托福阅读陷阱

托福阅读陷阱：辨别信息真伪

托福iBT阅读考查的一个重点是理解基本信息及合理推断的能力，要能够辨别信息的真伪以及是否在原文中出现过，这就为我们分析选项提供了思路，大家熟知的选项设置包括有悖原意（讲错了）和无中生有（没讲的）。事实上，多数小盆友往往忽略了另外一种选项设置，即和题干不相关的选项。这是托福阅读比较特别的地方，不仅追求选项的正确性，也追求选项和题干的关联。换句话说，一个选项，如果在原文定位区间内讲了，也讲对了，但答非所问，对不起，这个选项是错误的。我们来举个例子：

例如：

The hind leg of Basilosaurus was a significant find because it showed that Basilosaurus

○ Lived later than Ambulocetus natans

○ Lived at the same time as Pakicetus

○ Was able to swim well

○ Could not have walked on land

Another major discovery was made in Egypt in 1989. Several skeletons of another early whale, Basilosaurus, were found in sediments left by the Tethys Sea and now exposed in the Sahara desert. This whale lived around 40 million years ago, 12 million years after Pakicetus. Many incomplete skeletons were found but they included, for the first time in an archaeocyte, a complete hind leg that features a foot with three tiny toes. Such legs would have been far too small to have supported the 50-foot-long Basilosaurus on land. Basilosaurus was undoubtedly a fully marine whale with possibly nonfunctional, or vestigial, hind legs. An even more exciting find was reported in 1994, also from Pakistan. The now extinct whale Ambulocetus natans (“the walking whale that swam”) lived in the Tethys Sea 49 mi llion years ago. It lived around 3 million years after Pakicetus but 9 million before Basilosaurus….

这是一道事实信息题，根据题干中的关键词hind leg和Basilosaurus，本着“快、准、狠”的原则，找到定位句Such legs would have been far too small to have supported the 50-foot-long Basilosaurus on land. （这样的后肢太小了以至于不能支撑Basilosaurus在陆地上活动），和选项做一个对照，发现D是对定位句的同义改写，这样就可以直接选出正确答案D。

然后我们以胜利者的姿态来看一下A选项，根据原文小盆友们可以知道这个选项有提到，说法也正确（Ambulocetus natans...lived…9 million before Basilosaurus），但为什么不选呢？再来看下题干：Basilosaurus的后肢是个重要的发现（a significant find）因为它的后肢揭示出什么？A选项中说Basilosaurus晚于Ambulocetus natans，这和它的后肢是重要发现无关，所以是错误选项。

更多有关托福知识技巧请看外朗教育官网：