美国胸科医师协会第九版抗栓治疗及血栓预防指南静脉血栓栓塞性疾病最新进展

合集下载

ACCP新指南并非所有患者适用DVT预防

ACCP新指南:并非所有患者适用DVT预防美国胸科医师学会（ACCP）最新指南《抗栓治疗和血栓形成预防临床实践指南（第9版）》推荐，决定使用或不使用深静脉血栓（DVT）和静脉血栓栓塞（VTE）预防性治疗时要考虑个别患者血栓形成风险。

该指南对患者风险进行分类，这提示临床医师在进行预防性治疗前应考虑患者DVT/VTE风险。

长途旅行的DVT/VTE风险因素研究虽然大多数患者不易出现旅行相关性深静脉血栓形成/静脉血栓栓塞，但指南支出，长途航班后，几种因素可能会增加个体DVT/VTE风险，包括既往DVT/VTE或已知的血栓形成性疾病；恶性肿瘤；近期手术或创伤;不活动；使用雌激素或怀孕；坐在靠窗的座位。

由于旅客的旅游相关性DVT / VTE风险升高，该指南建议应经常行走，拉伸小腿肌肉，如果可能的话坐在靠过道的座位，或使用膝盖下渐进性压力弹性袜即静脉曲张袜。

相反，该指南建议称，尚无确切证据显示脱水，饮酒，或坐经济舱可增加长途飞行对患者造成的DVT / VTE风险。

阿司匹林及新疗法预防DVT / VTE该指南还还对提出了有关使用新疗法或潜在疗法用于DVT / VTE预防和治疗的建议。

虽然阿司匹林用于DVT/VTE预防并不是什么新方法，但以前的ACCP指南反对在任何手术人群中使用阿司匹林单药进行预防性治疗。

最新版的治疗指南中，ACCP已对此进行了修订，并表示在大多数矫形手术中，阿司匹林也是预防DVT/VTE的一种选择，尽管其不是首选药物。

抗栓指南的创新《抗栓治疗和血栓形成预防临床实践指南（第9版）》包括显著影响血栓形成的预防，诊断和治疗的600多条建议的创新。

两个关键的进步是更加明确和定量的考虑对患者重要的指标和预后限定因素。

后者的创新引起血栓形成预防中对机体指标不同的解释，而以前曾重点监测无症状血栓。

资料来源：New Guidelines Suggest DVT Prophylaxis not Appropriate for All Patients.美国胸科医师学会，2012/02/07全文：New Guidelines Suggest DVT Prophylaxis not Appropriate for All PatientsArticle | 02.07.12(NORTHBROOK, IL, FEBRUARY 7, 2012) — New evidence-based guidelines from the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) recommend considering individual patients’risk of thrombosis when deciding for or against the use of preventive therapies for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and venous thromboembolism (VTE). Specifically, the Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines, published in the February issue of the journal CHEST, focus on risk stratification of patients, suggesting clinicians should consider a patient’s risk for DVT/VTE and risk for bleeding before administering or prescribing a prevention therapy.“There has been a significant push in health care to administer DVT prevention for every patient, regardless of risk. As a result, many patients are receiving unnecessary therapies that provide little benefit and could have adverse effects,”said Guidelines Panel Chair Gordon Guyatt, MD, FCCP, Department of Medicine, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. “The decision to administer DVT prevention therapy should be based on the patients’risk and the benefits of prevention or treatment.” To address this, the ACCP guidelines provide comprehensive risk stratification recommendations for most major clinical areas, including medical, nonorthopedic surgery, orthopedic surgery, pregnancy, cardiovascular disease, atrial fibrillation, stroke, pediatrics, and long-distance travel.DVT/VTE Risk Factors for Long-distance TravelAlthough developing a travel-related DVT/VTE is unlikely in most cases, the guidelines note that for long-distance flights, several factors may increase an individual’s risk of developing a DVT/VTE, including previous DVT/VTE or known thrombophilic disorder; malignancy; recent surgery or trauma; immobility; estrogen use or pregnancy; and sitting in a window seat. For travelers with an increased risk for travel-related DVT/VTE, the guidelines recommend frequent ambulation, calf muscle stretching, sitting in an aisle seat if possible, or the use of below-knee graduated compression stockings. Conversely, the guidelines suggest there is no definitive evidence to support that dehydration, alcohol intake, or sitting in economy class increases a patient’s risk for developing a DVT/VTE resulting from long-distance flights. Aspirin and New Therapies for DVT/VTE PreventionThe guidelines also provide recommendations related to the use of new or potential therapies for the prevention and treatment of DVT/VTE. Although aspirin is not a new therapy for the prevention of DVT/VTE, previous ACCP guidelines recommended against using aspirin as the single agent for prophylaxis in any surgical population. In the current edition, the ACCP has revised this recommendation and indicates aspirin is an option—although not typically the agent of choice—for the prevention of DVT/VTE in major orthopedic surgery.“Although we are not recommending aspirin as the optimal DVT/VTE prophylaxis, we have reviewed the existing evidence and concluded that aspirin is an acceptable option in some instances where preventive therapy is needed,”said guideline co-author Mark Crowther, MD, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. In regard to new oral anticoagulants, guideline authors recognize the recent clinical trials of apixaban and rivaroxaban, both direct factor Xa inhibitors, and dabigatran etexilate, a direct thrombin inhibitor, and offer recommendations for the new agents for select clinical conditions, including atrial fibrillation and orthopedic surgery.Innovations in Antithrombotic GuidelinesThe Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines include innovations that have significantly impacted the more than 600 recommendations for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of thrombosis. Two key advances are the more explicit and quantitative consideration of patient values and preferences and restriction of outcomes to only those deemed to be important for the patient. The latter innovation results in different interpretation of the body of evidence in thrombosis prevention that has previously focused on the detection of asymptomatic thrombosis by surveillance methods.Guideline authors also took a more critical look at the overall process of guideline development, providing more methodologically sophisticated scrutiny of all available evidence. “The evidence review for the new guidelines was more rigorous than ever before, and our method for grading research studies has become even more stringent,”said guideline co-author David Gutterman, MD, FCCP, ACCP Immediate Past President, Cardiovascular Research Center, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. “We believe that the objective rigorous application of the science of guideline development will ultimately best serve our patients.”The guidelines are endorsed by the following medical associations: the American Association for Clinical Chemistry, American College of Clinical Pharmacy, American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, American Society of Hematology, International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis, and the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (pregnancy article only).For more information about the guidelines and accompanying clinician resources, visit and follow #AT9 on Twitter. Patient resources related to the guidelines are available through OneBreath®, an initiative of The CHEST Foundation, the philanthropic arm of the ACCP.About the American College of Chest PhysiciansThe ACCP represents 18,400 members who provide patient care in the areas of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine in the United States and more than 100 countries throughout the world. The mission of the ACCP is to promote the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of chest diseases through education, communication, and research. CHEST is the official peer-reviewed publication of the ACCP. More than 30,000 readers worldwide turn to CHEST in print and 400,000 people view CHEST online each month for the latest in chest-related medicine. For more information about the ACCP, visit or follow the ACCP via social media at /accpchest and @accpchest.。

ACCP9美国胸科医师协会抗栓与血栓预防指南

7.1 对于无症状血栓形成者（不包括既往VTE史）我们不推荐长期每天使用器械或药物进行血栓预防（推荐级别：1C 级）。
3.6.1. 对于接受腹腔-盆腔普通外科手术、且VTE发生风险极低（<0.5%；Rogers评分，<7；Caprini评分，0 ）的患者，除尽早下床活动外，我们不推荐给予特殊的药物（1B级）或机械（2C级）性预防措施。 3.6.2. 对于接受腹腔-盆腔普通外科手术、且VTE发生风险较低（～1.5%；Rogers评分，7-10； Caprini评分，1-2 ）的患者，我们建议给予机械预防措施，首选间歇充气加压（IPC ），优于不给予预防（2C级）。
2.2 对于接受骨科大手术（THA 、TKA 、HFS）且接受LMWH作为药物预防措施的患者，我们建议在术前 12小时或以上开始用药，或在术后12小时或以上开始用药，而不是在术前4小时内或术后4小时内（1B 级）。 2.3.1. 对于接受THA或TKA手术的患者，不论是否同时使用IPCD或治疗时间多长，我们建议优先选用 LMWH，可选其他替代方法：磺达肝癸钠、阿哌沙班、达比加群、利伐沙班、 LDUH （均为2B级）、调整剂量VKA或阿司匹林（均为2C级）。
2.7. 对于接受大型骨科手术且拒绝或不配合药物注射或使用IPCD的患者，我们建议使用阿哌沙班或达比加群（如果没有阿哌沙班或达比加群，可以用利伐沙班或剂量调整VKA代替），而不是其他形式的预防措施（均为1B级）。 2.8. 对于接受大型骨科手术伴出血风险升高或对于药物和机械抗栓预防都有禁忌症的患者，我们不建议植入下腔静脉过滤器（IVC）作为初级预防（2C 级）。。
4.2.1 对于无其他VTE 危险因素的门诊肿瘤患者，不建议使用低分子量肝素（LMWH）或低剂量普通肝素（LDUH）进行血栓预防（推荐级别：2B 级），也不推荐预防性使用维生素 K 拮抗剂（推荐级别： 1B 级）。

最新ACCP-9抗栓治疗和预防指南英文全文版

DOI 10.1378/chest.1412S3 2012;141;7S-47S ChestPhysicians Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis Panel Holger J. Schuünemann and for the American College of ChestGordon H. Guyatt, Elie A. Akl, Mark Crowther, David D. Gutterman,Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelinesed: American College of Chest Physicians Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th Executive Summary : Antithrombotic/content/141/2_suppl/7S.full.html services can be found online on the World Wide Web at:The online version of this article, along with updated information and7S.DC1.html/content/suppl/2012/02/06/141.2_suppl.Supplemental material related to this article is available at:ISSN:0012-3692)/site/misc/reprints.xhtml (written permission of the copyright holder.this article or PDF may be reproduced or distributed without the prior Dundee Road, Northbrook, IL 60062. All rights reserved. No part of Copyright2012by the American College of Chest Physicians, 3300Physicians. It has been published monthly since 1935.is the official journal of the American College of Chest ChestCHEST / 141 / 2 / FEBRUARY , 2012 SUPPLEMENT 7ST he eighth iteration of the American College of Chest Physicians Antithrombotic Guidelines pre-sented, in a paper version, a narrative evidence sum-mary and rationale for the recommendations, a small number of evidence proﬁ les summarizing bodies ofevidence, and some articles with quite extensivesummary tables of primary studies. In total, this represented 600 recommendations summarized in 968 pages of text. Many readers responded that the result was too voluminous for their liking or prac-tical use. C ognizant of this feedback, we worked hard to minimize the length of the text for the ninth iteration of the guidelines Antithrombotic Therapy and Pre-vention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (AT9) without sacriﬁ cing key content. A number of topic editors found our shortening edits draconian, but we were determined to produce the leanest product possible.T here were, however, a number of obstacles. In what we believe is a key advance in AT9, we con-ducted a systematic review of what is known about patients’ values and preferences regarding antithrom-botic therapy and included the results as an article in AT9. In another forward step, we recognized the problems with asymptomatic thrombosis as a surro-gate outcome, and devised strategies to estimate reductions in symptomatic DVT and pulmonary embolism with antithrombotic prophylaxis. We felt it important to explain this innovation to users of AT9, and this meant another article. W e included, for the ﬁ rst time, an article on diag-nosis addressing patients with symptoms and signs suggesting DVT. We increased the range of interven-tions we have covered, resulting in additional recom-mendations. Finally, we produced many summary of ﬁ ndings tables, which offer extremely succinct and informative presentations of best estimates of effect and the conﬁ dence associated with those estimates.I f published in the same fashion as the Antithrom-botic and Thrombolytic Therapy, 8th ed: AmericanA bbreviations:ACS 5 acute coronary syndrome; AF 5 atrialﬁ brillation; AIS 5 arterial ischemic stroke; APLA 5antiphospolipidantibodies; ASA 5 acetylsalicylic acid; AT9 5 Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines; BMS 5 bare-metal stent; CABG 5 coronary artery bypass graft; CAD 5coronary artery disease; CDT 5catheter-directed thrombosis; CHADS 2 5 congestive heart failure, hyperten-sion, age Ն 75 years, diabetes mellitus, prior stroke or transient ischemic attack; CSVT 5 cerebral sinovenous thrombosis; CTPH 5 chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension; CUS 5 com-pression ultrasound; CVAD 5 central venous access device; DES 5 d rug-eluting stent; GCS 5 g raduated compression stockings; H FS 5 hip fracture surgery; HIT 5 heparin-induced thrombocy-topenia; HITT 5 heparin-induced thrombocytopenia complicated by thrombosis; IA 5 intraarterial; ICH 5intracerebral hemor-rhage; IE 5 infective endocarditis; INR 5 international normalized ratio; IPC 5 intermittent pneumatic compression; IPCD 5 inter-mittent pneumatic compression device; IVC 5 inferior vena cava; LDUH 5 low-dose unfractionated heparin; LMWH 5 low-molecular-weight heparin; LV 5 left ventricular; MBTS 5 modiﬁ ed Blalock-Taussig shunt; MR 5 magnetic resonance; PAD 5peripheral artery disease; PCI 5 percutaneous coronary inter v ention; PE 5 pul-monary embolism; PFO 5 patent foramen ovale; PMBV 5 p ercuta-neous mitral balloon valvotomy; PTS 5postthrombotic syndrome; PVT 5 prosthetic valve thrombosis; r-tPA 5 recombinant tissue plas-minogen activator; RVT 5 renal vein thrombosis; SC 5 subcuta-neous; TEE 5 transesophageal echocardiography; THA 5 total hip arthroplasty; TIA 5 transient ischemic attack; TKA 5 total knee arthroplasty; UAC 5umbilical arterial catheter; UEDVT 5 upper-extremity DVT; UFH 5 unfractionated heparin; US 5 ultrasound; UVC 5 umbilical venous catheter; VAD 5 ventricular assist device; VKA 5 vitamin K antagonistAntithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice GuidelinesG ordon H. G uyatt ,M D, FCCP ;E lie A. A kl ,M D, PhD, M PH ;M ark C rowther ,M D ;D avid D. G utterman ,M D, FCCP ;H olger J. S chü n emann ,M D, PhD, FCCP ;f or the American College of Chest Physicians Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis Panel *CHEST 2012; 141(2)(Suppl):7S–47S8SExecutive Summarytables) and some tables summarizing the methodsand results, and the risk of bias, associated with the individual studies that contributed to the evidence proﬁ les and summary of ﬁ ndings tables.T he world of medical information is rapidly becom-ing a world of electronic storage and presentation of primary studies, recommendations, and a wide variety of other information of interest to health care prac t itioners. Although our abbreviated paper copy presentation represents a necessary response to a challenging situation, it is also a harbinger of the increasingly electronic world of medical information into which future editions of guidelines are destined to move.S ummary of Recommendations Note on Shaded Text: Throughout this guideline, shading is used within the summary of recommenda-tions sections to indicate recommendations that are newly added or have been changed since the publica-tion of Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Rec-ommendations that remain unchanged are not shaded.E vidence-Based Management of Anticoagulant TherapyF or further details, see Holbrook et al. 1 2.1 Loading Dose for Initiation of Vitamin K Antagonist(VKA) Therapy2.1. For patients sufﬁ ciently healthy to be treated as outpatients, we suggest initiating VKA therapy with warfarin 10 mg daily for the ﬁ rst 2 days followed by dosing based on international normalized ratio (INR) measurements rather than starting with the estimated maintenance dose (Grade 2C) .2.2 Initial Dose Selection and Pharmacogenetic Testing2.2. For patients initiating VKA therapy, we recommend against the routine use of pharma-cogenetic testing for guiding doses of VKA (Grade 1B) . 2.3 Initiation Overlap for Heparin and VKA2.3. For patients with acute VTE, we suggest that VKA therapy be started on day 1 or 2 of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or low-dose unfractionated heparin (UFH) therapy rather than waiting for several days to start (Grade 2C) .College of Chest Physicians Antithrombotic Guide-lines, this would have resulted in a document with . 850 pages of paper text, an unacceptable length. Given this and with the advice of the journal, we decided to adopt a highly focused print version that includes only this executive summary and the following articles:• An introduction describing the major innovations in AT9 • A methods article explaining how we devel-oped the guidelines (a potential model for other guideline groups interested in optimal rigor) • Recommendations and grading from each arti-cle embedded in the table of contents of each article T hose seeking the rationale for the recommenda-tions, including the supporting evidence, should access the online version of the guideline ( h ttp:///content/141/2_suppl )that includes a narrative summaries and support-ing summary of ﬁ ndings tables. The numbering indi-cated beside the recommendations in this summary is aligned with the sections and tables found in the full articles. Those interested in a deeper under-standing of the evidence can turn to online data supplements for each of the articles that include rec-ommendations. There, they will ﬁ nd evidence pro-ﬁ les (expanded versions of the summary of ﬁ ndingsR evision accepted August 31, 2011. A fﬁ liations: From the Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Drs Guyatt, Akl, and Schü n emann) and Depart-ment of Medicine (Drs Guyatt, Crowther, and Schü n emann), McMaster University Faculty of H ealth Sciences, H amilton, ON, Canada; Departments of Medicine and Family Medicine (Dr Akl), State University of New York, Buffalo, NY; Cardiovascular Research Center (Dr Gutterman), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.*For complete panel list, see: /content/141/2_suppl/2S F unding/Support : The Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines received support from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [R13 HL104758] and Bayer Schering Pharma AG. Support in the form of educa-tional grants were also provided by Bristol-Myers Squibb; Pﬁ zer, Inc; Canyon Pharmaceuticals; and sanoﬁ -aventis US.D isclaimer: American College of Chest Physician guidelines are intended for general information only, are not medical advice, and do not replace professional medical care and physician advice, which always should be sought for any medical condition. The complete disclaimer for this guideline can be accessed at /content/141/2_suppl/1SC orrespondence to: Gordon H . Guyatt, MD, FCCP , Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, L8N 3Z5, Canada; e-mail: guyatt@mcmaster.ca© 2012 American College of Chest Physicians.Reproduction of this article is prohibited without written permission from the American College of Chest Physicians ( h ttp:///site/misc/reprints.xhtml ).D OI: 10.1378/chest.1412S3CHEST / 141 / 2 / FEBRUARY , 2012 SUPPLEMENT 9S3.8 VKA Drug Interactions to Avoid3.8. For patients taking VKAs, we suggest avoid-ing concomitant treatment with nonsteroidal antiinﬂ ammatory drugs, including cyclooxyge-nase-2-selective nonsteroidal antiinﬂ ammatory drugs, and certain antibiotics (see Table 8 in mainarticle1 ) (Grade 2C) .F or patients taking VKAs, we suggest avoiding concomitant treatment with antiplatelet agents except in situations where beneﬁ t is known or is highly likely to be greater than harm from bleeding, such as patients with mechanical valves, patients with acute coronary syndrome, or patients with recent coronary stents or bypass surgery (Grade 2C) .4.1 Optimal Therapeutic INR Range4.1. For patients treated with VKAs, we recom-mend a therapeutic INR range of 2.0 to 3.0 (tar-get INR of 2.5) rather than a lower (INR , 2) or higher (INR 3.0-5.0) range (Grade 1B) . 4.2 Therapeutic Range for High-Risk Groups 4.2. For patients with antiphospholipid syn d rome with previous arterial or venous thromboembolism, we suggest VKA therapy titrated to a moderate-intensity INR range (INR 2.0-3.0) rather than higher intensity (INR 3.0-4.5) (Grade 2B). 5.0 Discontinuation of Therapy5.0. For patients eligible to discontinue treat-ment with VKA, we suggest abrupt discontinua-tion rather than gradual tapering of the dose to discontinuation (Grade 2C) .6.1 Unfractionated Heparin (UFH) Dose Adjustment by Weight6.1. For patients starting IV UFH, we suggest that the initial bolus and the initial rate of the continuous infusion be weight adjusted (bolus 80 units/kg followed by 18 units/kg per h for VTE; bolus 70 units/kg followed by 15 units/kg per h for cardiac or stroke patients) or use of a ﬁ xed dose (bolus 5,000 units followed by 1,000 units/h) rather than alternative regimens (Grade 2C) . 6.2 Dose Management of Subcutaneous (SC) UFH6.2. For outpatients with VTE treated with SC UFH, we suggest weight-adjusted dosing (ﬁ rst dose 333 units/kg, then 250 units/kg) with-out monitoring rather than ﬁ xed or weight-adjusted dosing with monitoring (Grade 2C) .3.1 Monitoring Frequency for VKAs3.1. For patients taking VKA therapy with con-sistently stable INRs, we suggest an INR testing frequency of up to 12 weeks rather than every 4 weeks (Grade 2B) .3.2 Management of the Single Out-of-Range INR3.2. For patients taking VKAs with previously stable therapeutic INRs who present with a single out-of-range INR of Յ 0.5 below or above therapeutic, we suggest continuing the current dose and testing the INR within 1 to 2 weeks (Grade 2C) .3.3 Bridging for Low INRs3.3. For patients with stable therapeutic INRs presenting with a single subtherapeutic INR value, we suggest against routinely adminis-tering bridging with heparin (Grade 2C) . 3.4 Vitamin K Supplementation3.4. For patients taking VKAs, we suggest against routine use of vitamin K supplementa-tion (Grade 2C) .3.5 Anticoagulation Management Services for VKAs 3.5. (Best Practices Statement) We suggest that health-care providers who manage oral antico-agulation therapy should do so in a systematic and coordinated fashion, incorporating patient education, systematic INR testing, tracking, follow-up, and good patient communication of results and dosing decisions.3.6 Patient Self-Testing and Self-Management3.6. For patients treated with VKAs who are motivated and can demonstrate competency in self-management strategies, including the self-testing equipment, we suggest patient self-management rather than usual outpatient INR monitoring (Grade 2B) . For all other patients, we suggest monitoring that includes the safe-guards in our best practice statement 3.5. 3.7 Dosing Decision Support3.7. For dosing decisions during maintenance VKA therapy, we suggest using validated deci-sion support tools (paper nomograms or com-puterized dosing programs) rather than no decision support (Grade 2C) .Remarks: Inexperienced prescribers may be more likely to improve prescribing with use of decision sup-port tools than experienced prescribers.10SExecutive Summaryunfractionated heparin (L DUH) bid, LDUHtid, or fondaparinux (Grade 1B) .R emarks: In choosing the speciﬁ c anticoagulant drug to be used for pharmacoprophylaxis, choices should be based on patient preference, compliance, and ease of administration (eg, daily vs bid vs tid dosing), as well as on local factors affecting acquisition costs (eg, prices of various pharmacologic agents in individual hospital formularies).2.4. For acutely ill hospitalized medical patients at low risk of thrombosis, we recommend against the use of pharmacologic prophylaxis or mechan-ical prophylaxis (Grade 1B) .2.7.1. For acutely ill hospitalized medical patients who are bleeding or at high risk for bleeding, we recommend against anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis (Grade 1B) .2.7.2. For acutely ill hospitalized medical patients at increased risk of thrombosis who are bleeding or at high risk for major bleeding, we suggest the optimal use of mechanical thromboprophylaxis with graduated compression stockings (GCS) (Grade 2C) or intermittent pneumatic compres-sion (IPC) (Grade 2C) , rather than no mechan-ical thromboprophylaxis. When bleeding risk decreases, and if VTE risk persists, we sug-gest that pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis be substituted for mechanical thromboprophy-laxis (Grade 2B) .R emarks: Patients who are particularly averse to the potential for skin complications, cost, and need for clinical monitoring of GCS and IPC use are likely to decline mechanical prophylaxis.2.8. In acutely ill hospitalized medical patients who receive an initial course of thrombopro-phylaxis, we suggest against extending the dura-tion of thromboprophylaxis beyond the period of patient immobilization or acute hospital stay (Grade 2B) .3.0 Critically Ill Patients3.2. In critically ill patients, we suggest against routine ultrasound screening for DVT (Grade 2C) .3.4.3. For critically ill patients, we suggest using LMWH or LDUH thromboprophylaxis over no prophylaxis (Grade 2C) .3.4.4. For critically ill patients who are bleeding, or are at high risk for major bleeding, we suggest mechanical thromboprophylaxis with GCS (Grade 2C) o r IPC (Grade 2C) u ntil the7.1 Therapeutic Dose of LM WH in Patients With Decreased Renal Function7.1. For patients receiving therapeutic LMWH who have severe renal insufﬁ ciency (calculated creatinine clearance , 30 mL/min), we suggest a reduction of the dose rather than using stan-dard doses (Grade 2C) .8.1 Fondaparinux Dose Management by Weight8.1. For patients with VTE and body weight over 100 kg, we suggest that the treatment dose of fondaparinux be increased from the usual 7.5 mg to 10 mg daily SC (Grade 2C) .9.1 Vitamin K for Patients Taking VKAs With High INRs Without Bleeding9.1.(a) For patients taking VKAs with INRs between 4.5 and 10 and with no evidence of bleeding, we suggest against the routine use of vitamin K (Grade 2B) .(b) For patients taking VKAs with INRs . 10.0 and with no evidence of bleeding, we suggest that oral vitamin K be administered (Grade 2C) . 9.2 Clinical Prediction Rules for Bleeding While Taking VKA9.2. For patients initiating VKA therapy, we suggest against the routine use of clinical pre-diction rules for bleeding as the sole criterion to withhold VKA therapy (Grade 2C) .9.3 Treatment of Anticoagulant-Related Bleeding9.3. For patients with VKA-associated major bleeding, we suggest rapid reversal of antico-agulation with four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate rather than with plasma. (Grade 2C) .W e suggest the additional use of vitamin K 5 to 10 mg administered by slow IV injection rather than reversal with coagulation factors alone (Grade 2C) .P revention of VTE in Nonsurgical PatientsF or further details, see Kahn et al. 2 2.0 Hospitalized Acutely Ill Medical Patients2.3. For acutely ill hospitalized medical patients at increased risk of thrombosis, we recom m end anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin [LMWH], low-doseCHEST / 141 / 2 / FEBRUARY , 2012 SUPPLEMENT 11Sknee GCS providing 15 to 30 mm Hg of pressureat the ankle during travel (Grade 2C) . F or all other long-distance travelers, we suggest against the use of GCS (Grade 2C) .6.1.3. For long-distance travelers, we suggest against the use of aspirin or anticoagulants to prevent VTE (Grade 2C) .7.0 Persons With Asymptomatic Thrombophilia7.1. In persons with asymptomatic thrombo-philia (ie, without a previous history of VTE), we recommend against the long-term daily use of mechanical or pharmacologic thrombopro-phylaxis to prevent VTE (Grade 1C) .P revention of VTE in Nonorthopedic Surgical PatientsF or further details, see Gould et al. 3 3.6 Patients Undergoing General, GI, Urological,Gynecologic, Bariatric, Vascular, Plastic, or Recon-structive Surgery3.6.1. For general and abdominal-pelvic sur-gery patients at very low risk for VTE ( , 0.5%; Rogers score, , 7; Caprini score, 0), we recom-mend that no speciﬁ c pharmacologic (Grade 1B) o r mechanical (Grade 2C) p rophylaxis be used other than early ambulation.3.6.2. For general and abdominal-pelvic sur-gery patients at low risk for VTE ( ف 1.5%; Rog-ers score, 7-10; Caprini score, 1-2), we suggest mechanical prophylaxis, preferably with inter-mittent pneumatic compression (IPC), over no prophylaxis (Grade 2C) .3.6.3. For general and abdominal-pelvic sur-gery patients at moderate risk for VTE ( ف 3.0%; Rogers score, . 10; Caprini score, 3-4) who are not at high risk for major bleeding complica-tions, we suggest L MWH (Grade 2B ), L DUH (Grade 2B) , o r mechanical prophylaxis, prefer-ably with IPC (Grade 2C) ,o ver no prophylaxis. R emarks: T hree of the seven authors favored a strong (Grade 1B) recommendation in favor of LMWH or LDUH over no prophylaxis in this group.3.6.4. For general and abdominal-pelvic sur-gery patients at moderate risk for VTE (3.0%; Rogers score, . 10; Caprini score, 3-4) who are at high risk for major bleeding complications or those in whom the consequences of bleed-ing are thought to be particularly severe, webleeding risk decreases, rather than no mechan-ical thromboprophylaxis. When bleeding risk decreases, we suggest that pharmacologic throm-boprophylaxis be substituted for mechanical thromboprophylaxis (Grade 2C) . 4.0 Patients With Cancer in the Outpatient Setting4.2.1. In outpatients with cancer who have no additional risk factors for VTE, we suggest against routine prophylaxis with L MWH or LDUH (Grade 2B) and recommend against the prophylactic use of VKAs (Grade 1B) .R emarks: Additional risk factors for venous throm-bosis in cancer outpatients include previous venous thrombosis, immobilization, hormonal therapy, angio-genesis inhibitors, thalidomide, and lenalidomide.4.2.2. In outpatients with solid tumors who have additional risk factors for VTE and who are at low risk of bleeding, we suggest prophylactic-dose L MWH or L DUH over no prophylaxis (Grade 2B) .R emarks: Additional risk factors for venous thrombo-sis in cancer outpatients include previous venous thrombosis, immobilization, hormonal therapy, angio-genesis inhibitors, thalidomide, and lenali d omide.4.4. In outpatients with cancer and indwelling central venous catheters, we suggest againstroutine prophylaxis with L MWH or L DUH (Grade 2B) and suggest against the prophylactic use of VKAs (Grade 2C) .5.0 Chronically Immobilized Patients5.1. In chronically immobilized persons residing at home or at a nursing home, we suggest against the routine use of thromboprophylaxis (Grade 2C) .6.0 Persons Traveling Long-Distance6.1.1. For long-distance travelers at increased risk of VTE (including previous VTE, recent surgery or trauma, active malignancy, preg-nancy, estrogen use, advanced age, limited mobility, severe obesity, or known thrombo-philic disorder), we suggest frequent ambula-tion, calf muscle exercise, or sitting in an aisle seat if feasible (Grade 2C) .6.1.2. For long-distance travelers at increased risk of VTE (including previous VTE, recent surgery or trauma, active malignancy, pregnancy, estrogen use, advanced age, limited mobility, severe obesity, or known thrombophilic disor-der), we suggest use of properly ﬁ tted, below-12SExecutive Summarygest use of mechanical prophylaxis, preferably with optimally applied IPC, over either no pro-phylaxis (Grade 2C) o r pharmacologic prophy-laxis (Grade 2C) .4.4.2. For cardiac surgery patients whose hos-pital course is prolonged by one or more non-hemorrhagic surgical complications, we suggest adding pharmacologic prophylaxis with LDUH or LMWH to mechanical prophylaxis (Grade 2C) .5.0 Patients Undergoing Thoracic Surgery5.4.1. For thoracic surgery patients at mod-erate risk for VTE who are not at high risk for perioperative bleeding, we suggest L DUH (Grade 2B) , L MWH (Grade 2B) , o r mechanical prophylaxis with optimally applied IPC (Grade 2C)o ver no prophylaxis. R emarks: T hree of the seven authors favored a strong (Grade 1B) recommendation in favor of LMWH or LDUH over no prophylaxis in this group.5.4.2. For thoracic surgery patients at high risk for VTE who are not at high risk for periopera-tive bleeding, we suggest LDUH (Grade 1B) o r LMWH (Grade 1B) o ver no prophylaxis. In addi-tion, we suggest that mechanical prophylaxis with elastic stockings or IPC should be added to pharmacologic prophylaxis (Grade 2C) .5.4.3. For thoracic surgery patients who are at high risk for major bleeding, we suggest use of mechanical prophylaxis, preferably with opti-mally applied IPC, over no prophylaxis until the risk of bleeding diminishes and pharmacologic prophylaxis may be initiated (Grade 2C) .6.0 Patients Undergoing Craniotomy6.4.1. For craniotomy patients, we suggest that mechanical prophylaxis, preferably with IPC, be used over no prophylaxis (Grade 2C) o r phar-macologic prophylaxis (Grade 2C) .6.4.2. For craniotomy patients at very high risk for VTE (eg, those undergoing craniotomy for malignant disease), we suggest adding pharma-cologic prophylaxis to mechanical prophylaxis once adequate hemostasis is established and the risk of bleeding decreases (Grade 2C) .7.0 Patients Undergoing Spinal Surgery7.4.1. For patients undergoing spinal surgery, we suggest mechanical prophylaxis, prefer-ably with IPC, over no prophylaxis (Grade 2C) , u nfractionated heparin (Grade 2C) , o r LMWH (Grade 2C) .suggest mechanical prophylaxis, preferably with IPC, over no prophylaxis (Grade 2C) .3.6.5. For general and abdominal-pelvic sur-gery patients at high risk for VTE ( ف 6.0%; Caprini score, Ն 5) who are not at high risk for major bleeding complications, we recommend pharmacologic prophylaxis with LMWH (Grade 1B) o r L DUH (Grade 1B) o ver no prophylaxis. We suggest that mechanical prophylaxis with elastic stockings or IPC should be added to phar-macologic prophylaxis (Grade 2C) .3.6.6. For high-VTE-risk patients undergoing abdominal or pelvic surgery for cancer who are not otherwise at high risk for major bleeding complications, we recommend extended-duration pharmacologic prophylaxis (4 weeks) with LMWH over limited-duration prophylaxis (Grade 1B) .R emarks: Patients who place a high value on mini-mizing out-of-pocket health-care costs might prefer limited-duration over extended-duration prophylaxis in settings where the cost of extended-duration pro-phylaxis is borne by the patient.3.6.7. For high-VTE-risk general and abdominal-pelvic surgery patients who are at high risk for major bleeding complications or those in whom the consequences of bleeding are thought to be particularly severe, we suggest use of mechan-ical prophylaxis, preferably with IPC, over no prophylaxis until the risk of bleeding diminishes and pharmacologic prophylaxis may be initiated (Grade 2C) .3.6.8. For general and abdominal-pelvic sur-gery patients at high risk for VTE (6%; Caprini score, Ն 5) in whom both L MWH and unfrac-tionated heparin are contraindicated or unavail-able and who are not at high risk for major bleeding complications, we suggest low-dose aspirin (Grade 2C) , f ondaparinux (Grade 2C) , o r mechanical prophylaxis, preferably with IPC (Grade 2C) ,o ver no prophylaxis.3.6.9. For general and abdominal-pelvic sur-gery patients, we suggest that an inferior vena cava (IVC) ﬁ lter should not be used for primary VTE prevention (Grade 2C) .3.6.10. For general and abdominal-pelvic surgery patients, we suggest that periodic surveillance with venous compression ultrasound should not be performed (Grade 2C) .4.0 Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery4.4.1. For cardiac surgery patients with an uncomplicated postoperative course, we sug-CHEST / 141 / 2 / FEBRUARY , 2012 SUPPLEMENT 13Sigatran, rivaroxaban, low-dose unfractionatedheparin (LDUH), adjusted-dose VKA, aspirin (all Grade 1B) , or an intermittent pneumatic com-pression device (IPCD) (Grade 1C) .R emarks: We recommend the use of only portable, battery-powered IPCDs capable of recording and reporting proper wear time on a daily basis for inpa-tients and outpatients. Efforts should be made to achieve 18 h of daily compliance. One panel member believed strongly that aspirin alone should not be included as an option.2.1.2. In patients undergoing HFS, we recom-mend use of one of the following rather than no antithrombotic prophylaxis for a minimum of 10 to 14 days: L MWH, fondaparinux, L DUH, adjusted-dose VKA, aspirin (all Grade 1B) , or an IPCD (Grade 1C) .R emarks: We recommend the use of only portable, battery-powered IPCDs capable of recording and reporting proper wear time on a daily basis for inpa-tients and outpatients. Efforts should be made to achieve 18 h of daily compliance. One panel member believed strongly that aspirin alone should not be included as an option.2.2. For patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery (THA, TKA, HFS) and receiving LMWH as thromboprophylaxis, we recommend starting either 12 h or more preoperatively or 12 h or more postoperatively rather than within 4 h or less pre-operatively or 4 h or less postoperatively (Grade 1B) .2.3.1. In patients undergoing THA or TKA, irrespective of the concomitant use of an IPCD or length of treatment, we suggest the use of L MWH in preference to the other agents we have recommended as alternatives: fonda-parinux, apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, LDUH (all Grade 2B) , adjusted-dose VKA, or aspirin (all Grade 2C) .R emarks: If started preoperatively, we suggest admin-istering LMWH Ն 12 h before surgery. Patients who place a high value on avoiding the inconvenience of daily injections with LMWH and a low value on the limitations of alternative agents are likely to choose an alternative agent. Limitations of alter-native agents include the possibility of increased bleeding (which may occur with fondaparinux, rivar-oxaban, and VKA), possible decreased efﬁ cacy (LDUH, VKA, aspirin, and IPCD alone), and lack of long-term safety data (apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban). Furthermore, patients who place a high value on avoiding bleeding complications and a low value on7.4.2. For patients undergoing spinal surgery at high risk for VTE (including those with malig-nant disease or those undergoing surgery with a combined anterior-posterior approach), we suggest adding pharmacologic prophylaxis to mechanical prophylaxis once adequate hemo-stasis is established and the risk of bleeding decreases (Grade 2C) . 8.0 Patients With Major Trauma: Traumatic Brain Injury, Acute Spinal Injury, and Traumatic Spine Injury8.4.1. For major trauma patients, we suggest use of LDUH (Grade 2C) , L MWH (Grade 2C) , o r mechanical prophylaxis, preferably with IPC (Grade 2C) ,o ver no prophylaxis.8.4.2. For major trauma patients at high risk for VTE (including those with acute spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, and spinal sur-gery for trauma), we suggest adding mechan-ical prophylaxis to pharmacologic prophylaxis (Grade 2C) w hen not contraindicated by lower-extremity injury.8.4.3. For major trauma patients in whom LMWH and LDUH are contraindicated, we sug-gest mechanical prophylaxis, preferably with IPC, over no prophylaxis (Grade 2C) w hen not contraindicated by lower-extremity injury. We suggest adding pharmacologic prophylaxis with either L MWH or L DUH when the risk of bleeding diminishes or the contraindication to heparin resolves (Grade 2C) .8.4.4. For major trauma patients, we suggest that an IVC ﬁ lter should not be used for pri-mary VTE prevention (Grade 2C) .8.4.5. For major trauma patients, we suggest that periodic surveillance with venous compression ultrasound should not be performed (Grade 2C) .P revention of VTE in Orthopedic Surgery PatientsF or further details, see Falck-Ytter et al. 4 2.0 Patients Undergoing Major Orthopedic Surgery: Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA), Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA), Hip Fracture Surgery (HFS)2.1.1. In patients undergoing THA or TKA, we recommend use of one of the following for a minimum of 10 to 14 days rather than no anti-thrombotic prophylaxis: low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), fondaparinux, apixaban, dab-。

美国胸科医师学会：循证临床实践指南——第9版中文执行纲要

21．对主动脉机械瓣膜置换患者，推荐用VKA治疗目标INR, 2.5; （范围, 2.0～3.0)优于更高的IN R目标（1B）。

22．对二尖瓣机械瓣膜置换患者，建议用VKA治疗目标INR, 3.0; （范围, 2.5～3.5)优于较低的IN R目标（2C）。

23．对主动脉瓣和二尖瓣双机械瓣膜置换的患者，建议VKA治疗目标INR 3.0 (范围2.5～3.5)优于目标INR2.5 (范围 2.0～3.0)（2C）。

对主动脉瓣或二尖瓣机械瓣膜置换患者，VKA治疗加抗血小板药。

24．对二尖瓣或主动脉瓣机械瓣置换、出血低危的患者，建议VKA加小剂量抗血小板药如阿司匹林( 50～100 mg/d)治疗（1B）。

25．对主动脉瓣或二尖瓣机械瓣膜置换患者，推荐VKA治疗优于抗血小板药（1B）。

26．对进行了二尖瓣修复、正常窦性心律的患者，建议头3个月用抗血小板药治疗优于VKA治疗（2C ）。

27．对拟行主动脉瓣修复的患者，建议用阿司匹林50 ～100 mg/d（2C）。

28．对右侧人工瓣血栓形成患者，如无禁忌症，建议溶纤治疗（2C）。

29．对左侧人工瓣血栓形成患者，血栓面积≥0.8 cm2，建议早期手术优于溶纤治疗（2C），如果存在手术禁忌症，建议溶纤治疗（2C）。

30．对左侧人工瓣血栓形成患者，血栓面积小（<0.8 cm2），建议溶纤治疗优于手术。

对于极小的、非梗阻性血栓，建议静脉内用普通肝素，并用多谱勒超声心动图监测，证实血栓溶解或改善（2C ）。

缺血性卒中的抗栓或溶栓治疗1．对于急性缺血性卒中、在症状发作3小时内能启动治疗的患者，推荐静脉内（IV）用重组组织型纤溶酶原激活物(r～tPA)治疗（1A）。

2. 对于急性缺血性卒中、在症状发作4.5小时而非3小时内能启动治疗的患者，建议IV用r～tPA（2 C）。

3. 对于急性缺血性卒中、在症状发作4.5小时内不能启动治疗的患者，建议不用IV r～tPA（1B）。

ACCP9指南

Chest 2012;141;7S-47S.
有房颤史的缺血性卒中抗栓建议
对于有房颤（包括阵发性房颤）史的缺血性卒中或短暂性脑缺
血发作患者，我们推荐予以抗栓治疗（1A）。推荐口服抗凝治疗（1A），阿司匹林（1B），或阿司匹林联合氯吡格雷
（1B）。
Chest 2012;141;7S-47S.
有房颤史的缺血性卒中抗栓建议
雷75mg/d+小剂量阿司匹林（2B）
Chest 2012;141;7S-47S.
急性冠脉综合征后一年内接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者抗栓建议
• 我们推荐双联抗血小板治疗：替卡格雷90mg/d每日2次+小
剂量阿司匹林75-100mg/d或者氯吡格雷75mg/d+小剂量阿司匹林或者普拉格雷10mg/d +小剂量阿司匹林（1B）。
PAD患者的抗栓建议
阿司匹林一级预防使用推荐
对于年龄大于或等于50岁的无症状心血管疾病人群，我们建议使用低剂量阿司匹林75-100mg/d（2B）。
Chest 2012;141;7S-47S.
目
ACCP9简介
录
冠心病一级预防的抗栓建议冠心病患者的抗栓建议肺栓塞患者的抗栓建议
Chest 2012;141;7S-47S.
静脉血栓栓塞高风险患者抗栓建议
对于有静脉血栓栓塞高风险且无高出血风险的普通患者和腹部盆腔
手术患者（6%;Caprini评分,≥5）,应予以抗凝治疗。
若存在低分子肝素和普通肝素使用禁忌或无条件应用这些药,我们建议低剂量阿司匹林（2C）,磺达肝葵钠（2C）, 或机械性预防--首选
Chest 2012;141;7S-47S.
非心源性卒中抗栓建议

美国医师学会静脉血栓栓塞性疾病诊疗指南解读

美国医师学会静脉血栓栓塞性疾病诊疗指南解读美国医师学会和美国家庭医师委员会近期公布静脉血栓栓塞性疾病(venous thromboembolism, VTE)的诊断和治疗的临床指南。

该指南的目的是总结现有的证据，主要是针对初级医疗保健人员提供治疗深静脉血栓(deep venous thrombosis, DVT) and肺栓塞(pulmonary embolism , PE)的合理建议，帮助临床医师理解和应用不同的诊断工具，如D-Dimer和超声，以及识别高危的临床特征。

VTE包括下肢深静脉血栓（DVT）和肺栓塞（PE）。

根据美国的资料，每年发生的VTE约60万例，因漏诊没有得到治疗的患者中，26%将发生致命性血栓事件，还有26%的患者再次发生非致命性血栓事件而最终致死。

存在于膝以上的血栓易合并PE，小腿部的血栓发生PE的风险较低，但有可能发生血栓后综合征。

因此，应重视早期诊断，做好预防工作非常重要。

一、临床诊断1．临床预测VTE可能性的方法由于单纯应用个体的临床特征诊断VTE的准确性较差，指南推荐应用有效的预测方法估计VTE的危险性，并以此作为进一步采用其他实验室和影像学方法的根据，或解释其他检查结果的基础。

迄今为止，多个临床研究证实了Wells预测法的有效性（见表1和表2）。

但应注意，没有并发疾病年龄较小者和有VTE病史的患者应用Wells 预测法的预测价值较高。

老年人或合并疾病较多的患者最好结合临床判断。

临床可能性：低度≤0；中度，1～2分；高度，≥3。

若双侧下肢均有症状，以症状严重的一侧为准。

表1 WELLS深静脉血栓的临床评分临床特征分值肿瘤 1瘫痪、不完全瘫痪或近期下肢石膏固定 11 近期卧床>3天，或12周内需要全麻或局部麻醉的大手术沿深静脉走行的局部疼痛 1全下肢的水肿 11 与无症状侧相比，小腿水肿大于3cm（胫骨粗隆下10cm处测量）局限于有症状腿部的指凹性水肿 1浅静脉的侧支循环（无静脉曲张的情况下） 1DVT和诊断为其他疾病的可能性一样大-2表2 WELLS肺栓塞的临床评分临床特征分值既往PE或DVT病史 1.5心率>100次/分 1.5近期外科手术或制动 1 DVT的临床表现 1诊断为其他疾病的可能性小于PE 1喀血 1肿瘤 1临床可能性：低度，0～1；中度，2～6分；高度，≥7。

美国胸科医师协会抗栓与血栓预防指南培训课件

4.2.2 对于有VTE风险但是出血风险较低的门诊肿瘤患者，我们建议使用预防剂量的低分子量肝素（ LMWH）或低剂量普通肝素（LDUH），优于不预防。（推荐级别：2B 级）
文档仅供参考，不能作为科学依据，请勿模仿；如有不当之处，请联系网站或本人删除。
ACCP9-非手术患者的VET预防
4.4 对于留置中心静脉导管的门诊肿瘤患者，我们不建议使用低分子量肝素（LMWH）或低剂量普通肝素（LDUH）进行血栓预防（推荐级别：2B 级），也不推荐预防性使用维生素 K 拮抗剂（推荐级别： 2C 级）。
ACCP9-非手术患者的VET预防
文档仅供参考，不能作为科学依据，请勿模仿；如有不当之处，请联系网站或本人删除。
ACCP9-非手术患者的VET预防
4.2.1 对于无其他VTE 危险因素的门诊肿瘤患者，不建议使用低分子量肝素（LMWH）或低剂量普通肝素（LDUH）进行血栓预防（推荐级别：2B 级），也不推荐预防性使用维生素 K 拮抗剂（推荐级别： 1B 级）。
第九版美国胸科医师协会抗栓与血栓预防实践指南汇总
首先针对非手术患者的VET预防，与大家分享ACCP 9 在ACCP 8 基础上新增和改动部分的摘要，供大家学习和参考。
文档仅供参考，不能作为科学依据，请勿模仿；如有不当之处，请联系网站或本人删除。
ACCP9-非手术患者的VET预防
2.3 对于血栓形成风险(Table2)较高的急性住院患者，推荐使用低分子量肝素（LMWH）、低剂量普通肝素（LDUH）（每日2 次或3 次）或璜达肝癸钠这些抗凝药（推荐级别：1B级）进行血栓预防。
6.1.3 对于长途旅行者，我们不建议使用阿司匹林或抗凝剂预防VTE（推荐级别：2C 级）。
文档仅供参考，不能作为科学依据，请勿模仿；如有不当之处，请联系网站或本人删除对于无症状血栓形成者（不包括既往VTE史）我们不推荐长期每天使用器械或药物进行血栓预防（推荐级别：1C 级）。

美国抗栓指南第九版(氯吡格雷)

美国抗栓指南第九版（有关氯吡格雷介绍）近日，美国胸内科医师学会（ACCP）在《胸》（Chest 2012，141：7S-47S）杂志公布了第9版《抗栓治疗及预防血栓形成指南》（ACCP-9）。

此版指南在第8版基础上，结合最新循证医学证据，对抗栓治疗进行了全面细致的推荐。

这里剪切指南里面有关氯吡格雷的介绍。

CHEST：第9版《美国胸科医师协会抗栓与血栓预防临床实践指南》之心血管疾病的初级和二级预防对于已确诊为冠心病（即急性冠脉综合征后1年）、先前有冠脉血管重建、冠脉造影提示冠脉狭窄>50%，和（或）有心肌缺血诊断依据的患者，推荐长期低剂量阿司匹林或氯吡格雷（75mg/d）治疗（证据1A）。

对于行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗（PCI）支架置入术的急性冠脉综合征患者，推荐第一年低剂量阿司匹林联合替卡格雷（90mg每日2次）或氯吡格雷（75mg/d）或普拉格雷（10mg/d）双联抗血小板治疗优于单一抗血小板药物治疗（证据 1B）。

对于择期行PCI和支架置入的患者，推荐阿司匹林（75-325mg/d）联合氯吡格雷治疗，若选择裸金属治疗，用药时间至少为1个月，若选药物涂层支架，用药时间至少为3-6个月（证据1A）。

并推荐所有支架植入患者连续使用低剂量阿司匹林联合氯吡格雷12个月（证据 2C）。

12个月以后，推荐单一抗血小板药物治疗优于双联抗血小板治疗（证据 1B）。

据此得出结论，对于确诊为冠心病的患者，推荐单一抗血小板药物治疗；对于急性冠脉综合征患者或择期行PCI支架置入术的患者，双联抗血小板药物治疗长达1年是必需的。

CHEST：第9版《ACCP临床实践指南》之缺血性卒中的抗栓和溶栓治疗对于有非心源性栓子（即动脉粥样硬化血栓形成性、腔隙性或隐源性）所致缺血性卒中或ＴＩＡ病史的患者，推荐长期使用抗血小板药物治疗，以下治疗方案均可选用：阿司匹林（剂量为75-100mg，每日一次)，氯吡格雷（剂量为75mg，每日一次），阿司匹林加缓释双嘧达莫（剂量分别为25mg，每日2次和200mg，每日2次）或西洛他唑（剂量为100mg，每日2次）。

第9版《抗栓治疗及预防血栓形成指南》（ACCP

第9版《抗栓治疗及预防血栓形成指南》（ACCP近日，美国胸内科医师学会（ACCP）在《胸》（Chest 2012，141：7S-47S）杂志公布了第9版《抗栓治疗及预防血栓形成指南》（ACCP-9）。

此版指南在第8版基础上，结合最新循证医学证据，对抗栓治疗进行了全面细致的推荐。

聊城市第二人民医院骨病外科刘士明阿司匹林一级预防再受推荐ACCP-9最新推荐：对于心血管病一级预防，年龄>50岁且无心血管疾病症状的人群应用小剂量阿司匹林75~100 mg/d 优于不用（推荐级别：2B）。

新指南指出，阿司匹林服用10年可以轻度降低各类心血管风险的全因死亡率。

对于心血管风险中高危患者来说，心肌梗死发生率降低的同时伴随严重出血的增加。

不论何种风险患者，如果不愿长期服药以换取很小的获益，可以不用阿司匹林进行一级预防。

心血管风险中高危患者，若心肌梗死预防获益大于胃肠道出血风险，应当应用阿司匹林。

阿司匹林用于心血管疾病一级预防疗效确切对于心血管疾病来说，推行健康的生活方式、有效控制危险因素、合理使用循证药物，才能真正发挥预防的作用。

作为防治心脑血管疾病的基石，阿司匹林的心血管益处已得到大量循证医学证据的证明，适用于动脉粥样硬化疾病的一级、二级预防和急性期治疗。

既往基于6项大规模随机临床试验[英国医师研究（BMD）、美国医师研究（PHS）、血栓形成预防试验（TPT）、高血压最佳治疗研究（HOT）、一级预防研究（PPP）和妇女健康研究（WHS）]的荟萃分析表明，未来10年心血管事件风险>6%的个体服用阿司匹林的获益大于风险。

最近，英国学者在《内科学年鉴》（Ann Intern Med）杂志发表了一项荟萃分析，对应用阿司匹林进行常规一级预防提出质疑。

然而，在ACCP-9中，采用包含最新临床试验的高质量系统性评估和荟萃分析对阿司匹林相对作用进行评估的结果显示，每治疗1000例患者，阿司匹林使低危人群心肌梗死减少6例，总死亡减少6例。

ACCP9第9版指南摘要翻译

—实施概要美国胸科医师学院循证医学临床实践指南：—抗栓治疗与血栓预防(第9版)Gordon H. Guyatt , MD, FCCP ; Elie A. Akl , MD, PhD, MPH ; Mark Crowther , MD ;David D. Gutterman, MD, FCCP; Holger J. Schünemann, MD, PhD, FCCP; for the American College of Chest Physicians Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis Panel*缩略语ACS=急性冠脉综合征; AF=心房颤动; AIS=动脉缺血性卒中; APLA=抗磷脂抗体；ASA =阿司匹林；AT9 = 抗栓治疗与血栓预防(第9版)，美国胸科医师学院循证医学临床实践指南；BMS=裸金属支架；CABG=冠状动脉搭桥术; GAD=冠状动脉疾病;CDT=导管溶栓；CHADS2 =充血性心力衰竭，高血压，年龄≥75岁，糖尿病，卒中或短暂脑缺血发作；CSVT=大脑窦静脉血栓形成; CTPH=慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压；CUS=压缩超声；CVAD=中心静脉植入装置；DES=药物洗脱支架；GCS=分级加压弹力袜;；HFS=髋骨骨折手术；HIT =肝素诱导的血小板减少症；HITT=肝素诱导的血小板减少症合并血栓形成；IA=动脉内的；ICH=颅内出血；IE=感染性心内膜炎; INR=国际标准化比率；IPCD=间歇充气加压装置；IVC=下腔静脉；LDUH=低剂量普通肝素；LMWH=低分子肝素；LV=左心室；MBTS=改良Blalock-Taussig分流术；MR=核磁共振成像；PAD=-外周动脉疾病；PCI=经皮冠状动脉介入治疗；PE=肺栓塞；PFO=卵圆孔未闭; PMBV=经皮二尖瓣球囊成形术; PTS=栓塞后综合征; PVT=人工瓣膜血栓形成; r-tPA=重组组织型纤溶酶原活化剂；RVT=肾静脉血栓形成；SC=皮下；TEE=经食管超声心动图; THA=全髋关节置换术；TIA=短暂性缺血发作；TKA=全膝关节置换术；UAC=脐动脉导管; UEDVT=上肢深静脉血栓形成；UFH=普通肝素;US=超声；UVC=脐静脉导管；VAD=心室辅助装置；VKA=维生素k拮抗剂前言已发表的ACCP第8版抗栓指南，以文章的形式，叙事性的证据总结和原则作为推荐，一小部分从循证得出的证据资料总结，一些项目来自于原始研究的广泛汇总表。

美国胸科协会抗栓治疗指南课件

09 免疫系统疾病
10
其他疾病，如系统性红斑狼疮、类风湿性
关节炎等。
适应症选择
急性心肌梗死：抗栓治疗可降低死亡率和再梗死率
缺血性脑卒中：抗栓治疗可降低复发率和死亡率
深静脉血栓形成：抗栓治疗可降低血栓形成和肺心肌梗死和脑卒中风险
心房颤动：抗栓治疗可降低血栓形成和脑卒中风险
03 监测指标：抗凝药物浓度、凝血酶原时间、活化部分凝血活酶时间等
04 监测频率：根据患者病情和抗凝药物种类确定，一般每周或每月监测一次
抗栓治疗适应症
适应症分类
01 急性心肌梗死
02 缺血性脑卒中
03
深静脉血栓形成
04 肺栓塞
05 动脉粥样硬化
06 糖尿病并发症
07 肾病综合征
08 恶性肿瘤
或增强
谢谢
抗凝效果减弱或增
强
抗凝药物与抗肿瘤
3
药物：如紫杉醇、
顺铂等，可能导致
抗凝效果减弱或增
强
抗凝药物与抗感染
4
药物：如青霉素、
头孢菌素等，可能
导致抗凝效果减弱
或增强
抗凝药物与抗高血
5
压药物：如ACEI、
ARB等，可能导致
抗凝效果减弱或增
强
抗凝药物与抗糖尿
6
病药物：如胰岛素、
二甲双胍等，可能
导致抗凝效果减弱
美国胸科协会抗栓治疗指南课件
演讲人
目录
01. 抗栓治疗指南概述 02. 抗栓治疗方法 03. 抗栓治疗适应症 04. 抗栓治疗并发症
抗栓治疗指南概述
指南制定背景
制定目的：提高抗栓治疗效果，降低血栓风险

静脉血栓栓塞性疾病的抗血栓治疗—解读美国胸科医师学会循证医学临床实践指南(+第9+版)

·综述与讲座·静脉血栓栓塞性疾病的抗血栓治疗———解读美国胸科医师学会循证医学临床实践指南（第9版）李圣青(解放军第四军医大学西京医院呼吸与危重症医学科，陕西西安710032)摘要：美国胸科医师学会（ACCP）抗栓治疗和血栓预防临床实践指南第9版的抗血栓治疗篇重点讲述了静脉血栓栓塞性疾病（VTE）的治疗。

与第8版指南相比，第9版指南有很大程度的修改并增添了部分新的内容。

除了抗血栓药物、使用装置或外科手术技术在深静脉血栓形成（DVT）和肺栓塞（PE）（统称为VTE）的使用建议外，还提供了关于血栓后综合征（PTS），慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压（CTPH），偶然诊断的（无症状）DVT或PE，急性上肢深静脉血栓形成（UEDVT），浅静脉血栓形成（SVT），内脏静脉血栓形成和肝静脉血栓形成的治疗建议。

本文对相关部分内容进行了解读。

关键词：静脉血栓栓塞症；急性下肢深静脉血栓；急性肺血栓栓塞；抗凝；溶栓中图分类号：Ｒ543．6文献标志码：A doi：10．3969/j．issn．1671-3826．2013．06．41文章编号：1671-3826（2013）06-0647-04美国胸科医师学会（ACCP）于2012年发布了第9版抗栓治疗和血栓预防临床实践指南［1］，与第8版指南相比有较大程度的修改并增添了部分新的内容，且更为简洁明了。

对待不同的治疗既表现出谨慎而稳妥，又表现出积极和开放。

指南规定高质量的临床证据为A级，中等质量的临床证据为B级，低质量的临床证据为C级。

根据临床证据等级的不同，将推荐等级分为强烈推荐（1级）和建议（2级）。

强烈推荐适用于大多数病人，建议则根据患者的具体情况而定，包括患者的个人选择。

绝大多数推荐和建议都是基于静脉血栓栓塞性疾病（VTE）的复发风险与抗凝或溶栓出血风险二者之间的权衡而得出的结论。

1急性深静脉血栓形成（DVT）的治疗1．1急性DVT抗凝治疗的时机对于高度怀疑VTE患者抗凝时机的把握，第9版指南给出了更加积极的抗凝建议。

外科手术患者预防静脉血栓栓塞症的研究进展

外科手术患者预防静脉血栓栓塞症的研究进展摘要：静脉血栓栓塞症常导致患者患肢疼痛、肿胀，沉重感明显，发病原因较多，包括静脉血流滞缓、静脉壁损伤和血液高凝状态等，对患者病情恢复和身心健康的影响较大。

手术后患者发生相关并发症的风险较大，静脉血栓栓塞症是常见并发症之一，据相关调查显示，手术后为患者进行适当的药物预防，但患者在术后3个月内约1.3%～10.0%会出现症状性深静脉血栓形成，威胁患者的身体健康。

基于此，本文主要就针对外科手术患者预防静脉血栓栓塞症相关研究进展进行分析探讨。

关键词：外科手术患者；静脉血栓栓塞症；进展1静脉血栓栓塞症风险评估1.1 Caprini 评估静脉血栓栓塞症血栓风险应由分管医生和责任护士共同评估。

外科患者的静脉血栓栓塞症风险能够涵盖内科患者的所有风险，外科手术是致使静脉血栓栓塞症的重要获得因素。

为了简洁、高效率、快速地对外科住院患者进行静脉血栓栓塞症的预防，所有住院患者均可采用Caprini 评估表以提高临床整体的快捷和效率。

Caprini 是最常用的科学而客观的风险评估模型，该评估表最早于1991 年由美国外科博士Joseph A. Caprini 等设计提出，2010 年更新，根据不同的风险具有1、2、3、5 分项，每项评分可累加。

该模型简易实用，根据分值合理地将患者静脉血栓栓塞症风险分为：极低危(0 分)、低危（1~2 分）、中危（3~4 分)、高危（≥ 5 分）。

在应用Caprini 风险评估模型时应综合不同的患者群体定制不同的评估时机[18-19]：一般患者入院24 h内完成入院首次评估；术后6 h 与转科6 h 内完成评估；如病情发生恶变要重新评估；肿瘤患者在放化疗前后均应进行静脉血栓栓塞症风险评估。

静脉血栓栓塞症预防措施的实施依据血栓风险评估的结果，加强血栓风险评估工具统一性的管理，真正有效的落实预防措施，可以及时预防静脉血栓栓塞症的发生。

1.2 出血风险评估根据住院患者静脉血栓栓塞症防治流程，Caprini 评估0分以上均应继续评估出血风险。

ACCP美国胸科协会抗栓治疗指南治疗指南

Scottish National Guideline (1995, 2002)
International Consensus Statement (1997) American College of Chest Physicians Consensus (1986, 1989, 1992, 1995, 1998, 2001, 2004)

Pay more attention !
静脉血栓栓塞性疾病
预防和治疗建议
第七届ACCP血栓栓塞预防指南 ——静脉血栓预防
与2001版指南的不同：
74项建议, 18 个表格, 794 篇参考文献
放弃了汇总表格
新增部分: 血管外科通过腹腔镜进行的手术膝关节成形术长途旅行
最新修改的部分: 脑卒中、心肌梗死
VTE: 第3位最常见的血管疾病
“实际上等于卒中的发生率"3 年发生率
单纯DVT 高达 145/100,0001,2
PE 伴有或不伴 DVT
高达 69/100,0003
1. Gillum RF. Am Heart. 1987;114:1262-1264. 2. Anderson et al. Arch Intern Med. 1991;151:933-938. 3. Silverstein et al. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:585-593.
N=15
血栓预防……
使患者获得最大限度的安全保障
让健康保障更安全: A Critical Analysis of Patient Safety Practices Shojania (2001) /clinic/ptsafety/
使患者获得更显著的临床获益，并降低费用

美国胸科医师协会第九版抗栓治疗及血栓预防指南静脉血栓栓塞性疾病最新进展

美国胸科医师协会第九版抗栓治疗及血栓预防指南静脉血栓栓塞性疾病最新进展周玉杰，杨士伟（首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院　心内科12病房，北京　100029）通讯作者：周玉杰　E-mail：jackydang@静脉血栓栓塞性疾病（venous thromboembolism ，VTE ）包括深静脉血栓（deep venous thrombosis ，DVT ）和肺栓塞（pulmonary embolism ，PE ）。

近日，美国胸科医师协会（American College of Chest Physicians ，ACCP ）在Chest 杂志上公布了第9版《抗栓治疗及血栓预防指南》（ACCP-9）[1-4]。

此版指南在第8版基础上，结合最新循证医学证据，对抗栓治疗进行了全面细致的推荐。

本文将结合ACCP-9对VTE 的最新进展进行阐述。

1　病因与诱因Virchow 于1856年提出了导致静脉血栓形成的三因素假说：静脉血流淤滞、血管损伤和高凝状态。

经过大量试验证实，该假说目前已得到了公认。

许多参与上述过程的临床情况均可诱发静脉血栓形成，主要包括：（1）肢体制动：各种疾病导致的长时间卧床或肢体制动，如急性心肌梗死、主要脏器功能衰竭、脑卒中、大型手术后等；（2）静脉受压：如股动脉或静脉穿刺术后压迫止血导致下肢静脉回流受阻，妊娠、腹腔巨大肿瘤或大量腹水导致盆腔静脉或下腔静脉回流受阻等；（3）静脉曲张：主要是指深静脉曲张，浅静脉曲张一般不会导致血栓形成；（4）静脉损伤：如外伤或手术累及静脉、静脉穿刺、静脉炎等；（5）高凝状态：各种遗传性或获得性血栓形成倾向，如抗凝因子缺乏（抗凝血酶Ⅲ、C 蛋白或S 蛋白最常见）、弥漫性血管内凝血（disseminated intravascular coagulation ，DIC ）、抗磷脂综合征、肾病综合征、恶性肿瘤、大量呕吐或腹泻导致的脱水、药物因素（长期口服避孕药、激素或抗肿瘤药物）等；（6）其他：如高龄、吸烟、肥胖等。

美国胸科医师协会抗栓和溶栓治疗指南简介(2)

·１４２·ＣｈｉｎｅｓｅＪｏｕｍａＩｏｆＭｅｄｉｃｉｎａＩＧｕｉｄｅ２００５Ｖｏｌｕｍｅ７Ｎｏ．２（ＳｅｒｉａｌＮｏ．３７）美国胸科医师协会抗栓和溶栓治疗指南简介（２）胡大一孙艺红（北京大学人民医院心内科，北京１０００４４）六、瓣膜性心脏病的抗栓治疗一原位或人工瓣１．１伴房颤或体循环栓塞病史的风湿性二尖瓣病对于风湿性二尖瓣病变合并ＡＦ或既往有体循环栓塞的患者：１．１．１推荐长期ＯＡＣ治疗（目标ＩＮＲ，２．５；范围：２．０～３．０）（证据：１Ｃ＋）。

１．１．２建议临床医生不要联合应用ＯＡＣ和抗血小板药物（ＡＰＡ）治疗（证据：２Ｃ）（注：该建议认为避免联合应用ＯＡＣ和抗血小板治疗造成的额外出血危险较重要）。

对于风湿性二尖瓣病变合并ＡＦ或既往有体循环栓塞者，在接受治疗水平ＩＮＲ剂量的ＯＡＣｓ时发生体循环栓塞患者：１．１．３推荐加用ＡＳＡ，７５～１００ｍｇ／ｄ（证据：１Ｃ）。

对于不能服用ＡＳＡ的患者，推荐加用双嘧达莫４００ｍｇ／ｄ或噻氯匹定（证据：ｌＣ）。

１．２窦性心律的二尖瓣病变患者１．２．１对于风湿性二尖瓣病正常窦性心律的患者，若左房直径＞５．５ｃｍ，推荐长期ＶＫＡ治疗（目标ＩＮＲ，２．５；范围：２．０—３．０）（证据：２ｃ）（注：该建议将预防体循环栓塞及其后果放在较重要的地位，而对避免出血危险和服用ＯＡＣ治疗带来的不便放在次要位置）。

１．２．２对于风湿陛二尖瓣病正常窦性心律患者，若左房直径＜５．５ｅｍ，建议临床医生不要使用抗栓治疗（证据：２Ｃ）。

１．３进行二尖瓣瓣膜成形术的患者１．３．１对于行二尖瓣成形术的患者，在手术前３周和术后４周，推荐应用ＶＫＡ治疗，ＩＮＲ目标值为２．５（范围：２．０—３．０）（证据：２Ｃ）。

一２．０二尖瓣脱垂（ＭＶＰ）２．０．１无体循环栓塞及原因不明的短暂脑缺血发作（ＴＩＡｓ）或伴ＡＦ的ＭＶＰ患者，建议不使用任何抗血栓治疗（证据：ｌｃ）。

２．０．２伴原因不明ＴＩＡｓ史的ＭＶＰ患者，推荐长期应用ＡＳＡ治疗，５０～１６２ｍｇ／ｄ（证据：１Ａ）。

栓与血栓预防实践指南中文解读汇总

第九版美国胸科医师协会抗栓与血栓预防实践指南汇总二十余篇ACCP-9抗栓溶栓指南原文完整版下载地址： /bbs/topic/22270927翻译来自丁香园李慕白的强力之作：/topic/special/20120309/accp2012.htm抗栓热点CHEST ：第9版《美国胸科医师协会抗栓与血栓预防临床实践指南》之房颤的抗栓治疗不同的心房颤动（AF ）患者卒中风险差别很大。

而抗血栓治疗来预防卒中会相应地增加出血的风险。

因此，美国胸科医师协会根据第9版临床实践指南的方法论（Methodologyfor the Development of Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of ThrombosisGuidelines ），并基于临床净获益和大量的临床实例为不同卒中风险的房颤患者提供了抗血栓治疗的推荐。

对非风湿性房颤（包括间歇性房颤）的患者：1）低度卒中危险（CHADS2评分=0）（CHADS2评分是指充血性心力衰竭、高血压病、年龄>75岁、糖尿病、卒中或短暂性缺血发作病史，前面4项危险因素各为1分，最后一项为2分），建议无需抗栓治疗；对于选择抗栓治疗的患者，建议单用阿司匹林而不是口服抗凝药或阿司匹林和氯吡格雷联合治疗。

2）中度卒中危险（CHADS2评分=1），推荐口服抗凝药而不是不用药，并建议单用口服抗凝药而不是阿司匹林或阿司匹林和氯吡格雷联合治疗。

3）高度卒中危险（CHADS2评分≥2），推荐口服抗凝药，而不是不用药、单用阿司匹林或阿司匹林和氯吡格雷联合治疗。

上述推荐或建议的口服抗凝药，其建议达比加群150毫克每日2次，而不是剂量调整维生素K 拮抗剂。

因此，对于具有高危卒中风险（CHADS2得分≥2）的房颤患者，口服抗凝药是抗栓治疗的最佳选择。

而对于卒中风险较低的房颤患者，抗栓治疗需要更为个体化。

CHEST ：第9版《ACCP 临床实践指南》之缺血性卒中的抗栓和溶栓治疗指南为卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作（TIA ）患者提供了抗栓治疗推荐，有助于临床医生对卒中患者做出循证治疗决策。