英语写作范文-谁应投资于高等教育

英语写作范文-谁应投资于高等教育

The issue that who should support students to carry on tertiary education has been constantly discussed and the

range have already been restricted within three stakeholders：the government, the student or the student who borrows money from the government and return it after finishing education.

In terms of the first proposal, it is crystal-clear that the families’ financial burden will, to a large extent, decrease. As a result of this, a substantial number of students from financially inferior families tend to have the access to university education, which will surely enlarge the number of people receiving higher education, therefore contributing to development of the whole nation. The student is likely to be more independent when the third approach is chosen. If

students pay for their education themselves, they will

probably have several years off and make a living. Not only could this help to gain social experiences, which will help

to determine their major in university they are most

interested in, but they will also be more of appreciating

their own efforts for accumulating such a massive amount of money for education. This will probably stimulate the student to study hard and realize value of the money they earn. With regard to the third choice, the prominent upside may lie with the students’ strong motivation to learn. In comparison with their counterparts, they shoulder more financial pressure and this would help them fully concentrate on their study so as

to be more competitive for a job position. In this regard, there is a higher possibility for them to have a more promising career prospect. Taking all three ways into

consideration, I personally would prefer students to use the loan from government and repay it after graduation. For one thing, there would be additional financial stress for the government if only the government take the responsibility.

For another, if all costs are paid by the student, s/he needs to take time off for years and there might be dangers for

them never coming back to school.

问题，谁应该支持学生实行高等教育持续讨论的范围已经被限制

在三个利益主体：政府，学生或学生贷款来自政府，返回后教育。从

第一个建议，很清楚地表明，家庭的财政负担，在很大水准上，减少。因为这个结果，大量的学生从经济上弱势的家庭往往有进入大学教育，这肯定会扩大接受高等教育的人数，所以有助于整个国家的发展。当

第三种方法被选中时，该学生更独立。如果学生为自己的教育付出，

他们很可能会有好几年的时间去谋生。这不但能协助获得社会经验，

这将有助于确定他们的主要在大学，他们最感兴趣的，但他们也将更

多地欣赏自己的努力，积累了大量的教育资金。这可能会刺激学生努

力学习，实现他们所赚的钱的价值。关于第三种选择，突出的好处可

能在于学生学习的强烈动机。与他们的同行相比，他们承担更多的财

政压力，这将有助于他们充分专注于他们的研究，以便更具竞争力的

工作岗位。在这方面，有一个更高的可能性，他们有一个更有前途的

职业前景。考虑到这三种方式，我个人更倾向于使用学生贷款，并在

毕业后偿还。一方面，如果政府承担责任，政府会有更多的财政压力。另一方面，如果所有的费用由学生支付，他/他需要休息几年，可能有

危险，他们永远不会回来了。