(精)英语辩论赛题目精选
英语辩论赛辩题大全_辩论赛_
英语辩论赛辩题大全就要策划举办英语辩论赛的你想好辩题了吗?下面是小编搜集整理的英语辩论赛辩题大全,欢迎阅读。
更多资讯请继续关注辩论赛栏目!英语辩论赛辩题大全0. Campus Lifea. China abolish English as a compulsory subject inpostgraduate entrance examinations.b. China make military training compulsory for allcollege students.c. All major corporations operating in China shouldbe required to offer student internships.1. Culturea. THW require study of the traditional styleChinese writing.b. TH opposes the private ownership of artifactsdeemed to be national treasures.c. THBT Shanzhai culture is bad for China.2. Educationa. THW base teachers? pay on their students? performance.b. THW make community service compulsory for all college students.c. THBT Chinese compulsory education should be extended to 12 years3. Economya. TH supports a new international trading currency.b. THB that China should stop buying US debt.c. China should issue consumption vouchers to stimulate the economy.4. Global climate changea. Developed nations should accept global warming refugeesb. Those affected by global climate change should have the right to sue major carbon-emitting nations.c. China should cap its carbon emissions.5. East Asiaa. Immediate elections are in Thailand抯 best interest.b. ASEAN should expel Myanmarc. Direct negotiations between the US and North Korea are preferable to the Six-Party Talks.6. Family & Populationa. THBT women should be allowed to sell their eggsb. TH would require the father抯 consent for abortions.c. China should legalize marriage between homosexuals.7. Crime & Punishmenta. Criminals sentenced to life imprisonment without parole should be allowed to choose deathinstead.b. China should establish a national DNA database of all citizens for the purposes of criminalinvestigations.c. This house would make parents liable for their children抯crimes.8. Governing & Governmenta. THW make one-year military service a qualification for public servants.b. TH would require government officials to make full financial disclosure to the public.c. THW make all NPC representatives full-time, professional legislators.Octofinals: Medical servicea. China should ban hymen reconstruction surgeries.b. China should legalize physician-assisted suicide.c. The World Health Organization (WHO) should have theauthority to quarantine in times ofhealth crises.Quarterfinals: Judiciarya. China should apply capital punishment only to homicide cases.b. China should fully establish a jury-by-peers system.c. Judges should be elected.Semifinals: International IssuesSEMIFINAL #1a. The Shanghai Cooperation Organization should admit Iran as a full member.b. The United Nations should take control of Jerusalem.c. NATO should fully withdraw from Afghanistan before 2019.SEMIFINAL #2a. The USA should stop promoting democracy as part of their foreign policy.b. Pre-emptive strikes on Somalia to curb piracy are justified.c. This house supports Spain抯criminal prosecution of members of the Bushadministration.FinalsThe PRC should ban the production, sale and consumption of all tobacco products.英语辩论赛常用语A征求他人观点或意见的用语I would be glad to hear your opinion of … 我很乐意听听你对……的意见。
英语辩论相关作文题目大全
英语辩论相关作文题目大全1. "The Impact of Social Media on Modern Communication: A Debate"- 这个题目鼓励学生探讨社交媒体对当代交流方式的影响,并从正反两方面进行辩论。
2. "Should School Uniforms Be Mandatory in All Schools?"- 学生可以就学校是否应该强制穿校服展开讨论,分析其对学生行为和学校文化的影响。
3. "The Role of Technology in Education: Boon or Bane?"- 探讨技术在教育中的作用,是否对学生的学习和教师的教学有积极影响。
4. "Is Capital Punishment Justified?"- 学生可以就死刑是否合理进行辩论,考虑道德、法律和社会影响。
5. "The Influence of Advertising on Consumer Behavior"- 分析广告如何影响消费者的购买决策,以及这种影响是正面还是负面。
6. "Globalization: A Positive or Negative Development?"- 讨论全球化对世界经济、文化和社会的影响,以及它是否对所有人都有益。
7. "Should Animal Testing Be Banned in Scientific Research?"- 学生可以就动物实验在科学研究中的必要性进行辩论,考虑伦理和科学进步。
8. "The Importance of Learning a Second Language"- 探讨学习第二语言的好处,包括个人发展、职业机会和跨文化交流。
9. "Online Education vs. Traditional Classroom Learning: Which Is More Effective?"- 比较在线教育和传统课堂教学的优劣,分析哪种方式更适合现代学习。
英语辩论赛辩题和答案(3篇)
第1篇For the Motion:Opening Statement:Ladies and gentlemen, esteemed judges, and fellow debaters, today we stand before you to advocate for the motion that the government should provide free education to all students up to the age of 18. Education is the cornerstone of a prosperous society, and ensuring that every child has access to quality education is a moral imperative. We believe that the government has a responsibility to invest in its youth and provide them with the tools they need to succeed.Argument 1: Equal OpportunityThe first and most compelling reason to support free education for all students up to the age of 18 is the principle of equal opportunity. Education is the great equalizer, providing individuals from all backgrounds with the knowledge and skills necessary to compete in the global economy. By making education free, we eliminate the financial barriers that prevent many students from pursuing their dreams. This ensures that every child, regardless of their socioeconomic status, has an equal chance to succeed.Argument 2: Economic BenefitsInvesting in education is an investment in the future of our economy. Educated individuals are more likely to be employed, have higher earning potential, and contribute positively to society. By providing free education, the government can create a more skilled workforce, leading to increased productivity and economic growth. Studies have shown that the return on investment in education is significant, making it a sound economic decision for the government.Argument 3: Social StabilityEducation plays a crucial role in fostering social stability and reducing crime rates. By providing free education, we empower young people to develop critical thinking skills, problem-solving abilities,and a sense of civic responsibility. Educated individuals are lesslikely to engage in criminal activities and more likely to be active, productive members of society. This investment in education can lead to a safer, more harmonious community.Argument 4: Moral ResponsibilityLastly, the government has a moral responsibility to ensure that all children have access to education. Education is a fundamental human right, and denying access to it based on financial constraints is a violation of that right. By providing free education, the government demonstrates its commitment to social justice and equity, ensuring that no child is left behind.Rebuttal:While the opposition may argue that free education is unaffordable or that it would lead to a decline in educational quality, these concerns can be addressed. First, the cost of providing free education can be offset by the economic benefits it generates. Second, ensuring quality education is not solely dependent on fees; it requires a comprehensive approach that includes well-trained teachers, modern facilities, and effective educational policies.Closing Statement:In conclusion, providing free education to all students up to the age of 18 is a necessary and beneficial policy. It ensures equal opportunity, fosters economic growth, promotes social stability, and fulfills the government's moral responsibility. We ask you to vote in favor of the motion and support the future of our children and our society.---Against the Motion:Opening Statement:Thank you, esteemed judges, and fellow debaters. We are here to argue against the motion that the government should provide free education toall students up to the age of 18. While the idea of free education may seem noble, it is impractical and fraught with consequences that could undermine the quality of education and the financial stability of the government.Argument 1: Financial BurdenThe primary concern with the motion is the financial burden it places on the government. Education is expensive, and providing free education to millions of students would require a significant allocation of resources. This could lead to cuts in other essential services, such as healthcare, infrastructure, and social welfare. The government must prioritize its spending to ensure that it can meet the needs of its citizens effectively.Argument 2: Quality of EducationAnother critical issue is the potential impact on the quality of education. When the government provides free education, it may be tempted to increase the number of students to maximize its investment. This could lead to overcrowded classrooms, understaffed schools, and a decline in the overall quality of education. It is essential to maintain high standards to ensure that students receive a valuable education that prepares them for future challenges.Argument 3: Incentive for Personal ResponsibilityEducation should be seen as a personal responsibility, and charging fees can serve as an incentive for students to value their education. When students are financially invested in their education, they are morelikely to take it seriously and perform better. Removing this financial barrier may lead to a decrease in student motivation and a rise in dropout rates.Argument 4: Alternative SolutionsInstead of providing free education, the government can explore alternative solutions that address the issue of accessibility. Thiscould include targeted scholarships, student loans with favorable terms,or partnerships with private institutions. These approaches can ensure that students from low-income families receive the support they need without burdening the government's budget.Rebuttal:The proponents may claim that the economic benefits of education justify the financial investment, but this overlooks the long-term costs of maintaining a high-quality education system. Moreover, the governmenthas a duty to manage its resources responsibly, and free education could lead to unsustainable spending practices.Closing Statement:In conclusion, while the desire to provide free education is commendable, it is not a viable solution. The financial burden, potential decline in educational quality, lack of personal responsibility, and alternative solutions make it clear that the government should not adopt this policy. We ask you to reject the motion and consider the long-term implications of such a decision.---This debate provides a framework for discussing the complexities of providing free education to all students up to the age of 18. Both sides present compelling arguments, and the final decision would depend on the priorities and values of the society in question.第2篇Side A: In Favor of Standardized TestingArgument 1: Ensuring Academic Standards- Standardized tests provide a common benchmark for evaluating student performance across different schools and regions. This ensures that all students are held to the same high academic standards, regardless oftheir background or the resources available to their schools.- By requiring a standardized test before graduation, schools can ensure that students have achieved a minimum level of proficiency in coresubjects, which is essential for their future success in higher education and the workforce.Argument 2: Identifying Areas for Improvement- Standardized tests often reveal specific areas where students are struggling. This information can be used by teachers and administrators to tailor their instruction and interventions to address these weaknesses, thereby improving overall student performance.- The data from standardized tests can also help identify trends and patterns that may indicate broader educational issues, such as a lack of access to quality resources or a need for additional support services.Argument 3: Promoting Accountability- Requiring a standardized test before graduation holds schools accountable for their educational outcomes. It incentivizes schools to focus on student achievement and to provide the necessary support forall students to succeed.- Accountability can also extend to teachers, who may be more motivated to deliver effective instruction if they know their performance will be evaluated based on student test scores.Answer to Counterarguments:Counterargument 1: Standardized Tests Do Not Measure True Learning- While it is true that standardized tests may not capture the full breadth of a student's knowledge and skills, they do measure certain critical aspects of learning, such as basic comprehension and problem-solving abilities. These are essential skills that students need to succeed in the real world.- Additionally, schools can use a variety of assessment methods to complement standardized tests, providing a more comprehensive picture of student learning.Counterargument 2: Standardized Tests Create Stress and Pressure- It is important to recognize that standardized tests can indeed create stress and pressure for students. However, this can be mitigated by implementing appropriate test preparation strategies and by creating a supportive testing environment.- Moreover, the benefits of ensuring academic standards and promoting accountability outweigh the potential negative effects of test stress.Counterargument 3: Standardized Tests Can Be Subjective and Biased- It is true that standardized tests can be influenced by factors such as socioeconomic status and cultural background. However, efforts are continually being made to improve the fairness and objectivity of these tests.- Additionally, schools can use the results to identify and address disparities, rather than using them as the sole measure of student performance.Side B: Against Standardized TestingArgument 1: Restricting Personalized Learning- Standardized tests can limit the flexibility of teachers to tailor their instruction to the individual needs of their students. This can result in a one-size-fits-all approach that does not cater to the diverse learning styles and abilities of students.- By focusing on test preparation, schools may prioritize rote learning and memorization over critical thinking and creativity, which are essential skills for the 21st century.Argument 2: Overemphasizing Test Scores- An overemphasis on standardized test scores can lead to a narrow focus on academic performance at the expense of other important educational outcomes, such as social-emotional development, physical health, and the arts.- This narrow focus can also create a competitive and stressful environment for students, which may have long-term negative effects on their well-being.Argument 3: Disproportionate Impact on Marginalized Students- Standardized tests can disproportionately impact marginalized students, who may face additional challenges such as language barriers, lack of access to resources, or discrimination.- The pressure to perform well on these tests can exacerbate existing inequalities and hinder the educational opportunities of these students.Answer to Counterarguments:Counterargument 1: Standardized Tests Provide a Consistent Measure of Student Performance- While standardized tests do provide a consistent measure of student performance, they should not be the sole measure. Schools should use a variety of assessment methods to ensure a well-rounded evaluation of student learning.- Moreover, standardized tests can be used as one tool among many to inform instruction and support students, rather than as the primary focus.Counterargument 2: Test Scores Do Not Reflect the Entire Educational Experience- It is true that test scores do not reflect the entire educational experience, but they do provide valuable information about certain aspects of student learning. This information can be used to identify strengths and weaknesses and to inform educational strategies.- The goal should be to use standardized test results as part of a larger, more holistic approach to student assessment.Counterargument 3: Efforts Can Be Made to Mitigate the Disproportionate Impact- While it is important to acknowledge the disproportionate impact of standardized tests on marginalized students, efforts can be made to mitigate this impact. This includes providing additional support and resources to these students, as well as using alternative assessment methods that are more equitable.In conclusion, while standardized testing has its drawbacks, thebenefits of ensuring academic standards, identifying areas for improvement, and promoting accountability make it a necessary component of the educational system. By using standardized tests as one tool among many and addressing the concerns of fairness and equity, schools can create a more balanced and effective approach to student assessment and support.第3篇Should governments around the world prioritize the development of renewable energy sources over the expansion of fossil fuel infrastructure?Answer for the Proposition (Pro):Introduction:The proposition argues that governments worldwide should prioritize the development of renewable energy sources over the expansion of fossilfuel infrastructure. This stance is supported by the urgent need to combat climate change, enhance energy security, and foster sustainable economic growth.Argument 1: Climate Change MitigationThe primary reason for prioritizing renewable energy is the urgent need to mitigate climate change. Fossil fuels are the largest contributors to greenhouse gas emissions, which are causing global temperatures to rise, leading to extreme weather events, rising sea levels, and the loss of biodiversity. By investing in renewable energy, governments can significantly reduce carbon emissions and slow down the pace of climate change.Answer 1.1: Renewable Energy's Emissions ProfileRenewable energy sources, such as solar, wind, hydro, and geothermal, produce little to no greenhouse gas emissions during operation. In contrast, fossil fuels release substantial amounts of carbon dioxide and other pollutants when burned. Prioritizing renewable energy will lead to a cleaner energy mix and a healthier planet.Answer 1.2: Technological AdvancementsAdvancements in renewable energy technology have made it more efficient and cost-effective. Solar panels are becoming cheaper and more efficient, wind turbines are producing more power at lower wind speeds, and battery storage is becoming more reliable. These advancements make renewable energy a viable alternative to fossil fuels.Argument 2: Energy SecurityAnother compelling reason to prioritize renewable energy is the enhancement of energy security. Countries that rely heavily on fossil fuels are vulnerable to price volatility and geopolitical tensions. By diversifying their energy sources and investing in renewable energy, governments can reduce their dependence on fossil fuels and stabilize energy prices.Answer 2.1: Diversification of Energy SourcesRenewable energy sources are typically abundant and widely distributed. Unlike fossil fuels, which are concentrated in certain regions, renewable energy can be harnessed almost anywhere in the world. This diversification reduces the risk of energy supply disruptions and enhances energy security.Answer 2.2: Economic ResilienceInvesting in renewable energy can create jobs and stimulate economic growth. The renewable energy sector is one of the fastest-growing job markets globally. By prioritizing renewable energy, governments can create new employment opportunities and build a more resilient economy.Argument 3: Long-term Economic BenefitsRenewable energy offers long-term economic benefits that outweigh the short-term costs of transitioning away from fossil fuels. While the initial investment in renewable energy infrastructure can be high, the long-term savings in energy costs and health care expenditures are significant.Answer 3.1: Lower Energy CostsRenewable energy is often more cost-effective in the long run. As technology improves and economies of scale are achieved, the cost of renewable energy will continue to decline. This will lead to lower energy bills for consumers and businesses.Answer 3.2: Health Care SavingsThe pollution associated with fossil fuels contributes to respiratory diseases, heart conditions, and other health issues. By reducing air pollution through the adoption of renewable energy, governments can save money on health care costs and improve public health.Conclusion:In conclusion, the proposition strongly supports the idea that governments worldwide should prioritize the development of renewable energy sources over the expansion of fossil fuel infrastructure. The need to mitigate climate change, enhance energy security, and foster sustainable economic growth makes renewable energy a compelling and necessary choice. By investing in renewable energy, governments can create a cleaner, more secure, and prosperous future for their citizens.Answer for the Opposing Proposition (Con):Introduction:The opposing proposition argues that governments worldwide should not prioritize the development of renewable energy sources over the expansion of fossil fuel infrastructure. This stance is based on thebelief that fossil fuels are currently more reliable, affordable, and essential for meeting the world's energy demands.Argument 1: Reliability and AffordabilityFossil fuels are currently the most reliable and affordable energy sources available. They provide a consistent and predictable energy supply, which is crucial for economic stability and growth. Prioritizing renewable energy could lead to energy shortages and increased costs.Answer 1.1: Reliability of Fossil FuelsFossil fuel infrastructure is well-established and has been providing energy for centuries. This reliability is essential for industries, transportation, and other sectors that require a stable energy supply. Renewable energy sources, on the other hand, are intermittent and depend on weather conditions, which can lead to power outages and energy shortages.Answer 1.2: Affordability of Fossil FuelsFossil fuels are currently the cheapest form of energy available. This affordability makes them accessible to a wide range of consumers and businesses. Shifting to renewable energy could lead to higher energy costs, which could disproportionately affect low-income households and small businesses.Argument 2: Energy SecurityExpanding fossil fuel infrastructure can enhance energy security by reducing dependence on imported fuels and increasing domestic energy production. This is particularly important for countries that rely on energy imports, as it reduces their vulnerability to geopolitical tensions and price fluctuations.Answer 2.1: Geopolitical TensionsCountries that rely on fossil fuel imports are at the mercy of globaloil markets and geopolitical events. By developing domestic fossil fuelresources, governments can gain more control over their energy supply and reduce their exposure to these risks.Answer 2.2: Domestic Energy ProductionExpanding fossil fuel infrastructure can create jobs and stimulate economic growth in the energy sector. This domestic production can also provide a source of revenue for governments and contribute to national economic stability.Argument 3: Technological and Economic ChallengesThe transition to renewable energy faces significant technological and economic challenges. The intermittent nature of renewable energy requires substantial investment in energy storage and grid infrastructure. Additionally, the renewable energy sector is not yet as mature as the fossil fuel industry, which has decades of experience and a well-developed supply chain.Answer 3.1: Energy StorageRenewable energy sources, such as wind and solar, are intermittent and depend on weather conditions. Energy storage solutions, such as batteries, are necessary to ensure a stable energy supply. However, the current technology is still expensive and not yet fully scalable.Answer 3.2: Supply Chain and InfrastructureThe renewable energy sector lacks the well-established supply chain and infrastructure of the fossil fuel industry. This can lead to inefficiencies and higher costs, which may hinder the transition to renewable energy.Conclusion:In conclusion, the opposing proposition believes that governments worldwide should not prioritize the development of renewable energy sources over the expansion of fossil fuel infrastructure. Fossil fuels are currently the most reliable and affordable energy sources, and expanding fossil fuel infrastructure can enhance energy security andeconomic stability. While the transition to renewable energy is important, it must be done in a manner that ensures reliability, affordability, and energy security.。
英语辩论赛常见辩题简单(3篇)
第1篇英语辩论赛是一种锻炼思维、语言表达和逻辑推理能力的活动。
以下是一些常见的英语辩论赛辩题,供参考:一、关于教育1. 课外补习班是否必要?2. 传统教育模式与素质教育哪个更好?3. 网络教育能否取代传统教育?4. 公办学校与私立学校哪个更有利于学生成长?二、关于科技1. 人工智能是否会取代人类?2. 社交媒体对人们生活的影响是正面还是负面?3. 移动支付是否会导致现金的消失?4. 互联网是否加剧了信息不对称?三、关于社会问题1. 网络暴力是否应该受到法律制裁?2. 环境保护与经济发展哪个更重要?3. 女性是否应该享有与男性同等的职场机会?4. 犯罪率上升的原因是什么?如何解决?四、关于文化1. 文化多样性是否应该得到尊重?2. 网络文学与传统文学哪个更具价值?3. 流行音乐对青少年价值观的影响是正面还是负面?4. 传统文化是否应该得到传承?五、关于政治1. 一国两制是否适用于香港、澳门?2. 民主制度与专制制度哪个更优越?3. 贸易战对全球经济的影响是正面还是负面?4. 国家是否应该干预互联网言论?六、关于个人成长1. 个人的成功是先天决定还是后天努力?2. 父母对孩子的教育方式是否应该一视同仁?3. 青少年是否应该接受心理辅导?4. 个人的兴趣爱好是否应该受到社会压力的影响?七、关于健康1. 饮食健康与生活习惯哪个更重要?2. 互联网成瘾是否应该被列为心理疾病?3. 健康生活方式是否应该从小培养?4. 国家是否应该加大投入,提高国民健康水平?八、关于历史1. 历史是否应该被铭记?2. 历史人物的评价是否应该客观?3. 历史事件对现代社会的启示是什么?4. 历史教育是否应该得到重视?这些辩题涵盖了教育、科技、社会、文化、政治、个人成长、健康和历史等多个领域,既具有普遍性,又具有一定的争议性。
在英语辩论赛中,辩手们可以通过对这些辩题的探讨,提高自己的思维能力和语言表达能力。
第2篇一、引言英语辩论赛是一种考验参赛者思维敏捷、语言表达、逻辑推理等能力的竞赛活动。
英语辩论赛辩题
1. Campus Lifea. China abolish English as a compulsory subject in postgraduate entrance examinations.b. China make military training compulsory for all college students.c. All major corporations operating in China should be required to offer student internships.2. Culturea. THW require study of the traditional style Chinese writing.b. TH opposes the private ownership of artifacts deemed to be national treasures.c. THBT Shanzhai culture is bad for China.3. Educationa. THW base teachers? pay on their students? performance.b. THW make community service compulsory for all college students.c. THBT Chinese compulsory education should be extended to 12 years4. Economya. TH supports a new international trading currency.b. THB that China should stop buying US debt.c. China should issue consumption vouchers to stimulate the economy.5. Global climate changea. Developed nations should accept global warming refugeesb. Those affected by global climate change should have the right to sue major carbon-emitting nations.c. China should cap its carbon emissions.6. Ea st Asiaa. Immediate elections are in Thailand抯best interest.b. ASEAN should expel Myanmarc. Direct negotiations between the US and North Korea are preferable to the Six-Party T alks.7. Family & Populationa. THBT women should be allowed to sell their eggsb. TH would require the father抯consent for abortions.c. China should legalize marriage between homosexuals.8. Crime & Punishmenta. Criminals sentenced to life imprisonment without parole should be allowed to choose death instead.b. China should establish a national DNA database of all citizens for the purposes of criminal investigations.c. This house would make parents liable for their children抯crimes.9. Governing & Governmenta. THW make one-year military service a qualification for public servants.b. TH would require government officials to make full financial disclosure to the public.c. THW make all NPC representatives full-time, professional legislators.10. Medical servicea. China should ban hymen reconstruction surgeries.b. China should legalize physician-assisted suicide.c. The World Health Organization (WHO) should have the authority to quarantine in times of health crises.11.Judiciarya. China should apply capital punishment only to homicide cases.b. China should fully establish a jury-by-peers system.c. Judges should be elected.。
英语辩论赛话题(通用5篇)
英语辩论赛话题(通用5篇)英语辩论赛话题篇一Group 1, For Side: Advertisements should be controlled.Group 1, Against Side: Advertisements should be encouraged.Group 2, For Side: Junior students should go in for beauty contests.Group 2, Against Side: Junior students should not take part in beauty contests.Group 3, For Side: Mobile phones are necessary for middle school students.Group 3, Against Side: Mobile phones are not necessary for middle school students.Group 4, For Side: Middle school students should go abroad to study.Group 4, Against Side: Middle school students should not go abroad to study.Group 5, For Side: Interest is the best teacher for pupils to learn English.Group 5, Against Side: Progress is the best teacher for pupils to learn English.Group 6, For Side: People and nature are in harmony.Group 6, Against Side: People and nature are not in harmony.Group 7, For Side: Mor shubaoc.c ome money means more happiness.Group 7, Against Side: More money means more sadness.Group 8, For Side: Internet alienates the relationship among people.Group 8, Against Side: Internet doesn't alienate the relationshipamong people.Group 9, For Side: Quality is more important for students.Group 9, Against Side: Scores are more important for students. Group 10, For Side: Students should wear their school uniforms. Group 10, Against Side: Students should be allowed to choosetheir own clothes.Group 11, For Side: Students should learn more from books and their teachers.Group 11, Against Side: Students should learn more from their experience and daily life.Group 12, For Side: Computers are good for studying.Group 12, Against Side: Computers are not good for studying.Group 13, For Side: Opportunity is more important for success. Group 13, Against Side: Hard work is more important for success. Group 14, For Side: It is good for students to attend after-school training classes.Group 14, Against Side: It is bad for students to attend after-school training classes.高中组Group 1, For Side: Olympic Games are purely commercial operations.Group 1, Against Side: Olympic Games are not purely commercial operations.Group 2, For Side: Government should control the rising price of houses.Group 2, Against Side: Government should not control the rising price of houses.Group 3, For Side: Reading and writing are more important thanlistening and speaking in the English study.Group 3, Against Side: Listening and speaking are more important than reading and writing in the English study.Group 4, For Side: It's more crucial for students to earn knowledge.Group 4, Against Side: It's more crucial for students to mould character.Group 5, For Side: Blogging has more advantages than disadvantages.Group 5, Against Side: Blogging has more disadvantages than advantages.Group 6, For Side: Money is the source of happiness.Group 6, Against Side: Money is the root of all evil.Group 7, For Side: Shopping online is good.Group 7, Against Side: Shopping online is not good.Group 8, For Side: Going to college is the best future for students.Group 8, Against Side: Going to college is not the best futurefor students.Group 9, For Side: Students should do as many mock tests as possible.Group 9, Against Side: Students should not do so many mock tests. Group 10, For Side: Modesty is never out of date.Group 10, Against Side: Modesty is out of date now.Group 11, For Side: Senior students should take part in after-school activities.Group 11, Against Side: Senior students should not take part in after-school activities.Group 12, For Side: Fighting against terrorism brings peace to the world.Group 12, Against Side: Fighting against terrorism causes more disasters to the world.Group 13, For Side: Paper reading will be replaced by E-reading. Group 13, Against Side: Paper reading will not be replaced by E-reading.Group 14, For Side: "Golden-Weeks" should be canceled.Group 14, Against Side: "Golden-Weeks" should not be canceled. Group 15, For Side: Pressure is a motivation for students.Group 15, Against Side: Pressure is a killer for students 决赛篇二1、 Is it a right and smart way for Americans to take up the Wall Street and even Washington D.C2、 Foreign culture has great effect on Chinese culture. Does the advantage of such effect outweigh the disadvantage or does the disadvantage outweigh the advantage?3、 What does work mean to people? Work to live or live to work?英语辩论赛话题篇三Dressing well is important to one's Iife.着装在人们的生活中作用重大。
(完整版)英语辩论题目
(完整版)英语辩论题目1. Examinations do more harm than good2. Private educational institutions should be encouraged in China3. Everyone should accept higher education4. Men need more care5.Should couples live together or not before marriage.6.Network shortens the distance between people.7. 男女同校和男女分校8.Weather teacher should use computer to help teaching in the class or not9.Should or should not celebrate western festivals10.The government should control rising house prices11. work is for interest or for money工作是以兴趣为重还是金钱为重For Side: National identity is important in the age of globalization.Against Side: National identity is not important in the age of globalization.For Side: Work experience is more important than education.Against Side: Education is more important than work experience.For Side: Following fashion is necessary for young people.Against Side: Following fashion is unnecessary for young people.For Side: Sending children to famous schools is essential.Against Side: Sending children to famous schools is not essential.For Side: People are happier living in cities than in thecountryside.Against Side: People are happier living in the countryside than in cities.For Side: The car industry should be further developed in China.Against Side: The car industry should not be further developed in China.For Side: College students should be allowed to live off campus.Against Side: College students should not be allowed to live off campus.For Side: Men contribute more to society than women.Against Side: Women contribute more to society than men.For Side: The college entrance examinations should be abolished.Against Side: The college entrance examinations should not be abolished.For Side: It's good for college students to have a part-time job.Against Side: It's not good for college students to have a part-time job.For Side: It's better for a college graduate to find a job than to undertake postgraduate study.Against Side: It's better for a college graduate to undertake postgraduate study than to find a job.For Side: Students should choose their majors to meet their personal needs and interests.Against Side: Students should choose their majors to meet the needs of society.For Side: Learning oral English is more important thanlearning written English. Against Side: Learning written English is more important than learning oral English. For Side: E-books will eventually replace printed books.Against Side: E-books will never replace printed books.For Side: The Chinese men's football team is hopeful.Against Side: The Chinese men's football team is hopeless.For Side: The “golden week” holidays should be abolished.Against Side: The “golden week” holidays should not be abo lished.For Side: Non-native English speaking teachers are better than native English speaking teachers.Against Side: Native English speaking teachers are better than non-native English speaking teachers.。
英文辩论赛辩题大全
英文辩论赛辩题大全1. For Side: Advertisements should be controlled.2. Against Side: Advertisements should be encouraged.3. For Side: Junior students should go in for beauty contests.4. Against Side: Junior students should not take part in beauty contests.5. For Side: Mobile phones are necessary for middle school students.6. Against Side: Mobile phones are not necessary for middle school students.7. For Side: Middle school students should go abroad to study.8. Against Side: Middle school students should not go abroad to study.9. For Side: Interest is the best teacher for pupils to learn English.10. Against Side: Progress is the best teacher for pupils to learn English.11. For Side: People and nature are in harmony.12. Against Side: People and nature are not in harmony.13. For Side: More money means more happiness.14. Against Side: More money means more sadness.15. For Side: Internet alienates the relationship among people.16. Against Side: Internet doesn't alienate the relationship among people.17. For Side: Quality is more important for students.18. Against Side: Scores are more important for students.19. For Side: Students should wear their school uniforms.20. Against Side: Students should be allowed to choose their own clothes.21. For Side: Students should learn more from books and their teachers.22. Against Side: Students should learn more from their experience and daily life.23. For Side: Computers are good for studying.24. Against Side: Computers are not good for studying.25. For Side: Opportunity is more important for success.26. Against Side: Hard work is more important for success.27. For Side: It is good for students to attend after-school training classes.28. Against Side: It is bad for students to attend after-school training classes.29. For Side: Olympic Games are purely commercial operations.30. Against Side: Olympic Games are not purely commercial operations.31. For Side: Government should control the rising price of houses.32. Against Side: Government should not control the rising price of houses.33. For Side: Reading and writing are more important than listening and speaking in the English study.34. Against Side: Listening and speaking are more important than reading and writing in the English study.35. For Side: It's more crucial for students to earn knowledge.36. Against Side: It's more crucial for students to mould character.37. For Side: Blogging has more advantages than disadvantages.38. Against Side: Blogging has more disadvantages than advantages.39. For Side: Money is the source of happiness.40. Against Side: Money is the root of all evil.41. For Side: Shopping online is good.42. Against Side: Shopping online is not good.43. For Side: Going to college is the best future for students.44. Against Side: Going to college is not the best future for students.45. For Side: Students should do as many mock tests as possible.46. Against Side: Students should not do so many mock tests.47. For Side: Modesty is never out of date.48. Against Side: Modesty is out of date now.49. For Side: Senior students should take part in after-school activities.50. Against Side: Senior students should not take part in after-school activities.51. For Side: Fighting against terrorism brings peace to the world.52. Against Side: Fighting against terrorism causes more disasters to the world.53. For Side: Paper reading will be replaced by E-reading.54. Against Side: Paper reading will not be replaced by E-reading.55. For Side: ;Golden-Weeks; should be canceled.56. Against Side: ;Golden-Weeks; should not be canceled.57. For Side: Pressure is a motivation for students.58. Against Side: Pressure is a killer for students.。
英语辩论赛辩题及答案(3篇)
第1篇Side 1: Affirmative - Arguments for Abolishing Homework in Primary SchoolsIntroduction:The debate on whether homework should be abolished in primary schools is a topic that garners considerable attention and controversy. Proponents of abolishing homework argue that it imposes unnecessary stress on young children, hinders their creativity, and does not contributesignificantly to their academic development. In this speech, we will present compelling arguments supporting the abolition of homework in primary schools.Argument 1: Reducing Stress on Young ChildrenHomework, particularly in primary schools, can be a source ofsignificant stress for young children. The pressure to complete assignments, often under strict deadlines, can lead to anxiety and a negative perception of school. Young children should be encouraged to explore their interests and develop a love for learning, rather than being burdened with the expectation to perform academically outside of school hours.Answer to Counterarguments:Opponents might argue that homework helps children develop time management skills and responsibility. However, research indicates that the stress caused by homework can outweigh any potential benefits. Furthermore, children can learn these skills through other activities that are more enjoyable and less pressure-filled, such as sports or music.Argument 2: Encouraging Creativity and PlayHomework often consists of repetitive tasks that do not fostercreativity or critical thinking. Primary school children are at a stage where their imagination is rapidly developing, and they should be given the freedom to explore their interests and creativity. Abolishinghomework would allow children to spend more time engaging in play, which is a crucial part of their cognitive and emotional development.Answer to Counterarguments:It is true that some homework assignments are designed to encourage critical thinking. However, the majority of primary school homework is focused on rote learning, which does not promote creativity. Moreover, children can develop critical thinking skills through hands-onactivities and group projects within the classroom, which are more engaging and beneficial.Argument 3: Limited Academic BenefitResearch has shown that the academic benefits of homework in primary schools are minimal. The amount of homework assigned does not correlate with improved academic performance, and some studies suggest that it can even hinder learning. Children in primary school are still developing their cognitive abilities, and the focus should be on foundationalskills rather than extended academic work.Answer to Counterarguments:Advocates of homework may argue that it reinforces what is learned in class. However, this can be achieved through other means, such as classroom discussions, group work, and interactive learning activities. Furthermore, the primary focus of primary education should be on laying the groundwork for future learning, not on the amount of homework completed.Argument 4: Impact on Family LifeHomework can also have a negative impact on family life. Parents often feel pressured to help their children with assignments, which can lead to tension and stress within the household. Additionally, children who are expected to complete homework may have less time to spend with family and friends, which is crucial for their social development.Answer to Counterarguments:It is understandable that some parents may find it difficult to balance work and helping their children with homework. However, this is a separate issue from whether homework should be abolished. Providing support and resources to parents can help alleviate this burden, but it does not negate the need to reconsider the role of homework in primary education.Conclusion:In conclusion, the arguments for abolishing homework in primary schools are compelling. The stress it imposes on young children, its limited academic benefits, and its potential to hinder creativity and familylife all point towards the need for a reevaluation of the role of homework in primary education. By removing the burden of homework, we can create a more supportive and enjoyable learning environment for primary school children, fostering their love for learning and their overall well-being.Side 2: Negative - Arguments Against Abolishing Homework in Primary SchoolsIntroduction:While the affirmative side has presented strong arguments for the abolition of homework in primary schools, it is important to consider the opposing viewpoint. The negative side believes that homework plays a crucial role in a child's education and development. In this speech, we will present arguments against abolishing homework in primary schools.Argument 1: Reinforcement of LearningHomework serves as a reinforcement of what is learned in the classroom. It allows children to practice and reinforce their understanding of the subject matter, ensuring that they retain information and are better prepared for future lessons. Without homework, children may forget what they have learned, leading to gaps in their knowledge.Answer to Counterarguments:Proponents of abolishing homework might argue that children canreinforce their learning through other means, such as classroom discussions and group projects. However, these methods do not providethe same level of individualized attention and repetition that homework does. Homework allows children to work at their own pace and revisit concepts that they may not fully understand.Argument 2: Development of Responsibility and Time Management SkillsHomework is an essential tool for teaching children responsibility and time management skills. By assigning homework, teachers are preparing children for the demands of higher education and the workforce. These skills are crucial for success in later life and should be developed at an early age.Answer to Counterarguments:It is true that homework can help children develop these skills. However, the amount of homework assigned should be appropriate for the age and developmental level of the children. Excessive homework can actually hinder the development of these skills by creating an environment of stress and burnout.Argument 3: Parental InvolvementHomework provides an opportunity for parents to be involved in theirchild's education. By helping with homework, parents can stay informed about their child's progress and reinforce learning at home. This involvement can strengthen the parent-child relationship and promote a shared sense of accomplishment.Answer to Counterarguments:While parental involvement is important, it should not be forced through homework. Parents should be encouraged to support their child's learning in a way that is enjoyable and meaningful, not through completing additional assignments. Quality time spent on educational activities, rather than traditional homework, can be more beneficial.Argument 4: Academic PerformanceResearch has shown that homework can lead to improved academic performance. By completing assignments, children are able to apply what they have learned in class to real-world scenarios, which can enhance their understanding and retention of the material. Without homework, some children may fall behind in their academic development.Answer to Counterarguments:It is true that homework can have a positive impact on academic performance. However, the quality and type of homework assigned are crucial. Homework should be purposeful and engaging, rather than a chore. Additionally, the benefits of homework should be weighed against the potential negative impacts on children's mental health and well-being.Conclusion:In conclusion, the negative side believes that homework plays a vitalrole in a child's education and development. While it is important to consider the potential drawbacks of homework, it is also essential to recognize its benefits. By assigning appropriate and purposeful homework, teachers can help children reinforce their learning, develop important skills, and achieve academic success. The key is to strike a balance between the educational benefits of homework and the well-being of the students.第2篇Should governments around the world implement a global minimum wage to ensure fair labor standards?Answer for the Proposition (For the Implementation of a Global Minimum Wage):Introduction:The implementation of a global minimum wage is a crucial step towards ensuring fair labor standards worldwide. This motion argues that a uniform minimum wage would protect workers from exploitation, reduce poverty, and stimulate economic growth. By examining the benefits ofsuch a policy, we can conclude that the implementation of a global minimum wage is not only ethical but also economically sound.Argument 1: Protection against ExploitationThe first and foremost reason to implement a global minimum wage is to protect workers from exploitation. In many countries, particularly in developing regions, workers are often subjected to low wages and harsh working conditions. This not only degrades their quality of life butalso perpetuates a cycle of poverty. A global minimum wage would set a standard that ensures workers receive fair compensation for their labor, thus preventing exploitation.Counter-Argument 1: Economic DifferencesOpponents argue that implementing a global minimum wage would be unfeasible due to the vast economic differences between countries. However, this argument fails to recognize that a global minimum wage could be tiered based on the economic development of each nation. This would allow for flexibility while still providing a basic level of protection for workers in all regions.Argument 2: Reduction of PovertyA global minimum wage would significantly reduce poverty rates worldwide. By ensuring that workers earn a living wage, they would have thefinancial stability necessary to support themselves and their families. This would lead to a decrease in the number of people living in extreme poverty, thereby improving overall social welfare.Counter-Argument 2: Inflation and Cost of LivingCritics contend that a global minimum wage could lead to inflation and increased costs of living. However, this argument overlooks the factthat higher wages would stimulate consumer spending, which in turn would boost economic growth. Additionally, a global minimum wage could be adjusted over time to account for changes in the cost of living and inflation.Argument 3: Economic Growth and ProductivityA global minimum wage can stimulate economic growth and productivity. When workers are paid fairly, they are more likely to be motivated and productive. This increased productivity can lead to higher profits for businesses, which can then be reinvested in the economy. Furthermore, a more prosperous workforce is more likely to contribute to the overall economic development of their country.Counter-Argument 3: Job Losses and Business FailuresOpponents argue that a global minimum wage could lead to job losses and business failures, particularly in small businesses. However, this argument fails to consider the long-term benefits of a well-paid workforce. By reducing turnover and increasing employee loyalty, businesses can enjoy greater stability and success. Additionally, a global minimum wage could be adjusted to account for the varying economic conditions of different businesses.Argument 4: Ethical ConsiderationsFrom an ethical standpoint, implementing a global minimum wage is the right thing to do. Workers deserve fair compensation for their hard work and dedication. By setting a minimum wage standard, governments can ensure that workers are treated with dignity and respect.Counter-Argument 4: Cultural and Social DifferencesSome argue that a global minimum wage would impose Western standards on other cultures, leading to cultural and social conflicts. However, a global minimum wage could be designed to respect cultural and social differences, with room for flexibility and adaptation to local conditions.Conclusion:In conclusion, the implementation of a global minimum wage is a necessary and beneficial policy. It would protect workers from exploitation, reduce poverty, stimulate economic growth, and promote ethical standards. While challenges and concerns exist, these can be addressed through careful planning and consideration of the uniquecircumstances of each country. Therefore, we strongly advocate for the implementation of a global minimum wage to ensure fair labor standards worldwide.第3篇Should governments invest more in renewable energy sources or prioritize the development of fossil fuel infrastructure?Side A: Argument for Investing in Renewable EnergyOpening Statement:Ladies and gentlemen, esteemed judges, and fellow debaters, today we stand before you to argue that governments should invest more in renewable energy sources rather than prioritizing the development of fossil fuel infrastructure. The case for renewable energy is compelling, driven by environmental, economic, and societal benefits that far outweigh the temporary allure of fossil fuels.Argument 1: Environmental BenefitsThe most pressing reason to invest in renewable energy is the urgent need to combat climate change. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has warned that we must limit global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius to avoid catastrophic consequences. Renewable energy sources, such as solar, wind, and hydroelectric power, produce little to no greenhouse gas emissions, which are the primary contributors to global warming. By shifting our energy portfolio to renewables, we can significantly reduce our carbon footprint and mitigate the effects of climate change.Argument 2: Economic AdvantagesContrary to the belief that renewable energy is too costly, the economic case is equally compelling. The cost of renewable energy has dropped dramatically in recent years, making it increasingly competitive with fossil fuels. Moreover, investing in renewable energy creates jobs. According to the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), the renewable energy sector employed 11.5 million people worldwide in 2019,and this number is expected to grow as the demand for clean energy increases. Additionally, renewable energy projects often lead to local economic development, as they require materials, labor, and services from within the community.Argument 3: Energy Security and IndependenceReliance on fossil fuels for energy needs leaves countries vulnerable to price fluctuations and geopolitical tensions. By investing in renewable energy, governments can enhance energy security and reduce dependence on imported fuels. Countries like Germany and Denmark have already achieved significant levels of renewable energy generation, demonstrating that it is possible to become energy-independent while maintaining a stable and reliable power supply.Argument 4: Health BenefitsThe health impacts of fossil fuel consumption are undeniable. Air pollution from coal-fired power plants and other fossil fuel infrastructure contributes to respiratory and cardiovascular diseases, as well as premature deaths. By transitioning to renewable energy, we can significantly improve air quality and public health, leading to lower healthcare costs and a better quality of life for citizens.Rebuttal to CounterargumentsOpponents may argue that renewable energy is not always reliable andthat we need to invest in fossil fuel infrastructure to ensure a stable energy supply. However, advancements in energy storage technologies, such as batteries and pumped hydro storage, are making renewable energy more reliable and less susceptible to the whims of weather conditions. Additionally, the intermittent nature of renewable energy can be mitigated through a mix of different renewable sources and the integration of smart grid technologies.Closing Statement:In conclusion, the case for investing more in renewable energy is clear and compelling. The environmental, economic, and societal benefits ofrenewable energy far outweigh the temporary advantages of fossil fuels. By prioritizing renewable energy, governments can ensure a sustainable future for their citizens, protect the planet, and foster economic growth. Thank you.Side B: Argument for Prioritizing Fossil Fuel InfrastructureOpening Statement:Thank you, judges, and fellow debaters. Today, we present the counter-argument that governments should prioritize the development of fossil fuel infrastructure over investment in renewable energy. While theallure of clean energy is undeniable, the practicalities and immediate needs of energy security, economic stability, and technological maturity of fossil fuels make this the wiser choice.Argument 1: Energy Security and ReliabilityFossil fuels, particularly oil and natural gas, provide a reliable and consistent energy supply that is crucial for economic stability and security. Unlike renewables, which are often intermittent and dependent on weather conditions, fossil fuels can be counted on to provide a steady flow of energy. This reliability is essential for industries, transportation, and everyday life, and cannot be overlooked.Argument 2: Economic StabilityThe development of fossil fuel infrastructure has been a significant driver of economic growth and job creation in many countries. Investing in new oil and gas projects can stimulate local economies, create jobs, and generate tax revenue. Moreover, many countries rely on fossil fuel exports as a major source of income, and neglecting this sector could have severe economic consequences.Argument 3: Technological Maturity and InfrastructureThe technology for extracting and utilizing fossil fuels has reached a level of maturity that is not yet matched by many renewable energy sources. Oil and gas extraction, refining, and transportation are well-established industries with a proven track record of safety andefficiency. While renewable energy technologies are rapidly advancing, they are still in the early stages of development and may not be as reliable or efficient as fossil fuel technologies.Argument 4: Transition to Renewable EnergyTransitioning to renewable energy is a complex and lengthy process that requires significant investment and infrastructure development. In the meantime, fossil fuels can provide a bridge to a cleaner energy future. By prioritizing the development of fossil fuel infrastructure, governments can ensure a smooth transition to renewable energy while meeting current energy demands.Rebuttal to CounterargumentsThe argument that renewable energy is not reliable is a red herring. While it is true that renewable energy can be intermittent, advancements in energy storage and grid management are making it increasingly reliable. Moreover, the health and environmental costs associated with fossil fuels are significant and cannot be ignored.Closing Statement:In conclusion, the development of fossil fuel infrastructure isessential for maintaining energy security, economic stability, and technological progress. While the transition to renewable energy is important, it is not a viable option for all countries at this time. By prioritizing fossil fuel infrastructure, governments can ensure that their citizens have access to reliable and affordable energy while working towards a cleaner energy future. Thank you.。
英语辩论经典题目_辩论的技巧有哪些_辩论赛_
英语辩论经典题目_辩论的技巧有哪些英语辩论越来越在人群中兴起,那么英语辩论有哪些经典的题目呢?今天小编给大家分享一些英语辩论题目,希望对大家有所帮助。
有趣的英语辩论题目19个1. Staying in China or going aboard for education becomes more and more popular for several years. Do you think which is better?2. “Piracy” means the publishing, reproducing of a book, CD, VCD, tape, etc. without permission. Are you in favor of piracy or against piracy?3. Should middle school students be allowed to bring the cell phone or not?4. Do you think cosmetic surgery have a positive or negative influence on our society?5. Should different cultures merge into each other or maintain their unique features?6. Can money buy happiness?7. Which is more important for hunting a job, the personal ability or interpersonal relationships?8. Which is more important, economic development or environmental protection?9. Foreign culture has great effect on Chinese culture. Does the advantage of such effect outweigh the disadvantage or does the disadvantage outweigh the advantage?10. What does work mean to people? Work to live or live to work?11. Does advertisement play a positive or negative role in our society?12. Are pets good or bad for mankind?13. Should we diet in order to keep fit?14. Should celebrities have greater protection from the media or not?15. Should the sale and consumption of alcohol be banned or not?16. Are beauty contests good or harmful to our society?17. Does criticism do more harm than good to people?18. Is it necessary to pass CET4 or CET6 in the university?19. Is puppy love good or bad for studying?英语辩论题目精选20个1. Is TV a malign influence on society?2. Talk about Poverty and Wisdom3. If u r on a deserted island what three things do u want to take?4. Talk about the meaning of Being Capable/Being Helpful/Kind5. What’s your understanding of team work?6. How to learn perfect English?7. We learn knowledge only from our teachers.8. We learn knowledge not only from our teachers.9. Do you prefer to buy sth. in big stores or small ones?10. Is career more important than family?11. Can people make true friends on the internet?12. Being single is very popular in China?13. Can you find out which qualities you look for in a boyfriend or girlfriend?14. What would you see as advantages for you to wait for your marriage, if you’ve found the perfect boyfriend or girlfriend?15. Do you prefer to marry before you have a successfulcareer or after you have a successful career?16. Positive side: It's good for people to grow up in adverse circumstances.Negative side: It's not good for people to grow up in adverse circumstances.17. Is there true love on the internet?18. Should professionals be paid according to their performance?19. Should Physical Education in schools be compulsory?20. Should parents have the right to educate their children privately?英语辩论的技巧一、保持微笑每次站起来的时候要先微笑,过两秒再进行辩论。
30个世界著名辩论赛赛题(中英文)
30个世界著名辩论赛赛题(中英文)当谈论世界著名的辩论赛赛题时,以下是30个具有代表性的辩论赛赛题:1.Should governments prioritize economic growth over environmental conservation?政府是否应该将经济增长置于环境保护之上?2.Is social media beneficial or harmful for society?社交媒体对社会是有益还是有害?3.Is globalization more beneficial than harmful?全球化对社会是利大于弊还是弊大于利?4.Should the use of nuclear energy be expanded or limited?核能使用是应该扩大还是限制?5.Should genetically modified organisms (GMOs) be banned?是否应该禁止转基因生物(GMO)?6.Is free trade more advantageous than protectionism?自由贸易是否比贸易保护主义更有优势?7.Should capital punishment (death penalty) be abolished?是否应该废除死刑?8.Is universal basic income an effective solution to poverty?普遍基本收入是否是解决贫困的有效方法?9.Should artificial intelligence have more regulations and restrictions?人工智能是否需要更多的监管和限制?10.Is access to quality healthcare a basic human right?获得高质量医疗保健是否是基本人权?11.Should social media companies be held responsible for fake news and misinformation?社交媒体公司是否应对虚假新闻和错误信息负责?12.Is nuclear disarmament a realistic goal for global peace?核裁军对于实现全球和平是否是现实目标?13.Should genetically editing human embryos be allowed for medical purposes?是否应该允许对人类胚胎进行基因编辑以进行医学治疗?14.Is the use of autonomous weapons in warfare ethical?在战争中使用自主武器是否符合伦理?15.Should the government have access to individuals' private data for national security purposes?政府是否应为了国家安全目的而获取个人的私人数据?16.Is the death penalty an effective deterrent against crime?死刑是否对犯罪有有效的威慑作用?17.Should the age of retirement be increased as life expectancy rises?随着预期寿命的增加,是否应该延长退休年龄?18.Is the use of animals in scientific research justified?在科学研究中使用动物是否是合理的?19.Should the government provide free education and healthcare for all citizens?政府是否应该为所有公民提供免费教育和医疗保健?20.Should recreational drugs be legalized and regulated?应该将娱乐性药物合法化和加以监管吗?21.Is online learning more effective than traditional classroom education?网络学习是否比传统课堂教育更有效?22.Should national borders be open or closed to immigrants?对移民来说,国家边界是否应该开放还是关闭?23.Is affirmative action an effective way to address historical discrimination?平权行动是否是解决历史性歧视的有效方法?24.Should governments invest more in renewable energy sources?政府是否应该增加对可再生能源的投资?25.Is animal testing necessary for medical research and drug development?动物实验是否对医学研究和药物开发是必要的?26.Should parents be held legally responsible for their children's actions?父母是否应该对子女的行为负法律责任?27.Is the use of plastic bags and packaging sustainable for the environment?塑料袋和包装的使用是否对环境可持续?28.Should the government regulate the use of artificial intelligence in job automation?政府是否应该对人工智能在工作自动化中的使用进行监管?29.Is the use of surveillance technology an invasion of privacy or necessary for security?监控技术的使用是侵犯隐私还是出于安全必要?30.Should individuals have the right to own firearms for self-defense?个人是否有权拥有枪支进行自卫?。
英语辩论赛辩题精选大全
《英语辩论赛辩题精选大全》一、教育领域辩题1. 中小学是否应该取消英语考试?2. 全日制英语教学是否有利于提高学生的英语水平?3. 在线英语教育能否取代传统英语课堂?4. 英语四六级考试是否应该取消?5. 学前教育阶段是否应该引入英语课程?二、社会热点辩题1. 网络用语是否影响了英语学习的规范性?2. 外国人在中国是否应该使用中文?3. 英语全球化是否加剧了文化同质化?4. 英语普及是否导致汉语危机?5. 中英双语标识是否有助于提高国民英语水平?三、科技与生活辩题2. 英语在科技领域的地位是否不可替代?3. 英语作为国际通用语言,是否限制了其他语言的创新?4. 虚拟现实技术在英语教学中的应用是否具有前景?5. 英语在跨国企业沟通中的重要性是否日益凸显?四、文化与价值观辩题1. 英语电影是否应该配译中文对白?2. 英语名著翻译是否应该尊重原文还是迎合读者?3. 英语国家文化输出是否对其他国家产生负面影响?4. 英语在全球文化交流中的作用是否被过度夸大?5. 学习英语是否有助于了解西方文化?五、政策与法规辩题1. 我国是否应该实行英语义务教育?2. 英语能力是否应该成为公务员招聘的必备条件?3. 英语考试改革是否有利于选拔人才?4. 英语课程标准是否需要与时俱进?5. 我国英语教育政策是否需要调整?《英语辩论赛辩题精选大全》六、经济与就业辩题1. 英语能力对企业员工的职业发展影响有多大?2. 英语是否应该成为国际贸易的官方语言?3. 英语水平是否决定了非英语国家求职者的就业机会?4. 在全球经济一体化背景下,英语的重要性是否在增加?5. 英语沟通能力对企业拓展国际市场的作用是否被高估?七、环保与可持续发展辩题1. 英语在环保国际合作中的角色是否不可替代?2. 英语普及是否有助于提高全球环保意识?3. 英语在传播可持续发展理念中的作用是否重要?4. 英语媒体在环保议题上的报道是否具有偏见?5. 英语能力是否影响了发展中国家参与国际环保事务?八、健康与医疗辩题1. 英语在跨国医疗交流中的重要性是否被忽视?2. 英语能力是否影响了医护人员的学习和交流?3. 英语在医疗研究领域的作用是否过大?4. 英语医学文献的普及是否有助于提高全球医疗水平?5. 英语在推广国际公共卫生标准中的角色是否关键?九、艺术与娱乐辩题1. 英语流行歌曲是否影响了本土音乐的发展?2. 英语电影是否主导了全球电影市场?3. 英语在跨文化戏剧交流中的作用是否重要?4. 英语文学作品是否应该被翻译成其他语言?5. 英语在电子游戏全球化的进程中是否起到了关键作用?十、伦理与道德辩题1. 英语辩论中是否应该避免使用具有歧视性的语言?2. 英语媒体在报道国际事件时是否应遵循道德准则?3. 英语教育是否应该包含跨文化伦理教育?4. 英语在传播普世价值观中的作用是否积极?5. 英语辩论赛是否有助于培养参赛者的道德素养?《英语辩论赛辩题精选大全》十一、政治与国际关系辩题1. 英语作为国际政治沟通的主要语言,是否造成了语言霸权?2. 英语国家的政治观点是否在全球范围内占据了主导地位?3. 英语媒体在塑造国际形象方面是否具有偏向性?4. 英语在国际组织中是否应该被平等使用?5. 英语能力是否影响了发展中国家在国际政治舞台上的发言权?十二、历史与文化遗产辩题1. 英语是否在无形中抹去了非英语国家的文化遗产?2. 英语在历史研究中的普及是否有助于全球史观的建立?3. 英语翻译是否能够准确传达历史文献的原意?4. 英语在推广世界文化遗产中的作用是否积极?5. 英语教育是否忽视了本土历史文化的传承?十三、法律与权利辩题1. 英语是否应该成为国际法庭的工作语言?2. 英语法律文献的普及是否有利于全球法治的推进?3. 英语在跨国法律事务中的作用是否被过高估计?4. 英语能力是否影响了公民在国际法律诉讼中的权益?5. 英语法律教育是否有助于培养国际法律人才?十四、心理与行为辩题1. 英语学习是否有助于提高跨文化交际能力?2. 英语环境是否对非母语者的心理产生压力?3. 英语辩论是否能够锻炼人的逻辑思维和表达能力?4. 英语作为第二语言学习是否影响了个体的认知发展?5. 英语教育是否有助于培养全球公民意识?十五、性别与平等等辩题1. 英语辩论赛中,性别是否影响了参赛者的表现和评价?2. 英语教育是否在无形中强化了性别刻板印象?3. 英语媒体在报道性别议题时是否持有偏见?4. 英语在推动性别平等全球对话中的作用是否显著?5. 英语能力是否影响了女性在国际职场中的地位?。
英语辩论赛题目精选_辩论赛_
英语辩论赛题目精选现如今,我们的英语辩论赛越来越少师生的欢迎,这样的情形我们怎么可以不收集一些英文辩论赛题目呢?下面是小编搜集整理的英语辩论赛题目精选,欢迎阅读。
更多资讯请继续关注辩论赛栏目!Does television play a positive or negative role in the modern world?1. Television is now playing a very important part in our lives.2. Television is not only a convenient source of entertainment,but also a comparatively cheap one.3. Television keeps one informed about current events,allows one to follow the latest developments in science and politics and offers an endless series of programmes which are both instructive and entertaining.4. A lot of television programmes introduce people to things they have never thought or heard of before.5. Television has been good company to those who do not work, like housewives, lonely old people, etc.6. Television provides enormous possibilities for education,like school programmes via closed-circuit television.7. Television provides special broadcasts for those in TV university, or open university. It also offers specialized subjects like language teaching,sewing,cooking,painting,cosmetics, etc.8. Television does the job of education in the broadest sense. Instructive programmes achieve their goal through entertaining the viewers.9. Compared with the radio,everything on television is more lifelike, vivid, and real.10. Television may be a vital factor in holding a familytogether where there are,for example,economic problems and husband and wife seem at breaking point.Counter-arguments1. Television is a great time-waster.2. Television makes the viewer completely passive because everything is presented to him without any effort on his part.3. Television is to blame for the fact that children take longer to learn to read these days and barely see the point at all of acquiring the skill.4. Television takes up too much of our time. We no longer have enough time for hobbies,entertaining activities,and other outside amusement like theatres, cinemas, sports, etc.5. People rush home, gulp their food, which is often as simple as sandwich and a glass of beer, and start watching the TV programmes.6. The monster, i.e. television, demands absolute silence and attention. No one dares to open his mouth during a programme.7. People have grown addicted to television,often neglecting the necessary and more important things like meals,sleep and even work.8. A lot of parents use television as a pacifier for their children. They put their children in front of the set and don't care whether the children are exposed to rubbishy commercials or spectacles of violence as long as the children are quiet.9. What the viewer receives from television is nothing but second-hand experience. He is completely cut off from the real world.10. Television prevents people from communicating with each other. It has done a lot of harm to the relationship betweenfamily members.Should students only learn from books?1. Only books can provide people with the knowledge that makes them educated.2. The criticism that what students learn today is not adapted to present-day society is utterly wrong because education can never be seen only in terms of how useful the subjects are when students leave school. We ought to evaluate education in terms of how much the students enjoy those subjects and how much they mean to those students.3. Instead of being trained to be utilitarian, students should be encouraged to do things for their own sake,for getting satisfaction out of them rather than for what is achieved at the end.4. Those with a good command of the knowledge provided in books can adapt themselves better to their future life than those without.5. Those who stress only practical skills and techniques and ignore the function of books are short-sighted.6. Only by urging students to read more, write more and do more exercises can education be improved.7. Being practical,many children leave school and start earning money at an early age. Because of this, quite a large number of children join the ranks of the illiterate in the country.8. Without the knowledge provided in books, there is no point in talking about training qualified personnel and fostering versatile talents.Counter-arguments1. Education is a gradual extension of oneself. It does not only take place in school buildings. It is a life-long experience.2. Students should be taught how to live and how to get on with one another. This is more important than reading and writing.3. Writing, reading and arithmetic don't really matter. What matters is that students should learn to understand the world.4. Students are so overburdened with classwork and homework that many of them do not enjoy good health.5. Instead of offering students book-learning only,we should encourage them to get to know society so that they will be more adaptable to real life.6. Many students are spoilt by our present-dayeducational system. They may be top students at school,but they are at a loss as to how to deal with practical matters.7. Education is but a failure if it only produces people who are unable to put theory into practice.8. We should put right the tendency of stressing only students' academic achievement and ignoring their moral and physical education. Students, in their formative years, should have a chance to broaden their outlook rather than feel compelled to work towards passing an exam.Should smoking be prohibited?Argument1. Smoking should be prohibited,for the World Health Organization points out that diseases linked to smoking kill at least 2,500,000 people each year.2. Scientific research had shown that the risk of developing lung cancer increases with the number of cigarettes smoked per day and the duration of the smoking habit, and it diminishes with the cessation of smoking.3. Smoking not only leads to lung cancer, but many otherdiseases such as heart attacks,sore throat,headache,chronic bronchitis, pulmonary emphysema, etc.4. Smoking is not only harmful to the smoker himself (herself),but also results in the deaths of non-smokers. Statistics show that passive smoking is causing 3,000 to 5,000 lung cancer deaths a year among American non-smokers.5. An American scientist estimated that smokers who average a package a day for 20 years will lose about eight years of their lives.6. Smoking is an expensive habit,for a smoker who consumes 10 cigarettes a day will have to spend at least 40 Yuana month.7. Smoking has a bad impact on the psyche of the smokers. On the one hand, smokers realize the bad effects of smoking and are persuaded from time to time to give up smoking. On the other hand, many of them can hardly resist the temptation to smoke. Hence they often lose confidence in themselves.8. Children exposed to parental cigarette smoking are put ata higher risk of developing lung diseases later in their lives.9. Smoking not only pollutes the air but also makes the streets dirty, for some smokers flick the ash off their cigarettes and throw cigarette ends everywhere.10. Smoking speeds up the process ofaging and helps cause wrinkles on people's faces.Counter-arguments1. Smoking should not be prohibited, for cigarettes give a vast number of people a good deal of pleasure a lot of the time.2. Nicotine can produce a tranquillizing effect during high emotional and shock situations,and,therefore,helps to calm people down.3. Smoking counteracts the decrease in efficiency that typically occurs in boring, monotonous situations.4. Smokers can improve their performance in complex situations while smoking.5. Smokers help increase the revenue of our country.6. Smoking kills no more people than epidemics or traffic accidents.7. Most non-smokers spend a lot of money on snacks,a habit costing as much as smoking if not more.8. If smoking is eliminated, a lot of people in the tobacco industry will be out of jobs,and that will create many social problems.9. Facts have shown that if a chain-smoker suddenly quits smoking, he's more likely to have lung cancer than those who keep the habit.10. Everybody has the right to keep his or her habit. Smokers are no exceptionDoes parental permissiveness affect children's development?Arguments1. The excessive permissiveness of present-day parents is doing more harm than good to children and society as well.2. Children should develop the habit of working and living independently and,meanwhile,practice the virtue of being filial to their parents.3. Children who have a surfeit of happiness in their child hood often emerge like stodgy puddings and fail to make a success of life.4. The fact that young people nowadays are self-centred,indifferent and inconsiderate 'of others is largely the outcome of parental permissiveness in their childhood.5. Parental authority in a family helps a child to develop his character healthily.6. Parents should exercise strict discipline over their children because,the more permissive the parents are,the more rebellious against their parents the children will become.7. Lavish care and excessive permissiveness will only give rise to hedonism among the younger generation.8. If one lets the child do whatever he wants to, he will ruin the child for life.9. We have to admit the fact that we now have got a generation of spoilt, self-centred brats with no respect for their elders.10. The spread of juvenile delinquency in our age is largely due to parental permissiveness.Counter-arguments1. More care for children is not the same as permissiveness to them.2. The truth is that parents nowadays do not take enough care of their children and often neglect their development because the parents are only interested in their careers.3. Parents are not at all permissive to their children. Violence often takes place in families in which children are abused.4. Only a relaxed family atmosphere can help the physical and psychological growth of children.5. To let children do what they like contributes to their independence and competence in their adult lives.6. It is unfair to blame parents for thespread of juvenile delinquency. There are a lot of other causes involved.7. Many cases show that children leave home and becomemembers of street gangs just because they can not bear authoritarian control over them by their parents.8. Strict discipline does not always work in terms of developing children's personal qualities. Too much pressure on children leads to rebellion and other extreme actions.9. Parents are not justified in using violence to keep discipline and maintain their authority over the children.10. Children are human beings,too. They need to be protected instead of being frequently scolded or physically abused.Does the younger generation know best?Arguments1. The young are better educated and more broad-minded.2. The young enjoy a lot more things than the old: they have money to spend; they are less dependent on their parents; they grow up more quickly; and they enjoy more freedom.3. The young question the values and assumptions of the older generation and they are right.4. The young enjoy more freedom and have a stronger sense of responsibility.5. The old tend to settle differences by conventional politics and violence.6. The old do not have noble ambitions and only strive for material possessions.7. The old are unable to keep away from the rat race,in which they have lost touch with the most important things in life.8. The old can learn from the young. Young people are more devoted to their friends.9. The young know how to enjoy work and leisure and not to be inhibited.10. The young live in the present rather than in the past or future.Counter-arguments1. The young do not assume their responsibility; they evade it.2. The young have too much money and they are spoiled.3. The young are only interested in themselves.4. The young seek material possessions like clothing, cars,etc. They do not wish to work for them.5. The young should feel grateful to the older generation,who have created a good life for them.6. The old provide the young with a good education and money to spend.7. The older generation fought in the two world wars. They faced real problems, but the young have an easier life.8. Young people have too much freedom and have no sense of morality.9. The older generation is too kind and soft with the young.A tougher policy is needed and might work wonders.10. Young people's outlook on the world is very bleak and they are skeptical of everything.。
英文辩论赛辩题大全
英文辩论赛辩题大全Title: A Complete List of English Debate Topics。
Debate Topic: Should the use of social media be restricted for teenagers?Opening Statement:Ladies and gentlemen, today we are here to discuss the topic of whether the use of social media should be restricted for teenagers. This is an important issue that has sparked a lot of debate in recent years. On one hand, some argue that social media can have negative effects on teenagers' mental health and social development. On the other hand, others believe that social media can be a valuable tool for communication and self-expression. Inthis debate, we will explore both sides of the argument and come to a conclusion on whether restrictions should be put in place.Arguments in Favor of Restrictions:1. Social media can have negative effects on teenagers' mental health, leading to issues such as anxiety and depression.2. Teenagers may become addicted to social media, leading to decreased productivity and engagement in real-life activities.3. The use of social media can expose teenagers to cyberbullying and online predators, putting their safety at risk.Arguments Against Restrictions:1. Social media provides a platform for teenagers to express themselves and connect with others who sharesimilar interests.2. Restricting social media use may limit teenagers' access to important information and resources availableonline.3. It is the responsibility of parents to monitor their children's social media use, rather than imposing blanket restrictions on all teenagers.Rebuttal:While it is true that social media can have negative effects on teenagers, it is important to consider the potential benefits as well. By restricting social media use, we may be limiting teenagers' ability to connect withothers and access valuable resources. Instead of imposing restrictions, we should focus on educating teenagers about the potential risks of social media and providing them with the tools to navigate it safely.Conclusion:In conclusion, while there are valid concerns about the negative effects of social media on teenagers, imposing restrictions may not be the most effective solution.Instead, we should focus on educating teenagers and their parents about the potential risks and benefits of social media, and provide them with the tools to navigate it safely. Thank you.。
初中生英语辩论赛100题(含答案)
初中生英语辩论赛100题(含答案)初中生英语辩论赛100题(含答案)为了帮助初中生更好地备战英语辩论赛,我们精心整理了100道常见的英语辩论题目及其答案。
这些题目涵盖了多个领域,包括社会、文化、科技、环保等,旨在提高学生的英语表达能力、逻辑思维能力和辩论技巧。
1. Should homework be banned in schools?Answer: No, homework serves as an important n of classroom learning. It helps students consolidate what they have learned and develop independent study skills. However, excessive homework should be avoided.2. Should students be allowed to use mobile phones in class?Answer: Yes, mobile phones can be nal tools if used appropriately. They provide access to a vast amount of n and can enhance learning experiences. However, they can also be distracting, so strict rules should be in place.3. Should schools enforce uniforms?Answer: Yes, school uniforms promote equality and a sense of identity. They also ce social pressure related to clothing choices. However, they can be expensive and may抑制 students' n.Answer: Yes, physical n is essential for students' overall development. It promotes physical fitness, teamwork, and discipline. However, the quality and intensity of PE classes should be monitored to ensure safety and effectiveness.5. Should public libraries be open 24 hours a day?...95. Should bottled water be banned in schools?Answer: Yes, bottled water contributes to environmental n and waste. Schools should provide clean drinking water facilities instead. However, some argue that bottled water is necessary for health reasons, and alternatives should be explored.96. Should schools offer nal n programs?Answer: Yes, nal n provides practical skills and prepares students for future careers. It helps bridge the gap een n and employment. However, it should not be ritized over academic n.97. Should homework be graded?98. Should schools have gender-neutral bathrooms?99. Should schools provide free lunches?Answer: Yes, providing free lunches ensures that all students have access to us food, cing hunger and improving academic performance. However, it may place a burden on the school's budget and could lead to increased waste.100. Should students be allowed to choose their elective courses?Answer: Yes, allowing students to choose their elective courses promotes interest and engagement in learning. It helps students explore their interests and develop their talents. However, a balance should be struck to ensure a well-rounded n.希望这份辩论题目及其答案能够为您的英语辩论赛准备提供有所帮助。
精选英语辩论题目_辩论赛_
精选英语辩论题目英语辩论赛越来越普遍,大家一定还是需要一些英语辩论题目的。
下面是小编搜集整理的精选英语辩论题目,欢迎阅读。
更多资讯请继续关注辩论赛栏目!英语辩论题目CLASS assignment at a Guangzhou university has provoked controversy after local press reported that a professor asked students to design a hypothetical plan to rob a bank. The professor said the same assignment had been used at the Harvard Business School to train students how to manage human resources.Many shocked commentators have criticized the assignment as absurd. They suggest that it may even encourage students to commit crime. Such a project wouldn't have any educational value, they argue. Others say that robbing a bank is not necessarily an innovative idea for a college class project; it only shows that the educator has run out of legitimate ideas and methods.However, a greater number of other commentators support the project. They suggest that such unconventional methods will capture students' imaginations and make the class more interesting.Students, too, came to the professor's defense, saying it was a very inventive project from which they learned a lot.Do you think this is a project that should be assigned to a college class?YesIt won't turn students into bank robbers. There's no need to make such a fuss over it.1. College students are adults with a well-grounded sense of right and wrong. Simply being asked by a professor to write a plan for robbing a bank isn't going to provoke them to do carry it out.2. Not every lesson in a college class has to be about morals or social values. Academic freedom means professors can give students assignments like this, as long as they are challenging and educational.3. The main problem with the Chinese educational system is its lack of innovation and fresh ideas. Students have been taught for decades to simply recite and repeat. This project is an example of educational innovation and should be encouraged, not criticized.NoThere are better ways to be innovative in the classroom than designing a bank robbery.1. A bank robbery, however hypothetical, usually involves violence. Although college students probably wouldn't carry out such an act, encouraging them to plan violence is inappropriate.2. There are better ways to stimulate students' imagination and critical thinking. The fact that the professor chose this particular case means that he is not sensitive enough to the students' real needs.3. Just because the assignment was used at a US college doesn't mean it's suitable for a Chinese university class. Borrowing "revolutionary" educational methods from abroad without adapting them to the situation in China can lead to problems.hypothetical假设的innovative创新的legitimate合理的recite背诵延伸阅读:英语辩论赛流程1、主席致辞:宣布辩题及辩题相关背景资料;介绍选手包括学院、专业、年级及正反方所持观点等;介绍评委及比赛规则。
(完整版)英语辩论题目
1. Examinations do more harm than good2. Private educational institutions should be encouraged in China3. Everyone should accept higher education4. Men need more care5.Should couples live together or not before marriage.6.Network shortens the distance between people.7. 男女同校和男女分校8.Weather teacher should use computer to help teaching in the class or not9.Should or should not celebrate western festivals10.The government should control rising house prices11. work is for interest or for money工作是以兴趣为重还是金钱为重For Side: National identity is important in the age of globalization.Against Side: National identity is not important in the age of globalization.For Side: Work experience is more important than education.Against Side: Education is more important than work experience.For Side: Following fashion is necessary for young people.Against Side: Following fashion is unnecessary for young people.For Side: Sending children to famous schools is essential.Against Side: Sending children to famous schools is not essential.For Side: People are happier living in cities than in the countryside.Against Side: People are happier living in the countryside than in cities.For Side: The car industry should be further developed in China.Against Side: The car industry should not be further developed in China.For Side: College students should be allowed to live off campus.Against Side: College students should not be allowed to live off campus.For Side: Men contribute more to society than women.Against Side: Women contribute more to society than men.For Side: The college entrance examinations should be abolished.Against Side: The college entrance examinations should not be abolished.For Side: It's good for college students to have a part-time job.Against Side: It's not good for college students to have a part-time job.For Side: It's better for a college graduate to find a job than to undertake postgraduate study.Against Side: It's better for a college graduate to undertake postgraduate study than to find a job.For Side: Students should choose their majors to meet their personal needs and interests.Against Side: Students should choose their majors to meet the needs of society.For Side: Learning oral English is more important than learning written English. Against Side: Learning written English is more important than learning oral English. For Side: E-books will eventually replace printed books.Against Side: E-books will never replace printed books.For Side: The Chinese men's football team is hopeful.Against Side: The Chinese men's football team is hopeless.For Side: The “golden week” holidays should be abolished.Against Side: The “golden week” holidays should not be abo lished.For Side: Non-native English speaking teachers are better than native English speaking teachers.Against Side: Native English speaking teachers are better than non-native English speaking teachers.。
英语辩论题目
初中组Group 1,For Side: Advertisements should be controlled.Group 1, Against Side: Advertisements should be encouraged.Group 2, For Side: Junior students should go in for beauty contests.Group 2, Against Side: Junior students should not take part in beauty contests.Group 3, For Side: Mobile phones are necessary for middle school students.Group 3, Against Side: Mobile phones are not necessary for middle school students.Group 4, For Side: Middle school students should go abroad to study.Group 4, Against Side: Middle school students should not go abroad to study.Group 5, For Side: Interest is the best teacher for pupils to learn English. Group 5, Against Side: Progress is the best teacher for pupils to learn English.Group 6, For Side: People and nature are in harmony.Group 6, Against Side: People and nature are not in harmony.Group 7, For Side: More money means more happiness.Group 7, Against Side: More money means more sadness.Group 8, For Side: Internet alienates the relationship among people.Group 8, Against Side: Internet doesn't alienate the relationship among people.Group 9, For Side: Quality is more important for students.Group 9, Against Side: Scores are more important for students.Group 10, For Side: Students should wear their school uniforms.Group 10, Against Side: Students should be allowed to choose their own clothes.Group 11, For Side: Students should learn more from books and their teachers.Group 11, Against Side: Students should learn more from their experience and daily life.Group 12, For Side: Computers are good for studying.Group 12, Against Side: Computers are not good for studying.Group 13, For Side:Opportunity is more important for success.Group 13, Against Side: Hard work is more important for success.Group 14, For Side: It is good for students to attend after-school training classes. Group 14, Against Side: It is bad for students to attend after-school training classes.高中组Group 1, For Side: Olympic Games are purely commercial operations.Group 1, Against Side: Olympic Games are not purely commercial operations.Group 2, For Side: Government should control the rising price of houses.Group 2, Against Side: Government should not control the rising price of houses.Group 3, For Side:Reading and writing are more important than listening and speaking in the English study.Group 3, Against Side: Listening and speaking are more important than reading and writing in the English study.Group 4, For Side: It's more crucial for students to earn knowledge.Group 4, Against Side: It's more crucial for students to mould character.Group 5, For Side: Blogging has more advantages than disadvantages.Group 5, Against Side: Blogging has more disadvantages than advantages.Group 6, For Side: Money is the source of happiness.Group 6, Against Side: Money is the root of all evil.Group 7, For Side: Shopping online is good.Group 7, Against Side: Shopping online is not good.Group 8, For Side: Going to college is the best future for students.Group 8, Against Side: Going to college is not the best future for students.Group 9, For Side: Students should do as many mock tests as possible.Group 9, Against Side: Students should not do so many mock tests.Group 10, For Side: Modesty is never out of date.Group 10, Against Side: Modesty is out of date now.Group 11, For Side: Senior students should take part in after-school activities.Group 11, Against Side: Senior students should not take part in after-school activities.Group 12, For Side: Fighting against terrorism brings peace to the world.Group 12, Against Side: Fighting against terrorism causes more disasters to the world.Group 13, For Side: Paper reading will be replaced by E-reading.Group 13, Against Side: Paper reading will not be replaced by E-reading.Group 14, For Side: "Golden-Weeks" should be canceled.Group 14, Against Side: "Golden-Weeks" should not be canceled.Group 15, For Side: Pressure is a motivation for students.Group 15, Against Side: Pressure is a killer for students.For Side: We should celebrate western festivals.Against Side: We should not celebrate western festivals.For Side: The government should control rising house prices.Against Side: The government should not control rising house prices.For Side: The generation gap can be bridged.Against Side: The generation gap cannot be bridged.For Side: National identity is important in the age of globalization.Against Side: National identity is not important in the age of globalization.For Side: Work experience is more important than education.Against Side: Education is more important than work experience.For Side: Following fashion is necessary for young people.Against Side: Following fashion is unnecessary for young people.For Side: Sending children to famous schools is essential.Against Side: Sending children to famous schools is not essential.For Side: People are happier living in cities than in the countryside.Against Side: People are happier living in the countryside than in cities.For Side: The car industry should be further developed in China.Against Side: The car industry should not be further developed in China.For Side: College students should be allowed to live off campus.Against Side: College students should not be allowed to live off campus.For Side: Men contribute more to society than women.Against Side: Women contribute more to society than men.For Side: The college entrance examinations should be abolished.Against Side: The college entrance examinations should not be abolished.For Side: It's good for college students to have a part-time job.Against Side: It's not good for college students to have a part-time job.For Side: It's better for a college graduate to find a job than to undertake postgraduate study.Against Side: It's better for a college graduate to undertake postgraduate study than to find a job.欢迎您的下载,资料仅供参考!致力为企业和个人提供合同协议,策划案计划书,学习资料等等打造全网一站式需求。
英文辩论赛辩题大全
英文辩论赛辩题大全Title: A Comprehensive List of Debate Topics。
Debate Topic: Should the voting age be lowered to 16?Introduction:The voting age has been a topic of debate for many years, with some arguing that 16-year-olds are mature enough to make informed decisions, while others believethat they lack the necessary life experience and knowledge to cast a meaningful vote. This debate topic is important as it directly affects the political participation of young people and the future of democracy.Arguments in favor of lowering the voting age to 16:1. 16-year-olds are capable of making informed decisions: Many 16-year-olds are politically aware and engaged, and have a good understanding of the issues thataffect them and their communities.2. Lowering the voting age would increase youth participation in politics: By allowing 16-year-olds to vote, we can encourage them to become more active and engaged citizens from an earlier age.3. 16-year-olds are affected by political decisions: Many 16-year-olds are working, paying taxes, andcontributing to society in various ways, so they shouldhave a say in the decisions that affect them.Arguments against lowering the voting age to 16:1. 16-year-olds lack the necessary life experience and maturity: Many argue that 16-year-olds are not mature enough to make informed decisions and may be easily influenced by others.2. Lowering the voting age could lead to uninformed voting: Some fear that 16-year-olds may not have enough knowledge about politics and may vote based on superficialreasons or peer pressure.3. The voting age should be consistent with other legal ages: 16-year-olds are not considered adults in other aspects of the law, so it may be inconsistent to allow them to vote.Conclusion:The debate over whether the voting age should be lowered to 16 is complex and multifaceted, with valid arguments on both sides. Ultimately, the decision should be made based on the best interests of the democratic process and the future of the country. Both sides should continue to engage in thoughtful and respectful discussions to find the best solution for all.。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
英语辩论赛题目精选英语辩论赛题目精选发布时间:2020-12-05现如今,我们的英语辩论赛越来越少师生的欢迎,这样的情形我们怎么可以不收集一些英文辩论赛题目呢?下面是小编搜集整理的英语辩论赛题目精选,欢迎阅读。
更多资讯请继续关注辩论赛栏目!Does television play a positive or negative role in the modern world?1. Television is now playing a very important part in our lives.2. Television is not only a convenient source of entertainment, but alsoa comparatively cheap one.3. Television keeps one informed about current events, allows one to follow the latest developments in science and politics and offe an endless series of programmes which are both itructive and entertaining.4. A lot of television programmes introduce people to things they have never thought or heard of before.5. Television has been good company to those who do not work, like housewives, lonely old people, etc.6. Television provides enormous possibilities for education, like school programmes via closed-circuit television.7. Television provides special broadcasts for those in TV univeity, or open univeity. It also offe specialized subjects like language teaching,sewing, cooking, painting, cosmetics, etc.8. Television does the job of education in the broadest see. Itructive programmes achieve their goal through entertaining the viewe.9. Compared with the radio, everything on television is more lifelike,vivid, and real.10. Television may be a vital factor in holding a family together where there are, for example, economic problems and husband and wife seem at breaking point.Counter-arguments1. Television is a great time-waster.2. Television makes the viewer completely passive because everything is presented to him without any effort on his part.3. Television is to blame for the fact that children take longer to learn to read these days and barely see the point at all of acquiring the skill.4. Television takes up too much of our time. We no longer have enough time for hobbies, entertaining activities, and other outside amusement like theatres, cinemas, sports, etc.5. People rush home, gulp their food, which is often as simple as sandwich and a glass of beer, and start watching the TV programmes.6. The moter, i.e. television, demands absolute silence and attention. No one dares to open his mouth during a programme.7. People have grown addicted to television, often neglecting the necessary and more important things like meals, sleep and even work.8. A lot of parents use television as a pacifier for their children. They put their children in front of the set and don t care whether the children are exposed to rubbishy commercials or spectacles of violence as long as the children are quiet.9. What the viewer receives from television is nothing but second-hand experience. He is completely cut off from the real world.10. Television prevents people from communicating with each other. It has done a lot of harm to the relatiohip between family membe.Should students only learn from books?1. Only books can provide people with the knowledge that makes them educated.2. The criticism that what students learn today is not adapted to present-day society is utterly wrong because education can never be seen only in terms of how useful the subjects are when students leave school. We ought to evaluate education in terms of how much the students enjoy those subjects and how much they mean to those students.3. Itead of being trained to be utilitarian, students should be encouraged to do things for their own sake, for getting satisfaction out of them rather than for what is achieved at the end.4. Those with a good command of the knowledge provided in books can adapt themselves better to their future life than those without.5. Those who stress only practical skills and techniques and ignore the function of books are short-sighted.6. Only by urging students to read more, write more and do more exercises can education be improved.7. Being practical, many children leave school and start earning money at an early age. Because of this, quite a large number of children join the ranks of the illiterate in the country.8. Without the knowledge provided in books, there is no point in talking about training qualified peonnel and fostering veatile talents.Counter-arguments1. Education is a gradual exteion of oneself. It does not only take place in school buildings. It is a life-long experience.2. Students should be taught how to live and how to get on with one another. This is more important than reading and writing.3. Writing, reading and arithmetic don t really matter. What matte is that students should learn to undetand the world.4. Students are so overburdened with classwork and homework that many of them do not enjoy good health.5. Itead of offering students book-learning only, we should encourage them to get to know society so that they will be more adaptable to real life.6. Many students are spoilt by our present-dayeducational system. They may be top students at school, but they are ata loss as to how to deal with practical matte.7. Education is but a failure if it only produces people who are unable to put theory into practice.8. We should put right the tendency of stressing only students academic achievement and ignoring their moral and physical education. Students, in their formative yea, should have a chance to broaden their outlook rather than feel compelled to work towards passing an exam.Should smoking be prohibited?Argument1. Smoking should be prohibited, for the World Health Organization points out that diseases linked to smoking kill at least 2,500,000 people each year.2. Scientific research had shown that the risk of developing lung cancer increases with the number of cigarettes smoked per day and the duration of the smoking habit, and it diminishes with the cessation of smoking.3. Smoking not only leads to lung cancer, but many other diseases such as heart attacks, sore throat, headache, chronic bronchitis, pulmonary emphysema, etc.4. Smoking is not only harmful to the smoker himself (heelf), but also results in the deaths of non-smoke. Statistics show that passive smoking is causing 3,000 to 5,000 lung cancer deaths a year among American non-smoke.5. An American scientist estimated that smoke who average a package a day for 20 yea will lose about eight yea of their lives.6. Smoking is an expeive habit, for a smoker who coumes 10 cigarettesa day will have to spend at least 40 Yuan a month.7. Smoking has a bad impact on the psyche of the smoke. On the one hand, smoke realize the bad effects of smoking and are peuaded from time to time to give up smoking. On the other hand, many of them can hardly resist the temptation to smoke. Hence they often lose confidence in themselves.8. Children exposed to parental cigarette smoking are put at a higher risk of developing lung diseases later in their lives.9. Smoking not only pollutes the air but also makes the streets dirty,for some smoke flick the ash off their cigarettes and throw cigarette ends everywhere.10. Smoking speeds up the process ofaging and helps cause wrinkles on people s faces.Counter-arguments1. Smoking should not be prohibited, for cigarettes give a vast number of people a good deal of pleasure a lot of the time.2. Nicotine can produce a tranquillizing effect during high emotional and shock situatio, and, therefore, helps to calm people down.3. Smoking counteracts the decrease in efficiency that typically occu in boring, monotonous situatio.4. Smoke can improve their performance in complex situatio while smoking.5. Smoke help increase the revenue of our country.6. Smoking kills no more people than epidemics or traffic accidents.7. Most non-smoke spend a lot of money on snacks, a habit costing as much as smoking if not more.8. If smoking is eliminated, a lot of people in the tobacco industry will be out of jobs, and that will create many social problems.9. Facts have shown that if a chain-smoker suddenly quits smoking, he s more likely to have lung cancer than those who keep the habit.10. Everybody has the right to keep his or her habit. Smoke are no exceptionDoes parental permissiveness affect children s development?Arguments。