华尔街之狼 观后感 英文

合集下载

电影华尔街之狼观后感

电影华尔街之狼观后感

电影华尔街之狼观后感《华尔街之狼》这部电影,真的是让我大开眼界!影片中的乔丹·贝尔福特,那家伙,从一个名不见经传的小角色,一路飙升成为华尔街的金融大鳄,这过程简直比坐过山车还刺激。

一开始,乔丹只是个在华尔街底层打拼的小职员,每天过着朝九晚五,拿着微薄薪水的生活。

可这小子不甘心啊,他那充满野心的眼神,仿佛在告诉全世界:“我,乔丹·贝尔福特,可不是个平凡人!”他发现了低价股的赚钱门道,于是开始大展拳脚。

那时候的他,就像一只嗅到了血腥味的鲨鱼,不顾一切地冲向目标。

他组建了自己的公司,招募了一群和他一样野心勃勃的家伙。

记得有个场景,乔丹在办公室里激情澎湃地给员工们洗脑。

他站在桌子上,手舞足蹈,嘴里吐出一连串让人热血沸腾的话语:“兄弟们,姐妹们,我们要赚大钱,要住豪宅,开豪车,泡美女!”那场面,简直疯狂到了极点。

员工们也跟打了鸡血似的,一个个眼睛里闪着贪婪的光。

随着公司的发展,乔丹的生活变得越来越奢靡。

他的办公室装修得金碧辉煌,各种奢侈品堆满了房间。

他开着豪车在街头狂飙,引得路人侧目。

他举办的派对,那叫一个豪华,美酒、美食、美女,应有尽有。

有一次,他在自己的豪华别墅里举办泳池派对,满池的香槟,人们在水中嬉戏打闹,那场面,真的是让人感叹金钱的魔力。

然而,在这看似风光无限的背后,却是无尽的黑暗。

乔丹为了赚钱不择手段,欺骗投资者,操纵股市。

他的行为越来越疯狂,越来越失去理智。

有个细节让我印象特别深刻,就是乔丹在和一个客户谈生意的时候。

那个客户原本还有些犹豫,可乔丹凭借着他那三寸不烂之舌,硬是把黑的说成白的,把风险说成机遇。

他的表情夸张,语气坚定,让人不知不觉就陷入了他的陷阱。

最后,那个客户乖乖地掏出了钱,还对乔丹感恩戴德。

可乔丹呢,一转脸就露出了狡黠的笑容,心里想着又一笔大钱到手了。

乔丹的妻子,原本也是个温柔善良的女人。

一开始,她还能忍受乔丹的忙碌和对家庭的疏忽。

但随着乔丹越来越沉迷于金钱和欲望,她终于受不了了。

华尔街之狼英文观后感

华尔街之狼英文观后感

The Wolf of Wall Street---------------------a ridiculous but introspective movie Beginning with the degenerate life of Jordan R. Belfort, the movie shows the fighting time of Jordan, and ultimately leaves us a questionable ending. Through its superficial manifestation mode, it still leaves us something worthy of being thought over again and again.At first glance, I just consider it as an R level movie which shows the degenerate life of bourgeois class like repeated drinking, drugs, whores and others.Anyway, all these things make me feel uncomfortable initially.After having appreciated the first 30 minutes of the firm, we can briefly have a further understanding of how Jordan attains his current life and becomes rich. We can firstly know that he did fight for his future in the past. Then here comes the core of the movie-----his criminal life and ending.Full closure, I feel a little bit uncomfortable with the exaggerate expression. Throughout the firm, “fucking” or “fuck” appear more than 500 times, and the scene of drug taking as well as whoring also appear repeatedly. But when I am accustomed to them, I just find that it is actually a kind of manifestation mode of showing their degenerate life, but the repeated scene makes the movie dilatory more or less.Many roles in this movie have their significant influence on Jordan. Mark Hanna, taught the significance of sex and drug to Jordan when he firstly entered the Wall Street. Actually Jordan even considers him as his tutor. Teresa, Jordan’s first wife, supported him firmly when his company went broke, but in the middle of the movie she divorced with Jordan due to Jordan’s affair. And Jordan’s best friend Donnie Azoff, followed and worked for Jordan just after he met with himat the first time. No matter what Jordan wants to do, he is always standing on his side. But to some extent, it is also him who causes the final bad ending.After finishing watching this movie, I find it difficult to judge whether Jordan is a “good guy” or a “bad guy”. On the one hand, obviously he is a criminal as he forms lots of cheatings and money laundering. But on the other hand he does better than the wealth in general. He will share his wealth with his friends, and always concerns about his stuff. When he was monitored by government,he warned his friend that do not speak too much, though all of them are not able to escape anyway. He is a clever guy, and as for a further comment, he is talented in business, but all talents can beuseless when he takes the wrong way.The question of “Can you sell me this pen now?” appears two times in this movie. The answer of this question really impresses me in the first time. When I amconsidering how to introduce this pen to customers, his friend just takes away his pen and asks “Can you please sign your name for me, sir?” A ver y impressive and also useful way. This question appears again in the ending of the movie, after Jordan is released from prison. But this time, all of the answers are pertaining how to introduce the size, type or other physical conditions of this pen. They are normal, andare lacking of innovation. Thesimple but meaningful ending really makes everyone begin to think deeply of our recent society. It is a simple contrast between two kinds of people. T he result is, Jordan’s uneducated friend does better than those who considers themselves as elitists. Does it mean the recent education weaken and limit people’s imagination and innovation? When we are chasing the normal and ordinary life, innovation does disappear from our life.So maybe next time when we are confronted with problems, we should remind ourselves of this question. When all the people are walking on the same, normal road, maybe we should take another different and innovate road to reach our destination.国贸创新班祁嘉杰20151603549。

大笑看影视2384《华尔街之狼》(英文名《The

大笑看影视2384《华尔街之狼》(英文名《The

⼤笑看影视2384《华尔街之狼》(英⽂名
《The Wolf Of Wall Street》)
⼤笑看影视2384《华尔街之狼》(英⽂名《The Wolf Of Wall Street》)
⼤笑观感(2014年1⽉18⽇):
迪卡普⾥奥将在⽚中扮演长岛股票经纪⼈贝尔福特,他因为在上世纪90年代的⼀起⼤规模有价证券欺诈案中拒绝与警⽅合作,⼊狱20个⽉。

该欺诈案涉及华尔街和包括⿊帮势⼒渗透的商业银⾏的⼤⾯积腐败。

与迪卡普⾥奥之前主演的《猫⿏游戏》⼀样,《华尔街的狼》中也将有两个主⾓———影⽚故事情节的⼤部分将落在贝尔福特和⼀名想从他这⾥套出内情的FBI探员的关系上。

《华尔街之狼》与其说是⾃传,不如说是⼀本精彩的⼩说。

值得⼀提的是,这起诈骗案揭出了华尔街背后的诸多不可告⼈的秘密,牵涉到⼤量幕后⽼⼤的腐败案件。

(以上均为⽹络转载)
86届奥斯卡奖⼊围影⽚。

碰巧洒家刚看了些《公民凯恩》的⽚段,懂得⾃然懂。

看上去像是拍摄“盖茨⽐”时迪卡普⾥奥顺便拍的前传,45分钟后失去兴趣停看,并予以减星评定。

⼤笑评级:2星级。

⼤笑影评的6档评级如下:5星级:极佳,值得再三观赏。

4星级:很好,全神贯注欣赏。

3星级:较好,有空不妨⼀看。

2星级:⼀般,没空可以不看。

1星级:较差,可当败笔案例。

0星级:极差,实在看不下去。

⼤笑影评仅供个⼈独⽴学习、备忘之⽤。

华尔街之狼 观后感 英文

华尔街之狼 观后感 英文

Wolf of Wall Street CinematographyThe wolf of Wall Street movie is a controversial motion picture based on a bestselling novel about the rise of a Wall Street trader Jordan Belfort. Leonardo Di Caprio, who delves into the life of drugs, women, money laundering and securities fraud plays the main character. Together with his friends, they are able to build a multi-million company that defrauds people by selling them penny stocks.Wolf of Wall Street movie may be classified as a narrative type of movie and is directed by Martin Scorsese. The cinematographer shot the interesting movie in film mode. Scorsese chose this approach as he saw the images shot by his cinematographer having richer skin tones and possessing more color nuance as compared to digital shots during preproduction testing runs. Most parts of the movie were therefore shot on film, and for night scenes, Alexa was used as well as green screen visual effects.A major challenge on the film’s director was on deciding how to depict the various phases of the main character’s(Belfort) life. In conjunction with the films cinematographer, Scorsese decided to differentiate scenes of Jordan’s life where he seemed lost or uncertain from the scenes he would appear to have found clarity in his life and some sense of right course. This was successfully achieve from the use of diverse optics, color schemes, and lighting styles. Being guided by Belfort’s mental state and thoughts, the cinematographer alternated between various lenses for example v-lite, Hawk V, V-plus lenses, among others to get various degrees of depth, clarity, and perspective (Barsam & Dave p.238). Moreover, to enhance the contrast, in the different mental states, the director mixed in several diffusion filters, with ambient smoke being used sometimes and pushing the negative. As Rodrigo Prieto, the movies cinematographer explains, at the start of the film, it has a softer and slightly murky look, as Jordan has not yetfound himself. He seems confused and somehow awestruck by the busy Wall Street. During this phase of Belfort’s career, the director used a more narrow depth of field together with some slight alteration of anamorphic lenses (Barsam & Dave p. 240).Jordan at first works at the firm LF Rothschild before starting his own business. The set at the investment firm is dominated by a color scheme of green and gold light that imply an old vintage look. The director claimed a photo he had seen of a brokerage firm in the 1980’s inspired this idea. In making wide shots, the cinematographer captured the office space using short range V-lite lenses that were able to curve the frames ends a bit, creating a sense of uncertainty. The picture of LF Rothschild is not as crisp clear as the outlook of Jordan’s subsequent firm, which had more of the color white. This helps show a different ambience and timeline of the two firms.After the crash of 1987, LF Rothschild falls and is shut down. Belfort loses his job and desperately searches for anywhere he can find employment. Eventually, he starts to work as a regular employee at an investment center, an occupation he dislikes. This set was only lit through big windows from one side bringing out a feeling of sort of being in a cave. This part of his life the idea was to show the decline of Belfort’s life an d he falls into darkness. After some time Jordan establishes his own brokerage firm and gains massive success. When he knows how to make a lot of money, and is successful, the film has a crisper, pristine look. The cinematographer changed to spherical Master Primes and did not use diffusion for this part.When he is under investigation, the director, and cinematographer create a sort of paranoia look. They changed back to Hawk anamorphic, with lengthier focal lengths to depict a feeling of being investigated. In some scenes, they also added some smoke to make the background faintly milky and have a shallow depth of field. The cinematographer did also push the film stock for the scenes and stop to improve grain and contrast.Prieto used an approach aimed at visually differentiating the three reiterations of Belfort’s firm as it grew. It started out in a renovated auto shop then relocated to a suitable office, and later finally moved into a bigger, elaborate office space. To differentiate the sets Rodrigo used a variety of color temperature combinations, applying different filters and diffusion. In the initial location, the auto shop is dimmer and realistic than the later evolved offices. Subsequently, the film brings out a look of power from Belfort and his offices become more luxurious. This is depicted in a crisper look with widely focused shots, white light, clear distinction, and fast camera shifts.The final version of Jordan’s investment firm is a huge office space full of big windows and offices with glass walls. The location selected for this section was a third floor office building at Westchester in New York. Moreover, the height of the building made it hard to control the amount of sunlight on set and recreating it after sunset. In the evenings to maintain a look of daylight, the film crew had to improvise with light boxes in all sides of the set and vertical blinds to show an effect of a plain whiteout. On another side, Jordan’s lavish office was situated where there lay a window with a vast outward view. The crew also improvised with lamps lighting the backing, and others lighting the set to ensure the film would maintain daylight brightness regardless of the type of weather.Moreover, the director of the film also created certain images to display characters mental states and emotions. For example, during the many drug escapades of Belfort there were up close shots with the fraudster, as he delivered slow slurred words in his dialogue and feel dizzy or high. The images would bring to mind a feeling of blur but at the same time flowed delivering a sensation of being loose. In one of the scenes where Jordan was high on Quaaludes in a nightclub,the cinematographer used 20mm lens and brought out very close shots of Leonardo’s mouth and eye as he tried to talk.The movie may be categorized as a narrative type of movie. There are narrations or commentaries given by the main character, which shape our itinerary in the movie. They are a sequence of cues that guide the viewers in the progression of the movie (Barsam p.159). At the initial scene of the movie, we see busy stockbrokers leapt over their desks in a vast work place where there is a lion lurking the pathways. We are also shown a contrasting view at another angle of the office where there are exhilarated staff who are having fun about to throw a little man towards a Velcro bull's eye. The small man is thrown and a freeze frame appears stopping the man in mid-air. One of the men who have thrown the man approaches the camera and introduces himself as Jordan Belfort. He continues to explain to us with motion pictures and scenes how he lives motivated by drugs, sex, living large and the debauchery he engages in. the scenes are brief and vulgar and does not show the escapade of Belfort implicitly but directly and swiftly.This type of movie is able to limit our knowledge of certain events and is successful in manipulating the films emotional level arbitrarily. At one time, Belfort angrily slaps Naomi, his Wife. However, the event is shown to the audience through a far camera shot where only a glimpse is seen of what really transpires. The act is seen through a doorway where the impact of the aggression by Belfort is minimized. Here we gain significant information in the story but not as openly as the nearby sexual exploits and drug abuse escapades we get from other sections. This may be explained that a near shot of the violence would have altered the audience’s perception of Jordan’s bad boy pranks as merely entertainment. It would have led viewers to acquire a negative attitude towards the main character.The director also utilizes suspense in the film to capture the attention of the audience. This is the intensified sense of impatience or anxiousness of what might happen next. For instance, in one scene, Jordan is too high on their special drugs they call Quaaludes to help his colleague Donnie from chocking. This scene makes us anticipate what might happen next due to the tense situation.The film characters performances especially Dicaprio’s confidence c ontribute significantly to the mood of the movie. The movie has a stylistically textured soundtrack that is beneficial to the movies nature. The music and sound effects together with Jordan’s Commentary bring out a stimulating and lively experience. The movie is also successful in demonstrating surprising and fascinating attributes of Jordan and his degenerate lifestyle.Scorsese was also careful in the shot angles he chose for various scenes in the motion picture. When Dunham, the FBI Agent, is interviewing Jordan, the long edgy scene at one instance may lead viewers to consider that the Agent may accept to be paid off by the degenerate Jordan. He makes facial expressions and asks questions implying he may be interested in Belfort’s offer. This conversatio n is filmed in constricted angles only showing certain parts of the setting. However, when the agent tells Jordan to repeat his proposal we see a shot where the FBI’s colle ague in the off screen draws in closer to listen in. This approach helps hide some information and surprise the audience with a different result than they expected.The film does contain clear depictions of the characters emotions and mental states. There is the use of vivid pictures of the themes contained in the movie. The colors have been expertly selected and used to bring out the season timing and mood as intended by the director.Works citedBarsam, Richard M, and Dave Monahan. Looking at Movies: An Introduction to Film. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2013. Print.The Way Hollywood Tells It: Story and Style in Modern Movies. Bordwell, David. 2006./books/wayhollywoodtellsit_intro.pdfWolf of Wall Street Cinematography FS 101: Introduction To Film – Friday 9:00-1:05。

华尔街之狼观后感

华尔街之狼观后感

华尔街之狼观后感《华尔街之狼》这部电影,真的是让我大开眼界!影片中的主角乔丹·贝尔福特,那家伙,简直就是个疯狂的赚钱机器。

从一个小小的股票经纪人起步,凭借着自己的那股子冲劲和聪明劲儿,迅速在华尔街崛起。

他的生活,那叫一个奢华无度,纸醉金迷。

电影里有个场景让我印象特别深刻。

那是一场疯狂的派对,整个屋子都被香槟和美女填满了。

乔丹站在人群中央,手里拿着一瓶价值不菲的香槟,像个国王一样。

他大声呼喊着,周围的人跟着他一起欢呼,那场面,真的是让人目瞪口呆。

我就在想,这得是多么疯狂的生活啊!乔丹和他的小伙伴们,每天的工作就是打电话推销股票。

他们可不是那种老老实实介绍产品的人,而是靠着各种忽悠、夸张的手段,把那些看似一文不值的股票卖给那些梦想着一夜暴富的人。

他们的口才那叫一个厉害,能把黑的说成白的,死的说成活的。

我看着都觉得不可思议,怎么会有人这么容易就被忽悠了呢?但仔细想想,也许是人们内心的贪婪在作祟吧。

乔丹的办公室里,永远是一片混乱和喧闹。

电话铃声此起彼伏,人们大声喊叫着交易指令,那种紧张和疯狂的氛围,让我这个旁观者都觉得心跳加速。

他们根本不在乎什么道德和法律,只在乎能不能赚到钱。

这种不顾一切追求财富的劲头,既让人佩服,又让人觉得可怕。

还有乔丹的感情生活,也是乱得一团糟。

他在妻子和情人之间游走,以为自己可以掌控一切。

但最终,他的放纵还是让他失去了很多珍贵的东西。

看着他在感情上的失败,我不禁感叹,金钱真的不是万能的,有时候它反而会让人迷失方向,失去真正重要的东西。

电影中的乔丹,为了赚钱不择手段,他的生活看似风光无限,但其实内心却无比空虚。

他沉迷于毒品和性爱,试图用这些东西来填补内心的空洞。

可是,这些东西只能带来短暂的快乐,最终留下的只有无尽的痛苦和悔恨。

当乔丹最终被法律制裁的时候,我并没有感到太多的意外。

因为他的所作所为,早就注定了这样的结局。

只是在看到他从巅峰跌落谷底的那一刻,心里还是有些唏嘘。

他曾经拥有了一切,却因为自己的贪婪和放纵,失去了所有。

华尔街观后感英语

华尔街观后感英语

华尔街观后感英语As I walked out of the movie theater after watching "The Wolf of Wall Street," I couldn't help but feel a rush of emotions. The thrilling portrayal of the stockbroker Jordan Belfort's rise and fall on Wall Street had left a lasting impact on me. The director Martin Scorsese's film, based on Belfort's memoir, was a gripping tale of ambition, greed, and excess that captivated audiences worldwide."The Wolf of Wall Street" is set in the 1990s when Belfort, played brilliantly by Leonardo DiCaprio, starts his journey as a young and ambitious stockbroker. He quickly rises through the ranks, amassing wealth beyond his wildest dreams. However, his success comes at a price – he becomes entangled in a web of corruption, fraud, and illegal activities.One of the most striking aspects of the film is its portrayal of the extravagant lifestyle led by Belfort and his colleagues. They splurge on luxury goods, lavish parties, drugs, and more, all fueled by their insatiable greed. The excessive display of wealth and the overwhelming desire for more is both mesmerizing and disturbing. It showcases the dark underbelly of Wall Street, where the pursuit of money becomes an all-consuming obsession.Scorsese's direction brilliantly captures the frenetic energy and chaotic nature of the financial world. The fast-paced editing, vibrant cinematography, and pulsating soundtrack create a sensory overload that mirrors the characters' wild and unpredictable lives. The film's three-hour runtime never feels tedious as it relentlessly propels the narrative forward, leaving viewers on the edge of their seats.At the core of "The Wolf of Wall Street" is DiCaprio's powerhouse performance as Jordan Belfort. He effortlessly embodies the character's charm, charisma, and boundless energy. DiCaprio's portrayal is equal parts captivating and repulsive – a testament to his skills as an actor. His ability to convey Belfort's manipulative nature and moral decay is truly remarkable.The supporting cast also deserves accolades for their outstanding performances. Jonah Hill shines as Belfort's loyal but equally corrupt friend Donnie, while Margot Robbie delivers a standout performance as Belfort's seductive and strong-willed wife Naomi. Their performances add depth and complexity to the story, highlighting the destructive relationships that fuel Belfort's downfall.As a viewer, I couldn't help but question the morality and ethics of the characters in "The Wolf of Wall Street." The film raises important questions about the corrupting influence of wealth and the lengths people will go to achieve success. It serves as a cautionary tale, reminding us of the dangers of unchecked ambition and the consequences of our actions.Beyond its compelling narrative and brilliant performances, "The Wolf of Wall Street" also offers a scathing critique of the financial industry. It exposes the culture of excess and greed that permeated Wall Street during the 90s and continues to be a prevalent issue today. The film forces us to confront the uncomfortable truth that the pursuit of wealth often comes at the expense of values and integrity.In conclusion, "The Wolf of Wall Street" is a thought-provoking film that leaves a lasting impression. It offers a glimpse into the dark side of the financial world, highlighting the consequences of unchecked ambition andgreed. Scorsese's masterful direction, coupled with the outstanding performances of the cast, makes this film an absolute must-watch. However, it also serves as a stark reminder of the ethical challenges that we face in society, urging us to reflect on our own values and the choices we make.。

华尔街之狼观后感选登

华尔街之狼观后感选登

华尔街之狼观后感选登圣诞期间,又有一部好莱坞大片“华尔街之狼”上映。

这部由派拉蒙公司制作,martin Scorsese导演,著名演员Leonardo Dicaprio主演的影片,耗资一亿多美元。

在此同时,“华尔街之狼”获得了金球奖最佳影片奖的提名,Leonardo Dicaprio获得了金球奖最佳男主角的提名。

“华尔街之狼”是根据一个真实的故事改编的。

jordan Belfort 是上世纪八十年代末华尔街上的一名股票经纪。

九十年代初,他创立了Stratton oakmount 公司,以大力推售廉价分币股票而大获利润。

在Stratton oakmount 公司鼎盛时期,它有超过一千名的雇员,股票出售总价超过了十亿美元。

但是,这种所谓的廉价分币股票完全是一场骗局,它造成了投资者两亿美金的损失。

jordan Belfort于1998年因交易欺诈与洗钱被起诉,在他与联邦调查局合作并提供他人犯罪的证据之后,他被轻判,只服刑22个月就出狱。

在狱中,他起了写书的念头。

出狱后,他的两本回忆录“华尔街之狼”和“抓住华尔街之狼”先后出版。

电影“华尔街之狼”就是根据Belfort的回忆录改编的。

自从20XX年金融危机以来,人们对华尔街的批评不绝于耳。

而“华尔街之狼”是自那以后第一部最为真实,深入地挖掘华尔街丑闻,披露华尔街蛀虫的影片。

“华尔街之狼”全片长达3小时,大大超过一般影片的长度。

但我在观看过程中,丝毫不觉得影片沉闷,冗长。

全片结构紧凑,情节起伏,紧紧抓住了观众的心灵。

全片对华尔街丑闻的揭露确实是触目惊心的。

当Belfort初进华尔街,还是一个不懂世事的年轻股票经纪时,他的老板午间带他到高档餐厅用餐,并告诉他“在这里,成功的关键是:手淫,毒品,妓女”,并当场在餐厅吸毒。

这样的“启蒙教育”令人不寒而栗,而Belfort也是遵循这样的“启蒙教育”一步步走上了犯罪的道路。

当Belfort到廉价分币股票公司任职时,已能将他在以前学到的推销技巧熟练运用,他在电话中口舌如簧,向不知情的顾客推销垃圾股的一幕,连同事都听得目瞪口呆。

《华尔街之狼》观后感精选

《华尔街之狼》观后感精选

三一文库()〔《华尔街之狼》观后感精选〕其实他也不过是华尔街万千投行中的一个,只不过赶上了股市泡沫的浪潮赚了一笔。

说到底他只是卖不靠谱的penny stock,只不过做了一家公司的IPO,和真正的大投行家根本就没法比。

但电影的三个小时也给我们展示了足够多的花花世界,让我们见识到了有钱人的生活究竟可以多么荒淫与荒谬。

Jordan的成功有两点,一个是他的sales skill,另一个则是他的欲望。

不得不说Jordan永远都是一个最棒的salesman,他一开始把自己推销给了华尔街,接着把股票推销给了客户,再接着把挣钱的理念与技巧推销给了公司的初创团队,然后是第1页共4页每次当中演讲让大家打鸡血式的推销,最后到出狱后仍然靠着兜售自己的成功学为生。

这种能力给了他成功的基础。

这部电影当我看到一个小时的时候,我就更坚定了自己不入金融这一行的想法。

因为有的时候钱生钱是需要欲望的,对钱欲望强烈的人才适合做这类事情,才会让你在面临许多机遇时愿意冒更大的风险去选择利益更大的那一个。

对金钱强烈的欲望可以让你成为顶级的交易员,而对金钱有这么强的欲望的人在毒品和性欲望自然也不会少,这也是为什么我们会在片中看到Jordan会有如此表现。

究竟是男人要变坏才有钱,还是有钱才变坏谁都说不清楚。

他开始并不吸毒,对老婆也都还不错,一个蓬勃向上的青年,但有钱以后诱惑就会越来越多,他也就逐步地陷入其中无法自拔。

有时候钱会蒙蔽人的眼睛,当Jordan再也无法克制自己对金钱的欲望的时候也是他真正走向灭亡的时候。

我们挣钱究竟是为了什么?影片里面给了两种价值观供24。

华尔街之狼观后感

华尔街之狼观后感

华尔街之狼观后感《华尔街之狼》这部电影,真的让我大开眼界!影片里展现的那个纸醉金迷、欲望横流的华尔街世界,简直太疯狂了。

小李子饰演的乔丹·贝尔福特,从一个普通的股票经纪人一路飙升成为金融界的大鳄,他的经历既让人惊叹,又让人深思。

乔丹一开始进入华尔街的时候,还只是个小喽啰,每天做着最基础的工作。

但这家伙聪明啊,脑子转得特别快,而且有着超强的口才和销售能力。

他很快就发现了那些低价股票的赚钱门道,然后开始忽悠那些想发财想疯了的人来买。

他组建的那个团队,也是一群疯狂的家伙,一个个都跟打了鸡血似的,为了赚钱啥都不顾。

我印象特别深的一个场景,是他们在办公室里疯狂打电话推销股票的那一段。

那场面,简直比菜市场还热闹!每个人都扯着嗓子喊,什么“亲爱的,这是你这辈子都不能错过的发财机会!”“相信我,买了这支股票,你明天就能开豪车住别墅!”各种夸张的话语满天飞。

乔丹就在中间走来走去,给大家鼓劲加油,那气氛热烈得能把屋顶都掀翻。

还有他们开派对的那些场景,哇塞,那叫一个奢华!美女如云,香槟像水一样流淌,毒品随手可得。

乔丹整个人都沉浸在这种极度放纵的生活中,他觉得自己已经站在了世界的巅峰。

可实际上呢,他不过是在欲望的泥潭里越陷越深。

看到乔丹在法庭上的那一幕,我心里挺复杂的。

他曾经那么风光无限,最后却落得个身败名裂的下场。

他在法庭上还试图为自己辩解,说自己只是在追求成功,只是在做大家都在做的事情。

可这能成为他违法犯罪的借口吗?显然不能。

这部电影让我想到了现实生活中的一些事情。

我们身边不也有很多人,为了追求所谓的成功和财富,不择手段吗?他们可能一开始也有着美好的梦想,想要通过自己的努力过上好日子。

但在这个过程中,他们渐渐迷失了自己,被金钱和欲望冲昏了头脑,忘记了什么才是真正重要的东西。

就拿我认识的一个人来说吧,暂且叫他老张。

老张以前是个老老实实的上班族,工作虽然辛苦,但也还算稳定。

后来,他看到别人做生意赚了大钱,心里就开始痒痒了。

华尔街之狼观后感简短

华尔街之狼观后感简短

华尔街之狼观后感简短前段时间看了《华尔街之狼》这部电影,真给我整得五迷三道的。

电影里展现的那个华尔街世界,好家伙,那叫一个疯狂和混乱。

小李子扮演的乔丹·贝尔福特,从一个底层的小职员一路飙升成金融大鳄,这过程简直比坐火箭还刺激。

刚开始,乔丹只是在一个破破烂烂的小交易所里打杂。

那地方又小又挤,每个人都忙得像热锅上的蚂蚁,脸上写满了对金钱的渴望。

乔丹也不例外,他那双眼睛就像饿狼看到了肥肉,时刻准备着扑上去。

慢慢地,他摸清了门道,学会了怎么忽悠人买那些垃圾股票。

他的口才那叫一个绝,能把死的说成活的,把一文不值的东西说得好像是世界上最珍贵的宝贝。

他打电话的时候,那激情澎湃的劲儿,唾沫星子都能飞出去老远。

我就在想,这要是我接到他的电话,说不定也会被他忽悠得晕头转向,乖乖地把钱掏出来。

随着生意越做越大,乔丹的生活也变得越来越奢靡。

豪车、别墅、美女,应有尽有。

他们开派对的场景,那真是让我大开眼界。

满屋子都是香槟、毒品,人们疯狂地跳舞、尖叫,好像世界末日就要来了,得赶紧把所有的快乐都在这一刻享受完。

乔丹站在人群中间,手里拿着酒杯,脸上挂着得意的笑容,仿佛他就是这个世界的王。

可是,这种疯狂的生活并没有一直持续下去。

乔丹的行为引起了监管部门的注意,最终他还是被抓了。

看到他被警察带走的那一刻,我心里居然有一种说不出来的感觉。

一方面觉得他罪有应得,毕竟他干的那些事儿确实不地道;另一方面又有点同情他,因为他曾经那么努力地追求自己的梦想,只不过用错了方法。

这部电影让我感触最深的,还不是乔丹的起起落落,而是金钱对人的诱惑。

在华尔街那个充满金钱味道的地方,人们为了钱可以不择手段,可以抛弃道德和良心。

乔丹一开始可能也只是想过上好日子,想证明自己的能力,但是在追求金钱的道路上,他渐渐迷失了自己,忘记了什么才是最重要的东西。

想想咱们现实生活中,虽然没有华尔街那么夸张,但也到处都充满了金钱的诱惑。

有时候我们为了赚更多的钱,拼命工作,忽略了家人和朋友,忽略了自己的身体和心理健康。

电影华尔街之狼观后感

电影华尔街之狼观后感

电影华尔街之狼观后感《华尔街之狼》是一部由马丁·斯科塞斯执导的电影,该片于2013年上映。

该电影改编自前华尔街经纪人乔丹·贝尔福特的自传《华尔街之狼》。

影片讲述了一个贪婪无度、以权谋私、追逐财富的华尔街故事。

观影后,我对这部电影产生了很深的触动,下面我将就几个方面进行分享。

首先,电影对贪婪与欲望的揭示让人深省。

贪婪是人性中的一种弱点,这部电影通过对主人公乔丹·贝尔福特的塑造,刻画了一个金钱至上、道德沦丧的形象。

乔丹为了追求自己暴富的梦想,不择手段地欺骗投资者,甚至涉及非法行为。

他的贪婪和欲望无止境,让他陷入了不断堕落的漩涡。

通过电影中精彩的剧情展示,观众不由自主地反思了自己对财富的追逐,而是否在追逐的过程中迷失了自己的灵魂。

其次,电影揭示了金融市场的黑暗面。

《华尔街之狼》以华尔街为背景,展示了金融市场背后的勾当。

乔丹·贝尔福特的公司以“淘金盛宴”为诱饵,欺骗无数客户投资,然后通过操纵股票价格获取高额利润。

这种不择手段的经营方式,揭示了金融市场中的道德沦丧和操纵性质。

电影通过细节展示了华尔街的黑暗面,给观众留下了深刻印象。

此外,电影中对权力的探讨也引起了我的思考。

在《华尔街之狼》中,权力是主人公乔丹追求的东西。

他不仅追求金钱,更重要的是追求掌控一切的权力。

电影中,乔丹逐步建立起一个庞大的金融帝国,拥有巨大的财富和影响力,但这并没有使他获得真正的幸福和满足。

相反,他失去了许多重要的东西,如家庭、友情和健康。

这让我思考权力的定义和价值,追求权力是否真的能够带来幸福,或者在追求权力的过程中我们是否失去了更重要的东西。

此外,电影的表现形式也令人印象深刻。

《华尔街之狼》采用了快节奏、动感十足的剪辑方式,配以激烈的音乐和纷繁复杂的画面,使整个电影充满了紧张和激烈的氛围。

这种表现形式与电影的主题相呼应,通过热血沸腾的场面展示了主人公对财富和权力的渴望,同时也让观众感受到了这种欲望带来的狂热和混乱。

华尔街之狼从金融视角的观后感

华尔街之狼从金融视角的观后感

华尔街之狼从金融视角的观后感英文版Reflections on "The Wolf of Wall Street" from a Financial PerspectiveMartin Scorsese's "The Wolf of Wall Street" is not just a film about greed, excess, and debauchery; it's also a commentary on the financial industry and its culture. Viewed through the lens of finance, the movie offers a chilling insight into the world of high-stakes trading and the lengths some people are willing to go to achieve success.Jordan Belfort, the protagonist, embodies the epitome of Wall Street excess. His rise to power and subsequent fall are a testament to the risks and rewards of the financial world. What's striking is how Belfort's success is not just a result of his shrewd business acumen but also of the permissive culture within the financial industry. The movie highlights the culture of bonus-driven sales, where brokers are encouraged to push the limits tomeet their quarterly targets, often with little regard for ethics or long-term consequences.The film also exposes the close-knit network of Wall Street insiders, where information and opportunities flow freely among a select few. This exclusive club mentality excludes those who don't fit the mold, creating a divide between the haves and the have-nots. Belfort's rise and fall are linked to his ability to navigate this network and capitalize on its perks.The movie's portrayal of Belfort's wild lifestyle and drug-fueled binges is undoubtedly shocking. However, it's the financial aspect of the film that makes it truly haunting. The ease with which Belfort and his cronies manipulate markets and skirt regulations is a stark reminder of the power and influence that financial players can wield. It also raises questions about the regulatory frameworks that are meant to protect investors but often seem inadequate in the face of such widespread abuse."The Wolf of Wall Street" is not just a cautionary tale about the dangers of greed and excess; it's also a critique of the financial industry's culture and practices. Viewed from a financial perspective, the movie offers a sobering look at the risks and temptations that lie within the world of high finance.中文版《华尔街之狼》从金融视角的观后感马丁·斯科塞斯的《华尔街之狼》不仅仅是一部关于贪婪、放纵和放荡的电影,它也是对金融行业及其文化的一种评论。

影评 - The Wolf of Wall Street

影评 - The Wolf of Wall Street

影评 - The Wolf of Wall Street《华尔街之狼》:疯狂、震撼、令人深思的华尔街狂欢作为一名电影评论家,我曾看过许多令人难忘的电影,但《华尔街之狼》无疑是其中之一。

这部由马丁·斯科塞斯执导的电影,以其疯狂的节奏、震撼的故事和令人深思的主题,给我留下了深刻的印象。

首先,这部电影给我带来了一种狂热的感觉。

从一开始,观众就被投入到华尔街的疯狂世界中。

主人公乔丹·贝尔福特(由莱昂纳多·迪卡普里奥饰演)的冒险精神和对财富的追求,让人无法抗拒地被吸引。

他的疯狂派对、奢华生活和无尽的欲望,让观众仿佛置身于一个无法想象的世界。

这种狂热感使我对故事的发展和角色的命运产生了浓厚的兴趣。

其次,这部电影在我内心引起了共鸣。

虽然大部分人无法与贝尔福特这样的富豪相提并论,但他的故事却触动了我们内心深处的某些东西。

贝尔福特的贪婪和欺骗手段,揭示了人性中的黑暗面。

他的成功让我们反思了金钱与道德之间的关系,以及我们自己在面对财富的诱惑时可能面临的道德抉择。

这种共鸣使得观影过程不仅仅是一种娱乐,更是一次对自我反思的旅程。

最后,这部电影引发了我对金融世界的思考。

《华尔街之狼》以贝尔福特的真实故事为基础,揭示了华尔街的黑暗面。

贪婪、欺诈和道德沦丧在金融界中并不罕见,这让我对整个金融体系产生了质疑。

电影通过对贝尔福特的描绘,向观众展示了一个充满诱惑和危险的世界,这种揭示让我对金融行业的运作方式产生了更深层次的思考。

总的来说,《华尔街之狼》是一部疯狂、震撼且令人深思的电影。

它通过贝尔福特的故事,向观众展示了一个充满贪婪、欺诈和道德困境的世界。

这部电影不仅仅是一种娱乐,更是一次对自我反思和对金融世界的思考。

如果你对疯狂的故事、令人深思的主题和出色的演技感兴趣,那么《华尔街之狼》绝对是一部值得一看的电影。

华尔街之狼影评2

华尔街之狼影评2

Can you sell this pen now?这句类似的话在电影中一共出现过两次,第一次是Jordan与Danny壮志酬酬拉来一群主要以卖大麻为生的sales在餐厅中说服他们卖金融产品就是卖东西,而当时的sales回答的非常巧妙,他问Jordan xxxx(原话实在脑盲不记得,感谢各位大牛脑补,无论是填表格还是在餐巾纸上签名,这位都很聪明好嘛!)。

第二次是电影临近尾声,Jordan从监狱中被放出后,来到一个满是迷茫眼神的大房间做motivation speaker时候问大家这样一个问题。

这些人不是诺诺的说着这只笔有多么多么的好,就是傻傻局促的笑着说不出话,紧张的看着Jordan。

这个时刻,也应证了电影其中的一个隐喻更是Jordan成功精神之一,卖东西要了解顾客的需求。

看看the wolf of wallstreet“小说”当年的畅销记录,再看看同名电影现今的轰动,不禁默默感叹难怪Jordan Belfort可以在31岁那么年轻的年纪成为billionaire. 小说改编电影虽然对外公开只赚了1million,在金融街中只是沧海一粟,可是以一个问题大人的身份,在经历各种随时能打垮一个正常人的遭遇后,依然可以准确把握公众需求,sell his pens to you successfully, 这便是主人公天才的地方了。

可以说在过去的时代,Jordan给投资者卖垃圾股票(or penny stock),现在,Jordan给公众卖自己的故事。

他依然很好的掌控着他参与的市场。

经常关注美国金融界应该或多或少听说过Jordan这号人物。

2013年的他在公众面前依然是非常非常的抢眼,不仅仅是因为华尔街之狼这部电影,更是因为他依然存在fraud的嫌疑(早期Jordan与美联储有过协议,必须要讲所得收入50%还给当年受骗的投资者,但实际上他在2013年依然被美联储怀疑隐藏大笔存款,还给受骗者只是收入的非常少的一部分。

影评 - The Wolf of Wall Street

影评 - The Wolf of Wall Street

影评 - The Wolf of Wall Street《华尔街之狼》是一部令人难以忘怀的电影。

这部由马丁·斯科塞斯执导的作品不仅给我带来了强烈的触动,还引发了我对贪婪、权力和道德的深思。

首先,这部电影让我感受到了强烈的刺激和兴奋。

从一开始,我就被主角乔丹·贝尔福特(由莱昂纳多·迪卡普里奥饰演)那种疯狂的生活方式所吸引。

他的奢华派对、豪华庄园和无尽的金钱,都让我屏住呼吸。

电影通过绚丽的画面和动感的音乐,将这个世界展现得如此真实而诱人。

然而,随着故事的展开,我开始意识到这种疯狂的生活方式背后隐藏的黑暗。

贝尔福特和他的同伙们通过欺骗和诈骗来获取财富,他们对道德和法律毫不在乎。

这让我深思,贪婪和权力的诱惑对人性的影响是如此之大。

我开始思考我们在面临诱惑时,会不会也会放弃我们的原则和良知。

除了引发我的思考,这部电影还给我带来了一种共鸣。

尽管我不能理解贝尔福特和他的团队的行为,但我发现自己对他们的生活方式有一种奇怪的羡慕。

他们拥有无穷无尽的财富和自由,他们可以随心所欲地追求快乐。

然而,我也明白这种快乐是虚假的,以及他们在追求财富和权力的过程中失去了真正的人生意义。

此外,莱昂纳多·迪卡普里奥的表演也让我深深着迷。

他将贝尔福特这个复杂的角色演绎得淋漓尽致,他的表演充满了能量和激情。

他的演技让我对这个角色产生了共鸣,我可以感受到他内心的挣扎和痛苦。

总的来说,《华尔街之狼》是一部令人难以忘怀的电影。

它不仅给我带来了刺激和兴奋,还引发了我对贪婪、权力和道德的思考。

这部电影通过精彩的表演和扣人心弦的剧情,让我对人性的弱点和对真正幸福的追求有了更深入的理解。

我强烈推荐这部电影给所有对人性和社会问题感兴趣的观众。

华尔街之狼观后感

华尔街之狼观后感

华尔街之狼观后感最近看了《华尔街之狼》这部电影,真的是让我感触颇深呐!电影里展现的那个华尔街世界,充满了金钱、欲望、疯狂和欺骗。

主角乔丹·贝尔福特,从一个名不见经传的小职员,一路飙升成为华尔街的大鳄,他的经历简直可以用“惊世骇俗”来形容。

影片一开始,乔丹初入华尔街,那时候的他还满怀着对未来的憧憬和梦想。

他穿着整洁的西装,打着漂亮的领带,眼神里透着一股初生牛犊不怕虎的劲儿。

他努力学习金融知识,试图在这个竞争激烈的世界里站稳脚跟。

可现实却给了他一记响亮的耳光,他所在的公司因为股市崩盘而倒闭,他一下子失去了工作。

但乔丹可不是那种会轻易被打倒的人。

他转身投入了一家名不见经传的小公司,卖起了垃圾股。

这一卖,可就卖出了大名堂。

他发现,只要自己巧舌如簧,能够把那些毫无价值的股票说得天花乱坠,就总有人会上当。

于是,他开始组建自己的团队,招揽了一群和他一样有着强烈赚钱欲望的人。

他们的办公室里,每天都充满了喧闹和疯狂。

电话铃声此起彼伏,员工们扯着嗓子对着电话那头的客户大喊大叫,推销着那些一文不值的股票。

乔丹则像一个指挥家,在人群中穿梭,激励着大家更加疯狂地工作。

他给员工们洗脑,告诉他们只要够狠、够大胆,就能赚到大把的钞票。

在这个过程中,乔丹的生活也发生了翻天覆地的变化。

他住上了豪华的别墅,开着顶级的跑车,身边美女如云。

他举办奢华的派对,香槟像不要钱似的喷洒,毒品随处可见。

他觉得自己仿佛站在了世界的巅峰,无所不能。

然而,随着财富的积累,乔丹的内心却变得越来越空虚。

他的妻子离开了他,他的朋友也因为利益而背叛了他。

他开始沉迷于毒品,试图用这种方式来逃避内心的痛苦和不安。

有一个场景让我印象特别深刻,那是乔丹在自己的别墅里举办派对。

泳池边挤满了人,音乐震耳欲聋,灯光闪烁迷离。

乔丹手里拿着一杯香槟,眼神却空洞无神。

他看着周围那些狂欢的人们,突然觉得自己是如此的孤独。

他意识到,这些所谓的朋友和追随者,只是因为他的钱才围在他身边。

华尔街之狼观后感

华尔街之狼观后感

华尔街之狼观后感《华尔街之狼》是一部由马丁·斯科塞斯执导的电影,根据真实事件改编而成。

影片讲述了华尔街股票经纪人乔丹·贝尔福特的故事,揭示了他在华尔街的疯狂生活和道德沦丧的行为。

观看这部电影后,我有些许触动和感悟。

电影以乔丹·贝尔福特(Jordan Belfort)的自传小说为基础,通过色彩艳丽、音乐活力十足的手法生动地展现了华尔街的奢靡与欲望。

主人公贝尔福特由莱昂纳多·迪卡普里奥出演,他以精湛的演技诠释了这个前途无限的股票交易员,贝尔福特通过欺诈和诱骗手法,迅速积累了巨额财富,成为华尔街的传奇人物。

整部电影的节奏紧凑,情节跌宕起伏,将观众完全引入了华尔街的疯狂世界。

贝尔福特的金钱观极端扭曲,他不择手段地追求快速致富,无论是与客户签订高风险的投资合同,还是教唆员工进行盗窃和欺诈,他对金钱的渴望成为他行骗的动力。

电影中贝尔福特高调奢华的生活方式令人羡慕,他拥有豪宅、豪车,派对和异性纷扰,但同时也看到了他道德沦丧和丧失自我的一面。

观后,我对贝尔福特这样的人物产生了深深的矛盾之感。

一方面,贝尔福特的魅力和智慧令人赞叹不已,他凭借自己的聪明才智和出色的销售技巧在华尔街获得了巨大成功。

他的演讲能力日益提高,他能够将任何一只看似毫无价值的股票说得天花乱坠,让客户倾家荡产地跟着他买进。

然而,另一方面,贝尔福特的行为也引发了我对道德和伦理的思考。

他不仅违法乱纪,还腐蚀了他周围人的道德底线。

他的员工们被他带入了黑暗的世界,用股票市场作为赌场,肆意糟蹋客户的财产。

在这个过程中,贝尔福特的欺骗和犯罪行为毫无愧意,他几乎变成了一个没有良知和人性的存在。

华尔街是一个利益至上的世界,其中的金钱和权力游戏让人触目惊心。

贝尔福特成为这个世界的代表性人物,他用自己的故事揭示了华尔街股票交易行业的黑暗面。

这部电影给人一种警示,让我深思贪婪和道德之间的较量。

从电影中,我明白了金钱的力量会如何扭曲人的思维和行为。

金钱、权利、性的电影《华尔街之狼》观后感

金钱、权利、性的电影《华尔街之狼》观后感

关于金钱、权利、性的电影《华尔街之狼》观后感关于金钱、权利、性的电影《华尔街之狼》观后感一:整部电影居然有点儿尺度小李子打鸡血演的很卖命,不只有他,其他演员也很卖命几段演讲忽悠的场面,有种李阳疯狂英语的即视感,大概他们干得都是一个勾当,有时候我想。

可是半点儿感动都没有,心下觉得无聊透顶故事情节推进神展开,处处都是色情、毒品、欺骗,我自认为是个讲究实干的理科生,这种价值观不敢苟同真为小李子今年的影帝担忧,不得不承认他表演的非常棒,很难得,如果在电影院看,结束后我一定会鼓掌,为了他的演技,只是我担心奥斯卡是不是喜欢这么一部片子,马丁爷爷的片子最近总是和奥斯卡交臂而过观影口味各有所好,说实话不怎么喜欢这部片子关于金钱、权利、性的电影《华尔街之狼》观后感二:奥斯卡是个名利场,这谁都知道,凡夫俗子,躲不过名利诱惑,但名利向来非唾手可得,四周总会竖起高高的围墙,入得了美国电影艺术与科学学院会员们的法眼,才能登堂入室。

有难度是好事。

从1928年奥斯卡奖设立至今,在人追名逐利之心的不懈推动下,聪明的电影人们已经基本上摸清了获奖的门道,成果足以编纂成一部“奥斯卡名利学”,在其学术成果指导下,不乏“私人定制”的出现,不惜真金白银烧起风火狼烟,只为博学院评委一票。

可惜,事情很奇怪,比如吸引某个女神青睐,越谄媚反而越不行,有人祭出大制作、大情怀、大时代,外加中西合璧以及人类共通之人性主题,只差片头打上“求入围”三个大字,结果惨败,别说个把小金人,连个提名都没有。

大家一分析,片子拍得不错,画面、布景、道具、表演都挺好,就是中心思想不对头,奥斯卡作为学院奖,对好莱坞传统价值观的坚守一向顽强,人家鼓励一群人牺牲去拯救一个人,你却反过来,强调等级贵贱弱者牺牲,真让人捏把汗。

奥斯卡就是这样,标准相当高大全,既要理念先进,又要价值观正确,既要拍摄技术突破,又要情节打动人心,既要艺术水准不俗,又要商业成绩达标……林林总总一句话:全面优秀有长项,观念正确无短板。

影评: The Wolf of Wall Street

影评: The Wolf of Wall Street

影评: The Wolf of Wall Street《华尔街之狼》:贪婪与诱惑的现实写照作为一部由马丁·斯科塞斯执导的电影,《华尔街之狼》以其震撼人心的故事情节和出色的演技,让我深受触动。

这部电影以真实的事件为基础,讲述了华尔街肆虐的贪婪和诱惑,展现了人性中最黑暗的一面。

首先,电影给我带来了一种强烈的感觉,那就是贪婪是如何毁灭一个人的。

主人公乔丹·贝尔福特(由莱昂纳多·迪卡普里奥饰演)在追逐金钱和权力的过程中,逐渐丧失了自我。

他与同伴们建立了一家名为斯特拉顿·奥克利的股票经纪公司,通过欺诈和操纵市场来获取巨额财富。

然而,这种贪婪迅速蔓延,最终导致了他的崩溃。

电影通过展示贪婪的后果,让观众深思人性中的弱点和道德边界。

其次,电影在我心中引发了共鸣的点是对人性的揭示。

乔丹·贝尔福特是一个迷人而复杂的角色,他既是一个成功的商人,又是一个道德沦丧的罪犯。

电影中的人物都不是黑白分明的,每个角色都有自己的动机和目标。

这让我意识到,在现实世界中,人性是复杂而多变的。

我们每个人都有可能在面临诱惑时选择错误的道路。

这种揭示让我对自己和他人的行为更加警觉。

此外,电影中的演技也是无可挑剔的。

莱昂纳多·迪卡普里奥的表演令人叹为观止。

他将乔丹·贝尔福特的疯狂和狂喜演绎得淋漓尽致,让观众完全沉浸在角色的情绪中。

同时,乔纳·希尔和玛格特·罗比也展现了出色的演技,为电影增添了更多的魅力。

然而,尽管电影在许多方面都令人印象深刻,但也有一些缺点。

电影的时长较长,有些场景显得过于冗长,可能会让观众感到厌烦。

此外,电影中也存在一些过度暴力和淫秽的场景,可能会让一些观众感到不适。

总的来说,马丁·斯科塞斯的《华尔街之狼》是一部令人难忘的电影。

它通过讲述一个贪婪和诱惑充斥的世界,揭示了人性中最黑暗的一面。

我被电影中的故事情节和演技所深深吸引,同时也对人性的复杂性有了更深的认识。

华尔街之狼影评-BigFerociousAttack(大而狠的攻击)

华尔街之狼影评-BigFerociousAttack(大而狠的攻击)

和奢糜,每一分钟里每一个人都几乎处于癫狂的
Байду номын сангаас
状态。什么叫纸醉金迷,什么叫腐化堕落,什么
叫骄奢淫逸。此类词汇随便说吧,形容这电影里
这帮人的生活都没什么过份。相比之下,那部貌
似很豪华的同样小李主演的电影《了不起的盖茨
比》,对不起,感觉就太假太塑料感了。
马丁说:“ Iwantitbig,Iwantitferocious。
头,是这个销售大师面前如沐甘霖的一张张脸, 你就知道,《华尔街之狼》最终直指的,还是人 性中的阴暗。
P.S. 这 部 电 影 让 人 必 须 对 LeonardoDiCaprio 至于崇高的敬礼。在这个几乎 是他一人单挑的电影里,他做出从影以来最 intensive 最饱满和张扬的演出,数个桥段都可 以对自已的重大突破。但最难得的是,实际上他 才是这部电影的始作俑者。《华尔街之狼》这部 自传,是他在 2007 年发现的。他感到这才是他
电影根据同名原著改编。这个叫做 JordanBelfort 的臭名昭著的华尔街掮客和骗
子,是那种 26 岁能狂赚 5000 万美元的极聪明也 极具感召力的人。他蛊惑人心的 sell 的能力可 以说已经登峰造极,各种穷困的人在他的说服下 也会掏出毕生积蓄永远不会上市的垃圾股票,而 他和他癫狂的,则坐收 50%的佣金。
我第一次意识到,所谓王者的傲骨,并不都是与生俱来
行批判,它更指向人内心最深层次的贪婪。 Belfort 自称是一个毒瘾者,同时是一个性瘾者, 他本质上更是一个病态的金钱成瘾者。他身上, 正集合了佛教里所说的所有的“业”:贪、嗔、 痴。
而最为讽刺的是,这个集贪嗔痴于一身的病 人和狂人,在服刑三年后再次出山,仍然是万众 嘱目和崇拜的“销售之神”。虽然也许他已远离 犯罪,但“sell”依然是他的信条,依然寄托着 芸芸众生对一夜暴富的痴迷。电影最后一个镜
  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

Wolf of Wall Street CinematographyThe wolf of Wall Street movie is a controversial motion picture based on a bestselling novel about the rise of a Wall Street trader Jordan Belfort. Leonardo Di Caprio, who delves into the life of drugs, women, money laundering and securities fraud plays the main character. Together with his friends, they are able to build a multi-million company that defrauds people by selling them penny stocks.Wolf of Wall Street movie may be classified as a narrative type of movie and is directed by Martin Scorsese. The cinematographer shot the interesting movie in film mode. Scorsese chose this approach as he saw the images shot by his cinematographer having richer skin tones and possessing more color nuance as compared to digital shots during preproduction testing runs. Most parts of the movie were therefore shot on film, and for night scenes, Alexa was used as well as green screen visual effects.A major challenge on the film’s director was on deciding how to depict the various phases of the main character’s(Belfort) life. In conjunction with the films cinematographer, Scorsese decided to differentiate scenes of Jordan’s life where he seemed lost or uncertain from the scenes he would appear to have found clarity in his life and some sense of right course. This was successfully achieve from the use of diverse optics, color schemes, and lighting styles. Being guided by Belfort’s mental state and thoughts, the cinematographer alternated between various lenses for example v-lite, Hawk V, V-plus lenses, among others to get various degrees of depth, clarity, and perspective (Barsam & Dave p.238). Moreover, to enhance the contrast, in the different mental states, the director mixed in several diffusion filters, with ambient smoke being used sometimes and pushing the negative. As Rodrigo Prieto, the movies cinematographer explains, at the start of the film, it has a softer and slightly murky look, as Jordan has not yetfound himself. He seems confused and somehow awestruck by the busy Wall Street. During this phase of Belfort’s career, the director used a more narrow depth of field together with some slight alteration of anamorphic lenses (Barsam & Dave p. 240).Jordan at first works at the firm LF Rothschild before starting his own business. The set at the investment firm is dominated by a color scheme of green and gold light that imply an old vintage look. The director claimed a photo he had seen of a brokerage firm in the 1980’s inspired this idea. In making wide shots, the cinematographer captured the office space using short range V-lite lenses that were able to curve the frames ends a bit, creating a sense of uncertainty. The picture of LF Rothschild is not as crisp clear as the outlook of Jordan’s subsequent firm, which had more of the color white. This helps show a different ambience and timeline of the two firms.After the crash of 1987, LF Rothschild falls and is shut down. Belfort loses his job and desperately searches for anywhere he can find employment. Eventually, he starts to work as a regular employee at an investment center, an occupation he dislikes. This set was only lit through big windows from one side bringing out a feeling of sort of being in a cave. This part of his life the idea was to show the decline of Belfort’s life an d he falls into darkness. After some time Jordan establishes his own brokerage firm and gains massive success. When he knows how to make a lot of money, and is successful, the film has a crisper, pristine look. The cinematographer changed to spherical Master Primes and did not use diffusion for this part.When he is under investigation, the director, and cinematographer create a sort of paranoia look. They changed back to Hawk anamorphic, with lengthier focal lengths to depict a feeling of being investigated. In some scenes, they also added some smoke to make the background faintly milky and have a shallow depth of field. The cinematographer did also push the film stock for the scenes and stop to improve grain and contrast.Prieto used an approach aimed at visually differentiating the three reiterations of Belfort’s firm as it grew. It started out in a renovated auto shop then relocated to a suitable office, and later finally moved into a bigger, elaborate office space. To differentiate the sets Rodrigo used a variety of color temperature combinations, applying different filters and diffusion. In the initial location, the auto shop is dimmer and realistic than the later evolved offices. Subsequently, the film brings out a look of power from Belfort and his offices become more luxurious. This is depicted in a crisper look with widely focused shots, white light, clear distinction, and fast camera shifts.The final version of Jordan’s investment firm is a huge office space full of big windows and offices with glass walls. The location selected for this section was a third floor office building at Westchester in New York. Moreover, the height of the building made it hard to control the amount of sunlight on set and recreating it after sunset. In the evenings to maintain a look of daylight, the film crew had to improvise with light boxes in all sides of the set and vertical blinds to show an effect of a plain whiteout. On another side, Jordan’s lavish office was situated where there lay a window with a vast outward view. The crew also improvised with lamps lighting the backing, and others lighting the set to ensure the film would maintain daylight brightness regardless of the type of weather.Moreover, the director of the film also created certain images to display characters mental states and emotions. For example, during the many drug escapades of Belfort there were up close shots with the fraudster, as he delivered slow slurred words in his dialogue and feel dizzy or high. The images would bring to mind a feeling of blur but at the same time flowed delivering a sensation of being loose. In one of the scenes where Jordan was high on Quaaludes in a nightclub,the cinematographer used 20mm lens and brought out very close shots of Leonardo’s mouth and eye as he tried to talk.The movie may be categorized as a narrative type of movie. There are narrations or commentaries given by the main character, which shape our itinerary in the movie. They are a sequence of cues that guide the viewers in the progression of the movie (Barsam p.159). At the initial scene of the movie, we see busy stockbrokers leapt over their desks in a vast work place where there is a lion lurking the pathways. We are also shown a contrasting view at another angle of the office where there are exhilarated staff who are having fun about to throw a little man towards a Velcro bull's eye. The small man is thrown and a freeze frame appears stopping the man in mid-air. One of the men who have thrown the man approaches the camera and introduces himself as Jordan Belfort. He continues to explain to us with motion pictures and scenes how he lives motivated by drugs, sex, living large and the debauchery he engages in. the scenes are brief and vulgar and does not show the escapade of Belfort implicitly but directly and swiftly.This type of movie is able to limit our knowledge of certain events and is successful in manipulating the films emotional level arbitrarily. At one time, Belfort angrily slaps Naomi, his Wife. However, the event is shown to the audience through a far camera shot where only a glimpse is seen of what really transpires. The act is seen through a doorway where the impact of the aggression by Belfort is minimized. Here we gain significant information in the story but not as openly as the nearby sexual exploits and drug abuse escapades we get from other sections. This may be explained that a near shot of the violence would have altered the audience’s perception of Jordan’s bad boy pranks as merely entertainment. It would have led viewers to acquire a negative attitude towards the main character.The director also utilizes suspense in the film to capture the attention of the audience. This is the intensified sense of impatience or anxiousness of what might happen next. For instance, in one scene, Jordan is too high on their special drugs they call Quaaludes to help his colleague Donnie from chocking. This scene makes us anticipate what might happen next due to the tense situation.The film characters performances especially Dicaprio’s confidence c ontribute significantly to the mood of the movie. The movie has a stylistically textured soundtrack that is beneficial to the movies nature. The music and sound effects together with Jordan’s Commentary bring out a stimulating and lively experience. The movie is also successful in demonstrating surprising and fascinating attributes of Jordan and his degenerate lifestyle.Scorsese was also careful in the shot angles he chose for various scenes in the motion picture. When Dunham, the FBI Agent, is interviewing Jordan, the long edgy scene at one instance may lead viewers to consider that the Agent may accept to be paid off by the degenerate Jordan. He makes facial expressions and asks questions implying he may be interested in Belfort’s offer. This conversatio n is filmed in constricted angles only showing certain parts of the setting. However, when the agent tells Jordan to repeat his proposal we see a shot where the FBI’s colle ague in the off screen draws in closer to listen in. This approach helps hide some information and surprise the audience with a different result than they expected.The film does contain clear depictions of the characters emotions and mental states. There is the use of vivid pictures of the themes contained in the movie. The colors have been expertly selected and used to bring out the season timing and mood as intended by the director.Works citedBarsam, Richard M, and Dave Monahan. Looking at Movies: An Introduction to Film. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2013. Print.The Way Hollywood Tells It: Story and Style in Modern Movies. Bordwell, David. 2006./books/wayhollywoodtellsit_intro.pdfWolf of Wall Street Cinematography FS 101: Introduction To Film – Friday 9:00-1:05。

相关文档
最新文档