雅思阅读4大特点

雅思阅读4大特点雅思阅读怎么复习?“做题呀!”怎么做才有效?“不停地做题呀!”在雅思阅读备考中，如若能正确使用雅思阅读真题来复习很有效果。

今天就来带大家了解雅思真题阅读4大特点。

雅思阅读4大特点你都知道吗?不同用途的*，其写作手法和要求是各不相同的。

报刊*就是最典型的例证，无论从用词还是结构、从修辞到语言都有其独特之处。

英美的报刊杂志对记者和编辑在写作和编辑*的时候是有很多特殊的要求的。

了解了雅思阅读真题的*特点之后，才能对症下药，迅速抓住答案啦!先了解下雅思阅读真题四大特点：1.语言模式1) 段落(Paragraph)英美报刊的*，不管是新闻还是特写，段落短小是一大特点，一个段落往往就是一句话或两句话。

一般来讲，英美报刊段落大概由60个单词组成，平均在4行左右。

据说，这是专家经过科学实验后总结出来的经验，认为这是适合读者的最佳段落长度。

大多数雅思阅读*的段落长度也都是在这个范围。

但是由于杂志期刊也是考试命题的重要****，实战中，长度很大的段落也屡见不鲜。

2) 简明(Concise)报纸的编辑出版受时间限制，一切都是在时间的压力下完成的。

因此报纸一般推崇简明的风格。

以上就是为大家带来的内容啦，希望对正在备考的你有所帮助。

更多雅思精彩内容，欢迎持续关注小站雅思频道。

这种风格的表现主要是：用词：记者对所报道的题目一般都比较熟悉，因此能够选用恰当的词汇来表达有关内容，包括一些专业词汇。

总体上新闻的用词都比较普通，某些反复用到的词出现率很高，如报道政治新闻时常见到president, congress, senator, representative, scandal, vote, bill一类的词。

偏爱短词是英美报刊用词的一大特点。

主动语态(active voice)：比较例句a) Senator Dole planned to announce his resignation from the Senate.和例句b) To announce his resignation from the Senate was planned by Senator Dole.时态：一般用现在时而不是过去时表示事件是最近发生的，是新闻而不是旧闻。

肯定句(positive form)：比较例句a) He was not very often on time. 和例句b) He usually came late.2.观点：英美报刊，尤其是美国报刊，常用“客观”、“公正”来体现新闻报道的价值。

即所谓：unprejudiced, unopinionated, uninvolved 和unbiased.(不偏不倚，不予评论，不加参与，不带偏见)。

因而一般作者对于*探讨的主题是站在比较中立客观的角度去分析的。

这也解释了为什么雅思阅读真题中一旦问到作者态度的时候，答案大部分都是跟中立客观有关。

3.时效性：雅思阅读*全部选自英美主流报刊杂志。

所以考生在考试中会经常遇到一些时髦话题的*，像BSE(疯牛病)、911事件、安然公司破产案这样的内容在考试中都出现过。

所以大家平时最好能够经常关心时事，积累一些必要的背景知识，这对于考试而言，大有裨益。

4.结构特点：大多数雅思阅读*的结构是人们常说的“到金字塔”形式。

这是指在一篇*中，最重要的信息都放在开头部分，尤其是开头的前三段。

也就是说，一篇*的主题(主题句)都出现在前三段。

一般我们把这样的段落称为导语段。

*一般把新闻所涉及的人物、时间、地点、过程和结果都交待出来。

读者读完了导语段，也就知道了新闻的关键信息。

接下来就是逐步向读者交待事件发生的起因、过程、影响等信息。

这是*的主要部分，但是各种信息并不是平铺直叙的，而是按照它们的重要性先后出现的。

与事件直接相关的信息被认为是最重要的，因此位置靠前，然后才是次要的信息。

在这一部分，*还可以交待消息的****，并且时常引用记者在采访中得到的有关人士的话，以证明消息的可靠。

新闻还可以补充说明一些背景材料，有时不惜重复一些内容。

*的结构有时显得松散，段落之间的逻辑关系不紧密，这是因为需要交待的信息没有一定的关联模式，只是发生的一些实事的铺陈。

新闻一般不要求结尾，尤其是总结性的结尾段。

在交待完事件的全过程后，作者通常加上一两段与该消息有点关系、但是不是很重要的信息，作为新闻的结尾。

雅思考试阅读模拟试题及答案解析Selling Digital Music without Copy-protection Makes SenseA.It was uncharacteristically low-key for the industry’s greatest showman. But the essay published this week by Steve Jobs, theboss of Apple, on his firm’s website under the unassuming title “Thoughts on Music” has nonetheless provoked a vigorous debate about the future of digital music, which Apple dominates with its iPod music-player and iTunes music-store. At issue is “digital rights management” (DRM)—the technology guarding downloaded music against theft. Since there is no common standard for DRM, it also has the side-effect that songs purchased for one type ofmusic-player may not work on another. Apple’s DRM system, called FairPlay, is the most widespread. So it came as a surprise when Mr. Jobs called for DRM for digital music to be abolished.B.This is a change of tack for Apple. It has come under fire from European regulators who claim that its refusal to license FairPlay to other firms has “locked in” customers. Since music from the iTunes store cannot be played on non-iPod music-players (at least not without a lot of fiddling), any iTunes buyer will be deterred from switching to a device made by a rival firm, such as Sony or Microsoft. When French lawmakers drafted a bill last year compelling Apple to open up FairPlay to rivals, the company warned of “state-sponsored piracy”. Only DRM, it implied, could keep the pirates at bay.C.This week Mr. Jobs gave another explanation for his former defence of DRM: the record companies made him do it. They would make their music available to the iTunes store only if Apple agreed to protect it using DRM. They can still withdraw their catalogues if the DRM system is compromised. Apple cannot license FairPlay to others, says Mr Jobs, because it would depend on them to produce security fixes promptly. All DRM does is restrict consumer choice and provide a barrier to entry, says Mr Jobs; without it there would be far more stores and players, and far more innovation. So, he suggests, why not do away with DRM and sell music unprotected? “This is clearly the best alternative for consumers,” he declares, “and Apple would embrace it in a heartbeat.”D.Why the sudden change of heart? Mr Jobs seems chiefly concerned with getting Europe’s regulators off his back. Rather than complaining to Apple about its use of DRM, he suggests, “those unhappy with the current s ituation should redirect their energies towards persuading the music companies to sell their music DRM-free.” Two and a half of the four big record companies, he helpfully points out, are European-owned. Mr Jobs also hopes to paint himself as a consumer champion. Apple resents accusations that it has become the Microsoft of digital music.E.Apple can afford to embrace open competition in music players and online stores. Consumers would gravitate to the best player and the best store, and at the moment that still means Apple’s. Mr Jobs is evidently unfazed by rivals to the iPod. Since only 3% of the music in a typical iTunes library is protected, most of it can already be used on other players today, he notes. (And even the protected tracks can be burned onto a CD and then re-ripped.) So Apple’s dominance evidently depends far more on branding and ease of use than DRM-related “lock in”.F.The music giants are trying DRM-free downloads. Lots of smaller labels already sell music that way. Having seen which way the wind is blowing, Mr Jobs now wants to be seen not as DRM’s defender, but as a consumer champion who helped in its downfall. Wouldn’t it lead to a surge in piracy? No, because most music is still sold unprotected on CDs, people wishing to steal music already can do so. Indeed, scrapping DRM would probably increaseonline-music sales by reducing confusion and incompatibility. With the leading online store, Apple would benefit most. Mr Jobs’s argument, in short, is transparently self-serving. It also happens to be right.Questions 1-7Do the following statemets reflect the claims of the writer in Reading Passage 1?Write your answer in Boxes 1-7 on your answer sheet.TRUE if the statement reflets the claims of the writerFALSE if the statement contradicts the claims of the writerNOT GIVEN if it is impossbile to say what the writer thinks about this1. Apple enjoys a controlling position in digital music market with its iPod music-player and iTunes music-store.2. DRM is a government decree issued with a purpose to protect downloaded music from theft by consumers.3. Lack of standardization in DRM makes songs bought for one kind of music player may not function on another.4. Apple has been criticized by European regulators since it has refused to grant a license FairPlay to other firms.5. All music can be easily played on non-iPod music devices from Sony or Microsoft without too much fiddling.。