哥大男神教授亲授新SAT Essay作文怎么写

合集下载

新SAT官方指南写作范文（一）

新SAT官⽅指南Essay范⽂ New SAT OG Essay Sample OnePrompt:Sometimes it is necessary to challenge what people in authority claim to be true. Although some respect for authority is, no doubt, necessary in order for any group or organization to function, questioning the people in charge-even if they are experts or leaders in their fields-makes us better thinkers. It forces all concerned to defend old ideas and decisions and to consider new ones. Sometimes it can even correct old errors in thought and put an end to wrong actions.Assignment:Is it important to question the ideas and decisions of people in positions of authority? Plan and write an essay in which you develop your point of view on this issue. Support your position with reasoning and examples taken from your reading, studies, experience, or observation.Sample Essay - Score of 6Every person has his or her own idea of ethics and morality, regardless of objective truth. Authority figures, whether teachers, heads of nations, or other positions of power, may not always be in line with that morality. In order to determine whether an authority figure is doing what is just, individuals must speak out when they perceive injustice. Oftentimes, that means questioning authority.Dystopic novels often portray systems of national leadership in which questioning governmental authority is explicitly forbidden. George Orwell’s novel 1984 is such a story. The government is known collectively as "Big Brother," who is a symbolic entity continually watching over every citizen. The language, Newspeak, is constantly being updated to control people’s expression and thereby control their thoughts. Anyone caught even thinking something other than Big Brother would want them to think are arrested by the Thought Police. Under this regime, there are virtually no independent thinkers. Every piece of information given to the people comes through the government, which has the power to change facts and history with utter impunity. The main character, Winston, manages to catch on, but in the end, he is finally brainwashed by torture. In this society of obedient drones, truth is irrelevant because there are no lies.When a student goes through formal education, he must be on his guard when it comes to what he absorbs. In the midst of objective facts, all too often a teacher may attempt to indoctrinate him with the teacher’s own ideology. One need only look at the majority of United States universities. There are thousands of easily-accessed articles exposing documented incidences of teachers boldly instilling in their students the liberal ideology. Universities are cesspools of leftist professors who punish students who express differences of opinion. Yet without those few questioning students, the rest of the student body would be subjected to unadulterated liberal lectures, with nary an opposing view in earshot. In order to form proper opinions, students must be exposed to both sides of an issue, and both sides must be questioned so as to ascertain the truth of each. Leaders of other countries must also be questioned by nonresidents so as to discover precisely what is happening under their authority.。

新SAT写作如何做好第一步？

新SAT写作如何做好第一步？对于中国的考生来说，新SAT考试变化给他们带来了一些挑战，那么怎么应对这些挑战呢?今天，天道小编就给大家说说新SAT写作开头怎么写，希望对备考的同学有所帮助。

College Board规定的写作考试时间为50分钟，包括了文章阅读分析和写作的时间，所以各位同学需要合理安排好自己的时间。

一般建议同学们使用约10分钟左右的时间去阅读分析文章，35分钟左右的时间去完成文章的写作，最后留出5分钟左右的时间进行检查。

为了节省时间，在考场上第一个方框的prompt可以不用阅读，因为每次考试中的内容都是一样的，同学们在考场上拿到考题后可以直接先看第二个方框里面的prompt，找到作者这篇文章的central idea。

作者的观点可以从第二个方框第二行persuade his/her audience that后面的那句话中找到。

找到作者的观点之后，就可以通过阅读文章去看作者如何来论证自己的观点了。

一般建议同学们在考试中将文章至少阅读两遍：第一遍先快速阅读文章，了解文章大意;第二遍逐自然段仔细阅读，去寻找每个段落中可能存在的作者使用的分析性元素，并且在旁边的空白处做好标注，方便后面的写作(标注该元素具体是什么，以及简单标注其作用)。

开头段写作内容不需要太多内容，一般建议同学们至少包含两方面内容：一是作者的观点，也就是在第一步骤中同学们在第二个方框里找到的信息;二是在这篇文章中你打算去讨论的作者使用的分析性元素(如examples， statistics， comparison and contrast， parallel structure，rhetoricalquestions等)。

当然同学们也可以谈及作者为什么会写这篇文章，一般来说考试中的议论文一般都是为了讨论某种社会现象。

以上就是天道小编给大家分享的新SAT作文开头段怎么写，供大家参考。

慢慢的了解新SAT写作也会发现SAT写作也是有套路的，同学们在掌握知识的同时也要学习一些技巧哦!如果想了解更多关于SAT写作基础培训及相关信息，请关注天道教育平台的SAT频道，小编也会持续为大家更新信息。

新sat写作技巧

新sat写作技巧新sat写作技巧新Sat写作现在分为三个分数，分别是Reading, Analysis, Writing，也就是“有没有掌握中心思想”、“对作者论证过程、表达方式的分析”和“英语写作清晰度、准确度”。

下面是新Sat写作技巧，希望能帮到大家!新Sat写作标准2016sat发生的重大改革，新的SAT的作文变化蛮大的，基本信息如下：1. 时长50分钟2. 写作内容基于所给文章3. 不需自己的观点作文部分有三个分数，分别是Reading, Analysis, Writing，也就是“有没有掌握中心思想”、“对作者论证过程、表达方式的分析”和“英语写作清晰度、准确度”。

每个部分拿6分是基础，7分不错，8分满。

新Sat拿高分的技巧一、手速虽然 Essay部分时间有50分钟，但是其中包括阅读、构思和写作时间，所以也是蛮紧张的。

而且作文长度对分数多多少少还是有些影响的。

作文一共有两张纸，也就是四页，建议长度方面“保三争四”，因为得8/8/8这次长度是3页半，而且College Board提供的满分范文长度也近似。

注意了，说的是长度，不是字数。

大家把字写大一点，词与词间隔多一点，作文就自动变长了。

二、套路之前说了，写作速度很重要，而套路能帮助我们有目标地阅读、省去“构思”时间、加快写作速度。

套路一：表扬作者新SAT要我们写所给文章的作者，是怎么通过这样那样的方式证明自己的观点/说服读者听众的。

比如说文章内容是：“喝酒伤身所以应该收税”，那作文就不要写“我觉得喝酒不伤身”、“收税也没用”、“我觉得喝酒确实伤身”等等个人观点，而是写“作者论证得真好&为什么论证得好”。

所以，可以用一些自带评论和表扬词汇句式：“John effectively builds his argumentthat…”“John skillfully develops his point that…”套路二：找到并评论三方面提高Essay这部分的效率，需要我们有备而来。

SAT作文内容这样写

SAT作文内容这样写下面是小编为大家整理的一篇关于新SAT写作干货供大家参考，下面是详细内容。

更多资讯请访问三立在线，专业老师为你在线解答相关疑问。

对于SAT写作来说，虽然并不是所有美国大学都要求的，但是如果申请大学需要写作成绩或者建议提供，那么一个好的SAT写作分数就非常有必要了。

锻炼逻辑的严密性对新SAT写作来说，是先要对一篇文章阅读分析，然后再开始写作的。

因此文章的逻辑性就很重要了。

简要来说，新SAT写作想要拿到高分，就要写出一篇包含开头+3个及以上主体段落+结尾的议论性文章。

最重要的主体段落必须含有：考生本人对写作手法的判断此写作手法在文章中作用的体现运用此写作手法是想表达什么主旨意思此手法如何使作者表现他的意思此手法如何让读者理解作者的意思我们可以看到这些SAT写作经验是一个接着一个的，每一个部分都是自然衔接，符合正常人的思维。

而在SAT写作学习中，分析，或者说Analysis，则是对于新手考生来说难度最大，得分最困难的部分。

那么“如何”是怎样推理的呢?具体哪一句话/一件事/一个词语/一处列数字...运用了手法由于这个手法的特殊特点，读者在这里才能产生共鸣或被深深打动通过考生自己的理解，这一处手法让读者意识到某问题的严重性这样作者就好办了，他表达主题自然就方便了，因为读者理解并由于产生共鸣而有了响应号召的迹象。

由此可见，分析是对一整套缜密的逻辑思维的考察。

遗漏其中的任何一步，都不能推断到最终的结果，(即手法的作用)所以Collegeboard的设计是十分合理的，阅读理解8分，分析8分，写作8分中，可以细致地考察到考生的各项水平。

所以，对于考生来说，每一次的写作练习都可以当做大脑逻辑思维的训练。

时间久了，大家就会发现自己在说话做事写文章的时候，会逐渐改掉“跳步”的习惯，遵循逻辑和推理，最终形成严密的思维。

对阅读概括能力的提升新SAT写作是从阅读一篇指定文章开始的。

考生想要下笔写开头，就必须先通读全文并迅速了解全文的主旨。

如何写好一篇新SAT写作文章

如何写好一篇新SAT写作文章一、注意审题小作文的审题(即审读材料)很重要,决定着文章的成败.因为一个小作文的材料中,往往隐含了若干个写作要求,如不细心审读,抓不到这些隐含的要求,就很容易出现错误。

二、注意语言的简洁这一点体现在两方面.其一,小作文字数一般是100┄300字,受篇幅限制,语言要求简洁明了.其二,如果是写应用文,则语言也一定要简洁,因为语言简洁是应用文写作的最基本要求.三、力求结构完整小作文是片断性作文,而非篇章.虽如此,但不能一味忽略结构的完整性.一篇小作文如果能够做到结构完整,则效果会更好。

四、注意表达方式的运用受文体的制约,一篇文章总以某种表达方式为主,同时兼用其他表达方式为主.小作文也应注意这一点.如江西省2002年中考语文小作文题为二选一,(1)通过某一情景或场面,描写你最喜欢的色彩.(2)就你最喜欢的色彩,发表议论.无论选哪一题,或描写、或议论,总得以一种表达方式为主.但如果能兼用其他表达方式,如兼用议论和抒情,表达自己对某种色彩的某中看法和喜爱之情,则能使短文大为增色.新SAT写作满分是多少SAT考试总分是2400分，数学Math、阅读Reading、写作Writing三部分各800分。

一般来说，申请美国前50的大学，SAT成绩至少要1800分。

通常一篇优秀的SAT满分作文范文一般都包括SAT写作开头段，主体还有就是文章的结尾了这三个部分了。

那么我们到底应该怎么才能从这几个部分入手呢？一：写作开头段 SAT写作考试一共有25分的钟的时间，那么我们分给开头段是只有5分钟的时间的。

开头段的话我们是不会超过5行字，一般的情况下差不多只有3-4句话这样的标准为最佳。

除了长度之外呢，开头段最好可以遵循一个原则，那么就是越简单越好，越清楚越好！在写作开头段我们这里有两种常用的结构：开门见山，先抑后扬，前者顾名思义就是可以直接表明观点，而后者则相反，考生完全可以选择自己比较熟悉的一种结构来进行开头段的构思。

SAT的essay怎么写

SAT的essay怎么写SAT的essay也就是SAT作文。

在写SAT作文的时候定要注意细节的描写。

细节描写在很大程度上可以弥补大家在选择例子时候的不恰当和没有说服力的状况。

1.审题先看任务栏，有些题干比较容易理解，比如要不要坚持隐私，这就可以直接进行思索。

而某些场次的任务较为晦涩，如果考生不理解可以再看缩进的摘录部分的内容。

比如09年5月亚太考区的题目中任务是我们是不是依据所做的事情被定义，关于do一词，大家假设觉得不理解，可以看摘录，摘录中告诉大家do指的是一个人的工作。

这样审题工作就算结束。

2.依据例子提炼观点参加〔托福〕〔雅思〕考试，一般我们都会在脑中进行pro and con的罗列，后确立观点。

不过鉴于SAT考试是一个以例子作为论述中心的考试，建议考生拿到题目审清后，在脑子中把准备过的例子过一遍，寻找合适的，从合适的例子中确认题目的大观点。

3.必须注意细节的描写SAT写作考试时间非常短，只有25分钟，想要在这样短的时间内完成一篇非常吸引人的文章，大家一定要注意细节的描写。

细节描写在很大程度上可以弥补大家在选择例子时候的不恰当和没有说服力的状况。

2SAT作文怎么练SAT写作第一部分为限时25分钟的议论文体SAT作文的写作，虽然没有具体字数要求，但参照官方所给出的样卷，必须填满一张半大小的A4纸，字数大约在500左右也可能更多。

这样的考试形式主要考验同学在压力下完成就某一日常话题给出观点并用各种具体论证手段加以支持分析的能力。

在这种状况下产出的论文，考试方将其归为写的初稿。

因此，一些不影响读者理解的语法错误通常被认作笔误，有别于雅思写作对语法准确性的严格要求，这一点和新托福关于初稿的强调十分相似。

所以建议：分部分把握总体，解剖部分学习。

就是说：今天我要学习开头段的写作，我今天就练开头段，就练它5-8个开头段;明天我学习结尾段，明天我就学习结尾段，我就只练5-8个结尾段;后天我学习第一个正文段，后天我就只练第一个正文段，就只练3-5个正文段;大后天(不废话了)，学习第二个正文段，也是3-5个。

新SAT写作真题与范文多读多写多看多听很重要

SAT写作题目:Write an essay in which you explain how Dana Gioia builds an argument to persuade his audience that the decline of reading in America will have a negative effect on society. In your essay, analyze how Gioia uses one or more of the features listed in the box above (or features of your own choice) to strengthen the logic and persuasiveness of his argument. Be sure that your analysis focuses on the most relevant features of the passage.Your essay should not explain whether you agree with Gioia’s cla ims, but rather explain how Gioia builds an argument to persuade his audience.SAT写作满分范文：In the article, “Why Literature Matters” by Dana Gioia, Gioia makes an argument claiming that the levels of interest young Americans have shown in art in recent years have declined and that this trend is a severe problem with broad consequences. Strategies Gioia employs to support his argument include citation of compelling polls, reports made by prominent organizations that have issued studies, and a quotation from a prominent author. Gioia’s overall purpose in writing this article appears to be to draw attention towards shortcomings in American participation in the arts. His primary audience would be the American public in general with a significant focus on millenials. In his introduction paragraph, Gioia employs a distinct contrast with several listed positive changes in American life such as increased college attendance and increases in income, with the focus of his article: the fact that theinterest young Americans show in art has declined. This tool is utilized to establish an emphasis on his primary point by highlighting it as a negative development relative to other changes in American life. This literary tool serves a strong purpose by acting as a vehicle to draw the audience into the principle issue addressed by the writing.In paragraph 5, Gioia utilizes a synergistic reference to two separate sources of information that serves to provide a stronger compilation of support for his main topic. By citing a quotation from author Daniel Pinks who states, that the talents individuals require for success in the 21st Century are not, “linear, logical, analytic talents,” but ones that provide, “the ability to create artistic and emotional beauty,to detect patterns and opportunities,” and “to craft a satisfying narrative,” Gioia is able to build his point with the agreement of a respected individual. He then immediately follows with a statement that business leaders like to see,“imagination, creativity, and higher order thinking” as qualities for individuals in management positions. This dual utilization of claims from two separate sources conveys to Gioia’s audience the sense that the skills built through immersion in the arts are vital to succeeding in the modern workplace which aids in logically leading his audience to the conclusion that a loss of experience with the arts may foreshadow troubling results.In paragraph 6, Gioia follows up on the point established in paragraph 5 by introducing a negative example of the consequences of loss of the arts with afocu on literacy. Gioia cites a 2001 poll on the National Association of American Manufactures stating stating that poor reading skills ranked second among its employees surveyed for skill deficiencies while 38% of employees believed local schools inadequately taught reading comprehension. Gioias presentation of a numerical statistic based on a major employer adds significant logical weight to his argument by providing an example of the effects of a deficit in experience with art and literature. This may effect his audience by providing a more accurrate depiction of the true problems caused by disconnection with arts while possibly choosing an example they could personally relate to.Overall, Gioia provides an strong logical argument that disconnection with the arts is troubling for America. He employs strong logical connections and establishes realOworld foundations for his point.三立在线课程培训优势班级种类：（预约试听和科学选班请详询老师）一对一在线授课班，其优势：一对一是指听说读写都由不同的老师教授，而不是由一位老师负责学生的全部课程。

新SAT作文范文2

SAT作文范文2The following sample Essay prompt is followed by an annotated version of the source text that suggests some of the ways that students might analyze the text in response to the prompt. The annotations are only examples of elements of the passage students may choose to write about.As you read the passage below, consider how Paul Bogard uses●Evidence, such as facts or examples, to support claims.●Reasoning to develop ideas and to connect claims and evidence.●Stylistic or persuasive elements, such as word choice or appeals toemotion, to add power to the ideas expressed.Adapted from Paul Bogard, “Let There be Dark.” ©2012 by the Los Angeles Times. Originally published December 21, 2012.At my family’s cabin on a Minnesota lake, I knew woods so dark that my hands disappeared before my eyes. I knew night skies in which meteors left smoky trails across sugary spreads of stars. But now, when 8 of 10 children born in the United States will never know a sky dark enough for the Milky Way, I worry we are rapidly losing night’s natural darkness before realizing its worth. This winter solstice, as we cheer the days’ gradual movement back toward light, let us also remember the irreplaceable value of darkness.All life evolved to the steady rhythm of bright days and dark nights. Today, though, when we feel the closeness of nightfall, we reach quickly for a light switch. And too little darkness, meaning too much artificial light at night, spells trouble for all.Already the World Health Organization classifies working the night shift as a probable human carcinogen, and the American Medical Association has voiced its unanimous support for “light pollution reduction efforts and glare reduction efforts at both the national and state levels.” Our bodies need darkness to produce the hormone melatonin, which keeps certain cancers from developing, and our bodies need darkness for sleep.Sleep disorders have been linked to diabetes, obesity, cardiovascular disease and depression, and recent research suggests one main cause of “ short sleep” is “ long light.” Whether we work at night or simply take our tablets, notebooks and smartphones to bed, there isn’t a place for this much artificial light in our lives.The rest of the world depends on darkness as well, including nocturnal and crepuscular species of birds, insects, mammals, fish and reptiles. Someexamples are well known—the 400 species of birds that migrate at night in North America, the sea turtles that come ashore to lay their eggs—and some are not, such as the bats that save American farmers billions in pest control and the moths that pollinate 80% of the world’s flora. Ecological light pollution is like the bulldozer of the night, wrecking habitat and disrupting ecosystems several billion years in the making. Simply put, without darkness, Earth’s ecology would collapse…In today’s crowded, louder, more fast-paced world, night’s darkness can provide solitude, quiet and stillness, qualities increasingly in short supply. Every religious tradition has considered darkness invaluable for a soulful life, and the chance to witness the universe has inspired artists, philosophers and everyday stargazers since time began. In a world awash with electric light…how would Van Gogh have given the world his “Starry Night”? Who knows what this vision of the night sky might inspire in each of us, in our children or grandchildren?Yet all over the world, our nights are growing brighter. In the United States and Western Europe, the amount of light in the sky increases an average of about 6% every year. Computer images of the United States at night, based on NASA photographs, show that what was a very dark country as recently as the 1950s is now nearly covered with a blanket of light. Much of this light is wasted energy, which means wasted dollars. Those of us over 35 are perhaps among the last generation to have known truly dark nights. Even the northern lake where I was lucky to spend my summers has seen its darkness diminish.It doesn’t have to be this way. Light pollution is readily within our ability to solve, using new lighting technologies and shielding existing lights. Already, many cities and towns across North America and Europe are changing to LED streetlights, which offer dramatic possibilities for controlling wasted light. Other communities are finding success with simply turning off portions of their public lighting after midnight. Even Paris, the famed “city of light,” which already turns off its monument lighting after 1 a.m., will this summer start to require its shops, offices and public buildings to turn off lights after 2 a.m. Though primarily designed to save energy, such reductions in light will also go far in addressing light pollution. But we will never truly address the problem of light pollution until we become aware of the irreplaceable value and beauty of the darkness we are losing.应该从哪几个点来展现作者的意图：1.用词：1)The descriptive words used in this sentence add visual intensity,evoking the wonder of the night sky. 作者是如何使用词汇来突出文章的画面感。

最常见的新SAT写作开头写法

很多考生在SAT写作考试中，经常下笔就忘词，不知道如何开头，今天小编与大家分享一个SAT开头段的写作技巧——直奔主题，这也是SAT写作考官比较喜欢的写作风格。

下面是SAT写作常用的几种开头方式：1、背景+论题+反方观点+(反方理由)+过渡+作者观点+作者理由2、事例+论题+各方观点(和理由)+作者理由和论点3、问题+论题+各方观点(和理由)+作者论点和理由4、作者观点+作者理由而对于SAT写作而言，究竟哪种方法才最好呢?我们可以来看几篇SAT写作范文的开头。

SAT写作范文1：There is always a “however”. Each situation has its benefits and drawbacks. In the field of market finance, we find a compelling example that supports this thesis.SAT写作范文2：Although it is good to stand out and make one’s own decision, sometimes it is beneficial to take the advice of others. We can see through the demise of King Lear that he should not have ignored Kent’s warning to not disown Cordelia. The ignominious lose of Sweden in the Great Northern War also demonstrate that others should listen to his advisers.相比较而言，两篇SAT写作文章的共同点是，少去了托福写作中冗长的背景信息叙述，而是直接点明自己的观点。

新SAT写作范文赏析

新SAT写作范文赏析SAT考试中有很多文章写的很好，和小编一起来看看优秀的SAT写作范文吧!Is strong moral character the most important qualification for a leader?范文：Many people deem that achievement should be judged by how well one does in his or her personal career. However, as I fathom some high achievers’ experience, I hold the belief that ones’s achievement ought to be assessed by his or her help to others.Part of my certain belief derives from a celebrity from sports field. Billy Beane, the manager of Oakland Athletics of major League Baseball, was the one who reached the summit of his enterprise by helping questionable athletes against the perspective of the experts and the public. With limited budget, Billy was just capable of gathering third grade staffs and equipments. The public were convinced that the mediocre team would just conduct ordinary performance and his colleagues even forbade his members from taking the field. Nevertheless, reluctant to conform to such “biased” perception, Bill determined to take effective measures to prove that even the weaker voices have their values. In the first place, he decisively abandoned the traditional mode of employment by specially recruiting those baseball players who were bad-tempered andseemingly insufficient but proficient in certain areas of baseball. Then he selected these players by accurately evaluating their potential instead of judging from their former performance. Regardless of question and criticism, Bill eventually led his team to accomplish big triumph, and henceforth was venerated as a prominent sports manager. The aid Bill Beane offered his fellow team members in turn brought back himself greater achievement.Another biography of an outstanding artist could also illustrate my point. Dr Dre, who is noted by assisting myriad musicians to gain their success, is one of the most celebrated and prolific artists in contemporary music industry. As a teenager of 17, Dr Dre found the music style of rap suited to express his undergone feelings and sensitivities and it might be a shortcut to conduct a wealthier living, so he strived to be a professional rapper. Struggling to succeed in a predominantly non-mainstream music style, he pored and drilled his skills and refined his verses in his friend’s garage and finally made his name notable in underground music. Although rejected and despised by mainstream music in 1990s at first, the predicament of rap music was subverted by the efforts of Dr Dre and his legendary band NWA, with their songs inspiring millions of fans and records selling millions of copies. After that, he spent all his spirits in being a producer and promoting rap rookies, such as Eminem andSnoop Dogg, who also became extremely renowned. Dr Dre is now worshiped not only for his prominent achievement as a singer, but for his readiness to help and promote young people in music industry.From the two examples above, we can conclude that achievement should not be judged only by one’s remarkable professional career，but the help he offers others is more important criterion of achievement.。

新sat写作官方范文

新SAT写作多少算高分改革后的SAT作文依然会由两位阅卷人评判。

新SAT的写作将从三个方面进行评分：Reading（阅读），Analysis（分析），Writing（写作）。

每个分数都是由2位专业的评卷老师完成，每位老师给出的分数范围为1-4分，所以最终结合两位阅卷者老师的分数后，考生每个方面的分数范围为2-8分。

和以往的写作考试不同，这三个分数彼此并不会叠加，也不会与其他单项合并计算，也就是说，满分的文章分数为8/8/8（三个分数分别对应Reading,Analysis,Writing）。

新SAT写作的算分规则：改革后的SAT作文依然会由两位阅卷人评判。

每位阅卷人将以1-4分来分别评阅考生作文中的阅读、分析和写作三个维度。

每个维度的得分分别相加后都会在2-8分区间内。

3、要练手，要练到形成惯性思维重要的是形成惯性思维，这样才能在规定的时间里下笔写完整篇文章。

要想现场思考每句话的调理性真的是太难了，写得时候手指不停的运转，远远超过了大脑运转的速度，只有有充分思维准备的人，才能驾轻就熟，运用自如。

4、备考的时候对写好的文章要一遍又一遍的修改如果不勤修改自己的文章，就不知道自己原来的漏洞和不足在哪，闷头写，只能导致事倍功半。

当认真学习一段时间写作之后，再回头改第一篇习作，肯定会发现自己很多毛病，这说明：我们在进步！。

改革后新SAT写作不重要了吗改革后的作文变为选考，作文分数不重要了吗？非也非也！首先可以肯定的是，并不是变为选考就说明作文不再重要了，恰恰相反，这其实是在一定程度上增加了写作的重要性。

这个结论绝对有据可循。

College Board（美国大学理事会）发布的《新SAT官方指南》中写道：“No part of the SAT has been more deeply affected by the redesign than the Essay.（改革后的新SAT中没有哪一部分比得上写作这一项的改变。

新SAT写作步骤及论据方式

新SAT写作步骤及论据方式随着报考SAT考试人数的增多，SAT官方对SAT写作也提出了新的要求。

新SAT写作要求同学们进行“分析性写作”，将自己的写作目的及观点用严谨而准确的语言表达出来。

本文文都国际教育小编给大家介绍新SAT写作步骤的详细内容，希望对大家有所帮助。

新SAT写作步骤步骤一：阅读(关键词法)通常，第一遍阅读时为了通晓文意，我们不需要，也没有足够的时间，去逐字逐句慢慢品读，因此我们应该拿起笔，边读边划，划出能让我们记住这个段落主旨的词句。

根据论说文的共性特点，通常每段话的首句往往是“主题句”(也有例外)，主题句尤其值得关注，因为整个段落通常围绕主题句展开。

然而，有些句子很长很复杂，这时，划出“关键词”对于快速领会句子意思有十分重要的作用。

对“关键词”的选择具有一定主观性，但是真正懂得阅读的人基本上会达成一些共识，我们的课堂上会具体展开学习，如何学会抓关键词，在主观因素存在的情况之下，有哪些相对客观的标准值得我们考虑和遵循。

步骤二：分析(贴标签法)分析是为第三步“写作”而准备素材的。

在进行分析性写作时，我们要记住一个字“精”。

“精”首先指的是精确，一篇文章可写的方面非常多，不要妄图面面俱到，而是选择令你影响最深刻的几个切入点展开即可。

这一点在官方指南OG中第179页有鲜明的提示。

(“Your Essay does not have to address the author’s use of allthree components…in order to earn hig h scores. An Essay that provides strong analysisof fewer but well-chosen points will likely score better than an essay thatprovides little analysis of a long list of points. ”)“精”还指精细，分析性写作的目的不只是“概括”文章内容(summarizing)，而更侧重于探讨作者写作的方式和意图及其同文章主旨目的的相关性。

新SAT作文范例(四)

新SAT作文范例（四）SAT写作满分作文是每个考生追逐的目标，它不仅体现了大家的SAT成绩，也是很多名校录取的重要把关。

接下来文都国际教育小编为大家带来新SAT写作范文，希望对大家SAT备考有所帮助。

SAT写作6分范文Throughout time mankind has strived to make his life easier. Whether it be through technology, science, or theories of social interaction every generation has made one contribution. From the idea of crop rotation to the cellular telephone mankind has advanced. It can be argued however, that not all of these advancements were beneficial. Many times people are accused of “taking the easy way out”, something that is looked down upon in today’s society.Consider, if you will, ancient Greecian Society. With hardly any of the technological or scientific advancements we have today, they were able to produce some of the greatest thinkers of all time. Socrates and Plato still influence modern philosophical thought. In addition, these men were well versed in all disciplines. They were thinkers, mathamaticians, writers, scientists, artists and much more. Examine some other great men in history. Leonardo Davinci was one of the greatest scientists and also one of the greatest artists of all time, he even invented and drew up early plans for the helicopter. These ancient men, without the technology and ease of life we have today, were able to produce some of the most prolific additions to human knowledge ever.Now let us examine some men from our time. Bill Gates, while adding immensely to the pleasures and ease of man’s life, did so only by forcefully destroying many fledgling companies and completely undermining our capitalistic market place. Very very few men in our time are leaders in more than one discipline. There are no scientists/artists or writer/mathamaticians. Men, while being able to more deeply delve into a discipline, are now restricted to it. I attribute this to technology. We now have a life outside of our work. A life with computers, cars, movies, and dinner with the family from across the country. Mankind can no longer devote himself to his work. He has his work life, and his home life. While a cell phone allows me to talk to anyone from anywhere, it prevents me from being alone and fully concentrating. While the internet allows me to look at websites from around the world, it prevents me from doing the work I set out to do.While techno logy and science have made man’s life easier, they have not made it better. Man has become less productive and less devoted, partly, as a result of this newfound ease of life. Therefore, What makes our lives easier does not necessarily make them better.SAT写作6分范文点评This outstanding essay insightfully and effectively develops the point of view that “What makes our lives easier does not necessarily make them better.” The writer demonstrates outstanding critical thinking by focusing on clearly appropriate examples throughout history to support the idea that not all of mankind’s “advancements” to make life easier have been “beneficial.” The essay begins by describing the ancient scholars who, “without the technology and ease of life we have today, were able to produce some of the most prolific additions to human knowledge ever.” The writer continues by offering the idea that today, due to the incredible advancements in technology, “Very very few men . . . are leaders in more than one discipline.” The essay co ncludes with the idea that, due to the distractions and ease of a technologically advanced society, “Man has become less productive and less devoted.” This well organized and clearly focused essay demonstrates coherence and progression of ideas. The essay consistently exhibits skillful use of language and demonstrates meaningful variety in sentence structure (“Bill Gates, while adding immensely to the pleasures and ease of man’s life, did so only by forcefully destroying many fledgling companies and completely undermining our capitalistic marketplace. Very very few men in our time are leaders in more than one discipline”). This essay demonstrates clear and consistent mastery and is scored 6.以上是小编帮大家整理的新SAT写作范文，希望对大家的SAT备考有所帮助。

新SAT作文如何训练？新SAT作文样题练习

新SAT作文如何训练？新SAT作文样题练习Adapted from Martin Luther King Jr., “Beyond Vietnam—A Time to Break Silence.” The speech was delivered at Riverside Church in New York City on April 4, 1967.文章摘自马丁路德金的打破沉寂的演讲，这个演讲发表于1967年4月4日的纽约注明的河边大教堂。

这篇演讲的背景是“忧世教士和俗人协会”的一个反越战的集会。

马丁路德金相信大多数同学都不陌生，也是常考的美国名人，他是个行动主义者，也是美国民权运动领袖。

因采用非暴力推动美国的民权进步而为世瞩目，并因此获得1964年诺贝尔和平奖。

金也是当代美国自由主义的象征，通称金牧师。

这些基本知识的了解，会帮助大家更好的了解他的演讲主题和中心思想。

下面是节选：Since I am a preacher by calling, I suppose it is not surprising that I have . . . major reasons for bringing Vietnam into the field of my moral vision. There is at the outset a very obvious and almost facile connection between the war in Vietnam and the struggle I, and others, have been waging in America. A few years ago there was a shining moment in that struggle. It seemed as if there was a real promise of hope for the poor—both black and white—through the poverty program. There were experiments, hopes, new beginnings. Then came the buildup in Vietnam, and I watched this program broken and eviscerated, as if it were some idle political plaything of a society gone mad on war, and I knew that America would never invest the necessary funds or energies in rehabilitation of its poor so long as adventures like Vietnam continued to draw men and skills and money like some demonic destructive suction tube. So, I was increasingly compelled to see the war as an enemy of the poorand to attack it as such.Perhaps a more tragic recognition of reality took place when it became clear to me that the war was doing far more than devastating the hopes of the poor at home. It was sending their sons and their brothers and their husbands to fight and to die in extraordinarily high proportions relative to the rest of the population. We were taking the black young men who had been crippled by our society and sending them eight thousand miles away to guarantee liberties in Southeast Asia which they had not found in southwest Georgia and East Harlem. And so we have been repeatedly faced with the cruel irony of watching Negro and white boys on TV screens as they kill and die together for a nation that has been unable to seat them together in the same schools. And so we watch them in brutal solidarity burning the huts of a poor village, but we realize that they would hardly live on the same block in Chicago. I could not be silent in the face of such cruel manipulation of the poor.My [next] reason moves to an even deeper level of awareness, for it grows out of my experience in the ghettoes of the North over the last threeyears—especially the last three summers. As I have walked among the desperate, rejected, and angry young men, I have told them that Molotov cocktails1 and rifles would not solve their problems. I have tried to offer them my deepest compassion while maintaining my conviction that social change comes most meaningfully through nonviolent action. But they ask—and rightly so—what about Vietnam? They ask if our own nation wasn't using massive doses of violence to solve its problems, to bring about the changes it wanted. Their questions hit home, and I knew that I could never again raise my voice against theviolence of the oppressed in the ghettos without having first spoken clearly to the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today—my own government. For the sake of those boys, for the sake of this government, for the sake of the hundreds of thousands trembling under our violence, I cannot be silent.For those who ask the question, “Aren't you a civil righ ts leader?” and thereby mean to exclude me from the movement for peace, I have this further answer. In 1957 when a group of us formed the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, we chose as our motto: “To save the soul of America.” We were convinced that we could not limit our vision to certain rights for black people, but instead affirmed the conviction that America would never be free or saved from itself until the descendants of its slaves were loosed completely from the shackles they still wear. . . . Now, it should be incandescently clear that no one who has any concern for the integrity and life of America today can ignore the present war. If America’s soul becomes totally poisoned, part of the autopsy must read: Vietnam. It can never be saved so long as it destroys the deepest hopes of men the world over. So it is that those of us who are yet determined that America will be—are—are led down the path of protest and dissent, working for the health of our land.下面是作文要求：Write an essay in which you explain how Martin Luther King Jr. builds an argument to persuade his audience that American involvement in the Vietnam War is unjust. In your essay, analyze how King uses one or more of the features listed in the box above (or features of your own choice) to strengthen the logic and persuasiveness of his argument. Be sure that your analysis focuses on the most relevant features of the passage.Your essay should not explain whether you agree with King’s claims, but rather explain how King builds an argument to persuade his audience.需要着重提醒的是，写作一定要看清楚要求，Your essay should not explain whether you agree with King’s claims, but rather explain how King builds an argument to persuade his audience.不是要你写你是否同意金的观点，而是要你解析金是如何用论证来说服他的听众的，理解题目很重要，你如果写了前者，那你就是跑题了，一次机会也就与你擦肩而过了，所以大家一定要谨慎！上海新托福精讲班多少钱？一、整体情况培训对象：英语基础薄弱大学生或未接触过托福考试的高中生培训目的：通过对托福基础听说读写的巩固及强化训练，帮助学员提高托福基础和应试技巧，顺利通过考试。

给SAT写作考生的一针强心剂 SAT写作高分范文赏析

Sample 2 Scores: 2/2/2Dana starts the article by presenting positive information on how our society is advancing, only to find that we’re actually losing interest in literature. He backs up this accusation by using a survey from 2002. In this survey Dana mentions that the decline of interest is mainley in younger adults. Throughout the passage he uses the findings of meny National Associations to show that these young adults won’t be able to land jobs due to their lack of reading and appreciation of the arts. Then he transitions into how society as a whole will become more free, innovative, and productive through reading alone. Gioia uses evidense found in surveys, polls, and other articles to support his arguement. He seamlessly moves to his next idea while still supporting al of his previous claims. The level of writing shows he is skilled at persuading, for he connects to the reader through a very concerning topic, education.This paper scored a 2/2/2.Reading—2: This response demonstrates limited compr ehension of Gioia’s text. The writer does demonstrate an understanding of Gioia’s central ideas: our society is actually losing interest in literature and society as a whole will become more free, innovative, and productive through reading. However, the writer provides little evidence of understanding the details Gioia provides to support these claims. The writer does briefly mention the 2002 survey Gioia cites and also vaguely refers to Gioia’s use of the findings of meny NationalAssociations and evidence from surveys, polls, and other articles, but neglects to effectively summarize or quote from these pieces of evidence. Although there are no errors of interpretation or fact in the essay, this incomplete understanding demonstrates only partially successful reading comprehension.Analysis—2: The writer demonstrates a partial understanding of the analytical task by offering limited analysis of the source text. The writer does identify in a general way the kinds of evidence Gioia draws on (for example, surveys, polls, and other articles) but fails to analyze how these pieces of evidence work to support Gioia’s argument. When the writer attempts to describe how Gioia builds his argument, the writer merely praises, rather than explains, the structure of Gioia’s text (He seamlessly moves to his next idea while still supporting al of his previous claims). The writer compliments Gioia’s argumentation (The level of writing shows he is skilled at persuading, for he connects to the reader through a very concerning topic, education), but does not, for example, explain how or why Gioia is able to connect to the reader. Overall, this response demonstrates only partially successful analysis.Writing—2: This response demonstrates limited cohesion and writing skill. The response lacks a clear central claim or controlling idea. Although the writer does end the essay with a summary sentence (The level of writing shows he is skilled at persuading, for he connects to the reader through a very concerningtopic, education), the response does not include a true introduction or conclusion to frame the discussion. The response does demonstrate some progression of ideas; however, given that the response is only one paragraph long, this progression is demonstrated on a very limited scale. Although the writer displays relatively good control of language and vocabulary, there simply is not enough text here to assess the ability to organize ideas or paragraphs. For these reasons, this paper demonstrates only partially successful writing.三立在线课程培训优势班级种类：（预约试听和科学选班请详询老师）一对一在线授课班，其优势：一对一是指听说读写都由不同的老师教授，而不是由一位老师负责学生的全部课程。

新SAT作文7范文

新SAT作文7范文Many people treat global warming as dogma. For John Hawkins, in the essay “5 Scientific Reasons That Warming Isn’t Happening,” the existence of global warming is far from proven. In fact, the evidence points against global warming. Hawkins builds his case against global warming by asking rhetorical questions, examining failed assertions, and citing encouraging recent events.Rhetorical questions sprinkled throughout the essay encourage the readers to question their assumptions about global warming. Hawkins opens with two questions designed to establish him as a credible, even-handed voice. By juxtaposing “climate deniers” with “global warming cultists” and questioning why there is so little discussion about the science behind the supposedly scientific topic of global warming, he presents his views as a level-headed evaluation of the facts, rather than a kneejerk emotional reaction. His next question occurs at the end of the second paragraph, where his redundant wording reminds the reader of the lack of global warming since 1997. It also highlights the reductivist logic of those who propagate global warming without thoroughly examining the evidence. The essay concludes as it began, with a final question that serves as an indirect call to action. By asking the reader “wouldn’t it be more scientific to reject hasty action based on faulty data…?” he allows the readers to come to his desired conclusion on their own. These carefully worded rhetorical questions set the stage for more concrete attacks on global warming. Hawkins makes three key attacks against global warming science. First, he shows that much of the scientific consensus surrounding global warming is based on a tautology: “The primary ‘scientific’ argument for global warming is that there is a ‘scientific consensus’ that it’s occurring”. However, consensus is far from evident: thousands of scientists have signed petitions questioning whether humans have caused global warming or whether global warming exists at all. Second, he stresses that climate change models have consistently been incorrect. Even government-sponsored models “’have failed miserably’”. By citing respected members of the scientific community, Hawkins dismantles the notion that global warming is indisputable. Similarly, he argues that famous doomsday predictions about global warming have failed the test of time. The Artic is not in a death spiral and the West Side highway is not underwater.The argument against global warming is rounded out with a discussion of signs that indicate a reversal in the planetary warming trend. In the second paragraph, Hawkins points out that even a respected climate change scientist acknowledges that there has been no warming over the past seventeen years. The absence of warming over the past seventeen years becomes san even stronger refutation of global warming when put in context. The alarming global warming trend was in fact only a twenty-two year period sandwiched between twenty-five years ofglobal cooling and the steady temperatures of the past two decades. In paragraph four, he explains that Arctic ice levels, frequently lamented as proof of global warming, have actually increased significantly since 2012. Hawkins presents himself as a fair arbitrator of the evidence and calls on his ideological rivals to be open-minded by acknowledging the recent increase in ice levels and the probability that they represent good news about climate change.John Hawkins cleverly takes on global warming from several different angles. Rhetorical questions cause the reader to begin rethinking their assumptions about global warming. Evidence that contradicts global warming demonstrates that the science is far from settled. Finally, positive trends give hope for a future that is far brighter than the one depicted by the doom and gloom prophets of global warming.。

新SAT作文(Essay)详解：写作部分为选考

新SAT作文(Essay)详解：写作部分为选考作文部分(Essay)是新SAT所有内容中调整幅度最大的。

新旧SAT的作文部分具体有哪些不同？为什么会做出这样的改变？新SAT对考生有哪些新的要求？中国考生又会遇到什么样的挑战？以下的这篇文章是博图教育为您的详细解答。

现行SAT要求考生根据题干要求，在25分钟内写一篇大概400字的文章；新SAT的写作部分要求考生先读一篇的文章，然后对文章的内容和表达效果进行分析和评论，总时长是50分钟。

考试主要从文章了解、例证引用、行为逻辑、书面语言四个方面来评分。

现行SAT中，写作是必考，而在新SAT中，写作部分为选考。

College Board为什么会做这样的改变呢？首先，现行SAT的写作部分(Essay)主要依赖学生个人的自由表达，例证可以来自事实也可以来自学生个人经历。

由于不是每个人都有那么多素材可以挖掘，很多学生会瞎编乱造个人经历，严重违背了College Board一切以事实为准绳的严谨风格。

其次，多项研究表明加不加写作后的结果对学生大学表现的预测效果并无太大影响。

这直接导致了第三个影响因子：大学的招生官对于Essay部分的评价存在严重分歧。

作为上游机构的大学提出异议，College Board自然也无法强行要求。

(SAT写作<Essay>由必考变为选考并不意味着考生真的可以自由选择是否参考，因为只要考生申请的任何一所学校要求Essay分数，该考生就必须参加考试。

)新SAT写作(Essay)关键词读写结合新SAT要求考生先读一篇文章，然后再写一篇评论。

文章一般是议论文，650-750字，文章特点是难度适中，论证清晰。

从某种意义上说，新SAT作文是阅读部分的延伸。

阅读文章通常针对学生日常学习和生活中遇到的问题进行探讨，比如《细则》中的两篇文章，一篇是关于“文学和阅读的价值”的探讨，另一篇则是有关“黑夜的重要性”的分析。

在新SAT里，阅读文章是写作的基础，是写作中一切论据的来源，只有把文章读懂了才有写作的可能。

新SAT写作范文分享

新SAT写作范文分享备考新SAT写作部分的同学有福利了，今天文都国际小编给大家分享两篇新SAT写作范文，供大家学习。

1、The vicissitude of history never fails to amaze us with all the changes it has brought to human life. If we trace back to see what has been changed since human civilization, seldom can we see anything that remains intact, with only one exception- the importance of reading. Despite the fact that reading has never dropped from our top priorities, few people keep the habit of it. As a reaction to such pathetic phenomenon, writer Frank Bruni draws people’s attention back to reading and encourages people to value it. Strategies he employs include contrast, credible reference and tactic reasoning that appeal to people’s emotion and agreement.One impressive feature of this article is Bruni’s contrast at the very beginning to introduce his topic, with the next paragraphs addressing its benefits. He compares things that he always ignores such as nephew’s birthday and niece’s school production with things he never fails to overlook -reading. For the majority of people, especially teenagers, birthday party and school performance are events that family members should remember. Unfortunately, this is not the case for the author. Reading at this point, readers are left a bit disappointed at the author and tend to pay more attention to what he wants to convey next. At the cusp of people’s attention, author Bruni brings about something that deserves greater emphasis- reading: “I’m incessantly asking my nephews and nieces what they’re reading and why they’re not reading more.” Thus the readers start to realize how justifiable the author is-as nothing like a birthday party or a performance in school is comparable with the importance of reading. With the utilization of this contrast, the authorsuccessfully draws the attention from the readers and lays a solid foundation for his later argument.Aside from this, the author’s careful choice of evidence adds credibility to the article. He cites properly a report by Common Sense Media, claiming that three is a sharp decline in the percentage of teenagers read for fun “fewer than 20 percent of 17-year-olds now read for pleasure”. At the same time, however, the number of the young who hardly ever read or never read for pleasure elevates from “only 8 percent of 13-year-olds and 9 percent of 17-year-olds” 30 years ago to “22 percent of 13-year-olds and 27 percent of 17-year-olds “ today. This worrisome report indicates that the young no longer read as much as they used to. Linked with the previous paragraphs, the author urges the reader to weight the disadvantage of such trend and possibly spurs some kind of response. Besides, the inclusion of an authoritative agency backs up Bruni’s point, makes the work of Bruni believable and credible.The most exquisite technique of the passage, however, is its elaborate reasoning. From paragraph 8 to 15, the author lists all the possible benefits of reading to add weight to the persuasiveness of the article. He starts from how reading benefit the brain in paragraph 8, that interviews indicate a symbiotic relationship between reading and intelligence. Paragraph 9 follows with a benefit to the qualities required to success, because those people who read are more adept at “ reading people” and “sizing up the social whirl around them”. If these benefits are not enough, in paragraph 10, 11, 12 and 13, the author compares reading with exposure to technological devices to indicate how reading would benefit the spirit. One obvious benefit reading offers to the spirit is that reading smoothens people “with thoughts less jumbled, moods less jangled”. The other benefit to spirit is that reading grants people “the ability to focus and concentrate”, which becomes a social corrective to“metabolism and sensory overload of digital technology”, because those who indulge themselves in technology requires something to force them to be focused and have delayed gratification. Finally, in paragraph 14 and 15, Bruni talks about the joy of reading: as the connection reading can provide to people is not anything like watching a movie is able to offer. In order to prove the zealous love people possess for reading, he sites the line from the protagonist in a famous love story that “You read a book and it fills you with this weird evangelical zeal, and you become convinced that the shattered world will never be put back together unless and until all living humans read the book.” People love reading want to share the zeal for it, because only those who read can feel the same addiction. All these are connected well to elaborate the value of reading to not only people’s brain and success, but also spirit and gratification. The combination of all these paragraphs provides the readers with a chance to see the well-rounded and multi-layer benefits of reading, surely help the reader to deliver his idea.All in all, the evidence and source make the reader’s idea worthy of recognition, and the tactical reasoning appeals to people’s emotion and trust. These writing techniques contribute to a well-structured and compelling argument that reading deserves more attention and emphasis.2、To the extent that Sita Slavov presented a strong and convincing argument claiming that the practice of carbon tax charge is a better policy compared with a pure Vacuum Ban, the author has managed to achieve so by using both psychological as well as semi scholarly sources to support her argument, and by listing a number of real-life examples to gain an echo from her audiences in an empirical way.These strategies suggest that Sita Slavov structured her persuasion by adopting both pure-rational and emotional means.Starting from analyzing the big picture, the methodology and structure that Slavov adopted to construct her think piece is fairly creative. To review her article from a macro prospective, the author did not start to pose out her own argument until the last two paragraphs. As a matter of fact, Slavov used a significant length of lines to introduce her readers the background knowledge as well as relevant disputes around the issue at present. In doing so, Slavov could not only offer her readers’a comprehensive abstract of the issue’s core but could also do foreshadowing for her personal arguments as follow----since the present disputes make sense respectively while cannot pose out a reasonable evaluation of the ban policy, a third party train of thought is necessitated, hence Slavov used these introductory sections as a perfect guiding stone for her body partand conclusion. Moreover, such high percentile of introductory length would inspire her readers’ brown study on the issue’s essence by themselves rather than merely ponder over current disputes.From a comparatively micro point of view, the author adopted both rhetorical as wellas academic strategies to frame her paragraphs.Firstly, Sita Slavov took a quite prominent political prospective, mainly because she is trying to comment on the core and influence of an EU policy. Although thepolicy itself aims to improve human environment and is hence categorized as an environmental public policy, the author didn’t try to take an environmental stand of point and construct her piece into academic. Rather, she attempted to criticize the authority of the European Union’s bureaucratic legislation itself. In doing so, she has successfully managed to interpret the core of the issue into “the government’s violation towards people’s freedom of choice inconsumptions” rather than “if the vacuum ban policy itself would be effective and environmental friendly”. In doing so, Sita Slavov furthertook an anthropological prospective to convince her readers that the vacuum ban policy is deeply lack of legitimacy. Specifically, the author used two constant rhetorical questions to emphasize on the government’s “lack of legitimacy” and accuse the government of “taking intrusion into even the most minute of personal decisions”. By using such methodologies, Sita Slavov could successfully evoke her readers’aversion towards the authority’s behavior and would hence turn to support his argument.Moreover, to strengthen her demonstrations, the author quoted a comparatively largeamount of evidence. Specifically, in the second paragraph, Sita Slavov mainly referenced semi scholarly data and statistics to claim why the negative influence of EU’s public policy would be so profound. Meanwhile, in the third paragraph, Sita intended to use real life evidence to convey the message that such policy is absurd in practice. The style of language, by itself, has made Slavov’s think piece into a more easy to read format, and thus would successfully attract the her audiences’ interests of reading.Though with her great success in persuasion, Slavov has also made a few errors interms of reasoning. For example, she didn’t manage to make intelligent and relevant criticisms of the authority’s public policy. Rather, he intended to delude her readers with petty and wild accusations against the government while didn’t provide his audiences enough scholarly evidences and sources to argue against the rationality and scientific necessity of the policy as well as its influence.以上就是小编给大家分享的新SAT写作范文。

怎样写好新SAT作文？分析能力很重要!(上篇)

怎样写好新SAT作文？分析能力很重要！（上篇）这个部分对于目前的考生来说难度极高，不仅仅因为它是主动型题目，需要考生自己提供答案，而且因为这种作文形式与以往学生见到的英文作文的形式(主要是essay/argument形式)大相径庭。

事实上，好的SAT作文是进入前30名名校的敲门砖，而这一年的SAT作文实际写作质量和打分标准让老师和考生均感觉困惑。

因此，对于作文，不可小觑。

第1步：熟悉SAT作文的格式和要求在实际考试中，SAT作文由封面、作文要求、阅读文章三个部分构成。

(1)封面：印有考试日期(例如：SAT Essay March2016)、内容(Essay Book)、要求(Directions)和重要提醒(Reminders)。

这一部分内容建议广大考生在考试之前就熟记于心。

通常而言，Directions如下所示(已经配上相关的中文翻译)：DIRECTIONSThe essay gives you an opportunity to show how effectively you can read and comprehend a passage and write an essay analyzing the passage. In your essay, you should demonstrate that you have read the passage carefully, present a clear and logical analysis, and use language precisely.第一段提出了明确要求：1. read the passage carefully 认真阅读文章;2. present a clear and logical analysis 分析清楚有逻辑性;3. use language precisely 言简意赅。

第一段也说明了写作立场：you …read…a passage and write an essay analyzing the passage。