2016美国总统大选电视辩论第二场
2016美国总统大选电视辩论第二场 希拉里川普互爆黑料斗智斗勇
2016美国总统大选电视辩论第二场希拉里川普互爆黑料斗智斗勇第二场总统大选电视辩论——川普希拉里巅峰对决高清视频全网独家下载对于美国总统候选人来讲，电视辩论是一场智力和体力的终极对决。
因为便是辩论中的表现可能会直接影响到最终的大选结果。
在历经了9月26日的第一场总统大选电视辩论上的剑拔弩张之后，副总统之间的角力对决也已经于10月4日落下帷幕。
今天美国总统大选第二场辩论，将于北京时间今日(10月10日)早上9点，在美国华盛顿大学举行。
美国共和党候选人特朗普有90分钟时间挽回自己的竞选生涯。
辩论主持人是美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)的安德森·库伯及美国广播公司(ABC)的拉达兹。
各大主流视频网站在线直播地址GET：Youtube直播地址： Youtube 2nd Presidential Debate at Washington UniversityCNN直播地址： CNN 2nd Presidential Debate at Washington UniversityNBC直播地址：NBC 2nd Presidential Debate at Washington University第二场电视辩论有哪些看点?——矛盾升级MAX如果说第一场电视辩论是礼尚往来之后，2016美国总统大学电视辩论第二场就开始来真格的了!【互挖黑历史】两位候选人辩论前夕都被曝出有损各自形象的“黑材料”。
《华盛顿邮报》7日公布了特朗普2005年一段用语非常粗俗的谈话录音，内容含有侮辱女性的言论。
“维基解密”网站也随即公开了黑客获取的希拉里华尔街高价演讲部分内容以及希拉里竞选团队一些内部邮件，其中一些言论与希拉里的公开立场不同，可能令民众对希拉里的诚信产生怀疑。
【提问环节】和第一场电视辩论的提问环节有所不同的是，这一的主持人仅负责提出半数问题，另半数将由盖洛普民意测验中心(Gallup)选出的未决选民提出。
截止小编发稿时候，第一个问题来自场下观众，这位观众问：上次辩论太“激烈”，小孩子要在大人陪同下才能观看，你们怎么看?【辩论爆点】特朗普避税疑云希拉里此前痛批共和党对手特朗普避税多年，称他是冷酷无情的商人，对国家没有贡献，她主张立法规定，参选总统必须公布税表。
美国总统大选第二场电视辩论
Transcript of second McCain, Obama debate NASHVILLE, Tennessee (CNN) -- Presidential candidates JohnMcCain and Barack Obama debated in Nashville, Tennessee, onTuesday night. NBC's Tom Brokaw moderated the debate. Here is a transcript of that debate.TOM: Good evening from Belmont University in Nashville, Tennessee. I'm Tom Brokaw of NBC News. And welcome to this second presidential debate, sponsored by the Commission on Presidential Debates. Tonight's debate is the only one with a town hall format. The Gallup Organization chose 80 uncommitted voters from the Nashville area to be here with us tonight. And earlier today, each of them gave me a copy of their question for the candidates. From all of these questions -- and from tens of thousands submitted online -- I have selected a long list of excellent questions on domestic and foreign policy. Neither the commission nor the candidates have seen the questions. And although we won't be able to get to all of them tonight, we should have a wide-ranging discussion one month before the election. Each candidate will have two minutes to respond to a common question, and there will be a one-minute follow-up. The audience here in the hall has agreed to be polite, and attentive, nocheering or outbursts. Those of you at home, of course, are not so constrained. The only exception in the hall is right now, as it is my privilege to introduce the candidates, Senator Barack Obama of Illinois and Senator John McCain of Arizona. Gentlemen? Gentlemen, we want to get underway immediately, if we can. Since you last met at Ole Miss 12 days ago, the world has changed a great deal, and not for the better. We still don't know where the bottom is at this time. As you might expect, many of the questions that we have from here in the hall tonight and from online have to do with the American economy and, in fact, with global economic conditions. I understand that you flipped a coin. And, Senator Obama, you will begin tonight. And we're going to have our first question from over here in Section A from Alan Schaefer. Alan ?QUESTION: With the economy on the downturn and retired and older citizens and workers losing their incomes, what's the fastest, most positive solution to bail these people out of the economic ruin?OBAMA: Well, Alan , thank you very much for the question. I want to first, obviously, thank Belmont University, Tom, thank you, and to all of you who are participating tonight and those of you who sent e-mail questions in. I think everybody knows now we are in the worstfinancial crisis since the Great Depression. And a lot of you I think are worried about your jobs, your pensions, your retirement accounts, your ability to send your child or your grandchild to college. And I believe this is a final verdict on the failed economic policies of the last eight years, strongly promoted by President Bush and supported by Senator McCain, that essentially said that we should strip away regulations, consumer protections, let the market run wild, and prosperity would rain down on all of us. It hasn't worked out that way. And so now we've got to take some decisive action.Now, step one was a rescue package that was passed last week. We've got to make sure that works properly. And that means strong oversight, making sure that investors, taxpayers are getting their money back and treated as investors. It means that we are cracking down on CEOs and making sure that they're not getting bonuses or golden parachutes as a consequence of this package. And, in fact, we just found out that AIG, a company that got a bailout, just a week after they got help went on a $400,000 junket. And I'll tell you what, the Treasury should demand that money back and those executives should be fired. But that's only step one.The middle-class need a rescue package. And that means tax cuts for the middle-class. It means help for homeowners so that they can stay in their homes. It means that we are helping state and localgovernments set up road projects and bridge projects that keep people in their jobs. And then long-term we've got to fix our health care system, we've got to fix our energy system that is putting such an enormous burden on families. You need somebody working for you and you've got to have somebody in Washington who is thinking about the middle class and not just those who can afford to hire lobbyists.TOM : Senator McCain?MCCAIN: Well, thank you, Tom. Thank you, Belmont University. And Senator Obama, it's good to be with you at a town hall meeting. And, Alan , thank you for your question. You go to the heart of America's worries tonight. Americans are angry, they're upset, and they're a little fearful. It's our job to fix the problem.Now, I have a plan to fix this problem and it has got to do with energy independence. We've got to stop sending $700 billion a year to countries that don't want us very -- like us very much. We have to keep Americans' taxes low. All Americans' taxes low. Let's not raise taxes on anybody today. We obviously have to stop this spending spree that's going on in Washington. Do you know that we've laid a $10 trillion debt on these young Americans who are here with us tonight, $500 billion of it we owe to China? We've got to have a package of reforms and it has got to lead to reform prosperity and peace in the world. And I think that thisproblem has become so severe, as you know, that we're going to have to do something about home values. You know that home values of retirees continues to decline and people are no longer able to afford their mortgage payments. As president of the United States, Alan, I would order the secretary of the treasury to immediately buy up the bad home loan mortgages in America and renegotiate at the new value of those homes -- at the diminished value of those homes and let people be able to make those -- be able to make those payments and stay in their homes. Is it expensive? Yes. But we all know, my friends, until we stabilize home values in America, we're never going to start turning around and creating jobs and fixing our economy. And we've got to give some trust and confidence back to America. I know how the do that, my friends. And it's my proposal, it's not Senator Obama's proposal, it's not President Bush's proposal. But I know how to get America working again, restore our economy and take care of working Americans. Thank you.TOM: Senator, we have one minute for a discussion here. Obviously the powers of the treasury secretary have been greatly expanded. The most powerful officer in the cabinet now. Hank Paulson says he won't stay on. Who do you have in mind to appoint to that very important post? Senator McCain?MCCAIN: Not you, Tom.TOM : No, with good reason.MCCAIN: You know, that's a tough question and there's a lot of qualified Americans. But I think the first criteria, Tom, would have to be somebody who immediately Americans identify with, immediately say, we can trust that individual. A supporter of Senator Obama's is Warren Buffett. He has already weighed in and helped stabilize some of the difficulties in the markets and with companies and corporations, institutions today. I like Meg Whitman, she knows what it's like to be out there in the marketplace. She knows how to create jobs. Meg Whitman was CEO of a company that started with 12 people and is now 1.3 million people in America make their living off eBay. Maybe somebody here has done a little business with them.But the point is it's going to have to be somebody who inspires trust and confidence. Because the problem in America today to a large extent, Tom, is that we don't have trust and confidence in our institutions because of the corruption on Wall Street and the greed and excess and the cronyism in Washington, D.C.TOM: All right. Senator McCain -- Senator Obama, who do you have in mind for treasury secretary?OBAMA: Well, Warren would be a pretty good choice -- Warren Buffett, and I'm pleased to have his support. But there are other folks out there. The key is making sure that the next treasury secretary understands that it's not enough just to help those at the top. Prosperity is not just going to trickle down. We've got to help the middle class. OBAMA: And we've -- you know, Senator McCain and I have some fundamental disagreements on the economy, starting with Senator McCain's statement earlier that he thought the fundamentals of the economy were sound. Part of the problem here is that for many of you, wages and incomes have flat-lined. For many of you, it is getting harder and harder to save, harder and harder to retire. And that's why, for example, on tax policy, what I want to do is provide a middle class tax cut to 95 percent of working Americans, those who are working two jobs, people who are not spending enough time with their kids, because they are struggling to make ends meet. Senator McCain is right that we've got to stabilize housing prices. But underlying that is loss of jobs and loss of income. That's something that the next treasury secretary is going to have to work on.TOM: Senator Obama, thank you very much. May I remind both of you, if I can, that we're operating under rules that you signed off on and when we have a discussion, it really is to be confined within abouta minute or so. We're going to go now, Senator McCain, to the next question from you from the hall here, and it comes from Oliver Clark (ph), who is over here in section F. Oliver?QUESTION: Well, Senators, through this economic crisis, most of the people that I know have had a difficult time. And through this bailout package, I was wondering what it is that's going to actually help those people out.MCCAIN: Well, thank you, Oliver, and that's an excellent question, because as you just described it, bailout, when I believe that it's rescue, because -- because of the greed and excess in Washington and Wall Street, Main Street was paying a very heavy price, and we know that. I left my campaign and suspended it to go back to Washington to make sure that there were additional protections for the taxpayer in the form of good oversight, in the form of taxpayers being the first to be paid back when our economy recovers -- and it will recover -- and a number of other measures.But you know, one of the real catalysts, really the match that lit this fire was Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. I'll bet you, you may never even have heard of them before this crisis. But you know, they're the ones that, with the encouragement of Senator Obama and his cronies andhis friends in Washington, that went out and made all these risky loans, gave them to people that could never afford to pay back. And you know, there were some of us that stood up two years ago and said we've got to enact legislation to fix this. We've got to stop this greed and excess. Meanwhile, the Democrats in the Senate and some -- and some members of Congress defended what Fannie and Freddie were doing. They resisted any change. Meanwhile, they were getting all kinds of money in campaign contributions. Senator Obama was the second highest recipient of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac money in history -- in history. So this rescue package means that we will stabilize markets, we will shore up these institutions. But it's not enough. That's why we're going to have to go out into the housing market and we're going to have to buy up these bad loans and we're going to have to stabilize home values, and that way, Americans, like Alan, can realize the American dream and stay in their home. But Fannie and Freddie were the catalysts, the match that started this forest fire. There were some of us -- there were some of us that stood up against it. There were others who took a hike.TOM: Senator Obama?OBAMA: Well, Oliver, first, let me tell you what's in the rescuepackage for you. Right now, the credit markets are frozen up and what that means, as a practical matter, is that small businesses and some large businesses just can't get loans. If they can't get a loan, that means that they can't make payroll. If they can't make payroll, then they may end up having to shut their doors and lay people off. And if you imagine just one company trying to deal with that, now imagine a million companies all across the country. So it could end up having an adverse effect on everybody, and that's why we had to take action. But we shouldn't have been there in the first place.Now, I've got to correct a little bit of Senator McCain's history, not surprisingly. Let's, first of all, understand that the biggest problem in this whole process was the deregulation of the financial system. Senator McCain, as recently as March, bragged about the fact that he is a deregulator. On the other hand, two years ago, I said that we've got a sub-prime lending crisis that has to be dealt with. I wrote to Secretary Paulson, I wrote to Federal Reserve Chairman Bernanke, and told them this is something we have to deal with, and nobody did anything about it. A year ago, I went to Wall Street and said we've got to reregulate, and nothing happened. And Senator McCain during that period said that we should keep on deregulating because that's how the free enterprise system works. Now, with respect to Fannie Mae, what Senator McCain didn't mention is the fact that this bill that he talked about wasn't hisown bill. He jumped on it a year after it had been introduced and it never got passed. And I never promoted Fannie Mae. In fact, Senator McCain's campaign chairman's firm was a lobbyist on behalf of Fannie Mae, not me. So -- but, look, you're not interested in hearing politicians pointing fingers. What you're interested in is trying to figure out, how is this going to impact you? This is not the end of the process; this is the beginning of the process. And that's why it's going to be so important for us to work with homeowners to make sure that they can stay in their homes. The secretary already has the power to do that in the rescue package, but it hasn't been exercised yet. And the next president has to make sure that the next Treasury secretary is thinking about how to strengthen you as a home buyer, you as a homeowner, and not simply think about bailing out banks on Wall Street.TOM: Senator Obama, time for a discussion. I'm going to begin with you. Are you saying to Mr. Clark (ph) and to the other members of the American television audience that the American economy is going to get much worse before it gets better and they ought to be prepared for that?OBAMA: No, I am confident about the American economy. But we aregoing to have to have some leadership from Washington that not only sets out much better regulations for the financial system. The problem is we still have a archaic, 20th-century regulatory system for 21st-century financial markets. We're going to have to coordinate with other countries to make sure that whatever actions we take work. But most importantly, we're going to have to help ordinary families be able to stay in their homes, make sure that they can pay their bills, deal with critical issues like health care and energy, and we're going to have to change the culture in Washington so that lobbyists and special interests aren't driving the process and your voices aren't being drowned out.TOM: Senator McCain, in all candor, do you think the economy is going to get worse before it gets better?MCCAIN: I think it depends on what we do. I think if we act effectively, if we stabilize the housing market -- which I believe we can, if we go out and buy up these bad loans, so that people can have a new mortgage at the new value of their home -- I think if we get rid of the cronyism and special interest influence in Washington so we can act more effectively. My friend, I'd like you to see the letter that a group of senators and I wrote warning exactly of this crisis. Senator Obama'sname was not on that letter. The point is -- the point is that we can fix our economy. Americans' workers are the best in the world. They're the fundamental aspect of America's economy. They're the most innovative. They're the best -- they're most -- have best -- we're the best exporters. We're the best importers. They're most effective. They are the best workers in the world. And we've got to give them a chance. They've got -- we've got to give them a chance to do their best again. And they are the innocent bystanders here in what is the biggest financial crisis and challenge of our time. We can do it.TOM: Thank you, Senator McCain. We're going to continue over in Section F, as it turns out. Senator Obama, this is a question from you from Theresa Finch. Theresa ?QUESTION: How can we trust either of you with our money when both parties got -- got us into this global economic crisis?OBAMA: Well, look, I understand your frustration and your cynicism, because while you've been carrying out your responsibilities -- most of the people here, you've got a family budget. If less money is coming in, you end up making cuts. Maybe you don't go out to dinner as much. Maybe you put off buying a new car. That's not what happens inWashington. And you're right. There is a lot of blame to go around. But I think it's important just to remember a little bit of history. When George Bush came into office, we had surpluses. And now we have half-a-trillion-dollar deficit annually. When George Bush came into office, our debt -- national debt was around $5 trillion. It's now over $10 trillion. We've almost doubled it. And so while it's true that nobody's completely innocent here, we have had over the last eight years the biggest increases in deficit spending and national debt in our history. And Senator McCain voted for four out of five of those George Bush budgets. So here's what I would do. I'm going to spend some money on the key issues that we've got to work on.You know, you may have seen your health care premiums go up. We've got to reform health care to help you and your budget. We are going to have to deal with energy because we can't keep on borrowing from the Chinese and sending money to Saudi Arabia. We are mortgaging our children's future. We've got to have a different energy plan. We've got to invest in college affordability. So we're going to have to make some investments, but we've also got to make spending cuts. And what I've proposed, you'll hear Senator McCain say, well, he's proposing a whole bunch of new spending, but actually I'm cutting more than I'm spending so that it will be a net spending cut. The key is whether or not we've got priorities that are working for you as opposed to thosewho have been dictating the policy in Washington lately, and that's mostly lobbyists and special interests. We've got to put an end to that.TOM: Senator McCain?MCCAIN: Well, Theresa (ph), thank you. And I can see why you feel that cynicism and mistrust, because the system in Washington is broken. And I have been a consistent reformer. I have advocated and taken on the special interests, whether they be the big money people by reaching across the aisle and working with Senator Feingold on campaign finance reform, whether it being a variety of other issues, working with Senator Lieberman on trying to address climate change.I have a clear record of bipartisanship. The situation today cries out for bipartisanship. Senator Obama has never taken on his leaders of his party on a single issue. And we need to reform. And so let's look at our records as well as our rhetoric. That's really part of your mistrust here. And now I suggest that maybe you go to some of these organizations that are the watchdogs of what we do, like the Citizens Against Government Waste or the National Taxpayers Union or these other organizations that watch us all the time. I don't expect you to watch every vote. And you know what you'll find? This is the most liberal big-spending record in the United States Senate. I have fought againstexcessive spending and outrages. I have fought to reduce the earmarks and eliminate them. Do you know that Senator Obama has voted for -- is proposing $860 billion of new spending now? New spending. Do you know that he voted for every increase in spending that I saw come across the floor of the United States Senate while we were working to eliminate these pork barrel earmarks? He voted for nearly a billion dollars in pork barrel earmark projects, including, by the way, $3 million for an overhead projector at a planetarium in Chicago, Illinois. My friends, do we need to spend that kind of money? I think you have to look at my record and you have to look at his. Then you have to look at our proposals for our economy, not $860 billion in new spending, but for the kinds of reforms that keep people in their jobs, get middle-income Americans working again, and getting our economy moving again. You're going to be examining our proposals tonight and in the future, and energy independence is a way to do that, is one of them. And drilling offshore and nuclear power are two vital elements of that. And I've been supporting those and I know how to fix this economy, and eliminate our dependence on foreign oil, and stop sending $700 billion a year overseas.TOM: We've run out of time. We have this one-minute discussion period going on here. There are new economic realities out there thateveryone in this hall and across this country understands that there are going to have to be some choices made. Health policies, energy policies, and entitlement reform, what are going to be your priorities in what order? Which of those will be your highest priority your first year in office and which will follow in sequence? Senator McCain?MCCAIN: The three priorities were health...TOM: The three -- health care, energy, and entitlement reform: Social Security and Medicare. In what order would you put them in terms of priorities?MCCAIN: I think you can work on all three at once, Tom. I think it's very important that reform our entitlement programs. My friends, we are not going to be able to provide the same benefit for present-day workers that we are going -- that present-day retirees have today. We're going to have to sit down across the table, Republican and Democrat, as we did in 1983 between Ronald Reagan and Tip O'Neill. I know how to do that. I have a clear record of reaching across the aisle, whether it be Joe Lieberman or Russ Feingold or Ted Kennedy or others. That's my clear record. We can work on nuclear power plants. Build a whole bunch of them, create millions of new jobs. We have tohave all of the above, alternative fuels, wind, tide, solar, natural gas, clean coal technology. All of these things we can do as Americans and we can take on this mission and we can overcome it.My friends, some of this $700 billion ends up in the hands of terrorist organizations. As far as health care is concerned, obviously, everyone is struggling to make sure that they can afford their premiums and that they can have affordable and available health care. That's the next issue. But we can do them all at once. There's no -- and we have to do them all at once. All three you mentioned are compelling national security requirements.TOM: I'm trying to play by the rules that you all established. One minute for discussion. Senator Obama, if you would give us your list of priorities, there are some real questions about whether everything can be done at once.OBAMA: We're going to have to prioritize, just like a family has to prioritize. Now, I've listed the things that I think have to be at the top of the list. Energy we have to deal with today, because you're paying $3.80 here in Nashville for gasoline, and it could go up. And it's a strain on your family budget, but it's also bad for our national security, because countries like Russia and Venezuela and, you know, in somecases, countries like Iran, are benefiting from higher oil prices. So we've got to deal with that right away. That's why I've called for an investment of $15 billion a year over 10 years. Our goal should be, in 10 year's time, we are free of dependence on Middle Eastern oil. And we can do it. Now, when JFK said we're going to the Moon in 10 years, nobody was sure how to do it, but we understood that, if the American people make a decision to do something, it gets done. So that would be priority number one.Health care is priority number two, because that broken health care system is bad not only for families, but it's making our businesses less competitive. And, number three, we've got to deal with education so that our young people are competitive in a global economy. But just one point I want to make, Tom. Senator McCain mentioned looking at our records. We do need to look at our records. Senator McCain likes to talk about earmarks a lot. And that's important. I want to go line by line through every item in the federal budget and eliminate programs that don't work and make sure that those that do work, work better and cheaper. But understand this: We also have to look at where some of our tax revenues are going. So when Senator McCain proposes a $300 billion tax cut, a continuation not only of the Bush tax cuts, but an additional $200 billion that he's going to give to big corporations, including big oil companies, $4 billion worth, that's money out of thesystem. And so we've got to prioritize both our spending side and our tax policies to make sure that they're working for you. That's what I'm going to do as president of the United States.TOM: All right, gentlemen, I want to just remind you one more time about time. We're going to have a larger deficit than the federal government does if we don't get this under control here before too long. Senator McCain, for you, we have our first question from the Internet tonight. A child of the Depression, 78-year-old Fiora (ph) from Chicago.Question: Since World War II, we have never been asked to sacrifice anything to help our country, except the blood of our heroic men and women. As president, what sacrifices -- sacrifices will you ask every American to make to help restore the American dream and to get out of the economic morass that we're now in?MCCAIN: Well, Fiora (ph), I'm going to ask the American people to understand that there are some programs that we may have to eliminate. I first proposed a long time ago that we would have to examine every agency and every bureaucracy of government. And we're going to have to eliminate those that aren't working. I know a lotof them that aren't working. One of them is in defense spending, because I've taken on some of the defense contractors. I saved the taxpayers $6.8 billion in a deal for an Air Force tanker that was done in a corrupt fashion. I believe that we have to eliminate the earmarks. And sometimes those projects, not -- not the overhead projector that Senator Obama asked for, but some of them that are really good projects, will have -- will have to be eliminated, as well. And they'll have to undergo the same scrutiny that all projects should in competition with others. So we're going to have to tell the American people that spending is going to have to be cut in America. And I recommend a spending freeze that -- except for defense, Veterans Affairs, and some other vital programs, we'll just have to have across-the-board freeze. And some of those programs may not grow as much as we would like for them to, but we can establish priorities with full transparency, with full knowledge of the American people, and full consultation, not done behind closed doors and shoving earmarks in the middle of the night into programs that we don't even -- sometimes we don't even know about until months later. And, by the way, I want to go back a second. Look, we can attack health care and energy at the same time. We're not -- we're not -- we're not rifle shots here. We are Americans. We can, with the participation of all Americans, work together and solve these problems together. Frankly,。
美国总统大选第二场辩论(中文字幕完整版)(转自CNN)-(-厦门韦博英语培训提供
美国总统大选第二场辩论（中文字幕完整版）（转自CNN）-(-厦门韦博英语培训提供美国总统大选第二场辩论（中文字幕完整版）（转自CNN）-(-厦门韦博英语培训提供美国总统大选第二场辩论（中文字幕完整版）（转自CNN）-(-厦门韦博英语培训提供美国总统大选第二场辩论（中文字幕完整版）Transcript: Second presidential debatePosted by CNN Political Unit(CNN) - President Barack Obama and Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney met in Hempstead, New York Tuesday evening for the second of three presidential debates, moderated by CNN Chief Political Correspondent Candy Crowley.CROWLEY: Good evening from Hofstra University in Hempstead, New York. I'm Candy Crowley from CNN's "State of the Union." We are here for the second presidential debate, a town hall, sponsored by the Commission on Presidential Debates.CROWLEY: The Gallup organization chose 82 uncommitted voters from the New York area. Their questions will drive the night. My goal is to give the conversation direction and to ensure questions get answered.The questions are known to me and my team only. Neither the commission, nor the candidates have seen them. I hope to get to as many questions as possible.CROWLEY: And because I am the optimistic sort, I'm sure the candidates will oblige by keeping their answers concise and on point.Each candidate has as much as two minutes to respond to a common question, and there will be a two-minute follow-up. The audience here in the hall has agreed to be polite and attentive - no cheering or booing or outbursts of any sort. We will set aside that agreement just this once to welcome President Barack Obama and Governor Mitt Romney.(APPLAUSE)Gentlemen, thank you both for joining us here tonight. We have a lot of folks who've been waiting all day to talk to you, so I want to get right to it. Governor Romney, as you know, you won the coin toss, so the first question will go to you. And I want to turn to a first-time voter, Jeremy Epstein, who has a question for you.QUESTION: Mr. President, Governor Romney, as a 20-year-old college student,all I hear from professors, neighbors and others is that when I graduate, I will have little chance to get employment. What can you say to reassure me, but more importantly my parents, that I will be able to sufficiently support myself after I graduate?ROMNEY: Thank you, Jeremy. I appreciate your - your question, and thank you for being here this evening and to all of those from Nassau County that have come, thank you for your time. Thank you to Hofstra University and to Candy Crowley for organizing and leading this - this event.Thank you, Mr. President, also for being part of this - this debate.College kids all over this country. I was in Pennsylvania with someone who had just graduated - this was in Philadelphia - and she said, "I've got my degree. I can't find a job. I've got three part-time jobs. They're just barely enough to pay for my food and pay for an apartment. I can't begin to pay back my student loans."So what we have to do is two things. We have to make sure that we make it easier for kids to afford college.ROMNEY: And also make sure that when they get out of college, there's a job. When I was governor of Massachusetts, to get a high school degree, you had to pass an exam. If you graduated in the top quarter of your class, we gave you a John and Abigail Adams scholarship, four years tuition free in the college of your choice in Massachusetts, it's a public institution.I want to make sure we keep our Pell grant program growing. We're also going to have our loan program, so that people are able to afford school. But the key thing is to make sure you can get a job when you get out of school. And what's happened over the last four years has been very, very hard for America's young people. I want you to be able to get a job.I know what it takes to get this economy going. With half of college kids graduating this year without a college - excuse me, without a job. And without a college level job, that's just unacceptable.And likewise you've got more and more debt on your back. So more debt and less jobs. I'm going to change that. I know what it takes to create good jobs again. I know what it takes to make sure that you have the kind of opportunity you deserve. And kids across this country are going to recognize, we're bringing back an economy. It's not going to be like the last four years. The middle-class has been crushed over the last four years, and jobs have been too scarce. I know what it takes to bring them back, and I'm going to do that, and make sure that when you graduate - when do you graduate?QUESTION: 2014.ROMNEY: 2014. When you come out in 2014, I presume I'm going to be president. I'm going to make sure you get a job. Thanks Jeremy. Yeah, you bet. CROWLEY: Mr. President?OBAMA: Jeremy, first of all, your future is bright. And the fact that you're making an investment in higher education is critical. Not just to you, but to the entire nation. Now, the most important thing we can do is to make sure that we are creating jobs in this country. But not just jobs, good paying jobs. Ones that can support a family.OBAMA: And what I want to do, is build on the five million jobs that we've created over the last 30 months in the private sector alone. And there are a bunch of things we can do to make sure yourfuture is bright.Number one, I want to build manufacturing jobs in this country again. Now when Governor Romney said we should let Detroit go bankrupt. I said we're going to bet on American workers and theAmerican auto industry and it's come surging back.I want to do that in industries, not just in Detroit, but all across the country andthat means we change our tax code so we're giving incentives to companies that are investing here in the United States and creating jobs here.It also means we're helping them and small businesses to export all around the world to new markets.Number two, we've got to make sure that we have the best education system in the world. And the fact that you're going to college is great, but I want everybody to get a great education andwe've worked hard to make sure that student loans are available for folks like you, but I also want to make sure that community colleges are offering slots for workers to get retrained for the jobs that are out there right now and the jobs of the future.Number three, we've got to control our own energy. Now, not only oil and natural gas, which we've been investing in; but also, we've got to make sure we're building the energy source of the future, not just thinking about next year, but ten years from now, 20 years from now. That's why we've invested in solar and wind and biofuels, energy efficient cars.We've got to reduce our deficit, but we've got to do it in a balanced way. Asking the wealthy to pay a little bit more along with cuts so that we can invest in education like yours. And let's take the money that we've been spending on war over the last decade to rebuild America, roads, bridges schools. We do those things, not only is your future going to be bright but America's future is going to bright as well. CROWLEY: Let me ask you for more immediate answer and begin with Mr. Romney just quickly what - what can you do? We're looking at a situation where 40 percent of the unemployed have been unemployed have been unemployed for six months or more. They don't have the two years that Jeremy has.美国总统大选第二场辩论（中文字幕完整版）（转自CNN）-(-厦门韦博英语培训提供温馨提示：我们厦门韦博英语分级别，分层级进行教学，适合不同英语基础的学员学习，如果您想报名学习的课程，我们会为您免费提供国际顶级口语水平测试。
美国总统选举电视辩论两则
比 赛 当天 。 尼克松 不 但拒 绝 ｌ 妆 ． 至连 胡 子 部 漫 就走 上 了 匕 甚
舞 台： 电视 台也按 照 原 计 划 ， 开 了所 有 的 灯 ， 舞 台照 得 恍 如 白 打 将
昼， 自然 ， 台上 的 温度 也特 别 高 ， 克松 只 得在 辩论 中 不 滓地 拿 舞 尼 手 帕擦 拭 额 头上 的 汗 ； 并且 ， 了一段 时 间 后 ， 站 尼克 松 的 刚痊 愈 的 脚 就开 始 隐 隐作 痛 ， 表情 也 变得痛 苦 起来 。
人看 起 来精 神抖 擞 ， 求 候选人 站 立辩 论 。 要 肯尼 迪事 先 了解 到这 一
点。 预料到灯光加强， 现场温度肯定 升高 ， 便在比赛 时， 了身较薄 穿
５ ２圜 ２． 导 术 ０６ ｌ 艺 ００领 ９
的西 服 而 怕热 、剐 刚 圈脚 伤 亡 院 周 的尼 宽 松却 忽视 了这 些 信 蔓
和老布什的教训 ， 莫要 因小失大 。
（ 自《 讲与 口才 》 摘 演 ）
余。 两相 对 比 ， 观众 心 中有 了判 断 ， 论 结束 后 ， 尼迪 的 支持 率 直 辩 肯 线上升 。 尼 克松 万 万想不 到 ， 自己会 败 在几 个他 压 根儿 就 没注 意 的小
问题 上 。 场辩论 下 来 ， 在 观众心 中就成 了形 象邋遢 、 台 紧张 、 ～ 他 上 表情 疲 惫的 代 言 人 ， 此 印象 ， 如 支持 率 又 怎能 不 的尼 克松 连 胡须 也 没有 刮干 净 ， 形象 十
分邋 遢 ； 并且 ， 色 苍 白， 头汗 水清 晰 可 见 ， 停地 擦拭 汗水 的动 脸 额 不
作显 得 他十分 紧张 ； 至． 情也越 来越 痛 苦 ， 起来 十 分疲 惫 而 甚 表 看 肯尼迪则不 同， 轻英俊 、 态潇洒， 年 仪 整场 辩 论 神情 自若 、 刃 有 游
2016美国总统大选电视辩论首选高清视频录像回放
2016美国总统大选电视辩论首选高清视频录像回放美国东部时间：2016年9月26日，下午2点。
美国2016年总统大选第一场辩论正式开战。
小编整理了2016美国总统大选电视辩论首选全程直播高清视频录像回放中文字幕内容，希望大家喜欢! 2016美国总统大选电视辩论首选直播高清视频录像回放下载2016美国总统选举首选电视辩论内容美国相关安全部门已经在长岛的霍夫斯特拉大学部署就绪。
总统大选辩论共有三场，26号为首场辩论。
辩论举办地在美国长岛的霍夫斯特拉大学。
辩手：民主党候选人：希拉里·克林顿共和党候选人：唐纳德·特朗普辩论持续时间：90分钟。
共分为六个部分，每部分15分钟时限。
大选辩论的意义何在?根据Nielson统计有1/3的选民表示辩论会对他们的投票决定产生重大影响，由此可见，距离大选结果尘埃落定还有一个多月，这三场辩论有着“扭转乾坤”的潜力。
这无疑为原本就备受关注的2016美国大选添了油加了醋，增加了大选的戏剧性和可看性。
在这个离大选结果只有一个多月的关头，希拉里和特朗普的两扇大门横在仍旧徘徊不定的选民面前，这场辩论就是他们最后的钥匙，让他们自行选择走进哪扇门。
废话不多说，我们开门见山，直奔主题，看看双方辩手在六个辩论板块中的表现。
Round One: Achieving Prosperity/实现富裕.这部分讨论的核心是美国的就业现状。
背景：从下图可见美国的失业率自金融危机以来逐渐回落到5%的水平, 但是收入不均现象仍旧险峻，有一半的美国人生活拮据，靠工资度日。
Part1:主持人：“Why are you a better choice than your opponent to create the kinds of jobs that will put more money in the pockets of American workers?”“你为什么觉得自己能比竞争对手创造更多的工作机会，以此给美国的工人带去更高的薪水?”Hillary：“First, we have to build an economy that works for everyone not just for those at the top. That means we need new jobs, good jobs, with rising incomes. I want us to invest in you. I want us to invest in your future. That means jobs in infrastructure, in advanced manufacturing, in innovation, in technology, clean renewable energy and small businesses."希拉里：“首先，我们要打造一个为每个人服务的经济体系，而不仅仅是为了顶层人士。
第二场总统辩论
第二场总统辩论：火药味浓，川普止血2016-10-10 作者：柯振兴谁能想到，在第二次总统辩论前的48小时内会发生那么多事情：共和党方面，川普先是被爆出非常露骨的羞辱女性的言论，以致于大批共和党人要求川普退出竞选，川普向民众道歉但是表示自己不会退选，民主党方面，维基解密突然又披露希拉里有偿演讲的部分语录。
因此，在第二次总统辩论之前，观众也被调高了胃口。
在第二场电视辩论中，希拉里能否乘胜追击，凭借稳健的表现再度拉高民调，特别是稳定住关键州的领先优势？在共和党的巨大压力下，川普能否以自己的表现稳定自己的军心，为自己的选情止血？川普在被提问这些事情时，会不会被激怒而失态，从而再次自损形象？有人甚至预测如果川普在本场表现糟糕，选举就将提前一个月结束。
在总统辩论前，川普还带着Paula Jones、Kathy Shelton、Juanita Broaddrick 和Kathleen Willey四位女士召开了一场小型新闻发布会，Jones，Broaddrick和Willey都声称前总统比尔·克林顿曾性骚扰或者强奸她们（但是法院都没有支持）。
这也是川普对希拉里阵营的反击，试图抹黑比尔·克林顿来打击希拉里的选情。
在辩论开始之前，双方入场后也没有握手，在观众席上的比尔克林顿也一脸严肃。
这也预示着本场辩论将充满火药味。
在第一场辩论中，电视辩论的主持人设计了“美国的前进方向”，“实现繁荣”和“保障美国安全”三个模块，分别辩论了经济问题，种族问题和国家安全与外交问题。
本次辩论中，很多选题则是从选民和网民的建议中筛选出来。
本次辩论的另一个特点是采用市政厅（Town Hall）的方式，类似一个小剧场，一些被随机选择的至今还未确定投票给谁的观众坐在两边，根据主持人的安排向舞台中间的两位候选人提问，而两位主持人负责控制时间以及促进讨论。
在这种小剧场，两位候选人也不用像上一场一直站在麦克风前回答问题，他们可以走动，特别是走到观众前回答问题。
美国总统选举辩论辩题
美国总统选举辩论辩题正方（支持美国总统选举辩论）：作为美国总统选举的重要环节，选举辩论是候选人展示自己政治理念和能力的重要机会。
首先，选举辩论能够帮助选民更好地了解候选人的政治立场和政策主张。
通过辩论，候选人可以就重大议题展开讨论，让选民更清楚地了解候选人的政治主张，有助于选民做出更明智的选择。
其次，选举辩论也能够提高选民的政治参与度。
通过观看辩论，选民可以更深入地了解候选人的政见，从而更加积极地参与到选举过程中来。
最后，选举辩论也有助于促进政治对话和民主价值观。
在辩论中，候选人可以就各种政治议题进行深入讨论，这有助于促进政治对话，让选民更好地了解各种政治观点，有助于民主社会的发展。
反方（反对美国总统选举辩论）：选举辩论并不能真正反映候选人的政治能力和素质。
首先，选举辩论往往只是表面功夫，候选人会在辩论中使用花言巧语来迷惑选民，而实际上并不能真正展现其政治能力。
其次，选举辩论往往只是形式主义，候选人会在辩论中避重就轻，而不是真正就重大议题进行深入讨论。
最后，选举辩论也容易受到舆论和媒体的影响，这样就会导致候选人在辩论中表现不真实，从而误导选民的判断。
正如美国前总统林肯所说，“你可以骗所有人一部分时间，也可以骗一部分人所有时间，但你无法骗所有人所有时间。
”选举辩论往往只是候选人表面的政治表演，不能真正反映其政治能力和素质。
综上所述，选举辩论在一定程度上有助于选民更好地了解候选人的政治立场和政策主张，提高选民的政治参与度，促进政治对话和民主价值观。
但是，选举辩论也存在着表面功夫、形式主义和容易受到舆论和媒体影响的问题。
因此，我们应该在推进选举辩论的同时，也应该对选举辩论进行改革，让选举辩论更加真实、公正和深入。
基于框架理论的美国总统大选辩论文本分析——以2016年电视辩论为例
|RADIO ＆TV JOURNAL 2019.042016年美国大选结果公布之前，许多人并不看好特朗普，因为其大胆的言论、夸张的言谈举止，似乎并不“像”总统的合适人选。
包括在大选的电视辩论中，与之前历届总统以及竞争对手希拉里相比，特朗普都显得与众不同。
因此，特朗普当选的消息一度引起广泛轰动。
通过对本次大选的重要环节———电视辩论进行观察分析之后会发现，特朗普的辩论风格也许看起来疯狂，但却是十分吸引人的，这与他辩论中完整的框架与逻辑是分不开的。
关于总统辩论的研究一般主要集中在政治学领域、辩论学领域，但很少有学者从传播学框架理论的角度讨论总统辩论。
本文主要采用框架理论对2016年美国总统大选中现任总统特朗普和民主党候选人希拉里的电视辩论文本中的语言符号进行分类整理与分析，采取普查的方式，对三次辩论的整体文本进行梳理，分析框架理论在2016年美国总统辩论中的应用情况及其所起到的作用。
一、认知框架中的框架框定认知框架，也被称为概念框架，其在语义上与交际事件相关。
认知框架的特点是：每个框架都有固定的基本范畴；语言表达跟随认知观点变化，反之亦然；一个完整框架的各个元素之间都是紧密关联的。
如果其中一个被提及，那么框架内的其他元素都会被激活。
人们总是在框架中进行思考。
在辩论中，认知框架可以帮助辩论者进行框架框定。
其恰当运用在辩论中起着至关重要的作用，在保证认知框架在公众心目中的坚固性的同时也方便了对相关话题的辩论，从而轻松击败对手。
希拉里和特朗普的辩论清楚地揭示了他们关于税收的不同政策。
在辩论过程中，特朗普率先直接采用了“税收减免”的说法，在“税收”框架下有效运用相关认知框架。
在希拉里对经济做了一番较为积极乐观的评估以及展望之后，特朗普使用“税收是一种灾难”的隐喻，表示自己不同意希拉里的增税政策。
对于美国人而言，这里的灾难不仅指美国经济，更是美国企业的未来发展，以及它们能提供给美国人的就业机会，紧接着便是美国人的生活水平。
政治语篇中的隐喻框架分析
政治语篇中的隐喻框架分析作者：唐春艳来源：《汉字文化(教育科研卷)》2017年第09期【提要】本文以2016年美总统大选第二场电视辩论希拉里和特朗普的辩论词为语料，分析隐喻、框架以及道德模型三者在政治语篇中的关系，研究发现：（1）民主党和共和党奉行的道德模型是其辩论的最深层的隐喻框架；（2）美国两党善用隐喻为议题构建次级框架，再通过一系列相互关联的隐喻或非隐喻的话语表达强化次级框架，使得自身的道德观深入民心，达到自己的政治意图。
（3）道德模型—议题框架—话语表达对应于政治语篇的深层框架—次级框架—表层框架。
【关键词】政治语篇框架隐喻道德模型一、引言政治语篇具有强烈的政治色彩，是政客们表达自身政治立场和说服民众的重要手段。
对政治语篇的研究由来已久，Charteris - Black （ 2004）用批评话语分析和概念隐喻理論分析了英国两大党的政治宣言和美国总统就职演说； Scacco （2009）从批评隐喻的视角分析了奥巴马任职 100 天内经济类演说中的概念隐喻。
汪少华（2011）以及梁靖玉、汪少华（ 2013，2015）运用框架理论分别对布什与奥巴马有关伊斯兰世界政策的演讲和布什与奥巴马颁布的教育法案、发表的医保演说进行分析，验证了 Lakoff（2013）关于政治和隐喻的观点，即政治立场是由道德概念系统衍生而来，共和党和民主党的政治立场不同主要源于两套不同的道德观。
而这两种道德观的对立对应的是两种家庭模型的对立：严父式家庭（strict father family）和抚养式家庭（nurturant parent family）。
在这两个隐喻框架内，执政者是家长；被统治者是家庭成员；民主党是慈亲，共和党是严父。
框架是塑造我们看待世界方式的心理结构，是“认知无意识（ cognitive uncontious）”的环节。
而框架要靠语言来激活，语言是表达我们思维的重要手段。
基于Lacoff（1987）“思维具有隐喻性”的科学论断，本文以2016美总统大选第二场电视辩论希拉里和特朗普的辩论词为语料，从教育、国家安全、医保和税收这四个议题，分析美国民主党和共和党是如何利用隐喻和框架强化各自的价值观，合法化自身的观点、非法化对方的观点，从而达到自己的政治意图。
2016美国总统辩论时间,美国总统大选辩论时间
2016美国总统辩论时间，美国总统大选辩论时间
美国大选2016最新消息
美国总统大选辩论时间及地点（以下均为北京时间）：
首场总统辩论：9月27日上午9：00-10：30，纽约州的霍夫斯特拉大学（HofstraUniversity）。
主持人：NBC夜间新闻（NightlyNews）的主播LesterHolt。
本场辩论将分为6个部分，每部分15分钟。
目前已经确定辩论的三个主题：美国的方向，实现繁荣和保障美国安全，每个主题两小节。
不过CPD也表示，届时可能根据新闻热点对辩论主题做出调整。
首场副总统辩论：10月5日上午9：00-10：30，佛吉尼亚州的朗沃德大学（LongwoodUniversity）。
主持人：CBS记者ElaineQuijano。
本轮辩论分为9个部分，每部分10分钟。
辩论主题将会在辩论前一周公布，接下来两场总统辩论也是如此。
第二场总统辩论：10月10日上午9：00-10：30，密苏里州的华盛顿大学（圣路易斯）（WashingtonUniversityinSt.Louis）主持人：ABC记者MarthaRaddatz以及CNN主播AndersonCooper。
第三场总统辩论：10月20日上午9：00-10：30，内华达州的UniversityofLasVegas。
主持人：福克斯周日新闻（FoxNewsSunday）主播ChrisWallace 南方财富网外汇频道为您提供美国总统大选辩论时间的更新。
美国总统选举辩题
美国总统选举辩题
正方，美国总统选举应当采取民主选举制度。
在美国总统选举中，应当采取民主选举制度，因为这样可以确保公民的选举权
利得到充分尊重。
民主选举制度是现代社会的基本政治原则，它体现了人民的意志和选择。
正如美国第三任总统杰斐逊所说，“民主是自由的基础，只有在民主的制度下，人民才能真正享有自由。
”因此，采取民主选举制度是符合现代社会价值观的。
此外，民主选举制度也可以确保选举结果的合法性和公正性。
通过普选的方式，可以让更多的人参与到选举中来，从而使选举结果更具代表性。
正如美国第六任总统林肯所说，“民主政府是‘人民、由人民、为人民’的政府。
”只有通过民主选举，才能真正实现政府的合法性和公正性。
反方，美国总统选举应当采取选举人制度。
在美国总统选举中，应当采取选举人制度，因为这样可以更好地保护少数派的
利益。
选举人制度是为了防止多数派对少数派的压迫和剥削，它可以确保每个州的利益都得到充分尊重。
正如美国第二任总统亚当斯所说，“选举人制度是为了保护少数派的权利，防止多数派的暴政。
”。
此外，选举人制度也可以防止选举结果被操纵和篡改。
通过选举人的间接选举
方式，可以减少选举过程中的不确定性和动荡，从而确保选举结果的稳定和可靠性。
正如美国第四任总统麦迪逊所说，“选举人制度是为了确保选举结果的稳定和可靠，防止选举过程中的混乱和纷争。
”。
综上所述，选举人制度是更符合现实情况的选举方式，它可以更好地保护少数
派的利益，防止选举结果的操纵和篡改。
因此，在美国总统选举中，应当采取选举人制度。
2016年美国总统大选谁是赢家
2016年美国总统大选谁是赢家2016年，谁最有可能当选新一届美国总统？谁是美国总统最终的赢家？第下面店铺分享了2016年美国总统大选最终赢家，希望你喜欢。
2016年美国总统大选谁是赢家?8月10日讯据英国《卫报》8月8日报道，美国纳粹党主席罗基•舒豪伊道(Rocky Suhayda)近日声明称，若特朗普当选总统，白人将获得“真正的机会”，可以发挥才智，建立起与国会黑人议员委员会类似的主流白人组织。
舒豪伊道还表示，鉴于纳粹党人并未像偏执狂一样行事，把他们称作偏执狂是欠妥的。
据悉，美国纳粹党是美国的一个边缘政党，源于乔治•洛克威尔(George Lincoln Rockwell) 于1959年成立的组织。
在美国纳粹党官网常见问题解答一栏，他们说虽然用了“纳粹”这个称号，但他们是国家社会主义党人。
之所以用纳粹这个名字，是为避免与马克思主义的社会主义相混淆。
他们声称纳粹党人不是白人至上主义者，却是分离主义者，他们相信种族隔离目前是最好的。
报道称，舒豪伊道预测特朗普将会击败希拉里，最终入主白宫。
据悉，特朗普批判了诸如太平洋伙伴关系协定等国际贸易协议。
他还承诺在美墨边境建立高墙并驱逐非法移民。
为应对恐怖主义，特朗普宣扬禁止穆斯林移民入境，并对在美穆斯林进行监视。
这些举措使他吸引了大量工人阶级白种人的选票。
美国总统大选最新消息：特朗普竟称中国伟大曾经常把“中国用从美国偷来的钱养肥了自己”挂在嘴边的特朗普，如今，对中国的态度来了个180度的大转弯，大呼“中国很伟大，我爱中国。
”共和党总统候选人特朗普在周五的造势活动中提到美国对中国的庞大贸易逆差，强调美国不能再当一个愚蠢的国家，而是在贸易问题上要变得聪明，还说不会因为中美庞大的贸易逆差而嫉恨中国，特朗普还大呼“中国很伟大，我爱中国，我和中国做生意，我们可以与中国好好相处。
”从选举开始，特朗普也没少“称赞”中国，比如，在4月 27日在华盛顿就外交政策发表的演讲中，特朗普提到要进入一个繁荣的新世纪，修复与中国的关系是另一重要步骤。
希拉里特朗普辩论
希拉里特朗普辩论引言希拉里·克林顿和唐纳德·特朗普是美国历史上最具争议和备受关注的两位总统候选人。
他们之间的辩论是整个选举过程中最重要的部分之一。
希拉里特朗普辩论是两位候选人之间的一场激烈辩论，吸引了数亿观众的目光。
本文将探讨辩论的背景、主要观点以及对选情的可能影响。
辩论背景希拉里特朗普辩论于2016年9月26日在纽约大学举行，是美国总统选举的首场辩论。
这场辩论是两位候选人之间共三场正式辩论的第一场，也被认为是最具影响力的一场。
这场辩论旨在通过候选人的直接对话，帮助选民更好地了解他们的政策和观点。
辩论的主题包括美国经济、国内和国际政策、种族关系、治理和领导能力等。
两位候选人之前已经持续数月展开激烈竞选，而这场辩论成为他们最直接、最公开的交锋之一。
辩论观点希拉里·克林顿希拉里·克林顿是民主党的总统候选人，她在这场辩论中强调了以下观点：1.经济发展：克林顿承诺将推动经济增长，创建更多工作机会。
她主张通过提高最低工资、加强教育和职业培训、提供更多的创新和技术投资来实现这一目标。
2.医疗保健：克林顿主张保留奥巴马医改法案，并提出进一步改进的措施，以确保更多人获得负担得起的医疗保健。
3.种族关系：克林顿强调要解决种族不平等和警务改革的问题，她主张改善警察和社区之间的关系，减少种族主义和歧视。
4.全球事务：克林顿强调她的外交政策经验，主张继续在国际事务中发挥美国的领导作用，保护美国的利益。
唐纳德·特朗普唐纳德·特朗普是共和党的总统候选人，他在这场辩论中强调了以下观点：1.经济发展：特朗普主张通过减税、减少监管和重新谈判贸易协定来促进经济增长和创造就业机会。
2.移民政策：特朗普提出了严格的移民政策，主张建立边境墙、限制移民和难民流入，并强调要保护美国的工作机会和国家安全。
3.领导能力：特朗普强调自己的商界成功经验，并批评克林顿在政治领域的决策和处理能力。
美国总统大选第二场电视辩论会实录
美国总统大选第二场电视辩论会实录引言美国总统大选是全球关注的焦点，每场电视辩论会都成为选民了解并评估候选人的重要途径。
第二场电视辩论会作为决定选情的关键时刻，创造了紧张激烈的氛围。
本文将以Markdown文本格式输出美国总统大选第二场电视辩论会的实录，准确记录候选人之间的交锋和观点争论。
辩论主题本场辩论会的主题包括经济、外交政策和治理方式等关键问题。
两位候选人将在主持人的引导下，针对这些议题展开辩论。
辩论实录介绍阶段主持人：欢迎各位观众来到美国总统大选第二场电视辩论会。
我们将就经济、外交政策和治理方式等问题展开讨论。
请欢迎我们的候选人，A先生和B女士。
经济问题讨论主持人：我们首先将讨论经济问题。
A先生，您认为当前美国经济面临的最大挑战是什么？请您发表看法。
A先生：感谢主持人。
我认为当前最大的挑战是失业率过高和经济不稳定。
我们需要采取一系列措施来刺激经济增长和创造就业机会。
B女士：我不同意A先生的说法。
我认为贫富差距的扩大和无法解决中产阶级的问题才是我们面临的最大挑战。
我们需要通过改革税收政策来实现更公平的经济发展。
外交政策问题讨论主持人：让我们转向外交政策问题。
B女士，您认为美国在国际事务中的角色应该是什么样的？B女士：我认为美国应该继续发挥领导作用，致力于推动全球合作解决重大问题，如气候变化和恐怖主义。
A先生：我不同意B女士的观点。
我认为我们应该更加关注国内问题，将资源用于改善国内基础设施和提升国内就业率。
治理方式问题讨论主持人：最后我们将讨论治理方式问题。
A先生，您认为政府应该如何解决党派分歧和政治僵局？A先生：我认为我们需要更多的合作和妥协。
只有通过党派之间的合作，才能解决国家面临的重要问题。
B女士：我同意合作的重要性，但我认为我们需要采取更加果断的行动来推动改革和解决分歧。
我们不能再继续拖延了。
总结阶段主持人：谢谢A先生和B女士的观点。
在我们离开之前，请您向选民表达最后的呼吁。
A先生：我希望选民能够认真考虑候选人的观点和计划，为美国的未来做出明智的选择。
2016美国总统大选电视辩论第二场副总统之间的角力对决
2016美国总统大选电视辩论第二场副总统之间的角力对决在继上一场希拉里和特朗普的2016美国总统大选第一场电视辩论9天之后，美国民主、共和两党的副总统候选人于当地时间4日晚间举行了一场火药味十足的辩论。
总统辩论委员会要求候选人在五个全国性民调中获得15%的支持率才能进入最后的电视辩论。
因此，美国自由党总统候选人加里-约翰逊以及绿党总统候选人吉尔-斯坦均无缘上场。
据民调显示，两人的支持率加起来只有16%。
辩论在弗吉尼亚州法姆维尔的朗沃德大学举行。
这是民主党副总统候选人凯恩和共和党候选人彭斯的首场，也是仅有的一场辩论。
两位副手原本应该通过辩论展现各自的能力，但整场辩论反而沦为一场“代理人战争”，两人把大部分时间花在攻击对方的竞选搭档上。
【辩论流程】副总统辩论一共分为九个部分，每个部分10分钟。
每个部分开始之前，主持人会向两位候选人发问，两位候选人分别有2分钟时间陈述观点。
剩余时间主持人会带领候选人对该问题做深入讨论。
【辩论议题】凯恩和彭斯两位候选人已经做好了充分的准备，过去几天二人都各自找人进行过多场模拟辩论。
在明天的正式辩论中，凯恩表示将继续就希拉里在上次辩论中陈述的主张进行细化，并且就特朗普表现出的政策弱点进行攻击。
彭斯称将把辩论重点放在攻击希拉里的历史丑闻上，同时也将就自己的政策观点进行陈述。
【代理人如何攻击对方主子】彭斯说：希拉里“软弱无力”，作为国务卿的时候就没能在外交政策上取得成功。
凯恩则说，如果特朗普上台，美国将面临和里根时代相似的“核武器危机”。
他引用这位已故共和党总统的话警告，核武器扩散会导致某些“傻瓜和狂人”启动“灾难性事件”。
凯恩说：“一想到唐纳德·特朗普担任总司令,我们就要被吓死了,”凯恩说,“我无法想象彭斯州长如何能够维护以侮辱他人为驱动力、自私的、唯我独尊的唐纳德·特朗普。
”【谁赢了】至于谁赢得了当晚的辩论，两党各执一词。
希拉里转发了多条认为凯恩获胜的“推特”，特朗普则发推文称，“彭斯获得大胜，应该为他感到骄傲”。
2016美国大选第二场总统候选人电视辩论文字实录
2016美国大选第二场总统候选人电视辩论文字实录第二场总统辩论：10月10日上午9：00-10：30，密苏里州的华盛顿大学主持人：ABC记者MarthaRaddatz以及CNN主播AndersonCooper。
2016年美国总统选举将于2016年11月08日星期二举行，此次是美国第58届总统选举，同时众议院全部435个席位及参议院100个议席也会进行改选以产生美国第114届国会。
选举人团将首先被选出，再由选举人团于2016年12月17日选举产生总统和副总统。
美国东部时间2016年10月9日晚间，共和党总统候选人唐纳德-特朗普和民主党总统候选人希拉里-克林顿展开第二场电视辩论。
双方就多个热点问题和政策议题进行了激烈的辩论，场面火热。
这次辩论首度纳入民众网络票选的热门议题，用“市政座谈会”（Town-Hall）形式，也就是民众提问、候选人作答。
希拉里、特朗普互相揭短，花样互黑，火药味十足。
以下为此次辩论的文字实录。
【主持人玛莎-拉达茨】晚上好，我是ABC新闻的玛莎-拉达茨【支持人安德森-库珀】我是来自CNN的安德森-库珀。
非常感谢来到这里，我们马上要开始第一个来自“市民会议”成员的问题。
你们每一个人有两分钟的时间回答这个问题。
希拉里国务卿，您先请。
【提问者】谢谢，晚上好。
请问一下您觉得您的行为是否适并为大学生作出表率?【希拉里-克林顿(以下简称希拉里)】你是一个老师吗?【提问者】是的。
【希拉里】你问的非常好，我从很多学生和老师的关切中发现我的行为表现非常关键，我们作为候选人一定要给孩子们作个表率，美国是一个了不起的国家，因为我们候选人也很优秀，我们应该要尊敬对方，同时帮助各位成功，我觉得大家都应该有理由庆祝我们的经济成功，我觉得每一个人无论青年人还是成年人，都应该为美国所奋斗，其实我是一个非常有正能量的人，我非常关注你们的一些情况，所以我的口号就是让我们一起越变越强，我们能够克服我们的一些种族的分离，达到四大目标：第一，就是经济体，能够为每个人提供资源，第二，那就是从学前到大学，整个教育体系要可支付，这些目标一旦实现了，只要美国人合力没有什么做不到，我们能够尽力的合作，我也希望大家能够把票投给我，我也希望可以获得大选最终的优势目标，因为我是美国人，我为美国人工作，我也为美国工作，不去管大家的政治理念、生活背景、宗教理念，我希望我们真正的团结起来，这是让我们能够最佳拥抱一个光明未来的唯一之道。
美国总统选举辩论辩题
美国总统选举辩论辩题正方（支持美国总统选举辩论）：作为正方辩手，我认为美国总统选举辩论是一个非常重要的政治事件，它可以帮助选民更好地了解候选人的政策和立场，从而作出更明智的选举决定。
首先，美国总统选举辩论是候选人展示自己能力和领导才能的重要机会。
在辩论中，候选人可以通过言辞和表现展示自己的政策观点和领导能力，让选民更好地了解他们的才能和价值观。
正如美国前总统约翰·肯尼迪曾经说过，“辩论是政治的最高形式，因为它是一种言辞和逻辑的较量，能够展示一个人的才能和智慧。
”。
其次，美国总统选举辩论也是选民了解候选人政策和立场的重要途径。
在辩论中，候选人会就各种政治议题展开讨论，包括经济、外交、社会福利等，这些都是选民关心的问题。
通过辩论，选民可以更好地了解候选人的政策观点，从而作出更明智的选举决定。
最后，美国总统选举辩论也可以帮助选民更好地了解候选人的性格和品质。
在辩论中，候选人的言辞和行为会展现出他们的性格和品质，这对选民来说也是一个重要的参考因素。
正如英国前首相温斯顿·丘吉尔曾经说过，“辩论是一个人品格的试金石，它能够展示一个人的胆识和品质。
”。
综上所述，美国总统选举辩论是一个非常重要的政治事件，它可以帮助选民更好地了解候选人的政策和立场，展示候选人的领导能力，同时也可以帮助选民了解候选人的性格和品质，从而作出更明智的选举决定。
反方（反对美国总统选举辩论）：作为反方辩手，我认为美国总统选举辩论并不是一个必要的政治事件，它在一定程度上是一场政治秀，很难真正反映候选人的能力和政策观点。
首先，美国总统选举辩论往往更像是一场表演，而非真正的政策辩论。
候选人往往会在辩论中使用花言巧语和政治口号，而非深入讨论真正的政治议题。
这使得辩论往往只是一场政治秀，很难让选民真正了解候选人的政策观点和能力。
其次，美国总统选举辩论往往更像是一场形式主义的较量，而非真正的政治辩论。
候选人往往会在辩论中互相攻击对手，而非就政治议题展开深入讨论。
2016美国总统大选第一场电视辩论直播 希拉里VS川普谁将成为下一届美国总统？
2016美国总统大选第一场电视辩论直播希拉里VS川普谁将成为下一届美国总统？第一场希拉里PK川普的电视辩论视频新鲜出炉啦!!【视频下载】2016美国总统电视辩论第一场美国当地时间26日晚上9点，美国将举行大选首场电视辩论，民主党总统候选人希拉里和共和党总统候选人特朗普将展开正面交锋。
总而言之，如果不出什么意外，美国的下以为总统将在这边这两位中间产生!最新出炉的民调结果显示，民主党总统候选人希拉里领先对手共和党总统候选人特朗普6%。
直播地址大放送：YouTube直播地址 NBC直播地址 CNN直播地址同时，最新民调显示，非裔美国人依然一面倒力挺希拉里，有93%愿投票给希拉里，仅3%给特朗普;希拉里也获得拉丁裔选民的青睐，74%支持希拉里，仅16%挺特朗普。
报道还指出，在受欢迎程度，希拉里和特朗普依然不讨喜，有40%选民较青睐希拉里，另有37%选择特朗普。
民调最新结果：据法媒评论，为了周一的电视公开辩论，希拉里正在准备一场“诺曼底登陆”，她的强项是头脑思考力强，从政经验丰富，熟知法律，政治正确不会出偏，因此被誉为“大脑型”候选人。
但如果希拉里在辩论中过分展示大脑，可能反过来为她减分。
密苏里大学政治传播学教授麦克尼(MitchellMcKinney)向法新社表示，看电视辩论时，没人在意哪个候选人更聪明，有多少知识或了解多少数字。
电视观众喜欢能用几句话简单逻辑地说清自己观点的人。
希拉里是工作狂，对国际国内问题了如指掌，她在解答问题时，要避免落入技术细节。
两位总统候选人对已第一次电视辩论相当重视，希拉里一袭红色套装上阵，而川普则除了标配的西服套装之外，选择了一条宝蓝色的领带!不过，在初选的12场辩论时，特朗普并不总是占上风，他往往后撤，让其他候选人被骂。
他在初选接近尾声，只剩几个对手时，常使出扰乱的招数，用尖刻粗鲁的短语或口号切断对方讲话。
但是，这次电视辩论与初选时有10来人站在台上不同了，这次电视辩论90分钟，特朗普占一半。
肯尼迪与尼克松电视辩论及公共广播电视法案
第十一小组组员：安嫩 何显丽 汪全艳 林晓伟
• 一、首次电视辩论的背景 • 二、政客利用电视，推动了电视的普及和 推广 • 三、美国大选中电视媒体的宣传功能
一、首次电视辩论的背景
• 1960年9月26日，在芝加哥、哥伦比亚广播公司的一个电 视直播间里，总统候选人尼克松和肯尼迪站在摄像机和聚 光灯前，进行了美国总统竞选历史上第一次电视辩论。
1961年1月20日正式宣誓肯尼迪就任美国第三十五任总统
• 肯尼迪、尼克松开辟了电视辩论的时代 • 电视作为总统竞选政治活动中的决定性媒介立刻脱颖而出。
二、政客利用电视，推动电视的普及和推广
• 肯尼迪总统是第一位充分认识到电视的传播潜力， 并充分发挥电视功能的政治家，正如罗斯福总统 是第一位深谙广播魔力的领导人一样。 • 大约从20世纪50 年代中期开始电视新闻在美国开 始受人青睐，尤其在政治领域，比如总统竞选， 电视新闻的作用日趋显著。 • 1963年，在美国依靠电视了解新闻的人第一次超 过依靠报纸了解新闻的人，这是一个历史性转变， 标志电视新闻时代的到来。
容是放宽《1990年广播电视法案》中有关媒体所 有权的限制，以及建立英国数字地面广播的管理 机构。
1996年广播电视法案主要涉及内容：
• 第一部分涉及电视，第二部分涉及广播。
• 第三部分授权独立电视委员会确保某些体育赛事能够免费
报道和播出。
• 第四部分关于英国广播公司的传输网络资产、权利和债务
转移的有关规定。 • 第五部分涉及版税及相关事宜。 • 第六部分是综合部分，包括传输系统的新标准，有关有无 资格拥有执照的新规定，以及有关媒体所有权的新限制性 规定。
三、 美国大选中电视媒体的宣传功能
•
垂滴经济学 trickle-down economics
垂滴经济学 trickle-down economics美国总统大选第二场电视辩论10月9日结束，据CNN联合另一家机构的民调显示，在观看本场辩论的美国民众中，有57%的被调查者认为希拉里胜出，而认为特朗普胜出的仅为34%。
另外，由于两人在辩论中互黑无下限，本场辩论也被美国媒体称为dirty fight。
trumped-up trickle-down第一场辩论一开始，两人有关就业和税收等经济政策的辩论中，希拉里表示，特朗普提出的为富人减税政策是trumped-up trickle-down。
这里先说这个trickle-down，是一种经济理论，也叫trickle-down economics，翻译为“垂滴经济学”，说的是“一个体制中给予上层人的利益会传递给较低阶层的人”。
trumped-up是个固定表达，表示“伪造的，捏造的，莫须有的”。
希拉里在这里用trumped-up来修饰trickle-down可谓一语双关，既表明这种理论是虚假的，同时提到了特朗普的名字Trump，说明这样不靠谱的政策是特朗普提出来的。
姜果然是老的辣。
原话摘录：We also, though, need to have a tax system that rewards work and not just financial transactions. And the kind of plan that Donald has put forth would be trickle-down economics all over again. In fact, it would be the most extreme version, the biggest tax cuts for the top percent of the people in this country than we've ever had. 我们同时需要一个能够让劳动有回报的税收系统，而不是仅仅反应金融交易。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
对于美国总统候选人来讲，电视辩论是一场智力和体力的终极对决。
因为便是辩论中的表现可能会直接影响到最终的大选结果。
在历经了9月26日的第一场总统大选电视辩论上的剑拔弩张之后，副总统之间的角力对决也已经于10月4日落下帷幕。
今天美国总统大选第二场辩论，将于北京时间今日(10月10日)早上9点，在美国华盛顿大学举行。
美国共和党候选人特朗普有90分钟时间挽回自己的竞选生涯。
辩论主持人是美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)的安德森·库伯及美国广播公司(ABC)的拉达兹。
各大主流视频网站在线直播地址GET：
Youtube直播地址：Youtube 2nd Presidential Debate at Washington
University
CNN直播地址：CNN 2nd Presidential Debate at Washington University NBC直播地址：NBC 2nd Presidential Debate at Washington University
第二场电视辩论有哪些看点?——矛盾升级MAX
如果说第一场电视辩论是礼尚往来之后，2016美国总统大学电视辩论第二场就
开始来真格的了!
【互挖黑历史】
两位候选人辩论前夕都被曝出有损各自形象的“黑材料”。
《华盛顿邮报》7日公布了特朗普2005年一段用语非常粗俗的谈话录音，内容含有侮辱女性的言论。
“维基解密”网站也随即公开了黑客获取的希拉里华尔街高价演讲部分内容以及希拉里竞选团队一些内部邮件，其中一些言论与希拉里的公开立场不同，可能令民众对希拉里的诚信产生怀疑。
【提问环节】
和第一场电视辩论的提问环节有所不同的是，这一的主持人仅负责提出半数问题，另半数将由盖洛普民意测验中心(Gallup)选出的未决选民提出。
截止小编发稿时候，第一个问题来自场下观众，这位观众问：上次辩论太“激烈”，小孩子要在大人陪同下才能观看，你们怎么看?
【辩论爆点】
特朗普避税疑云
希拉里此前痛批共和党对手特朗普避税多年，称他是冷酷无情的商人，对国家没有贡献，她主张立法规定，参选总统必须公布税表。
希拉里说，特朗普因为巨额亏损而避税，特朗普在与会计师忙于避税，以便继续维持亿万富翁的生活水平时，其他人却备受煎熬。
希拉里的健康问题
希拉里68岁、特朗普70岁，两位高龄候选人的健康状况一直是选战焦点。
他们行程满档，长途旅行不仅压力大，且经常吃得不健康且睡眠不足，对健康都是威胁-虽然他们最近相继公布体检报告，内容都是“无重大疾病，可胜任总统”。
但希拉里在9月出席9·11纪念活动时，因身体不适提前离场。
后来，她对外透露是感染肺炎，但她抱病硬撑、却差点在公开场合昏倒的行为，引发民众热烈讨论候选人的健康问题。
事实上，希拉里还有血栓问题。
特朗普则公布了自己的体检报告，显示并无大碍。
“身高190.5公分、重107公斤，身体质量指数(BMI)偏高约30。
”他的健康检查报告如此显示。
经常分享吃炸鸡、汉堡照片的特朗普自己则觉得自己“跟30岁时没两样”，
特朗普“筑墙”的移民政策
特朗普主张“遣返非法移民、在美墨边界筑高墙”，和希拉里呼吁“放宽移民措施、只遣返暴力的犯罪者和恐怖份子”的政策大相径庭，也可能是这次争辩的重点。
本文来自小站教育留学频道。