PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
绩效评估的英语
绩效评估的英语
绩效评估是现代企业管理中非常重要的一环,它通过评估员工的工作表现,从而决定他们的晋升、奖励或惩罚。
绩效评估需要进行科学、客观、公正的评价,同时需要考虑不同员工的特点和不同工作的性质。
在这篇文章中,我们将介绍一些与绩效评估相关的英语词汇和表达,以帮助读者更好地理解和应用这一概念。
1. Performance evaluation / appraisal 绩效评估/考核
2. Job responsibilities 工作职责
3. Performance goals 绩效目标
4. Performance indicators 绩效指标
5. Key performance indicators (KPIs) 关键绩效指标
6. Performance metrics 绩效指标
7. Performance review 绩效评审
8. Performance improvement plan (PIP) 绩效改进计划
9. Performance rating 绩效评分
10. Performance feedback 绩效反馈
11. Self-assessment 自我评估
12. Peer assessment 同事评估
13. 360-degree assessment 全方位评估
14. Performance-based pay 绩效工资
15. Bonus 奖金
16. Promotion 晋升
17. Demotion 降职
18. Termination 终止
以上是一些常用的绩效评估相关英语词汇和表达。
希望这些内容能够帮助读者更好地掌握这一概念,从而在工作中更加高效和成功。
Performance-Appraisal-绩效评估
30
Midterm Exam
範圍:
人力資源介紹 (~10%) 工作分析 (10~15%) 招募 (10~15%) 訓練 (20~30%) 績效評估 (20~30%)
31
Job analysis
特質、行為、結果
績效管理
P = (能力 X 動機 X 機會)
2
個人績效的決定因素
個人績效= f (能力,動機,機會)
招募甄選 教育訓練與發展
績效管理
薪酬制度 授權
頭銜與地位 成就慾望
資源 時間
3
績效評估的用途
調薪 (94%) 升遷 (88%) 員工發展 (56%) 員工訓練 (45%) 人事研究 (18%)
提出績效改善方案 發展行動方案、並解決問題 雙向溝通、有回饋的管道
24
績效管理
探討績效不佳的原因
P = (能力 X 動機 X 機會)
三個主要因素可以來探討:
能力 動機 情境/系統因素
25
Directing attention to the causes of problem.
Performance Appraisal 績效評估
Lecture 6 11/2/2005
HRM-MBA
Prepared by Ying-Jung Yeh - NCU, Fall, 2005
1
Agenda
績效評估的用途 評估者誤差 (Rater bias) 如何做好績效評估? 360度評估/回饋 (360-degree feedback) 績效評估的方法
22
Summary of Appraisal Methods
绩效 翻译
绩效翻译Performance appraisal (also known as performance evaluation or performance review) is a process that involves assessing an individual or a group's performance in relation to predefined goals and objectives. It is typically conducted by the organization's managers or supervisors, and serves as a tool for measuring and improving employee productivity and development.The main purpose of performance appraisal is to ensure that employees' performance meets the organization's expectations, and to provide feedback and guidance for improvement. It helps identify strengths and weaknesses, and sets the basis for further training and development opportunities. By evaluating performance, organizations can reward high performers, motivate underperformers, and establish a fair and objective system for determining compensation and promotions.There are different methods and approaches that can be used for performance appraisal, depending on the organization's culture, resources, and goals. Some of the commonly used methods include:1. Rating scales: This method involves the use of a predefined set of criteria against which the individual's performance is rated. The criteria may include factors such as job knowledge, quality of work, problem-solving abilities, communication skills, and teamwork.2. 360-degree feedback: In this approach, feedback is collected from multiple sources, including supervisors, peers, subordinates, and sometimes even clients or customers. This provides a more holistic view of the individual's performance, as it takes intoaccount different perspectives and opinions.3. Management by objectives (MBO): This method involves setting specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART) goals for employees, and then assessing their performance based on the extent to which these goals are achieved. It focuses on outcomes and results, rather than on the process or the means used to achieve them.4. Behaviorally anchored rating scales (BARS): This technique involves defining specific behavioral indicators that are linked to different levels of performance. Supervisors then observe and assess the employee's behavior against these indicators, and rate their performance accordingly.Regardless of the method used, it is important that the performance appraisal process is conducted in a fair, objective, and transparent manner. Employees should be provided with clear and timely feedback on their performance, and given the opportunity to discuss and provide their own input. The process should also be linked to the organization's overall goals and objectives, and used as a tool for continuous improvement and development.In conclusion, performance appraisal plays a crucial role in managing and developing employees. It helps in aligning individual and organizational goals, identifying areas for improvement, and recognizing and rewarding high performers. By implementing an effective performance appraisal system, organizations can enhance their overall performance and competitiveness.。
考核管理制度 英语
考核管理制度英语1. IntroductionPerformance appraisal is a formal evaluation process used by organizations to assess employees’ job performance and productivity. It is an important tool for managing and improving employee performance, and for making decisions about promotions, compensation, and training and development opportunities. A well-designed performance appraisal system can motivate employees, enhance job satisfaction, and contribute to organizational success.2. Purpose of Performance AppraisalThe purpose of performance appraisal is to provide employees with feedback on their job performance, to identify areas for improvement, and to recognize and reward excellent performance. Appraisals also help in setting performance goals and objectives, and in determining training and development needs. Another important purpose of performance appraisal is to support decision making on pay and promotions.3. Features of Performance AppraisalThe features of a good performance appraisal system include:- Clear Objectives: The objectives and criteria for appraisal should be clearly communicated to employees.- Fair and Objective: The appraisal should be fair, objective, and free from bias or discrimination.- Regular Feedback: Regular and ongoing feedback should be provided to employees, not just annually during the performance appraisal.- Two-way Communication: The process should be a two-way communication between the employee and the manager, with both parties able to express their views and concerns.- Continuous Improvement: The system should support continuous improvement and development of employees’ skills and capabilities.4. Components of Performance AppraisalThe components of a performance appraisal system typically include:- Setting Objectives: Employees and managers should collaborate to set specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART) objectives and goals.- Regular Feedback: Managers should provide regular feedback to employees on their performance, not just during the formal annual appraisal.- Evaluation: A formal assessment of the employee’s performance against the set objectives and criteria.- Development Plan: Identification of training and development needs, and creation of a development plan to address areas for improvement.- Rewards and Recognition: Recognition of outstanding performance, and providing opportunities for career advancement and rewards.5. Benefits of Performance AppraisalA good performance appraisal system can bring several benefits to the organization and its employees, including:- Motivation and Job Satisfaction: Feedback and recognition of good performance can motivate employees and enhance job satisfaction.- Improved Performance: Performance appraisals can lead to improved job performance and productivity.- Clarified Expectations: Clear communication of objectives and expectations can help employees understand what is expected of them.- Training and Development: Identification of development needs can lead to targeted training and development activities.- Communication and Feedback: Regular feedback can improve communication and relations between employees and managers.6. Challenges of Performance AppraisalDespite the benefits, performance appraisal systems can also face several challenges, such as:- Bias and Discrimination: Appraisals can suffer from bias and discrimination, leading to unfair outcomes.- Lack of Training: Managers may lack the training and skills to conduct fair and objective appraisals.- Negative Impact on Morale: Poorly conducted appraisals can have a negative impact on employee morale and job satisfaction.- Inaccuracy: Appraisals may not accurately reflect an employee’s true performance due to subjective assessments or inaccurate information.- Legal Compliance: Appraisals must be conducted in a way that complies with legal requirements and prevents potential liabilities for the organization.7. Best Practices in Performance AppraisalWhen designing and implementing a performance appraisal system, organizations should follow best practices, including:- Training for Managers: Managers should receive training on how to conduct fair and objective appraisals, and on providing effective feedback.- Employee Involvement: Employees should be involved in setting their own objectives and in the appraisal process, promoting a sense of ownership and accountability.- Multiple Feedback Sources: Managers should seek feedback from multiple sources, not just their own assessment, to gain a comprehensive view of an employee’s performance.- Performance Management Software: The use of performance management software can streamline the appraisal process and provide a central platform for recording and tracking performance data.- Continuous Improvement: The system should be continuously reviewed and improved based on feedback and lessons learned from previous appraisals.8. ConclusionA well-designed performance appraisal system can be a valuable tool for managing and improving employee performance, and for making key HR decisions. By setting clear objectives, providing regular feedback, and supporting training and development, organizations can benefit from increased productivity, improved morale, and better business performance. Despite the challenges, best practices and continuous improvement can help organizations create an effective performance appraisal system that contributes to their overall success.。
绩效评估考核(Performanceappraisalandassessment)
绩效评估考核(Performance appraisal and assessment)The so-called performance appraisal, is through the system method and principle to assess and measure employees in the work of the behavior and effect. The results can affect the staff salary adjustment, bonuses and job rise and fall, career design and many other vital interests. The ultimate goal is to improve the performance of employees, while achieving business goals, improve employee satisfaction and future sense of accomplishment, and ultimately to achieve "win-win" development of enterprises and individuals". But it is also a "double-edged sword", well used to maximize the enthusiasm of employees and tap the potential of employees; on the contrary, it will undermine employees, and bring negative impact on enterprise development. The following 10 years of work experience, we should talk about the current situation and existing problems of enterprise staff performance appraisal, as well as suggestions for effective performance appraisal.First, the correct management idea of performance appraisal has not been successfully implanted in EnterprisesTo carry out performance appraisal work, the first question is why we should carry out performance appraisal work. This problem is not clear, and it will inevitably lead to blind performance appraisal. To carry out performance appraisal, the core problem is to achieve the strategic goal of the enterprise. Enterprises in the implementation of the performance appraisal, it is necessary to do a good job of propaganda and training, but the training and publicity if there is no real intention to highlight the performance appraisal, performance appraisal can not let employees understand very well, so the performanceappraisal is very difficult to achieve the goal.But in many enterprises, performance management is only senior managers in the little master, did not get a good promotion at the grassroots level, in the implementation process will inevitably lead to such problems, and some departments will think the performance appraisal is the human resources department that has nothing to do with other departments within the enterprise. At the same time, in the performance evaluation system design, the pursuit of one step in the design of indicators, without considering the actual situation of the enterprise, then some of the assessment will be difficult to achieve good results in actual operation.Two, the assessment indicators are primary and secondary, and the design is not reasonable enoughPerformance appraisal is a scientific measurement and evaluation of employees' job performance with various techniques and methods to meet the needs of personnel selection, allocation and training, as well as organizational change and development. There is no doubt that performance appraisal is a work, and it is a highly technical work. Therefore, the performance evaluation of the program design and formulation of a high demand. Normally, we are used to complete the mission, from the perspective of organization development, to design and establish evaluation scheme, and the scheme is the result of some cover and contain everything, non quantitative indicators were artificially "quantified", the "quantitative index" ready to accept either course caused by the examiners and examinees were at a loss.Three, the implementation of the organization is not enoughAmerican management scientist Larry Idy and Ram Charan in "execution: put forward how to complete the task of learning" in the book: not because of business failure often take the wrong strategy, but because of the good strategy is not performed correctly, ineffective implementation is the real cause of business failure.Business strategy and planning are important, but only execution can make them potentially useful. A lack of executive power of enterprise will make it work out the strategy and eventually become a mere scrap of paper, so is the performance appraisal. A good assessment system can not be carried out well, but it is also a waste of effort. There is a process to realize the strategic goal of an enterprise. The concrete process is execution, and executive ability is the ability to change the strategic vision into reality. The executive power of an enterprise is determined by three key factors, namely strategy, personnel and operation process. The effective implementation of performance appraisal also needs the coordination of personnel and the selection of the method of implementation and the process control.The author knows from many enterprises,More and more workers and even some executives believe that the performance appraisal is a kind of form, not to play its due role in the human face, not essential; performance appraisal is so feeble. The author believes that the main reason for thisdecline in the execution may be: (1) performance evaluation related to inadequate training; (2) the performance appraisal is not high-level practical support; (3) the performance appraisal index itself is unreasonable, contributed to the subjectivity and uncontrollable sex; (4) effect interpersonal relationship; (5) subordinate departments, the lack of effective communication mechanism; (6) "to advance inertia and culture to the people".Four, performance appraisal results and rewards and punishments are not equalFor enterprises, performance management is a part of corporate culture, fair and scientific performance appraisal can optimize its organizational structure, improve the overall performance, performance management for employees, create a positive work environment, through the performance appraisal, the staff to correctly understand their own advantages and disadvantages, and the development direction of the self correction, so as to get more opportunities and greater development performance.But at present, many enterprise managers regard performance appraisal as the task and requirement of the enterprise or superior. Therefore, in the process of assessment, the work attitude is not serious, the examination form is unitary, and the work is done carelessly. After that, the performance appraisal results are shelved. On the whole, performance appraisal results will have little impact on the final pay of the person being evaluated and the promotion of the future position. The intensity of punishment is not consistent withthe results of performance appraisal, to give material and spiritual rewards for the performance of employees are not significant, employee punishment for poor performance is not enough, this will inevitably lead to employees' work enthusiasm is not high, thus losing the purpose of the performance appraisal. In dealing with the assessment results on the one hand to ensure the fairness and justice, on the other hand also from the human point of view, considering the differences in temperament of employees, take individual mode of communication, the performance feedback to be assessed, and help them to find causes analysis, the result is good or bad, so as to arouse by re assessment of the rise of hope, to establish confidence in the work, and they help enterprises grow together and progress.。
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
CHAPTER SEVEN: PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL第七章绩效考评CHAPTER OBJECTIVES本章目标第一节绩效考评概述AN BRIEF INTRODUCTON TO PERFORMANCEAPPRAISAL1. The Significance of Performance Appraisal2. Roles (作用) of Performance Appraisal3. Principle of Performance Appraisal4. Who Performance AppraisalPERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROCESS第二节绩效考评的过程1. Preparation: To establish the criteria and standardfor each position2. Conducting Performance Appraisal3.To Coach (辅导阶段)4.To improveTYPES OF APPRAISAL INSTRUMENTS第三节绩效考评的方法1.Alternation Ranking Scale2.Forced Distribution Method.(强制分布法)3.Paired comparison Method(配对比较法)4.GRAPHIC RATING SCALES(量表法)5.BEHAVIORALLY ANCHORED RATING SCALES(行为锚定法)6.Critical Incident Method(关键事件法)7.MANAGEMENT-BY-OBJECTIVES(目标管理法)FEEDBACK INTERVIEW第四节绩效考评的面谈EXERCISES作业Reference参考文献CHAPTER OBJECTIVES(本章目标)After you learn this chapter, you should be able to:1. To cite the various objectives of performance appraisal.2. To identify the basic consideration in selecting standards for appraisal3. To identify and discuss the major performance appraisal method.4. To identify the different approaches to performance appraisal interview.5.To describe the types of errors those are commonly found in performance appraisalAN BRIEF INTRODUCTON TO PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL (第一节绩效考评概述)CASE:“ Why did Zhang jump ship?”After graduated from the college, Zhang was recruited to be a salesman in Company Z .In the first two years, his performance was not so satisfactory because of lacking experience. But at the end of the third year, His performance was greatly improved.Last year, Zhang did a very good job, and he accomplished his sale-volume at the end of September. But the sales manager didn’t show any response to it, so Zhang felt quite disappointed. Zhang left the company in October since the company had no formal appraisal system. In the Company z, an HR professional appraised employees only based on informal conversations between the HR professional and the employees’ supervisor. This system yields no information regarding employee strengths and weaknesses. To make matter worse, this system provided no information regarding company expectation, leaving the employees in the dark as to what they needed to do to achieve favorable performance.In this chapter we turn to discuss performance appraisal programs, which are among the most helpful tools an organization can use to maintain and enhance competitive advantage and facilitate progress toward organization goals.Performance appraisal (绩效评估) refers to a formal, structured system for measuring, evaluating, an employee’s job-related attributes, behavior, and outcomes.1. The Significance of Performance AppraisalIt may understand at first glance that performance appraisals are used for evaluating who is doing a good job and who is doing a bad one. The significance of performance appraisals can be reviewed from the point of employees as well as the organization’s. The following are just a sample of those significance.For Employees a. Understand more clearly about their own duties, tasks and requirements.b. Understand more about what the organization expects from them and their future goals for achieving high performance.c. Employees who are performing well can receive formal recognition (认可)for their performance.d. To provide Employees with the opportunity to participate in performance appraisal.For Organizationa. To provide the supervisor with a means of identifying the strengths and weaknesses of an employe e’s performance.b. To provide a format enabling managers and employees to jointly establish future development and growth plan for the employees.c. To establish a communication channel between managers and employees.d. To express what managers wish to expect from employees.2. Roles (作用) of Performance AppraisalIn HRM activities, a lot decisions have to be based on performance appraisal process, which implies that performance appraisal provides input into all aspects of HRM. The interrelationship between the performance appraisal function and other major HR functions is shown in following Figure:Training: It can determined which employee needs more training and what should be trained (培训内容)b. Administrative decisions: It helps the organization to decide who should be receive pay raises, promoted, laid off, transferred.c. Rewards: It provides basis for judging Pay System (薪酬制度) and pay adjustment.d. Motivation: It encourages initiative, develops a sense of responsibilities, and stimulates efforts to perform better.e. HR planning: Performance appraisal data can also be used in HR planning, in determining the relative worth of jobs under a job evaluation program.f. Selection: It can be used to validate selection tool such as a testing program.3. Principle of Performance Appraisala. Transparency (透明):A supervisor should communicate appraisal criteria (评估项目)or dimension, appraisal procedures, results openly with employees.b. Objectiveness(客观): Employees’ outcome must be assessed by supervisors fairly without inserting their own Likes or dislikes.c. Practical(实用): The appraisal scheme should be simple but practical.d. Training(培训): Supervisor should be trained how to apply appraisal standards, when making judgments.e. Clear performance standards: It must be so clear that employees know exactly when the company expects of them,f. Relented: Appraisal form must exclude criteria that are irrelevant to job performance.g. Difference (差别化): The result of appraisal must be able to reflect the difference between high and low performers.4. Who Performance Appraisala. Appraisal by supervisor (主管评估) The superior knows the subordinate’sperformance better. He knows his ability and behaviors and attitude. However, appraisal by supervisor has drawbacks. Supervisor appraisal has been the traditional approach to evaluating an employee’s performance. Supervisor has the power to reward and pu nish.b. Peer Appraisals (同事评估) Some companies use it to replace or supplement the appraisal given by supervisor. The co-worker who is at an individual’s side all day has an excellent opportunity to observe the individual’s behavior and even can observe the o ther facets of the employee’s behavior that his supervisor can not because employees often be have differently when the boss is present.c. Self-Appraisal (自评)A worker knows clearly what he has done. Self-appraisal can reduce the defensive of the employee and make the employee to evaluate his performance with his responsibility.d. Subordinate Appraisal(下属评价)Subordinates are in a good position to evaluate their managers since they are in frequent contact with many performance-related behaviors. Those performance dimensions judged most appropriate for subordinate appraisals include leadership, oral communication, delegation of authority, coordination of team efforts, and interest in subordinates.e. Customers (客户评估) Some companies like restaurants will ask the customers to assess their employees’ performance.E. 360-Degree Feedback(360度评估)Performance information is collected all round an employee, from his or her supervisors, subordinates, peers, and internal or external customers; this approach is increasingly popular. It is generally used for management and career development.PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROCESS(第二节绩效考评的过程)1. Preparation: To establish the criteria and standard for each positiona.Types of Performance Criteria (考评项目)Criteria are dimensions against which the performance of an employee team or a work unit is evaluated.Trait-based criteria: They focus on the personal moral character, value and work attitude such as team-sprit, locality, initiative or creativity of an employee.Behaviour-based criteria: They focus on how the work is performed. With behaviour clearly defined, an employee is more likely to exhibit the acts that lead to peak performance. Behaviour is difficult to be measured in figures or amounts. As a matter of fact, an organization generally uses frequency to describe the employee s’ behavior.Outcome-based criteria: They focus on what was produced rather than on how it was produced. (focus on output and contribution which can be reflected in quality, quantity, efficiency). This kind of criteria can be easily measured. It doesn’t c are how the result achieved. Aresult-at-all-cost may plague outcome-based appraisal.Unfortunately, when used alone, any one of these performance criteria is deficient for accurately evaluating performance. Thus, many organizations use several criteria in making judgments about an employee’s performance.Realistic, measurable, clearly understood performance standards benefit both the organization and the employee. It is important to establish standards before the work is performed so that all involved will understand the level of accomplishment expected.b.To set performance standard Ensure that the targets set are in the smart model.Specific means that they are transparent and not open to dispute.Targets should be measurable so that all sides can agree when they are achieved or not. Thirdly, Targets should be agreed and achievable. If employees disagree with the target because they find them too difficult to achieve, then they may set out to prove this by determining to fail.Fourthly, targets should be realistic and relevant, which makes them more attractive to all parties. Finally, they should be time-related, so that it is clear at what point they should be achieved.An organization may use three approaches to performance evaluations. The first evaluates employees against preestablished common criteria or standards, similar to the way many professors evaluate students’ performance.The second evaluation approach is based on individualized performance criteria and standards. Performance goals for each individual are derived from the overall departme nt’s performance requirements for a specified period. Each employee may have unique performance goals (criteria and standards), and each employee is evaluated on the basis of how well he or she meets those goals.A third evaluation approach entails rankin g one employee’s performance against the performance of other employees.2. Conducting Performance AppraisalAfter an appraisal system is designed, must be properly implemented. Managers are chiefly responsible for implementation; they must complete the real ratings for employees and provide feedback to employees.One of the key objectives of feedback is to improve employee performance by giving them constructive criticism, when necessary, to make them aware of their shortcomings.3.To Coach (辅导阶段)After completing performance Appraisal, some employees’ result may turn out to be comparatively dissatisfactory which may be resulted from lacking knowledge or skills. In reality, it is supervisor’s responsibility to establish a performan ce improvement plan as follows.4.To improveThe supervisor must evaluate whether the employees have improved their outcome or not after caring out the plan for some time.TYPES OF APPRAISAL INSTRUMENTS(第三节绩效考评的方法)1.Alternation Ranking ScaleFor the trait you are measuring, list all the employees you want to rank. Put the highest-rankingemployee’s name on line 1. Put the lowest-ranking employee’s mane on line 10. Then list the next highest ranking on line 2, the next lowest ranking on ling 9, and so on Continue all names are on the scale.Highest-ranking employeeLowest –ranking employee2..Forced Distribution Method.(强制分布法)The forced distribution method is similar to grading on a curve. With this method, predetermined percentages of rates are placed in performance categories. For example, you may decide to distribute employees as follows:5% high performers20% high-average performers50% average performers20% low-average performers5% low performers3..Paired comparison Method(配对比较法)The paired comparison method helps make the ranking method more precise. For every trait (quantity of work, quality o f work, and so on), every subordinate is paired with and compared to4.GRAPHIC RATING SCALES(量表法)A graphic rating scale (GRS) presents a list of traits (e.g., cooperativeness, adaptability, maturity,motivation). Each trait is accompanied by a five or seven-point rating scale. The points along the scale are defined by numbers and/or descriptive words or phrases that indicate the level of performance.Many organizations use graphic rating scales because they are practical and cost little to develop. But Graphic rating scales do present a number of problems. Such scales do not effectively direct behavior; that is, the rating scale does not clearly indicate what a person must do to achieve a given rating. Another problem with GRS is the points on the rating scale are not clearly defined. An example of GRS is showed as followsEvaluate the worker on each quality using the following ratting scale:5=Outstanding; one of the best workers you have known4=Good; meets all job standards; exceeds some3=Adequate; meets all job standards2=Needs improvement; needs improvement in some way1=Unsatisfactory; not acceptableA. Dress and appearanceB. Self-confidenceC. DependabilityD. Tact and diplomacyE. AttitudeF. CooperationG. EnthusiasmH. Knowledge1_________2________3________4________5_________1_________2________3________4________5_________1_________2________3________4________5_________1_________2________3________4________5_________1_________2________3________4________5_________1_________2________3________4________5_________1_________2________3________4________5_________1_________2________3________4________5_________5.BEHAVIORALLY ANCHORED RATING SCALES(行为锚定法)A behaviorally anchored rating scale (BARS), is a combination of a graphic rating scale, and Critical Incident Method. It requires appraisers to rate employees on their traits. The typical BARS includes seven or eight traits, referred to as ―dimensions,‖ each anchored by a seven-or nine-point scale.6.Critical Incident Method(关键事件法)With the critical incident method, the supervisor keeps a record good or bad or so, the supervisor and subordinate meet and discuss the latter’s performance using the specific incidents as examples.This method has several advantages. It provides you with specific hard example true facts of good and poor performance for explaining the appraisal. A BARS anchors each trait with examples of specific job behaviors that reflect varying levels of performance. An example is shown in Exhibit below.DIMENSION: CLASSROOM TEACHICG SKILLSOutstanding7 ·The instructor answers students questions in a clear, concise, and accurate manner.6 ·The instructor uses examples when trying to emphasize a point.54 ·The instructor exhibits a number of annoying habits when lecturing.3 ·The instructor singles out students in class for unreasonable criticism.2Extremely Poor 1The greatest strength of BARS is to let employees know what types of behaviors are expected of them and gives appraisers the opportunity to provide behaviorally based feedback.The failure of BARS may lie in the difficulty raters experience when trying to select the one behavior on the scale that is most indicative of the employees performance level. Sometimes an employee may exhibit behaviors at both ends of the scale, so the rater would not know which rating to assign.7.MANAGEMENT-BY-OBJECTIVES(目标管理法)Management-by-objectives (MBO) is a management system designed to achieve organizational effectiveness by steering each empl oyees behavior toward the organization’s mission. The MBO process includes goal setting, planning, and evaluation.GOAL SETTING Goal setting starts at the top of the organization. The goal then cascades down through the organizational hierarchy to the level of the individual employee.In most instances individual goals are mutually set by employees and their supervisors, at which time mine how goal attainment will be measured. As will as to identify potential obstacles to reaching goals and devise strategies to overcome these obstacles.EVALUATION In the final phase, the employee’s success at meeting goals is evaluated against the agreed-on performance standards.MBO lets people know what is expected of them so that they can spend their time and energy in ways that maximize the attainment of important organizational objectives.But MBO presents several potential problems, it does not specify the behaviors required to reach them. This may be a problem for some employees, especially new ones.MBO also tends to focus on short-term goals.The successful achievement of MBO goals may be partly affect by some factors which are outside the worker’s control.Common appraisal problemHalo Effect :It means that the rating of a subordinate on one trait influences the way the person is rated on other traits. Managers may rate employees on the basis of their personal relationships rather than by an objective measure of their competencies and abilities.Central Tendency :It refers to a tendency to rate all employees above average.Leniency or Strictness: Some supervisors tend to rate all subordinates consistently high or low Recency Error: Some supervisors tend to be too influenced by an event that happened a few days or weeks ago that is fresh in their mind.Bias :It refers to the tendency to allow individual differences such as age, race, and sex to affect the appraisal rating employees receive.FEEDBACK INTERVIEW (第四节绩效考评的面谈)Before the InterviewAdequate preparation, including giving notice, reviewing the job description and choosing the right place.During the InterviewListen and questionConcentrate on performance not personalityBe specific about specificDon’t impose your ideasDon’t be instructiveAfter the InterviewMonitor progressFollow-up any issuesEXERCISES (作业)QURSTION1.. What is meant by the term ―relevance‖ in the context of performance appraisal? And what canan organization do to ensure its rating instruments are relevant?2. What are some of the causes of inaccurate ratings? How can ratings be made more accurate?3. Why are graphic rating scales so frequently used? What are major problems associated with their use?4. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages associated with the use of MBO as a performance appraisal technique.5. Why are peer ratings sometimes used to supplement supervisory ratings? What are some problems associated with their use?6. What steps can an organization take to help ensure that its appraisal system is a fair one?7.What sources could be used to evaluate the performance of people working in the following jobsa. Taxi driverb. GMc. HR Managerd. Lathe operatorA spokesperson for each group should present the group’s responses.8.Suppose you are the HR manager of Foshan University, how you should develop a performance appraisal system for teachers. Please follow the steps as below■ Gain support for system: gain support of President and seek employee input when developing the system■ Develop rating instruments: instrument o f choice depends on practicality, cost, and the nature of jobs being evaluated■ Chose raters: supervisors, peers, self, and 360-degree feedback■ Determine when appraisals will be given■ Include safeguards to ensure fairness: should include an u pper-management review and an appeals system,A spokesperson for each group should present the group’s responses.CASE STUDY华夏银行商业信贷部的绩效评估华夏银行商业信贷部总共有4名出纳员,其中一名是资深出纳员马丽,部门主管张岚负责信贷部的工作,已经有3年了。
PERFORMANCE-APPRAISAL-FORM(企业绩效考核)
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM1. This review is for the period from 1st Nov 2009 to 31st Oct 20102. Approved recommendations to be made effective from_____________ Name: _______________________________________ Emp_Code: ___________________________________ Designation: __________________________________ Grade/Category: _______________________________ Qualification: __________________________________ Division / Department:__________________________Date of joining:_________________________________ Date of Last review:_____________________________ Present CTC : _________________________________APPRAISAL GUIDELINES :01. The appraisal rating form ‘contains factors that are relevant in performing an employee job.02. Base your ratings and judgment on the entire period covered and not upon isolated/recentincident.03. Consider only one factor at a time. Do not let your rating in one trait influence your rating ofanother.04. Base your judgment on the requirements of the job and the performance of the appraisee in it.05. The Superior of the employee shall be the reporting Officer and the immediatesupervising superior/officer shall be the reviewing Officer.06. Whenever the shift duty operation is involved, the concerned Shift-in-charge shall be the reporting officer.07. While assessing, the Reporting Officer and Reviewing Officer shall give the scores for all theindividual points that are mentioned below the factors.08. Upon completion, review and check your scores & overall rating.09. The rating for factor analysis is as follows80 & above70 and above & below 79 60 and above & below 69 50 and above & below 59 Below 50 ‘O’ – OUTSTANDING‘A’ – VERY GOOD‘B’ – GOOD‘C’ – SATISFACTORY ‘D’ – UNSATISFACTORY10. Concrete evidence / Justification is necessary in support of “Outstanding” or Unsatisfactory rating.11. Guide Note to attendance (Including leave approved)No. of Days ofAttendanceMarksA) OUTSTANDING 300 & Above 20B) VERY GOOD 285 – 299 16C) GOOD 275-284 12D) SATISFACTORY 240-274 8E) POOR Below 239 0Page-1PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM Name :________________________________________Emp_Code: ___________________________________Page 2The head of the Department in consultation with the Manager/ Section incharge to review and to give the over all rating and recommendations. Reporting Officer Reviewing HODOBSERVATION BY HR DEPARTMENT。
英语作文-员工绩效考核审批
英语作文-员工绩效考核审批Performance Appraisal Approval。
Introduction:Performance appraisal is an essential process for evaluating the performance of employees in an organization. It helps in identifying the strengths, weaknesses, and areas of improvement for each employee. This document aims to provide guidelines for the approval of performance appraisals.1. Purpose:The purpose of the performance appraisal approval is to ensure fairness, consistency, and transparency in evaluating employee performance. It allows managers to make informed decisions regarding promotions, salary increments, and training needs.2. Process:2.1 Performance Evaluation:The performance evaluation process should be conducted annually or as per the organization's policy. It involves assessing various aspects such as job knowledge, quality of work, productivity, teamwork, communication skills, and adherence to deadlines.2.2 Appraisal Form:A standardized appraisal form should be used to evaluate employees. The form should include clear performance criteria, rating scales, and space for comments. It should be designed to capture both quantitative and qualitative aspects of performance.2.3 Appraiser Training:Managers responsible for conducting performance appraisals should receive appropriate training on the evaluation process. They should understand the criteria, rating scales, and how to provide constructive feedback to employees.2.4 Self-Assessment:Employees should be given an opportunity to self-assess their performance. This allows them to reflect on their achievements, challenges, and future goals. Self-assessment can provide valuable insights for the appraisal process.2.5 Performance Discussion:After completing the appraisal, managers should schedule a meeting with each employee to discuss the evaluation results. This discussion should be conducted in a private and supportive environment, focusing on strengths, areas of improvement, and career development opportunities.3. Approval Criteria:3.1 Consistency:The performance appraisal should be consistent across employees in similar roles. It should ensure that similar performance levels receive similar ratings and rewards. Any deviations from the set criteria should be justified with valid reasons.3.2 Fairness:The appraisal process should be fair and unbiased. It should not be influenced by personal preferences, biases, or discrimination. Managers should base their evaluations on objective evidence and performance data.3.3 Performance Improvement Plans:If an employee's performance falls below expectations, a performance improvement plan should be implemented. This plan should outline specific goals, timelines, and support mechanisms to help the employee improve their performance.3.4 Calibration:Calibration sessions should be conducted to review and discuss the appraisal ratings of employees across different teams or departments. This helps in ensuring consistency and fairness in the overall appraisal process.4. Approval Process:4.1 Review by Immediate Supervisor:The immediate supervisor should review the performance appraisal and provide their feedback and recommendations. They should ensure that the appraisal aligns with the employee's job responsibilities and performance expectations.4.2 Review by HR Department:The HR department should review the performance appraisal to ensure compliance with the organization's policies and procedures. They should verify the accuracy of the ratings, comments, and adherence to the appraisal timeline.4.3 Final Approval:The final approval of the performance appraisal should be given by the designated authority, such as the department head or HR manager. They should ensure that the appraisal process has been followed correctly and that it aligns with the organization's goals and values.Conclusion:The approval of performance appraisals plays a crucial role in recognizing and rewarding employee performance. It ensures fairness, consistency, and transparency in the evaluation process. By following the guidelines outlined in this document, organizations can effectively manage performance and support employee development.。
什么是绩效评估
什么是绩效评估绩效评估,又称绩效评价、员工考核绩效评估是一种正式的员工评估制度,店铺把整理好的什么是绩效评估分享给大家,欢迎阅读,仅供参考哦!什么是绩效评估所谓绩效评估,是指运用数理统计、运筹学原理和特定指标体系,对照统一的标准,按照一定的程序,通过定量定性对比分析,对项目一定经营期间的经营效益和经营者业绩做出客观、公正和准确的综合评判。
绩效评估(performance appraisal),又称绩效评价、员工考核绩效评估是一种正式的员工评估制度,它是通过系统的方法、原理来评定和测量员工在职务上的工作行为和工作成果。
绩效评估是企业管理者与员工之间的一项管理沟通活动。
绩效评估的结果可以直接影响到薪酬调整、奖金发放及职务升降等诸多员工的切身利益。
绩效评估的目的是什么1、对员工的晋升、降职、调职和离职提供依据;2、组织对员工的绩效考评的反馈;3、对员工和团队对组织的贡献进行评估;4、对员工的薪酬决策提供依据;5、对招聘选择和工作分配的决策进行评估;6、了解员工和团队的培训和教育的需要;7、对培训和员工职业生涯规划效果的评估;8、对工作计划、预算评估和人力资源规划提供信息。
绩效评估应遵循哪些原则1、与企业文化和管理理念相一致。
考评内容实际上就是对员工工作行为、态度、业绩等方面的要求和目标,它是员工行为的导向。
考评内容是企业组织文化和管理理念的具体化和形象化,在考评内容中必须明确:企业鼓励什么,反对什么,给员工以正确的指引。
2、要有侧重。
考评内容不可能涵盖该岗位上的所有工作内容,为了提高考评的效率,降低考核成本,并且让员工清楚工作的关键点,考评内容应该选择岗位工作的主要内容进行考评,不要面面俱到。
3、不考评无关内容。
绩效考评是对员工的工作考评,对不影响工作的其它任何事情都不要进行考评。
譬如员工的生活习惯、行为举止等内容不宜作为考核内容,否则自然后会影响相关工作的考评成绩。
论绩效评估和绩效管理绩效评估与绩效管理之间是存在很大差异的,不要将绩效评估或评价等同于绩效管理,两者之间是有所不同的。
Probation Performance Appraisal
Probation Performance Appraisal(试用期评估)(For manager use / 由直接主管填写)姓名/Employee: 部门/Department: 职位/Job Title:上司/Supervisor: 部门/Department: 职位/Job Title: 试用期/Probation Period: / / / to / / / 地区/Location:(管理人员总分低于45分,普通员工总分低于30分,不予以转正。
Employees won ’t pass the probation if the total evaluation score less than 45 for managerial position, and less than 30 for average )⏹ 员工评述/Feedback and comments from Employee:⏹ 上司建议/Recommendation from Supervisor ⏹总评/Overall Comments转为正式员工/Suitable for permanent employment终止劳动关系/Service to be terminated(如需薪酬调整请核对员工合同并填写员工变动表/Requirement for salary adjustment please check the employee ’s contract and fill the Personnel Action Form )⏹ 确认/Acknowledgement员工/Employee: 上司/Supervisor: 日期/Date: 日期/Date:部门主管/Department Head: 人力资源经理/Human Resources Manager: 日期/Date: 日期/Date:。
绩效相关名词
绩效管理绩效: (performance)绩效是指某一组织或员工在一定时间与条件下完成某一工作任务所表现出来的工作行为和所取得的工作结果,对组织而言,绩效的表现形式主要体现在三个方面:工作效率、工作数量与质量、工作效益。
绩效考核:(Performance appraisal)绩效考核又叫绩效评估或绩效评价,它通过系统的方法,原理来评定和测量员工在职务上的工作行为和工作效果。
就是在工作一端时间或工作完成后,对照工作说明书或绩效标准,采用科学的方法,检查和评定员工对职务所规定的职责和履行程度以及员工个人发展的情况,对员工的工作结果进行评价,并将评定结果反馈给员工的过程。
目标管理:(management by objective,MBO)目标管理是以目标为导向,以人为中心,以成果为标准,而使组织和个人取得最佳业绩的现代管理方法。
目标管理亦称“成果管理”,俗称责任制。
是指在企业个体职工的积极参与下,自上而下地确定工作目标,并在工作中实行“自我控制”,自下而上地保证目标实现的一种管理办法。
目标管理法:(Target administration)目标管理法是一种管理过程,在这一过程中通过使主管人员和下属共同参与制定双方同意的目标、目的,从而使组织的目的得到确定和满足。
绩效计划:(Performance Plan)绩效计划是被评估者和评估者双方对员工应该实现的工作绩效进行沟通的过程,并将沟通的结果落实为订立正式书面协议即绩效计划和评估表,它是双方在明晰责、权、利的基础上签订的一个内部协议。
绩效计划的设计从公司最高层开始,将绩效目标层层分解到各级子公司及部门,最终落实到个人。
对于各子公司而言,这个步骤即为经营业绩计划过程,而对于员工而言,则为绩效计划过程。
绩效目标:(Performance objective/Performance goal)绩效目标(常被称为目的和责任,英文Achievement imitates a target)是指给评估者和被评估者提供所需要的评价标准,以便客观地讨论、监督、衡量绩效。
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
CHAPTER SEVEN: PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL第七章绩效考评CHAPTER OBJECTIVES本章目标第一节绩效考评概述AN BRIEF INTRODUCTON TO PERFORMANCEAPPRAISAL1. The Significance of Performance Appraisal2. Roles (作用) of Performance Appraisal3. Principle of Performance Appraisal4. Who Performance AppraisalPERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROCESS第二节绩效考评的过程1. Preparation: To establish the criteria and standardfor each position2. Conducting Performance Appraisal3.To Coach (辅导阶段)4.To improveTYPES OF APPRAISAL INSTRUMENTS第三节绩效考评的方法1.Alternation Ranking Scale2.Forced Distribution Method.(强制分布法)3.Paired comparison Method(配对比较法)4.GRAPHIC RATING SCALES(量表法)5.BEHAVIORALLY ANCHORED RATING SCALES(行为锚定法)6.Critical Incident Method(关键事件法)7.MANAGEMENT-BY-OBJECTIVES(目标管理法)FEEDBACK INTERVIEW第四节绩效考评的面谈EXERCISES作业Reference参考文献CHAPTER OBJECTIVES(本章目标)After you learn this chapter, you should be able to:1. To cite the various objectives of performance appraisal.2. To identify the basic consideration in selecting standards for appraisal3. To identify and discuss the major performance appraisal method.4. To identify the different approaches to performance appraisal interview.5.To describe the types of errors those are commonly found in performance appraisalAN BRIEF INTRODUCTON TO PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL (第一节绩效考评概述)CASE:“ Why did Zhang jump ship?”After graduated from the college, Zhang was recruited to be a salesman in Company Z .In the first two years, his performance was not so satisfactory because of lacking experience. But at the end of the third year, His performance was greatly improved.Last year, Zhang did a very good job, and he accomplished his sale-volume at the end of September. But the sales manager didn’t show any response to it, so Zhang felt quite disappointed. Zhang left the company in October since the company had no formal appraisal system. In the Company z, an HR professional appraised employees only based on informal conversations between the HR professional and the employees’ supervisor. This system yields no information regarding employee strengths and weaknesses. To make matter worse, this system provided no information regarding company expectation, leaving the employees in the dark as to what they needed to do to achieve favorable performance.In this chapter we turn to discuss performance appraisal programs, which are among the most helpful tools an organization can use to maintain and enhance competitive advantage and facilitate progress toward organization goals.Performance appraisal (绩效评估) refers to a formal, structured system for measuring, evaluating, an employee’s job-related attributes, behavior, and outcomes.1. The Significance of Performance AppraisalIt may understand at first glance that performance appraisals are used for evaluating who is doing a good job and who is doing a bad one. The significance of performance appraisals can be reviewed from the point of employees as well as the organization’s. The following are just a sample of those significance.For Employees a. Understand more clearly about their own duties, tasks and requirements.b. Understand more about what the organization expects from them and their future goals for achieving high performance.c. Employees who are performing well can receive formal recognition (认可)for their performance.d. To provide Employees with the opportunity to participate in performance appraisal.For Organizationa. To provide the supervisor with a means of identifying the strengths and weaknesses of an employe e’s performance.b. To provide a format enabling managers and employees to jointly establish future development and growth plan for the employees.c. To establish a communication channel between managers and employees.d. To express what managers wish to expect from employees.2. Roles (作用) of Performance AppraisalIn HRM activities, a lot decisions have to be based on performance appraisal process, which implies that performance appraisal provides input into all aspects of HRM. The interrelationship between the performance appraisal function and other major HR functions is shown in following Figure:Training: It can determined which employee needs more training and what should be trained (培训内容)b. Administrative decisions: It helps the organization to decide who should be receive pay raises, promoted, laid off, transferred.c. Rewards: It provides basis for judging Pay System (薪酬制度) and pay adjustment.d. Motivation: It encourages initiative, develops a sense of responsibilities, and stimulates efforts to perform better.e. HR planning: Performance appraisal data can also be used in HR planning, in determining the relative worth of jobs under a job evaluation program.f. Selection: It can be used to validate selection tool such as a testing program.3. Principle of Performance Appraisala. Transparency (透明):A supervisor should communicate appraisal criteria (评估项目)or dimension, appraisal procedures, results openly with employees.b. Objectiveness(客观): Employees’ outcome must be assessed by supervisors fairly without inserting their own Likes or dislikes.c. Practical(实用): The appraisal scheme should be simple but practical.d. Training(培训): Supervisor should be trained how to apply appraisal standards, when making judgments.e. Clear performance standards: It must be so clear that employees know exactly when the company expects of them,f. Relented: Appraisal form must exclude criteria that are irrelevant to job performance.g. Difference (差别化): The result of appraisal must be able to reflect the difference between high and low performers.4. Who Performance Appraisala. Appraisal by supervisor (主管评估) The superior knows the subordinate’sperformance better. He knows his ability and behaviors and attitude. However, appraisal by supervisor has drawbacks. Supervisor appraisal has been the traditional approach to evaluating an employee’s performance. Supervisor has the power to reward and pu nish.b. Peer Appraisals (同事评估) Some companies use it to replace or supplement the appraisal given by supervisor. The co-worker who is at an individual’s side all day has an excellent opportunity to observe the individual’s behavior and even can observe the o ther facets of the employee’s behavior that his supervisor can not because employees often be have differently when the boss is present.c. Self-Appraisal (自评)A worker knows clearly what he has done. Self-appraisal can reduce the defensive of the employee and make the employee to evaluate his performance with his responsibility.d. Subordinate Appraisal(下属评价)Subordinates are in a good position to evaluate their managers since they are in frequent contact with many performance-related behaviors. Those performance dimensions judged most appropriate for subordinate appraisals include leadership, oral communication, delegation of authority, coordination of team efforts, and interest in subordinates.e. Customers (客户评估) Some companies like restaurants will ask the customers to assess their employees’ performance.E. 360-Degree Feedback(360度评估)Performance information is collected all round an employee, from his or her supervisors, subordinates, peers, and internal or external customers; this approach is increasingly popular. It is generally used for management and career development.PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROCESS(第二节绩效考评的过程)1. Preparation: To establish the criteria and standard for each positiona.Types of Performance Criteria (考评项目)Criteria are dimensions against which the performance of an employee team or a work unit is evaluated.Trait-based criteria: They focus on the personal moral character, value and work attitude such as team-sprit, locality, initiative or creativity of an employee.Behaviour-based criteria: They focus on how the work is performed. With behaviour clearly defined, an employee is more likely to exhibit the acts that lead to peak performance. Behaviour is difficult to be measured in figures or amounts. As a matter of fact, an organization generally uses frequency to describe the employee s’ behavior.Outcome-based criteria: They focus on what was produced rather than on how it was produced. (focus on output and contribution which can be reflected in quality, quantity, efficiency). This kind of criteria can be easily measured. It doesn’t c are how the result achieved. Aresult-at-all-cost may plague outcome-based appraisal.Unfortunately, when used alone, any one of these performance criteria is deficient for accurately evaluating performance. Thus, many organizations use several criteria in making judgments about an employee’s performance.Realistic, measurable, clearly understood performance standards benefit both the organization and the employee. It is important to establish standards before the work is performed so that all involved will understand the level of accomplishment expected.b.To set performance standard Ensure that the targets set are in the smart model.Specific means that they are transparent and not open to dispute.Targets should be measurable so that all sides can agree when they are achieved or not. Thirdly, Targets should be agreed and achievable. If employees disagree with the target because they find them too difficult to achieve, then they may set out to prove this by determining to fail.Fourthly, targets should be realistic and relevant, which makes them more attractive to all parties. Finally, they should be time-related, so that it is clear at what point they should be achieved.An organization may use three approaches to performance evaluations. The first evaluates employees against preestablished common criteria or standards, similar to the way many professors evaluate students’ performance.The second evaluation approach is based on individualized performance criteria and standards. Performance goals for each individual are derived from the overall departme nt’s performance requirements for a specified period. Each employee may have unique performance goals (criteria and standards), and each employee is evaluated on the basis of how well he or she meets those goals.A third evaluation approach entails rankin g one employee’s performance against the performance of other employees.2. Conducting Performance AppraisalAfter an appraisal system is designed, must be properly implemented. Managers are chiefly responsible for implementation; they must complete the real ratings for employees and provide feedback to employees.One of the key objectives of feedback is to improve employee performance by giving them constructive criticism, when necessary, to make them aware of their shortcomings.3.To Coach (辅导阶段)After completing performance Appraisal, some employees’ result may turn out to be comparatively dissatisfactory which may be resulted from lacking knowledge or skills. In reality, it is supervisor’s responsibility to establish a performan ce improvement plan as follows.4.To improveThe supervisor must evaluate whether the employees have improved their outcome or not after caring out the plan for some time.TYPES OF APPRAISAL INSTRUMENTS(第三节绩效考评的方法)1.Alternation Ranking ScaleFor the trait you are measuring, list all the employees you want to rank. Put the highest-rankingemployee’s name on line 1. Put the lowest-ranking employee’s mane on line 10. Then list the next highest ranking on line 2, the next lowest ranking on ling 9, and so on Continue all names are on the scale.Highest-ranking employeeLowest –ranking employee2..Forced Distribution Method.(强制分布法)The forced distribution method is similar to grading on a curve. With this method, predetermined percentages of rates are placed in performance categories. For example, you may decide to distribute employees as follows:5% high performers20% high-average performers50% average performers20% low-average performers5% low performers3..Paired comparison Method(配对比较法)The paired comparison method helps make the ranking method more precise. For every trait (quantity of work, quality o f work, and so on), every subordinate is paired with and compared to4.GRAPHIC RATING SCALES(量表法)A graphic rating scale (GRS) presents a list of traits (e.g., cooperativeness, adaptability, maturity,motivation). Each trait is accompanied by a five or seven-point rating scale. The points along the scale are defined by numbers and/or descriptive words or phrases that indicate the level of performance.Many organizations use graphic rating scales because they are practical and cost little to develop. But Graphic rating scales do present a number of problems. Such scales do not effectively direct behavior; that is, the rating scale does not clearly indicate what a person must do to achieve a given rating. Another problem with GRS is the points on the rating scale are not clearly defined. An example of GRS is showed as followsEvaluate the worker on each quality using the following ratting scale:5=Outstanding; one of the best workers you have known4=Good; meets all job standards; exceeds some3=Adequate; meets all job standards2=Needs improvement; needs improvement in some way1=Unsatisfactory; not acceptableA. Dress and appearanceB. Self-confidenceC. DependabilityD. Tact and diplomacyE. AttitudeF. CooperationG. EnthusiasmH. Knowledge1_________2________3________4________5_________1_________2________3________4________5_________1_________2________3________4________5_________1_________2________3________4________5_________1_________2________3________4________5_________1_________2________3________4________5_________1_________2________3________4________5_________1_________2________3________4________5_________5.BEHAVIORALLY ANCHORED RATING SCALES(行为锚定法)A behaviorally anchored rating scale (BARS), is a combination of a graphic rating scale, and Critical Incident Method. It requires appraisers to rate employees on their traits. The typical BARS includes seven or eight traits, referred to as ―dimensions,‖ each anchored by a seven-or nine-point scale.6.Critical Incident Method(关键事件法)With the critical incident method, the supervisor keeps a record good or bad or so, the supervisor and subordinate meet and discuss the latter’s performance using the specific incidents as examples.This method has several advantages. It provides you with specific hard example true facts of good and poor performance for explaining the appraisal. A BARS anchors each trait with examples of specific job behaviors that reflect varying levels of performance. An example is shown in Exhibit below.DIMENSION: CLASSROOM TEACHICG SKILLSOutstanding7 ·The instructor answers students questions in a clear, concise, and accurate manner.6 ·The instructor uses examples when trying to emphasize a point.54 ·The instructor exhibits a number of annoying habits when lecturing.3 ·The instructor singles out students in class for unreasonable criticism.2Extremely Poor 1The greatest strength of BARS is to let employees know what types of behaviors are expected of them and gives appraisers the opportunity to provide behaviorally based feedback.The failure of BARS may lie in the difficulty raters experience when trying to select the one behavior on the scale that is most indicative of the employees performance level. Sometimes an employee may exhibit behaviors at both ends of the scale, so the rater would not know which rating to assign.7.MANAGEMENT-BY-OBJECTIVES(目标管理法)Management-by-objectives (MBO) is a management system designed to achieve organizational effectiveness by steering each empl oyees behavior toward the organization’s mission. The MBO process includes goal setting, planning, and evaluation.GOAL SETTING Goal setting starts at the top of the organization. The goal then cascades down through the organizational hierarchy to the level of the individual employee.In most instances individual goals are mutually set by employees and their supervisors, at which time mine how goal attainment will be measured. As will as to identify potential obstacles to reaching goals and devise strategies to overcome these obstacles.EVALUATION In the final phase, the employee’s success at meeting goals is evaluated against the agreed-on performance standards.MBO lets people know what is expected of them so that they can spend their time and energy in ways that maximize the attainment of important organizational objectives.But MBO presents several potential problems, it does not specify the behaviors required to reach them. This may be a problem for some employees, especially new ones.MBO also tends to focus on short-term goals.The successful achievement of MBO goals may be partly affect by some factors which are outside the worker’s control.Common appraisal problemHalo Effect :It means that the rating of a subordinate on one trait influences the way the person is rated on other traits. Managers may rate employees on the basis of their personal relationships rather than by an objective measure of their competencies and abilities.Central Tendency :It refers to a tendency to rate all employees above average.Leniency or Strictness: Some supervisors tend to rate all subordinates consistently high or low Recency Error: Some supervisors tend to be too influenced by an event that happened a few days or weeks ago that is fresh in their mind.Bias :It refers to the tendency to allow individual differences such as age, race, and sex to affect the appraisal rating employees receive.FEEDBACK INTERVIEW (第四节绩效考评的面谈)Before the InterviewAdequate preparation, including giving notice, reviewing the job description and choosing the right place.During the InterviewListen and questionConcentrate on performance not personalityBe specific about specificDon’t impose your ideasDon’t be instructiveAfter the InterviewMonitor progressFollow-up any issuesEXERCISES (作业)QURSTION1.. What is meant by the term ―relevance‖ in the context of performance appraisal? And what canan organization do to ensure its rating instruments are relevant?2. What are some of the causes of inaccurate ratings? How can ratings be made more accurate?3. Why are graphic rating scales so frequently used? What are major problems associated with their use?4. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages associated with the use of MBO as a performance appraisal technique.5. Why are peer ratings sometimes used to supplement supervisory ratings? What are some problems associated with their use?6. What steps can an organization take to help ensure that its appraisal system is a fair one?7.What sources could be used to evaluate the performance of people working in the following jobsa. Taxi driverb. GMc. HR Managerd. Lathe operatorA spokesperson for each group should present the group’s responses.8.Suppose you are the HR manager of Foshan University, how you should develop a performance appraisal system for teachers. Please follow the steps as below■ Gain support for system: gain support of President and seek employee input when developing the system■ Develop rating instruments: instrument o f choice depends on practicality, cost, and the nature of jobs being evaluated■ Chose raters: supervisors, peers, self, and 360-degree feedback■ Determine when appraisals will be given■ Include safeguards to ensure fairness: should include an u pper-management review and an appeals system,A spokesperson for each group should present the group’s responses.CASE STUDY华夏银行商业信贷部的绩效评估华夏银行商业信贷部总共有4名出纳员,其中一名是资深出纳员马丽,部门主管张岚负责信贷部的工作,已经有3年了。
Performance-appraisal-and-employee-satisfaction1
Performance appraisal and employee satisfactionAbstract: The performance appraisal is often referred to as performance appraisal or "performance" is for the enterprise work undertaken by each employee, qualitative and quantitative application of scientific methods, the actual effect on staff behavior and their contribution to the enterprise or value evaluation.Performance appraisal as an effective business management tools, in the enterprise management plays a very important role, is the core of human resource management.This article on the current performance appraisal of the problems to do a detailed analysis.To tackle the problem, the paper proposes the performance evaluation of all angles from the control to ensure effective performance appraisal in place, and ultimately play the role of human resource management.Keywords: Performance Evaluation with analysis of the proposed21st century is the era of knowledge economy, as economic competition intensifies, it is increasingly recognized that human resources are the current era of economic development of the first resource.As the human resources management in the development of Chinese enterprises become more sophisticated, performance management, human resources management as an important component of the position within the enterprise is also more important.Human resource management performance appraisal is one of the core issue is to protect and promote the orderly operation of the internal management mechanism, the management objectives of the enterprise must be carried out by a management behavior.Organizational behavior United States where scientists Yuehan Yi Las its view that performance assessment can achieve the purpose of the following eight areas: staff promotion, demotion, transfer and separation of the assessment; organization employee performance evaluation feedback; employees and team to assess the contribution of the organization; to provide the basis for employee compensation decisions; for the recruitment selection and assessment of the work allocation decisions; understand the staff and team training and education needs; understanding of staff and team training and education needs; the work plan, budget and human resources planning assessments to provide information.Employee performance appraisal is an effective means of business management is the primary means of business management in the core of irreplaceable.However, there are a lot of business performance evaluation and business development strategy for the phase out of line, business performance evaluation system is only an empty shell it impossible to achieve the purpose of staff appraisal, and even counterproductive, leading to brain drain.Therefore, the work of the enterprise's performance appraisal analysis to identify problems and solve these problems become imperative to work.1Current Problems and Performance Assessment Analysis1.1 pairs of inadequate understanding of performance appraisal(1) That the performance appraisal is only human resources matter.Many enterprises believe that the performance appraisal is performance management content, and performance management is one of the functions of human resource management, so that HR performance evaluation is only a matter.Corporateexecutives only the instructions on the implementation of performance appraisal is not specifically guidance; Human Resources functions in communication with the other how to improve the performance appraisal can not be actively cooperate.(2) Insufficient understanding of the objectives of performance appraisal.Many companies now emphasize the introduction of advanced assessment tools, and leadership that the assessment is Jiangyoufalie, the ultimate goal of performance appraisal is not a clear understanding.The fundamental purpose of performance appraisal is to promote the effectiveness and efficiency, improve performance; performance evaluation is to improve the fundamental purpose is to work in accordance with the provisions of assessing whether the staff to complete tasks.The quality is not the purpose of examination results, but to analyze the reasons.(3) That the performance evaluation exist independently.Although performance appraisal is an essential business management core, but not to independent existence, it needs as a basis for other related work.The final appraisal is just a part of, and this assessment must be based on a few to be effective based on: reasonable performance goals, clear performance standards, performance counseling and objective record of performance, performance improvement and employee skills development.Only on the basis of these work, performance evaluation will be objective and fair in order for staff to accept, but also a greater practical significance.1.2 The purpose of performance appraisal is not clear(1) Goal setting fuzzy, set during the lack of effective control.Work schedule has set a target column, has asked each of the assessment system must have clear objectives.If the enterprises to implement performance appraisal, then they would know exactly why the implementation of performance appraisal.However, the actual implementation point of view, the current performance appraisal of the purpose of many companies is not clear, many companies do not have a clear purpose of performance appraisal, and sometimes even for assessment and evaluation, business evaluation appraisal side by side and not fully clear understanding of the performance appraisal just a management tool in itself is not the purpose of management. Most enterprises in the work schedule is basically a column filled goal setting are "complete", but this does not reflect the work "completed" the specific conditions, so that assessment can not start.(2) The purpose of the enterprise performance appraisal is not enough understanding of the phenomenon is that many companies have problems.Many managers will be the management and performance appraisal as a means of controlling employees that the purpose of performance appraisal is to enable employees in accordance with the arrangements and willingness of managers to do work.Therefore, managers will be a way to contain the performance appraisal staff, to establish their own credibility and to show their authority, the performance appraisal of staff performance problems as challenges, criticism and punishment according to the staff that the psychological staff performance appraisal a great deal of pressure, creating a bad impact, so that employees feel that performance appraisal for managers to control their instruments and tools, it is equivalent to the so-called fault-finding performance appraisal.Thus, employees will have reverse psychology to increase thefear, it will naturally produce resentment on the performance appraisal system, and eventually failure of the implementation of performance appraisal.(3) The purpose of performance appraisal can be divided into five categories: First, as a promotion, dismissal, and adjust the position of the basis; Second, for determining the salary and bonus basis; three, as the potential basis for the development and education and training; four, as adjusted personnel policy, based on incentives; five, examination results for the production, procurement, marketing, research and development, finance and other departments to develop work plans and decision-making reference.Only the clear purpose of performance appraisal, the performance assessment may focus on this goal was well underway.1.3Performance evaluation standard design unscientific(1) Performance appraisal standard fuzzy, lack of performance as a standard, standards and relevance of the work is not strong, operational poor or too subjective, too single, and standards are not quantified and so on.Work standards, only a few words of reviews, not an objective scoring scale so that the evaluators are free to givea score or examination results.(2) Employee performance appraisal, the result difficult to judge objectively, the subjective understanding of the different results of the evaluation bias.Result, the standard will have a different measure of more or less favorable.Some assessment were too high, often show the work of the staff was disappointed in the assessment, they will underestimate the evaluation of staff should be.On the contrary, some assessment of employees who think the best is simply not exist, the worst is hard to find employees, so employees are often used to be classified as middle class.Therefore, employees do not want to accept the examination results.(3) Lack of clear performance goals.Business employees do not know what their requirements are not clear what extent do considered as well, therefore, their performance is difficult to get corporate approval. Some companies are just a form of performance appraisal, there is no real content, performance appraisal every year, although in practice, but every year is "nowhere near", "fly."So that the performance results lose their meaning, no longer has objectivity, comparability and effectiveness.1.4 Performance Evaluation Index System flawed(1) Performance appraisal system design is not realistic.As the scale of the enterprise management level and uneven, business performance evaluation and management-level inputs also varied.Some enterprises have developed their own corporate management performance targets, but because of performance management in theory at this stage is still lack of scientific and practical methods, or because of corporate performance management and evaluation committee members lack of experience, so the decomposition is not appropriate performance indicators, assessment purpose is not clear, the principles of confusion and contradictory assessment issues, which planted the hidden performance targets difficult to complete.(2) Lack of scientific performance appraisal system design, practicality.Management performance evaluation system to evaluate the work of the foundation and core, and many enterprises did not use fully understand the importance of performance evaluation, full flow in one form, the performanceassessment and evaluation in order.The contents of the appraisal, the project settings and set the weight so often show no correlation and randomness, the will and personal likes and dislikes obvious.At the same time, many enterprises performance evaluation standards are too vague and difficult to accurately quantify less practical, easily lead to incomplete, non-objective and impartial judgments, so that the performance results difficult to be convinced.2 solve the problems proposed performance appraisal2.1 Establish the scientific concept of performance(1) Leadership need to clear the great role of performance appraisal.Performance evaluation can not only enhance the competitiveness, but also improve employee productivity, performance evaluation is good or bad determines the quality of enterprise management, and its function more and more prominent.First of all, improve employee performance appraisal is an important basis for work and training.Through regular assessment, employees can clearly see in what areas their own has increased, in what areas need to continue strong, the right to own a position.Meanwhile, the performance appraisal is to provide a different level of employees say what platform to those mediocre and lazy to expose the bad behavior, optimize human resources; more staff in the mirror and reinforce the correct behavior and reward employees effective basis. Nowadays, many enterprises of the old ideas, old practices remain unchanged, human resources and the environment can not be optimistic, to establish an advanced, highly effective performance appraisal system is not easy, especially, corporate leadership must establish the scientific concept of performance, a reasonable performance evaluation system, otherwise, it is difficult to achieve the desired results.(2) Increase the levels of staff training and publicity.Performance appraisal is the basis for promotion and training.Through regular assessment, the employees themselves can understand what has been improved, in which there is still insufficient.Performance appraisal system, although only a writing system, but in the specific needs of the implementation process at all levels of managers with the skills, performance appraisal, such as determining the objectives of the skills, interview skills, evaluation skills, which require training. Through training, so that managers work to develop the items and objectives, understanding staff performance appraisal methods, processes and responsibilities, improve communication skills, to develop performance improvement plans, effective implementation of the counseling.Through advocacy, the staff performance appraisal system, part of the composition and the organic link between well aware of, and implementation of employee performance appraisal program clear understanding of the inner link.Eventually through advocacy and training reflect human management of the performance assessment to be a consensus, thus trying to explore the enterprise contains abundant human resources, to achieve the intended purpose of assessment.2.2 The establishment of a reasonable performance evaluation system(1) Set goals.Enterprise should have a clear work objectives, to start work around this goal and towards the goal to guide the staff development.In determining the performance goals, the need for performance counseling session, the departmentmanager employee goals to continue to communicate with the process, do everything to maintain close contact with employees, continue to give staff support on the road ahead for its removal obstacles.That is the goal of staff together with the company, as far as possible to each and every staff, especially managers, are the work of the company's goal to achieve, together in the same direction, should individual performance improved organizational performance improvement and the combination of the vital interests of employees, the establishment of incentive systems.(2) Rreference method.Many methods of performance appraisal, the enterprise according to the actual situation of their own assessment methods to learn from others.However, no reference is copied.Science, advanced assessment methods, such as the Balanced Scorecard BSC, costing ABC, integrated performance management, IPM, are very worth learning methods.(3) Systematic evaluation cycle.Routinely with the monthly, quarterly and annual examination closely linked.To routinely based, the normal performance appraisal results as the work of employees is one important basis for evaluation.To give full play to goal-oriented performance appraisal system for managing the effect of the annual general appraisal, performance evaluation should be based on reasonable providing encouragement, more importantly, the results for the staff and the ability to work, the proposal should receive training to its to effectively improve their ability to work with development potential.2.3 And the standard performance index optimizationDesign a scientific and reasonable performance index and standard system, the fully reflect the merits of a business management performance is critical.Therefore, assessment of enterprise performance indicators and standards to follow the scientific, systematic, importance, comparable, workable principles, will be independent of individual indicators, according to the organic combination of internal relations together can build a real, scientific, fully reflect the situation of business management performance index and standard system.Establish the right of each performance measure and standard, we need to determine the strategic direction of performance appraisal, assessment methods to strengthen the supervision of the implementation process and final sound of each job objective and reasonable analysis.But also the results of the analysis develop a performance index of each post and standards, the implementation process should pay attention to "two with":(1)Performance evaluation and quality assessment combined.Improve the performance appraisal performance assessment in addition to outside content; there should be quality of the assessment. Performance evaluation can effectively stimulate the employees to complete their duties as required; quality assessment is to promote staff to enhance the overall quality of personal attention and encourage teamwork. A correlation between the role of promotion, so that both businesses and employees have been harmonious development.(2) Focus on the combination of examination and general assessment.Enterprises to settle down after the assessment indicators, but also the establishment in the overall index in the key indicators and general indicators.The impact of large, difficult, related to the business development and strategic objectives, reflecting the importantfunctions of the position indicators, evaluation indicators should be identified as a priority; to little effect, the difficulty small, short period of time to complete, the development of enterprises is not too much contact of the index, to determine the general assessment indicators.Key assessment indicators and general indicators of effective integration of assessment, prioritized, can play a better assessment of its role.2.4 The integrated use of assessment results, effective feedbackWhether the performance appraisal results in a reasonable manner, the effect of the performance appraisal is a vital link.Appropriate use of evaluation results, the implementation of performance appraisal would have a very large role in promoting the role of performance appraisal is also a positive; the other hand, the work will be the effectiveness of performance appraisal would have a huge impact.Therefore, the emphasis on the integrated use of performance evaluation results are very important and necessary.(1)The establishment of the principle of open examination results.Enterprise performance evaluation standards, evaluation procedures and evaluation of the results should be clearly defined, and all staff to encourage employees to participate in public, and in the assessment of these provisions should be strictly observed, so the assessment process transparent and open.In order to make performance appraisal staff have a sense of trust in order to maintain the performance results on the understanding and acceptance.Meanwhile, the results of the assessment must be timely feedback to me, let truly understand and identify with their work the previous period, the two sides can discuss the basis of improved performance possible.In the performance feedback interview, should be noted that two-way communication, to ask less about the problem both diagnosis and counseling, not only talking about the past, but should be based on the future.(2)Promptly after the examination results to communication with staff.The review is not conducted by the evaluation of the main one, which is the main examination, assessment objects, assessment criteria, assessment methods, assessment procedures and other components of the interrelated whole.In the performance evaluation, to follow the principles of communication, and engage in patriarchal system, which allows employees to ask questions, explain the problem and the opportunity to make recommendations, and staff equal to communicate with each other and let everyone participate in the evaluation activities.If there is no performance evaluation indicators for assessment and evaluation based on the specific content of such instructions to staff on the full, and do not give employees the opportunity to participate, it may lead to staff on the assessment results are not ideal, discontented, it is necessary to establish two-way communication mechanism managers and staff work together to develop performance indicators to assess the situation on the completion of analysis and propose an improved method, in order to make people think that performance appraisal is open, fair, employees will be on the evaluation results to understand, accept and improve their own inadequacies.3 ConclusionEnterprise in the implementation of China's current performance appraisal occurswhen different problems are inevitable, it is important to think in the process, find the problem, and a reasonable analysis of the problem and find ways of targeted measures to address these issues.Only a clear analysis of the root of the problem, according to the actual situation of targeted, timely and accurate use of appropriate methods and technical means to do it well performance evaluation, performance appraisal can give full play to enhance the core competitiveness of enterprises in the great role in promoting more effective achievement of corporate strategic objectives, to promote continuous healthy and sustainable development.。
绩效考核ppt课件
考核的方法-1
被比较者1
被比较者2得分 被比较者2
张三
张三
李四 1
王五 1
赵六 0刘七 1Biblioteka 被比 较者2 得分3
李四
0
101 2
王五
00
01 1
赵六
1 11
14
刘七
0 000
0
考核结论:被考核的5名员工按绩效从优至劣次序 为:赵六、张三、李四、王五、刘七。 19
考核的方法-1
优点
准确度高
20 40 60 80 100 20 40 60 80 100 10 20 30 40 50
10 20 30 40 50
10
20
30
40
50 25
考核的方法-3
优点
全面 突出重点
缺点
烦琐 依然是主观评分
26
考核的方法-4
行为观察量表
明确做好工作所需要的行为
有时,为评分目的可以取其相反的行为
人力资源管理
第六章 绩效考核 Performance Appraisal
1
绩效考核(Performance Appraisal)
绩效考核的理论基础 绩效考核的方法 绩效考核体系的设计 绩效反馈
2
绩效考核(Performance Appraisal)
绩效考核的理论基础
3
绩效考核:困难重重
上的客观标准。“具体人”变成“抽象 人”,背离考核初衷。 “永远的先进” 先进成为特殊阶层
13
考核标准有效的八项特征
标准是基于工作而非工作者 标准是可以达到的 标准是为人所知的 标准是经过下上制定的 标准要尽可能具体而且可衡量 标准有时间限制 标准必须有意义 标准是可以改变的
迈瑞绩效考核方法
迈瑞绩效考核方法Performance appraisal is an essential process in any organization as it helps in evaluating the effectiveness of employees. 迈瑞绩效考核是一个至关重要的过程,有助于评估员工的有效性。
It provides a platform for managers to assess the performance of their team members and provide feedback on areas of improvement. 这为经理们提供了一个评估团队成员表现并提供改进意见的平台。
Performance appraisal at Mindray aims to ensure that employees are meeting the company's goals and objectives. 迈瑞的绩效考核旨在确保员工达到公司的目标和目标。
It also helps in identifying top performers and recognizing their contributions to the organization. 它还有助于确定顶尖表现者并认可他们对组织的贡献。
One of the key benefits of performance appraisal at Mindray is that it helps in aligning individual goals with the overall goals of the organization. 迈瑞绩效考核的一个关键好处是它有助于将个人目标与组织的整体目标保持一致。
This alignment ensures that employees are working towards the common objectives of the company, thus increasing productivity and efficiency. 这种一致性确保员工致力于公司的共同目标,进而提高生产力和效率。
Performance appraisal
Performance appraisal application and evaluationExecutive summaryYuan Li is a human resource manager of a Chinese IT company in Beijing. This company has a set of integrated human resource strategies, especially an advanced performance appraisal system. They have used performance appraisal for about five years and developed a well organized system. They do performance appraisal monthly. Every May and November, the performance appraisal may affect individual’s promotion and salary change. They use self-assessments, peer or superiors assessments as well as multi-level and multi-source assessments. The appraisal meeting will be hold after all participants finishing evaluation forms and interviews. Both appraisers and appraisees have to sign their names after the appraisal meeting, which indicates the agreement has been reached. By analysis all of policies and procedures of performance appraisal of Yuan’s company based on related theories, some weaknesses and mistakes have been found. In order to improve the quality of their appraisal, they may modify their aims of appraisal to meet employees’ requirements more, try upward appraisal as one source of 360 degree appraisal, involve other participants to attend appraisal meetings and discuss together to find out whether the employee should be promoted or not. Meanwhile, the company may change monthly reviews to bi-monthly reviews and decide the promotion and salary change in the first month of the second quarter and the forth quarter. Moreover, the company may design some appraisal training, monitoring and measuring programmes to improve effects of performance appraisal.IntroductionYuan Li is a human resource manager of a Chinese IT company in Beijing. This company is an international IT company which has more than 300 employees and owns a set of relative integrated human resource policies. It has a separated human resource department and about 8 people working for this department. At the same time, two experts, who come from a professional human resource management company working for international companies specifically, work at their company for any human resource queries and problems everyday. This company has a series of up-to-date human resource management strategies and operates well. Yuan talked about procedures and policies of performance appraisal of her company during the interview. According to Yuan, they have processed performance appraisalsmoothly for more than five years and do performance appraisal every month currently. They have kept their talents by these policies and achieved more profits for the company. In the interview, Yuan described their policies, procedures and activities of performance appraisal in detail.Policies descriptionPerformance appraisal of this company is processed every month from this year. And it was annual three years ago and quarterly within last three years. There are two aims of appraisal in this company. In terms of individuals, they have chance to find weaknesses and mistakes and inspire themselves to do harder and better. In terms of company, it helps to understand current working status and performance of employees clearly. If mangers find any leak or deficiency by appraisal, they will act to modify immediately. Performance appraisal is linked to salaries, rewards and promotion in this company. However, only May and Novembers’appraisals are directly relative with these three items. Other month’s appraisals, comparatively, are mainly for performance evaluation and documentation. In this company, managers and peers do appraisal for subordinates. Meanwhile, people who are working in other departments or teams and consumers also have responsibilities to do appraisals for employees. It is a 360 degree feedback system. Although peers, internal and external consumers and managers do appraisal together, only managers, HR and financial people have the right to decide any change of salary and promotion. Whereas, financial and HR people do not take part in performance appraisal.Procedures descriptionThe procedures of performance appraisal in this company mainly include three steps:The first step: appraisees and appraisers receive evaluation forms separately from HR people.- For appraisees, it is a self-assessment questionnaire including self work performance evaluation, the scale of company culture understanding, the scale of corporation with other departments and other teams’ members, the development plan and schedule for the future. At the same time, they are also asked to hand in reports and statistics of profits of their work in that month.- Appraisers, comparatively, are superiors of appraisees. If this time’s appraisal is related to promotion or change of salary, internal and external consumers and top managers attend as well. Appraisers receive evaluation forms which focus on the work performance, workattitudes, team work spirits and monthly work reports and statistics and the possibility of future development. If it is an appraisal in May or November, consumers, other department s’collaborators and peers also need to give out their opinions. However, they are only interviewed by HR people or managers.The second step: after finishing evaluation forms and interviews, an appraisal meeting should be prepared. Generally speaking, monthly appraisal meetings include only superiors and subordinates. They will go though both two evaluation forms and communicate the difference. During this process, superiors point out weaknesses, advantages and improvement of subordinates. On the other hand, if subordinates do not agree with superiors’ opinions, they had right to express their own thinking and discuss with their superiors. The purpose of appraisal meeting is to reach the agreement of the performance appraisals. After the meeting, appraisers and appraisees have to sign their names on both two evaluation forms. Moreover, if the appraisal meeting is related with promotion or salary change, top managers will attend as well. Top managers are listeners in the meeting. They usually understand the work performance of appraisees by this meeting and make the final decision with superiors as well as financial and HR people.The final step: about two weeks after appraisal meetings, appraisees will receive formal performance evaluation that record all of conclusions in appraisal meetings. They are evidences for their further development and possibilities of promotion or salary raising. And in May or November’s appraisal, appraisees will receive final decision whether they will be promoted or not or whether their salary will be raised or not.Theoretical conceptsAccording to Boxall and Purcell, “performance appraisal (PA) systems are formal methods of planning and evaluating employees performance which involve employees interviewing (typically annually)” (2003:144). Determining the organization’s objectives is the first steps in developing an effective performance evaluation system (Boice & Kleiner, 1997:197). After that, organizations have to design an appraisal system, which includes sources of performance appraisal, the frequency and documentation of performance appraisal. Moreover, organizations may prepare some training programmes for both appraisers and appraisees and develop some monitoring and measuring programmes for maintenance. It is a standard process of performance appraisal. Based on this standard, policies and procedures of performance appraisal of Yuan’s company will be evaluated in the following parts.Performance appraisal policies and procedures analysisAims of performance appraisalAims clarification is the very first step of PA. Increasing organizational effectiveness and productivity is the overall purpose of performance appraisals (Spinks, Wells & Meche, 1999:94). According to Fletcher, other key aims of appraisal are “making reward decisions, improving performance, motivating staff, succession planning and identifying potential, promoting manager-subordinate dialogue and formal assessment of unsatisfactory performance”(1993:5). The aims of Yuan’s company are helping employees to find weaknesses and mistakes and motivating employees. On the other hand, the company also rely on performance appraisal to understand attitudes and work performance of individuals and make rewards and promotion decision. Actually, performance appraisal should not only work for company, it also works for employees. It means that using performance reviews, company will clearly understand what employees really need, what kinds of training should be provided to employees and whether some extra rewards should give to some special employees? Performance appraisal is not only a tool for organizations to evaluate staff, it also an approach to know how to care staff. In other words, staff can use it to deliver their requirements.Performance appraisal systems designingAppraisal systems designing is a difficult task and easy to bring many problems. To design a good PA system, organizations should clarify participants, the frequency, the documentation and methodology of PA. According to Katsanis and Pitta, there are various sources of performance evaluation. The most frequently used appraisal sources are supervisors, peers and self-evaluation (1999:464). Self-appraisal is main source of PA. Self-appraisal could be defined as “a process in which individuals review their own performance, using a structured approach, as the basis of discussions with their managers in review meetings”(Armstrong, 2000:87). Self-appraisal has numerous advantages, such as engendering more commitment, reducing defensiveness by encouraging the appraisees to review their own performance and encouraging appraisees to think about their own performance and development needs spontaneously (Fletcher, 1993:55). Yuan’s company uses self-appraisal to identify the individual’s performance as well. Even self-review is an effective and advantageous tool for PA, there still is some weakness such as subjectivity and limitation. Therefore, self-appraisal can not be used individually. The other source is peers or superiors appraisal. Under this method, appraisers usually are managers or peers of appraisees. They are in positions to givea unique insight into an individuals’work contribution. Self-appraisals and appraisal by superiors are most usual way to do performance appraisal. In Yuan’s company, these two kinds of source are used in monthly appraisal (except May and November). Other sources of PA are multi-level and multi-source appraisals, in other words, 360 degree appraisal. According to Dalessio, a 360 degree appraisal could be defined as “evaluations gathered about a target participant from two or more rating sources, including self, supervisor, peers, direct reports, internal customers, external customers and vendors or suppliers” (1998:278). Generally speaking, a 360 degree appraisal is more comprehensive, objective, reliable and broader perspective than other sources. However, it also has many disadvantages such as wasting cost and human resource as well as too much bureaucracy. Yuan’s company avoids drawbacks and reinforces advantages of the 360 degree appraisal by doing it only two times per year and only when they need to do final decisions for promotion or salary changes. Whereas, they do not involve vendors and direct reports in the 360 degree appraisal, which made the whole process not complete. Katsanis and Pitta provided several recommendations for performance appraisal system designing, such as gaining support of both human resources and top management; using qualitative versus quantitative criteria; making sure the performance appraisal system is not dated; attempting to eliminate internal boundary spanning by creating direct reporting relationships where possible (1999:465). Although Yuan’s company involve HR people into the final decision stage, they have not really involved into the appraisal process. And top managers only attend the meetings that promotion or salary change will be decided. Moreover, financial people also have rights to decide the promotion and salary change even they totally have no relativity with the performance appraisal. It made the PA process useless for employees and increased the bureaucracy. The good aspects of policies of Yuan’s company are qualitative and quantitative criteria using and keeping systems updated.After collecting feedback from various channels, an appraisal meeting should be hold accordingly. An appraisal meeting “provides an opportunity for a frank, open, but non-threatening discussion about the individual’s performance and development needs; give the individual a chance to discuss her/his aspirations and any work problems and focus the attention of both the individual and the manager on objectives and plans for the future”(Armstrong, 2000:80). Reviews meetings are conclusions for appraisal process and treat get final agreement as the purpose. Appraisees and appraisers are compulsory attendees of appraisal meetings. They should exchange their opinions and feedback about the workperformance of appraisees, discuss every item then get the agreement finally. At the end of the meeting, both appraisees and appraisers should sign their names on the performance appraisal evaluation forms. Yuan’s company have done it well. The meetings often are prepared by managers carefully. During the meeting, the subordinates always receive encourage and suggestion from their superiors. However, they have never involved other source into meetings, such as peers, external and internal customers. Even in May and Novembers’360 degree source appraisal meetings, direct superiors, subordinates and top managers are only attendees. It affects the objectivity and transparency of appraisal meetings.The administration of performance appraisalIn Boxall and Purcells’definition, performance appraisal is typically annual (2003:144). However, Boice and Kleiner thought that “a typical frequency would be bi-monthly or quarterly” (1997:198). They also pointed that frequent appraisals help people remember what happened during the last month, give both managers and employees predictions about any performance problem and help to modify these problems before annual review. Therefore, frequent appraisals make managers ensure that performance appraisals are useful to develop objectives (1997:199). Actually, bi-monthly performance reviews are obviously better than annually reviews since they give staff more motivations, more consciousness and more impetus. Whereas, over-frequent appraisals are unnecessary since they are cost and human resource wasting. At the same time, they will make staff adaptive with the PA and lose motivation. Yuan’s company do performance appraisal monthly, which is a little over-frequent. It will make staff weary and paltered with appraisal.In terms of documentation, a core rule of good documentation is to keep minimum and clear. Usual documents are evaluation forms with signatures, appraisal meeting records and appraisees’ performance statistics. Yuan’s company keep these documents in HR department and file all of them by one person. However, they only keep these documents for one year and documents more than one year are moved to a storehouse. This solution loses confidentiality of appraisal and is difficult to review previous records.Training the participants of performance appraisalAppraisal training will help to develop an effective performance system (Boice & Kleiner, 1997:198). Appraisal training should include following items: agreeing key tasks, setting objectives, agreeing skills, knowledge and capability requirements, reviewing performance ona continuing basis, providing feedback, coaching and counselling, preparing work plans and agreeing personal development plans (Armstrong, 2000:192). Other experts also think linking the system to pay and setting performance standards are objectives of appraisal training as well (Boice & Kleiner, 1997:198). Actually, appraisal training should be provided to both appraisers and appraisees. Although more studies focus on the training of appraisers, appraisees’ training is also important to enhance the effect of performance appraisal. Yuan’s company has not any training programme for performance appraisal. They just write down the instruction on the first page of evaluation forms. There still are lots of skills that participants of performance appraisal should grasp, such as assessment skills, communication skills, and skills of giving feedback, problem solving and motivating skills.Monitoring and measurement of performance appraisalPerformance appraisal process should be monitored and measured to ensure that the whole PA process could be evaluated. There are both short-term and long-term criteria for PA measurement and maintenance. Short-term criteria include completion rate, action generated, quality of written reports, attitudes and the perceived value of appraisal and equity. Long-term criteria include organisational performance, quality of staff, retention of staff and level of commitment (Fletcher, 1993:90-94). These criteria help organizations to evaluate whether their performance appraisal systems are effective or not and how to improve it. Yuan’s company has not any monitoring and measurement programme for the performance appraisal system. It will result in a vicious circle which wrong process induces wrong result or right method is not up-to-date. As a result, the performance appraisal can not bring the expected outcomes at all.Conclusion and recommendationsYuan’s company has a relative integrated performance appraisal system and operates this system well. However, there still are many weaknesses needed to be improved. They have very clear aims but these aims are not complete and objective. They only focus on benefits of the company without caring about staff. They may use performance review to understand what employees really need, what kinds of training should be provided to employees and whether some extra rewards should give to special individuals? In terms of the performance appraisal system, Yuan’s company may keep self-assessment, peer and superiors assessments and multi-source and multi-level assessments. Self-assessment and peer or superiors assessments are used in regular appraisal and 360 degree assessments are used in promotionand salary decision process. Moreover, they may try upward appraisal as one source of 360 degree appraisal. The key contents of upward appraisal are communication skill of superiors, capability of planning out work effectively, inspiring subordinates, never imposing unrealistic objectives and courteousness. Meanwhile, they may try to involve all participants to attend appraisal meetings and discuss together to find out whether the employee should be promoted or not. Moreover, HR and financial people should have no right to make the final decision unless they take part in the performance appraisal process. In terms of frequency, Yuan’s company may change monthly reviews to bi-monthly reviews and decide the promotion and salary change in the first month of the second quarter and the forth quarter. They may keep all of documents as soft copies in their computers to avoid loss and keep confidential. They should add some training programmes for both appraisers and appraisees annually. The training may cover how to finish self-assessment and evaluation forms, how to communicate different opinion, how to provide feedback and how to discuss in the appraisal meetings. They may also add some further topics, such as how to motivate subordinates, how to tell drawbacks to appraisees and how to discuss with superiors to get more rights. And for monitoring and measurement, they may design some short-term and long-term objectives to fulfil by performance appraisal. If the appraisal can not reach the objectives, they have to modify the PA system accordingly. They may assign a HR people to monitor the whole appraisal process to find mistakes or weaknesses, then HR department may held a meeting to resolve all these problems to improve their appraisal system.References1, Armstrong, M 2000, Performance management 2nd ed., Kogan Page Limited, UK.2, Boice, D F & Kleiner, B H 1997, Designing effective performance appraisal systems, Work Study, Vol.46, No.6, pp. 197-201.3, Boxall, P & Purcell, J 2003, Strategy and human resource management, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.4, Dalessio, A T 1998, Using multisource feedback for employee development and personnel decisions, in Smither, J, W (ed.), Performance Appraisal: state of the art in practice, Jossey-Bass Inc., California.5, Fletcher, C 1993, Appraisal: routes to improved performance, Institute of Personnel Management, IPM house, Camp Road, Wimbledon.6, Katsanis, L P & Pitta, D A 1999, The performance appraisal process of pharmaceutical product managers in Canada: an empirical study, Journal of Product & Brand Management, Vol.8, No. 6, pp. 463-493.7, Spinks, N, Wells, B & Meche, M 1999, Appraising the appraisals: computerized performance appraisal systems, Career Development International, Vol.4, No.2, pp.94-100.。
绩效考核用英语怎么说
绩效考核用英语怎么说引言在职场中,绩效考核是一项十分重要的工作。
通过对工作绩效进行评估和量化,能够有效地衡量员工的工作能力和表现。
然而,对于学英语的人来说,绩效考核用英语怎么说可能是一个常见的疑问。
本文将为大家介绍一些常用的表达方式。
正文以下是几个与绩效考核相关的常用英语表达:1.Performance Appraisal–绩效评估–例句:The company conducts performance appraisalsannually to assess employee performance.2.Performance Evaluation–绩效评估–例句:The performance evaluation process includes setting goals, providing feedback, and assessing performance.3.Performance Assessment–绩效评估–例句:The manager conducted a performance assessment to determine individual contributions to the project.4.Performance Review–绩效评审–例句:The performance review meeting allows for open discussion and feedback between the employee and the manager.5.Performance Management–绩效管理–例句:Effective performance management involves setting clear goals, providing regular feedback, and recognizing achievements.6.Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)–关键绩效指标–例句:The company uses key performance indicators to measure and track performance against specific goals.7.Performance Metrics–绩效指标–例句:The HR department collects performance metrics to analyze individual and team performance.8.Performance Improvement Plan (PIP)–绩效改进计划–例句:The employee was placed on a performanceimprovement plan to help them meet performance expectations.以上是一些常用的与绩效考核相关的英语表达,通过这些词汇的运用,你可以更流利地讨论绩效考核的话题。
毕博管理咨询工具PerformanceAppraisalFormChinese
绩效评估PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL 姓名NAME:职位POSITION:经理MANAGER:部门DIVISION:评估日期APPRAISAL DATE:时间TIME:综述OVERVIEW绩效评估的目的在于向管理人员提供就员工的工作表现提出反馈意见的机缘。
The aim of the performance appraisal is to allow the manager the opportunity to provide feedback to the team member on how they are performing.评估能够帮忙员工明确自身的优缺点,使员工培育必要的技术,在企业中取得不断地进展。
This appraisal will assist the team member to identify his/her strengths and weaknesses, which will allow the team member, to develop the necessary skills in order to grow and advance within the business.评估有三个环节,即员工自身、直属领导及同事。
这有助于开辟一个公开沟通的渠道,并培育员工间的彼此信赖。
This appraisal has been designed to create a three between managers, the team member and their peers. This encourages open communication channels and builds trust within a team.说明INSTRUCTIONS绩效评估由三种类型的人员完成。
这有助于管理人员与员工取得一个全面的信息,为下一步的行动提供一个良好的基础。
英语作文-绩效考核审批
英语作文-绩效考核审批Performance Appraisal Approval Process。
Performance appraisal is a critical process in any organization, serving as a cornerstone for assessing employee contributions, setting expectations, and facilitating career development. This document outlines the procedures and considerations involved in approving performance appraisals within our company.Purpose of Performance Appraisal。
Performance appraisal aims to evaluate individual job performance against predefined goals and competencies. It provides a structured approach for recognizing achievements, identifying areas for improvement, and aligning employee efforts with organizational objectives. By conducting fair and objective assessments, we foster a culture of accountability and continuous growth.Initiating the Appraisal。
The performance appraisal process begins with the employee and their immediate supervisor. Both parties engage in a dialogue to review job responsibilities, performance expectations, and any relevant metrics or KPIs established at the beginning of the appraisal period. This initial discussion sets the foundation for evaluating the employee's contributions and achievements over the specified timeframe.Documentation and Evidence Gathering。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
CHAPTER SEVEN: PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL第七章绩效考评CHAPTER OBJECTIVES本章目标第一节绩效考评概述AN BRIEF INTRODUCTON TO PERFORMANCEAPPRAISAL1. The Significance of Performance Appraisal2. Roles (作用) of Performance Appraisal3. Principle of Performance Appraisal4. Who Performance AppraisalPERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROCESS第二节绩效考评的过程1. Preparation: To establish the criteria and standardfor each position2. Conducting Performance Appraisal3.To Coach (辅导阶段)4.To improveTYPES OF APPRAISAL INSTRUMENTS第三节绩效考评的方法1.Alternation Ranking Scale2.Forced Distribution Method.(强制分布法)3.Paired comparison Method(配对比较法)4.GRAPHIC RATING SCALES(量表法)5.BEHAVIORALLY ANCHORED RATING SCALES(行为锚定法)6.Critical Incident Method(关键事件法)7.MANAGEMENT-BY-OBJECTIVES(目标管理法)FEEDBACK INTERVIEW第四节绩效考评的面谈EXERCISES作业Reference参考文献CHAPTER OBJECTIVES(本章目标)After you learn this chapter, you should be able to:1. To cite the various objectives of performance appraisal.2. To identify the basic consideration in selecting standards for appraisal3. To identify and discuss the major performance appraisal method.4. To identify the different approaches to performance appraisal interview.5.To describe the types of errors those are commonly found in performance appraisalAN BRIEF INTRODUCTON TO PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL (第一节绩效考评概述)CASE:“ Why did Zhang jump ship?”After graduated from the college, Zhang was recruited to be a salesman in Company Z .In the first two years, his performance was not so satisfactory because of lacking experience. But at the end of the third year, His performance was greatly improved.Last year, Zhang did a very good job, and he accomplished his sale-volume at the end of September. But the sales manager didn’t show any response to it, so Zhang felt quite disappointed. Zhang left the company in October since the company had no formal appraisal system. In the Company z, an HR professional appraised employees only based on informal conversations between the HR professional and the employees’ supervisor. This system yields no information regarding employee strengths and weaknesses. To make matter worse, this system provided no information regarding company expectation, leaving the employees in the dark as to what they needed to do to achieve favorable performance.In this chapter we turn to discuss performance appraisal programs, which are among the most helpful tools an organization can use to maintain and enhance competitive advantage and facilitate progress toward organization goals.Performance appraisal (绩效评估) refers to a formal, structured system for measuring, evaluating, an employee’s job-related attributes, behavior, and outcomes.1. The Significance of Performance AppraisalIt may understand at first glance that performance appraisals are used for evaluating who is doing a good job and who is doing a bad one. The significance of performance appraisals can be reviewed from the point of employees as well as the organization’s. The following are just a sample of those significance.For Employees a. Understand more clearly about their own duties, tasks and requirements.b. Understand more about what the organization expects from them and their future goals for achieving high performance.c. Employees who are performing well can receive formal recognition (认可)for their performance.d. To provide Employees with the opportunity to participate in performance appraisal.For Organizationa. To provide the supervisor with a means of identifying the strengths and weaknesses of an employe e’s performance.b. To provide a format enabling managers and employees to jointly establish future development and growth plan for the employees.c. To establish a communication channel between managers and employees.d. To express what managers wish to expect from employees.2. Roles (作用) of Performance AppraisalIn HRM activities, a lot decisions have to be based on performance appraisal process, which implies that performance appraisal provides input into all aspects of HRM. The interrelationship between the performance appraisal function and other major HR functions is shown in following Figure:Training: It can determined which employee needs more training and what should be trained (培训内容)b. Administrative decisions: It helps the organization to decide who should be receive pay raises, promoted, laid off, transferred.c. Rewards: It provides basis for judging Pay System (薪酬制度) and pay adjustment.d. Motivation: It encourages initiative, develops a sense of responsibilities, and stimulates efforts to perform better.e. HR planning: Performance appraisal data can also be used in HR planning, in determining the relative worth of jobs under a job evaluation program.f. Selection: It can be used to validate selection tool such as a testing program.3. Principle of Performance Appraisala. Transparency (透明):A supervisor should communicate appraisal criteria (评估项目)or dimension, appraisal procedures, results openly with employees.b. Objectiveness(客观): Employees’ outcome must be assessed by supervisors fairly without inserting their own Likes or dislikes.c. Practical(实用): The appraisal scheme should be simple but practical.d. Training(培训): Supervisor should be trained how to apply appraisal standards, when making judgments.e. Clear performance standards: It must be so clear that employees know exactly when the company expects of them,f. Relented: Appraisal form must exclude criteria that are irrelevant to job performance.g. Difference (差别化): The result of appraisal must be able to reflect the difference between high and low performers.4. Who Performance Appraisala. Appraisal by supervisor (主管评估) The superior knows the subordinate’sperformance better. He knows his ability and behaviors and attitude. However, appraisal by supervisor has drawbacks. Supervisor appraisal has been the traditional approach to evaluating an employee’s performance. Supervisor has the power to reward and pu nish.b. Peer Appraisals (同事评估) Some companies use it to replace or supplement the appraisal given by supervisor. The co-worker who is at an individual’s side all day has an excellent opportunity to observe the individual’s behavior and even can observe the o ther facets of the employee’s behavior that his supervisor can not because employees often be have differently when the boss is present.c. Self-Appraisal (自评)A worker knows clearly what he has done. Self-appraisal can reduce the defensive of the employee and make the employee to evaluate his performance with his responsibility.d. Subordinate Appraisal(下属评价)Subordinates are in a good position to evaluate their managers since they are in frequent contact with many performance-related behaviors. Those performance dimensions judged most appropriate for subordinate appraisals include leadership, oral communication, delegation of authority, coordination of team efforts, and interest in subordinates.e. Customers (客户评估) Some companies like restaurants will ask the customers to assess their employees’ performance.E. 360-Degree Feedback(360度评估)Performance information is collected all round an employee, from his or her supervisors, subordinates, peers, and internal or external customers; this approach is increasingly popular. It is generally used for management and career development.PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROCESS(第二节绩效考评的过程)1. Preparation: To establish the criteria and standard for each positiona.Types of Performance Criteria (考评项目)Criteria are dimensions against which the performance of an employee team or a work unit is evaluated.Trait-based criteria: They focus on the personal moral character, value and work attitude such as team-sprit, locality, initiative or creativity of an employee.Behaviour-based criteria: They focus on how the work is performed. With behaviour clearly defined, an employee is more likely to exhibit the acts that lead to peak performance. Behaviour is difficult to be measured in figures or amounts. As a matter of fact, an organization generally uses frequency to describe the employee s’ behavior.Outcome-based criteria: They focus on what was produced rather than on how it was produced. (focus on output and contribution which can be reflected in quality, quantity, efficiency). This kind of criteria can be easily measured. It doesn’t c are how the result achieved. Aresult-at-all-cost may plague outcome-based appraisal.Unfortunately, when used alone, any one of these performance criteria is deficient for accurately evaluating performance. Thus, many organizations use several criteria in making judgments about an employee’s performance.Realistic, measurable, clearly understood performance standards benefit both the organization and the employee. It is important to establish standards before the work is performed so that all involved will understand the level of accomplishment expected.b.To set performance standard Ensure that the targets set are in the smart model.Specific means that they are transparent and not open to dispute.Targets should be measurable so that all sides can agree when they are achieved or not. Thirdly, Targets should be agreed and achievable. If employees disagree with the target because they find them too difficult to achieve, then they may set out to prove this by determining to fail.Fourthly, targets should be realistic and relevant, which makes them more attractive to all parties. Finally, they should be time-related, so that it is clear at what point they should be achieved.An organization may use three approaches to performance evaluations. The first evaluates employees against preestablished common criteria or standards, similar to the way many professors evaluate students’ performance.The second evaluation approach is based on individualized performance criteria and standards. Performance goals for each individual are derived from the overall departme nt’s performance requirements for a specified period. Each employee may have unique performance goals (criteria and standards), and each employee is evaluated on the basis of how well he or she meets those goals.A third evaluation approach entails rankin g one employee’s performance against the performance of other employees.2. Conducting Performance AppraisalAfter an appraisal system is designed, must be properly implemented. Managers are chiefly responsible for implementation; they must complete the real ratings for employees and provide feedback to employees.One of the key objectives of feedback is to improve employee performance by giving them constructive criticism, when necessary, to make them aware of their shortcomings.3.To Coach (辅导阶段)After completing performance Appraisal, some employees’ result may turn out to be comparatively dissatisfactory which may be resulted from lacking knowledge or skills. In reality, it is supervisor’s responsibility to establish a performan ce improvement plan as follows.4.To improveThe supervisor must evaluate whether the employees have improved their outcome or not after caring out the plan for some time.TYPES OF APPRAISAL INSTRUMENTS(第三节绩效考评的方法)1.Alternation Ranking ScaleFor the trait you are measuring, list all the employees you want to rank. Put the highest-rankingemployee’s name on line 1. Put the lowest-ranking employee’s mane on line 10. Then list the next highest ranking on line 2, the next lowest ranking on ling 9, and so on Continue all names are on the scale.Highest-ranking employeeLowest –ranking employee2..Forced Distribution Method.(强制分布法)The forced distribution method is similar to grading on a curve. With this method, predetermined percentages of rates are placed in performance categories. For example, you may decide to distribute employees as follows:5% high performers20% high-average performers50% average performers20% low-average performers5% low performers3..Paired comparison Method(配对比较法)The paired comparison method helps make the ranking method more precise. For every trait (quantity of work, quality o f work, and so on), every subordinate is paired with and compared to4.GRAPHIC RATING SCALES(量表法)A graphic rating scale (GRS) presents a list of traits (e.g., cooperativeness, adaptability, maturity,motivation). Each trait is accompanied by a five or seven-point rating scale. The points along the scale are defined by numbers and/or descriptive words or phrases that indicate the level of performance.Many organizations use graphic rating scales because they are practical and cost little to develop. But Graphic rating scales do present a number of problems. Such scales do not effectively direct behavior; that is, the rating scale does not clearly indicate what a person must do to achieve a given rating. Another problem with GRS is the points on the rating scale are not clearly defined. An example of GRS is showed as followsEvaluate the worker on each quality using the following ratting scale:5=Outstanding; one of the best workers you have known4=Good; meets all job standards; exceeds some3=Adequate; meets all job standards2=Needs improvement; needs improvement in some way1=Unsatisfactory; not acceptableA. Dress and appearanceB. Self-confidenceC. DependabilityD. Tact and diplomacyE. AttitudeF. CooperationG. EnthusiasmH. Knowledge1_________2________3________4________5_________1_________2________3________4________5_________1_________2________3________4________5_________1_________2________3________4________5_________1_________2________3________4________5_________1_________2________3________4________5_________1_________2________3________4________5_________1_________2________3________4________5_________5.BEHAVIORALLY ANCHORED RATING SCALES(行为锚定法)A behaviorally anchored rating scale (BARS), is a combination of a graphic rating scale, and Critical Incident Method. It requires appraisers to rate employees on their traits. The typical BARS includes seven or eight traits, referred to as “dimensions,” each anchored by a seven-or nine-point scale.6.Critical Incident Method(关键事件法)With the critical incident method, the supervisor keeps a record good or bad or so, the supervisor and subordinate meet and discuss the latter’s performance using the specific incidents as examples.This method has several advantages. It provides you with specific hard example true facts of good and poor performance for explaining the appraisal. A BARS anchors each trait with examples of specific job behaviors that reflect varying levels of performance. An example is shown in Exhibit below.DIMENSION: CLASSROOM TEACHICG SKILLSOutstanding7 ·The instructor answers students questions in a clear, concise, and accurate manner.6 ·The instructor uses examples when trying to emphasize a point.54 ·The instructor exhibits a number of annoying habits when lecturing.3 ·The instructor singles out students in class for unreasonable criticism.2Extremely Poor 1The greatest strength of BARS is to let employees know what types of behaviors are expected of them and gives appraisers the opportunity to provide behaviorally based feedback.The failure of BARS may lie in the difficulty raters experience when trying to select the one behavior on the scale that is most indicative of the employees performance level. Sometimes an employee may exhibit behaviors at both ends of the scale, so the rater would not know which rating to assign.7.MANAGEMENT-BY-OBJECTIVES(目标管理法)Management-by-objectives (MBO) is a management system designed to achieve organizational effectiveness by steering each empl oyees behavior toward the organization’s mission. The MBO process includes goal setting, planning, and evaluation.GOAL SETTING Goal setting starts at the top of the organization. The goal then cascades down through the organizational hierarchy to the level of the individual employee.In most instances individual goals are mutually set by employees and their supervisors, at which time mine how goal attainment will be measured. As will as to identify potential obstacles to reaching goals and devise strategies to overcome these obstacles.EVALUATION In the final phase, the employee’s success at meeting goals is evaluated against the agreed-on performance standards.MBO lets people know what is expected of them so that they can spend their time and energy in ways that maximize the attainment of important organizational objectives.But MBO presents several potential problems, it does not specify the behaviors required to reach them. This may be a problem for some employees, especially new ones.MBO also tends to focus on short-term goals.The successful achievement of MBO goals may be partly affect by some factors which are outside the worker’s control.Common appraisal problemHalo Effect :It means that the rating of a subordinate on one trait influences the way the person is rated on other traits. Managers may rate employees on the basis of their personal relationships rather than by an objective measure of their competencies and abilities.Central Tendency :It refers to a tendency to rate all employees above average.Leniency or Strictness: Some supervisors tend to rate all subordinates consistently high or low Recency Error: Some supervisors tend to be too influenced by an event that happened a few days or weeks ago that is fresh in their mind.Bias :It refers to the tendency to allow individual differences such as age, race, and sex to affect the appraisal rating employees receive.FEEDBACK INTERVIEW (第四节绩效考评的面谈)Before the InterviewAdequate preparation, including giving notice, reviewing the job description and choosing the right place.During the InterviewListen and questionConcentrate on performance not personalityBe specific about specificDon’t impose your ideasDon’t be instructiveAfter the InterviewMonitor progressFollow-up any issuesEXERCISES (作业)QURSTION1.. What is meant by the term “relevance” in the context of performance appraisal? And what canan organization do to ensure its rating instruments are relevant?2. What are some of the causes of inaccurate ratings? How can ratings be made more accurate?3. Why are graphic rating scales so frequently used? What are major problems associated with their use?4. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages associated with the use of MBO as a performance appraisal technique.5. Why are peer ratings sometimes used to supplement supervisory ratings? What are some problems associated with their use?6. What steps can an organization take to help ensure that its appraisal system is a fair one?7.What sources could be used to evaluate the performance of people working in the following jobsa. Taxi driverb. GMc. HR Managerd. Lathe operatorA spokesperson for each group should present the group’s responses.8.Suppose you are the HR manager of Foshan University, how you should develop a performance appraisal system for teachers. Please follow the steps as below■ Gain support for system: gain support of President and seek employee input when developing the system■ Develop rating instruments: instrument o f choice depends on practicality, cost, and the nature of jobs being evaluated■ Chose raters: supervisors, peers, self, and 360-degree feedback■ Determine when appraisals will be given■ Include safeguards to ensure fairness: should include an u pper-management review and an appeals system,A spokesperson for each group should present the group’s responses.CASE STUDY华夏银行商业信贷部的绩效评估华夏银行商业信贷部总共有4名出纳员,其中一名是资深出纳员马丽,部门主管张岚负责信贷部的工作,已经有3年了。