间接言语行为理论
合集下载
相关主题
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
2) illocutionary act (言外行为) - the making of a statement, offer, promise, etc. to fulfill the purpose of speaking.
(3) perlocutionary act (言后行为) – the effects left on the audiences.
Searle's Indirect Speech Act Theory
Searle continues his teacher's research on illocutionary acts, and finds that actually all the speech acts can be seen as illocutionary acts. He makes some revisions to Austin's felicity conditions and use new terms to classify felicity conditions into three: preparatory conditions, propositional content conditions and sincerity conditions .
I nominate John to be President, “I sentence you to ten years' imprisionment,
I promise toHale Waihona Puke Baidupay you back.
In these typical, rather explicit cases of performative sentences, the action that the sentence describes (nominating,sentencing, promising) is performed by the utterance of the sentence itself.
Later, when Austin tries to separate performatives from constatives, he realizes the difficulty in distinguishing them from apart. In fact, all sentences can be used to perform speech acts. In order to explain in what sense to say something is to do something, Austin classifies three kinds of speech acts: 1)locutionary act(言内行为) – the movement of vocal organs to produce a stretch of meaningful sounds,
Introduction Austin's Speech Act Theory Searle's Indirect Speech Act Theory
--Classification of Indirect Speech Acts Its Relations with Other Pragmatic Theories
Austin's Speech Act Theory
It all begins with Austin's) distinction between two kinds of sentences: performatives(施为句) and constatives(叙事句). Austin argues that the uttering of a performative sentence is actually doing an action.
Introduction
The theory of indirect speech acts was put forward by the American philosopher of language John Searle. It originated from Austin's theory, but made some revisions. One of Searle's contributions lies in his understanding of the importance of speech acts. He regards a speech act as a basic unit in social communication, yet not a word or a sentence. This means that his theory pays much attention to the functions rather than the forms of languages.
The second speech act, i.e. illocutionary act, is the focus of Austin's research, because the illocution of an utterance is the speaker's communicative intention or the function it is intended to perform. In this sense, Austin's speech act theory is actually a theory of illocutionary acts. His previous research focus performatives then in fact belongs to a special group of illocutionary acts which are expressed explicitly.