华政国际公法试题

华政2003年国际公法试题

Translate into Chinese and briefly explain the following term s. (15 points)

1.jus inter gentes

2.Dualism

3.judicial immunity

4.reversionary rights

5.sector principle

Indicate the nationality and one of his major works of the following scholars. (10 points)

1.Garotius

uterpacht

3.Vattel

4.Kelson

5.Verdross

Answer the following questions.(25 points)

1.What is your opinion concerning the legal aspects of humanity interference?

2.Giveyour comment on the veto rights of the permanent members of the Security Co uncil of UN.

华政2004年国际公法试题

暂缺

华政2005年国际公法试题

I Please Explain the Following Definitions

1 res nullius

2 pacta sunt servanda

3 Calvo Clause

4 International Humanitarian Law

II. Provision AnalysisThe following provision is quoted from

an important treaty:

“ARITCALE38

(1) The Court, whose function is to decide in accordance wi th international law such disputes as are submitted to it, shall apply:

(a) international conventions, whether general or particular, establishing rules expressly recognized by the contesting stat es;

(b) international custom, as evidence of a general practice accepted as law;

(c)the general principles of law recognized by civilized nati ons;

(d) subject to provisions of ARTICLE 59, judicial decisions and the teaching of the most highly qualified publicists of the various nations, as subsidiary means for the determinat ion of rules of law.

(2) This provision shall not prejudice the power of the Cou rt to decide a case ex aequo et bono, if the parties agre e thereto.”

Please answer the following questions:

1. Which treaty is the provision quoted from?

2. Can you explain the meaning of this provision briefly?

3. Can you make any comment on this provision?

III. Please briefly tell the difference between state respons ibility and international criminal liability.

IV. Please analyze Humanitarian Intervention from the perspect ive of International Law.

华政2006年国际公法试题

一、解释下列词语（用中文回答，每题4分，共16分）

1.principle of identity

2.exhaustion of local remedies

3.aut dedere aut judicare

4.acta sunt servanda

二、简答题（每题8分，共16分）

1.大使馆和领事馆在外交特权与豁免上的区别。

2.简述国际人道法的适用范围。

三、案例分析题（18分）

挪威公债案（Norwegian Loans Case）。1885年至1909年间，挪威政府和挪威两家银行在法国等外国市场发行了各种不同的公债。根据法国政府的规定，所有这些公债都载有一个黄金条款，这样，这些公债到期兑换时，应当用黄金或用可兑换黄金的货币来支付；而挪威政府认为，公债的偿还只能由挪威法律来调整，据此，这些公债便只能用挪威克郎（钞票）偿还。为此，法国政府对其国民行使外交保护，并代表和支持本国公债持有人向挪威提出，要求公债用黄金或用可兑换黄金的货币来支付。两国在谈判中未能达成协议。1955年7月6日，法国将次争端向国际法院提出请求书，请求国际法院做出有利于法国公债持有人的判决；而挪威则反对国际法院的管辖权。（注：本案当事国挪威和法国都发表过接受国际法院强制管辖的声明。挪威的声明是无保留地接受强制管辖权，但法国的声明则附有一项保留，声明其所接受的强制管辖权不适用于法国政府认为在本质上属于其国内管辖之事项。）

华政2007年国际公法试题

一、名词解释

1.多边条约的加入

2.域外庇护

3.无害通过权

4.任意强制管辖权

二、案例分析

(有关领事豁免权，国家主权豁免，还有美国国家豁免法案)

三、简答题