LSAT分析推理篇

合集下载

LSAT考试分析推理题：重点问题

LSAT考试分析推理题：重点问题LSAT考试由五个35分钟的section组成，这些section包括1个阅读理解、1个分析推理和2个逻辑推理，以及一个不计入成绩的加试section。

加试有可能是上述任一种题型。

下面就为大家整理了LSAT考试分析推理题，快来看看吧~LSAT考试分析推理题：重点问题When permits for the discharge of chemicals into a waterway are issued, they are issued in terms of the number of pounds each chemical that can be discharged into the waterway per day. These figures, calculated separately for each chemical for which a permit is issued, are based on an estimate of the effect of the dilution of the chemical by the amount of water flowing through the waterway. The waterway is therefore protected against being adversely affected by chemicals discharged under the permits.The argument depends on the assumption that(A) relatively harmless chemicals do not interact with each other in the water to form harmful compounds(B) there is a swift flow of water in the waterway that ensures rapid dispersion of chemicals discharged(C) those who receive the permits do not always discharge the entire quantity of chemicals that the permits allow(D) the danger of chemical pollution of waterways is to be evaluated in terms of human health only and not in terms of the health of both human beings and wildlife这个假设题目请大牛们重点讲解,A/B我的确是没有分开的我觉得两个都是假设.答案是A.M: A是相关选项, 与原文中的separately对应, 如果取非,不同的chemical合成新的chemical, permit的作用就不存在了, 结论中的permits --> protection就不成立. 所以A是答案.B的问题在于1. 和原文中的重点问题无关(见上) 2. 非必要条件,而是充分条件. 原文提到dilution, 所以chemical要被冲散,而不是聚集在某处. B是一个充分条件, 既:有A,就有dilution. 但是原文并没有提出B这种情况是唯一的办法. 既还有可能通过其它手段来解决dilution的问题.推荐阅读--解题技巧1·在解答每一组问题时，将其作为一个单元。

lsat考试各部分

lsat考试各部分
LSAT（法学院入学考试）由以下几个部分组成：
1. 阅读理解（Reading Comprehension）：考察考生对法律文本和论述的理解能力以及总结归纳和推理的能力。

考生需要阅读长篇法学文章，回答相关问题。

2. 逻辑推理（Logical Reasoning）：考察考生分析和评估法律论证的能力，以及识别和推理逻辑结构的能力。

考生需要在给定的时间内回答一系列关于法律论证的问题。

3. 逻辑游戏（Logic Games）：考察考生分析复杂情境、理解条件关系以及推理解决问题的能力。

考生需要解决一系列可视化表达的逻辑问题。

4. 科学推理（Experimental Section）：这一部分与其它三个部分的内容相似，但是题目不计分。

这一部分通常是用于测试新题目的实验性部分，考生无法区分它与其它部分的指定顺序。

注：以上是LSAT的一般考试结构，具体的考试形式和内容可能会因不同的地区、时间和版本而有所差异。

建议考生在报名参加考试前，仔细了解官方提供的最新考试信息。

LSAT逻辑推理原则讲解

LSAT逻辑推理原则讲解LSAT是为测试赴美加地区留学学生的英语能力，其成绩只是作为申请入法学院的评估条件之一，几乎所有的美国法学院和绝大部分加拿大法学院都要求申请人参加LSAT作为J.D.的入学条件。

那么大家知道LSAT逻辑推理原则吗？Focus: Logical Reasoning Logical Reasoning is half of your score on the LSAT - and this is good news. 实际上逻辑推理是你稳拿一半分数的部分...Why?Because you already have most of the Logical Reasoning skills you need for the test. The LSAT* tests your ability to use those skills thoroughly, quickly, andstrategically in the context of a strictly timed, multiple-choice test.On the LSAT, in law school, and in your law career, you will need the ability to see and understand complex reasoning. It's not enough to sense whether an argumentis wrong or weak; you'll need to analyze precisely why it is so. This involves an even more fundamental skill, one that's called on by nearly every Logical Reasoning question--the ability to isolate and identify the various components of any given argument.Logical Reasoning on the LSATEach of the two scored Logical Reasoning sections consists of twenty-four totwenty-six questions based on short passages called "stimuli." Each stimulus takes the form of an argument--i.e., a conclusion based on evidence. You will need to understand the stimulus to answer the questions based on it.2 scored sectionseach 35 minutes longApproximately 50 percent of your scoreUsually 24 to 26 questions eachCommon question-types: weakening, strengthening, assumption, main point, inference,parallel logic·Tests ability to understand, analyze, evaluate, and manipulate argumentsSeven Basic Principles1.Understand the Structure of ArgumentsSuccess on this section hinges on your ability to identify the two basic parts of every argument:* the conclusion: the point that the author is trying to make* the evidence: the support that the author offers for the conclusion2. Preview the Question StemDoing so before reading the stimulus makes you a better, more directed reader. You will know what you're looking for in advance.3. Paraphrase the Author's PointIt's much easier to understand and remember an argument if you restate it simply,in your own words.4. Judge the Author's PersuasivenessYou must read actively, not passively. Constantly question whether the author's argument seems valid or dubious. On a section where many of the questions deal with finding flaws in the author's reasoning, it's imperative to read with a critical eye.5. Answer the Question AskedYou read the argument. You see a major weakness in it. You find an answer choice that points out this weakness. You choose that answer. And you miss the point. Why? Because the question stem was asking for a statement that strengthened the argument, not one that weakened it. Don't let this happen to you. Always double-check the question stem.6.Try to Paraphrase the AnswerApproach the answer choices with at least a faint idea of what the answer should look like.7. Keep the Scope of the Argument in MindA remarkable number of wrong answers have scope problems. Always be on the lookout for answer choices that are too extreme, that contain value judgments that are not relevant to the argument, or that don't match the stimulus in tone or subject matter.注意：逻辑推理部分(两个section)：每个section有24～26道试题。

LSAT考试科目：LSAT分析推理是什么

LSAT考试科目：LSAT分析推理是什么LSAT分析推理是什么呢？分析推理是LSAT考试的一门课程，一般分四组，共有24个问题。

每组里面的每一个问题都基于一系列的条件，这些条件共同描述一种情况，例如，把人分成几组，把物品按顺序排列等。

LSAT分析推理是什么，更多知识等你来看！LSAT考试由五个35分钟的section组成，这些section包括1个阅读理解、1个分析推理和2个逻辑推理，以及一个不计入成绩的加试section。

加试有可能是上述任一种题型。

LSAT分析推理每个section围绕一个单独的段落。

以下是LSAC官方关于分析推理的介绍：Analytical Reasoning questions are designed to assess the ability to consider a group of facts and rules, and, given those facts and rules, determine what could or must be true. The specific scenarios associated with these questions are usually unrelated to law, since they are intended to be accessible to a wide range of test takers. However, the skills tested parallel those involved in determining what could or must be the case given a set of regulations, the terms of a contract, or the facts of a legal case in relation to the law. In Analytical Reasoning questions, you are asked to reason deductively from a set of statements and rules or principles that describe relationships among persons, things, or events.Analytical Reasoning questions appear in sets, with each set based on a single passage. The passage used for each set of questions describes common ordering relationships or grouping relationships, or a combination of both types of relationships. Examples include scheduling employees for work shifts, assigning instructors to class sections, ordering tasks according to priority, and distributing grants for projects.Analytical Reasoning questions test a range of deductive reasoning skills. These include:Comprehending the basic structure of a set of relationships by determining a complete solution to the problem posed (for example, an acceptable seating arrangement of all six diplomats around a table)Reasoning with conditional (“if-then”) statements and recognizing logically equiva lent formulations of such statementsInferring what could be true or must be true from given facts and rulesInferring what could be true or must be true from given facts and rules together with new information in the form of an additional or substitute fact or ruleRecognizing when two statements are logically equivalent in context by identifying a condition or rule that could replace one of the original conditions while still resulting in the same possible outcomesAnalytical Reasoning questions reflect the kinds of detailed analyses of relationships and sets of constraints that a law student must perform in legal problem solving. For example, an Analytical Reasoning passage might describe six diplomats being seated around a table, following certain rules of protocol as to who can sit where. You, the test taker, must answer questions about the logical implications of given and new information. For example, you may be asked who can sit between diplomats X and Y, or who cannot sit next to X if W sits next to Y. Similarly, if you were a student in law school, you might be asked to analyze a scenario involving a set of particular circumstances and a set of governing rules in the form of constitutional provisions, statutes, administrative codes, or prior rulings that have been upheld. You might then be asked to determine the legal options in the scenario: what is required given the scenario, what is permissible given the scenario, and what is prohibited given the scenario. Or you might be asked to develop a “theory” for the case: when faced with an incomplete set of facts about the case, you must fill in the picture based on what is implied by the facts that are known. The problem could be elaborated by the addition of new information or hypotheticals.No formal training in logic is required to answer these questions correctly. Analytical Reasoning questions are intended to be answered using knowledge, skills, and reasoning ability generally expected of college students and graduates.。

lsat infer题目

lsat infer题目LSAT（Logical Reasoning）推理题目是法学院入学考试（Law School Admission Test）中的一部分，主要考察考生的逻辑推理和批判性思维能力。

以下是几个LSAT推理题目的示例：1. A city has two hospitals: the General Hospital and the Children's Hospital. The General Hospital treats adults, while the Children's Hospital treats only children. Each hospital has a waiting room. One day, a family with three children enters the General Hospital's waiting room. Explain how this is possible.2. A police officer pulled over a speeding car and wrote a ticket for the driver. When the officer returned to his patrol car, he found that someone had set fire to it. Explain how this is possible.3. A restaurant owner claims that the best way to prepare a turkey is to roast it in the oven at 350 degrees Fahrenheit for two hours per pound. A customer challenges this claim, saying that a turkey should be cooked at 450 degrees Fahrenheit for one hour per pound. Who is correct? Explain why.4. A group of explorers enters a cave and finds a set of hieroglyphics on the wall. They cannot read them, so they take pictures and leave. Later, an Egyptologist examines the pictures and determines that the hieroglyphics say "Death to all who enter here." How did the Egyptologist know this? Explain why hieroglyphics were used by ancient Egyptians.这些题目都是基于现实生活中的场景或情境，要求考生通过逻辑推理和分析，找出合理的解释或推断出正确的结论。

lsat 新手必读

LSAT考试新手必读目录LSAT考试新手必读 (1)什么是Lsat考试 (2)LSAT考试时间和评价标准 (2)LSAT阅读...............................................................................................3-4 LSAT逻辑推理.........................................................................................5-7 LSAT分析推理.........................................................................................8-9 LSAT写作 (10)一、什么是LSAT考试？LSAT（Law School Admission Test），即法学院入学考试。

它是由位于美国宾西法尼亚州的法学院入学委员会（Law School Admission Council）负责主办的法学院人学资格考试。

几乎所有的美国和加拿大法学院都要求申请人参加LSAT考试。

LSAT考试共有五个部分（包含一个不记分的供入学委员会评估用的评测部分），包括三个方面的内容，每部分时间为35分钟，另加30分钟的写作。

三个方面的内容是阅读理解、逻辑推理及分析推理，主要测试考生下列几方面的能力：∙准确阅读并理解复杂文章的能力∙组织有关信息并得出合理结论的能力∙批判性地推理能力∙对他人的推理进行分析和评价的能力二、LSAT考试时间及评价标准LSAT考试每年举办四次，分别在二月、六月、十月及十二月。

中国大陆地区六月和十二月在北京大学有固定考试。

部分中国大陆地区考生会选择在二月、十月时到香港参加在那里举办的LSAT考试。

LSAT考试满分为180分，最低分为120分，其计算方法是根据选择的正确的答案的数目来确定。

lsat题型

LSAT题型LSAT（Law School Admission Test）是美国法学院入学考试。

作为申请者进入美国法学院的必备考试之一，LSAT考试主要用于评估申请者的逻辑推理、阅读理解和分析问题的能力。

一、LSAT题型概述LSAT考试涵盖了多个题型，包括逻辑推理、阅读理解和分析问题。

每个题型都测试不同的能力和技巧，考生需要针对不同题型制定相应的解题策略。

以下是LSAT 常见的题型：1. 逻辑推理题逻辑推理题主要考察考生的逻辑思维和分析能力。

题干通常会给出一段逻辑论证的论据和结论，考生需要根据所给信息判断论证的有效性、推理的合理性等。

2. 阅读理解题阅读理解题考察考生的阅读理解和理解能力。

考生需要在规定的时间内阅读文章，并回答与文章内容相关的问题。

文章内容涉及法律、哲学、社会科学等多个领域。

3. 分析问题题分析问题题主要考察考生分析问题和解决问题的能力。

题干通常给出一个问题和相关信息，考生需要根据所给信息作出推理、分析和判断。

二、LSAT题型分析接下来将分别对LSAT的三个常见题型进行详细分析。

1. 逻辑推理题分析逻辑推理题是LSAT考试中最常见的题型，占据了考试的很大比例。

逻辑推理题要求考生根据所给的事实和推理进行逻辑推理，判断陈述的真伪、条件的充分性等。

解答这类题目的关键是理解论据和结论，并进行合理的推理。

逻辑推理题可以分为几个常见的类型，包括：•假设题：要求考生根据所给的假设条件判断结论的合理性。

•推理题：要求考生根据所给的事实和条件推理结论。

•强弱化题：要求考生根据所给的信息判断某一论证的论据或结论的强弱。

•概括题：要求考生根据所给的论证内容判断最适合的概括。

在解答逻辑推理题时，考生需要注意判断过程的逻辑合理性，善于分析论证的结构和推理方式，避免被干扰选项所迷惑。

2. 阅读理解题分析阅读理解题在LSAT考试中是必不可少的一部分，考察考生的阅读理解和分析能力。

阅读理解题通常要求考生在规定时间内阅读一篇文章，并回答与文章内容相关的问题。

2023年LSAT考试真题

2023年LSAT考试真题2023年LSAT考试真题已经公布，这是一次备受关注的考试。

LSAT（美国法学入学考试）是许多想要在美国攻读法学硕士（JD）学位的学生必须参加的考试。

在这个真题里，我们将探讨一些题目类型和例题。

希望以下内容对你有所帮助。

题目一：逻辑推理逻辑推理是LSAT考试中的重要部分。

在这一部分，学生需要根据一些给定的条件进行分析和推理，以确定哪个选项是最符合逻辑的。

以下是一个例题："如果马丁是个音乐家，那么他会擅长吉他。

马丁不擅长吉他。

所以，他不是音乐家。

"根据上述陈述，学生需要选出以下哪个选项是最恰当的：A. 马丁是个音乐家，同时也擅长吉他。

B. 马丁是个音乐家，但并不擅长吉他。

C. 马丁不是音乐家，但擅长吉他。

D. 马丁不是音乐家，同时也不擅长吉他。

通过推理，我们可以得出答案是D。

因为题目中给出的条件是，如果马丁是音乐家，那么他会擅长吉他。

而题目中明确告诉我们，他不擅长吉他，因此可以判断他不是音乐家。

题目二：阅读理解阅读理解是LSAT考试的另一个重要部分。

在这一部分，学生需要阅读一篇文章，然后回答相关问题。

以下是一个例题：阅读下面这段短文，并回答问题。

"根据最新的研究，饮食和健康之间存在紧密的关联。

科学家们发现，均衡的饮食可以提供人体所需的营养物质，并降低患病风险。

然而，目前的问题在于，很多人的饮食习惯不健康，充斥着高糖、高盐和高脂肪的食物。

为了改善这种情况，人们应该学会选择更健康的食物，并培养良好的饮食习惯。

"问题：根据短文，为什么人们应该选择更健康的食物？通过阅读短文，我们可以看出，科学家们发现均衡的饮食可以提供人体所需的营养物质，并降低患病风险。

因此，人们应该选择更健康的食物来改善他们的饮食习惯。

题目三：逻辑游戏逻辑游戏是LSAT考试中的另一个题型。

这种题型要求学生通过解决一些逻辑问题和条件制约，来确定最终的结果。

以下是一个例题：四名游戏选手Dave，Jane，Mark和Sue，根据一些条件，你需要确定每个人的游戏顺序。

LSAT考试分析推理题：原逆否命题

LSAT考试分析推理题：原逆否命题LSAT考试是美国法学院申请入学的参考条件之一,该成绩作为预估申请入学者在法学院是与否有正确且合理的推论与判断能力、分析及评估能力而进行的考试。

本文整理了LSAT考试分析推理题。

快来看看吧~LSAT考试分析推理题：原逆否命题-1-1-14. Either Perry’s faction or Tucker’s faction, but not both, will win control of the government. If Perry’s faction wins, the nation will suffer economically. If Tucker’s faction wins, the nation will suffer militarily.Given the statements in the passage, which one of the following statements must be true?(A) It is possible, but not certain, that the nation will neither suffer economically nor suffer militarily.(B) If the nation suffers economically, it is certain that Perry’s faction has won control of the government.(C) It is certain that the nation will suffer either economically or militarily, and also certain that it will not suffer both.(D) If the nation suffers militarily, it is possible, but not certain, that Tucker’s faction has won control of the government.(E) If the nation suffers both economically and militarily, it is certain that neither Perry’s faction nor Tucker’s has won control of the government.由原文，可得1。

lsat真题试卷

lsat真题试卷
LSAT真题试卷
LSAT（Law School Admission Test）是美国法学院入学考试，是评估考生逻辑
推理、阅读理解和写作能力的标准化考试。

LSAT真题试卷是考生备考的重要资料，通过做真题可以更好地了解考试内容和考试形式，提高考试技巧和应试能力。

LSAT真题试卷包括逻辑推理、阅读理解和写作三个部分。

逻辑推理部分主要考
察考生的逻辑思维能力，要求考生在有限的时间内分析和解答一系列逻辑问题。

阅读理解部分则考察考生的阅读理解能力和分析能力，要求考生在阅读一篇文
章后回答相关问题。

写作部分要求考生在规定的时间内完成一篇短文，展现自
己的写作能力和逻辑思维能力。

做LSAT真题试卷有助于考生熟悉考试形式和考试内容，提高解题速度和准确性。

通过做真题，考生可以了解自己在逻辑推理、阅读理解和写作方面的不足
之处，有针对性地进行复习和提高。

同时，做真题也可以让考生逐渐适应考试
的节奏和压力，增强应试能力和心理素质。

在备考LSAT时，考生可以通过做真题试卷来检验自己的备考成果，找出自己
的薄弱环节，并有针对性地进行复习和提高。

同时，做真题也可以让考生更好
地了解考试形式和考试要求，提高解题速度和准确性。

因此，LSAT真题试卷是
考生备考的重要参考资料，通过做真题可以更好地应对考试挑战，取得更好的
成绩。

美国法学院入学考试LSAT分析推理真题精选及详解【圣才出品】

LSAT分析推理真题精选及详解Directions:Each group of questions in this section is based on a set of conditions. In answering some of the questions, it may be useful to draw a rough diagram. Choose the response that most accurately and completely answers each question and blacken the corresponding space on your answer sheet.A company employee generates a series of five-digit product codes in accordance with the following rules:the codes use the digits 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4, and no others.Each digit occurs exactly once in any code.the second digit has a value exactly twice that of the first digit.the value of the third digit is less than the value of the fifth digit.1. If the last digit of an acceptable product code is 1, it must be true that the(A) first digit is 2(B) second digit is 0(C) third digit is 3(D) fourth digit is 4(E) fourth digit is 0答案：A解析：如果1在最后一位，第三位比1还小只能是0，而由于前两位必须是倍数关系，那么前两位必然是2和4。

最新LSAT考试逻辑推理模拟试题(一)

最新 LSAT 考试逻辑推理模拟试题(一)TEST 1 SECTION I Time 35 minutes 25 Questions Directions: The questions in this section are based on the reasoning contained in brief statements or passages. For some questions, more than one of the choices could conceivably answer the question. However, you are to choose the best answer; that is, the response that most accurately and completely answers the question. You should not make assumptions that are by commonsense standards implausible, superfluous, or incompatible with the passage. After you have chosen the best answer, blacken the corresponding space on your answer sheet.1.Mr. West: Well, Ms. Smith, by how much do you plan to increase your donation to thecultural society this year? You know how many worthwhile projects we do. Ms. Smith: I’m not so sure of that. I was very upset about the statue you purchased last month. I think I’ll give no more money to your cause. Mr. West: That’s all right: we’ll just put you down for the same amount that you gave last year. Which one of the following words or phrases has been misinterpreted in the conversation? (A) “increase” (B) “you know” (C) “worthwhile” (D) “no more”（D） (E) “same amount”2.Handwriting analysis—also known as graphology—is a poor way to predict personalitytypes, even though it is used by 3,000 United States firms and by a majority of European companies. In a recent study, five graphologists scored no better than chance in predicting the occupations of forty professionals. Which one of the following is an assumption necessary to the argument? (A) People in the same occupation usually do not have the same personality type. (B) Graphology is an effective means of predicting personality types in non-business contexts. (C) There are more United States firms that do not use graphology than all the United States and European firms that do use it. (D) There are several other techniques for predicting personality types that are more accurate than graphology.（E） (E) There is a correspondence between type of personality and choice of occupation.Questions 3-4 The simple facts are these: the number of people killed each year by grizzly bears is about the same as the number of people killed by lightning on golf courses. And the number of people killed by lightning on golf courses each year is about the same as the number of people electrocuted by electric blenders. All the horrible myths and gruesome stories aside, therefore, a grizzly bear is in fact about as dangerous as an electric blender or a game of golf.3.Which one of the following is an assumption that the author relies upon in the passage?(A) Most incidents involving grizzly bears are fatal. (B) Grizzly bears are no longer the danger they once were. (C) The number of fatalities per year is an adequate indication of something’s dangerousness. (D) A golf course is a particularly dangerous place to be in a thunderstorm.（C） (E) Something is dangerous only if it results in death in the majority of cases. Which one of the following, if true, would most effectively undermine the author’s argument?4.(A) Although the number of people killed by lightning on golf courses each year is very small, the total number of lightning fatalities is many times greater. (B) Electric blenders are among the safest household appliances; were the author to compare fatalities from electrical appliances in general, she would get a much higher figure. (C) Most people would rather take their chances with blenders and golf games than with grizzly bears. (D) Bears in general—including black, brown, and cinnamon bears, as well as grizzly bears—kill many more people than do electric blenders.（E） (E) Statistics show that the number of times people use electric blenders each year exceeds the number of times people play golf each year, which in turn far exceeds the number of contacts people have with grizzly bears each year.5.Emperor: The enemy empire across the sea has harassed us for centuries. I want to conquer itand stop it once and for all. What advice can you give me? Admiral: If you cross the sea, a mighty empire will fall. Emperor: In that case, prepare the troops. We set sail tonight. Of the following, the strongest criticism of the Emperor’s decision to invade would be that it (A) is certain to lead to the emperor’s defeat (B) is based on opinion rather than objective facts about troop strength (C) contradicts the Admiral’s statement (D) fails to consider fully the possible meanings of the Admiral’s advice（D）(E) is a futile strategy for solving the problem at hand 来源:考试大-LSAT 6. No senator spoke at the convention unless he or she was a Democrat. No Democrat bothspoke at the convention and was a senator. Which one of the following conclusions can be correctly drawn from the statements above? (A) No one but senators spoke at the convention. (B) No Democrat spoke at the convention. (C) Only Democrats spoke at the convention. (D) No senator spoke at the convention.（D） (E) Some Democrat senators spoke at the convention.7.If Sarah were a concert pianist for a major orchestra, she would be famous. She is not aconcert pianist since she is not famous. The conclusion above is unsound because the author does not consider that (A) Sarah could be a famous actress. (B) Sarah could be a harpist for a major orchestra. (C) Sarah could be a pianist with a rock group. (D) Sarah could be a concert pianist with a minor orchestra.（D） (E) Sarah could be famous for another reason. Neuroscientists are making progress in discovering more about the cause of Alzheimer’s8.disease. Alzheimer’s disease patients suffer from dementia and sever memory loss. Autopsies performed on such patients have revealed the presence of brain lesions caused by abnormal protein deposits. Similar deposits are also found in the brains of elderly patients who do not suffer from Alzheimer’s disease. It follows that everyone who lives long enough will eventually develop Alzheimer’s disease. Which one of the following statements, if true, most seriously undermines the conclusion that everyone who lives long enough will eventually develop Alzheimer’s disease? (A) The lesions found in the brains of non-Alzheimer’s disease patients are far less extensive than those found in the brains of Alzheimer’s disease patients. (B) The developing brain produces a greater number of cells than it will ever use. The extra cells are later destroyed by what biologists call “programmed cell death.” (C) The procedure that allows scientists to discover the presence of protein deposits during an autopsy is not yet refined enough to ensure detection of the lesions in all patients. (D) Autopsies have shown that some people lack the chemical necessary for protein deposits to cause brain lesions.（D） (E) Though most Alzheimer’s disease patients develop the disease when they are in their latefifties to early seventies, the frequency of patients who develop the disease in their forties is on the rise.9.Free public education is the best form of education there is. Therefore, we must fight toensure its continued existence; that is, we must be ready to defend the principle of equality of educational opportunity. Because this principle is we worth defending, it is clear that free public education is better than any other form of education. Which one of the following illustrates the same weak reasoning as found in the passage? (A) I love music, and that’s why I listen to it constantly. I have my stereo or radio on every waking minute. Since I play music all the time, I must really love it. (B) Books are my most valuable possessions. My books are like my friends—each pleases me in different ways. Just as I would give up everything to save my friends, so too with my books. (C) I would much rather be poor and respected than be rich and despised. To have the respect of others is far more valuable than to have millions of dollars. (D) I have never been betrayed by any of my friends. They have been true to me through good times and bad. Therefore I will never betray any of my friends.（A） (E) Because every plant I have ever seen has green leaves, I have concluded that all plants must have green leaves. This looks like a plant but it does not have green leaves, so it cannot be a plant. 10. Some people say that the scarcity of food is a function of the finite limits of the earth’s resources, coupled with a relentless rate of population growth. This analysis fails to recognize, however, that much of the world’s agricultural resources are used to feed livestock instead of people. In the United States, for example, almost one-half of the agricultural acreage is devoted to crops fed to livestock. A steer reduces twenty-one pounds of inexpensive grain to one pound of expensive meat. Thus, the scarcity of food is not merely a function of limited resources and population growth. Which one of the following is an assumption that would allow the conclusion in the argument to be properly drawn? (A) People prefer eating meat to eating grain. (B) Meat is twenty-one times more expensive than grain. (C) The limits of the earth’s agricultural resources are not finite. (D) More than one-half of the agricultural acreage in the United States is devoted to crops fed to humans.（E） (E) Growing crops for human consumption on the acreage currently devoted to crops for livestock will yield more food for more people. 来源:考试大-LSAT 11. Hanifah: A recent survey shows that there are fewer people who driveonly on weekends than there are people who drive to work each weekday. As a result,weekend-only drives are involved in fewer accidents. Therefore, insurance rates should be adjusted so that rates would be significantly higher for the regular commuters. Katsu: I can’t agree with your conclusion. The same study also showed that, although weekend-only drives are involved in fewer accidents, when considered on the basis of accidents-per-mile-driven their records are worse than those of regular commuters. Therefore, insurance rates should be adjusted to increase the rates of weekend-only drivers over those of regular commuters. In the conversation above, Katsu does which one of the following? (A) Katsu disagrees with each of the premises of the argument that Hanifah offers. (B) Katsu cites additional evidence stating that weekend-only drivers are actually involved in a greater number of accidents than regular commuters. (C) Katsu accuses Hanifah of using inaccurate statistical information. (D) Katsu proves that Hanifah didn’t read the entire report that was cited.（E） (E) Katsu disagrees with Hanifah over how accident records are to be evaluated for insurance rates.12.If Country X does not intervene militarily in Country Y, then the whole region willdefinitely fall under enemy influence. It most logically follows from the statement above that, if Country X does intervene militarily in Country Y, then the whole region (A) Will definitely fall under enemy influence (B) Will probably fall under enemy influence (C) Will probably not fall under enemy influence (D) Will definitely not fall under enemy influence（E） (E) May or may not fall under enemy influence13.Top college graduates are having more difficulty demonstrating their superiority toprospective employers than did the top students of twenty years ago when an honors degree was distinction enough. Today’s employers are less impressed with the honors degree. Twenty years ago no more than 10 percent of a given class graduated with honors. Today, however, because of grade inflation, the honors degree goes to more than 50 percent of a graduating class. Therefore, to restore confidence in the degrees they award, colleges must take steps to control grade inflation. Which one of the following is an assumption that, if true, would support the conclusion in the passage? (A) Today’s students are not higher achievers than the students of twenty years ago. (B) Awarding too many honors degrees causes colleges to inflate grades. (C) Today’s employers rely on honors ranking in making their hiring decisions. (D) It is not easy for students with low grades to obtain jobs.（A）(E) Colleges must make employers aware of the criteria used to determine who receives an honors degree. 14. Either Perry’s faction or Tucker’s faction, but not both, will win control of the government. If Perry’s faction wins, the nation will suffer economically. If Tucker’s faction wins, the nation will suffer militarily. Given the statements in the passage, which one of the following statements must be true? (A) It is possible, but not certain, that the nation will neither suffer economically nor suffer militarily. (B) If the nation suffers economically, it is certain that Perry’s faction has won control of the government. (C) It is certain that the nation will suffer either economically or militarily, and also certain that it will not suffer both. (D) If the nation suffers militarily, it is possible, but not certain, that Tucker’s faction has won control of the government.（D） (E) If the nation suffers both economically and militarily, it is certain that neither Perry’s faction nor Tucker’s has won control of the government.15. One of the more reliable methods of determining regional climatic conditions in prehistoric periods is to examine plant pollen trapped in glacial ice during ancient times. By comparing such pollen samples with spores taken from modern vegetation, scientists can figure out approximately what the weather was like at the time of pollen deposition. Furthermore, by submitting the prehistoric samples to radiocarbon dating techniques, we can also determine when certain climatic conditions were prevalent in that portion of the globe. Which one of the following may be inferred from the information in the passage? (A) The earth has undergone several glacial periods. (B) Radiocarbon dating can be corroborated by glacial evidence. (C) Similarities between prehistoric and contemporary climates do not exist. (D) Pollen deposition is a fairly continuous process.（E） (E) Certain flora are reliably associated with particular climatic conditions. 来源:考试大-LSAT 16. Investigators concluded that human failure was not responsible for the fatal airplane crashlast August, and since that time new and more stringent rules for identifying and reporting mechanical problems have been in effect. That accounts for the fact that reports of airplane mechanical problems have increased in frequency by 50 percent since last August. Which one of the following is an assumption underlying the argument in the passage?(A) Airplane travel is still relatively safe, despite the increase in reported mechanical problems. (B) Mechanical problems in airplanes have increased dramatically since last August. (C) Mechanical problems in airplanes have not increased by 50 percent since last August. (D) Airlines are less reluctant to report mechanical problems than they previously were.（C） (E) Mechanical problems in airplanes have become easier to detect since last August.17. The peculiar evil of silencing the expression of an opinion is that it robs the human race. It takes from posterity, as well as the existing generation, and from those who dissent from the opinion even more than from those who hold it. If the opinion is right, they are deprived of the opportunity of exchanging error for truth; if it is wrong, they lose what is almost as great a benefit: the clearer perception and livelier impression of truth, produced by its collision with error. Which one of the following best expresses the conclusion presented in the argument? (A) Silencing the expression of an opinion is robbing the human race. (B) Silencing the expression of an opinion harms those who dissent more than those who agree. (C) Anyone who agrees with an opinion would not want to silence its expression. (D) Gaining a clearer perception and livelier impression of truth is a great benefit.（A） (E) The greatest benefit is the opportunity of exchanging truth for error.18. Brushing your teeth regularly, no matter which toothpaste you use, will reduce your chances of tooth decay. Scientists have concluded that, when you brush, you reduce tooth decay by removing the film of plaque that forms on teeth and gums. So, you can forget about fluorides: brush your teeth carefully and say goodbye to cavities. Which one of the following is a criticism of the reasoning in the argument? (A) Brushing with fluoride toothpaste has been shown to reduce tooth decay. (B) The fact that brushing will reduce tooth decay does not show that fluorides are of no value. (C) Few people adequately remove plaque by brushing. (D) People have plaque on their teeth most of the time.（B） (E) Scientists have been wrong about fluorides.19. Some good cooks are gourmet cooks who pride themselves on always using extravagantly rich ingredients in elaborate recipes. Some good cooks can be characterized as fast-food cooks. They may use rich ingredients as long as the recipes are easy to follow and take little time. Other good cooks are health food enthusiasts, who are concerned primarily with the nutritional value offood. But even though not all good cooks are big eaters, they all enjoy preparing and serving food. If the information in the passage is true, which one of the following CANNOT be true? (A) Most good cooks do not use extravagantly rich ingredients. (B) Everyone who enjoys preparing and serving food is a good cook. (C) More good cooks who use extravagantly rich ingredients are big eaters than are good cooks who do not use such ingredients. (D) There are fewer good cooks who enjoy serving and preparing food than there are good cooks who are big eaters.（D） (E) Gourmet cooks, fast-food cooks, and cooks who are health food enthusiasts are all big eaters.20.Most discussions of the factors contributing to improvements in public health greatlyunderestimate the influence of the values held by individuals. This influence is indicated by the fact that the astonishing decline in mortality from infectious disease during the past century was primarily due to an improvement in living conditions. To a substantial degree, these improvements depended on the emphasis by an increasing share of the population on cleanliness, prudence, and moderation. The main point of the passage is made primarily by (A) analyzing existing data on medical practices and health outcomes (B) presenting a set of related cause-and-effect assertions (C) applying several general principles to a specific case (D) presenting a general observation and supporting it with several specific examples（B） (E) refuting in detail a commonly accepted argument Questions 21-22 If the city council institutes new parking regulations, city revenues will surely increase, since studies have conclusively shown that, if such parking regulations are put into effect, there is an increase in parking violations, and an increase in parking violations will result in a greater number of parking fines collected. 来源:考试大-LSAT 21.Which one of the following is closest, in terms of its logicalfeatures, to the reasoning used in the argument above? (A) Last year’s increase in revenues can be easily explained. That was the year the city council instituted new parking regulations. No doubt the new law brought with it an increase in the number of parking violations. (B) If taxes were increased, this act would naturally result in increased revenues for thecity, and increased revenues would make some desirable social programs possible. So, if taxes were increased, some desirable social programs would become possible. (C) Henry says that, if the city council goes into closed session, an important matter of personnel policy is being discussed. However, no personnel matters were discussed at the council meeting, so if Henry is right, the council did not go into closed session. (D) All cars parked on the north side of the street were ticketed last night, and the same cars were towed away this morning. So beware! A car ticketed in this city also gets towed away.（B） (E) Allen says that, if the city council institutes new parking regulations, it is unlikely that revenues for the city will increase. If Allen is right, then the parking regulation plan should not be instituted.22. If the statements in the passage are true, which one of the following must also be true? (A) Unless there is an increase in the number of parking violations in the city, city revenues will not increase. (B) If the city council institutes new parking regulations, the council will fall from favor with the citizens. (C) The city council will institute new parking regulations only if an increase in city revenues can be expected to result. (D) If the city council’s new regulations cause more parking violators to be ticketed, the city revenues will increase.（D） (E) Unless the city institutes a complex system of parking regulations, the city cannot expect traffic violations to increase.23. The function of government is to satisfy the genuine wants of the masses, and government cannot satisfy those wants unless it is informed about what those wants are. Freedom of speech ensures that such information will reach the ears of government officials. Therefore, freedom of speech is indispensable for a healthy state. Which one of the following, if true, would NOT undermine the conclusion of the argument? (A) People most often do not know what they genuinely want. (B) Freedom of speech tends ultimately to undermine social order, and social order is aprerequisite for satisfying the wants of the masses. (C) The proper function of government is not to satisfy wants, but to provide equality of opportunity. (D) Freedom of speech is not sufficient for satisfying the wants of the masses: social order is necessary as well.（D） (E) Rulers already know what the people want.24. An unbiased observer of everyday encounters in Western societies would surely not find many instances of unkindness by people under 65 toward people over 65. There are undoubtedly incidents of unkindness based on age, and these warrant reproof. However, the very fact that such reproof occurs and is generally accepted implies that our Western societies basically respect the elderly. The same conclusion can be drawn from a recent survey finding: 71 percent of the under 65 population agreed with the statement that “people over 65 receive too little respect from society”, while only 44 percent of the over-65 population, the target of the alleged irreverence agreed with it. The author concludes that Western societies basically respect the elderly partly because (A) people under 65 are just as kind to people over 65 as they are to people of their own age group (B) survey data suggest that fewer people over 65 than under 65 get too little respect (C) disrespect for the elderly does not go so far as to result in actual harm (D) survey data suggest that people over 65 are more aware of incidents involving disrespect to the elderly than are people under 65（E） (E) incidents of unkindness to the elderly are neither common nor generally accepted in Western societies25. These days, everyone talks about being too busy. But all this busyness does not seem to result in things getting done. Just as many tasks are still left uncompleted, phone calls unreturned, and appointments missed as there were in the days before this outbreak of busyness. Therefore, people must not be as busy as they claim. Which one of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion in the passage? (A) These days, looking busy is a status symbol. (B) People have to do much more these days than before the so-called outbreak ofbusyness.(C) People waste so much time talking about being busy that they fail to get things done.(D) Just as many things are getting done now as before the so-called outbreak of busyness.（B）(E) People have more leisure time these days than before the so-called outbreak of busyness. 来源:考试大-LSAT。

LSAT考试内容介绍

LSAT考试内容介绍
参加LSAT考试之前，了解LSAT考试内容是首要任务，下面为大家详细地说明了LSAT考试各科的相关内容，一起来看一下吧。

LSAT考试分为四个部分，包括阅读理解、逻辑推理及分析推理三个方面的内容，每部分时间为35分钟，另加30分钟写作，不计总分，但此范例写作将随成绩单寄到你申请的学校。

L SAT阅读理解
4篇文章，每篇文章为400~600个单词，有6-8个问题，4篇文章共有28个问题。

LSAT逻辑推理
两个部分，每部分有24-26道试题。

一般每道题都有一篇小的短文或对话，然后针对此短文或对话提出问题。

短文或对话，然后针对此短文或对话提出问题。

短文或对话涉及的范围很广，包括哲学、文学、政治、科技、艺术、历史、体育等等。

逻辑推理试题主要测试考生的以下能力：·确定中心思想·找出推理中的假设·从已知事实或前提得出合理结论·确定推理的准则并将之应用于新的论证·确定推理的方法或结构·找出推理的错误及误解·确定新的事实或论证对现有论证或结论的加强或削弱·对论证进行分析
LSAT分析推理
一般分四组，共24个问题。

每组里面的每一个问题都基于一系列的条件，这些条件共同描述一种情况，例如，把人分成几组，把物品按顺序排列等。

这部分试题主要测试考生理解有关关系结构并推出结论的能力。

L SAT写作
就给定的题目中的两种观点选择一个，并加以阐述。

lsat考试内容

lsat考试内容联合国法学考试(LSAT)是一个世界范围内的法学院入学考试，世界上许多国家的大学都会以LSAT成绩作为申请法学院的主要依据。

LSAT由美国法律教育协会(ABA)制定，在过去的几十年中，LSAT也一直是所有美国法学院必备的考试。

LSAT考试是一个标准化考试，它考查学生在阅读、分析、推理、解决法律问题以及英语/社会学等方面的综合能力。

LSAT考试分5个部分：阅读推理、分析推理、解决法律问题、数量推理和口语/书面表达能力。

LSAT考试的阅读推理部分考查考生对文章中隐含涵义的分析能力，考生需要通过分析阅读材料中支持作者陈述的事实和信息，提出有说服力的观点并且多尝试联系语义相关联的单词表达，以此来证明作者的陈述内容是对应的。

LSAT考试的分析推理部分考查考生对文章的结构、细节、观点及推理的理解能力。

考生需要从原文的内容及结构中把握语义，根据文章的主旨及重点，去分析论述作者的观点，并用逻辑推理方法来检验作者的陈述可信性和可靠性。

LSAT考试的解决法律问题部分考查考生对法律理论和案例分析的能力。

考生需要认识法律的原则，从法律制度的角度来分析案件的问题，并在合理的假设和分析的基础上，根据法律案例及例外条款等来做出正确的判断及结论。

LSAT考试的数量推理部分考查考生的计算能力。

考生需要掌握解答数量推理题的技巧，分析题目所设置的条件，把握题目所要求的内容，理解数量概念之间的关系，用正确的数学方法推算出结果。

LSAT考试的口语/书面表达能力部分考查考生的书面和口头表达能力，包括阅读文章所掌握到的内容，并用相应的语言组织起来。

这部分考试检验考生在语言表达能力、逻辑表达能力、文字表达能力、深入概括能力，以及编写正规的文章的能力。

总的来说，LSAT考试是一个复杂、严格的考试，考试内容涉及多个领域，要求考生有较高的数学、分析能力及英语表达能力。

一般来说，想要在LSAT考试中取得理想的成绩，考生要尽早开始准备，系统复习LSAT考试各部分的内容，并充分练习。

LSAT逻辑游戏决胜法则

LSAT逻辑游戏决胜法则在准备LSAT（美国法学院入学考试）逻辑游戏部分时，了解并掌握逻辑游戏决胜法则是非常关键的。

逻辑游戏是LSAT考试中一个重要的部分，要求考生通过给定的条件，在规定的规则下解决问题。

下面将介绍几个逻辑游戏决胜法则，帮助考生提高解题效率和正确率。

一、先做简单游戏在LSAT逻辑游戏部分，游戏难度各不相同，因此在解题过程中需要找到适合自己的策略。

通常建议先尝试解决相对简单的游戏，提高解题的信心和积极性，为后面更难的游戏做好准备。

在做简单游戏时，可以尝试找到一种快速解题的方法并熟练掌握，以便在考试中能够迅速应用。

二、细致阅读游戏规则在解决逻辑游戏问题之前，必须充分理解和把握所给的游戏规则。

游戏规则描述了游戏中各个元素之间的关系，了解这些关系对于正确解题至关重要。

因此，应该仔细阅读游戏规则，确保理解所有的要点。

此外，还要注意理解规则之间可能存在的交互作用，以便在解决问题时能够准确把握所有的限制条件。

三、绘制图表和推断在解决逻辑游戏问题时，绘制图表是一种常用的方法，有助于组织和可视化所给的信息。

通过用图表表示游戏规则和条件，可以更清晰地理解问题的本质和限制条件。

同时，通过绘制图表也可以帮助识别和推断出潜在的答案。

在绘制图表时，可以使用符号、线条、图形等各种方式，根据自己的理解和需求进行设计，以最方便自己理解的方式表示游戏中的关系。

四、逻辑推理和快速消除错误选项逻辑游戏考察的是考生在逻辑推理方面的能力。

因此，在解答问题时应该善于运用逻辑推理和快速消除错误选项的方法。

逻辑推理是指通过分析游戏规则和条件，并将其应用到问题中，推导出正确答案的过程。

而快速消除错误选项则是通过排除那些根据规则和条件显然不符合要求的选项，筛选出潜在正确答案的方法。

通过这两种方法的灵活运用，可以提高解题速度和准确率。

五、练习和模拟考试LSAT逻辑游戏部分是需要较高的逻辑思维和推理能力的，因此需要进行充分的练习和模拟考试，以熟悉考试内容和考试环境。

lsat考试内容

lsat考试内容LSAT（LawSchoolAdmissionTest）考试是美国法律专业院校招生的入学考试，也是全球最受欢迎的法学研究生入学考试。

LSAT考试分为考试内容及内容模块：一、逻辑分析LSAT逻辑分析测验，也叫综合分析测验。

考生在45分钟内完成35道综合分析测验题。

每道题要求考生分析文字及推理等信息，从而正确回答问题，包括推理出合理结论、判断言论有效性等。

二、语言表达LSAT语言表达测验，考生在35分钟内完成24道语言表达题。

语言表达测验要求考生对对话和文章的信息表达的理解，以及某些数据的解释，考生需要充分理解话语背景，并结合文章的内容，正确回答问题。

三、数学推理LSAT数学推理测验，考生在35分钟内完成20道数学推理题。

数学推理测验要求考生推断特定关系，其中包括代数方程、几何等内容。

考生需要有较强的数学思维能力，了解常见的数学知识，及建立适当的模型来分析数学问题，以正确回答问题。

四、阅读理解LSAT阅读理解测验，考生在35分钟内完成短篇阅读的题目，共有三篇文章，每篇文章附有五道题目。

考生在阅读文章的基础上，对文章中的信息背景、人物对话、文字推理等进行深度理解，根据文章内容正确回答问题。

五、推理编辑LSAT推理编辑测验，考生在35分钟内完成35道推理编辑题。

推理编辑测验要求考生对文字信息的文字表达、语义解释、推断逻辑等能力进行考核，考生要有良好的文字表达能力，及较强的推理思维能力，以正确回答问题。

LSAT考试经过多年的发展，已成为美国法律教育的重要组成部分，不仅可以作为招生名额的申请条件，也为法律教育注入新的活力。

申请者如果拥有一份好的成绩，可以得到全美的法学院的认可，得到更多的机会。

LSAT考试的备考是一个系统的过程，需要考生在各个模块上都要完成一系列有效的训练，才能在考试中取得好成绩，以便获得更多的机会和潜力。

首先，要熟练掌握考试大纲中涉及的知识点，并进行反复练习。

考生在备考时，应根据自己的需要，确定自己的学习范围，及学习方法。

LSAT逻辑推理题解题三大步骤

可乐留学网留学可以很快乐第1页 / 可乐留学网 LSAT 逻辑推理题解题三大步骤LSAT 逻辑推理题一直是困扰很多考生的难点之一，那么如何才能攻破它呢？为了彻底根除这个难题，小编特意找到一位资深的学霸，希望他给大家分享的LSAT 逻辑推理题解题三大步骤，你可以受用。

在做逻辑题时可以参考LSAT 逻辑推理题解题三大步骤：问题，明晰问题目的，从而迅速确定解题方向先读问题而非段落似乎有违常理，但这样可以事先了解题目类型。

只有知道了问题目的类型，阅读段落才能更具有针对性。

另外，问题目的本身变化不多，往往一眼就可以看出题型。

注意：警惕选项中出现的not ，unless ，except ，least 等词，许多人由于漏看了这些“小词”而与正确答案无缘。

读段落，根据不同的问题目的确定不同的解题重点如问题属于“假设、支持、反对、评价”类，读段落时重在找出论点的前提与结论。

边读边思考：从前提中能否推出结论？结论成立还需要哪些假设？如问题属于“归纳”类，读段落时要注重其逻辑层次结构及去向，边读边琢磨：作者想要说明什么？如问题属于“逻辑应用与技法”类，读段落时分清前提与结论。

边读边考虑：段落推理犯了哪种逻辑错误？结论的成立还需要哪些假设？假设的合理性如何等？如问题属于“解释”类，读段落时要格外关注要解释的对象以及解释对象的特点。

边读边斟酌：怎么样才能找一个与要解释的内容直接相关的答案？找答案，注意有些题型可调整看选项的顺序读完问题与段落之后，寻读五个选项，选出正确答案。

有时，阅读选项时要放慢速度，有时甚至应反复掂量。

当然，若费时过多，猜测并非下策。

而像假设的某类题型（后有详述）以及Except 题型，可以调整看选项顺序。

LSAT 逻辑推理题解题三大步骤的全部内容就是这样啦！随后，学霸还将分享他更多的备考经验，知道这个消息的你，还不快点一点关注本栏目吗？。

LSAT逻辑推理解题方法：不要脱离原文的逻辑

可乐留学网留学可以很快乐第1页 / 可乐留学网 LSAT 逻辑推理解题方法：不要脱离原文的逻辑LSAT 逻辑推理解题方法一文主要是教考生如何进行解题，大家在答题时，不要脱离原文的逻辑。

详情解题方法如下：Emperor: The enemy empire across the sea has harassed us for centuries. I want to conquer it and stop it once and for all. What advice can you give me?皇帝：帝国的敌人是你harassed across the US 几个世纪。

我想征服它，阻止它Once and for all 。

你能给我的建议是什么？Admiral: If you cross the sea, a mighty empire will fall.海军上将：如果你穿越大海，一个强大的帝国将会倒下。

Emperor: In that case, prepare the troops. We set sail tonight.皇帝：在这种情况下，让军队做好准备。

我们今晚启航。

Of the following, the strongest cr iticism of the Emperor‘s decision to invade would be that it. 下面，对皇帝入侵的最强烈的批评是。

(A) Is certain to lead to the emperor‘s defeat(B) Is based on opinion rather than objective facts about troop strength(C) Contradicts the Admiral‘s statement(D) Fails to con sider fully the possible meanings of the Admiral‘s advice(E) Is a futile strategy for solving the problem at hand答案：D ，解析：不要脱离原文的逻辑. B is out of scope. 比如说原文讲根据一个survey 做了一个结论, 首选答案应该是和survey 有关, 例如survey 不够representative. 这道题D 和原文的逻辑有直接的关系, 首选.。

GRE与LSAT分析推理题的比较

GRE与LSAT分析推理题的比较LSAT与GRE中的Analytical Reasoning：在LSAT（美国法学院研究生入学考试）考试中，有专门一个Analytical Reasoning的section，那么GRE与LSAT分析推理题有什么联系呢？LSAT考试的各部分考试难度上均略高于GRE，所以新东方学校收集了大量LSAT考试真题作GRE及GMAT考试辅助材料。

本书在这里就专门介绍一下LSAT中分析推理的Section与GRE的异同。

首先LSAT与GRE考查方向在所差别，GRE Analytical Reasoning 普遍并不很难考查重点在于速度，在计算机考试中平均每道题须在1.5分钟左右时间内解完。

而LSAT Analytical Reasoning 不同，其独成一个Section 共24道题要求35 分钟解完，那么解题时间也为1.5分钟，但LSAT此类考题推理难度明显高于GRE，往往推到最后才出答案，这样一种出题方向与法学院要求的推理能力相对应。

其次LSAT阅读难度也高于GRE，往往条件繁琐、混杂、不易读懂，难以分析总结，而GRE往往条件简单明了。

LSAT题量，虽然共24道小题，但每道题推理量远远大于GRE，对于文科学生往往难于应付这样难度的推理。

LSAT的资料对于GRE考试有帮助吗？GRE，GMAT，是Princeton ETSR 正式考试，而LSAT不同，其难度和侧重点有所不同，而题型和思路大致一样，它们之间的交叉使用，相互借鉴，对参加考试的同学有一定好处，但一定要注意使用方法。

在此本书以GRE与LSAT Analytical Reasoning为例分析其差别。

对于大多数理工科学生，分析推理能力足够应付GRE，则不必去做LSAT Analytical Reasoning。

习惯LSAT的复杂推理后回到GRE易把简单问题复杂化，并且易打乱对考试的思维感觉，理工科学生在Analytical 中所遇见的主要是Logical Reasoning的阅读问题，那么可以去借鉴LSAT中的逻辑推理题，提高阅读能力，但不要被其不同于GRE的问题思维所迷惑，坚持GRE Logical Reasoning 的思维，对于在GRE中感觉Analytical Reasoning速度跟不上的文科同学可以选择练习LSAT，锻炼分析推理的能力，如果能适应LSAT，再回头看GRE的分析推理题难度就不大了，但这一切都必须在学习中期进行，前期熟悉GRE问题方向，中期练习LSAT提高推理能力及速度，后期回到GRE熟练GRE的考题方向及问题思维，否则不利于GRE考试思维的培养。