Gastro-oesophageal reflux in infancy

合集下载

埃索美拉唑联合莫沙必利治疗反流性食管炎前瞻性临床论文

埃索美拉唑联合莫沙必利治疗反流性食管炎前瞻性临床论文

埃索美拉唑联合莫沙必利治疗反流性食管炎的前瞻性临床研究【中图分类号】r571 【文献标识码】a 【文章编号】1672-3783(2011)11-0365-01【摘要】目的探讨埃索美拉唑联系治疗莫沙必利治疗反流性食管炎(reflux esophagitis,re)的疗效。

方法 90例经内镜证实的re患者随机分为2组,试验组45例,给予口服埃索美拉唑40 mg,1次/日;对照组45例,给予口服埃索美拉唑40 mg,1次/日加莫沙必利5mg,3次/日。

治疗前及治疗后2、4、8周计算患者进行疗效和安全性评价。

治疗后8周复查胃镜,观察胃镜下愈合率。

结果治疗8周时,埃索美拉唑联合莫沙必利组在改善re病人临床反流症状、内镜下食管炎愈合率明显优于单用埃索美拉唑组,两组相比存在显著性差异(p4的时间相关。

因此,维持胃内ph>4对gerd的食管黏膜损伤愈合和症状缓解非常重要。

质子泵抑制剂的问世大大提高了反流性食管炎的治愈率[4]。

埃索美拉唑是第一个以单一s异构体存在的ppi,可用于治疗酸相关性疾病,较以往的ppi能有效地迅速缓解反流性食管炎烧心症状,而且可以提高反流性食管炎治愈率。

埃索美拉唑的左旋异构体优化了其药动学,增加了药物到达壁细胞水平的浓度,并减少了机体个体差异,使其具有抑酸作用,起效快,能持续提高胃内值,抑酸作用更强,更有效,全天维持较高的抑酸水平,且疗效无明显的个体差异等优势,故临床效果更加稳定可靠,文献报道[5]药代动力参数平均血浆时间曲线下面积(auc),埃索美拉唑40mg为奥美拉唑20mg的5倍,表明埃索美拉唑比奥美拉唑具有更高的生物利用。

莫沙必利是一种新型的安全有效的胃肠道促动力药[6],是5-羟色胺第4(5-ht4)受体的激动剂,它通过激动5-ht4受体,促进肠间神经丛乙酰胆碱的释放,增强平滑肌的收缩。

它使食管下端括约肌张力和远端食道蠕动增加,促进食管的蠕动和对酸的清除,具有增加加强胃肠蠕动,协调胃窦、十二指肠、小肠和大肠运动,加速胃排空,减缓或消除胃、十二指肠的返流。

奥沙利铂联合替吉奥或卡培他滨方案用于胃癌术后疗效对比

奥沙利铂联合替吉奥或卡培他滨方案用于胃癌术后疗效对比

奥沙利铂联合替吉奥或卡培他滨方案用于胃癌术后疗效对比胥敏【摘要】Objective To compare the efficacy and adverse reactions of SOX and XELOX chemotherapy used after gastric cancer operation. Methods 70 cases of elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer in the hospital from January 2010 to January 2015 were randomly divided into two groups, 35 cases of SOX group, 35 cases of XELOX group. Results 70 patients were treated with 327 cycles. SOX group therapy had 167 cycles, XELOX treatment group had 160 cycles. The effectiveness of SOX and XELOX group was 62. 86%, 51. 43% respectively. The quality of life improvement rate of SOX and XELOX group was 85. 71%, 65. 71% respectively. The incidence of adverse reactions of SOX group was smaller than XELOX group. Conclusion The SOX program is more suitable than XELOX program for the treatment of elderly patients with advanced stomach cancer.%目的:观察并比较奥沙利铂联合替吉奥或卡培他滨方案在胃癌术后辅助化学治疗中的应用效果。

难治性胃食管反流症状一定是胃食管反流病吗?

难治性胃食管反流症状一定是胃食管反流病吗?

难治性胃食管反流症状一定是胃食管反流病吗?吕宾【摘要】胃食管反流症状可由酸、非酸或弱酸等病理性反流所致,也可出现于食管高敏感、食管动力障碍、食管器质性疾病或解剖异常等情况.难治性胃食管反流病(GERD)是指经标准剂量质子泵抑制剂(PPI)治疗后症状仍不能缓解的GERD.大部分PPI治疗效果不佳的反流症状患者,其病因并非反流,而是由嗜酸粒细胞性食管炎、食管动力障碍、胃轻瘫或合并功能性胃肠病所致,对这类患者应详细了解病史,并行胃镜、病理检查以及食管pH/阻抗监测以明确其潜在病因.%The symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux may be induced by acid reflux, nonacidic or weakly acidic reflux, and also can occur with hypersensitive esophagus, esophageal motility disorders, or other organic/anatomical abnormalities of esophagus.Refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) denotes the symptoms of GERD could not be remitted with the standard dosage proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy.In most patients with refractory symptoms the etiology is of non-reflux-related causes, such as eosinophilic esophagitis, esophageal motility disorders, gastroparesis, or concomitant functional gastrointestinal disorders.A careful and detailed understanding of patient's medical history, examination with endoscopy and biopsy pathology, and esophageal pH-impedance monitoring are very important for identifying the potential cause.【期刊名称】《胃肠病学》【年(卷),期】2017(022)003【总页数】4页(P129-132)【关键词】胃食管反流;食管pH监测;胃肌轻瘫;食管炎【作者】吕宾【作者单位】浙江中医药大学附属第一医院消化内科,310006【正文语种】中文胃食管反流的典型症状是反酸、烧心,还可有胸痛、咽喉部不适、咳嗽、上腹部不适等表现,但吞咽困难并不属于反流症状。

非糜烂性胃食管反流病中西医治疗进展

非糜烂性胃食管反流病中西医治疗进展

非糜烂性胃食管反流病中西医治疗进展朱远熔,朱凌云(指导)(上海中医药大学附属上海市中医医院,上海200071)[关键词]胃食管反流病;非糜烂;中西医疗法[中图分类号]R573[文献标识码]A[文章编号]1008—8849(2009)01—0104—03非糜烂性胃食管反流病(NERD)典型症状为烧心和反流(反酸、反食),排除其他疾病,且内镜检查食管黏膜未见损伤,可以诊断为NERD;如症状不典型,表现为上腹痛、腹胀、非心源性胸痛、慢性咳嗽、哮喘或慢性咽喉痛等,需行与反流相关证据的检查,如24h食管pH监测,质子泵抑制剂(PPI)试验等以明确症状与胃食管反流的关系【lJ。

目前NERD发病率呈不断上升趋势。

其相关发病机制有:食管内脏的高敏感性,食管下端括约肌一过性松弛,酸反流与胆汁反流,动力异常,应激和精神因素的影响[2J。

由于NERD的高发病率以及发病机制和诊断标准欠明确,导致NERD患者的治疗欠佳,从而使NERD成为研究和关注的热点。

笔者将近年来中西医治疗NERD的进展情况综述如下。

1西药治疗1.1抑酸剂抑制胃酸分泌仍是目前最常用、最有效、缓解症状最快的方法,PPI被公认为临床一线用药;它起效较快,可保持胃内pH>4较长时间,更有利于消除症状,预防复发,但普遍认为其对NERD症状的缓解不如反流性食管炎(RE)显著。

第一代PPI(奥美拉唑、兰索拉唑和潘托拉唑)由于耐受性好,价格相对低廉,长期服用较为安全,仍然被普遍运用;近年不断有新一代的PPI问世(如雷贝拉唑、埃美拉唑等),它们的特点是起效快,抑酸强,能迅速缓解症状,且个体差异依从性好,但目前临床无足够证据说明各类PPI的疗效有显著性差异。

如Miner等∞J对203例GERD患者进行安慰剂对照研究显示,NERD患者每天服用奥美拉唑20mg或10mg,近60%的患者4周后烧心症状消失,缓解率比RE患者(70%~75%)低;而雷贝拉唑的疗效与奥美拉唑近似,治疗组每日口服10mg,4周后总体感觉有显著改善者为52.4%,20mg组的改善率为51.6%,2种剂量无显著差异;治疗组达到第1次全天24h无烧心比安慰组快约1d,有统计学意义。

胃食管反流病与特发性肺纤维化

胃食管反流病与特发性肺纤维化

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-0939.2016.02.015
部分病灶非对称性分布的IPF患者,GERD所致的微误吸可 能是其重要病因:在病灶非对称性的IPF患者中,GERD发 生率为明显高于病灶对称性IPF患者,其中94%的患者睡眠 时卧位方向与肺部病变最显著的一侧一致。与病灶对称性
[I]King’rJ,Pardn [2 J
A,Selman M.hliopathi(-pulmonary
议治疗大多数IPF患者的无症状GER,但指南也指}};相关 证据质量并不高。最近ATs/ERs/JRs/ALA更新的2015年 IPF治疗指南中,仍然建议对IPF患者进行抗酸治疗(有条 件推荐)。“1。尽管抗酸治疗的推荐等级较201 1年的指南没 有变化,但值得注意的是,新版指南中明确指出抗酸治疗适 用于所有的IPF患者,其以IPF为治疗指fiF而不是GERD,未 来需要进行抑酸剂和安慰剂治疗IPF的RCT研究进一步证 实抑酸治疗对于IPF的确切疗效。对于质子泵抑制剂与其 他IPF治疗药物的相互作用、长期抗酸治疗的安伞性、针对 非酸性反流的治疗和外科治疗对降低IPF患者GERD和误 吸风险的安全性和有效性仍需要进行深入研究。目前质子 泵抑制剂和抗反流手术治疗IPF的前瞻性临床研究已经在 clinicahrials.gov注册,并已开始招募人组患者。 i、GERD促进IPF发生发展的可能机制 目前比较公认的是Raghu和Meyer”j提出的胃食管反 流致肺损伤假说:在具有易感倾向的人群中,长期慢性微吸 入反流内容物(包括酸性成分胃酸、非酸性成分胃蛋白酶和
disease,GERD)可能是IPF的潜在病因,2011年IPF循证医 学新指南中已将GERD列入IPF发病的主要危险因素之 一“,现就GERD与IPF的相关研究进展综述如下。 一、GERD的定义与流行病学 GERD是指十二指肠、胃内容物反流引起的一系列症候 群,可累及耳鼻喉、呼吸道和口腔等器官,出现食管外综合 征。食管外综合征与呼吸系统疾病密切相关,包括明确相关 的疾病:反流性咳嗽综合征、反流性喉炎综合征、反流性哮喘 综合征及反流性牙侵蚀症,以及可能相关的疾病:咽炎、鼻窦 炎、复发性中耳炎及IPF 3;GERD在西方国家比较普遍,患 病率为10%~20%、引,亚洲国家患病率为6%~10%4。 二、GERD与IPF的临床相关性 1.IPF患者中GERD发生率明显升高:GERD在IPF患 者中发生率明显高于健康对照和其他类型的间质性肺疾病, 由于检测方法、研究对象基础用药情况的差异,IPF中GERD 发生率报道不一。 1976年Mays等5。采用上消化道造影对86例肺纤维化 患者(包括48例IPF、15例免疫相关的肺纤维化、23例已知 病因的肺纤维化)进行检测,结果显示肺纤维化组GERD发 生率(44%)和食管裂孑L疝的发生率(73%)明显高于对照组 (分别为5%和19%),而且IPF组患者的GERD和食管裂孔 疝的发生率明显高于其他2组肺纤维化患者:作者推测长 期慢性吸入胃内容物至细小支气管可能是导致肺纤维化的 重要原因“。但上消化造影诊断GERD特异性较差,而且 当时IPF的定义较为广泛、并非特指普通型间质性肺炎 (UIP),因此研究结果存在较大的局限性。 1998年美国华盛顿医学中心Tobin等6。采用24 h食管 pH监测检测IPF患者GERD的发生情况,在17例病理确诊 的IPF患者中,16例发生异常的近端和(或)远端食管酸反 流,显著高于其他病因的间质性肺疾病患者(4/8,P=

难治性胃食管反流病的治疗进展

难治性胃食管反流病的治疗进展

难治性胃食管反流病的治疗进展李松霏;李文波;范飞飞;刘晓峰【摘要】胃食管反流病(GERD)是一种常见的上消化道疾病,近年其在我国的发病率逐年增高.质子泵抑制剂(PPI)为目前治疗该病最主要的药物,其治疗效果稳定,长期使用安全性好.但仍有高达30%的GERD患者规范使用PPI后症状控制欠佳,甚至进展为难治性GERD,严重影响生活质量.GERD的治疗是目前临床工作中较为棘手的问题,因此多种治疗方法应运而生,包括药物治疗、内镜治疗、外科手术等.本文就难治性GERD治疗方法的研究进展作一综述.%Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common gastrointestinal disease and its incidence is increased in recent years in China.As the main treatment of GERD, proton pump inhibitors (PPI) has stable effects and high safety in long-term application.However, around 30% GERD patients had poor symptom control under standard PPI treatment, even developed into refractory GERD, seriously affecting the quality of life.Therefore, the treatment of GERD is a difficult clinical problem and multiple therapeutic modalities have emerged, including drug therapy, endoscopic treatment and surgery.In this paper, we reviewed the advances in study on treatment of refractory GERD.【期刊名称】《胃肠病学》【年(卷),期】2017(022)007【总页数】4页(P439-442)【关键词】难治性胃食管反流病;药物治疗;内镜治疗;外科手术【作者】李松霏;李文波;范飞飞;刘晓峰【作者单位】锦州医科大学济南军区总医院研究生培养基地 250031;济南军区总医院消化内科;锦州医科大学济南军区总医院研究生培养基地 250031 ;济南军区总医院消化内科【正文语种】中文胃食管反流病(gastroesophageal reflux disease, GERD)是指胃、十二指肠内容物反流入食管引起反酸、烧心、胸骨后疼痛等症状或组织损害的一种疾病,目前最主要的治疗方法为抑酸治疗。

氟哌噻吨美利曲辛治疗非糜烂性胃食管反流病的临床研究

氟哌噻吨美利曲辛治疗非糜烂性胃食管反流病的临床研究

氟哌噻吨美利曲辛治疗非糜烂性胃食管反流病的临床研究陈侃【摘要】目的探讨雷贝拉唑、莫沙必利联合氟哌噻吨美利曲辛治疗非糜烂性胃食管反流病(NERD)的临床疗效.方法将2015年2月~2017年2月因非糜烂性胃食管反流病于本院就诊的78例患者纳入研究并随机分组,对照组38例患者采用雷贝拉唑、莫沙必利治疗,观察组40例患者采用氟哌噻吨美利曲辛,4周为1个疗程.比较两组患者临床疗效.结果治疗后,两组患者胸痛、反酸、烧心等症状积分均降低,但观察组各积分水平更低,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗后观察组HAMD评分更低(P<0.05);对照组总有效率73.68%(28/38),观察组92.50%(37/40),差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论雷贝拉唑、莫沙必利联合氟哌噻吨美利曲辛治疗NERD疗效显著,可更好地改善临床症状,值得推广.【期刊名称】《当代医学》【年(卷),期】2018(024)005【总页数】3页(P27-29)【关键词】雷贝拉唑;莫沙必利;氟哌噻吨美利曲辛;非糜烂性胃食管反流病【作者】陈侃【作者单位】赣南医学院第一附属医院急诊科,江西赣州 341000【正文语种】中文胃食管反流病(GERD)是临床常见的消化系统动力障碍性疾病,以反流、烧心、胸痛为主要表现。

本病好发于年轻女性及瘦弱者,病机尚不明确且近年来发病率逐渐升高。

胃食管反流病包括难治性食管炎、非糜烂性胃食管反流病及糜烂性食管炎,其中又以非糜烂性胃食管反流病比例最高,患者反流症状较典型,可对患者身心健康均造成影响[1]。

质子泵抑制剂及促胃肠动力药物联合应用是本病的常用治疗方案,对于改善临床症状发挥了一定作用。

但不少患者由于长期反流引起的不适感可引发焦虑情绪,依从性较差,此时常规治疗往往效果并不理想[2]。

氟哌噻吨美利曲辛是临床常用的抗抑郁药物,作用显著且安全可靠。

我们在常规治疗基础上联合氟哌噻吨美利曲辛效果显著,现报道如下。

医药代表学术培训-难治性GERD的处理2013-04

医药代表学术培训-难治性GERD的处理2013-04
I的代谢方式差异: 肝细胞色素p4502C酶 个体间P4502C酶代谢PPI的能力有差异- 基因型差异
药物代谢对抑酸效果的影响
PPIs
CYP2C19
CYP3A
无活性代谢物
PPI应用合理?
3、PPI的代谢方式差异: 个体分为PPI快代谢及慢代谢,亚洲人快代 谢型占有较高的比例
动力异常的意义
临床抑酸治疗效果不佳的应检测 食管动力。 食管动力异常是GERD食管外症状 的重要co-factor.
Knight RE, et al Larygoscope 2000;110(9):1462-6 Devayt KR et al Am J Gastroenterol 2005,100:190
我国汉族CYP2C19基因型构成比
14.71% 30.88% 54.41%
homEM hetEM PM
奥美拉唑、兰索拉唑主要依赖于CYP2C19 酶代谢。 埃索美拉唑、雷贝拉唑主要通过CYP3A4 酶代谢。
对策:对于治疗效果不佳的,可增加剂量或 换用其它种类PPI制剂(有条件的检测 CYP2C19基因型)。
LES压力低下:屏障功能降低 GERD食管体部蠕动异常,“无效食管动力 ”达43% 更多见于严重RE、Barrett’s食管患者 存在食管动力异常者对常规药物治疗效果 较差。
尚占民 关玉盘 中华消化内镜杂志 2005,22,258-259 尚占民 关玉盘 中华内科杂志 尚占民 高岩 中华消化内镜 2004,43,317-318 2002,19,159-161
近端胃的感觉和运动功能
GERD患者近端胃潴留(液体和固体) 餐后近端胃张力低于对照 产生饱胀感觉的容量低于对照 产生饱胀感觉的压力低于对照

非糜烂性反流病与糜烂性食管炎研究进展及相互关系探讨

非糜烂性反流病与糜烂性食管炎研究进展及相互关系探讨
Conchillo等[11]多位学者研究证实,NERD患 者有明显直立反流趋势,而EE患者有明显仰卧反 流趋势。提示NERD患者反流事件发生与重力作 用关系不大,下食管括约肌一过性松弛可能是主要 机制¨2|。夜间仰卧状态失去重力作用,唾液分泌量 下降,导致继发蠕动减少,EE患者酸反流事件发生 主要原因可能是食管运动功能不良。Martinez 等[133发现,NERD患者酸反流事件数比EE患者 少。但当仅比较P—NERD与EE时,无论何种体位, 食管酸反流事件数量及食管酸暴露程度均相似。 表明P—NERD食管酸暴露与N-NERD不同,而与 EE有更多相似性。 2.4精神心理状态
参考 文献
1 Fass R.Ero.sive esophagitis and nonerosive reflux disease(NERD): comparison of epidemiologic。physiologie.and therapeutic character- istics.J Clin Gastroenterol,2007.41:131—137.
(2)食管pH监测阴性患者(N—NERD):这类患 者食管pH监测提示酸暴露在正常范围内。部分患 者症状与酸反流事件明显相关,表明其食管敏感性 较高,约占N—NERD患者35%。其余患者症状与 酸反流事件无直接相关性,抑酸等抗反流治疗效果 不佳,明显表现出心理状态对症状程度的影响。 2 NERD与EE特点比较 2.1 食管黏膜形态学改变
2 Lee YC。Yen AM.Tai JJ.et a1.The effect of metabolic risk factors on the natural course of gastro-oesophageal reflux dis— ease.Gut,2009,58:174—181.

炎症性肠病相关异型增生病理诊断问题与建议

炎症性肠病相关异型增生病理诊断问题与建议

讨 论GERD 被认为是全球最常见的慢性胃肠疾病之一,治疗费用和诊断费用通常高昂[6]。

初始治疗是经验性使用PPI ,对PPI 治疗无反应的患者通常需行进一步检查,如胃镜检查和24 h MII⁃pH 监测,但国外研究[7]发现仅44%的GERD 患者24 h MII⁃pH 监测阳性,仍有相当高比例的患者诊断不明确,因此提出了新的阻抗参数食管MNBI 用于GERD 的诊断。

MNBI 不受昼夜节律变化的影响,被认为是一种潜在的客观反流指标,亦是一种反映纵向反流负荷、食管黏膜完整性和损伤程度的标志物,可作为抗反流治疗的独立潜在预测因子[8]。

但食管MNBI 在诊断GERD 中的价值有待进一步探讨。

本研究中GERD 患者的AET 、DeMeester 评分和总反流次数均显著高于非GERD 患者,这与目前24 h MII⁃pH 监测的诊断标准[9]是一致的,但因上述各反流参数的日间变异率较大,且AET 和总反流次数的诊断敏感性欠佳[3]。

本研究发现GERD 患者各通道食管MNBI (距离齿状线上方3 cm 、5 cm 、7 cm 处)明显低于非GERD 患者,且GERD 患者食管远端MNBI 明显低于非GERD 患者。

这与国外研究[10]结果基本一致,可能是由于长时间的酸暴露和延迟清除所造成的。

食管清除功能障碍是GERD 的发病机制之一,食管延迟清除可导致酸暴露时间增加,造成食管黏膜损伤,进而使食管MNBI 降低。

本研究发现Spearman 相关性分析表明AET 越长、DeMeester 评分越高以及酸反流次数、弱酸反流次数越多,食管远端MNBI 越低,但总反流次数、非酸反流次数与食管远端MNBI 无明显相关性。

多项研究[11⁃13]结果均认为AET 、DeMeester 评分、酸反流次数与食管远端MNBI 呈负相关(P <0.05)。

而对于食管近端MNBI 的分析发现,弱酸反流次数越多,GERD 患者食管近端MNBI 明显降低,这可能与研究对象中包含难治性GERD 患者以及伴食管外症状GERD 患者有关,有学者认为弱酸反流至近端也可损伤食管黏膜,造成食管近端敏感性增加,从而使食管外症状表现更明显[14]。

难治性胃食管反流病的识别与治疗进展

难治性胃食管反流病的识别与治疗进展

㊃专题㊃通信作者:白文元,E m a i l :w e n yu a n b a i @m e d m a i l .c o m.c n 难治性胃食管反流病的识别与治疗进展白 研1,白文元2(1.河北医科大学第三医院肿瘤科,河北石家庄050051;2.河北医科大学第二医院消化内科,河北石家庄050000) 摘 要:难治性胃食管反流病(r e f r a c t o r yg a s t r o e s o p h a ge a l r ef l u xd i s e a s e ,R G E R D )是指标准剂量质子泵抑制剂(p r o t o n p u m p i n h i b i t o r ,P P I )治疗8周,反流症状仍无缓解的胃食管反流病(g a s t r o e s o ph a ge a l r ef l u x d i s e a s e ,G E R D )㊂R G E R D 症状特点是接受标准P P I 治疗后,仍持续存在严重而频繁的反流症状㊂研究发现,R G E R D 占G E R D 的10%~40%,而R G E R D 中50%是功能性烧心,这部分患者是P P I 治疗失败的主要来源,R G E R D 常有非酸反流存在㊂在每日2次P P I 治疗失败的G E R D 患者中,非酸反流与症状的相关性远远高于酸反流㊂R G E R D 的机制概括为两大方面:P P I 治疗失败和P P I 抵抗㊂对于R G E R D 的诊治目前有亚太共识,但无任何一种药物可以解决P P I 治疗的失败,需要具体分析每一位R G E R D 患者病因,采取个体化合理治疗措施㊂关键词:胃食管反流;质子泵抑制剂;共识中图分类号:R 573.9 文献标志码:A 文章编号:1004-583X (2017)01-0009-04d o i :10.3969/j.i s s n .1004-583X.2017.01.003A d v a n c e s i n i d e n t i f i c a t i o na n d t r e a t m e n t o f r e f r a c t o r y g a s t r o e s o p h a ge a l r ef l u xd i s e a s e B a iY a n 1,B a iW e n yu a n 21.D e p a r t m e n t o f G a s t r o e n t e r o l o g y ,t h eT h i r d H o s p i t a l o f H e b e iM e d i c a lU n i v e r s i t y ,S h i j i a z h u a n g 050051,C h i n a ;2.D e p a r t m e n t o f G a s t r o e n t e r o l o g y ,t h eS e c o n d H o s p i t a l o fH e b e iM e d i c a lU n i v e r s i t y ,S h i j i a z h u a n g 050051,C h i n a C o r r e s p o n d i n g a u t h o r :B a iW e n y u a n ,E m a i l :w e n yu a n b a i @m e d m a i l .c o m .c n A B S T R A C T :R e f r a c t o r yg a s t r o e s o p h a g e a l r e f l u x d i s e a s e (R G E R D )r e f e r s t o t h e u s e o f t h e s t a n d a r d d o s e o f p r o t o n p u m p i n h i b i t o r (P P I )f o r e i g h tw e e k s ,r e f l u xs y m p t o m s s t i l l r e m a i nn or e m i s s i o no f g a s t r o e s o p h a ge a l r ef l u xd i s e a s e .S y m p t o m s o fR G E R Da r ec h a r a c t e r i z e db yp e r s i s t e n t s e v e r ea n df r e q u e n t r eg u r gi t a t i o na f t e r t r e a t m e n tw i t hs t a n d a r d P P I .R G E R Da c c o u n t sf o r10%-40%o fG E R D ,w h i l e50%o fR G E R Di sf u n c t i o n a lh e a r t b u r n ,w h i c hi st h e m a i ns o u r c e o fP P I f a i l u r e .R G E R Di s o f t e na s s o c i a t e dw i t hn o n -a c i dr e f l u x .I n p a t i e n t sw i t hG E R D w h o f a i l e d t w i c ed a i l y P P I t h e r a p y ,t h ea s s o c i a t i o n o fn o n a c i dr e f l u x w i t h s y m p t o m s w a s m u c h h i gh e rt h a nt h a to fa c i dr e f l u x .T h e m e c h a n i s mo fR G E R Di s s u mm a r i z e d a s t w o a s p e c t s :P P I t r e a t m e n t f a i l u r e a n dP P I r e s i s t a n c e .R G E R Dd i a gn o s i s a n d t r e a t m e n t o f t h e c u r r e n tA s i a -P a c i f i c c o n s e n s u s i n d i c a t e s t h a t n o n e o f t h e d r u g s c a n s o l v e t h e f a i l u r e o f P P I t r e a t m e n t ,a s p e c i f i c a n a l y s i s o f e a c hR G E R De t i o l o g y i sn e c e s s a r y so a s t o t a k e i n d i v i d u a l a n d r e a s o n a b l e t r e a t m e n t .K E Y W O R D S :g a s t r o e s o p h a g e a l r e f l u x ;p r o t o n p u m pi n h i b i t o r s ;c o n s e n s us 白文元,河北医科大学第二医院消化内科教授,M e m b e r so f A s i a n B a r r e t t 'sE s o p h a gu sC o n s o r t i u m ㊁中华医学会消化病学分会常委㊁中国医师协会消化医师分会常委㊁海峡两岸医药卫生交流协会消化病学专家委员会常委;中华医学奖评审委员会和国家重点临床专科评审委员;河北省医学会消化病学分会前任主委㊁河北省医师协会消化医师分会主委㊁河北省中西医结合学会消化专业委员会主委㊁河北省中西医结合学会常务理事㊁中国医师协会中西医结合医师分会副主任委员㊁中国中医药研究促进会消化整合医学分会副会长㊁中国健康促进基金会消化病防治专项基金会专家㊁中国中西医结合学会消化专业委员会委员㊁石家庄市医学会副会长㊁石家庄市医学会消化专业委员会主委㊂河北省科技成果鉴定委员会专家㊁河北省医疗事故鉴定委员会专家等㊂中华消化杂志㊁中华消化内镜杂志㊁中华胰腺病杂志㊁G U T 中文版㊁内科急危重症杂志㊁胃肠病和肝病学杂志㊁胃肠病学杂志㊁临床肝胆杂志㊁临床内科杂志等编委㊂随着我国城乡居民生活方式的改变,胃食管反流病(g a s t r o e s o p h a ge a l r ef l u xd i s e a s e ,G E R D )在我国的发病率呈上升趋势㊂多数酸反流所致的G E R D症状应用常规质子泵抑制剂(p r o t o n p u m pi n h i b i t o r ,P P I )治疗即可达到有效的控制,但是近年来临床上也发现约有10%~40%的患者采用标准剂量P P I 治疗8周后仍无效或症状不能完全缓解[1],因此,有学者提出了难治性胃食管反流病(r e f r a c t o r yg a s t r o e s o p h a ge a l r ef l u xd i s e a s e ,R G E R D )的概念,此类患者的共同特点是对P P I 治疗效果不佳[2-4]㊂R G E R D 是当前消化内科门诊中最为常见的治疗难㊃9㊃‘临床荟萃“ 2017年1月5日第32卷第1期 C l i n i c a l F o c u s ,J a n u a r y 5,2017,V o l 32,N o .1Copyright ©博看网. All Rights Reserved.题之一,近年来,众多研究学者运用多种治疗方法来治疗该病,但均未取得突出疗效[5-6],那么,我们在临床上如何正确识别R G E R D与合理治疗呢?现将近年来此领域的研究进展介绍供参考㊂1R G E R D定义和病因机制2016亚太共识指出,在常规P P I剂量治疗至少8周反流症状仍无缓解的G E R D可以定义为对P P I 耐受的G E R D㊂在亚洲非糜烂性反流病(n o n-e r o s i v e r e f l u xd i s e a s e,N E R D)患者中对P P I耐受的情况更为常见㊂R G E R D的症状会影响到患者的生活质量,包括睡眠和工作[1]㊂R G E R D的主要因素为非酸或弱酸反流㊂我国近期研究表明,R G E R D患者的主要致病因素为抑酸不充分和非酸反流,其次为功能性烧心[3]㊂当反流导致食管内p H值<4或反流发生时食管内p H值<4,称为酸反流;如果当反流使食管内p H值下降>1,但食管内p H值仍>4则为弱酸反流;当反流导致食管内p H值上升至>7时为碱反流㊂碱反流多因十二指肠胃食管反流所致,反流物主要由胆汁组成㊂需要引起注意的是,弱酸反流与碱反流并非同一概念,有研究发现,仅10%~15%弱酸反流的反流物中含有胆汁㊂因反流物p H值受P P I的影响,因此目前尚无R G E R D中非酸和(或)弱酸反流发生率的结论性数据㊂有多中心研究表明,在每日2次P P I治疗无效的患者中,18%存在病理性酸反流,41%存在弱酸和(或)非酸反流(仅食管阻抗异常)[7]㊂虽然酸反流是导致G E R D症状的主要因素,但是p H联合胆汁反流监测结果表明,在P P I 治疗失败的患者中,约2/3患者的症状为非酸反流或胆汁反流所致㊂非酸和(或)弱酸反流导致G E R D症状的可能机制:①反流物对食管扩张作用增强㊂食管阻抗研究发现,弱酸和(或)混合反流常合并气体反流,后者可增加反流物体积,增强食管扩张作用,该类反流物常可到达近端食管,近端食管的敏感性高于远端食管,导致患者易出现症状㊂②反流物对食管黏膜的损伤㊂许多弱酸反流患者反流频率并无增加,提示患者的症状可能与食管对反流物的敏感性增高有关㊂动物实验表明,食管内灌注含胆汁的弱酸溶液可显著增加黏膜通透性,增加上皮间隙,人体内灌注相同溶液可引起胃灼热症状,上皮间隙增宽是G E R D患者食管敏感性增高的重要机制[8]㊂R G E R D患者抑酸治疗不充分,包括P P I剂量不足㊁患者依从性差和夜间酸突破等㊂有部分器质性和功能性疾病的临床症状与G E R D相似,如贲门失弛缓症患者因食物咽下障碍,食物滞留于食管内发酵,也可导致烧心症状;嗜酸性食管炎患者因嗜酸性粒细胞浸润食管壁可出现胸痛症状,不过在亚洲地区,嗜酸性食管炎并不是引起R G E R D的常见病因;功能性烧心患者因内脏感觉过敏也可引起烧心症状;这些症状的发生与酸反流无关,P P I治疗往往无效㊂此外,某些继发性因素,如自身免疫病(如系统性硬化症)㊁药物(如N S A I D)等也可导致G E R D的发生和P P I疗效不佳[8]㊂引起R G E R D发生的主要诱因包括:①无法有效抑制胃酸分泌;②持续性弱酸(或非酸性)反流的存在;③非G E R D影响因素的存在(如胃肠动力问题㊁嗜酸性粒细胞性食管炎㊁功能性烧心㊁与肠易激惹综合征症状的重叠等);④内脏高敏感性[1]㊂2R G E R D患者食管p H监测和动力学特点食管p H监测是评价R G E R D的重要方法㊂评价R G E R D患者时,建议在使用P P I时行p H监测,可以反映患者症状是否因抑酸不足所致,或症状是否因酸反流所致㊂对于R G E R D患者采用每日2次P P I治疗时,p H监测结果阴性者,往往提示症状与酸反流无关,此外对症状反流关系进行分析,也有助于排除食管酸敏感㊂需要注意的是,传统p H监测是将p H电极置于食管下括约肌近端5c m处,以避免电极在吞咽时滑入胃内㊂近年来研究结果提示,部分G E R D患者鳞柱状上皮交界处也可有酸暴露(短段反流),导致传统p H检测无法检出,可能是R G E R D无法被发现的原因[8]㊂目前研究证实,R G E R D患者食管高动力异常的检出率为16.48%㊂推测反流物刺激食管黏膜,食管代偿性蠕动增强㊁增快,导致继发痉挛性㊁快速蠕动可能是G E R D患者发生高动力异常的原因㊂而本组非反流烧心患者食管高动力异常的检出率高达31.11%,该组患者并不存在异常反流这一因素,食管高动力异常在这些患者中可能呈原发性㊂由于食管高动力障碍本身存在烧心㊁胸痛等症状,在缺乏食管测压结果的情况下,也可能被误判为功能性烧心㊂因此在诊断功能性烧心时,食管压力测定是非常有必要的检查手段[9]㊂R G E R D患者中食管动力异常的比例较高,其中G E R D组患者(包括反流性食管炎㊁N E R D酸及N E R D弱酸反流患者)以食管下括约肌功能减弱㊁食管体部运动减弱为突出特点;非反流相关烧心患者中除了包含一部分功能性烧心患者外,尚存在较多的食管高动力障碍患者㊂因此,对R G E R D患者,除了进行反流事件的监测外,有必要进行食管动力功能的分析,并予以相应的治疗[9]㊂㊃01㊃‘临床荟萃“2017年1月5日第32卷第1期 C l i n i c a l F o c u s,J a n u a r y5,2017,V o l32,N o.1Copyright©博看网. All Rights Reserved.食管电阻抗检测不受反流物p H值影响,多项大样本多中心24小时阻抗+p H监测研究证实, R G E R D患者中仅10%~20%存在酸反流,近40%的患者为非酸反流,提示24小时阻抗+p H监测可证实约2/3的R G E R D患者存在病理性反流㊂因此,目前认为24小时阻抗+p H监测可以发现绝大多数反流事件并鉴别出酸㊁弱酸和弱碱反流,对R G E R D 的诊断和指导治疗有重要意义,同时还可以分析患者症状反流间的关系,有助于与功能性烧心鉴别㊂食管胆红素监测使用B i l i t e c检测可以了解反流物中的胆红素含量,B a r r e t t食管患者胆红素增高尤为明显,虽然多数胆汁反流与酸反流同时发生,酸比胆汁更易诱发症状,但是也有研究表明,部分P P I治疗无效患者症状与胆汁反流有关,巴氯芬可显著降低十二指肠-胃-食管反流,减少反流物胆红素含量,缓解症状㊂3R G E R D识别与诊断2016亚太共识建议R G E R D症状诊断可能性[1]见表1㊂表1R G E R D病因分析与症状诊断病因症状非G E R D因素胃排空延迟㊁食管动力紊乱(失迟缓)㊁功能性反流㊁吞气症㊁反刍㊁嗜酸性粒细胞性食管炎等弱酸/非酸性反流可能存在于抑酸治疗后因机械性因素存在所致的胃内容物持续性反流,如食管裂孔疝抑酸治疗效果差剂量因素㊁服药的依从性㊁卓艾综合征㊁P P I耐药等反流敏感性内脏高敏感性以及过度警觉导致患者对症状过于敏感对于R G E R D需要进一步做哪些检查在确定了是否存在服药依从性的影响后,可以进行进一步的检查以更好的了解相关的病理生理学机制,包括上消化道内镜检查(必要时可联合放大内镜㊁染色内镜以及N B I内镜)㊁24小时食管动态p H检查以及食管内压力测定,为制定R G E R D治疗方案提供依据㊂4R G E R D治疗进展R G E R D治疗的主要方法包括生活方式的调整㊁药物㊁手术和内镜治疗等㊂R G E R D的管理路径[1]见图1㊂改善生活方式对于治疗R G E R D可能有帮助㊂对于超重或肥胖的患者,控制体质量有助于症状改善,但此项数据仍缺乏长期随访资料的支持㊂对于R G E R D症状持续的患者而言,P P I仍是治疗基础㊂可以考虑增加P P I的剂量或者更换另一种P P I治疗㊂也可以考虑使用P P I联合H2受体拮抗剂(H2R A)或海藻酸盐进行治疗㊂对于药物治疗失败的R G E R D患者,手术治疗是一种可以选择的治疗方式,可以根据当地医疗条件和胃肠外科专家术者的经验和水平,考虑选择腹腔镜下胃底折叠术进行治疗[1,10-20]㊂图1R G E R D的管理路径对于功能性烧心如何治疗可以使用包括三环类抗抑郁药和选择性5羟色胺再摄取抑制剂在内的抗抑郁药物进行治疗,但治疗效果在人群中并不一致,需要因人而异个体化治疗㊂对于存在食管外症状的患者,且使用P P I治疗无效的G E R D患者,应当在进行内镜或功能性检查前优先进行非G E R D因素的病因检查[1,10-20]㊂对于个体患者,标准剂量P P I治疗后,部分患者症状未缓解,可能与非酸反流有关,可加用H2R A,但是H2R A的耐受性限制其应用㊂巴氯芬能降低下食管括约肌一过性松弛的次数,但其不良反应亦限制了临床应用㊂传统的外科手术,要求苛刻且不良反应多,推广不多㊂内镜治疗弥补了外科手术的弊端,但技术上缺乏统一规范,疗效尚不肯定㊂膈肌生物反馈㊁胃电起搏㊁心理干预㊁中医针灸,均可减少G E R D患者对P P I的依赖,简便易行且疗效较好,或将成为R G E R D综合治疗的新热点[15]㊂参考文献:[1] F o c kKM,T a l l e y N,G o h K L,e ta l.A s i a-P a c i f i cc o n s e n s u so nt h e m a n a g e m e n to f g a s t r o-o e s o p h a g e a lr e f l u xd i s e a s e:a nu p d a t ef o c u s i n g o n r e f r a c t o r y r e f l u x d i s e a s e a n d B a r r e t t so e s o p h a g u s[J].G u t,2016,65(9):1402–1415. [2]S i f r i m D,Z e r b i b F.D i a g n o s i sa n d m a n a g e m e n to f p a t i e n t sw i t hr e f l u xs y m p t o m sr e f r a c t o r y t o p r o t o n p u m p i n h i b i t o r s.[J].G u t,2012,61(9):1340-1354.[3] X i a oY,L i a n g M,P e n g S,e ta l.T a i l o r e dt h e r a p y f o rt h eR e f r a c t o r y G E R D p a t i e n t s b y c o m b i n e d m u l t i c h a n n e lI n t r a l u m i n a l i m p e d a n c e-p H m o n i t o r i n g[J].J G a s t r o e n t e r o lH e p a t o l,2016,31(2):345-350.[4]罗金燕,牛春燕.难治性胃食管反流病诊治进展[J].中国实用㊃11㊃‘临床荟萃“2017年1月5日第32卷第1期 C l i n i c a l F o c u s,J a n u a r y5,2017,V o l32,N o.1Copyright©博看网. All Rights Reserved.内科杂志,2010,30(1):90-92.[5]I z a w aS,F u n a k iY,I i d aA,e t a l.T h er o l eo f g a s t r o e s o p h a g e a lr e f l u x i nr e l a t i o nt os y m p t o m o n s e t i n p a t i e n t s w i t h p r o t o np u m p i n h i b i t o r-r e f r a c t o r y n o n e r o s i v e r e f l u x d i s e a s ea c c o m p a n i e db y a nu n d e r l y i n g e s o p h a g e a lm o t o rd i s o r d e r[J].D i g e s t i o n,2014,89(1):61-67.[6]王高峰,朱生棵.难治性胃食管反流病的诊断及治疗进展[J].实用医学杂志,2011,27(9):1517-1520.[7] M a i n i e I,T u t u i a nR,S h a y S,e t a l.A c i da n dn o n-a c i dr e f i u xi n p a t i e n t sw i t h p e r s i s t e ns y m p t o m sd e s p i t ea c i ds u p p r e s s i v et h e r a p y:a m u l t i c e n t e r s t u d y u s i n g c o m b i n e d a m b u l a t o r yi m p e d a n c e-P hm o n i t o r i n g[J].G u t,2006,55(10):1398-1402.[8]刘劲松.难治性胃食管反流病[J].中华消化杂志,2016,36(5):289-291.[9]王琨,段丽萍,夏志伟,等.基于高分辨食管压力测定及阻抗-p H监测的难治性烧心患者食管动力特点[J].中华医学杂志, 2014,94(34):2650-2655.[10] F r a z z o n iM,C o n i g l i a r oR,M a n t aR,e t a l.R e f l u x p a r a m e t e r s a sm o d i f i e d b y E s o p h y X o r l a p a r o s c o p i e f u n d o p l i c a t i o n i n r e f r a c t o r y G E R D[J].A l i m e n tP h a r m a c o lT h e r,2011,34(1): 67-75.[11] R e p i c iA,F u m a g a l l i U,M a l e s c i A,e t a l.E n d o l u m i n a l f u n d o p l i-c a t i o n(E L F)f o rG E R Du s i n g E s o p h y X:a12-m o n t h f o l l o w-u pi na s i n g l e-c e n t e r e x p e r i e n c e[J].JG a s t r o i n t e s tS u r g,2010,14(1):1-6.[12]黄四海,雍艳艳.R G E R D原因分析及治疗对策[J].吉林医学,2010,31(18):2903-2904.[13]钱燎.黛力新辅助治疗60例难治性胃食管反流病的临床效果[J].现代消化及介入诊疗,2015,20(2):134-136. [14]秦咏梅,孙屹峰,张超贤,等.艾普拉唑治疗难治性胃食管反流病62例[J].华北国防医药,2010,22(4):331-333. [15]陈鸣艳,吕宾.难治性胃管反流病[J].胃肠病学,2010,15(1):57-58.[16] B a j b o u j M,B e c k e rV,P h i l l i p V,e t a l.H i g h-d o s e e s o m e p r a z o l ef o rt r e a t m e n t o f s y m p t o m a t i c r e f r a c t o r yg a s t r o-e s o ph a g e a lr e f l u x d i s e a s e-a p r o s p e c t i v e p H-m e t r y/i m p e d a n c e-c o n t r o l l e d s t u d y[J].D i g e s t i o n,2009,80(2):112-118.[17] G y a w a l i C P,B r e d e n o o r d A J,C o n k l i nJ L,e ta l.E v a l u a t i o no fe s o p h a g e a l m o t o rf u n c t i o n i n c l i n i c a l p r a c t i c e[J].N e u r o g a s t r o e n t e r o lM o t i l,2013,25(2):99-133. [18] R o m a n S,Z e r b i b F,B e l h o c i n e K,e t a l.H i g h r e s o l u t i o nn a a n o m e t r y t o d e t e c tt r a n s i e n tl o w e ro e s o p h a g e a ls p h i n c t e r r e l a x a t i o n s:d i a g n o s t i c a c c u r a c y c o m p a r e dw i t h p e r f u s e d-s l e e v em a n o m e t r y,a n dt h ed e f i n i t i o no fn e w d e t e c t i o nc r i t e r i a[J].A l i m e n t P h a r m a c o lT h e r,2011,34(3):384-393.[19] R o h o f WO,B o e c k x s t a e n s G E,H i r s c h D P.H i g h-r e s o l u t i o ne s o p h a g e a l p r e s s u r et o p o g r a p h y i ss u p e r i o rt oc o n v e n-t i o n a ls l e e v e m a n o m e t r y f o r t h e d e t e c t i o n o f t r a n s i e n t l o w e re s o p h a g e a l s p h i n c t e r r e l a x a t i o n s a s s o c i a t e dw i t ha r ef l u xe v e n t[J].N e u r o g a s t r o e n t e r o lM o t i l,2011,23(5):427-432.[20]S w e i s R,A n g g i a n s a h A,W o n g T,e t a l.A s s e s s m e n t o fe s o p h a g e a ld y sf u n c d o n a n d s y m p t o m s d u r i ng a n d a f t e r as t a n d a r d i z e d t e s tm e a l:d e v e l o p m e n t a n d c l i n i c a l v a l i d a t i o no f an e w m e t h o d o l o g y u t i l i z i n g h i g h-r e s o l u t i o n m a n o m e t r y[J].N e u r o g a s t r o e n t e r o lM o t i l,2014,26(2):215-228.收稿日期:2016-12-21编辑:﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏王秋红(上接第8页)[11] R i n s m a N F,F a r r e R,B o u v y N D,e ta l.T h e e f f e c t o fe n d o s c o p i cf u n d o p l i c a t i o n a n d p r o t o n p u m p i n h i b i t o r s o nb a s e l i n e i m p e d a nc e a n dh e a r t b u r ns e v e r i t y i nG E R D p a t i e n t s[J].N e u r o g a s t r o e n t e r o lM o t i l,2015,27(2):220-228. [12] M a u r i t zF A,R i n s m a N F,C o n c h i l l oJ M,e ta l.E s o p h a g e a lm u c o s a l i n t e g r i t y r e c o v e r s a f t e r l a p a r o s c o p i c f u n d o p l i c a t i o n i nc h i ld re n w i t h g a s t r o e s o p h a g e a l r ef l u x d i s e a s e[J].G a s t r o e n t e r o l o g y,2014,146(5):497-502.[13] W o o d l a n dP,A k t a rR,M t h u n z iE,e ta l.D i s t i n c ta f f e r e n ti n n e r v a t i o n p a t t e r n s w i t h i nt h eh u m a n p r o x i m a la n dd i s t a le s o p h a g e a l m u c o s a[J].A m J G a s t r o i n t e s tL i v e rP h y s i o l,2015,308(6):G525-G531.[14] R i b o l s iM,S a v a r i n oE,D eB o r t o l iN,e ta l.R e f l u x p a t t e r na n d r o l e o f i m p e d a n c e-p Hv a r i ab l e s i n p r e d ic t i n g P P I r e s p o n s ei n p a t i e n t sw i t hs u s p e c t e d G E R D-r e l a t e dc h r o n i cc o u g h[J].A l i m e n t P h a r m a c o lT h e r,2014,40(8):966-973.[15] L e e H J,J e o n g W J,S h i n C M,e t a l.R e l e v a n c e o fl a r y n g o s c o p y,p H-i m p e d a n c e m o n i t o r i n g a n d e s o p h a g e a lh y p o m o t i l i t y i n p a t i e n t s w i t h s u s p e c t e dl a r y n g o p h a r y n g e a lr e f l u xs y m p t o m s[J].N e u r o g a s t r o e n t e r o l M o t i l,2014,26(1):63-72.[16] C h o iK,M i n YW,M i n B H,e ta l.T h ei m p a i r m e n t o fp r o x i m a l e s o p h a g e a lm u c o s a l i n t e g r i t y m a yp l a y ac a u s a t i v e r o l e i n p a t i e n t sw i t hn o n c a r d i a c c h e s t p a i n[J].G a s t r o e n t e r o l, 2014,146(5):S-887.[17] M a n a b eN,K a m a d aT,K u s u n o k iH,e t a l.N e w l y d e v e l o p e db i o e l ec t r i c a lad m i t t a n ce m e a s u r e m e n td i s t i n g u i s h e s p a t i e n t sw i t hn o n-e r o s i v er e f l u x d i s e a s ef r o m t h o s e w i t hf u n c t i o n a lh e a r t b u r n[J].G a s t r o e n t e r o l,2014,146(5):S-116.[18] K i m H P,H e l l e rL T,A t e sF,e t a l.I n t r a l u m i n a l i m p e d a n c ev e r s u sm u c o s a l i m p e d a n c e t e s t i n g f o r t h e d i a g n o s i s o f G E R D:d o t he y m e a s u r et h es a m et h i n g[J].G a s t r o e n t e r o l,2015,148(4):S-615-S-616.[19] A t e s F,Y u k s e l E S,H i g g i n b o t h a m T,e t a l.M u c o s a li m p e d a n c ed i s c r i m i n a t e s G E R Df r o m n o n-G E R D c o n d i t i o n s[J].G a s t r o e n t e r o l,2015,148(2):334-343.收稿日期:2016-12-12编辑:王秋红㊃21㊃‘临床荟萃“2017年1月5日第32卷第1期 C l i n i c a l F o c u s,J a n u a r y5,2017,V o l32,N o.1Copyright©博看网. All Rights Reserved.。

胃泌素与胃食管反流病的相关性研究进展

胃泌素与胃食管反流病的相关性研究进展

㊃综述㊃通信作者:李兆申,E m a i l :z h s l i @81890.n e t胃泌素与胃食管反流病的相关性研究进展朱春平,刘肖肖,李兆申(第二军医大学附属长海医院消化科,上海200433) 摘 要:胃食管反流病是一种常见的食管疾病,其发病率逐年增高㊂胃泌素是一种重要的胃肠道激素,可以维持食管下括约肌压力,防止胃食管反流㊂它的异常分泌与胃食管反流病的发病机制密切相关,因此血清胃泌素的检测可以应用于初步临床诊断㊂关键词:胃食管反流;胃泌素中图分类号:R 573.9 文献标志码:A 文章编号:1004-583X (2018)06-0541-04d o i :10.3969/j.i s s n .1004-583X.2018.06.020 根据2006年蒙特利尔共识意见[1],胃食管反流病(g a s t r o -e s o h p a g e a l r e l u xd i s e a s e ,G E R D )系指胃内容物反流入食管,引起不适症状和(或)并发症的一种疾病㊂G E R D 可分为非糜烂性反流病(n o n -e r o s i v er ef l u x d i s e a s e ,N E R D )㊁糜烂性食管炎(e r o s i v ee s o p h ag i t i s ,E E )和B a r r e t t 食管(B a r r e t t e s o ph a gu s ,B E )㊂近年来,G E R D 发病率有逐渐升高趋势,北美洲和东亚发病率分别为18.1%~27.8%和2.5%~7.8%[2]㊂当前,G E R D 的诊断主要依赖质子泵抑制剂(P P I )试验法㊁食管反流监测(包括24小时食管P H 监测和食管阻抗监测)和内镜检查等㊂胃泌素是一种由胃窦G 细胞分泌的胃肠道激素,具有刺激胃酸分泌㊁促进胃肠道细胞增殖和分化等生理功能㊂人类胃泌素基因是单拷贝基因,位于17号染色体g 区,由4.1k b 组成,能够编码101个氨基酸多肽-胃泌素原[3]㊂在人体中,95%以上具有生物活性的胃泌素是经酰胺化的成熟胃泌素,包括大分子G -34和小分子G -17,其中G -17占胃泌素总量的90%以上[4]㊂胃泌素分泌水平受诸多因素影响,包括G 细胞数量㊁胃内p H 值㊁进食(蛋白质是最佳刺激物)㊁刺激迷走神经㊁胃窦牵拉㊁服用抑酸药和促胃泌素刺激激素(蛙皮素)等[5]㊂既然G E R D 是一种酸相关性㊁动力障碍性疾病,因此胃泌素与其发病机制关系密切,为临床诊断提供一种可能㊂现将两者关系综述如下㊂1 胃泌素与胃食管反流病发病机制的相关性食管下端括约肌(l o w e re s o p h a g e a l s ph i n c t e r ,L E S )是食管-胃连接处抗反流的第一道屏障,能在食管与胃交界线之上3~5c m 范围内形成高压带,防止胃内容物反流入食管㊂L E S 的舒缩受神经㊁体液和胃肠道激素影响㊂食管下端括约肌压力(l o w e r e s o p h a g e a l s p h i n c t e r p r e s s u r e ,L E S P )降低和一过性食管下端括约肌松弛(t r a n s i e n tl o w e re s o p h a ge a l s ph i n c t e r r e l a x ,T L E S R )频率增高是G E R D 发病的重要机制[5]㊂胃泌素是参与调节L E S 舒缩功能的胃肠道激素之一㊂胃泌素通过结合L E S 平滑肌上的C C K -2受体,促进L E S 收缩,促进食管平滑肌推进性蠕动[6]㊂G i l e s 等[7]于1969年首先报道静脉注射五肽胃泌素能引起L E S P 升高㊂我国刘玉成等[8]通过观察五肽胃泌素对G E R D 患者L E S P 和食管p H 值影响,发现实验组L E S P 明显升高,且呈S 型曲线的剂量效应关系㊂胃泌素对L E S 的调节效应与剂量相关,尽管较低剂量(或内源性释放的生理学剂量)引起的调节效应各文献报道差异较大,但较高剂量(或静注胃泌素的药理学)的胃泌素能明显促进L E S 收缩[9-14]㊂其作用机制可能为胃泌素刺激节后胆碱能神经元使之释放乙酰胆碱,或通过结合胃泌素受体直接刺激L E S [15-16]㊂既然胃泌素参与调节L E S 的舒缩功能,因此胃泌素分泌异常是G E R D 的发生机制之一㊂低胃泌素血症是G E R D 发生因素之一[17]㊂L i ps h u t z 等[18]在研究胃泌素与L E S P 关系时发现,G E R D 组基础血清胃泌素和基础L E S P 显著低于正常对照组,胃内输注碱和葡萄糖的混合液后,G E R D 组刺激后的胃泌素增量和L E S P 增量也显著低于正常对照组㊂该研究表明,胃泌素分泌不全是L E S 功能不全的重要原因㊂M c C a l l u m 等[19]在探讨L E S P 与血清胃泌素关系时,入选17例G E R D 组和16例正常对照组,研㊃145㊃‘临床荟萃“ 2018年6月5日第33卷第6期 C l i n i c a l F o c u s ,J u n e 5,2018,V o l 33,N o .6Copyright ©博看网. All Rights Reserved.究发现,L E S P在G E R D组和对照组分别为(5.9ʃ0.5)mmH g和[14.3ʃ1.2)mmH g(1mmH g= 0.133k P a)(P<0.01],血清胃泌素在两组分别为(39.6ʃ1.8)p g/m l和(48.1ʃ4.7)p g/m l(P> 0.05)㊂同样,他在另一项研究中也得到类似结果[20]㊂M c C a l l u m这两项研究中,G E R D患者的血清胃泌素水平偏低,但差异无统计学意义,原因可能为研究病例数太少㊂由于胃泌素能增强食管L E S P,是维持食管L E S 功能的重要因素,因此高胃泌素血症是G E R D发生的保护因素㊂高胃泌素血症,是各种病理因素导致的胃泌素增高状态,卓-艾综合征(Z o l l i n g e r-E l l i s o n s y n d r o m e,Z E S)㊁自身免疫性胃炎导致的低酸状态和H P感染是常见的病理因素[21-23]㊂多项研究表明,高胃泌素血症患者的L E S P较高㊂H e i l等[24]在研究胃泌素和生长抑素对健康志愿者和Z E S患者的L E S P影响时发现,Z E S患者的血清胃泌素和L E S P 均高于正常水平,用生长抑素抑制胃泌素分泌后, L E S P明显降低㊂Y a k u t等[25]在一项探讨高胃泌素血症对L E S P影响的研究中,病例组入选37例自身免疫性胃炎引起的高胃泌素血症患者,对照组入选35例功能性胃肠病患者,两者胃泌素水平为(1382.8ʃ731.9)p g/m l和(107ʃ83.9)p g/m l㊂结果表明,病例组L E S P和食管收缩振幅明显高于对照组,两组L E S P分别为(31.6ʃ14.42)mmH g 和(20.5ʃ8.05)mmH g㊂然而,有个别研究表明[26],Z E S发生G E R D风险并未减少,甚至发生重度食管炎的风险反而增加,其中原因为高胃酸状态抵消了胃泌素的保护作用㊂有文献报道,H P感染后,血清胃泌素水平升高,G E R D发病风险降低[27-28]㊂2胃泌素与胃食管反流病的临床应用2.1血清胃泌素低值是胃食管反流病的预测指标其原理可以概括为两点㊂其一,低胃泌素血症是G E R D发生机制之一㊂其二,G E R D是一种酸相关性疾病,多数患者处于高胃酸状态,基础胃酸分泌量(b a s a l a c i do u t p u t,B A O)较高[29-30];由于胃酸的反馈性抑制作用,胃窦G细胞分泌胃泌素减少,血清胃泌素相应降低㊂血清胃泌素降低,可以提示B E㊂S i p p o n e n等[31]在一项病例对照研究中探讨血清胃泌素G-17与B E 关系时,纳入19例B E患者和199例对照组(其中105例胃黏膜正常),用E L I S A法检测患者空腹血清G-17㊂研究结果表明,B E组的G-17显著低于对照组㊂若以199例非B E者为对照,以0.5p m o l/L㊁1.0 p m o l/L为界限值诊断B E的阳性似然比分别为3.5㊁3.0;若以105例胃黏膜正常者为对照,以0.5p m o l/ L㊁1.0p m o l/L为界限值诊断B E的阳性似然比分别为5.6㊁3.8㊂因此,若能排除胃窦萎缩等因素,血清胃泌素越低,越能预测B E发生㊂韩国一项病例对照研究也表明[32],与对照组相比,E E组血清胃泌素水平较低(P=0.029)㊂血清胃泌素降低,可以预测E E㊂C h o u r a s i a 等[33]对纳入的123例G E R D(其中E E88例,N E R D 35例)进行血清学特征和幽门螺杆菌(H P)感染状态研究发现,经过多因素分析后,血清胃泌素水平降低㊁高龄(>40岁)㊁食管裂孔疝和H P(-)是E E的危险因素;经过单因素分析后,血清胃泌素水平降低(<10p g/L)预测E E的相对危险度(O R)为5.07㊂尽管低胃泌素水平与E E有关,然而G E R D严重程度与血清胃泌素水平不具有相关性[34]㊂胃泌素与D eM e e s t e r积分具有相关性,可以提示内镜阴性的N E R D㊂冯桂建等[35]在一项研究中,纳入20例G E R D患者,探讨H P㊁血清胃泌素与G E R D关系㊂该研究发现,胃泌素和D e M e e s t e r积分具有相同的升高或下降的趋势,相关系数为0.902 (P<0.01)㊂因此,血清胃泌素测定有助于G E R D 诊断,尤其是对内镜阴性的N E R D诊断具有重要的临床意义㊂既然胃泌素分泌不足是导致L E S功能不全的重要因素,那么餐后测定的血清胃泌素水平或者刺激后胃泌素增量也能预测G E R D㊂L i p s h u t z等[36]研究发现,G E R D患者不仅空腹血清胃泌素较低,刺激后的胃泌素增量也较低㊂M c C a l l等[37]在一项探讨餐后胃泌素水平改变与L E S P关系的一项研究表明,在标准餐刺激后,若血清胃泌素水平的增量小于5 p g/m l,L E S P平均仅增加18%;中等增量(约50p g/ m l)的胃泌素水平,L E S P平均增加54.2%;高增量(大于50p g/m l)的胃泌素水平,L E S P平均增加80.3%㊂由此可见,胃泌素是进食引起L E S P增加的主要因素,胃泌素对蛋白餐反应的强弱可以预测G E R D风险,餐后胃泌素增量较低,其患病风险较大㊂2.2血清胃泌素高值可以预测B a r r e t t食管癌变风险众所周知,B E是食管腺癌(e s o p h a g e a l a d e n o c a r c i n o m a,E A C)的癌前病变㊂胃泌素除了在生理状态下营养㊁增殖胃肠道黏膜细胞,在消化道黏㊃245㊃‘临床荟萃“2018年6月5日第33卷第6期 C l i n i c a l F o c u s,J u n e5,2018,V o l33,N o.6Copyright©博看网. All Rights Reserved.膜的癌变机制中也具有重要作用,在肿瘤细胞增殖㊁抗凋亡㊁血管形成和浸润侵袭等方面都有涉及[38]㊂胃泌素受体C C K2在B E的柱状黏膜细胞高度表达[39],胃泌素可以通过结合该受体促进B E食管的癌变过程㊂由于P P I等抑酸剂的广泛使用,B E患者长期处于高胃泌素血症,是B E癌变的高风险因素㊂有研究表明,血清高胃泌素水平可以预测食管高级别上皮内瘤变㊁食管腺癌㊂W a n g等[40]纳入长期服用P P I的G E R D病例[其中N E R D13例,B E16例,低度异型增生(L G D)16例,高度异型增生(H G D) 38例,腺癌(A C)12例],将血清胃泌素水平分为低级㊁中级㊁高级3个等级,研究血清胃泌素水平与B E 癌变程度的关系㊂结果表明,虽然血清胃泌素水平在B E组㊁非B E组中差异无统计学意义,但高胃泌素水平是进展期瘤变(包括H G D和A C)的危险因素,其O R值为5.46,并且80%的进展期瘤变具有高胃泌素水平㊂综上所述,胃泌素与G E R D的发生机制密切相关,胃泌素分泌不足可以导致L E S功能不全,进而增加G E R D发病风险㊂因此,若血清胃泌素水平较低,可以初步提示G E R D,特别是内镜阳性的反流性食管炎㊂但由于各研究纳入的病例组不同,特别是N E R D是否纳入,血清对G E R D诊断界限值和诊断效能参差不齐㊂因此,由于血清胃泌素检测具有"无创㊁简便和大规模应用"等优势,在今后的研究中若能确定血清胃泌素的诊断界限值,将成为G E R D重要的诊断工具㊂参考文献:[1] V a k i lN,v a nZ a n t e nS V,K a h r i l a sP,e ta l.T h e M o n t r e a ld e f i n i t i o na n d c l a s s i f i c a t i o no f g a s t r o e s o p h a g e a l r e f l u xd i s e a s e:a g l ob a le v i d e nc e-b a s ed c o n se n s u s[J].A m J G a s t r o e n t e r o l,2006,10(8):1900-1920.[2] E l-S e r a g H B,S w e e t S,W i n c h e s t e rC C,e t a l.U p d a t eo n t h ee p i d e m i o l o g y ofg a s t r o-o e s o ph a g e a l r e f l u x di s e a s e:as y s t e m a t i c r e v i e w[J].G u t,2014,63(6):871-880. [3] D o c k r a y G J,V a r r o A,D i m a l i n e R,e t a l.T h e g a s t r i n s:t h e i r p r o d u c t i o n a n db i o l o g i c a l a c t i v i t i e s[J].A n n uR e vP h y s i o l,2001,63:119-139.[4]S a w a d aM,D i c k i n s o nC J.T h eGc e l l[J].A n n uR e vP h y s i o l,1997,59:273-298.[5] C a s t e l l D O,M u r r a y J A,T u t u i a nR,e t a l.R e v i e wa r t i c l e:t h ep a t h o p h y s i o l o g y o f g a s t r o-o e s o p h a g e a l r e f l u x d i s e a s e-o e s o p h a g e a l m a n i f e s t a t i o n s[J].A l i m e n t P h a r m a c o l T h e r,2004,20(S u p p l9):914-925.[6] L i u J F,G a oL P,W e nS W,e t a l.R e s p o n s e so fh u m a ns l i n ga n d c l a s p f ib e r s t oc h o l e c y s t o k i n i n(C C K)a nd g a s t r i nt h r o u g hC C Kr e c e p t o r s[J].JG a s t r o e n t e r o lH e p a t o l,2008,23(10):1608-1612.[7] G i l e sG R,M a s o n M C,H u m p h r i e sC,e t a l.A c t i o no f g a s t r i no n t h e l o w e r o e s o p h a g e a l s p h i n c t e r i nm a n[J].G u t,1969,10(9):730-734.[8]刘玉成,李玉,解晨昊.胃泌素对胃食管反流病患者食管压力及p H的影响[J].河北医科大学学报,2002,23(6):327-329.[9] H e n d e r s o n J M,L i d g a r d G,O s b o r n e D H,e t a l.L o w e ro e s o p h a g e a l s p h i n c t e r r e s p o n s e t o g a s t r i n--p h a r m a c o l o g i c a lo r p h y s i o l o g i c a l[J].G u t,1978,19(2):99-102.[10] K a y e M D,R e i n R,J o h n s o n W P,e ta l.R e s p o n s e so ft h ec o m p e t e n t a nd I n c o m pe t e n t l o w e r o e s o p h a g e a l s p h i n c t e r t op e n t a g a s t r i na n da b d o m i n a l c o m p r e s s i o n[J].G u t,1976,17(12):933-939.[11] C a l v e r tC H,P a r k s T G,B u c h a n a n K D.P r o c e e d i n g s:T h er e l a t i o n s h i p o f l o w e r o e s o p h a g e a l s p h i n c t e r p r e s s u r e t o p l a s m ag a s t r i nc o n c e n t r a t i o n[J].G u t,1975,16(5):403.[12] C a s t e l l D O,H a r r i s L D.H o r m o n a l c o n t r o l o fg a s t r o e s o p h a g e a l-s p h i n c t e r s t r e n g t h[J].N E n g l JM e d,1970,282(16):886-889.[13] W r i g h tL F,S l a u g h t e rR L,G i b s o nR G,e ta l.C o r r e l a t i o no fl o w e r e s o p h a g e a l s p h i n c t e r p r e s s u r e a n d s e r u m g a s t r i n l e v e l i nm a n[J].A mJD i g D i s,1975,20(7):603-606. [14]S t r a a t h o f J W,L a m e r sC B,M a s c l e eA A.E f f e c to f g a s t r i n-17o n l o w e re s o p h a g e a l s p h i n c t e r c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s i n m a n[J].D i gD i s S c i,1997,42(12):2547-2551.[15] G i l e sG R,R o s z k o w s k iA.T h e i n f l u e n c eo fh o r m o n e so nt h el o w e r e s o p h a g e a l-s p h i n c t e r i n m a n[J].L e b e r M a g e n D a r m, 1972,2(1):20-22.[16] G o n z a l e zA A,F a r r eR,M o n e s J,e t a l.P h a r m a c o l o g i c a l a n dm o l e c u l a r c h a r a c t e r i z a t i o n o f m u s c u l a r c h o l e c y s t o k i n i n r e c e p t o r si n t h e h u m a n l o w e r o e s o p h a g e a ls p h i n c t e r[J].N e u r o g a s t r o e n t e r o lM o t i l,2000,12(6):539-546. [17] V a i s r u bS.G a s t r i na n dt h e g a s t r o e s o p h a g e a ls p h i n c t e r[J].J AMA,1971,217(8):1098.[18] L i p s h u t z WH,G a s k i n s R D,L u k a s h WM,e t a l.H y p o g a s t r i n e m i a i n p a t i e n t sw i t hl o w e re s o p h a g e a ls p h i n c t e ri n c o m p e t e n c e[J].G a s t r o e n t e r o l o g y,1974,67(3):423-427.[19] M c C a l l u m RW,W a l s h J H.R e l a t i o n s h i p b e t w e e n l o w e re s o p h a g e a l s p h i n c t e r p r e s s u r e a n ds e r u m g a s t r i nc o n c e n t r a t i o ni nZ o l l i n g e r-E l l i s o ns y n d r o m ea n do t h e rc l i n i c a l s e t t i n g s[J].G a s t r o e n t e r o l o g y,1979,76(1):76-81.[20] M c C a l l u m RW,H o l l o w a y R H,C a l l a c h a n C,e t a l.E n d o g e n o u s g a s t r i nr e l e a s ea n d a n t r a l g a s t r i nc o n c e n t r a t i o ni ng a s t r o e s o p h a g e a l r e f l u x p a t i e n t s a n dn o r m a l s u b j e c t s[J].A mJG a s t r o e n t e r o l,1983,78(7):398-402.[21] W a l d u m H L,F o s s m a r kR,B a k k e I,e t a l.H y p e r g a s t r i n e m i ai na n i m a l sa n d m a n:c a u s e sa n d c o n s e q u e n c e s[J].S c a n d JG a s t r o e n t e r o l,2004,39(6):505-509.[22] W a t s o nS A,G r a b o w s k a AM,E l-Z a a t a r i M,e ta l.G a s t r i n-a c t i v e p a r t i c i p a n t o rb y s t a n d e r i n g a s t r i cc a r c i n o g e n e s i s?[J].㊃345㊃‘临床荟萃“2018年6月5日第33卷第6期 C l i n i c a l F o c u s,J u n e5,2018,V o l33,N o.6Copyright©博看网. All Rights Reserved.N a tR e vC a n c e r,2006,6(12):936-946.[23] B u r k i t tM D,V a r r oA,P r i t c h a r dD M.I m p o r t a n c e o f g a s t r i n i nt h e p a t h o g e n e s i s a n d t r e a t m e n t o f g a s t r i c t u m o r s[J].W o r l dJG a s t r o e n t e r o l,2009,15(1):1-16.[24] H e i lT,M a t t e s P,R a p t i s S.E f f e c t s o fs o m a t o s t a t i n a n dh u m a n g a s t r i n I o n t h e l o w e r e s o p h a g e a l s p h i n c t e r i n m a n[J].D i g e s t i o n,1977,15(6):461-468.[25] Y a k u t M,K a b a c a m G,B e k t a s M,e t a l.T h e e f f e c t o fe n d o g e n o u s h y p e r g a s t r i n e m i a o n l o w e r e s o p h a g e a l s p h i n c t e rp r e s s u r e a n d e s o p h a g e a lm o t i l i t y[J].H e p a t o g a s t r o e n t e r o l o g y, 2011,58(112):1989-1992.[26] H i r s c h o w i t zB I,S i mm o n s J L,J o h n s o nL F,e t a l.R i s k f a c t o r sf o r e s o p h ag i t i s i n e x t r e m e a c i dh y p e r s e c r e t o r s wi t h a n dw i t h o u tZ o l l i n g e r-E l l i s o n s y n d r o m e[J].C l i n G a s t r o e n t e r o lH e p a t o l,2004,2(3):220-229.[27] D o m i n g u e z-M u n o z J E,M a l f e r t h e i n e rP.E f f e c t o fH e l i c o b a c t e rp y l o r i i n f e c t i o n o n g a s t r o i n t e s t i n a l m o t i l i t y,p a n c r e a t i c s e c r e t i o na n dh o r m o n er e l e a s ei na s y m p t o m a t i ch u m a n s[J].S c a n d JG a s t r o e n t e r o l,2001,36(11):1141-1147. [28] E r e n M,Ço l a kÖ,Işık s o y S,e t a l.I s i k s o y e t a l.E f f e c t o fH.p y l o r i i n f e c t i o n o n g a s t r i n,g h r e l i n,m o t i l i n,a n dg a s t r o e s o p h a g e a l r e f l u x[J].T u r kJ G a s t r o e n t e r o l,2015,26(5):367-372.[29] C o l l e n M J,J o h n s o n D A.C o r r e l a t i o n b e t w e e n b a s a l a c i do u t p u t a n dd a i l y r a n i t i d i n e d o s e r e q u i r e d f o r t h e r a p y i nB a r r e t t 's e s o p h a g u s[J].D i g D i s S c i,1992,37(4):570-576.[30] C o l l e n M J,J o h n s o nD A,S h e r i d a n M J.B a s a l a c i do u t p u t a n dg a s t r i c a c i dh y p e r s e c r e t i o n i n g a s t r o e s o p h a g e a l r e f l u xd i s e a s e.C o r r e l a t i o nw i t h r a n i t i d i n e t h e r a p y[J].D i g D i sS c i,1994,39(2):410-417.[31]S i p p o n e nP,V a u h k o n e n M,H e l s k eT,e t a l.L o wc i r c u l a t i n gl e v e l s o f a s t r i n-17i n p a t i e n t s w i t h B a r r e t t'se s o p h a g u s[J].W o r l d JG a s t r o e n t e r o l,2005,11(38):5988-5992. [32] K w o n J H,C h u n g I S,S o n H S,e ta l.T h er e l a t i o n s h i p o fg a s t r i n,p e p s i n o g e n,a n d H e l i c o b a c t e r p y l o r i i ne r o s i v e r e f l u xe s o p h a g i t i s[J].K o r e a nJ G a s t r o e n t e r o l,2008,51(3):159-166.[33] C h o u r a s i a D,M i s r a A,T r i p a t h i S,e t a l.P a t i e n t s w i t hH e l i c o b a c t e r p y l o r i i n f e c t i o nh a v e l e s s s e v e r e g a s t r o e s o p h a g e a lr e f l u xd i s e a s e:as t u d y u s i n g e n d o s c o p y,24-h o u r g a s t r i ca n de s o p h a g e a l p H m e t r y[J].I n d i a nJ G a s t r o e n t e r o l,2011,30(1):12-21.[34] M o n k e m u l l e rK,N e u m a n nH,N o c o nM,e t a l.S e r u m g a s t r i na n d p e p s i n o g e n sd on o tc o r r e l a t ew i t ht h ed i f f e r e n t g r a d e so fs e v e r i t y o f g a s t r o-o e s o p h a g e a l r e f l u xd i s e a s e:am a t c h e dc a s e-c o n t r o l s t ud y[J].A l i me n tP h a r m a c o lT h e r,2008,28(4):491-496.[35]冯桂建,王化虹,胡伏莲,等.幽门螺杆菌㊁胃泌素与胃食管反流病的关系[J].胃肠病学,2002,7(增刊):A5.[36] L i p s h u t z WH,G a s k i n s R D,L u k a s h WM,e t a l.H y p o g a s t r i n e m i a i n p a t i e n t sw i t hl o w e re s o p h a g e a ls p h i n c t e ri n c o m p e t e n c e[J].G a s t r o e n t e r o l o g y,1974,67(3):423-427.[37] M c C a l lI W,H a r v e y R F,O w e n s C J,e t a l.R e l a t i o n s h i pb e t w e e nc h a n g e s i n P l a s m a g a s t r i n a nd l o we r o e s o p h a g e a ls p h i n c t e r p r e s s u r e a f t e rm e a l s[J].B r J S u r g,1975,62(1):15-18.[38] W a t s o nS A,G r a b o w s k a AM,E l-Z a a t a r i M,e ta l.G a s t r i n-a c t i v e p a r t i c i p a n t o rb y s t a n d e r i n g a s t r ic c a r c i n o g e n e s i s?[J].N a t r u e,2006,6(12):936-947.[39] H a i g h C R,A t t w o o d S E,T h o m p s o n D G,e t a l.G a s t r i ni n d u c e s p r o l i f e r a t i o n i nB a r r e t t'sm e t a p l a s i a t h r o u g ha c t i v a t i o no f t h eC C K2r e c e p t o r[J].G a s t r o e n t e r o l o g y,2003,124(3): 615-625.[40] W a n g J S,V a r r o A,L i g h t d a l e C J,e ta l.E l e v a t e d s e r u mg a s t r i n i sa s s o c i a t e d w i t hah i s t o r y o fa d v a n c e dn e o p l a s i ai nB a r r e t t'se s o p h a g u s[J].A m J G a s t r o e n t e r o l,2010,105(5):1039-1045.收稿日期:2018-03-03编辑:张卫国㊃445㊃‘临床荟萃“2018年6月5日第33卷第6期 C l i n i c a l F o c u s,J u n e5,2018,V o l33,N o.6Copyright©博看网. All Rights Reserved.。

质子泵抑制剂研究进展

质子泵抑制剂研究进展

质子泵抑制剂研究进展作者:杨继红王培民周力张贵平赵亚萍医学频道来源:本站原创点击数:120 更新时间:2004-1-1920世纪,人们对消化性溃疡的治疗从以外科手术减少溃疡复发,到1927年H2受体拮抗剂的发现,虽然在治疗手段上发生了一次重大变革,但停药后的复发率仍高达60%~70%。

直到80年代初以奥美拉唑为代表的质子泵抑制剂(protonpumpinhibitor,PPI)的出现,才将溃疡病的治愈率提高了近20%[1],并在酸性消化性疾病中发挥了举足轻重的作用。

本文就质子泵抑制剂的研究进展作一简要的综述。

1药用机理1.1抑酸作用已知H+、K+-ATP酶是负责胃壁细胞分泌胃酸的最终步骤,质子泵抑制剂先聚集于胃壁细胞的高酸性的沟腔内,通过与位于壁细胞分泌小管酸空间附近的胃H+、K+-ATP酶上的丝氨酸分子结合发挥作用的,先在分泌小管的酸性环境中转化为活性磺酰胺基化合物,继而呈现剂量依赖性抑制基础和刺激后胃酸分泌。

其抑酸作用与H2受体拮抗剂相比,强而持续。

逐渐改善的质子泵抑制剂(如喷妥拉唑)在中性条件下稳定,弱酸条件下较稳定,强酸条件下有强的作用;而且,pH相关的激活特点可改善其对胃壁细胞质子泵作用的选择性,降低可能对其它酸性细胞的抑制作用。

1.2抗幽门螺杆菌作用1983年幽门螺杆菌(Helicobacterpylori,HP)的发现又推出了“无幽门螺杆菌,无溃疡,无复发”的新概念,以质子泵抑制剂为基础的抗生素联合应用可大大提高溃疡的愈合率和根除率,并能增强病人的耐受性和减少副作用的发生率,故而成为国际上治疗HP相关性溃疡的首选。

HP感染对胃酸分泌的影响十分复杂,其胃酸分泌的异常程度受到HP型别、宿主因素等方面的影响。

溃疡的形成也与宿主感染HP后的泌酸反应强弱有关,泌酸反应强,可发展至十二指肠溃疡,故在治疗时应采取抗HP和抑酸治疗相结合的方式,临床亦证明这种治疗行之有效[2]。

HP细菌产物和细胞因子可增加基础和刺激后胃泌素水平,十二指肠溃疡患者,持续的高胃泌素血症可促进壁细胞泌酸增加[3],而胃泌素细胞和壁细胞的抑制性反射途径“受阻”,造成十二指肠酸负荷加重,粘膜继而发生胃上皮化生,从而形成发生溃疡的病理基础。

反流性食管炎和非糜烂性反流病患者24小时pH及阻抗监测结果分析

反流性食管炎和非糜烂性反流病患者24小时pH及阻抗监测结果分析

反流性食管炎和非糜烂性反流病患者24小时pH及阻抗监测结果分析马蓉;李凌云【期刊名称】《临床荟萃》【年(卷),期】2012(027)010【总页数】3页(P883-885)【关键词】胃食管反流;胃镜检查;Barrett食管【作者】马蓉;李凌云【作者单位】新疆医科大学第五附属医院消化内科,新疆乌鲁木齐830011;乌鲁木齐市头屯河区中心医院体检科,新疆乌鲁木齐830012【正文语种】中文【中图分类】R571.9目前我国胃食管反流病(GERD)发病率呈上升趋势,GERD正日益受到临床的关注。

GERD主要包括反流性食管炎(RE)、非糜烂性反流病(NERD)及Battett食管(BE)。

近年来,食管阻抗-pH联合监测开始在GERD的诊断中发挥越来越重要的作用,本研究主要对RE,NERD患者进行24小时pH及阻抗监测的各项指标特点进行比较,进一步研究GERD的发病机制,为临床合理用药提供参考。

1 资料与方法1.1 病例选择 2011年6~12月于新疆医科大学第五附属医院就诊的GERD患者60例,男32例,女28例,年龄30~79岁,平均(56.0±22.3)岁,GERD纳入标准为符合蒙特利尔共识意见(典型的反流症状每周至少2次及以上;症状引起不适而就诊),并同时经胃镜检查除外上消化道肿瘤、消化性溃疡等疾病的患者。

根据胃镜表现分为NERD、RE,内镜诊断RE 24例,男14例,女10例,年龄35~74岁,平均(56.0±11.4)岁;NERD 36例,男15例,女21例,年龄38~80岁,平均(57.0±13.3)岁。

两组性别年龄等一般资料差异无统计学意义,具有可比性。

1.2 方法所有入选患者均需完成24小时阻抗-pH监测。

4小时阻抗-pH联合监测:Ohmega动态阻抗-pH联合监测系统(荷兰MMs公司生产),包括便携式数据记录仪及具有8个阻抗电极和1个pH电极的阻抗-pH导管。

牙颈部非龋性缺损的研究进展

牙颈部非龋性缺损的研究进展

牙颈部非龋性缺损的研究进展牙颈部非龋性缺损可引起牙本质敏感症、牙髓炎、根尖周炎等,更甚者可致牙折断。

本文就牙颈部非龋性缺损的病因学研究进展作一综述。

标签:牙颈部非龋性缺损,酸蚀,摩擦,应力。

牙颈部非龋性缺损是临床上常见的牙体硬组织疾病之一,其危害可引起牙本质敏感症、牙髓炎、根尖周炎等,更甚者可致牙折断,故其早期防治及病因学研究在口腔临床工作中显得越来越重要。

牙颈部非龋性缺损(Non-carious Cervical lesions),指发生在釉牙骨质界处牙体硬组织的丧失[1],常呈楔形,有时呈浅碟状、杯状、平底状及不规则形状等。

究其病因主要与腐蚀、摩擦和应力等[2]有关。

一与腐蚀的关系腐蚀(corrosion)是指化学或电化学作用引起牙体硬组织的溶解丢失,与细菌无关[2]。

狭义腐蚀多指酸蚀(erosion),其作用途径分两种:内源性和外源性。

1、内源性酸:内源性酸多源于胃肠道疾病,如神经性贪食症、厌食症、呕吐、胃酸返流等,可致胃内容物流入口腔,长时间作用于牙齿表面引起酸蚀。

国外许多文献已证实酸蚀症与胃食管返流疾病(gastro-esophageal reflux disease,GORD)有关。

而Moazzez在104名患有GORD的病人及31名无GORD的人群中也发现,患有GORD的病人更易出现牙酸蚀[3]。

多数学者认为胃酸进入口腔后,作用于腭面牙体硬组织引起酸蚀,长期作用可使酸蚀的范围扩大,进而形成牙颈部缺损。

2、外源性酸:外源性酸多来自日常饮食和工作生活环境中。

最初把牙酸蚀症归为职业病的一种,认为酸蚀症多见于长期从事酸作业及处于酸环境的人群中。

制酸厂工人、软性饮料制造厂工人、电镀工人及电池制造厂工人都属于酸蚀症的高危人群。

一项调查发现电解质车间工人患酸蚀症的危险是非电解质车间工人的三倍,提示酸蚀症的发生与受检者是否直接暴露于酸环境中有关[4]。

除环境因素外,一些饮食习惯,如饮用碳酸饮料、果汁、葡萄酒和醋等,也与酸蚀症的发生密切相关[5]。

多通道腔内阻抗在胃食管反流病中的诊断价值

多通道腔内阻抗在胃食管反流病中的诊断价值

多通道腔内阻抗在胃食管反流病中的诊断价值梁雄;苏秉忠【摘要】多通道腔内阻抗( MII)监测是一种能全面监测食管功能以及胃食管反流物性质和成分的技术,可应用于胃食管反流病( GERD)的诊断,尤其适用于对弱酸或非酸反流、难治性GERD以及非典型症状GERD的诊断。

本文就MII技术及其在GERD诊断中的临床应用作一综述。

%Multichannel intraluminal impedance( MII)is a new technique that monitors comprehensively the function of esophagus and the nature and composition of gastroesophageal reflux, and can be applied for the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease( GERD),especially suitable for the diagnosis of weakly acidic reflux,non-acid reflux, refractory GERD,and GERD with atypical symptoms. This article reviewed the study on MII and its clinical application in diagnosis of GERD.【期刊名称】《胃肠病学》【年(卷),期】2014(000)008【总页数】3页(P504-506)【关键词】多通道腔内阻抗;胃食管反流;食管pH监测;诊断【作者】梁雄;苏秉忠【作者单位】内蒙古医科大学 010059;内蒙古医科大学第一附属医院消化内科【正文语种】中文胃食管反流病(gastroesophageal reflux disease, GERD)系指胃内容物反流入食管,引起不适症状和(或)并发症的一种疾病,根据其内镜下表现可以分为非糜烂性反流病(NERD)、糜烂性食管炎(EE)以及Barrett食管(BE)三种类型[1]。

复方异丙托溴铵佐治小儿支原体肺炎的疗效察

复方异丙托溴铵佐治小儿支原体肺炎的疗效察

复方异丙托溴铵佐治小儿支原体肺炎的疗效察发表时间:2016-06-02T15:22:27.677Z 来源:《健康世界》2016年第3期作者:张鲲[导读] 复方异丙托溴铵可有效改善患儿病情和机体炎性反应,提高临床疗效。

普兰店市中心医院辽宁省大连 116200摘要:目的观察复方异丙托溴铵对小儿支原体肺炎临床症状及炎性指标的影响。

方法选择我院2014年 2 月—2015 年 1 1月收治的 135 例小儿支原体肺炎患儿,随机分为对照组 67 例与治疗组 68 例。

全部患儿均给予相同的基础治疗,对照组患儿给予阿奇霉素治疗,治疗组患儿在此基础上给予复方异丙托溴铵治疗。

结果治疗组患儿有效率明显高于对照组患儿,具有显著性差异(P<0.05);与对照组比较,治疗后治疗组治疗后症状消失时间及住院时间均明显短于对照组(P<0.05)。

结论复方异丙托溴铵可有效改善患儿病情和机体炎性反应,提高临床疗效。

关键词:复方异丙托溴铵;支原体肺炎;支原体是比较微小的微生物,是导致支原体肺炎的病原微生物,可黏附于宿主呼吸道黏膜上皮细胞,通过直接侵犯、释放毒素等方式破坏呼吸道黏膜的完整性,导致气管黏膜水肿、狭窄。

肺炎支原体是儿童社区获得性肺炎最常见的病原之一[1],由肺炎支原体引起的儿童上、下呼吸道感染往往具有流行性。

小儿支原体肺炎是小儿呼吸道临床较为常见的一种疾病,抗生素是临床治疗小儿支气管肺炎的主要方法。

复方异丙托溴铵有潜在抗炎作用[2],吸入后仅作用于支气管,不作用于全身。

沙丁胺醇为β2肾上腺素能受体激动剂,它舒张从主气管至终末细支气管的所有平滑肌,拮抗支气管收缩。

异丙托溴铵和沙丁胺醇叠加作用于肺部的毒蕈碱和β2肾上腺素能受体而产生支气管扩张作用,疗效远优于单一给药。

本研究采用复方异丙托溴铵佐治小儿支原体肺炎,观察其临床疗效。

现报告如下 1.资料和方法1.1一般资料选择我院2014年 2 月—2015 年11月收治的 135 例小儿支原体肺炎患儿。

囊肿性纤维化

囊肿性纤维化

Cystic fibrosis 分类系统及外部资源ICD-10E84. (http://www.who.int/classifications/apps/icd/icd10online/?ge70.htm+e84)ICD-9277 (/index.php?action=search&srchtext=277)OMIM 219700 (/omim/219700)DiseasesDB 3347 (/ddb3347.htm)MedlinePlus 000107 (/medlineplus/ency/article/000107.htm)eMedicineped/535 (/ped/topic535.htm)MeSH D003550 (/cgi/mesh/2010/MB_cgi?field=uid&term=D003550)囊肿性纤维化维基百科,自由的百科全书囊肿性纤维化(CysticFibrosis ,CF ),亦称为囊性纤维化、囊肿性纤维变性或囊纤维变性,是一种常见的遗传疾病。

此病症会影响病患的全身,导致逐渐的行动困难以及提早死亡。

最常见的症状是因为长期反复的肺部感染所导致的呼吸困难,其他可能的症状包括鼻窦炎、发育不良、腹泻以及不孕。

囊肿性纤维化是最常见且致命的遗传疾病,最常发生在欧洲人或阿什肯纳兹犹太人之中,每25个有欧洲人血统的人之中就会有一个是带原者,这使得此疾病在欧美非常的常见。

产前的抽取羊水进行基因分析或是在幼儿时期的汗液检查可以轻易的诊断出此病症。

虽然诊断很简单,但是此病症目前尚未出现可以治愈的疗法或药物,大部分的患者都在二、三十岁时因为肺衰竭而导致死亡,而目前唯一可以延迟的办法只有肺脏移植手术。

移植手术后一年存活率是80%,五年存活率是55%。

囊性纤维化发生突变的结果在230 kb 的基因,基因位于染色体7的中间。

这个基因通常产生一种蛋白称为囊性纤维化跨膜调节器(CFTR)蛋白,其功能是一个在上皮细胞膜的氯通道,从而影响几乎所有的人体细胞氯的流动。

特发性肺纤维化的治疗与进展

特发性肺纤维化的治疗与进展

特发性肺纤维化的治疗与进展贺琛;俞小卫【期刊名称】《临床肺科杂志》【年(卷),期】2015(020)010【总页数】3页(P1890-1892)【作者】贺琛;俞小卫【作者单位】213000 江苏常州,常州市第二人民医院呼吸科;213000 江苏常州,常州市第二人民医院呼吸科【正文语种】中文特发性肺纤维化(IPF)指原因不明,并以寻常型间质性肺炎(usual interstitial pneumonia,UIP)为特征性组织病理学和(或)影像学改变的一种慢性进展性纤维化型肺间质疾病。

其主要发生在中老年人,占肺间质疾病的20%~30%,平均生存时间为3~5年,逐渐进展,最终导致呼吸衰竭而死亡,被称为“不是癌症的癌症”。

肺纤维化受多种因素影响,包括环境和职业暴露、吸烟,合并症尤其是胃食管反流病[GERD]和遗传多态性等。

而对这些因素的识别非常重要,它可以对疾病起到预防策略,并有利于早诊断和早治疗。

近年来特发性肺纤维化的发病率逐年增加,在治疗上也取得了一系列新的进展。

1.抗炎治疗糖皮质激素在临床上用于治疗IPF患者已有超过50年历史,因可抑制炎症反应和免疫过程、抑制其分泌细胞因子、减少肺泡巨噬细胞等作用而被认为可减缓肺纤维化的发展。

然而,2003年,Cochrane等系统评价15篇单用糖皮质激素治疗的IPF的论文,指出没有文章符合最低标准纳入meta分析,表明糖皮质激素在IPF患者无有益影响[1]。

该分析更新至今仍未有新的证据结果。

2.抗氧化剂许多体外和体内的肺纤维化动物试验模型表明氧自由基在肺纤维化的形成中是一个关键因素,而N-乙酰半胱氨酸(NAC)已被证实:在IPF具有抗氧化性能,还能减少氧化剂诱导上皮细胞损伤。

但由于缺乏有效的安慰剂对照,NAC治疗IPF一直存有争议。

在近期的NEJM杂志上,Raghu等研究结果显示:NAC不能改善患者的FVC和DLCO。

但在6分钟步行距离、欧洲生存质量评分、SF-36精神评分、ICECAP总评分等方面,NAC则有优势[2]。

高效液相色谱法测定富马酸沃诺拉赞的含量

高效液相色谱法测定富马酸沃诺拉赞的含量

高效液相色谱法测定富马酸沃诺拉赞的含量肖敏;乐志艳【摘要】目的:建立富马酸沃诺拉赞的含量测定方法.方法:采用高效液相色谱法,色谱柱为Agilent TC-C18柱(4.6 mm×150 mm,2.5 μm),流动相为0.01 mol/L磷酸钠溶液-乙腈(V∶V=75∶25),流速为1.0 ml/min,检测波长为230 nm,进样量为10μl.结果:富马酸沃诺拉赞的线性范围是121.06~282.48 μg/ml,线性方程为Y=16 019X-28 538(r=1.000 0);平均加样回收率为100.40%,RSD=0.79%(n=9);6批样品含量测定结果分别为100.2%、100.8%、100.4%、100.6%、100.0%及99.8%.结论:本方法简便、快速且准确,可用于富马酸沃诺拉赞的质量控制.【期刊名称】《中国医院用药评价与分析》【年(卷),期】2018(018)010【总页数】3页(P1381-1383)【关键词】富马酸沃诺拉赞;含量测定;方法学验证;高效液相色谱法【作者】肖敏;乐志艳【作者单位】抚州市食品药品检验所质控科,江西抚州344000;抚州市食品药品检验所质控科,江西抚州344000【正文语种】中文【中图分类】R927.2胃酸相关性疾病是一类胃酸与发病机理密切相关的上消化道疾病,主要包括反流性食管炎、胃肠道溃疡、胃炎、消化不良、十二指肠溃疡、卓-艾综合征、肠道十二指肠炎及非甾体抗炎药引发的消化道疾病等,在发达国家较为常见。

该病是临床上最常见多发的消化系统疾病之一,严重影响了患者的生活质量[1-5]。

因此,抑酸强度更高、抑酸持续时间更长的抗胃酸药的开发成了当务之急[6]。

富马酸沃诺拉赞是由日本武田制药研发的钾离子(K+)竞争性酸阻滞剂((potassium competitive acid blocker,P-CAB)的新型可逆性质子泵抑制剂,药物原型发挥作用起效迅速,且半衰期长,抑酸作用显著,能够在胃壁细胞胃酸分泌的最后一步通过抑制K+对H+-K+-ATP酶(质子泵)的结合作用,提前终止胃酸的分泌,具有强劲、持久的抑制胃酸分泌作用,对糜烂性食管炎、胃溃疡、十二指肠溃疡及幽门螺杆菌感染等胃酸相关性疾病疗效良好[6-12]。

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

Gastro-oesophagealreflux in infancyVinod KolimaralaR Mark BeattieAkshay BatraAbstractGastro-oesophageal reflux is very common in infancy.It is important to differentiate benign physiological reflux from gastro-oesophageal reflux disease,which is associated with significant morbidity.This re-view summarises the approach to infants with symptoms and signs of reflux,differential diagnosis,investigations and management including non-pharmacological,pharmacological and surgical treatments.Most infants with physiological gastro-oesophageal reflux do not require any medical management if the infant is thriving.Severe cases require a careful diagnostic work,treatment of associated conditions and aggressive medical management of the reflux.Involvement of the multidisciplinary team is essential and in persistent refractory reflux surgical intervention may need to be considered.Keywords gastro-oesophageal reflux;infancy;oesophagitis;reflux; vomitingGastro-oesophageal refluxGastro-oesophageal reflux(GOR)is the involuntary passage of the gastric contents into the oesophagus.It is a normal physio-logical phenomenon,particularly common in infancy.Most epi-sodes,in healthy individuals,last less than3minutes,occur in the postprandial period,and cause few or no symptoms.It is a very common presentation;both in primary and secondary care setting and can affect nearly50%of infants less than three months old.Major factors include the high volume of milk ingested compared with older children/adults,posture and the functional immaturity of the lower oesophageal sphincter.The natural history of GOR is generally of improvement with age,with less than5%of children with vomiting or regurgitation in infancy continuing to have symptoms after the age of14 months.This is due to a combination of growth in length of the oesophagus,a more upright posture,increased tone of the lower oesophageal sphincter,and a more solid diet.Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease(GORD)Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease(GORD)is defined as‘gastro-oesophageal reflux associated with troublesome symptoms or complications’although the authors caution that this definition is complicated by unreliable reporting of symptoms in young chil-dren.Gastrointestinal sequelae include oesophagitis,haema-temesis,oesophageal stricture formation,and Barrett’s oesophagus.Extra-intestinal sequelae can include acute life-threatening events and apnoea,chronic otitis media,sinusitis, secondary anaemia,and chronic respiratory disease(chronic wheezing/coughing or aspiration),as well as failure to thrive.Oesophagitis can develop as a result of acid or non-acid reflux and presents with symptoms of crying and irritability in infants and can lead to food aversion.This is likely to be a significant factor in faltering growth seen in some children with GORD. EpidemiologyGORD is a significant problem for infants in the community and in hospital setting.Determination of the exact prevalence of GORD at any age is difficult because of a lack of specific symp-toms but approximately33%of infants seek medical attention for symptoms suggestive of reflux,of whom up to20%require diagnostic evaluation.The problem is more pronounced in certain groups like infants born prematurely,infants with neu-rodisability,with congenital malformations like repaired oeso-phageal atresia or congenital diaphragmatic hernia,and those with chronic lung disease.Over50%of children with neuro-disability have GORD,due to oesophageal dysmotility and a poorly functioning lower oesophageal sphincter.They have trouble expressing their symptoms,and may also have co-morbidities,which may impact on the ability to perform investigations.PathophysiologyThe physical barrier between the oesophagus and stomach is provided by the lower oesophageal sphincter(LOS)and the diaphragm.The LOS,or internal sphincter,is a specialised part of the circular smooth muscle of the distal oesophagus.Both com-ponents work together to stop refluxing of gastric contents into the oesophagus.The major mechanism of reflux is transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation(TLOSR).This is a normal phenomena.Relaxation of LOS occurs in response to swallowing but this is brief and lasts less than10seconds.In contrast,in infants with GORD,TLOSR is prolonged(more than 10secs)and accounts for75e90%episodes of reflux in infants.Other causes for GORD include abnormal position of LOS as seen in hiatus hernia.This results in inability of diaphragm to contribute to lower oesophageal tone and contraction to prevent reflux.Delayed gastric emptying is felt to be a contributing factor in worsening of reflux and is especially seen in children with neurodisability.It exacerbates GOR by prolonging gastric distension and increasing the frequency of transient LOS relax-ation.There is an associated delay in clearance of reflux contentsVinod Kolimarala MBBS MRCPCH,Speciality Trainee,Paediatric Gastroenterology,Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust,Southampton,UK. Conflicts of interest:none declared.R Mark Beattie MBBS BSc(Hons)FRCPCH MRCP,Professor in Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition,Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology,University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton,UK.Conflicts of interest:none declared.Akshay Batra MBBS MD MRCPCH,Consultant,Paediatric Gastroenterology,Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust,Southampton,UK. Conflicts of interest:none declared.from oesophagus increasing oesophageal exposure to gastric contents,leading to oesophagitis.Symptoms,signs and historyGastro-oesophageal reflux disease can be oesophageal or extra-oesophageal depending on the presenting symptoms.The symptoms,signs and typical historical features of GORD are summarised in Tables1and2.Differential diagnosisGiven the frequency of gastro-oesophageal reflux it is easy to forget that other conditions can present with similar features. The commoner alternative diagnoses include:Infection,e.g.urinary tract infection,gastroenteritis,peptic ulcer diseaseIntestinal obstruction e.g.pyloric stenosis,malrotation,in-testinal atresia,Food allergy and intolerances e.g.cow’s milk allergy,soy allergy,coeliac diseaseEosinophilic oesophagitisMetabolic disorders e.g.diabetes,inborn errors of metabolismIntestinal dysmotilityDrug induced vomiting e.g.cytotoxic agentsPrimary respiratory disease e.g.asthma,cysticfibrosisFactitious induced illnessChild neglect or abuseIt is important to remain vigilant for other diagnoses. ManagementPhysiological reflux is common in infancy and is a clinical diagnosis.For most parents reassurance that the condition willresolve without treatment is all that is needed.It is important to carefully consider the differential diagnosis,particularly if symptoms persist or worsen.Full assessment of infants is essential including a full feeding history to explore possibility of overfeeding or difficulty with feeding.Careful attention needs to be paid to severity of symp-toms,faltering growth and relevant social factors,e.g.parental anxiety and stress.Severe cases need further assessments and investigation.These may include barium study,pH study, impedence study,gastro-oesophageal scintigraphy,gastroscopy and biopsy(described below).Difficult cases require assessment by multidisciplinary team including dietician,speech and language therapist,paediatric gastroenterologist and paediatric surgeon.InvestigationsOesophageal pH monitoringAcid reflux into the oesophagus occurs in all infants as a physi-ological phenomenon and is only significant when it occurs in excess.The pH probe is designed to measure acidity(i.e.acid reflux)in the lower oesophagus and monitors the frequency and duration of reflux into the oesophagus.It is a microelectrode passed through the nose and down the back of the throat to sit3 e5cms above the lower oesophageal sphincter and records for a set period,usually24hrs.A reflux episode is defined as the drop in oesophageal pH less mon parameters obtained from pH monitoring include the total number of reflux episodes, the number of reflux episodes lasting more than5minutes,the duration of the longest reflux episode,and the reflux index which is the percentage of time when pH was less than4.Specific indications for pH Study include diagnostic uncer-tainty in presence of extra oesophageal symptoms,poor response to medical treatment or to quantify the degree of reflux (Figure1).Interpretation of oesophageal pH studiesThe North American Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition(NASPGHAN)consensus recommen-dation is that a reflux index greater than7%is abnormal.In general reflux index up to10%is mild,10e20%is moderate which is usually controlled by medical therapy and more than 30%is severe and may require surgical intervention.When interpreting studies it is important to consider the following: It is useful to correlate symptoms(e.g.,cough,chest pain) with acid reflux episodes and to select those infants and children with wheezing or respiratory symptoms in whom GOR is a causative/aggravating factor.The sensitivity,specificity and clinical utility of pH moni-toring for diagnosis and management of possible extra oesophageal complications of GOR are not wellestablished. Table1There are several limitations to pH studies.These include: pH studies are unable to detect anatomical abnormalities (e.g.stricture,hiatus hernia,malrotation)or aspiration. Non-acid reflux will not be detected.This should be borne in mind with non-acidic feeds such as infant formula and in particular when infants are continuously fed.The changes in environment,diet and behaviour as a result of investigation and admission to hospital may impact on the result.There is potential for technical difficulties and reproducibility is poor.pH studies provide no objective measures of inflammation,and thus are less useful than endoscopy and biopsies for the diagnosis and grading of oesophagitis.The severity of pathologic acid reflux does not correlate consistently with symptom severity or demonstrable bined multiple intraluminal impedance (MII)and pH monitoringSome of the limitations of the pH study in detecting nonacid reflux and proximal reflux can be overcome by combining it with intraluminal impedance monitoring.This measures changes in the electrical impedance (i.e.resistance)between multiple elec-trodes located along an oesophageal catheter.Oesophageal impedance tracings are then analyzed for the typical changes caused by liquid,solid,air or mixed bolus and can differentiate between antegrade and retrograde flow.MII reflux episodes can be categorized as acidic (pH less than 4lasting 4seconds or more),weakly acidic (pH4-7)or weakly alkaline (pH 7).Studies on the normal values in in-fants and children are lacking.Normal values are results of consensus agreements,data extrapolation and studies on symptomatic children.ESPGHAN EURO-PIG suggests up to 100reflux episodes in Infants aged less than 1and oesophageal acid exposure time up to 10%and up to 70episodes in children more than 1year and oesophageal exposure time less than 3%is regarded asnormal.Table2Figure 1An example of a pH study in an infant showing moderate re flux.The indications are the same as those for pH monitoring.MII-pH recording provides more information than simple pH mea-surement because it allows the study of non-acid reflux,extent of reflux and the temporal association between symptoms and reflux.MII still has the following limitations:high cost;limited contribution to medical therapeutic implications;and lack of evidence-based parameters for the assessment of GOR and especially symptom association in children (Figure 2).Radiological investigationsBarium swallow :assesses the patient over only short periods and may therefore miss pathological reflux or overdiagnose physiological reflux.It is therefore neither a sensitive or specific test.Its main role is in detecting anatomical abnormalities such as hiatus hernia,intestinal malrotation,oesophageal stricture or web,atypical pyloric stenosis,gastric web,duodenal web or volvulus.Gastro-oesophageal scintigraphy :uses continuous evaluation for up to an hour after radiolabelled meal.Food or milk labelled with 99Technetium is given to the infant and stomach and oesophagus are scanned.The standards for interpretation of this test are poorly established and it is not recommended for the routine evaluation of paediatric patients with suspected GORD.Its main role is in the assessment of gastric emptying times to identify the group of children with foregut dysmotility and delayed gastric emptying.It also has a limited role in diagnosis of pulmonary aspiration in patients with chronic and refractory respiratory symptoms.Delayed gastric emptying is especiallycommon in children with cerebral palsy in whom vomiting may reflect an overall gut dysmotility rather than GORD.Oesophageal manometry :measures the pressures and peristaltic contractions in the oesophagus.It is now increasingly used to help in the diagnosis of pathological reflux and has a role in identifying the position of lower oesophageal sphincter and assessing its morphology and function.The transient relaxation of the sphincter can be better defined with high resolution manometry and provocative tests with multiple swallows help assess severity.Its main role lies in looking for conditions,which can mimic GORD,e.g.achalasia or other motor disorders of the oesophagus such as diffuse oesophageal spasm,Chagas disease,isolated hypertensive lower oesophageal sphincter.Gastroscopy and biopsy:is used in children with suspected oesophagitis.Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is a useful investigation and should be considered in all children with se-vere symptomatic reflux.Presence of active oesophagits either macroscopically or on histology is the most specific test for GORD though normal oesophageal histology does not exclude significant gastro-oesophageal reflux.The histological features include an increased eosinophil count,intrapapillary blood vessel dilatation,intraepithelial bleeding,basal cell hyperplasia,dilated intercellular spaces,and enhanced cellular proliferation.Endoscopic biopsy is important to identify or rule out other causes of oesophagitis and to diagnose and monitor Barrettoesophagus.Figure 2Combined MII and pH monitoring demonstrating acid re flux in an infant.The indications for endoscopy in GORD include:Gastrointestinal bleeding which can present as haemetem-esis or malenaFailure of resolution of symptoms beyond1year of age despite medical therapyFaltering growthFood aversionSuspected Sandifer’s syndromeManagementMost patients with physiological gastro-oesophageal reflux are managed in primary care by the health visitor and general practitioner and do not require any specific treatment.Non-pharmacological measures include:Review of feeding and feeding practice e checking for overfeeding,trial of smaller more frequent feeds,too small or too large a teat(both of which can cause air swallowing).Review of feeding posture e Infants have significantly less reflux when placed in the prone position than in a supine position.However,prone position is associated with a higher rate of sudden infants death syndrome(SIDS).In infants from birth to12months of age with reflux,the risk of SIDS generally outweighs the potential benefits of prone sleeping.In children more than1year it is likely that there is a benefit to right side positioning during sleep and elevation of the head of the bed.Use of feed thickeners and use of anti-regurgitation milks e these are useful in reducing the symptoms of GOR and should be considered in children with persistent symptom-atic reflux impacting on nutrient intake or through excessive vomiting on lifestyle.They should not be used for healthy children who regurgitate.Extensively hydrolysed or amino acid based formula e In-fants with persistent symptoms with associated redflags like blood in stools,history of eczema or atopy could have non IgE mediated cow’s milk protein intolerance and may benefit from a2e6week trial of elimination diet.This can be done by elimination of cow’s milk in maternal diet in breast fed infants.In bottle fed infants extensively hydrolysed formula should be used.Soya formulae should be avoided as there is significant cross reactivity between cow’s milk and soya protein and because of the presence of phytoestrogens in soya milk they are not recommended in infants less than6 months.Drug treatmentDrug treatment is indicated in children with severe symptomatic reflux or signs and symptoms suggestive of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.The major pharmacological agents currently used for treating GORD in children are gastric acid e buffering agents,mucosal surface barriers,and gastric anti-secretory agents.Acid sup-pressant agents are the mainstay of treatment for all but the patient with occasional symptoms.The potential adverse effects of acid suppression,including increased risk of community-acquired pneumonias and GI infections,need to be balanced against the benefits of pound alginates:(e.g.Gaviscon Infant-Rickett Benckiser) are effective for symptomatic treatment for GOR.Infant gaviscon works by reacting with gastric acid to form a viscous gel.Infant Gaviscon comes in a dual sachet and each half is a dose.1dose for babies weighing less than4.5kg and2doses for those more than4.5kg given a maximum6times a day.Infant gaviscon can be added to formula feed or for breast fed infants dissolved in cooled boiled water and given by spoon after a feed.Chronic use of alginates is not recommended for GORD. Occasionally they can cause constipation and bloating.They should be used with caution in children with renal impairment as the product contains sodium and can cause hypernatraemia.An overdose can lead to a bezoar formation which may require surgical removal.Acid suppression agents:include H2-receptor blockers and proton pump inhibitors.H2receptor blockers are widely used in the management of reflux.They are safe and well tolerated and can be consid-ered before any further investigation in children who are thriving and in whom the diagnosis is robust.There are several studies that have suggested that H₂-antagonists are efficacious in children.Ranitidine is the most commonly used H2-receptor blocker.Ranitidine is well tolerated and has a low incidence of side-effects(common side-effects include fatigue,dizziness or diarrhoea).Oral ranitidine pro-vides symptomatic relief and endoscopic improvement of oesophagitis in children with GORD.Dosage for neonates is between2and3mg/kg TDS.Child1e5months1e3mg/kg TDS.Child6months-2years2e4mg/kg BD.Proton pump inhibitors(PPI)such as omeprazole and lan-soprazole are a group of drugs that irreversibly inactivate Hþ/KþATPase:the parietal cell membrane transporter.This increases the pH of gastric contents and decreases total volume of gastric secretion,thus facilitating emptying.Side effects reported with long term use include hypomagnese-mia,gastric fundal polyps and small increase in risk of osteoporotic fractures.Omeprazole is the most commonly used PPI and is shown to be effective in children with GORD resistant to ranitidine.For healing of erosive oesophagitis and relief of symptoms,PPIs are superior to H2-receptor blockers.Omeprazole is available as dispersible tablets or capsules given once daily.The tablet can be gently mixed or dispersed(not crushed)or the capsule broken for ease of administration in children.Dosage is0.7e1.4mg/kg per day although higher doses can be used,up to3mg/kg.When acid suppression is required,the smallest effective dose should be used.Most patients require only once-daily nsoprazole is the other commonly used PPI.Dosage0.5e1mg/kg OD a maximum dose of15mg OD can be used.Prokinetic drugs:can be helpful in some circumstances. Gastroesophageal reflux is primarily a motility disorder,and the use of pharmacologic agents that improve oesophageal and gastric motility are conceptually attractive as therapies.Unfor-tunately,the currently available prokinetic medications have only modest efficacy in relieving GORD symptoms,and the side effect profile makes them less useful clinical practice.Examples include metoclopramide,domperidone,and erythromycin.Domperidone is a dopamine-receptor(D2)blocker that has relatively fewer side effects but case reports of extrapyramidal side effects exist,as well as an effect on the QT interval(pro-longation).Domperidone acts to increase lower oesophageal sphincter pressure improve oesophageal clearance and promote gastric emptying.Domperidone is commonly used in clinical practice either as part of empirical medical therapy of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease or if delayed gastric emptying has been demonstrated on nuclear scintigraphy.In view of a small increased risk of cardiotoxicity,it is advisable to use domperidone in lower doses and only in cases with overt vomiting secondary to reflux.All infants should have an ECG to rule out prolonged QT interval before starting treat-ment and should be referred to a specialist if treatment is required for greater than3months.Buffering agents(magnesium hydroxide and aluminium hy-droxide)and sucralfate:are useful for occasional heart burn. Buffering agents carry significant risk of toxicity and are not recommended for long term use.Sucralfate binds to inflamed mucosa and forms a protective layer that resists further damage from gastric acid.Enteral feedingIn infants with faltering growth who are not responding to usual medical treatments a period of enteral tube feeding(ETF) should be considered.This ensures slow delivery of feeds and thus reduced distension of stomach and subsequent reflux. When tube feeding is started small oral stimulation in the form of small amount of oral feeds(milk or solids)should be continued.Post pyloric feeding,is reserved for severe cases not responding to other forms of management and associated with complications.As the stomach is bypassed there is no distension of stomach and there is reduction in reflux of gastric contents.This is particularly helpful in children with failure to thrive,severe oesophagitis and reflux related pul-monary aspiration.Continuous post pyloric feeding is most commonly used in children with neurodisability where the volume of feed is limited because of discomfort associated with feeding.SurgeryThe commonest operative intervention is fundoplication done laparoscopically or via open procedure.Children with co mor-bidities,particularly neurodisability who have the most severe GORD are at the highest risk for operative morbidity and post-operative failure.Before surgery it is essential to rule out non-GORD causes of symptoms and ensure that the diagnosis of chronic-relapsing GORD isfirmly established.Indications for surgery include:Failure of optimal medical therapyExtra oesophageal manifestation(asthma,cough,chest pain,recurrent pulmonary aspiration of refluxate) Complication of GORD(e.g.Barrett’s oesophagus or oeso-phageal stricture)It is important to provide families with appropriate education and a realistic understanding of the potential complications of surgery,which include recurrence of reflux(10%),retching, bloating,dumping and intestinal obstruction.Some children have a high risk of needing surgery.These include children with neurodisability,those with respiratory disease with intractable reflux(e.g.oesophageal atresia,bron-chopulmonary dysplasia),Children with complication of oeso-phagitis such as stricture or Barrett’s oesophagus and those who have had a tracheo-oesophagealfistula repair.Gastro-oesophageal reflux and neurodisabilityPaediatric neurodisability is an umbrella term for conditions associated with impairment of the nervous system,including conditions such as cerebral palsy,and epilepsy.Potential cau-ses of feeding difficulties include bulbar weakness,primary or secondary aspiration,reflux oesophagitis,widespread gut dys-motility,mobility and posture problems,poor nutritional state and constipation.These children require careful multidisci-plinary assessment by a feeding team including dietetics, speech and language therapy,occupational therapy and the neurodevelopmental paediatrician.Attention to nutrition is of key importance and many children with feeding difficulties benefit from a feeding gastrostomy.A fundoplication is required if reflux is severe although in some cases improved nutritional status will result in improvement of the reflux.The motility of the gut is a key factor in feed tolerance in children with cerebral palsy who may have delayed gastric emptying which impact significantly on the ability to feed particularly if nutrition is dependent upon nasogastric or gas-trostomy feeding.Therapeutic strategies include explanation and reassurance,trial of anti-reflux therapy,prokinetic agents such as domperidone and in some cases with marked dysmo-tility it may be necessary to give feeds by continuous infusion via gastrostomy or gastro-jejunal route.A milk free diet for a trial period of2e4weeks can be helpful.Hydrolysed protein formula feeds/MCT predominant feeds may be given as a milk substitute.Gastro-oesophageal reflux and respiratory disease Gastro-oesophageal reflux has been associated with significant respiratory symptoms in infants and children.There is a complex relationship between asthma and gastro-oesophageal reflux, manifested by a bidirectional cause and effect.One postulated mechanism for gastro-oesophageal reflux mediated airway disease involves micro-aspiration of gastric contents that leads to inflammation and bronchospasm. However,experimental evidence also supports the involve-ment of oesophageal acid e induced reflex bronchospasm,in the absence of frank aspiration.In such cases,gastro-oesophageal reflux therapy using either H2-blockers or pro-ton pump inhibitors has been shown to benefit patients with steroid-dependent asthma,nocturnal cough and reflux symp-toms.Similarly,intrinsic lung disease may through excessive coughing result in reflux.The association between gastro-oesophageal reflux and apparent life-threatening events is somewhat controversial and probably only relevant if the infant vomits,chokes or goes blue during or immediately after feeds.Barrett’s oesophagusThis refers to the presence of metaplastic columnar epithelium in the lower oesophagus thought to be a consequence of long-standing gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.There is an increased risk of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus.It is rare in childhood and requires aggressive medical treat-ment,of the gastro-oesophageal reflux and regular endoscopic surveillance.Surgery(fundoplication)is often considered. Case study1A7week old baby formula fed baby presented with history of vomiting after most feeds and excessive crying.Vomiting was variable quantity,non-projectile and non-bilious.The child was thriving very well.There was no abnormality seen on examina-tion.A careful feed history revealed he was having nearly 200mlg/kg of formula feed.Parents were reassured and the volume of feeds was reduced.Symptoms resolved in3weeks.He continued to thrive and was discharged from follow-up.Over feeding is frequently seen in formula fed infants and a careful feeding history allows for an accurate diagnosis and helps in avoiding unnecessary treatments.Case study2An11month old with cerebral palsy and seizure disorder pre-sented with history of poor weight gain,recurrent vomiting and episodic crying.She was born at25weeks of gestation and had periventricular leukomalacia.She was particularly distressed at meal times as if she was in pain.Further investigations revealed significant reflux(reflux index14%and endoscopicfindings of oesophagitis).She was treated with proton pump inhibitors with improvement in her symptoms.Her symptoms were secondary of acid reflux in her oesophagus in response to gastric acid secretion associated with meal times.Her feeding improved with treatment of the reflux.Case study3A4month old presented with feed refusal,retching,constipation and eczema.Her symptoms failed to improve with anti-reflux therapy and her weight was static.She was referred to specialist clinic and was started on extensively hydrolysed for-mula.At6months she was started on a dairy free diet.Symp-toms improved and she showed good catch up growth.Cow’s milk was gradually introduced in her diet from the age of12 months.Cow’s milk allergy is the commonest food allergy in infancy and usually resolves by2years of life and almost always by5years of age.Gastro-oesophageal reflux can co-exist but poor a response to anti-reflux therapy should prompt consider-ation of cow’s milk allergy.AFURTHER READINGBeattie RM,Dhawan A,Puntis JWL,Batra A,Kyrana E.Oxford specialist handbook in paediatric gastroenterology,hepatology and nutrition.Oxford University Press,2018.Mutalib M,Rawat D,Lindley K,et al.BSPGHAN Motility working Group position statement:paediatric multichannel intraluminal pH impedance monitoring e indications,methods and interpretation.Front Gastroenterol2017;8:156e62.Nelson SP,Chen EH,Syniar GM,Christoffel KK.Prevalence of symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux during infancy.A pediatric practice-based survey.Pediatric Practice Research Group.Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med1997Jun;151:569e72.Rosen R,Vandenplas Y.Paediatric gastroesophageal reflux clinical practice guidelines:joint recommendations of the North American society for paediatric Gastroenterology,Hepatology,and nutrition and the European society for pediatric gastroenterology,hepatol-ogy,and nutrition.J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr2018;66:516e54. Rudolph CD,Vandenplas Y.Paediatric gastro-oesophageal reflux clinical practice guidelines:joint recommendation of NASPGHAN and ESPGHAN e J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr49;498-547. Sherman PM,Hassall E,Fagundes-Neto U.A global,evidence-based consensus on the definition of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in the pediatric population.Am J Gastroenterol,2009;https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2009.129.Tighe M,Afzal NA,Bevan A,Hayen A,Munro A,Beattie RM.Phar-macological treatment of children with gastro-oesophageal reflux.Cochrane Database Syst Rev2014Nov24;11.Tighe MP,Beattie RM.Managing gastro-oesophageal reflux in in-fancy.Arch Dis Child2010;95:243e4.Tighe MP,Cullen M,Beattie RM.How to use:a pH study.Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed2009;94:18e23.。

相关文档
最新文档