GMAT写作七宗罪详细分析

合集下载

《七宗罪》分析

犯罪心理学作业（2011-2012-2学期）********所在学院：公共事务学院班级：11013102班学号：**********论文题目：《七宗罪》中的有关犯罪心理的分析摘要：社会发展至今，并非只有文明传承了下来，许多丑恶的事物连同各种犯罪行为一起，也都一直存在着并且有着多样化复杂化的趋势。

《七宗罪》反映的就是一种典型的新型犯罪，从罪犯的犯罪心理的萌生到其犯罪动机的最终形成以及犯罪行为的最终实施都与传统的犯罪行为有着一定的区别。

关键词：犯罪心理宗教社会法律人性正文：1、犯罪心理学的简介犯罪心理学（Criminal Psychology）是一门研究犯人的意志、思想、意图及反应的学科，和犯罪人类学相关连。

这一门学科主要深入研究的部分在于有关“是什么导致人犯罪”的问题，但也包含人犯罪后的反应，在逃跑中或在法庭上的。

犯罪心理学家也可以做为证人，以帮助法庭了解犯人的心理。

精神病学亦有处理到一部分的犯罪行为。

这部出色的惊险悬疑影片对犯罪心理学也作了详尽的描述，而罪犯通过圣经的道德审判来杀人，更具社会意义。

2、七宗罪天主教明言七宗罪：“暴食”、“贪婪”、“懒惰”、“嫉妒”、“骄傲”、“愤怒”。

3、从犯罪动机看现代侦查传统案件的犯罪动机通常可分为情杀、仇杀、财杀、奸杀等。

这些动机多是由于人与人之间的具体关系引发，侦查人员可以在侦查过程中，通过掌握具体材料分析犯罪嫌疑人的犯罪动机和犯罪心理。

但《七宗罪》中约翰的犯罪动机超出了传统的范式。

这部影片也因为其所构思的独特的犯罪动机而成为电影史上的一部成功之作。

在第一罪“暴食案”的现场，镜头对准了一条捆绑死者双手和双脚的绳索。

这个画面在经验丰富的警官萨摩赛心中引起了小小的激荡，“It’sjustbeginning”——天主教七宗罪诫的第一反应。

但是，萨摩赛此刻还没有足够的理由分析出犯罪嫌疑人的犯罪动机。

第二案“贪婪案”，死者是有名的律师，死者旁边有用血书写的“Greed”。

雅思口语“七宗罪”,你知道吗

雅思口语“七宗罪”，你知道吗朗阁大连考试研究中心朗阁雅思大连培训中心最近发现雅思世界动荡不安，一些“不法分子”作恶多端，总是有意或无意地犯下一些“滔天大罪”。

雅思大法官终于看不下去了，派遣专业特警将“不法分子”一一抓获，并将他们犯下的七条罪状全部公布，加以分析和判刑。

罪状一词汇滥用【犯罪经过】A: Do you think it’s useful to plan your time?B: I think it is very useful to make a plan. However, I think things in the world will always change, so sometimes we have to change our plan and make another plan temporarily. And I think sometimes we even have to postpone the things we plan to do.【罪状分析】词汇严重重复，严重影响英语词汇多样性。

重复的用词包括一些非常常见的词，如：useful、plan、think和change。

现判回答者五年有期徒刑，并规定其将useful改成beneficial、helpful、practical等词，将plan改成schedule、timetable、arrangement等词，将think改成believe、suppose、guess等词，将change改成alter、modify、adjust 等词，刑满释放。

【犯罪经过】A: Do you like rainy days?B: I don’t like heavy rain, but I like light rain. The reason is that a heavy rain will make every event less enjoyable. And it might be difficult for people to go outside when there is a heavy rain. However, a light rain might clear the air andmake cities cleaner. When there is a light rain, I would feel very comfortable.【罪状分析】回答者无视英语词汇多样性，肆意重复使用一些词汇，如：like、heavy rain和light rain。

七宗罪的解释---给不太明白七宗罪的TX

七宗罪的解释---给跟我一样不太明白七宗罪的TX19号就要考试了。

今天才开始看awa，发现虽然大概能看懂七宗罪，但是真的不知道怎么用。

不知道either-or choice 和gratuitous assumption又什么区别。

头大。

所以翻了一下以前的GRE资料，发现了一个类似七宗罪的解释版。

因为资料是1年前的，所以不记得是从哪里download的了。

好像是太傻或寄托上吧。

先谢谢原作者了。

1. 开头In this argument, the arguer concludes/ suggests/ makes a suggestion/ makes a conclusion that…To justify this conclusion/ suggestion/ argument, the arguer points out/ cites that…The arguer also points out/ cites that…Although the argument/ conclusion/ suggestion seems plausible, after closely scruinizin g this argument, I find that this argument is logically flawed in several aspects, which render it unconvincing as it stands.2. 结尾In conclusion, despite that fact that this argument seems appealing, it has several logical flaws, and is therefore unpersuasive as it stands. To bolster his or her argument, the arguer must provide more information which can show that…To better support this argument, the arguer should also provide…To better evaluate this argument, I would also need to know that…3. 调查问题A threshold problem with this argument involves a survey/ study/ research itself. The statistical reliability of the survey/study/research/ is really dubious可疑for the reason that the speaker provide no evidence which can show that the number of the respondents( 这里建议替换成调查研究中的群体。

七宗罪犯罪心理分析

老师、同学们：大家下午好，今天我要讲的是《七宗罪》的犯罪心理分析。

影片的背景来源于天主教教义中的七大死罪，而凶手杜约翰制造一场离奇的连环杀人案，受害者都是死于这七宗罪其中的一种。

大家知道七宗罪是什么吗？傲慢、妒忌、暴怒、懒惰、贪婪、饕餮（暴食）及色欲。

请大家看电影中一小部分剧情。

影片中，我们可以看到，凶手杜约翰因为妒忌警官米尔斯的幸福美满的家庭，割下米尔斯妻子美丽的头颅。

而警官米尔斯暴怒之下枪毙了凶手杜约翰，自己却成为凶手。

而杜约翰因为妒忌，结束了自己的生命，完成了七宗罪的最后2宗——暴怒与妒忌。

那么，大家是否有个疑惑，杜约翰为什么激怒警官，而毁了自己的生命？也就是他的犯罪动机是什么呢？我们知道，传统案件的犯罪动机有情杀、仇杀、财杀、奸杀等。

但是，很显然，凶手杜约翰以近乎变态的手段完成了七宗连环杀人案，很显然他的犯罪动机超越了传统。

那么杜约翰的犯罪心理是什么呢？而达莱德和米勒修订了弗洛伊的观点，他们提出“挫折一攻击”理论，“挫折一攻击”理论认为，当个人动机、行为受到挫折时，攻击与侵犯就成为一种原始而普遍的反应。

杜约翰受到的挫折不同于一般的罪犯，他属于心理创伤，对整个社会及人类的失望不满使深受天主教义熏染的他有一种挫折感，他的挫折感不同于一般的挫折感，甚至可能他自己都没有意识到这是一种挫败的体现，或者他自己还一厢情愿地认为自己是高尚的，是来救赎人类救赎世界的。

实际上，他的这种挫折感已经发展到了深深地咬噬他的灵魂的地步，于是他选择了攻击他所认为有违天主教教义的那些人。

而且由于他心理已经发生了极大的扭曲，所以其攻击手段及其残忍。

“暴食案”中，通过法医鉴定，受害者是由于被人12小时连续喂食撑破内脏而死，“懒惰案”中的受害者被进行了长达1年之久的控制和虐待。

影片的最后，有一句意味深长的话：“海明威说这个世界很美丽，值得为它奋斗，我同意后半句。

”这也正是影片想传达出的一种积极的思想：我们生活在一个无法选择的世界，每个人都要做好自己，为这个社会尽自己的一份力，而不仅仅是法律的约束。

GMAT写作七宗罪详细分析

GMAT写作七宗罪详细分析1.构建逻辑错误：这是最常见的漏洞，阅读文章和听力录音之间存在不一致或者缺乏逻辑推理的问题。

解决这个问题的方法是在阅读和听力中寻找一致的信息，并且在写作中强调这些信息的重要性。

2.事实与观点混淆：有时候，听力录音中提到的是个别观点或者例子，而阅读文章表明这些例子并不代表全部真相。

在写作中，要清晰地区分事实和观点，并提供适当的证据和解释支持自己的观点。

3.信息纵观不明：GMAT写作考查考生对于文章主旨及关键信息的理解，所以在写作中要清楚地传达主要内容，并突出重点。

可以列出关键点，以确保写作中没有遗漏重要信息。

4.逻辑推理困难：有时候，听力录音中的理由和例子并不与阅读文章中的论点完全一致，这会使得写作变得困难。

为了解决这个问题，可以更仔细地分析并评估听力录音和阅读文章中的论证，找出他们之间的共同点和不同点，并寻找真正的逻辑推理。

5.信息细节过载：有时候，阅读文章和听力录音中提供了大量细节，但这些细节并不对解决问题有实质性的帮助。

写作要尽量避免过多关注这些细节，而是集中在问题的核心点上，提供简洁但有力的论点。

6.概念混淆：有时候，GMAT写作的题目涉及到一些抽象或技术性的概念，这可能导致解释不清或者混淆概念。

写作应该尽可能简明扼要地解释这些概念，并提供具体的例子或者解释说明，以确保读者能够理解。

7.语法和拼写错误：最后一个七宗罪是语法和拼写错误。

GMAT写作的得分也包括对语言使用的评估。

为了避免这个问题，写作前应该充分准备，尽量使用简单而流畅的语法结构，并检查文章的拼写和语法错误。

总体而言，GMAT写作考察考生的关键阅读、理解和写作能力。

通过注意以上七个七宗罪并提供适当的解决方案，考生可以在写作中展示出自己的能力，从而获得更好的评分。

七宗罪赏析

《七宗罪》,给我留下了深刻的印象，一部值得细细咀嚼的影片，最值得体会的就是它丰富的文化内涵，大卫芬奇无疑是一个天才，这样的一部电影拍在我们面前，除了为他鼓掌，为他流泪，真的没有什么别的可作。

这个题材的成功和演员的到位不必过多评论，值得注意的是它的每一个细节都是把握的那样完美。

我原以为拍电影很容易，现在才知道这和做饭一样，泡方便面也叫做饭，满汉全席也叫做饭，究竟你是什么样的厨师，看看你作的饭就知道了。

首先，我认为要仔细体会影片，就必须对于天主教义中的七宗罪有所了解，六世纪后期，教宗额我略一世将那8种罪行减至7项，将自负并归入骄傲，伤悲并归入懒惰，并加入妒忌。

他的排序准则在于对爱的遗背程度。

其顺次序为：傲慢、妒忌、暴怒、懒惰、贪婪、饕餮（暴食）及色欲。

各种罪行其实环环相扣，所以各种各样的动机也被假设成是与各种罪行相连。

回归到电影，影片描述一个连环杀手和两个警探的故事，经验丰富的老探员萨默塞特再过七天就要退休了，年轻的警察米尔斯是他最后一个搭档。

凶案发生了，罪犯在现场分别留下了“贪婪”、“暴吃”等字样，这正是《圣经》中所讲的“七宗罪”。

一切罪行都出自一个名叫多伊的男子之手，此君精通古典文学，他精心设计了一套向邪恶世界挑战的方法：根据西方古典文学的说法，人有七宗罪，他为每一宗罪找到一个代表人物，然后用以毒攻毒的方式置该人于死地。

他将米尔斯诱至荒野，但米尔斯没想到在邮包中竟找到了自己爱妻的头颅，狂怒的他开枪射杀了多伊，并最终完成了“七重罪”凶杀。

《七宗罪》恰好利用观众对玄学的神秘感和不理解，剑出偏锋的讲一个连环谋杀的故事。

“Seven”在宗教上是个神秘的数字，这一点在旧约中有最充分的表现。

上帝用七天造亚当，取出亚当的第七根肋骨造了夏娃。

撒旦的原身是有七个头的火龙（《启示录》第十二章第三节写道：“有一条大红龙，七头，也戴着冠冕……在电影里，七罪、七罚、七次下雨、故事发生在七天，甚至结局也由罪犯定在第七天的下午七时，无处不在的“7”暗示观众：它是宿命的罪与罚。

AWA 七宗罪写作模板

GMAT Essay Model开头段The conclusion endorsed in this argument is that…Several reasons are offered in support of this argument. First of all, the author points out that… In addition, the author reasons that… What’s more, he also assumes that … At first glance, the author’s argument appears to be somewhat convincing, but further reflection reveals that the conclusion is based on some dubious assumptions and the reasoning is biased due to the inadequacy and partiality in the nature of evidence provided to justify the conclusion. A careful examination would review how groundless this conclusion is.AWA七宗罪结论无据（other factors）The author assumes that A is due to B.However, B may be an important contributing factor but not necessary the only one. For example, such factors as… and ……may account for A.Without taking into account other essential factors, the assumption is unsupportable. The author has to rule out other factors that may lead to the conclusion.无因果联系The author falsely establishes a causal relationship.The mere fact that A is somewhat correlated with B is insufficient to establish a causal relationship.For example...Without taking into account the real relationship between two events, the assumption is unreasonable.The author has to provide more concrete evidence to prove a causal relationship between A and B.错误类比The author assumes that A is analogous to BHowever, their discrepancy outweighs their similarities. The author actually makes a false analogy.For example, A and B will be poles apart if…Without taking into account such discrepancy, the assumption is groundless.The author has to provide the A resembles B in all aspects.时地全等The author assumes that conditions of will remain unchanged as they were before. However, the future is uncertain. The argument commits a fallacy of “All things are equal”.For example…Without taking into account such possibilities, the assumption is ungrounded.The author has to rule out other possibilities that may lead to the conclusion.二者择一The author assumes that A and B are mutually exclusive alternatives.And by applying such an “either-or” reasoning, the author actually presents a false dilemma.For example, there could have other possibilities that…Without taking account into other options, the assumption is unfair.The author has to rule out other options that may lead to the conclusion.可疑调查（gratuitous assumption）The evidence quoted is intended to support the author’s claim that….However, the evidence is too vague to be informative.For example…Without taking into account such potential issues, the issues may portrait a distorted view of…….and mislead the mass audience.The author has to provide the evidence to rule out that possibility.样本不足The author relies on the assumption that A is typical of B as a whole.However, the evidence quoted is too limited to substantiate the assumption.For example, it is entirely possible that……Without taking into account such cases, the assumption is unwarranted.The author has to provide the evidence that A is representative of the whole group.结尾段To conclude, this argument is not persuasive as it stands. Accordingly, it is imprudent for the author to claim that…. To make this argument logically acceptable, the author would have to show that…. In addition, to solidify the conclusion, the author should provide concrete evidence as well to demonstrate that…. Only with more convincing evidence could this argument become more than just an emotional appeal.。

《七宗罪》赏析

《七宗罪》赏析《七宗罪》赏析《七宗罪》无论是从背景、主题、风格，还是从故事结构、镜头设计、画面构图、灯光色彩上来说，都有很多值得赏析的东西。

下面我从故事结构、镜头设计、灯光色彩上来谈一谈我的浅见。

一、故事结构。

电影的开头是一个下着雨的早晨,年轻警官米尔斯起床，穿衣，准备去上班。

这里的片段全部是用近景拍摄,突出人物和人物动作。

在米尔斯和他妻子吻别的时候，不知道为什么，我突然有点不太好的预感。

也许是因为在看电影之前听人说这部片子的每个场景都有深刻寓意，值得好好推敲。

所以会下意识地想导演刻画这么温馨的一幕有什么别的涵义。

果不其然，这一开场的场面调度为结局做了很好的感情铺垫，让人觉得头尾贯连，事出有因。

接着音乐响起,迎来了这个连环杀人案件中第一个案件。

在故事情节上，作者浓彩重墨的的给我们展现了这个部分。

接下来的几个案子相对来说就省略一些。

这种张弛有度的情节设计使影片更加有节奏感。

在结局部分，导演把场景安排在一个荒芜人烟的原野里。

和之前狭隘拥挤的室内犯罪现场想比，这样的场景虽然不会给人带来窒息感，却产生另一种由神秘未知带来的紧张感。

让观众希望的美好结局出现反转，这是很多电影为了被人们记住而使用的有效手段之一。

于是，年轻警察米尔斯的妻子翠西死了。

于是，性感迷人的他因为爱妻犯了罪，成为了杀人凶手完美计划的执行者，让很多人深感遗憾。

在这个部分，年轻警官妻子的人头镜头特写只是很短暂的一瞬。

看见警官愤怒痛苦的表情镜头时，我会不由自主地想起之前他和爱妻吻别的第一个场景。

正是因为有了之前那样温馨一幕的铺垫，此时对他不可抑制的痛苦，我们更能直观地感同身受，理解他对凶手开枪的冲动。

如果没有之前的镜头，我们可能觉得这个情节有点儿突兀抽象，只是在理性上理解，感观上的理解并不那么强烈充分。

这个结局虽然不太符合喜欢大团圆结局的人的口味，但比较一下各种可能的结局之后，就会忍不住再次为编剧的情节设计拍手叫好。

二、镜头设计。

在第一个案件中，镜头先是用近景在外面跟着两位警察走，等到两位警察走到门口的时侯，就切换到房子里面，拍摄两位警察走进来的场景。

英文电影影评、讨论、文化现象分析——七宗罪

IntroductionSomerset is a senior detective, who will soon retire. Mills is new to this place, Monday, a fat man was fed to death at home, the killer left the word "gluttony" behind the refrigerator .Tuesday, a lawyer was bled to death, live the word "greed", then the lazy and the proud.Catholic Church made it clear that gluttony, greed, sloth, pride, lust, envy, and wrath are seven deadly sins. Every victim died in one of them. Somerset did not want to take the cases because he would retire, he had lived in the city for a long time, got used to looking at things coldly. Finally, he stayed to help Mills. After tireless efforts, they finally found the clue. After five murders, who is the next target? No one can foresee. At this point, the killer Surrendered unexpectedly, when there are still two of the “Seven”. Why would he walk into? Perpetrators claimed that his "great masterpiece" still would becompleted .What would he do next?The outcome is far beyond people's expectations. The murderer elected energetic impulsive Mills as the last of the seven deadly sins - wrath. The killer envied of Mills’ happy family and his ordinary life, so he killed his beautiful pregnant wife to anger him. With the gunfire, we know John won the game, he managed to let himself to be envy, so Mills , who would have to face the trial, became the wrath.Comments"Seven" really gave me a deep impression and reflection. As far as I am concerned, Seven itself and Mills’ shooting at the end of the film are the most attractive part in the movie.In fact, each of us can commit the seven in daily life, the extent is different. Appropriate envy is our motivation, proper rest is helpful to adjusting ourselves, proper eating can add energy. But when they are excessive, they will change into the Seven.Although the criminal was cruel, indeed he was exhorting people in an abnormal way. At the end Somerset said: Hemingway wrote: This world is a good place, it is worth fighting for it. The last part I agree. It shows the change of cold Somerset .Also the movie want to tell us, first, recognize the world, then jump out from the negative, to strive.Mills did not control his wrath, he shot, let the criminal win the game, and he would face the trial because of that. But I support his shot, after all, there is something precious than the reason. Even if he held back, wouldn’t heregret when it was over? The tragic lens and ending touched me deeply, and tell me to cherish something I have overlooked previously.CultureThe film describes a very religious philosophical crime story, so that we know the Western religious culture from another point of view.Seven, the name of the movie is significant. Chinese and Western culture seems to have completely different message to the figure. In Chinese culture, "seven" represents light, luck and joy. While in the West, "seven" is related t o religions and human sin, very mysterious and even secretive. Gluttony, greed, sloth, lust, pride, envy and wrath, was seven deadly sins considered by the Catholic.In the movie, 7 sins, 7 penalties, 7 rain, the story took place in 7 days, and even the ending was determined by the criminal, seven days at 7 pm. Just implie that: Seven is the crime and punishment of the fate. And let us know the power of religion.。

影评《七宗罪》

七宗罪——分析案件是假，分析人性是真七宗罪讲的是一场离奇的连环杀人案，受害者都是死于这七宗罪其中的一种。

经验十足的警探Somerset经过不懈的努力，终于将这些看似没有联系的命案屡出头绪，五桩命案过后，凶手下一个目标是谁？在何处？没有人可以预见。

正当警方不知所措之际，凶手奇迹般的自首了，此时凶手的“七宗罪”还差两宗，难道他会就此罢手？他又为何会自投罗网？凶手宣称自己的“伟大杰作”仍会完成，在警方的严密看管下，插翅难飞的杀人犯又能做什么呢？结局大大出乎人的意料。

从故事上讲，这是一部悬疑惊悚片，但是当你深入到电影中，特别是每一个角色，每一个死者，每一个对话，都让你对“人”做重新的定义。

整个故事中给我印象最深的一句话，是Somerset说的，他说：“在这个城市里，女人遇到抢劫，要喊救火，因为救火会有人帮你，但是救命，居民都怕惹麻烦。

”这句话也是Somerset 想要离开警局的原因。

因为人已经失去了本有的“人性观念”大家开始麻木了，警察也不过是处理麻木尸体的工作人员而已。

每当有案件了，有了非法的事情，警察似乎都充当着处理后事者，他们的工作改善不了社会，该变不了人。

那么这是多么大的悲哀啊！在整个故事剧情当中，米尔斯都是一个积极向上的青年，他渴望还人公道，渴望早日抓住罪犯,但是这种单纯的渴望让他愤怒、偏激。

这时我想到天主教中有一种罪是：愤怒，那么单纯的梦想渴望也是一种罪吗？在故事的结尾，罪犯犯了嫉妒罪被米尔斯枪杀，米尔斯犯了愤怒罪坐上了警车。

（故事请在电影中了解，不做阐述，留下伏笔）在这一幕落幕的时候，电影宣告结束，那么我们是否要思考，这样一场结尾的设计，究竟意味着什么？好像无论正义的人，还是邪恶的人都在犯罪，他们生下来就是恶的，那么这个社会还有救嘛？我不曾贪吃过吗？对于美味我从不拒绝，我不曾懒惰过吗？有时候也会小憩一下。

我甚至也曾愤怒过，但是这些都是神的旨意，神是伟大的，那么人是否是卑微的可有可无的呢，人一生下来便是等待者审判的来临，等待着死亡，所以人都是麻木的，任何一个认识抑或不认识的人死去，都是一种赎罪所以不带有一丝感情。

七宗罪犯罪心理的深度剖析

七宗罪犯罪心理的深度剖析犯罪是人类社会中不可避免的问题，不同的犯罪行为背后往往有各种各样的心理因素。

七宗罪，即傲慢、忿怒、嫉妒、懒惰、贪婪、暴食和淫欲，是人类天性中最基本的欲望和弱点。

在犯罪心理学中，七宗罪被认为是犯罪行为的动因之一。

本文将从心理学的角度对七宗罪的犯罪心理进行深度剖析，并探讨其潜在的危害和影响。

傲慢，是指对自己过分自信和自大的心态。

在犯罪心理中，傲慢往往伴随着对权力和控制的追求。

傲慢的人常常认为自己高人一等，不屑于顺从社会规范和法律法规。

这种心态容易导致犯罪行为，比如贪污腐败和侵犯他人权益。

傲慢还与心理上的权力欲望有关，犯罪者常常通过违法行为来满足控制欲和攫取更多权力的欲望。

忿怒，是人类情绪中的一种基本表现。

在犯罪心理中，忿怒是一种常见的激发犯罪行为的情绪。

忿怒的人通常具有易怒和暴力倾向，他们容易因为一些触发因素而失去理智，从而采取暴力行为来宣泄自己的情绪。

忿怒还与人际关系的破裂有关，犯罪者常常因为自己的不满和怨恨而采取报复行动。

嫉妒，是人类天性中的一种负面情绪。

在犯罪心理中，嫉妒常常导致对他人的恶意行为。

嫉妒的人往往因为自己对他人的不满和不平等感而采取攻击行为，比如诋毁他人、破坏他人的声誉等。

嫉妒还与物质追求有关，犯罪者常常因为对他人财富和地位的嫉妒而采取盗窃行为。

懒惰，是指缺乏积极性和主动性的心态。

在犯罪心理中，懒惰容易导致犯罪行为的发生。

懒惰的人常常缺乏对社会道德和法律法规的敬畏，他们对自己的未来和生活没有明确的规划和目标，容易被犯罪诱惑所动摇。

懒惰还与经济困难有关，犯罪者常常因为缺乏合法的生活来源而采取犯罪行为。

贪婪，是人类欲望中的一种典型表现。

在犯罪心理中，贪婪是一种常见的驱使犯罪行为的动因。

贪婪的人常常对金钱和物质拥有强烈的渴望，他们不择手段地追求自己的利益，甚至不惜违法犯罪。

贪婪还与欺骗行为有关，犯罪者常常通过欺骗他人来获取自己的不正当利益。

暴食，是指过度追求食物和快乐的心态。

七宗罪英文电影赏析

Love his job but hate the cruel world
MILLS
7Sins
Gluttony(饕餮)
Derived from the Latin gluttire, meaning to gulp down or swallow, gluttony is the over-indulgence and overconsumption of anything to the point of waste. In the Christian religions, it is considered a sin because of the excessive desire for food, or its withholding from the needy.
Actor
Morgan Freeman[1] (born June 1, 1937) is an American actor, film director, and narrator. Freeman has received Academy Award nominations for his performances in Street Smart, Driving Miss Daisy, The Shawshank Redemption and Invictus and won in 2005 for Million Dollar Baby. He has also won a Golden Globe Award and a Screen Actors Guild Award. Freeman has appeared in many other box office hits, including Unforgiven, Glory, Seven, Deep Impact, The Sum of All Fears, Bruce Almighty, The Dark Knight Trilogy, and March of the Penguins.

GMAT写作七宗罪详细分析

GMAT写作七宗罪详细分析一、什么是“七宗罪”GMAT作文七宗罪是指GMAT驳论文Argument题目中存在的逻辑漏洞或错误，考生根据考试中常见的逻辑漏洞和考察方向把其总结为“七宗罪”，既形象又方便参加GMAT考试备考的考生进行背诵。

考生在备考时可以按照七宗罪中的逻辑错误类型进行有目的的查找，一方面节省了考试时间，另一方面确保找到的逻辑错误的准确，对于提升GMAT写作效率也非常有帮助。

通常考生所说的七宗罪指的就是：第一宗罪：无因果联系，第二宗罪：样本不足，第三宗罪：错误类比(横向)第四宗罪：时地全等(没有用发展的观点看待问题)，第五宗罪：二者择一(非此即彼)，第六宗罪：可疑调查，第七宗罪：结论无据(无根据假设)。

可能个别地方的'叫法不完全一样，考生只要知道其表达的真正意义即可。

二、七宗罪包含哪些内容第一宗罪：无因果联系，是指作者给出的解释和得出的结论没有因果上的联系，或者是二者毫不相关。

The author commits a fallacy of causal oversimplification. The line of the reasoning is that because A occurred before B, the former event is responsible for the latter. But this is fallacious reasoning unless other possible causal explanations have been considered and ruled out. For example, perhaps C is the cause of these events or perhaps B is caused by D.第二宗罪样本不足，是指给出的论据或例子不充分，不足以说明某个问题，不能支撑作者得出这样的结论。

《七宗罪》的评论--行而上的意义

行而上的意义(Se7en / 七宗罪的评论)1.暴食、贪婪、淫欲、懒惰、骄傲、嫉妒、复仇，有种宗教上的道德劝诫的警世意味。

罪犯严密的犯罪逻辑，是本片的线索。

从前五种罪来看，罪犯没有过错，起码是在替天行道，要说错也是社会的过，而最后的“嫉妒”和“复仇”正是本片的争议之处：在罪犯看来，大卫枪杀自己就是完成了救赎，最后的环节如果完成不了，那么类似的循环就不可能被他人重复，从这个角度讲，罪犯是无罪的，他是在完成自己的使命；在大卫及一些观众看来，罪犯不能以任何理由害死无辜的生命，特别有孕在身的翠茜，是无论如何不能被接受的。

这样，一个解决不了的矛盾就产生了，法律上是罪犯杀了人，但是伦理上他又没错，杀了翠茜，又是为了完成使命（当然，我说的伦理不是指杀人偿命一类的问题，再说“嫉妒”也算不上罪行）。

哎，真是一个好BT的问题呀。

转一下其他人的评论，来回答这个问题吧：想像或者宿命影片的英文名字只有一个醒目而惊心的单词--"Seven"，它在宗教上是个神秘的数字，这一点在《旧约》中有最充分的表现。

上帝用7天造亚当，取出亚当的第7根肋骨造了夏娃。

撒旦的原身是有7个头的火龙，世界共有7名堕落天使被称为撒旦。

到了16世纪后，天主教更直接用撒旦的7个恶魔的形象来代表7种罪恶--傲慢，嫉妒，暴怒，懒惰，贪婪，饕餮，以及淫欲。

在电影里，7罪、7罚、7次下雨、故事发生在7天，甚至结局也由罪犯定在第7天的下午7时，无处不在的"7"暗示着观众：它是宿命的罪与罚。

既然如此，宿命的悲剧是必定要属于人间的，"上帝"作为"授意者"和"观望者"参与了整个事件。

冷血杀手作为传道者莅临人间，最终以身殉道。

从某种角度看，悲剧中没有正邪的区分，作为渺小的人类，只能接受宿命的审判。

分开来看七宗罪的罪行，每一宗并不构成死罪（上帝只告诉我们，犯下这七宗罪者，必下地狱，强调的是死后而非现世的惩罚）。

GMAT知识点之AWA及七宗罪

GMAT知识点之AWA及七宗罪在学习英语的时候，同学们呀注意掌握节奏，确保每个知识点都复习到。

下面是店铺整理的2017年GMAT知识点之AWA模板及七宗罪，希望对大家有用，更多消息请关注应届毕业生网。

AWA模板及七宗罪ArgumentIn this argument the author reaches the conclusion that.... The basis for this recommendation is that.... An additional reason given in support of this recommendation is that...(The author cites...as an example in support of this recommendation). At first glance, the author's argument appears to be somewhat convincing, but further reflection reveals that it omits some important concerns that should be addressed to substantiate the argument.In the first place,In the second place,In the third place,In conclusion, the author fails to provide adequate justification for.... As it stands, the reasoning does not constitute a logical argument in favor of the recommendation. T o strengthen the argument, the author would have to provide evidence to prove that.... To better assess the argument, we need additional detailed information about...so that we can establish the conclusion whether....IssueThe issue of whether...is a complex and controversial one. Different people hold different views due to their respective angles. On the one hand, as is well-known and has often been advocated, ...; on the other hand, others probably insist that.... Wedo not have to look very far to see the valid standpoint of this matter. In the following analysis, I would like to reason and provide evidence favoring the former one and refuting the latter one. (The complex nature of the above issue requires us to consider it on a case-by-case basis. In my point of view, whether one has advantages over the other depends on the specific circumstances.)In the first place, the important reason that can be presented to develop my position is that.... A good example may be found in the case that.... Under this circumstance/therefore, it is obvious that....In addition, there is another reason for me to choose the former statement/consider the latter statement to be wrong. The reason is not far to seek:.... To illustrate, a case in point in this respect is that....Admittedly, there is no denying that...in some conditions. As we know, .... However, this alone does not constitute a sufficient support to.... (When...of X and Y are carefully compared, the most striking conclusion is obvious. To sum up, while...may be true in exceptional cases, I agree that....)Consequently, I advocate that..., because: (1) ...; (2) .... Due to the above-mentioned reasons, which sometimes intertwine to form an organic whole and thus become more persuasive, we may safely arrive at the conclusion I support.严重推荐：Argument之七宗罪第一宗罪：无因果联系The author commits a fallacy of causal oversimplification. The line of the reasoning is that because A occurred before B, the former event is responsible for the latter. (The author uses the positive correlation between A and B to establish causality.However, the fact that A coincides with B does not necessarily prove that A caused B.) But this is fallacious reasoning unless other possible causal explanations have been considered and ruled out. For example, perhaps C is the cause of these events or perhaps B is caused by D.第二宗罪 Insufficient-sampleThe evidence the author provides is insufficient to support the conclusion drawn from it. One example is logically unsounded to establish a general conclusion (The statistics from only a few recent years are not necessarily a good indicator of future trends), unless it can be shown that A1 is representative of all A. It is possible that.... In fact, in face of such limited evidence, the conclusion that B is completely unwarranted.第三宗罪: 错误类比 (based on a false analogy )<横向>The argument rests on the assumption that A is analogous to B in all respects. This assumption is weak, since although there are points of comparison between A and B, there is much dissimilarity as well. For example, A..., however, B.... Thus, it is likely much more difficult for B to do....第四宗罪 all things are equal<纵向>The author commits the fallacy of “all things are equal”. The fact that happened two years ago is not a sound evidence to draw a conclusion that.... The author assumes without justification that the background conditions have remained the same at different times or at different locations. However, it is not clear in this argument whether the current conditions at AA are the same as they used to be two years ago. Thus it is impossible to conclude that....第五宗罪 Either-Or choiceThe author assumes that AA and BB are mutually exclusivealternatives and there is no room for a middle ground. However, the author provides no reason for imposing an either-or choice. Common sense tells us that adjusting both AA and BB might produce better results.第六宗罪 survey is doubtfulThe poll cited by the author is too vague to be informative. The claim does not indicate who conducted the poll, who responded, or when, where and how the poll was conducted. (Lacking information about the number of people surveyed and the number of respondents, it is impossible to access the validity of the results. For example, if 200 persons were surveyed but only 2 responded, the conclusion that...would be highly suspect. Because the argument offers no evidence that would rule out this kind of interpretations,) Until these questions are answered, the results of the survey are worthless as evidence for the conclusion.第七宗罪 gratuitous assumptionThe author falsely depends on gratuitous assumption that.... However, no evidence is stated in the argument to support this assumption. In fact, this is not necessarily the case. For example, it is more likely that.... Therefore, this argument is unwarranted without ruling out such possibility【2017年GMAT知识点之AWA模板及七宗罪】。