰mechanisms“机制”。
这些机制在选择朋友的过程中发挥了什么作用就是我们选择的目标。
根据上一段的信息，我们不难推测这些机制是促进我们选择和我们相似的人作朋友，所以正确答案选择D。
13. [B] rather than【解析】此题考查副词短语辨析：因为2015年完形填空的选文不是英文原版文章，而是文章的改写，出题者删除了大量的细节性信息，而我们对于文章的理解以及本题的选择都是基于这些细节来的，所以题目给出的信息不足以引导我们选出正确答案。
原文链接已给出：/pressrelease/friends_are_the_family_you_choose14. [C] benefits【解析】此题考查名词辨析：解析同上。
15. [A] faster【解析】此题考查副词辨析：题干给出一个比较结构，题目的选择任务是补全相似基因和其他基因进化的不同。
根据下文“Studying this could help 16 why human evolution picked pace in the last 30,000 years”我们知道研究这样的不同可以解释为什么在近3万年中人类进化加快步伐的原因。
所以该题选择faster“更快”。
16. [D] understand【解析】此题考查动词辨析：“Studying this could help 16 why human evolution picked pace in the last 30,000 years”题目要求我们补全句子谓语部分。
研究可以帮助我们人类进化加速的原因，那么正确答案应该选择understand “理解”。
17.[B] contributory【解析】此题考查形容词辨析：该题目位于with引导的介词短语中。
这类介词短语表示伴随状态，解释社会环境在人类进化过程中起到了的主要作用。
此空应该选择一个表示正面的、积极意义的词，只有contributory“贡献的”符合题意。
18.[A] tendency【解析】此题考查名词辨析：题干要求选择人类的某种名词性的特性，而这种特性使得人们对有着某种相似特种的人友好。
选项中给出的四个名词 A. tendency“习惯、倾向”B. decision“决定”C. arrangement“安排”D. endeavor “努力”中只有A符合题目要求。
19. [C] ethnic【解析】此题考查形容词辨析：此题选择的根据在于后文中的“a population of European extraction”和“from the same population”。
这两处信息提示我们题目中提到的相似背景是指人们的民族或者种族背景。
20. [A] see【解析】此题考查动词辨析和让步关系：“Though all the subjects were drawn from a population of European extraction, care was taken to ”译为：“虽然所有的研究主题都是源自欧洲人口的分支，但是我们仍需要谨慎地”。
在A.关注、B.展示、C.证明、D.讲诉四个选项中只有A能将文章的意思连贯起来。
凯程教育：凯程考研成立于2005年，国内首家全日制集训机构考研，一直从事高端全日制辅导，由李海洋教授、张鑫教授、卢营教授、王洋教授、杨武金教授、张释然教授、索玉柱教授、方浩教授等一批高级考研教研队伍组成，为学员全程高质量授课、答疑、测试、督导、报考指导、方法指导、联系导师、复试等全方位的考研服务。
凯程考研的宗旨：让学习成为一种习惯；凯程考研的价值观口号：凯旋归来，前程万里；信念：让每个学员都有好最好的归宿；使命：完善全新的教育模式，做中国最专业的考研辅导机构；激情：永不言弃，乐观向上；敬业：以专业的态度做非凡的事业；服务：以学员的前途为已任，为学员提供高效、专业的服务，团队合作，为学员服务，为学员引路。
如何选择考研辅导班：在考研准备的过程中，会遇到不少困难，尤其对于跨专业考生的专业课来说，通过报辅导班来弥补自己复习的不足，可以大大提高复习效率，节省复习时间，大家可以通过以下几个方面来考察辅导班，或许能帮你找到适合你的辅导班。
师资力量：师资力量是考察辅导班的首要因素，考生可以针对辅导名师的辅导年限、辅导经验、历年辅导效果、学员评价等因素进行综合评价，询问往届学长然后选择。
判断师资力量关键在于综合实力，因为任何一门课程，都不是由一、两个教师包到底的，是一批教师配合的结果。
还要深入了解教师的学术背景、资料著述成就、辅导成就等。
凯程考研名师云集，李海洋、张鑫教授、方浩教授、卢营教授、孙浩教授等一大批名师在凯程授课。
而有的机构只是很普通的老师授课，对知识点把握和命题方向，欠缺火候。
对该专业有辅导历史：必须对该专业深刻理解，才能深入辅导学员考取该校。
在考研辅导班中，从来见过如此辉煌的成绩：凯程教育拿下2015五道口金融学院状元，考取五道口15人，清华经管金融硕士10人，人大金融硕士15个，中财和贸大金融硕士合计20人，北师大教育学7人，会计硕士保录班考取30人，翻译硕士接近20人，中传状元王园璐、郑家威都是来自凯程，法学方面，凯程在人大、北大、贸大、政法、武汉大学、公安大学等院校斩获多个法学和法硕状元，更多专业成绩请查看凯程网站。
在凯程官方网站的光荣榜，成功学员经验谈视频特别多，都是凯程战绩的最好证明。
对于如此高的成绩，凯程集训营班主任邢老师说，凯程如此优异的成绩，是与我们凯程严格的管理，全方位的辅导是分不开的，很多学生本科都不是名校，某些学生来自二本三本甚至不知名的院校，还有很多是工作了多年才回来考的，大多数是跨专业考研，他们的难度大，竞争激烈，没有严格的训练和同学们的刻苦学习，是很难达到优异的成绩。
最好的办法是直接和凯程老师详细沟通一下就清楚了。
建校历史：机构成立的历史也是一个参考因素，历史越久，积累的人脉资源更多。
例如，凯程教育已经成立10年（2005年），一直以来专注于考研，成功率一直遥遥领先，同学们有兴趣可以联系一下他们在线老师或者电话。
有没有实体学校校区：有些机构比较小，就是一个在写字楼里上课，自习，这种环境是不太好的，一个优秀的机构必须是在教学环境，大学校园这样环境。