电影《死亡诗社》中Neil Perry的人物分析

合集下载

从电影“死亡诗社”得到的教育启示

从电影“死亡诗社”得到的教育启示

看到电影《死亡诗社》悲伤的结尾,我们不禁要问这是谁的错。

我无法评价基丁老师的做法到底是正确还是错误。

他的个性教育是否值得提倡,但很肯定对于尼尔的死,家庭、学校、尼尔自己都有责任。

如果没有基丁,尼尔不会自杀,因为他恐怕就妥协了;如果他父亲不是如此专制和严厉,尼尔亦不会自杀;如果尼尔坚强一点,也不会自杀,而根本原因则在于他父亲无视他的兴趣和理想,把自己的意愿专横地强加在尼尔身上。

虽然,基丁想把学生引领到他认为对的地方,但这却和当时社会、学校的教育模式相反。

在那样一个古板而传统的学校里,所有老师都在严守着他们所认为正确的一切。

只有他,只有基丁,做着与学校传统背道而驰的事情,这无异于以卵击石,后果是可想而知的。

一个人站了出来,反抗教育制度。

有人会问这有意义吗?值得吗?当教师在发挥自己的个性,发表自己的见解和传递自己的价值观时可能传递出与社会和家长要求相悖的价值观,这种做法还可取吗?从电影我们反思我们的教育,中国的教育制度以考试为中心,以成绩为第一,以乖为好。

在老师和家长眼中,成绩好的学生样样好,成绩代表一切,成绩不好什么都不好。

在这种教育制度下,无数的学生的厌烦学习,无数的学生的抗议学习。

在这种死的教育制度下,学生厌倦了,家长累了。

老师也是怨声载道,整天改作业,整天改试卷。

考不好,学生遭殃,老师遭殃。

学生以服从老师的安排为原则,永远都是按照长辈的意思去做,没有反驳的余地,老师也是在规则内办事,从不敢超出。

悲剧归根到底是死板教育制度和家长的不理解所造成的。

着让我们不得不思考什么是教育,我们的教育目的是什么?我们的教育一是要培养人的身心素质,即要求受教育者在知识、智力、品德、审美、体质诸方面都要发展;二是要培养人的社会价值,即把学生培养成符合社会需要的人。

教育目的对教育工作非常重要,只有当教师、家长、学生以及其他教育工作者正确认识教育目的,并把教育目的转化为自己的教育活动的动力,对教育目的理解越深刻,越全面,教育活动才越有效。

死亡诗社追求与反叛

死亡诗社追求与反叛

死亡诗社追求与反叛在电影《死亡诗社》中,主人公凯特先生作为英文课的新老师,给学生们带来了一场教育的变革。

他鼓励学生们发展独立思考的能力,追求个人激情与自由,这种追求与反叛成为了整个剧情的核心。

本文将探讨《死亡诗社》中人物的追求与反叛,并分析其对人生和教育的影响。

一、追求激情与自由1.1 学生们的自我探索在电影中,学生们生活在一个传统而严肃的学校环境中。

通过凯特先生的教导,他们开始了解自己内心真正的欲望与热情。

例如尼尔·佩里,他本来被父亲安排了医学方向的学习,但他内心追求的是舞台表演。

凭借凯特先生的激励,尼尔开始参演学校戏剧社,追求自己的梦想。

1.2 艺术的力量死亡诗社成为了学生们表达自己思想与情感的方式,他们通过诗歌创作展现内心深处的声音。

例如托德·安德森,一个内向且含蓄的学生,通过诗歌表达了自己内心的声音,并最终展现了自己的真正才华。

1.3 对传统观念的挑战凯特先生成为了学生们追求激情与自由的引领者,他教育他的学生们要勇敢地挑战传统观念和权威。

他鼓励学生们思考不同的观点,并拒绝被社会期望所束缚。

这些追求和反叛真正唤起了学生们内心的激情与活力。

二、追求与反叛对人生的影响2.1 个人成长与自信心追求激情与自由使得学生们在这个传统学校环境中找到了自己的价值和目标。

他们开始相信自己的能力,发展独立思考和创新的能力。

这种个人成长和自信心的建立,将对他们的整个人生产生积极的影响。

2.2 自我认同与个性发展在面对家庭和社会对自己未来的期望时,学生们经过追求与反叛,逐渐找到了自己真正的兴趣和激情。

追求个人独立性和个性发展,使他们更加了解自己的价值观和长处,从而塑造了与众不同的个性。

2.3 追求的代价与挑战然而,追求与反叛并非总是一帆风顺的。

在电影中,许多学生和凯特先生都不得不面对来自家庭、学校和社会的压力和反对。

这些反对和挑战使得他们付出了不小的代价,但也使他们更加坚持追求自己的激情与自由。

外语系论文影片《死亡诗社》中的尼尔悲剧的原因分析

外语系论文影片《死亡诗社》中的尼尔悲剧的原因分析

辽宁科技学院(2014 届)本科毕业论文题目:An Analysis of the Reasons for Neil’s Tragedy in the Movie DeadPoets Society影片《死亡诗社》中的尼尔悲剧的原因分析专题:专业:英语班级:姓名:学号:指导教师:王鲁宁论文共21 页,其中:专题页,译文页An Analysis of the Reasons for Neil’s Tragedy in theMovie Dead Poets SocietyAbstractAmerican classic film "dead poets society" tells the story of the education and teaching in 1959 new England Wilton college preparatory story. The film through the contrast, tells the story of the teacher and a group of young students with a personal independence of conduct of the story, show some contradictions and conflicts between the school and the students, parents and students, teachers and students. "Dead poets society" is a can cause the educator ruminating over film, is also a part of life and freedom, and the traditional related educational film. The film by Neal, in between the parents and the ideal between tradition and freedom, tragic ending side contend with the traditional patriarchy, and reflects the influence of family education, social education for teenagers.The paper consists of the following five parts:The introduction gives a general idea of the production background of Dead Poets Society, the current research at home and abroad, a brief description of the purpose and significance of this paper as well.The second part describes the tragedy of Neal and its embodiment in the film. The third part discusses the causes of the tragedy of Neal in the film. The fourth part states the causes of Neal's tragedy in the film to the enlightenment of Chinese education.The conclusion part of explores the deep and creative thinking of director Peter Will in the film, which is the negative effect of traditional school education and family education which produces to the youth.Finally, this thesis deeply explores the negative impact of traditional school education and family education to the teenagers, and put forward some reasonable suggestions.Keywords: family education, school education, education reform影片《死亡诗社》中尼尔悲剧的原因分析摘要美国经典影片《死亡诗社》讲述了1959年新英格兰威尔顿预备学院教育教学的故事。

死亡诗社影评 个人原创请勿抄袭

死亡诗社影评  个人原创请勿抄袭

死亡诗社观影报告Oh,captain,my captain!电影的开头,基丁老师用这一句诗表达了自己的角色。

没错,他就是从这个被称为地狱学校走出来的学生,他何尝不知道在里面得忍受多少的条条框框,诸多金科玉律的限制。

但是他希望自己是一个captain,是一个指引方向的船长,带领这些年轻的孩子找到真正属于自己的方向。

基丁老师年轻的时候是一个绝对的浪漫主义者,他年轻的时候组织诗社,躲避在山洞里聚会,念诗,无非是为了摆脱这个世俗的捆绑,追求绝对的自由。

可是基丁老师总是会老去,年轻时的盛气俨然不在,只是他内心仍保留着那样一份自由的心,并且想把这份自由传递给自己的学生。

死亡诗人,致力于吸取生命的精华。

什么是生命的精华?在导演看来,生命的精华,就是追求生命的自由。

为了这份自由,可以抵挡世俗的观念和利益驱使,专注于自己的人生意义。

但是死亡诗社,注定是要死亡的诗社。

因为这个时代容不下这些特立独行,追求自由的人。

可是也正如基丁老师说的一样,死亡是不可避免的,或迟或早,但总归会来临,我们是蛆虫的食物,每一个人到有一天都会停止呼吸,变冷,死亡。

那既然如此,何不让我们的生命还绽放的时候,开出它想要展现出来的美?“医学,商业,律师,工程,这些是崇高的追求,足以支撑人的一生。

但诗歌,美丽,浪漫,爱情,这些才是我们生活的意义。

”这是现实主义和浪漫主义的根本分歧。

现实主义能够让我们更快的适应这个现实社会,但是它不能让我们的内心得到欢愉,得到满足。

而梦想,是浪漫的,却同时也是遥远不可及的,但是它却丰富了我们的生命。

“卡匹迪恩”,我们应该抓紧时间,我们应该迫不及待地去实现我们自己人生的意义。

电影里,每当小伙子们在梦想面前软弱的时候,他们脑海中总是闪现出这句话来鼓励自己。

无论是Neil Perry对戏剧的追求,还是Todd Anderson最终战胜自己的胆怯和软弱,还是Knox Overstreet勇敢追求自己心爱的女孩,他们都因为坚信基丁老师教授的,要追求自由,实现真的自我。

电影死亡诗社人物分析

电影死亡诗社人物分析
批注本地保存成功开通会员云端永久保存去开通
Character Analysis
John Keating
—O Captain!My Captain!
The image of Keating:
Unconventional , imaginative, passionate, amiable, knowledgeable, idealistic
When Neil organized the death poet’s society, he was the scarest one.
At last, he betrayed others to save himself when questioned by the principle about the dead poets society.
in the eyes of the school leaders, I’m a “good” student.
The ideal was beated by the reality, and the captain was expeled.
Although Mr.Keating was fired by the school in the end, what he taught to the students has been remembered by those youCameron
——the Disgusting Rat
The image of Richard: Traditional conformist selfish …
After Mr.Keating’s first class,he only concerned about if Mr.Keating will test them about those stuff.

电影《死亡诗社》中NeilPerry的人物分析

电影《死亡诗社》中NeilPerry的人物分析

Neil’s character always remains static – meaning he does not undergo a change in his character at any time during the movie. Just because he died at the end does not mean that he changed.His life was an act –to his father, to Keating, even to himself, b ut when he wasn’t acting, he thought he had nothing to contribute – he was just as lost as Todd was when Todd first came to Welton. Neil couldn’t deal with the idea that to give up acting was to quit playing the roles that he lived everyday, and so he kill ed himself because he “realized that he had not lived” up to that point. He just took on a different role to fit the circumstance. He never was upfront and honest about his passions to anyone. Neil wanted to be someone else – a person who could express his passions when the time was appropriate. Symbolism:Neil seems to symbolize his kneeling down before everyone – such as his father (who takes away all control Neil tries to have – such as the editor of the newspaper) and the school. Perry seems to be sym bolic for “perish” and death, foreshadowing Neil’s suicide later in the movie. I think that’s why Todd and Neil got along so well. (On the first day of Keating’s class, Keating states that they are all going to die. Neil looks incredibly disturbed while considering this.) Neil could control Todd, and that was the only thing in his life he felt he had control over. Also, in a way, I think Neil saw himself in Todd, because Neil acted towards his father the way Todd acted towards everyone. By trying to help Todd, he thought maybe he could help himself. Neil claims, “the meek might inherit the earth, but they don’t make it into Harvard,” and he’s right –he’s meek, and he never makes it into Harvard.He is the first to ask what the Dead Poets Society was. He is also the one to organize the first meeting. Neil also tells Todd that he must participate in the club.Neil’s PoemsThese lines and his Madman Story not only explain Neil’s philosophy but foreshadow what is about to come – his destruction.“I went to the woods because I wanted to live deliberately. I wanted to live deep and suck out all the marrow of life. To put to rout all that was not life, and not when I had come to die, discover that I had not lived.” – from Walden“Come, my friends, ‘T is not too la te to seek a newer world.For my purpose holds To sail beyond the sunset, and tho’ We are not now that strength which in old days Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are; One equal temper of heroic hearts, Made weak by time and fate, but strong i n will To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.” – from Ulysses“It was a dark and rainy night. And this old lady who had a passion for jigsaw puzzlessat by herself in her house at her table to complete a new jigsaw puzzle. As she piecedthe puzzle together, she realized to her astonishment that the image that was formed washer very own room, and the figure in the center of the puzzle, as she completed it, washerself. And with trembling hands she placed the last four pieces and stared in horror atthe face of the demented madman at the window. The last thing that this old lady everheard was the sound of breaking glass.”In the end, Neil realized that it was his own life and he was in the center of it. Since his dad had control over him and he was too afraid to stand up to him.Midsummer Night’s DreamWhen Neil learns about the play, he is filled with his passions. He claims that this is the first time in his life that he knows what he wants to do, even if his father disapproves. When Todd mentions this, he asks, “Can’t I just enjoy the idea for a while?” This is the beginning of his loss of control to his passions.As the role of Puck, Neil is able to express what he could not when he wasn’t acting. The Puck epilogue is said directly to his father, in hopes that his father will forgive him. He cannot say anything later when his father tells him what he expects Neil to do because at that moment he is no longer acting.SuicideFinally, in his room, he realizes that the last four pieces of the puzzle of his life have been put into place, and that his only option in order to gain some control of his life is to take his own life. Neil was his father’s dream. When his father woke up, his dream was gone.Neil, His Father, and the SuicideNeil’s relati onship with his father is a case of misunderstanding and lack of communication. Mr. Perry wanted what was best for his son, which led to extremely high expectations. Neil wanted to find out who he was and what he wanted to do. Neil was unable to discuss his opinions and options with his father, and Mr. Perry was unwilling to look at Neil’s outlook on life. This cyclical pattern led Neil to conclude that suicide was the only way to gain control of his life and stand up to his father.There is no evidence that Neil thought about suicide up until that night. It appears to be a spontaneous decision made on the basis of the hopelessness he felt that night. Maybe it was an act to break free from his father’s control, but in trying to gain that control over his l ife, he sacrificed everything to escape.Mr. Perry was at traditionalist, which unfortunately meant he had a difficult time expressing affectionate emotions. He also had a large number of expectations because like any parent, he ultimately wanted the best for his son, a 16-17 year old with a bright future ahead of him. Unfortunately, Neil never really saw or understood that his father only wanted what was best for Neil. He only saw the tyrant-like authority figure who constantly demanded that Neil achieve greatness in academia and who obeyed him unquestioningly.Neil, however, did question that role – to himself, to others, even to Keating. Unfortunately, he never truly was able to convey that to his father. The only time he was able to stand up to his father was in the role of Puck during the play, when he asked for forgiveness with his last soliloquy, an act which deliberately disobeyed and thus enraged his father. He had many opportunities to do so before then, but he never seized the opportunity to reestablish a connection. The father and son were like strangers, each with a specific perception of the other, but neither really knew who the other was. This perpetuated the cycle of misunderstandings between the two and eventually played a major role in Ne il’s suicide.In Mr. Perry’s perspective, Neil was a model child who was focused on getting into a good college. He then learns from another parent that Neil was going to be in the play. This was the first he had heard of this, as Neil had lied to everyo ne about his father’s approval. Mr. Perry then told Neil that couldn’t be involved, an order Neil deliberately disobeyed by performing in the opening show the following night. When Mr. Perry saw Neil as Puck, he became furious and probably overreacted a bit by concluding thatit must be the school (or more specifically, Mr Keating – the new teacher) that was the cause of this and that Neil should transfer schools to regain his focus.Neil, on the other hand, wanted to know who he was. He was always obedien t to his father’s wishes, but he wanted to know more about himself. Acting was something he could do for himself – something that he enjoyed and allowed him to explore what he was able to accomplish. On the other hand, it was also a means of escaping his current reality by being someone else for a few hours. Keating suggested Neil talk to his father about this passion, but Neil second guessed his father’s actions by arguing that his father would never understand. He never gave his father the benefit of the doubt and tried to explain. Keating even went so far as to tell Neil that even if his father didn’t see things his way, he’d soon be out of school and could do what he wished then. Neil wouldn’t listen to this advice, and later when Keating asked if Neil had spoken to his father, Neil said he did consent.Yes, Mr. Perry was hard on Neil, but that was probably out of concern. He was paying a lot of money to attend a great school to prepare him for an ivy league school, and Neil, out of nowhere, decides he d oesn’t want to go to college. He wants to act. Mr. Perry believed that this was a fleeting dream, and that if Neil followed this path, he would be throwing away a wonderful opportunity for a pursuit that would last a couple of years. After all, most people don’t really have a grasp on their future until at least their junior or senior year of college. If his acting career failed, which in all likelihood, it would have, Neil would have no skills to fall back on.Also, Neil never really stood up to his father. There were times he tried, like when Mr. Perry told Neil he should drop some extracurricular activities, but he did so in the presence of others, which created a hostile environment between the two. It would have been interesting if Neil and his father would have actually sat down and chatted about what Neil wanted and what they could do to compromise. Even at the very end, when the two confronted each other right before Neil committed suicide, Neil still could not face his father. Mr. Perry specifically asked Neil what he wanted, and Neil couldn’t answer him. I think Mr. Perry really expected Neil to give him an answer, and I think if Neil would have, his father may have been more understanding.In a way, Neil resembles how Todd was in the beginning of the movie. Todd couldn’t speak to anyone of authority without sounding insecure. In one of the extra scenes, Todd tried to ask for rowing instead of soccer, but could barely speak. He was given soccer instead. Also, in class, whenever he was asked a quest ion, he couldn’t answer. He wanted to say something – especially to recite the poem he spent so much time writing, but he never could. He even ended up ripping up his poem.Who is Responsible for the Suicide?In the end, both the realists and the romantic s blame the other for Neil’s suicide. The romantics say it was Neil’s father. Even Todd says this when he first confronts his romanticism in the snow. The realists say it was Keating, and in the end, force Keating to leave. Neither side wants to believe that through the act of suicide, Neil is taking control of his own life decisions and therefore must assume the responsibility.Suicide is a personal choice, and only Neil could decide whether or not to commit the act. There is a point in everyone’s life wh ere they feel that no one understand them, and no matter what they say, itdoesn’t change the situation. However, by Neil killing himself, Mr. Perry never had the opportunity to understand his son’s desires and passions.。

分析电影死亡诗社中的教育与反叛

分析电影死亡诗社中的教育与反叛

分析电影死亡诗社中的教育与反叛电影《死亡诗社》是一部于1989年上映的经典作品,由彼得·威尔上执导,罗宾·威廉姆斯主演。

电影以中学生学习和成长为背景,通过描绘一位非传统教师和他的学生们的故事,思考了教育与反叛的关系。

本文将从教育和反叛两个方面来分析电影《死亡诗社》中所传递的信息。

一、教育电影《死亡诗社》中的教育主题主要围绕着传统教育与个体自由思考之间的冲突展开。

学校里的传统教育强调纪律、规矩和功利性的学习,而主角约翰·基廷老师(John Keating)则倡导个体独立思考、追求内心真实的教育方法。

首先,约翰·基廷老师注重培养学生们独立思考的能力。

他鼓励学生们踏出现有的框架,勇敢地表达自己的想法和独特的观点,不被外界的期待束缚。

例如,在一次课堂上,约翰·基廷老师要求学生们爬到课桌上,以此来传达追求个性、突破常规的意义。

这种鼓励独立思考的教育方法,培养了学生们的勇气和创造力,激发了他们对知识和人生的热爱。

其次,约翰·基廷老师强调学生们对文学艺术的品味和欣赏。

他以诗歌、戏剧等方式来教导学生们感受美的力量,开拓他们的精神世界。

通过文学的启发,学生们能够更好地理解人性、价值观和情感追求。

电影中的学生们在课堂上朗读诗歌、思考经典文学作品的意义,从中发现了对人生的独特解读和理解。

然而,电影中也展现了传统教育对学生个性发展的压抑。

学校强调的功利主义教育,追求分数和名次,忽视了学生个体的思考和个性的培养。

学生们被注入大量的知识,但缺乏对生活的真正理解和独立的思考能力。

例如,男主角尼尔(Neil)被迫放弃表演梦想,按照父亲期望报考医学院。

这种对学生自由发展的限制,对他们的心灵造成了深深的伤害。

二、反叛电影《死亡诗社》中的反叛主题主要体现在学生们对传统教育和社会现象的反抗。

约翰·基廷老师鼓励学生们挑战现有的制度和规则,以追求内心的自由和真理。

首先,学生们开始怀疑传统教育的价值和意义。

英语电影赏析剧情和人物分析

英语电影赏析剧情和人物分析

死亡诗社The story took place in 1959.The plot centers on the influence of Mr. Keating, a young and exciting English and poetry teacher, who is determined to teach his students to live life with absolute passion. Mr. Keating, using poetry as his vehicle, teaches his students to challenge the institutions around them.Inspired by Mr. Keating's philosophy of life, many of his students recreate the "Dead Poet's Society," a secret club which meets in a cave in order to discuss poetry, philosophy and other topics.the story ended with a disaster.one of his students committed suicide,he was blamed for the boy^s death and forced to leave. Finally,he was fired,his students stood on the desks to pay respect to him.美女与野兽Once upon a time,an inhospitable and supercilious prince lived in the imposing tower lonely,because he refused an old woman with ugly looking to stay overnight,then became a beast by cursing.He must learned to treat people sincerely If he wanted to relieve the curse Belle's father accidentally broke into the beast's territory, was imprisoned in the beast's castle. In order to save his father, belle alone make risks, promised to dwell with the beast in the castle and switch back to his father. Belle, however, because of thinking of my father, so the life is not happy. Belle find a chance to escape, but encountered ferocious wolves. A crisis, the beast appears in time to save the belle, is injured, belle be touched, carefully take care of wild animals. Since then, Gaston failed because the pursuit of belle, designed to let the villagers together to kill the beast. Belle sad kisses the dead animal. The beast was because the kiss, lifted his curse, resurrected and went back to the original human nature费城Andrew is a gay, and contracted AIDS. He didn't put these tell the boss. Shortly after he promotion, but due to the boss discovered a secret for his lost files fired him, Andrew find Joe wanted him to accept the case. Joe had refused to accept, but out of sympathy for Andrew as well as to the fair and the pursuit of the principle of equality under the law, eventually agreed to appear in court. Andrew's family support he went to court. Hearing, many demonstrators gathered outside the court, the requirements for gay people legitimate rights and interests, no discrimination against AIDS patients. But at the same time has opponents call \"anal sex without human rights\", intercept Andrew asked. The accused insisted that does not admit is fired Andrew so reasons. Andrew weak body is unable to withstand vigorous anti-aids drugs intravenously, anticipate his dying. But he is still strong to survive the fierce court defense. In the day of judgment, the jury finally sentenced Andrew from unfair dismissal to the plaintiff, the defendant shall be responsible for the damages. Andrew finally won,but he is dying.时尚女魔头Chief MARANDA is the envy of all women living body. Require all employees to wear prada dress she go to work, all the people are afraid of her. Surprise, she was appointed Andy deputy assistant earth country women in case of injury. Andy is very simple, adhere to the style of self. Then she realized she had a chance, then you can get a good job, she and MARANDA similar road. Andy's life indeed fresh light, however, she is this but lose ego. When she saw as MARANDA similar to a woman's life is also experience a trap, she chose to leave. One day, Andy come back return to natural dress walking in the street in New York, we saw a real people found life goals is a confident and brave. When she saw the MARANDA again, two people smile, each other again, improve the orbit of life.演员robin Williams---john keating Robert Sean Leonard---neil Perry Norman Lloyd—Mr Nolan Hugh grant---will Freeman Nicholas hoult---Marcus Ming na wen---jing mei June wooKieu chinh---suyuan woo Tsai chin—lindo Jong Meryl streep---Miranda priestlyAnne Hathaway---Andrea sachs Tom hanks—Andrew beckett Denzel Washington—Joe MillerHelen mirren—queen Michael sheen—tony Blair Ales Jennings---prince Charles死亡诗社---peter weir 单亲插班生---chirs weitz paul weitz 喜福会---wayne wang时尚女魔头---david frankel 费城---jonathan demme 美女与野兽-----gary Trousdale女王---stephen frears。

从教育学角度评析《死亡诗社》中尼尔父亲的形象

从教育学角度评析《死亡诗社》中尼尔父亲的形象

从教育学角度评析《死亡诗社》中尼尔父亲的形象从教育学角度评析《死亡诗社》中尼尔父亲的形象从教育学的角度分析《死亡诗社》,我们可以发现这是一部以教育变革为题材的电影,在影片中我们可以看到两种力量:一是以基廷老师为代表倡导变革的力量;一是以学校领导为代表提倡传统教育的阻碍变革的力量。

纵观我们当下教育,教育活动是倾向于保守的,正如基廷老师渴望变革,却遭受到了打压和阻碍。

而影片中的主人公之一尼尔更是用自杀的方式来反抗学校的传统教育和家庭教育中的磨灭学生人性的行为。

在影片中,尼尔的父亲对他说:“You don't understand, Neil. You have opportunities that l never even dreamt of and l am not going to let you waste them. 你不明白,尼尔,你拥有我从来没有奢望过的机会,我不会允许你浪费他们的。

”从这里我们可以看出作为一个父亲,他专制,独裁,一心希望儿子依靠自己规划的轨道前行,其实这不是尼尔的人生,是他自己的目标和希望走出的人生,在自己无法实现这一梦想时,就剥夺了儿子的梦想让其替自己实现。

尼尔的父亲就是阻碍教育变革的一方强势的力量,扼杀了儿子的梦想,扼杀了儿子的生命,并且还不认为这是自己的错误,将其推到了基廷老师这一方。

美国心理学家德里克说过:“孩子需要成人的鼓励,就像植物需要水一样。

”对于孩子的学习,家长应该以鼓励为主,批评为辅,并且从语言和物质等方面激励他为之奋斗。

语言鼓励主要激发他学习的热情,物质奖励主要让他享受学习的成果,感受成功的喜悦。

然而,尼尔的父亲却像一个独裁者,尼尔从心里害怕父亲,不敢反抗,直到遇到基廷老师,教会了他要做生命的主人,而不是生命的奴隶。

所以尼尔才开始努力追求自己的梦想。

作为父亲,在不支持孩子梦想的基础上,还进行千方百计的阻止,是他让孩子心灰意冷,我不禁心寒,父母真的是为了孩子好吗!尼尔的父亲是在将尼尔的人性教化为奴性,他要求一切按原则,按目标来做事,就拿一个很小的细节来说,他上床睡觉前脱鞋子也是一定要将鞋子摆放整齐,从这里可以看出,他的思想固有的模式化,他为人的固执己见。

影评:死亡诗社

影评:死亡诗社

影评:死亡诗社电影影评:《死亡诗社》作为一名电影评论家,我有幸观看了一部让我深受感动的电影,《死亡诗社》。

这部电影不仅仅是一部娱乐作品,更是一部能够触动内心深处的作品。

它通过讲述一群学生与一位激励他们追求梦想的老师之间的故事,给我带来了强烈的感触和共鸣。

首先,电影通过真实而深刻的人物刻画,让我对每个角色都产生了共鸣。

主人公尼尔·佩里是一个充满激情和才华的学生,他梦想成为一名演员。

他的坚持和努力,让我深深地感受到了追逐梦想的艰辛和挫折。

他的父亲对他的期望和压力,也让我感受到了来自家庭的束缚和压抑。

而那位魅力非凡的老师约翰·基廷,更是这部电影的核心人物。

他教导学生们不仅仅是知识,更是如何思考、如何独立和如何追求自己的梦想。

他通过引导学生们加入死亡诗社,激发了他们内心深处的激情和创造力。

他的教诲让我深刻地反思了教育体制对学生个性发展的束缚,以及对于创造力和独立思考的忽视。

电影中的一幕幕令人难以忘怀。

当尼尔·佩里为了追求自己的梦想而与父亲发生冲突时,我感受到了来自家庭的压力和对梦想的追求之间的矛盾。

当约翰·基廷被学校指责并迫使学生出卖他时,我感受到了社会对于不合规范行为的惩罚和对个人独立精神的打压。

这些场景让我深深地反思了现实生活中的种种限制和束缚,也让我更加坚定地相信每个人都应该追寻自己的梦想,追求内心的真实。

此外,电影的音乐和摄影也给我留下了深刻的印象。

音乐的运用让整个故事更加感人,摄影的精美画面则增添了电影的艺术美感。

这些元素的结合,使得观影体验更加丰富和感人。

总结起来,《死亡诗社》这部电影给了我很多的感触和共鸣。

它通过真实而深刻的人物刻画,让我对每个角色都产生了共鸣。

它通过讲述追逐梦想的艰辛和挫折,让我深深地反思了现实生活中的限制和束缚。

它通过音乐和摄影的运用,让整个故事更加感人。

这部电影不仅仅是一部娱乐作品,更是一部能够触动内心深处的作品,让我重新审视自己的人生和梦想。

死亡诗社尼尔的故事对我个人的意义

死亡诗社尼尔的故事对我个人的意义

逝去诗社是一部经典的电影,它讲述了一个寄宿学校的学生们在一位风趣又富有灵感的老师的带领下,通过诗歌和表演艺术,探索自我和人生意义的故事。

尼尔是电影中一个关键的角色,他的故事以及他所代表的精神内涵,对于我个人来说有着深刻的意义。

尼尔的故事告诉我们,人应该追随内心的激情和理想。

在电影中,尼尔是一位充满激情与活力的学生,他对文学和表演艺术有着浓厚的兴趣,并致力于在学校的戏剧表演中展现自己的才华。

尼尔在学校里的种种追求,都让我深深感受到了对理想的追求是多么的宝贵和重要。

正是由于尼尔坚持不懈地追随内心的激情和理想,让他在短短的时间里就获得了同学们和老师们的尊重与喜爱。

作为一个普通人,我也受到了尼尔的激情所感染。

他的故事告诉我,无论遇到什么困难,都应该坚持自己的梦想,努力追求内心的激情和理想。

尼尔的故事启发了我对人生意义的思考。

在电影的情节中,尼尔不仅是一个有梦想的少年,更是一位带领同学们探索生命真谛的启蒙者。

他鼓励学生们勇敢地追寻内心的激情,教导他们要用心去领会诗歌和戏剧的内涵。

在我看来,这种对生命深刻的思考和追求,并不仅仅是电影中的人物所具备的,更是对我们当下社会的一种警醒和抨击。

在当今社会,人们往往被物质生活和功利心态所困扰,而忽视了内心的追求和情感的表达。

尼尔的故事给了我极大的启发,让我意识到应该放慢脚步,停下来认真思考生活的意义,积极追求内心的激情和理想,不被外界的琐事所干扰和左右。

尼尔的故事也让我对师生关系有了新的认识。

在电影中,尼尔与老师之间的互动,给了我非常深刻的印象。

尼尔对老师的尊敬和信任,也是学生们对老师的一种模范。

对于我个人来说,这段师生关系的描绘让我意识到,师生之间的互动是多么重要。

良好的师生关系不仅可以激发学生的潜力和激情,更可以让老师受益匪浅,获得成就感。

尼尔和老师之间的互动告诉我,师生之间应该建立起一种相互尊重、信任和理解的关系,让学生在良好的氛围中自由地成长和发展,让教师在教书育人的过程中得到心灵的满足与回报。

死亡诗社角色分析

死亡诗社角色分析

The change
• He was requested to write a poem which exhausted all his brain but was left undone. Later in the class , Mr.Keating make him to think, to imagine, to speak aloud, truly releasing the deep emotion of him. He succeeded. Todd made his turnaround as himself, a warm-hearted, emotional,talented, and brave young man. As for the braveness, at the last scene of his movie, he was the first student to stand on the desk to show his respect to Mr.Keating, which was impossible to happen if he was that former himself.
his fight-back
• If we say institution and rules are unbreakable, but later for his acting dream, he did resist in his own way. Writing a letter in the name of his father to get permission for acting, talking with Mr Keating for solution or at last committing a suicide as his final fight, he did all these, though tragic and fierce, to accomplish his breakthrough of life and finally be free.

电影《死亡诗社》中尼尔之死的教育启示

电影《死亡诗社》中尼尔之死的教育启示

二、 家长孩 子间“ 自我 实现 需 要 ” 和 “ 尊重 需要” 的 矛 盾 冲 突是 尼尔 自杀 的导 火 索
美 国 心理 学 家 亚 伯 拉 罕 ・ 马斯 洛 在 1 9 4 3年 的 《 人
类 激 励 理论 》 论 文 中 所 提 出 的 马 斯 洛需 求 层 次 理论 认 为 ,人类 需 求 像 阶梯 一 样 从 低 到 高 按 层 次 分 为 五 种 . 分别是 : 生理需求 、 安全需 求 、 社 交需求 、 尊 重 需 求 和 自我 实 现 需 求 其 中 “ 自我 实 现需 求 ” 是 最 高 层 次 的 需 求, 是指个人理想 、 抱 负 得 以 实 现 的 需 求 马 斯 洛 提
老 师 坚 持 认 为 : 教 育 的 根 本 在 于 让 学 生 学 会 自我 思
充 满 着 无 尽 的 遗 憾 。这 也 引 导 我 们 去 思 考 : 尼 尔 为 什 么 要 走 向 自杀 这 条 不 归 路 ?

考 基廷 老师 不 仅 仅 使 用 传 统 的 讲 授 法 . 还 使 用 了 现
充分激活学生们的学习热情以学生为中心满足学生个性发展需要二家长孩子间自我实现需要和尊重需要的矛盾冲突是尼尔自杀的导火索美国心理学家亚伯拉罕马斯洛在1943年的人类激励理论论文中所提出的马斯洛需求层次理论认为人类需求像阶梯一样从低到高按层次分为五种
安徽文 学
ANHUI W EN XU E 艺
长孩子间“ 自我 实现 需要 ” 和“ 尊重需要” 的 矛盾 冲 突是 尼 尔 自杀 的 导 火 索 、 青 春 期 心 理特 点 和 个 人 气 质 类 型 的 交合 是 尼 尔 自杀 的 本 能 驱 动 力 . 论 述 了尼 尔 自杀 的 原 因 . 得 出学 校 教 育 应 该 调 和 社 会 发 展 需要 和 学 生 个 性 需 要之间的平衡 . 以及 家 长要 尊 重 孩 子 , 不应 把 家 长 的 “ 自我 实现 需 要 ” 凌驾在孩子“ 自我 实现 需 要 ” 之 上, 以及 每 个 孩 子 都 是 不 同的 个 体 . 教 育 工作 者 应 该 因材 施 教 的 结 论 。 关键词 : 《 死 亡 诗 社 》 尼 尔采 取 的 途 径 是 因人 而 异

电影赏析总结

电影赏析总结

《死亡诗社》(又译《春风化雨》)导演: Peter Weir(彼得·威尔)时间:1989 类型:剧情 (Drama)主演:(罗宾·威廉斯)Robin Williams ——John Keating(基廷)在封闭的时代,他是叛逆者。

在学生的记忆里,他是灵魂的拯救者。

来到一所传统的贵族学校,中途接班,教授古典文学,第一节课就让学生撕掉诗集扉页上的导言,他让孩子们感受到自己的激情、包容,感受到文学的力量。

他的课堂不是死气沉沉,而是充满生命的张力、自由的气息、思想的碰撞。

他让孩子们知道学习不仅仅是几何代数。

然而在那个时代,他超前的状态不被身边的死寂所包容,最终,他被学校开除,但自由之花已经在学生们的心中生根发芽(罗伯特·肖恩·莱纳德)Robert Sean Leonard——Neil Perry(尼尔佩里)(伊桑·霍克)Ethan Hawke——Todd Anderson(安德森)(迪伦)Dylan Kussman——Richard Cameron(理查德)(诺尔曼•劳埃德)Norman Lloyd——Mr. Nolan(诺兰先生)(柯特伍德·史密斯)Kurtwood Smith——Mr. Perry(佩里先生)()Leon Pownall——McAllister(麦考利斯特)情节复述:This story takes place at Welton School, a very traditional preparatory school for boys in the United States. After the summer holidays of 1959, John Keating, former student at the institution, enters the school as the new English teacher. With his unconventional teaching methods, he inspires his students to act as individuals. He encourages them to think for themselves, to find new points of view, to discover their own ways and feelings and to "seize the day".台词翻译:1. Because we are food for worms, lads. Because believe it or not, each and every one of us in this room if one day going to stop breathing, turn cold and die. …They are not that different from you, are they? Same haircuts. Full of hormones, just like you. Invincible, just like you feel. The world is their oyster. They believe they’re destined for great things, just like many of you. Their eyes are full of hope, just like you. Did they wait until it was too late to make form their lives even one iota of what they were capable? Because you see, gentleman, these boys are now fertilizing daffodils…因为我们是蛆虫的食物。

高级英语视听说-死亡诗社-人物

高级英语视听说-死亡诗社-人物
也许他是对的,心灵何用?梦想何用?诗歌何为? 终究,人要在现实的世界里苟延残喘,看浪漫化为 齑粉。我想每个人都有过怀疑Keating的时刻, Keating他究竟错了吗?
三大主体
*传统的校方——凝重、古板、纪律、卓越
*顺从又叛逆的学生——在家长意志和浪漫 主义之间挣扎
*船长老师——敢于打破传统,希望教孩 子独立的思考
亲震怒了。在强权的父亲面前,他的灵与肉处于分裂的状
态之中:是顺从传统父亲的强势?还是听从自己内心的召
唤。年轻的他无力承担这种重负,他选择了死亡。把《仲
夏夜之梦》的精灵花冠放在窗台旁,他用那把父亲长年希
望他使用的外科手术刀打开通向坟墓的道路。
他死得很美。在现实和理想的挣扎中,理想总成为祭 品,庄严地放在了祭台上。他们非如此不可,在严酷的成 人世界里,在一切以现世利益为准则来判断是非对错的社 会中,理想主义者往往无力对抗现实,他们的尖锐、脆弱 与唯美都那么触目惊心,如烟花闪过,在夜空里刻下创痕。
道者般,不计后果的浪漫。他是现实的,生活原本是需要
历练艰难和忍受平凡的乏味。他眼含热泪,一样地和其他
孩子一样在那份给Keating老师定罪的文书上签了字,将
灵魂掷于火中,顺从于已定的命运。然而,他会小心呵护
心灵和头脑中如星闪耀的火花,那最后喊出的一声‘oh
Captain, My captain’,那站在桌子上与Keating告别的
第一节课下课,他的第一个反应是:这些内容要 考吗?他参加死亡诗社,不过是因为其他人都去 参加。在最为桀骜不逊的Charlie和学校闹恶作剧 时,他面如土色。所有的这些表现一点一滴地累 加,所以,在Neil死后,他是第一个向学校签字 证明Keating老师罪过的人,他从内心里也相信那 是Keating老师的罪过,毫不犹豫地出卖了他,以 保全自己。在最后一幕里,他也没站上桌子,为 Keating送行。

死亡诗社影评

死亡诗社影评

《死亡诗社》影评看完电影,我哭了两次。

一次是在尼尔自杀,朋友和船长悼念他的时候。

尼尔无疑是一个非常出色的人。

对于朋友,他真诚友善,帮助陶德融入集体,缓解他内心的压力;对于父母,他非常孝顺,刻苦学习,满足他们的期待;他成绩优异,有表演天赋,个性开朗,是一个非常讨人喜欢的男孩。

当尼尔自杀的枪被发现的一刹那,我心里便在不断呐喊:为什么?为什么一定要选择死亡来表达自己的抗拒。

当你活着的时候,无论生活和周边人给你多少的压力,你仍然有为自己争取选择的机会,仍然有改变自己处境的可能性,可人一旦死了,就失去了所有可能性,更会给身边真正爱你的人带来不能磨灭的伤害。

电影中间因为“上帝来电”引发了一段小高潮,在这里船长告诉他们,必要时要学会忍耐,否则在他们这个没有多少自主权的年纪,很可能会因此失去许多宝贵的机会,比如听他上课。

基廷先生的“及时行乐”贯穿了整部电影,可最终孩子们付出了沉重的代价来验证他说的“忍耐”。

第二次哭是在船长离开,陶德站在桌上大声喊“船长,我的船长”的时候。

慢慢地,越来越多的学生站到桌子上大声喊“船长,我的船长”,我内心百感交集。

学生的敬重与不舍固然让人感动,可更多的是无奈,他们只能用自己的“口供”和“亲笔签名”将船长送走。

电影借学生的嘴说出“我们都知道尼尔的真正死因又怎样,学校需要一个替罪羔羊,那个人就是基廷先生”。

电影前面部分通过各种暗示,表现了学校其他老师对船长的不满。

在这里我们可以看到传统力量的可怕,学校和家长一起制造了确凿的证据,给一个老师冠上了“间接杀人”的罪名。

我们也能看到传统思想的悲哀,即便尼尔的父母失去了最心爱的儿子,也没能明白他们为什么会失去这个儿子。

背叛者无法理解陶德他们即便被威胁要被处分仍要高喊出“船长,我的船长”内心的悲愤。

最后,我想说教育从来不是一个人的工作。

基廷先生凭借一己之力只能影响班上的部分学生。

作为老师,我们要不断地去接纳新思想,新方法,不可盲目地排异。

2023年高中生观看死亡诗社心得感想

2023年高中生观看死亡诗社心得感想

2023年高中生观看死亡诗社心得感想《死亡诗社》这部电影,对于我作为一个高中生来说,无疑是一次深刻而震撼的触动。

通过观看这部电影,我不仅获得了对诗歌与艺术的新的理解,也对教育体制和人生价值观有了更加深入的思考。

以下是我对这部电影的感悟和观后感,希望能与大家分享。

首先,影片所揭示的教育体制的问题令我深感触动。

在电影中,伊顿中学这样一所传统、保守的学校,对学生们进行了严格的束缚和规范,无论是学术成就还是该有的行为举止,都被统一限制在一种标准之中。

这种教育模式缺乏关注个体差异,使得学生们缺乏自主的思考和创造力的发展空间。

这种教育方式往往侧重于功利性的考试成绩,而忽视了对学生艺术和人文素养的培养。

因此,观影过程中我深感学校教育应该多给学生拓宽眼界和思维的空间,让他们树立正确的人生观和价值观。

其次,导演巧妙地表现了教育和家庭对于学生的双重束缚。

在影片中的主人公Neil Perry就是一个鲜明的例子。

他生在一个传统家庭,父母期望他成为律师,而他自己却热爱戏剧,渴望成为一名演员。

然而,他面临的现实却是被家庭和学校共同压迫,无法发展自己的兴趣爱好。

最后,他无法抵抗来自两方面的压力,选择了终结自己的生命。

这对于我来说是一个极端的例子,但也提醒了我在追求自己的梦想时要坚持自己,不要被世俗的眼光束缚住。

作为家长和教育者,应该尊重孩子的选择和兴趣,给予他们支持和鼓励。

再者,电影也展示了学生们的团结和反抗精神。

在教育体制的压迫下,学生们通过秘密地组建死亡诗社,追求他们内心的激情和自由。

他们相互支持,鼓励彼此追寻真实的自我,并通过诗歌表达他们的情感和思考。

这种团结和反抗精神使得学生们不再孤单,他们通过诗歌创作找到了自己的存在感和价值。

在这个过程中我深感,作为学生,应该追寻内心的真实,勇敢表达自我,不要迎合别人的期望。

同时也应该关注他人,给予支持和鼓励。

团结和反抗精神将会让我们摆脱束缚,走向更加自由和充实的人生。

最后,影片所传递的关于生命的思考和价值观引起了我对于人生的思考。

死亡诗社尼尔写在书上的话

死亡诗社尼尔写在书上的话

死亡诗社尼尔写在书上的话
(实用版)
目录
1.尼尔的背景和性格
2.尼尔在《死亡诗社》中的表现
3.尼尔写在书上的话的意义
4.对现代社会的启示
正文
尼尔是电影《死亡诗社》中的一个重要角色,他是一个年轻有为的学生,拥有独立的思想和追求。

在电影中,尼尔因为加入了基廷老师的诗歌俱乐部,开始对诗歌产生了浓厚的兴趣,也逐渐找到了自己的人生方向。

然而,他的父亲却希望他成为一名医生,这与尼尔的梦想产生了冲突。

在电影中,尼尔写在书上的话,是他对诗歌、人生和未来的思考和追求。

他写道:“我要做自己想做的事情,我要追逐我的梦想,我要活得自由自在。

”这句话充分展现了尼尔的个性和追求,他希望能够摆脱社会的束缚,追求自己的梦想。

尼尔的这段话对现代社会也有着很大的启示。

在当今社会,很多人被现实的压力所束缚,放弃了自己的梦想和追求。

我们应该像尼尔一样,勇敢地追求自己的梦想,活得自由自在。

同时,尼尔的这段话也提醒我们,要尊重每个人的个性和追求,不要用传统的观念来束缚他们。

只有这样,才能让每个人都有机会实现自己的梦想,社会才能更加进步。

总的来说,尼尔写在书上的话,是他对诗歌、人生和未来的思考和追求,也是对现代社会的启示。

第1页共1页。

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

Neil’s character always remains static – meaning he does not undergo a change in his character at any time during the movie. Just because he died at the end does not mean that he changed.His life was an act –to his father, to Keating, even to himself, b ut when he wasn’t acting, he thought he had nothing to contribute – he was just as lost as Todd was when Todd first came to Welton. Neil couldn’t deal with the idea that to give up acting was to quit playing the roles that he lived everyday, and so he kill ed himself because he “realized that he had not lived” up to that point. He just took on a different role to fit the circumstance. He never was upfront and honest about his passions to anyone. Neil wanted to be someone else – a person who could express his passions when the time was appropriate. Symbolism:Neil seems to symbolize his kneeling down before everyone – such as his father (who takes away all control Neil tries to have – such as the editor of the newspaper) and the school. Perry seems to be sym bolic for “perish” and death, foreshadowing Neil’s suicide later in the movie. I think that’s why Todd and Neil got along so well. (On the first day of Keating’s class, Keating states that they are all going to die. Neil looks incredibly disturbed while considering this.) Neil could control Todd, and that was the only thing in his life he felt he had control over. Also, in a way, I think Neil saw himself in Todd, because Neil acted towards his father the way Todd acted towards everyone. By trying to help Todd, he thought maybe he could help himself. Neil claims, “the meek might inherit the earth, but they don’t make it into Harvard,” and he’s right –he’s meek, and he never makes it into Harvard.He is the first to ask what the Dead Poets Society was. He is also the one to organize the first meeting. Neil also tells Todd that he must participate in the club.Neil’s PoemsThese lines and his Madman Story not only explain Neil’s philosophy but foreshadow what is about to come – his destruction.“I went to the woods because I wanted to live deliberately. I wanted to live deep and suck out all the marrow of life. To put to rout all that was not life, and not when I had come to die, discover that I had not lived.” – from Walden“Come, my friends, ‘T is not too la te to seek a newer world.For my purpose holds To sail beyond the sunset, and tho’ We are not now that strength which in old days Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are; One equal temper of heroic hearts, Made weak by time and fate, but strong i n will To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.” – from Ulysses“It was a dark and rainy night. And this old lady who had a passion for jigsaw puzzlessat by herself in her house at her table to complete a new jigsaw puzzle. As she piecedthe puzzle together, she realized to her astonishment that the image that was formed washer very own room, and the figure in the center of the puzzle, as she completed it, washerself. And with trembling hands she placed the last four pieces and stared in horror atthe face of the demented madman at the window. The last thing that this old lady everheard was the sound of breaking glass.”In the end, Neil realized that it was his own life and he was in the center of it. Since his dad had control over him and he was too afraid to stand up to him.Midsummer Night’s DreamWhen Neil learns about the play, he is filled with his passions. He claims that this is the first time in his life that he knows what he wants to do, even if his father disapproves. When Todd mentions this, he asks, “Can’t I just enjoy the idea for a while?” This is the beginning of his loss of control to his passions.As the role of Puck, Neil is able to express what he could not when he wasn’t acting. The Puck epilogue is said directly to his father, in hopes that his father will forgive him. He cannot say anything later when his father tells him what he expects Neil to do because at that moment he is no longer acting.SuicideFinally, in his room, he realizes that the last four pieces of the puzzle of his life have been put into place, and that his only option in order to gain some control of his life is to take his own life. Neil was his father’s dream. When his father woke up, his dream was gone.Neil, His Father, and the SuicideNeil’s relati onship with his father is a case of misunderstanding and lack of communication. Mr. Perry wanted what was best for his son, which led to extremely high expectations. Neil wanted to find out who he was and what he wanted to do. Neil was unable to discuss his opinions and options with his father, and Mr. Perry was unwilling to look at Neil’s outlook on life. This cyclical pattern led Neil to conclude that suicide was the only way to gain control of his life and stand up to his father.There is no evidence that Neil thought about suicide up until that night. It appears to be a spontaneous decision made on the basis of the hopelessness he felt that night. Maybe it was an act to break free from his father’s control, but in trying to gain that control over his l ife, he sacrificed everything to escape.Mr. Perry was at traditionalist, which unfortunately meant he had a difficult time expressing affectionate emotions. He also had a large number of expectations because like any parent, he ultimately wanted the best for his son, a 16-17 year old with a bright future ahead of him. Unfortunately, Neil never really saw or understood that his father only wanted what was best for Neil. He only saw the tyrant-like authority figure who constantly demanded that Neil achieve greatness in academia and who obeyed him unquestioningly.Neil, however, did question that role – to himself, to others, even to Keating. Unfortunately, he never truly was able to convey that to his father. The only time he was able to stand up to his father was in the role of Puck during the play, when he asked for forgiveness with his last soliloquy, an act which deliberately disobeyed and thus enraged his father. He had many opportunities to do so before then, but he never seized the opportunity to reestablish a connection. The father and son were like strangers, each with a specific perception of the other, but neither really knew who the other was. This perpetuated the cycle of misunderstandings between the two and eventually played a major role in Ne il’s suicide.In Mr. Perry’s perspective, Neil was a model child who was focused on getting into a good college. He then learns from another parent that Neil was going to be in the play. This was the first he had heard of this, as Neil had lied to everyo ne about his father’s approval. Mr. Perry then told Neil that couldn’t be involved, an order Neil deliberately disobeyed by performing in the opening show the following night. When Mr. Perry saw Neil as Puck, he became furious and probably overreacted a bit by concluding thatit must be the school (or more specifically, Mr Keating – the new teacher) that was the cause of this and that Neil should transfer schools to regain his focus.Neil, on the other hand, wanted to know who he was. He was always obedien t to his father’s wishes, but he wanted to know more about himself. Acting was something he could do for himself – something that he enjoyed and allowed him to explore what he was able to accomplish. On the other hand, it was also a means of escaping his current reality by being someone else for a few hours. Keating suggested Neil talk to his father about this passion, but Neil second guessed his father’s actions by arguing that his father would never understand. He never gave his father the benefit of the doubt and tried to explain. Keating even went so far as to tell Neil that even if his father didn’t see things his way, he’d soon be out of school and could do what he wished then. Neil wouldn’t listen to this advice, and later when Keating asked if Neil had spoken to his father, Neil said he did consent.Yes, Mr. Perry was hard on Neil, but that was probably out of concern. He was paying a lot of money to attend a great school to prepare him for an ivy league school, and Neil, out of nowhere, decides he d oesn’t want to go to college. He wants to act. Mr. Perry believed that this was a fleeting dream, and that if Neil followed this path, he would be throwing away a wonderful opportunity for a pursuit that would last a couple of years. After all, most people don’t really have a grasp on their future until at least their junior or senior year of college. If his acting career failed, which in all likelihood, it would have, Neil would have no skills to fall back on.Also, Neil never really stood up to his father. There were times he tried, like when Mr. Perry told Neil he should drop some extracurricular activities, but he did so in the presence of others, which created a hostile environment between the two. It would have been interesting if Neil and his father would have actually sat down and chatted about what Neil wanted and what they could do to compromise. Even at the very end, when the two confronted each other right before Neil committed suicide, Neil still could not face his father. Mr. Perry specifically asked Neil what he wanted, and Neil couldn’t answer him. I think Mr. Perry really expected Neil to give him an answer, and I think if Neil would have, his father may have been more understanding.In a way, Neil resembles how Todd was in the beginning of the movie. Todd couldn’t speak to anyone of authority without sounding insecure. In one of the extra scenes, Todd tried to ask for rowing instead of soccer, but could barely speak. He was given soccer instead. Also, in class, whenever he was asked a quest ion, he couldn’t answer. He wanted to say something – especially to recite the poem he spent so much time writing, but he never could. He even ended up ripping up his poem.Who is Responsible for the Suicide?In the end, both the realists and the romantic s blame the other for Neil’s suicide. The romantics say it was Neil’s father. Even Todd says this when he first confronts his romanticism in the snow. The realists say it was Keating, and in the end, force Keating to leave. Neither side wants to believe that through the act of suicide, Neil is taking control of his own life decisions and therefore must assume the responsibility.Suicide is a personal choice, and only Neil could decide whether or not to commit the act. There is a point in everyone’s life wh ere they feel that no one understand them, and no matter what they say, itdoesn’t change the situation. However, by Neil killing himself, Mr. Perry never had the opportunity to understand his son’s desires and passions.。

相关文档
最新文档