Quantum Manifestations of Classical Stochasticity in the Mixed State
量子反复叠加形成物质
量子反复叠加形成物质英文回答:Quantum superposition, the state in which a quantum system can simultaneously exist in multiple states, plays a fundamental role in the formation of matter. When a quantum system is in superposition, its wave function, which describes the state of the system, is a linear combination of wave functions representing each of the possible states. This means that the system is not in any one state, but rather in a superposition of all possible states, with a certain probability associated with each state.As the system evolves over time, the superposition of states can lead to the formation of matter. For example, in the case of an electron and a proton, the superposition of states can result in the formation of a hydrogen atom. The electron and proton are initially in separate states, but when they come together, their wave functions overlap and form a new wave function that represents the bound state ofthe hydrogen atom.The superposition of states is also responsible for the properties of matter. For example, the superposition of electron spin states in a material can lead to theformation of magnetism. Similarly, the superposition of energy states in a material can lead to the formation of different colors.中文回答:量子迭加,即量子系统可以同时存在于多个状态的状态,在物质的形成中起着至关重要的作用。
量子科学英语
量子科学英语量子科学的英语是:Quantum Science。
例句:1.The field of quantum science is revolutionizing computing as researchers develop quantum algorithms capable of solving complex problems exponentially faster than classical methods.翻译:量子科学领域正在经历一场革命,随着研究人员开发出能够以比经典方法指数级更快的速度解决复杂问题的量子算法,它正在彻底改变计算机科学。
2.In quantum science, entanglement is a phenomenon where two particles become correlated in such a way that the state of one instantly influences the state of the other, regardless of the distance between them.翻译:在量子科学中,纠缠是一种现象,两个粒子以某种方式相互关联,以至于一个粒子的状态会立即影响到另一个粒子的状态,无论它们之间相隔多远。
3.Quantum cryptography harnesses the principles of quantum mechanics to develop unbreakable encryption methods, providing unprecedented levels of security for data transmission in the realm of quantum science."翻译:量子密码学利用量子力学原理开发出不可破解的加密方法,在量子科学领域为数据传输提供了前所未有的安全级别。
Quantum Mechanics
Quantum MechanicsQuantum Mechanics is the branch of physics that deals with the behavior of matter and energy at a microscopic level. It is a complex andfascinating subject that has revolutionized our understanding of the universe. Quantum Mechanics is based on the principles of quantum theory, which describes the behavior of particles at the subatomic level.One of the most important concepts in Quantum Mechanics is the wave-particle duality. This principle states that particles can behave as both waves and particles at the same time. This means that electrons, for example, can exist in multiple places at once and can interfere with themselves. This idea is fundamental to Quantum Mechanics and has led to many of its most important discoveries.Another important concept in Quantum Mechanics is the uncertainty principle. This principle states that it is impossible to know both the position and momentum of a particle at the same time. The more precisely we know the position of a particle, the less precisely we can know its momentum, and vice versa. This principle has important implications for the behavior of particles at the subatomic level.Quantum Mechanics has many practical applications, including in the development of new technologies such as transistors and lasers. It is also important in the study of materials and the behavior of atoms and molecules. Quantum Mechanics has led to many breakthroughs in our understanding of the universe and has helped us to develop new technologies that havetransformed our world.However, Quantum Mechanics is also a subject that is often misunderstood and can be difficult to grasp. The concepts involved are very different from our everyday experience, and the mathematics can be complex and abstract. This can make it challenging for students to learn and for researchers to make progress in the field.One of the challenges of Quantum Mechanics is that it seems to contradict our everyday experience of the world. For example, the idea that particles can exist in multiple places at once seems to go against our intuition. However, this is a fundamental principle of Quantum Mechanics, and experiments have shown that it is true.Another challenge of Quantum Mechanics is that the mathematics involved can be very complex and abstract. This can make it difficult for students to learn and for researchers to make progress in the field. However, the mathematics is essential for understanding the behavior of particles at the subatomic level, and it has led to many important discoveries in the field.Despite the challenges, Quantum Mechanics is a fascinating subject that has revolutionized our understanding of the universe. It has led to many important discoveries and has helped us to develop new technologies that have transformed our world. While it may be difficult to grasp at first, with time and effort, anyone can learn about this important field of physics.。
量子点具有量子力学的
量子点具有量子力学的英文回答:Quantum dots exhibit quantum mechanical effects due to their nanoscale dimensions. These effects include:Quantization of energy levels: The energy levels of electrons in quantum dots are discrete, meaning they can only occupy certain specific energies. This is in contrast to the continuous energy levels of electrons in bulk materials.Tunable bandgap: The bandgap of a quantum dot is the energy difference between the valence band and the conduction band. The bandgap of a quantum dot can be tuned by changing the size of the dot. This allows quantum dots to be used in a variety of optoelectronic applications.Enhanced optical properties: Quantum dots have enhanced optical properties, such as high photoluminescenceefficiency and narrow emission spectra. These properties make quantum dots ideal for use in applications such as light-emitting diodes (LEDs), lasers, and solar cells.中文回答:量子点由于其纳米尺度的尺寸而表现出量子力学效应。
Classical and quantum self-reference systems
Classical and quantum self-reference systems in physics and mathematics.Dainis ZEPS∗†AbstractSystematic use of the concept of self-reference system is suggested to apply in mathematics and physics.We enter concept of quan-tum self-references,which describe our most general mathematicaldistinctions,abstractions.We argue that in nature there are onlyself-reference systems,that we may distinct properly,and that ournatural way of thinking is mathematical.1IntroductionWe see world via pictures.Scientists would say,that we see world as3D moving picture of the manifold of reality.How far do we see in the world using our visional ability?As far as beautiful star picture in the night sky? But there exists another tool for seeing,and it reaches much further,until the farthest stars,until quarks.This tool is used by mathematics,and its name is distinction.Picture and distinction are opposite notions,one given to us by God with the support of two other things,namely,time and space,to enjoy the world via pictures,ourselves being as if participants of these moving pictures,but mainly to procure our existence here on Earth,similarly as cats aptness to catch mice is given for,but the other one is given to procure another our ability,sometimes left without any use-to think.Mathematics makes use of the other.Even more,mathematics can do without thefirst,even without its supporters,time and space.Let us show this.Many physicists up to now have tried to exclude time and space from the picture of reality[1,13,26,41],i.e.in fact,trying to do the same what many idealistic philosophers[21]have tried to do before them.We believe that time and space should be objects of the same nature as all othersthat should be built from somewhat,i.e.,they should be constructed,or be reconstructible,that should mean the same.Any mathematical space should be constructed from the objects that live within it,and time and space can’t be some exception from this general rule of nature.We are going to build a very simplified model of the universe without time and space, i.e.universe comprised by causal causes,and consider it both in classical and quantum outline.We are going to use this model universe not only to characterize general causal relations in nature,but to characterize our cognitive capability in most general sense too.We are going to endow our toy universe with some aspect of thinking calling it cogitans ergo existens-universe model.2Definition of the self-reference systemLet us call self-reference system a system,which is closed in itself excluded from outer world,unless for a while,when it interchanges some informa-tion with the outer world.Other word for self-reference systems could be self-ontology systems,which as well would describe good the notion of the interest.Let us call an oracle system a self-reference system where the outer world does not exist in the sense,that an exchange of information with anything,that could stand for this outer world,does not take place. For self-reference systems we also use another word-idems,pronounced ’aidems.The best way to model self-reference systems in our sense is to depict them as movement of particles in the space with collisions,where each particle is considered as a distinct self-reference system or idem.For any particle=idem we may differentiate two possible states:1)between collisions,particle is closed in itself;we would say that it is in the state particula in se or simply in se;2)when colliding,we say that through this occurrence it learns about the existence of some other particle(it is in state particula collidens)and may receive some qualified information from the outer world.Sometimes,we would like to add one more aspect to the self-reference system.In the state particula in se,we would like to imagine the particle be without any notion of time,for example,let us choose a model for such being without time,exempli gratia,that of Descartes Cogito ergo sum[7,6] existence where cogitatio is the precondition of the state of essens,i.e.our particle is as if in state of thinking,meditation,but not directly in time2duration’s aspect,but without any precondition,where the thinking itself is the base of the existence with no presence of time’s duration whatsoever. Thus,our particle in the state particula in se,is as if particula in se meditans, or particula in se cogitans ergo existens.We would like to differentiate this state of particle by speaking either merely of particula in se or particula in se meditans.We are going to use this notion of the self-reference system or idem in the most general sense to describe a notion corresponding to an aspect of any thing in the observable world to be closed in itself.Each thing in the nature or a notion that describes the nature’s some aspect can be thus in two predictable states,namely,within itself(particula in se state)and in interplay with the outer world(paricula collidens state). One may argue that both may occur simultaneously.We are interested to look more generally,namely,not confining occurrences only with time durability’s distinctions,but rather with conceptual ones.Then for a self-reference may stand a simpler aspect of any higher complexity,imagining this simpler aspect to be particula in se and sometimes in collision,being in the state particula collidens[where somewhere there are particulae colliden-dae]which refers to the higher complexity.We come to the distinctiveness as a framework notion of hierarchically organized cognitively recognizable references.In this article we are interested in what these simple notions cold give to physics and mathematics.We are going to claim that mathe-matics on the whole actually is built and can be rebuilt,and actually is in dynamics of rebuilding of a structuring of self-reference systems or idems.Let us consider the simplest cases of self-reference systems in physics, mathematics,programming,i.e.,in nature’s imitation by humans,and in nature in general.3Self-reference systems in physicsWe are going to start with physics,showing that self-reference systems exist in the nature in the most natural way.Let us see picture1.Any object,e.g.,stone,in nature is as if closed in se and does not know what goes on around it,because it is,as we are used to say,unconscious,i.e.,it does not possess consciousness.Actually, we must discern that,whenever we are trying to start to think about that what,say,stone knows or doesn’t know,it is our understanding of the world around us.Thinking physically,as a physicist should do,when he/she is3pondering about what goes on in the physical world,he/she is discerning things in the world,organize them in certain ordered patterns,and end up with the picture of the whole universe where this picture should stand for the opposite of what could be imaginable as being possible to appear from somewhere as a whole.Thus,really,what goes on in the world,we may capture in terms how we discern the very basic things in nature.Scientist does not have any extra access to what goes on,except through these his/her senses given to him/her,where the notion sense we use in deeper sense,more meaning by it distinction in general then,say,any of physical senses,vision,or hearing, or taste,or else.It is argued here that actually a human being sees the world with the distinctions,and,as a consequence,with mathematical eyes. And this ability starts with someone to be able to discern any object in the world as if possessing the faculty(or imagination)to be in the place of this thing,to get in the particula in se state.Philosophically maybe we should refer the reader to the man who was closest to this way of thinking,namely, Johann Gottlieb Fichte.I-subject,what I am actually,and any of us,sees the world.But we may in similarly attribute this faculty of seeing to any thing in the world.Further,we may make philosophies and whatever sciences around what makes sense to attribute to stone this faculty of being in itself,but math-ematically attributing to the stone this faculty gives us way to productive thinking paradigm with enormous power.It turns out to be one of basic truths that a scientist at a time may turn its interest only to one thing and then this should work as a principal limit for human beings,but it can and should be made a proper tool of investigation as possible,and then it itself works as an excellent principle of our scientific epistemology.Maybe it is our fault to discern things in nature only via distinctions[not in some godlike way],but it turns out to be our achievement when we apply this as a cleverly chosen principle as properly as possible.Mathematics does it. Let us have a closer look.3.1Classical caseLet us consider the simplest case when a pair of particles collide,and con-sider one/any of them as a self-reference system(see pict.1).Let us have manifold which locally is space R3·V2,i.e.,space R3,where our particle in se lives,multiplied with the pair of vectors from V2,describing the state particula collidens where V1and V2are directions wherefrom and where5the other particle(or whatsoever),that caused interaction,come and go to. Thus,our particle lives in three dimensional Euclid space and interaction comes from somewhere outside in the form of possibility of being some other (maybe)particle in the state particula collidens,describing here this as pair of vectors,showing directions of this other particle(or interaction)coming from and going to somewhere.Our particle lives essentially(and ontologically,if you like)in this5D space in classical sense,moving along zigzag path and in every fracture point of movement exchanges some information with another particle(interac-tion).All possible points of the particle in the5D manifold reconstructs(or construct in this only sense)this space which may be called a living space of our particle,which then could be another name(and not only)for this 5D manifold.We would say that there exists a multiparticle that recon-structs all states,as superposition of all states,and now this multiparticle reconstructs its living space,this5D manifold.Let us call this multiparticle CM5(classical multiparticle in5D space).Let us look at the multiparticle CM5from combinatorial point of view2. One particle’s interaction with other particles can be simply characterized as combinatorial structure called combinatorial map or more general struc-ture-constellation[14,15,8,31,3,4,36,35,37,38,39,2,18].But we know that constellation may guide such general mathematical structures as Rie-mann surfaces and ramified coverings[18]used in descriptions of Riemann surfaces.Speaking on very general level,a constellation always guides in any Riemann surface pieces of monotone functions(states in se),of what-ever complexity Riemann surface could be,with ramifications of whatever complexity.The constellation is just thefitting combinatorial structure, that is sufficient for this binatorial map is a special case of the constellation[18],andfits for description of synchronized events.This gives to us one simple clue,i.e.,multiparticle CM5may be characterized by combinatorial map,say,cm5,and it may be a part,or guiding it,if you like, of some manifold,which we would like to call manifold of reality,which is holomorphic function[18].Essential fact is that neither time,nor space are present in these descriptions of reality,but this description is,in it’s very essence,completely multicausal.We can’t get this conviction from the classical particle,even if we would be forced to call BB for because of our understanding of causality in general.Let us try to construct am quantum picture of this and see what we get in that case.Let us consider the multiparticle CM5,which can be considered as a single self-reference system and/or as one-particle,as a model of universe6what is built merely from causal dependences.If we take into account that in the quantum electrodynamic interaction between electron and photonmay be considered as a general pattern of interaction between the forms ofmatter,then the suggested model of universe is only slight simplification of the picture of universe that gives QED[9].It is easy to see that the modelof universe,suggested by us,is cyclical.That causes some general invariantson,e.g.,number of hitting balls in the representation given here.Our model being cyclical means that we have to do with causal cycles.How to inter-pret them?First of all we have to do with multidirectional causality what in case of time aspect being present would mean multidirectional time.As aconsequence,our usual universe cyclicity would mean that BB is connectedwith Big Crutch,but in case of multidirectionality we do not neither be-ginning nor end.More interesting development of idea is to try to connectcausal cycles with matter directly trying to interpret matter interactionsgeometrically.We have at least two models in this direction,i.e.model of Rueda and Haisch[quantum vacuum inertia hypothesis[26]]and model ofLisa Randall and[28],where we have to imagine that gravitational forces are these thatflow through causal cycles.The model we are discussing weare going to call in se universe model.Even more interesting is to look on the model which we have built with adding the aspect of thinking to the self-reference systems which comprisethe model universe,i.e.with particula in se meditans particles.The multi-particle CM5now can now be considered as a self-reference system itself that is being in the state in se cogitans ergo existens.This model we are goingto call meditans in se model or cogitans ergo existens model of universe.Our thinking universe turns out to be cyclical but we must remind our-selves that it is crucially multicausal.Further,if for one particle the attributemeditans may seem without much sense,then for CM5,if we besides think of some real universe model with immense number of causalities,our toyuniverse can turn to be very interesting one.3.2Quantum-like caseLet us consider a path of this particle from5D-point a to5D-point b in its living space.Further,let us consider the path integral[9](sum overall possible paths)from a to b,and denote itℑ(a,b).Let us consider the multiparticle over all possible pairs(a,b),i.e.,over all manifold: ℑ(a,b), the same particle not accounting more then once.Does this multiparticlediffer from the previous one CM5?In classical sense-no.7£¡1£¡2£¡3£¡42432143311242132341:24323:142424:23132:14331Figure 2:Let bookkeeping of 4balls’hitting history be depicted in the multigraph.on the right the same multigraph is shown,but in more gen-eral outline,i.e.,as if without knowing which events are to be connected,i.e.,as if without synchronization of events.Picture on the right corre-sponds to eventuality,noncausalities to be present locally,meanwhile in the picture on the left noncausalities are solved with help of synchronization of events.Picture on the left can be characterized with combinatorial maps,but on the right -requires their generalization,constellations [18].Either our manifold of reality,i.e.,corresponding holomorphic function,is guided by combinatorial map,or by constellation[18],is the same question -do we live in monocausal or multicausal universe.Here cyclicity of histories of events is as if ignored,but if we live in the Newtonian world,without time limits whatsoever,then the connection of the past with future is a mere fact of imagination.Quantum mechanical interpretation of this picture may bring here some essential corrections.8Let us ask the same,but now try to attribute to this picture some quantum mechanical sense.Let us the QM interpretation’s air connectwith Feynman path’s integral interpretation.Then we atribute toℑ(a,b)one reference system,that of quantum life(actually on single(quantum) path)of our particle,which was in one summary interconnection with themembers of ℑ(a,b)via vector pairs in V2.What do we get for all these integral paths in manifold?We get as if one multiparticle not in the sense CM5,but as one reference system actually,i.e.,it is the same particle,butvaried at all ends where whatever starting point should be chosen from some kind of actualization(or measurement?),where the initial information must be known by something(or someone)that guides all the process,keeping all the necessary information in the form of some initial(or border)conditions. Let us have a look in detail.We get instead of classical multiparticle a single particle,self-reference system,to what notion quantum particle can be attributed,i.e.,quantum one-particle with varied ends.We discern it as a self-reference system and say that now it is another problem,how to look it at or tackle otherwise,because,looking at it(in classical sense), it should somewhere commence,but now this self-reference system is the variation over all ends(to all ends)in the living space.Trying to”measure”this particle one should break down this self-reference system.It is not only a trick to name things.Our quantum one-particle does not know about time sequences principally,except causal sequences of collisions on separate mono threads in one-particle life,that is,our particle does not know one(world)time,rather it is multicausal.[From global point of view we do not see difference from what we saw in the previous case,but maybe this point is crucial,because quantum picture should not give another world picture except when we see the world divided.]When we try to separate possible models in physical world picture from many mathematical opportunities then we mostly choose these with one world time as being in correspondence with our everyday experience.But it does not give us right to choose only such self-reference systems,which support one world times,as physically comprehensible from those that do not support this.It concerns the cases[and our case]where models without one world time give more comprehensive world picture,than those being in use before[maybe out of use for future].But now,if we choose the combinatorial model2of CM5then our uni-verse turns out to be cyclical and the question about initial conditions falls off.Of course,big bang and big crunch unification is mere play of imagina-tion if we can not put there any new sense.But as we saw higher,there are9Figure3:Idem0=particles movement in Euclid space.idem1=particles movement infield along geodesic.idem2=multiparticle simulating action of thefield.Considered as quantum particle,i.e.,one-particle,it comprises abstraction of the action of thefield.plenty of possibilities to put interesting interpretations there.What additional sense could be attached to the fact that we are drawing quantum mechanical picture of our particle CM5?We get one-particle.If we look on it from combinatorial universe model point of view,then com-binatorial picture of our particle may be replaced with that of Riemann geometry,and say that our one-particle is the holomorphic function,the manifold of reality which takes into account all causal dependences because the corresponding holomorphic function is guided by the corresponding con-stellation[18].We get the model of one-particle that in the same time is the model of the whole universe-the manifold of reality.Our quantum particle being the whole universe is much in resemblance with Wheeler’s one electron idea[10].Let us have a look at a simpler example.See picture3.Particle is moving in thefield along geodesic.This physical picture may be described by three idems:idem0is a self-reference system of a free particle,say,in Euclid space.idem1is a reference system of a particle’s movement in the physical field along some geodesic now,say,in Riemann space.Then we may discern third idem3that should be a reference system of thefield itself,but let us10imagine in this example the idem3as consisting from many particles along geodesic,which acting on our main particle gives impression of the physical field.Is this only an occasional,convenient scheme,say,to explain action of some physicalfield to students?Not that.It turns out that mathematics more and more supports distinction of such reference systems where these reference systems can be joined together through convenient mathematical description.In this case a vector bundle with connection of space,imitating afield,is the right description.Even more,looking at such pictures we may even try to simplify these vector bundle pictures,introducing corresponding notions that directly communicate the idea with the mathematical model. This is the expectable eventuality,giving productive models in mathematics, in case most correct self-reference systems are detected in our problems. The mathematicians work in those directions,and we do not see any limits there.We think mathematically in the sense that it is our naturally given gift through world phenomena distinctiveness.In order to go deeper in the idea let us look at even simpler example and tackle the problem of calculus,compute function of one variable f(x) or some other manipulation with it.See pict.4.We can differentiate three idems,namely,idem0that of the constant function,i.e.,no change at all. This idem is interacting with the idem of some change,that together makes resulting idem of the graph of the function f(x).We think even further and apply to this case and the previous one,the particle in thefield,what follows.In these cases we were thinking classically,i.e.we had multiparticle, that imitated geodesic in thefield and the change of one argument function. Let us try to look at these problems,say,quantum mechanically,let us say that we are going to tackle these problems as if one generalized problem with one single quantum particle instead of this multiparticle[imitating change].What do we have?When we discover mathematical truths we discover just these quantum-mechanical self-reference systems,not those broken down in particular computations.Of course,we end up with broken down machines in order to do practical computations,e.g.,when drawing particular functions’graphs.These examples from physics give us a pattern of what we could call quantum self-reference system;i.e.,if problem tackling forces us to introduce multi idems then,generalizing this problem in mostly natural way it leads us to one generalized idem,that stands for one quantum idem or quantum self-reference system.11f(x)xFigure4:f0(x)=Const is idem F x0,which collides with the change causing multiparticle Ch;idem F x is particula collidens,which in thefield of change collides,moves along the graph of the function f(x).If in quantum aspect we could see all the problems of the same type as one,then multiparticle would change in one particle:then F x0:Ch=>F x interacting with Ch gives F x.All this problem tackling is one self-reference,which breaks down whenever we tackle individual problem,calculate f(x),find derivation etc.124Self-reference systems in mathematics and computer programmingLet us turn directly to mathematics,butfirst consider computer program-ming and what relates to them both as cognitive activity and computational process,and mathematical machines’construction.Let us look at a program which on some set of data S gives result set R .We know from computer science that there is invariant I of the program that gives S from R,whenever proving and gives R from S,whenever com-puting.We may break the invariant into as many invariants,say,as many procedures(or even instructions)there are in this program.Let us look at any single procedure in the program.It may be considered as self-reference system with the state in se,or even in se meditans which constitutes all actions that procedure does within itself and the state particula collidens, when procedure turns to other procedures,interchanging data,i.e.,is in interaction with outer program’s body.We know that each program cy-cle in the program has corresponding cycle’s invariant,that,of course,is self-reference system,which corresponds to this cycle action and comprise its logical action.The global invariant I is a self-reference system built from these smaller invariants-idems.Thus,all program is one single idem, built from many other idems.We by programming discover or discern these idems and write them down[read break them down]into program codes, and so on.Quantum reference systems should be all on paradigmatic level in computer programming.Only thus programs work and turn out to be more general,than were projected initially.Good programmers do know this,programming directors should know this.We may see that programming paradigm very well demonstrates our idea in the particula in se meditans aspect.Any large programm is very good pattern of our cogitants ergo existens universe model.Today,a branch of computer science is developing using the term-on-tology[12,24],but not in the sense philosophers are used to do.It,in its essence,is typed and classified mathematical distinction,i.e.a self-reference system,which their authors call the framework for building models.It only depends on how we use this term:it turns out to be the same self-reference system,but applicable to some predictablefield of interest with the effect of being conveniently deposable in common knowledge base with the possi-bility to be easy retrieved and applied.Because of the rapid development of thisfield we see here additional possibility to give computer scientists the13necessary theoretical background,i.e.,if our attitude is right,there should never be any limits for our desire to implement whatever mathematical theories in the frameworks of eventual ontologies.All is but tofind appro-priate mathematical distinctions,i.e.,idems.There is a point where these attitudes work one against other.Ontologies’bases are hierarchical and depend on ground decisions in their basic choices.But it is only a question of how proper mathematical distinctions are made that they should work eventually good even in cases of human made knowledge databases based on particular choices.Some people from otherfields teach us how to do this [18,22].Let us turn to mathematics where we should encounter examples of real quantum self-references.We may start with one beautiful example,e.g.,the group theory[25].We see that the group theory is self-reference system; when we work within the theory we apply theorems within it and develop it and applying the group theory outside itself we come to the state particula collidens.But this situation is already too general.We see that we have to do with quantum self-reference system,when we speak about already ready theory,say,the group theory that comprise in some way the tackling of many general problems at once in a great abundance.This even should turn to be right for a single theorem as a quantum self-reference system..4.1Can mathematics be built from self-reference sys-tems?All mathematics is built[or can be built]from idems where one set of idems makes others,are there limits to it?When we come to this idea we may ask two questions:can actually all mathematics be built from idems?or,is there anything in building of mathematics or applying of mathematics that can’t be recognized as idem,where we do not think this only nominally, namely,when all theorems designing with names and designating them as self-reference systems,but asking if there really could be anything princi-pally that doesn’t break down in simpler idems and so on.If we remember Descartes,who suggested to build all mathematics from simpler facts.If all mathematics is Cartesian in this very sense then our idea works with greatest expectancy and correlation in support of this hypothesis.Another statement against our idea may be,that it does not mean any-thing in those directions of what we are here around because the idea of self-reference is too weak to draw such conclusions as we are going to.Our argument against it could be:if we come to conclusion that each mathemat-14。
量子计算机 经典问题
量子计算机经典问题【中英文版】Title: Quantum Computers and Classical QuestionsTitle: 量子计算机与经典问题The phrase "quantum computer" often evokes images of futuristic technology, capable of solving complex problems beyond the scope of classical computers.However, the concept of quantum computing also raises classical questions in the field of computer science.“量子计算机”这一词汇常引发人们对未来科技的想象,能够解决传统计算机难以应对的复杂问题。
然而,量子计算的概念在计算机科学领域也引发了经典问题。
One of the classical questions in computer science is the "halting problem," which asks whether it is possible to determine, for an arbitrary program, whether it will eventually halt.This problem is known to be undecidable in the classical computing paradigm.However, quantum computing offers a potential solution to this problem.计算机科学中的一个经典问题是“停机问题”,它询问是否可以确定任意程序最终是否会停止。
这个问题在传统计算范式中已知是不可判定的。
中学物理,普通物理与四大力学重复
中学物理,普通物理与四大力学重复1.物理是研究物质运动规律和物质结构的科学。
Physics is the science that studies the laws of motion and the structure of matter.2.常见的物理学分支包括力学、热力学、电磁学、光学和量子力学等。
Common branches of physics include mechanics, thermodynamics, electromagnetism, optics, and quantum mechanics.3.学习物理可以帮助我们更好地理解自然界的现象和规律。
Studying physics can help us better understand the phenomena and laws of nature.4.普通物理是中学物理的一部分,重点介绍了物质的基本性质和运动规律。
General physics is a part of middle school physics, focusing on the basic properties and motion laws of matter.5.会议结束后,学生们通过实验加深了对普通物理的理解。
After the meeting, the students deepened their understanding of general physics through experiments.6.中学物理是普通物理的综合应用,旨在培养学生的科学素养和实践能力。
Middle school physics is the comprehensive application of general physics, aiming to cultivate students' scientific literacy and practical ability.7.学习中学物理,首先要了解四大力学的基本概念和作用。
量子力学英文读物
量子力学英文读物以下是一些关于量子力学的英文读物推荐:1. "Quantum: Einstein, Bohr, and the Great Debate about the Nature of Reality" by Manjit Kumar2. "The Elegant Universe: Superstrings, Hidden Dimensions, and the Quest for the Ultimate Theory" by Brian Greene3. "The Quantum World: Quantum Physics for Everyone" by Kenneth W. Ford4. "Quantum Mechanics: Concepts and Applications" by Nouredine Zettili5. "Quantum Physics: A Beginner's Guide" by Alastair Rae6. "Quantum Computing for Computer Scientists" by Noson S. Yanofsky and Mirco A. Mannucci7. "Quantum Physics for Babies" by Chris Ferrie (a simplified introduction for children and adults)8. "The Strange World of Quantum Mechanics" by Daniel F. Styer这些书籍从不同的角度介绍了量子力学的基本原理、应用、历史以及相关的思想争论。
根据你的兴趣和程度,选择适合你的读物开始探索量子世界吧!。
量子力学索引英汉对照
21-centimeter line, 21厘米线AAbsorption, 吸收Addition of angular momenta, 角动量叠加Adiabatic approximation, 绝热近似Adiabatic process, 绝热过程Adjoint, 自伴的Agnostic position, 不可知论立场Aharonov-Bohm effect, 阿哈罗诺夫—玻姆效应Airy equation, 艾里方程;Airy function, 艾里函数Allowed energy, 允许能量Allowed transition, 允许跃迁Alpha decay, α衰变;Alpha particle, α粒子Angular equation, 角向方程Angular momentum, 角动量Anomalous magnetic moment, 反常磁矩Antibonding, 反键Anti-hermitian operator, 反厄米算符Associated Laguerre polynomial, 连带拉盖尔多项式Associated Legendre function, 连带勒让德多项式Atoms, 原子Average value, 平均值Azimuthal angle, 方位角Azimuthal quantum number, 角量子数BBalmer series, 巴尔末线系Band structure, 能带结构Baryon, 重子Berry's phase, 贝利相位Bessel functions, 贝塞尔函数Binding energy, 束缚能Binomial coefficient, 二项式系数Biot-Savart law, 毕奥—沙法尔定律Blackbody spectrum, 黑体谱Bloch's theorem, 布洛赫定理Bohr energies, 玻尔能量;Bohr magneton, 玻尔磁子;Bohr radius, 玻尔半径Boltzmann constant, 玻尔兹曼常数Bond, 化学键Born approximation, 玻恩近似Born's statistical interpretation, 玻恩统计诠释Bose condensation, 玻色凝聚Bose-Einstein distribution, 玻色—爱因斯坦分布Boson, 玻色子Bound state, 束缚态Boundary conditions, 边界条件Bra, 左矢Bulk modulus, 体积模量CCanonical commutation relations, 正则对易关系Canonical momentum, 正则动量Cauchy's integral formula, 柯西积分公式Centrifugal term, 离心项Chandrasekhar limit, 钱德拉赛卡极限Chemical potential, 化学势Classical electron radius, 经典电子半径Clebsch-Gordan coefficients, 克—高系数Coherent States, 相干态Collapse of wave function, 波函数塌缩Commutator, 对易子Compatible observables, 对易的可观测量Complete inner product space, 完备内积空间Completeness, 完备性Conductor, 导体Configuration, 位形Connection formulas, 连接公式Conservation, 守恒Conservative systems, 保守系Continuity equation, 连续性方程Continuous spectrum, 连续谱Continuous variables, 连续变量Contour integral, 围道积分Copenhagen interpretation, 哥本哈根诠释Coulomb barrier, 库仑势垒Coulomb potential, 库仑势Covalent bond, 共价键Critical temperature, 临界温度Cross-section, 截面Crystal, 晶体Cubic symmetry, 立方对称性Cyclotron motion, 螺旋运动DDarwin term, 达尔文项de Broglie formula, 德布罗意公式de Broglie wavelength, 德布罗意波长Decay mode, 衰变模式Degeneracy, 简并度Degeneracy pressure, 简并压Degenerate perturbation theory, 简并微扰论Degenerate states, 简并态Degrees of freedom, 自由度Delta-function barrier, δ势垒Delta-function well, δ势阱Derivative operator, 求导算符Determinant, 行列式Determinate state, 确定的态Deuterium, 氘Deuteron, 氘核Diagonal matrix, 对角矩阵Diagonalizable matrix, 对角化Differential cross-section, 微分截面Dipole moment, 偶极矩Dirac delta function, 狄拉克δ函数Dirac equation, 狄拉克方程Dirac notation, 狄拉克记号Dirac orthonormality, 狄拉克正交归一性Direct integral, 直接积分Discrete spectrum, 分立谱Discrete variable, 离散变量Dispersion relation, 色散关系Displacement operator, 位移算符Distinguishable particles, 可分辨粒子Distribution, 分布Doping, 掺杂Double well, 双势阱Dual space, 对偶空间Dynamic phase, 动力学相位EEffective nuclear charge, 有效核电荷Effective potential, 有效势Ehrenfest's theorem, 厄伦费斯特定理Eigenfunction, 本征函数Eigenvalue, 本征值Eigenvector, 本征矢Einstein's A and B coefficients, 爱因斯坦A,B系数;Einstein's mass-energy formula, 爱因斯坦质能公式Electric dipole, 电偶极Electric dipole moment, 电偶极矩Electric dipole radiation, 电偶极辐射Electric dipole transition, 电偶极跃迁Electric quadrupole transition, 电四极跃迁Electric field, 电场Electromagnetic wave, 电磁波Electron, 电子Emission, 发射Energy, 能量Energy-time uncertainty principle, 能量—时间不确定性关系Ensemble, 系综Equilibrium, 平衡Equipartition theorem, 配分函数Euler's formula, 欧拉公式Even function, 偶函数Exchange force, 交换力Exchange integral, 交换积分Exchange operator, 交换算符Excited state, 激发态Exclusion principle, 不相容原理Expectation value, 期待值FFermi-Dirac distribution, 费米—狄拉克分布Fermi energy, 费米能Fermi surface, 费米面Fermi temperature, 费米温度Fermi's golden rule, 费米黄金规则Fermion, 费米子Feynman diagram, 费曼图Feynman-Hellman theorem, 费曼—海尔曼定理Fine structure, 精细结构Fine structure constant, 精细结构常数Finite square well, 有限深方势阱First-order correction, 一级修正Flux quantization, 磁通量子化Forbidden transition, 禁戒跃迁Foucault pendulum, 傅科摆Fourier series, 傅里叶级数Fourier transform, 傅里叶变换Free electron, 自由电子Free electron density, 自由电子密度Free electron gas, 自由电子气Free particle, 自由粒子Function space, 函数空间Fusion, 聚变Gg-factor, g—因子Gamma function, Γ函数Gap, 能隙Gauge invariance, 规范不变性Gauge transformation, 规范变换Gaussian wave packet, 高斯波包Generalized function, 广义函数Generating function, 生成函数Generator, 生成元Geometric phase, 几何相位Geometric series, 几何级数Golden rule, 黄金规则"Good" quantum number, “好”量子数"Good" states, “好”的态Gradient, 梯度Gram-Schmidt orthogonalization, 格莱姆—施密特正交化法Graphical solution, 图解法Green's function, 格林函数Ground state, 基态Group theory, 群论Group velocity, 群速Gyromagnetic railo, 回转磁比值HHalf-integer angular momentum, 半整数角动量Half-life, 半衰期Hamiltonian, 哈密顿量Hankel functions, 汉克尔函数Hannay's angle, 哈内角Hard-sphere scattering, 硬球散射Harmonic oscillator, 谐振子Heisenberg picture, 海森堡绘景Heisenberg uncertainty principle, 海森堡不确定性关系Helium, 氦Helmholtz equation, 亥姆霍兹方程Hermite polynomials, 厄米多项式Hermitian conjugate, 厄米共轭Hermitian matrix, 厄米矩阵Hidden variables, 隐变量Hilbert space, 希尔伯特空间Hole, 空穴Hooke's law, 胡克定律Hund's rules, 洪特规则Hydrogen atom, 氢原子Hydrogen ion, 氢离子Hydrogen molecule, 氢分子Hydrogen molecule ion, 氢分子离子Hydrogenic atom, 类氢原子Hyperfine splitting, 超精细分裂IIdea gas, 理想气体Idempotent operaror, 幂等算符Identical particles, 全同粒子Identity operator, 恒等算符Impact parameter, 碰撞参数Impulse approximation, 脉冲近似Incident wave, 入射波Incoherent perturbation, 非相干微扰Incompatible observables, 不对易的可观测量Incompleteness, 不完备性Indeterminacy, 非确定性Indistinguishable particles, 不可分辨粒子Infinite spherical well, 无限深球势阱Infinite square well, 无限深方势阱Inner product, 内积Insulator, 绝缘体Integration by parts, 分部积分Intrinsic angular momentum, 内禀角动量Inverse beta decay, 逆β衰变Inverse Fourier transform, 傅里叶逆变换KKet, 右矢Kinetic energy, 动能Kramers' relation, 克莱默斯关系Kronecker delta, 克劳尼克δLLCAO technique, 原子轨道线性组合法Ladder operators, 阶梯算符Lagrange multiplier, 拉格朗日乘子Laguerre polynomial, 拉盖尔多项式Lamb shift, 兰姆移动Lande g-factor, 朗德g—因子Laplacian, 拉普拉斯的Larmor formula, 拉摩公式Larmor frequency, 拉摩频率Larmor precession, 拉摩进动Laser, 激光Legendre polynomial, 勒让德多项式Levi-Civita symbol, 列维—西维塔符号Lifetime, 寿命Linear algebra, 线性代数Linear combination, 线性组合Linear combination of atomic orbitals, 原子轨道的线性组合Linear operator, 线性算符Linear transformation, 线性变换Lorentz force law, 洛伦兹力定律Lowering operator, 下降算符Luminoscity, 照度Lyman series, 赖曼线系MMagnetic dipole, 磁偶极Magnetic dipole moment, 磁偶极矩Magnetic dipole transition, 磁偶极跃迁Magnetic field, 磁场Magnetic flux, 磁通量Magnetic quantum number, 磁量子数Magnetic resonance, 磁共振Many worlds interpretation, 多世界诠释Matrix, 矩阵;Matrix element, 矩阵元Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution, 麦克斯韦—玻尔兹曼分布Maxwell’s equations, 麦克斯韦方程Mean value, 平均值Measurement, 测量Median value, 中位值Meson, 介子Metastable state, 亚稳态Minimum-uncertainty wave packet, 最小不确定度波包Molecule, 分子Momentum, 动量Momentum operator, 动量算符Momentum space wave function, 动量空间波函数Momentum transfer, 动量转移Most probable value, 最可几值Muon, μ子Muon-catalysed fusion, μ子催化的聚变Muonic hydrogen, μ原子Muonium, μ子素NNeumann function, 纽曼函数Neutrino oscillations, 中微子振荡Neutron star, 中子星Node, 节点Nomenclature, 术语Nondegenerate perturbationtheory, 非简并微扰论Non-normalizable function, 不可归一化的函数Normalization, 归一化Nuclear lifetime, 核寿命Nuclear magnetic resonance, 核磁共振Null vector, 零矢量OObservable, 可观测量Observer, 观测者Occupation number, 占有数Odd function, 奇函数Operator, 算符Optical theorem, 光学定理Orbital, 轨道的Orbital angular momentum, 轨道角动量Orthodox position, 正统立场Orthogonality, 正交性Orthogonalization, 正交化Orthohelium, 正氦Orthonormality, 正交归一性Orthorhombic symmetry, 斜方对称Overlap integral, 交叠积分PParahelium, 仲氦Partial wave amplitude, 分波幅Partial wave analysis, 分波法Paschen series, 帕邢线系Pauli exclusion principle, 泡利不相容原理Pauli spin matrices, 泡利自旋矩阵Periodic table, 周期表Perturbation theory, 微扰论Phase, 相位Phase shift, 相移Phase velocity, 相速Photon, 光子Planck's blackbody formula, 普朗克黑体辐射公式Planck's constant, 普朗克常数Polar angle, 极角Polarization, 极化Population inversion, 粒子数反转Position, 位置;Position operator, 位置算符Position-momentum uncertainty principles, 位置—动量不确定性关系Position space wave function, 坐标空间波函数Positronium, 电子偶素Potential energy, 势能Potential well, 势阱Power law potential, 幂律势Power series expansion, 幂级数展开Principal quantum number, 主量子数Probability, 几率Probability current, 几率流Probability density, 几率密度Projection operator, 投影算符Propagator, 传播子Proton, 质子QQuantum dynamics, 量子动力学Quantum electrodynamics, 量子电动力学Quantum number, 量子数Quantum statics, 量子统计Quantum statistical mechanics, 量子统计力学Quark, 夸克RRabi flopping frequency, 拉比翻转频率Radial equation, 径向方程Radial wave function, 径向波函数Radiation, 辐射Radius, 半径Raising operator, 上升算符Rayleigh's formula, 瑞利公式Realist position, 实在论立场Recursion formula, 递推公式Reduced mass, 约化质量Reflected wave, 反射波Reflection coefficient, 反射系数Relativistic correction, 相对论修正Rigid rotor, 刚性转子Rodrigues formula, 罗德里格斯公式Rotating wave approximation, 旋转波近似Rutherford scattering, 卢瑟福散射Rydberg constant, 里德堡常数Rydberg formula, 里德堡公式SScalar potential, 标势Scattering, 散射Scattering amplitude, 散射幅Scattering angle, 散射角Scattering matrix, 散射矩阵Scattering state, 散射态Schrodinger equation, 薛定谔方程Schrodinger picture, 薛定谔绘景Schwarz inequality, 施瓦兹不等式Screening, 屏蔽Second-order correction, 二级修正Selection rules, 选择定则Semiconductor, 半导体Separable solutions, 分离变量解Separation of variables, 变量分离Shell, 壳Simple harmonic oscillator, 简谐振子Simultaneous diagonalization, 同时对角化Singlet state, 单态Slater determinant, 斯拉特行列式Soft-sphere scattering, 软球散射Solenoid, 螺线管Solids, 固体Spectral decomposition, 谱分解Spectrum, 谱Spherical Bessel functions, 球贝塞尔函数Spherical coordinates, 球坐标Spherical Hankel functions, 球汉克尔函数Spherical harmonics, 球谐函数Spherical Neumann functions, 球纽曼函数Spin, 自旋Spin matrices, 自旋矩阵Spin-orbit coupling, 自旋—轨道耦合Spin-orbit interaction, 自旋—轨道相互作用Spinor, 旋量Spin-spin coupling, 自旋—自旋耦合Spontaneous emission, 自发辐射Square-integrable function, 平方可积函数Square well, 方势阱Standard deviation, 标准偏差Stark effect, 斯塔克效应Stationary state, 定态Statistical interpretation, 统计诠释Statistical mechanics, 统计力学Stefan-Boltzmann law, 斯特番—玻尔兹曼定律Step function, 阶跃函数Stem-Gerlach experiment, 斯特恩—盖拉赫实验Stimulated emission, 受激辐射Stirling's approximation, 斯特林近似Superconductor, 超导体Symmetrization, 对称化Symmetry, 对称TTaylor series, 泰勒级数Temperature, 温度Tetragonal symmetry, 正方对称Thermal equilibrium, 热平衡Thomas precession, 托马斯进动Time-dependent perturbation theory, 含时微扰论Time-dependent Schrodinger equation, 含时薛定谔方程Time-independent perturbation theory, 定态微扰论Time-independent Schrodinger equation, 定态薛定谔方程Total cross-section, 总截面Transfer matrix, 转移矩阵Transformation, 变换Transition, 跃迁;Transition probability, 跃迁几率Transition rate, 跃迁速率Translation,平移Transmission coefficient, 透射系数Transmitted wave, 透射波Trial wave function, 试探波函数Triplet state, 三重态Tunneling, 隧穿Turning points, 回转点Two-fold degeneracy , 二重简并Two-level systems, 二能级体系UUncertainty principle, 不确定性关系Unstable particles, 不稳定粒子VValence electron, 价电子Van der Waals interaction, 范德瓦尔斯相互作用Variables, 变量Variance, 方差Variational principle, 变分原理Vector, 矢量Vector potential, 矢势Velocity, 速度Vertex factor, 顶角因子Virial theorem, 维里定理WWave function, 波函数Wavelength, 波长Wave number, 波数Wave packet, 波包Wave vector, 波矢White dwarf, 白矮星Wien's displacement law, 维恩位移定律YYukawa potential, 汤川势ZZeeman effect, 塞曼效应。
与古典科学相对应的英文表述
与古典科学相对应的英文表述对应于古典科学的英文表述是"Classical Science"。
这是指基于经验观察、数学推理和逻辑推理的科学体系,包括牛顿力学、爱因斯坦相对论以及经典热力学等。
以下是21句双语例句:1. Classical science played a crucial role in shaping our understanding of the physical world.(古典科学在塑造我们对物理世界的理解方面起着关键作用。
)2. The principles of classical science laid the foundation for modern physics.(古典科学的原理为现代物理学奠定了基础。
)3. Newton's laws of motion are fundamental concepts in classical science.(牛顿运动定律是古典科学中的基本概念。
)4. Classical science focuses on deterministic explanations of natural phenomena.(古典科学关注对自然现象的确定性解释。
)5. Classical science assumes a fixed and objective reality.(古典科学假设存在一个固定且客观的现实。
)6. Many engineering applications still rely on classical science principles.(许多工程应用仍然依赖于古典科学的原理。
)7. In classical science, cause and effect relationships are emphasized.(在古典科学中,强调因果关系。
)8. Classical science provides a framework for understanding the macroscopic world.(古典科学为理解宏观世界提供了一个框架。
量子物理的秘密英语作文
量子物理的秘密英语作文The Secrets of Quantum Physics。
Quantum physics is a branch of science that deals with the behavior of particles at the atomic and subatomic levels. It is a field that has fascinated scientists and researchers for decades, and continues to be the subject of much study and debate. The secrets of quantum physics are both mysterious and intriguing, and have the potential to revolutionize our understanding of the universe.One of the most fascinating aspects of quantum physics is the concept of duality, which refers to the idea that particles can exhibit both wave-like and particle-like behavior. This duality is best exemplified by the famous double-slit experiment, in which particles such as electrons are fired at a barrier with two slits. When the particles pass through the slits, they create an interference pattern on the other side, as if they were waves. However, when a detector is placed to observe whichslit the particles pass through, the interference pattern disappears and the particles behave as individual particles. This phenomenon has baffled scientists for years, and continues to be a subject of much debate and speculation.Another intriguing aspect of quantum physics is the concept of entanglement, which refers to the phenomenon in which two particles become connected in such a way that the state of one particle is instantly correlated with thestate of the other, regardless of the distance between them. This phenomenon was famously described by Albert Einsteinas "spooky action at a distance," and has been the subjectof much study and experimentation. The implications of entanglement are profound, and have the potential to revolutionize the field of communication and information technology.Furthermore, quantum physics has also led to the development of new and exciting technologies, such as quantum computing and quantum cryptography. Quantum computing utilizes the principles of quantum mechanics to perform complex calculations at speeds that are far beyondthe capabilities of traditional computers. This has the potential to revolutionize fields such as cryptography,drug discovery, and materials science. Quantum cryptography, on the other hand, utilizes the principles of quantum mechanics to create secure communication channels that are immune to eavesdropping and hacking. This has the potential to revolutionize the field of cybersecurity and information technology.In conclusion, the secrets of quantum physics are both mysterious and intriguing, and have the potential to revolutionize our understanding of the universe. The concepts of duality, entanglement, and quantum technologies have the potential to transform the way we think about the world around us, and have the potential to revolutionize fields such as communication, computing, and cybersecurity. As our understanding of quantum physics continues to evolve, it is likely that we will continue to unlock the secrets of the universe and develop new and exciting technologies that will shape the future of humanity.。
读《假如历史是一群猫》有感英语作文
读《假如历史是一群猫》有感英语作文全文共3篇示例,供读者参考篇1My Reflections on "If History Were a Cat" by Rasheed OgunlaruWhen I first saw the quirky title "If History Were a Cat" by Rasheed Ogunlaru on the shelf at the library, I have to admit I was intrigued. A book comparing history to a cat? I couldn't quite wrap my head around the metaphor, but I decided to give it a chance. Little did I know just how profound and insightful this little book would turn out to be.The central premise is that if we imagine history as an actual cat, we can gain a deeper understanding of how to view and interpret the past. Ogunlaru paints history as an aloof, independent feline who doesn't adhere to the expectations we try to place on it. Just as cats will roam where they please and behave as they wish regardless of our desires, history unfolds according to its own chaotic rhythm, not the neat linear narrative humans attempt to impose.One of the first impactful metaphors compares different philosophical perspectives on history to the variety of ways people view cats. The metaphor goes that some see history as a noble creature to be admired from a distance, studying its movements and habits without ever truly understanding its inner essence. This represents more empirical, detached approaches to examining the past based solely on surviving evidence and artifacts.Others view history as a tool to be utilized, appreciating it for how it can provide us with practical benefits like entertainment or moral lessons, just as some appreciate cats for their pest control abilities. This metaphor represents interpretations that see history as a means to an end, valuing only what can provide tangible value.In contrast, Ogunlaru promotes an approach of intimately bonding with and accepting history in all its complexity, much like developing a relationship with a cat as a companion. We must strive to appreciate history for what it is rather than what we want it to be. We can't force it into the mold of the stories we wish to tell.This inspires one of the core insights - that history is not meant to be tamed and confined to crisp narratives. Like a catresisting constraint, suppressing details that don't fit our desired sequence of events does an injustice to the richness and nuance of the past. We must embrace history's contradictions, ambiguities, and elements of chaos.The book is full of clever turns of phrases that lend humor and creativeness to the cat metaphor. For example, Ogunlaru describes history's tendency to "cough up" unexpected hairballs of information that can contradict established assumptions. Or when discussing omitted or neglected histories, he warns that like housecats, "history always leaves downy sediments of itself behind closed doors."I found the chapter on historiography, the study of how history is researched and written, particularly insightful through the cat metaphor. Ogunlaru argues that no matter how skilled the historian, their work is merely an approximation of history's "fur" - its surface appearance and behavior. No matter how comprehensive, we only capture a rendering of history's outer manifestations and impressions. Its true inner essence as a whole remains elusive, much like how a cat's inner mental life is impossible to fully comprehend.This drives home the theme that we should remain humble about our ability to conclusively determine historical truth.History exists in a state of supposition, like Schrondinger's famous thought experiment with a cat in a box who is simultaneously alive and dead until observed. Until a historian peers into the "box" of a historical event and is affected by what they discover, the true reality remains uncertain.Similarly, just as observers affect the behavior of the particles they observe in quantum physics, so too do historians influence the histories they attempt to study through unconscious biases and limitations of perspective. We can never be impartial witnesses, but rather active participants imposing our own attitudes and blind spots through the historical narratives we construct.As such, Ogunlaru promotes the radical idea that we must constantly re-evaluate our assumptions about major historical events and figures through new lenses. Our histories quickly become outdated narratives that are products of their time and place. While not discarding all previous work, we must update our histories much like revising software or upgrading technology so it remains compatible with new evidence and societal outlooks that emerge.For example, he analyzes how Western interpretations of Cleopatra's legacy were heavily prejudiced by racist attitudesthat portrayed her as a cunning seductress who used her sexuality to gain influence over noble Roman leaders. However, from a more modern postcolonial perspective, her story can be reframed as one of a strong female sovereign protecting the sovereignty of her Egyptian kingdom against imperialist threats.Overall, I came away from "If History Were a Cat" with a much more mature perspective on how to approach the study of the past. History is a complex, multi-layered tapestry that should never be reduced to simple fables crafted to suit particular moral or ethnocentric agendas. We must develop the humility and open-mindedness to engage with the full extent of history's tangles and contradictions.Just as cats can never be fully domesticated and retain elements of inscrutable wildness, the past can never be completely tamed to conform to any single perspective or interpretation. There will always be loose ends that refuse to be neatly tucked away. Our mission should be to dive into those loose threads and engage with the wonderful mess that is the unbounded lived experience of humanity across time.Rather than seeking utter objectivity, which is impossible, we should aim to incorporate as many subjective viewpoints into our histories as possible. Like a cat showing affection to theirbeloved human companions, history occasionally grants small insights and purrs of clarity amid the mystery. But those brief moments of revelation should inspire us to forever continue revising our understanding, not resting on perceived laurels of objectivity.I'll confess that some of the cat analogies felt a bit strained or whimsical at times. However, this light-hearted playfulness seemed intentional on Ogunlaru's part to encourage us not to take ourselves too seriously as we tackle the profound challenge of excavating the human experience. History is too important to be treated as dry and austere - it's messy, funny, tragic, and everything in between. We should embrace its characterful quirks and chaos with empathy and openness.In the end, "If History Were a Cat" didn't provide any groundbreaking new historical revelations or frameworks. Rather, it served as a reminderto maintain a flexible mindset and willingness to question assumptions as we approach the daunting task of reconstructing and reinterpreting the past. While relatively slight at less than 200 pages, this unassuming little book containing an entitled feline's musings opened my eyes to a whole new way of seeing history and the world around me. I have a new appreciation for ambiguity and a doggeddetermination to untangle the hairballs of half-truths and contradictions obscuring so much of the human story. I may never attain anything close to a complete understanding of history, but at least I can strive to cuddle up to it and relate to it on its own peculiar terms - as one would with a finicky, complicated cat.篇2If History Was a Cat: Reflections of a StudentAs a student, I have always found history to be a fascinating yet sometimes dry subject. Learning about dates, names, and events from the past can feel like memorizing a endless list of facts disconnected from our modern lives. However, after reading the delightful book "If History Was a Cat" by Xu Zhiyuan, my perspective has been transformed. This whimsical tale breathes new life into the study of history by personifying it as a quirky and mischievous feline.At first, the very premise of anthropomorphizing history as a cat may seem peculiar or even absurd. How can the sweeping narrative of human civilizations be captured through the lens of a household pet? But as I turned the pages, I found myself utterly captivated by Xu's imaginative storytelling. The author deftlyweaves together engaging anecdotes and profound insights, utilizing the metaphor of the cat to shed light on the complexities and paradoxes that define the human experience across eras.One of the most striking aspects of "If History Was a Cat" is how it challenges our traditional, linear understanding of historical progression. Much like a cat's tendency to wander and explore without adhering to predetermined paths, Xu reminds us that history is not a neatly packaged chronology but rather a tapestry of interconnected threads, each unraveling and intertwining in unexpected ways. This perspective encourages readers to step back and appreciate the intricate patterns that emerge when we examine the past from a more holistic and fluid viewpoint.Throughout the book, the cat serves as a playful yet poignant metaphor for the unpredictable and often paradoxical nature of historical events. Just as cats can be both affectionate and aloof, history is portrayed as a capricious force that can bring forth both remarkable achievements and devastating tragedies. Xu's vivid descriptions of the cat's mischievous antics and inscrutable behavior mirror the twists and turns that have shaped the course of human civilizations, reminding us that eventhe most seemingly insignificant actions can have profound and far-reaching consequences.Perhaps one of the most profound lessons I gleaned from "If History Was a Cat" is the importance of maintaining a sense of curiosity and wonder when studying the past. Xu's playful narrative encourages readers to approach history not as a dry collection of facts, but as a rich tapestry of stories waiting to be explored and unraveled. By imbuing history with the qualities of a curious and adventurous feline, the author invites us to embrace the spirit of inquiry and to seek out the unexpected connections and insights that lie hidden beneath the surface.Moreover, the book's central metaphor serves as a powerful reminder of the enduring legacy of human civilization. Just as cats have been revered and celebrated across cultures for millennia, the achievements and struggles of our ancestors continue to shape the world we inhabit today. Xu's imaginative tale encourages us to recognize the threads that connect us to those who came before, and to appreciate the richness and diversity of the human experience that has unfolded over countless generations.As I reflect on the profound impact "If History Was a Cat" has had on my understanding of the past, I am struck by the book'sability to bridge the gap between academic study and personal resonance. By infusing history with a sense of whimsy and relatability, Xu has created a work that transcends the confines of traditional textbooks and invites readers of all ages to engage with the subject in a more intimate and meaningful way.In a world that often prioritizes efficiency and practicality, "If History Was a Cat" serves as a gentle reminder of the power of imagination and metaphor. By embracing the unconventional lens of a feline protagonist, Xu has crafted a narrative that not only educates but also captivates and inspires. As a student, I find myself inspired to approach the study of history with a renewed sense of wonder and curiosity, seeking out the hidden stories and interconnections that lie beneath the surface of recorded events.In conclusion, "If History Was a Cat" is a remarkable work that has profoundly impacted my understanding and appreciation of the past. Through its imaginative metaphor and playful storytelling, Xu Zhiyuan has breathed new life into the study of history, inviting readers to embrace the complexities, paradoxes, and enduring legacies that have shaped the human experience across generations. As I continue my academic journey, I carry with me the invaluable lessons gleaned from thiscaptivating tale, forever inspired to approach the study of history with a sense of curiosity, wonder, and a willingness to embark on unexpected paths, much like the mischievous feline that has captured my imagination.篇3If History Were a Cat: A Student's ReflectionsAs a student, I've read countless history textbooks over the years. Dry recitations of names, dates, and events that seemed to have little relevance to my life. However, the book "If History Were a Cat" by Umberto Eco opened my eyes to history in a whole new way. Through its whimsical premise of personifying history as a group of unruly felines, this book managed to breathe life into the past like never before.The central metaphor is both ingenious and apt. Just like a cluster of cats, history can often feel chaotic, unpredictable, and resistant to human efforts to systematize and control it. Eco illustrates how major civilizations and empires have risen and fallen in seemingly random patterns, just as cats knock over vases and claw up furniture on a whim. Yet amidst the apparent pandemonium, there are also moments of peaceful coexistenceand an underlying order, much like a litter of kittens curling up together for a nap after a rambunctious play session.One of the book's great strengths is how it frames historical narratives in delightfully feline terms. The ancient Egyptians, for instance, are likened to "sleek, regal cats," lounging imperiously along the Nile while lesser feline civilizations scurry around them. In contrast, the aggressive military campaigns of figures like Alexander the Great are portrayed as "history's first major cat fight," with the great conqueror bounding from Persia to India, knocking over any mouse-civilizations foolish enough to get in his way. These playful descriptions make even the most familiar historical events feel fresh and engaging.At the same time, Eco uses the feline lens to uncover deeper truths about the human condition and our endless grappling with the forces of history. He posits that we are all just "humans in a room with a bunch of cats," trying in vain to comprehend and assert control over these unruly beasts. Our great leaders and nation-builders fancy themselves as canny cat-herders, carefully guiding the course of events. But more often than not, Eco argues, we're simply carried along by the churning currents of historical change, just one more series of scratches left on the torn fabric of time.This message resonated deeply with me. As a student, I've been trained to seek overarching narratives and ideological frameworks for understanding the world. Marxist theories of historical inevitability. The cyclical philosophies of Ssu-ma Ch'ien. The Great Man theory of history as shaped by the whims of a few elite individuals. Yet "If History Were a Cat" challenges these tidy centralized models. Instead, it suggests that history emerges organically from the swarming, chaotic interplay of a multitude of actors, chance events, and unforeseen consequences—much like the engrossing yet inscrutable dances of cats.One particularly striking example is Eco's depiction of the fall of Rome. Rather than a singular cataclysmic event, he frames it as a gradual fraying, with once-great cats devolving into quarrelsome strays as resources dwindled. Bit by bit, the grand imperial feline shed its fur and retreated into the shadows while scrappier cat communities took its place—first the Byzantines, then the Germanic tribes, and ultimately the Islamic caliphates. This demystifying, decentralized interpretation upends the traditional historical focus on the Decline and Fall as a clash of great civilizations. It's just one set of cats outmaneuvering and outlasting another in the never-ending struggle for territory, security, and the prime sunbeam.By presenting history through this unique zoomorphic lens, Eco exposes the biases baked into conventional historical narratives. Too often, we project our human-centric values and preconceptions onto the past, seeking grandiose meanings and reinforcing our cultural mythologies. We write ourselves into history as the prime movers, the rightful conquerors, the inevitable victors. Yet from the feline perspective, our hubristic aspirations to mastery appear rather pitiful—just another set of peculiar grooming behaviors by a particularly self-important species of ape."If History Were a Cat" prompts us to radically decenter ourselves, to recognize that we are but one thread in the rich tapestry of life on this planet. Our retellings of the past are inevitably colored by our anthropocentric conditioning, our desperate desire to find significance amid the seeming chaos of existence. The cats, for their part, seem utterly indifferent to such human foibles. They simply go about their timeless routines of eating, grooming, napping, and territorial skirmishing—their own unique forms of history-making that predate and will likely long outlast our fleeting civilizations.For students like myself, this message is both deflating and strangely uplifting. On one hand, it pricks the inflated balloons ofego and exceptionalism we've been fed. The grand civilizational narratives we cling to are mere catnip—tantalizing fictions confected to soothe our troubled primate minds. And our future ambitions to remake the world through scientific or ideological dogma are merely the human variation on a cat chasing a laser pointer, endlessly frantic yet never catching the elusive red dot.Yet this ruthlessly honest portrayal is also deeply liberating. Stripped of our ingrained self-importance, we can appreciate history anew—as the vivid, variegated unfolding of life itself across eons. An intricate, indifferent dance that our kind has been privileged to witness and fleetingly participate in. We are not the central players, but jovial guests at the grand feline pageant of existence. Our mark will inevitably fade, but the great carnival of cats will frolic on, leaving new claw marks and molted fur in its wake.In this light, our role becomes one of simply bearing witness and finding joy in this cosmic cat circus. Rather than lofty attempts to control the uncontrollable, Eco seems to argue, we would do better to lounge in the warm sunbeams of being, to gaze with amused detachment at the perennial games of chase and territoriality playing out around us. To laugh at our own species as we mouth pithy homilies about the meaning of it allwhile the cats bat indifferently at our self-important theorems, just more dangly abstractions to be toyed with and discarded.For me, this re-framing has been incredibly liberating as a student and a human being. No longer do I need to anxiously seek the One True Path to historical enlightenment or civilizational progress. Those are just more futile longings to join the supposed "cat herders" club, a Sisyphean quest doomed to frustration and farce. Instead, I can let the currents of history flow through and around me while still finding my own pockets of meaning and connection. My studies become an appreciation of the richness and dynamism of life rather than an obsessive compulsion to categorize and control.I'll always cherish the memory of reading "If History Were a Cat" sprawled out on a sunny patch of campus greenery, surrounded by the comforting thrums of squirrels and the concerned stares of indifferent passers-by. In those quiet moments, I felt at peace with my insignificance, content to be but one more curious primate delighting in this grand, inexplicable circus we call existence. The cats will do as they will regardless of our puny protests, sowing paradoxes and overturning ideologies with every calculated twitch of their tails. All we can do is sit back and enjoy the enigmatic spectacle,reveling in its mysteries even as we futilely attempt to demystify it through books and theories.For as long as our breed walks this earth, the interminable cat parade of history will wind its way through our lands, by turns alluring and terrifying, fascinating and indifferent. We may fancy ourselves the stars of the show, but deep down we know the truth. The real players have been here all along, casually licking themselves as the feeble rise and fall of human civilizations is just another fleeting warm patch on the carpet. So sit back, forget your cares, and let Umberto Eco's inimitable cat tales transport you to a new appreciation of our delightfully unimportant place in the grand scheme. We are but whiskers in the wind, and what a privilege it is to behold the majestic follies of these felines we call history.。
遇事不决量子力学 英语
遇事不决量子力学英语Quantum Mechanics in Decision-MakingIn the face of complex and uncertain situations, traditional decision-making approaches often fall short. However, the principles of quantum mechanics, a field of physics that explores the behavior of matter and energy at the subatomic level, can provide valuable insights and a new perspective on problem-solving. By understanding and applying the fundamental concepts of quantum mechanics, individuals and organizations can navigate challenging scenarios with greater clarity and effectiveness.One of the key principles of quantum mechanics is the idea of superposition, which suggests that particles can exist in multiple states simultaneously until they are observed or measured. This concept can be applied to decision-making, where the decision-maker may be faced with multiple possible courses of action, each with its own set of potential outcomes. Rather than prematurely collapsing these possibilities into a single decision, the decision-maker can embrace the superposition and consider the various alternatives in a more open and flexible manner.Another important aspect of quantum mechanics is the principle of uncertainty, which states that the more precisely one property of a particle is measured, the less precisely another property can be known. This principle can be applied to decision-making, where the decision-maker may be faced with incomplete or uncertain information. Instead of trying to eliminate all uncertainty, the decision-maker can acknowledge and work within the constraints of this uncertainty, focusing on making the best possible decision based on the available information.Furthermore, quantum mechanics introduces the concept of entanglement, where two or more particles can become inextricably linked, such that the state of one particle affects the state of the other, even if they are physically separated. This idea can be applied to decision-making in complex systems, where the actions of one individual or organization can have far-reaching and unpredictable consequences for others. By recognizing the interconnectedness of the various elements within a system, decision-makers can better anticipate and navigate the potential ripple effects of their choices.Another key aspect of quantum mechanics that can inform decision-making is the idea of probability. In quantum mechanics, the behavior of particles is described in terms of probability distributions, rather than deterministic outcomes. This probabilistic approach can be applied to decision-making, where the decision-maker canconsider the likelihood of different outcomes and adjust their strategies accordingly.Additionally, quantum mechanics emphasizes the importance of observation and measurement in shaping the behavior of particles. Similarly, in decision-making, the act of observing and gathering information can influence the outcomes of a situation. By being mindful of how their own observations and interventions can impact the decision-making process, decision-makers can strive to maintain a more objective and impartial perspective.Finally, the concept of quantum entanglement can also be applied to the decision-making process itself. Just as particles can become entangled, the various factors and considerations involved in a decision can become deeply interconnected. By recognizing and embracing this entanglement, decision-makers can adopt a more holistic and integrated approach, considering the complex web of relationships and dependencies that shape the outcome.In conclusion, the principles of quantum mechanics offer a unique and compelling framework for navigating complex decision-making scenarios. By embracing the concepts of superposition, uncertainty, entanglement, and probability, individuals and organizations can develop a more nuanced and adaptable approach to problem-solving. By applying these quantum-inspired strategies, decision-makers can navigate the challenges of the modern world with greater clarity, resilience, and effectiveness.。
Quanta Without Quantization
a rXiv:h ep-th/975235v129M a y1997Quanta without quantization James T.Wheeler Department of Physics,Utah State University,Logan,UT 84322Abstract The dimensional properties of fields in classical general relativity lead to a tangent tower structure which gives rise directly to quantum mechanical and quantum field theory structures without quantization.We derive all of the fundamental elements of quantum mechanics from the tangent tower structure,including fundamental commuta-tion relations,a Hilbert space of pure and mixed states,measurable expectation values,Schr¨o dinger time evolution,“collapse”of a state and the probability interpretation.The most central elements of string theory also follow,including an operator valued mode expansion like that in string theory as well as the Virasoro algebra with central charges.Introduction The detailed structure of quantum systems follows by fully developing the scaling structure of spacetime.Thus quantum systems -de-spite their Hilbert space of states,operator-valued observables,interferingcomplex quantities,and probabilities -are rendered in terms of classical spacetime variables which simultaneously form a Lie algebra of operators on the space of conformal weights.This remarkable result follows from the tangent tower structure implicit in general relativity.We develop this structure,cite a central theorem,then examine some properties of tensors over the tangent tower.Finally,we apply these ideas to quantum mechanics and string theory,showing how the core elements of both arise classically.1The weight tower and weight maps Consider a spacetime(M,g)with dynamicalfields,{ΦA|A∈A}of various conformal weights and tensorial types.Under a global change of units byλ,letΦA→(λ)w AΦA(1) where w A is called the conformal weight ofΦA.Normally,physicists simply insert these scale factors by hand when needed,without mentioning the im-plicit mathematical structures their use requires,but these structures turn out to be interesting and important.The tower structure begins with the set of conformal weights,W≡{w A| A∈A},which must be closed under addition of any two different elements. Possible sets include the reals R,the rationals Q,the integers J,and the finite set{0,1,−1}.For most physical problems we can choose the unit-weight objects to give W=J.Next,define the equivalence relationΦA∼=ΦB if w A=w B and∃ηsuch thatΦA=ηΦB(2) which partitions the tangent space T M into a tower of projective Minkowski spaces,P M,one copy for each n∈J=W.This partition enlarges the linear transformation group of the tangent space into the direct product of the Lorentz group and the group of weight maps.While the Lorentz trans-formations have their usual effect,general weight maps act on conformal weight.To see that the group is a direct product,consider the product of an n-weight scalarfield with an m-weight vectorfield.Since the linear trans-formations preserve the Lorentz inner product between arbitrarily weighted vectors,the resulting(n+m)-weight vectorfield remains parallel to the orig-inal m-weight vectorfield under Lorentz transformation.Therefore,Lorentz transformations map different weight vectors in the same way.We now investigate weight maps.Just as the only measurable Lorentz objects are scalars,the only measurable tangent tower quantities are zero weight scalars1.Therefore,to readily form zero weight scalars,we classify weight maps and tensors over W by their conformal weights.The generator of global scale changes,D,determines the weights offields according to2DΦA=w AΦA(3)while the generators Mαof definite-weight maps satisfy[D,Mα]=nαMα(4) where nα∈J.Then Mαmaps n-weightfields to(n+nα)-weightfields,making the construction of0-weight quantities straightforward.The following theorem now holds[1]:Theorem.Let V be a maximally non-commuting Lie algebra consisting of exactly one weight map of each conformal weight.Then V is the Virasoro algebra with central charge,[M(m),M(n)]=(m−n)M(m+n)+cm(m2−1)δ0m+n1(5) The lengthy proof relies on explicit construction through a series of induc-tive arguments.It is highly significant to note that the real-projective tangent tower produces the same central charge for V as unitarily-projective string theory,despite its classical character.This is thefirst concrete evidence that some phenomena widely regarded as“quantum”can be understood from a classical standpoint.Tensors over the weight tower Having understood the algebraic char-acter of definite-weight weight maps,we next look at the tensors they act on.Since Lorentz transformations decouple from weight maps,the Lorentz and conformal ranks are independent.ThusT a1···a rn1···n s:(P M)r⊗J s→R(6) is a typical rank(r,s)tensor.Weight maps act linearly on each label n i.Particularly relevant to quantum systems are(0,1)tensors.Withηk a k-weight scalar,Dηk=kηk,a general(0,1)tensor is an indefinite-weightlinear combinationΦ=∞k=−∞φkηk(7)We immediately see the need for some convergence criterion.Imposing a norm provides such a criterion,and with a norm these objects form a Hilbert space,H.The simplest norm uses a continuous representation for the(0,1)tensors defined byΦ(x)≡∞n=−∞φn e inx.(8) 3Clearly,Φ(x)exists only under appropriate convergence conditions,provided by including as the(0,1)tensors those vectors satisfying1δ(x−y)+c1(11)∂xfor D andM(k)(x,y)=e ikx(−i∂x−k)δ(x−y)(12) for the k-weight Virasoro operator.In eq.(11),D(x,y)requires the central distribution c to cancel surface terms from the product integral.Such terms are an artifact of the continuous representation.Physical effects of the tangent tower Now we describe physical effects of the tangent tower.We replace the usual(r,0)tensors of quantum mechan-ics and quantumfield theory by(r,1)or(r,2)tensors.In the remaining two sections we do this in detail for quantum mechanics,then briefly for string theory.Conformal weight and quantum mechanics The tangent tower under-pinning of all axiomatic features of quantum mechanics now follows imme-diately:commutation relations of operator-valued position and momentum vectors,a Hilbert space of pure and mixed states,measurable expectation values,Schr¨o dinger time evolution,“collapse”of a state and the probability interpretation.First,consider canonical commutators.Since w x=1and w p/h=−1, canonical coordinates lie in the subalgebra determined by W0={0,1,−1}⊂W.We temporarily consider operators in this subspace,replacing symplectic coordinates Q A=(q i,πj)by weight-map-valued6-vectorsˆQ A=(ˆq i,ˆπj)∈T a nm forming the Lie algebra[ˆQ A,ˆQ B]=c AB1(13)4where projective representation allows arbitrary central charges c AB.The only invariant antisymmetric symplectic tensor is the symplectic2-formΩAB= 0−δi jδj i0 (14)so we set[ˆQ A,ˆQ B]=ΩAB1(15) Furthermore,the natural symplectic metricK AB= 0δi jδj i0 (16)may be diagonalized by a symplectic transformation to new variablesˆR A= (ˆX i,ˆP j)such that˜K AB= δij−δij (17) or equivalentlyˆR′A=(ˆX i,iˆP j)with˜K′AB= δijδij (18)The zero signature of the symplectic metric requires an imaginary unit in relatingˆR′A toˆP j because the physicalˆX i andˆP j have the same metric, +δij.The projective algebra ofˆX i andˆP j is the canonical one[ˆX i,ˆP j]=iδij1(19)[ˆX i,ˆX j]=[ˆP i,ˆP j]=0(20) Thus,“quantum”(ˆX i,ˆP j)commutators follow from classical scaling consid-erations by replacing classical variables with weight tower operators in the {0,1,−1}subalgebra,and using the natural symplectic structure.Other quantum structures follow easily.Thus,definite weight scalars replace pure quantum states,while indefinite weight objects such asΦ(x)∈H replace mixed states.The construction of expectation values is simply a rule to generate a0-weight scalar.The rule works by matching elements of5H with their complex conjugates but the definition ofΦ(x)above translates this into the manifestly0-weight sumΦ,Ψ =1dτinflat spacetime while uµWµΦgives the action ofa weight map H≡uµWµon the weight superpositionΦ(xν;x).Identifying H as the Hamiltonian operator[2],eq.(22)becomes the Schr¨o dinger equation. The free-particle form for H is the zero-weight quantityH= dˆX jL ,L2φ−2,etc.,with L some standard unitof length.Therefore the rules of quantum mechanics have natural classical interpre-tations in terms of the scale-invariance properties of spacetime.6Conformal weight and quantumfield theory Just asfield theory emerges as the limiting case of multiparticle dynamics,and quantumfield theory emerges as a blend of quantum mechanics and special relativity[3], we can imagine retracing the preceding arguments to derive the principles of quantumfield theory.After all,the quantum state is afield,even in quantum mechanics.Thus,we may anticipate a classical tangent tower in-terpretation of quantumfield theory.As striking as this conjecture seems, we now demonstrate a more striking claim:the tangent tower contains the essential elements of string theory[4].Minor manipulations of a definite weight(1,2)tensorαµ(k)(x,y)found bywriting theδ-function in D asδ(x−y)=1References[1]Wheeler,J.T.,String without strings,in preparation.[2]Wheeler,J.T.,Phys.Rev.D44(1990);Wheeler,J.T,Proceedings ofthe Seventh Marcel Grossman Meeting on General Relativity,R.T.Jantzen and G.M.Keiser,editors,World Scientific,London(1996)pp 457-459.[3]Weinberg,S.,The quantum theory offields,Cambridge University Press(1995).[4]Green,M.B.,J.H.Schwarz and E.Witten,Superstring theory,Cam-bridge University Press(1987).[5]Kuchar,K.V.and C.G.Torre,J.Math.Phys.30(8),August1989.8。
量子纠缠 双缝干涉 英语 范例
量子纠缠双缝干涉英语范例Engaging with the perplexing world of quantum entanglement and the double-slit interference phenomenon in the realm of English provides a fascinating journey into the depths of physics and language. Let's embark on this exploration, delving into these intricate concepts without the crutchesof conventional transition words.Quantum entanglement, a phenomenon Albert Einstein famously referred to as "spooky action at a distance," challengesour conventional understanding of reality. At its core, it entails the entwining of particles in such a way that the state of one particle instantaneously influences the stateof another, regardless of the distance separating them.This peculiar connection, seemingly defying the constraints of space and time, forms the bedrock of quantum mechanics.Moving onto the enigmatic realm of double-slit interference, we encounter another perplexing aspect of quantum physics. Imagine a scenario where particles, such as photons or electrons, are fired one by one towards a barrier with twonarrow slits. Classical intuition would suggest that each particle would pass through one of the slits and create a pattern on the screen behind the barrier corresponding tothe two slits. However, the reality is far more bewildering.When observed, particles behave as discrete entities, creating a pattern on the screen that aligns with the positions of the slits. However, when left unobserved, they exhibit wave-like behavior, producing an interferencepattern consistent with waves passing through both slits simultaneously. This duality of particle and wave behavior perplexed physicists for decades and remains a cornerstoneof quantum mechanics.Now, let's intertwine these concepts with the intricate fabric of the English language. Just as particles become entangled in the quantum realm, words and phrases entwineto convey meaning and evoke understanding. The delicate dance of syntax and semantics mirrors the interconnectedness observed in quantum systems.Consider the act of communication itself. When wearticulate thoughts and ideas, we send linguistic particles into the ether, where they interact with the minds of others, shaping perceptions and influencing understanding. In this linguistic entanglement, the state of one mind can indeed influence the state of another, echoing the eerie connectivity of entangled particles.Furthermore, language, like quantum particles, exhibits a duality of behavior. It can serve as a discrete tool for conveying specific information, much like particles behaving as individual entities when observed. Yet, it also possesses a wave-like quality, capable of conveying nuanced emotions, cultural nuances, and abstract concepts that transcend mere words on a page.Consider the phrase "I love you." In its discrete form, it conveys a specific sentiment, a declaration of affection towards another individual. However, its wave-like nature allows it to resonate with profound emotional depth, evoking a myriad of feelings and memories unique to each recipient.In a similar vein, the act of reading mirrors the double-slit experiment in its ability to collapse linguistic wave functions into discrete meanings. When we read a text, we observe its words and phrases, collapsing the wave of potential interpretations into a singular understanding based on our individual perceptions and experiences.Yet, just as the act of observation alters the behavior of quantum particles, our interpretation of language is inherently subjective, influenced by our cultural background, personal biases, and cognitive predispositions. Thus, the same text can elicit vastly different interpretations from different readers, much like the varied outcomes observed in the double-slit experiment.In conclusion, the parallels between quantum entanglement, double-slit interference, and the intricacies of the English language highlight the profound interconnectedness of the physical and linguistic worlds. Just as physicists grapple with the mysteries of the quantum realm, linguists navigate the complexities of communication, both realmsoffering endless opportunities for exploration and discovery.。
Classical and quantum massive string
Zbigniew Hasiewicz Institute of Theoretical Physics, Wroclaw University, Wroclaw, Poland Zbigniew Jaskolskiy Institut de Recherche sur la Mathematique Avancee Universite Louis Pasteur et CRNS, Strasbourg, France March 26, 1995
Abstract
1 Introபைடு நூலகம்uction
The rst quantum model of massive string was proposed twenty years ago by Chodos and Thorn 1]. It was originally formulated as the tensor product of d-copies of the standard free eld representation of the Virasoro algebra and one copy of the free eld Fairlie representation with the central charge c = 26 ? d. Although satisfying all consistency conditions of a free string model it had some important drawbacks. First of all it contained a non physical continuous internal quantum number. Secondly because of the lack of the path integral representation it was not clear how to implement the idea of "joiningsplitting" interaction. The attempts to construct string amplitudes by means of the operator formalism known from the critical dual models lead to tree amplitudes with a continuous range of intercepts. Finally rather ad hoc phase space formulation made the
Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical
a r X i v :q u a n t -p h /0105127v 3 19 J u n 2003DECOHERENCE,EINSELECTION,AND THE QUANTUM ORIGINS OF THE CLASSICALWojciech Hubert ZurekTheory Division,LANL,Mail StopB288Los Alamos,New Mexico 87545Decoherence is caused by the interaction with the en-vironment which in effect monitors certain observables of the system,destroying coherence between the pointer states corresponding to their eigenvalues.This leads to environment-induced superselection or einselection ,a quantum process associated with selective loss of infor-mation.Einselected pointer states are stable.They can retain correlations with the rest of the Universe in spite of the environment.Einselection enforces classicality by imposing an effective ban on the vast majority of the Hilbert space,eliminating especially the flagrantly non-local “Schr¨o dinger cat”states.Classical structure of phase space emerges from the quantum Hilbert space in the appropriate macroscopic limit:Combination of einse-lection with dynamics leads to the idealizations of a point and of a classical trajectory.In measurements,einselec-tion replaces quantum entanglement between the appa-ratus and the measured system with the classical corre-lation.Only the preferred pointer observable of the ap-paratus can store information that has predictive power.When the measured quantum system is microscopic and isolated,this restriction on the predictive utility of its correlations with the macroscopic apparatus results in the effective “collapse of the wavepacket”.Existential in-terpretation implied by einselection regards observers as open quantum systems,distinguished only by their abil-ity to acquire,store,and process information.Spreading of the correlations with the effectively classical pointer states throughout the environment allows one to under-stand ‘classical reality’as a property based on the rela-tively objective existence of the einselected states:They can be “found out”without being re-prepared,e.g,by intercepting the information already present in the envi-ronment.The redundancy of the records of pointer states in the environment (which can be thought of as their ‘fit-ness’in the Darwinian sense)is a measure of their clas-sicality.A new symmetry appears in this setting:Envi-ronment -assisted invariance or envariance sheds a new light on the nature of ignorance of the state of the system due to quantum correlations with the environment,and leads to Born’s rules and to the reduced density matri-ces,ultimately justifying basic principles of the program of decoherence and einselection.ContentsI.INTRODUCTION2A.The problem:Hilbert space is big 21.Copenhagen Interpretation 22.Many Worlds Interpretation 3B.Decoherence and einselection 3C.The nature of the resolution and the role of envariance4D.Existential Interpretation and ‘Quantum Darwinism’4II.QUANTUM MEASUREMENTS5A.Quantum conditional dynamics51.Controlled not and a bit-by-bit measurement 62.Measurements and controlled shifts.73.Amplificationrmation transfer in measurements91.Action per bit9C.“Collapse”analogue in a classical measurement 9III.CHAOS AND LOSS OF CORRESPONDENCE11A.Loss of the quantum-classical correspondence 11B.Moyal bracket and Liouville flow 12C.Symptoms of correspondence loss131.Expectation values 132.Structure saturation13IV.ENVIRONMENT –INDUCED SUPERSELECTION 14A.Models of einselection141.Decoherence of a single qubit152.The classical domain and a quantum halo 163.Einselection and controlled shifts16B.Einselection as the selective loss of information171.Mutual information and discord18C.Decoherence,entanglement,dephasing,and noise 19D.Predictability sieve and einselection20V.EINSELECTION IN PHASE SPACE21A.Quantum Brownian motion21B.Decoherence in quantum Brownian motion231.Decoherence timescale242.Phase space view of decoherence 25C.Predictability sieve in phase space 26D.Classical limit in phase space261.Mathematical approach (¯h →0)272.Physical approach:The macroscopic limit 273.Ignorance inspires confidence in classicality 28E.Decoherence,chaos,and the Second Law281.Restoration of correspondence 282.Entropy production293.Quantum predictability horizon 30VI.EINSELECTION AND MEASUREMENTS30A.Objective existence of einselected states 30B.Measurements and memories31C.Axioms of quantum measurement theory321.Observables are Hermitean –axiom (iiia)322.Eigenvalues as outcomes –axiom (iiib)333.Immediate repeatability,axiom (iv)334.Probabilities,einselection and records342D.Probabilities from Envariance341.Envariance352.Born’s rule from envariance363.Relative frequencies from envariance384.Other approaches to probabilities39 VII.ENVIRONMENT AS A WITNESS40A.Quantum Darwinism401.Consensus and algorithmic simplicity412.Action distance413.Redundancy and mutual information424.Redundancy ratio rate43B.Observers and the Existential Interpretation43C.Events,Records,and Histories441.Relatively Objective Past45 VIII.DECOHERENCE IN THE LABORATORY46A.Decoherence due to entangling interactions46B.Simulating decoherence with classical noise471.Decoherence,Noise,and Quantum Chaos48C.Analogue of decoherence in a classical system48D.Taming decoherence491.Pointer states and noiseless subsystems492.Environment engineering493.Error correction and resilient computing50 IX.CONCLUDING REMARKS51 X.ACKNOWLEDGMENTS52 References52I.INTRODUCTIONThe issue of interpretation is as old as quantum the-ory.It dates back to the discussions of Niels Bohr, Werner Heisenberg,Erwin Schr¨o dinger,(Bohr,1928; 1949;Heisenberg,1927;Schr¨o dinger,1926;1935a,b;see also Jammer,1974;Wheeler and Zurek,1983).Perhaps the most incisive critique of the(then new)theory was due to Albert Einstein,who,searching for inconsisten-cies,distilled the essence of the conceptual difficulties of quantum mechanics through ingenious“gedankenexper-iments”.We owe him and Bohr clarification of the sig-nificance of the quantum indeterminacy in course of the Solvay congress debates(see Bohr,1949)and elucidation of the nature of quantum entanglement(Einstein,Podol-sky,and Rosen,1935;Bohr,1935,Schr¨o dinger,1935a,b). Issues identified then are still a part of the subject. Within the past two decades the focus of the re-search on the fundamental aspects of quantum theory has shifted from esoteric and philosophical to more“down to earth”as a result of three developments.To begin with, many of the old gedankenexperiments(such as the EPR “paradox”)became compelling demonstrations of quan-tum physics.More or less simultaneously the role of de-coherence begun to be appreciated and einselection was recognized as key in the emergence of st not least,various developments have led to a new view of the role of information in physics.This paper reviews progress with a focus on decoherence,einselection and the emergence of classicality,but also attempts a“pre-view”of the future of this exciting and fundamental area.A.The problem:Hilbert space is bigThe interpretation problem stems from the vastness of the Hilbert space,which,by the principle of superposi-tion,admits arbitrary linear combinations of any states as a possible quantum state.This law,thoroughly tested in the microscopic domain,bears consequences that defy classical intuition:It appears to imply that the familiar classical states should be an exceedingly rare exception. And,naively,one may guess that superposition principle should always apply literally:Everything is ultimately made out of quantum“stuff”.Therefore,there is no a priori reason for macroscopic objects to have definite position or momentum.As Einstein noted1localization with respect to macrocoordinates is not just independent, but incompatible with quantum theory.How can one then establish correspondence between the quantum and the familiar classical reality?1.Copenhagen InterpretationBohr’s solution was to draw a border between the quantum and the classical and to keep certain objects–especially measuring devices and observers–on the clas-sical side(Bohr,1928;1949).The principle of superposi-tion was suspended“by decree”in the classical domain. The exact location of this border was difficult to pinpoint, but measurements“brought to a close”quantum events. Indeed,in Bohr’s view the classical domain was more fundamental:Its laws were self-contained(they could be confirmed from within)and established the framework necessary to define the quantum.Thefirst breach in the quantum-classical border ap-peared early:In the famous Bohr–Einstein double-slit debate,quantum Heisenberg uncertainty was invoked by Bohr at the macroscopic level to preserve wave-particle duality.Indeed,as the ultimate components of classical objects are quantum,Bohr emphasized that the bound-ary must be moveable,so that even the human nervous system could be regarded as quantum provided that suit-able classical devices to detect its quantum features were available.In the words of John Archibald Wheeler(1978; 1983)who has elucidated Bohr’s position and decisively contributed to the revival of interest in these matters,“No[quantum]phenomenon is a phenomenon until it is a recorded(observed)phenomenon”.3 This is a pithy summary of a point of view–known asthe Copenhagen Interpretation(CI)–that has kept manya physicist out of despair.On the other hand,as long as acompelling reason for the quantum-classical border couldnot be found,the CI Universe would be governed by twosets of laws,with poorly defined domains of jurisdiction.This fact has kept many a student,not to mention theirteachers,in despair(Mermin1990a;b;1994).2.Many Worlds InterpretationThe approach proposed by Hugh Everett(1957a,b)and elucidated by Wheeler(1957),Bryce DeWitt(1970)and others(see DeWitt and Graham,1973;Zeh,1970;1973;Geroch,1984;Deutsch,1985,1997,2001)was toenlarge the quantum domain.Everything is now repre-sented by a unitarily evolving state vector,a gigantic su-perposition splitting to accommodate all the alternativesconsistent with the initial conditions.This is the essenceof the Many Worlds Interpretation(MWI).It does notsuffer from the dual nature of CI.However,it also doesnot explain the emergence of classical reality.The difficulty many have in accepting MWI stems fromits violation of the intuitively obvious“conservation law”–that there is just one Universe,the one we perceive.But even after this question is dealt with,,many a con-vert from CI(which claims allegiance of a majority ofphysicists)to MWI(which has steadily gained popular-ity;see Tegmark and Wheeler,2001,for an assessment)eventually realizes that the original MWI does not ad-dress the“preferred basis question”posed by Einstein1(see Wheeler,1983;Stein,1984;Bell1981,1987;Kent,1990;for critical assessments of MWI).And as long asit is unclear what singles out preferred states,perceptionof a unique outcome of a measurement and,hence,of asingle Universe cannot be explained either2.In essence,Many Worlds Interpretation does not ad-dress but only postpones the key question.The quantum-classical boundary is pushed all the way towards theobserver,right against the border between the materialUniverse and the“consciousness”,leaving it at a veryuncomfortable place to do physics.MWI is incomplete:It does not explain what is effectively classical and why.Nevertheless,it was a crucial conceptual breakthrough:4ment)can be in principle carried out without disturbing the system.Only in quantum mechanics acquisition of information inevitably alters the state of the system–the fact that becomes apparent in double-slit and related experiments(Wootters and Zurek,1979;Zurek,1983). Quantum nature of decoherence and the absence of classical analogues are a source of misconceptions.For instance,decoherence is sometimes equated with relax-ation or classical noise that can be also introduced by the environment.Indeed,all of these effects often ap-pear together and as a consequence of the“openness”. The distinction between them can be briefly summed up: Relaxation and noise are caused by the environment per-turbing the system,while decoherence and einselection are caused by the system perturbing the environment. Within the past few years decoherence and einselection became familiar to many.This does not mean that their implications are universally accepted(see comments in the April1993issue of Physics Today;d’Espagnat,1989 and1995;Bub,1997;Leggett,1998and2002;Stapp, 2001;exchange of views between Anderson,2001,and Adler,2001).In afield where controversy reigned for so long this resistance to a new paradigm is no surprise. C.The nature of the resolution and the role of envariance Our aim is to explain why does the quantum Universe appear classical.This question can be motivated only in the context of the Universe divided into systems,and must be phrased in the language of the correlations be-tween them.In the absence of systems Schr¨o dinger equa-tion dictates deterministic evolution;|Ψ(t) =exp(−iHt/¯h)|Ψ(0) ,(1.1) and the problem of interpretation seems to disappear. There is no need for“collapse”in a Universe with no systems.Yet,the division into systems is imperfect.As a consequence,the Universe is a collection of open(in-teracting)quantum systems.As the interpretation prob-lem does not arise in quantum theory unless interacting systems exist,we shall also feel free to assume that an environment exists when looking for a resolution. Decoherence and einselectionfit comfortably in the context of the Many Worlds Interpretation where they define the“branches”of the universal state vector.De-coherence makes MWI complete:It allows one to ana-lyze the Universe as it is seen by an observer,who is also subject to decoherence.Einselection justifies elements of Bohr’s CI by drawing the border between the quan-tum and the classical.This natural boundary can be sometimes shifted:Its effectiveness depends on the de-gree of isolation and on the manner in which the system is probed,but it is a very effective quantum-classical border nevertheless.Einselectionfits either MWI or CI framework:It sup-plies a statute of limitations,putting an end to the quantum jurisdiction..It delineates how much of the Universe will appear classical to observers who monitor it from within,using their limited capacity to acquire, store,and process information.It allows one to under-stand classicality as an idealization that holds in the limit of macroscopic open quantum systems.Environment imposes superselection rules by preserv-ing part of the information that resides in the correlations between the system and the measuring apparatus(Zurek, 1981,1982).The observer and the environment compete for the information about the system.Environment–because of its size and its incessant interaction with the system–wins that competition,acquiring information faster and more completely than the observer.Thus,a record useful for the purpose of prediction must be re-stricted to the observables that are already monitored by the environment.In that case,the observer and the en-vironment no longer compete and decoherence becomes unnoticeable.Indeed,typically observers use environ-ment as a“communication channel”,and monitor it to find out about the system.Spreading of the information about the system through the environment is ultimately responsible for the emer-gence of the“objective reality”.Objectivity of a state can be quantified by the redundancy with which it is recorded throughout Universe.Intercepting fragments of the environment allows observers tofind out(pointer) state of the system without perturbing it(Zurek,1993a, 1998a,and2000;see especially section VII of this pa-per for a preview of this new“environment as a witness”approach to the interpretation of quantum theory). When an effect of a transformation acting on a system can be undone by a suitable transformation acting on the environment,so that the joint state of the two remains unchanged,the transformed property of the system is said to exhibit“environment assisted invariance”or en-variance(Zurek,2002b).Observer must be obviously ignorant of the envariant properties of the system.Pure entangled states exhibit envariance.Thus,in quantum physics perfect information about the joint state of the system-environment pair can be used to prove ignorance of the state of the system.Envariance offers a new fundamental view of what is information and what is ignorance in the quantum world. It leads to Born’s rule for the probabilities and justifies the use of reduced density matrices as a description of a part of a larger combined system.Decoherence and ein-selection rely on reduced density matrices.Envariance provides a fundamental resolution of many of the inter-pretational issues.It will be discussed in section VI D.D.Existential Interpretation and‘Quantum Darwinism’What the observer knows is inseparable from what the observer is:The physical state of his memory implies his information about the Universe.Its reliability de-pends on the stability of the correlations with the exter-nal observables.In this very immediate sense decoher-5ence enforces the apparent“collapse of the wavepacket”: After a decoherence timescale,only the einselected mem-ory states will exist and retain useful correlations(Zurek, 1991;1998a,b;Tegmark,2000).The observer described by some specific einselected state(including a configu-ration of memory bits)will be able to access(“recall”) only that state.The collapse is a consequence of einse-lection and of the one-to-one correspondence between the state of his memory and of the information encoded in it. Memory is simultaneously a description of the recorded information and a part of the“identity tag”,defining observer as a physical system.It is as inconsistent to imagine observer perceiving something else than what is implied by the stable(einselected)records in his posses-sion as it is impossible to imagine the same person with a different DNA:Both cases involve information encoded in a state of a system inextricably linked with the physical identity of an individual.Distinct memory/identity states of the observer(that are also his“states of knowledge”)cannot be superposed: This censorship is strictly enforced by decoherence and the resulting einselection.Distinct memory states label and“inhabit”different branches of the Everett’s“Many Worlds”Universe.Persistence of correlations is all that is needed to recover“familiar reality”.In this manner,the distinction between epistemology and ontology is washed away:To put it succinctly(Zurek,1994)there can be no information without representation in physical states. There is usually no need to trace the collapse all the way to observer’s memory.It suffices that the states of a decohering system quickly evolve into mix-tures of the preferred(pointer)states.All that can be known in principle about a system(or about an observer, also introspectively,e.g.,by the observer himself)is its decoherence-resistant‘identity tag’–a description of its einselected state.Apart from this essentially negative function of a cen-sor the environment plays also a very different role of a“broadcasting agent”,relentlessly cloning the informa-tion about the einselected pointer states.This role of the environment as a witness in determining what exists was not appreciated until now:Throughout the past two decades,study of decoherence focused on the effect of the environment on the system.This has led to a mul-titude of technical advances we shall review,but it has also missed one crucial point of paramount conceptual importance:Observers monitor systems indirectly,by in-tercepting small fractions of their environments(e.g.,a fraction of the photons that have been reflected or emit-ted by the object of interest).Thus,if the understand-ing of why we perceive quantum Universe as classical is the principal aim,study of the nature of accessibil-ity of information spread throughout the environment should be the focus of attention.This leads one away from the models of measurement inspired by the“von Neumann chain”(1932)to studies of information trans-fer involving branching out conditional dynamics and the resulting“fan-out”of the information throughout envi-ronment(Zurek,1983,1998a,2000).This new‘quantum Darwinism’view of environment selectively amplifying einselected pointer observables of the systems of interest is complementary to the usual image of the environment as the source of perturbations that destroy quantum co-herence of the system.It suggests the redundancy of the imprint of the system in the environment may be a quantitative measure of relative objectivity and hence of classicality of quantum states.It is introduced in Sec-tions VI and VII of this review.Benefits of recognition of the role of environment in-clude not just operational definition of the objective exis-tence of the einselected states,but–as is also detailed in Section VI–a clarification of the connection between the quantum amplitudes and probabilities.Einselection con-verts arbitrary states into mixtures of well defined possi-bilities.Phases are envariant:Appreciation of envariance as a symmetry tied to the ignorance about the state of the system was the missing ingredient in the attempts of ‘no collapse’derivations of Born’s rule and in the prob-ability interpretation.While both envariance and the “environment as a witness”point of view are only begin-ning to be investigated,the extension of the program of einselection they offer allowes one to understand emer-gence of“classical reality”form the quantum substrate as a consequence of quantum laws.II.QUANTUM MEASUREMENTSThe need for a transition from quantum determinism of the global state vector to classical definiteness of states of individual systems is traditionally illustrated by the example of quantum measurements.An outcome of a “generic”measurement of the state of a quantum sys-tem is not deterministic.In the textbook discussions this random element is blamed on the“collapse of the wavepacket”,invoked whenever a quantum system comes into contact with a classical apparatus.In a fully quan-tum discussion this issue still arises,in spite(or rather because)of the overall deterministic quantum evolution of the state vector of the Universe:As pointed out by von Neumann(1932),there is no room for a‘real collapse’in the purely unitary models of measurements.A.Quantum conditional dynamicsTo illustrate the ensuing difficulties,consider a quan-tum system S initially in a state|ψ interacting with a quantum apparatus A initially in a state|A0 :|Ψ0 =|ψ |A0 = i a i|s i |A0−→ i a i|s i |A i =|Ψt .(1)Above,{|A i }and{|s i }are states in the Hilbert spaces of the apparatus and of the system,respectively,and a i6are complex coefficients.Conditional dynamics of such premeasurement(as the step achieved by Eq.(2.1)isoften called)can be accomplished by means of a unitary Schr¨o dinger evolution.Yet it is not enough to claim thata measurement has been achieved:Equation(2.1)leads to an uncomfortable conclusion:|Ψt is an EPR-like en-tangled state.Operationally,this EPR nature of the state emerging from the premeasurement can be made moreexplicit by re-writing the sum in a different basis:|Ψt = i a i|s i |A i = i b i|r i |B i .(2)This freedom of basis choice–basis ambiguity–is guar-anteed by the principle of superposition.Therefore,if one were to associate states of the apparatus(or the ob-server)with decompositions of|Ψt ,then even before en-quiring about the specific outcome of the measurement one would have to decide on the decomposition of|Ψt ; the change of the basis redefines the measured quantity.1.Controlled not and a bit-by-bit measurementThe interaction required to entangle the measured sys-tem and the apparatus,Eq.(2.1),is a generalization of the basic logical operation known as a“controlled not”or a c-not.Classical,c-not changes the state a t of the target when the control is1,and does nothing otherwise: 0c a t−→0c a t;1c a t−→1c¬a t(2.3) Quantum c-not is a straightforward quantum version of Eq.(2.3).It was known as a“bit by bit measurement”(Zurek,1981;1983)and used to elucidate the connection between entanglement and premeasurement already be-fore it acquired its present name and significance in the context of quantum computation(see e.g.Nielsen and Chuang,2000).Arbitrary superpositions of the control bit and of the target bit states are allowed:(α|0c +β|1c )|a t−→α|0c |a t +β|1c |¬a t (3) Above“negation”|¬a t of a state is basis dependent;¬(γ|0t +δ|1t )=γ|1t +δ|0t (2.5) With|A0 =|0t ,|A1 =|1t we have an obvious anal-ogy between the c-not and a premeasurement.In the classical controlled not the direction of informa-tion transfer is consistent with the designations of the two bits:The state of the control remains unchanged while it influences the target,Eq.(2.3).Classical measurement need not influence the system.Written in the logical ba-sis{|0 ,|1 },the truth table of the quantum c-not is essentially–that is,save for the possibility of superpo-sitions–the same as Eq.(2.3).One might have antici-pated that the direction of information transfer and the designations(“control/system”and“target/apparatus”)of the two qubits will be also unambiguous,as in the clas-sical case.This expectation is incorrect.In the conjugate basis{|+ ,|− }defined by:|± =(|0 ±|1 )/√2|1 1|S⊗(1−(|0 1|+|1 0|))A(5) Above,g is a coupling constant,and the two operators refer to the system(i.e.,to the former control),and to the apparatus pointer(the former target),respectively. It is easy to see that the states{|0 ,|1 }S of the system are unaffected by H int,since;[H int,e0|0 0|S+e1|1 1|S]=0(2.10) The measured(control)observableˆǫ=e0|0 0|+e1|1 1| is a constant of motion under H int.c-not requires inter-action time t such that gt=π/2.The states{|+ ,|− }A of the apparatus encode the information about phase between the logical states.They have exactly the same“immunity”:[H int,f+|+ +|A+f−|− −|A]=0(2.11) Hence,when the apparatus is prepared in a definite phase state(rather than in a definite pointer/logical state),it will pass on its phase onto the system,as Eqs.(2.7)-(2.8),show.Indeed,H int can be written as:H int=g|1 1|S|− −|A=g7 phases between the possible outcome states of the ap-paratus.This leads to loss of phase coherence:Phasesbecome“shared property”as we shall see in more detailin the discussion of envariance.The question“what measures what?”(decided by thedirection of the informationflow)depends on the initialstates.In“the classical practice”this ambiguity does notarise.Einselection limits the set of possible states of theapparatus to a small subset.2.Measurements and controlled shifts.The truth table of a whole class of c-not like trans-formations that includes general premeasurement,Eq.(2.1),can be written as:|s j |A k −→|s j |A k+j (2.13)Equation(2.1)follows when k=0.One can thereforemodel measurements as controlled shifts–c-shift s–generalizations of the c-not.In the bases{|s j }and{|A k },the direction of the informationflow appears tobe unambiguous–from the system S to the apparatus A.However,a complementary basis can be readily defined(Ivanovic,1981;Wootters and Fields,1989);|B k =N−1N kl)|A l .(2.14a)Above N is the dimensionality of the Hilbert space.Anal-ogous transformation can be carried out on the basis{|s i }of the system,yielding states{|r j }.Orthogonality of{|A k }implies:B l|B m =δlm.(2.15)|A k =N−1N kl)|B l (2.14b)inverts of the transformtion of Eq.(2.14a).Hence:|ψ = lαl|A l = kβk|B k ,(2.16)where the coefficientsβk are:βk=N−1Nkl)αl.(2.17)Hadamard transform of Eq.(2.6)is a special case of themore general transformation considered here.To implement the truth tables involved in premeasure-ments we define observableˆA and its conjugate:ˆA=N−1k=0k|A k A k|;ˆB=N−1 l=0l|B l B l|.(2.18a,b)The interaction Hamiltonian:H int=gˆsˆB(2.19)is an obvious generalization of Eqs.(2.9)and(2.12),withg the coupling strength andˆs:ˆs=N−1l=0l|s l s l|(2.20)In the{|A k }basisˆB is a shift operator,ˆB=iN∂ˆA.(2.21)To show how H int works,we compute:exp(−iH int t/¯h)|s j |A k =|s j N−1。
关于双向奔赴的英语作文素材名人势力和素材
全文分为作者个人简介和正文两个部分:作者个人简介:Hello everyone, I am an author dedicated to creating and sharing high-quality document templates. In this era of information overload, accurate and efficient communication has become especially important. I firmly believe that good communication can build bridges between people, playing an indispensable role in academia, career, and daily life. Therefore, I decided to invest my knowledge and skills into creating valuable documents to help people find inspiration and direction when needed.正文:关于双向奔赴的英语作文素材名人势力和素材全文共3篇示例,供读者参考篇1The Interplay of Remarkable Individuals and Impactful MaterialsThroughout the annals of human civilization, the dynamic interplay between groundbreaking individuals and the influentialmaterials they have wielded or been inspired by has been a driving force behind paradigm shifts and transformative advancements. This symbiotic relationship, characterized by a bidirectional flow of influence, has birthed revolutionary ideas, pioneering discoveries, and enduring legacies that have reshaped our understanding of the world and propelled us forward.One striking example of this phenomenon can be found in the realm of literature, where literary giants and their seminal works have left an indelible mark on the collective consciousness. Consider the profound impact of William Shakespeare, whose plays and poetry not only mirrored the societal and cultural currents of his time but also transcended them, becoming a wellspring of inspiration for countless writers, artists, and thinkers across generations. His masterpieces, such as "Hamlet" and "Romeo and Juliet," have been dissected, reinterpreted, and adapted in myriad ways, each iteration adding layers of meaning and resonance.Conversely, Shakespeare's own creative genius was undoubtedly shaped by the materials he encountered and drew upon, be it classical Greek and Roman literature, contemporaneous works by his peers, or the rich tapestry offolklore and oral traditions that permeated Elizabethan England. His ability to weave these disparate threads into timeless narratives that capture the essence of the human experience is a testament to the power of synthesis and the cross-pollination of ideas.In the scientific realm, the interplay between pioneering minds and groundbreaking materials has been equally profound. Marie Curie's groundbreaking work on radioactivity, for instance, was inextricably linked to the materials she studied – the radioactive elements radium and polonium. Her painstaking investigations not only unlocked new frontiers in our understanding of the atomic world but also paved the way for numerous applications in fields ranging from medicine to energy production.Yet, Curie's contributions were not solely the product of her intellectual prowess; they were also facilitated by the availability of new materials and technologies that enabled her to conduct her experiments and refine her theories. The development of sensitive instrumentation, such as the electrometers she employed to detect and measure radioactivity, played a crucial role in advancing her research.Moving beyond the realms of literature and science, the bidirectional influence between individuals and materials can be observed across a plethora of disciplines, from the visual arts to music, architecture, and beyond. Pablo Picasso's revolutionary cubist paintings, for example, were inspired by the African masks and sculptures he encountered, which challenged his perceptions of form, space, and representation. Simultaneously, Picasso's radical artistic vision indelibly shaped the trajectory of modern art, influencing generations of artists who followed in his footsteps and inspiring new modes of creative expression.In music, the advent of new instruments and recording technologies has profoundly impacted the creative process and artistic expression of musicians. The electric guitar, for instance, revolutionized rock music, enabling artists like Jimi Hendrix and Eddie Van Halen to push the boundaries of what was sonically possible, unleashing a torrent of innovation and experimentation that continues to reverberate through the genre today.Conversely, the creative visions and technical virtuosity of these musical icons have, in turn, inspired the development of new materials and technologies. The design of guitar amplifiers, effects pedals, and recording equipment has been driven by thepursuit of capturing and amplifying the unique tonal qualities and performance styles of these trailblazers.Beyond the realms of art and culture, the bidirectional influence between individuals and materials has also had profound implications in the realm of social and political movements. Figures like Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr. harnessed the power of non-violent resistance, using simple materials like salt and symbols like the Montgomery bus boycott to galvanize mass movements and challenge deeply entrenched systems of oppression.At the same time, the materials they employed – from Gandhi's spinning wheel to King's powerful oratory – were infused with profound meaning and symbolism, becoming rallying points for millions and serving as catalysts for widespread social and political transformation.In our contemporary era, the interplay between individuals and materials continues to shape our world in myriad ways. The digital revolution, for instance, has been driven by the convergence of visionary minds and groundbreaking materials, from the silicon chips that power our computers and smartphones to the fiber-optic cables that enable global connectivity.Yet, even as these technologies have transformed virtually every aspect of our lives, their development has been guided and influenced by the creative visions and aspirations of individuals –from the pioneers of computing like Alan Turing and Grace Hopper to the modern-day titans of technology like Steve Jobs and Elon Musk.As we look to the future, it is clear that the bidirectional influence between remarkable individuals and impactful materials will continue to shape the trajectory of human progress. The challenges we face, from climate change to energy sustainability, from healthcare to space exploration, will require a synergistic approach that harnesses the ingenuity of brilliant minds and the transformative potential of cutting-edge materials.It is this dynamic interplay, this reciprocal exchange of ideas and inspiration, that has propelled us forward throughout history, and it will be the wellspring from which tomorrow's breakthroughs and paradigm shifts will emerge. By embracing this symbiotic relationship and fostering an environment that nurtures both individual genius and material innovation, we can unlock the full potential of human creativity and ingenuity,paving the way for a future that is brighter, more sustainable, and more extraordinary than we can imagine.篇2Bidirectional Convergence: Influential Figures and MaterialThe concept of bidirectional convergence has captivated the minds of scholars, philosophers, and intellectuals across various disciplines. It represents a profound exploration of the intricate interplay between the material and immaterial realms, challenging conventional boundaries and inviting us to reimagine the very nature of our existence. At the core of this discourse lie the influential figures whose ideas have shaped our understanding and the rich tapestry of material that informs and fuels their profound insights.One of the most prominent figures in this realm is the renowned philosopher and seminal thinker, Immanuel Kant. His groundbreaking work, the "Critique of Pure Reason," laid the foundation for a transcendental idealism that sought to bridge the gap between the empirical world and the realm of pure reason. Kant posited that while our senses provide us with the raw material of experience, it is the inherent structures of our mind that imbue this material with meaning and coherence. Inessence, he proposed a bidirectional interplay between the objective and subjective, where the material world and our cognitive faculties converge to shape our understanding of reality.Building upon Kant's legacy, the influential philosopher and mathematician, Gottlob Frege, introduced a revolutionary approach to logic and language. His work, "The Foundations of Arithmetic," challenged the prevailing notions of arithmetical truths as self-evident axioms, instead proposing a rigorous system of logical deduction grounded in concrete material representations. Frege's insights paved the way for a deeper appreciation of the bidirectional relationship between abstract concepts and their symbolic manifestations, highlighting the profound intertwining of the immaterial and the material realms.Delving into the realm of quantum mechanics, the enigmatic figure of Erwin Schrödinger emerges as a pivotal contributor to our understanding of bidirectional convergence. His famous thought experiment, the "Schrödinger's Cat," was a provocative attempt to illustrate the counterintuitive principles of quantum superposition and the observer's role in shaping reality. By proposing a scenario where a cat's fate is inextricably linked to a subatomic event, Schrödinger challenged the very notion of adefinite state, suggesting that the material and immaterial are intrinsically intertwined in ways that defy our classical intuitions.In the field of neuroscience, the pioneering work of Antonio Damasio has shed light on the intricate dance between the material brain and the immaterial mind. Through his groundbreaking research, Damasio has demonstrated how our subjective experiences, emotions, and consciousness are inextricably linked to the intricate neural circuitry and biochemical processes of the brain. His findings underscore the profound bidirectional convergence between the material substrates of our biology and the seemingly ethereal realm of subjective experience.Venturing into the artistic realm, the works of Pablo Picasso stand as a testament to the bidirectional convergence of the material and immaterial. Picasso's revolutionary cubist paintings challenged the traditional notions of representation by dismantling and reassembling the material world into abstract, geometric forms. Through his bold experimentation, Picasso invited viewers to transcend the boundaries of literal representation and explore the interplay between the tangible and the conceptual, inviting us to perceive the world through alens that blurs the lines between the physical and the metaphysical.The rich tapestry of material that informs and supports these influential figures is as diverse as it is profound. From the ancient philosophical texts that laid the groundwork for contemplating the nature of reality to the cutting-edge scientific experiments that push the boundaries of our understanding, the material realm serves as a wellspring of inspiration and empirical grounding.The writings of Plato and Aristotle, for instance, have profoundly shaped our understanding of the relationship between the ideal and the material, with their explorations of forms, essences, and the nature of being. The seminal works of Descartes, Hume, and Leibniz have further enriched this discourse, grappling with the seemingly irreconcilable divide between themind and matter, ultimately paving the way for more nuanced and integrative perspectives.In the scientific realm, the groundbreaking experiments of physicists like Niels Bohr, Werner Heisenberg, and ErwinSchrödinger have challenged our classical notions of reality, revealing the profound interconnectedness of the observer andthe observed, the immaterial and the material. The ongoing quest to unravel the mysteries of quantum entanglement and the nature of consciousness continues to push the boundaries of our understanding, inviting us to embrace the bidirectional convergence of realms once thought to be separate.The rich tapestry of artistic expression, from the transcendent melodies of composers like Bach and Beethoven to the evocative brushstrokes of painters like Monet and van Gogh, serves as a powerful reminder of the human capacity to imbue the material with the immaterial, evoking emotions, ideas, and experiences that transcend the purely physical realm.As we stand at the precipice of a new era, the discourse on bidirectional convergence has never been more relevant. The rapid advancements in fields such as artificial intelligence, nanotechnology, and quantum computing demand a deeper appreciation of the intricate interplay between the material and immaterial realms. The emergence of these transformative technologies, grounded in the material substrates of silicon and quantum particles, holds the potential to profoundly reshape our understanding of consciousness, cognition, and the very nature of our existence.In this ever-evolving landscape, it is imperative that we approach the discourse on bidirectional convergence with an open and inquisitive mind, embracing the rich diversity of perspectives and material that inform and enrich our understanding. By doing so, we may unlock new frontiers of knowledge, transcending the boundaries that once confined our thinking and ushering in a paradigm shift that integrates the material and immaterial in ways we have yet to imagine.In the end, the pursuit of understanding bidirectional convergence is not merely an intellectual exercise but a profound exploration of the very nature of our existence. It calls upon us to embrace the complexity and interconnectedness of all things, to recognize that the material and immaterial are not separate realms but rather intertwined facets of a greater whole. By heeding the insights of influential figures and immersing ourselves in the rich tapestry of material that surrounds us, we may unlock the key to a deeper, more holistic understanding of ourselves and the cosmos we inhabit.篇3Bidirectional Convergence: Where the Paths of Greatness IntertwineIn the vast tapestry of human history, certain individuals have emerged as beacons of inspiration, their lives and achievements transcending the boundaries of time and space. These remarkable figures have not only left an indelible mark on their respective fields but have also catalyzed a fascinating phenomenon – the bidirectional convergence of ideas, philosophies, and materials. This essay delves into the lives and legacies of some of these luminaries, exploring how their paths have intersected and converged in remarkable ways.One such iconic figure is Leonardo da Vinci, the quintessential Renaissance man whose insatiable curiosity and boundless intellect propelled him to greatness in numerous disciplines. Da Vinci's masterpieces, such as the Mona Lisa and The Last Supper, are not merely artistic marvels but also testaments to his mastery of perspective, anatomy, and the science of light and shadow. His notebooks, filled with intricate drawings and observations, reveal a mind that seamlessly blended art, science, and engineering. It is this multifaceted genius that allowed da Vinci to converge seemingly disparate fields, paving the way for future generations to build upon his groundbreaking ideas.Another titan whose life exemplifies bidirectional convergence is Marie Curie, the pioneering physicist and chemist who revolutionized our understanding of radioactivity. Curie's discovery of radium and polonium not only earned her the distinction of being the first woman to win a Nobel Prize but also opened up new frontiers in medicine, energy, and nuclear physics. Her work converged with that of other scientific luminaries, such as Max Planck and Albert Einstein, whose theories of quantum mechanics and relativity would later shed light on the very nature of the universe.In the realm of literature, few names resonate as profoundly as William Shakespeare. The Bard of Avon's plays and sonnets have transcended the boundaries of language and culture, resonating with audiences across the globe. Shakespeare's works are not only literary masterpieces but also reflect a deep understanding of human nature, philosophy, and the complexities of the human experience. His characters, from Hamlet to Juliet, have become archetypes that have converged with other artistic forms, inspiring countless adaptations in theater, film, and music.Moving into the modern era, we encounter the iconic figure of Mahatma Gandhi, whose nonviolent resistance movementagainst British rule in India forever changed the course of history. Gandhi's philosophy of ahimsa (non-violence) and satyagraha (nonviolent resistance) converged with the teachings of other great spiritual leaders, such as Buddha and Jesus Christ. His message of peace, love, and civil disobedience resonated across borders, inspiring countless movements for social justice and human rights around the world.In the field of technology, one cannot overlook the contributions of visionaries like Steve Jobs and Elon Musk. Jobs, the co-founder of Apple, revolutionized the way we interact with computers and mobile devices, converging design, functionality, and user experience into sleek and intuitive products. His vision for seamless integration between hardware and software has profoundly influenced the tech industry and paved the way for innovations that have transformed our daily lives.Meanwhile, Elon Musk's ambitions span from electric vehicles and sustainable energy to space exploration and neural interfaces. His companies, such as Tesla and SpaceX, have converged cutting-edge technologies with ambitious goals, pushing the boundaries of what was once thought impossible. Musk's vision for a sustainable future and his determination tomake humanity a multi-planetary species have inspired a new generation of entrepreneurs and scientists.These extraordinary individuals are just a few examples of the countless luminaries whose paths have converged, shaping the course of human history and propelling us forward. Their legacies extend far beyond their respective fields, transcending boundaries and inspiring others to follow in their footsteps.However, it is not only the lives and achievements of these individuals that exhibit bidirectional convergence but also the very materials and technologies they have worked with or inspired. Consider the humble pencil, a seemingly simple tool that has played a crucial role in the creative processes of artists, writers, and thinkers throughout history. From da Vinci's sketches to Shakespeare's manuscripts, the pencil has been a conduit for capturing the fleeting moments of inspiration and conveying ideas that have shaped our world.In the realm of art, materials such as canvas, paints, and pigments have converged with the visions of master artists, resulting in masterpieces that have stood the test of time. The vibrant hues of the Renaissance paintings, the bold strokes of the Impressionists, and the abstract expressions of the Modernists allowe their existence to the convergence of these materials with the creative minds that wielded them.Similarly, in the world of engineering and construction, materials like steel, concrete, and glass have converged with the visions of architects and builders, giving rise to awe-inspiring structures that have redefined our skylines and pushed the boundaries of what is possible. From the soaring skyscrapers of modern metropolises to the iconic bridges that span vast expanses, these materials have been instrumental in realizing the dreams of those who dared to imagine the impossible.As we look to the future, the bidirectional convergence of ideas, philosophies, and materials will undoubtedly continue to shape our world. Emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence, quantum computing, and nanotechnology, hold the potential to converge with the insights and creativity of brilliant minds, ushering in a new era of innovation and discovery.In this ever-evolving landscape, it is crucial for us, as students and future leaders, to embrace the spirit of bidirectional convergence. By studying the lives and legacies of those who have come before us, we can gain invaluable insights and draw inspiration from their triumphs and challenges. Additionally, by fostering interdisciplinary collaboration and embracing theconvergence of diverse fields, we can unlock new frontiers of knowledge and create solutions to the complex challenges that lie ahead.In conclusion, the concept of bidirectional convergence is a testament to the interconnectedness of human endeavors and the boundless potential that arises when brilliant minds and innovative materials intersect. By studying the lives of luminaries and the materials they have worked with, we can not only gain a deeper appreciation for their achievements but also cultivate a mindset that embraces the convergence of ideas and disciplines. It is through this convergence that we can continue to push the boundaries of human potential and create a future that is brighter, more sustainable, and more inspiring than ever before.。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。
a rX iv:n lin/03112v1[nli n.CD]14Jan231Quantum Manifestations of Classical Stochasticity in the Mixed State Victor P.Berezovoj ,Yuri L.Bolotin ,Vitaliy A.Cherkaskiy Institute for Theoretical Physics National Science Center “Kharkov Institute of Physics and Technology”61108Kharkov,Ukraine We investigate the QMCS in structure of the eigenfunctions,corresponding to mixed type classical dynamics in smooth potential of the surface quadrupole oscillations of a charged liquid drop.Regions of different regimes of classical motion are strictly separated in the configuration space,allowing direct observation of the correlations between the wave function structure and type of the classical motion by comparison of the parts of the eigenfunction,corresponding to different local minima.§1.Introduction The deformation potential U (a 0,a 2)= m,n C mn (a 20+2a 22)m a n 0(6a 22−a 20)n (1.1)where a 0and a 2are the internal coordinates of the drop surface R (θ,ϕ)=R 0{1+a 0Y 2,0(θ,ϕ)+a 2[Y 2,2(θ,ϕ)+Y 2,−2(θ,ϕ)]}(1.2)Fig.1.The potential shape for W =18.describes surface quadrupole oscilla-tions of a charged liquid drop of any nature,including atomic nuclei 1)and metal clusters,2)containing specific character of the interaction only in the coefficients C mn .Expanding (1.1)to fourth order in deformation variables x =√3C 01a 0,y =√3C 01a 2(1.3)and assuming equality of masses for thetwo independent directions,we get theone-parametric C 3v -symmetric Hamil-tonianH =p 2x +p 2y2W (x 2+y 2)+xy 2−12Berezovoj,Bolotin,Cherkaskiywhere W =9C 201/(C 10C 20).The potential (1.5)is a generalization of the well-known Henon-Heiles potential 3)with one important difference:motion in (1.5)is finite for all energies,assuring ex-istence of the stationary states in quantum case.For W >16the potential energy surface has seven critical points:four minima (one central and three peripheral)and three saddles.We consider in detail the case W =18,when all four minima have the same depth E =0and the saddle energies are E S =1/20736.Critical energy of transition to chaos equals E S for the peripheral and roughly E S /2for the central minimum,so we will be interested in the energy range E S /2<E <E S ,where the classical motion is chaotic in the central and purely regular in peripheral minima,resulting in what we shall call the mixed state.4),5)We find numerically the spectrum E n and the eigenfunctions ψn (x,y )for the Hamil-tonian (1.4)by the spectral method,6),7)which implies the numerical solution of the time-dependent Schr¨o dinger equationi ∂ψ(x,y,t )2m +U (x,y,W ) ψ(x,y,t )(1.6)with the symmetrically split operator algorithm 8)ψ(x,y,t +∆t )=e i ∆t ∇24m ψ(x,y,t )+O (∆t 3)(1.7)where exp (i∆t ∇2/4m )ψ(x,y,t )is efficiently calculated using the fast Fourier trans-form.Initial wave functionψ(x,y,t =0)=n a n ψn (x,y )(1.8)is chosen to assure the convergence of ψ(x,y,t )in both the coordinate and reciprocal spaces and to avoid the degenerate states in the decomposition (1.8).Having calculated ψ(x,y,t )for 0<t <T ,we obtain the spectrum E n as the local maxima ofP (E )=1T T 0dtψ(x,y,t )w (t )e iE n t (1.10)whereP (t )= dxdyψ∗(x,y,t =0)ψ(x,y,t )(1.11)δT (E −E n )=1QMCS in the Mixed State3§2.QMCS in the eigenfunction structureQuantum manifestations of classical stochasticity can be expected in the form of some peculiarities of concrete stationary state9)–11)or in the whole group of states close in energy.12)–21)Of course,it is not excepted that such alternative does not exist at all,i.e.the manifestations of the classical chaos can be observed both in the properties of separate states and in their sets.For example,comparing the eigen-functions,corresponding to energy levels below the critical energy of transition to chaos E c,with those corresponding to energy levels above E c,drastic changes in the eigenfunction structure can be easily seen and analyzed.However,a question can arise if those changes are due to change in the type of classical motion or they are just a result of the quantum numbers change.Instead of comparing the eigenfunc-tions corresponding to different states,we propose to look for QMCS in the single quantum mechanical object—the eigenfunction of the mixed state.C3v-symmetric Hamiltonian(1.4)is invariant under rotation of2π/3in the(x,y) plain and under reflection through x axis,so according to the transformation prop-ertiesψ(r,ϕ+2π/3)=Rψ(r,ϕ)(2.1)ψ(r,−ϕ)=σψ(r,ϕ)(2.2) the eigenfunctions can be divided into three types of different symmetry:A1(R= 1,σ=1),A2(R=1,σ=−1),and double degenerate E(R=exp(±2π/3),σ=±1). The initial wave function(1.8)was chosen to excite only A1-type states,and we computed the energy levels and the eigenfunctions for(1.4)with W=18and m= 1010,which corresponds to the main quantum numbers of order102in the energy range E S/2<E<E putations were made on a1024×1024grid of length0.6 (distance from the central minimum to saddles was1/12and1/6to the peripheral minima),number of time steps was16384with increment∆t=104.Isolines of probability density and nodal curves for the eigenfunction corresponding to E n=0.444×10−4=0.92E S are presented in Fig.2,3.As we did not compute the entire spectrum,we cannot point out the number n exactly,but we estimate it to be about200.Correlations between the character of classical motion—developed chaos in the central minimum and pure regularity in the peripheral ones—can be easily seen comparing the parts of the eigenfunction corresponding to different local minima.§3.ConclusionWe considered the quantum manifestations of classical stochasticity in the struc-ture of eigenfunction in the coordinate representation,corresponding to the mixed state in the potential of surface quadrupole oscillations of a charged liquid drop. Correlations between character of classical motion and structure of the eigenfunc-tion parts,corresponding to local minima with different type of classical motion, was observed in the shape of the probability density distribution and in the nodal curves structure,which gives direct and natural way to study the QMCS in smooth4Berezovoj,Bolotin,CherkaskiyFig.2.The eigenfunction shape。