雅思大作文政府类
雅思大作文范文三篇政府类
雅思大作文范文三篇政府类店铺网小编为大家整理收集了雅思考试大作文范文汇总：政府类，希望对各位考生的备考有所帮助，祝每位考生考试顺利，都能取得好成绩!雅思大作文范文：政府应限制艺术家发表见解的自由?The responsibility of an artist is to createartworks to cater for people’s needs for aesthesisand enjoyment. Some masterpieces by the world-renowned artists like Shakespeare, the greatestpoet in British literature; Vinci, the most famousItalian painter, architect and sculptor impress the people around the world deeply. From mypoint of view, the government should not give restrictions to artists. On the contrary, theircreativity and innovation should be encouraged.Creativity is the source of arts. The development of literature is a very vivid illustration.From Classicism to Romanticism, from Renaissances to Realism, from Humanity to Post-modernism, (从古典主义到浪漫主义，从文艺复兴到现实主义，从人文主义到后现代主义) all the styles ofliterature reflect people’s thinking and have epoch-making significance. Suppose there wereonly one style of literature, people would not appreciate so abundant poetry and novels andour world would become so monotonous.Furthermore, restrictions on creativity will arouse tragedies, one of which is “Burn booksand bury the literati in pits” (焚书坑儒) in Chinese history launched by Emperor Qin Shihuang,who buried the Confucian scholars alive and prohibited the dissemination of Confucian.Another tragedy was started by Emperor Yongzheng in the Qing Dynasty, who killed manycreative artists and intellectuals, undermining the literal development and distorting thedevelopment of humanity.History proves that only when a government encourages people toexpress their own idea and thought freely, can its country make progress and prosper.Finally, I will quote a classic sentence from a famous article entitled “Give Me Liberty OrGive Me Death” by Patrick Henry, the greatest writer in American history, “I know not whatcourse others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!”雅思大作文范文：广告误导消费者,政府应采取措施吗?No one can avoid being influenced byadvertisements and advertising exerts a tremendousinfluence on us. Recently, there are people who areof the opinion that public has the right to know thecorrect information of the advertisements andgovernment also should restrict the contents of these advertisements. Personally I agree withthis opinion for the following reasons.In the first instance, consumers have the right to know the correct information beforedeciding on whether to buy them. Advertisements are highly information that helps people tomake choice before they go to buy what they need. If the advertisement exaggerates theproducts it also will persuade people into buying things, which they don’t really want.Secondly, any misleading advertisements will lead to the marketing tricks, causing chaos inthe market. Too many misleading advertisements are barrio to distinguishing between decentproducts or products of bad quality. His bread in truth is made with soy flour, while headvertises it as white bread. These misleading information causes illegal competition.Last but not least, government should stipulate laws in consumers’ interests. According tothe laws, advertisements must be truthful. If the advertisements misleadconsumers,government can impose great fine on them to set a lesson.In general, the role of advertisements is inevitable and undeniable. A good advertisementcan be a bridge between business and consumers and helps keep business moving. So we needcorrect information and government also needs to restrict the contents of advertisements. Letmisinformation of advertisements be far away from us.雅思大作文题目：Traditional arts civilized a nation. Do youthink government should subsidize musicians,artists, actors or drama companies? Whatshould a government do?雅思大作文范文：Traditional arts, as valuable cultural relics of anation, are disappearing far away from the modernsociety. China, as one of the highly-civilized countriesin the world, abound in various forms of traditionalarts, such as painting, calligraphy, music,architecture and dramas, which are not only ournational cultural treasures, but also a rich fortune ofthe world.As essence of a local culture, traditional arts reflect a nation’s artistic talents andtraditions. For example, water-color painting depicts a harmony between people and nature.Architecture illustrates a nation’s aesthetic value and religious belief. Cathedrals, highlighted byGothic style in the Medieval, represent Christianity. Pagodas, totally different from cathedralsstylistically, are a symbol of Buddhism. Peking Opera describes the history of our country.However, traditional arts are leaving contemporary people further and further away, oneof the main reasons for which is that the authorities concerned and some institutes lack fundsandprofessionals, which are quite essential to the research and promotion of traditionalculture. Another radical reason should be attributed to the impact of western cultures ontraditions. Young people, especially youngsters, are addicted to western music like rock and roll,without any knowledge about traditional musical instruments. With the economic globalization,traditional culture and arts will be in the danger of assimilation. How to maintain and developtraditional arts becomes the biggest concern of a government.Firstly, the government should lay a fund for the research and promotion of traditionalarts. Secondly, the research institutes and universities should work out a long-term developingscheme, organizing systematic research on traditional arts. Arts belong to a nation and thewhole world as well. The prosperity of traditional arts will diversify the culture of the world.。
雅思大作文范文3篇政府类作文
雅思大作文范文3篇政府类作文店铺网为考生们提供最新最全的雅思写作范文,希望对大家有帮助。
雅思大作文范文：政府应提供平等的医疗福利The quality of health care a person receivesshould not depend on the size of their bank balance.The government is responsible for providing a highlevel of health care for all the citizens.To what extent do agree or disagree with theabove statement?As more and more people have realized theimportance of their quality of life, the issue ofhealth care has received increasing public attention.In my opinion, the government should establish ahigh-quality health care system for all the citizens, regardless of their gender, occupation andsocial status. There are three main reasons for this as follows.The first reason to be taken into account is based on the premise that all men are createdequal, which is a generally accepted belief in most countries. Just like equal pay for equal work,uniform. quality and quantity of health care should be given to all citizens, who are believedto be born equal. Similarly, health care can be compared to justice, which is dispensedimpartially by judges to all people, without reference to their social backgrounds. Therefore,everyone stands equal under the health care system that is supposed to be provided by thegovernment.In facet, poor people are those who can receive the most needed benefits from a high levelof health care. The poor, who are plagued by financial burdens and chronic unemployment,face especially serious heath problems. Many of them live at the subsistence level and can notafford even thefraction of the exorbitant medical costs if there is no health care for them. Incontrast, the rich, with their luxurious and extravagant lifestyle. and the extreme care oftheir private doctors, often regard the health care as a dispensable thing. Therefore, the ideathat the quality of health care people receive should be in proportion to their affluence istotally absurd.Furthermore, as most citizens are honorable taxpayers and, therefore, make greatcontribution to the society, whose finances derive largely from taxation, good quality ofhealth care provided by the government should be deemed as a returned favor to thesetaxpayers. As a matter of fact, all developed nations and many developing ones haveincorporated health care into their welfare system, making it one of the fundamental humanrights that are granted by the constitution. On the contrary, governments that do notattempt to address people’s health problems are rarely supported by the citizens.To conclude, health care is an issue that all governments cannot afford to avoid in theirday-to-day running of the country. To them, there is no alternative but to provide an excellentsystem of medical care for all the citizens because the scenario of a country full of diseased anduncared-for people is almost inconceivable.雅思大作文范文：政府资金投向Much discussion concerning allocation of resourcesassumes that the government should spend moneyon medicine and education rather than on theatresand sports stadiums. In my opinion, this issueshould be examined from the angle of whether theinvestment benefits the great majority of thepopulation.The institutions of medical care and education, undoubtedly, should receive priority in theallocation of a government’sexpenditures, at the thought of millions of children from deprivedbackgrounds who now get a substandard education, and who would require a relatively highquality of education if they are to enjoy anything approaching equality of opportunity in laterlife. Another pressing need of society is improvement of medical care for the adult poor, forthe aged, and so forth down the list.Theatres and sports stadiums are institutions for promoting human culture. A successfultheatrical event is an exciting and stimulating experience, whether it occurs in a grand theatreor a high school auditorium. Spectators as well as those involved in the production feel thisexcitement. Sports stadiums, on the other hand, attract millions of spectators to watchprofessionals play every year. Many more millions watch games on television, read about themin newspapers, and discuss them with their friends. Therefore, can we say that these areunnecessary public expenditures the government should ignore?In conclusion, today man is becoming ever more aware of his spiritual needs. Medicine andeducation are needs that we recognize, but are contacts with theatrical or sports events alsobasic needs?雅思大作文范文：政府补贴艺术家?Traditional arts, as valuable cultural relics of anation, are disappearing far away from the modernsociety. China, as one of the highly-civilized countriesin the world, abound in various forms of traditionalarts, such as painting, calligraphy, music,architecture and dramas, which are not only ournational cultural treasures, but also a rich fortune ofthe world.As essence of a local culture, traditional arts reflect a nation’s artistic talents andtraditions. For example, water-colorpainting depicts a harmony between people and nature.Architecture illustrates a nation’s aesthetic value and religious belief. Cathedrals, highlighted byBaroque style in the 17th century, represent Christianity. Pagodas, totally different fromcathedrals stylistically, are a symbol of Buddhism. Peking Opera describes the history of ourcountry.However, traditional arts are leaving contemporary people further and further away, oneof the main reasons for which is that the authorities concerned and some institutes lack fundsand professionals, which are quite essential to the research and promotion of traditionalculture. Another radical reason should be attributed to the impact of western cultures ontraditions. Young people, especially youngsters, are addicted to western music like rock and roll,without any knowledge about traditional musical instruments. With the economic globalization,traditional culture and arts will be in the danger of assimilation. How to maintain and developtraditional arts becomes the biggest concern of a government.Firstly, the government should lay a fund for the research and promotion of traditionalarts. Secondly, the research institutes and universities should work out a long-term developingscheme, organizing systematic research on traditional arts. Arts belong to a nation and thewhole world as well. The prosperity of traditional arts will diversify the culture of the world.。
雅思大作文政府类
雅思大作文政府类In today's world, the role of government is a topic of great debate. Many people have strong opinions about the extent to which the government should be involved in the lives of its citizens. Some argue that the government should have a limited role, allowing individuals to make their own choices and take responsibility for their own actions. Others believe that the government should play a more active role in providing for the needs of its citizens and ensuring social and economic equality. In this essay, I will explore the various perspectives on the role of government and provide my own insights on the matter.One perspective on the role of government is that it should be limited, with a focus on protecting individual rights and freedoms. Proponents of this view argue that excessive government intervention can lead to a loss of personal freedom and individual responsibility. They believe that individuals should be free to make their own choices and that the government's role should be limited to maintaining law and order and protecting citizens from external threats. This perspective is often associated with libertarianism and a belief in small government.On the other hand, there are those who argue that the government should play a more active role in providing for the needs of its citizens. This perspective is often associated with social liberalism and a belief in the welfare state. Proponents of this view argue that the government has a responsibility to ensure that all citizens have access to basic necessities such as healthcare, education, and housing. They believe that government intervention is necessary to address social and economic inequality and to promote the common good.Another perspective on the role of government is that it should be focused on promoting economic growth and development. Proponents of this view argue that the government should create a favorable environment for business and investment, and should play a role in regulating the economy to ensure stability and growth. They believe that a strong economy is essential for the well-being of society as a whole, and that the government has a responsibility to promote economic prosperity.In addition to these perspectives, there are also those who argue that the government should play a role in protecting the environment and addressing climate change. Proponents of this view argue that the government has a responsibility to regulate industry and promote sustainable practices in order to protect the planet for future generations. They believe that environmental protection is a critical issue that requires government intervention and global cooperation.In my opinion, the role of government is complex and multifaceted. While I believe in the importance of individual freedom and personal responsibility, I also recognize the need for government intervention to address social and economic inequality, promote economic growth, and protect the environment. I believe that a balanced approach is necessary, with the government playing a role in addressing the needs of its citizens while also allowing for individual freedom and initiative. Ultimately, the role of government should be to promote the well-being of society as a whole, while respecting the rights and freedoms of its citizens.。
政府职责雅思作文
政府职责雅思作文在我们的生活中，政府就像是一个超级管家，管着各种各样的事儿。
那这个超级管家到底有哪些重要的职责呢？首先啊，保障公民的安全肯定是重中之重。
这安全可不只是抓抓小偷那么简单。
政府得建立强大的国防，就像给国家穿上一层厚厚的铠甲，防止那些不怀好意的国家来捣乱。
你想啊，如果没有强大的军队守护边境，那咱们就像住在没有围墙的房子里，谁都能随便闯进来抢东西，多可怕啊！而且在国内呢，警察也要时刻巡逻，确保大街小巷都平平安安的。
这就好比是房子里也得有保安到处走走看看，让居民们放心。
再说说教育吧。
政府就像是一个知识的播种机。
教育可是关系到国家未来的大事。
政府得建学校，从小学到大学都不能少。
还得保证有好的老师，不能让那些半吊子的人来教孩子们。
毕竟孩子们就像小树苗，要是一开始就没浇对水施好肥，以后怎么长成参天大树呢？而且政府还要考虑让穷人家的孩子也能上学，总不能因为家里没钱，就把那些聪明的小脑袋瓜给浪费了吧。
还有医疗方面。
政府要做健康的守护者。
建医院、培养医生护士，这些都是基础操作。
现在生病可不像以前，生个小病都可能要人命。
所以政府得确保有足够的医疗资源，不管是在大城市还是偏远的小山村。
不能让老百姓因为没钱看病就只能在家干等着，那多可怜啊。
就像每个人都有可能在路上摔一跤，政府得保证旁边就有个能包扎伤口的地方。
基础设施建设也是政府的重要任务。
想象一下，如果没有路，我们的汽车就像没头的苍蝇到处乱撞；要是没有电，晚上就只能点蜡烛，那感觉就像是回到了古代。
政府得把路修得四通八达，这样大家上班、旅游都方便。
水电供应也得稳稳当当的，不能今天停水明天停电，那老百姓的日子可就没法过了。
另外呢，保护环境也是政府义不容辞的责任。
现在地球就像一个生了病的老人，到处都是污染。
政府要制定规则，让那些工厂不能乱排污水废气，就像告诉调皮的孩子不能随地大小便一样。
还要提倡种树、保护野生动物之类的，毕竟我们人类也不是地球唯一的居民，得和其他生物和谐共处。
政府类雅思大作文真题范文
政府类雅思大作文真题范文这篇大作文真题问的是关于政府给运动员拨款而不给大众拨款是不是好事。
下面我们来看看雅思作文范文，希望能帮到大家。
雅思大作文真题Some countries achieve international sporting success by building specialized facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use. Do you think it is a positive or negative development?雅思大作文真题范文【1】When it comes to a phenomenon that some countries prefer to allocate more money to facilities designed for athletes rather than spend money on public facilities, some people argue that such a phenomenon may be a negative development, but I cannot agree with this opinion.Admittedly, the public may lack facilities for exercise without devices provided by governments. It is acknowledged that governments’ budget is limited but what governments need to improve is countless. Providing that governments use money to purchase more professional devices for athletes, comparatively, the amount of fund for public facilities will be reduced. Then, some communities may even lack sports facilities for their residents. Nevertheless, it is still a positive development for countries to focus on training professional players.To begin with, constructing more devices specialized for athletes could serve to maintain their performances. In order to defeat others in international games, such as the Olympic Games, countries, even after gaining a lot of golden medals, need to guarantee that their athletes could perform better in the future. It is natural and reasonable for those governments to fund theirplayers and offer them better equipment and devices. Then, their players could maintain their performances and countries could gain honor and reputation from those matches as well.In addition, sports facilities could be better used by athletes. Even in some communities where there are a lot of sports facilities accessible, occupied by work, citizens may neglect those facilities to some degree. Compared with building facilities for the public, allocating budgets to professional facilities seems more effective since most athletes will make use of those devices quite frequently. Thus, funding athletes could lead to a better utilization of sports facilities.In sum, it is still positive for countries to concentrate on training athletes and provide them with more facilities, considering that players are potent to perform better in competitions and they could also make better use of those devices.雅思大作文真题范文【2】In some countries,players with athletic talent receive more support, especially in terms of the specialised facilities they used while the demand of the masses in sports is often ignored. From my perspective, the development of elite sport may bring a range of benefits in the short term, but mass sport is more closely related to the well-being of the public in the long run.In the short term, it seems sensible to invest on speclialised facilities for some excellent sportsmen when considering the positive impacts brought by these top athletes. From the national level, it is these elites that bring honor in some international competitions and then shape a strong image for their own country. On a individual level, the public will be positively influenced by the sportsmanship revealed by these champions,which will contribute to the improvement of the quality of the whole nation.However, in the long run, when pondering the essential reason why sports exist, we can find out that the prosperity of mass sports is of more significance and therefore more capital should be allocated to construct facilities that everybody can use. The most fundamental function of sports is to assist people to build a strong body, and in some extent, the more sports facilities there are, the more chances there are for people to take part in sports in their daily life. Another deeper reason is that people can develop a host of valuable qualities such as self-control and perseverance in this process, both of which play an key role on people’s way to achieve success.So, when comparing the advantages of two sides, I believe this development is a short-sighted approach regarding to sports success. The public are the base of a nation. Only when every ordinary person benefits from the sports facilites, will the development of sports industry be more meaningful.。
2023.10.21雅思Task2：科学研究由政府主导
2023.10.21：科学研究由政府主导观点类大作文，科技类话题Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by government rather than private companies. To what extent do you agree or disagree?Sample Answer：The debate over whether scientific research should be a governmental matter rather than a private sector's concern often ignites diverse viewpoints. I partially agree that the government should lead scientific initiatives due to ethical standards and public welfare concerns, but this disregards the innovation and financial capabilities of private companies.On one side of the argument, governmental control over scientific research ensures that the studies and explorations undertaken serve public interests. Governments are theoretically bound to their citizens' welfare, thereby focusingon projects that cater to societal needs such as health, environmental protection, and education. Additionally, they are in a position to maintain ethical standards by enforcing strict regulations to prevent misconduct that could potentially arise from profit-driven motives, which are often associated with private companiesHowever, it is essential to recognize the pivotal role that private companies have played in groundbreaking innovations. The private sector’s competitiveness f uels rapid development and efficiency, attributes that are frequently absent in governmental agencies, due to bureaucratic limitations. For instance, the technological advancements we have witnessed in the digital era are largely attributed to private entities competing against each other. Moreover, these companies reinvest their profits into research and development, indicating their financial robustness and sustainability in carrying out extensive research without over-relying on taxpayers' money.Nonetheless, the primary concern with private companies leading scientific research is their inevitable focus on profitability. The market-driven approach can lead to inequalityin resource allocation, where only projects deemed profitable are pursued, potentially neglecting critical areas that do not promise immediate financial returns but are crucial for societal progression.In conclusion, while the government's involvement in scientific research is crucial for ensuring that it aligns with the citizens' welfare and upholding ethical standards, the exclusion of private companies is not advisable. A balanced approach, perhaps through public-private partnerships, could harness the private sector's innovative prowess while leveraging governmental oversight to steer these advancements towards the greater public good. This synergy, rather than a polarized stance, would be instrumental in fostering an environment where scientific research thrives, contributing to both societal welfare and economic progression.5相关词汇和语法结构diverse viewpoints 多元观点assurance of ethical standards 道德标准的保证public welfare 公共福利innovative spirit 创新精神financial capabilities 财务能力serve public interests 服务公众利益malpractices 渎职行为groundbreaking innovations 开创性的创新bureaucratic constraints 官僚限制reinvest their profits 重新投资他们的利润market-driven approach 市场驱动的方式public-private partnerships 公私合作伙伴关系societal progression 社会进步。
政府相关的雅思英语作文
政府相关的雅思英语作文一些政府说可以通过税收控制孩子的数量。
政府有时以这种方式控制人口是必要的，也是正确的。
你对这个看法有什么一件?理由是什么?下面是店铺分享的政府相关的作文，欢迎大家阅读!雅思英语作文【1】Some governments say how many children a family can hare in their country. They may control the number of children someone has through taxes. It is sometimes necessary and right for a government to control the population in this way.Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer.Model Answer:It is certainly very understandable that some governments should start looking at ways of limiting their populations to a sustainable figure. In the past, populations were partly regulated by frequent war and widespread disease, but in recent years the effects of those factors have been diminished. Countries can be faced with a population that is growing much faster than she nation's food resources or employment opportunities and whose members can be condemned to poverty by the need to feed extra mouths. They identify population control as a means to raising living standards.But how should it be achieved? Clearly, this whole area is a very delicate personal and cultural issue. Many people feel that this is not a matter for the state. They feel this is one area of life where they have the right to make decisions for themselves. For that reason, it would seem that the best. Approach would be to work by persuasion rather than compulsion This could be done by a process of education that points out the way a smaller family can mean an improved quality of life for the family members, aswell as less strain on the country's perhaps very limited, resources.This is the preferred way. Of course if this docs not succeed within a reasonable time scale, it may be necessary to consider other measures. Such as tax incentives or child-benefit payments for small families only. These are midway between persuasion and compulsion.So. Yes. It is sometimes necessary, but governments should try very hard to persuade first. They should also remember that this is a very delicate area indeed, and that social engineering can create as many problems as it solves?雅思英语作文【2】All education, primary, secondary and further education, should be free to all people and paid for by the government.Do you agree or disagree with this statement?Model Answer:Different countries have different education systems. I don‛t know all the education systems in the world but all the ones I do know about have free school education at primary and secondary level. I certainly agree with the statement that this should be the case. I believe university education is different.No matter what standard of income someone has or what society someone comes from, everyone should have the opportunity to have a good standard of education. This is not always what happens but it is what should happen. Private schools can be available for those who want and can afford it but the free schools should always be there. This is certainly one of the best attributes of western democracy and all countries it seems strive to attain situation although some have problems due to the economic and political situations in their countries. Governments should make sure that all their citizens have accessto a good standard of free education at primary and secondary level.Further education is different. In an ideal world this should be free but governments have a lot of demands on their money.I think that students should have to pay, maybe not all, but at least a contribution towards their tuition fees. They will be able to earn it back once they have graduated. The UK has this system whereas in the US students have to pay all their high tuition fees which can run into the tens of thousands of dollars over a full course. I am not sure if I agree with this but it certainly would make sure that students make the best of efforts to pass or all their money would be wasted.Therefore I conclude that primary and secondary education should be freely available for all if possible but that further education should not necessarily be wholly free.雅思英语作文【3】Some people say the government should not put money into building theatres and sports stadiums; they should spend more money on medical care and education.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?Model Answer:What would the world be like without Shakespeare or the Olympics? While medical care and education are perhaps the highest causes to which money can be contributed, the arts and athletics are in some ways just as valuable. So, to ask the government to not extend support to these two areas could be just as detrimental to the welfare of society as the lack of sufficient health care and education.The Romans b elieved in “mens sana in corpore sano”. In short, that there is indeed a correlation between a healthy bodyand healthy mind. When we are healthy, we feel better and so are more likely to be productive academically. Plus, the practice of sports can also teach us the very same discipline we need for our studies. Why even a brisk walk or watching an exciting athletic match can refresh the mind for greater work. Moreover, sports can serve to create healthier bodies, which in turn would serve as a form of “preventive medicine” thereby cutting down on medical costs. In the same vein, the arts are known to induce a sense of well-being in performers and audience alike, reducing mental problems and their associated physical manifestations and again, medical costs. As such, building theatres and stadiums, which spur interest in the arts and sports respectively, actually would be practically identical to spending money on medical care and education!Now I realize the question specifically addresses the building of theatres and sports stadiums by government. Some people would contend athletics and the arts can still be enjoyed and practiced without such constructions. I would hazard that these buildings stand as the altars to the sports and arts worlds, inspiring would-be athletes and performers. Without such venues where would sports spectators and music aficionados be able to enjoy these events? Now some other people would also say business could support their construction, but we know the avarice of business could very likely jeopardize the lofty spirit of athletics and the arts just as well. Therefore, allowing government to retain some say in the matter on behalf of the people would, I believe, be in the best interest of the people.In short, as long as the government does not go overboard in its expenditures for these buildings and uses such venues for the benefit of all, then, as mentioned above, people will benefitin terms of both medical care and education as well. This is not to say the government should neglect medical care and education, but rather to think of this not as an either-or choice but as a win-win situation for all.。
雅思大作文 政府国际援助 7分
雅思大作文政府国际援助7分《政府国际援助：一场爱心与责任的全球接力》我呀，有时候就会想一些特别大的事儿。
就像政府的国际援助这件事，感觉可神秘又可伟大了呢。
咱们先说说我怎么就开始琢磨这个事儿的吧。
那天我在看新闻，看到有个特别穷的国家，那里的小朋友都吃不饱饭，房子也破破烂烂的，好多人都生病了，可是他们没有足够的药。
我就跟我爸说：“爸，他们好可怜啊，咱们能做点啥不？”我爸就跟我说：“咱们国家有时候就会给他们援助呢。
”我当时就特别好奇，啥是国际援助呀？我就自己开始去了解。
原来啊，政府的国际援助就像是一个超级有爱心的大哥哥或者大姐姐，看到别的小弟弟小妹妹有困难了，就伸出援手去帮忙。
比如说，有的国家遇到地震了，房子全倒了，好多人被埋在下面。
这时候呢，我们国家就可能会派一些救援队伍过去，带着那些能把人从废墟里挖出来的工具，还有医生去救那些受伤的人。
这就像在一个村子里，一家着火了，其他家就会拿着水桶去帮忙灭火一样。
再说说援助物资这方面。
就像那些贫穷的国家没有吃的，我们国家就会送好多粮食过去。
这粮食啊，对于那些饿肚子的人来说，就像黑暗里的一束光，能让他们活下去。
我就想啊，要是我没饭吃，突然有人给我送来香喷喷的米饭和可口的菜，我得多高兴啊。
这援助的粮食就是这样的希望啊。
而且呢，不光是吃的，还有衣服啊。
那些地方的人冬天冷得直哆嗦，我们送去的衣服就像温暖的小太阳，裹在他们身上，让他们不再寒冷。
还有教育方面的援助呢。
我觉得这可太重要了。
我们在宽敞明亮的教室里学习，有那么多的书本和文具。
可是有些国家的小朋友呢，连个像样的本子都没有。
我们国家会送书本、文具过去，还会派老师去教他们知识。
这就好比是在一片荒芜的土地上播撒种子，这些知识的种子种下去，以后就可能会长成参天大树。
那些小朋友学会了知识，就可以改变自己国家的命运呢。
就像我们如果不好好学习，以后就做不了大事一样，他们要是有了知识，就能把自己的国家建设得更好。
我跟我同学也讨论过这个事儿。
政府引导更健康生活雅思作文
政府引导更健康生活雅思作文在现代社会，我们的生活就像一场疯狂的大冒险，有时候我们在健康的道路上一路狂飙，有时候却一头扎进了不健康的泥沼里。
这时候，就该政府这个超级英雄闪亮登场，来引导我们走向更健康的生活啦。
首先呢，政府有强大的宣传能力。
想象一下，政府就像一个拥有超级大喇叭的广播员。
它可以通过各种渠道，比如说电视广告、公益短片，还有街边那些花花绿绿的海报，把健康生活的理念传播到每一个角落。
就像我邻居老王，以前是个超级大烟枪，一天能抽三包烟。
但是看了政府播放的那些吸烟危害健康的公益广告后，里面那黑乎乎的肺部图片可把他吓得不轻。
于是，他就开始慢慢减少抽烟量了。
要是没有政府这种大规模的宣传，老王可能还美滋滋地在烟民的道路上越走越远呢。
再来说说政府在建设健康基础设施方面的作用。
这就好比政府是一个神奇的建筑大师，它建造公园、健身房和各种运动设施。
比如说我们小区附近新建了一个小公园，里面有漂亮的跑道、健身器材，还有大片的绿地。
这可不得了，以前大家下班后都窝在家里当沙发土豆，现在呢，都纷纷跑到公园里散步、跑步、锻炼身体。
我自己就是受益者，以前我总是抱怨没地方锻炼，现在好了，公园就在家门口，我都养成了每天晚上去跑两圈的好习惯。
而且这些设施对不同年龄的人都有吸引力，小孩可以在绿地上玩耍，老人可以在健身器材那里活动活动筋骨。
还有哦，政府可以通过制定政策来引导健康生活。
这就像是给我们的生活制定了一套健康规则。
比如说，对那些健康食品可以给予一些补贴，这样超市里的新鲜水果、蔬菜价格就会更便宜，大家就更愿意去买。
而对于那些高热量、高脂肪的垃圾食品，政府可以多收点税，让它们的价格变得不那么“亲民”。
这样一来，大家在购买食品的时候就会多考虑一下健康因素。
我记得有段时间，我特别爱吃那些油炸的垃圾食品，可是当我发现它们的价格涨了不少后，我就觉得还是吃点新鲜水果和蔬菜划算多了，既健康又实惠。
不过呢，也有人会说，健康生活是自己的事情，政府管得是不是太宽了？但是我觉得啊，在这个快节奏的现代社会里，很多人都像没头的苍蝇一样，不知道什么才是真正对自己好的。
雅思政府类的英语作文范文
雅思政府类的英语作文范文政府应该做出更多的努力来促进替代能源。
你同意这个观点吗?为什么?下面有店铺整理的关于这个话题的英语作文，大家可以参考参考。
雅思英语作文【1】Governments should make more effort to promote alternative sources of energy.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?Model Answer:It has been known for some time now that a move towards sources of energy which are not carbon-based is urgently required to stop the effects of global warming. In my view, there are too few governments who seem to be promoting the use of other types of energy such as wind, wave, solar and nuclear sources of energy.Governments at present are too reliant on coil, oil and gas. Although some governments are doing research into the use of alternative energy sources, many are not. Energy from the wind, the sea and the sun does not pollute the environment and is an everlasting source of power. Nuclear power is clean, and although it is not totally unproblematic, it would provide a large amount of energy and dramatically improve the environment. Countries such as France have made good use of nuclear power.My feeling is that more use could be made of wind power. In some countries, there has been a reluctance to use wind turbines, even in areas which are not densely populated, as some people believe they are eyesores. Personally, I believe they are not only useful, but beautiful as well. Governments should spend more time and effort promoting the benefits of this source of energy and trying to make the public understand the reason for change.In conclusion, I believe that, if governments forced everyone to have a wind turbine and solar panels on the building they live in, made more use of wave power and built more nuclear power stations, then they would manage to avert the dangers that are seriously threatening the Earth.雅思英语作文【2】Some people say the government should not put money into building theatres and sports stadiums; they should spend more money on medical care and education.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?Model Answer:What would the world be like without Shakespeare or the Olympics? While medical care and education are perhaps the highest causes to which money can be contributed, the arts and athletics are in some ways just as valuable. So, to ask the government to not extend support to these two areas could be just as detrimental to the welfare of society as the lack of sufficient health care and education.The Romans believed in “mens sana in corpore sano”. In short, that there is indeed a correlation between a healthy body and healthy mind. When we are healthy, we feel better and so are more likely to be productive academically. Plus, the practice of sports can also teach us the very same discipline we need for our studies. Why even a brisk walk or watching an exciting athletic match can refresh the mind for greater work. Moreover, sports can serve to create healthier bodies, which in turn would serve as a form of “preventive medicine” thereby cutting down on medical costs. In the same vein, the arts are known to induce a sense of well-being in performers and audience alike, reducing mental problems and their associated physical manifestationsand again, medical costs. As such, building theatres and stadiums, which spur interest in the arts and sports respectively, actually would be practically identical to spending money on medical care and education!Now I realize the question specifically addresses the building of theatres and sports stadiums by government. Some people would contend athletics and the arts can still be enjoyed and practiced without such constructions. I would hazard that these buildings stand as the altars to the sports and arts worlds, inspiring would-be athletes and performers. Without such venues where would sports spectators and music aficionados be able to enjoy these events? Now some other people would also say business could support their construction, but we know the avarice of business could very likely jeopardize the lofty spirit of athletics and the arts just as well. Therefore, allowing government to retain some say in the matter on behalf of the people would, I believe, be in the best interest of the people.In short, as long as the government does not go overboard in its expenditures for these buildings and uses such venues for the benefit of all, then, as mentioned above, people will benefit in terms of both medical care and education as well. This is not to say the government should neglect medical care and education, but rather to think of this not as an either-or choice but as a win-win situation for all.雅思英语作文【3】The costs of medical health care are increasing all the time. Governments are finding it difficult to balance the health care budget.Should citizens be totally responsible for their own health costs and take out private health insurance, or is it better to havea comprehensive health care system which provides free health services for all? Discuss.Model Answer:A much debated issue these days is whether citizens should take out private health insurance or not. The cost of providing free medical care for both the wealthy and the poor is far too great for any government, and most people agree that if you can pay for insurance, you should. In this essay, I will argue that all who can afford it should be insured, but free medical care must be made available for those too poor to do so.The most important reason for encouraging people to take out private health insurance is the cost to the government of health care. Free health cover for people who are able to pay for it is a waste of public money. Of course, people will only pay health insurance premiums if they know that they are getting good value for their money. If they get sick, they should pay very little or nothing at all. In addition, the privately insured are entitled to special benefits such as having the choice of their own doctors, and being able to avoid long waiting lists for hospital beds.On the other hand, those who really cannot afford to pay private insurance premiums, which are often very high, are still entitled as citizens to the best medical care available –they cannot be expected to pay their own medical bills. However, if they are working, they should still pay a percentage of their wage (say 1 to 2%) as a tax which pays towards the cost of providing "free" medical services.In conclusion, most people should privately insure their health, but it is unreasonable to suppose that all citizens can afford it. Therefore, a safety net in the form of a basic free healthcare system must exist for the very poor and the unemployed.。
政府类雅思大作文写作
KanmyAll education, primary, secondary and further education, should be free to all people and paid for by the government. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?primary, secondary education paidby the statefurther education paid by citizens1.tax revenue come from citizens, should give citizens the welfare 3. provide more career opportunities and higher incomes2.benifit both individuals and the society ernment should provide scholarship and financial aidAs education becomes increasingly important, a certain amount of people hold a view that all education including primary, secondary and further education should be paid all by the government. I partly agree with this point of view.The funds of government most come from the tax revenue supported by the citizens; therefore, the state should pay the cost of primary and secondary education for all people to help them acquire good knowledge base. It is not fair if people contribute parts of the salary to their country but cannot enjoy the educational welfare. Furthermore, this practicemay not only benefit the individuals themselves, but also promote the economic and culture of the whole society as the fundamental education would improve the productivity and competitiveness of a country.However, the tuition fees of further education, from undergraduate to postgraduate, should be paid by the citizens themselves as further education such as bachelor degree, master degree and doctor degree could provide more career opportunities and higher incomes than primary and secondary education do after people accomplish their courses. More importantly, the state should establish the scholarship system for students who excel in academic courses and researches and offer financial aid such as loans for people who have the quality to receive further education but cannot afford the tuitions.In conclusion, it is essential that the spending of people attending primary and secondary schools should be paid by the government while citizens should pay for their tuitions but supported with scholarship and financial assistance by the state if people plan to attend further education.261words。
雅思写作分类范文之政府类
雅思写作分类范文之政府类雅思写作中遇到政府类的话题该怎么写呢？下面小编给大家分享几篇优秀范文。
雅思大作文范文：政府是否应该给医疗买单【政府类】Some people believe that the healthcare should be free for everyone，while others say that people should pay for their own health care. Discuss both sides and give your opinion 有人认为健康医疗对于每一个公民应该免费，有人认为个人应该承担医疗费用，讨论两种观点，给出你的意见。
【老师预测——原题压中，见前预测】【政府类】Some people say that the government should pay for the health care and education of its citizens, but other people say that it is not the government’s responsibility. Discuss the two opinions and give your views. 有人认为政府应该给公民的教育和医疗买单，有人认为这不是政府的责任，讨论两种观点，说明你的立场?【作家立场】我认为，享受免费的医疗是公民的一项基本权利。
同时，政府应该合理地分配医疗预算。
【思路拓展】〖政府给医疗买单的理由〗① 公民是纳税人，有享受免费医疗的权利。
政府是人民利益的代表，普及免费医疗可以还利于民。
② 政府的医疗上的援助可以使得很多患病的，同时来自贫困家庭的人得到及时的治疗，这有助于提高政府的威信，以及增强民众的民族自豪感。
③ 普及免费医疗可以公民的健康指数，因此提高国民的基本素质，增强一个国家在国际舞台的竞争力。
〖反对政府给医疗买单的理由〗① 政府的财政有限，但是，要解决的民生问题是无穷的，完全普及免费医疗会无疑增加政府的财政压力。
雅思写作政府类范文
雅思写作政府类范文在当今社会，关于政府是否应该为全体民众提供免费医疗这个话题一直备受争议。
就像一场激烈的辩论赛，正反双方都有各自强大的论据。
让我们来看看那些支持政府提供免费医疗的观点吧。
想象一下，有个生病的穷人，本来就因为生病而痛苦不堪，如果还要为医疗费用发愁，那简直就是雪上加霜啊。
免费医疗就像是黑暗中的一束光，对于低收入群体来说，这可能是他们获得救治的唯一希望。
政府这么做就像是一个超级英雄，守护着每一个公民的健康。
而且，从整个社会的角度来看，当大家都能得到及时的医疗救治时，那些传染病之类的疾病就能得到更好的控制。
这就好比在一个小区里，如果有一户人家有老鼠，但是他没钱买老鼠药，最后老鼠可能就会跑到其他人家去。
疾病也是一样的道理，免费医疗可以防止疾病在社会上大规模传播，对整个社会的稳定和发展有着不可忽视的意义。
但是呢，那些反对政府提供免费医疗的人也有他们的说法。
有人会说，政府的钱也不是大风刮来的啊。
要实现免费医疗，那得花多少钱啊？这就像要填满一个无底洞一样。
可能政府就得提高税收来筹集资金，这就好比从大家的口袋里多掏钱。
对于那些努力工作、收入还不错的人来说，可能会觉得有点不公平。
他们辛辛苦苦赚的钱，要拿出一部分来为别人的医疗买单。
而且，一旦医疗免费了，可能会出现一些人滥用医疗资源的情况。
就像有些人有点小毛病就往医院跑，占用了那些真正急需医疗救助的人的资源。
这就好比在餐厅里，有人明明不饿，却占着位置一直吃，让那些真正饿的人没地方坐。
在我看来呢，政府确实应该朝着为全民提供免费医疗这个方向努力，但不能一蹴而就。
政府可以先从一些基本的、常见的疾病开始提供免费治疗，就像先在地上铺几块砖，然后慢慢地把路铺好。
同时，要建立完善的医疗资源分配制度，避免资源的浪费和滥用。
就像在游乐园里，要安排好每个游乐设施的排队秩序一样，让真正需要的人能够优先得到医疗服务。
这样，既能保障公民的健康权益，又能合理利用资源，让政府的钱花在刀刃上。
雅思大作文真题之议论文优秀范文：政府类
雅思大作文真题之议论文优秀范文：政府类今天三立在线教育雅思网为大家带来的是雅思大作文真题之议论文优秀范文之政府类的相关资讯，备考的烤鸭们，赶紧来看看吧！Question 2Governmentsshould introduce healthcare which prevents illness rather than cures it.Howfar do you agree with this statement?Key words analysisgovernment: 政府，这里加了s.表示各国政府introduce: 介绍，这里表示引进，鼓励cure: 治疗Argument:这是属于议论文中的argument类型，通常会在agree或disagree之间进行选择。
但是该题特别提到说how far do you agree or disagree，那么我们最好是能够讨论到这个事件的两个方面，然后给出自己的意见。
Possible reasons:预防比治愈的成本小政府有责任去引导正确的生活方式，减少疾病率有些病是不能只预防的，所以同时治疗系统要完善Model Essay 1 –Part 1IntroductionHealthcare is very important for everyonein the world but it can be very expensive. Many people believe that governmentsshould try to prevent illness by making sure everyone in their country has ahealthy lifestyle. I agree that preventing illness is better than curing it.Main body 1The cost of medical treatment can be highso governments have to think of ways to encourage people to be healthier. Ifpeople are healthy, they will not need medical care so often. Many diseases canbe prevented if people have good diets, take exercise and give up unhealthyhabits such as smoking. If people cannot work or care for themselves or theirfamily due to illness, this will cost governments and taxpayers a lot of money.In my opinion, governments should spend money on producing information leafletsand films which encourage people to follow healthy lifestyles, such as eatingplenty of fruit and vegetables, taking regular exercise and giving up smoking. Governmentsshould also try to reduce environmental pollution because this can causeillness and health problems.Model Essay 1 –Part 2Main body 2However, having a healthy lifestyle cannotprevent all health problems. There are many diseases, such as cancer, which area result of living in the modern world and which cannot be prevented by ahealthy lifestyle. Accidents at work or on theroads will also cause injurieswhich need medical treatment. If governments focus mainly on prevention, theremay be less money for urgent healthcare and many people could suffer.ConclusionIn conclusion, I believe that governmentsshould provide a balance of prevention and treatment because of the differenttypes of health problem, but their main focus should be on prevention ratherthan cure.如上就是三立网课教育小编为大家带来的雅思大作文真题之议论文优秀范文之政府类的相关资讯，掌握最新雅思资讯，敬请关注（三立在线教育雅思网）更多雅思考试资讯以及备考资料免费领！。
雅思大作文政府类
其次，政府是人民的代表，有这个责任。而且政府付钱有利于 维护社会稳定性。
最后，可以减轻人们的经济负担，提高人们的生活水平。当然 反过来可以从政府的财政预算是有限的，要致力于很多基础设 施建设， 从子女后代也可以承担部分责任。
social stability 社会稳定 prerequisite 前提 the representative of people 人民代表 corresponding 相应的 in consideration of 考虑到 social welfare 社会福利 financial burden 财政负担 tax revenue 税收 immense contribution to 对…有巨大贡献 rudimentary 根本的 physical inferiority 身体劣势 offspring/descendant 后代 improve people's living standard 提高人们的生活水平 tighten one's belt 勒紧裤腰带，生活拮据
commercialisation of housing unaffordable to low-income families economical housing government intervention the housing affordability gap widens
国际援助
Some people think that rich countries giving international aid to the poor countries has positive impact. Others argue that it may lead to problems. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 题目解析：国际援助是积极还是消极，需要讨论两边再给出 自己的观点。这道题需要对两边进行辩证思考。
雅思写作大作文-政府类范文
雅思写作大作文-政府类范文Question：The best way for the government to solve traffic congestion is to provide free public transportation 24 hours a day 7 days a week. To what extent do you agree or disagree?Model Answer：“Getting somewhere” is a concept—despite its original meaning of “succeeding in something”—that plagues the general public around the world. To cope with thetraffic, governments are believed to be able to help by providing free public transport around the clock.This essay disapprove of the practicality and validity in the practice.It is admittedly true that public transport is certainly appealing, especially when it is offered free and 24/7. With no fees incurred, most if not all commuters will favour public transport regardless of such downsides as relatively prolonged trip and less comfortable experience. Also,should passengers choose public transport, their road safety would be enhanced for the insurance attached to their fare and when they travel at an inconvenient/late hour.However, it is impractical to implement all-day free public transport service. The first and obvious obstacle is finance. Most countries are operating public transportation system as a public service with governmental subsidy, and thus free public transport might be financially impossible. Moreover, all-day public transport is theoretically redundant and with few precedents, and thefor that is little to none.To further the argument, the measure in the topic lacks rationale. Apparently, an population will most likely incurs more traffic, and in that sense, population control instead of free transport would be the key. More profoundly, reasons for ever-heavier traffic are urbanisation and city planning. With the influx of population, cities are forced to expand in area and accordingly traffic mounts. Also, civil planning without a vision adds to traffic problems—trips to places with congested traffic around are sometimes unavoidable.In sum, free and all-day public transport service is not the cure to congested traffic because it not financially feasible and does not address the issues behind the problem.。
雅思写作大作文8：政府投资？（5篇范文）
雅思写作大作文8：政府投资？（5篇范文）第一篇：雅思写作大作文8：政府投资？雅思写作大作文范文8：政府投资？雅思写作中大作文占的比重颇高，话题涵盖学术、生活等各个领域。
100教育小编为你整理了雅思写作大作文范文，以下是关于政府投资，希望对考生们有所帮助！Topic: Some people argue that the government should spend money only on medical care and education but not on theatres or sport stadiums.Do you agree or disagree?政府投资教育和医疗的好处：• 教育可以帮助人们摆脱贫穷（break the cycle of poverty);如果没有政府资助，穷人的孩子上不起大学，那么他们可能代代贫穷(remain poor throughout their lifespan and even across generations.)；• 教育可以提高一个人的工作能力（improve productivity),从而提高一个国家的产出能力，对国家的繁荣(prosperity)有着深远的影响（havefar-reaching effects);• 完善的医疗健康服务（high quality and availability of health care)可以赢得人们对国家的忠诚度(win the loyalty),使人们愿意在一个国家生活和工作，以此留住有生产能力和技术的工作者(productive and skilledworkers)；为残疾人、退休者及贫穷的人提供帮助（render assistance to the disabled, retired and disadvantaged)；提高国民的健康(improve health)；• 体育设施和歌剧院有私人企业赞助(privately financed),而且大部分时间只符合少数人的兴趣。
雅思考试大作文范文政府类
雅思考试大作文范文政府类雅思写作是雅思考试中非常重要的一部分,同时也是广大考友们必须攻克的一大难关。
下面是店铺整理的一些雅思考试大作文范文，以供大家学习参考。
雅思大作文题目：Some people think that thegovernment should provide assistance to all kindsof artists includes painters, musicians, poets,however, other people think that is a waste ofmoney for providing this assistance. State youropinion.雅思大作文范文：To be of assistance or not, it indeed isdebatable if artists deserve and require funding bythe government. Firstly, I acknowledge that thebenefits from artists and poets can enrich oureveryday lives in so many different ways; otherwiseour life would have been a lot drabber without them.Any genuine artist most certainly deserves some form of aid and there can not be anydoubt about that, however, whether they require government assistance is another issuealtogether. Contrary to popular belief it seems to be that not all artists and literarypersonalities are wealthy, and most renowned personalities are deservedly rich and famous.While the other large group of artists is neither rich nor famous, they do continue toproduce the art works as for the passion and often the passion is what drives them. Itwould be ridiculous to think that any kind of financial incentives could power their creativity.However, not many of them are able to take up their passion on a full time basis because theycannot afford to. It is import to note that most creative artists are made, and were not bornso. It is the vagaries of life & struggles that theyhave to face which fuels their creativity,in the process they need to mature into renowned to be an artist or a writer. When they doand when their work is recognized, there will not be any dearth of money or fame.In my opinion, it would be criminal to take away this very drive and shun their creativity.Having said that, I do believe that they need to have some kind of incentives, it can be in theway of appreciation and opportunity to present their talent to the rest of the world. Thiscould be done in various ways, for instance, giving tax incentives to amateur artists and writersor financial rebates in government owned auditoriums to stage their presentations.In talking about artists in Australia, which has a concrete social security system in placeto take care of all kinds of basic needs, any kind of added financial incentives are not only anadded burden on the taxpayer. It would be an issue to find out worthy beneficiaries and therewill be enough crooks who will misuse any well intended government assistance schemes.Every human being craves for recognition and money happens to be one of the meanstowards this end, however, as I mentioned in the beginning it is more important toacknowledge their work than provide financial assistance.On the other hand, as a Chinese, my perception of the government's assistance is morequestionable. Firstly, we need to give artists a definition and how do you classify a personwho is an artist. In essence, calligraphy, poetry, music and art they all can be extended to aperson who writes well, paints well in his/her Blog. To extend this artist sense further, can wesay a singer is an artist? Well, there are many pop song and folk music singers in China. In thesame way, a dancer, a talk show's talent, a movie star,the director, the photographer theycan all be artists. And this number of artists would add up to whole population of Australia.How could the Chinese government provide any assistance without any discrimination tothose artists in every classification? I personally do not believe our government has enoughfinancial ability to accommodate this wide ganging number of artists.As a Chinese I can see that in my country, there is still a big gap between the poor and therich, I would rather government's financial assistance be directed toward the poor, this doesnot mean that I would think to provide assistance to artists is a waste of money. My point isthat while we can give a true definition of artists, government should use our taxes in a way tobe more accountable for.雅思大作文题目：The government should control the amountof violence in films and on television in order todecrease the violent crimes in society. To whatextent do you agree or disagree with this issue?雅思大作文范文：Violence appears more and more often in filmsand on television. Requests are made that thegovernment should take action because it leads tothe rise of violent crimes in society. However, somepeople think differently.They say that instead of inducing people tocommit a crime, violence onTV helps people to release the stress put on them by the fast pace of the modern societyand thus reduces the chance for them to break the law. The employee who was severelycriticized by the boss at work may feel relieved when he returns home and sees a strong manbeing punched in his face on TV.Admittedly, that may be one little good effect of violence on screen, but the side effect ofit is much serious and should not be ignored. As was mentioned in the beginning of the essay,violence on screen does result in more crimes in real life. For one thing, teenagers are good atintimating and they have a strong desire to release their extra energy. One good example ofthis is the notorious campus gun shot case in the US. The criminal, a university student, whoshot several of his teachers and fellow students, confessed that a violent movie inspired stly, violence in films and television fills people’s mind with evil and hatred. We certainlyshould be shown the better side of our society if we want to decrease the violent crimes.To sum up, in order to have fewer violent crimes in society, violence on screen should becontrolled.雅思大作文范文：政府补贴艺术工作者Traditional arts civilized a nation. Do you thinkgovernment should subsidize musicians, artists,actors or drama companies? What should agovernment do?Traditional arts, as valuable cultural relics of anation, are disappearing far away from the modernsociety. China, as one of the highly-civilized countriesin the world, abound in various forms of traditionalarts, such as painting, calligraphy, music,architecture and dramas, which are not only ournational cultural treasures, but also a rich fortune ofthe world.As essence of a local culture, traditional arts reflect a nation’s artistic talents andtraditions. For example, water-color painting depicts a harmony between people and nature.Architecture illustrates a nation’s aesthetic value and religious belief. Cathedrals, highlighted byGothic style in the Medieval, represent Christianity. Pagodas, totally different fromcathedralsstylistically, are a symbol of Buddhism. Peking Opera describes the history of our country.However, traditional arts are leaving contemporary people further and further away, oneof the main reasons for which is that the authorities concerned and some institutes lack fundsand professionals, which are quite essential to the research and promotion of traditionalculture. Another radical reason should be attributed to the impact of western cultures ontraditions. Young people, especially youngsters, are addicted to western music like rock and roll,without any knowledge about traditional musical instruments. With the economic globalization,traditional culture and arts will be in the danger of assimilation. How to maintain and developtraditional arts becomes the biggest concern of a government. (105 words)Firstly, the government should lay a fund for the research and promotion of traditionalarts. Secondly, the research institutes and universities should work out a long-term developingscheme, organizing systematic research on traditional arts. Arts belong to a nation and thewhole world as well. The prosperity of traditional arts will diversify the culture of the world.。
雅思大作文 2政府
雅思大作文题材分类——第2类政府Topic 6: Many countries spend a lot of money in art. Some people think investment in art is necessary, but others say money is better spent public services and facilities. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Topic 7: Instead of asking government to bear the cost of higher education, students should pay tuition fees themselves. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?Topic 8: Some people say that the government should ensure that people lead a healthy life, while others believe that individuals should have their own choices. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.Topic 9: The society is based on rules and laws. The society would not function well if individuals were free to do whatever they want. To what extent do you agree or disagree?Topic 10: Economic progress is one way to measure the success of one country, while some people think there are other factors are also important. What other factors should be considered? Within these factors, do you think anyone is more important than the others?Topic 11: Some people believe that they should be able to keep all the money they earn and should not pay any tax to the state. To what extent do you agree or disagree?。
与政府工作的风险雅思作文
与政府工作的风险雅思作文在很多人眼里，政府工作就像是捧着一个金饭碗，稳定又体面。
但朋友们，这工作可不像表面看起来那么轻松，实际上也是存在不少风险的呢。
首先啊，公众压力那可是一座大山。
政府工作人员就像是站在舞台中央的演员，一举一动都被台下的观众——老百姓盯着呢。
只要政策有一点没落实好，或者有个什么小失误，那批评声就像潮水一样涌来。
比如说要搞个城市建设项目，要是因为一些不可预见的因素导致工期拖延了，老百姓可不管你背后有啥困难，投诉电话估计就得被打爆了。
这就像你在厨房做饭，食客们都在门口等着，你要是稍微慢一点或者菜的味道不对，那可就麻烦大了。
再说说媒体的影响吧。
现在媒体那是无孔不入啊，政府的任何事情都可能被放到聚光灯下。
一个小新闻瞬间就能变成大热点。
就好比你在政府部门负责一个小小的环保宣传活动，要是在活动过程中出了点小岔子，比如说宣传资料上有个小错误，媒体可不会轻易放过。
这就像你在学校犯了个小错，结果被全校广播通报批评一样尴尬。
而且一旦上了媒体的负面报道，想要挽回形象那可得费好大的劲儿，就像在泥地里想要拔腿走出来一样艰难。
当然啦，内部管理也是个头疼的事儿。
政府部门的层级和规章制度比较复杂，就像一个有着无数个小齿轮的大机器。
要是在这个复杂的体系里协调不好关系，比如说和上级领导或者同事之间有了矛盾或者沟通不畅，那工作可就难以开展了。
这就像你在一个多人合作的团队项目里，和队友闹别扭了，那这个项目肯定是要受到影响的。
不过呢，虽然有这么多风险，但政府工作也有着它独特的意义和魅力。
这些风险就像是游戏里的关卡，闯过了就能获得成就感，并且为社会做出更大的贡献。
但不管怎么说，在考虑进入政府工作的时候，可不能只看到它光鲜的一面，还得把这些风险好好掂量掂量呢。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
关于负责人相关的话题，倾向于选择政府负责人比较好。
首先政府的收入来自人们的税收，所以人们享受相应的权利。
其次，政府是人民的代表，有这个责任。而且政府付钱有利于 维护社会稳定性。
最后，可以减轻人们的经济负担，提高人们的生活水平。当然 反过来可以从政府的财政预算是有限的，要致力于很多基础设 施建设，
题目解析：国际援助是积极还是消极，需要讨论两边再给出 自己的观点。这道题需要对两边进行辩证思考。
从主客体的角度出发，从穷国和富国的优缺点入手。
首先，应该给予国际援助是因为国际援助能够救助穷国家人的 生命，维护基础设施建设，摆脱贫困等。从主体来讲也能为富 国树立一个比较好的国际形象。
然后，造成的问题是这些援助可能会被当地政府误用，不能最 终帮助穷国家。而且富的国家也会有穷人，有违公平问题等。
and civil society增加透明度和私营部分对公众事业的参与
养老责任
Some people say that it is the responsibility of individuals to save money for their own care after they retire. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
impoverished country 贫困国家
suffer from starvation and poverty 遭受贫困和饥饿
be regarded as 被认为
infrastructural construction 基础设施建设
lead deprived lives 过着贫困生活
taxpayer 纳税者
谢谢
tighten one's belt 勒紧裤腰带，生活拮据
政府投资
All education, primary, secondary and further education, should be free to all people and paid for by the government. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
responsibility/obligation 责任、义务
be conducive to 对…有好处
be entitled to 有权利
minimize the possibility of 减少…可能性
国际援助
Some people think that rich countries giving international aid to the poor countries has positive impact. Others argue that it may lead to problems. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
house allocation system
dampen the ehthusiasm of individuals in housing investment降低私人投资热情
a grave shortage in the investment in house construction 房屋建设的投资少
combat corruption 腐败斗争
humanitave道德上的必要性
ease tention缓和紧张关系
increase accountability增加责任度
transparency and the involvement of the private sector
The advocate of international aid believe that countries have a moral obligationt help each other, while the opponents consider it unnecessary, because money is misspent by the government that receive it. Discuss these tow points of view and give your opinion.
健康医疗
It is more important for the government to spend money on promoting the healthy lifestyle to prevent the illness than to spend money treating people who are already ill. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
tax revenue 税收
immense contribution to 对…有巨大贡献
rudimentary 根本的
physical inferiority 身体劣势
offspring/descendant 后代
improve people's living standard 提高人们的生活水平
release the pressure of society
fianancial assistance
break the cycle of poverty
remain poor throughout their lifespan and even across generations
improve productivity
住房分配会降低私人投资热情 房地产是一个大产业，对经济发展有重要意义 当市场占据主导地位，政府对房屋市场的控制会导致单调，不 能满足城市居民对生活条件的高要求
commercialisation of housing unaffordable to low-income families economical housing government intervention the housing affordability gap widens the direct result of overcrowding and overpopulation zoning policies划地政策 housing allowance住房补贴
benifit both individuals and the society
provide more career opportunities and higher incomes
government should provide scholarship and financial aid
从子女后代也可以承担部分责任。
social stability 社会稳定
prerequisite 前提
the representative of people 人民代表
corresponding 相应的
in consideration of 考虑到
social welfare 社会福利
financial burden 财政负担
雅思作文Part 2 —Government
Presentor—Susan
政府类
国防（defense）：保护一个国家免受攻击（protect a country against attack or other threats）
保证法律和公共秩序（enforcement of law and public order)
政府运作（operation of government） 政府职能（government function） 社会保障（social security） 医疗保健（health care system） 福利（welfare） 退休和残疾人福利（retirement and disabilitybenefits）
well-being 幸福
ailment 疾病
go hand in hand 密切相关
complementary factors 互补因素
timely medical attention and cure 及时的医疗关注和治疗
lead a healthy and sound life 倡导健康的生活
题目解析：教育是不是应该由政府来买单。政府职能的话题
首先政府的收入来自人们的税收，所以人们享受相应的权利。
其次，提供了更多的就业机会和更高的收入
政府可以提供奖学金和救学援助从子女后代也可以承担部分责 任。
tax revenue come from citizens, should give citizens the welfare
ease the housing pressure减轻住房压力
the fundamental rele占主导地位
construction quality建筑工程质量
monotonous cityscape单一的城市景观（uniformity of house design)
comprehensive requiements on living conditions对生活 的高要求
题目解析：一些人认为政府花钱促进人们健康的生活方式来 预防疾病比花钱治疗已经病的人更重要。同意或者不同意。
很多疾病是无法治愈的，比如说癌症，所以健康的生活方式是 维持健康的根本方法。
倡导健康的生活方式也是政府的责任。但是给予生病的人经济 上的帮助也是必须的，因为人们有权利享受社会福利。
suffer from 遭受
have far-reaching effects
政府调配职能
Only government action can solve housing shortages in big cities. To what extent do you agree or disagree？ 题目解析：支持政府调控房地产的原因 房屋商业化最大的受害人是低收入家庭—政府开发经济适用房， 对房地产行业进行干预 住房购买力缺口大，租金不断增加，低收入家庭没能力买房 人口过多，拥挤造成住房紧缺