Test Case WM Stock Transfer to Kanban

合集下载

Wi-Fi_Equipment_Catalog_v14.0

$XJXVW 2012 Version 1 .Wi-Fi Alliance Test Bed Equipment CatalogWi-Fi Alliance CONFIDENTIALWi-Fi Alliance Test Bed Equipment CatalogTable of Contents∙ Steps to OrderingPage 2 ∙ Instructions to Obtain Drivers & Downloads Page 3 ∙ Wi-Fi Alliance Test Bed Summary PagePage 4Wi-Fi Alliance Test Beds∙ Wi-Fi Alliance Test Bed - WPA2 Page 5∙ Wi-Fi Alliance Test Bed - WMM Page 6 ∙ Wi-Fi Alliance Test Bed - WPA2 and WMM Combo Page 7 ∙ Wi-Fi Alliance Test Bed - WMM-Power SavePage 8∙ Wi-Fi Alliance Test Bed - Wi-Fi Protected Setup 2 Page 9 ∙ Wi-Fi Alliance Test Bed - Approved 11n Page 10 ∙ Wi-Fi Alliance Test Bed - Voice PersonalPage 11∙ Wi-Fi Alliance Test Bed - Direct Page 12 ∙ Wi-Fi Alliance Test Bed - Protected Management Frames Page 13 ∙ Wi-Fi Alliance Test Bed - Admission ControlPage 14∙ Wi-Fi Alliance Test Bed - Voice Enterprise Page 15 ∙ Wi-Fi Alliance Test Bed - Admission Control - Voice Enterprise Page 16 ∙ Wi-Fi Alliance Test Bed - PasspointPage 17∙ Wi-Fi Alliance Test Bed - Tunneled Direct Link Setup Page 18 ∙ Wi-Fi Alliance Test Bed - Servers and Supplicants Page 19 ∙ Wi-Fi Alliance Test Bed - Chariot 6.7 Page 20 ∙ Wi-Fi Alliance Test Bed - Special DevicesPage 21 ∙About TESSCO & the Wi-Fi Alliance PartnershipPage 22Wi-Fi Alliance Test Bed Equipment CatalogSteps to OrderingStep 1: An inquiry is made to TESSCO, wifialliance@, to purchase Wi-Fi Alliance Test Bed components.Step 2: TESSCO confirms that the inquiring company is authorized to purchase. If your company is currently a Wi-Fi Alliance member, please proceed to Step 4.Step 3: If the inquiring company is NOT an authorized member instructions will be sent on “How to Become a Member”. TESSCO cannot quote or ship product to Non-Wi-Fi Alliance Members. For additional information please contact membership@.Step 4: Request a copy of the latest Wi-Fi Test Bed Catalog.Step 5: Submit a “Request for Quote” via email to wifialliance@ or call 410-229-1526. Step 6: Submit a “Purchase Order” via email to wifialliance@.Purchase Order Requirements:∙Vendor must be listed as:TESSCO IncorporatedP.O. Box 102885Atlanta, GA 30368-2885∙Payment terms must be clearly stated. Contact TESSCO to discuss the available payment options (NET Terms, Prepayment via Wire Transfer, or Credit Card).∙All Server and Supplicant purchases, for International customers, must be pre-paid in advance via wire transfer. The quoted price does not include additional software import taxes that are associated with specific geographic locations.∙Components of the test bed may not always be available for immediate shipment. Clearly state on your Purchase Order if “Partial” shipments are required. Contact wifialliance@ for estimated lead-times.Delivery Options:∙Delivery charges can be pre-paid to TESSCO. If you choose this option please be sure the additional charges are reflected on your Purchase Order.Note: For International customers; if you choose to Pre-Pay the delivery we cannot send“Partial” shipments.∙Collect shipments: Ex-Works, can be arranged. Please provide your carrier and account number.Note: for International customers, partial shipments will be allowed, for collect shipments.Wi-Fi Alliance CONFIDENTIAL 2Wi-Fi Alliance Test Bed Equipment CatalogInstructions to Obtain Drivers & DownloadsTest Bed software (drivers, FW, etc.) can be located on the WLABS FTP site: ftp://.To obtain a user ID and password, for the FTP site, click here. This link will direct you to the Wi-Fi Alliance’s Document Management System (KAVI).Note - This information is available to Regular and Sponsor Members only.Wi-Fi Alliance Test Beds - Summary Page*To jump to a specific test bed, click on the appropriate test bed name belowTest Bed Description Price W11_WPA2Wi-Fi Alliance Test Bed - WPA2$11,733.34 W11_WMM Wi-Fi Alliance Test Bed - WMM$9,692.89 W11_WPA2/WMM Wi-Fi Alliance Test Bed - Combo WPA2 & WMM$11,733.34 W11_WMM-PS Wi-Fi Alliance Test Bed - WMM-PowerSave$11,017.60 W11_WPS2Wi-Fi Alliance Test Bed - Wi-Fi Protected Setup 2$20,739.39 W11n_Approved Wi-Fi Alliance Test Bed - Approved 11n $11,494.35 W11_Voice Personal Wi-Fi Alliance Test Bed - Voice Personal$9,064.19 W11_Direct Wi-Fi Alliance Test Bed - Direct$5,505.31 W11_PMF Wi-Fi Alliance Test Bed - Protected Management Frames$11,549.30 W11_WMM-AC Wi-Fi Alliance Test Bed - Admission Control $20,158.99 W11_Voice Enterprise Wi-Fi Alliance Test Bed - Voice Enterprise$19,907.32W11_WMM-AC - Voice Enterprise Wi-Fi Alliance Test Bed - Admission Control & VoiceEnterprise $26,767.39W11_Passpoint Wi-Fi Alliance Test Bed - Passpoint$16,103.35 W11_TDLS Wi-Fi Alliance Test Bed - TDLS$6,481.75 W11_SERV Wi-Fi Alliance Test Bed - Servers & Supplicants$6,711.76 W11_Chariot Wi-Fi Alliance Test Bed - Chariot$8,758.00 W11_SPEC Wi-Fi Alliance Test Bed - Special Devices$2,035.50 Notes: 1. The Firmware and Drivers provided are in accordance to the Wi-Fi Alliance'sspecifications.2. The pricing listed does not include freight, taxes, import or export duties,insurance, or any other miscellaneous costs, if applicable.3. Wi-Fi Alliance test beds include a 12 month warranty.Qty TESSCO Part Number Manufacturer Part Number Manufacturer Price Description Also used in:1347808BCM94718NR Broadcom$2,900.00Broadcom Access Point Reference Design WMM, WPA2/WMM Combo, WMM-PS, WPS2, 11N Approved, Voice Personal, PMF & Passpoint1345028BCM9SRLCBL Broadcom$10.00Broadcom Access Point Reference Design -CableWMM, WPA2/WMM Combo, WMM-PS, WPS2, 11NApproved, Voice Personal, PMF & Passpoint1387482BCM943224HMS Broadcom$290.00Broadcom STA Reference Design WPA2, WMM, WPA2/WMM Combo, WMM-PS, WPS2, 11N Approved, Voice Personal, Direct, PMF, WMM-AC, Voice Enterprise, WMM-AC - Voice Enterprise Combo, Passpoint & TDLS1355184BCM9HMCSPACER Broadcom$10.00Broadcom STA Reference Design - Spacer WPA2, WMM, WPA2/WMM Combo, WMM-PS, WPS2, 11N Approved, Voice Personal, Direct, PMF, WMM-AC, Voice Enterprise, WMM-AC - Voice Enterprise Combo, Passpoint & TDLS1319438WAIR-AP1262N-A-K9Cisco$824.44Cisco Aironet 1260 Series Access Point WMM,WPA2 & WMM Combo, WMM-PS & Voice Personal1338232WAIR-PWR-B Cisco$28.00Cisco Power Supply for AP 1262WMM,WPA2 & WMM Combo, WMM-PS & Voice Personal3348745WAIR-ANT2422DG-R Cisco$45.182.4 GHz 2.2 dBi Dipole Antenna with RPTNCPlug ConnectorWMM,WPA2 & WMM Combo, WMM-PS & VoicePersonal3384804WAIR-ANT5135D-R Cisco$45.18Cisco 5 GHz 3.5 dBi Dipole Antenna withRPTNC Plug ConnectorWMM, WPA2 & WMM Combo, WMM-PS, VoicePersonal & Direct1346481622ANHMW Intel$30.19Intel® Centrino® Advanced-N 6200WFDinternal PCIe half mini cardWMM, WPA2/WMM Combo, Voice Personal, Direct,& WPS21307664CD-88W-AP95-AO Marvell$2,040.45Access Point Reference Design WPA2 & WMM Combo, WMM-PS, WPS2, 11N Approved & PMF1387932AR5KAP-0096WFA QualcommAtheros$2,900.00Access Point Reference DesignWMM, WPA2 & WMM Combo, WMM-PS, & 11NApproved1397154AR5BXB-0092DA QualcommAtheros$678.50802.11a/b/g/n Wireless LAN PCIe Mini CardWMM, WPA2 & WMM Combo, WMM-PS, WPS2,11N Approved, Voice Personal, Direct, PMF, VoiceEnterprise, WMM-AC - Voice Enterprise Combo &Passpoint1386884RT3800PDAP2Ralink$1,264.40Dual-Band Access Point Reference Design WMM, WPA2 & WMM Combo, 11N Approved & TDLS1316864RT3800PD2Ralink$667.00Dual Band STA WMM, WPA2 & WMM Combo, WMM-PS, 11N Approved, WMM-AC & WMM-AC - Voice Enterprise ComboTotal$11,733.34Notes:1. The Extended EAP Server and Supplicant software are required for this test bed only if Enterprise devices are being tested. Personal devices do not need these. Warning: It is strongly recommended that test bed devices NOT be shared across other test beds which require different firmware versions.Test bed devices are not designed to be re-flashed frequently. Doing so may cause device failure and void your warranty.The current versions of the Wi-Fi Alliance Test Plans can be found in the M embers Only area of the website.Qty TESSCO Part Number Manufacturer Part Number Manufacturer Price Description Also used in:1347808BCM94718NR Broadcom$2,900.00Broadcom Access Point Reference Design WPA2, WPA2/WMM Combo, WMM-PS, WPS2, 11N Approved, Voice Personal, PMF & Passpoint1345028BCM9SRLCBL Broadcom$10.00Broadcom Access Point Reference Design -CableWPA2, WPA2/WMM Combo, WMM-PS, WPS2, 11NApproved, Voice Personal, PMF & Passpoint1387482BCM943224HMS Broadcom$290.00Broadcom STA Reference Design WPA2, WPA2/WMM Combo, WMM-PS, WPS2, 11N Approved, Voice Personal, Direct, PMF, WMM-AC, Voice Enterprise, WMM-AC - Voice Enterprise Combo, Passpoint & TDLS1355184BCM9HMCSPACER Broadcom$10.00Broadcom STA Reference Design - Spacer WPA2, WPA2/WMM Combo, WMM-PS, WPS2, 11N Approved, Voice Personal, Direct, PMF, WMM-AC, Voice Enterprise, WMM-AC - Voice Enterprise Combo, Passpoint & TDLS1319438WAIR-AP1262N-A-K9Cisco$824.44Cisco Aironet 1260 Series Access Point WPA2, WPA2 & WMM Combo, WMM-PS & Voice Personal1338232WAIR-PWR-B Cisco$28.00Cisco Power Supply for AP 1262WPA2, WPA2 & WMM Combo, WMM-PS & Voice Personal3348745WAIR-ANT2422DG-R Cisco$45.182.4 GHz 2.2 dBi Dipole Antenna with RPTNCPlug ConnectorWPA2, WPA2 & WMM Combo, WMM-PS & VoicePersonal3384804WAIR-ANT5135D-R Cisco$45.18Cisco 5 GHz 3.5 dBi Dipole Antenna withRPTNC Plug ConnectorWPA2, WPA2 & WMM Combo, WMM-PS, VoicePersonal & Direct1346481622ANHMW Intel$30.19Intel® Centrino® Advanced-N 6200WFDinternal PCIe half mini cardWPA2, WPA2/WMM Combo, Voice Personal, Direct& WPS21387932AR5KAP-0096WFA QualcommAtheros$2,900.00Access Point Reference DesignWPA2, WPA2 & WMM Combo, WMM-PS, & 11NApproved1397154AR5BXB-0092DA QualcommAtheros$678.50802.11a/b/g/n Wireless LAN PCIe Mini CardWPA2, WPA2 & WMM Combo, WMM-PS, WPS2,11N Approved, Voice Personal, Direct, PMF, VoiceEnterprise, WMM-AC - Voice Enterprise Combo &Passpoint1386884RT3800PDAP2Ralink$1,264.40Dual-Band Access Point Reference Design WPA2, WPA2 & WMM Combo, 11N Approved & TDLS1316864RT3800PD2Ralink$667.00Dual Band STA WPA2, WPA2 & WMM Combo, WMM-PS, 11N Approved, WMM-AC & WMM-AC - Voice Enterprise ComboTotal$9,692.89Notes:1. This Test Bed assumes that you already own the components in the W11_SPEC and W11_SERV for your respective country format. If not, you will need to order these kits. Warning: It is strongly recommended that test bed devices NOT be shared across other test beds which require different firmware versions.Test bed devices are not designed to be re-flashed frequently. Doing so may cause device failure and void your warranty.The current versions of the Wi-Fi Alliance Test Plans can be found in the Members Only area of the website.W11_WPA2/WMMWi-Fi Alliance Test Bed - WPA2/WMM Combo Test BedQty TESSCO Part Number Manufacturer Part Number Manufacturer Price Description Also used in:1347808BCM94718NR Broadcom$2,900.00Broadcom Access Point Reference Design WPA2, WMM, WMM-PS, WPS2, 11N Approved, Voice Personal, PMF & Passpoint1345028BCM9SRLCBL Broadcom$10.00Broadcom Access Point Reference Design -CableWPA2, WMM, WMM-PS, WPS2, 11N Approved,Voice Personal, PMF & Passpoint1387482BCM943224HMS Broadcom$290.00Broadcom STA Reference Design WPA2, WMM, WMM-PS, WPS2, 11N Approved, Voice Personal, Direct, PMF, WMM-AC, Voice Enterprise, WMM-AC - Voice Enterprise Combo, Passpoint & TDLS1355184BCM9HMCSPACER Broadcom$10.00Broadcom STA Reference Design - Spacer WPA2, WMM, WMM-PS, WPS2, 11N Approved, Voice Personal, Direct, PMF, WMM-AC, Voice Enterprise, WMM-AC - Voice Enterprise Combo, Passpoint & TDLS1319438WAIR-AP1262N-A-K9Cisco$824.44Cisco Aironet 1260 Series Access Point WPA2, WMM, WMM-PS & Voice Personal 1338232WAIR-PWR-B Cisco$28.00Cisco Power Supply for AP 1262WPA2, WMM, WMM-PS & Voice Personal3348745WAIR-ANT2422DG-R Cisco$45.182.4 GHz 2.2 dBi Dipole Antenna with RPTNCPlug Connector WPA2, WMM, WMM-PS & Voice Personal3384804WAIR-ANT5135D-R Cisco$45.18Cisco 5 GHz 3.5 dBi Dipole Antenna withRPTNC Plug Connector WPA2, WMM, WMM-PS, Voice Personal & Direct1346481622ANHMW Intel$30.19Intel® Centrino® Advanced-N 6200WFDinternal PCIe half mini card WPA2, WMM, Voice Personal, Direct & WPS21307664CD-88W-AP95-AO Marvell$2,040.45Access Point Reference Design WPA2, WMM-PS, WPS2, 11N Approved & PMF1387932AR5KAP-0096WFA QualcommAtheros$2,900.00Access Point Reference Design WPA2, WMM, WMM-PS, & 11N Approved1397154AR5BXB-0092DA QualcommAtheros$678.50802.11a/b/g/n Wireless LAN PCIe Mini CardWPA2, WMM, WMM-PS, WPS2, 11N Approved,Voice Personal, Direct, PMF, Voice Enterprise, WMM-AC - Voice Enterprise Combo & Passpoint1386884RT3800PDAP2Ralink$1,264.40Dual-Band Access Point Reference Design WPA2, WMM, 11N Approved & TDLS1316864RT3800PD2Ralink$667.00Dual Band STA WPA2, WMM, WMM-PS, 11N Approved, WMM-AC & WMM-AC - Voice Enterprise ComboTotal$11,733.34Notes:1. The Extended EAP Server and Supplicant software are required for this test bed only if Enterprise devices are being tested. Personal devices do not need these. Warning: It is strongly recommended that test bed devices NOT be shared across other test beds which require different firmware versions.Test bed devices are not designed to be re-flashed frequently. Doing so may cause device failure and void your warranty.The current versions of the Wi-Fi Alliance Test Plans can be found in the M embers Only area of the website.W11_WMM-PSWi-Fi Alliance Test Bed - WMM Power Save Test BedQty TESSCO Part Number Manufacturer Part Number Manufacturer Price Description Also used in:1347808BCM94718NR Broadcom$2,900.00Broadcom Access Point Reference Design WPA2, WMM, WPA2/WMM Combo, WPS2, 11N Approved, Voice Personal, PMF & Passpoint1345028BCM9SRLCBL Broadcom$10.00Broadcom Access Point Reference Design -CableWPA2, WMM, WPA2/WMM Combo, WPS2, 11NApproved, Voice Personal, PMF & Passpoint1387482BCM943224HMS Broadcom$290.00Broadcom STA Reference Design WPA2, WMM, WPA2/WMM Combo, WPS2, 11N Approved, Voice Personal, Direct, PMF, WMM-AC, Voice Enterprise, WMM-AC - Voice Enterprise Combo, Passpoint & TDLS1355184BCM9HMCSPACER Broadcom$10.00Broadcom STA Reference Design - Spacer WPA2, WMM, WPA2/WMM Combo, WPS2, 11N Approved, Voice Personal, Direct, PMF, WMM-AC, Voice Enterprise, WMM-AC - Voice Enterprise Combo, Passpoint & TDLS1319438WAIR-AP1262N-A-K9Cisco$824.44Cisco Aironet 1260 Series Access Point WPA2, WMM, WPA2 & WMM Combo & Voice Personal1338232WAIR-PWR-B Cisco$28.00Cisco Power Supply for AP 1262WPA2, WMM, WPA2 & WMM Combo & Voice Personal3348745WAIR-ANT2422DG-R Cisco$45.182.4 GHz 2.2 dBi Dipole Antenna with RPTNCPlug ConnectorWPA2, WMM, WPA2 & WMM Combo & VoicePersonal3384804WAIR-ANT5135D-R Cisco$45.18Cisco 5 GHz 3.5 dBi Dipole Antenna withRPTNC Plug ConnectorWPA2, WMM, WPA2 & WMM Combo, VoicePersonal & Direct1307664CD-88W-AP95-AO Marvell$2,040.45Marvell Access Point Reference Design WPA2, WPA2 & WMM Combo, WPS2, 11N Approved & PMF1387932AR5KAP-0096WFA QualcommAtheros$2,900.00Access Point Reference DesignWPA2, WMM, WPA2 & WMM Combo, & 11NApproved1397154AR5BXB-0092DA QualcommAtheros$678.50802.11a/b/g/n Wireless LAN PCIe Mini CardWPA2, WMM, WPA2 & WMM Combo, WPS2, 11NApproved, Voice Personal, Direct, PMF, VoiceEnterprise, WMM-AC - Voice Enterprise Combo &Passpoint1316864RT3800PD2Ralink$667.00Dual Band STA WPA2, WMM, WPA2 & WMM Combo, 11N Approved, WMM-AC & WMM-AC - Voice Enterprise Combo1322936RT2800PD2Ralink$578.85Ralink Dual Band Adapter Reference DesignSTA Cardbus Voice PersonalTotal$11,017.60Warning: It is strongly recommended that test bed devices NOT be shared across other test beds which require different firmware versions. Test bed devices are not designed to be re-flashed frequently. Doing so may cause device failure and void your warranty.The current versions of the Wi-Fi Alliance Test Plans can be found in the M embers Only area of the website.W11_WPS2Wi-Fi Alliance Test Bed - Wi-Fi Protected Setup 2Qty TESSCO Part Number Manufacturer Part Number Manufacturer Price Description Also used in:2347808*BCM94718NR Broadcom$5,800.00Broadcom Access Point Reference Design WPA2, WMM, WPA2/WMM Combo, WMM-PS, 11N Approved, Voice Personal, PMF & Passpoint2345028*BCM9SRLCBL Broadcom$20.00Broadcom Access Point Reference Design -CableWPA2, WMM, WPA2/WMM Combo, WMM-PS, 11NApproved, Voice Personal, PMF & Passpoint2387482*BCM943224HMS Broadcom$580.00Broadcom STA Reference Design WPA2, WMM, WPA2/WMM Combo, WMM-PS, 11N Approved, Voice Personal, Direct, PMF, WMM-AC, Voice Enterprise, WMM-AC - Voice Enterprise Combo, Passpoint & TDLS2355184*BCM9HMCSPACER Broadcom$20.00Broadcom STA Reference Design - Spacer WPA2, WMM, WPA2/WMM Combo, WMM-PS, 11N Approved, Voice Personal, Direct, PMF, WMM-AC, Voice Enterprise, WMM-AC - Voice Enterprise Combo, Passpoint & TDLS1346481622ANHMW Intel$30.19Intel® Centrino® Advanced-N 6200WFDinternal PCIe half mini cardWPA2, WMM, WPA2/WMM Combo, Voice Personal& Direct2307664*CD-88W-AP95-AO Marvell$4,080.90Marvell Access Point Reference Design WPA2, WPA2 & WMM Combo, WMM-PS, 11N Approved & PMF1348304**RD-88W-PLUG-8787Marvell$688.90Marvell Plug Computer with 8787 Dual BandWi-FiPMF, WMM-AC, Voice Enterprise, WMM-AC - VoiceEnterprise Combo & Passpoint2376141*AR5KAP-096WPS QualcommAtheros$5,800.00Atheros Access Point Reference Design2397154*AR5BXB-0092DA QualcommAtheros$1,357.00802.11a/b/g/n Wireless LAN PCIe Mini CardWPA2, WMM, WPA2 & WMM Combo, WMM-PS,11N Approved, Voice Personal, Direct, PMF, VoiceEnterprise, WMM-AC - Voice Enterprise Combo &Passpoint1318525RT3800PDAP3Ralink$1,264.40Ralink Access Point PMF, WMM-AC & WMM-AC - Voice Enterprise Combo1376661RT3592Ralink$638.00Ralink MIMObility 802.11n Reference Design Direct, WMM-AC & WMM-AC - Voice Enterprise Combo1318539RTL8192DE Realtek$460.002x2 11 abgn miniCard TDLSTotal$20,739.39Notes:1. *A second of all Atheros and Broadcom devices and the Marvell CD-88W-AP95-A0 are only required if a WPS1.0 Test Bed was not purchased previously2. **For WPS2, the Marvell station has two hardware versions, A0 and A1. Either can be used.3. A second Broadcom station is needed to act as a non-WPS station. This non-WPS station can be obtained from other test beds if available. Otherwise, a second Broadcom station needs to be purchasedWarning: It is strongly recommended that test bed devices NOT be shared across other test beds which require different firmware versions.Test bed devices are not designed to be re-flashed frequently. Doing so may cause device failure and void your warranty.The current versions of the Wi-Fi Alliance Test Plans can be found in the M embers Only area of the website.W11n_ApprovedWi-Fi Alliance Test Bed - Approved 11n Test BedQty TESSCO Part Number Manufacturer Part Number Manufacturer Price Description Also used in:1347808BCM94718NR Broadcom$2,900.00Broadcom Access Point Reference Design WPA2, WMM, WPA2/WMM Combo, WMM-PS, WPS2, Voice Personal, PMF & Passpoint1345028BCM9SRLCBL Broadcom$10.00Broadcom Access Point Reference Design -CableWPA2, WMM, WPA2/WMM Combo, WMM-PS, WPS2,Voice Personal, PMF & Passpoint1387482BCM943224HMS Broadcom$290.00Broadcom STA Reference Design WPA2, WMM, WPA2/WMM Combo, WMM-PS, WPS2, Voice Personal, Direct, PMF, WMM-AC, Voice Enterprise, WMM-AC - Voice Enterprise Combo, Passpoint & TDLS1355184BCM9HMCSPACER Broadcom$10.00Broadcom STA Reference Design - Spacer WPA2, WMM, WPA2/WMM Combo, WMM-PS, WPS2, Voice Personal, Direct, PMF, WMM-AC, Voice Enterprise, WMM-AC - Voice Enterprise Combo, Passpoint & TDLS1319199633AN_HMWWB Intel$67.00Intel® Centrino® Advanced-N 6300WFDNetwork Adapter and Spacer.TDLS1307664CD-88W-AP95-AO Marvel$2,040.45Marvell Access Point Reference Design WPA2, WPA2 & WMM Combo, WMM-PS, WPS2 & PMF1387932AR5KAP-0096WFA QualcommAtheros$2,900.00Access Point Reference Design WPA2, WMM, WPA2 & WMM Combo, & WMM-PS1397154AR5BXB-0092DA QualcommAtheros$678.50802.11a/b/g/n Wireless LAN PCIe Mini CardWPA2, WMM, WPA2 & WMM Combo, WMM-PS,WPS2, Voice Personal, Direct, PMF, Voice Enterprise,WMM-AC - Voice Enterprise Combo & Passpoint1386884RT3800PDAP2Ralink$1,264.40Dual-Band Access Point Reference Design WPA2, WMM, WPA2 & WMM Combo & TDLS2316864RT3800PD2Ralink$1,334.00Dual Band STA WPA2, WMM, WPA2 & WMM Combo, WMM-PS, WMM-AC & WMM-AC - Voice Enterprise ComboManual6 Testing Environment (Optional)1350324OPWGP-WFA WildPackets$2,807.20WildPackets Bundle for the W11n Test Bed:Includes W11n Sniffer OmniPeek v6,OmniPeek Workgroup Pro Maintenance.WMM-AC & WMM-AC - Voice Enterprise Combo1367712*SRV-OPPR-12WildPackets$516.4712 Months Maintenance Renewal - OmniPeekProfessional WMM-AC & WMM-AC - Voice Enterprise ComboSigma7 Automated Testing Environment (Optional)1479552AP7900APC$502.46AP7900 Switched Rack PDU (100-120 VAC)Passpoint 1305553AP7921APC$524.22AP7921 Switched Rack PDU (200-240 VAC)Passpoint The Sigma Automated Testing Environment requires a number of non-brand specific components.Qty Item Qty Description Suggested Source / Model(s)1Each 2-Port RS-232 to EthernetData Gateway http://www.vscom.de/667.htm1Each 24-Port 10/100 Mbps SwitchGenericTotal$11,494.35Notes:1. The Extended EAP Server and Supplicant software are required for this test bed only if Enterprise devices are being tested. Personal devices do not need these.2. *The WildPackets 12 Month Maintenance Renewal cannot be purchased until the expiration of the original 12 Month Warranty included withthe purchase of the WildPackets Bundle.3. The Approved 11n Test Bed may be configured as a manual testing environment and/or as an automated testing environment with Sigma.4. At least one of the optional packages above is required to configure a working test bed.5. Both of these optional packages use the Ralink RT3800PD2, already included in the test bed, for sniffer support.6. Manual: Requires the test bed APs, stations, an extra Ralink station for the sniffer, and Ixia Chariot or some form of traffic generator such as IPERF.(Note: IPERF is not a sanctioned test SW for WFA).8. SIGMA: Requires the test bed APs, stations, an extra Ralink station for the sniffer, 2-Port RS-232 to Ethernet Data Gateway, 24-Port 10/100 Mbps Switch Generic, and one APC (either one listed, both are not needed)Warning: It is strongly recommended that test bed devices NOT be shared across other test beds which require different firmware versions.Test bed devices are not designed to be re-flashed frequently. Doing so may cause device failure and void your warranty.The current versions of the Wi-Fi Alliance Test Plans can be found in the Members Only area of the website.W11_Voice PersonalWi-Fi Alliance Test Bed - Voice PersonalQty TESSCO Part Number Manufacturer Part Number Manufacturer Price Description Also used in:1347808BCM94718NR Broadcom$2,900.00Broadcom Access Point Reference Design WPA2, WMM, WPA2/WMM Combo, WMM-PS, WPS2, 11N Approved, PMF & Passpoint1345028BCM9SRLCBL Broadcom$10.00Broadcom Access Point Reference Design -CableWPA2, WMM, WPA2/WMM Combo, WMM-PS,WPS2, 11N Approved, PMF & Passpoint1387482BCM943224HMS Broadcom$290.00Broadcom STA Reference Design WPA2, WMM, WPA2/WMM Combo, WMM-PS, WPS2, 11N Approved, Direct, PMF, WMM-AC, Voice Enterprise, WMM-AC - Voice Enterprise Combo, Passpoint & TDLS1355184BCM9HMCSPACER Broadcom$10.00Broadcom STA Reference Design - Spacer WPA2, WMM, WPA2/WMM Combo, WMM-PS, WPS2, 11N Approved, Direct, PMF, WMM-AC, Voice Enterprise, WMM-AC - Voice Enterprise Combo, Passpoint & TDLS1319438WAIR-AP1262N-A-K9Cisco$824.44Cisco Aironet 1260 Series Access Point WPA2, WMM, WPA2 & WMM Combo & WMM-PS 1338232WAIR-PWR-B Cisco$28.00Cisco Power Supply for AP 1262WPA2, WMM, WPA2 & WMM Combo & WMM-PS3348745WAIR-ANT2422DG-R Cisco$45.182.4 GHz 2.2 dBi Dipole Antenna with RPTNCPlug Connector WPA2, WMM, WPA2 & WMM Combo & WMM-PS3384804WAIR-ANT5135D-R Cisco$45.18Cisco 5 GHz 3.5 dBi Dipole Antenna withRPTNC Plug ConnectorWPA2, WMM, WPA2 & WMM Combo, WMM-PS &Direct1346481622ANHMW-WFD Intel$30.19Intel® Centrino® Advanced-N 6200WFDinternal PCIe half mini card WPA2, WMM, WPA2/WMM Combo & Direct1353627CD-88W-CB85-B3Marvell$694.85STA Card Cardbus Direct 1343760MNAP201/MNMC500 Meru Networks$2,929.00802.11 a/b/g AP Reference Design1397154AR5BXB-0092DA QualcommAtheros$678.50802.11a/b/g/n Wireless LAN PCIe Mini CardWPA2, WMM, WPA2 & WMM Combo, WMM-PS,WPS2, 11N Approved, Direct, PMF, Voice Enterprise,WMM-AC - Voice Enterprise Combo & Passpoint1322936RT2800PD2Ralink$578.85Ralink Dual Band Adapter Reference DesignSTA Cardbus WMM-PSTotal$9,064.19Warning: It is strongly recommended that test bed devices NOT be shared across other test beds which require different firmware versions. Test bed devices are not designed to be re-flashed frequently. Doing so may cause device failure and void your warranty.The current versions of the Wi-Fi Alliance Test Plans can be found in the Members Only area of the website.Wi-Fi Alliance Test Bed - Direct Test BedQty TESSCO Part Number Manufacturer Part Number Manufacturer Price Description Also used in:1387482BCM943224HMS Broadcom$290.00Broadcom STA Reference Design WPA2, WMM, WPA2/WMM Combo, WMM-PS, WPS2, 11N Approved, Voice Personal, PMF, WMM-AC, Voice Enterprise, WMM-AC - Voice Enterprise Combo, Passpoint & TDLS1355184BCM9HMCSPACER Broadcom$10.00Broadcom STA Reference Design - Spacer WPA2, WMM, WPA2/WMM Combo, WMM-PS, WPS2, 11N Approved, Voice Personal, PMF, WMM-AC, Voice Enterprise, WMM-AC - Voice Enterprise Combo, Passpoint & TDLS1333375WAIR-LAP1242AGA-K9Cisco$625.16CISCO AIRONET 1200 SER 802.11AG DUAL 2.4 5GHZ2390098WAIR-ANT4941Cisco$30.842.4 GHz 2.2 dBi Dipole Antenna with RPTNC Plug Connector2384804WAIR-ANT5135D-R Cisco$30.125GHz Dipole Antenna with RP-TNC connector WAP2, WMM, WPAS & WMM Combo, WMM-PS & Voice Personal1394285AIR-WLC2106-K9 Cisco$2,262.00Cisco 2100 Series Wireless LAN Controller1346481622ANHMW-WFD Intel$30.19Intel® Centrino® Advanced-N 6200WFDinternal PCIe half mini cardWPA2, WMM, WPA2/WMM Combo & VoicePersonal2397154AR5BXB-0092DA QualcommAtheros$1,357.00802.11a/b/g/n Wireless LAN PCIe Mini CardWPA2, WMM, WPA2 & WMM Combo, WMM-PS,WPS2, 11N Approved, Voice Personal, PMF, VoiceEnterprise, WMM-AC - Voice Enterprise Combo &Passpoint1376661RT3592Ralink$638.00Ralink MIMObility 802.11n Reference Design WPS2, WMM-AC & WMM-AC - Voice Enterprise Combo1329122RTL8192CE Realtek$232.002x2 11bgn half size minicardTotal$5,505.31Warning: It is strongly recommended that test bed devices NOT be shared across other test beds which require different firmware versions. Test bed devices are not designed to be re-flashed frequently. Doing so may cause device failure and void your warranty.The current versions of the Wi-Fi Alliance Test Plans can be found in the M embers Only area of the website.。

SAP 命令清单

Selection by: Role Z&PNE_XXX_OPERATOR-WAREHOUSE_LBGS: Operator WarehouseTCode Text/FIR/REHSB101_002 Report for Sevesso and Allergens/FIR/RF2S0BGS_048 Settle Consignment/Pipeline Liabs./FIR/RF2S0BGS_059 SPS Cockpit Inquiry/FIR/RF2S0BGS_071 Process Order Consolidation Report/FIR/RF2S0BGS_084 Available Packs of Materials/FIR/RF2S0BGS_103 Replenishment report for process ord/FIR/RF2S0BGS_800 Confirmation of Putaway/FIR/RF2S0BGS_801 Bin-to-Bin Stock Transfer/FIR/RF2S0BGS_803 Create Picking TO for Delivery/FIR/RF2S0BGS_804 Barcode Comparison Utility/FIR/RF2S0BGS_805 Confirm a TO/FIR/RF2S0BGS_806 Move Storage unit to SF/FP Area/FIR/RF2S0BGS_807 Move Storage unit/FIR/RF2S0BGS_808 Online Delivery Report/FIR/RF2S0BGS_809 Online Stock Report for Samples & La/FIR/RF2SA042_001 Controlled Item Report/FIR/RF2SD010_010 Move Multiple Storage unit/FIR/RP2P0BGS_001 Delivery Pipeline ReportCBGL_LS03 EHS: Display Label StockCBGL_MP01 EHS: Manual Print DialogCG43 Display Report TemplatesCO09 Availability OverviewCOR3 Display Process OrderCV03N Display documentDGP3 Display Dangerous Goods MasterIQ09 Display Material Serial NumberLB03 Display Transfer RequirementLB10 TRs for Storage TypeLB11 TRs for MaterialLB12 TRs and Posting Change for Mat.Doc.LB13 TRs for RequirementLL01 Warehouse Activity MonitorLM00 Logon RFLM01 Dynamic MenuLM02 Select by SU -Put AwayLM04 Put Away -System GuidedLM05 Picking by TO IDLM07 Picking - System GuidedLM12 Material Inquiry LM50 Count Inventory By System Guided LM51 Count Inventory By User Selection LM61 Goods Issue by Delivery LM63 Goods Issue by Shipment LM77 Queue Assignment LP21 WM replenishment for fixed bins LS03N Display Warehouse Master Record LS04 Display Empty Storage Bins LS23 Display Quants LS24 Display Quants for Material LS26 Warehouse stocks per material LS33 Display storage unit LS41 List of control cycles for WIP loc. LT01 Create Transfer Order LT03 Create TO for Delivery LT04 Create TO from TR LT05 Process Posting Change Notice LT07 Create TO for mixed storage unit LT09 ID point function for storage units LT0G Return delivery to stock LT10 Create Transfer Order from List LT11 Confirm Transfer Order Item LT12 Confirm transfer order LT13 Confirm TO for storage unit LT15 Cancelling transfer order LT16 Cancelling TO for storage unit LT21 Display Transfer Order LT22 Display Transfer Order / Stor. Type LT23 Display Transfer Orders by Numbers LT24 Display Transfer Order / Material LT26 Transfer orders for storage bin LT31 Print TO Manually LU03 Display Posting Change Notice LX01 List of Empty Storage Bins LX02 Stock list LX03 Bin Status Report LX04 Capacity load utilization LX06 Fire Department Inventory List LX07 Check storage LX08 Accident Regulations List LX09 Overview of All Transf.Requirements LX23 Stock comparison IM - WM LX27 Stock levels by shelf life exp.dateLX29 Fixed bin supervision LX41 Bin Status Report WM/PP Interface LX42 Evaluation PP Order from WM View MB02 Change Material Document MB03 Display Material Document MB04 Subsequ.Adj.of "Mat.Provided"Consmp. MB1A Goods Withdrawal MB1B Transfer Posting MB21 Create Reservation MB22 Change Reservation MB23 Display Reservation MB25 Reservation List MB51 Material Doc. List MB52 List of Warehouse Stocks on Hand MB53 Display Plant Stock Availability MB54 Consignment Stocks MB56 Analyze batch where-used list MB58 Consgmt and Ret. Packag. at Customer MB59 Material Doc. List MB5B Stocks for Posting Date MB5M BBD/Prod. Date MB5T Stock in transit CC MBBS Display valuated special stock MBLB Stocks at Subcontractor MBVR Management Program: Reservations MD04 Display Stock/Requirements Situation ME23N Display Purchase Order ME2N Purchase Orders by PO Number ME2O SC Stock Monitoring (Vendor) ME2V Goods Receipt Forecast MI21 Print physical inventory document MIGO Goods movement MM03 Display Material & MMBE Stock Overview PK06 PP Maintain Supply Area (Kanban) VA03 Display Sales Order VL01N Create Outbound Dlv. with Order Ref. VL02N Change Outbound Delivery VL03N Display Outbound Delivery VL06F General delivery list - Outb.deliv. VL06IF Selection inbound deliveries VL06O Outbound Delivery Monitor VL10H Items Due for Delivery VT03 Old: Display ShipmentNumber of transactions selected: 126。

中日英翻译列表

散装库存bulk storage平置保管仓库管理系统decentralized Warehouse Management system倉庫管理システムAPPQ接口APPQ interface APPQ ゗ンタフェース消防器材区fire-containment section可燃品目棚番区分差异中间记录interim record for differences差異仮レコード库存入库putaway在庫受入邻近领货仓位堆放putaway near picking bin予備ピッキング棚番への受入出库转储订单pick transfer orderピッキング転送指図FIFO原则FIFO principle FIFO 方針预分配的库存preallocated stock転送先棚番事前割当固定存储仓位fixed storage bin固定保管棚从固定仓位拣配picking from fixed storage bin固定棚番からのピッキング消防部门的库存清单inventory list for fire department消防署提出在庫一覧危险物料警告hazardous material warning危険物注意事項危险物料hazardous material危険物坐标coordinate棚設定LIFO原则LIFO principle LIFO 方針WM单位WM unit倉庫管理単位仓库warehouse倉庫番号自动仓库automatic warehouse自動倉庫仓储单位storage unit保管単位仓储单位编号storage unit number保管単位番号仓储单位凭证storage unit document保管単位伝票仓储单位类型storage unit type保管単位タ゗プ仓储单位管理Storage Unit Management保管単位管理危险物料仓储警告hazardous material storage warning危険物保管注意事項仓储等级storage class保管クラス综合仓库warehouse complex複合倉庫动态仓位dynamic storage bin動的棚番仓储区storage bin section棚番内仕切仓位类型bin type棚タ゗プ仓位状态报告bin status report棚番状況レポート仓库主数据warehouse master倉庫マスタ仓库控制单元warehouse control unit倉庫制御単位仓储类型storage type保管域タ゗プ仓储类型搜索storage type search保管域タ゗プ検索随机存储random storageランダム保管慢移动项目slow-moving item滞留在庫品目空仓位索引index of empty storage bins空棚番索引备料material staging品目供給行间库存存储cross-line stock putawayクロスラ゗ン受入确认confirmation確認年度盘点annual inventory年次棚卸TO拆分TO splitting転送明細分割转储类型shipment type転送タ゗プ转储单transfer order転送指図记帐修改posting change振替要求记帐修改通知单posting change notice振替要求通知库存转储stock transfer在庫転送总货架寿命total shelf life総有効期間物料转储频率分析analysis of material transfer frequency在庫転送頻度分析高架存储区high rack storage area高層棚保管域标识点identification point識別ポ゗ント连续盘点continuous inventory継続棚卸系统库存记录system inventory record棚卸レコード仓库库存清单warehouse inventory list倉庫在庫一覧看板产品控制kanban production controlかんばん生産管理能力检查capacity check保管容量確認拣配技术picking techniqueピッキング方法通讯凭证communication document通信伝票通讯记录communication record通信レコード混储mixed storage混合保管混合托盘mixed pallet混合パレット目的地仓储类型destination storage type転送先保管域タ゗プ补充replenishment補充补充数量replenishment quantity補充数量零库存校验zero stock checkゼロ在庫確認托盘单pallet noteパレットノート聚合状态aggregate state物質の状態部分托盘数量partial pallet quantity分割パレット数量部分数量存储区storage area for partial quantities分割数量保管域部分数量partial quantity分納数量需求数量requested quantity転送要求数量备货类型staging type品目供給タ゗プ库存种类stock category在庫カテゴリ控制周期control cycle管理周期区域码region code地域コード退回仓储类型return storage type返送先保管域タ゗プ退回转储return transfer返品転送多处理multiple processing一括処理合并拣配单combined pick list複数在庫転送要求ピッキングリスト快速移动项fast-moving item高回転品目中间仓位interim storage bin仮棚番中间存储范围interim storage area仮保管域标准托盘standard pallet標準パレット完成出库complete stock pick完全在庫払出源发地仓储位source storage bin転送元棚番源发地仓储类型source storage type転送元保管域タ゗プ收货中间存储区goods receipt interim storage area入庫仮保管域需求类型requirement type転送数量タ゗プ收藏策略putaway strategy在庫受入方針存储区storage section保管区画储存箱storage bin棚番空存储箱empty storage bin空棚番控制数量control quantity管理数量份 in SAP WM quant保管ロット转移要求transfer requirement転送要求非混合存储non-mixed単一保管增加现有库存addition to existing stock既存在庫への追加物料发放临时库存区域goods issue interim storage area出庫仮保管域检查样品inspection sample品質検査サンプル出库策略stock removal strategy在庫払出基本方針破损托盘partial pallet分割パレット库存出库记帐stock removal posting在庫払出転記出库原则stock removal quantity在庫払出数量因出库冻结stock removal block在庫払出保留使用能力capacity used使用中保管容量仓位使用信息bin usage information棚使用情報车间级分区floor-level compartment階層棚帐面金额book amount帳簿数量合并转储combined putaway統合転送库存入库记帐putaway posting在庫受入転記保存日期putaway date保管日入库数量putaway quantity在庫受入数量入库确认confirmation of putaway受入確認因入库冻结blocked for putaway在庫受入保留铲车forkliftフォークリフト过道aisle通路危险品分类hazard classification危険分類危险物料处理hazardous material handling危険物取扱い高架high rack高層棚盘点方法inventory method在庫管理方法存货差额inventory difference棚卸差異盘点历史记录inventory history棚卸履歴库存重盘点inventory recount棚卸再検数库存盘点inventory count results棚卸検数实际数量actual quantity実数量小部件存储范围small parts storage area小部品保管域拣配索引picking indexピッキング゗ンデックス随机存储仓库warehouse with random storageランダム保管倉庫存储时间time in storage保管時間仓库效用warehouse utility倉庫施設仓库容量warehouse capacity倉庫収容能力仓位搜索storage bin search棚番検索仓位描述storage bin description棚番テキスト仓位冻结storage bin block棚番ブロック仓位装载容量bin load capacity棚収容量仓储结构warehouse structure倉庫構造仓储类型名称storage type name保管域タ゗プ名仓储类型特征storage type characteristic保管域タ゗プ特性仓库管理Warehouse Management倉庫管理不允许的灭火剂disallowed fire-extinguishing agent非認可消火責任者控制数量单位control quantity unit管理数量単位目标数量destination quantity転送先数量重新盘点版本recount version再検数バージョン临时仓位清单list of temporary storage bins仮保管棚番一覧零库存zero stockゼロ在庫托盘palletパレット仓位库存bin inventory棚番在庫货架区shelf section棚区画运送者conveyorコンベヤー退回仓位return storage bin返送先棚番返回数量quantity returned返品数量退回子项return subitem返品副明細中间仓储记帐interim storage posting仮保管転記中间仓储数量interim storage quantity仮保管数量安全数据表safety data sheet安全データシート安全数据表变式safety data sheet variant安全データシートバリゕント安全数据表版本safety data sheet version安全データシートバージョン目标库存数量target stock amount転送先在庫数量冻结原因blocking reasonブロック理由铲车操作者forklift operatorフォークリフト運転者危险物质hazardous substance危険物質危险物料分类hazardous substance classification危険物分類危险物质的集中concentration of hazardous substances危険物集中管理堆栈stack棚装载容量load capacity積載容量全部出库需求requirement to remove all stock全在庫払出要求源数量source quantity供給量源子项source subitem転送元副明細准备屏幕preparation screen準備画面货物移动goods movement在庫移動时间限制time limit時間制限出库, 到remove from stock在庫から払出从相同的批from the same batch同一ロットより入库, 到put away在庫受入を行う or 在庫に受け入れる大容量仓储标识符bulk storage indicator平置保管区分危险物料清单hazardous substance list危険物一覧钢丝吊篮wire basketワ゗ヤバスケット转储单凭证transfer order document転送指図伝票仓位坐标序列series of bin coordinates棚座標列仓储类型标识storage type indicator保管域タ゗プ区分货盘化palletizationパレット積載随机拣配random pickingランダムピッキング同类存储单位homogeneous storage unit同一保管単位混合存储单位mixed storage unit混合保管単位SU-管理SU-managed保管単位管理货盘化数据palletization dataパレット積載データ总计份数total quant count保管ロット検数合計拣配大/小量picking large/small quantities数量比較ピッキング数量危险物料号hazardous material number危険物コード易燃物料combustible material可燃性品目易燃液体combustible liquid可燃性液体易燃固体combustible solid可燃性固体易燃品inflammable material可燃性品目自燃品self-igniting material発火性品目有毒品poisonous material毒性品目易传染品infectious material伝染性品目腐蚀性物料corrosive material腐食性品目提货范围picking areaピッキングエリゕ爆炸性物料explosive material起爆性品目仓库入库类型storage type for putaway在庫受入保管域タ゗プ下达订单部分release order partリリース発注部品盘点清除清单inventory clearing list棚卸決済一覧盘点输入清单inventory input list棚卸入力一覧仓储区标识storage section indicator保管区画区分库存盘点记录inventory count record棚卸検数レコード能力使用的程序capacity used使用中保管容量剩余货架寿命remaining shelf life残存有効期間正差额positive differenceプラス差異SLED 控制清单SLED control list SLED (有効期限日) 管理一覧差异标识difference indicator差異区分校验verify確認库存记录inventory record棚卸レコード铲车控制系统forklift control systemフォークリフト制御システム库存号inventory number棚卸番号特殊移动指示器special indicator for movement特殊移動区分分散的仓库decentralized warehouse分散倉庫工作量计算workload calculationワークロード計算装载装备loading equipment積載機器仓库管理应用组件Warehouse Management application component倉庫管理ゕプリケーションコンポーネント2－步相关2-step relevanceツーステップ関連手控中止mobile data entry deviceモーバ゗ルデータ入力デバ゗ス应用软件检验认application identifier適用 ID科目折扣account discount顧客割引订单类型order type指図タ゗プATP 数量ATP quantity ATP 数量EAN 类别EAN category EAN カテゴリ订单完成日期order finish date指図終了日付最后确认final confirmation最終確認外协加工external processing外注工程更新生成EAN perishables EAN生鮮品 EAN销售订单的存货sales order stock受注在庫存储地点storage location保管場所供应商vendor仕入先（计划的）交货日期delivery date/time(計画)納入期日交货delivery出荷/納入供应链supply chainサプラ゗チェーン后勤监控logistics monitorロジステゖクスモニタ物料material品目组计数器group counterグループカウンタ项目说明文本item text明細テキスト产品层次product hierarchy製品階層产品结构product structure製品構成参数文件profileプロフゔ゗ル发票检查invoice verification請求書照合循环库存periodic inventory定期棚卸UPC Universal Product Code UPC交货不足容差underdelivery tolerance不足納入許容範囲付款条件terms of payment支払条件过量交货容差overdelivery tolerance過剰納入許容範囲总计补充前置时间total replenishment lead time総補充リードタ゗ム重量 EAN weight EAN加重 EANITF 代码ITF code ITF コード单个业务伙伴individual business partner取引先(個別)库存差异inventory difference棚卸差異提货顺序pick sequenceピッキング順序拣配pickingピッキング条件condition条件条件conditions条件物料主记录material master record品目マスタレコード工作work作業国际商品编码International Article Number EAN订单order受注基准数量base quantity基本数量基本计量单位base unit of measure基本単位确认confirmation確認折扣协议rebate agreementリベート契約行业industry sector産業コード预甾reservation入出庫予定选择变式selection variant選択バリゕント工序operation作業发货goods issue出庫工厂plantプラント集中供应燃油的联合组织Office for Coorganization共通組織の中央組織库存出库stock removalピッキング量纲dimension次元通知单类型notification type通知タ゗プ加权weighting加重任务清单task listタスクリスト确认confirmation確認税确定程序tax determination procedure税決定手順物料组material group品目グループ完成确认completion confirmation完了確認计划开始日期planned start date計画開始日价格条件pricing conditions価格条件折扣rebateリベート产生安全边际safety margin after production製造後余裕期間海港seaport港出货港port of shipment出荷港装载的航空港airport of loading積載空港卸货港port of discharge荷卸港 (空港)到达码头port dues入港税后勤控制Logistics Controllingロジステゖクス分析计划/实际比较planned/actual comparison計画/実績比較安全库存safety stock安全在庫用户设置user settingsユーザ設定报价quotation見積合同contract基本契約交货单delivery note出荷伝票/納品書项目类别item category明細カテゴリ框架协议outline agreement購買契約/販売契約排序字符串sort stringソート文字列不足交货underdelivery不足納入未清库存opening stock初期在庫(DP)凭证类型document type文書タ゗プ（DP）同意approve承認する批准approval承認初始下载initial download初期ダウンロード结构总揽structure overview構成概要销售订单部件sales order component受注構成品标准补充standard supplement標準補足拣配清单pick listピッキングリスト实用程序utilityユーテゖリテゖ相关资源开票resource-related billing実績ベース請求计划工厂planning plant計画プラント内陆码头inland port内陸港签字策略signature strategy署名方針组合值码combination value key組み合わせ値キー签字处理signature process署名処理相资源价格resource-related quotation実績ベース見積科目所有人account holderゕカウントホルダ退货returns返品工作列表worklistワークリスト容器containerコンテナ工业工程师industrial engineer゗ンダストリゕルエンジニゕ设计师design engineerデザ゗ンエンジニゕ复制规则copying ruleコピー規則署名方式signature method署名方式业务伙伴工程师business partner engineerビジネスパートナエンジニゕ。

SAP（物流）相关英文单词1

SAP（物流）相关英文单词1Plant : 工厂Storage Location: 存储地点WQ3D WQ3N WQ02 SU03 SU04 SU05 Storage type:存储类型100 (floor loc) 200 (shelving loc) 300(high up pallet) Storage Bin:仓位，即为库位Warehouse number:仓库号（SU5）创建TOTO:Transfer Order:传输指令DO:Delivery Order:交货订单Shipment number:备货单Material:料号Batch:批次号Quantity（QTY）：数量PO：合同号Item：项目Requirement:要求Certificates：证书test reports：测试报告source inspection：来源检验Crating：装箱special labeling：特殊标签license tags：许可标签Delivery:配送Stock：库存P/N：型号（客户）Currency：货币picklist for delivery：选择列表为交货within china 1day truck：中国1天卡车内Net weight:净重Grow weight:毛重shipment complete：装运完成pallet number：托盘数量Confirmation：确认Don't display materials/QTY：不显示料号/数量pack in one pallet装在一个托盘（只有一个）use license tag table：使用许可标签表（出口）Description：说明picking quantity：出货数量Picking date：出货日期transfer order 0001373941 created：创建TO为0001373941 to in background ：在后台（自动）to in foreground ：在前台（手动）to for group：为组item view：项目视图activate item：启动项目adopt pick quantity采用接项目transfer order for picking :set parameters：为了采摘转移：设置参数WM-TO:1 deliveries successful,0 with errors,0 not relevant：WM-TO:1DO的TO创建成功，0个错误，0相关确认TOConfirmed：确认for checking：检查for distribution：分发for picking：采摘for confirmation：确认for loading：运载for goods issue：发货for transport .planning：运输.规划list outbound deliveries：列出外向交货shipping point：运输点time date：时间日期picking date：采摘日期loading date：装运日期Group：集团production supply：生产供应supply area：供应面积Order：次序partner date：客户日期forwarding agent：货运代理shipment date：装运日期Route：线路route schedule：线路时间表Status：状态outbound deliveries for confirmation：出站交付确认2 pick/putaway order(is) confirmed successfully,0 with errors：2/入库顺序（是）确认成功，0挑错误制作箱单change shipment:initial screen：改变装运：初始屏幕selection ：选择Processing：处理Identification：鉴定Control：控制shipment type：装运货物种类tender status：货币的状态overall status：整体状态shipment route：装运路线shipping type：航运类型service level：服务水平shipping cond：航运已调节spec process：规范的过程Container：集装箱further dates：进一步日期Stages：阶段Partner：合作伙伴Tests：测试Status：状态Tender：招标continuous move：连续移动Planning：规划Execution：执行check-in：办理登记手续loading end：运载结束Completion：完成shipment start：运装开始shipment end：装运结束display options：显示项目to not confirmed for：不证实pallet level：托盘水平low level only：只有低水平carton ID：纸箱的IDnumber of cartons：纸箱的数carton detail's option：纸箱详细选项carton detail's not required：纸箱详细的不需要carton detail's required：纸箱细节的需求carton detail req w/o gross wt：纸箱细节REQ W / O总重量country of origin options：国家的起源选项mixed COO per pallet：每托盘混合首席运营官only one COO per pallet：只有一个首席运营官每托盘call transaction mode：呼叫交易模式carton numbers from license tag：从许可标签的纸箱号码制作标签label data entry screen：标签的数据输入屏幕Bldg：大厦production label（complete one row only）：生产标签（仅完成一排）purchasing document：采购文件material document：材料文件Operation：操作Sales：销售material number ：材料编号print all production labels：打印所有生产标签print co-product labels：打印合作产品标签follow-on labels screen：后续屏幕上的标签kanban container：看板容量return to first screen after printing：返回到印刷后的第一个屏幕ship to/customer special/carrier label：船到/客户的特殊/载体标签delivery document：交付文件license tags：许可标签handling units：承办单位CSL spec number：CSL的规格号miscellaneous/free form label：免费形式的标签label format：标签的格式pick ticket/label：接票/标签Continue：继续label detail screen：标签细节画面selected material：所选材料shipping information：航运信息Address：地址label printer：标签打印机labeling details：标签细节Value：值value for printing：打印值Description：说明# of labels：标签# of copies：份数Printer：打印机carton qty：纸箱数量customer po number：客户订单号shipment number：备货单号delivery number：DO号delivery item number：DO项目编号customer part number：部分客户号码pkg shipper qty：PKG托运的数量part number：部件号labels have been generated：标签已经被生成系统盘点（WM）carry out continuous inventory：开展连续清查program parameters：系统参数count date：盘点日期group number：组号required number of bins：所需数量箱only empty bins：只有空箱with dynamic storage bins：与动态存储箱only bins not yet counted：尚未计算只垃圾桶only bins that can be counted：可以只算箱name of counter：名称计算器（单位换算）continuous inventory:list sorted by number of quants：连续库存：金融工程师的数量排序的列表display storage bin：显示屏储物箱continuous inventory:error log：连续库存：错误日志system inventory record 1434 created：创建系统库存记录1434external ID：外部IDProgram：计划log number：日志数量log number：消息文本inventory overview：库存概述physical inventory number：物理库存数量general program parameters：一般程序的参数planned date：计划日期inventory status：库存状况not counted：不计partially counted：部分计算Counted：算Cleared：清除only non-activated：唯一的非激活only non-printed：唯一的非打印warehouse inventory list printed：仓库库存清单印list name:列表名称print immediately：立即打印delete after output：删除后输出new spool request：新的假脱机请求print in landscape：横向打印warehouse inventory list printed：仓库库存清单印enter inventory count:initial screen：输入库存盘点：初始屏幕Overview：概述new item：新项目single record entry：单记录条目inventory record：库存记录recount version：验票版本Positioning：定位inventory page：库存页面inventory item：库存项目storage bin：存储位置differences list per storage type：每个存储类型的差异列表program parameters：程序参数Variance：方差Value：值list of uncounted bins：不计数箱名单Layout：布局inventory record：库存记录inventory status：库存状况recount version：验票版本inventory page：库存页面dynamic selections：动态选择value difference：价值的差额Remarks：备注processing options：处理选项value-based variance：基于价值的方差display not-counted：显示不计数Foreground：前景write off：注销count information：计数信息value difference currency remarks：价值的差额货币备注sign difference：签署的区别inventory time period：清查时期include details：包括细节inventory document number：库存证件号码list viewer：列表浏览器total metrics：总指标summary of bins counted：摘要计算箱differences per profit center：每个利润中心的差异code page：代码页file path：文件的路径file name：文件名profit center description：利润中心介绍。

(完整word版)投资学第7版TestBank答案07

Multiple Choice Questions1。

Market risk is also referred to asA）systematic risk， diversifiable risk.B）systematic risk， nondiversifiable risk.C) unique risk， nondiversifiable risk.D) unique risk, diversifiable risk.E) none of the above.Answer： B Difficulty： EasyRationale： Market, systematic, and nondiversifiable risk are synonyms referring to the risk that cannot be eliminated from the portfolio。

Diversifiable， unique, nonsystematic, and firm-specific risks are synonyms referring to the risk that can be eliminated from the portfolio by diversification.2. The risk that can be diversified away isA）firm specific risk。

B) beta。

C) systematic risk.D）market risk.E) none of the above。

Answer: A Difficulty： EasyRationale: See explanations for 1 and 2 above.3. The variance of a portfolio of risky securitiesA）is a weighted sum of the securities’ variances。

Dhaliwal_2011_TAR_Internal Control Disclosures, Monitoring, and the Cost of Debt

THE ACCOUNTING REVIEW American Accounting Association Vol.86,No.4DOI:10.2308/accr-10043 2011pp.1131–1156Internal Control Disclosures,Monitoring,and the Cost of DebtDan DhaliwalThe University of Arizona and Korea UniversityChris HoganMichigan State UniversityRobert TrezevantUniversity of Southern CaliforniaMichael WilkinsTexas A&M UniversityABSTRACT:We test the relationship between the change in a firm’s cost of debt andthe disclosure of a material weakness in an initial Section404report.We find that,onaverage,a firm’s credit spread on its publicly traded debt marginally increases if itdiscloses a material weakness.We also examine the impact of monitoring by creditrating agencies and/or banks on this result and find that the result is more pronouncedfor firms that are not monitored.Additional analysis indicates that the effect of bankmonitoring appears to be the primary driver of these monitoring results.This finding isconsistent with the argument that banks are effective delegated monitors for the debtmarket.The results of this study suggest the need for future research,particularly to testthe differential effects of monitoring on the cost of debt compared to the cost of equity.Keywords:cost of debt;monitoring of debt;bank monitoring;Section404reporting.Data Availability:Data are publicly available from the sources identiﬁed in the text.I.INTRODUCTIONS ection404of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002(hereafter,Sarbanes-Oxley)requires a publicly tradedﬁrm’s Form10-K to contain an audited report concerning the effectiveness of theﬁrm’s internal control overﬁnancial reporting.Under the Securities and Exchange Commission’s(SEC)Final Rule on management’s reporting on the effectiveness of internal controlWe are very grateful to Steven Kachelmeier(the Senior Editor)and two anonymous referees for their valuable and constructive suggestions.We also acknowledge the helpful comments received from workshop participants at The Ohio State University and Monash University.Editor’s note:Accepted by Steven Kachelmeier.Submitted:April2009Accepted:September2010Published Online:April20111131over ﬁnancial reporting,and under Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB)Auditing Standard No.2(AS 2),which were in effect during the time period examined in our study,ﬁrms are required to disclose in the Section 404report any material weakness in internal control over ﬁnancial reporting (SEC 2003;PCAOB 2004).By deﬁnition in AS 2,a material weakness indicates a more than remote likelihood that a material misstatement will not be prevented or detected in a ﬁrm’s ﬁnancial statements.1,2Section 404became effective for ﬁscal years ending on or after November 15,2004,for accelerated ﬁlers,deﬁned as panies with an equity market capitalization exceeding $75million that ﬁle Form 10-K.In this study,we use the release of an initial Section 404report as a natural experiment to test whether the cost of a ﬁrm’s publicly traded debt increases if it discloses a material weakness (hereafter,MW)in internal control over ﬁnancial reporting.We have several reasons to expect that weak internal control over ﬁnancial reporting is associated with a higher cost of debt.For example,weak internal control over ﬁnancial reporting leads to a decrease in the precision of ﬁnancial reporting numbers.This decrease in precision means that debt investors have less reliable information to assess default risk and to determine compliance with debt covenants (i.e.,estimation risk increases),which leads investors to charge a higher cost of debt (Bhojraj and Sengupta 2003).Moreover,weak internal control over ﬁnancial reporting suggests that managers ﬁnd it easier to misappropriate a ﬁrm’s cash ﬂows (Lambert et al.2007),thus increasing default risk,which again leads investors to charge a higher cost of debt.If weak internal control over ﬁnancial reporting is associated with a higher cost of debt,then we predict that the disclosure of a MW in an initial Section 404report is associated with an increase in the cost of a ﬁrm’s publicly traded debt.We ﬁnd marginal support for this prediction (p =0.099).Even though we ﬁnd that the disclosure of a MW is associated with an increase in a ﬁrm’s cost of debt,it is possible that this ﬁnding may not hold equally between ﬁrms that are monitored and ﬁrms that are not monitored by credit rating agencies and/or banks.To our knowledge,prior research has not studied the impact of monitoring on the response of markets to the information in a Section 404report.In Section II,we predict that the increased cost of debt associated with MW disclosure is more pronounced for ﬁrms that are not monitored than for ﬁrms that are monitored by credit rating agencies and/or banks.We ﬁnd strong support for this prediction.Additional analysis indicates that the effect of bank monitoring appears to be the primary driver of these monitoring results.This ﬁnding is consistent with the argument that banks have a comparative advantage in carrying out information search and monitoring activities.Ogneva et al.(2007)ﬁnd that the effect of Section 404requirements on a ﬁrm’s cost of equity is strongest for delinquent ﬁlers.Also,Moody’s Investors Service,Inc.(2005a)states that Moody’s views a ﬁling delay as indicating the most serious internal control over ﬁnancial reporting problems.Consistent with these observations,we ﬁnd that delinquent ﬁlers have an increase in their cost debt after the required initial Section 404report ﬁling date relative to ﬁrms that ﬁle a timely report.1More speciﬁcally,a material weakness is deﬁned as a signiﬁcant deﬁciency,or combination of signiﬁcant deﬁciencies,that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim ﬁnancial statements will not be prevented or detected (PCAOB 2004).Firms are not required to disclose in a Section 404report control deﬁciencies or signiﬁcant deﬁciencies that do not rise to the level of a material weakness.2Based on feedback received,including criticism that AS 2was too costly and resulted in inefﬁcient audits of internal controls,AS 2was superseded by AS 5(PCAOB 2007).AS 5was effective for ﬁscal years ending on or after November 15,2007,with early adoption permitted.Like AS 2,AS 5continues to require disclosures of material weaknesses in internal control over ﬁnancial reporting.However,the deﬁnition of material weakness in AS 5is somewhat less inclusive than in AS 2.In particular,AS 5uses the terminology ‘‘a reasonable possibility ’’rather than ‘‘a more than remote likelihood ’’that a material misstatement will not be prevented or detected.We have no reason to believe that our results would have been different under AS 5.1132Dhaliwal ,Hogan ,Trezevant ,andWilkins The Accounting ReviewJuly 2011When we partition sampleﬁrms by their ex ante probability of reporting a MW in an initial Section404report,weﬁnd that low-probabilityﬁrms have a larger increase in their cost of debt in response to reporting a MW than high-probabilityﬁrms.This result is consistent with the notion that the debt market is more surprised when aﬁrm with a low ex ante probability of reporting a MW actually reveals a MW than when this occurs for a high ex ante probabilityﬁrm.Concurrent studies by Kim et al.(2011)and Costello and Wittenberg-Moerman(2011)use bank loan credit spreads to examine some of the same issues that we investigate.The major difference between these two studies and our study is that Kim et al.(2011)and Costello and Wittenberg-Moerman(2011)focus on the impact of Sarbanes-Oxley reporting requirements in the private debt market,while we focus on this impact in the public debt market.As further discussed in Section VI,all three studiesﬁnd that aﬁrm’s cost of debt increases after it discloses a MW.Thus, we view the three studies as complementary in that they collectively provide evidence that Sarbanes-Oxley reporting requirements can impact aﬁrm’s cost of debt in both the private debt market and the public debt market.Our study contributes to the literature by examining the effect of Section404disclosures on the cost of debt rather than on the cost of equity.3One beneﬁt to examining the cost of debt is that measures of the cost of debt are better deﬁned and easier to estimate than measures of the cost of equity.4A more important beneﬁt is that examining debt allows us to analyze the effect of monitoring,or a lack of monitoring,by two debt monitors(i.e.,credit rating agencies and banks)on the relationship between the cost of debt and the disclosure of a MW.This analysis allows us to assess the impact that monitoring has on the response of markets to the information in a Section404report.This assessment of monitoring effects is valuable because,to our knowledge,prior research has not examined this issue.Further,the introduction of monitoring effects into the analysis creates some tension in the prediction that aﬁrm’s cost of debt increases if it discloses a MW.Finally,this analysis also provides evidence regarding(1)the argument that banks are effective delegated monitors for the debt market, and(2)the importance of bank monitoring relative to monitoring by credit rating agencies.A third beneﬁt to examining the cost of debt is that we are able to compare our results to the corresponding cost of equity results in Ashbaugh-Skaife et al.(2009).Based on this analysis,we are able to offer several suggestions for future research.These suggestions involve comparing and contrasting the effect of various monitoring agents on(1)the change in aﬁrm’s cost of equity and the disclosure of a MW,and(2)the change in aﬁrm’s cost of debt and the disclosure of a MW.Section II develops the hypotheses.Section III provides a description of the sample.Section IV describes the primary test results.Section V compares these results to the cost of equity results in Ashbaugh-Skaife et al.(2009).Section VI reports the results of additional analyses.Section VII provides a summary of the majorﬁndings.II.HYPOTHESESInternal Control over Financial Reporting and the Cost of DebtWe have several reasons to expect that weak internal control overﬁnancial reporting is associated with a higher cost of debt.For example,cost of debt factors in the likelihood of default. At the same time,weak internal control overﬁnancial reporting leads to a reduction in the precision ofﬁnancial reporting numbers,which decreases the reliability of the information needed to assess 3Debt is an important source ofﬁnancing for manyﬁrms.For example,among our sampleﬁrms,long-term debt as a percentage of equity is,on average,almost60percent.4See Botosan and Plumlee(2005)for a discussion of the measurement of the cost of equity,as well as a comparison of different measures of the cost of equity.Internal Control Disclosures,Monitoring,and the Cost of Debt1133The Accounting Review July2011the likelihood of default (i.e.,estimation risk increases).This decrease in reliability would cause debt investors to charge a higher cost of debt to compensate for their decreased ability to accurately assess the likelihood of default (Bhojraj and Sengupta 2003).Similarly,since debt investors use ﬁnancial reporting numbers to determine compliance with debt covenants (DeFond and Jiambalvo 1994),this decrease in reliability would lead debt investors to charge a higher cost of debt to compensate for their decreased ability to determine this compliance.Lambert et al.(2007)observe,‘‘[W]hen accounting quality increases,however,managers steal less,so more of the payoff goes to shareholders,’’where payoff refers to a ﬁrm’s cash ﬂows.This observation suggests that weak internal control over ﬁnancial reporting,which decreases accounting quality,provides managers with more opportunities to misappropriate cash ﬂows (i.e.,misappropriation risk increases).This increased misappropriation risk increases default risk,thus increasing the cost of debt.The disclosure of a MW in an initial Section 404report indicates the potential for a material misstatement in a ﬁrm’s ﬁnancial statements due to weak internal control over ﬁnancial reporting.Thus,based on the preceding arguments,we predict that the disclosure of a MW in an initial Section 404report is associated,on average,with an increase in a ﬁrm’s cost of debt.The hypothesis used to test this prediction is:H1:Firms that initially disclose a MW under Section 404experience a larger increase in theircost of debt compared to ﬁrms with no such disclosure.Monitoring Effects and the Cost of DebtAlthough we predict that a ﬁrm’s cost of debt increases if it discloses a MW in an initial Section 404report,it is possible that this average prediction does not hold equally for ﬁrms that are monitored compared to ﬁrms that are not monitored by credit rating agencies and/or banks.When monitoring debt,a credit rating agency assesses the quality of a ﬁrm’s internal control over ﬁnancial reporting.This assessment is reﬂected in the credit rating assigned to the ﬁrm.Consistent with this notion,Moody’s Investors Service,Inc.(2005b)indicates that,for ﬁrms that report a Section 404MW,rating actions are not needed in most cases,as the Moody’s rating already reﬂects Moody’s impression of the control weaknesses that are eventually disclosed in a Section 404report.Based on the preceding,we expect that a ﬁrm’s credit rating provides the debt market with indirect information about the quality of a ﬁrm’s internal control over ﬁnancial reporting,thereby reducing the importance of the information provided to the debt market in a Section 404report.This reduced importance should lead to a smaller increase in a ﬁrm’s cost of debt upon the disclosure of a MW than the increase that would occur if no monitoring by credit rating agencies existed.If the preceding is the case,then we expect:H2a:The increased cost of debt associated with MW disclosure is more pronounced for ﬁrmswith unrated debt than for ﬁrms with rated debt.Diamond (1984)and Fama (1985),among others,argue that banks serve as effective monitors for the debt market because they have a comparative advantage in carrying out information search and monitoring activities.For example,bankers have an ongoing relationship with a borrower,allowing them access to information about a borrower that is not publicly available (Fama 1985).Also,bankers ﬁnd it easier to monitor a ﬁrm because other providers of corporate debt are more dispersed;thus,monitoring by these other providers suffers from free-rider problems (Diamond 1984).Many empirical studies document support for the notion that banks serve as effective delegated monitors (e.g.,James 1987;Datta et al.2000;Bharath et al.2008;Altman et al.2010).Given the preceding,we argue that ﬁrms without bank loans exhibit a larger increase in their cost of debt following the disclosure of a MW in an initial Section 404report than ﬁrms with bank1134Dhaliwal ,Hogan ,Trezevant ,andWilkins The Accounting ReviewJuly 2011loans.If a bank makes a loan to a givenﬁrm,the bank would assess the quality of theﬁrm’s internal control overﬁnancial reporting;this assessment would be reﬂected in the interest rate on the loan. In other words,banks would price protect against internal control overﬁnancial reporting problems. Further,aﬁrm that has bank loans must disclose information about the terms of these loans in Form 10-K.Also,there are databases that provide detailed information about the terms of aﬁrm’s bank loan agreements(e.g.,DealScan).This information would provide the debt market with indirect information about the quality of aﬁrm’s internal control overﬁnancial reporting,thereby reducing the importance of the information provided in a Section404report.Further,the debt market could use this information to mimic the behavior of banks and also price protect against internal control overﬁnancial reporting problems,thereby reducing(relative to ﬁrms not subject to bank monitoring)the reaction of the cost of debt to the disclosure of a MW.5 Based on the preceding arguments,we expect:H2b:The increased cost of debt associated with MW disclosure is more pronounced forﬁrms that are not subject to bank monitoring than forﬁrms that are subject to bankmonitoring.We initially test H2a and H2b separately.We then test these hypotheses jointly to determine if the monitoring effect of credit rating agencies and that of banks each has its own incremental effect on the relationship between the cost of debt and the disclosure of a MW,as opposed to one effect subsuming the other.Delinquent Filers and the Cost of DebtOgneva et al.(2007)ﬁnd that the effect of Section404on the cost of equity is strongest for delinquentﬁlers.Additionally,Moody’s Investors Service,Inc.(2005a,1–2)views a delay inﬁling a Section404report as indicating the most serious internal control overﬁnancial reporting problems for the following reasons:Lateﬁlers may heighten uncertainty about the nature and extent of their control deﬁciencies while the company and its auditor complete their evaluation of the company’s controls.This uncertainty,in turn,raises questions about the reliability of the company’sﬁnancial data,particularly un-audited data,the ultimate timing ofﬁling reports with the SEC,and the nature of the company’s plan to remediate control problems.Regarding liquidity,laterﬁlers may:Temporarily lose access to the public capital markets because their SECﬁlings are ‘‘delinquent’’;Also miss the deadline forﬁling auditedﬁnancial statements,which,in turn,could cause uncertainty among market participants and affect the amount and terms of capital available to the company;andViolate covenants in credit agreements and/or indentures.A common covenant requires timelyﬁling ofﬁnancial data with the SEC.Based on the preceding,we test the following hypothesis:H3:Firms that delayﬁling an initial Section404report experience an increase in their cost of debt relative to timelyﬁlers.5If the debt market did not behave in this manner,then it is possible that the cost of debt would signiﬁcantly increase when aﬁrm that a bank is supposed to be monitoring discloses a MW in an initial Section404report.However,our results suggest that this is not the case.Internal Control Disclosures,Monitoring,and the Cost of Debt1135The Accounting Review July2011The Ex Ante Probability of Reporting a MW and the Cost of DebtAshbaugh-Skaife et al.(2009)document that the increase in the cost of equity for ﬁrms with a low ex ante probability of reporting a MW is greater than the increase for high-probability ﬁrms when a Section 302material weakness (hereafter,Section 302MW)or a Section 404MW is disclosed.6This ﬁnding is consistent with the notion that the equity market is more surprised when a ﬁrm with a low ex ante probability of reporting a MW actually reveals a MW than when this occurs for a high ex ante probability ﬁrm.Based on this evidence,we expect:H4:The increased cost of debt associated with MW disclosure is more pronounced for low exante probability of reporting MW ﬁrms than for high ex ante probability ﬁrms.III.SAMPLE SELECTION AND DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICSThe initial sample of Section 404disclosures consists of 4,536ﬁrm-years identiﬁed as reporting or not reporting a Section 404MW in their Form 10-K ﬁlings between November 3,2004,and March 3,2006,according to the Audit Analytics Internal Controls (hereafter,Audit Analytics)database.We eliminate ﬁrm-years with erroneous or duplicate CIK codes (these are the ﬁrm-identiﬁer codes that Audit Analytics uses),duplicate or triplicate ﬁrm-years (e.g.,where a ﬁrm disclosed internal control status updates in a subsequent year’s Form 10-K),and ﬁrm-years not in the Compustat database.After applying these screens,we are left with 3,640(3,087non-MW and 553MW)unique ﬁrms making an initial Section 404disclosure.The ﬁrms come from a broad range of industries.For example,only four two-digit SIC industries comprise more than 5percent of the ﬁrms,with the greatest concentration in SIC 60(Depository Institutions,10.93percent of ﬁrms)and SIC 73(Business Services,10.27percent of ﬁrms).To obtain yield data,we use the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD)Trade Reporting and Compliance Engine (TRACE)ﬁxed income securities transaction data.All brokers/dealers who are NASD members have an obligation to report transactions in corporate debt instruments via the TRACE system.TRACE should provide a relatively complete picture of trading in corporate debt instruments.For example,by the time of our sample period,(1)‘‘As a general rule,the vast majority of dollar denominated corporate debt instruments must be reported to TRACE ’’(NASD 2004,4),and (2)‘‘approximately 99%of all transactions and 95%of par value in the TRACE-eligible securities market are disseminated immediately ’’(SEC 2005,5).7Further,the data collected and disseminated on these transactions would cover the majority of all transactions in corporate bonds because ‘‘[m]ost corporate bonds trade in the over-the-counter (OTC)market ...The OTC market is much larger than the exchange markets,and the vast majority of bond transactions,even those involving exchange-listed issues,take place in this market ’’(Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association [SIFMA]2009,1).6Ashbaugh-Skaife et al.(2009)use both Section 302and Section 404disclosures in their analysis.Section 302,which was ﬁnalized and implemented on August 29,2002,requires management to certify in quarterly and annual reports that disclosure control processes and procedures have been designed and implemented,and to conclude on the effectiveness of disclosure controls.Both Sections 302and 404require the disclosure of material weaknesses in internal control over ﬁnancial reporting.Under Section 302,the disclosure is the responsibility of management,while under Section 404,the disclosure is the responsibility of the ﬁrm’s independent auditor,as well as management.7For example,in 2004TRACE was collecting data on secondary over-the-counter market transactions for approximately 23,000publicly traded corporate bond issues,including investment-grade debt,high-yield debt,and unrated debt,and on a typical day $20billion par value of corporate bonds turned over in approximately 25,000transactions (NASD 2004).In 2005,transactions not reported immediately were subject to a maximum ten-business-day reporting delay,except for trades of Rule 144A securities,which were not disseminated because of the limited transferability and tradability of securities sold pursuant to Rule 144A (SEC 2005).1136Dhaliwal ,Hogan ,Trezevant ,andWilkins The Accounting ReviewJuly 2011TRACE provides transaction-speciﬁc information,including price and ing this data, we calculate the transaction-speciﬁc credit spread as yield to maturity,or YTM,on a given corporate debt instrument transaction minus YTM(obtained from Federal Reserve Board[2006]) on a Treasury security matched on time to maturity.8We remove from the sampleﬁrms with missing required data,and fourﬁrms for which the absolute value of the test variable D DefaultRisk exceeds400percent.9We also remove43ﬁrms that report a Section302MW prior to their initial Section404report.10,11These procedures yield a sample of577(531non-MW and46MW)ﬁrms.Table1reports descriptive statistics for these ﬁrms.Similar to previous studies,MWﬁrms are smaller,less proﬁtable,and more distressed than non-MWﬁrms.12Also,for both MW and non-MWﬁrms,there is an increase in credit spreads in the time period following the initial Section404reportﬁling date,indicating that our tests should control for this general increase in credit spreads over the test period.Moreover,MWﬁrms have a higher pre-report credit spread than non-MWﬁrms,suggesting that the debt market,at least partially,can anticipate whichﬁrms are more likely to disclose a MW.This last observation indicates that our tests should control for pre-report credit spreads.Finally,if we partition the Spread(pre)data in Table1by bank monitoring status,weﬁnd that, for bank-monitoredﬁrms over days[À45,À3]relative to the initial Section404reportﬁling date, the mean spread for MWﬁrms in excess of the mean spread for non-MWﬁrms equals3.22percent. Forﬁrms not subject to bank monitoring,the corresponding difference is1.69percent.Finally, consistent with the notion that banks serve as effective monitors and that the debt market mimics bank behavior,the difference between3.22percent and1.69percent is marginally signiﬁcant(p= 0.062).IV.TEST DESIGN AND RESULTSTest of H1:Internal Control Disclosures and the Cost of DebtTest DesignTo examine ifﬁrms that initially disclose a Section404MW experience an increase in their cost of debt relative toﬁrms with no such disclosure,we estimate Model(1):138In these calculations,to eliminate outliers,we delete the top and bottom1percent of transaction-speciﬁc yield observations.9Our conclusions do not change if we estimate our models after setting D DefaultRisk for these fourﬁrms equal to the next most extreme value of D DefaultRisk observed in the distribution of D DefaultRisk.10Theseﬁrms are removed because(1)the disclosure of a prior Section302MW may preempt any information provided by the disclosure of a MW in an initial Section404report,and(2)we do not wantﬁrms that disclose a prior Section302MW,but disclose no MW in an initial Section404report,included in the sample because the remediation of a material weakness is not the primary interest of our study.11Approximately85percent of our sampleﬁrms have complete data on debt seniority.We do not want to reduce the sample size for our regression tests further by requiring data on debt seniority.If we estimate our models after adding the variable Seniority,coded1forﬁrms that have trades in only senior/senior secured debt instruments, and0forﬁrms that either have trades in at least some less senior debt instruments or have missing seniority data, the estimated coefﬁcient on Seniority is negative and not signiﬁcant at conventional levels(most signiﬁcant p=0.115).The only notable change in our results is that the estimated coefﬁcient on MW in Model(1)is positive atp=0.120(rather than p=0.099).Based on this analysis,we conclude that the seniority of debt does not appear to have an inﬂuence on our test results.12The previous studies that we refer to here are Ge and McVay(2005),Ashbaugh-Skaife et al.(2007,2009),Doyle et al.(2007),Ogneva et al.(2007),Beneish et al.(2008),Hogan and Wilkins(2008),Crabtree et al.(2009), Elbannan(2009),and Kim et al.(2011).13Appendix A summarizes the data sources used to calculate model variables.Internal Control Disclosures,Monitoring,and the Cost of Debt1137The Accounting Review July2011TABLE 1Descriptive StatisticsVariable531Non-MW Firms46MW Firms Mean Median Std.Dev .Mean Median Std.Dev .Yield (pre )4.982 4.822 2.2307.788* 6.042* 6.784Yield (post )5.520 5.260 2.6418.539*6.529* 6.844Spread (pre )1.308 1.0112.240 4.050* 2.487* 6.750Spread (post )1.676 1.3112.693 4.737* 2.634* 6.811DefaultRisk (pre )À1.800À1.841 2.039À0.578*À0.691* 2.045DefaultRisk (post )À1.431À1.652 1.685À0.415*À0.248* 2.010Assets (pre )7760.932878.4814151.944427.13*1317.92*7560.75Assets (post )7915.962978.4014411.514332.26*1298.93*7353.87CFO (pre )0.0540.0600.0780.016*0.016*0.055CFO (post )0.0860.0920.1010.037*0.041*0.082Leverage (pre )0.3190.2710.2030.2990.2900.169Leverage (post )0.3150.2660.2080.3100.2840.171CFVol (pre )0.0430.0360.0310.0450.0330.037CFVol (post )0.0450.0380.0320.0440.0360.036TrsYTM (pre )3.674 3.7540.640 3.738 3.9000.712TrsYTM (post )3.844 3.9330.604 3.802 3.9170.645Restructure (pre )0.31100.4630.478*00.505Restructure (post )0.38200.4860.47800.505WriteDown (pre )0.13000.3370.15200.363WriteDown (post )0.19600.3970.30400.465M&A (pre )0.04300.2040.02200.147M&A (post )0.05500.2270.02200.147Restate (pre )0.12200.3270.11100.318Restate (post )0.12700.3340.17800.387*Indicates that the ‘‘531Non-MW Firms ’’value is signiﬁcantly different from the ‘‘46MW Firms ’’value at the two-tailed 5percent level or better,based on a t-test of difference in means or a Wilcoxon two-sample test for medians.Table 1provides summary statistics for the 531sample ﬁrms that do not report a MW and the 46sample ﬁrms that do report a MW in an initial Section 404report.Variable Deﬁnitions:Yield (pre )=mean (for all TRACE-reported trades in a ﬁrm’s debt issues)YTM over days [À45,À3]relative to theinitial Section 404report ﬁling date;Yield (post )=mean (for all TRACE-reported trades in a ﬁrm’s debt issues)YTM over days [þ3,þ45];Spread (pre )=mean (for all TRACE-reported trades in a ﬁrm’s debt issues)credit spread over days [À45,À3],wherethe credit spread for each trade is YTM on the relevant debt issue minus YTM on a matched-by-maturity Treasury security;Spread (post )=mean (for all TRACE-reported trades in a ﬁrm’s debt issues)credit spread over days [þ3,þ45];DefaultRisk =score from the bankruptcy model of Ohlson (1980);Assets =total assets in $millions;CFO =cash ﬂow from operations scaled by total assets;Leverage =long-term debt scaled by total assets;CFVol =standard deviation over the last 20quarters of cash ﬂow from operations scaled by total assets;For each sample ﬁrm i ,TrsYTM i (pre )=the mean of all ‘‘YTM on a matched-by-maturity Treasury security ’’used tocalculate Spread i over days [À45,À3],and TrsYTM i (post )=the mean of all ‘‘YTM on a matched-by-maturity Treasury security ’’used to calculate Spread i over days [þ3,þ45];andRestructure (WriteDown ,M&A ,Restate )=an indicator variable equal to 1if restructuring (writedown,M&A,restatement)activity occurs in a given period,and 0otherwise.(continued on next page)1138Dhaliwal ,Hogan ,Trezevant ,andWilkinsThe Accounting ReviewJuly 2011。

《跨境电商实务英语》项目5参考答案

教材册Convincing an OrderPart One Warming UpI . C略）II . If I am a seller, I would like to choose the online chat software Skype. Because it has the following advantages.Firstly, I can make free calls to any Skype user, no matter where they are.Secondly, I can call cell phones and landlines around the world at low rates.Thirdly, I can make one-to-one video calls and even group video calls so that I can communicate with the customer more convenient and efficient.Part Two Case StudyCase 1I The seller expresses his thanks to the buyer firstly and replies to the buyer's inquirypatiently. In order to lead the buyer see more information in detail pages, the seller attaches some pictures.II. I. 我们的假发质量非常好，得到了顾客的一致好评。

2. 我们只使用环境友好型材料，保证符合质量标准。

III.Dear Mrs. Smith,Thank you for your interest in our item. Our throw pillows are of very good quality and have received favorable comments from customers. We only use enviromnentally friendly materials and we can guarantee that the throw pillows are well up to standard. We are looking forward to receiving your order early.Yours sincerely,David1. The seller says "More information about it can be found from the pictures weattached below." to lead the buyer to see more information on detail pages.2. The seller promises that he will arrange the delivery within 24 hours once the buyerplaces an order.II.Dear Miss Jones,Thanks for your interests in our bags. This shoulder bag is the bestseller in our store. The main material is PU and the lining material is polyester. We offer two different colors, white and black. More information about it can be found from the pictures we attached below. We have this item in stock and we will ship it within 24 hours once you place an order.Please contact us if you have any questions.Best regards,DavidCase 3亲爱的贝克先生：非常感谢您的询问。

股票短期收益的预测

Testing the predictive ability of technical analysis using a new stepwise test without data snooping biasPo-Hsuan Hsu a,⁎,Yu-Chin Hsu b ,Chung-Ming Kuan ca Department of Finance,University of Connecticut,United Statesb Department of Economics,University of Texas at Austin,United States cDepartment of Finance,National Taiwan University,Taiwana r t i c l e i n f o ab s t r ac tArticle history:Received 25October 2008Received in revised form 19July 2009Accepted 5January 2010Available online 18January 2010In the ﬁnance literature,statistical inferences for large-scale testing problems usually suffer from data snooping bias.In this paper we extend the “superior predictive ability ”(SPA)test of Hansen (2005,JBES )to a stepwise SPA test that can identify predictive models without potential data snooping bias.It is shown analytically and by simulations that the stepwise SPA test is more powerful than the stepwise Reality Check test of Romano and Wolf (2005,Econometrica ).We then apply the proposed test to examine the predictive ability of technical trading rules based on the data of growth and emerging market indices and their exchange traded funds (ETFs).It is found that technical trading rules have signi ﬁcant predictive power for these markets,yet such evidence weakens after the ETFs are introduced.Published by Elsevier B.V.JEL classi ﬁcation:C12C32C52G11Keywords:Data snoopingExchange traded funds Reality check SPA testStepwise testTechnical trading rules1.IntroductionTechnical analysis has been widely applied in stock markets since W.P.Hamilton wrote a series of articles in The Wall Street Journal in 1902.Its predictive power (or pro ﬁtability),however,remains a long-debated issue in both industry and academia.A recent article in The Wall Street Journal observes:“Some brokerage ﬁrms have eliminated their technical research departments altogether.Still,when the markets begin to sag,investors rediscover technical analysis ”(Browning,July 30,2007).Indeed,the same article reports that some technical analysts did foresee and warn their clients right before the stock market plunge on July 23,2007.There are also numerous empirical results in the literature that support technical analysis,such as Sweeney (1988),Blume et al.(1994),Brown et al.(1998),Gencay (1998),Lo et al.(2000),and Savin et al.(2007).Such evidences,however,may be criticized for their data snooping bias;see,e.g.,Lo and MacKinlay (1990)and Brock et al.(1992).Data snooping is common in the ﬁnance and economics literature.In practice,only a few ﬁnancial data sets are available for empirical examination.Data snooping arises when researchers rely on the same data set to test the signi ﬁcance of different models (technical trading rules)individually.As these individual statistics are generated from the same data set and hence related to each other,it is dif ﬁcult to construct a proper joint test,especially when the number of models (rules)being tested is large.White (2000)Journal of Empirical Finance 17(2010)471–484⁎Corresponding author.E-mail address:Paul.Hsu@ (P.-H.Hsu).0927-5398/$–see front matter.Published by Elsevier B.V.doi:10.1016/j.jemp ﬁn.2010.01.001Contents lists available at ScienceDirectJournal of Empirical Financej o ur n a l h o m e p a g e :ww w.e l s ev i e r.c o m /l o c a t e /j e m pf i n472P.-H.Hsu et al./Journal of Empirical Finance17(2010)471–484proposes a large-scale joint testing method for data snooping,also known as Reality Check(RC),which takes into account the dependence of individual statistics.Sullivan et al.(1999)apply the RC test andﬁnd that technical trading rules lose their predictive power for major U.S.stock indices after the mid80s.White's RC test suffers from two drawbacks.First,Hansen(2005)points out that the RC test is conservative because its null distribution is obtained under the least favorable conﬁguration,i.e.,the conﬁguration that is least favorable to the alternative.In fact, the RC test may lose power dramatically when many poor models are included in the same test.To improve on the power property of the RC test,Hansen(2005)proposes the“superior predictive ability”(SPA)test that avoids the least favorable conﬁguration.Empirical studies,such as Hansen and Lunde(2005)and Hsu and Kuan(2005),also show that the SPA test is more powerful than the RC test. Second,the RC test checks whether there is any signiﬁcant model but does not identify all such models.Note that Hansen's SPA test shares the same limitation.Romano and Wolf(2005)introduce an RC-based stepwise test,henceforth Step-RC test,that is capable of identifying as many signiﬁcant models as possible.Nonetheless,Romano and Wolf's Step-RC test is conservative because its stepwise critical values are still determined by the least favorable conﬁguration,as in the original RC test.In this paper,the SPA test is further extended to a stepwise SPA(Step-SPA)test that can identify predictive models in large-scale, multiple testing problems without data snooping bias.This is analogous to the extension of White's RC test to Romano and Wolf's Step-RC test.It is shown that the Step-SPA test is consistent,in the sense that it can identify the violated null hypotheses(models or rules) with probability approaching one,and its familywise error(FWE)rate can be asymptotically controlled at any pre-speciﬁed level, where FWE rate is deﬁned as the probability of rejecting at least one correct null hypothesis.This paper makes additional contribution by showing analytically and by simulations that the Step-SPA test is more powerful than the Step-RC test,under any power criterion deﬁned in Romano and Wolf(2005).In our empirical study,the proposed Step-SPA test is applied to evaluate the predictive power of9120moving average rules and 7260ﬁlter rules in several growth and emerging markets.Unlike many existing studies on technical analysis,we examine not only market indices but also their corresponding Exchange Traded Funds(ETFs).Considering ETFs is practically relevant because ETFs have been important investment vehicles since their inception in late90s.Moreover,due to the tradability and low transaction costs,ETFs help to increase market liquidity and hence may improve market efﬁciency(e.g.Hegde and McDermott,2004).Our empirical study thus enables us to assess whether the predictive power of technical rules,if any,is affected after ETFs are introduced.Our empirical results provide strong evidence that technical rules have signiﬁcant predictive ability in pre-ETF periods,yet such evidence weakens in post-ETF periods.In particular,weﬁnd many technical rules with signiﬁcant predictive power prior to the inception of ETFs in U.S.growth markets but none when the ETFs that track these market indices become available.For emerging markets,weﬁnd technical rules have predictive ability for4(out of6)index returns but for only2ETF returns.For these two predictable ETFs,far fewer rules with signiﬁcant predictive power can be identiﬁed by the proposed stepwise test.The high break-even transaction costs associated with the top rules in those predictable ETFs further suggest that some technical rules may be exploited to make proﬁt in certain emerging markets.Ourﬁndings therefore indicate a negative impact of the inception of ETFs on the predictive ability of technical trading rules.This is compatible with the intuition that ETFs allow arbitrageurs to trade away most potential proﬁts in young markets.To summarize,this paper makes the following contributions to the literature.First,we develop a new test for empirical testing problems inﬁnance that require correction of data snooping bias.Second,we provide new evidence of technical predictability (and potential proﬁtability)of growth and emerging stock markets based on recently available data of st,but not least,this study supports the adaptive market efﬁciency hypothesis of Lo(2004).Using technical predictability as a barometer of market efﬁciency,our results suggest that the existence of ETFs effectively improves market efﬁciency.1This paper proceeds as follows.We summarize the existing tests and introduce the Step-SPA test in Section2.The simulation results for the Step-SPA test are reported in Section3.The data and performance measures are discussed in Section4.The empirical results are presented in Section5.Section6concludes the paper.The proofs and some details of the technical rules considered in the paper are deferred to Appendices.2.Tests without data snooping biasGiven m models for some variable,let d k,t(k=1,2,...,m and t=1,2,...,n)denote their performance measures(relative to a benchmark model)over time.Suppose that for each k,IE(d k,t)=μk for all t,and for each t,d k,t may be dependent across k.We wish to determine whether these models can outperform the benchmark and would like to test the following inequality constraints:H k0:μk≤0;k=1;:::;m:ð1ÞFor example,we may test if there is any technical trading rule that can generate positive return for an asset.Let r t be the return of this asset at time t andδk,t−1be the trading signal generated by the k-th trading rule at time t−1,which takes the values of1,0, or−1,corresponding to a long position,no position,and a short position,respectively.Then,d k,t=δk,t−1r t is the realized return of the k-th trading rule,and Eq.(1)is the hypothesis that no trading rule can generate positive mean return.Note that d k,t depend on each other because they are based on the same return r t.1Neely et al.(2009)also suggest that the weakening technical predictability in foreign exchange markets can be explained by the adaptive market efﬁciency hypothesis.Following Hansen (2005),we impose the following condition on d t =(d 1,t ,...,d m ,t )′which allows d t to exhibit weak dependence over time.Assumption 1.{d t }is strictly stationary and α-mixing of size −(2+η)(r +η)/(r −2),for some r >2and η>0,where E |d t |(r +η)<∞with |⋅|the Euclidean norm,and var (d k ,t )>0for all k .Under this condition,the data obey a central limit theorem:ﬃﬃﬃn p ð–d −μÞD →N ð0;ΩÞ;ð2Þwhere –d =n −1∑n t =1d t ,μ=IE (d t ),Ω≡lim n →∞var ðﬃﬃﬃn p ð–d −μÞÞ,and D→stands for convergence in distribution.Moreover,Assumption 1ensures the validity of the stationary bootstrapping procedure and the consistency of the covariance matrix estimator of Politis and Romano (1994).2.1.Existing testsData snooping arises when the inference for Eq.(1)is drawn from the test of an individual hypothesis H 0k .One may circumvent the problem by controlling the signi ﬁcance level of each individual test based on the Bonferroni inequality.This approach is,however,not practically useful when the number of hypotheses,m ,is large.In many applications,m is typically very large;for example,Sullivan et al.(1999)evaluate 7846technical trading rules,and Hsu and Kuan (2005)study a total of 39,832simple technical rules and complex trading strategies.Alternatively,one may conduct a joint test of Eq.(1)with a properly controlled signi ﬁcance level.A leading example is the RC test of White (2000)with the statistic:RC n =maxk =1;…;mﬃﬃﬃn p –d k ;where d –k is the k -th element of d –.Given that Eq.(1)is a collection of composite hypothesis,White (2000)chooses the leastfavorable con ﬁguration (LFC),i.e.,μ=0,to obtain the null distribution.It follows from Eq.(2)that ﬃﬃﬃn p –d D→N ð0;ΩÞunder the LFC.The limiting distribution of RC n is thus max {N (0,Ω)}which may be approximated via a (stationary)bootstrap procedure.The null hypothesis Eq.(1)would be rejected when the bootstrapped p -value is smaller than a pre-speci ﬁed signi ﬁcance level or,equivalently,when the test statistic RC n is greater than the bootstrapped critical value.The LFC of the RC test is convenient but also renders this test relatively conservative.Hansen (2005)shows that under the null,when there are some μi <0and at least one μi =0,RC n D →max {N (0,Ω0)},where Ω0is a sub-matrix of Ωwith the j -th row and j -th column of Ωdeleted when μj <0.That is,the limiting distribution depends only on the models with a zero mean but not on those poor models (i.e.,the models with a negative mean).It is also conceivable that including very poor models may arti ﬁcially increase the empirical p -value of the RC test.This motivates the SPA test of Hansen (2005)with the statistic:SPA n =max ðmaxk =1;…;mﬃﬃﬃn p –d k ;0Þ;which is virtually the same as the RC test.A novel feature of the SPA test is that it avoids the LFC by re-centering the null distribution,as described below.Let Ωdenote a consistent estimator for Ωwith the (i ,j )-th element ωij .Also let σk 2≡ωkk and A n ;k =−σˆk ﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃﬃ2loglogn p .We de ﬁne μ̂as the vector with the k -th element:μˆk =–d k 1ﬃﬃﬃn p –d k ≤A n ;k ;where 1(B)denotes the indicator function of the event B .It can be seen that μ̂k =0almost surely when μk =0.Moreover,when μk <0,ﬃﬃﬃn p –d k ≤A n ;k with probability approaching one,so that μ̂k converges in probability to μk .Noting that ﬃﬃﬃn p –d =ﬃﬃﬃn p ð–d −μÞ+ﬃﬃﬃn p μ,Hansen (2005)suggests to add ﬃﬃﬃn p μˆto the bootstrapped distribution of ﬃﬃﬃn p ð–d −μÞ.Re-centering the bootstrapped distribution thus yields a better approximation to the null distribution of SPA n :max {N (0,Ω0),0}.The SPA test is a more powerful test than the RC test because the bootstrapped SPA p -value is smaller than the corresponding RC p -value.Another drawback of the RC test is that it does not identify all models that signi ﬁcantly deviate from the null hypothesis.Rejecting the null hypothesis by the RC test only suggests that there exists at least one model with μk >0.Basing on the RC test,Romano and Wolf (2005)propose a stepwise procedure that can identify as many models with μk >0as possible,while asymptotically controlling the FWE rate,the probability of rejecting at least one of the correct hypotheses.This test,also known as the Step-RC test,is practically more useful than the RC test.For example,a fund-of-fund manager ought to be more interested in ﬁnding out the funds that can beat the benchmark,rather than just knowing the best performed fund.To implement the stepwise procedure,we re-arrange d –k in a descending order.A top model k would be rejected if ﬃﬃﬃn p –d k is greater than the bootstrapped critical value,where bootstrapping is computed as in the RC test.If none of the null hypotheses isrejected,the process stops;otherwise,we remove d –k of the rejected models from the data and bootstrap the critical value again473P.-H.Hsu et al./Journal of Empirical Finance 17(2010)471–484using the remaining data.In the new sample,a top model i would be rejected if ﬃﬃﬃn p –d i are greater than the newly bootstrapped critical value.The procedure continues until no more model can be rejected.Note that Hansen (2005)and Romano and Wolf(2005)also suggest that using studentized statistics,ﬃﬃﬃn p –d k =σˆk ,would render the test more powerful.To ease the expression,our discussion below is still based on non-studentized statistics.2.2.The stepwise SPA testAnalogous to the extension from the RC test to the Step-RC test,it is natural to extend the SPA test to the Step-SPA test.The stepwise procedure enables us to identify signi ﬁcant models,as in the Step-RC test,yet it ought to be more powerful because itsnull distribution does not depend on the LFC.The proposed Step-SPA test is based on the following statistics:ﬃﬃﬃn p –d 1;…;ﬃﬃﬃn p –d m ,and a stepwise procedure analogous to that of the Step-RC test.For the Step-SPA test,we adopt the stationary bootstrap of Politis and Romano (1994)which is computed as follows.Let d ⁎t ðb Þ≡d ⁎n b ;t ,t =1,…,n ,be the b -th re-sample of d t ,where the indices n b ,1,...,n b ,n consist of blocks of {1,...,n }with random lengths determined by the realization of a geometric distribution with the parameter Q ∈[0,1).First,n b ,1is randomly chosen from {1,...,n }with an equal probability assigned to each number.Second,for any t >1,n b ,t =n b ,t −1+1with probability Q ;2otherwise,n b ,t ischosen randomly from {1,...,n }.A re-sample is done when n observations are drawn;let d –⁎ðb Þ=∑n t =1d ⁎t ðb Þ=n denote the sample average of this re-sample.Repeating this procedure B times yields an empirical distribution of d –*with B realizations.Given the pre-speci ﬁed level α0,the bootstrapped SPA critical value is determined asq ˆ*α0=max ðq ˆα0;0Þ;ð3Þwith q ˆα0=inf f q j P ⁎½ﬃﬃﬃn p max k =1;…;m ðd –⁎k −d –k +μˆk Þ≤q ≥1−α0g ,the (1−α0)-th quantile of the re-centered empirical distribution,and P *is the bootstrapped probability measure.The Step-SPA test with the pre-speci ﬁed level α0then proceeds as follows.1.Re-arrange d –k in a descending order.2.Reject the top model k if ﬃﬃﬃn p d –k is greater than q α0*(all),the critical value bootstrapped as in Eq.(3)using the complete sample.If no model can be rejected,the procedure stops;otherwise,go to next step.3.Remove d –k of the rejected models from the data.Reject the top model i in the sub-sample of remaining observations if ﬃﬃﬃn p d –i is greater than q α0*(sub),the critical value bootstrapped as in Eq.(3)from the sub-sample.If no model can be rejected,the procedure stops;otherwise,go to next step.4.Repeat the third step till no model can be rejected.When the critical values in the procedure above are bootstrapped as in the RC test,we obtain a version of Step-RC test,which is in the spirit of Romano and Wolf (2005)but implemented differently.3The results below show that the Step-SPA test is consistent while asymptotically controlling the FWE rate at a pre-speci ﬁed level,analogous to Theorem 4.1of Romano and Wolf (2005).All proofs of theorems are collected in Appendix A .Theorem 2.The following results hold under Assumption 1and α0<1/2.1.The hypothesis H 0k with μk >0will be rejected by the Step-SPA test with probability approaching 1when n tends to in ﬁnity.2.Given the pre-speci ﬁed level α0,the FWE rate of the Step-SPA test is α0when n tends to in ﬁnity if and only if there is at least one μk =0.Note that the FWE rate of the Step-RC test is less than or equal to α0,in contrast with the second result above.This is due to the fact that the RC test relies on the LFC and hence yields a conservative test.If there is no μk =0,it can also be shown that the FWE rate is zero asymptotically,4so that no null hypothesis will be incorrectly rejected.As far as power is concerned,our key result below shows that the Step-SPA test is superior than the Step-RC test.Theorem 3.Given Assumption 1,the Step-SPA test is more powerful than the Step-RC test under the notions of power de ﬁned in Romano and Wolf (2005).3.SimulationsIn this section,we evaluate the ﬁnite-sample performance of the Step-SPA and Step-RC tests using Monte Carlo simulations.We are mainly concerned with the FWE rate and the rejection frequency of the models with signi ﬁcant returns.This is similar to the examination of the empirical level and power of a test.2If n b ,t −1=n ,we use the wrap-up procedure and set n b ,t =1.3The original Step-RC test of Romano and Wolf (2005)differs from our procedure in the following ways.First,they use circular block bootstrap,rather than stationary bootstrap.Second,they rely on a data-dependent algorithm to determine the block size of bootstrap,rather than using an ex ante ﬁxed value.Third,they use bootstrapped standard errors,rather than heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent (HAC)estimators based on sample data;see also footnote 5.These differences may affect the ﬁnite sample performance of the Step-RC test.4When μk <0,ﬃﬃﬃn p d –k would diverge to negative in ﬁnity in probability.Given that the critical value is always non-negative,H k 0would be rejected with probability approaching zero,which implies that FWE rate is zero in the limit.474P.-H.Hsu et al./Journal of Empirical Finance 17(2010)471–484We ﬁrst generate m return series:x i ;t =c i +γx i ;t −1+ i ;t ;i =1;…;m ;t =1;…;Twhere i ,t are i.i.d.noises distributed as N (0,σ2),c i and γare parameters such that c i is a constant a for i =1,…,m 1,c i =0for i =m 1+1,…,m 1+m 2,and c i =−a for i =m 1+m 2+1,…,m .We ﬁrst set a =0.0008(8basis points),γ=0.01,and σ=0.005.Thus,each sample contains m 1“outperforming ”returns that have a positive mean 0.0008/0.99=0.00081,m 2“neutral ”returns with a zero mean,and m −m 1−m 2“poor ”returns with a negative mean −0.00081.The numbers of return series are m =90,900and 9000,the sample size is n =1000,and the number of simulation replications is R =500.For each m ,there are three cases:(1)m 1=m 2=m /3so that there are 3equal groups of returns,(2)m 1=m 2=m /9so that there are unequal groups of returns with a much larger group of “poor ”returns,and (3)m 2=m so that there are only neutral returns.In the stationary bootstrap,we set the number of bootstraps B =500and the parameter of the geometric distribution Q =0.9.To estimate the covariance matrix Ω0,we use the consistent estimator of Politis and Romano (1994)in the simulations and subsequent empirical study.5The simulation results based on non-studentized and studentized statistics are summarized in Tables 1and 2,respectively.Here,d –k =x –k ,the sample average of the k -th return series.For Table 1,the k -th return would be rejected if ﬃﬃﬃn p x –k is greater than the 5%bootstrapped critical value.For Table 2,we base the test decisions on studentized statistics ﬃﬃﬃn p x –k =σˆk ,where σ̂k is as discussed in Section 2.1and computed from the sample data.6In each replication,the rejection rate of these tests is the number of correctly rejected returns divided by m 1,the total number of outperforming returns.Averaging these rejection rates over R ,the number of replications,yields the average rejection (AR)rate,which is also the “average power ”de ﬁned in Romano and Wolf (2005).The FWE rate is computed as the relative frequency of the replications in which at least one neutral or poor return is incorrectly rejected.In Tables 1and 2we report the average rejection rates in the ﬁrst step,the average rejection rates in all steps,and the FWE rates of the Step-SPA and Step-RC tests.Note that case 3contains only the FWE rates,because there is no outperforming return (m 1=0).Table 1shows that,for the ﬁrst two cases,the FWE rates of the Step-SPA test are controlled properly and closer to the nominal level 5%than those of the Step-RC test.Note that case 3is exactly the LFC considered by the RC test.Thus,it is not surprising to see that the Step-SPA and Step-RC tests have the same FWE rates in this case (the last column of Table 1)because the Step-SPA test has no advantage here.Moreover,we ﬁnd that the FWE rate of the Step-SPA test is much smaller than 5%when m is large,but it is closer to 5%when m =90.This shows that the second result of Theorem 2is relevant in ﬁnite samples when m is small relative to the sample size n .When m is too large,the test becomes more conservative.Moreover,we can see that the Step-SPA test is more powerful than the Step-RC test in terms of average rejection rate.For each m ,the improvement of the Step-SPA test over the Step-RC test is greater when there are unequal groups of returns (with a larger number of poor models).Such improvement becomes more signi ﬁcant when m is large.The greatest improvement is about 16%(81.4%for the Step-SPA test vs.65.4%for the Step-RC test)which occurs for m =9000with unequal groups of returns.All the results support the argument of Hansen (2005)that the RC test is adversely affected by the number of poor models included in the test.It is also clear that the stepwise procedure does identify more signi ﬁcant returns than its one-step counterpart.Yet,the power gain is quite marginal for the Step-RC test.For example,when m =900with unequal groups of returns,further steps of the Step-5Following Hansen (2005),the following estimator due to Politis and Romano (1994)is used:Ωˆ=Ωˆ0+∑n −1j =1κðj ;n Þ½Ωˆj +Ωˆ′j ;where Ωˆj =n −1∑n t =j +1ðd t −d –Þðd t −j −d –Þ′and the weight function κ(j ,n )is de ﬁned as κðj ;n Þ≡n −j n ð1−Q Þj +jnð1−Q Þn −j ;where Q is the parameter of the geometric distribution.This HAC estimator is similar to that of Newey and West (1987)but with a different weight function.6For the studentized method,the bootstrapped statistics are computed as ﬃﬃﬃn p x –⁎k =σˆk ,k =1,…,m .That is,σ̂k from the sample data is also used in bootstrap.One could also compute the bootstrapped statistics as ﬃﬃﬃn p x –⁎k =σˆ⁎k ,with σ̂k *estimated from bootstrapped samples;see,e.g.,Romano and Wolf (2005).Table 1Simulated average rejection rates and familywise error rates of the Step-SPA and Step-RC tests.TestEqual group Unequal group All neutral AR rate (1-step)AR rate (all-steps)FWE rate AR rate (1-step)AR rate (all-steps)FWE rate FWE rate30outperforming +30neutral +30poor 10outperforming +10neutral +70poor 90neutral Step-SPA 96.397.7 4.898.399.0 4.6 3.0Step-RC 95.196.22.295.195.50.23.0300outperforming +300neutral +300poor 100outperforming +100neutral +700poor 900neutral Step-SPA 85.989.2 3.291.994.2 3.0 1.4Step-RC 83.585.61.283.884.40.21.43000outperforming +3000neutral +3000poor 1000outperforming +1000neutral +7000poor 9000neutral Step-SPA 68.772.5 1.677.781.40.8 1.0Step-RC64.967.60.864.865.40.01.0Notes:(1)All numbers are in percentage (%).(2)We consider m return series with three different means:“Outperforming ”returns with c i =8bps (means =8.1bps)for i =1,...,m 1,“neutral ”returns with c i =0(zero mean)for i =m 1+1,...,m 1+m 2,and “poor ”returns with c i =−8bps (means =−8.1bps)for i =m 1+m 2+1,...,m .(3)Other parameters in the simulation are:n =1000,R =500,B =500,and Q =0.9.(4)The signi ﬁcance level of the Step-SPA and Step-RC tests is 5%.(5)“AR rate ”stands for average rejection rate which is the percentages of correctly rejected return series with c i =8bps.(6)“FWE rate ”is the familywise error rate,the percentage of incorrectly rejected neutral and poor return series.(7)“1-step ”denotes the results from the ﬁrst step of the Step-SPA and Step-RC tests which are just the original SPA and RC tests;“all-steps ”denotes the ﬁnal results of the Step-SPA and Step-RC tests.475P.-H.Hsu et al./Journal of Empirical Finance 17(2010)471–484476P.-H.Hsu et al./Journal of Empirical Finance17(2010)471–484Table2Simulated average rejection rates and familywise error rates of the Step-SPA and Step-RC tests(Studentized).Test Equal group Unequal group All neutral AR rate(1-step)AR rate(all-steps)FWE rate AR rate(1-step)AR rate(all-steps)FWE rate FWE rate30outperforming+30neutral+30poor10outperforming+10neutral+70poor90neutral Step-SPA96.698.0 4.898.899.4 4.8 3.2Step-RC95.396.4 2.295.495.60.8 3.2 300outperforming+300neutral+300poor100outperforming+100neutral+700poor900neutral Step-SPA86.189.4 3.092.094.3 3.4 1.8Step-RC83.885.9 1.284.084.60.4 1.8 3000outperforming+3000neutral+3000poor1000outperforming+1000neutral+7000poor9000neutral Step-SPA68.872.6 2.078.682.5 1.6 1.2Step-RC65.267.8 1.065.065.60.6 1.2Notes:(1)All numbers are in percentage(%).(2)We consider m return series with three different means:“Outperforming”returns with c i=8bps(means=8.1bps)for i=1,...,m1,“neutral”returns with c i=0(zero mean)for i=m1+1,...,m1+m2,and“poor”returns with c i=−8bps(means=−8.1bps)for i=m1+m2+1,...,m.(3)Other parameters in the simulation are:n=1000,R=500,B=500,and Q=0.9.(4)We test the signiﬁcance of the studentized statistics using the Step-SPA and Step-RC tests at5%level.(5)“AR rate”stands for average rejection rate which is the percentages of correctly rejected return series with c i=8bps.(6)“FWE rate”is the familywise error rate,the percentage of incorrectly rejected neutral and poor return series.(7)“1-step”denotes the results from theﬁrst step of the Step-SPA and Step-RC tests which are just the original SPA and RC tests;“all-steps”denotes theﬁnal results of the Step-SPA and Step-RC tests.SPA test identify2.3%more signiﬁcant returns(91.9%vs.94.2%),whereas the Step-RC test onlyﬁnds extra0.6%signiﬁcant returns (83.8%vs.84.4%).From Table2it is readily seen that the Step-SPA and Step-RC tests are marginally improved when studentized statistics are used and that all the conclusions based on Table1carry over.We also note that these simulation results are quite robust to different a values for c i.In Fig.1,we plot the average rejection rates and FWE rates for a=0.0005,0.00055,…,0.001and m=90, 900,and9000with unequal groups of returns.We can see that the rejection frequencies and FWE rates increase with a;that is, these tests reject the null more easily when the return has a larger mean.More importantly,the Step-SPA test uniformly dominates the Step-RC test across a values in all3panels of Fig.1.Similarﬁndings are obtained in unreported simulations with various settings,such as correlated i and differentγ.All the results support the theoretical properties established in Section2.2 and unambiguously indicate that the Step-SPA test ought to be preferred to the Step-RC test in practice.4.Empirical data and performance measuresIn our empirical study,we evaluate the predictive ability of technical trading rules based on the data of market indices and corresponding ETFs.When an index is found to be predictable,one may question whether it can be easily traded by(U.S.) investors.This concern is practically relevant,especially for the indices of emerging markets,but it can be mitigated to a large extent when ETFs are available.Indeed,ETFs have been powerful investment tools for arbitrageurs and hedge funds because they track market indices closely and can be conveniently traded at low transaction costs.Thus,it makes practical sense to also examine the predictability of ETFs.4.1.Index and ETF dataWe consider three indices of U.S.growth markets:S&P SmallCap600/Citigroup Growth Index(SP600SG),Russell2000Index (RUT2000),and NASDAQ Composite Index(NASDAQ),and the ETFs that track these indices:SmallCap600Growth Index Fund(IJT), Russell2000Index Fund(IWM),and NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Fund(ONEQ).We also consider the indices of six emerging markets,including MSCI Emerging Markets Index,MSCI Brazil Index,MSCI South Korea Index,MSCI Malaysia Index,MSCI Mexico Index,and MSCI Taiwan Index.7The corresponding ETFs are:MSCI Emerging Markets Index Fund(EEM),MSCI Brazil Index Fund (EWZ),MSCI South Korea Index Fund(EWY),MSCI Malaysia Index Fund(EWM),MSCI Mexico Index Fund(EWW),and MSCI Taiwan Index Fund(EWT).All ETFs are issued by iShares,except that NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Fund is issued by Fidelity.The SP600SG and all MSCI indices are taken from Global Insight,while the other two U.S.indices and all ETFs are taken from Yahoo Finance with dividend adjustment.These data are partitioned into pre-and post-ETF periods,i.e.,the periods before and after the inception of the corresponding ETF.Table3summarizes the pre-ETF periods for all indices(upper panel),the post-ETF periods for all ETFs up to the end of the year2005(lower panel),and the inception dates of the ETFs.All pre-ETF periods have more than2000observations,yet the numbers of observations in post-ETF periods are quite different.For example,MSCI Malaysia and Mexico Index Funds have more than2000observations,but NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Fund and MSCI Emerging Markets Index Fund have only508and566observations,respectively.Table4contains the descriptive statistics of daily holding returns on the indices and ETFs considered in the paper.We can see that,for U.S.markets,NASDAQ Composite Index yields the highest daily return(7.4basis points)and the largest standard deviation in the pre-7Note that the MSCI indices are evaluated in U.S.dollars and reﬂect the holding returns on these markets for U.S.investors.These MSCI indices are important references to institutional investors,and they mitigate the liquidity and tradability issues in emerging markets because they include only investable larger stocks (Chang et al.,2004).。

制造业常用词汇集锦

ERP：ERP=Enterprise Resource Planning 企业资源规划WM= Warehouse Management System 仓库管理系统（不同于ERP中的库存管理）ETO = Engineering-to-Order面向订单设计MTO= Make-to-Order面向订单生产ATO= Assembly-to-Order面向订单装配MTS= Make-to-Stock面向库存生产PP= Production Planning生产计划大纲CO= Controlling控制MPS= The Master Production Schedule主生产排程RCCP= Rough Cut Capacity Planning粗能力需求计划CRP= Capacity Requirements Planning能力需求计划BOM= Bill Of Material物料清单MRP= Material Requirements Planning物料需求计划PAC= Production Activity Control 车间作业管理SD=Sales and Distribution 分销管理MM=Material Management 物料管理MTL=Material Management 物料管理ATP= Available To Promise可承诺产品数量COE= Customer order Entry客户订单输入PO= Purchasing Order采购定单OM= Order Management订单管理IM= Inventory Management库存管理VMI= vendor managed inventory供应商管理库存MRP=Material Requirements Planning 物料需求计划MRPII=Manufacture Resource planning 制造资源规划JIT=Just In Time 及时生产TQM=Total Quality Management 全面质量管理DRP=Distribution Resource Planning 分销资源计划SCM=Supply Chain Management 供应链管理SRM=Supplier Relationship Management 供应商关系管理CRM=Customer Relationship Managemen 客户关系管理BPR=Business Process Reengineering 业务流程重组（再造）EAM=Enterprise Asset Management 企业资产维护/管理WMS=Warehouse Management System 仓库管理系统CDC=Central Distribution Center 中央配送中心RDC=Regional distribution center 区域配送中心RFID=Radio Frequency Identification 无线射频识别(采用无线方式的标签识别技术) Bar Code条形码标签识别技术OA=Office Automation 办公自动化KM=Knowledge Management 知识管理BI=Business Intelligence 商务智能HR=Human Resources 人力资源计划KPI=Key Performance Index 关键绩效指标CRP(Capacity Requirements Planning)产能需求规划DRP(Distribution Resource Planning)分销资源规划visibility--可视化usability--可用性flexibility--灵活性localization--本土化configurable--可配置的customized--定制reporting framework--报表框架drill down--钻取fields--字段On premise--传统应用模式/预置模式On demand--按需配置模式a portal for a large customer’s tracking, receipt, shipments or demand--一个有关大型客户的跟单、收货、出货或需求的门户screens--窗口The key trend is to have smaller and smaller laws and more and more 最主要的趋势是固化的东西越来越少，可配置性越来越强。

MB1A MB1B MB1C

TJ厂主要用到的Movement Type为101 仓库收料 102退料201 工程领料 202工程退料 cost center261 仓库发料 262退料411 转仓 412退回 sales order GR/GI Slip No.501 仓库without PO 收料 by G/L Account 502 退回Z51仓库without PO 收料 by Vendor Z52 退回561 初始化库存 562退回以下为Movement Type 的detail 说明▲Movement Type1.物料的移动在SAP中的反映,也可以理解为物流业务在SAP中的反映2.移动类型可以根据物料类型的Quantity/Value属性,更新(数量(Stock)或价值(FI凭证/科目的确定)3.移动类型的字段显示(Screen)可以在IMG中设置4.MRP,ATP check 等计算的基础5.链接SAP各模块▲Mvt type Description1xx GR from Pur/Prd and return2xx GI for Consumption3xx,4xx Transfer5xx GR W/O ref to Pur/Prd Order6xx LE-SHP movement types7xx Physical inventory(IM:70x/WM:71x)8xx BrazilCustomer 9xx,Xxx,Yxx,Zxx▲T-Code: OMJJMenu path: IMG - Materials Management - Inventory Management and Physical Inventory – Movement type - Copy, Change Movement TypesGI: goods issue (consumption/usage, withdrawal) or goods receipt without reference;发料GR: goods receipt with reference to a purchase order or production orderGD: goods movement with reference to a delivery (from the Shipping component) RE: return delivery, return, reversalRE: returns reversalTP: transfer to company's own stockTF: transfer postingTR: reversal of transfer postingSLS: sales value receiptMovement type tablesCustomized tableT156 Movement Type - BWARTT156B Movement Types: Screen Selection (BWART+SOBKZ)Batch determinationT156SC Mvt Type: Qty/Value Posting: Customer Table; as of Rel.4.6A ;QM.InspectionT156Q Movement Type: Material-Independent ControlT156X Trans./Event Key ModificationT156T Movement Type TextT158B Check Table: Movement Type for Transaction CodeT157H Help Texts for Movement TypesT157D Reason for MovementT156N Next Movement TypeTMCA Evaluating movement types for LIS updateSystem tableT156SY Mvt Type: Qty/Value Update: System Table; Rel. 4.6A;(<4.6,T156S) T156W Posting string values(BUSTW)T156M Posting String: Quantity(BUSTM)T156F Fields in Quantity StringT156C Stock Types and Their Values▲Special stockK Consignment (vendor)O Parts prov.vendorW Consignment (cust)E Order on handQ Project stockV Ret.pkg w.customerM Ret.trans.pkg vendorP Pipeline material▲Movement indicator (KZBEW)Space Goods movement w/o referenceB Goods movement for purchase orderF Goods movement for production orderL Goods movement for delivery noteK Goods movement for kanban requirement (WM - internal only)O Subsequent adjustment of "material-provided" consumptionW Subsequent adjustment of proportion/product unit materialBelow you will find a short description of the standard movement types. The cancellation movement type is the movement type + 1 (cancellation for 101 = 102).▲101 Goods receipt for purchase order or orderIf the purchase order or order has not been assigned to an account, a stock type (unrestricted-use stock, stock in quality inspection, blocked stock) can be entered during goods receipt.If the purchase order or order has been assigned to an account, the goods receipt is not posted to the warehouse, but to consumption.In the case of non-valuated materials, the goods receipt is posted to the warehouse, although the purchase order has not been assigned to an account.Possible special stock indicators:K, Goods receipt for purchase order to consignment stockO, Goods receipt for purchase order to stock of material provided to vendorE, GR for purchase order or order to sales order stockQ, GR for purchase order or order to project stock▲103 Goods receipt for purchase order into GR blocked stockYou cannot receive goods into goods receipt blocked stock for stock transport orders. Possible special stock indicators:K, O, E, Q▲105 Release from GR blocked stock for purchase orderMovement type 105 has the same effects as 101.Possible special stock indicators:K, O, E, Q▲121 Subsequent adjustment for subcontractingThis movement type cannot be entered manually.With a subsequent adjustment for a subcontract order it is possible to correct the consumption of components. In this case, the material produced by the supplier is credited with the excess consumption / under-consumption. For this reason, if there is a subsequent adjustment, an item is generated for the produced material using movement movement type 121.Movement type 121 does not have a reversal movement type.Possible special stock indicators:O, E, Q▲122 Return delivery to supplier or to productionUsing movement type 122, you can distinguish real return deliveries for a purchase order or order from cancellations (102).In the standard version, you must enter a reason for the return delivery if you are using movement type 122. This enables you to carry out evaluations for return deliveries.The effects of movement type 122 correspond to a cancellation of movement type 101. Possible special stock indicators:K, O, E, Q▲123 Reversal of return deliveryIf you returned a goods receipt using movement type 122, you can reverse the return delivery using movement type 123. This movement type has the same effects as movement type 101.Possible special stock indicators:K, O, E, Q▲124 Return delivery to vendor from GR blocked stockUsing movement type 124, you can return a goods receipt to GR blocked stock (103). Movement type 124 has the same effects as movement type 104.Possible special stock indicators:K, O, E, Q▲125 Return delivery from GR blocked stock - reversalIf you returned a goods receipt to GR blocked stock using movement type▲124, you can reverse the return delivery using movement type 125.Movement type 125 has the same effects as movement type 103.Possible special stock indicators:K, O, E, Q▲131 Goods receipt for run schedule headerThis movement type cannot be entered manually. It is generated automatically at notification of goods receipt for a run schedule header.Possible special stock indicators:E, Q▲141 Goods receipt for subsequent adjustment for active ingredientThis movement type cannot be entered manually. It is generated automatically upon subsequent adjustment for a proportion/product unit . Subsequent adjustment is necessary if the system finds that there has been excess consumption or under-consumption after a goods receipt posting.Possible special stock indicators:K, O, E, Q▲161 Return for purchase orderIf a purchase order item is marked as a returns item, the returns to vendor are posted using movement type 161 when the goods receipt for purchase order (101) is posted. Movement type 161 has the same effects as movement type 122.Possible special stock indicators:K, O, E, Q▲201 Goods receipt for a cost centerThe goods can only be withdrawn from unrestricted-use stock.Possible special stock indicators:o K: Goods withdrawal fromo consignment stocko P: Goods withdrawal from pipelineIf you have withdrawals from consignment stock and from pipeline, payables to suppliers ensue.▲221 Goods issue for a projectThe goods can only be withdrawn from unrestricted-use stock.Possible special stock indicators:K, Q▲231 Goods issue for a customer order (without Shipping)You use this movement type if you want to process the delivery without Shipping.The goods can only be withdrawn from unrestricted-use stock.Possible special stock indicators:E, K, Q▲241 Goods issue for an assetThe goods can only be withdrawn from unrestricted-use stock.Possible special stock indicators:K▲251 Goods issue for sales (without customer order)Use this movement type if you have not entered a customer order in SD. In the standard system, the movement is assigned to a cost center.The goods can only be withdrawn from unrestricted-use stock.Possible special stock indicators:K▲261 Goods issue for an orderThis refers to all withdrawals for orders (for example, production order, maintenance order, except customer orders.Possible special stock indicators:E, K, P, Q, WThe goods issue can be posted manually in Inventory Management or automatically when an order is confirmed or via a delivery in Shipping.▲281 Goods issue for a networkThe goods can only be withdrawn from unrestricted-use stock.The goods issue can also be posted via a delivery in Shipping.Possible special stock indicators:E, K, P, Q▲291 Goods issue for any arbitrary account assignmentWith this movement type, all account assignment fields are ready for input. You can assign the movement to any arbitrary account assignment object.The goods can only be withdrawn from unrestricted-use stock.Possible special stock indicators:E, K, P, Q▲301 Transfer posting plant to plant in one stepThe quantity is transferred from unrestricted-use stock in the issuing plant to unrestricted-use stock in the receiving plant.Possible special stock indicators:E, O, Q, V, W▲303 Transfer posting plant to plant in two steps - removal from storageThe quantity is transferred from unrestricted-use stock of the issuing plant to stock in transfer in the receiving plant.For technical reasons, you cannot carry out transfer postings from plant to plant in two steps for split valuation materials.Removal from storage can be posted with movement type 603 via Shipping.Possible special stock indicators:None▲305 Transfer posting plant to plant in two steps - placement in storageThe quantity is posted fromstock in transfer to unrestricted-use stock in the receiving plant. The movement is not valuated.You can use movement type 605 in Shipping to post the goods receipt with reference to the delivery.Possible special stock indicators:None▲309 Transfer posting material to materialThe quantity is posted from unrestricted-use stock of the issuing material into unrestricted-use stock in the receiving material.Prerequisite: both materials have the same stockkeeping unit.Possible special stock indicators:E, O, Q, V, W▲311 Transfer posting storage location to storage location in one stepThe quantity is transferred from unrestricted-use stock of the issuing storage location to unrestricted use in the receiving storage location.Possible special stock indicators:E, K, M, QSee also 321, 343, 349, 455 for other stock types.▲313 Stock transfer storage location to storage location in two steps - removal from storageThe quantity is transferred from unrestricted-use stock of the issuing storage location to stock in transfer in the receiving storage location.Possible special stock indicators:None▲315 Transfer posting storage location to storage location in two steps - placement in storageIn the receiving storage location, the quantity is transferred from the stock in transfer to the unrestricted-use stock.Possible special stock indicators:None▲317 Creation of a structured material from constituent components (Retail)A material split into its components using movement type 319 can be rejoined using movement type 317.Movement type 317 has the same effect as a cancellation of movement type 319. Possible special stock indicators:None▲319 Split structured material into components (Retail)You can enter the splitting of a structured material manually using movement type 319. You can configure Customizing so that a structured material (for example, a set, prepack or display is automatically split into its components at goods receipt. The system posts the split using movement type 319. In this process, the BOM header material is posted and each of the component stocks are increased. You can also use this function if you use the Warehouse Management System (WM).Possible special stock indicators:NoneExample:A box of the structured material S contains 3 pieces of the component K1 and 4 pieces of the component K2. The following material document items result after the material is split at goods receipt:Qty Unit Material Movement type1 box S 101 +1 box S 319 -4 piece K1 319 +5 piece K2 319 +▲321 Transfer posting stock in quality inspection - unrestricted-use stockThe quantity is transferred from stock in quality inspection into unrestricted-use stock. Here it is possible to post the quantity to another storage location.You cannot use this movement type for QM-managed materials since transfer posting for these materials takes place using the usage decision.Possible special stock indicators:E, K, O, Q, V, W▲323 Transfer posting storage location to storage location - stock in quality inspection The quantity is transferred from stock in quality inspection in the issuing storage location into stock in quality inspection in the receiving storage location.Possible special stock indicators:E, K, Q▲325 Transfer posting storage location to storage location - blocked stockThe quantity is transferred from blocked stock in the issuing storage location into blocked stock in the receiving storage location.Possible special stock indicators:E, K, Q▲331 Withdrawal of sample from stock in quality inspectionThe sample is destructive, that is, the withdrawal has the same effects asscrapping. Possible special stock indicators:E, K, Q, V, W▲333 Withdrawal of sample from unrestricted-use stockThe sample is destructive, that is, the withdrawal has the same effects asscrapping. Possible special stock indicators:E, K, Q, V, W▲335 Withdrawal of sample from blocked stockThe sample is destructive, that is, the withdrawal has the same effects asscrapping. Possible special stock indicators:E, K, Q▲341 Change in status of a batch (available to unavailable)This goods movement is automatically created when there is a change in the status of a batch and it is also used to transfer the unrestricted-use stock intorestricted-use stock.Possible special stock indicators:E, K, M, O, Q, V, W▲343 Transfer posting blocked stock - unrestricted-use stockThe quantity is transferred from blocked stock to unrestricted-use stock. You can also post the quantity to another storage location.Possible special stock indicators:E, K, Q▲349 Transfer posting from blocked stock to stock in quality inspectionThe quantity is transferred from blocked stock to stock in quality inspection. Here you can transfer the quantity to another storage location.Possible special stock indicators:E, K, Q▲351 Goods issue for a stock transport order (without Shipping)The quantity is transferred from unrestricted-use stock in the issuing plant to stock in transit in the receiving plant.Movement type 351 is only used if the goods issue is posted without a delivery in Shipping. A goods issue for a stock transport order with delivery in Shipping is posted using movement type 641, 643, 645 or 647.The transfer posting is also possible for materials with split valuation.The goods issue for a stock transport order takes place using movement type 101. Possible special stock indicators:E, QFor special stock indicators E and Q and for purchase orders assigned to an account, ensure that the quantity is not posted to the stock in transit in the receiving plant.▲411 Transfer posting of special stocks E, K, and Q to company's own stockThe quantity is transferred from unrestricted-use special stock E( sales order stock ), unrestricted-use special stock K ( consignment stock) andunrestricted-use special stock Q ( project_stock ) to unrestricted-use storage location stock. The corresponding special stock indicator is required for this movement.If you do not use the special stock indicator, the system uses this movement type and movement type 311.For sales order stock, you can change the material number for this movement if you manage the material in your company's own stock under a different material number (for example, for configurable materials).Consignment stock is transferred to valuated stock, thus resulting in a vendor liability. ▲413 Transfer posting to sales order stockYou can use this movement type to carry out a transfer posting from your own unrestricted-use stock, other sales order stock, consignment stock, and project stock to a sales order stock.Possible special stock indicators:E, K, Q▲415 Transfer posting to project stockYou can use this movement type to carry out a transfer posting from your own unrestricted-use stock, consignment stock, and other project stock to a project stock. Possible special stock indicators:E, K, Q▲441 Transfer posting non-tied to tied emptiesPart of the stock of an "empties" material assigned to a full product is managed in the stock type "tied empties".Empties stock not assigned to a full product forms part of the stock type "unrestricted-use".Using movement type 441, you can make a transfer posting for an empties material from the stock type "unrestricted-use" to the stock type "tied empties". Movement type 442 reverses this transaction.Example:The full product "beer" has a stock of 15 cases. Part of the empties components "bottle" and "case" is tied empties stock.Material unrestricted-use tied emptiesBeer 15Bottle 240 360case 10 15▲451 Returns from customers (without Shipping)Using movement type 451, you post customer returns without a returns delivery in Shipping into blocked stock returns . The blocked stock returns are not valuated. Possible special stock indicators:NoneSee also: 453, 651, 653▲453 Transfer posting blocked stock returns to unrestricted-use stockThe quantity is transferred from blocked stock returns to unrestricted-use stock and thereby transferred to valuated stock.With this movement you can transfer the quantity to another storage location at the same time.Possible special stock indicators:None▲455 Transfer posting storage location to storage location - blocked stockreturnsThe quantity is transferred from blocked stock returns of the issuing storage location to blocked stock returns of the receiving storage location.Possible special stock indicators:None▲457 Transfer posting blocked stock returns to quality inspection stockThe quantity is transferred from blocked stock returns to quality inspection stock and thereby transferred to valuated stock.With this movement you can transfer the quantity to another storage location at the same time.Possible special stock indicators:None▲459 Transfer posting blocked stock returns to blocked stockThe quantity is transferred from blocked stock returns to blocked stock and thereby transferred to valuated stock.With this movement you can transfer the quantity to another storage location at the same time.Possible special stock indicators:None▲501 Goods receipt without purchase order - unrestricted-use stockThis movement type is used for deliveries from vendors that are not based on a purchase order. Invoice verification is not possible for these goods receipts.For a goods receipt for purchase order (101), the receipt of returnable transport packaging can be entered using movement type 501 and special stock indicator M.Possible special stock indicators:E, K, M, Q▲503 Goods receipt without purchase order - stock in quality inspectionThis movement type is used for deliveries from vendors that are not based on a purchase order. Invoice verification is not possible for these goods receipts.Possible special stock indicators:E, K, Q▲505 Goods receipt without purchase order - blocked stockThis movement type is used for deliveries from vendors that are not based on a purchase order. Invoice verification is not possible for these goods receipts.Possible special stock indicators:E, K, Q▲511 Free-of-charge delivery from vendorThe quantity is posted to unrestricted-use stock. If there is a material with moving average price, the moving average price is reduced accordingly.Possible special stock indicators:None▲521 Goods receipt without order - unrestricted-use stockThis movement type is used for deliveries from production that are not based on an order. Possible special stock indicators:E, Q▲523 Goods receipt without order - stock in quality inspectionThis movement type is used for deliveries from production that are not based on an order. Possible special stock indicators:E, Q▲525 Goods receipt without order - blocked stockThis movement type is used for deliveries from production that are not based on an order. Possible special stock indicators:E, Q▲531 Goods receipt from by-product from the orderThe goods receipt of a by-product usually refers to an order, but it can be entered without a reference.If a component is entered with a negative quantity in the order, a reservation item is created with 531 (instead of 261). The receipt of a by-product can be entered when the component for the order is withdrawn from stock or it can be entered as an 'other goods receipt'.Possible special stock indicators:E, QSee also: 545 and 581▲541 Transfer posting unrestricted-use stock - stock of material provided to vendor With this movement type you provide the subcontractor with the components required for subcontract orders . The quantity is posted into unrestricted-use stock of material provided to vendor.If there is a goods receipt for a subcontract order (101), the consumption of components is posted from this stock.The transfer posting can be posted via a delivery in Shipping.Possible special stock indicators:None▲543 Consumption from stock of material provided to vendorThis movement cannot be entered manually.The consumption of components for a subcontract order is posted using goods receipt for purchase order (101). It can be corrected by means of a subsequent adjustment.For special stock indicators E and Q, you must ensure that the quantity is not posted to the stock of material provided to vendor, but to the unrestricted-use sales order or project stock.Possible special stock indicators:E, O, Q▲545 Goods receipt from by-product from subcontractingIf a component is entered with a negative quantity for the subcontract order, the receipt of the by-product is posted to stock provided to vendor during goods receipt for purchase order or during the subsequent adjustment.For special stock indicators E and Q, you must ensure that the quantity is not posted to the stock of material provided to vendor, but to the unrestricted-use sales order or project stock.Possible special stock indicators:E, O, Q▲551 Scrapping from unrestricted-use stockPossible special stock indicators:E, K, O, Q, V, W▲553 Scrapping from stock in quality inspectionPossible special stock indicators:E, K, O, Q, V, W▲555 Scrapping from blocked stockPossible special stock indicators:E, K, Q▲561 Initial entry of stock - unrestricted-use stockDuringinitial entry of stock balances, when the R/3 system is active, you enter the physical warehouse stock figures or the book inventory from your old system into the R/3 Materials Management component. This data entry usually takes place by means of batch input.Possible special stock indicators:E, K, M, O, Q, V, W▲563 Initial entry of stock - quality inspectionDuringinitial entry of stock balances, when the R/3 system is active, you enter the physical warehouse stock figures or the book inventory from your old system into the R/3 Materials Management component. This data entry usually takes place by means of batch input.Possible special stock indicators:E, K, O, Q, V, W▲565 Initial entry of stock - blocked stockDuringinitial entry of stock balances, when the R/3 system is active, you enter the physical warehouse stock figures or the book inventory from your old system into the R/3 Materials Management component. This data entry usually takes place by means of batch input.Possible special stock indicators:E, K, Q▲571 Goods receipt for assembly order to unrestricted-useThis movement cannot be entered in Inventory Management, but only in repetitive manufacturing using the Goods receipt for sales order function.Possible special stock indicators:E, Q▲573 Goods receipt for assembly order to quality inspectionThis movement cannot be entered in Inventory Management, but only in repetitive manufacturing using the Goods receipt for sales order function.Possible special stock indicators:E, Q▲575 Goods receipt for assembly order to blocked stockThis movement cannot be entered in Inventory Management, but only in repetitive manufacturing using the Goods receipt for sales order function.Possible special stock indicators:E, Q▲581 Goods receipt of a by-product from the networkThe goods receipt of a by-product usually refers to a network , but can be entered without reference.If a component is entered with a negative quantity in the network, a reservation is created with 581 (instead of 281). The receipt of a by-product can be entered during the withdrawal for the network or as an 'other goods receipt'.Possible special stock indicators:E, Q▲601 Goods issue for delivery (Shipping)In Shipping, this movement type is created automatically with the Goods issue for delivery function.The quantity is taken from unrestricted-use stock.Possible special stock indicators:E, K, Q▲603 Goods issue for stock transport order (Shipping) with additionalitemIf you issue goods for a stock transport order in Shipping using movement type 641, you can use this movement type to assign an extra item to the order.The ordered material is transferred to the stock in transit of the receiving plant. The material for the additional item is transferred from unrestricted-use stock in the issuing plant to stock in transfer in the receiving plant.You can also use this movement type without referencing a purchase order.Possible special stock indicators:NoneSee also: 303, 641▲605 Goods receipt for a stock transport order (Shipping) withadditional itemYou can use this movement type to transfer into unrestricted-use stock the material you posted into stock in transfer in the receiving plant using movement type 603. You post the goods movement with reference to the purchase order (if available) or the delivery. Possible special stock indicators:NoneSee also: 305, 641▲621 Transfer posting unrestricted-use - returnable packaging (Shipping)The quantity is transferred from unrestricted-use stock to the returnable packaging stock at customer .Possible special stock indicators:none▲623 Goods issue from returnable packaging stock at customer (Shipping)This quantity is withdrawn from unrestricted-use returnable packaging stock at the customer.Possible special stock indicators:V▲631 Transfer posting unrestricted use - customer consignment stock (Shipping)The quantity is transferred from unrestricted-use stock to consignment stock at customer. Possible special stock indicators:E, Q▲633 Goods issue from customer consignment (Shipping)The quantity is withdrawn from unrestricted-use consignment stock at the customer. Possible special stock indicators:W▲641 Goods issue for a stock transport order (Shipping)The quantity is transferred using a delivery in Shipping from unrestricted-use stock of the issuing plant to stock in transit of the receiving plant.The goods receipt for thestock transport order takes place using movement type 101 and can, if required, refer to the purchase order or to the delivery. If a purchase order item is flagged as a returns item in the stock transport order, you can post the goods receipt of the returns in the issuing plant with movment type 671.Possible special stock indicators:E, QFor the special stock indicators E and Q and for purchase orders assigned to an account, you must ensure that the quantity is not posted to the stock in transit of the receiving plant.See also: 351, 643, 671▲643 Goods issue for a cross-companystock transport order (Shipping)It is used only for cross-company stock transport orders with SD billing and invoice. The quantity is withdrawn from the unrestricted-use stock of the issuing plant. No stock in transit is created here. In the second step, the goods receipt must be entered in the receiving plant. If a purchase order item is flagged as a returns item in the stock transport order, you can post the goods receipt of the returns in the issuing plant with movment type 673.Possible special stock indicators:NoneSee also: 351, 641, 673▲645 Goods issue for a cross-company。

SAP常用专有名词中英对照表

中文工廠庫位／儲存位置採購組織
採購群組物料主檔供應商主檔
備註 Buyer
採購相關
SAP 名詞
中文
備註
Purchase Requisition 請購單
PR
Request for Quotation
詢價單
RFQ
Quotation
報價單
Purchase Order
採購單
PO
Release Strategy
訂單類型
SAP 名詞
中文
Agreement
協議
Consignment Order 託售訂單
Contracts
合約
Credit/Debit memo
借項/貸項通知單(訂單)
Quotation
報價單
Return Order
退貨訂單
Sales Support & Sales Schedule agreement
中文信用額度信用管理折讓單跨公司代碼交易交貨折舊折價範圍折舊預測折舊執行分配文件類型
備註
SAP 名詞 Down Payment Dunning Ex Rate Differences Ex Rate Types Ex Rates Financial Accounting Financial Statement Version Foreign Currency Valuation Fiscal Year Fixed Assets Functional Area
中文
總帳科目發貨總帳收貨/發票接收結清群組資產往來銀行收款資本投資訂單內部文件內部訂單發票
備註 G/L
I/O
SAP 名詞 Low Value Asset Location Lock Mass Reversal Master Data Material Ledger Moving average price Number Ranges Offsetting One-Time Vendors Open Items

WMRT-10000-US

Walmart USA Product Safety and Compliance Standard based on Various State Laws PHYSICAL AND MECHANICAL REQUIREMENTS Age Grading Walmart USA Product Safety and Compliance Standard based on CPSC Age Determination Guidelines and ASTM F963 Annex A1 Age Grading Guidelines Feathers - Use Restrictions, as Walmart USA applicable Product Safety and Compliance Standard Flammability (contact 16 CFR 1500.133 adhesives)
Mechanical Hazards
Stuffing Cleanliness
Loose fillers shall be free of objectionable matter and contamination such as animal infestation, splinters, metal chips, etc.
Products that are silvery liquids with similar properties to mercury shall contain no intentionally added mercury (detection limit of 5 PPM). In lieu of testing, a passing test report may be submitted. See Document Acceptance list for document parameters.

SAP物料移动类型查询表

SAP 物料移动类型查询表Goods movement w/o reference B Goodsmovement for purchase order F Goodsmovement for production order L Goodsmovement for delivery note K Goodsmovement for kanbanrequirement (WM - internal only)O Subsequent adjustment of "material-provided"consumption W Subsequent adjustment ofproportion/product unit material 移动类型描述移动类型特殊库存标⽰B Customer Stock C SC Customer Stock E Orders on hand FSCCustomerOrderStock I SC RTPJ SC Vendor consignmntK Consignment (vendor)M Ret.trans.pkg vendor O Parts prov. vendor P Pipeline material Q Project stock R SC Project Stock V Ret. pkg w. customer W Consignment (cust.)Y Shipping unit (whse)是否有相关业务使⽤模块B GR 收货101 Y MM-PU F 订单收货101 Y PP B 托售库存的收货101K Y MM-PU B 收货到SC 供应商101O Y MM-PU B为采购订单的收货冲销102 Y MM-PU F 定单收货冲销102 Y MM-PU B消耗库存的收货冲销102K Y MM-PU B收货到SC 供应商冲销102O Y MM-PU B进⼊冻结库存的收货103 Y MM-PU B GR 托售到冻结103K Y MM-PU BSC 供应商冻结的收货103O Y MM-PU B 到冻结冲销的收货104 Y MM-PU B GR 托售冻结转回104K Y MM-PU B冲销冻结的GRSC供应商104O Y MM-PU B来⾃冻结库存的收货105 Y MM-PU B GR 托售来⾃冻结105K Y MM-PU BGR SC 供应商来⾃冻结105O Y MM-PU B来⾃冻结的收货冲销106 Y MM-PU B GR 托售冻结转回106K Y MM-PU BGR SC 供应商冻结转回106O Y MM-PU O 收货后续调整121 N O 收货后续调整121O NB RE 向供应商退货122 Y MM-IM F RE 退回订单122 Y MM-IM B RE 向供应商退货122K Y MM-IM B RE 向供应商退货122O Y MM-IM B RE 退货供应商冲销123 Y MM-IM FRE 退给销售订单冲销123YMM-IM销B RE退货供应商冲销123K Y MM-IM B RE退货供应商冲销123O Y MM-IM B收货退给冻结库存124Y MM-IM B收货退给冻结库存124K Y MM-IM B收货退给冻结库存124O Y MM-IM B收货退给冻结库存冲销125Y MM-IMB收货退给冻结库存冲销125K Y MM-IMB收货退给冻结库存冲销125O Y MM-IMF收货131NF收货132N收货后续调整141N收货后续调整142NB收货退货161Y MM-IM B收货退给寄存库存161K Y MM-IM B收货退给SC供应商161O Y MM-IM B收货退给冲销162Y MM-IMB GR退回托售库存冲帐162K Y MM-IMB GR退回SC供应商冲帐162O Y MM-IM 有关成本中⼼的发货201Y MM-IM GI托售成本中⼼201K Y MM-IM 有关成本中⼼的收货202Y MM-IM GI托售成本中⼼202K Y MM-IM 有关项⽬的发货221NGI项⽬到托售221K N有关项⽬的收货222NRE项⽬到托售222K N销售订单的发货231NGI托售到销售订单231K N有关销售订单的收货232NRE托售到销售订单232K N有关资产的发货241N来⾃寄存的发货资产241K N有关资产的收货242N来⾃寄存的收货资产242K N有关销售的发货251N来⾃寄存的发货销售251K N有关销售的收货252N来⾃寄存的收货销售252K N有关订单的发货261Y PPL有关订单的发货261Y PP 从寄存的发货订单261K Y PP L从寄存的发货订单261K Y PP GI客户托售到订单261W Y PP L GI客户托售到订单261W Y PP 有关订单的收货262Y PP L订单的收货262Y PP 从寄存的收货订单262K Y PP L从寄存的收货订单262K Y PP RE客户托售到订单262W Y PP L RE客户托售到订单262W Y PP 有关⽹络的发货281NL有关⽹络的发货281NGI来⾃托售的⽹络281K NL GI来⾃托售的⽹络281K N有关⽹络的收货282NL有关⽹络的收货282NL有关⽹络的收货282N RE来⾃托售的⽹络282K N L RE来⾃托售的⽹络282K N 发货的全部帐户分配291N GI托售的科⽬分配291K NGR科⽬分配托售客户291W NL GR科⽬分配托售客户291W N 收货的全部帐户分配292N RE来⾃托售的科⽬分配292K N RE科⽬分配托售客户292W NL RE科⽬分配托售客户292W N TF⼯⼚间的转移301N TF⼯⼚间的转移301K N TF⼯⼚间的转移301O N TF⼯⼚间的转移301W N TR ⼯⼚间的转储302N TF⼯⼚间的转移302K N TR ⼯⼚间的转储302O N TR ⼯⼚间的转储302W N TF 部件从库存到⼯⼚303NL TF 部件从库存到⼯⼚303N TR 部件从库存到⼯⼚304NL TR 部件从库存到⼯⼚304N TF⼚内库存转储计划305NL TF⼚内库存转储计划305N TR⼚内库存交易计划306NL TR⼚内库存交易计划306NTF转储采购物料到物料309Y MM-IM TF转储采购物料到物料309O Y MM-IM TF转储采购物料到物料309W Y MM-IM TR转储采购物料到物料310Y MM-IM TR转储采购物料到物料310O Y MM-IM TR转储采购物料到物料310W Y MM-IM TF ⼚内移储311Y MM-IM TF⼯⼚中托售311K Y MM-IM TR ⼚内转储312Y MM-IM TR⼯⼚内托售312K Y MM-IM TF 部件从库到库存地313NTR 部件从库到库存地314NTF库存地库存转储计划315NTR库存地库存转储计划316N创建结构化物料317NRE创建结构化物料318NRE创建结构化物料318N拆分结构化物料319NRE拆分结构化物料320NTF质量到⾮限制321Y MM-IM TF寄存: 质检到⾮限321K Y MM-IM 制TF SC ord. QI to321O Y MM-IM unrTF当前寄存:QI到⾮321W Y MM-IM 限TR 质量到⾮限制322Y MM-IM 寄存交易: QI 到 unr.322K Y MM-IMTR SC ord. QI 到322O Y MM-IM unr客户寄存交易:QI 到322W Y MM-IM uTF ⼚内质量323Y MM-IM⼯⼚中的TF质检寄323K Y MM-IM 存TR ⼚内质量324Y MM-IM 寄存业务: ⼚内质检324K Y MM-IM TF⼚内冻结325Y MM-IM TF⼯⼚冻结的寄存325K Y MM-IM TR⼚内冻结326Y MM-IM⼚内冻结寄存业务326K Y MM-IM 处理GI 到样品质检331NGI抽样: 质检寄存331K NGI抽样: 质检客户寄331W N存RE 到样品质检332NRE抽样:托售QI332K NRE样品: 质检客户332W N寄存GI 到采样⾮限制333NGI抽样: ⾮限制寄存333K NGI抽样: ⾮限客户寄333W N存RE 到采样⾮限制334NRE样品: ⾮限制寄334K N存RE样品: ⾮限客户334W N寄存GI 到采样冻结335NGI抽样: 被冻结寄存335K NRE 到采样冻结336NRE样品: 冻结的寄存336K N批次重估340NTF batch重估340O NTF batch重估340W NTF ⾮限制到限制341NTF寄存⽆限制到限341K N制TF SC st⽆限制到341O N限制TF con.atC⽆限到341W N限制TF 限制到⾮限制342NTF托售未限制到限342K N制TF SCst.未限制到342O N限制TF con.atC未限到342W N限制TF冻结到⾮限制343Y MM-IMTF寄存: 冻结⾄⾮限343K Y MM-IM 制制TR 冻结到⾮限制344Y MM-IM TR寄存: 冻结⾄⾮限制344K Y MM-IM TF 冻结到质检349NTF寄存: 冻结于质量349K NTR 冻结到质检350N寄存业务: 冻结到质检350K NTF库存地到库存地411Y MM-IM TP 从代销到本公司411K Y MM-IM TR库存地到库存地412Y MM-IM 回转寄售到本公司412K Y MM-IM TF库存地到销售订单413TF 寄售到销售订单413KTR库存地到销售订单414TR 寄售到销售单414KTF 库存地到项⽬415NTF 寄售到项⽬415K NTR 库存地到项⽬416NTR 寄售到项⽬416K NTP 不受限制到受约束441NTP 受约束到不受限制442N发货退货451N收货退货(冲销)452N总储备退回发出处453N总储备到退货454NTF库存转储退货455NTR库存转储退货456NTP 退货到⾃⼰质检457NTP ⾃⼰质检到退货458NTP 退货到⾃⼰冻结459NTP ⾃⼰冻结到退货460N⽆采购订单的收货501Y MM-IM 对寄存的收据501K Y MM-IM⽆采购订单的RE收货502Y MM-IMRE接受到托售502K Y MM-IM收货到质检503N对寄存QI的收据503K NRE收货到质检504NRE接收到质检寄存504K N收货到冻结505N对寄存冻结的收据505K NRE收货到冻结506NRE接收到冻结寄存506K N免费交货511N⽆费⽤的RE交货512N⽆订单的收货521NRE⽆⽣产订单的收货522N⽆⽣产订单的QI收货523NRE⽆⽣产订单的质量524N⽆⽣产订单的冻结收货525NRE⽆⽣产订单冻结526N副产品收货531NRE副产品532N发货仓库到转包库存541Y MM-PUL发货仓库到转包库存541Y MM-PU发货仓库到转包库541O Y MM-PU发货仓库到转包库541O Y MM-PU 存L发货仓库到转包库541O Y MM-PU 存RE 转包库存到仓库542Y MM-PU L RE 转包库存到仓库542Y MM-PU RE 转包库存到仓库542O Y MM-PU L RE 转包库存到仓库542O Y MM-PU GI 发货分包库存543O Y MM-PUGI 接收分包库存544O Y MM-PU副产品SC收货545O NGI 发货 SC 副产品546O N发货报废551Y MM-IM发货报废寄存551K Y MM-IMGI 报废 SC st.551O Y MM-IMGI 报废客户寄售551W Y MM-IMRE报废552Y MM-IMRE报废寄存552K Y MM-IMRE 报废 SC 库存552O Y MM-IMRE 报废客户寄售552W Y MM-IM发货报废质检553Y MM-IMGI报废质检寄存553K Y MM-IMGI 报废 SC 库存 QI553O Y MM-IMGI 报废客户寄售 QI553W Y MM-IM收货报废质检554Y MM-IMRE报废质检寄存554K Y MM-IMRE 报废 SC 库存 Q554O Y MM-IMRE 报废客户寄售554W Y MM-IM QIGI报废冻结555Y MM-IMGI报废冻结寄存555K Y MM-IMRE报废冻结556Y MM-IMRE报废冻结寄存556K Y MM-IMGI调整转运557NGI调整转运558N库存余额的初始条561Y MM-IM ⽬库存余额输⼊:托售561K Y MM-IM库余输⼊:转包库存561O Y MM-IM库存余额:CuCons561W Y MM-IMRE初始条⽬库存余562Y MM-IM 额RE库存余额:托售562K Y MM-IMRE库存余额:转包库562O Y MM-IM 存RE库存余562W Y MM-IM 额:CuCon初始条⽬库存余563N额:QI库存余额:托售QI563K N库存余额:转包QI563O N库存余563W N额:CuCons.QIRE库存余额输⼊:QI564NRE库存余额:透售QI564K NRE库存余额:转包QI564O NRE库存余564W N额:cuCons.QI库存余额输⼊:冻结565N库存余额:托售冻结565K NRE库存余额输⼊:冻566N结RE库存余额:托售冻566K N结收货装配571N接收装配寄存571K NRE 收货装配572NRE 接收装配寄存572K N收货 QI 装配573N收货 QI 装配573N接受装配托售QI573K NRE 收货 QI 装配574NRE 接收装配寄存QI574K N收货冻结装配575N接收装配寄存冻结575K NRE 收货冻结装配576NRE接收装配寄存冻结576K N收货副产品⽹络581NRE 副产品⽹络582NL GD发货: 交货601Y SD L GD发货: 交货601K NRE交货冲销602Y SD L GD交货冲销602Y SD RE交货冲销602K NL GD交货冲销602K NTF 部件从库存到⼯⼚603NL TF补充交货603NTR 部件从库存到⼯⼚604NL TR 部件从库存到⼯⼚604NL TF⼚内库存转储计划605N TR⼚内库存交易计划606NL TR⼚内库存交易计划606N GI返回式包装:借贷621NL GD还包装: 出借621NGI返回式包装:退货622NL GD还包装: 退货622NGI寄售: 借贷631Y SD L GD货物寄存: 出借631Y SD GI寄售: 借贷631W Y SD L GD货物寄存: 出借631W Y SD GI寄售: 退货632Y SD L GD寄存: 退货632Y SD GI寄售: 退货632W Y SD L GD寄存: 退货632W Y SD GI发货: 客户寄售633W Y SD L GI发货: 客户寄售633W Y SD GI收货: 客户寄售634W Y SD L GI收货: 客户寄售634W Y SD L TF ⾄跨公司间643NL TR ⾄跨公司间644NTR 跨公司646NL GD退货退回651NL GD退货退货冲销652NL GD 退货⾮限制653Y SDL GD 退货⾮限制冲销654Y SDL GD 退货质检655N L GD 退货 QI 冲销656N L GD 退货冻结657N L GD 退货冻结冲销658N GI向供应商退货661N L GD退给供应商661N GI向供应商退货661K N L GD退给供应商661K N RE退货到供应商冲销662N L GD退给供应商冲销662N RE退货到供应商冲销662K N销L GD退给供应商冲销662K NTR 在途库存671NTF 到在途库存672NL TF ⾄跨公司间673NL TR ⾄跨公司间674NL TF GI16A1NL TR GI16A2NL TF CC GI16A3NL TR CC GI16A4NTF CC GI16A5NL TF CC GI16A5NTR CC GI16A6NL TR CC GI16A6NL TF GI16A7NL TR GI16A8NTF CC GI26B5NTR CC GI26B6NTF GI1 托售6W5NL TF GI1 托售6W5NTF GI1 托售6W5W NL TF GI1 托售6W5W NTR GI1 托售6W6NL TR GI1 托售6W6NTR GI1 托售6W6W NL TR GI1 托售6W6W NGR实际盘点: 仓库701Y MM-PIGR实际盘点: 寄存701K Y MM-PI 库存GR实际盘点: 分包701O Y MM-PI 库存GR实际盘点: 客户701W Y MM-PI 寄存GI实际盘点: 仓库702Y MM-PIGI实际盘点:寄存库702K Y MM-PI 存GI实际盘点: 分包库702O Y MM-PI 存GI实际盘点:客户寄702W Y MM-PI 存GR 盘点: 质检703Y MM-PIGR实际盘点: 质检703K Y MM-PI 寄存GR实际盘点:QI703O Y MM-PI subcStGR实际盘点:QI703W Y MM-PI cuConsGI 盘点: 质检704Y MM-PIGI实际盘点:质检寄704K Y MM-PI 存GI实际盘点:QI704O Y MM-PI subcStGI实际盘704W Y MM-PI 点:QIcuConsgGR 盘点: 已冻结707Y MM-PIGR实际盘点: 冻结707K Y MM-PI 寄存GI 盘点: 已冻结708Y MM-PIGI实际盘点:冻结寄708K Y MM-PI 存GI存货差异: 仓库711NGI库存偏差:仓库/寄711K N存GR存货差异: 仓库712NGR库存偏差:仓库/712K N寄存GI存货差异:QI713NGI库存偏差: QI/寄存713K NGR存货差异: 质检714NGR库存偏差:质检/寄存714K N GI存货差异: 退货715N GR存货差异: 退货716N GI存货差异: 冻结717N GI库存偏差:冻结/寄存717K N GR存货差异: 冻结718N GR库存偏差:冻结/寄存718K N SlsVal.rec.n.afftMgs721N SlsVal.iss.n.afftMgs722N SlsVal.rec. afftgMgs731N SlsVal.iss. afftgMgs732NL GD发货: 成本中⼼免费交货907Y SDL GD发货: 成本中⼼免费交货907K NRE免费交货冲销908Y SDL GD免费交货冲销908Y SD RE免费交货冲销908K NL GD免费交货冲销908K NL GD发货: 内部订单免费交货909Y SDL GD发货: 内部订单免费交货909K NRE免费交货冲销910Y SDL GD免费交货冲销910Y SD RE免费交货冲销910K NL GD免费交货冲销910K N有关项⽬的发货Z01NGI项⽬到托售Z01K N有关项⽬的收货Z02NRE项⽬到托售Z02K N有关项⽬的发货Z21NGI项⽬到托售Z21K N有关项⽬的收货Z22NRE项⽬到托售Z22KN。

SAP常用后台透明表

TABLES IN SAP1CUSTOMISING (4)1.1G ENERAL SETTINGS (4)1.1.1Countries (4)1.1.2Currency (4)1.1.3Unit of measure (4)1.1.4Calendar functions (4)1.2E NTERPRISE STRUCTURE (4)1.2.1Definition (4)1.2.2Assignment (5)1.3F INANCIAL ACCOUNTING (5)1.3.1Company code (5)1.3.2Fi document (5)1.4N OT CATEGORIZED (6)2BASIC DATA / ADMINISTRATION (7)2.1W ORKBENCH RELATED TABLES (7)2.1.1Data dictionary tables (7)2.1.2Workbench (7)2.2A DMINISTRATION (7)2.2.1User administration (7)2.2.2Batch input queue (8)2.2.3Job processing (8)2.2.4Spool (8)2.2.5Runtime errors (8)2.2.6Message control (8)2.2.7EDI (8)2.2.8Change documents (8)2.2.9Reporting tree table (9)2.2.10LIS structure/control tables (9)3MASTER DATA : (10)3.1M ATERIAL MASTER : (10)3.1.1Basic data text (sap script) (10)3.1.2Batches (10)3.2C USTOMER MASTER DATA (10)3.3V ENDOR (11)3.4C USTOMER – MATERIAL INFO RECORD (11)4CHARACTERISTICS : (12)4.1C HARACTERISTICS : (12)4.2C LASS TYPES AND OBJECTS : (12)4.3L INKS : (12)5FI/CO : (13)5.1FI: (13)5.1.1Master data (13)5.1.2Accounting documents // indices (13)5.1.3Payment run (13)5.2CO: (13)5.2.1Cost center master data (13)5.2.2Cost center accounting (13)6SALES AND DISTRIBUTION (SD) : (15)6.1S ALES ORDER : (15)6.2B ILLING DOCUMENT : (15)6.3S HIPPING : (15)6.4D ELIVERY : (15)6.5P RICING : (15)6.6CONTRACTS : (15)7MATERIAL MANAGEMENT (MM) : (16)7.1M ATERIAL DOCUMENT (16)7.2P URCHASING (16)8WAREHOUSE MANAGEMENT (WM) : (17)8.1T RANSFER REQUIREMENT (17)8.2T RANSFER ORDER (17)8.3M ASTER DATA - STOCK POSITIONS (17)8.4I NVENTORY DOCUMENTS IN WM (17)9QUALITY MANAGEMENT (QM) : (18)9.1I NSPECTION LOT / INFO RECORD (18)9.2Q UALITY NOTIFICATION (18)9.3C ERTIFICATE PROFILE (18)10PRODUCTION PLANNING (PP) (19)10.1W ORK CENTER (19)10.2R OUTINGS/OPERATIONS (19)10.3B ILL OF MATERIAL (19)10.5P LANNED ORDERS (20)10.6KANBAN (20)10.7R ESERVATIONS (20)10.8C APACITY PLANNING (20)10.9P LANNED INDEPENDENT REQUIREMENTS (20)11PROJECT SYSTEM (PS) (22)11.1B ASIC DATA (22)11.2E QUIPMENT (22)12PLANT MAINTENANCE (PM) (22)12.1H UMAN RESOURCES (23)12.2S ETTINGS (23)12.3M ASTER DATA (23)12.4I NFOTYPES (23)1Customising1.1General settings1.1.1CountriesT005 Countries1.1.2CurrencyTCURC Currency codesTCURR WisselkoersenTCURT Currency nameTCURX Decimal places for currencies.1.1.3Unit of measureT006 Units of measure1.1.4Calendar functionsT247 Month namesTFACD Factory calendar definitionT015M Month namesTTZZ Time zonesTTZD Summer time rulesTTZDF Summer time rules (fixed annual dates)TTZDV Summer time rules (variable dates)TTZDT Summer time rules textsTTZ5 Assign Time Tones to CountriesTTZ5S Assign time zones to regions1.2Enterprise structure1.2.1DefinitionFI T880 CompanyT001 Company codeCO TKA01 Controlling areaLO T001W Plant / sales organisationT499S LocationsTSPA DivisionSD TVKO Sales organisation / company code TVTW Distribution channelTVBUR Sales officeTVKBT Sales office textTVKGR Sales groupTVGRT Sales group textT171T Sales district textMM T001L Storage locationsT024E Purchasing organizationT3001 Warehouse numberTVST Shipping pointTVLA Loading pointTTDS Transportation1.2.2AssignmentCO TKA02 Assign company code to controlling areaLO T001K Assign plant (valuation area) to company codeSD TVKO Sales organisation / company codeTVKOV Distribution channel / sales organisationTVKOS Division to sales organizationTVTA Sales ariaTVKBZ Sales office to sales areaTVBVK Sales group to sales officeTVKWZ Plants to sales organizationMM T024E Purchasing organization / company code T024W Plant to Purchase organizationT001K Link plant ( = valuation area) / company codeTVSWZ Shipping point to plantT320 Assignment MM Storage Location to WM Warehouse 1.3Financial accounting1.3.1Company codeT004 Chart of accountsT077S Account group (g/l accounts)T009 Fiscal year variantsT880 Global company dataT014 Credit control area1.3.2Fi documentT010O Posting period variantT010P Posting Period Variant NamesT001B Permitted Posting PeriodsT003 Document typesT012 House banks1.4Not categorizedT007a Tax keysT134 Material typesT179 Materials: Product HierarchiesT179T Materials: Product hierarchies: TextsTJ02T Status textTINC Customer incotermsTVFK Billing doc typesT390 PM: Shop papers for print control2Basic data / administration2.1Workbench related tables2.1.1Data dictionary tablesDD02L Tables in SAPDD02T Tables descriptionDD03L Field names in SAPDD03T Field description in SAP2.1.2WorkbenchTADIR Directory of R/3 Repository ObjectsTRDIR System table TRDIRTFDIR Function ModuleTLIBG Person responsible for function classTLIBT Function Group Short TextsTFTIT Function Module Short TextTSTC Transaction codes in SAPTSTCT Transaction codes textsT100 Message text (vb e000)VARID Variant dataD020T Screen textsTDEVC Development classTDEVCT Texts for development classes2.2Administration2.2.1User administrationUSR01 User masterUSR02 Logon dataUSR03 User address dataUSR04 User master authorizationsUSR11 User Master Texts for Profiles (USR10)UST12 User master: AuthorizationsUSR12 User master authorization valuesUSR13 Short Texts for AuthorizationsUSR40 Prohibited passwordsTOBJ ObjectsTOBC Authorization Object ClassesTPRPROF Profile Name for Activity GroupDEVACCESS Table for development user2.2.2Batch input queueAPQD DATA DEFINITION QueueAPQI Queue info definition2.2.3Job processingTBTCO Job status overview tableTBTCP Batch job step overview2.2.4SpoolTSP02 Spool: Print requests2.2.5Runtime errorsSNAP Runtime errors2.2.6Message controlTNAPR Processing programs for outputNAST Message statusNACH Printer determination2.2.7EDIEDIDC Control recordEDIDD Data recordEDID2 Data record 3.0 VersionEDIDS EDI status recordEDPAR Convert External < > Internal Partner NumberEDPVW EDI partner typesEDPI1 EDI partner profile inboundEDPO1/2/3 EDI partner profile outbound2.2.8Change documentsCDHDR Change document headerCDPOS Change document positionenJCDS Change Documents for System/User Statuses (Table JEST)2.2.9Reporting tree tableSERPTREE Reporting: tree structure2.2.10LIS structure/control tablesTMC4 Global Control Elements: LIS Info Structure3MASTER DATA :3.1Material master :MARA Material masterMAKT Material textMARC Material per plant / stockMVKE Material master, sales dataMARD Storage location / stockMSKA Sales order stockMSPR Project stockMARM Units of measureMEAN International article numberPGMI Planning materialPROP Forecast parametersMAPR Link MARC <=> PROPMBEW Material valuationMVER Material consumptionMLGN Material / Warehouse numberMLGT Material / Storage typeMPRP Forecast profilesMDTB MRP tableMDKP Header data for MRP documentMLAN Tax data material masterMTQSS Material master view: QM3.1.1Basic data text (sap script)STXB SAPscript: Texts in non-SAPscript formatSTXH STXD SAPscript text file headerSTXL STXD SAPscript text file lines3.1.2BatchesMCHA BatchesMCH1 BatchesMCHB Stock : batches3.2Customer master dataKNA1 Customer masterKNB1 Customer / companyKNVV Customer sales dataKNBK Bank detailsKNVH Customer hierarchyKNVP Customer partnersKNVS Shipment data for customerKNVK Contact personsKNVI Customer master tax indicator3.3VendorLFA1 Vendor masterLFB1 Vendor per company codeLFB5 Vendor dunning dataLFM1 Purchasing organisation dataLFM2 Purchasing dataLFBK Bank details3.4Customer – material info recordKNMT Customer material info record3.5Bank dataBNKA Master bank data4Characteristics :4.1Characteristics :CABN Characteristics ( o.a. batch/vendor)CABNT Characteristics descriptionCAWN Characteristics ( o.a. material)CAWNT Characteristics descriptionAUSP Characteristic Values4.2Class types and objects :TCLAO Several class types for objectTCLA Class types ( vb. lfa1 => v10 en 010)TCLAT Class type textTCLT Classifiable objectsTCLC Classification status4.3Links :INOB Link between Internal Number and ObjectKLAH Class header dataKSSK Allocation Table: Object (vb.matnr) to Class KSML Characteristics for a class (internal number)5FI/CO :5.1FI :5.1.1Master dataSKA1 AccountsBNKA Bank master record5.1.2Accounting documents // indicesBKPF Accounting documentsBSEG item levelBSID Accounting: Secondary index for customersBSIK Accounting: Secondary index for vendorsBSIM Secondary Index, Documents for MaterialBSIP Index for vendor validation of double documents BSIS Accounting: Secondary index for G/L accountsBSAD Accounting: Index for customers (cleared items)BSAK Accounting: Index for vendors (cleared items)BSAS Accounting: Index for G/L accounts (cleared items)5.1.3Payment runREGUH Settlement data from payment programREGUP Processed items from payment program5.2CO :TKA01 Controlling areasTKA02 Controlling area assignmentKEKO Product-costing headerKEPH Cost components for cost of goods manuf.KALO Costing objectsKANZ Sales order items - costing objects5.2.1Cost center master dataCSKS Cost Center Master DataCSKT Cost center textsCRCO Assignment of Work Center to Cost Center5.2.2Cost center accountingCOSP CO Object: Cost Totals for External PostingsCOEP CO Object: Line Items (by Period) . COBK CO Object: Document header COST CO Object: Price Totals6Sales and Distribution (SD) :VBFA Document flow (alg.)VTFA Flow shipping documents6.1Sales order :VBAK Header dataVBAP Item dataVBPA Partners in sales orderVBKD Sales district dataVBEP Data related to line items, delivery lines6.2Billing document :VBRK header dataVBRP Item data6.3Shipping :VTTK Shipment headerVTTP Shipment itemVTTS Stage in transportVTSP Stage in transport per shipment itemVTPA Shipment partnersVEKP Handling Unit - Header TableVEPO Packing: Handling Unit Item (Contents)6.4Delivery :LIKP Delivery headerLIPS Delivery item6.5Pricing :KONH Conditions headerKONP Conditions itemsKONV Procedure ( billing doc or sales order)KOND6.6contracts :VEDA Contract data7Material Management (MM) :7.1Material documentMKPF material documentMSEG material document (item level)7.2PurchasingEKKO Purchase documentEKPO Purchase document (item level)EKPV Shipping-Specific Data on Stock Tfr. for Purch. Doc. Item EKET Delivery scheduleVETVG Delivery Due Index for Stock TransferEKES Order Acceptance/Fulfillment ConfirmationsEKKN Account assignment in purchasingEKAN Vendor address purchasingEKPA Partner functionsEIPO Item export / import dataEINA Purchase info record (main data)EINE Purchase info record (organisational data)EORD Source listEBAN Purchase requisitionEBKN Purchase Requisition Account Assignment8Warehouse Management (WM) :8.1Transfer requirementLTBK Transfer requirement - headerLTBP Transfer requirement - item8.2Transfer orderLTAK Transfer order - headerLTAP Transfer order - item8.3Master data - stock positionsLQUA Quants8.4Inventory documents in WMLINK Inventory document headerLINP Inventory document itemLINV Inventory data per quant9Quality Management (QM) :9.1Inspection lot / info recordQALS Inspection lot recordQAMB Link inspection lot - material documentQAVE Inspection usage decisionQDPS Inspection stagesQMAT Inspection type - material parametersQINF Inspection info record (vendor - material)QDQL Quality levelQDPS Inspection stages9.2Quality notificationTQ80 Notification typesQMEL Quality notificationQMFE Quality notification – itemsQMUR Quality notification – causesQMSM Quality notification – tasksQMMA Quality notification – activitiesQMIH Quality message - maintenance data excerpt9.3Certificate profileQCVMT Certificate profile characteristic level: textsQCVM Certificate profile characteristic levelQCVK Certificate profile header10Production Planning (PP)10.1Work centerCRHH Work center hierarchy()CRHS Hierarchy structureCRHD Work center headerCRTX Text for the Work Center or Production Resource/Tool CRCO Assignment of Work Center to Cost CenterKAKO Capacity Header SegmentCRCA Work Center Capacity AllocationTC24 Person responsible for the workcenter10.2Routings/operationsMAPL Allocation of task lists to materialsPLAS Task list - selection of operations/activitiesPLFH Task list - production resources/toolsPLFL Task list - sequencesPLKO Task list - headerPLKZ Task list: main headerPLPH Phases / suboperationsPLPO Task list operation / activityPLPR Log collector for tasklistsPLMZ Allocation of BOM - items to operations10.3Bill of materialSTKO BOM - headerSTPO BOM - itemSTAS BOMs - Item SelectionSTPN BOMs - follow-up controlSTPU BOM - sub-itemSTZU Permanent BOM dataPLMZ Allocation of BOM - items to operationsMAST Material to BOM linkKDST Sales order to BOM link10.4Production ordersAUFK Production order headersAFIH Maintenance order headerAUFM Goods movement for prod. orderAFKO Order header data PP ordersAFPO Order itemRESB Order componentenAFVC Order operationsAFVV Quantities/dates/values in the operationAFVU User fields of the operationAFFL Work order sequenceAFFH PRT assignment data for the work order(routing) JSTO Status profileJEST Object statusAFRU Order completion confirmationsPRT’s voor production ordersAFFH PRT assignment data for the work orderCRVD_A Link of PRT to DocumentDRAW Document Info RecordTDWA Document TypesTDWD Data Carrier/Network NodesTDWE Data Carrier Type10.5Planned ordersPLAF Planned orders10.6KANBANPKPS Kanban identification, control cyclePKHD Kanban control cycle (header data)PKER Error log for Kanban containers10.7ReservationsRESB Material reservationsRKPF header10.8Capacity planningKBKO Header record for capacity requirementsKBED Capacity requirements recordsKBEZ Add. data for table KBED (for indiv.capacities/splits)10.9Planned independent requirementsPBIM Independent requirements for materialPBED Independent requirement dataPBHI Independent requirement historyPBIV Independent requirement indexPBIC Independent requirement index for customer req.11Project system (PS)11.1Basic dataPRHI Work Breakdown Structure, Edges (Hierarchy Pointer) PROJ Project definitionPRPS WBS (Work Breakdown Structure) Element Master DataRPSCO Project info database: Costs, revenues, financesMSPR Project stock11.2EquipmentEQUI Equipment master dataEQKT Equipment short textEQUZ Equipment time segment12Plant maintenance (PM)IHPA Plant Maintenance: PartnersOBJK Plant Maintenance Object ListILOA PM Object Location and Account AssignmentAFIH Maintenance order header12.1Human resources12.2SettingsT582A Infotypes: Customer-Specific Settings12.3Master dataT527X Organizational UnitsT528T Position TextsT554T Attendance and Absence TextsT501 Employee groupT503 Employee group, subgroupT503K Employee subgroupT510N Pay Scales for Annual Salaries (NA)T549A Payroll Accounting AreasT750X Vacancy12.4InfotypesPA0001 Org. AssignmentPA0002 Personal DataPA0006 AddressesPA0007 Planned Working TimePA0016 Contract elementsPA0008 Basic payPA0105 CommunicationsPA1007 VacanciesPA1035 TrainingPA2001 Absences。

投资学第7版Test-Bank答案24

Multiple Choice Questions1. Trading activity by mutual funds just prior to quarterly reporting dates is known asA) insider trading.B) program trading.C) passive security selection.D) window dressing.E) none of the above.Answer: D Difficulty: ModerateRationale: Mutual funds must disclose portfolio composition quarterly, and trading activity that immediately precedes the reporting date is referred to as "window dressing". Thespeculation is that window dressing involves changes in portfolio composition, which gives the appearance of successful stock selection.2. The comparison universe is __________.A) a concept found only in astronomyB) the set of all mutual funds in the worldC) the set of all mutual funds in the U. S.D) a set of mutual funds with similar risk characteristics to your mutual fundE) none of the aboveAnswer: D Difficulty: EasyRationale: A mutual fund manager is evaluated against the performance of managers of funds of similar risk characteristics.3. __________ did not develop a popular method for risk-adjusted performanceevaluation of mutual funds.A) Eugene FamaB) Michael JensenC) William SharpeD) Jack TreynorE) A and BAnswer: A Difficulty: EasyRationale: Michael Jensen, William Sharpe, and Jack Treynor developed popular models for mutual fund performance evaluation.4. Henriksson (1984) found that, on average, betas of funds __________ during marketadvancesA) increased very significantlyB) increased slightlyC) decreased slightlyD) decreased very significantlyE) did not changeAnswer: C Difficulty: ModerateRationale: Portfolio betas should have a large value if the market is expected to perform well and a small value if the market is not expected to perform well; thus, these results reflect the poor timing ability of mutual fund managers.5. Most professionally managed equity funds generally __________.A) outperform the S&P 500 index on both raw and risk-adjusted return measuresB) underperform the S&P 500 index on both raw and risk-adjusted return measuresC) outperform the S&P 500 index on raw return measures and underperform the S&P500 index on risk-adjusted return measuresD) underperform the S&P 500 index on raw return measures and outperform the S&P500 index on risk-adjusted return measuresE) match the performance of the S&P 500 index on both raw and risk-adjusted returnmeasuresAnswer: B Difficulty: ModerateRationale: Most mutual funds do not consistently, over time, outperform the S&P 500 index on the basis of either raw or risk-adjusted return measures.6. Suppose two portfolios have the same average return, the same standard deviation ofreturns, but portfolio A has a higher beta than portfolio B. According to the Sharpemeasure, the performance of portfolio A __________.A) is better than the performance of portfolio BB) is the same as the performance of portfolio BC) is poorer than the performance of portfolio BD) cannot be measured as there is no data on the alpha of the portfolioE) none of the above is true.Answer: B Difficulty: ModerateRationale: The Sharpe index is a measure of average portfolio returns (in excess of the risk free return) per unit of total risk (as measured by standard deviation).7. Consider the Sharpe and Treynor performance measures. When a pension fund is largeand has many managers, the __________ measure is better for evaluating individualmanagers while the __________ measure is better for evaluating the manager of a small fund with only one manager responsible for all investments.A) Sharpe, SharpeB) Sharpe, TreynorC) Treynor, SharpeD) Treynor, TreynorE) Both measures are equally good in both cases.Answer: C Difficulty: ModerateRationale: The Treynor measure is the superior measure if the portfolio is a small portion of many portfolios combined into a large investment fund. The Sharpe measure is superiorif the portfolio represents the investor's total risky investment position.8. Suppose you purchase 100 shares of GM stock at the beginning of year 1, and purchaseanother 100 shares at the end of year 1. You sell all 200 shares at the end of year 2.Assume that the price of GM stock is $50 at the beginning of year 1, $55 at the end of year 1, and $65 at the end of year 2. Assume no dividends were paid on GM stock.Your dollar-weighted return on the stock will be __________; your time-weightedreturn on the stock.A) higher thanB) the same asC) less thanD) exactly proportional toE) more information is necessary to answer this questionAnswer: A Difficulty: ModerateRationale: In the dollar-weighted return, the stock's performance in the second year, when 200 shares are held, has a greater influence on the overall dollar-weighted return. Thetime-weighted return ignores the number of shares held.9. Suppose the risk-free return is 4%. The beta of a managed portfolio is 1.2, the alpha is1%, and the average return is 14%. Based on Jensen's measure of portfolio performance, you would calculate the return on the market portfolio asA) 11.5%B) 14%C) 15%D) 16%E) none of the aboveAnswer: A Difficulty: DifficultRationale: 1% = 14% - [4% + 1.2(x - 4%)]; x = 11.5%.10. Suppose the risk-free return is 3%. The beta of a managed portfolio is 1.75, the alpha is0%, and the average return is 16%. Based on Jensen's measure of portfolio performance, you would calculate the return on the market portfolio asA) 12.3%B) 10.4%C) 15.1%D) 16.7%E) none of the aboveAnswer: B Difficulty: DifficultRationale: 0% = 16% - [3% + 1.75(x - 3%)]; x = 10.4%.11. Suppose the risk-free return is 6%. The beta of a managed portfolio is 1.5, the alpha is3%, and the average return is 18%. Based on Jensen's measure of portfolio performance, you would calculate the return on the market portfolio asA) 12%B) 14%C) 15%D) 16%E) none of the aboveAnswer: A Difficulty: DifficultRationale: 3% = 18% - [6% + 1.5(x - 6%)]; x = 12%.12. Suppose a particular investment earns an arithmetic return of 10% in year 1, 20% inyear 2 and 30% in year 3. The geometric average return for the year period will be__________.A) greater than the arithmetic average returnB) equal to the arithmetic average returnC) less than the arithmetic average returnD) equal to the market returnE) cannot tell from the information givenAnswer: C Difficulty: ModerateRationale: The geometric mean will always be less than the arithmetic mean unless the returns in all periods are equal (in which case the two means will be equal).13. Suppose you buy 100 shares of Abolishing Dividend Corporation at the beginning ofyear 1 for $80. Abolishing Dividend Corporation pays no dividends. The stock price at the end of year 1 is $100, the price $120 at the end of year 2, and the price is $150 at the end of year 3. The stock price declines to $100 at the end of year 4, and you sell your 100 shares. For the four years, your geometric average return isA) 0.0%B) 1.0%C) 5.7%D) 9.2%E) 34.5%Answer: C Difficulty: DifficultRationale: [(1.25)(1.20)(1.25)(0.6667)]1/4 - 1.0 = 5.7%14. You want to evaluate three mutual funds using the information ratio measure forperformance evaluation. The risk-free return during the sample period is 6%, and the average return on the market portfolio is 19%. The average returns, residual standard deviations, and betas for the three funds are given below.The fund with the highest information ratio measure is __________.A) Fund AB) Fund BC) Fund CD) Funds A and B are tied for highestE) Funds A and C are tied for highestAnswer: B Difficulty: DifficultRationale:Information ratio = αP/σ(e P); A: αP = 20 - 6 - .8(19 - 6) = 3.6; 3.6/4 = 0.9; B: αP = 21 -6 - 1(19 - 6) = 2.0; 2/1.25 = 1.6; C: αP = 23 - 6 - 1.2(19 - 6) = 1.4; 1.4/1.20 = 1.16. 15. You want to evaluate three mutual funds using the Sharpe measure for performanceevaluation. The risk-free return during the sample period is 6%. The average returns, standard deviations and betas for the three funds are given below, as is the data for the S&P 500 index.The fund with the highest Sharpe measure is __________.A) Fund AB) Fund BC) Fund CD) Funds A and B are tied for highestE) Funds A and C are tied for highestAnswer: C Difficulty: ModerateRationale: A: (24% - 6%)/30% = 0.60; B: (12% - 6%)/10% = 0.60; C: (22% - 6%)/20% = 0.80;S&P 500: (18% - 6%)/16% = 0.75.16. You want to evaluate three mutual funds using the Sharpe measure for performanceevaluation. The risk-free return during the sample period is 4%. The average returns, standard deviations and betas for the three funds are given below, as is the data for the S&P 500 index.The fund with the highest Sharpe measure is __________.A) Fund AB) Fund BC) Fund CD) Funds A and B are tied for highestE) Funds A and C are tied for highestAnswer: B Difficulty: ModerateRationale: A: (18% - 4%)/38% = 0.368; B: (15% - 4%)/27% = 0.407; C: (11% - 4%)/24% =0.292; S&P 500: (10% - 4%)/22% = 0.273.17. You want to evaluate three mutual funds using the Sharpe measure for performanceevaluation. The risk-free return during the sample period is 5%. The average returns, standard deviations and betas for the three funds are given below, as is the data for the S&P 500 index.The investment with the highest Sharpe measure is __________.A) Fund AB) Fund BC) Fund CD) the indexE) Funds A and C are tied for highestAnswer: D Difficulty: ModerateRationale: A: (23% - 5%)/30% = 0.60; B: (20% - 5%)/19% = 0.789; C: (19% - 5%)/17% =0.824; S&P 500: (18% - 5%)/15% = 0.867.18. You want to evaluate three mutual funds using the Treynor measure for performanceevaluation. The risk-free return during the sample period is 6%. The average returns, standard deviations, and betas for the three funds are given below, in addition toinformation regarding the S&P 500 index.The fund with the highest Treynor measure is __________.A) Fund AB) Fund BC) Fund CD) Funds A and B are tied for highestE) Funds A and C are tied for highestAnswer: A Difficulty: DifficultRationale: A: (13% - 6%)/0.5 = 14; B: (19% - 6%)/1.0 = 13; C: (25% - 6%)/1.5 = 12.7; S&P 500: (18% - 6%)/1.0 = 12.19. You want to evaluate three mutual funds using the Jensen measure for performanceevaluation. The risk-free return during the sample period is 6%, and the average return on the market portfolio is 18%. The average returns, standard deviations, and betas for the three funds are given below.The fund with the highest Jensen measure is __________.A) Fund AB) Fund BC) Fund CD) Funds A and B are tied for highestE) Funds A and C are tied for highestAnswer: C Difficulty: DifficultRationale: A: 17.6% -[6% + 1.2(18% - 6%)] = - 2.8%; B: 17.5% - [6% + 1.0(18% - 6%)] = - 0.5;C: 17.4% - [6% + 0.8(18% - 6%)] = + 1.8.20. Suppose you purchase one share of the stock of Volatile Engineering Corporation at thebeginning of year 1 for $36. At the end of year 1, you receive a $2 dividend, and buyone more share for $30. At the end of year 2, you receive total dividends of $4 (i.e., $2 for each share), and sell the shares for $36.45 each. The time-weighted return on your investment is ________.A) -1.75%B) 4.08%C) 8.53%D) 11.46%E) 12.35%Answer: C Difficulty: ModerateRationale: Year 1: ($30 + $2 - $36)/$36 = - 11.11%; Year 2: ($36.45 + $2 - $30)/$30 = 28.17%;Average: 8.53%.21. Suppose you purchase one share of the stock of Volatile Engineering Corporation at thebeginning of year 1 for $36. At the end of year 1, you receive a $2 dividend, and buy one more share for $30. At the end of year 2, you receive total dividends of $4 (i.e., $2 for each share), and sell the shares for $36.45 each. The dollar-weighted return on your investment is _______.A) -1.75%B) 4.08%C) 8.53%D) 8.00%E) 12.35%Answer: E Difficulty: ModerateRationale: $36 + $30/(1 + r) = $2/(1 + r) + $4/(1 + r)2 + $72.90/(1 + r)2; r = 12.35%.22. Suppose you purchase one share of the stock of Cereal Correlation Company at thebeginning of year 1 for $50. At the end of year 1, you receive a $1 dividend, and buy one more share for $72. At the end of year 2, you receive total dividends of $2 (i.e., $1 for each share), and sell the shares for $67.20 each. The time-weighted return on your investment is __________.A) 10.00%B) 8.78%C) 19.71%D) 20.36%E) none of the aboveAnswer: D Difficulty: ModerateRationale: Year 1: ($72 + $1 - $50)/$50 = 46%; Year 2: ($67.20 + $1 - $72)/$72 = -5.28%;Average: 20.36%.23. Suppose you purchase one share of the stock of Cereal Correlation Company at thebeginning of year 1 for $50. At the end of year 1, you receive a $1 dividend, and buy one more share for $72. At the end of year 2, you receive total dividends of $2 (i.e., $1 for each share), and sell the shares for $67.20 each. The dollar-weighted return on your investment is __________.A) 10.00%B) 8.78%C) 19.71D) 20.36%E) none of the aboveAnswer: B Difficulty: ModerateRationale: $50 + $72 /(1 + r) = $1/(1 + r) + $2/(1 + r)2 + $134.40/(1 + r)2; r = 8.78%.24. Suppose you own two stocks, A and B. In year 1, stock A earns a 2% return and stock Bearns a 9% return. In year 2, stock A earns an 18% return and stock B earns an 11%return. __________ has the higher arithmetic average return.A) stock AB) stock BC) the two stocks have the same arithmetic average returnD) at least three periods are needed to calculate the arithmetic average returnE) none of the aboveAnswer: C Difficulty: ModerateRationale: A: (2% + 18%)/2 = 10%; B: (9% + 11%)/2 = 10%.25. Suppose you own two stocks, A and B. In year 1, stock A earns a 2% return and stock Bearns a 9% return. In year 2, stock A earns an 18% return and stock B earns an 11%return. Which stock has the higher geometric average return?A) stock AB) stock BC) the two stocks have the same geometric average returnD) at least three periods are needed to calculate the geometric average return.E) none of the aboveAnswer: B Difficulty: ModerateRationale: A: [(1.02)(1.18)]1/2 - 1 = 9.71%; B: [(1.09)(1.11)]1/2 - 1 = 10.00%.Use the following to answer questions 26-29:The following data are available relating to the performance of Sooner Stock Fund and the market portfolio:26. What is the Sharpe measure of performance evaluation for Sooner Stock Fund?A) 1.33%B) 4.00%C) 8.67%D) 38.6%E) 37.14%Answer: D Difficulty: ModerateRationale: (20% - 3%)/44% = 0.386, or 38.6%.27. What is the Treynor measure of performance evaluation for Sooner Stock Fund?A) 1.33%B) 4.00%C) 8.67%D) 9.44%E) 37.14%Answer: D Difficulty: ModerateRationale: (20% - 3%)/1.8 = 9.44%.28. Calculate the Jensen measure of performance evaluation for Sooner Stock Fund.A) 2.6%B) 4.00%C) 8.67%D) 31.43%E) 37.14%Answer: A Difficulty: ModerateRationale:αP = 20% - [3% + 1.8(11% - 3%)] = 2.6%.29. Calculate the information ratio for Sooner Stock Fund.A) 1.53B) 1.30C) 8.67D) 31.43E) 37.14Answer: B Difficulty: ModerateRationale:αP = 20% - [3% + 1.8(11% - 3%)] = 2.6%, 2.6% / 2.00% = 1.3.Use the following to answer questions 30-33:The following data are available relating to the performance of Monarch Stock Fund and the market portfolio:30. What is the information ratio measure of performance evaluation for Monarch StockFund?A) 1.00%B) 280.00%C) 44.00%D) 50.00%E) none of the aboveAnswer: B Difficulty: ModerateRationale: αP = 16% - [4% +1.15(12% - 4%)] = 2.8%; αP/σ(e P) = 2.8%/1% = 2.8, or280%.31. Calculate Sharpe's measure of performance for Monarch Stock Fund.A) 1.00%B) 46.00%C) 44.00%D) 50.00%E) none of the aboveAnswer: B Difficulty: ModerateRationale: (16 - 4)/ 26 = .4632.Calculate Treynor's measure of performance for Monarch Stock Fund.A) 10.40%B) 8.80%C) 44.00%D) 50.00%E) none of the aboveAnswer: A Difficulty: ModerateRationale: (16 - 4)/1.15 = 10.433. Calculate Jensen's measure of performance for Monarch Stock Fund.A) 1.00%B) 2.80%C) 44.00%D) 50.00%E) none of the aboveAnswer: B Difficulty: ModerateRationale: 16 - [4 + 1.15 (12 - 4)] = 2.80%Use the following to answer questions 34-37:The following data are available relating to the performance of Seminole Fund and the market portfolio:34. If you wanted to evaluate the Seminole Fund using the M2 measure, what percent of theadjusted portfolio would need to be invested in T-Bills?A) -36% (borrow)B) 50%C) 8%D) 36%E) 73%Answer: E Difficulty: ModerateRationale: 22/30 = .733335. Calculate the M2 measure for the Seminole Fund.A) 4.0%B) 20.0%C) 2.86%D) 0.8%E) 40.0%Answer: D Difficulty: ModerateRationale: 22/30 = .7333; 1 - .7333 = .2667; M2 = [.7333 (18) + .2667 (6)] - 14 = 0.8%.36. If the Seminole Fund is actively managed, fairly priced, and will be mixed with themarket index portfolio, calculate the value of the measure that should be used forevaluation.A) 4.0%B) 20.0%C) 2.86%D) 0.8%E) 40%Answer: E Difficulty: DifficultRationale: The Sharpe ratio is the correct measure to use in this case. (18 - 6) / 30 = 40% 37. If the Seminole Fund is actively managed and will be mixed with the market indexportfolio, but you suspect it may be mispriced, calculate the value of the measure that should be used for evaluation.A) 4.0%C) 2.86%D) 0.8%E) 40%Answer: B Difficulty: DifficultRationale: The information ratio is the correct measure to use in this case. AP=18% - [6%+1.4*(14%-6%)] = 0.8%, Information Ratio= 0.8%/4.0%=.20= 20%Use the following to answer questions 38-41:The following data are available relating to the performance of Wildcat Fund and the market portfolio:38. What is the information ratio measure of performance evaluation for Wildcat Fund?A) 1.00%B) 8.80%C) 44.00%D) 50.00%E) none of the aboveAnswer: D Difficulty: ModerateRationale:αP = 18% - [7% +1.25(15% - 7%)] = 1%; αP/σ(e P) = 1%/2% = 0.50, or 50.00%.39. Calculate Sharpe's measure of performance for Wildcat Fund.A) 1.00%B) 8.80%C) 44.00%D) 50.00%E) none of the aboveAnswer: C Difficulty: ModerateRationale: (18 - 7)/ 25 = .4440. Calculate Treynor's measure of performance for Wildcat Fund.A) 1.00%B) 8.80%D) 50.00%E) none of the aboveAnswer: B Difficulty: ModerateRationale: (18 - 7)/1.25 = 8.841. Calculate Jensen's measure of performance for Wildcat Fund.A) 1.00%B) 8.80%C) 44.00%D) 50.00%E) none of the aboveAnswer: A Difficulty: ModerateRationale: 18 - [7 + 1.25 (15 - 7)] = 1.00%Use the following to answer questions 42-45:The following data are available relating to the performance of Long Horn Stock Fund and the market portfolio:42. What is the Sharpe measure of performance evaluation for Long Horn Stock Fund?A) 1.33%B) 4.00%C) 8.67%D) 31.43%E) 37.14%Answer: E Difficulty: ModerateRationale: (19% - 6%)/35% = 0.3714, or 37.14%.43. What is the Treynor measure of performance evaluation for Long Horn Stock Fund?A) 1.33%B) 4.00%C) 8.67%D) 31.43%Answer: C Difficulty: ModerateRationale: (19% - 6%)/1.5 = 8.67%.44. Calculate the Jensen measure of performance evaluation for Long Horn Stock Fund.A) 1.33%B) 4.00%C) 8.67%D) 31.43%E) 37.14%Answer: B Difficulty: ModerateRationale: αP = 19% - [6% + 1.5(12% - 6%)] = 4.00%.45. Calculate the information ratio for Long Horn Stock Fund.A) 1.33B) 4.00C) 8.67D) 31.43E) 37.14Answer: A Difficulty: ModerateRationale:αP = 19% - [6% + 1.5(12% - 6%)] = 4.00%, 4.00% / 3.00% = 1.33.Use the following to answer questions 46-48:In a particular year, Razorback Mutual Fund earned a return of 1% by making the following investments in asset classes:46. The total excess return on the Razorback Fund's managed portfolio was __________.A) -1.80%B) -1.00%C) 0.80%D) 1.00%E) none of the aboveAnswer: B Difficulty: ModerateRationale: 1% - 2% = -1%.47. The contribution of asset allocation across markets to the Razorback Fund's total excessreturn was __________.A) -1.80%B) -1.00%C) 0.80%D) 1.00%E) none of the aboveAnswer: A Difficulty: DifficultRationale: See table below.48. The contribution of selection within markets to the Razorback Fund's total excess returnwas __________.A) -1.80%B) -1.00%C) 0.80%D) 1.00%E) none of the aboveAnswer: C Difficulty: DifficultRationale: See table below.Use the following to answer questions 49-51:In a particular year, Aggie Mutual Fund earned a return of 15% by making the following investments in the following asset classes49. The total excess return on the Aggie managed portfolio was __________.A) 1%B) 3%C) 4%D) 5%E) none of the aboveAnswer: D Difficulty: EasyRationale: 15% - 10% = 5%.50. The contribution of asset allocation across markets to the total excess return wasA) 1%B) 3%C) 4%D) 5%E) none of the aboveAnswer: C Difficulty: DifficultRationale: See table below.51. The contribution of selection within markets to total excess return wasA) 1%B) 3%C) 4%D) 5%E) none of the aboveAnswer: A Difficulty: DifficultRationale: See table below.52. In measuring the comparative performance of different fund managers, the preferredmethod of calculating rate of return is __________.A) internal rate of returnB) arithmetic averageC) dollar-weightedD) time-weightedE) none of the aboveAnswer: D Difficulty: EasyRationale: For the investor, the internal rate of return (or dollar-weighted rate of return) is the preferred measure because if the investor chooses to invest heavily in one investment vehicle that performs extremely well, an increased return results, which is reflected in A (or C). However, the mutual fund manager does not usually make the decision as to the amount to invest in a particular vehicle; therefore, the time-weighted rate of return isusually used to evaluate these managers. Arithmetic average is a good measure forestimating future returns (if expectations are unchanged).53. The __________ measures the reward to volatility trade-off by dividing the averageportfolio excess return by the standard deviation of returns.A) Sharpe measureB) Treynor measureC) Jensen measureD) information ratioE) none of the aboveAnswer: A Difficulty: EasyRationale: The Sharpe measure is a measure of excess average portfolio returns over time per unit of total risk of the portfolio returns (standard deviation).54. A pension fund that begins with $500,000 earns 15% the first year and 10% the secondyear. At the beginning of the second year, the sponsor contributes another $300,000.The dollar-weighted and time-weighted rates of return, respectively, wereA) 11.7% and 12.5%B) 12.1% and 12.5%C) 12.5% and 11.7%D) 12.5% and 12.1%E) none of the aboveAnswer: B Difficulty: ModerateRationale: $500,000 + $300,000/(1 + r) = $75,000/(1 + r) + $880,000/(1 + r)2; r = 12.059%; (15+ 10)/2 = 12.5%55. The Value Line Index is an equally weighted geometric average of the returns of about1,700 firms. The value of an index based on the geometric average returns of 3 stocks where the returns on the 3 stocks during a given period were 32%, 5%, and -10%,respectively, is __________.A) 4.3%B) 7.6%C) 9.0%D) 13.4%E) 5.0%Answer: B Difficulty: ModerateRationale: [(1.32)(1.05)(0.90)]1/3 - 1.0 = 7.6%.56. Risk-adjusted mutual fund performance measures have decreased in popularity becauseA) in nearly efficient markets it is extremely difficult for portfolio managers tooutperform the market.B) the measures usually result in negative performance results for the portfoliomanagers.C) the high rates of return earned by the mutual funds in recent years have made themeasures useless.D) A and B.E) none of the above.Answer: D Difficulty: ModerateRationale: C is not true because the overall market has performed extremely well in the recent years of mutual fund growth and positive performance. In fact, the funds have grown and performed well because of the sustained market rally, and still do not show superior performance when compared to the market.57. The Sharpe, Treynor, and Jensen portfolio performance measures are derived from theCAPM,A) therefore, it does not matter which measure is used to evaluate a portfolio manager.B) however, the Sharpe and Treynor measures use different risk measures, thereforethe measures vary as to whether or not they are appropriate, depending on theinvestment scenario.C) therefore, all measure the same attributes.D) A and B.E) none of the above.Answer: B Difficulty: ModerateRationale: The Sharpe measure uses standard deviation, or total risk, as the risk measure; the Treynor measure uses beta, or systematic risk, as the risk measure.58. The Jensen portfolio evaluation measureA) is a measure of return per unit of risk, as measured by standard deviation.B) is an absolute measure of return over and above that predicted by the CAPM.C) is a measure of return per unit of risk, as measured by beta.D) A and B.E) B and C.Answer: B Difficulty: ModerateRationale: A is the Sharpe measure, C is the Treynor measure.59. The M-squared measureA) considers only the return when evaluating mutual funds.B) considers the risk-adjusted return when evaluating mutual funds.C) considers only the total risk when evaluating mutual funds.D) considers only the market risk when evaluating mutual funds.E) none of the above.Answer: B Difficulty: ModerateRationale: The M-squared measure adjusts the fund by hypothetically borrowing or lending until the total portfolio matches the risk level of an index, then ranks the fund on thebasis of this risk-adjusted return. .60. The dollar-weighted return on a portfolio is equivalent toA) the time-weighted return.B) the geometric average return.C) the arithmetic average return.D) the portfolio's internal rate of return.E) none of the above.Answer: D Difficulty: EasyRationale: The dollar-weighted return on a portfolio is equivalent to finding the internal rate of return on the cash flows to the portfolio.61. A portfolio manager's ranking within a comparison universe may not provide a goodmeasure of performance becauseA) portfolio returns may not be calculated in the same way.B) portfolio durations can vary across managers.C) if managers follow a particular style or subgroup, portfolios may not be comparable.D) both B and C.E) all of the above.Answer: D Difficulty: ModerateRationale: Returns are typically time-weighted for all portfolios and broad risk classes or styles are grouped together, but particular subgroups and differences in duration are typically not considered.62. The geometric average rate of return is based on。

制造企业常用术语缩写全称及释义

制造企业常用术语缩写全称及释义ATO——按订单装配（Assemble to Order）MTO——按订单生产（Make to Order）ETO——按订单设计MTS——库存生产（Make-to-Stock）PAPC——生产和流程控制（Production and Process Control）DHR——器械历史文件（Device History Record）NCR——不合格（Non-conformance）CAPA——纠正和预防措施（Corrective And Preventive Activity）NPV——净现值（Net Present Value）IRR——内部收益率（Internal Rate of Return）PP——回收期（Payback Period）SPC——统计过程控制（Statistic process control）BOM——物料清单（Bill of Material）OBOM——订单BOM MBOM——生产制造物料清单EBOM——工程设计BOM PBOM——工艺规划BOM SBOM——销售BOM PLM——产品生命周期管理（Product Lifecycle Management）PDM——产品数据管理（Product Data Management）CAD——计算机辅助设计（Computer Added Design）CAPP——计算机辅助工艺设计（Computer Aided Process Planning）KPI——关键绩效指标（Key Performance Index）SOA——面向服务架构（Service Oriented Architecture）ASN——预先发货通知（Advanced Shipment Notice）MHE——物料处理设备（Material Handling Equipment）EMEA——欧洲、中东和非洲CRM——客户关系管理（Customer Relationship Management）SCM——供应链管理（Supply Chain Management）BI——商业智能（Business Intelligence）LDAP——轻量级目录访问协议（Lightweight Directory Access Protocol）MRP——生产资源规划（Manufacturing Resource Planning）SFA——自动销售（Sales Force Automation）SCV ——供应链可见性（Supply Chain Visibility）MDM——制造数据管理（Manufacturing Data Management）APS——高级计划系统（Advanced Planning System）CMMS——一体化维护管理系统CMMS——电脑化维修管理系统（computerized maintenance management system）HMI——人机界面（Human Machine Interface）OEM——原始设备制造商（Original Equipment Manufacturer）MES——制造执行系统（Manufacturing Execution System）CPG——消费包装产品（Customer Packaged Goods）Time to Market——即时上市/及时切入生产Time to Volume——即时量产/及时大量生产Time to Money——即时变现/及时大量交货AIT——自动验证技术（Automated Identification Technologies）TAV——全部资产可视化（Total Assets Visualization）SCADA——数据采集和监视控制（Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition）OPC——用于过程控制的对象链接和嵌入（OLE for Process Control）ASRS——自动存贮与检索系统（Automatic Storage and Retrieval System ）BTO ——订单生产（Build-to-Order）CTO——（Configuration-to-Order）VMI——供货商免费存放（Vendor Managed Inventory）MCT——制造周期时间（Manufacturing Cycle Time）ABC——作业制成本制度(Activity-Based Costing) ABB——实施作业制预算制度(Activity-Based Budgeting) ABM——作业制成本管理(Activity-Base Management) APS——先进规画与排程系统(Advanced Planning and Scheduling) ASP——应用程序服务供货商（Application Service Provider）ATP——可承诺量(Available To Promise) AVL——认可的供货商清单(Approved Vendor List) BPR——企业流程再造(Business Process Reengineering) BSC——平衡记分卡(Balanced Scorecard) BTF——计划生产(Build To Forecast) CPM——要径法(Critical Path Method) CPM——每一百万个使用者会有几次抱怨(Complaint per Million) CRM——客户关系管理(Customer Relationship Management) CRP——产能需求规划(Capacity Requirements Planning) CTO——客制化生产(Configuration To Order) DBR——限制驱导式排程法(Drum-Buffer-Rope) DMT——成熟度验证(Design Maturing Testing) DVT——设计验证(Design Verification Testing) DRP——运销资源计划(Distribution Resource Planning) DSS——决策支持系统(Decision Support System) EC——设计变更／工程变更(Engineer Change) EC——电子商务(Electronic Commerce) ECRN——原件规格更改通知(Engineer Change Request Notice) EDI——电子数据交换(Electronic Data Interchange) EIS——主管决策系统(Executive Information System) EMC——电磁相容(Electric Magnetic Capability) EOQ——基本经济订购量(Economic Order Quantity) ERP——企业资源规划(Enterprise Resource Planning) FAE——应用工程师(Field Application Engineer) FCST——预估(Forecast) FMS——弹性制造系统(Flexible Manufacture System) FQC——成品质量管理(Finish or Final Quality Control) IPQC——制程质量管理(In-Process Quality Control) IQC——进料质量管理(Incoming Quality Control) ISO——国际标准组织(International Organization for Standardization) ISAR——首批样品认可(Initial Sample Approval Request) JIT——实时管理(Just In Time) KM ——知识管理(Knowledge Management) L4L——逐批订购法(Lot-for-Lot) LTC——最小总成本法(Least Total Cost) LUC——最小单位成本(Least Unit Cost) MES——制造执行系统(Manufacturing Execution System) MO——制令(Manufacture Order) MPS——主生产排程(Master Production Schedule) MRO——请修(购)单(Maintenance Repair Operation) MRP——物料需求规划(Material Requirement Planning) MRPII——制造资源计划(Manufacturing Resource Planning) NFCF ——更改预估量的通知Notice for Changing Forecast OEM——委托代工(Original Equipment Manufacture) ODM——委托设计与制造(Original Design & Manufacture) OLAP——在线分析处理(On-Line Analytical Processing) OLTP——在线交易处理(On-Line Transaction Processing) OPT——最佳生产技术(Optimized Production Technology) OQC——出货质量管理(Out-going Quality Control) PDCA——PDCA管理循环(Plan-Do-Check-Action) PDM——产品数据管理系统(Product Data Management) PERT——计划评核术(Program Evaluation and Review Technique) PO——订单(Purchase Order) POH——预估在手量(Product on Hand) PR——采购申请Purchase Request QA——品质保证(Quality Assurance) QC——质量管理(Quality Control) QCC——品管圈(Quality Control Circle) QE——品质工程(Quality Engineering) RCCP——粗略产能规划(Rough Cut Capacity Planning) RMA——退货验收Returned Material Approval ROP——再订购点(Re-Order Point) SCM——供应链管理(Supply Chain Management) SFC——现场控制(Shop Floor Control) SIS——策略信息系统(Strategic Information System) SO——订单(Sales Order) SOR——特殊订单需求(Special Order Request) SPC——统计制程管制(Statistic Process Control) TOC——限制理论(Theory of Constraints) TPM——全面生产管理Total Production Management TQC——全面质量管理(Total Quality Control) TQM——全面品质管理(Total Quality Management) WIP——在制品(Work In Process) LAN——局域网（Local Area Network）WAN——广域网（Wide Area Network）MAN——城域网（Metropolitan Area Network）TCP——传输控制协议（Transfer Control Protocol）IP——网际协议（Internet Protocol）ERP：ERP=Enterprise Resource Planning 企业资源规划WM= Warehouse Management System 仓库管理系统（不同于ERP 中的库存管理）ETO = Engineering-to-Order面向订单设计MTO= Make-to-Order面向订单生产ATO= Assembly-to-Order面向订单装配MTS= Make-to-Stock面向库存生产PP= Production Planning生产计划大纲CO= Controlling控制MPS= The Master Production Schedule主生产排程RCCP= Rough Cut Capacity Planning粗能力需求计划CRP= Capacity Requirements Planning能力需求计划BOM= Bill Of Material物料清单MRP= Material Requirements Planning物料需求计划PAC= Production Activity Control 车间作业管理SD=Sales and Distribution 分销管理MM=Material Management 物料管理MTL=Material Management 物料管理ATP= Available To Promise可承诺产品数量COE= Customer order Entry客户订单输入PO= Purchasing Order采购定单OM= Order Management订单管理IM= Inventory Management库存管理VMI= vendor managed inventory供应商管理库存MRP=Material Requirements Planning 物料需求计划MRPII=Manufacture Resource planning 制造资源规划JIT=Just In Time 及时生产TQM=Total Quality Management 全面质量管理DRP=Distribution Resource Planning 分销资源计划SCM=Supply Chain Management 供应链管理SRM=Supplier Relationship Management 供应商关系管理CRM=Customer Relationship Managemen 客户关系管理BPR=Business Process Reengineering 业务流程重组（再造）EAM=Enterprise Asset Management 企业资产维护/管理WMS=Warehouse Management System 仓库管理系统CDC=Central Distribution Center 中央配送中心RDC=Regional distribution center 区域配送中心RFID=Radio Frequency Identification 无线射频识别(采用无线方式的标签识别技术) Bar Code条形码标签识别技术OA=Office Automation 办公自动化KM=Knowledge Management 知识管理BI=Business Intelligence 商务智能HR=Human Resources 人力资源计划KPI=Key Performance Index 关键绩效指标CRP(Capacity Requirements Planning)产能需求规划DRP(Distribution Resource Planning)分销资源规划visibility--可视化usability--可用性flexibility--灵活性localization--本土化configurable--可配置的customized--定制reporting framework--报表框架drill down--钻取fields--字段On premise--传统应用模式/预置模式On demand--按需配置模式 a portal for a large customer’s tracking, receipt, shipments or demand--一个有关大型客户的跟单、收货、出货或需求的门户screens--窗口The key trend is to have smaller and smaller laws and more and more configurable.--最主要的趋势是固化的东西越来越少，可配置性越来越强。

SAP(物流)相关英文单词1

Plant : 工厂Storage Location: 存储地点WQ3D WQ3N WQ02 SU03 SU04 SU05 Storage type:存储类型100 (floor loc) 200 (shelving loc) 300(high up pallet) Storage Bin:仓位，即为库位Warehouse number:仓库号（SU5）创建TOTO:Transfer Order:传输指令DO:Delivery Order:交货订单Shipment number:备货单Material:料号Batch:批次号Quantity（QTY）：数量PO：合同号Item：项目Requirement:要求Certificates：证书test reports：测试报告source inspection：来源检验Crating：装箱special labeling：特殊标签license tags：许可标签Delivery:配送Stock：库存P/N：型号（客户）Currency：货币picklist for delivery：选择列表为交货within china 1day truck：中国1天卡车内Net weight:净重Grow weight:毛重shipment complete：装运完成pallet number：托盘数量Confirmation：确认Don't display materials/QTY：不显示料号/数量pack in one pallet装在一个托盘（只有一个）use license tag table：使用许可标签表（出口）Description：说明picking quantity：出货数量Picking date：出货日期transfer order 0001373941 created：创建TO为0001373941to in background ：在后台（自动）to in foreground ：在前台（手动）to for group：为组item view：项目视图activate item：启动项目adopt pick quantity采用接项目transfer order for picking :set parameters：为了采摘转移：设置参数WM-TO:1 deliveries successful,0 with errors,0 not relevant：WM-TO:1DO的TO创建成功，0个错误，0相关确认TOConfirmed：确认for checking：检查for distribution：分发for picking：采摘for confirmation：确认for loading：运载for goods issue：发货for transport .planning：运输.规划list outbound deliveries：列出外向交货shipping point：运输点time date：时间日期picking date：采摘日期loading date：装运日期Group：集团production supply：生产供应supply area：供应面积Order：次序partner date：客户日期forwarding agent：货运代理shipment date：装运日期Route：线路route schedule：线路时间表Status：状态outbound deliveries for confirmation：出站交付确认2 pick/putaway order(is) confirmed successfully,0 with errors：2/入库顺序（是）确认成功，0挑错误制作箱单change shipment:initial screen：改变装运：初始屏幕selection ：选择Processing：处理Identification：鉴定Control：控制shipment type：装运货物种类tender status：货币的状态overall status：整体状态shipment route：装运路线shipping type：航运类型service level：服务水平shipping cond：航运已调节spec process：规范的过程Container：集装箱further dates：进一步日期Stages：阶段Partner：合作伙伴Tests：测试Status：状态Tender：招标continuous move：连续移动Planning：规划Execution：执行check-in：办理登记手续loading end：运载结束Completion：完成shipment start：运装开始shipment end：装运结束display options：显示项目to not confirmed for：不证实pallet level：托盘水平low level only：只有低水平carton ID：纸箱的IDnumber of cartons：纸箱的数carton detail's option：纸箱详细选项carton detail's not required：纸箱详细的不需要carton detail's required：纸箱细节的需求carton detail req w/o gross wt：纸箱细节REQ W / O总重量country of origin options：国家的起源选项mixed COO per pallet：每托盘混合首席运营官only one COO per pallet：只有一个首席运营官每托盘call transaction mode：呼叫交易模式carton numbers from license tag：从许可标签的纸箱号码制作标签label data entry screen：标签的数据输入屏幕Bldg：大厦production label（complete one row only）：生产标签（仅完成一排）purchasing document：采购文件material document：材料文件Operation：操作Sales：销售material number ：材料编号print all production labels：打印所有生产标签print co-product labels：打印合作产品标签follow-on labels screen：后续屏幕上的标签kanban container：看板容量return to first screen after printing：返回到印刷后的第一个屏幕ship to/customer special/carrier label：船到/客户的特殊/载体标签delivery document：交付文件license tags：许可标签handling units：承办单位CSL spec number：CSL的规格号miscellaneous/free form label：免费形式的标签label format：标签的格式pick ticket/label：接票/标签Continue：继续label detail screen：标签细节画面selected material：所选材料shipping information：航运信息Address：地址label printer：标签打印机labeling details：标签细节Value：值value for printing：打印值Description：说明# of labels：标签# of copies：份数Printer：打印机carton qty：纸箱数量customer po number：客户订单号shipment number：备货单号delivery number：DO号delivery item number：DO项目编号customer part number：部分客户号码pkg shipper qty：PKG托运的数量part number：部件号labels have been generated：标签已经被生成系统盘点（WM）carry out continuous inventory：开展连续清查program parameters：系统参数count date：盘点日期group number：组号required number of bins：所需数量箱only empty bins：只有空箱with dynamic storage bins：与动态存储箱only bins not yet counted：尚未计算只垃圾桶only bins that can be counted：可以只算箱name of counter：名称计算器（单位换算）continuous inventory:list sorted by number of quants：连续库存：金融工程师的数量排序的列表display storage bin：显示屏储物箱continuous inventory:error log：连续库存：错误日志system inventory record 1434 created：创建系统库存记录1434external ID：外部IDProgram：计划log number：日志数量log number：消息文本inventory overview：库存概述physical inventory number：物理库存数量general program parameters：一般程序的参数planned date：计划日期inventory status：库存状况not counted：不计partially counted：部分计算Counted：算Cleared：清除only non-activated：唯一的非激活only non-printed：唯一的非打印warehouse inventory list printed：仓库库存清单印list name:列表名称print immediately：立即打印delete after output：删除后输出new spool request：新的假脱机请求print in landscape：横向打印warehouse inventory list printed：仓库库存清单印enter inventory count:initial screen：输入库存盘点：初始屏幕Overview：概述new item：新项目single record entry：单记录条目inventory record：库存记录recount version：验票版本Positioning：定位inventory page：库存页面inventory item：库存项目storage bin：存储位置differences list per storage type：每个存储类型的差异列表program parameters：程序参数Variance：方差Value：值list of uncounted bins：不计数箱名单Layout：布局inventory record：库存记录inventory status：库存状况recount version：验票版本inventory page：库存页面dynamic selections：动态选择value difference：价值的差额Remarks：备注processing options：处理选项value-based variance：基于价值的方差display not-counted：显示不计数Foreground：前景write off：注销count information：计数信息value difference currency remarks：价值的差额货币备注sign difference：签署的区别inventory time period：清查时期include details：包括细节inventory document number：库存证件号码list viewer：列表浏览器total metrics：总指标summary of bins counted：摘要计算箱differences per profit center：每个利润中心的差异code page：代码页file path：文件的路径file name：文件名profit center description：利润中心介绍。

物流英语总复习——词汇选择

总复习~词汇选择1: 物流技术Logistics activityLogistics operationLogistics modulusLogistics technology2: 物流网络Logistics networkLogistics centerLogistics costLogistics management3: 物流单证Logistics informationLogistics enterpriseLogistics documentLogistics alliance4: 销售物流Supply logisticsProduction logisticsDistribution logisticsReturned logistics5: 企业物流Internal logisticsExternal logisticsMilitary logisticsInternational logistics6：定制物流Environmental logisticsCustomized logisticsVirtual logisticsThird part logistics7：电子数据交换Electronic data interchangeValue-added logistics serviceTangible lossIntangible loss8：运输TransportationConsumptionProductionContainerization9：联合运输Combined transportThrough transportTransfer transportDrop and pull transport10：门到场Door to doorDoor to cyDoor to cfsTerminal to terminal11：库存StorageStackingInventory12: 库存周期Inventory cycle timeCycle stockLead timeOrder cycle time13: 堆码Goods stackStackingHandling/carryingLoading and unloading14：中性包装Sales packagePacking of nominated brand Neutral packingTransport package15：散装化ContainerizationIn bulkCross dockingDistribution16：共同配送DistributionJoint distribution Distribution center Distribution processing17：集货Order pickingGoods collectionAssemblySorting18：出口监管仓库Export supervised warehouse Stereoscopic warehouse Virtual warehouseBoned warehouse19: 冷冻区Chill spaceFreeze spaceReceiving spaceShipping space20：货场Goods shedGoods yardGoods shelfPallet21：叉车Folk lift truckAutomatics guided vehicleConveyor22: 集装箱货运站Railway container yardContainer freight station (CFS) Container terminalInland container depot23：班轮运输International through railway transport International multimodal transportLand bridge transportLiner transport24：船务代理Shipping agencyInternational freight forwarding agentTallyInternational transportation cargo insurance 25：报关Customs declarationCustoms brokerCommodity inspectionInventory control26：物流战略Logistics strategyWarehouse managementWarehouse layoutQuick Response (QR)27: 定期订货方式Economic Order Quantity (FOQ)Fixed Quantity System (FQS)Fixed Interval System (FIS)ABC classification28: 制造资源计划Material Requirement Planning (MRP) Manufacturing Resource Planning (MRP) Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Distribution Resource Planning (DRP) 29：物流成本管理Electronic Order System (EOS)Just-in-time logisticsZero-inventory logisticsLogistics cost control30：供应链管理Supply chainSupply Chain Management (SCM) Efficient Customer Response (ECR) Continuous Replenishment Program (CRP) 31: 业务外包Computer Assisted Ordering (CAO) Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) OutsourcingAccuracy audit32：附加价值Accounting costActual weightAdded valueMore value33: 应用供应商After-sales servicesAggregate shipmentAir pollutionApplication Service Provider (ASP)34：资源回收Asset recoveryAir freightAutomated Storage and Retrieval System (ASRS) Automated warehouse35: 回程BackwardationBack haulAvailable vehicle capacityAutomated Vehicle Identification (AVI)36: 条形码扫描机Bar code labelBar code scannerBi-directional readBay37：批号Base stockBatch numberBear marketBull market38：托运单Belt conveyorBill of Lading (B/L)Bill of Material (BOM)Broken carton39: 散装运送业BrokerBulk carrierBulk containerClosed distribution system40：业务流程重组Business process re-engineering (BPR) Cancellation chargeCargoCargo booking41: 集中采购Cargo inspectionCash discountCentralized dispatchingCentralized procurement42：分销渠道Check inChannel of distributionChief Logistics Officer (CLO)Claim43：联合采购Cost controlConsumer physical distribution Cooperative buyingCubed out44：客户关系管理Customer serviceCraneCustomer Relationship Management (CRM) Deadhead45：分货中心Data warehousingDeclining conveyorDe-consolidation centerDelivery terminal46：全球定位系统Decision support system (DSS)Executive Support System (ESS) Geographic Information System (GIS)Global Positioning System (GPS)47: 需求预测Design for logisticsDepalletizerDemand forecastingEconomic stock48：国内物流Domestic intercity truckingDomestic logisticsDirect distributionDirect store delivery49: 双托盘处理Dispatching areaDouble floor stackingDouble pallets handlingDouble pallet jack50：独家分销DutyElectronic clearanceExclusive distributionExport51: 产品说明标签Fact tagHot tagFactory priceFixed rack52：搬家公司Flatbed trailerFleetFurniture removal carriers53: 集成物流Industrial Engineering (IE)Global logisticsIntegrated logisticsLogistician54：手提扫描仪Bar code scannerHandheld scannerLaser scannerOptical scanner55: 共同配送Integrated Service Digital Network (ISDN) Interchange terminalInventory controlJoint distribution56：标签机FirewallKanban systemMarking machineLabel making machine57: 物流管理Knowledge managementLogistics managementLogistics engineeringCold chain58：市场导向Loose packageMake to orderMarket orientationMarket share59: 多层仓库Material handling equipment MiddlewareMulti-story warehouseDouble floor stacking60：牌照Noise pollutionNumber plateOn seasonPackage61：处理中心Open DataBase Connectivity （ODBC）Order processingOrder Point System （OPS）Process center62：质量控制OverloadQuality controlProcurementQuarantine63：零售Regional distribution center Retail sellingWholesaling64：供应链Safety stockRackSealing machineSupply chain65: 真空包装Tank containerTemporary laborVacuum packagingVoice recognition66：物流作业Logistics operation Logistics technology Logistics activity Logistician68: 社会物流Internal logisticsExternal logistics International logistics Global logistics69：搬运StackingTrimmingHandling/carrying Loading and unloading70：定牌包装Sales packageTransport packagePacking of nominated brand Neutral packing71：直达运输Combined transport Through transport Transfer transportDrop and pull transport72：物流联盟Logistics networkLogistics enterprise Logistics documents Logistics alliance74：无形损耗Tangible lossIntangible lossWaste materialScrap disposal75：保税仓库Stereoscopic warehouse Virtual warehouseBoned warehouseExported supervised warehouse 76：零担运输In bulkFull Container Load （FCL）Less-than Container Load （LCL）Less-than Truck Load （LTL）77: 转运站GatewayDelivery terminalContainer freight station (CFS) Depot78：收货区Chill spaceFreeze spaceHumidity control space Receiving space79: 清关Customs declarationCustoms clearanceCustomer serviceCustoms formality80：企业资源计划MRPMRPⅡERPDPR81：经济订货批量Fixed Quantity System (FQS) Fixed Interval System (FIS)Fixed goods stackEconomic Order Quantity (EOQ) 83：运费、保险费付至目的地DESCIFCIPDDU84: 货交承运人FCADAFDESCFR85: 欧盟机械产品安全标志ASCEULCSA86：销售确认书S/CS/OPOSSCM87：进货清点Check inCheck outCargo inspection Quarantine88: 物品用料清单BOMB/LD/OHAWB90：售后服务Customer serviceAfter-sales service Parts serviceAfter market service 91: 物流模数Logistics mode Logistics movement Logistics modulus Logistics motion93：回收物流Waste material logistics Returned logistics Recycle logistics Recycling96：虚拟物流Information logistics Virtual logisticsImage logisticsNon-material logistics 97: 集装运输Container transport Containerized transport Combined transport Condition transport98：经常库存Current inventoryCycle stockCycle inventory Regular stock100：自动化仓库Automatic warehouse Automated warehouse Automation warehouse Auto warehouse101: 输送机BeltBelt machine ConveyorTransport belt machine 102：集装箱码头Container yardContainer placeContainer pierContainer terminal103：集装箱货运站Container cargo stationContainer goods stationContainer freight stationContainer station104：国际货运代理International transport agency International agentInternational freight forwarding agent International tally105：决策支持系统Decision support systemDecision supply systemDecision supply management Executive support system106：防火墙Wall to stop fireElectronic wall to stop fireComputer protection systemFirewall107: 联运站Interchange terminalCombined terminalThrough transport terminal Interchange station109：起重机Fork liftCraneLift machineLift weight machine110：零库存技术Zero inventoryZero-inventory logisticsZero-inventory technologyZero-inventory control111: 分拣SeparatingSeparating processSortSorting112：装卸Load and unloadLoading and unloadingPut on and offMove in and out114：自动数据采集ADC automatic data collection115: 自动化存取系统ASRS116: 顾客、竞争、变化3C117: 一般原产地证书CAO certificate of origin118: 完税后交货价DDP119: 目的港船上交货价DES delivery EX ship120：站场收据D/R dock receipt121：整箱FCL full container load122：文件传输协议FTP file transfer protocol123：全球运输网GTN global transport net124: 因特网内容提供商ICP internet content provider125：零担运输LTL less-than truck load126: 多式联运单据MTD multimodal transport document127: 便携式数据终端设备PDT portable data terminal128: 装货单S/O shipping order129：增殖物流服务VAL value added logistics130：海运提单Ocean bill of lading131: 物权凭证Document of titleT h e e n d基本概念术语1．物品article 2．物流logistics 3．物流活动logistics activity 4．物流作业logistics operation 5．物流模数logistics modulus 6．物流技术logistics technology 7．物流成本logistics cost 8．物流管理logistics management 9．物流中心logistics center 10．物流网络logistics network 11．物流信息logistics information 12．物流企业logistics enterprise 13．物流单证logistics documents 14．物流联盟logistics alliance 15．供应物流supply logistics 16．生产物流production logistics 17．销售物流distribution logistics 18．回收物流returned logistics 19．废弃物物流waste material logistics 20．绿色物流environmental logistics 21．企业物流internal logistics 22．社会物流external logistics 23．军事物流military logistics 24．国际物流international logistics 25．第三方物流third-part logistics (TPL) 26．定制物流customized logistics 27．虚拟物流virtual logistics 28．增值物流服务value-added logistics service 29．供应链supply chain 30．条码bar code 31．电子数据交换electronic data interchange (EDI) 32．有形消耗tangible loss 33．无形消耗intangible loss物流作业术语1．运输transportation 2．联合运输combined transport 3．直达运输through transport 4．中转运输transfer transport 5．甩挂运输drop and pull transport 6．集装运输containerized transport 7．集装箱运输container transport 8．门到门door-to-door 9．整箱货full container load (FCL) 10．拼箱货less than container load (LCL 11．储存storing 12．保管storage 13．物品储存article reserves 14．库存inventory 15．经常库存cycle stock 16．安全库存safety stick 17．库存周期inventory cycle time 18．前置期（或提前期）lead time 19．订货处理周期order cycle time 20．货垛goods stack 21．堆码stacking 22．搬运handing/carrying 23．装卸loading and unloading 24．单元装卸unit loading and unloading 25．包装package/packaging 26．销售包装sales package 27．定牌包装packing of nominated brand 28．中性包装neutral packing 29．运输包装transport package 30．托盘包装palletizing 31．集装化containerization 32．散装化containerization 33．直接换装cross docking 34．配送distribution 35．共同配送joint distribution 36．配送中心distribution center 37．分拣sorting 38．拣选order picking 39．集货goods collection 40．组配assembly 41．流通加工distribution processing 42．冷链cold chain 43．检验inspection物流技术装备及设施术语1．仓库 warehouse 2．库房 storehouse 3．自动化仓库 automatic warehouse 4． 4立体仓库 stereoscopic warehouse 5．虚拟仓库 virtual warehouse 6．保税仓库 boned warehouse 7．出口监管仓库 export supervised warehouse 8．海关监管货物 cargo under customer’s supervision 9．冷藏区 chill space 10．冷冻区 freeze space 11．控湿储存区 humidity controlled space 12．温度可控区 temperature controlled space 13．收货区 receiving space 14．发货区 shipping space 15．料棚 goods shed 16．货场 goods yard 17．货架 goods shelf 18．托盘 pallet 19．叉车 fork lift truck 20．输送机 conveyor 21．自动导引车 automatic guided vehicle (AGV) 22．箱式车 box car 23．集装箱 container 24．换算箱 twenty-feet equivalent unit (TEU) 25．特种货物集装箱 specific cargo container 26．全集装箱船 full container ship 27．铁路集装箱场 railway container yard 28．公路集装箱中转站 inland container depot 29．集装箱货运站 container freight station (CFS) 30．集装箱码头 container terminal 31．国际铁路联运 international through railway transport 32．国际多式联运 international multimodal transport 33．大陆桥运输 land bridge transport 34．班轮运输 liner transport 35．租船运输 shipping by chartering 36．船务代理 shipping agency 37．国际货运代理 international freight forwarding agent 38．理货 tally 39．国际货物运输保险 international transportation cargo insurance 40．报关 customs declaration 41．报关行 customs broker 42．进出口商品检验 commodity inspection物流管理术语1．物流战略 logistics strategy 2．物流战略管理 logistics strategy management 3．仓库管理 warehouse management 4．仓库布局 warehouse layout 5．库存控制 inventory control 6．经济订货批量 economic order quantity (EOQ) 7．定量订货方式 fixed-quantity system (FQS) 8．定期订货方式 fixed-quantity system (FIS) 9． ABC分类管理 ABC classification 10．电子订货系统 Electronic order system (EOS) 11．准时制 just in time (JIT) 12．准时制物流 just-in-time logistics 13．零库存技术 zero-inventory logistics 14．物流成本管理 logistics cost control 15．物料需要计划 material requirements planning (MRP) 16．制造资源计划 manufacturing resource planning (MRP II) 17．配送需要计划 distribution requirements planning (DRP) 18．配送资源计划 distribution resource planning (DRP II) 19．物流资源计划 logistics resource planning (LRP) 20．企业资源计划 enterprise resource planning (ERP) 21．供应链管理 supply chain management (SCM) 22．快速反映 Quick response (QR) 23．有效客户反映 efficient customer response(ECR) 24．连续库存补充计划 continuous replenishment program (CRP) 25．计算机付诸订货系统 computer assisted ordering (CAO) 26．供应商管理库存 vendor managed inventory (VMI) 27．业务外包 outsourcing。

SAPABAP物料转移过账

REPORT zppmm_mb1b.TABLES:mseg,mkpf,rm07m,t158b,t001l,msegk.DATA: mat_doc LIKE bapi2017_gm_head_ret-mat_doc.DATA:save_code LIKE sy-ucomm,ok_code LIKE sy-ucomm,loc_msg(50),gmnga LIKE afru-gmnga,mtsnr LIKE rm07m-mtsnr,errflag..DATA:BEGIN OF gt_afpo OCCURS 0.INCLUDE STRUCTURE afpo.DATA:END OF gt_afpo.DATA:gmhead LIKE bapi2017_gm_head_01.DATA: BEGIN OF gmcode.INCLUDE STRUCTURE bapi2017_gm_code. DATA: END OF gmcode.DATA: BEGIN OF mthead.INCLUDE STRUCTURE bapi2017_gm_head_ret. DATA: END OF mthead.DATA: BEGIN OF itab OCCURS 100.INCLUDE STRUCTURE bapi2017_gm_item_create. DATA: END OF itab.DATA: BEGIN OF errmsg OCCURS 10.INCLUDE STRUCTURE bapiret2.DATA: END OF errmsg.INITIALIZATION.t001l-lgort = '1051'.mseg-lgort = '1050'.mseg-werks = '1000'.mkpf-bldat = sy-datum.mkpf-budat = sy-datum.t158b-bwart = '311'.rm07m-sobkz = 'E'.rm07m-werks = '1000'.rm07m-lgort = '1050'.mseg-erfme = 'PC'.gmcode-gm_code = '04'. "MB1B CALL SCREEN 100.*&----------------------------------------------------**& Module STATUS_0100 OUTPUT*&-----------------------------------------------------** text*--------------------------------------------------------* MODULE status_0100 OUTPUT.SET PF-STATUS 'FOR0100'.SET TITLEBAR '100'.ENDMODULE. " STATUS_0100 OUTPUT*&--------------------------------------------------**& Module USER_COMMAND_0100 INPUT*&----------------------------------------------------** text*-----------------------------------------------------*MODULE user_command_0100 INPUT.save_code = ok_code.CLEAR ok_code.CASE save_code.WHEN 'SAVE'.PERFORM form_save.WHEN 'EXIT' OR 'BACK'.LEAVE TO SCREEN 0.WHEN 'CLOSE' .LEAVE PROGRAM.ENDCASE.ENDMODULE. " USER_COMMAND_0100 INPUT*&-----------------------------------------------------**& Form FORM_SAVE*&-------------------------------------------------** text*---------------------------------------------------------** --> p1 text* <-- p2 text*---------------------------------------------------* FORM form_save .IF mkpf-bldat = ''OR mkpf-budat = ''OR rm07m-mtsnr = ''OR mseg-matnr = ''OR mseg-lgort = ''OR mseg-erfmg = ''OR mseg-erfme = ''OR t001l-lgort = ''OR msegk-mat_kdauf = ''OR msegk-mat_kdpos = ''.MESSAGE i000(znyj13) WITH '信息不完整'.RETURN.ENDIF.IF gmnga < mseg-erfmg.MESSAGE i000(znyj13) WITH '移动数量应小于确认数量'. mseg-erfmg = ''.RETURN.ENDIF.gmhead-pstng_date = sy-datum."mkpf-bldat.gmhead-doc_date = sy-datum."mkpf-budat.gmhead-ref_doc_no = rm07m-mtsnr.gmhead-pr_uname = sy-uname.gmhead-header_txt = mkpf-bktxt.* APPEND gmhead.itab-material = mseg-matnr .itab-plant = '1000'.itab-stge_loc = mseg-lgort.itab-move_type = t158b-bwart."rm07m-bwartwa.itab-spec_stock = rm07m-sobkz.itab-entry_qnt = mseg-erfmg.itab-entry_uom = mseg-erfme.* itab-batch = mseg-charg.* itab-orderid = rm07m-mtsnr.* itab-order_itno = msegk-mat_kdpos.itab-move_mat = mseg-matnr.itab-move_plant = '1000'.itab-move_stloc = t001l-lgort .itab-val_sales_ord = msegk-mat_kdauf.itab-val_s_ord_item = msegk-mat_kdpos.itab-nb_slips = 1.APPEND itab.CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE'EXPORTINGgoodsmvt_header = gmheadgoodsmvt_code = gmcodeIMPORTINGgoodsmvt_headret = mtheadmaterialdocument = mat_docTABLESgoodsmvt_item = itabreturn = errmsg.LOOP AT errmsg.CLEAR loc_msg.CONCATENATE '过帐成功!' errmsg-message INTO loc_msg.IF errmsg-type EQ 'E'.MESSAGE errmsg-message TYPE 'E'.errflag = 'X'.ELSE.MESSAGE loc_msg TYPE 'S'.ENDIF.ENDLOOP.IF errflag IS INITIAL.COMMIT WORK AND WAIT.CLEAR loc_msg.IF sy-subrc NE 0.MESSAGE '过帐操作出现错误,请稍后重试!' TYPE 'E'.EXIT.ELSE.CONCATENATE '物料凭证:' mat_doc '已成功创建!' INTO loc_msg.MESSAGE i000(znyj13) WITH loc_msg.gmhead-ref_doc_no = ''.gmhead-header_txt = ''.mseg-matnr = ''.msegk-mat_kdauf = ''.msegk-mat_kdpos = ''.mseg-erfmg = ''.rm07m-mtsnr = ''.gmnga = ''.mkpf-bktxt = ''.ENDIF.ELSE.MESSAGE '这不是正确的发料单或者已经创建凭证!' TYPE 'E'.ENDIF.CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'EXPORTINGwait = 'X'.ENDFORM. " FORM_SAVE*&-----------------------------------------------**& Module RM07M-MTSNR INPUT*&----------------------------------------------** text*------------------------------------------------*MODULE rm07m-mtsnr INPUT.CONCATENATE '0000' rm07m-mtsnr INTO mtsnr.* SELECT SINGLE gmnga INTO gmnga FROM afru WHERE aufnr = rm07m-mtsnr. IF sy-subrc = 0.SELECT * INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE gt_afpoFROM afpoWHERE aufnr = mtsnr.IF sy-subrc = 0.READ TABLE gt_afpo INDEX 1.msegk-mat_kdauf = gt_afpo-kdauf.msegk-mat_kdpos = gt_afpo-kdpos.mseg-matnr = gt_afpo-matnr.gmnga = gt_afpo-wemng.ENDIF.ELSE.CONCATENATE '订单: ' rm07m-mtsnr ' 不存在!' INTO loc_msg.MESSAGE i000(znyj13) WITH loc_msg.RETURN.ENDIF.ENDMODULE. " RM07M-MTSNR INPUTPROCESS BEFORE OUTPUT.MODULE STATUS_0100.*PROCESS AFTER INPUT.MODULE USER_COMMAND_0100.FIELD RM07M-MTSNR MODULE RM07M-MTSNR ON REQUEST.* BAPI TO Upload Inventory Data** GMCODE Table T158G - 01 - MB01 - Goods Receipts for Purchase Order * 02 - MB31 - Goods Receipts for Prod Order* 03 - MB1A - Goods Issue* 04 - MB1B - Transfer Posting* 05 - MB1C - Enter Other Goods Receipt* 06 - MB11** Domain: KZBEW - Movement Indicator* Goods movement w/o reference* B - Goods movement for purchase order* F - Goods movement for production order* L - Goods movement for delivery note* K - Goods movement for kanban requirement (WM - internal only)* O - Subsequent adjustment of "material-provided" consumption* W - Subsequent adjustment of proportion/product unit material。