一定要知道的GRE写作四大潜规则

一定要知道的GRE写作四大潜规则

一定要知道的GRE写作四大潜规则，快来一起看看吧，分享下面就和大家分享，来欣赏一下吧。

一定要知道的GRE写作四大潜规则

一、娴熟掌握GRE写作题库

为了到达公正，ETS发布了它考试的一切写作题库，那么为了到达能和native speaker一同竞赛，考生应当在考前对一切标题都进行预习(节省考试时的审题时间)，并经过100-150个提纲的写作了解gre写作的通常构造，经过30-50篇写作来操练自个的写作思路和表达。对题库中的标题越娴熟，对考试越有利。

二、新GRE写作投合评卷人的评卷思路

每个评卷人对你*的评阅非常快，不行能对每个细节都很细心地去看。考生应当投合评卷人的评卷思路，用最规范的构造和最清晰的表达来表现自个的思路：首段要明显地提出观念，中心阶段层次要摆开，每段的开端应当就是该段的topic sentence。

三、新GRE写作的评分重视三方面

首要，从ETS发布的各分数段评分标准看，其评分首要重视以下三个方面：

①、逻辑剖析才能(请求insightful)sanas②、*的安排(请求well-organized)

③、言语才能(请求standard written English; concise; varied structure等)

四、尽量进步AI有些的写作才能而力保AA有些满分

因为AA的写作不牵涉自个观念的打开，只须指出作者逻辑上的缝隙，因此在经过训练以后，写起来并不艰难;而AI的写作需求自个打开自个建立的观念，不光需求逻辑上的洞察才能，还需求证明观念的才能，言语安排的才能，因此关于我国考生来讲对比艰难，难以短期内有较大进步。

GRE重点话题之质疑精神

Skepticism

Skepticism refers to the philosophic position holding that the possibility of knowledge is limited either because of the limitations of the mind or because of the inaccessibility of its object. It is more loosely used to denote any questioning attitude. Extreme skepticism holds that no knowledge is possible, but this is logically untenable since the statement contradicts itself. During the

Renaissance the influence of ancient skepticism was reflected preeminently in the writings of the 16th-century French philosophical essayist Michel de Montaigne. The greatest exponent of modern skepticism was the 18th-century Scottish empiricist philosopher David Hume. In his Treatise of Human Nature

(1739-1740) and An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding (1748), Hume questions the possibility of demonstrating the truth of beliefs about the external world, causal connections, future events, or such metaphysical entities as the soul and God. The

18th-century German philosopher Immanuel Kant, while attempting to overcome Humes skepticism, denied the possibility

of knowing things in themselves or of achieving metaphysical knowledge. In the 19th century, the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche denied the possibility of complete objectivity, and thus of objective knowledge, in any field. The 20th-century American philosopher George Santayana, claiming to have taken Humes skepticism a step further, maintained, in his work Scepticism and Animal Faith (1923), that belief in the existence of anything, including oneself, rests on a natural, but irrational impulse. Elements of skepticism may be found in other modern schools of philosophy, including pragmatism, analytic and linguistic philosophy, and existentialism.

Philosophical skepticism

In philosophical skepticism, pyrrhonism is a position that refrains from making truth claims. A philosophical skeptic does not claim that truth is impossible (which would be a truth claim). The label is commonly used to describe other philosophies which appear similar to philosophical skepticism, such as "academic" skepticism, an ancient variant of Platonism that claimed knowledge of truth was impossible. Empiricism is a closely related, but not identical, position to philosophical skepticism. Empiricists see empiricism as a pragmatic compromise between philosophical skepticism and nomothetic science; philosophical skepticism is in turn sometimes referred to as "radical empiricism."

Philosophical skepticism originated in ancient Greek philosophy. One of its first proponents was Pyrrho of Elis (c.

360-275 B.C.), who traveled and studied as far as India, and propounded the adoption of practical skepticism. Subsequently, in the New Academy Arcesilaos (c. 315-241 B.C.) and Carneades (c. 213-129 B.C.) developed more theoretical perspectives, by which conceptions of absolute truth and falsity were refuted. Carneades criticized the views of the Dogmatists, especially supporters of Stoicism, asserting that absolute certainty of knowledge is