英语专业四级作文评分标准

合集下载

专四作文评分标准

专四作文评分标准

Section A:Composition (15%)能根据所给的作文题目、提纲或图表、数据等,写一篇200个单词左右的作文。

能做到内容切题、完整,条理清楚,结构严谨,语法正确,语言通顺,表达得体。

考试时间35分钟。

Section B: Note-writing (10%)能根据所给提示写50至60个单词的便条、通知、请帖等。

能做到格式正确,语言得体。

考试时间为10分钟Section A: Composition评分标准:14分:切题。

表达思想清楚,文字通顺,连贯性较好,基本无语言错误。

11分:切题。

表达思想清楚,文字连贯,但有少量语言错误。

8分:基本切题。

表达思想比较清楚,文字上连贯,但语言错误较多,其中有少量严重错误。

5分:基本切题。

表达思想不够清楚,文字连贯性差,有较严重的语言错误。

2分:条理不清,思想紊乱,语言支离破碎或大部分句子均有错误,且多为严重错误。

交白卷者或作文与题目毫不相关,则以零分计算。

注:1.如题目中给出主题句、起始句、结束句,均不得计入所写字数。

2. 对于规定三段的作文,只写一段者:0—4分;只写两段者:0—9 分。

3. 按规定,考生作文若为0分,考试均作不及格处理;若作文分高于0分,低于6分,要在总分中减去实得作文分与6分之间的差额部分。

注:字数不足应酌情扣分。

*累计字数在150-170之间,扣1分。

*累计字数在130-150之间,扣2分。

*累计字数在110-130之间,扣3分。

*累计字数在90-110之间,扣4分。

*累计字数在90个以下,最多给5分。

作文命题英语专业四级命题作文的出题范围是根据考生的知识结构、年龄特点和文化背景而确定的,不外乎校园生活、社会生活等日常话题,不涉及知识面过广、专业性太强的内容校园话题:My Idea of a University Arts Festival (2005)Travel Broadens the Mind? (2001)The Importance of Extracurricular Activities (2000)社会话题1.社会生活The Benefits of Volunteering (2008)Saving Money or Spending T omorrow’s Money (2006)2. 环境与健康The Importance of Keeping a Good Mood (2003)The Best Way to Stay Healthy (2002)3. 科技与校园Is It Wise to Make Friends on the Internet? (2007)Will Phones Kill Letter Writing? (2004)A Major Advantage/Disadvantage of Advertising onTelevision (1999)Section B: Note-writing根据《大纲》,便条的满分为10分,评分主要参照作文格式、内容、语言以及语言得体性四方面进行评分。

四级作文评分标准及样卷1满分15分2分5等2分条理不清思路

四级作文评分标准及样卷1满分15分2分5等2分条理不清思路

四级作文评分标准及样卷 1.满分15分 2.分5等 2分:条理不清,思路四级作文评分标准及样卷1(满分15分.2(分5等2分:条理不清,思路紊乱,语言支离破碎或绝大部分句子均有错误,且多数为严重错误。

5分:基本切题。

思想表达不清楚,连贯性差。

有较多的严重的语言错误。

8分:基本切题。

思想表达比较清楚,文字尚连贯;但语言错误较多,其中有一些是严重错误。

11分:切题。

思想表达清楚,文字连贯,但有少量语言错误。

14分:切题。

思想表达清楚,文字通顺,连贯性较好,基本无语言错误或仅有个别小错。

注:如题目中给出主题句、起始句和结束句,均不得计入所写字数。

样卷分析:Should the University Campus Be Open to Tourists?1. 名校校园正成为旅游新热点2. 校园是否应对游客开放,人们看法不同3. 我认为。

1(Currently, campuses of many famous universities are becoming one of the popular tourist attractions. It is reported that more and morepeople enjoy their holidays by visiting famous universities, such as Tsinghua University and Peking University.This phenomenon has exerted heated debates concerning whether university campus should be open to tourists. They indicate that people’s opinions vary in a big way. Some peoplebelieve that it is a good thing to open university campuses to tourists while others argue that it is not.Personally speaking, I’m in favor of campus tourism. For one thing, tourists may derive lots of enjoyment from the beautiful scenes of famous universities. For another, the strong academic atmosphere may motivate tourists, particularly students, to work hard persevere with their dreams. Moreover, for famous universities, being open to tourists may serve as an effective approach to attract talents from all over the country. In short, campus tourism will not only benefit tourists but also develop the universities.2.At present, a large number of people choose to visit famous universities, such as Tsinghua University and Peking University. As a result, famous universities campuses have become one of the tourist destinations.But should the university campus be open to tourists? As to this question, people have different opinions. Some people think that university campuses should be open to tourists since tourists can learna lot of knowledge from them. Others think that they should not be open because universities are places for studying instead of touring.I’m one of the members who object to opening university campuses to tourists. First, if university campuses are open to tourists, the environment of the universities will possibly become dirty. Besides, many bad people will enter into the campuses and that will bring danger.3.Famous universities campuses are now becoming the touring places.Lots of people visit famous universities in their holidays. So shouldthe university campus be open to tourists?Different people have different ideas. For example, some peoplethink university campus should be open to tourists. Others think they should not be.How do I think of this question? I think university campus should be open to tourists. Universities are not only the places for their own students and teachers. They are public sources, too. So people should have the right to visit them. Many university campuses are beautiful. Tourists will enjoy them. Return back from the universities, students work hard to go into the universities. So I think universities should be open to tourists.4.Now people like visit famous universities. So famous university campuses becomes thetourists’ hot places.Should the university campus be open to tourists? Person does not have same ideas. Somepeople think the university campus should be open to tourists. Some people think they should not be open to.I think the university campus should not open to tourists. Because tourists will make the environment of campus bad. They harm students studying. Some have bad purpose, they do badthings. Though some tourists can learn something from the university campus, but I don’t thinkthat is the point. So I think it is not good to be open to tourists.真题作文分类解析一、原因分析型第一段:描述现象;第二段:解释这种现象产生或存在的原因;第三段:提出解决问题的建议或总结观点。

英语专业四级考试听写及写作评分标准.doc

英语专业四级考试听写及写作评分标准.doc

英语专业四级考试听写评分标准(一)听写评分标准1. 听写共分15小节,每节1分,扣分一律写在试卷右边的空白处。

大错误下面画线。

小错误用圆圈表示,重复错误用三角记号表示。

2. 每节最多扣1分。

3. 重复错误,仅扣一次分。

4. 错误共分两类:小错误(minor mistakes)和大错误(major mistakes),分别扣0.25分和0.5分。

A. 小错误:1)单词拼写错一到两个字母。

例:steadily →staedily;harbor →habor两个字母以下的词、次序颠倒算小错。

2)标点符号错误(含大小写)。

例:World War I →world war one, and then adopted → . And then adopeted3) 冠词、单复数错误。

例:until the beginning →until beginning; parent →parents4)小错误扣分标准:小错误在一节中出现一次,留作总计;出现两次:扣0.5分;出现三次:扣0.5分后留作总计;出现四次:扣1分。

5)未扣分小错误的扣分标准:累计2 ~ 4 个:扣0.5分累计5 ~ 8 个:扣1分B. 大错误:漏写、加词、造词、换词(冠词作小错计)、大移位、时态错误,每个错误扣0.5分。

例:loved →love;task —test;trip —trap;flee —flea;have finished —finsh(ed)5. 一些特例的扣分标准:下列情况不扣分:World War I →World War Onerace car →racecarwell-balanced →well balanced90 percent →90%6. 总分只有0.5分时,以1分计算;其余总分中如含小数点的,小数舍去,保留整数,如12.5 →12;7.5 →77. 空白卷一律打0分。

The concept of family life has changed considerably over the years. / In earliest times, several generations lived together in clans, / which consisted of all living descendents and their husbands or wives. / These clans were almost totally self-sufficient, / every m ember contributing in some way toward the survival of the group. / The men hunted an d fished for food or sometimes maintained flocks of sheep or goats. / The women baked bread and roasted the meat their men provided. / Special members of the communi ty were selected to make products like pottery, baskets and home weapons. / But with the development of greater varieties of food, clothing and shelter, / a single clan could no longer develop all the individual skills the group required. / Clans merged into larg er societies and at the same time broke into smaller units consisting of married couple s and their children. / Later the Industrial Revolution brought about even more importan t changes in family life. / New inventions brought shorter working hours for men and e asier housekeeping routines for women. / Today a productive family life suggests not th e group's cooperative efforts of working together, / but the pleasant and meaningful sha ring of its leisure.(二)英语专业四级写作要求(1)能根据各种不同的听读材料笔头回答问题,复述内容写摘要、写提纲和记笔记。

四级作文评分原则及标准

四级作文评分原则及标准
例句: 可想而知;知识在我们的一生中扮演一个重要的角色& It is conceivable that knowledge plays an important role in our life.
二十一、For the past 去...年来;...一直...
+ 时间;S + 现在完成式...过
例句: 过去两年来;我一直忙着准备考试& For the past two years; I have been busy preparing for the examination.
贯;语言错误相当多;其中有一些是严重错误&
11分:切题&表达思想清楚;文字连贯;但有少量语言错误& 14分:切题&表达思想清楚;文字通顺;连贯性好;基本上无
语言错误;仅有个别小错& 白卷;与作文题目毫不相干;或只有几个孤立的词而无法表 达思想;则给0分&
4; 字数不足酌情扣分:
累 110 100 90- 80- 70- 60- 50- <49 计 - - 99 89 79 69 59 字 119 109 数 扣1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 分
九、So + 形容词 + be + 主词 + that + 句子 如此...以致于...
例句: 时间是如此珍贵;我们经不起浪费它& So precious is time that we can't afford to waste it.
十、Adj + as + Subject主词+ be; S + V~~~ 虽然...
五、It is universally acknowledged that + 句子~~ 全世界都知 道...

英语四级考试作文评分标准

英语四级考试作文评分标准

英语四级考试作文评分标准1.本题满分为15分。

2.阅卷标准共分五等:2分、5分、8分、11分及14分。

各有标准样卷1至2份。

3.阅卷人员根据阅卷标准,对照样卷评分,若认为与某一分数(如8分)相似,即定为该分数(即8分);若认为稍优或稍劣于该分数,则可加1分(即9分)或减1分(即7分)。

但不得加或减半分。

评分标准:2分—条理不清,思路紊乱,语言支离破碎或大部分句子均有错误,且多数为严重错误。

5分—基本切题。

表达思路不清楚,连贯性差。

有较多的严重语言错误。

8分—基本切题。

有些地方表达思想不够清楚,文字勉强连贯;语言错误相当多,其中有一些是严重错误。

11分—切题。

表达思路清楚,文字连贯,但有少量语言错误。

14分—切题。

表达思想清楚,文字通顺,连贯性较好。

基本上无语言错误,仅有个别小错。

辩论式议论文模版(一)Some people believe (argue, recognize, think) that观点1. But other people take an opposite side. They firmly believe that观点2. As for me, I agree to the former/latter idea. There are a dozen of reasons behind my belief. First of all,论据1. More importantly, 论据2. Most important of all, 论据3. In summary, 总结观点。

As a college student, I am supposed to 表决心。

或From above, we can predict that 预测。

辩论式议论文模版(二)People hold different views about X. Some people are of the opinion that观点1. While others point out that观点2. As far as I am concerned, the former/latter opinion holds more weight. For one thing,论据1. For another, 论据2. Last but not the least, 论据3. To conclude, 总结观点. As a college student, I am supposed to 表决心。

英语4级作文评分标准

英语4级作文评分标准

英语4级作文评分标准全国大学英语四、六级考试题评分原则及标准一、评分原则1. CET检查考生是否达到大学英语教学大纲规定的四级和六级教学要求,对作文的评判应以此要求为准则。

2.CET作文题采用总体评分(Global Scoring)方法。

阅卷人员就总的印象给出奖励分(Award Scores),而不是按语言点的错误数目扣分。

3.从内容和语言两个方面对作文进行综合评判。

内容和语言是一个统一体。

作文应表达题目所规定的内容,而内容要通过语言来表达。

要考虑作文是否切题,是否充分表达思想,也要考虑是否用英语清楚而合适地表达思想,也就是要考虑语言上的错误是否造成理解上的障碍。

4.避免趋中倾向。

该给高分的给高分,包括满分;该给低分给低分,包括零分。

一名阅卷人员在所评阅的全部作文卷中不应只给中间的几种分数。

5.所发样卷一律不得翻印,严禁出版,一经发现,必予追究。

二、评分标准1.本题满分为15分2.阅卷标准共分五等:2分、5分、8分、11分及14分。

各有标准样卷一份。

3.阅卷人员根据阅卷标准,对照样卷评分,若认为与某一分数(如 8分)相似,即定为该分数(即8分);若认为稍优或稍劣于该分数则可加一分(即9分)或减一分(即7分)。

但不得加或减半分。

4.评分标准2分—条理不清,思路紊乱,语言支离破碎或大部分句子均有错误,且多数为严重错误。

5分—基本切题。

表达思想不清楚,连贯性差。

有较多的严重语言错误。

8分—基本切题。

有些地方表达思想不够清楚,文字勉强连贯;语言错误相当多,其中有一些是严重错误。

11分—切题。

表达思想清楚,文字连贯,但有少量语言错误。

14分—切题。

表达思想清楚,文字通顺,连贯性较好,基本上无语言错误,仅有个别小错。

[注:白卷,作文与题目毫不相关,或只有几个孤立的词而无法表达思想,则给0分。

]5.字数不足应酌情扣分:累计字数 CET-4 110-119 100-109 90-99 80-89 70-79 60-69 50-59 <49CET-6 140-149 130-139 120-129 110-119 100-109 90-99 80-89 <79扣分 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9[注:1.如题目中给出主题句、起始句、结束句,均不得计入所写字数。

2023专四听写评分标准

2023专四听写评分标准

2023专四听写评分标准英语专业四级考试(TEM4)作为衡量英语专业学生语言技能的重要考试之一,听写部分是其中的重要环节。

本文将详细解读2023年专四听写的评分标准,帮助考生全面了解考试要求,提高应试能力。

一、专四听写考试的重要性和目的专四听写考试旨在检验学生的听力理解、快速反应和准确书写的能力。

通过这项考试,学生可以更好地适应未来的学习和工作,例如翻译、教学和国际交流等。

因此,了解并掌握专四听写的评分标准对于提高学生的英语水平及应试能力至关重要。

二、听写部分评分标准1.单词评分标准单词是构成句子的基本单位。

在听写过程中,学生需准确书写所听到的单词。

根据单词拼写、词性、时态和单复数等细节,对每个单词进行评分。

若单词拼写错误或词性、时态、单复数不正确,将会影响得分。

2.句子评分标准句子是表达完整意义的基本单位。

在听写过程中,学生需根据所听内容,完整、准确地书写句子。

评分标准主要关注句子的语法结构、词汇选择和拼写是否正确,以及句子是否通顺、流畅。

3.短文评分标准短文作为一个整体,要求学生在听懂内容的基础上,准确把握文章的主旨和细节。

评分时,将根据学生是否能完整、准确地记录短文内容,以及短文整体意思是否清晰明确来评分。

三、笔记与转述部分评分标准在听写过程中,学生需要进行笔记和转述。

这部分的评分标准主要包括:1.准确性:学生能否准确记录关键信息和细节。

2.速度:学生记录信息的速度是否适中,既不过快也不过慢。

3.完整性:学生是否全面地记录了文章的重要信息,没有遗漏。

四、理解问题回答评分标准这部分主要考察学生的听力理解和信息筛选能力。

评分标准主要包括:1.准确性:答案是否准确反映了问题所问的内容。

2.详尽性:答案是否全面、详尽地回答了问题。

3.逻辑性:答案的逻辑是否清晰,是否能够有条理地回答问题。

为了提高理解问题的回答能力,建议学生多进行听力训练,培养快速捕捉关键信息和筛选无关信息的能力。

同时,平时可以多进行阅读理解训练,提高自己的信息筛选和整合能力。

专四作文评分标准

专四作文评分标准

专四作文评分标准专四作文评分标准一、命题作文满分15分,分五个等级,14分、11分、8分、5分和2分,可以酌情加一或减一分,但不得加或减半分。

具体标准为:14分:切题。

表达思想清楚,文字通顺,连贯性较好,基本无语言错误。

11分:切题。

表达思想清楚,文字连贯,但有少量语言错误。

8分:基本切题。

表达思想比较清楚,文字上连贯,但语言错误较多,其中有少量严重错误。

5分:基本切题。

表达思想不够清楚,文字连贯性差,有较严重的语言错误。

2分:条理不清,思想紊乱,语言支离破碎或大部分句子均有错误,且多数为严重错误。

交白卷,或作文与题目毫不相干,或只写几个单词,以0分计算。

评分对于字数的要求:累计字数在150-170之间,扣1分;130-150之间,扣2分;110-130之间,扣3分;90-110之间,扣4分;90以下,至多给5分。

若照抄提示中原句,均不得计入所写字数。

09年英语专业四级便条写作高分技巧英文书信有正式与非正式之分,英文便条为非正式书信。

TEM4(英语专业四级考试)把写便条(note~writing)列入必考项目之一,其目的是按照(高等院校英语专业英语教学大纲)的要求,测试英语专业学生在基础阶段末用英语书面表达思想的能力。

便条成绩在TEM4笔试成绩中虽只占10%,却如同一面镜子,能反映出学生英语书面交际的能力。

有关英文便条写作,国内外学者多有论述(可参见宁有权、刘永军,1999;王崇义,1995;杨俊峰,1997;Aired,Brusaw&Oliu,2000;Bates,1990)。

学者们认为,便条是一种简短信函,多使用非正式语体,它的形式比一般书信简单。

例如,写便条的人与收便条的人的地址、称呼中“Dear'’一词、日期中的年份以及结尾套语(complimentary close,亦称结束语),都可以省去;便条正文篇幅可小至一、两句话。

可是,~TEM4便条写作而言,并不完全像以上说的那样,它有一定的限制。

四六级英语作文评分标准和样文

四六级英语作文评分标准和样文

四级作文评分原则、标准及样文一、作文评分原则1.CET-4作文题采用总体评分方法(Global Scoring)。

阅卷人员就总的印象给出奖励分(Reward Scores),而不按语言点的错误数目扣分。

2.从内容和语言对作文进行综合评判.内容和语言是个统一体。

作文应表达作文题目所规定的内容,而内容通过语言来表达.要考虑作文是否切题,是否充分表达思想,还要考虑是否用英语清楚地表达思想,也就是要考虑语言上的错误是否造成理解上的障碍。

二、评分标准1.本题满分为15分。

2.阅卷标准通常分为五等:2分、5分、8分、11分和14分。

3.阅卷人员根据阅卷标准,对照样卷评分,若认为与某一分数(如8分)相似,即定为该分数(即8分);若认为稍优或稍劣于该分数,则可加一分(即9分)或减一分(即7分),但不得加减半分。

4.评分标准:2分-—条理不清,思路紊乱,语言支离破碎或大部分句子均有错误,且多数为严重错误。

5分—-基本切题。

表达思想不清楚,连贯性差。

有较多的严重语言错误。

8分-—基本切题。

有些地方表达思想不够清楚,文字勉强连贯;语言错误相当多,其中有一些是严重错误.11分——切题。

表达思想清楚,文字连贯,但有少量语言错误.14分——切题。

表达思想清楚,文字通顺,连贯性较好。

基本上无语言错误,仅有个别小错。

注:白卷,作文与题目毫不相关,或只有几个孤立的词而无法表达思想,则给0分。

5.字数不够120个,应酌情扣分,具体标准:累计字数在110~119之间,扣1分;累计字数在100~109之间,扣2分;累计字数在90~99之间,扣3分;累计字数在80~89之间,扣4分;累计字数在70~79之间,扣7分;累计字数〈69,扣9分.注:如题目给出主题句,祈使句,结束句,均不得计入所写字数;只写一段者:0-4分;只写两段者:0-9分(指规定三段的作文)。

三、四级真题作文评分范文与错误范例Directions: For this part, you are allowed 30 minutes to write a short essay entitled Should the University Campus Be Open to Tourists?You should write at Least 120 words following the outline given below:1.名校校园正成为旅游新热点2.校园是否应对游客开放,人们看法不同3.我认为……实例1:14分Should the University Campus Be Open to Tourists?In recent years,there is an ever—rising fever that many famous university campuses have become popular tourist attractions,especially such renowneduniversities as Tsing Hua University and Peking University. Many tourists prefer traveling around the university campus,consequently, thousands of people throng into campuses every year。

英语四级作文评分标准

英语四级作文评分标准

Sample-1

As he turned left to Guangming Road, he failed to see a car coming from behind a truck parked on the corner. Suddenly I heard a big noise and saw an umbrella thrown away. The boy was knocked down by the car. I was completely shocked. I think the boy’s absent-mindedness accounted much for the accident. He was talking all the time and dangerously used an umbrella while riding a bike. The weather also played a role in the tragedy. The third cause was the unproperly parked truck, which was big enough to make the road conditions invisible to the students who were going to make a turn. All these contributed to this accident.
评分标准

4.避免趋中倾向。该给高分的给高分,包括满分;该 给低分给低分,包括零分。一名阅卷人员在所评阅的 全部作文卷中不应只给中间的几种分数。 5. 字数不足以应酌情扣分。


二、评分标准
1.本题满分为15分 2.阅卷标准共分五等:2分、5分、8分、11分及14分。 各有标准样卷一份。 3.阅卷人员根据阅卷标准,对照样卷评分,若认为与 某一分数(如 8分)相似,即定为 该分数(即8分);若认 为稍优或稍劣于该分数则可加一分(即9分)或减一分(即 7分)。但不得加或减半分。

四级给分标准 -回复

四级给分标准 -回复

四级给分标准-回复四级英语写作给分标准四级英语写作是四级考试中的一项重要内容,分为短文写作和作文写作两部分。

其中,短文写作要求考生根据所给提示信息,写一篇短文,通常包含一两条主要信息和一些补充信息;作文写作是一个开放性的话题,要求考生根据自己的观点和经验,提出论点、举例论证等,表达自己的观点。

四级写作的给分标准如下:1. 内容(Content):主要考察考生是否能理解题目要求,能否针对主题做出适当的论述和展开。

给分标准:- 6分:内容完全符合题目要求,且观点清晰,主次分明,有较好的逻辑性和连贯性。

- 5分:内容基本符合题目要求,但存在一定的论述不全面或不准确,逻辑性和连贯性稍差。

- 4分:内容部分符合题目要求,但存在一定的偏离主题或论述不清楚,逻辑性和连贯性较差。

- 3分:内容明显偏离或不全面,没有清晰的观点和论述,逻辑性和连贯性非常差。

- 0分:与题目要求严重不符。

2. 语法与拼写(Grammar and Spelling):主要考察考生的语法掌握程度和单词拼写能力。

给分标准:- 4分:语法准确无误,拼写无误。

- 3分:语法有少量错误,拼写有少量错误,但不影响表达。

- 2分:语法错误较多,拼写错误较多,但能基本理解句意。

- 1分:语法错误严重,拼写错误严重,影响阅读理解。

- 0分:语法错误和拼写错误非常严重,无法理解。

3. 词汇与表达(Vocabulary and Expression):主要考察考生的词汇量和表达能力。

给分标准:- 4分:运用较丰富的词汇和短语,表达准确、生动、流畅。

- 3分:词汇和短语使用较为基础,表达基本准确但较为简单。

- 2分:词汇量和短语使用有限,表达较为简单和不准确。

- 1分:词汇量和短语使用非常有限,表达简单和错误。

- 0分:词汇量和短语使用非常有限,无法表达。

4. 结构与连贯(Structure and Coherence):主要考察考生的文章结构和段落之间的连贯性。

英语专四写作评分标准

英语专四写作评分标准

12
I'm excited that our school will hold an art festival. I believe it will be to all the students' liking as it can definitely make our dull lives more colorful. My suggestion to the art festival is to hold a painting competition. Many of our students are versatile. They are good at singing, dancing, painting, etc. As the singing and dancing competitions have been held many times, only painting competition has never been held. Why should we neglect these people who are good at painting? Secondly, holding a painting competition can not only give students a stage to show their ability but also improve the art atmosphere in our campus. Since our university is one of science and technology, the atmosphere in our campus is a little dull, so we desperately need some art activities to enliven it. After the competition, we can hang up the students' masterpieces to create an art atmosphere. From the above analysis, it is obvious that holding a painting competition is a good choice for the coming art festival. And I believe it will be all the students' favor.

英语专业四级作文评分标准

英语专业四级作文评分标准
(14-12分)32-39
较好地完成了试题规定的任务;主题比较突出,论证比较成分,说理比较明确。
结构比较清楚,有一定的逻辑性;文章连贯性好。
有少量或个别语法错误;能够运用正确的句式;用词准确;写作比较规范,有极个别的拼写、标点或大小写错误。
语言较得体;语气较恰当Leabharlann 有一定说服力。Band 3
(11-9分)24-31
英语专业四级作文评分标准
档次和分数
内容
结构
语法
得体
Band 5
(15分)40
很好地完成了试题规定的任务;主题突出,论证充分,说理明确
结构清楚,逻辑性强;文章连贯性好
几乎没有任何语法错误;能够灵活运用多样的句式;用词确切、恰当;写作规范,几乎没有拼写、标点或大小写错误。
语言得体;语气恰当;有说服力
Band 4
结构比较松散,缺乏一定的逻辑性;缺乏一定的连贯性。
语法错误多,影响意思表达;用词不正确,表达不清楚;拼写、标点、大小写错误多,影响意思表达。
文章语气不恰当,含糊其辞;缺乏说服力。
Band 1
(5-3分)8-15
未完成试题规定的任务;主题模糊,说理不清。
结构混乱,逻辑不清;无连贯性。
语法错误很多且严重,严重影响意思表达;用词不正确,使读者不知其解;有严重拼写、标点、大小写错误,严重影响意思表达。
语气生硬,有失分寸;没有说服力。
基本完成了试题规定的任务;主题比较突出,阐述基本清楚。
结构基本清楚,有逻辑性,但不充分;衔接不够顺畅。
有一些语法错误,但不影响意思表达;能够使用不同句式;用词基本准确;存在一些拼写、标点、大小写错误,但不影响意思表达。
文章语气不够恰当;说服力稍差。

英语专业四级写作评分标准

英语专业四级写作评分标准

英语专业四级写作评分标准Writing Scoring Criteria for English Major CET-4Introduction:The purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive overview of the scoring criteria used in the English Major College English Test (CET-4) writing section. This assessment is crucial for English major students as it evaluates their proficiency in English writing skills. Understanding the scoring criteria will enable students to better prepare for the exam and improve their chances of achieving a high score.1. Content and Relevance:The content of the essay should be relevant to the given topic or prompt.A well-written essay demonstrates a clear understanding of the subject matter and addresses all aspects of the topic. The ideas presented should be logical, coherent, and well-developed. The writer should provide evidence and examples to support their arguments and opinions. A high-scoring essay shows originality and critical thinking ability, offering insightful perspectives.2. Organization and Cohesion:An effectively written essay has proper organization and coherence. It should consist of a well-structured introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion. Each paragraph should focus on a single idea, and there should be clear transitions between paragraphs. The essay should have a logical flow, with ideas progressing smoothly from one to another. Transitionaldevices, such as linking words and phrases, should be used appropriately to enhance coherence.3. Language Use and Vocabulary:The language used in the essay should be accurate, appropriate, and varied. It should display a wide range of vocabulary, demonstrating the writer's lexical resource. Precise and sophisticated vocabulary choices enhance the overall quality of the essay. The writer should also demonstrate control over grammar, syntax, and sentence construction. Sentences should be structurally sound, and errors in spelling, punctuation, and capitalization should be minimized.4. Argument and Development:A strong essay presents a well-developed argument or point of view. The writer should provide solid evidence, examples, and reasoning to support their claims. Counterarguments should be acknowledged and addressed in a balanced and objective manner. The essay should show a clear progression of ideas, with each paragraph contributing to the overall argument. Critical thinking and analysis are highly valued in this section.5. Clarity and Coherence:An excellent essay is one that is clear and easy to understand. The writer should express their ideas in a concise and coherent manner. Complex ideas should be explained clearly and succinctly. The essay should be well-structured, with a clear introduction that previews the main points and a conclusion that summarizes the key arguments. Each paragraph should have a focused topic sentence and follow a logical order of presentation.6. Cultural Awareness:An exceptional essay showcases cultural awareness and sensitivity. The writer should demonstrate an appreciation for different perspectives and cultural diversity. Avoiding stereotyping or biased viewpoints is essential. Global issues should be analyzed from a broader perspective, taking into account cross-cultural understanding and ethical considerations.Conclusion:The aforementioned criteria outline the key factors considered when evaluating writing in the English Major CET-4 exam. By understanding these scoring criteria, students can focus on developing their writing skills accordingly. Practice and preparation in line with these standards will ultimately lead to higher scores in the writing section and overall success in the CET-4 exam.。

英语专四作文评分标准2021

英语专四作文评分标准2021

英语专四作文评分标准2021作文在英语四六级考试中占分值比15%,要想得高分,除了写作技巧外,知道阅卷老师的打分标准也很重要,以下就是的关于2021阅卷老师对于英语四级作文的评分标准:一、听写部分:专四听写部分,共计10分,考试时间是10分钟。

1、每节最多扣1分。

2、重复错误,仅扣一次分。

3、错误共分两类:小错误(minormistakes)和大错误(majormistakes)分别扣0.25分和0.5分。

A、小错误:1)单词拼写错一到两个字母:2)标点符号错误(含大小写):3)冠词、单复数错误。

B、大错误:漏写、加词、造词、换词(冠词作小错计)、大移位、时态错误,每个错误扣0.5分。

4、一些特例的扣分标准:下列情况不扣分:WorldWar|→WorldWarOne;90percent→90%5总分只有0.5分时,以1分计算;其余总分中如含小数点的,小数舍去,保留整数,如95→97.5→7,空白卷一律打0分。

二、专四简答题评分原则:1、评分点是关键词或词组是否正确。

2、不要求学生用完整句子回答。

3、字数如超过15字,扣0.5分。

4、学生写的关键词有对有错,酌情扣分。

5、关键词词性错误扣0.5分,如luxurious写成luxury。

6、语法错误扣0.5分。

7、同类错误不重复扣分。

作文题目写或不写,不会作为作文的评分依据。

但是如果在写题目时就已离题万里,势必会影响阅卷人对作文的期待和判断。

由于或题目说明中均有主题的提示,考试除非完全没有看到题目。

规定四级写作120-180词,六级写作150-200词。

阅卷老师不会也没有时间去数几个单词的差异。

一般在正负20词内都可以接受。

字数可以再超一些,但是不可以再少。

评分标准中无关于字迹的说明,只要清晰可辨,就不会影响分数。

但是更加美观整洁的卷面在相同条件下一定会获得更好的分数。

所以,小伙伴们在考试中一定要注意自己的卷面哦。

两者会被同时,但是由于大部分同学的写作内容相对类似,所以语言质量显得更加重要,可能成为得分关键,最好要熟悉外说话、思考方式,学习他们的语言习惯,这样才不会出现中国式英语。

专四专八作文评分标准

专四专八作文评分标准

专四作文评分标准14-15分内容切题,完整,条理清楚,文章结构严谨,语法正确,语言通顺恰当,句式用词富有变化,有"闪光点"基本无语言错误.11-13分内容切题,完整,条理清楚,文章结构严谨,语法正确,语言通顺恰当,少量语法错误8-10分内容基本切题,完整, 条理基本清楚,文章结构基本严谨,语法基本正确,语言基本通顺恰当.少量严重错误,一些词使用不当.5-7分内容基本切题,完整, 条理不够清楚,教明显的母语痕迹.较多语言错误,许多词使用不当.2-4分内容偏题,不完整,思路混乱,语句不完整,只有少数句子可以理解,词汇拼写错误严重.考试时间及计分比重为:听写考15分钟占15分;听力理解考15分钟占15分;完型填空考15分钟占10分;语法与词汇考15分钟占15分;阅读理解25分钟占20分;大作文考35分钟占15分;便条10分钟占10分。

总考试时间为130分钟,满分100分。

或者说听写占15%听力:包括对话,小文章,新闻各10道占15%(30道题)完型填空:20道题占10%阅读:20道题占20%取消了快速阅读(2005年开始就没有快速阅读了)语法和词汇:30道题占15%大作文写作15%小作文10%-专业四级考试听写评分标准1. 听写共分15小节;每节1分。

2. 每节最多扣1分。

3. 错误分两类:小错误(minor mistakes)和大错误(major mistakes)。

4. 小错误:单词拼写错一到两个字母。

例:steadily — staedily; harbor — habor; parent —parents; mouths — mouth 两个字母以下的词、标点符号、次序颠倒和大小写错误算小错。

5. 小错误扣分标准:小错误在一节中出现一次,留作总计;出现两次:扣0.5分;出现三次:扣0.5分后留作总计;出现四次:扣1分。

6. 大错误:漏写、加词、造词、换词(冠词作小错计),每个错误扣0.5分。

英语专业四级写作评分标准

英语专业四级写作评分标准

专业四级写作评分标准满分15分,分项可以打0.5分。

A. 思想与表达(ideas and argument) 7分满分7分,其中6-7分为优秀,4-5分良好,3分一般,1-2分较差。

1. 思想内容(idea content)a. 内容切题b. 内容充实c. 观点明确d. 论据支持论点e. 有独到见解2. 表达效果(effectiveness)a. 表达清晰b. 有说服力3. 篇章组织结构(rhetorical organization)a. 每段有主题句b. 句间衔接自然c. 段间过渡自然d. 第一部分明确提出观点e. 最后一部分自然得出结论f. 段落排列合理B. 语言运用能力(language use) 6分满分6分,其中6分为优秀,4-5分良好,3分一般,1-2分较差。

1. 准确性(correctness)a. 语法正确b. 句子结构正确c. 固定搭配正确d. 用词准确2. 丰富性(richness)a. 词汇丰富b. 句子形式多样3. 得体性(appropriateness)a. 语气恰当b. 语言地道4. 流利度(fluency)完成规定词数超出200词过多扣一分;完成规定内容,字数少于170词扣一分;未完成任务的不仅扣字数分,也要从内容上扣分。

只有topic sentence, 没有supporting points,一般只能得3-5分C. 写作规范(mechanics) 2分满分2分,其中2分优秀,1.5分良好,1分一般,0.5分较差a. 单词拼写正确b. 标点符号正确c. 大小写正确d. 书写美观e. 卷面整洁。

2024年英语专业四级写作评分标准

2024年英语专业四级写作评分标准

2024年英语专业四级写作评分标准The 2024 English Proficiency Level 4 Writing Assessment Scoring CriteriaAs the world continues to evolve and the demand for proficient English language skills increases, the assessment of English writing proficiency has become a critical component in the education system. In 2024, the English Proficiency Level 4 (EPL4) writing assessment will undergo a significant revision to better reflect the changing needs and expectations of the global community. This essay will outline the key aspects of the 2024 EPL4 writing assessment scoring criteria and the rationale behind these changes.The primary objective of the 2024 EPL4 writing assessment is to evaluate a candidate's ability to effectively communicate in written English across a variety of contexts. The assessment will focus on the candidate's mastery of the following core competencies essential for successful written communication in the 21st centuryOrganization and CoherenceThe 2024 EPL4 writing assessment will place a strong emphasis on the candidate's ability to organize their thoughts and present a clear,logical, and coherent written response. This includes the effective use of introductions, body paragraphs, and conclusions to guide the reader through the essay. Candidates will be expected to demonstrate their ability to develop a central idea or argument and support it with relevant and well-structured supporting details.Clarity and Precision of ExpressionThe assessment will evaluate the candidate's proficiency in using appropriate vocabulary, sentence structure, and grammatical conventions to convey their ideas clearly and precisely. Candidates will be expected to demonstrate their ability to express themselves with clarity, avoiding ambiguity and ensuring that the intended meaning is effectively communicated to the reader.Depth of Analysis and Critical ThinkingThe 2024 EPL4 writing assessment will place a greater emphasis on the candidate's ability to engage in critical analysis and demonstrate a depth of understanding on the given topic. Candidates will be expected to go beyond simple description or narration and instead provide well-reasoned arguments, draw insightful conclusions, and demonstrate a nuanced understanding of the subject matter.Effective Use of Supporting EvidenceThe assessment will evaluate the candidate's ability to support their ideas and arguments with relevant and credible supporting evidence.This may include the use of examples, facts, statistics, or references to authoritative sources. Candidates will be expected to integrate this supporting evidence seamlessly into their writing to strengthen the overall persuasiveness and credibility of their response.Adherence to Conventions and FormatThe 2024 EPL4 writing assessment will also assess the candidate's ability to adhere to the conventions and format of academic writing. This includes the appropriate use of spelling, punctuation, and capitalization, as well as the overall presentation and organization of the written response.The rationale behind these changes to the EPL4 writing assessment scoring criteria is to better align the evaluation process with the evolving demands of the global workforce and the increasing emphasis on effective communication skills. In today's interconnected world, the ability to write clearly, critically, and persuasively is a valuable asset across a wide range of professional and academic contexts.By focusing on these core competencies, the 2024 EPL4 writing assessment will not only measure a candidate's English language proficiency but also their ability to think critically, analyze complex issues, and communicate their ideas effectively in written form. This shift in emphasis is intended to better prepare candidates for thechallenges and opportunities they will face in their future academic and professional endeavors.Furthermore, the revised scoring criteria will provide a more comprehensive and nuanced evaluation of a candidate's writing abilities, allowing for a more accurate assessment of their overall English language proficiency. This, in turn, will enable educational institutions and employers to make more informed decisions regarding the placement, admission, and selection of candidates based on their demonstrated written communication skills.In conclusion, the 2024 EPL4 writing assessment scoring criteria reflect a significant evolution in the evaluation of English language proficiency. By emphasizing the core competencies of organization, clarity, critical thinking, supporting evidence, and adherence to conventions, the assessment will better prepare candidates for the demands of the 21st-century global landscape. As the world continues to evolve, the ongoing refinement of assessment tools like the EPL4 writing assessment will be crucial in ensuring that the next generation of English language learners are equipped with the necessary skills to succeed in their academic and professional pursuits.。

英语四级的写作评分标准总结

英语四级的写作评分标准总结

英语四级的写作评分标准总结英语四级写作评分标准总结英语四级写作考试是中国大陆大学本科英语课程考试的一部分,对于考生来说具有一定的挑战性。

为了帮助考生更好地应对这一评测项目,以下将总结英语四级写作评分标准,希望能对考生有所裨益。

一、任务完成能力(25%)任务完成能力是评估学生是否理解和完成所要求的写作任务的关键因素。

好的写作应能明确回应问题,充分发挥自己的想法,论述观点并提供相关细节、论据或例证。

二、语法和词汇(25%)语法和词汇是评估学生基本语言技能的重要考核点。

写作中,正确运用各类句法结构、句子连贯性和恰当使用词汇,能够提高文章的质量和准确性。

三、逻辑和连贯性(25%)逻辑和连贯性评估的是学生的组织和表达能力。

文章应该有清晰的开头,明确的结构和合理的段落划分。

同时,各段之间的过渡要流畅自然,以确保篇章的连贯性。

四、内容和观点(25%)内容和观点是文章的核心,评估学生对所选主题的理解和分析能力。

优秀的文章应该给出合理的论证,结合实例和细节来支持观点,并充分展示自己的思考深度和广度。

综上所述,英语四级写作评分标准主要考察学生的任务完成能力、语法和词汇、逻辑和连贯性以及内容和观点。

对于考生来说,在备考过程中,需要注重培养和提高自己的写作技巧,包括扩大词汇量、熟悉各类句式结构、加强逻辑思维训练等。

同时,在写作过程中,应注意语句的通顺和清晰,避免出现拼写和语法错误,以保证整篇文章的质量。

最后,合理组织文章结构,理清观点,加强论证,以提高文章的逻辑性和说服力。

通过对英语四级写作评分标准的总结,希望广大考生能够更好地了解考试要求,有针对性地准备和应对写作考试,取得满意的成绩。

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

英语专业四级作文评分标准
英语专业四级作文评分标准主要包括以下方面:
1. 题目要求:作文能否全面、准确地回答题目要求。

2. 语言表达:作文能否用恰当的语言表达清晰、流畅、连贯、准确、得体。

3. 文章结构:作文能否有良好的结构,包括适当的开头、主体和结尾,并且表达方式和手法凸显文章的主题和重点。

4. 主题观点:作文能否有清晰的主题和明确的论点或观点,并且有充分的、合理的、有说服力的理由和证据来支持。

5. 文化意识:作文能否体现出作者对文化和社会背景的理解和透彻的思考。

6. 语法、拼写和标点符号:作文能否遵守英语语法、拼写规则和标点符号的使用,表达清晰和准确。

评分标准的具体安排是:该项作文的总分为100分,其中,内容占70分,语言占30分。

内容和语言的具体评分标准如下:
1. 内容(70分)
(1)作文是否言之有理、中心明确、重点突出(15分)
(2)作文是否作到了分析问题,阐述观点(15分)
(3)作文是否联系实际,具有实践意义(10分)
(4)作文是否有深度和广度,充分表达了所要阐述的问题(15分)
(5)作文是否符合题意和要求(15分)
2. 语言(30分)
(1)词汇、句子语法的正确使用(10分)
(2)文采、衔接词、成语和托福模板的恰当使用(10分)
(3)语音、语调的自然和流利(5分)
(4)标点符号的使用(5分)
总的来说,要得到好成绩,作文要言之有理、结构完整,语言优美、词汇准确,重点突出、分析深入,并且要联系实际,有实践意义。

相关文档
最新文档