电影紫色影评

合集下载

从《紫色》看黑人女性摆脱双重压迫走向新生

从《紫色》看黑人女性摆脱双重压迫走向新生看完电影《紫色》，最直观的感觉就是做黑人难，做黑人女性更是难上加难。

会让人产生‘你将会不幸，因为你是女人’的认知。

《紫色》以黑人女性的独特视角向我们讲述了黑人女性喜丽在家庭和社会中所受到的双重压迫下的悲惨生活。

在其他黑人女性的帮助下，喜丽从麻木到觉醒，发现自我，从而从压迫走向新生，成长为一个具有独立人格的女性的故事。

在影片大部分的篇幅里，喜丽都是懦弱卑怯的。

14岁就被继父强奸，还经常遭到毒打，先后生下的两个小孩下落不明，身心备受折磨却不懂得反抗，仍旧逆来顺受。

婚后，喜丽的生活没有丝毫的改善，做牛做马，任人摆布，长期遭受丈夫的毒打，沦为了一个家庭奴隶。

喜丽不懂得如何去斗争，只懂得要活下去。

在男权至上的黑人社会里，喜丽这种做法是极为普遍的。

更可悲的是，深受男性迫害的喜丽却怂恿丈夫的儿子哈泼打他的妻子索菲亚。

由此可见，喜丽从忍气吞声到麻木不仁到安于现状，内心的奴性已经根深蒂固。

哈泼希望能向父亲那样通过暴力教训自己的老婆，使她像喜丽一样听话。

索菲亚跟喜丽不同，她强壮并具有反抗精神，常常和哈泼对打，哈泼非但没有驯服她，还经常被打得鼻青脸肿。

索菲亚一生都在打架，跟父亲打，跟兄长打，跟叔伯们打，在自己家里也打，不愿意成为黑人家庭里男权的牺牲品。

在《紫色》中，黑人女性不仅受到黑人男性的压迫，还受到白人的种族歧视。

索菲亚因为和市长太太顶嘴动手打了市长而被判入狱，在监狱里，索菲亚受到了非人的待遇，毫无生气，变得跟喜丽一样的麻木不仁；即使出狱后，还是当了市长家里的佣人。

可见，黑人女性不仅受到肉体上的折磨，在精神上也饱受摧残。

女权的觉醒与反抗是影片最明确的主题。

莎葛唱歌动听、光彩照人；也是一个有着坏名声的女人，连亲生父亲都不愿意承认她。

莎葛的出现，使得喜丽与丈夫之间的关系相对缓和了，而喜丽的善良和好心也使莎葛开始关心她，帮助她，这正是喜丽树立自信，自我觉醒，争取独立人格的开始。

在莎葛的帮助下，喜丽第一次认识到自己的女性特征，她的女性意识开始觉醒，开始认清自己的女性地位和价值。

紫色影评

《紫色》这部电影讲了四个女人的故事。

第一个女人----西莉西莉是影片的主角，长的丑，家境贫寒，继父曾强奸过她并生有两个孩子，这样的遭遇令西莉非常自卑，自卑导致西莉对生活逆来顺受。

西莉十六岁就在继父的命令下成亲，婚后的生活实际上使西莉成为了一大群孩子的辛勤抚养者，一个家庭的佣人，和一个男人发泄的工具，这是西莉的命运，如果不是后来桑的出现西莉的一生无疑将会是黑暗的一生、受压迫的一生、失去自由的一生、丢失自我的一生。

第二个女人----索菲亚索菲亚的悲惨结局与西莉的结局形成鲜明的对比，我们在同情索菲亚的同时看到了西莉找回自我的难得可贵。

索菲亚本是一个与桑有类似性格的人，但她最终没有能够战胜命运。

这个曾经挺着大肚子与男朋友的父亲争吵的女人、这个曾经面对贫穷的生活从容面对的女人、这个在大街上勇敢拒绝市长夫人对她的“怜悯”、进而对市长大大出手的女人在经历了8年的监狱生活后，最初的那个她已经荡然无存，残缺的外表下我们看到的是索菲亚已经麻木的精神，她已经被种族歧视所摧毁。

但这里我更愿意把这段情节理解为种族歧视和8年的监狱生活仅仅是一个象征，它象征着一个不彻底的坚强最后得到的悲惨结局。

第三个女人----桑桑是本片中自强、自尊、自由的理想主义化身，是西莉心中的偶像。

为了使她不至于过分理想化，桑被赋予了人性化的情节，她与她父亲之间的矛盾多年以后成为桑内心的伤，影片的最后桑用她真诚的歌声打动了做为神父的父亲，歌声中“上帝启示你什么，罪人也有灵魂。

”回荡在神圣的教堂。

第四个女人----娜蒂娜蒂是西莉的妹妹，在影片中只有开头和结尾时才出场，但娜蒂与西莉的姐妹情贯穿着影片的始终，正象两人在童年时玩拍手游戏中唱到的那样：“你我永不分离，你我永远一条心，没有洋，没有海，不要让她离开我。

”正是这种姐妹情使得西莉这个人物充满魅力，前半生她是那么的懦弱，那么的愚昧，那么的麻木不仁，但同时她又是那么的坚忍无视生活的苦难，那么的深情厚谊。

简介：》。

电影《紫色》影评

电影《紫色》——盛开在烟囱里的紫罗兰一、她的一生都在打架索菲娅和哈泼婚后的第一次家庭战争就搞得鸡飞狗跳，盘子和镜子都被打破了，窗帘扯碎了，一切的起因都是因为哈泼想让索菲娅变得服服帖帖，不要总是自作主张。

索菲娅•巴特勒漂亮、聪明、强壮，最重要的是她有不肯低头的精神，从来都像一列勇往直前的军队那样充满霸气。

但是，当自己深爱的丈夫第一次打了她，她的忧愁多过愤怒：她的一生都在打架，跟父亲打，跟兄弟打，跟堂兄弟和叔叔伯伯打。

一个女孩在一个男人统治的家里是不安全的。

让她难过的是，没想到在自己家里也得打一架。

在人类文明发展的很长一段时间里，男人占领了社会中权势与地位，他们制定法律、维持秩序、统治国家，甚至发动战争。

女人在历史舞台上只是优雅的点缀或者惊鸿一瞥、灵光一现。

众多文学著作中，男人们利用金钱、权力和地位上演着一次次明争暗斗，女人则更多地挥霍着青春与美貌，而这些不过是为了盼望男人们的回顾。

长久以来的无形枷锁，把她们置于社会舞台的橱窗内“展示拍卖”，幸福或是忧愁全都不由自己。

1847年10月，《简•爱》出版发行，夏洛蒂•勃朗特笔下的女主角不再娇艳柔弱，她贫穷、矮小、黝黑，性格执拗，不同于其他地位悬殊的爱情故事，她没有盲目沉醉于爱情的旋涡，而是昂首挺胸地追求着平等，不论是生活中的还是感情上的。

舅母的无情让她懂得反抗，孤儿院的艰苦让她懂得忍耐，贵族小姐们的嘲讽轻视让她懂得维持尊严，罗切斯特先生的隐瞒与强势让她抛弃唾手可得的幸福，踏上荆棘去追求爱情中的平等。

虽然早在1789年，法国女剧作家已经开始了为女性争取权力的序幕，但是《简•爱》却是让很多女性独立意识觉醒的启蒙小说。

美国黑人女作家艾丽丝•沃克就对此书爱不释手。

她于1982年写出了轰动一时的《紫色》，跳脱了以往黑人小说中揭露种族歧视带来的痛苦与仇恨，把视点放在了黑人男女间的家庭关系和男权的压迫。

这部小说在很多地方都受到了十八世纪末出生的女作家佐拉•尼尔•郝斯顿的影响。

《紫色》读后感

《紫色》读后感《紫色》观后感我本是一朵高贵的紫色鲜花“我穷，是黑人，我也许很丑，但是亲爱的神，我解脱了！我解脱了...”当西利第一次从丈夫身旁解脱时，她的灵魂之花也终究绽放出来鲜艳的颜色。

这部电影是著名导演斯皮尔伯格指导的同名小说传记电影，和他以前的作品比起来，这部作品显得更加压抑，同时也充分地展现了当时黑人女性的卑微地位。

电影开篇，先是用旁人的视角，给我们展现了两个黑人小女孩在一片紫色的草丛中无忧无虑地玩耍，一切都看起来很美好的样子，直到两个小女孩冲出草丛一个阳光可爱，一个丑陋腼腆而且还顶着个大肚子，强大的反差也隐约暗示着她们接下来截然不同的人生。

这部影片采用了仰拍和俯拍的镜头，给我们充分展现了当时女人地位的卑微。

当西莉第一次见到自己的丈夫亚伯特时，镜头采用了俯拍西莉而仰拍亚伯特，当西莉决定追寻自由离开亚伯特的欺压时，这个气候镜头采用了仰拍西莉而俯拍亚伯特。

前后的镜头反差，也很明显地刻画了西莉的心理变化，她从一个又丑又穷的卑微黑人女性，变成一个可以勇敢追求自由的独立女性，也时刻警醒着我们，作为一个女人，你可以丑，你可以穷，但是永远不要去试着习惯男人的欺压，你也可以像翩翩起舞的蝴蝶一样，去飞往那自由的天空。

这也不是我们生活的真谛吗？习惯难道就真的意味着你就是这样的人吗，有一句话叫做，你种下了什么样的种子就会结出什么样的花果。

我想影中西莉的姐妹南蒂正是西莉希望的样子，亚伯特一直隐藏南蒂给西莉写的信不正是抑制了她心中这朵独立自主的花成长吗？如果说哈伯特是一座牢笼，西莉是一朵被囚禁的花朵，那么影片中另外两个独立的女性，索菲亚和秀格就是给予这朵花的养料，让西莉成长为一朵突破“习惯”，战胜“男人”，向往“南蒂”的美丽花朵。

其中索菲亚的那句“我的一生都在和男人抗争”，给我的震撼很大，究竟是什么样的社会让这样一个强壮独立自强的女人变成一个长满尖刺的斗士，可叹的是这样一位斗士居然为了一句不愿为奴而遭受多年的监狱之苦。

《紫色》分析

--《紫色》的分析《紫色》是美国当代著名黑人女作家艾里斯·沃克的代表作，以美国南方佐治亚乡为背景，讲述了喜丽几十年的家庭生活，反映了黑人女性受到种族主义和性别歧视的双重压迫，批判了两性关系中的不合理内容, 张扬了平等独立、自尊自强的女性意识。

喜丽的成长轨迹可分为：迷茫遭受奴役的初期阶段；自我意识逐渐觉醒而奋起抗争的过渡阶段；独立自主而赢得自由和平等的末期阶段。

《紫色》通过对喜丽与她周围几位不同黑人女性的描写，说明了黑人女性只有相互支持和热爱，才能真正摆脱男性的桎梏，重新建立自我。

夏葛虽然是喜丽丈夫的情人，但在喜丽的成长过程中扮演了各种角色。

夏葛对喜丽的帮助首先表现在唤醒喜丽对自己女性身体的热爱和信心。

在夏葛的启发和支持下，喜丽做起了裤子生意，体会到自己的社会价值。

喜丽的解放不仅是精神解脱，还实现与男人在物质和精神上的平等。

正是通过这样的自我确立，沃克将一个支离破碎的喜丽整合成了一个完整的充满自我和自主意识的女性。

对喜丽的人生转变起到重要作用的还有另外两个女性。

索菲亚从一出现就表现了强烈的反抗精神和独立意识，她认为“女人在有男人的家庭里，就是不安全”。

虽然她战胜了家庭暴力，但在掌握着政权的白人阶级面前，她的反抗犹如以卵击石。

被索菲亚的斗争精神所感染，喜丽终于从沉睡中惊醒，不再忍受艾伯特的欺凌与折磨，为寻找自己的人生目标而奋起反抗。

妹妹耐蒂是喜丽精神上的支柱。

这位个性独立的女性一直对生活充满信心，认识到教育的重要性，并坚持不懈地给喜丽写信。

当喜丽在夏葛的帮助下找到被艾伯特藏匿的所有信件时，喜丽顿时感觉到了生活的希望，坚定了跟艾伯特作斗争的勇气。

小说的结局是耐蒂从非洲回来，并带回了喜丽的孩子，让喜丽获得了真正意义上的家。

大团圆的结局表达了作者的期望，它不仅歌颂了妇女间的姐妹情，并且强调了黑人妇女要摆脱旧思想的束缚，充分认识到自身的价值和尊严。

多次出现的“sky”暗示了喜丽对自由和夫妻平等关系的渴望，电影尾声中哈波对索非亚穿裤子的认同也呈现了作者美好的愿望，暗示一种平等和谐的夫妻关系的建立。

紫色Purple影评2000词英文

徐奕颖Class A 2021105030The blooming violets—— the film review of Purple Here is some reflection on this film from three respects: the theme, the symbols, and the character analysis.Ⅰ.ThemeThe main theme of this film is the awaking and resistance of feminism. Looking back at the movie，we can see this more clearly.At the beginning of the movie, two girls were playing games in the purple flower field with laughter. But when their father came, they were all in silence. Men educated by the concept of female inferiority didn’t know what respect，kindness and equality were. They generally felt superior for being male and regarded women as slaves. The heroine Celie was pregnant with her father’s child at that time. Albert, who lived on the other side of the farm, had a fancy for her sister Nettie and wanted to marry her. However, Nettie was also coveted by their father. So the ugly and stupid Celie became Albert’s wife. Albert is a man who was bad and selfish. He often beat and cursed Celie. Each of his children didn’t respect the stepmother and bullied her as a matter of routine.Celie’s growth reflects the awakening of female consciousness. The three women made a big difference in Celie’s life.Her sister Nettie taught her knowledge. She said to her sister, “You got to fight, Celie. You got to.”She also taughther to read, planting the seeds of resistance in Celie.After her sister Nettie left home, the singer Shug Avery turned up in her life. She is free and outgoing, as well as beautiful. Her husband Albert had been infatuated with the woman for a long period. It was the woman who’s hot and wild in the tavern that kindled Celie’s passion. She freed Celie’s nature, showing respect and recognition to Celie at the same time. She kissed Celie and wrote for Celie. She sparked Celie’s desire for beauty.The third woman Sophia was an example of defiance against patriarchy. She would raise her fist when her husband beat her. She would say “no” to the unreasonable invitation from mayoress. In the film, her words“All my life I had to fight .” really made a great impression on me. Sophia gave Celie the courage to fight.At the end of the film, Celie said what she thought, did what she wanted, and then had the life she was eager for. Celie’s growth showed the main theme——the awaking and resistance of woman’s rights.Ⅰ.Symbols1. The color purplePurple is more melancholy than red, less weak than blue, flowing like lavender in the wind, which displayed a kind of deep love as well as deep pain.The title of the film is a very important symbol. Celie went through a hard time while noticing the beautiful things and appreciating them. When she had a difficult life, the color purple was continually equated with suffering and pain. However, later Shug pointed out to her that life must be enjoyed when they were in a field of purple flowers. Thecolor purple symbolized the beauty of life.2. GodAt the start of the film, Celie viewed God as completely separate from her world. Her faith was strong, but it was dependent on only what other people have revealed to her about God. Later, Shug told her God had no race or gender. She realized that humans cannot place qualities on God because God is a part of the unknown. Her faith was then based on her interpretation of God, not one she learned from someone else.3. LettersThe letters that Celie wrote to God, and later to her sister Nettie, symbolize a certain voice that only Celie has. Celie wrote to God for a lack of someone else to write to. She wrote to her sister, saying that she got mad at God because of her past and the people hurt by it. She asked God “Why?”, which means the start of the fight.4.PantsCelie began to make pants after she gained her freedom from Albert. Celie was able to have a job and live the life many women longed for in that period. The pants represent liberation from the common view of women as just homemakers.Ⅰ.Character Analysis1.CelieCelie is the main character, who has been oppressed by men her whole life. Celie learned from three other women and then successfully fought for her happy life.tieNettie is Celie’s younger sister, whom Celie saved fromliving the tragic life that she had to endure. She helped Celie become more enthusiastic about how the world could be.3. Shug AveryShug is a very extroverted and transcendental character. She is Albert’s mistress, the one who always got away. Shug entered and exited Celie’s life, normally making it for the better. She helped Celie devolop herself emotionally and spiritually, supplying her with even more hope and inspiration.4.AlbertAlbert is the man to whom Celie is married. Albert mistreated Celie just as her father had, and she allows it, not understanding that she doesn’t have to. Shug began to take an interest in Celie, and led Albert to start treating her better. In the end, Albert realized that he had mistreated Celie and sought a friendship with her.In a nutshell, Purple is an excellent movie so it is worthwhile to have a look. Hope we all live a happy life like Celie.。

The Color Purple《紫色》—影片视听语言浅析

《The Color Purple》绽放的紫色女性主义首先，这是一部讲述黑人的电影，一部讲述黑人女性在美国种族主义昌盛，民族矛盾深化的年代，一个普通的；或说丑陋的，被继父玷污强迫生下一男一女的；嫁了一个粗暴、不忠的丈夫的；被迫与至亲至爱的妹妹分离的；这么一个黑人女性，追求自我价值，实现人生理念，打破常规束缚的这么一个“感人”的故事；为什么说它感人呢？照理说这是一个悲伤的或沉重的故事，但就在我观看的第一次，就被它深深感动，那种眼泪是动容的，是被人物内心所牵动的；而这部影片是如何做到这点，除了基本的剧情，我想还和整部影片的镜头的运用、色彩、构图和剪辑有着很大的关系。

其次，导演Steven Spielberg，作为一名白人男性，如何去表现黑人社会，乃至黑人女性的心理历程，我想是很值得揣摩的，在这边多余的提一下，《种族、性别与身份认同》一书中，有谈到关于《The Color Purple》这部影片的评价，本片根据美国黑人女作家Alice Walker小说改编，其实开始作为一个文学作品，是没有受到如此大的关注的，但在1985年电影上映之后，却引起了来自黑人社会的内部批评，更多的是对Alice Walker这位女性主义者的讨伐，他们认为影片过度丑化黑人男性，扭曲黑人社会，认为这是在投好西方世界的所谓白人对黑人社会的猎奇心态，有些黑人组织甚至聚集在影院外，阻挡前来观看的人们；也就是说，在某种意义上，这是一部遭到争议的影片，但身为一名亚洲人，为什么我能被其影片内容以及其画面所表达的深刻意义所感动，尤其是后者，是我所要探讨的。

有意味的美感---紫色花丛影片一共出现三次人物在紫色花丛中的画面，分别是开始、中后和结尾。

紫色，一般来讲是象征着魔力，是蓝色和红色的结合体，给人相对情感交织、无法掌握的感觉，在色彩情绪性上属于冷色系，代表着不稳定、难以捉摸的；忧郁、压抑却又高贵的感觉。

影片的一开始，就带给了观众色彩上的冲击，隐隐约约的少女嬉笑声，在紫色花丛中喧闹，画面感是朦胧的(图1)；导演运用流畅的摇镜和剪辑，以及视觉元素本身的堆积制造出的一种意境，给人唯美的视觉感受。

紫色

紫色---- 一个女性走向觉醒的故事《紫色》应该是一部典型的女性主义影片，不仅是因为它细腻真实地讲述了一个黑人女性如何在延续几千年的男权社会压迫下逐渐觉醒过来的故事，也因为它将种族歧视这一现今仍然困扰世界和平与安定的问题毫不唐突地与主情节水乳交融。

或者可以说，影片中想要表现的女性主义正是在种族问题的覆盖下艰难前行的。

在整个故事之中添加宏大的历史背景，是影片本身对女性主义所作出的的第一步阐释。

事实上，在父权社会中，所有相对弱势的群体都会被赋予女性的特征或代名词,比如在该影片中，黑人相对于白人就是相对弱势的群体，就相当于影片中黑人女性所处的地位。

我觉得整部影片就是在给我们讲诉，在当时那个充满了种族歧视的父权社会中，被压迫的群体走向觉醒与反抗的过程，而最终女性得到了觉醒，并且反抗也有了结果，但被赋予了政治色彩的种族的反抗到最后似乎仍没有什么结果。

影片的一开始，用唯美一词来形容都觉得太浅薄了。

一片紫色的花海充满画面，与此同时，两个小女孩的朗朗笑声和击掌声把我们带入了遥远而美好的童年。

然而这时一个高大男人的到来打破了这片安宁，一个大仰角告诉我们，他就是一种压迫与权力的象征，他所呈现的就是父权社会对女性的压迫。

紧接着是歇斯底里的喊叫，无情的暴风雨似乎预示了接下来要发生的将是让主人公痛其一生的事情。

事实上，在影片大部分的篇幅里，主人公喜丽都是懦弱卑怯的，特别是积年累月被丈夫奴役之后，从忍气吞声到麻木不仁再到安之若素，内心早已奴性深种，甚至后来还建议儿子也以父亲为榜样对待妻子。

但是，后来在另外几个女人的影响下，她重新认识了自己的价值，走向了觉醒。

首先对喜丽产生影响的就是苏菲亚，苏菲亚敢于反抗的性格是影片对于女性主义的开端，是震慑动摇喜丽内心觉醒的先行者，是黑人女性反体制、对抗精神的载体。

苏菲亚第一次出场，是随哈波去见亚伯特，面对亚伯特的男权主义的压制，她却一点也不害怕。

这与喜丽的怯懦形成了鲜明的对比。

正如她自己所说，苏菲亚一生都在斗争，与自己的父亲，舅舅和丈夫。

电影紫色观后感范文

电影紫色观后感范文紫色观后感在人类文明发展的很长一段时间里，男人占领了社会中权势与地位，他们制定法律、维持秩序、统治国家，甚至发动战争。

女人在历史舞台上只是优雅的点缀或者惊鸿一瞥、灵光一现。

众多文学著作中，男人们利用金钱、权力和地位上演着一次次明争暗斗，女人则更多地挥霍着青春与美貌，而这些不过是为了盼望男人们的回顾。

长久以来的无形枷锁，把她们置于社会舞台的橱窗内“展示拍卖”，幸福或是忧愁全都不由自己。

1847年10月，《简?爱》出版发行，夏洛蒂?勃朗特笔下的女主角不再娇艳柔弱，她贫穷、矮小、黝黑，性格执拗，不同于其他地位悬殊的爱情故事，她没有盲目沉醉于爱情的旋涡，而是昂首挺胸地追求着平等，不论是生活中的还是感情上的。

虽然早在1789年，法国女剧作家已经开始了为女性争取权力的序幕，但是《简?爱》却是让很多女性独立意识觉醒的启蒙小说。

美国黑人女作家艾丽丝?沃克就对此书爱不释手。

她于1982年写出了轰动一时的《紫色》，跳脱了以往黑人小说中揭露种族歧视带来的痛苦与仇恨，把视点放在了黑人男女间的家庭关系和男权的压迫。

这部小说在很多地方都受到了十八世纪末出生的女作家佐拉?尼尔?郝斯顿的影响。

其作品《他们眼望上苍》用流畅诗意的文字讲述了一位黑人女性珍妮作为女人，在男权社会中争取作为人基本的权力与尊严。

在最初的几年，小说由于“缺乏种族抗议和斗争的观点”而被束之高阁，到了70年代女权运动时期才被给予应有的赞誉。

抗议种族矛盾的狂热渐渐消退，人们开始探索自己族群中的文化和世界观。

郝斯顿作品中的黑人不因为自己的黑皮肤感到压抑的痛苦，他们享受劳动带来的快乐，也得面对生活中的灾祸。

相对于《紫色》女主人公茜莉的悲惨遭遇，珍妮有着“平静幸福”的生活，先后嫁给了拥有田产的洛根和发迹致富的市长乔?斯塔克斯，但是她却一次次从这种令旁人艳羡的生活中出走。

解读电影《紫色》中黑人女性的解放

艾丽斯?沃克的一生都在探讨黑人妇女的生存问题，将其称之为黑人女性的“辩护士”最合适不过。

《紫色》是一部女性自我解放的经典之作，从独特的视角上叙述出女主人公觉醒和奋起的过程，对黑人妇女生存环境进行深入探讨，并为她们寻找出路。

这部小说后来被斯皮尔伯格导演改电影，在未上映之前，就已经了广泛的轰动，在上映之后更是获得了令人骄傲的票房成绩。

一、黑人女性拓展精神空间作家沃克非常关心女性的精神成长，尤其是黑人女性，在他的世界观众认为黑人女性的精神升华，才能称之为其完整生存的关键条件，沃克在接受采访时，也曾说过：没有精神的帮助，这部作品她无法完成。

可见在沃克的文学世界中精神的关键性，沃克在自己的作品中深入开拓了女性成长的精神空间。

在沃克的眼中，如果想要拯救灵魂，那么必须要处理宗教信仰的一系列问题。

由于宗教被人们看成是灵魂的寄托，而黑人灵魂一直都在被白人基督教所残害。

西方基督教中宣扬上帝是无所不能的，这为黑人奴隶们带来了心灵上的勇气和安慰，对他们的反抗意识或多或少的起到了麻醉的作用。

但在这部小说之中，沃克从黑人泛灵论思想的角度上，对白人基督教这种荒诞、没有根据的观念进行了深刻的批判。

最初西丽由于不知道该向谁诉苦，也没有人会聆听她的苦衷，她只能将苦衷写到信里求上帝帮助自己。

西丽如此坚定上帝会帮助她，但她的生活却越来越惨。

在朋友莎格的指点下，西丽开始质疑上帝。

莎格对西丽讲到：“要是上帝能够多听听命运悲惨黑女人的话语，这世间肯定不是这种情况了。

[1]莎格说：“万事万物都是上帝，上帝并不遥不可及，它在我们每个人的心理，你与上帝一起来到了这个世界，但只能在自己的心里才能找到她”。

在这里，莎格的话明显将上帝自然化和普遍化，上帝应该与让所有人和谐共处，这也是沃克所鼓吹的“泛灵论”。

在这一思想的呼吁下，西丽与耐蒂开始通信，在最后一封信中，她将对耐蒂的称呼换成了“敬爱的上帝，敬爱的树木，敬爱的人们”。

这里显然可以看出西丽已经解放自己，她正从精神层面上解放自己，开始试图摆脱基督教的管制，与大自然亲密接触。

紫色英文影评

The Trouble With The Color PurpleThe Color Purple (Steven Spielberg, 1985) can now be seen as a kind of cinematic watershed. It was a sign of the times but also of things to come: what was still unusual in 1985 would become commonplace by 1990. Since then, movies based on this mentality have become pervasive. Around that time, black men came forward charging that the movie was sexist (for perpetuating negative stereotypes of black men) as well as racist (for pitting black men and women against each other instead of white society). What caused their fury? In a nutshell, it was that every male character, without exception, is either a hopelessly stupid buffoon, a fiendishly evil tyrant, or both. And every female character, without exception, is a purely innocent victim, a quietly enduring hero, or both.In The Color Purple, this cinematic world - viewers know it only from what they actually see and hear in movie theatres or on television - consists ultimately of a battle between the forces of light represented by women and those of darkness represented by men. Unless viewers supply other information from their own world (and thus contradict what is "said" by the movie itself) or from Walker's novel (and thus add at least some depth of humanity to the male characters), they must reach the conclusion that men are inherently worthless.What has made the male characters so worthless or evil is never shown; they just are that way. Was it because of the appalling conditions black people endured in the rural South of sixty years ago? Possibly. But if the situation was so destructive, why did only the female characters emerge with their dignity and humanity intact? From what viewers are shown, only one conclusion is possible: something innate in women allows them to rise above degradation, while something innate in men prevents them from doing so.Four women are triumphant and four men defeated: Harpo, the oaf who keeps falling through the ceiling as if in a rerun of Amos 'n Andy, is taken back at the very end by his long-suffering wife. No discernible change has taken place in him, while she has grown in wisdom and tolerance. Mister, a kind of black Simon Legree, eventually repents of his evil ways. But the last scene showed him so crushed by guilt that he cannot bring himself even to ask for Celie's forgiveness. She, meanwhile, has successfully transcended the past and can thus move on into the future. Even in contrition, then, the men are worthless. At their best, in other words, they are irrelevant anachronisms.Given the roles presented, the only people who can actually identify themselves with the characters on-screen are women, whether black or white. No healthy man, black or white, could possibly do so, not only because all male characters are so unspeakably vile and so incredibly stupid but also because they are so uncinematically lifeless. Unlike the women, the men are not really people at all. They are wooden caricatures who represent crimes or pathologies, cardboard cutouts that exist in only one dimension, straw men set up to be knocked down - in short, not complex human beings in whom male and female viewers can see some of the good and evil in themselves. But this movie is not addressed to male viewers, not even to racist, white, male viewers. Apparently, the possible reaction of male viewers was considered irrelevant. The movie indicates that men are irrelevant once they stop persecuting women. In the final shot, the camera looks upward at the women, thus conferring visual monumentality and dignity on those who have escaped from their men and gone off to live together. Their pride and independence is thus emphasized in precisely the same way asthe brutality and evil of the men, Celie's father and husband, were at the beginning.There are many positive things to be said about this film - the performances, the photography, and especially the direction by Spielberg, who at this point in time was still close enough to the peak of his powers to make anything he put his name to worth watching. But the message of the film is an ugly one, something that bypassed so many of its viewers when it was first released, and to look at the many reviews surrounding this one, continues to do so now.Remarkably moving story from the maestroThis is a truly wonderful film from the guru of directing, Mr Steven Spielberg. This great director has suffered much criticism throughout his career. He was slammed by a lot of the press for 'never really growing up' and it took SCHINDLER'S LIST to quiten these critics. However almost ten years before his remarkable account of the Holocaust Spielberg directed this gem.It is the moving tale of a young black girl born into a male-dominated world, and tells the story of her gradual loss of identity followed by her defiance in reclaiming the life she lost. This was Whoopi Goldberg's remarkable screen debut that assured her of major stardom, and it is not hard to see why. Her fear towards her husband is frighteningly real, as is her silent rebellious side that ventures outwards in the last section of the film. Danny Glover paints a horrific image of a cruel husband, and still manages to give us a valid reason why he acts the way he does, before a moving conclusion to his character's development. The part of Sofia is also expertly played by Oprah Winfrey, especially during the Christmas reunion scene when the viewer can't help but share her pain through to joy. A special treat is an appearance by Laurence Fishburne (then Larry) in a small role.It is cinema such as this that proves Steven Spielberg's genius. You will often forget that it is him you are watching (not least by the lack of another genius, Mr John Williams), but it only adds to this director's credit that he is so versatile. If anyone passed over this film as a possible blip in Spielberg's career (as I shamefully did!) watch it now! You will not be disappointed.Spielberg's 1st "Serious" Film Is Beautiful and Powerful...A film that can make you shed tears of sadness and tears of joy would be considered quite a step in the career of a common filmmaker. The fact is, Steven Spielberg, probably our greatest story-teller, has been doing this in various movie formats for years. THE COLOR PURPLE, at the time, was considered risky, especially after action classics like JAWS and RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARK. In hindsight, this film should have come as no surprise, for Spielberg had made us cry tears of joy and sadness in E.T. Critics called COLOR PURPLE his entrance into intellectual fare. It is quite an entrance. No special effects, no swashbuckling, just brilliant story-telling based on a literary classic by Alice Walker. One surprise is how Spielberg could present such a moving film aboutAfrican-Americans in the deep south. Slavery is gone, but in the south depicted here, it seems as though blacks are using other blacks as slaves.Spielberg is always put down for sentimentalizing his pictures or adding an element of childishness to please the audience. This is really the first of overlooked films from his career that you cannot make these observations. It is the first in a line of films people either didn't see or wouldn't see because there are no aliens. EMPIRE OF THE SUN, ALWAYS, SCHINDLER'S LIST, etc.. His awesome talent is obvious with this specific picture because A) he uses mostly untrained, first-timeactors, B) he tackles a subject most felt was unadaptable to the screen, and C) it is pure drama with no strings pulled where characters grow and change over the passage of roughly 30 years. It is almost epic-like in look and scope and the fact that it did not garner a single Academy Award from 11 nominations is a travesty and an insult.Whoopi Goldberg is fabulous as the tortured Celie, an unattractive woman given away by her incestuous father to an abusive Danny Glover, who she only knows as "Mister". The film follows a path of occasional beatings and mental torture she goes through while with "Mister". The PG-13 rated film is pretty open to the sexual issues raised by the Walker novel. This is not "The Burning Bed" in Georgia by any means. There is no blatant revenge taken as might be expected. It happens gracefully. Goldberg perfectly plays a human being, someone in need of love and someone who deserves it. The films' most poignant and heartbreaking moment comes when Goldberg and her sister, Nettie (played by Akosua Busia) are separated, maybe forever. (Possibly foreshadowing Holocaust separation of child and parent?) You may have to check for a pulse if you are not moved by this sequence.The color purple stands for the beauty of the fields and flowers surrounding these poor people. There really is something to live for, but love triumphs over all. Spielberg bashers take note: the guy can make an unforgettable classic without any cute aliens.A powerful insight into the life of a mistreated black woman in the Deep SouthThis stunning and enthralling portrayal, directed by the marvelous Steven Spielberg, is a true gem for reminding the world of the hardships of the ancestors of America's black peoples. Celie, an uneducated black woman is mistreated by her father, her "Mister", her step-children and almost anyone she is forced to endure –aside from sister Nettie of course whose companionship, I believe, reiterates an important message: to love each other no matter what.The brief injections of comedic satire in the picture enable Goldberg, in her debut, to show the world what she really is –a comic. A Golden Globe Award-winning and Oscar-nominated performance allows Goldberg to profess the destitute situation of the protagonist. One feels this was Goldberg's time to shine and really did thoroughly deserve that golden statuette from the Academy in comparison to her actual Oscar-winning supporting performance in 1990's Ghost. Nonetheless, the lack of real acclaim for this picture doesn't take away its drawing and moving storyline to see if, for once, Celie can really be happy.I didn't really recognize much of the supporting cast of the movie, expect from Oprah Winfrey. Now, I was not expecting much from Winfrey's performance as time and time again you get the occasional 'pop' and 'TV' stars who try and make the 'transition' into film. However, I was pleasantly surprised of Winfrey's portrayal of a distraught and let's say 'difficult' housewife Sofia. Although her character, I felt, did in a sense perpetuate the stereotype of the "big angry black woman" which I believe the film was trying to move away from. All in all, Winfrey garnered both an Oscar and Golden Globe nomination.One of the most beautiful pictures I have seen in years, and, not a single Oscar win, that I'll never know.Spielberg for the first time showing different new colors as a director.As much as I love Spielberg, I never have been too fond of his more dramatic movie attempts. The drama in his movies often feels very melodramatic. This movie was his first real, straight-forward, dramatic endeavor and though I also have some real problems with this movie, people seem to forget and fail to see that as far as the genre goes, this still truly is one excellent movie. People look at this movie and see that it's not up to Spielberg's usual high standards of entertainment andfilm-making but that doesn't mean at all that this movie is an horrible one.There is simply no denying it that this is a skillfully made movie. It has all of the right settings and actors in it, as well as a compelling dramatic story, that focuses mainly on an African American woman, living and trying to survive life in the early 1900's America. She has to face lots of ordeals, such as the forced split-up of her and her sister that she was incredibly close with, taking beatings and rape. It's not necessarily a movie about racism, though it still plays some part in the story but it's more one that focuses on African American society, in rural areas, in the early 1900's and on its women and their position in particular. It follows its characters for some decades. Some things change for them, while others keep remaining the same. It's a good character driven drama with a compelling story, that ensures that the movie is always going and good to watch, even though the movie is being a bit of a long sit.It really is a movie that foremost works out thanks to its characters and actors that are portraying them. Amazingly enough two of its key characters are being played by debutantes; Whoopi Goldberg and Oprah Winfrey but what a fine debut it was! Both are truly excellent and its hard to recognize them in this movie, not necessarily because they look different and younger but more because of their performances, that is unlike anything they have ever done since. I truly wish Whoopi Goldberg would had continued playing more roles like this, instead of choosing a more comical career. How different her career must have been but she wanted to stay loyal to her comical background instead, which is of course her right to do. But with all this talking about Winfrey and Goldberg, people tend to forget how great Danny Glover is being in this movie as well. But this is also only because the movie is being a sort of ode to African American woman and their strength and also tells the story from their perspective.It all combined ensures that "The Color Purple" has something that a good drama requires; some good powerful emotions and drama. It's a touching movie that perhaps goes a bit over-the-top at times but overall as a whole still works out as some powerful and memorable.Can't say I'm too fond about its last 30 minutes though. The movie tries to desperately to wrap everything up needly. Everything ends well for the 'good' guys and gals and the 'bad' ones end up badly. It feels a bit forced, as if Spielberg was too afraid to that his movie would end on a downer and would leave its audience depressed. This is actually something quite a lot of Spielberg movies suffer from; they desperately try to end on a positive and uplifting note. Even "Schindler's List" somewhat does!It's far from my favorite Spielberg movie and it's also far from the best thing he has ever done but this movie still remains one fine, effective, powerful 'colored' drama, that by the way still really is missing a John Williams musical score.。

《紫色》观后感

周末的佳片有约里一部《紫色》打动了我，如果你不懂什么叫剥夺，你可以去看本片，如果你不懂什么叫大地，你也可以来看本片。

电影的立脚点放在了美国的黑人社会，一个没接收过文化教育的女人，一个被亲人摧残的女人，一个被剥夺了所有精神思想的女人，历经了三十年后，终于觉醒反抗。

事实上这个过程应该是历经了千年。

紫色里包含着红色的张扬还有蓝色的深沉，紫色象征着自由，走向自由的路真的很不平坦。

印象最深的一个画面；西丽一家人围坐在一张桌子上吃饭，夏格告诉西丽的丈夫：西丽要和我们一起走了。

西丽的丈夫说：除非我死了。

现在是什么问题？一直低着头沉默的西丽这时一字一句地说：你是个肮脏的、低级的狗东西。

这就是问题所在。

我该离开你了，进入我高贵的人生。

丈夫使出了他的杀手锏：你将什么也得不到。

西丽：我从你这里要过东西吗？我从没向你要过任何东西。

听到这里先生眼神游移，这么多年里从来是索取，奴役着西丽，从没把她当人睁眼看过，这样一个从来一声不吭的女人突然发作，他还没一点心理准备，心里有种控制不住局面的恐慌。

夏格会唱歌，她有才能，她有胆量和任何人交谈，她站在那里都会吸引大家的目光。

你有什么？你又老又丑、体型又难看，你不敢和任何人说话，你只适合做夏格的佣人，你或许帮她烧个菜还可以，你烧的菜又没好到可以做厨师。

这时先生的爸爸说：她的确做的菜比你的第一个老婆好吃。

先生马上接着说：如果不是我的太太死了，谁会疯了去娶你？你会干什么呢？去务农？或许有人会雇你到铁路公司做事。

说到这里他肆无忌惮地嘲笑着，他的爸爸也跟着嘲笑到：或许到煤矿去有人会用她。

所有把老婆看扁的男人都有这个架势，你不过是块烂泥巴扶都扶不上墙还有啥能力反抗？勉强在这里给我做个饭，伺候伺候我，我不嫌弃你就不错了。

气愤的西丽说起那些信件时愤怒地一把抓起餐刀指向先生，被众人劝解后，丈夫朝出去的西丽喊到：你是个黑人，你穷、你又老又丑，还是个女人，你一无是处，苍白无力的丈夫最后冲到门口喊到：真应该把你锁在房子里工作，西丽镇静地说：那个房子就是个监狱，你留着自己住吧。

《紫色》观后感

《紫色》观后感
《紫色》是一部感人至深的电影，它通过细腻而真实的刻画，展现了女性在特定历史和社会背景下的生活与成长。

这部电影以其独特的叙事方式和深刻的主题内涵，深深地触动了我的内心。

首先，我被电影中的主人公西莉所吸引。

她是一个身处困境的女性，但她从未放弃对美好生活的向往和追求。

在经历了种种磨难和挫折后，她逐渐找到了自己的价值和力量，成为了一个独立、自信的女性。

西莉的成长历程让我深刻地认识到了坚持和勇气的重要性，无论遇到多大的困难，只要我们勇敢地面对并坚持下去，就一定能够找到属于自己的出路。

其次，电影中的色彩运用也给我留下了深刻的印象。

紫色作为电影的主题色，贯穿了整个影片。

它象征着神秘、高贵和独立，与西莉的性格特点形成了完美的呼应。

同时，电影中的其他色彩也都有着深刻的寓意和象征意义，它们共同构建了一个丰富多彩、富有感染力的视觉世界。

此外，《紫色》还通过细腻的人物刻画和情节设置，展现了女性在特定社会背景下的生存状态和内心世界。

它揭示了女性所面临的种种困境和挑战，以及她们在困境中所表现出的坚韧和力量。

这种对女性生存状态的关注和思考，让我更加深入地了解了女性的内心世界和生活经历。

最后，我认为这部电影所传递的信息和价值观也非常值得我们深思。

它告诉我们，无论身处何种环境，我们都应该保持对生活的热爱和追求，勇敢地面对困难和挑战。

同时，我们也应该关注社会现象和问题，用自己的力量去影响和改变世界。

总之，《紫色》是一部非常优秀的电影，它以其独特的魅力和深刻的内涵深深地打动了我。

我相信这部电影将会成为一部经典之作，永远留在人们的心中。

从象征视角分析电影《紫色》

锋绘２０１９年第４(下)期２５７㊀作者简介:郁淑娟(１９９５－),女,汉族,山东临沂人,硕士,东北财经大学,研究方向:英语笔译.从象征视角分析电影«紫色»郁淑娟(东北财经大学,辽宁大连１１６０２５)摘㊀要:«紫色»是１９８５年由导演史蒂文斯皮尔伯格执导的一部影片,以女主人公西丽为主线,讲述了她从一个毫无人权的黑人女性成长到把握自己命运的独立女性的故事.本文主要从象征的角度来分析人物中角色的深层含义以及影片紫色的象征意义.关键词:电影«紫色»;象征;黑人女性１㊀背景介绍影片«紫色»改编于同名小说,电影中没有小说中对于紫色含义的具体表达,只是在电影开头和结尾以大片紫色花海首尾呼应.斯皮尔伯格导演又没有换掉影片名字,仍然选择«紫色»作为电影片名,只是在电影中用不同的方式展现出紫色到底象征着什么.象征是指用一种具体事物来代表其他事物的表现手法,尤其是用可见的事物来代表不可见的事物,它通常不直接表示某种确定的意义或意思,而是描述一种体现意义的事物.２㊀紫色的构成紫色是一种优雅㊁高贵㊁神秘的颜色,在西方,紫色代表着尊贵和神圣,在基督教中,紫色代表至高无上和来自圣灵的力量,而这种尊贵神秘的颜色是由蓝色和红色合成的.这部影片就是以紫色来象征西丽的命运,在西丽一直受压迫㊁没有自由的时期,她是静谧的蓝色,默默忍受父亲的野蛮和丈夫艾伯特的粗暴,直到一抹红色出现在她生命中,一切发生了改变.歌星夏葛出现了,她用自己的热情中和了西丽蓝色低沉的生活,使得西丽逐渐变成自信高贵的紫色.３㊀炽热的红色夏葛夏葛是一个歌手,虽然也是一个黑人,但是因为唱歌好听,外貌出众,受到很多男性的喜爱与追捧.她的生命如同炽热的红色,夏葛是黑人女性独立的代表,她热情自信,靠自己的能力与努力打拼自己的事业.同时,夏葛作为独立黑人女性的代表,她痛恨这个不平等社会对女性的压迫,所以她根本不会选择对西丽没有尊重,只有奴役与强权的艾伯特,即使艾伯特一直尊重夏葛,把她当作自己的女神.夏葛可以为追求自己的幸福放弃现有的安稳生活,去到外面的世界,具有无畏的勇气和冒险精神,因此也找到了自己的幸福.４㊀静谧的蓝色西丽主人公西丽从小就过着没有自由的生活,十几岁的时候就被父亲侵犯,生下两个孩子,连看一眼的权利都没有孩子就被送人了.在父亲阴影的笼罩下,西丽活的就像一副没有灵魂的躯壳,只有在和妹妹南蒂到那片紫色花海中的时候才能感受到生命的活力,影片的开头也是为故事的后续发展埋下了伏笔.在西丽父亲以一种近乎交易的方式将其嫁给了一个鳏夫,西丽心中曾燃起过重新开始的希望,她把鸡飞狗跳的家收拾的井井有条,却被丈夫艾伯特一巴掌打回了现实.这场婚姻只不过是从一个火坑跳进了另一个火坑,在这里,她经历了一次又一次绝望,被丈夫任意欺凌,甚至连碰家里信箱的权利都没有.在长期得不到释放的灰暗生活中,西丽一直忍受着,像一片深蓝的海,笼罩在乌云之下,仿佛失去了自己的颜色.５㊀红与蓝的交融紫色的诞生静谧的蓝碰到炽热的红会发生怎样的变化呢?两个人的第一次见面就激起了不小的火花.夏葛在一次醉酒后被艾伯特带回家,见到西丽后的第一句话是你好丑 .但是在西丽的照顾下,夏葛渐渐对她卸下防备,两个人成为知心朋友.在发现艾伯特随意殴打西丽,西丽生活的毫无自我后,夏葛开始鼓励西丽,教她唱歌,告诉她其实很漂亮,帮西丽建自信.在夏葛要去全国各地旅游巡演的时候,西丽萌生了离开艾伯特的想法.这个时候的西丽已经有了追求自由的想法,但是还不够强烈,在车开走的那一刻没有迈出那一步.夏葛找到自己的幸福后回到当地,一切都发生的那么自然,夏葛打开了艾伯特家的信箱,那个西丽一直无法触及的信箱,也由此开启了南蒂给西丽写的信.当她们找到多年来被艾伯特藏起来的信后,西丽终于爆发了,她开始反抗艾伯特,否定艾伯特的强权.这一次,西丽潇洒的同夏葛一起离开了,开始书写自己的人生画卷.６㊀结语该影片以一种隐晦的手法,将紫色融入到整个故事中.紫色就象征着主人公西丽的一生,由最初的受压迫黑人,经过热情自信的夏葛的引导鼓励,逐渐成长为一个把握自己命运的独立女性.参考文献[１]张鹤,电影«紫色»黑人女性人格形成的过程与动因[J ]．电影评介,２０１６,(１５):６４Ｇ６６．[２]孙天南,由«紫色»看美国黑人文学中的女性主义[J ]．风格与特色,２０１６,(２):１１１Ｇ１１３．。

《紫色》好看吗？经典观后感10篇

《紫色》好看吗?经典观后感10篇《紫色》是一部由史蒂文·斯皮尔伯格执导,丹尼·格洛弗/乌比·戈德堡/玛格丽特·艾弗瑞主演的一部剧情类型的电影,特精心从网络上整理的一些观众的观后感,希望对大家能有帮助。

《紫色》观后感(一):thecolorpurpleThecolorpurple抛开对种族歧视和女人地位低微的状况的描画之外,我深感到电影中生命中不可承受之重,然而这种压弯了背脊的生活仍然是有希望的,会悲叹,会欣喜。

然而对比另一种观念:生命中不能承受之轻,哪一种更加不能承受呢?《紫色》观后感(二):冲破思想的牢笼,才得真正的自由作为父亲的私欲和物欲的牺牲品,再转变为丈夫的奴隶和佣人,整个人生前半段都是生活如在地狱……尽管身边有很多追求自由和平等身份的女性,但是长久的压抑已经让她失去了反抗的勇气……直到妹妹和孩子们的境遇才让她意识到自己也可以获得纯粹的爱与自由……其实要远离糟糕的人生,真正要战胜的是自己的思想!!被压迫,凭什么?!!!《紫色》观后感(三):对我,紫色是一个成长的故事有卑微､有傲慢､有无知,有软弱､有坚持,有迷路､有悔恨､有醒悟,有逆境､有信念,有倔强､也有一些妥协...所有这些都是在一些谈谈的紫色的情景下发生,有点忧伤,尤显真实。

尤其喜欢那个结尾:“爸爸,罪人也有自己的灵魂!”,每次都不免眼泪横溢。

成长真的是一个过程,对弱者如此,对犯错者也如此...《紫色》观后感(四):感人相当感人的电影。

时间跨越很大,从西丽童年一直拍到老年,也见证了时代变迁中,黑人,尤其是妇女黑人西丽的人生。

电影的阵容相当庞大,导演是史蒂文·斯皮尔伯格,主演是《修女也疯狂》的WhoopiGoldberg。

万万没想到的是,脱口秀女王OprahWinfrey,居然也在电影中演一个主要配角Sofia,而且戏份相当大,演技很不错!《紫色》观后感(五):一般般感觉一般。

女主和妹妹被父亲性侵,女主嫁人之后被丈夫虐待,妹妹带着女主的孩子逃去了非洲。

电影作品分析：斯佩尔伯格《紫色》拉片

《紫色》影片分析《紫色》讲述了一个黑人妇女苦难的一生，她的一生，在等待和隐忍中渡过，无休止的身体暴力和心灵侮辱没有让她倒下，她的心中始终活着两样东西，那就是上帝和爱。

这两样东西使她最终苦尽甘来。

它带给我的是一种震颤，一种发自心底的悲悯，对人性恶的思考。

紫色是豪华,美丽,忧心,平安,爱,悔改,谦卑,仰望,热情,热忱的象徵。

影片開頭畫面是大片的紫色花朵，影響是喜麗和娜緹姐妹兩個的笑聲，給人一種美好的感覺，而且和片名《紫色》相呼應。

喜麗和娜緹唱著歌玩耍，在太阳的怀抱里展露安详的笑容。

这场景让喜麗和娜緹姐妹俩暂时忘却了所有的哀伤，显现出孩子天真的童趣，她们忘情地奔跑着，十分开心。

喜麗在蔚藍的天空下安詳的笑容，可以看出他很容易滿足，但是上帝卻連最基本的快樂都不能給她。

姐妹俩在游戏之时，却被继父粗暴地打断了。

喜丽与妹妹游戏之时脸蛋上的笑容还尚未消褪，她继父没忘记评论一句：“你的笑容是世界上最丑的。

”喜丽依旧傻笑着，当时她才14岁，大着肚子，肚子里是继父的孩子，更恐怖的是——她以为那男人不是继父而是亲生父亲。

喜麗生产，接生的是妹妹娜緹，生产之后孩子却被父亲送人了。

顯示了他父親的恐怖和狠心。

大地是那么广阔，但喜麗却不知道该何去何从，这个镜头的色彩全是灰色使人感觉灰暗悲哀很压抑。

继父卖掉了出生的婴儿，还威胁茜莉说“除了上帝，你最好绝不要对谁说。

”于是她只能将恼人的生活和不解的心事倾诉给从不写回信的上帝。

父亲结婚了，这一直是喜麗的梦想，因为她以为这样她就可以解脱了，可以过自己喜欢的简单却快乐生活。

运用音响转场，显示喜麗梦想的破灭，亚伯特去向喜麗的父亲求婚要娶娜緹。

娜緹透过窗户看到亚伯特，窗户就像笼子一样，说明他们都是受到当时理念束缚的人。

喜麗看亚伯特的视线，可以看出喜麗对先生的恐惧，也显示出当时黑人女人的地位。

俯视表现出喜麗地位的低等，他们根本只是把他当成工具，干活，泄欲。

喜麗以后的生活不会比现在好，也许会更惨。

雾蒙蒙的画面，看到喜麗跟着亚伯特走了，对喜麗来说跟残酷的人生开始了，她不知道前方等到她的是什么样的道路，显示出喜麗的恐惧和无助。

紫色影评

The color purpleLast week , I have a chance to watch this film in English class . The first sense perception that it gives to me is wonderful . Beside, which makes me feel sad .Celie Harris is the main heroine of this film , when she is young ,she has led a miserable life . She is ugly in people’s eyes ,she also has a poor family ,but it’s hard to imagine ,her stepfather rapes her,and she has two children when she is only fourteen .and then , when she is sixteen ,she is ordered by her father to married with Albert Johnson ,which makes her became a servant and a tool that her husband vent . Until Shug goes into her life ,her life with darkness and no free change s gradually . Finally , she gets together with her sister and her children .In the contrat , her husband’s life is dramatic , In the beginning ,he always abuses Celie ,more importantly ,he doesn’t give any rights to her ,which reacts the theme of this movie , In that century , color people is discriminated , In white people’s eyes , they should live in the bottom of world . In fact , Johnson’s life satires this . When the film does into the last , heroine gets together with her sister ,but , Johnson is only a passing traveler . Maybe this which we all can image , because english teacher gives me some several suggestions before we watched .The movie is wonderful , which explains truth in that century .。

The Color Purple《紫色》—影片视听语言浅析

有意味的美感---紫色花丛影片一共出现三次人物在紫色花丛中的画面，分别是开始、中后和结尾。

电影紫色影评

从《紫色》看黑人女性摆脱双重压迫走向新生

紫色影评

电影《紫色》影评

《紫色》读后感

《紫色》分析

紫色Purple影评2000词英文

The Color Purple《紫色》—影片视听语言浅析

紫色

电影紫色观后感范文

解读电影《紫色》中黑人女性的解放

紫色英文影评

《紫色》观后感

《紫色》观后感

从象征视角分析电影《紫色》

《紫色》好看吗？经典观后感10篇

电影作品分析：斯佩尔伯格《紫色 》拉片

紫色影评

The Color Purple《紫色》—影片视听语言浅析

电影作品分析：斯佩尔伯格《紫色》拉片