中国上市公司管理者的不良会计行为外文翻译
上市公司治理准则中英文对照
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c99e7/c99e7ecae38795c28727cbff97d3d0efcc91b812" alt="上市公司治理准则中英文对照"
上市公司治理准则中英文对照一、引言上市公司治理准则是一套规范上市公司运作、保护股东权益、提高公司治理水平的重要规则。
在全球化的经济环境下,了解和掌握上市公司治理准则的中英文表述对于企业的国际化发展、投资者的跨境投资以及监管机构的国际交流都具有重要意义。
二、公司治理的基本原则(一)公平对待所有股东Fair treatment of all shareholders上市公司应当平等对待所有股东,不得在股东之间实行不合理的差别待遇,不得有选择性地向部分股东提供信息或给予优惠。
(二)保护股东权利Protecting shareholders' rightsShareholders should have the right to participate in and vote on major corporate decisions, and have access to accurate and timely information股东应享有参与和表决公司重大决策的权利,并能够获取准确、及时的信息。
(三)强化信息披露Enhanced information disclosureThe company shall disclose relevant information truthfully, accurately, completely and timely to ensure that shareholders have sufficient understanding of the company's operations and financial situation公司应当真实、准确、完整、及时地披露相关信息,确保股东对公司的运营和财务状况有充分的了解。
三、股东与股东大会(一)股东的权利和义务Rights and obligations of shareholdersShareholders have the right to receive dividends, vote on company matters, and inspect the company's financial and accounting reports At the same time, they should fulfill their obligations such as paying subscribed capital in full and in a timely manner股东有权获得股息、对公司事务进行表决以及查阅公司的财务和会计报告。
上市公司治理准则中英文对照
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ffd4/3ffd48068f9ff686f705269a37dfb9fcca41feca" alt="上市公司治理准则中英文对照"
精心整理上市公司治理准则中英文对照中文:导言为推动上市公司建立和完善现代企业制度,规范上市公司运作,促进准则。
的行为准则和职业道德等内容。
第一章第一节股东权利第一条股东作为公司的所有者,享有法律、行政法规和公司章程规定的合法权利。
上市公司应建立能够确保股东充分行使权利的公司治理结构。
第二条上市公司的治理结构应确保所有股东,特别是中小股东享有平等地位。
股东按其持有的股份享有平等的权利,并承担相应的义务。
第三条股东对法律、行政法规和公司章程规定的公司重大事项,享有知情权和参与权。
上市公司应建立和股东沟通的有效渠道。
第四条股东有权按照法律、行政法规的规定,通过民事诉讼或其他法律手段保护其合法权利。
股东大会、董事会的决议违反法律、行政法规的规定,侵犯股东合法权益,股东有权依法提起要求停止上述违法行为或司依法提起要求赔偿的诉讼。
第二节股东大会的规范第五条第八条上市公司应在保证股东大会合法、有效的前提下,通过各种方式和途径,包括充分运用现代信息技术手段,扩大股东参与股东大会的比例。
股东大会时间、地点的选择应有利于让尽可能多的股东参加会议。
第九条股东既可以亲自到股东大会现场投票,也可以委托代理人代为投票,两者具有同样的法律效力。
第十条上市公司董事会、独立董事和符合有关条件的股东可向上市公司股东征集其在股东大会上的投票权。
投票权征集应采取无偿的方式进行,并应向被征集人充分披露信息。
第十一条机构投资者应在公司董事选任、经营者激励与监督、重大事项决策等方面发挥作用。
第三节关联交易第十二条上市公司与关联人之间的关联交易应签订书面协议。
协议的签订应当遵循平等、自愿、等价、具体。
披露。
第十三条业原则,第二章第一节控股股东行为的规范第十五条控股股东对拟上市公司改制重组时应遵循先改制、后上市的原则,并注重建立合理制衡的股权结构。
第十六条控股股东对拟上市公司改制重组时应分离其社会职能,剥离非经营性资产,非经营性机构、福利性机构及其设施不得进入上市公司。
外文翻译上市公司财务舞弊原因及对策
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac8d3/ac8d35caeed3db210900b46f949cfd3b0b8a53ff" alt="外文翻译上市公司财务舞弊原因及对策"
Reasons and countermeasures of listed companies ' financial fraudPick to: financial fraud accompanied by China's reform and opening process and continuous development, bring social harm is more and more apparent, whether to financial fraud effective management by the people's widespread concern. On the listed company's financial fraud concepts and methods were summarized, from the interest drive, corporate governance, accounting personnel occupation moral standards, accounting and auditing system, in-depth analysis of the causes of financial fraud, and in view of the above reasons put forward the corresponding control measuresKey words: financial fraud; reasons; control countermeasures; listed companyIntroductionSince the beginning of Enron in late 2001, cases of financial fraud in listed companies at home and abroad frequently burst out. In early 2006, the Shanghai national accounting Institute Research Center for financial fraud (snaiFFRC) disclosed to "kelong" headed by the "2005 top ten most fraudulent financial companies of the listed companies" means is more amazing the financial fraud of "smart". Self, circulating trading, trading of yin and Yang, the packing channels, always accounting errors, large bath, mergers and acquisitions, restructuring, concealed stocks, the report cash traps, this is a top ten listing companies financial fraud trick.One, the concept of financial fraud and wayFinancial fraud is the subject of false financial information processing in accounting and reporting process, to obtain undue economic interests, used deceptive means to intentionally lied about the importance and financial facts of violations of laws and substantive violations. Financial fraud has four characteristics: unlawful, intentional sexuality, danger, and concealment. Specific means of financial fraud can be said to be endless, but the core is intact. Income fraud including fictitious earnings and revenue across periods; cost of fraud including cross-phase meter cost less and adjustment costs as well as costs of capital; corrupt cash fraud, should be the project assets, such as fraud, less provision for impairment; liabilities are generally less-total liabilities of fraud.Financial fraud means basically has the following several aspects:1.the use of improper accounting policies and accounting fraud. Management typically useintertemporal amortization class accounts for many share, share more, less or less cost to adjust profit. (1) the selection of inappropriate borrowing costs accounting method. In practice, many listed company through misuse of borrowing costs accounting, in build a project completed and not the final. (2) improper selection of equity investment accounting methods. Principles of enterprise accounting regulations: investment enterprises of joint control or significant influence, should adopt equity method; instead, it uses the cost method.But many companies use, when the investee company profit, should not use the equity method investment using the equity method of accounting; when the investee company loss, the equity method to the cost method .(3) improper selection of merging policy. (4) the improper selection of depreciation method.Extended depreciation, by accelerating method is changed into the straight line method, inpractice it is often seen. (5) the improper selection of income, cost confirmation method.Advance or delay the confirmation of income or expense is also listed companies generally adopt cheating. (6) the improper selection of the impairment provision method.2. use of enterprise internal control system defects and the weak link of fraud. As the cashier personnel use enterprise blank check, financial dedicated seal, legal person seal does not separate keeping malpractice, privately issued checks, misappropriation of public funds. Cozy with his duties incompatible staff collude with a fraud.3.related party transaction fraud. The related party transaction fraud, refers to the management using the related party transaction to hide losses, fictitious profits, and not in the statements and notes in accordance with the provisions as appropriate, full disclosure, the resulting information will have on the users of financial statements misleading a fraud method. Typically, Chinese listed companies using the purchase and sale of related fraud, fraud, entrusted with the operation of funds embezzlement, fraud and other four kinds of cost sharing related transactions by way of fictitious profit.4. the assets of fraud. Asset restructuring, mergers and acquisitions, debt restructuring, asset replacement form, occurring between the related parties. Assets reorganization of corrupt corrupt corrupt major mergers and acquisitions and debt restructuring in two ways.5. cover up fraud transaction or fact. Hide transaction or fact of fraud is through the use of accounting statements to hide transactions of listed companies or the truth, or has not been fully disclosed in the notes to the report deals truth an fraud methods.Second, the causes of listed companies ' financial malpracticeListed companies ' financial malpractice caused several of the following reasons:1. financial return far greater than the cost of fraud. To meet listing standards at some companies desperate to find ways to make financial fraud, and fraud, to meet the policy requirements. In addition, because the share price is times the income and earnings per share, and high stock market price/earnings ratio of deformity in China, so the main purpose of listed company's financial fraud is false profits. False profits of $ 1, the circulation market value of listed companies will increase 10 times times times. Relative to the fraud fraud income, cost is too low, from a certain extent, it is too low a fraud cost contributed some fraud.2. corporate governance structure is not perfect. Corporate governance structure is in fact about between owners, the Board of Directors and senior executive officers rights assigned and the arrangement of a system of checks and balances, the reality in China, led directly to the equity structure of listed companies malformations include the general meeting of shareholders, Board of Directors, Board of supervisors, which distort the relationship between corporate governance structure of checks and balances, which has provided an opportunity for financial fraud in listed companies. This is mainly manifested in the following aspects: (1) the ownership structure is not reasonable. As of the second half of 2006, the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock market, shares of over50 listed companies only 185, largest shareholder holding ratio of no more than 25 and only 219, 60~70 listed companies have invaded and occupied by large shareholders of listed company's funds. In the case of high concentration of ownership, possibilities of treatment failure of listed companies increased, listed companies, the greater possibility of financial fraud. (2) the independence of the Board is not strong, internal control is a serious problem. China listed company Director served as Senior Manager of the phenomenon is more prevalent, Director serves as the Senior Manager (internal control) more than 50 per cent of the sample company 32, more than 30 per cent of a sample of 65 companies. In this case, the operation of the Board is usually "Insider" or shareholder control, rather than based on the collective interest. This has led to the phenomenon of frequent corporate financial fraud. (3) the Supervisory Board weakening the oversight function, financial report difficulty in discharging its oversight functions. Based on analysis of listed company financial reporting fraud, Board of supervisors system in suppression of financial fraud in China did not play a role of Directors and managers of monitoring. Listed companies are required by law to set up a supervisory board, Board of supervisors actually are in a very awkward position, lower right or upper right of vulnerable rights of supervision or stronger right.3. accounting staff lack of professional ethics. Finance and accounting personnel who are directly involved in financial fraud, from the macro perspective, is mainly long term and not enough on accounting ethics education, lack of accounting professional standards; micro-perspective, strong sense of company accountants law, in order to meet company leaders of unhealthy psychological, thus violating the ethics of being practical and realistic, objective and fair. In addition, individuals driven by economic interests, has also led to some accountants deliberately forged, altered, hiding and destroyed the accounting information, taking advantage of his position of financial fraud.4. accounting and audit system is not sound. In recent years, although China is making a lot of accounting and auditing legislation, but from the practical point of view are not perfect and sound. Poor operability of some provisions, resulting in accounting fraud an opportunity. New accounting law "legal responsibility" chapter referred to "serious", "criminal", "significant losses" are not quantified, has no specific explanation. 2006 implementation of new accounting standards, provided more accounting options for management, which provides management with more profit opportunities. In addition, lack of punishment measures, social supervision is not strong, quality performance evaluation of accounting does not work, no ability to detect fraud, also can lead to occurrence of listed companies ' financial malpractice.Third, the governance of listed companies’financial fraud countermeasures1. coordinating the relationship between benefits and costs of financial fraud. We should increase the penalties for financial fraud, financial fraud costs more than it gains, so you can basically stop financial fraud. At the same time, in charge of financial malpractice should bear unlimited joint and several financial responsibility, which can to a large extent, inhibit their impulses of illegal counterfeiting. For those who dare to report the accounting officer shall provide ample rewards, so that its behavior is greater than the loss of income to report financial fraud. In this way, financial malpractice liability and they will take the initiative to give up the idea of financial fraud.2. perfect the corporate governance structure. Improve the internal governance structure of thecompany, is to prevent financial fraud, improve the quality of accounting information. (1) to improve the company's ownership structure, can solve the status of minority shareholders and the controlling shareholder is not symmetric. (2) the perfection of listed company's Board. In the establishment of external independent directors on the Board of the company, and provides that a certain proportion of the external independent directors, and established a number of specialized committees, raise the level of professionalization of the Board, to play the role of the Board. (3) improvement Board of supervisors of listed companies. As the Board of supervisors a mere formality, only to stand in the governance structure of the company, to further improve the system of Board of supervisors.3. raising the level of professional ethics of accountants. State management and accounting departments, should continuously strengthen the ideological education of accountants and accounting staff levels continue to improve, making it able to consciously resist financial malpractice, gradually establishing accounting integrity and fair image.4. accounting and auditing systems. Accounting standards and the flexibility of the system is the important basis for financial fraud to achieve. First of all, according to China's actual conditions, principles of system of accounting standards and make appropriate adjustments, in general lack of ethical culture in China now, improving the reliability of the accounting report is the key. Second, correctly handle the relationship between consistency and flexibility, reducing the options available to the company within the scope of accounting system as much as possible, especially when it comes to income and expenses recognized measuring principle, the depreciation of fixed assets, eight-asset impairment provision ratio and maximum detailed provisions should be made. Introduce specific implementation details will be quantitative and specific legal responsibility to explain, this has the advantage of parties a clear financial consequences of fraud, also in favour of the relevant departments to determine the financial fraud and punishable by appropriate penalties. Finally, give full play to the role of public opinion and the media. As the perfection of the securities market, market supervision is not limited to certified public accountants and the Government, the general public and the media has also been involved in the regulatory process.The endAt present, China is in an early stage of market economy, all kinds of deceptive behaviors emerge, accounting activity as a measure of economic activity, inevitably financial fraud. Financial fraud is not only an economic phenomenon, is also a visualization of the deep moral conviction. So, on the governance of financial fraud is a systems engineering, business, community and government supervision of Trinity system is required in all departments and make concerted efforts, coordinate with each other. Only an integrated approach to governance, to create good information environment for China's economic development.Reference.[1] Hou Yanlei, Zhai Yingmin. The financial fraud of listed companies analysis [J]. Economy and management,2006, (7):71-73.[2] Huang Xinjian . Chinese listed company's financial fraud and the Countermeasures Research [J]. Economic survey,2006, (4):77-79.[3] Wang Jianxin. The financial fraud of listed companies : motives and management [J ]. Market modernization,2008, (2):346-347.[4] Yang Yunshu . The financial fraud of listed companies analysis [J ]. Accounting research,2006,(5):62-63.[5]You Xiaofeng. Chinese Research on financial governance of Listed Companies [ M]. Beijing: Economic Science Press,2005: 144-145.[6] Zhang Aimin. The combination of internal and external, prevention of financial fraud of Listed Companies [ J]. Contemporary economy,2006, (2):18-19.[7]Hong Ge. Fraud in financial reports of listed companies governance approach [J]. Economic review,2005, (9):117-137.[8]Wang Haixia. Internal governance structure in listed companies and the prevention of financial fraud [J]. Auditing & Finance,2005, (7):23-24.上市公司财务舞弊原因及对策摘要:财务舞弊行为伴随着中国改革开放的进程而不断演进发展,带给社会的危害也愈来愈明显,能否对财务舞弊行为进行切实有效地治理受到人们的普遍关注。
上市公司治理准则中英文对照
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3631/b36311ab4c0bef7eba6123ae7e853b96ab989b31" alt="上市公司治理准则中英文对照"
上市公司治理准则中英文对照一、引言上市公司治理准则是规范上市公司运作、保障投资者权益、促进资本市场健康发展的重要文件。
随着全球经济一体化的加速,越来越多的中国上市公司走向国际市场,同时也有众多国际投资者参与中国资本市场。
因此,提供上市公司治理准则的中英文对照版本具有重要的现实意义。
二、上市公司治理准则的主要内容(一)股东与股东大会Shareholders and Shareholders' General Meeting股东享有平等的权利,能够按照其所持有的股份行使表决权。
Shareholders enjoy equal rights and can exercise their voting rights in accordance with the shares they hold股东大会是公司的最高权力机构,应当依法行使职权。
The shareholders' general meeting is the highest authority of the company and shall exercise its functions and powers in accordance with the law(二)董事与董事会Directors and the Board of Directors董事应当具备履行职责所必需的知识、技能和经验。
Directors should possess the necessary knowledge, skills and experience to perform their duties董事会应当对公司的战略规划、重大决策等进行审议和决策。
The board of directors should review and make decisions on the company's strategic planning and major decisions(三)监事与监事会Supervisors and the Board of Supervisors监事应当认真履行监督职责,维护公司及股东的合法权益。
财务报告舞弊外文翻译
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47d24/47d24aa677ca122c4847f625350d1ee8f9615a5c" alt="财务报告舞弊外文翻译"
财务报告舞弊,外文翻译:外文舞弊财务报告翻译财务报告舞弊定义舞弊风险因素怎么分析会计舞弊案例篇一:全球公司会计舞弊和改革行为【外文翻译】(1)外文文献翻译译文原文Global Corporate Accounting Frauds and Action for Reforms1、IntroductionDuring the recent series of corporate fraudulent financial reporting incidents in the U.S., similar corporate scandals were disclosed in several other countries. Almost all cases of foreign corporate accounting frauds were committed by entities that conduct their businesses in more than one country, and most of these entities are also listed on U.S. stock exchanges. Following the legislative and regulatory reforms of corporate America, resulting from the SarbanesOxley Act of 2002, reforms were also initiated worldwide. The primary purpose of this paper is twofold: (1) to identify the prominent American and foreign companies involved in fraudulent financial reporting and the nature of accounting irregularities they committed; and (2) to highlight the global reaction for corporate reforms which are aimed at restoring investorconfidence in financial reporting, the public accounting profession and global capital markets.2、Cases of Global Corporate Accounting FraudsThe list of corporate financial accounting scandals in the U.S. is extensive, and each one was the result of one or more creative accounting irregularities. Exhibit 1 identifies a sample of U.S. companies that committed such fraud and the nature of their fraudulent financial reporting activities.EXHIBIT 1. A SAMPLE OF CASES OF CORPORATE ACCOUNTING3、Global Regulatory Action for Corporate and Accounting ReformsI. U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOA 2002)In response to corporate and accounting scandals, the effects of which are still being felt throughout the U.S. economy, and in order to protect public interest and to restore investor confidence in the capital market, U.S. lawmakers, in a compromise by the House and Senate, passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. President Bush signed this Act into law (Public Law 107-204) on July 30, 2002. The Act resulted in major changes to compliance practices of large U.S. and non-U.S. companies whose securities are listed or traded on U.S. stock exchanges, requiring executives, boards of directors and external auditors to undertake measures to implement greater accountability, responsibility and transparency of financial reporting.The statutes of the act, and the new SEC initiatives that followed, are considered the most significant legislation and regulations affecting the corporate community and the accounting profession since 1933. Other U.S. regulatory bodies such as the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation (NASDAQ) and the State Societies of CPAs have also passed new regulations which place additional burdens on publicly traded companies and their external auditors.The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOA) is expressly applicable to any non-U.S. company registered on U.S. exchanges under either the Securities Act of 1933 or the Security Exchange Act of 1934, regardless of country of incorporation or corporate domicile. Furthermore, external auditors of such registrants, regardless of their nationality or place of business, are subject to the oversight of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) and to the statutory requirements of the SOA .The United States' SOA has reverberated around the globe through the corporate and accounting reforms addressed by the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC); the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD); the European Commission (UC); and authoritative bodies within individual European countries.II. International Federation of Accountants (IFAC)The International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) is a private governance organization whose members are the national professional associations of accountants. It formally describes itself as the global representative of the accounting profession, with the objective of serving the public interest, strengthening the worldwide accountancy profession and contributing to the development of strong international economies by establishing and promoting adherence to high quality standards. The Federation represents accountancy groups worldwide and has served as a reminder that restoring public confidence in financial reporting and the accounting profession should be considered a global mission. It is also considered a key player in the global auditing arena which, among other things, constructs international standards on auditing and has laid down an international ethical code for professional accountants. The IFAC has recently secured a degree of support for its endeavors from some of the world's most influential international organizations in economic and financial spheres, including global Financial Stability Forum (FSF), the International Organization ofSecurities Commissions (IOSCO), the World Bank and, most significantly, the European Communities(EC).In October 2002, IFAC commissioned a Task Force on Rebuilding Public Confidence in Financial Reporting to use a global perspective to consider how to restore the credibility of financial reporting and corporate disclosure. Its report, Rebuilding Public Confidence in Financial Reporting: An International Perspective, includes recommendations for strengthening corporate governance, and raising the regulating standards of issuers. Among its conclusions and recommendations related to audit committees are :1. All public interest entities should have an independent audit committee or similar body .2. The audit committee should regularly report to the board and should address concerns about financial information, internal controls or the audit .3. The audit committee must meet regularly and have sufficient time to perform its role effectively .4. Audit committees should have core responsibilities, including monitoring and reviewing the integrity of financial reporting, financial controls, the internal audit function, as well as for recommending, working with and monitoring the external auditors.5. Audit committee members should be financially literate and a majority should have substantial financial experience. They should receive further training as necessary on their responsibilities and onthe company.6. Audit committees should have regular private executive sessions with the outside auditors and the head of the internal audit department. These executive sessions should not include members of management. There should be similar meetings with the chief financial officer (CFO) and other key financial executives, but without other members of management.7. Audit committee members should be independent of management .8. There should be a principles-based approach to defining independence on an international level. Companies should disclose committee members' credentials,篇二:财务报表舞弊的原因,后果和威胁外文翻译财务报表舞弊的原因,后果和威胁财务报表舞弊是一种由企业蓄意欺骗或通过编制和传播重大误报的财务报表来误导财务报表使用者的行为,尤其是投资者和债权人,严重威胁市场参与者对已公布的经审计的财务报表信心。
250.D我国上市公司会计信息失真现状及对策外文翻译
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54791/5479199cdeca5a66da4d0ddea18f2c3a3f7f7f31" alt="250.D我国上市公司会计信息失真现状及对策外文翻译"
这项计划的问题是,为什么不贷款人员支付最终盈利该贷款,而不是它的起源费。'根据贷款盈利将奖金优势给予贷款人员奖励,寻找良好的信用风险,贷款,销售较高的预期值。换句话说,这样的性能衡量标准将提供给一些人员贷款的激励机制。不过,这项计划也将给予更大的信贷风险,因为许多事情可能发生在债务人基本上不知道贷款的背景下。在这种情况下,风险和失真之间的权衡是赞成作低风险和较高的失真的决策的。
学院学生毕业设计(论文)
外文译文
院(系)经济管理学院专业班级 Nhomakorabea学生姓名
学号
译文要求
1.外文翻译必须使用签字笔,手工工整书写,或用A4纸打印。
2.所选的原文不少于2万字印刷字符,其内容必须与课题或专业方向紧密相关,注明详细出处。
3.外文翻译书文本后附原文(或复印件)。
译文评阅
评阅要求:应根据学校“译文要求”,对学生译文的准确性、翻译数量以及译文的文字表述情况等作具体的评价。
许多组织的最大价值是不能用于激励计划的。在私人控股公司,该组织的未知的财务价值,它是可能不是所有人的目标。相反,其目标是要最大限度地提高业主的实用工具,组织的事业显然不是一个收缩性能的措施。
这种非收缩组织价值的问题更体现在非营利性组织和政府机构。在这种类型的组织,甚至有可能不会为了使管理人员同意,而指定该组织的目标。这些组织通常的特点是不能使用基于股票的激励设备,以及在良好的组织目标的情况下阻碍有效的绩效评价体系设计。如果高层的目标不知道,那么如何衡量该组织个别员工的表现?下面我会说是在界定“良好”的非营利组织的绩效措施中,困难的一个原因是疲弱的奖励措施,经常组织这种类型的奖励措施,其功能失调的后果,往往发生在这T些类型的组织尝试使用奖励后。
上市公司会计舞弊成因分析及防范策略
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/165c8/165c8e578b79167ebf59ab03fd7389e2a0801ef1" alt="上市公司会计舞弊成因分析及防范策略"
上市公司会计舞弊成因分析及防范策略上市公司会计舞弊(Accounting Fraud)是指公司为了做美化财务报表而采取的不合规的会计操作行为。
会计舞弊是对市场经济秩序的严重破坏,严重扰乱了市场的公平竞争环境,损害了投资者的权益。
因此,分析其成因并制定相应的防范策略对于保障市场稳定和投资者利益至关重要。
会计舞弊的成因主要包括以下几点:1.管理层动机:管理层追求个人利益最大化,为了达到自身的目标,可能会采取违法违规的会计操作手段。
例如,为了提高企业价值,会计报表可能被操纵以影响股价。
2.内控缺失:公司内部的监管机制和内部控制不健全,缺乏有效的制度和流程。
例如,公司可能没有独立的审计委员会,监督会计人员或审计师的工作;也可能缺乏审计流程和内部审计机制。
3.缺乏专业素质的会计人员:一些公司会安排没有专业背景或经验的人员从事会计工作,或者会计人员缺乏诚信和专业道德,容易被利益驱使。
4.不合理的业绩指标和目标:一些上市公司设定过高或不合理的业绩指标和目标,为了实现这些目标,可能会进行不正当的会计操作。
为了防范上市公司会计舞弊,可以采取以下策略:1.加强内控制度建设:完善公司的内部管控体系,确保公司内部控制的有效性。
例如,建立独立的审计委员会,并设立内部审计部门,加强对会计操作的监督和审计。
2.提高会计人员的专业素质与道德水平:加强对会计人员的培训和教育,提高其专业素质和道德水平,加强对会计人员的监管。
3.加强外部监管与审计:加强对上市公司的监管力度,加大对上市公司财务报表的审计力度。
加强对会计事务所的监督,确保审计质量。
4.引入市场机制:加强投资者保护机制,提供举报渠道,并设立举报奖励制度,鼓励投资者积极参与监督,对会计舞弊行为进行检举。
5.加大对会计舞弊的惩罚力度:建立健全的法律法规体系,对会计舞弊行为进行惩罚。
加大对会计舞弊行为的打击力度,对违法违规行为严厉处罚,形成有效的震慑力。
综上所述,会计舞弊对市场经济和投资者利益造成了巨大的伤害,防范会计舞弊是保障市场秩序和投资者权益的重要任务。
行政总裁股权激励和会计违规【外文翻译】
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77b32/77b3203477014c6163673af7417532ef2b2444a3" alt="行政总裁股权激励和会计违规【外文翻译】"
外文翻译Chief Executive Officer Equity Incentives and AccountingIrregularitiesMaterial Source: School foreign nets Author: Gordon EvansThis study examines the relation between chief executive officer (CEO) equity incentives and accounting irregularities (i.e., restatements, Securities and Exchange Commission Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Actions, and shareholder class action lawsuits). Although equity holdings may mitigate certain agency problems between executives and shareholders, researchers, regulators, and the business press have voiced concerns that “high-powered” equity incentives might also motivate executives to manipulate accounting information for personal gain. This view assumes that stock prices are a function of reported earnings and posits that executives manipulate accounting earnings to increase the value of their personal equity holdings. 1If this allegation is true and the economic cost of accounting manipulation is large, this idea has important implications for executive compensation contract design and corporate monitoring by both internal and external parties.Although at least ten recent studies examine the relationship between equity incentives and various types of accounting irregularities, a convergent set of results does not emerge from this literature. In particular, eight prior studies fiThis study examines the relationship between chief executive officer (CEO) equity incentives and accounting irregularities (i.e., restatements, Securities and Exchange Commission Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Actions, and shareholder class action lawsuits). The wealth of most executives is highly concentrated in a portfolio of stock, restricted stock, stock options, and human capital that is directly linked to changes in shareholder value. Although equity holdings may mitigate certain agency problems in the principal-agent relationship that exists between executives and shareholders, researchers, regulators, and the business press have voiced concerns that “high-power ed” equity incentives might also motivate executives to manipulate accounting ind evidence of a positive relationship, but even within this group the evidence is mixed as to which components of an executive’s equity incentives (e.g.,restricted stock, unvested options and vested options) cause this association. Two additional studies do not find any evidence of a relationship, even though they share similar proxies and samples to those used in the studies that do find a relationship.Most prior studies also adopt a common research design that relies heavily on assumptions about the functional form of the relationship between equity incentives and accounting irregularities. Specifically, these studies tend to match firms on the outcome variable of interest (e.g., an accounting fraud firm is matched to a non-fraud firm) and on a small number of characteristic variables such as firm size and industrial classification. These studies then “control” for other potential confounding variables (e.g., investment opportunities, corporate governance, etc.) by including these variables in the estimation equation which relates accounting irregularities to equity incentives. However, as we discuss more fully, this traditional approach requires a variety of restrictive (and perhaps unrealistic) assumptions to be satisfied to produce appropriate inferences.Prior studies also tend to analyze a relatively small sample of firms that lie in the intersection of ExecuComp and either Governmental Accounting Office (GAO) Financial Statement Restatements or SEC Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Actions (AAERs). Since ExecuComp does not contain data for the majority of firms in the economy, it is possible that results of prior studies are further confounded by selection bias.2 In addition, it is not clear whether small samples (e.g., between 50 and 200 observations) can provide sufficient statistical power for an analysis of the determinants of a relatively rare event. This hinders the ability to draw inferences regarding the primary research hypothesis when a statistically significant relationship is not detected. Finally, prior studies generally ignore the potential endogenous matching of executives with their observed compensation contracts (and thus their observed level of equity incentives). Since this type of endogenous matching is an important feature of the executive labor market, it is difficult to interpret prior results because the parameter estimates are likely to be inconsistent.We draw inferences regarding the relationship between CEO equity incentives and accounting irregularities from a broad dataset and utilize a research design that better addresses the potential confounds inherent in observational studies (Rosenbaum, 2002). Specifically, we employ a propensity score matched pair research design to match observations that are similar along multiple firm- and manager-level dimensions (Rosenbaum and Rubin, 1983). In this setting, the propensity score method forms matched pairs with similar contracting environmentsbut different levels of CEO equity incentives to better isolate the effect of executive equity incentives on accounting irregularities, which reduces the potential for “overt bias.”3 We also assess the sensitivity of our results to “hidden bias” in the form of correlated omitted (i.e., unobserved) covariates through bounding techniques described by Rosenbaum (2002). This bounding approach provides insight into the likelihood that our results are confounded by the endogenous matching of CEOs and compensation contracts (and, thus, equity incentives). Thus, our research design has the advantages of the traditional matched pairs approach, but it is also robust to violations of critical assumptions that may confound analyses in prior work.In contrast to most prior studies, we do not observe a positive relationship between CEO equity incentives and the incidence of accounting irregularities. Instead, our evidence suggests that the level of CEO equity incentives has a modest negative relation with the incidence of accounting irregularities. This result is consistent with the notion that equity incentives mitigate agency costs that arise with respect to financial reporting, as opposed to the interpretation that equity incentives cause managers to manipulate reported earnings.At least ten recent studies (summarized in Table 1) examine the relation between executives’equity incentives and accounting irregularities. These studies generally hypothesize that equity-based compensation and holdings provide incentives for managers to manipulate accounting numbers (e.g., Harris and Bromiley, 2007; Efendi, Srivastava, and Swanson, 2007; Bergstresser and Phillipon, 2006), perhaps to increase gains from pending insider sales (Cheng and Warfield, 2005). Harris and Bromiley (2007), for example, suggest the likelihood of managerial impropriety rises with “the strength of inducements,” and therefore test for a positive relationship between the probability of accounting misrepresentation and stock option compensation. Few studies (e.g., O’Connor, Priem, Coombs, and Gilley, 2006; Burns and Kedia, 2006), however, explicitly consider the alternative possibility that equity incentives might instead mitigate management’s desire to manipulate accounting numbers by aligning managers’ inter ests with those of shareholders.Eight of the ten papers in Table 1 find some evidence that executives’ equity incentives exhibit a positive statistical association with accounting manipulation. Although the results across these studies might be considered as a consensus for this research question, there is considerable variation across inferences presented within these papers. This lack of consistency occurs even though similar proxies foraccounting manipulation and equity incentives are used and there is considerable cross-sectional and temporal overlap in their samples. For example, Johnson, Ryan, and Tian (2008) and Erickson, Hanlon, and Maydew (2006) both assess the relation between the incidence of accounting fraud (identified using AAERs) and the equity portfolio delta computed for top firm executives. 4 Although the two samples exhibit considerable overlap, Johnson, Ryan, and Tian (2008) report evidence of a strong positive association between unrestricted equity holdings and the incidence of accounting fraud, while Erickson, Hanlon, and Maydew (2006) do not observe any statistical association. Similarly, Baber, Kang, and Liang (2007) and Harris and Bromiley (2006) both examine the relation between equity incentives and the incidence of accounting restatements. Their samples differ in number of observations, but overlap completely in observation years. In spite of this overlap, the studies report surprisingly different results. Harris and Bromiley (2006) find a positive association between the incidence of accounting restatements and the ratio of option compensation to total compensation while Baber, Kang, and Liang (2007) do not find a similar statistical association.Some prior studies provide evidence of a positive association only for certain components of option-related holdings (e.g., Harris and Bromiley, 2006; Burns and Kedia, 2006; Efendi, Srivastava, and Swanson, 2007). Others provide evidence of a positive association for different equity components such as unvested options and stock ownership (Cheng and Warfield, 2005), vested stock holdings (Johnson, Ryan, and Tian, 2008), and the entire equity portfolio (Bergstresser and Phillipon, 2006). Yet another study finds evidence of a positive association for option-related equity components only when conditioned on the Board of Directors’ composition and compensation structure (O’Connor, Priem, Coombs, and Gilley, 2006). These inconsistencies highlight the difficulty in drawing general inferences regarding the association between equity incentives and accounting irregularities from prior research.行政总裁股权激励和会计违规资料来源:学校外文网作者:戈登·伊斯本研究对公司首席执行官(CEO)股权激励和会计违规行为之间的关系进行了实证分析。
外文翻译上市公司财务舞弊原因及对策
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a41da/a41da1bccf73c8bf967e471870984af3aea2ef1a" alt="外文翻译上市公司财务舞弊原因及对策"
外文翻译上市公司财务舞弊原因及对策以下是为您起草的一份关于外文翻译上市公司财务舞弊原因及对策的协议:1、合同主体11 甲方(委托方)姓名:____________________________身份证号:____________________________12 乙方(受托方)姓名:____________________________身份证号:____________________________2、合同标的21 甲方委托乙方进行关于上市公司财务舞弊原因及对策的外文翻译工作。
22 翻译的外文资料由甲方提供,包括但不限于相关学术论文、研究报告等。
23 乙方应按照甲方的要求,准确、完整地将外文资料翻译成中文。
3、权利义务31 甲方的权利义务311 有权要求乙方按照约定的时间、质量完成翻译工作。
312 应按时向乙方提供所需的外文资料,并保证资料的真实性和合法性。
313 按照本协议的约定,向乙方支付相应的翻译费用。
32 乙方的权利义务321 有权要求甲方按时提供相关资料和支付费用。
322 应严格遵守翻译行业的规范和标准,保证翻译质量。
323 对甲方提供的外文资料进行保密,不得泄露给任何第三方。
324 按照约定的时间完成翻译工作,并向甲方提交翻译成果。
4、违约责任41 若甲方未按时提供外文资料或支付费用,每逾期一天,应按照未支付费用的一定比例向乙方支付违约金。
42 若乙方未按照约定的时间提交翻译成果,每逾期一天,应按照翻译费用的一定比例向甲方支付违约金。
43 若乙方的翻译质量不符合要求,甲方有权要求乙方重新翻译,若重新翻译仍不符合要求,乙方应退还甲方已支付的翻译费用,并承担因此给甲方造成的损失。
44 若因乙方泄露甲方提供的外文资料而给甲方造成损失的,乙方应承担赔偿责任。
5、争议解决方式51 本协议在履行过程中如发生争议,双方应首先友好协商解决。
52 若协商不成,任何一方均可向有管辖权的人民法院提起诉讼。
外文翻译上市公司财务舞弊原因及对策
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/627b9/627b9a5088948ec79eed4851ce64d64d37789f94" alt="外文翻译上市公司财务舞弊原因及对策"
外文翻译上市公司财务舞弊原因及对策在当今的经济社会中,上市公司财务舞弊现象屡见不鲜,这不仅严重损害了投资者的利益,破坏了资本市场的公平与秩序,也对整个经济的健康发展产生了负面影响。
深入探究上市公司财务舞弊的原因,并提出相应的对策,具有重要的现实意义。
一、上市公司财务舞弊的原因(一)内部原因1、利益驱动上市公司的管理层和大股东往往为了追求个人利益的最大化,如高额薪酬、股权增值等,不惜通过财务舞弊手段来美化公司的财务报表,以达到提升股价、获得更多融资或避免退市等目的。
2、公司治理结构不完善一些上市公司内部治理结构存在缺陷,董事会、监事会等监督机制未能有效发挥作用,导致管理层权力过大,缺乏有效的制衡和约束,从而为财务舞弊行为提供了可乘之机。
3、财务压力当公司面临业绩下滑、债务危机等财务压力时,为了避免违约、维持信用评级或满足债权人的要求,可能会采取财务舞弊手段来掩盖真实的财务状况。
4、企业文化和道德缺失部分上市公司缺乏诚信经营的企业文化,管理层和员工的道德水准低下,对财务舞弊行为的危害性认识不足,甚至将其视为一种“正常”的经营手段。
(二)外部原因1、监管不力监管部门在对上市公司的监管过程中,存在监管手段落后、监管资源不足、处罚力度不够等问题,使得一些上市公司敢于冒险进行财务舞弊。
2、审计失效审计机构在对上市公司进行审计时,可能由于独立性不足、审计程序不规范、专业能力欠缺等原因,未能发现或揭露财务舞弊行为。
3、法律法规不完善目前,我国针对上市公司财务舞弊的法律法规还不够完善,对财务舞弊行为的处罚力度相对较轻,难以对舞弊者形成有效的威慑。
4、资本市场的压力资本市场对上市公司的业绩和股价表现有着较高的期望,这种压力可能促使公司管理层为了满足市场预期而采取不正当的手段进行财务舞弊。
二、上市公司财务舞弊的对策(一)完善公司内部治理结构1、优化股权结构避免股权过度集中,形成多元化的股权结构,以减少大股东对公司的绝对控制,增强中小股东的话语权。
外文翻译上市公司财务舞弊原因及对策
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9fdf/a9fdf0bace555ca7b8124995dafa0d3ccebf59f0" alt="外文翻译上市公司财务舞弊原因及对策"
外文翻译上市公司财务舞弊原因及对策在当今复杂多变的经济环境中,上市公司财务舞弊问题日益严重,不仅损害了投资者的利益,破坏了市场的公平和透明,也给整个经济社会带来了负面影响。
本文旨在深入探讨外文翻译上市公司财务舞弊的原因,并提出相应的对策,以维护市场的健康稳定发展。
一、外文翻译上市公司财务舞弊的原因(一)利益驱动利益是导致外文翻译上市公司财务舞弊的首要原因。
公司管理层为了达到个人或团体的经济利益,如获取高额薪酬、奖金、股票期权等,可能会操纵财务数据。
此外,公司为了满足上市要求、获得融资、避免退市等,也会不惜通过舞弊手段来美化财务报表。
(二)公司治理结构不完善公司内部治理结构的缺陷为财务舞弊提供了机会。
如果董事会、监事会等监督机制失效,管理层权力过大且缺乏有效制衡,就容易出现财务舞弊行为。
同时,内部审计部门独立性不足,无法发挥有效的监督作用,也使得财务舞弊难以被及时发现和制止。
(三)外部监管不力证券监管部门的监管力度不足,法律法规不够健全,对财务舞弊行为的处罚力度不够严厉,使得上市公司违法成本较低。
此外,审计机构、评级机构等第三方中介机构未能尽职尽责,也在一定程度上纵容了财务舞弊行为的发生。
(四)压力与动机公司面临的业绩压力、市场竞争压力以及来自股东和投资者的期望压力,都可能促使管理层采取不正当手段来达到预期的财务目标。
例如,当公司业绩不佳时,为了稳定股价、避免投资者恐慌抛售,管理层可能会选择财务舞弊。
(五)财务人员职业道德缺失部分财务人员缺乏职业操守和道德底线,为了个人利益或者迫于上级压力,参与或协助财务舞弊。
他们可能故意篡改财务数据、编制虚假财务报告,严重违背了会计职业的诚信原则。
(六)信息不对称上市公司与投资者之间存在信息不对称,投资者难以获取公司真实、准确、完整的财务信息。
这种信息差距使得上市公司更容易进行财务舞弊,而投资者难以察觉和防范。
二、外文翻译上市公司财务舞弊的对策(一)完善公司治理结构建立健全的公司治理机制,优化董事会结构,增强董事会的独立性和专业性。
外文翻译---上市公司财务舞弊原因及对策
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/281f7/281f7010a4a4d56cea6eb44cab9399f02ee4c34f" alt="外文翻译---上市公司财务舞弊原因及对策"
外文翻译上市公司财务舞弊原因及对策外文翻译上市公司财务舞弊原因及对策引言上市公司财务舞弊是指企业在财务报表中故意掩盖真实的经济状况,以欺骗投资者、骗取融资、规避监管等目的进行的违法、违规行为。
财务舞弊对企业和投资者都带来了巨大的损失,并严重损害了金融市场的信誉和稳定。
本文将探讨上市公司财务舞弊的原因,并提出相应的对策。
上市公司财务舞弊的原因财务舞弊的原因是多样的,主要包括以下几个方面:1. 利益驱动上市公司财务舞弊往往源于对利润和业绩的追求。
企业为了实现高额的利润,可能会选择使用不当的财务手段来美化财务报表,使得企业看起来更具吸引力,以吸引更多的投资者和融资机构。
2. 缺乏有效监管监管机构对上市公司的监管力度不够,或者在监管中存在漏洞,也是财务舞弊的原因之一。
当企业感受到监管机构的弱势时,就有可能冒着被发现的风险进行财务造假。
3. 内部控制体系不健全公司内部控制体系的薄弱是财务舞弊的另一个原因。
如果企业在内部控制方面存在漏洞,管理体系不完善,那么不法分子就有机可乘,很容易找到可以利用的弱点进行财务舞弊。
4. 职业道德缺失职业道德缺失也是导致财务舞弊的原因之一。
在一些企业中,管理层或相关人员缺乏职业道德观念,只关心个人利益,而忽视了对公司和投资者的责任。
这种缺乏道德约束的行为往往会导致财务舞弊的发生。
对策建议为了避免上市公司财务舞弊的发生,我们可以从以下几个方面提出对策:1. 加强监管力度监管机构应加大对上市公司的监管力度,建立严格的监管制度,并及时发现和处理财务舞弊行为。
监管机构还应加强对上市公司内部控制体系的审核,确保其健全有效。
2. 完善内部控制体系上市公司应建立健全的内部控制体系,加强对财务报表的审查和监督,确保报表的真实准确。
企业还应加强对员工的培训和教育,提高其职业道德水平,增强诚信意识,减少财务舞弊的发生。
3. 强化公司治理提高公司的治理水平也是预防财务舞弊的重要对策之一。
公司应建立独立的董事会和审计委员会,加强对公司经营和财务报告的监督。
外文翻译上市公司财务舞弊原因及对策
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70569/705699c162c269eea2bf32fe5680906721e3c214" alt="外文翻译上市公司财务舞弊原因及对策"
外文翻译上市公司财务舞弊原因及对策一、引言上市公司财务舞弊是一个严重的问题,不仅损害了投资者的利益,也破坏了市场的公平和透明度。
随着经济全球化的发展,越来越多的上市公司参与国际业务,外文翻译在财务信息披露中变得至关重要。
然而,外文翻译过程中也可能出现财务舞弊的情况。
本文将探讨外文翻译上市公司财务舞弊的原因,并提出相应的对策。
二、外文翻译上市公司财务舞弊的原因(一)利益驱动上市公司为了满足融资需求、维持股价稳定或达到管理层的业绩目标,可能会采取财务舞弊手段。
在外文翻译过程中,通过故意歪曲或隐瞒关键财务信息,误导国外投资者和监管机构。
(二)缺乏有效的内部控制公司内部治理结构不完善,内部控制制度存在漏洞,导致财务部门和翻译部门之间缺乏有效的监督和制衡。
翻译人员可能在没有充分审核和监督的情况下,对财务信息进行错误或误导性的翻译。
(三)翻译人员专业素质不足部分翻译人员缺乏财务知识和专业素养,对财务术语和概念理解不准确,从而在翻译过程中出现错误。
此外,一些翻译人员职业道德缺失,为了个人利益而参与财务舞弊。
(四)监管不力对上市公司外文翻译的财务信息监管存在难度,不同国家和地区的监管标准和要求存在差异,导致监管漏洞。
同时,监管部门的资源和技术手段有限,难以对大量的外文财务信息进行及时、有效的审查。
(五)压力与竞争市场竞争激烈,上市公司面临巨大的压力。
为了在竞争中脱颖而出,一些公司不惜通过财务舞弊来美化业绩。
在外文翻译环节,这种舞弊行为可能更具隐蔽性。
三、外文翻译上市公司财务舞弊的对策(一)加强内部控制建立健全的内部控制体系,明确财务部门和翻译部门的职责和权限,加强部门之间的沟通和协作。
定期对内部控制制度进行评估和完善,确保其有效性。
(二)提高翻译人员素质加强对翻译人员的培训,提高其财务知识水平和职业道德素养。
要求翻译人员具备相关的专业认证,确保其能够准确理解和翻译财务信息。
(三)强化监管加强国际间的监管合作,统一监管标准和要求,减少监管差异。
外文翻译上市公司财务舞弊原因及对策
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78007/78007204a7a8274631d4279ce0f0fcf9a248ad68" alt="外文翻译上市公司财务舞弊原因及对策"
外文翻译上市公司财务舞弊原因及对策外文翻译:上市公司财务舞弊原因及对策引言上市公司财务舞弊是指公司操纵财务报表以获取不正当利益的行为。
财务舞弊对投资者、股东和整个市场都会带来严重的经济损失和信任危机。
本文将探讨外文研究文献中关于上市公司财务舞弊的原因以及可能的对策。
财务舞弊的原因1. 绩效压力上市公司通常面临来自股东、投资者和分析师的高期望压力。
管理层为了满足这种压力,可能会采取不正当手段来提高业绩,比如虚报收入或减少负债。
绩效压力是导致财务舞弊的主要原因之一。
2. 薪酬激励计划薪酬激励计划可以激励员工为公司创造更高的利润,但如果激励计划设计不合理或监督不到位,员工可能会通过不正当手段来达到奖励目标,从而导致财务舞弊的发生。
3. 薄弱的内部控制上市公司应建立有效的内部控制机制,以确保财务报表的真实、完整和准确。
然而,薄弱的内部控制可能会导致财务舞弊的发生。
比如,没有适当的审计程序、缺乏独立性的董事会或审计委员会,以及管理层滥用权力等。
4. 管理层诚信缺失财务舞弊的另一个重要原因是管理层的诚信缺失。
当企业高层管理人员缺乏道德和道德标准时,他们可能会利用公司资源谋取个人利益,包括操纵财务报表。
5. 不透明的财务报告如果财务报表不透明,投资者将很难了解公司的真实财务状况。
不透明的财务报告为财务欺诈提供了机会,因为管理层可以通过各种方式掩饰真实的财务状况。
对策1. 加强内部控制公司应建立完善的内部控制机制,包括制定严格的审计程序和内部审计制度。
此外,建立一个独立、专业的审计委员会可以提高内部控制的有效性,并监督财务报表的准确性和透明度。
2. 提高管理层的道德标准公司应通过培训和教育提高管理层的道德和道德标准,加强其对企业伦理和道德风险的认识。
此外,建立有效的奖惩制度,以激励和约束管理层的行为。
3. 加强财务报告的透明度公司应确保财务报表的透明度和准确性,以提高投资者对公司财务状况的了解。
透明度可以通过清晰的财务报表、充分披露的信息和和适当的沟通渠道来实现。
外文翻译上市公司财务舞弊原因及对策
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55a5b/55a5b8a2c7aab2c02dafdc164e6bf8629bd82983" alt="外文翻译上市公司财务舞弊原因及对策"
外文翻译上市公司财务舞弊原因及对策在当今复杂多变的商业环境中,上市公司财务舞弊问题屡屡出现,给投资者、市场秩序和社会经济带来了严重的负面影响。
深入探究其原因并提出有效的对策,对于维护市场的公平、公正和透明,保障各方利益,促进经济的健康发展具有重要意义。
一、上市公司财务舞弊的原因(一)利益驱动追求高额利润和个人利益是上市公司财务舞弊的主要动机之一。
管理层可能为了达到业绩目标,获取高额薪酬、奖金或股权激励,而故意操纵财务数据。
此外,公司为了满足融资需求、维持股价高位或避免退市,也可能采取舞弊手段来美化财务报表。
(二)内部治理缺陷公司内部治理结构不完善是财务舞弊发生的重要原因。
董事会、监事会等监督机构未能有效发挥监督作用,内部审计制度不健全,缺乏独立性和权威性。
管理层权力过大,缺乏制衡机制,容易导致决策的独断专行和财务舞弊的发生。
(三)外部监管不力证券监管部门的监管力度不足,对上市公司的信息披露要求不够严格,监管手段相对滞后,难以及时发现和查处财务舞弊行为。
同时,审计机构的独立性和专业性也可能受到质疑,一些审计师未能保持应有的职业谨慎和操守,为财务舞弊提供了可乘之机。
(四)会计准则的灵活性和复杂性会计准则在某些情况下存在一定的灵活性和模糊性,为公司管理层进行财务操纵提供了空间。
例如,在收入确认、资产减值计提、公允价值计量等方面,不同的判断和估计可能导致财务报表结果的巨大差异。
(五)企业文化和道德缺失公司缺乏诚信文化和道德价值观,管理层和员工对法律和道德规范的漠视,也是导致财务舞弊的原因之一。
在追求短期利益的驱使下,忽视了企业的社会责任和长期发展。
二、上市公司财务舞弊的对策(一)完善公司内部治理结构优化董事会构成,增加独立董事的比例,提高董事会的独立性和专业性。
强化监事会的监督职能,确保其能够对公司的财务活动进行有效监督。
建立健全内部审计制度,保证内部审计机构的独立性和权威性,加强对公司内部财务控制的审查和评估。
最新上市公司会计信息质量研究-外文翻译
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d9bea/d9bea491d4c20a0fa429b489062941f9f281ac21" alt="最新上市公司会计信息质量研究-外文翻译"
上市公司会计信息质量研究-外文翻译中国上市公司管理者的不良会计行为摘要管理者有意或无意的不良会计行为将导致上市公司会计信息质量差,从而在很大程度上干扰投资者,造成资本市场混乱,不利于反映绩效管理责任。
研究中国上市公司管理者的不良会计行为具有重要意义,即改善管理,优化社会资源的分配。
本文分别讨论了管理者无意和有意的不良会计行为的表现形式和原因。
它也提出了防止中国上市公司管理者的不良会计行为的建议,通过提高工作效率和上市公司会计信息质量,来维护利益相关者的利益,并为资本市场提供良好的环。
关键词:不良会计行为;管理者;上市公司;会计信息质量引言会计行为是指提供高度相关的会计信息的行为,即会计信息的生成、处理和传输的过程。
会计行为会对预算,绩效评估,成本控制和决策产生重大影响。
从微观角度看,会计行为包括会计机构,会计业务,内部会计控制。
在核算过程中,掌握经营决策和控制权的管理者是选择会计政策和重大会计问题的决策的重要参与者。
因此,上市公司会计信息质量在很大程度上取决于管理者的行为。
我们把企业中,管理者参与会计的行动和表现称为管理者会计行为。
管理者通常被称为与管理人才签订业务合同和真正拥有剩余控制权利的人力资本所有者。
管理者负责确定组织的目标,制订策略,实现既定目标,监测和解释外部环境条件,对影响整个组织的问题做出决定。
一般来讲,中国上市公司的管理人员包括总裁,副总裁,部门经理,财务总监,总工程师等。
会计行为的结果是产生会计信息,会计实务和会计信息有直接的因果关系。
标准的会计实务提供真实和完整的会计信息,满足各种需求。
不规范的会计行为,会产生虚假和不完整的会计信息,最终扰乱甚至误导那些会计信息的使用者。
这些违规行为,可能是由于两个方面的原因,一个是由于人的有限理性,造成会计目标的偏差或目标的丢失,称为非主观不良会计行为。
另一种是为了某些不良意图或目的,对会计信息的生成和披露造成负面影响,因此可称为有意的不良会计行为。
上市公司治理准则-中英文对照
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/187e8/187e88aa2c44bbac477bf9bd3573b91726a5ee38" alt="上市公司治理准则-中英文对照"
上市公司治理准则中英文对照Code of Corporate Governance for Listed Companies in China导言为推动上市公司建立和完善现代企业制度,规范上市公司运作,促进我国证券市场健康发展,根据《公司法》、《证券法》及其它相关法律、法规确定的基本原则,并参照国外公司治理实践中普遍认同的标准,制订本准则.本准则阐明了我国上市公司治理的基本原则、投资者权利保护的实现方式,以及上市公司董事、监事、经理等高级管理人员所应当遵循的基本的行为准则和职业道德等内容.本准则适用于中国境内的上市公司.上市公司改善公司治理,应当贯彻本准则所阐述的精神。
上市公司制定或者修改公司章程及治理细则,应当体现本准则所列明的内容。
本准则是评判上市公司是否具有良好的公司治理结构的主要衡量标准,对公司治理存在重大问题的上市公司,证券监管机构将责令其按照本准则的要求进行整改。
第一章股东与股东大会第一节股东权利第一条股东作为公司的所有者,享有法律、行政法规和公司章程规定的合法权利。
上市公司应建立能够确保股东充分行使权利的公司治理结构.第二条上市公司的治理结构应确保所有股东,特别是中小股东享有平等地位.股东按其持有的股份享有平等的权利,并承担相应的义务。
第三条股东对法律、行政法规和公司章程规定的公司重大事项,享有知情权和参与权。
上市公司应建立和股东沟通的有效渠道。
第四条股东有权按照法律、行政法规的规定,通过民事诉讼或其他法律手段保护其合法权利。
股东大会、董事会的决议违反法律、行政法规的规定,侵犯股东合法权益,股东有权依法提起要求停止上述违法行为或侵害行为的诉讼.董事、监事、经理执行职务时违反法律、行政法规或者公司章程的规定,给公司造成损害的,应承担赔偿责任.股东有权要求公司依法提起要求赔偿的诉讼。
第二节股东大会的规范第五条上市公司应在公司章程中规定股东大会的召开和表决程序,包括通知、登记、提案的审议、投票、计票、表决结果的宣布、会议决议的形成、会议记录及其签署、公告等。
会计职业道德的外文翻译
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/16e35/16e352791e4f828519d2128d70f2bda6ae5643d1" alt="会计职业道德的外文翻译"
Under the financial crisis to rebuilding accountingoccupation ethics question research literature review徐珊珊The financial crisis has become an indisputable fact, accounting occupation morals got be pounded badly,be placed in jeopardy of accounting integrity。
The accounting personnel in the country,social interests and the interests of individual units,conflicts of interest,not the interests of the temptation of forgery, alteration in accounting information or collusion,lost the basic concept of legal system,in order to meet their own selfish desires and make the non moral behavior, these are serious impact on accounting occupation and the accounting information reliability. Therefore we must strengthen the accounting occupation morals construction,establish and perfect the accounting,auditing and relevant law laws and regulations,strengthen the audit organization and the supervision of public opinion,to strengthen the accountant occupation morals education and continuing education.The financial crisis,it is to point to a country or several countries and regions all or most of the financial indicators, sharp,and ultra—short—cycle deterioration. The accounting occupation morals is the accounting occupation activities that should be followed,reflect accountant occupation characteristics of occupation code of conduct and norms. The financial crisis as catalyst,which have been faced with the serious challenge of accounting occupation morals bottom line faced collapse, especially small and medium—sized enterprises in China faces sharp decline in the volume of trade and capital shortage of the double pressure, serious influence to the environment for the survival and development of small and medium—sized enterprises. The outbreak of the financial crisis that causes,causes the enterprise market risks increase, contradiction of supply and demandincreasingly outstanding,market atrophy caused by poor liquidity,appeared the phenomenon of serious run behind one's expenses; at the same time, the bank strengthened the business loan recovery efforts, making enterprises financing channels are affected,resulting in low economic benefits of business。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
Managers’ Bad Accounting Behaviors of ListedCompanies in ChinaAbstractManagers’ unintentional or intentional bad accounting behaviors will result in poor quality of accounting information of listed companies, making a great extent to interfere with investors, causing confusion in the capital market, is not conducive to reflect the performance management responsibility. Research on Managers bad accounting behaviors of listed companies is of great significance to improve management, optimize the allocation of social resources. This paper respectively discusses the manifestation and the causes both of managers’ unintentional and intentional bad accounting behaviors. It also puts forward recommendations to prevent managers’ bad accounting behaviors of listed companies in China, so as to safeguard the interests of stakeholders and provide good environment for capital market by improving the efficiency and accounting information quality of listed companies.Key words: Bad accounting behaviors; Managers; Listed companies; the quality of accounting informationINTRODUCTIONAccounting behaviors refer to the course of conduct highly relevant to accounting information generation, processing and transmission. Accounting behaviors have a significant impact on budgeting, performance evaluation, cost control and decision-making (Hopwood, 1974). From the micro view, accounting behaviors include accounting organization, business accounting, and internal accounting controls. In the accounting process, managers who master business decision-making power and control are important participants in accounting policy choices, decision-making of significant accounting issues, etc. Thus the quality of accounting information of listed companies depends largely on the managers’ behavior. We call the managers’ actions and manifestations involved in corporate accounting practices as managers accounting behaviors.Managers are usually referred to the human capital owners who join in a business contracts with their management talent and really own the residual rights of control (XIE, 2005). Managers are responsible for determining organizational goals, formulate strategiesto achieve stated objectives, monitor and explain the external environmental condition, and make decisions on issues affecting the entire organization. General speaking, managers of Chinese listed companies cover president, vice president, department managers, chief financial officer, chief engineer and so on.The result of accounting behaviors is to produce accounting information, thus accounting practices and accounting information has a direct causal relationship. Standard accounting practices provide true and full accounting information and meet various needs. Nonstandard accounting behaviors will produce false, incomplete accounting information, which ultimately disturbs or even misleads those in need of accounting information to use. Such irregularities may be due to two aspects, one is deviations from accounting objectives or losing the objectives because of people’s bou nded rationality, which is summarized as non-subjective bad accounting (ZHANG, 2005). The other is negative affect on accounting information generation and disclosure for certain bad intent or purpose, which accordingly may be called intentional bad accounting. So, management accounting practices can also be divided into two categories: one is the management non-subjective bad accounting behaviors, the managers involved in the process of accounting practices have not any bad intentions but are constrained by bounded rationality, which lead to low quality of accounting information, it is not malicious, and thus may be called the managers unintentional bad accounting behaviors; the other is manager intentional bad accounting behaviors, which means the manager’s participate accounting practices just for their own interests or certain bad purpose. An analysis shows that management is the most fundamental body of financial reporting fraud, and is the real source of financial reporting fraud (CHEN, 2009).This paper discusses the specific manifestations of managers’ unintentional and intentional bad accounting behaviors respectively, analyzes their causes and proposes recommendations against these two types of managers’ bad accounting behaviors of listed companies in China, which is to promote listed companies to improve management level and accounting information quality.1. THE MANIFESTATION AND CAUSES OF MANAGERS’ UNINTENTIONAL BAD ACCOUNTING BEHAVIORS IN CHINA’S LISTED COMPANIES1.1 The Manifestation of Managers’ Unintentional Bad Accounting BehaviorsThe performance of manager’ unintentional bad accounting can be divided into the following three aspects:First, the accounting organization is less rigorous. Accounting organization is the basis of accounting. From the micro view, it mainly covers the development and implementation of enterprise accounting system, setting up accounting body, arrangement of accounting personnel and selecting accounting methods, which is to ensure the rational and effective for accounting work.But in fact some listed companies’ accounting basic work has weak links, the most prominent are: the quality of some company’s accounting staff is not high, resulting in accounting arbitrary, unclear procedures, serious errors, accounting data mi ssing; some company’s accounting staff is not equipped well, accounting methods are not suitable for the unit, making accounting disorder and inefficient.Second, the accounting process is less standardized Mainly include: managers' unintentional choices of accounting policies are not applicable, resulting in accounting information has less relevant to information users need for economic decision-making; the content of cross-company accounts imputation, books set confusion, accounting treatment was not standardized, leading to mismatch of financial reporting and financial activities, accounting information is not a true reflection of the company operation. China securities news, the Audit Commission reported on May 20, 2011 that, accounts in Aluminum Corporation of China is not standardized, so although it acquired a variety of enterprises, the integration situation is not satisfactory.Third, the internal accounting control is a mere formality. The main internal accounting controls include internal accounting management system, accounting personnel, job responsibility system, the financial processing system, the internal containment system, audit system, quota management system, measurement inspection system, and property inventory system, the financial revenue and expenditure approval system, cost accounting system , financial analysis, risk early warning system. However, some managers’ design of approval authority and approval process on financial revenue and expenditure is unreasonable, leading to false accounting information; delivery of accounting documents in some companies is not scientific, resulting in inefficient accounting; Job separation in some companies is not clear, causing accountant misrepresent accounting information; some companies’ internal accounting control system is designed by copying others, does not apply to their characteristics and requirements for production and management; some companies’ feasibility studies on foreign investment is not sufficient, resulting in corporate decision-making mistakes, increasing risks and grim financial situation. “New Century Weekly” reported that the National Audit Office claimed in August 2010 after auditing: China Steel Group has financial management confusion and other major problems such as high-risk investment, huge debts. It means there are significant internal accounting control deficiencies in CSG, and there is little internal control and regulation according to the enterprise itself.1.2 The Causes of Managers’ Unintentional Bad Accounting BehaviorsPerson’s rational behavior is limited rational behavior but not fully rational behavior (Simon, 1947). The root cause of unintentional bad accounting lies in managers’ limited rationality. On the one hand, various managers own different intelligence, ability, personality, temperament, attitudes, values, and different degree in understanding accounting theory and methods; on the other hand, it’s impossible for managers to fully master and comprehensively apply accounting knowledge, while accounting theory is in a dynamic developing process, a variety of accounting codes of conduct and financial regulations constantly change with social bining with the mentioned three manifestations, we analyze the reasons for managers’ unintentional bad accounting behaviors as following: In the organization of accounting work, many factors should be considered when managers design the accounting organization forms. They should appraise company size, business conditions, related accounting requirements, the number and the ability of accounting personnel; they strive to simplify accounting procedures, deliver accounting information timely and correctly, and save human and material resources while ensure the quality of accounting; they should make relevant departments cooperate to provide consistent accounting data. But there is no fixed standard to evaluate these factors, managers subjective judgments are necessary. While managers’ awareness and capacity is limited, the design of corporate accounting organization is not necessarily of scientific and rational.As to accounting, appropriate accounting policies and reasonable recognition, measurement and reporting accounting elements require that managers should be familiar with the current financial regulations and accounting standards, has a wealth of practical experience, a positive sense of innovation, keen vision and adequate professional ability to judge. For the existence of bounded rationality which create limitations in managers’ knowledge, ability and expe rience, continuous development of accounting theory and the relevant laws and regulations in addition, managers can not fully grasp the timely knowledge of accounting and related laws and regulations, it is impossible for them to put their knowledge into practice. Moreover, due to limited time and energy, relearning the accounting knowledge is difficult.Speaking of internal accounting controls, managers do not pay attention to the internal accounting control system enables the production of accounting information process get out of control, ultimately affect the quality of accounting information. Since bounded rationality exists, there are omissions of the internal control system designed by managers, or corporate internal control system which is no longer meet the new environment has not been revised and improved in time, or the sound internal control system isn’t implemented well. All of these have a direct impact on the reliance of accounting information.2. THE MANIFESTATION AND CAUSES OF MANAGERS’ INTEN TIONAL BAD ACCOUNTING BEHAVIORS IN CHINA’S LISTED COMPANIES2.1 The Manifestation of Managers’ Intentional Bad Accounting BehaviorsThe feature of managers’ intentional bad accounting behaviors is the managers’ bad intent or purpose. It includes accounting fraud and earnings management. Earnings management contains accounting policy choice, the way of it is to disclosure companies’ earnings for outsider, the final object of it is accounting data, its concrete operation is ultimately reflected in accounting fraud (LIU, 2009). Following studies take accounting fraud as a typical case of managers’ intentional bad accounting behaviors.According to China Securities Regulatory Commission penalty notice, there are 41 listed companies are punished for untrue disclosure, incomplete or late accounting information from January 2008 to January 2011. Table 1 shows specific tools and the frequency of accounting fraud.Tracing the reasons why these companies are punished, we can find various means and a huge amount are involved in managers’ intentional bad accounting behaviors.Firstly, various means are involved in managers’ deliberately bad accounting behaviors. From Table 1 we can find, 41 listed companies reached 7 categories 127 kinds of fraud means as much, in average, every punished company adopts more than three kinds of accounting fraud method. Table 1 also indicates that the most important category of accounting fraud is the seventh one (concealment, late or improper disclosure of material matters), up to 66 cases, accounting for 51.96% of the total samples.10 cases among them are underestimation of liabilities, accounting for 52.63% of this category. There are 16 cases of the third category (inflated assets) and 13 cases of the forth category (false revenue), respectively accounting for 12.60% and 10.24% of the total samples. These accounting fraud methods seriously distort the company’s assets, liabilities and profits.Secondly, a huge amount of money is involved in managers’ intentional bad accounting behavior s of listed companies. For example: six companies cumulatively fabricate ¥2.23 billion operating revenue. Of which Jinli Technology has reported fictitious revenues for two times and has been punished twice by SEC. Specific circumstances is shown in Table 2.The distorted accounting information generated by accounting fraud makes serious consequences: on one hand, it may result in financial virtual income, the excessive distribution of national income, inflation of consumption, distortion of economic facts, covering up some contradictions in the economy, and makethe country’s macro-supervision and regulation lose foundation, leading to significant financial, economic decision-making mistakes; on the other hand, creditors and investors may be led to poor decisions, their interests may be bruised, and reduce the efficiency of allocating resources in capital markets.2.2 The Causes of Managers’ Intentional Bad Accounting BehaviorsOverall, as the agent of listed companies managers’ objective function is inconsistent with shareholders’ who is the principal, the relation between managers and stakeholders is also complex. Because managers get far more and earlier corporate information than other accounting information users, and the outsiders such as the shareholders, creditors weakly supervise the insiders -the managers which allows managers to actually control the enterprise, when conflict between various parts interests happen, the managers have the opportunity and the ability to engage accounting fraud so as to achieve their own interests (WANG, 2011). Specific analysis on the reasons for managers accounting fraud is as following:3. RECOMMENDATIONS TO PREVENT MANAGERS’ BAD ACCOUNTING BEHAVIORS I N CHINA’ S LISTED COMPANIESActually, it is not easy to distinguish unintentional managers’ bad accounting behaviors from intentional ones in practice. But managers can do this themselves. To awaken managers’ social awareness of consciously reducing bad accounting behaviors, suggestions followed are respectively proposed in terms of two types of managers’ bad accounting behaviors.3.1 Suggestions on Keeping away from Managers’ Unintentional Bad Accounting Behaviors3.1.2 Strengthen the Continuing Education on ManagementThrough a variety of job training, study tours outside the listed companies, further education and teaching-himself, we can e xpand the manager’s professional knowledge and skills, develop their good habits of thinking and behavior, promote them to keep up with the developments of accounting theory, accounting standards and accounting laws and regulations, attach great importance to the construction of basic accounting work, continuously improve the company’s rules and regulations, strengthen the accounting staff in-service training, then accounting standards can be gradually, steadily improved and accounting plays an real important role in the management of listed companies.3.1.2 Perfect the System of Internal Accounting Controls and Strictly Implement itThe priority to sound system of internal accounting controls and strict implementation of it is to make managers pay more attention to internal accounting controls, then consciously strengthen the internal audit system which includes these actions: setting up the internal audit institution led by the board of supervisors and audit the daily operations of accounting, guaranteeing a high degree of independence of supervisory staff; ensuring separation of incompatible duties, such as: authorization to execute a particular transaction and executing duties; performing duties on certain business and auditing duties to these; performing a particular transaction and recording the business; custody of certain property, materials and recording them; custody of certain property, materials and checking duties; general ledger and subsidiary ledger duties; journalizing and general ledger duties, etc.3.2 Precautionary Measures to Managers’ Intentional Bad Accounting Behaviors3.2.1 Improve Corporate GovernanceThe quality of accounting information relies on the corporate governance, it is the result of struggle among relative parties of corporate governance. Balancing the strength of variety parties can effectively prevent the managers’ bad accounting behaviors and truly improve the quality of accounting information (XU, 2011). Dargenidou, McLeay and Raonic (2007) considered that more stringent corporate governance practices can help investors overcome the weaknesses of the legal protection terms in Europe.First of all, the managerial ownership should be properly handled and appropriate management incentives should be established to avoid short-term behavior of managers. Secondly, the structure of the board members and the independence of the Board must be improved so as to effectively bind the managers’ financial reporting fraud. So, we should not only increase the proportion of independent directors in the Board and continue to improve the independent director system, but also prevent the chairman or vice chairman and general manager duties on one person. To effectively perform the independent director system, we can start from three aspects: First, chose independent directors from external institutional investors, conforming to formal independence and substantial independence. Secondly, provide independent directors with remuneration commensurate with monitoring responsibilities, in order to mobilize their enthusiasm and sense of responsibility. Third, clearly define the powers and duties of independent directors as well as negligence penalties to ensure the independent directors have full motive power and pressure to supervise the company.As to “Dandong Chemical Fiber”, the proportion of independent directors was 33.33% from 2003 to 2005, it is 25% in 2006 and increased to 42.86% in 2007. According to China Securities Regulatory Commission administrative penalty notice, Dandong Chemical Fiber were involved in violations of accounting information disclosure from 2003 to 2006 but were not in 2007, indicating a high proportion of independent directors of listed companies had some restraining effect on executives accounting fraud.3.2.2 Strengthen the External OversightWe should improve the social supervision system and steady the comprehensive and authoritative supervision of accounting. First, inspect companies’ accounting practices relying on social forces as CPA and strengthen the supervision of certified public accountants as well as accounting firms, promoting them to increase ethical standards and professional quality. Clear the legal liability of CPA to review and verify accounting information, develop and strictly enforce specific penalties for irresponsible or unethical CPAs to increase the cost of financial fraud (LIU, CHEN, ZHENG, 2010). Secondly, the China securities Regulatory Commission should carry out greater scrutiny, while mobilize tax authorities, financial sector, the public and other intermediaries to monitor the accounting practices of listed companies. Finally, the aforementioned means of accounting fraud in table 1 can be divided into three types: income statement fraud, the balance sheet fraud, concealment or improper and late disclosure of significant issues (LI Si-long, 2008).Therefore, the internal audit department, accounting firms, regulatory authorities and other relevant agencies can focus on items listed in Table 1 from corporate income statement, balance sheet and the notes as censoring and inspecting accounting information of list companies3.2.3 Mature the Accounting Regulations SystemOn one hand, we should build a scientific, rigorous, coordinated and uniform system of accounting regulations after overall planning the system and content of different accounting laws or rules, on the other hand, we should complement and revise the accounting standard in time to avoid leaving vacuum for the innovation business so that minimize the manipulation opportunity by accounting policy choice. At the same time, we need to improve the feedback process of accounting standards. For accounting regulations have been promulgated, the implementation effect and problems reflected should be investigated.In particular, the views and suggestions fed back from accounting practitioners should be closely concerned, which enable accounting regulations to be timely revised and improved and accommodate themselves to developed economy.3.2.4 Promote the Healthy Development of Financial MarketsAs the advanced form of modern enterprises, listed companies are essentially different from private companies, which are closely related with the financial markets, especially the stock markets. Financial markets are important channels for listed companies and investors and also the occasion of optimal allocation of resources in society as a whole. Darrough and Stoughton (1990) analyzed incentives of voluntary disclosure and found that corporate disclosure of proprietary information would help financial markets to more accurately assess the enterprise although provided information to potential competitors at the same time. Fernandes and Guedes (2010) found that companies fraudulently announced revenue waspositively related to expected economic performance, but was negatively correlated to economic performance realized. These studies show that healthy, well-established financial markets can truly reflect the past of listed companies and can reasonably predict the future of them. When the financial markets valuation mechanism is perfect day by day and investors gradually rise their overall quality, phenomenon that deceived by false information will be greatly reduced, managers deliberately bad accounting will lose opportunities to gain profits, thereby reducing the illegal motivation; simultaneously, the resources configuration function of financial markets can also force the listed companies with apparent problems to rectify as soon as possible to avoid suspension or delisting, so managers unintentional bad accounting practices can be corrected.CONCLUSIONThis paper breaks the routine that managers’ bad accounting behaviors just means accounting fraud, divides managers’ bad accounting behaviors into intentional bad accounting behaviors and unintentional ones. Then, it discusses respectively the manifestation and the causes of the both. It concludes that the managers’ unintentional bad accounting behaviors of listed companies in China mainly reflect in less rigorous accounting basis, nonstandardized accounting process, formalized internal accounting controls and other aspects. The fundamental reason is that managers are of limited rationality.Managers’ unintentional bad accounting behavior is an objective reality and can not be completely avoided, but it would be reduced through sound continuing education on managers and improvement of the company’s internal accounting system. As a typical of managers’ intentionally bad accounting behaviors, accounting fraud includes such seven categories as false revenue, false investment income, inflated assets and concealment of important matters and so on. The causes of them contain defective corporate governance, weak external supervision, immature accounting regulations. We can improve corporate governance, strengthen the external oversight, mature the accounting system of norms and promote healthy development of financial markets and other measures to prevent accounting fraud. This paper argues that: in practice, it’s not easy to distinguish managers’ intentional bad accounting behaviors from unintentional ones, but the managers can do. Therefore, the above suggestions are able to play a role.中国上市公司管理者的不良会计行为摘要管理者有意或无意的不良会计行为将导致上市公司会计信息质量差,从而在很大程度上干扰投资者,造成资本市场混乱,不利于反映绩效管理责任。