全球化利与弊英语辩论搞

文化多样性的减少

一、全球化会抹平社会间的多样性，但会增加社会内部的多样性。因为人们可供选择的菜单增加了。想想哪个更重要。

二、多样性是一个悖论。全球化确实会使某些局部上的多样性减少。太多的知识会限制我们的创造力。某种程度的隔绝可以将自信和某种魔术感注入到艺术中。这种局部多样性的减少又意味着人们可供选择的菜单的减少。

三、这是一个“度”的问题。

First, globalization will smooth out the diversity among the community, but will increase the diversity within society. Because people increased choice of menu. Think about which is more important.

Second, diversity is a paradox. Globalization does make some partial reduction of diversity. Too much knowledge will limit our creati vity. Some degree of isolation can inject a sense of confidence and a certain magic to the art. This diversity of local people to reduce the mean reduction in choice of menu.

Third, this is a "degree" of the problem.

文化既是民族的，又是世界的

各民族都有自己文化的个性和特征。

各民族文化都是世界文化中不可缺少

Culture is national, but also the world's

All ethnic groups have their own culture and personality characteristics.

The national culture is indispensable to world culture

全球化导致贫富差距的扩大

全球化无疑促进了世界经济的整体成长，但全球经济利益的分配却是不成比例的。一小撮国家及跨国公司垄断游戏规则并掌控着世界市场。跨国公司是经济全球化的重要动力，全球100个最大经济体中，竟然有51个是跨国公司。（2000年数据）而绝大多数跨国公司来源于发达国家。可见，由国民财富体现的国家权力差距依然是巨大的。在经济总量上，没有几个国家有望挑战中等甚至较小的工业化国家。第三世界即使保持高速发展势头，可绝对差距如此之大，在可预见的将来也不大可能会消除。

Globalization undoubtedly contributed to the overall growth of the world economy, the global distribution of economic interests is disproportionate. A handful of national and multinational monopolies rules of the game and control the world market. Multinational corporations are an important driving force of economic globalization, the world's 100 largest economies, and yet there are 51 multinational companies. (2000 data) and the vast majority of multinational companies from developed countries. Seen by the state power embodied in national wealth gap is still huge. In economic output, few countries are expected to challenge the middle or even smaller industrialized countries. Even the third world to maintain the momentum of rapid development, the absolute gap can be so large that in the foreseeable future is unlikely to be eliminated.

目前，有关人士都宣扬经济全球化对发达国家“危害论”。然而，对世界经济和国际体系影

响更大的却是全球化扩大了国家间的不平等。第一，过去积累下来的国家间不平等现象非但没有因全球化而消除或减缓，反而日益扩大。许多因素表明，第三波全球化与世界经济中的马太效应有着内在联系。第二，目前缺乏一个进行有效全球治理的机构及其法律。由于全球化促使技术愈来愈复杂化，发达国家和发展中国家之间的科技差距进一步扩大。全球化对单个发展中国家可能是有益的，印度、中国和墨西哥经济迅猛发展就是例证，这些国家庞大的贫困人口数量大幅降低。

At present, the persons concerned are to promote economic globalization on developed countries' damage theory. "However, the world economy and the greater impact of the international system is globalization has increased inequality between countries. First, the past accumulated inequalities between countries not only failed to eliminate or mitigate a result of globalization, but growing. Many factors indicate that the third wave of globalization and world economy are intrinsically linked to Matthew. Second, the current lack of a effective global governance institutions and their laws. As globalization increasingly complex to promote technology, science and technology between developed and developing countries to further expand the gap. Globalization may be useful for individual developing country, India, China and Mexico as evidenced by rapid economic development, poverty in these countries a large number of significantly reduced.

全球化导致发达国家对发展中国家的资源掠夺

高收入国家人口只占全球人口的15%左右,其本土生物承载力是全球28%,但却消耗了全球55%的生物承载力。这是如何实现的呢？毕竟,过去几十年中第三世界国家中民族独立运动取得了极大的成就,西方不能再像从前那样赤裸裸从殖民地掠夺廉价的原材料。可是,政治独立了,经济上的独立依然还是遥遥无期。在全球化国际分工下，第三世界国家依然处在全球产业链的最底端,为发达国家的过度消费提供着廉价的资源和劳动力。如果没有便宜得让人心痛的中国制造，没有许多第三世界国家同样廉价得惊人的农产品(中南美诸多香蕉共和国就是最好的一例)，美国欧洲的人们是不可能在如此高消费的情况下同时享受山清水秀的。Population of high-income countries account for only about 15% of the world's population, their home is the world's biological capacity by 28% but 55% of global consumption of biocapacity. This is how to achieve it? After all, the past few decades in the third world countries national independence movement has made great achievements in the West can no longer be business as usual, naked from the colonial exploitation of cheap raw materials. However, political independence, economic independence they are still nowhere in sight. International division of labor under globalization, third world countries are still at the bottom of the global industrial chain, excessive consumption in developed countries to provide the resources and cheap labor. If you do not have the heartbreak of cheap Chinese-made, not many Third World countries also surprisingly cheap agricultural products (many Central and South American banana republic is the best example), the United States in Europe people are not in such a case of high consumption while enjoying the beautiful.一位来自菲律宾的原住民领袖曾一针见血地指出,”所谓经济全球化,不过是殖民主义的最新表现形式。”过去的殖民是直接的掠夺,殖民者不得不直接面对被殖民者的不满和反抗; 现在