雅思写作易犯错误点
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
雅思写作易犯错误点
一些“学霸”的雅思阅读和听力能上8分,但是写作却迟迟不上6分,写作成了他们听说读写中的拉分项和申请名校的绊脚石,这让许多烤鸭“迷惑不解”甚至“灰心丧气”。
下面我就和大家共享雅思索试阅历写作突破6.5分技巧,来观赏一下吧。
雅思写作避开这四项错误
第一,不要字体潦草。
其次,不要单边论证。
第三,不要错误太多。
第四,不要规律混乱。
第一点要牢记的是,千万不要字体潦草,难以辨认。
许多考生认为字体不重要,平常写字就龙飞凤舞,到了考场时间紧急,字体更加潦草,难以辨认,给考官阅卷带来困难。
字体不好会不会影响分数? 想想看,考官是通过阅读你写的文字来了解你的观点和思路,判定你的写作水平,而每篇文章通常只有2—3分钟的阅卷时间,假如字体潦草,难以辨认,影响了考官的阅读和理解,势必会影响分数,所以友爱的考生们,肯定要字迹工整清楚啊!
其次点要牢记的是,千万不要单边论证,结构失衡。
在雅思大作文题目中,通常都有两个对立面需要去分别阐述和论证,假如你只说其一,不说其二,片面看待问题,很简单造成写作偏题,结构失衡,因此而失分。
比如下面这个题目:
Some people think money which the government spends on art, such as music and painting, would be better spent on things more important. Do you agree or disagree?
该题话题属于政府支出类,题目中有两个对立面,分别是art和things more important,都需要阐述。
而有的同学只写things more important,比如教育和医疗,忽视其对立面art,那么这样的文章就是偏题,没有完全回应题目的要求,会因此而失分。
考生在审题的时候,肯定要把握住题目中的对立面,正方和反方都要有相应的主体段落。
第三点要牢记的是,千万不要语法错误太多、用词不当。
6分的作文,是一篇可读性较强的文章,可以是简洁句为主,复合句为辅,语法错误很少,读起来通顺流畅。
许多考生误以为“牛”的文章就是大词长词、从句套从句,因此他们过于追求生僻的词汇和简单的句型,常常消失用词错误和语法错误。
殊不知这样错误百出的文章,在考官眼里只是“学校生作文”,很难上6分。
因此,笔者建议考生尽量选择有把握的常用词汇,力求写出符合英语语法的精确句子,多写多练,提高表达的精确性,这样就离6分越来越近了。
第四点要牢记的是,千万不要规律混乱,思维跳动。
有的考生在论证观点时不符合常理和规律,比如在论证因果关系时,不是从缘由到结果一步一步往下推动,而是想到哪说到哪,思维跳动,缺乏规律。
这样的文章,考官读起来可能感到不知所云。
其实在论证时,并不需要高深莫测的思想和标新立异的观点,只要把论点合理绽开,解释清
晰,符合常理和规律就可以了。
雅思写作Task2社会类考官范文
Write about the following topic:
In most countries multinational companies and their products are becoming more and more important. This trend is seriously damaging our quality of life.
Do you agree or disagree?
Model Answer:
Multinational companies nowadays find it convenient both to market their goods all over the world and set up production facilities wherever they find it convenient. In my opinion this has had an adverse effect on our quality of life in three main areas.
The first area is their products. Supporters of globalization would argue that multinational companies make high-quality goods available to more people. While this may be true to some extent, it also means that we have less choice of products to consume. When powerful multinational companies invade local markets with their goods, they often are obliged local companies with fewer resources to go out of business. In consequence, we are obliged to buy multinational products whether we like them or not.
This brings me to my second point. It is sometimes said that multinational companies and globalisation are making societies more
open. This may be true. However, I would point out that as a result the human race is losing its cultural diversity. If we consumed varied products, societieswherever we live would be more varied. This can be seen by the fact that we all shop in identicalmultinational supermarkets and buy identical products wherever we live.
Thirdly, defenders of multinational companies often point out that they provide jobs. Although this is undoubtedly true, it also means that we have become more valnurable on them, which in turn makes us more vulnerable to their decisions. When, for example, a multinational decides to move its production facilities to another country, this has an adverse effect on its workers who lose their jobs.
All in all, I believe that if we as voters pressured our governments to make multinational companies more responsible and to protect local producers from outside competition, we could have the benefits of globalisation without its disadvantages.
雅思写作Task2社会类考官范文
Write about the following topic:
Modern lifestyles mean that many parents have little time for their children. Many children suffer because they do not get as much attention from their parents as children did in the past.
Do you agree or disagree?
Model Answer:
People who argue that nowadays parents give less attention to their children than in the past are frequently looking back to a brief period of time in the twentieth century when mothers in middle-class families remained at home to look after their children. What these people are suggesting is that women nowadays should not go out to work.
The fact of the matter is that in the majority of families in the past both parents worked much longer hours than they do nowadays. What has changed is that now in most countries their children attend school rather than also working themselves. In that sense they may have less contact with their parents.
Nowadays, as a result of acquiring an education, children come into contact with teachers who naturally have to explain why some of their students are failing. What teachers come up with are frequent stories of parents who are simply too busy for their children. And if children are not supervised by their parents, they will often underperform at school. However, academic failure is nothing new even when one or both parents are at home. If children are neglected by their parents, they will suffer.
In my opinion, children probably suffered more in the past when the whole family was obliged to work long hours just to survive. Nowadays children are protected by the law. Moreover access to education means that they have greater opportunities than ever before.
英语写作。