2016上海交通大学MTI考研真题(英语翻译基础)(回忆版)
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
2016上海交通大学MTI考研真题(英语翻译基础)(回忆版)考完了,还有点记忆,给大家分享
一、短语英翻中(15)
1、founding shareholder
2、Caucasian
3、Trans-Pacific Partnership
4、Laser range finder
5、nip slip
6、Thousand-Year Reich
7、Charlatan
8、greenhorn
9、sensitized paper
10、harassing phone call
11、adjunct professor
12、animal shelter
13、IPO
14、homo sapiens
15、non-fossil fuel
二、短语中翻英(15)
1、外汇储备
2、简政放权
3、衣冠礼乐
4、一带一路
5、第三方评估
6、节能减排
7、中华老字号
8、西湖风情
9、闲人免进
10、品牌代言人
11、水货
12、社会主义核心价值观
13、正能量
14、禅宗
15、月嫂
三、英翻中(120)
Are the risks greatly exaggerated, or conversely are they underestimated? Does it stand to reason that today’s human population of almost seven billion, with our potent modern technology, is causing our environment to crumble globally at a much more rapid rate than a mere few million people with stone and wooden tools already made it crumble locally in the past? Will modern technology solve our problems, or is it creating new problems faster than it solves old ones? When we deplete one resource (e.g., wood, oil, or ocean fish), can we count on being able to substitute some new resource (e.g., plastics, wind and solar energy, or farmed fish)?
Isn’t the rate of human population growth declining, such that we’re already on course for the world’s population to level off at some manageable number of people?
All of these questions illustrate why those famous collapses of past civilizations have taken on more meaning than just that of a romantic mystery. Perhaps there are some practical lessons that we could learn from all those past collapses. We know that some past societies collapsed while others didn’t: what made certain societies especially vulnerable? What, exactly, were the processes by which past societies committed ecocide? Why did some past societies fail to see the messes that they were getting into, and that (one would think in retrospect) must have been obvious? Which were the solutions that succeeded in the past? If we could answer these questions, we might be able to identify which
societies are now most at risk, and what measures could best help them, without waiting for more Somalia-like collapses.
But there are also differences between the modern world and its problems, and those past societies and their problems. We shouldn’t be so naïve as to think that study of the past will yield simple solutions, directly transferable to our societies today. We differ from past societies in some respects that put us at lower risk than them; some of those respects often mentioned include our powerful technology (i.e., its beneficial effects), globalization, modern medicine, and greater knowledge of past societies and of distant modern societies. We also differ from past societies in some respects that put us at greater risk than them: mentioned in that connection are, again, our potent technology (i.e., its unintended destructive effects), globalization (such that now a collapse even in remote Somalia affects the U.S. and Europe), the dependence of millions (and, soon, billions) of us on modern medicine for our survival, and our much larger human population. Perhaps we can still learn from the past, but only if we think carefully about its lessons.
三、中翻英(60)
没找到相应文章,也就是讲阿里巴巴的三个主营业务,第一是淘宝网和天猫商城,……,第二是支付宝,……,第三个是……,阿里巴巴于 1999 年成立,通过旗下三个交易市场协助世界各地数以百万计的买家和供货商从事网上生意。
真不记得了,sorry