雅思阅读选择题如何拿高分

雅思阅读选择题如何拿高分雅思阅读选择题想拿高分?你得看这个,下面给大家带来了雅思阅读选择题如何拿高分，希望能够帮助到大家，下面就和大家分享，来欣赏一下吧。

雅思阅读选择题想拿高分?你得看这个选择题有两种类型：单选题和多选题。

多数情况下，选择题都是考察文中的细节信息，但也有少数单选题会考察*的主旨信息。

比如，当一篇*原本就没有标题的时候，那么这篇*出的最后一个题目一定是让我们选择*标题的单选题;再比如有时候题目会问到写这篇*的目的，或者写某个段落的目的。

像这种提问意图的选择题，以及选择*或段落标题的选择题就是考察主旨的选择题，对于考察主旨的选择题来说，我们在选择答案的时候一定要选择一个最概括的选项来作为答案，那些*没提到过的或者过于片面的选项都是要排除的选项。

接下来，我们就来分析一下考察细节信息选择题。

多选题都是考察细节的选择题。

对于多选题来说，题干中的信息一定包含题目的定位信息，所以必须找出题干中的定位词，然后回到原文中扫读包含定位词的语句。

而对于多选题的正确选项来说，都是出自定位词所在的段落或者相邻的一两个段落里，不可能相差太远，除非题干中的定位词很明显地出现在比较远的段落里。

其次，对于考察细节的单选题来说，题干信息同样重要，但往往很多同学在做单选题的时候容易忽略掉题干的信息，而是去根据选项的信息去找答案了。

这种做法无疑使得在做单选题的时候思路不清，不知道自己该找什么了，这种时候有的同学就下意识地去选择文中提及过的选项，而忽略的什么样的选项才是能够回答问题的选项。

所以，在做任何选择题的时候，第一步永远是看明白题干到底问什么。

第二步，便是从题干中找出定位词，回到原文中扫读包含定位词的语句，但有时候题干的定位词在原文中不明显或者被同义替换，这些时候我们就需要适当的借助选项中比较容易被找到的特殊词或者重复出现的关键词来辅助定位，需要注意的是根据选项信息定到的位置是选项的对应的原文位置，不一定是正确的选项，所以要找到题目答案，还是要在根据选项定到的位置附近找到题干的位置，通常情况下这才是离正确答案最近的位置。

这就是为什么有时候做选择题需要读的可能是*中定位词出现的位置附近的几句话，而非仅仅定位词所在的句子了。

在做选择的过程中，无非就是两种方法：直选法和排除法。

不管用哪种方法，只要能快速准确的做出题目就好，当直选难以选出正确答案的时候，我们就去用排除法排除错误答案，这样剩下的便是正确的选项了。

那么，什么样的选项会是错误选项呢?我们把错误选项分为四类：1、选项中的关键词在原文中未提及或者判断不出选项信息是否和原文信息一致的情况下，该选项是错误的。

换句话说，如果把每个选项当成判断题来做，那么判断出答案是NOT GIVEN，这样的选项便是错误选项，需要排除。

2、选项信息和原文信息相抵触的情况下，该选项是错误选项，需要排除。

3、当选项信息和原文信息一致，但选项信息却无法回答题干问题的情况下，即使是和原文一致的信息也是错误的，需要排除。

4、最后一种情况也是最容易被错选的：当选项中的关键词信息非常明显地在定位词出现的位置附近出现了，这样的选项只能是部分信息和原文一致，而我们要选出的正确选项一定是全部信息都得和原文一致的并且能够回答题干问题的信息才是正确的信息。

所以这种部分信息一致，但整体却不一定一致的选项也是错误的，需要排除。

最后，希望大家在读了这篇*之后，试着用上文中所提到的一些做题技巧，在之后做选择题的时候，思路能够更清晰，做题能够更快速、更准确雅思阅读机经真题解析-纸张和电脑Paper or Computer?A Computer technology was supposed to replace paper. But that hasnt happened. Every country in the Western world uses more paper today, on a per-capita basis, than it did ten years ago. The consumption of uncoated free-sheet paper, for instance — the most common kind of office paper — rose almost fifteen per cent in the United States between 1995 and 2000 This is generally taken as evidence of how hard it is to eradicate old, wasteful habits and of how stubbornly resistant we are to the efficiencies offered by computerization. A number of cognitive psychologists and ergonomics experts, however, dont agree Paper has persisted, they argue, for very good reasons: when it comes to performing certain kinds of cognitive tasks, paper has many advantages over computers The dismay people feel at the sight of a messy desk — or the spectacle of air-traffic controllers tracking fj through notes scribbled on paper strips — arises from a fundamental confusion about the role that paper plays in our lives.B The case for paper is mode most eloquently in "The Myth of the Paperless Office", by two social scientists. Abigail Sellen and Richard Harper. They begin their book with an account of a study they conducted at the International Monetary Fund, in Washington.D.C. economists at the I.M.F. spend most of their time writing reports on complicated economic questions, work that would seem to be perfectly suited to sitting in front of a computer. Nonetheless, the I.M.F. is awash in paper, and Sellen and Harper wanted to find out why. Their answer is that the business of reports — at least at the I M F. — is an intensely collaborative process, the professional judgments and contributions of many people. The economists bring drafts of reports to conference rooms, spread out the relevant pages, and negotiate changes with one other. They go back to their offices and jot down comments in the margin, taking advantage of the freedom offered by the informality of the handwritten note. Then they deliver the annotated draft to the author in person, taking him, page by page, through the suggested changes. At the end of the process, the author spreads out all the pages with comments on his desk and starts to enter them on the computer —moving the pages around as he works, organizing and reorganizing, saving and discarding.C Without paper, this kind of collaborative and iterative work process would be much more difficult. According to Sellen and Harper, paper has a unique set of "affordances" — that is, qualities that permit specific kinds of uses. Paper is tangible: we can pick up a document, flip through it, read little bits here and there, and quickly get a sense of it. Paper is spatially flexible, meaning that we can spread it out and arrange it in the way that suits us best. And its tailorable: we can easily annotate it, and scribble on it as we read, without altering the original text. Digital documents, of course, have their own affordances. They can be easily searched, shared, stored, remotely, and linked to other relevant material. But they lack the affordances that really matter to a group of people working together on a report. Sellen and Harper write:D Paper enables a certain kind of thinking. Picture, for instance, the top of your desk. Chances are that you have a keyboard and a computer screen off to one side, and a clear space roughly eighteen inches square in front of your chair. What covers the rest of the desktop is probably piles — piles of papers, journals, magazines, binders, postcards, videotapes, and all the other artifacts of the knowledge economy. The piles look like o mess, but they arent. When a group at Apple Computer studied piling behavior several years ago, they found that even the most disorderly piles usuallymake perfect sense to the piles, and that office workers could hold forth in great detail about the precise history and meaning of their piles. The pile closest to the cleared, eighteen-inch-square working area, for example, generally represents the most business, and within that pile the most important document of all is likely to be at the top. Piles are living, breathing archives. Over time, they get broken down and resorted, sometimes chronologically and sometimes thematically and sometimes chronologically and thematically; clues about certain documents may be physically embedded in the file by, say, stacking a certain piece of paper at an angle or inserting dividers into the stack.E But why do we pile documents instead of filing them? Because piles represent the process of active, ongoing thinking. The psychologist Alison Kidd, whose research Sellen and Harper refer to extensively, argues that "knowledge workers" use the physical space of the desktop to hold "ideas which they cannot yet categorize or even decide how they might use" The messy desk is not necessarily a sign of disorganization. It may be a sign of complexity: those who deal with many unresolved ideas simultaneously cannot sort and file the papers on their desks, because they havent yet sorted and filed the ideas in their head. Kidd writes that many of the people she talked to use the papers ontheir desks as contextual cues to "recover a complex set of threads without difficulty and delay" when they come in on a Monday morning, or after their work has been interrupted by a phone call. What we see when we look at the piles on our desks is, in a sense, the contents of our brains.F This idea that paper facilitates a highly specialized cognitive and social process is a far cry from the way we have historically thought about the stuff. Paper first began to proliferate in the workplace in the late nineteenth century as part of the move toward "systematic management." To cope with the complexity of the industrial economy, managers were instituting company-wide policies and demanding monthly, weekly, or even daily updates from their subordinates. Thus was born the monthly sales report, and the office manual and the internal company newsletter. The typewriter took off in the eighteen-eighties, making it possible to create documents in a fraction of the time it had previously taken, and that was followed closely by the advent of carbon paper, which meant that a typist could create ten copies of that document simultaneously. Paper was important not to facilitate creative collaboration and thought but as an instrument of control.Questions 27-32The reading passage has seven paragraphs, A-GChoose the correct heading for paragraphs A-G from the list below.Write the correct number, i-x. in boxes 27-32 on your answer sheet.List of Headingsi. paper continued as a sharing or managing mustii. piles can be more inspiring rather than disorgansingiii. Favorable situation that economists used paper pagesiv. overview of an unexpected situation: paper survivedv. comparison between efficiencies for using paper and using computervi. IMF paperless office seemed to be a waste of papersvii. example of failure for avoidance of paper recordviii. There are advantages of using a paper in officesix. piles reflect certain characteristics in people s thoughtx. joy of having the paper square in front of computer1. Paragraph A2. Paragraph B3. Paragraph C4. Paragraph D5. Paragraph E6. Paragraph GQuestions 33-36 SummaryComplete the following summary of the paragraphs of Reading Passage, using no more than three words from the Reading Passage for each answer. Write your answers in boxes 33-36 on your answer sheet.Compared with digital documents, paper has several advantages. First it allows clerks to work in a____33____way among colleagues. Next, paper is not like virtual digital versions,its____34____. Finally, because it is____35____note or comments can be effortlessly added as related information. However, shortcoming comes at the absence of convenience on task which is for a____36____.Question 37-40Choose the correct letter, A, B, C or DWrite your answer in boxes 37-40 on your answer sheet.37 What do the economists from IMF say that their way of writing documents?A they note down their comments for freedom on the draftsB they finish all writing individuallyC they share ideas on before electronic version was madeD they use electronic version fully38 What is the implication of the "Piles" mentioned in the passage?A they have underlying ordersB they are necessarily a messC they are in time sequence orderD they are in alphabetic order39 What does the manager believe in sophisticated economy?A recorded paper can be as management toolB carbon paper should be compulsory。