安乐死的英语作文
考研英语写作30篇范文：安乐死
考研英语写作30篇范文：安乐死范文（八）Writi ng （图画提纲式议论文）Directio ns: Study the followi ng picture carefully and write an essay of 160 -200 words in which you should1）describe the picture.2）state differe nt views on mercy killi ng, and3）give your opinion on it.晚期癌症病人请求安乐死。
我们怎么办？范文Mercy killi ng is one of the most con troversial issues in the world of medici ne. As the picture give n above depicts, a late-stage cancer patie nt is term in ally-ill, asking the doctors for mercy killing. But the doctors look deeply embarrassed, feeling helpless because they are at a loss what to do about it.The picture really sets me thinkin g. It implies that people differ in theirattitudes towards the mercy killi ng. Some people think that physicia n-assistedsuicide can relieve dying patie nts of un bearable pain and sufferi ng. They maintainthat as long as a doctor prescribes a drug for a legitimate medical purpose, he hasdone nothing illegal even if the patie nt uses the drug to haste n death. Others arestron gly opposed to physicia n-assisted suicide. They contend that a doctor has noright to give a patient sufficient medication to control his pain if that may hasten death. They conclude that it is illegal for doctors to help the dying end their lives.As far as I'm concerned, doctors have a duty to help dying patients to alleviate their pain and suffering. I also agree that doctors deserve to be punished if theyprolong the needless suffering of their terminally-ill patients. In short, I am infavor of mercy killing. (207 words)译文：安乐死是医学界最有争议的问题之一。
安乐死_英语作文（优秀范文五篇）
安乐死_英语作文（优秀范文五篇）第一篇：安乐死_英语作文The euthanasia The fast advance of medicine and life–extending technologies enable life to be prolonged.The euthanasia has been becoming the hot topic around the world, and questioned discussion about its legalization occurs at home and abroad.In my opinion, the euthanasia is mercy.It can help hopeless ill patients to dead qucikly，relieve them from the pain , For these people，the quality of life is the foundation value of life.For these patients who can never be cured, death is unavoidable to them, so the euthanasia is the best way to let them away from great pain.And these patients have to suffer from the pain, at the same time, their family members have to stand the expensive medical expenses and the great hurt mentally，“We mustn't delay any longer … swallowing is difficult … and breathing, that's also difficult.Those muscles are weakening too … we mustn't delay any longer.”the words from a Dutchman asked his doctor to help him die.At that time ,he was no longer able to speak clearly and he knew there was no hope of recovery and that his condition was rapidly get worse.Therefore,it's merciful for the doctors to help these patience come to an end of their life with the euthanasia.In addition, to reduce the pain of the patients is one of the doctors' duty, so euthanasia.is moral.To be frank, everyone has the right and freedom to manage their own final destiny, such as refuse any cure.And thus right also includes the freedom of choosing to die as well as the ways of death, even when it's necessary to ask somebody else to end their life.In a word.I want to call on the legitimization of the euthanasia.let the patients get rid of thestruggle between life and death as soon as possible.第二篇：英语作文：安乐死（1）有利于病人的自身利益。
安乐死的英文作文
安乐死的英文作文英文：Euthanasia, also known as assisted suicide or mercy killing, is a controversial topic that has been debated for decades. Some people believe that individuals who are terminally ill or suffering from unbearable pain should have the right to choose to end their own lives with the help of a physician. Others argue that euthanasia goes against the sanctity of life and can lead to abuse.Personally, I believe that euthanasia should be legalized under certain circumstances. For example, if a patient has a terminal illness and is in constant pain, they should have the right to end their suffering. However, strict regulations and guidelines must be put in place to prevent abuse and ensure that the patient is making an informed decision.In my opinion, the decision to end one's own life is adeeply personal one and should not be made lightly. It is important for the patient to have access to counseling and support to help them make an informed decision. Additionally, the physician who assists with the euthanasia should be well-trained and experienced in end-of-life care.中文：安乐死，也称为协助自杀或慈悲杀死，是一个备受争议的话题，已经争论了几十年。
安乐死 Die With Pleasure_英语作文
安乐死Die With PleasureMercy killling has been the hot issue and some animals were accepted this way of death. In some countries, mercy killing is legal for human being. When people are badly ill and have given up life, they wished to die with pleasure. Betsy Davis made her choice.安乐死一直是一个热点话题，一些动物接受了这种方式离去。
在一些国家，安乐死是合法的。
当人们病得很严重的时候，对生命已经放弃了希望，他们就希望快乐地死去。
贝特西·戴维斯就做出了自己的选择。
Betsy Davis was an artist and she suffered from ALS. After being treated for some time, she still got sick worse and worse and she had big trouble in moving, so she decided to accept mercy killing. But she was not going to die sadly, instead, she emailed her families and friends to join her good-bye party for two days, and she told them not to be sad but only with pleasure. 贝特西·戴维斯是一个艺术家，她患有肌萎缩性侧索硬化症，接受一段时间治疗后，病情仍然恶化了，她难以移动，所以她决定接受安乐死。
安乐死的看法英语作文
安乐死的看法英语作文关于安乐死的看法英语作文Directions： For this part you are allowed thirty minutes to write a composition on the topic Should Euthanasia Be Legalized? You should write no less than 150 words and base your composition on the outline （given in Chinese） below：1、有的人赞成实行安乐死2、有的人反对安乐死合法化3、我的看法。
范文：Euthanasia, a quiet and easy death, or “mercy killing” as we call it recently has made the headlines frequently. Many people applaud it and argue that euthanasia should be legalized.As is pointed out, to practise euthanasia can benefit both the patient and his family. To a terminally ill person who is suffering excruciating pains day and night or living “like a vegetable”, to be allowed to end his life painlessly is a good release. To his family it is also a big relief considering the financial and emotional drain on them that having to sustain his life entails. However, the legalization of euthanasia may also bring with it problems our society has not previously faced. Is it humane, for example, that a terminally ill patient is thus caused to feel guilty for remaining alive because he does not want to die? Is it wise that a patient is killed alive simply because of a mistaken terminal diagnosis? And is it possible that euthanasia could be taken advantage of for some ulterior or even criminal purposes?Since the legalization of euthanasia will raise serious moral and social issues, the decision our society makes about euthanasia will undoubtedly have tremendous consequences insociety.单词：1. euthanasia：adj. 安乐死2. mercy：n. 仁慈，宽容；怜悯；幸运；善行3. headline：n. 大标题；内容提要；栏外标题；头版头条新闻4. applaud：vt. 赞同；称赞；向…喝采5. legalized：adj. 合法的6. benefit：vt. 有益于，对…有益7. terminally：adv. 处于末期症状上8. excruciating：adj. 折磨人的；使苦恼的`9. painlessly：adv. 无痛苦地，不费力地10. relief：n. 减轻，解除；安慰11. drain：n. 消耗12. sustain：vt. 维持13. legalization ：n. [法] 合法化；法律认可14. guilty：adj. 有罪的；内疚的15. diagnosis：n. 诊断16. ulterior：adj. 隐秘不明的17. criminal：adj. 刑事的；犯罪的；罪恶的18. purpose：n. 目的；用途19. moral：adj. 道德的20. issue：n. 问题21. undoubtedly：adv. 确实地，无庸置疑地22. tremendous：adj. 极大的，巨大的；惊人的23. consequence：n. 结果词组：1. point out：指出2. day and night：日以继夜3. like a vegetable：像一个植物人4. be allowed to do sth.：被允许做某事5. take advantage of：利用句子分析：To a terminally ill person who is suffering excruciating pains day and night or living “like a vegetable”, to be allowed to en d his life painlessly is a good release.1）who is suffering excruciating pains day and night or living “like a vegetable”做定语修饰a terminally ill person 2）to be allowed to end his life painlessly为整句句子的主语，his life指的是a terminally ill person’s life，所以整句句子的中心意思在最后，即：to be allowed to end his life painlessly is a good release。
英文作文(安乐死)
Euthanasia should be illegalSubmitted by: XxxxxxEnglish WritingDecember 15, 2009OutlineThesis: Euthanasia should be illegal.(1)Introduction: the definition and general introduction of euthanasia is broughtabout.(2)The legality of euthanasia differs in different countries and more importanceshould be attached to ethics and moral principles.(3)From the aspect of ethics, we oppose the performing of euthanasia mainly for fourreasons.A.Some patients choose euthanasia just because of poverty.B.Some doctors may give up the efforts to save the sufferers if euthanasia ispermitted.C.The euthanasia may be used to murder the patients.D.No one should be denied the right to live.(4)A survey is introduced about people‟s attitude toward euthanasia.(5)Conclusion: euthanasia should be made illegal.Euthanasia should be illegalThe term …euthanasia‟ derives from the ancient Greek word euthanatos, meaning …easy death,‟ which combines eu …good‟ and thanatos …death‟. In Webster‟s dictionary euthan asia is defined as “the act or practice of killing or permitting the death of hopelessly sick or injured individuals (persons or domestic animals) in a relatively painless way for reasons of mercy”（Pestalozzi 263）. Generally speaking, euthanasia is not a new problem, and until now, it is still a controversial issue. The euthanasia itself is a complex problem which covers so many fields, such as law, ethics, medical principle and so on.As to the legality of euthanasia, although euthanasia law was legalized in some west countries, such as Netherlands, which is the first country to make euthanasia legal, there is no definite legal provision to allow euthanasia in our country. To many of us, to perform euthanasia on the sufferer is no less than murdering. Of course, we have to admit that euthanasia can lessen the pain of the sufferer to a certain extent so that the patient can die without enduring so much pain. But, we should also realize that there are surely ethics and moral principles which we should attach more importance to.From the aspect of ethics, we oppose the performing of euthanasia mainly for four reasons. First, some sufferers, especially those in poverty, choose euthanasia just because they do not want the family to get involved into financial problems. As their family members, should we give up and see the one who are intimate to us die in desperate? The answer is of course not. What we should do is just to back them andencourage them. Second, if euthanasia is permitted, then some doctors may just give up the efforts to save the sufferer and abandon the patients to euthanasia, which may insult the essence and mission of the doctor. Third, in order to get the estates of the patients, the relatives of the sufferer and the doctor may take advantage of euthanasia to murder the patients. Fourth, life is given to us only once, thus, no one should be denied the right to die. Here, I would like to mention the euthanasia issue happened in Florida America. That is the story about Terri Schindler-Schiavo, who was in a condition of diminished consciousness since 1990. Although at last, she was disconnected from life support at the request of her husband, this event still drew much public attention and even the US government was involved (Wikipedia). Schindler-Schiavo has died, but the argumentation of her death and the argumentation about moral principles have not stopped.As to the attitudes towards euthanasia in general and attitudes towards legalization of euthanasia, doctor Radulovic and Mojsilovic had once made a survey among oncologists, home care physicians (family doctors), third-year medical students and lawyers. The result showed that more than half of the individuals (57%) were against euthanasia, and 61% are against the legalization of euthanasia (Radulovic and Mojsilovic 400-412). So, making efforts to reduce the pains of sufferer, trying our best to save the patient, showing more care to the patient, and improving the service of the hospital are really something more important than euthanasia.As to the legality of euthanasia, different people may have different opinions. But we should always believe that medical problems today may be solved tomorrow. Sothe sufferer should not be given up. As long as we have confidence, then everything is possible. Besides, euthanasia is to some extent against the ethics and is not widely accepted. So, euthanasia should be made illegal.Works cited:Pestalozzi, “Euthanasia: do we know it and do we need it?”, Support Care Cancer, no.10 (April 2002):263-264.Radulovic, Mojsilovic, “Attitudes of oncologists, family doctors, medical students and lawyers to euthanasia”, Support Care Cancer, no.6 (1998):410-415Terri Schiavo case, Wikipedia, /wiki/Terri_Schiavo: Accessed December 18, 2009。
对安乐死的看法 英语作文
对安乐死的看法英语作文未生效。
I have mixed feelings about euthanasia. On one hand, I believe that people should have the right to make decisions about their own lives, including when and how they want to die. It is a personal choice that should be respected. Additionally, in cases where individuals are suffering from incurable diseases or are in extreme pain, euthanasia can provide a compassionate and humane option to end their suffering.However, I also have concerns about the potential for abuse and misuse of euthanasia. There is a risk that some people may be coerced or pressured into choosing euthanasia, especially if they are vulnerable or have limited access to healthcare resources. It is important to have strict regulations and safeguards in place to ensure that euthanasia is only used in cases where it is truly the individual's own choice and in their best interest.Furthermore, the ethical and moral implications of euthanasia are complex. It raises questions about the value of human life and the role of healthcare professionals in facilitating death. Some argue that euthanasia goes against the principles of medicine, which is to preserve and protect life. Others believe that it is a compassionate act of mercy and can provide a dignified death for those who are suffering.In addition, the religious and cultural beliefs surrounding euthanasia vary greatly. Some religions view it as a sin and believe that only God has the right to determine when a person's life should end. Others may have more lenient views or even support the idea of euthanasia in certain circumstances. It is important to respect these diverse perspectives and engage in open and respectful dialogue when discussing euthanasia.Overall, euthanasia is a complex and controversialtopic that elicits strong emotions and differing opinions. It is important to consider the individual's autonomy andright to make decisions about their own life, while also ensuring that proper safeguards are in place to prevent abuse. Ultimately, the decision about whether or not to legalize euthanasia should be made through careful consideration of the ethical, moral, and practical implications involved.。
安乐死英语小论文Euthanasia
Euthanasia: A Means, Not the End Summary:Euthanasia means "happy death" or "mercy killing", which is sometimes used to help patients die without suffering too much pain. The purpose of euthanasia is kind and benevolent, but as it is related to death, the result may not seem so kind or benevolent when we see anyone die. This is why euthanasia becomes one of the most widely and hotly debated issues in society. Do we have "the right to die"? Should euthanasia be legalized? In what kind of situation will euthanasia be put into practice?(words:87)With the high-speed development of medicine, our life become much longer and more comfortable. Though medicine can usually prevent us from death, we cannot avoid dying throughout life. If your disease were incurable, of course high-level medicine could extend your life more or less, but it would also extend your pain at the same time. In this situation, as death is visible and unavoidable while pain is hard for you to stand, euthanasia is used.Many people around the world are in favor of the idea of euthanasia, the core concept they invoke is "the right to die", which means anyone who has incurable disease with pain beyond suffering can choose to die when they or their family is determined to. People supporting the idea "the right to die" believe that euthanasia is humane, because it helps hasten the death of hopelessly ill patients, relieving them from the fierce pain, which is good for not only the dying patients but their families.Of course, the use of euthanasia has rationality. It's necessary to permit euthanasia in some special situations.However, there are also many disadvantages of euthanasia. First, euthanasia can be abused when doctors is treating disabled people and old people, which leads to crime. Second, when a seriously-ill patient is determined to take euthanasia, he may not make clear-headed decision because his consciousness is probably muddled. Third, too many examples of euthanasia may result in social moral crisis and doctors may not try their best to cure a dying patient once they have the power to practice euthanasia. This conduct is nothing less than murdering.In order to prevent the abuse of euthanasia, we must strictly standard ize the application of euthanasia. So, when can doctor use euthanasia legally? I think it depends on several conditions.First of all, euthanasia can be only practiced on terminally ill patients, when the practice of euthanasia serves only to hasten death. Secondly, we should guarantee the earnest and strictness of euthanasia, so taking euthanasia need the permission of patient himself or his family, the acceptance of doctors and the certificate from court. Thirdly, the method to practice euthanasia must conform to humanitarianism, and only professional and qualified doctor can practice euthanasia. Finally, legal euthanasia can't betray its original purpose. Euthanasia is a merciful way to end patients' life. Doctors practice euthanasia in order that the patients will no longer suffer a fierce pain. Euthanasia can make the patients die peacefully. To some extent, it is a kind of respect to human life.Euthanasia has come into being for a long time, it's impossible and groundless to forbid it completely. I think it won't be long to legalize euthanasia in China, what we should do is to make the law on euthanasia as perfect as possible.Anyhow, we shouldn't regard euthanasia as a painless way to commit suicide, and there is no reason for us to take it for granted that euthanasia is a good way to terminate our life. Y ou cannot expect euthanasia to bring you any relief as it seems, the only thing euthanasia can do is take your pain with your life. After all, life is the most precious treasure we have.In fact, to terminate one's life by taking euthanasia is not only a legal issue but also a moral issue because it refers to a choice between painfully liv ing and comfortably dying. Which one would you choose? Just like what Confucius said: "It's useless talking about death before you understand life clearly."[1]According to Confucius's words, it's useless talking about choosing how to die while we haven't settled the problems of life. So should we pay too much attention on "the right of death" while we still can't guarantee the rights of life? Is it the time for us to focus more on those people who are alive?(words:655) [1] 出自《论语·先进》:孔子云：“未知生，焉知死？”Reference:1.Y e Gaofeng. "A Law View on Euthanasia",The Issues and Disputes of Penal Law . 1(2001): 3992.Zhang Yutang. "Do We Have right to die?" Law. 5(2001): 333.Wu Jing. "Euthanasia Is Not Crime", The Issues and Disputes of Penal Law. 1(2000): 1134.Wang Xiaohui. To Discuss Euthanasia. Jilin People's Press5.Chu Dongping. Euthanasia. Shanghai. Culture Press, 1988。
支持安乐死的英语作文
支持安乐死的英语作文英文回答：Euthanasia, also known as assisted suicide, is a topic that sparks heated debates worldwide. Proponents of euthanasia argue that individuals should have the right to end their own lives with dignity, especially when faced with terminal illnesses, unbearable pain, or severe mental health conditions. They emphasize the principle of patient autonomy and the importance of respecting individuals' wishes. Additionally, they contend that euthanasia can alleviate suffering and prevent prolonged agony, providing comfort and peace to those who choose it.Opponents of euthanasia, on the other hand, raise concerns about the potential for abuse, coercion, and slippery slopes. They argue that legalizing euthanasia could lead to a devaluation of life and increased pressure on vulnerable individuals to end their lives. Critics also express concerns about the potential for misdiagnosis andmistakes, emphasizing the need for extreme caution and a robust regulatory framework. Furthermore, they argue that euthanasia undermines the role of palliative care and hospice services, which focus on providing comfort and pain management without ending life.In many countries, the legal status of euthanasia varies. Some jurisdictions have legalized euthanasia under strict conditions, while others prohibit it entirely. In the United States, for example, euthanasia is generally illegal, but certain states have legalized physician-assisted suicide under specific circumstances.The debate surrounding euthanasia is complex and involves a range of ethical, legal, medical, and religious considerations. There are valid arguments on both sides of the issue, and it is a matter that requires careful deliberation and compassionate dialogue.中文回答：安乐死。
安乐死的英语作文
安乐死的英语作文Euthanasia is a complex and controversial topic that has stirred debates around the world. It refers to the act of intentionally ending a life to relieve pain and suffering, often in the context of terminal illness. There are two main types of euthanasia: active, where a medical professional administers a lethal dose of medication, and passive, where life-prolonging treatments are withheld or withdrawn.The Ethical DebateThe ethical debate surrounding euthanasia is multifaceted. Proponents argue that it is a compassionate choice that allows individuals to die with dignity, free from the unbearable pain that can accompany terminal illnesses. They believe that the right to die should be a personal decision, reflecting the autonomy and self-determination of the individual.On the other hand, opponents of euthanasia raise concerns about the potential for abuse, the sanctity of life, and the role of medical professionals. They fear that legalizing euthanasia could lead to a slippery slope where vulnerable individuals might feel pressured to end their lives prematurely.Legal PerspectivesDifferent countries have varying legal stances on euthanasia. In some nations, such as the Netherlands and Belgium, euthanasia is legal under strict conditions. In contrast, other countries have stringent laws against it, viewing it as a form of murder.The Role of Medical ProfessionalsMedical professionals are often at the forefront of the euthanasia debate. They must balance their duty to relieve suffering with their commitment to preserve life. Some doctors and nurses feel conflicted about participating in euthanasia, while others believe it is a humane option for their patients.Personal StoriesPersonal stories can be powerful in shaping public opinion on euthanasia. For example, the story of Brittany Maynard, a young woman with terminal brain cancer who chose to end her life in Oregon, where euthanasia is legal, brought the issue to the forefront of public consciousness.Future ConsiderationsAs medical technology advances, the question of how and when to end life will become increasingly pertinent. The future may hold more legal and societal acceptance of euthanasia, or it may see a renewed emphasis on palliative care to improve the quality of life for the terminally ill.In conclusion, euthanasia is a deeply personal and societal issue that requires careful consideration of ethical, legal, and medical perspectives. It is a topic that will continue to be debated and discussed as society evolves and as our understanding of death and dying changes.。
安乐死英语作文
安乐死英语作文Euthanasia, derived from the Greek words 'eu' meaning goodand 'thanatos' meaning death, refers to the practice of intentionally ending a life to relieve pain and suffering. It is a complex and controversial topic that has sparkedvigorous debate across the globe. This essay aims to explore the ethical considerations surrounding euthanasia, the arguments for and against it, and the legal implications it carries.The ethical debate on euthanasia often centers around the principle of autonomy, which is the right of individuals to make decisions about their own lives and bodies. Proponents argue that if a person is suffering from a terminal illness and has no hope of recovery, they should have the right to choose a dignified and peaceful death. They believe that prolonging life through artificial means when there is no chance of recovery is both cruel and unnecessary.On the other hand, opponents of euthanasia raise concerns about the sanctity of life and the potential for abuse. They fear that legalizing euthanasia could lead to a slipperyslope where the value of human life is diminished, and vulnerable individuals might be pressured into choosing death. Additionally, there are concerns about the accuracy ofmedical diagnoses and the possibility of patients changingtheir minds once the decision for euthanasia has been made.The religious perspective also plays a significant role in the euthanasia debate. Many religious doctrines teach that life is sacred and should be preserved, regardless of the circumstances. This belief is often cited as a reason to oppose euthanasia, as it is seen as an interference with the natural order and divine will.From a legal standpoint, euthanasia is a highly regulated and restricted practice. In some countries, such as the Netherlands and Belgium, euthanasia is legal under strict conditions. However, in many other countries, it remains illegal and is punishable by law. The legal framework surrounding euthanasia is designed to protect patients and ensure that the procedure is carried out ethically and with the utmost care.In conclusion, euthanasia is a deeply divisive issue that touches on the core values of society. It raises profound questions about the nature of life, the limits of medical intervention, and the rights of individuals. While some argue for the right to die with dignity, others stand firm in their belief that life should be preserved at all costs. As medical technology advances and societal attitudes evolve, the debate on euthanasia is likely to continue, reflecting the complexity of the human condition and our quest for a compassionate and just society.。
mercykilling（安乐死）5篇
mercykilling（安乐死）5篇第一篇：mercykilling(安乐死)Euthanasia Euthanasia or mercy killing which aims to induce the painless death of a person for triggers assumed to be merciful, including four types for instance voluntary and direct, involuntary and direct, and so forth, is one of the biggest controversial issues of this decade.People who oppose to mercy killing argue that the euthanasia interferes with laws of nature, especially to those who share sincere religious beliefs, it is a desecration to the God.Also assisted death or assisted suicide may contribute to crime of people illegally taking advantage of it to deprive other people of their life, which is disguised violation of the right to life.When it comes to me, whereas, euthanasia helps to relieve terminally ill patient from agonizing pain, which not merely fulfills one's desire for a self-determined death but also set aside their family from the pain of having to witness torture that the patient does not need to bear.Additionly, Death as nature as birth, is sometimes a process that require assistance, and mercy killing one of such help.A case in point is that when one is under extreme suffering in the body and spirit and the overwhelming existence of life become a nightmare, assisted suicide may be a good way.Finally, when one is suffering a sever and incurable disease which we can not even cope with, euthanasia can be a choice for it being not contempt for life or moral decline, but a form of respect for life.第二篇：浅议安乐死浅议“安乐死”近来，绵阳某中学教师唐昀因不堪忍受病痛和精神上的重压，向成都华西医院提出安乐死被拒一事，使安乐死再度成为社会的敏感话题。
我对于安乐死的观点英语作文
我对于安乐死的观点英语作文The concept of euthanasia, often dubbed as the 'right to die,' has been a hotly contested subject that stirs deep emotional and ethical debates. It's a topic that doesn't just challenge our medical practices but also our very understanding of life and death. For some, euthanasia represents a compassionate end to unbearable suffering, a humane choice for those who are terminally ill and wish to avoid a prolonged, painful demise. It's about autonomy, the right of an individual to make decisions about their own body and life, even if it means choosing to end it.On the other hand, the notion of euthanasia raises profound moral and legal questions. It's not just about the sanctity of life but also the slippery slope of where such a practice could lead. What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse? How do we ensure that the decision for euthanasia is truly voluntary and not influenced by external pressures? These are not trivial concerns, but rather the very heart of the debate.As I ponder on this, I find myself oscillating between the two sides. The empathy for those in chronic pain and the desire to alleviate their suffering is undeniable. Yet, the fear of setting a precedent that could be exploited is equally compelling. It's a delicate balance between respecting individual rights and protecting society from potential misuse of such a powerful decision.The complexity of this issue is further compounded by cultural, religious, and personal beliefs. While some may see euthanasia as an act of mercy, others view it as an affront to the natural order of life. It's a reflection of our diverse perspectives on what it means to live and die with dignity.In my view, the conversation around euthanasia should not be about binary choices but about nuanced understanding. It calls for a society that can engage in open dialogue, acknowledging the complexity of human suffering and the right to self-determination. It's about creating a framework that respects individual autonomy while ensuring that the decision to end one's life is made with the utmost care and consideration.Ultimately, the debate on euthanasia is not just about the end of life but about the values we hold as a society.It's a reflection of how we choose to navigate the delicate line between compassion and control, between the sanctity of life and the relief of suffering. It's a conversation that deserves our utmost attention, empathy, and wisdom.。
支持安乐死的英语作文
支持安乐死的英语作文英文回答:Euthanasia, commonly known as assisted suicide or mercy killing, has been a topic of heated debate worldwide. Advocates argue that it offers a dignified end to those suffering from incurable illnesses, while opponents raise concerns about ethical, legal, and moral implications. Asfor me, I firmly support the legalization of euthanasia for several reasons.Firstly, it's about autonomy and individual rights. Every person should have the right to make decisions about their own life, especially when facing unbearable suffering. Denying someone the right to end their life in a peaceful and dignified manner is a violation of their autonomy.Imagine a scenario where a terminally ill patient is in excruciating pain with no hope for recovery. Despite receiving palliative care, the suffering persists,diminishing their quality of life. In such cases, euthanasia provides a compassionate option to end their suffering on their own terms.Furthermore, legalizing euthanasia ensures proper regulation and safeguards to prevent abuse. Strict protocols can be established to ensure that the decision is made voluntarily by the patient, free from any external pressure or coercion. For instance, in countries where euthanasia is legal, there are stringent criteria and procedures that must be followed, including multiple assessments by healthcare professionals and a waiting period.Opponents often argue that legalizing euthanasia undermines the value of human life and opens the door to slippery slopes, where vulnerable individuals might be coerced into ending their lives. However, stringent regulations and oversight can mitigate these concerns. Moreover, the option of euthanasia doesn't diminish the value of life; rather, it respects the individual's autonomy and dignity.In addition, legalizing euthanasia can alleviate the burden on families and caregivers. Witnessing a loved one suffer immensely without any hope of improvement can be emotionally and psychologically taxing. Knowing that their loved one had the option of a peaceful and dignified death can bring solace and closure to families.Lastly, it's essential to acknowledge that euthanasia is not about promoting death but about providing a humane option for those facing unbearable suffering. It's a decision that should be made with careful consideration and in consultation with medical professionals and loved ones.In conclusion, I believe that legalizing euthanasia is a compassionate and humane response to alleviate the suffering of terminally ill patients. It upholds the principles of autonomy, dignity, and compassion, ensuring that individuals have the right to die with dignity and without unnecessary pain and suffering.中文回答：安乐死，通常被称为辅助自杀或仁慈杀，是一个在全球范围内引发激烈争议的话题。
英文议论文：安乐死 On euthanasia
On euthanasiaEuthanasia is a controversial issue around the world. With people increasing requirements of euthanasia , more and more countries and districts have made euthanasia legal. Different people hold different ideas about it and here the argument it is--Should euthanasia be allowed or not?Let us have a look first to the definition of euthanasia.Euthanasia refers to the practice of intentionally ending a life in order to relieve pain and suffering. From the definition we could learn that it is mainly used in people terminally ill, near death or in extreme pain.Many people suppose that those patients who are in such pain should be granted a better way to death instead of being suffered all the time without any hope. There are three points to support the argument. Firstly, as the most famous psychiatrist Norman Cousins says, ‘Death is not the greatest loss of life, but the living d eath’, people who show a little mercy on others in pain may understand the use of euthanasia. When you see those patients with incurable disease lying on the bed are inserted oxygen lines and varies machines in their bodies, will you turn your back upon the request of euthanasia? Euthanasia can help patients relieve their pains so why not be allowed? Secondly, if we insisted in cure, the result of itwould not be so satisfied to some extent. For example, children who suffered from polio~~~(各种后遗症，但这个例子仿佛不太恰当的样子orz)And also, 有些人会将其与人权划勾，但当一个人无法拥有意识，连生和死都决定不了，何来权力？（翻译无能orz）Others hold the opinion that euthanasia should be banned like the majority of countries do. It is reasonable to have such an appeal. Some people against the euthanasia because lives are so valuable that we do not have any right to end other lives at random. As an old saying goes, ‘a living dog is better than a dead lion’. Life is full of opportunities and possibilities, and all we should do is to keep it and never give it up. After all, to live is better than to die. Some people think the use of euthanasia is a kind of ‘murder’ which ends other lives in a subjective way. Although those patients who suffer from severe disease are painful, they may be still optimistic about their situation. It is one-sided and unfair to end others’lives as a bystander. What’s more, since euthanasia is not legalized that is not easy to get, which means it contains enormous business opportunities for the wrong crowd, some patients only buy it through illegal channels, resulting in a series of illegal profit chain. From my perspective, I。
对安乐死的看法英语作文
对安乐死的看法英语作文English:I believe that euthanasia, or assisted suicide, is a complex and controversial issue. On one hand, it can be seen as a compassionate choice for individuals who are suffering from terminal illness and wish to end their lives on their own terms. It can also be viewed as a way to alleviate the emotional and financial burden on their families. However, on the other hand, there are ethical and moral considerations surrounding the intentional ending of a person's life, regardless of the circumstances. There are also concerns about the potential for abuse and coercion in the practice of euthanasia. Ultimately, I believe that the focus should be on improving palliative care and providing support for individuals facing terminal illnesses, rather than legalizing euthanasia as a solution.中文翻译:我认为安乐死，或者辅助自杀，是一个复杂而有争议的问题。
安乐死的英语作文
安乐死的英语作文安乐死的英语作文一：安乐死（532字）Euthanasia is one of society's most widely and hotly debated moral issues. It has pained and exhausted the courts for entirely toolong, questioning the ethics and morality of the issue. It is a never-ending loop that by no means considers our right, or the victim's right, to freedom.I believe that euthanasia is only debated and kept on the political agenda to keep the courts busy, thereby ensuring the security of political pocket books.The vast majority of the population is in favor of euthanasia. However, their elected candidates don't represent their views. Thuseliminating their power of democracy and right to freedom.安乐死的英语作文二：安乐死（1030字）Mercy killing is one of the most controversial issues in the world of medicine. As thepicture given above depicts, a late-stage cancer patient is terminally-ill, asking the doctors for mercy killing. But the doctors look deeply embarrassed, feeling helpless because they are at a loss what to do about it.The picture really sets me thinking. It implies that people differ in their attitudes towards the mercy killing. Some people think thatphysician-assisted suicide can relieve dying patients of unbearable pain and suffering. They maintain that as long as a doctor prescribes a drug for a legitimate medical purpose, he has done nothing illegal even if the patient uses the drug to hasten death. Others are strongly opposed tophysician-assisted suicide. They contend that a doctor has no right to give a patient sufficient medication to control his pain if that may hasten death. They conclude that it is illegal for doctors to help the dying end their lives.As far as I’mconcerned, doctors have a duty to help dying patients to alleviate their pain and suffering. I also agree that doctors deserve to be punished if they prolong the needless suffering of their terminally-ill patients. In short, I am in favor of mercy killing.安乐死的英语作文三：安乐死（815字）The fast advance of medicine and life–extending technologies enable life to be prolonged 。
安乐死英语辩论
安乐死英语辩论第一篇：安乐死英语辩论(!)Euthanasia is to kill people.Life is so important for every one.People don’t only live for themselves, but they also live for their families and the society.If they choose to leave the world, they are not responsible for themselves, their families and the society.Euthanasia is disparagement of life.Life is so precious.Patients should cherish their life.They should try their best to prevail incurable disease.Everyone should show basic respect for life.No matter what happens, we should face up to the facts, we should live on with great courage, we should believe in wonder.Nothing is impossible.so we view that Euthanasia should not be legeled(!)Euthanasia stops the medicine developing.If the patients require using euthanasia, doctors won’t try their best to save patients.The medicine will stop progress.If making euthanasia is made legal, patients who use euthanasia will be protected by law.The doctors’ right will be obvious.Doctors are given too much power, and can be wrong or unethical.Patients put their faith and trust in the opinions of their doctor.people abuse euthanasia when it is legalized, it can harm people lives.In the name of euthanasia, carry out committing suicide.Miracle cures or recoveries can occur.You can never underestimate the power of the human spirit.It demeans the value of human life.In this country, human life means something.It could open the floodgates to non-critical patient suicides and other abuses.Any loosening of the assisted-suicide laws could eventually lead to abuses of the privilege.Many religions prohibit suicide and the intentional killing of others.The most basic commandment is “You shall not kill”.Insurancecompanies may put undue pressure on doctors to avoid heroic measures or recommend the assisted-suicide procedure.Health insurance providers are under tremendous pressure to keep premiums down.Euthanasia can become a means of health care cost containment..Physicians and other medical care people should not be involved in directly causing death.Mercy killing is morally incorrect and should be forbidden by law.It's a homicide and murdering another human cannot be rationalized under any circumstances.Human life deserves exceptional security and protection.Advanced medical technology has made it possible to enhance human life span and quality of life.Palliative care and rehabilitation centers are better alternatives to help disabled or patients approaching death live a pain-free and better life.Family members influencing the patient's decision into euthanasia for personal gains like wealth inheritance is another issue.There is no way you can be really sure if the decision towards assisted suicide is voluntary or forced by others.Mercy killing would cause decline in medical care and cause victimization of the most vulnerable society.Would mercy killing transform itself from the “right to die” to “right to kill”? How would one assess whether a disorder of mental nature qualifies mercy killing? What if the pain threshold is below optimum and the patient perceives the circumstances to be not worthy of living? How would one know whether the wish to die is the result of unbalanced thought process or a logical decision in mentally ill patients? What if the individual chooses assisted suicide as an option and the family wouldn't agree? As to face the parting, helplessness, loss of self-control, fear of death and sorrow and so the majority of patients will experience mental suffering.In this psychological requirement under the “Euthanasia”, we can say that he isreasonable? “According to the study of suicide, suicide and treatable mental illness is intrinsically related, but not the fatal disease, a study found that in 44 patients with advanced cancer, only three thought about suicide, but are there is a serious depression.Another study shows that 85 suicides, only one person suffering from terminal illness, and 90-100% of the suicides were suffering from obvious mental illness.Undeniably, the modern medical practice slow death process, often cited the loss of personal characteristics of patients Mei, dignity, independence and autonomy.However, the expression of active euthanasia as acts of personal autonomy, it is wrong.Reasons:(a)Since active euthanasia need help, then it is not an individual matter, but the open or in the public thing.(B)under the public recognition to self-defense, capital punishment and justice in the form of war, murder, only to defend the life for everyone, not to the benefit of those killed.So, even if death is painful relief, can not be lightly taken away the right to life committed to personal.(C)even if the person's self-determination recognized the right to choose to die, that does not mean the right to ask others to kill themselves, does not include the right to authorize self to kill others.(D)autonomy, including the right of slavery has never been their own, in other words, the right to freedom does not mean the right not to freedom.So to maintain the autonomy, the need to protect life, to give others their right to life is not trampling the principle of maintaining independence.Therefore, individual autonomy and social need and public objectives and values to be consistent.结尾active euthanasia may gradually lose its spontaneity, and thus out of(i)”secret euthanasia“, meaning that without their own consent, to be a doctor euthanized.(Ii)”forced euthanasia“,meaning patients suffering from terminal illness would be coercion to lure choose euthanasia to relieve their families in the economic and psychological pressures, and save limited resources of society, the patients chose to die, do not feel life is a burden or tired of life, but he felt the burden of someone else, and that others dislike.(Iii)”Deputy euthanasia“ means to allo w patients who lack capacity to self-determination by the people ”proxy decision“ to euthanasia.(Iv)”Discrimination against euthanasia,“ the crisis is the number of types of patients such as the poverty stricken or belonging to ethnic minorities, may be ”clever“ to force that ”euthanasia“ requirement, the mercy of others.Made ill patients caught in the dilemma of both the opposition between the yield, resulting in additional unnecessary fear and anxiety.The information may be heard: ”Death is terrible!Your best choice of euthanasia.“ of the slip waves, is once the ”euthanasia“ is legalized, its use will inevitably extend to other types of patients but not the dying, if not cure patients, but not incurable disease, then the risk of Alzheimer's disease or brain degradation, even those born with severe disabilities Down syndrome baby..And so on.So, if this argument, once established, will only create panic and fear that they will be forcibly sent to ”euthanasia“ in the ranks.Therefore, I agree Frasen say, ”human life, merely the possibility of error, is enough to completely reject the“ euthanasia.” "第二篇：安乐死_英语辩论(!)Euthanasia is to kill people.Life is so important for every one.People don’t only live for themselves, but they also live for their families and the society.If they choose to leave the world, they are not responsible for themselves, their families and the society.Euthanasia is disparagement of life.Life is soprecious.Patients should cherish their life.They should try their best to prevail incurable disease.Everyone should show basic respect for life.No matter what happens, we should face up to the facts, we should live on with great courage, we should believe in wonder.Nothing is impossible.so we view that Euthanasia should not be legeled(!)Euthanasia stops the medicine developing.If the patients require using euthanasia, doctors won’t try their best to save patients.The medicine will stop progress.If making euthanasia is made legal, patients who use euthanasia will be protected by law.The doctors’ righ t will be obvious.Doctors are given too much power, and can be wrong or unethical.Patients put their faith and trust in the opinions of their doctor.people abuse euthanasia when it is legalized, it can harm people lives.In the name of euthanasia, carry out committing suicide.Miracle cures or recoveries can occur.You can never underestimate the power of the human spirit.It demeans the value of human life.In this country, human life means something.It could open the floodgates to non-critical patient suicides and other abuses.Any loosening of the assisted-suicide laws could eventually lead to abuses of the privilege.Many religions prohibit suicide and the intentional killing of others.The most basic commandment is “You shall not kill”.Insurance companies may put undue pressure on doctors to avoid heroic measures or recommend the assisted-suicide procedure.Health insurance providers are under tremendous pressure to keep premiums down.Euthanasia can become a means of health care cost containment..Physicians and other medical care people should not be involved in directly causing death.Mercy killing is morally incorrect and should be forbidden by law.It's a homicide and murdering another human cannot be rationalized under anycircumstances.Human life deserves exceptional security and protection.Advanced medical technology has made it possible to enhance human life span and quality of life.Palliative care and rehabilitation centers are better alternatives to help disabled or patients approaching death live a pain-free and better life.Family members influencing the patient's decision into euthanasia for personal gains like wealth inheritance is another issue.There is no way you can be really sure if the decision towards assisted suicide is voluntary or forced by others.Mercy killing would cause decline in medical care and cause victimization of the most vulnerable society.Would mercy killing transform itself from the “right to die” to “right to kill”? How would one assess whether a disorder of mental nature qualifies mercy killing? What if the pain threshold is below optimum and the patient perceives the circumstances to be not worthy of living? How would one know whether the wish to die is the result of unbalanced thought process or a logical decision in mentally ill patients? What if the individual chooses assisted suicide as an option and the family wouldn't agree? As to face the parting, helplessness, loss of self-control, fear of death and sorrow and so the majority of patients will experience mental suffering.In this psychological requirement under the “Euthanasia”, we can say that he is reasonable? “According to the study of suicide, suicide and treatable mental illness is intrinsically related, but not the fatal disease, a study found that in 44 patients with advanced cancer, only three thought about suicide, but are there is a serious depression.Another study shows that 85 suicides, only one person suffering from terminal illness, and 90-100% of the suicides were suffering from obvious mental illness.Undeniably, the modern medical practice slow death process, often cited theloss of personal characteristics of patients Mei, dignity, independence and autonomy.However, the expression of active euthanasia as acts of personal autonomy, it is wrong.Reasons:(a)Since active euthanasia need help, then it is not an individual matter, but the open or in the public thing.(B)under the public recognition to self-defense, capital punishment and justice in the form of war, murder, only to defend the life for everyone, not to the benefit of those killed.So, even if death is painful relief, can not be lightly taken away the right to life committed to personal.(C)even if the person's self-determination recognized the right to choose to die, that does not mean the right to ask others to kill themselves, does not include the right to authorize self to kill others.(D)autonomy, including the right of slavery has never been their own, in other words, the right to freedom does not mean the right not to freedom.So to maintain the autonomy, the need to protect life, to give others their right to life is not trampling the principle of maintaining independence.Therefore, individual autonomy and social need and public objectives and values to be consistent.结尾active euthanasia may gradually lose its spontaneity, and thus out of(i)”secret euthanasia“, meaning that without their own consent, to be a doctor euthanized.(Ii)”forced euthanasia“, meaning patients suffering from terminal illness would be coercion to lure choose euthanasia to relieve their families in the economic and psychological pressures, and save limited resources of society, the patients chose to die, do not feel life is a burden or tired of life, but he felt the burden of someone else, and that others dislike.(Iii)”Deputy euthanasia“ me ans to allow patients who lack capacity to self-determination by the people ”proxy decision“ to euthanasia.(Iv)”Discriminationagainst euthanasia,“ the crisis is the number of types of patients such as the poverty stricken or belonging to ethnic minorities, may be ”clever“ to force that ”euthanasia“ requirement, the mercy of others.Made ill patients caught in the dilemma of both the opposition between the yield, resulting in additional unnecessary fear and anxiety.The information may be heard: ”Death is terrible!Your best choice of euthanasia.“ of the slip waves, is once the ”euthanasia“ is legalized, its use will inevitably extend to other types of patients but not the dying, if not cure patients, but not incurable disease, then the risk of Alzheimer's disease or brain degradation, even those born with severe disabilities Down syndrome baby..And so on.So, if this argument, once established, will only create panic and fear that they will be forcibly sent to ”euthanasia“ in the ranks.Therefore, I agree Frasen say, ”human life, merely the possibility of error, is enough to completely reject the“ euthanasia.” “ Euthanasia is humane because it helps to hasten the death of terminally ill patient.Death, as natural as birth, is sometimes a hard process that requires assistance, and euthanasia is part of such assistance.People have the right to die.It is unnecessary to maintain life artificially beyond the point when people will never regain consciousness.Extending an incurably ill patient’s life means the same as aggravating his pain.Efforts should not be made to perpetuate what has become a meaningless existence.Euthanasia can bring mental and physical release to the patient and his family when he is terminally ill and has no prospect of recovering.Mercy killing is motivated by nothing but love and sympathy for the dying patient.Most of the terminally ill patients themselves want to die with dignity and peace instead of agony and degradation.Medical treatment for a comatosepatient cause great burden economically for the hospital and the patient’s family.It is inhumane to perform euthanasia no matter how painless the process is.Anyone who voluntarily, knowingly or premeditatedly takes the life of another, even one minute prior to death, is a killer.Euthanasia is a criminal offense because it involves the killing of a person.Legalized euthanasia will invite abuse of human life because any form of murder many be conveniently dubbed “mercy killing ”by unscrupulous people.Euthanasia raises many moral issues since it implies that active measures are taken to terminate human life.Doctors and nurses should do everything they can to save dying patients instead of hastening their death by active measures.The instinct for self-preservation is the strongest instinct that human beings possess.It is untrue that any patient himself should want to die.Doctors and nurses involved in euthanasia have discredited their profession, for euthanasia is a violation of the fundamental medical principle to save human life.Mercy killing is one of the most controversial issues in the world of medicine.As the picture given above depicts, A late sick mother desperately ill son request for euthanasia.But the son was cut for this。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
安乐死的英语作文安乐死的英语作文一：安乐死（532字）Euthanasia is one of society's most widely and hotly debated moral issues. It has pained and exhausted the courts for entirely toolong, questioning the ethics and morality of the issue. It is a never-ending loop that by no means considers our right, or the victim's right, to freedom.I believe that euthanasia is only debated and kept on the political agenda to keep the courts busy, thereby ensuring the security of political pocket books.The vast majority of the population is in favor of euthanasia. However, their elected candidates don't represent their views. Thuseliminating their power of democracy and right to freedom.安乐死的英语作文二：安乐死（1030字）Mercy killing is one of the most controversial issues in the world of medicine. As the picture given above depicts, a late-stage cancer patient is terminally-ill, asking the doctors for mercy killing. But the doctors look deeply embarrassed, feeling helpless because they are at a loss what to do about it.The picture really sets me thinking. It implies that people differ in their attitudes towards the mercy killing. Some people think thatphysician-assisted suicide can relieve dying patients ofunbearable pain and suffering. They maintain that as long as a doctor prescribes a drug for a legitimate medical purpose, he has done nothing illegal even if the patient uses the drug to hasten death. Others are strongly opposed tophysician-assisted suicide. They contend that a doctor has no right to give a patient sufficient medication to control his pain if that may hasten death. They conclude that it is illegal for doctors to help the dying end their lives.As far as I’m concerned, doctors have a duty to help dying patients to alleviate their pain and suffering. I also agree that doctors deserve to be punished if they prolong the needless suffering of their terminally-ill patients. In short, I am in favor of mercy killing.安乐死的英语作文三：安乐死（815字）The fast advance of medicine and life–extending technologies enable life to be prolonged 。
But it’s this leap of technologies to prolong life and control dying that raises the controversial topic—euthanasia or mercy killing.People supporting mercy killing argue that euthanasia is humane because it helps to hasten the death of hopelessly ill patients，relieving them from the agonizing pain , which is good for both the doomed people and their families. For these people，staving off death is to compromise a fundamental value—the quality of human life.However，those who object to euthanasia think it is immoral to give up treatment or commit suicide with doctors’ assistance。
In their opinions, that is nothing less than murdering.IN fact, to continue or terminate life is a moral choice because it involves a decision about a fundamental human good , the preservation of life . After all, life is the mast precious asset that we have for creativity and productivity.安乐死的英语作文四： The Debate of Euthanasia（972字）As the development of human society, people emphasis much on their rights, they believe that everyone has the right to choose what they want if it is not against the law. The issue of euthanasia has been a hot topic these years, some agree it in that people have the right to end their suffering, others disagree because they think life is precious, no one can take away one’s life. Now the debate is still going on.On the one hand, euthanasia is admitted by some people, they think the patients have the right to end their agony. The patients who are diagnosed with cancer and there is no way for them to cure, they can choose to end their life peacefully.On the other hand, euthanasia is believed to kill someone legally, such behavior should be stopped. What’s more, patients should not be hopeless, they should struggle for the last minute, there is always miracle, if they choosemercy killing, the only chance is deprived.On my opinion, euthanasia is brutal, people should fight for the hope, never give up life. The patients struggle with agony, they have family, their support makes one stronger, what’s more, even the animal fight for life, not to say our human being.安乐死的英语作文五：安乐死（749字）Basically, i support the act of euthanasia.Everyone was born equally, and everyone was born with human rights. what's human rights stand for? it simply means the rights about life and living, that is to say, people should have the rights to decide for themselves whether to live or to die. they are masters of theirselves. for those who execute the act of euthanasia, if they operate it under the party's own willings, and through a legal and openly process, they should not be to blame.And what's more, the act of euthanasia is sort of humanitarian, especially when the party are tortured by his health condition, and it's completely hopeless at all for them to recover.of course, from optimistic and positive point of view, nobody should give up himself and end his life. but sometimes, and many times, it's just a torture for him to prolong his life, not only for himself, but also his families.。