GRE作文资料大全
GRE作文素材整理(1)
1.研究历史的好处：World Expo 2000 in Hanover is undoubtedly successful, but then the utilization of a great number of vacant buildings and parking is very low, as fixed assets, depreciation of non-stop. Follow up, especially the permanent exhibition hall, for the drying up funds, was left unused, causing a huge waste of resources. However, the 2010 Shanghai World Expo, with the example of Hanover, uses the easy to disassemble biodegradable environmentally construction materials, and retain only some important four-axis halls for the visit as well as historical heritage. Thus, it is a better and more environmentally solution to that complex problem. This shows that the study of the history can help us avoid taking detours.2.史今结合：In order to move forward firmly in stone, society must not only rely on the imitation, more importantly for creativity. The beautiful Aegean River bred noble Athens, the ancient Greek temple is shining in the shadow of the ancient Egyptian columns of the hall, but this is not only a simple mechanical imitation, but on a higher plane and a form of aesthetic release. In this way, people continue to extend human civilization history of the classic, and use the innovation to smash the conservative imprisonment at the same time. Ultimately, our society becomes to be eternal.3.支持现在：The technology today gives the convenient the history cannot offer us.For example, the projector technology and PPT software enable the teachers to teach with the new teaching methods from the past transformed into multimedia teaching, which will improve the efficiency of the class.4.群众的努力：In ancient war, the order of the generals is important, but more significant is the cooperation in various generals, sending their talents and leadership. At the same time, each soldier also needs courage and hard work, which eventually leads to the success of the war.Form this we can see that the success of an event does not depend on the leadership ability only, but the efforts of the masses are also of decisive importance.5.艺术家特征:Art critics, is a person who specializes in evaluating arts. No doubt, based on their experience of the works of art, they can make a in-depth analysis and summary to help us better understand art.6.领导的特征：According to the philosophical definition of the leadership, it can be divided to three types. First, the behavior can provide significant information. Second, the leadership is procedural, that is to say,which can help direct the group’s discussion. Third, the behavior will help improve the relationship among the members. This leadership model places more emphasis on how an organization is being led rather than who has been formally assigned a leadership role.7.政府的廉政：Singapore’s social security is very good, and the most important reason is the Government’s integrity as well as their stringent requirements. Singapore’s government anti-corruption position is very clear. In state regulations, government officials, after being hired, are required to declare their assets, including stocks real estate and other interest income, which will be strictly examined. In addition, officials cannot name their own duties to others to borrow money, and they have to make the personal financial statements every year.Once they make a mistake, especially corruption, the punishment for them is not the demotion or removal, but the conviction.8.科技的例子：（好）Japan is an economic power, but is a resource-poor country, so they are advocating frugality. Copier paper work will be a lot of throughput, which is a huge for the consumption of paper. To solve this problem, Japan’s scientists invented a kind of anti-copying machines. When paper has been copied by this machine, the graphic above the paper is gone, getting a piece of white paper. In this way, awhite paper can be reused many times, which not only creates wealth, but also saves resources.(好)In surgery, people will encounter the problem of bone transplantation, the usual practice is that doctor use the patients’bones in other part of the body to repair damaged bones. This is a very painful process. Davis, University of Toronto, developed a bone transplantation method for artificial bone. The implantation of artificial bone model into the human body, including bone growth and direction of cell growth, may be the formation of new bone matrix, and the materials can be absorbed well for the human body to achieve the purpose of repairing bone.(坏)The proliferation of e-books, and the rapid expansion of the database, making the original need to consume a great effort to achieve “a great deal of information” is no longer the biggest obstacle to the study. Therefore, the “knowledgeable”is no longer the main standard for the first-class scholars. The formation of this new situation may lead to memory loss, weak sense of history and dependence, which us undoubtedly unfavorable for the development of science. As a consequence, the development of technology has brought convenient to people, but also to some extent, hindered the progress of science.9.法律的执行：Law, justice and injustice is the one to judge, and any of a law may have its two aspects: on the part of people’s fair, some people of another injustice. The fairness of the law is not and cannot be objective judged. Therefore, the fairness of the law should not be judged by the people themselves, or the law will lose its purpose. In this sense, the implementation of the law should not be affected by personal judgments, people should have mandatory compliance with the law9.合作与竞争：As the famous poet Saadi once said: If the mosquitos attack together, the elephant will also be conquered.Goose has a cooperative instinct. They choose to flight in the V-shape. The line of goose is on a regular basis transformation leader, when the heading goose flies forward, both sides of the goose will help it form a local vacuum, which will make the advancement easier. Scientists have discovered that such a form of goose flying will take more 12% of the distance than solo flight.Cooperation can produce one plus one is greater than the sum. According to statistics, in the Nobel award-winning project, more than 60% award-winning come from collaboration. Before the establishment of the Nobel Prize 35 years,41% partnership award, and now it jumps into 80%.Famous “law of definite proportions”is discovered by the famous French scientist Rust. However, in order to explore the mysteries ofscience, he and Beisuo, another French scientist, refused to give way to each other for as long as 9 years of debate, both sides deny and overthrow the other side too many attempts to prove their view is the correct conclusion. However, after the double competition, scientific truth will eventually show up, although the final winner of the competition is Rust, he declared to the world: to the great discoveries, Beisuo has half of the credit.10.目标的价值：Targets can encourage re-emerging form the difficulties.Chekhov, the Russian novelists, once said: We aim to determine people’s activities. Great goals, activities can be said to be great.Marx’s ambitious goal was born in childhood. In his graduation thesis he had raised a new idea, and the end writes: We chose to follow the main occupation of the pointer, is a human being. Teachers were filled with wonder because of this paper shining great ideas.Ultimately, Marx followed the great goal of “search for human happiness”, eventually reveal the nature the nature of capitalism to become the greatest thinker in the 19th century.11.兴趣的价值：Goethe, Germany’s greatest poet, once said: There is no strong interest in addiction, there is no scientist.Samuel Ting, American experimental physicist, a Chinese American,has a strong interest in physics. Studying in the U.S, he put all his energy on studies above. Someone asked him:”you work hard, is it tough?”he replied with a smile:”Not at all, on the contrary, I think this is very happy, because I am interested, and I was eager to explore the secrets of the physical world.”Because so, he has made outstanding achievement in physics, and ultimately won the Nobel Prize in Physics.12.理想与现实的关系：The relationship between the ideal and the reality is dialectical. Face the reality, based on reality, the pursuit of beauty, longing for the next day is the criteria to deal with the relationship between ideal and reality.13.成功与失败：Emerson，American thinker, once said: Failure is often the dark before the dawn, followed by the emergence of that glow of success.Failure is not terrible, and it can bring people experience, lessons learned, so that people understand what is wrong, then compared to understand what is right, to get progress. But the error does not take the initiative to translate into success, depending on the people’s mentality when facing the wrong. Active in the face of mistakes and lessons learned from the experience, is the premise of progress; the face of error is depressed, frustrated, and success will never come.When Hansen created “Chicken Soup”book, he had seek a lot of publishing houses, but none of the publishing houses are willing to publish his books. However, he was not discouraged, as summing-up the experience of the failure and revising his books, as more persistent running between the various publishers. Finally, a small company was finally moved by his sincerity, promised to help him published. After “Chicken soup”was published, the sales reached 12 million, which became one of the best-selling books.14.艺术的价值Art is a particular re-creation of reality, a reflection of life from the artists. Art has improved our living conditions, enhance our culture.Arts directly or indirectly enhance the personal state of mind, creating a social solidarity. Art is life, so to understand life though art.Art serves to lift the human spirits and to put us more in touch with our feeling, foibles and fate. In short, it is can be with our own humanity.15.不同角度看世界：Belinsky, Russian revolutionary democrat, once said: a thousand eyes of the audience hae a thousand Hamlets.Gibran, the Arab principal founder of modern fiction, once said: optimists see in a disaster, a hope, a hope that the pessimists saw a16.环保:Environmental issues are closely related not only with us, but also with the survival and development of future generations.Roosevelt once said: destruction of their land is to destroy their own country.Historically, an Indian chief said: man belongs to earth, but the earth does not belong to human beings. World everything is linked, like the blood putting all parts of our body linked together. The life network is not weaved by human, and human is just a line in the network, or a knot. But human beings do all of this, which ultimately will affect the network and also affect the humanity itself.17.想象力：According to the definition of philosophy, imagination is the ability to form mental images, or the ability to generate images within one’s own mind. It helps provide meaning to experience and understanding to knowledge.Imagination can help people break through constraints to innovation, constantly exploring the unknown. For example, when people imagined themselves in the air like a bird flying, people will work hard to invent and create, through people keep trying, they invented the airplane. So, imagine is a leader in the development of science and18.社会的福利：In Japan, the city has well-developed transportation system throughout every corner of the country. For example, Japan’s trains are very punctual, the train’s schedule says it on time, the train will not have any errors. Moreover, the transportation department will base on actual conditions of each year to adjust the thousand of lines of time and will put out to the public. Thus, the residents will not have to worry about traffic jams or being late, which can prevent them wasting a lot of time on the road. Therefore, a good country for the welfare of the people is to bring the convenience of life.。
GRE必备范文60篇
上篇：Issue范文2014/7/3Tobacco Regulation, at LastThe New York Times, June 11, 2009After more than a decade of struggle — and countless smoking-related deaths —the Senate overwhelmingly approved a bill on Thursday that gives the Food and Drug Administration the power to regulate tobacco products. The House approved a similar bill in April, also by an overwhelming margin. The days when this rogue industry could inflict its harmful products on Americans with impunity are drawing to a close.This is an enormous victory for public health. For that, we owe thanks to tireless advocacy by the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, a nonprofit organization, and strong endorsements from medical groups.It still might not have passed without the decision by Philip Morris, the industry leader, to accept regulation. The company apparently believes it can thrive better under regulation than its competitors, who complain that it will now be much harder for them to introduce new products to challenge Philip Morris’s dominance.The bill is not perfect. It will not allow the F.D.A. to ban cigarettes or nicotine — a concession made years ago to avoid drawing intense opposition from smokers and free-market advocates. But the agency will still have far-reaching powers.It could order a reduction in nicotine levels and the elimination of other harmful ingredients. Companies will also have to submit lists of all their product ingredientsand disclose research about their health effects. And all new tobacco products will have to get marketing approval from the F.D.A. Most flavorings used to lure first-time smokers would be outlawed.To the extent allowed by the First Amendment, the regulators could restrict advertising and promotions to children —industry needs to addict them to keep replenishing the population of smokers — and could shape advertisements aimed at adults as well. The agency could prohibit unsubstantiated health claims about supposedly “reduced risk” products and require larger, more effective health warnings on packages and advertisements.Funds to support tobacco regulation would come entirely from new fees imposed upon the manufacturers, a reasonable step to prevent siphoning money from other vital regulatory activities at the hard-pressed F.D.A.The Congressional Budget Office estimates that the legislation will reduce youth smoking by 11 per cent over the next decade and adult smoking by 2 percent. That’s a good start, but clearly the regulators will still need help from strong anti-smoking campaigns.The House is expected to move quickly to approve the Senate version of the bill. There are few substantial differences. And that is the fastest and surest way to get it to President Obama, who is eager to sign it into law.It has now been proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that cigarette makers have spent decades making false statements, suppressing evidence of harm, and manipulating the design of cigarettes to increase their addictiveness. Federal regulators should be able to stop many of these abuses —and we hope help prevent more Americans from losing their lives to smoking. (477 words)9. In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.Today, due to the increasing reliance on abstruse technologies it is more difficult than ever to contribute to a field without being strongly influenced by past achievements. However, it still remains possible to invent new fields as well as shrug off influence to re-invent previously existing fields. Equally possible are contributions from amateurs. Therefore, I disagree with the statement that in any field of endeavor it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.Firstly, the statement cannot be true because new fields of endeavor are regularly invented. Because in new fields no past achievements exist to exert influence, it is impossible for the first contributions to these fields to be influenced by past achievements. Modern examples of new fields of endeavor include space exploration and Internet technology. Upon the creation of each of these fields, neither one was susceptible to influence from past achievements in the field because no such achievement existed. Therefore, a significant contribution can be made without first being strongly influenced by past achievements in new fields of endeavor.Secondly, it is often possible for significant contributions to be made to a field while only being somewhat influenced by past achievements within that field. An excellent example is French artist Claude Monet and his work in the development of the Impressionist style. While it is true that Monet was influenced by the achievements of previous painters, it can be argued that influence on Monet was negligible because he largely ignored previous conventions in order to develop Impressionism. Hence, Monet was able to make a significant contribution to painting without being strongly influenced by past achievements.Furthermore, it is also possible for amateurs to stumble upon significant contributions without having knowledge of prior achievements within the field. Thefields of palaeotonlogy and archaeology, for example, are brimming with examples of amateurs who have made outstanding contributions without any influence of prior achievements. Unlike other fields of science where expensive equipment is required to make advances, palaeontological and archaeological specimens are scattered throughout the world in fields and backyards where anyone can find them. Thus historically farmers and hikers have been nearly as successful as professionals in making significant contributions in these fields. In light of these contributions, it is obvious that one need not be significantly influenced by prior achievements within a field in order to make a significant contribution to that field.To conclude, although there is no doubt that the influence of prior achievements commonly factors into contributions to most fields, for new fields, the radical reinvention of old fields and in the case of amateur discoveries there is ample room for contributions to be made without being strongly influenced by previous contributions. (458 words)26. The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.As social animals, humans have become increasingly dependent on one another over the course of history to increase the efficiency and survivability, but at a cost to our ability to develop into truly strong and independent individuals. In fact, contemporary luxuries and conveniences have so hindered individual strength and independence that most modern individuals are unable to provide themselves with even the most basic needs.First, consider the effect that the convenience of modern factory farming and the ubiquity of cheap, ready-made food has on our strength and independence as indivi duals. In the past when much of the world’s population was engaged in agriculture, the production, preparation, and storage of food were common knowledge.Today, however, only a small portion of the population is able to produce food independently. This reliance on others to satisfy our most basic needs clearly illustrates the negative effects that modern convenience have had on our independence as individuals.In addition, just as with food, the luxuries and conveniences of modern life have had a negative impact on the ability of most people to independently provide their own shelter. As recently as last century many Americans were knowledgeable and industrious enough to create their own homes. In those days people erected homes that were in tune with their natural surroundings so that they would remain comfortable year round. However, the modern conveniences of universally available electricity as well as central air-conditioning have reduced the need for individual Americans to remain knowledgeable on efficient methods of constructing shelter. With a global energy crisis looming, this lack of independence caused by modern conveniences will likely have troublesome consequences in the future.Not only have contemporary luxuries taken away our ability to develop into individuals capable of providing for our own basic needs, they have also stripped away even the ability of the body to develop a strong, full-functioning immune system. In recent years scientists have taken note of an increased prevalence of illnesses among individuals of the developed world, such as allergies and asthma, that are caused by a weekened immune system. One possible explanation for this is the Hygiene Hypothesis, which suggests that children of the conveniently clean developed world are unexposed to certain agents that are necessary for the proper development of their immune system. This example proves that modern luxuries have taken away our ability to develop into strong, independent individuals.In conclusion, humans in the developed world have lost the ability to function independently due to the luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life. Having lost the ability to develop into truly strong and independently individuals, if humans were to be denied these luxuries and conveniences, we would have extreme difficulty meeting even the most basic needs for survival. (455 words)24. The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.There is no denying the fact that praising positive actions is a powerful educational tool. However, any teaching method that ignores the benefit of examining negative actions is incomplete. Therefore, the best way to teach --- whether as an educator, employer, or parent --- is to praise positive actions while also, contrary to the statement, discussing negative actions and their effects.First of all, as part of a complete education strategy educators should praise students for positive performance. Depending on the age of students, positive feedback in the classroom can take many forms. For example, primary school students might be motivated by receiving small toys, while for university students praise could take the form of positive verbal feedback from a professor. What the age group and reward, praising motivates them to learn in order to continue receiving positive feedback. While positive feedback is a powerful tool, educators should also include feedback for negative actions in order to best educate students. As evidence, consider the number of learning opportunities that would be lost if an educator failed to point out instances of incorrect usage to a foreign language student.Just as with educators, in order to teach most effectively, employers should praise positive actions. There can be little doubt that praise doled out for positive performance in the form of bonuses, raises and promotions motivates workers to learn improved methods to perform their job. However, to ensure that learning takes place in the most efficient manner possible, employers should also point out and discuss the effects of any significant negative actions on the part of employees. If an employee is never reprimanded for negative actions at work, he may never learn the correct method.Likewise, parents should also employ both praise for positive actions and advice on correcting negative actions in order to best educate children. In a manner similar to that of students and employees, praising children for positive actions is an excellentway to reinforce good behavior. At the same time children should have negative behavior pointed out to them so that they know what needs to be improved. Just as with employees, if negative actions are not discussed with children, they may not know that certain behavior isn’t acceptable. Therefore, in order for parents to provide the best teaching, they should both praise positive actions and discuss negative ones.In summary, the argument is correct to point out that praise for positive actions is integral if educators, employers and parents wish to teach most effectively. However, an examination of the effects of acknowledging negative actions shows that doing so is an equally effective method of teaching. Thus, in order for educators, employers and parents to provide the best teaching, they must acknowledge negative actions as well as praise positive actions. (462 words)31. Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.Extinctions occur so rapidly that protecting an endangered species is often a race against time, so there is often no time to pause to determine whether or not human activity is the source of the problem. Thus, contrary to the view expressed in the statement, in deciding which endangered species to protect the most important factor should not be whether the potential extinction of a species is the result of human activities.First of all, it is difficult or impossible to ascertain which endangered species face potential extinction due to human activities and which species face extinction due to natuaral processes. For example, current estimates place the number of species going extinct each year in the thousands. It would take an army of scientists and researchers to identify which species are endangered as a result of human activities. What’s more, due to the complicated nature of earth’s ecosystems making accurate determination of the cause of endangerment for every species would be impossible. Therefore, rather than seeking to protect only those species endangered as a result ofhuman activites, society should try to protect all species known to be endangered.Furthermore, a more important consideration in deciding whether to protect an endangered species or not should be based on its potential for future benefit to society. Many endangered species should be protected because of the potential benifts of retaining a high degree of biodiversity. Approximately half of all medicines in use today are derivatives of natural products. Alarmingly, thousands of species are going extinct annually without being discovered by science. As a result, thousands of chances are lost each year for society to discover life-saving medical compounds. In light of these developments the necessity to protect remaining species, no matter why they are endangered, becomes sbsolutely clear.Likewise, another key factor in deciding whether or not to protect an endangered species is the role of that species in its local ecosystem. For example, it has been well documented by biologists that “keystone”species are of greater importance to ecosystems than other species. The extinction of a keystone species could produce a domino effect in which an ecosystem collapses and several more species become endangered or extinct. Hence, in order to most efficiently preserve biodiversity, all endangered keystone species should be protected without consideration for the cause of their endangerment.In conclusion, I disagree with the statement that society should make efforts to save an endangered species only if the potential extinction of the species is the result of human activities. Following the policy outlined in the argument would occupy precious resources in a fruitless task, as whether or not humans are determined to be responsible for the potential extinction of species is secondary to consideration regarding the value of that species. (460 words)8. Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.New leadership often brings about reform or change in strategy. As beneficial as new leadership can be for achieving success, there are other more effective ways to stimulate the same result. Therefore, while I agree with the claim that in any field those in power should step down after five years, in my opinion there are more reliable paths to success than revitalization of leadership.One compelling argument in support of the claim is that forcing those in power to step down after five years is necessary to keep leadership motivated toward achieving success. For example, if the president of the United States was not forced to step down after four years unless reelected, he would lose a powerful source of motivation to successfully serve the will of the people. For this reason, a system without term limits invites lackluster performance and corruption. Thus, in the field politics those in power should step down after five years.Another reason in support of the claim is that one effective path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership. New leadership has the ability to provide an enterprise with renewed enthusiasm as well as new ideas and approaches. When an enterprise undergoes a change of leadership, it is often the case that there is increased enthusiasm at all levels of the enterprise, which can lead to increased success. Furthermore, enterprises are equally likely to benefit from new leadership through the application of new ideas and approaches to old problems. By instating new leadership, enterprises are given the opportunity to benefit from the strengths of a new leader, which often results in the ability to solve previously unmanageable problems.However, the reason given in support of the claim is not entirely correct. While it is true that new leadership can stimulate success through revitalization, the assertion that this is the surest path toward success is unfounded. Among the many paths to success there are several that are as important as or even more so than revitalization through new leadership. To illustrate this point, consider the possible benefits of discovering a new technology to a business. When a business is able to outpace itscompetitors by employing a more efficient means of production, success is almost guaranteed. In light of this example, it becomes obvious that revitalization through new leadership is not the best way to ensure success.In summary, requiring leadership to step down after five years is an effective means to ensure the success of any enterprise. But this policy may not be the most effective path to success due to the existence of other equally effective methods. (437 words)76. We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.When contemplating the value of learning opportunities presented by individuals who share our views versus individuals with contrasting views, it is important to consider social factors. For obvious reasons people are generally more receptive to ideas presented by those occupying positions of trust than to the ideas of others with dissimilar views. Thus, I agree with the statement that we can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own.First of all, people can usually learn much more from those with shared views because people are often more receptive to information conveyed by people with similar views. Consider that most people surround themselves with others who have shared views: most friendships begin and persist due to shared views; shared views are an important component of romantic attraction; families often have shared views. This tendency to surround oneself with others who have shared views becomes a critical argument in support of the view that people are always receptive to the ideas of family members, friends and others with shared views who they trust most. Of course, it goes without saying that more learning usually takes place when people are initially receptive to ideas due to shared views and trust.Equally important is the argument that exchanges between individuals with differing views often become hostile. For instance, there are many well-known instances of rivals in the scientific community. Most often such pairs of scientists have differing views on the relative value of competing theories. Theses rivalries, brought about by differing views, can eventually lead to disregard for the facts in question, as both parties often become emotionally entangled in a series of reciprocal personal attacks. Thus, because conflicting ideas can lead to decreased learning, we usually learn more from people whose ideas we share.Conversely, those disagree with the statement might argue that people can learn more from those with contradictory views because they are able to provide differing perspectives. Admittedly, interaction with others who hold differing views does have great potential for learning. However, because of the previously mentioned arguments most people are often presented with few opportunities to learn from others whose views are dissimilar to their own. Furthermore, the statement only proposes that it is usually the case that more learning takes place between people with similar views. Therefore, despite the existence of substantial learning opportunities between parties with separate views, ultimately most learning takes place between people with similar views.In conclusion, there is ample evidence in support of the statement that we usually learn more from others whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own. Because on average more opportunities for learning are presented when people are receptive to ideas than dubious of them. (462 words)76. We can learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.Learning is the result of thinking critically about something. And critical thinking involves alternative pathways of thought to what we previously held to be true.Disagreement often helps us consider one problem from a different perspective. Therefore, it follows that we can learn more from people whose views contradict our own.Dealing with disagreement is a process of learning because it offers opportunities to learn. When two people agree, they often value the same reasons, and there is not much to discuss. In contrast, by disagreeing, people have knowledge and logic to unravel and understand. Through listening and contemplating the different point of view, we gain further insights of an issue based new information available to us. It opens our options as we consider someone else’s viewpoint s. They might uncover cultural, experiential, and moral differences that open new doors to discussion and understanding.Another advantage to grappling with disagreement is that it treats learning as problematic rather than automat ic. Defending one’s viewpoint requires motivation and significant effort. For example, when people discuss which politicians or laws they support, they cannot simply say, “Because that one is the best.” They must support their views with facts and their logic. They must locate themselves within the facts to show the advantages and disadvantages to the different alternative choices. If they listen actively to the person with opposite opinions they must then work strenuously to understand where that person is located within the facts. The brain works hard to justify one’s opinions and understand someone else’s.Disagreement also teaches people how to handle disagreement in a positive way that benefits everyone involved. Disagreement can help us consider one problem from a different perspective. Even when we hold onto our own viewpoints, we might better understand other viewpoints. And understanding the opposing views, in turn, helps us strengthen our arguments. Thus disagreement expands our knowledge and encourages learning. With disagreement often comes understanding one another better and becoming closer. We learn how to value diverse views, communicate with respect, and most importantly, collaborate with others. These skills are essential toward teamwork and leadership.Admittedly, if the mood is full of animosity or anger, it is likely thatdisagreement will turn into an emotional battle that involves trying to hurt the other person. But if the participants in a disagreement are motivated to understand each other’s viewpoints, learning will take place.Therefore, disagreement is a potent source of creativity in most situations. (407 words)57. The main benefit of the study of history is to dispel the illusion that people living now are significantly different from people who lived in earlier times.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.It is indisputable that people now are significantly different from people who lived in earlier times; and there are far more valuable benefits to be obtained from the study of history than dispelling illusions. Thus, I disagree with the statement’s claim that the main benefit of the study of history is to dispel the illusion that people living now are significantly different from people who lived in earlier times.First, to state that people living now are not significantly different from people who lived in earlier times is factually inaccurate. People have existed for many thousands of years and have gone through many changes over the millennia. Consider the physical differences between modern man and the first humans. Due to a combination of genetic factors as well as environmental and nutritional differences, the first people were physically much smaller than modern humans. They reached sexual maturity at an earlier age and had greatly decreased life spans compared to those of people today.Additionally, the first humans were vastly different from people today culturally. For example, the languages of the first humans would be completely unintelligible to people living today, and vice versa. Due to their inability to read or write, all of their communication would have been performed orally --- in stark contrast to the massive amounts of printed material consumed by humans today. And rapid advances in knowledge and technology continue to separate us from even our most recent ancestors.。
gre 写作范文
gre 写作范文含翻译Technology and ProgressIn the contemporary world, technology plays a pivotal role in driving progress across various domains. While some argue that technological advancements inevitably lead to societal progress, others contend that the drawbacks associated with technology cannot be ignored. This essay examines both perspectives and asserts that, when wielded responsibly, technology is a powerful catalyst for positive change.在当代世界中，技术在推动各个领域的进步方面发挥着至关重要的作用。
虽然有人认为技术的进步不可避免地导致社会的进步，但也有人认为技术所带来的缺点不可忽视。
本文将审视这两种观点，并强调，当技术得到负责任的运用时，它是促使积极变革的强大催化剂。
On one hand, proponents of technology argue that it is the driving force behind advancements in fields such as medicine, communication, and education. Breakthroughs in medical technology have led to improved healthcare and increased life expectancy. Communication technologies have transformed the way people connect and share information globally, fostering a more interconnected world. Educational tools powered by technology have expanded access to learning resources, bridging gaps and democratizing knowledge.一方面，技术的支持者认为，技术是推动医学、通信和教育等领域进步的动力。
gre作文高分范文集锦
gre作文高分范文集锦为了帮助大家备考gre。
了解更多关于gre的知识，打有准备的仗，下面小编给大家带来gre作文高分范文集锦，希望大家喜欢。
gre作文高分范文集锦1"Wisdom is rightfully attributed not to people who know what to look for in life but to people who know what to overlook."Never before in history have people been so beset with the overflow of ideas and images that the modern human must endure. We are constantly bombarded with news, advertising, and entertainment, so much so that we are often at a loss as to where we should focus our attention. This has lead to what many media critics have called "information anxiety," a term used to discribe the paralysis the ordinary human experiences when attempting to organize and synthesize the vast amounts of data that move past her everyday. Now, more than ever before, it can be seen that wisdom truly is attributable to those "who know what to overlook."The Internet is a good example of the effects of information overload on people. Many people recieve hundreds of email messages a day, yet there is no possible way for them to respond, let alone read, all of these messages. Through practice they learn to pick out what will be of interest and to ignore the rest. A similar phenomena occurs when a person is "browising the web." Information, both trivial and profound, float by in a disorganized way. A person learns to ignore what is not relevant to their search. This is easily demonstrated by watching a person new to the Internet next to someone who is a veteran of the net. The new person will stumble on loads of irrelevant information while the veteran will most likely proceed to the information she seeks. This ability to overlook useless information is not only applicable to the net; consider the older but more established form of information known as the book.Ever since Guttenberg rolled out his first few pages from his press humans have been wondering how to synthesize all this knowledge. Each year more and more books are written and published, more and more information is available to the public through bookstores and libraries, and each year the average person must struggle harder to find what she needs to know.. This is one of the primary reasons people are sent to college: they are taught how to access and research information they need.It is only through experience that one understands how to overlook useless data. This is most likely what the author of the above quote meant.Comments:This response presents a well-developed analysis of the issue.Beginning with a strong description of the current state of information overload, the first paragraph provides a context for the issue and takes a clear position agreeing with the stated claim. The Internet example is well chosen and well developed, clearly supporting the point that wisdom involves learning to ignore what is not relevant. The reference to books reinforces this position but does little to advance the argument or add insightful analysis. The conclusion restates an earlier point, adding little to the analysis.Despite a few instances of imprecise reference (, "this has" and "all this knowledge"), the argument is presented clearly and coherently, meriting a score of 5. To earn a higher score, the response would need to develop a more thoughtful analysis of the issue.gre作文高分范文集锦2"Wisdom is rightfully attributed not to people who know what to look for in life but to people who know what to overlook."I disagree with the opinion expressed above, in that I feel that the statement is omitting a very big part of what learning is all about. I firmly believe that wisdom is gained by careful observation of all that is around us in our lives. We gain a great deal by watching those around us, or by observing our surroundings, as well as watching the assembly of an object. All my life, I have learned a great deal by being very observant of people and their reactions to certain situations, or to procedures that are to be followed. Being observant has helped tremendously in travelling as well, since it has helped me recall certain landmarks to know if I am going in the correct direction. It is true that if we pay too much attention to insignificant detail, we clutter our minds with too much that is unnecesssary. Instead, we should have more time to devote our attention to that which is meaningful. In the field of science, we teach our students to be observant, and to look for specific reactions. If they don't learn to watch closely and record their data precisely, their results will be less than adequate, and their data will most likely not be very accurate or dependable. The statement above has merit, but it does not represent widsom in its entirety. It doesn't do justice to the great amount of learning that thas taken place through the ages through simple observation. Our forefathers survived by learning and knowing what to look for. That information was then passed on, so each successive generation didn't have to gather the same basic knowledge, but could build on what had already been learned. As a society, we need to lean on those who come before us, to learn valuable lessons from their experience, and to decipher that which we can improve on and that which is steadfast through the ages.Comments:This response presents a competent analysis of the issue, taking a position contrary to that expressed in the prompt, at least initially.After stating the importance of "careful observation of all that is around us," the response presents reasons and examples to support that position. The examples are clear and relevant, although the analysis is fairly brief. Also, the organization and focus of the response weakens a little, especially as the writer interrupts the group of examples with a statement that "if we pay too much attention to insignificant detail, we will clutter our minds with too much that is unnecessary." This statement modifies -- and weakens -- the initial position, which the writer believed "firmly."The writer抯ideas are conveyed with reasonable clarity, but -- as is evident in the closing sentence -- this response lacks the skillful use of sentence structure and vocabulary that communicate meaning in responses that typically earn higher scores.gre作文高分范文集锦3"Wisdom is rightfully attributed not to people who know what to look for in life but to people who know what to overlook."I believe this statement is how you look at a glass of water. Either the glass is half full or it is half empty. The opptimist would look for things in life, whereas the pessimist would try to aviod things in life. This summary will explain how looking for things in life better than overlooking a persons involvement in new opportunities and to learn from these new experiences.I am strong believer in hands on experiences. If I have a open mind, try new things, and look for new answers to my questions about life, I will in the end gain wisdom because I have experienced many new situations. I plan on becoming a speech language pathologist in the future.In this field I will be dealing with clients who may have a disorder, such as autism or a cognitive delay. I must be aware of the red flags that identify these disorders. I must look for the obvious symptoms before I can overlook anything. If I would in my mind tell my self to overlook things. The result would be detrimental to my career and the individual I am treating.Who can predict the future? So how can someone purposely overlook an experience in which they may recieve a life lesson or gain knowledge. In conclusion, a person should look at the glass half full. No one can predict the future so how can one know what to overlook. Look for things in life, you may even stumble across that wisdom you were looking for in the first place.Comments:This response displays some competence analytic writing since it presents a position on the issue and has a clear pattern of organization.The opening paragraph introduces the topic and states a position that neither agrees or disagrees completely with the stated claim. The second paragraph presents an example; and the last paragraph provides a clear conclusion. The one example is minimally developed, however, and does not clearly explain "how looking for things in life [is] better than overlooking a person[抅s involvement in new opportunities."There are numerous small errors and problems in sentence structure (, "If I would in my mind tell my self to overlook things."), but they do not seriously interfere with meaning. Thus, this response meets the criteria for a score of 3.gre作文高分范文集锦4"Wisdom is rightfully attributed not to people who know what to look for in life but to people who know what to overlook."It is common sense to think or state that wisdom should be attributed to peopel who only know what to overlook in life. But is should also be attributed to people who only know what to look at in life. Reason for this is because all the people should be exposed to this concept of wisdom. Even if the people who tened to overlook at life may have more of a background from farther reading and reading and research which they may have engaged in, there has got to be a way to expose the other people who may not be as knowledgable, to this type of wisdom. In this way everyone will be able to take part in variouse discusion or debates that may be held based on the topicof what to Look For In Life. It is also very true that when the topic of overlooking or looking at life comes up in a discussion everyone in the room is likely to have a common of their own to add. Their for the wisdome that may based on it is for everyone and not only the most wise one.Comments:This response received a score of 2, not because of language problems, but because reasoning, analysis, and development are extremely thin and insubstantial.This response displays serious weaknesses in analyzing the issue. Although the response states a position and offers limited support for the position, the reasons given are not always clear. The writer seems to be making an interesting point -- that more people should "be exposed to this concept of wisdom," but here, too, the meaning is not communicated clearly.The response is further flawed by serious and frequent problems in language and sentence structure, which often obscure meaning.This is not a 1 essay because the response does present a position with some support, and it is able to communicate some ideas clearly.gre作文高分范文集锦5"Wisdom is rightfully attributed not to people who know what to look for in life but to people who know what to overlook."Everyone can agree with this issue or not. I think everyone can have arguments to support it and arguments to not support it. It's one of that issue that is not true for everyone. I think if you know what to look for in your life maybe all your efforts can be very concentrated on certain things with the result of obtain what you planned to have in your life, with the result of being satisfied more than people who ask themselves any kind of questions prior to doing anything or prior to think about anything. These factors summarize to display truth about the issue and the discussion. People can disagree if they choose it. Now the question is wisdom belongs to those who know what to look for or to those who know what to overlook and in this behavior they can touch or stop the widom of other people?Comments:This response presents a fundamentally deficient discussion of the issue.The first portion of the response, while referring to "this issue," never clearly identifies the issue and, instead, contains statements that could be attributed to any number of topics. As such, there is little evidence of the ability to organize and develop a coherent analysis of the stated claim. The final statement essentially rephrases the topic as a question and seems to try to interpret its meaning, but -- without an explanation -- the ending merely adds to the overall confusion.The severe and persistent errors in language and sentence structure add to the overall incoherence and the score of 1.gre作文高分范文集锦。
gre范文
gre范文GRE范文一：Technology vs. NatureTechnology has revolutionized our lives in many ways, providing us with numerous conveniences and opportunities for efficiency. However, this rapid advancement of technology has also brought about certain negative consequences, particularly when it comes to our relationship with nature. In this essay, I will argue that while technology has undoubtedly improved our lives in many aspects, it has also created a disconnect between humans and the natural world.One of the main ways in which technology has impacted our relationship with nature is through its role in consumerism and overconsumption. The development of new technologies has fueled the creation of a consumerist culture, where people are constantly encouraged to buy the latest gadgets and devices. This culture of consumerism encourages the constant consumption of resources, leading to environmental degradation and the depletion of natural resources. As people become more reliant on technology, they may be less inclined to appreciate the value of the natural world and the need for its preservation.Furthermore, the use of technology has allowed us to control and modify our environment to a greater extent than ever before. While this has led to advancements in agriculture and the creation of artificial environments, it has also resulted in the loss of natural habitats and biodiversity. For example, the construction of urban areas and the clearing of land for agriculture often leads to the destruction of ecosystems and the displacement of wildlife. Astechnology allows us to manipulate the natural world to suit our needs, we may be losing sight of the importance of preserving nature in its natural state.Lastly, the constant use of technology can lead to a decrease in physical activity and outdoor pursuits. With the convenience of technology, people are increasingly opting for sedentary lifestyles, spending more time indoors than ever before. This lack of outdoor activity not only has negative consequences for our physical health, but also limits our direct engagement with nature. When we are constantly surrounded by screens and virtual realities, we may become disconnected from the natural world and lose the sense of wonder and appreciation that comes from direct interaction with nature.In conclusion, while technology has undoubtedly improved our lives in many ways, it has also created a disconnect between humans and the natural world. The culture of consumerism, the manipulation of the environment, and the decrease in outdoor activity are just a few examples of how our reliance on technology has impacted our relationship with nature. It is important for us to find a balance, where technology can be used responsibly and in a way that respects and preserves the natural world. Only then can we truly harness the benefits of technology while also ensuring the long-term sustainability of our planet.。
《GRE高频作文》word版
Argument提纲一.开头部分I n this argument, the arguer concludes that…to substantiate the conclusion, the arguer points out that…In addition, the arguer assumes that / reasons that / cites the example of / cites the result of a recent study that…A careful examination of this argument would reveal how groundless it is.二.论证驳斥部分First of all, the argument is based on a false analogy. / The arguer simply assumes that…but he does not provide any evidence that…is indeed comparable. / As we know…differ conspicuously. / It is true that both…but even her e exist fundamental differences…/ Therefore, even though…proved effective in doing…there is no guarantee that it will work just as well for…// As a result, A and B do not establish a warranted analogy, so we cannot safely assume that… (两者无法比)The author unfairly assumes that A bears some relations to B. / However, the author provides no evidence to support that this is the case, nor does the author establish a causal relationship between A and B. / It is highly possible that other factors might contribute to the B/change/progress. / For example…it is also likely B just resulted from…/ Lacking evidence that links A to B, it is presumptuous to suggest that A was responsible for B. (无法建立必然的因果关系)The evidence the author provides is insufficient to support the conclusion drawn from it. / One example is rarely sufficient to establish a general conclusion. / B ased on a specific example of…, it is logically unsounded to make suggestion for all…/ In fact, in face of such limited evidence, it is fallacious to draw any conclusion at all. / Unless it can be shown that…is representative of all…, the conclusion that…is completely unwarranted. (单个事例不能说明整体问题)By concluding that sb must do A or must do B, the author commits a fallacy of“false dilemma”. / The author assumes that A and B are the only available solutions to the problem. / However, it is possible that other factors might also contribute to the problem. For example…/ If so, just doing A and B would not solve the problem. (还有其他原因)In addition, the arguer commits a fallacy of hasty generalization. / Even if…, which is, of course, an unwarranted assumpt ion, it does not follow that…/ I t is highly possible that other factors may have contributed to B…/ F or instance,…/ Besides, the arguer does not provide any solid information concerning…/ U nless…, which is unknown from this argument, there is no guarantee that…// Without ruling out these and other possible factors that give rise to B, the author cannot confidently conclude that… (结论得出过早，考虑不周到)The arguer assumes that just because one event follows another, the second event has been caused by the first. / However, no evidence is provided to support that this is the case. / The mere fact that A occurs beforeB does not necessarily establish a causal relationship between A and B. / It is highly possible that other factors might also bring about these same results. / F or instance,…in addition,…/ Without ruling out these and other possible factors that give rise to B, the author cannot confidently conclude that…（无因果关系）The recommendation depends on the assumption that no alternative means of doing sth are available. / However, the arguer fails to offer any evidence to substantiate this crucial assumption. It is highly possible that means other than this would better solve the problem. / Without considering and ruling out these and other alternative means of doing sth, the author cannot confidently conclude that…The arguer assumes the characteristics of asgroupsapply to every member of that group. / The conclusion that…is based on the assumption that…/ However, there is no guarantee that this is the case, nor does the author provide any evidence to substantiate this assumption. It is very likely that…/ Lacking such evidence the author cannot draw any firm conclusion. (整体规律不一定适用于个人)It is assumed without justification that background conditions have remained the same at different times / conditions. / The arguer unfairly infers from…in the past that…/ However, he/she fails to offer any evidence to substantiate this inference. It is very likely that…or that…/ Any of these scenarios, if true, would serve to undermine the claim that… (从过去不能推知现在和将来)Finally, the arguer provides no assurance that the survey on which the argument depends is statistically reliable. / Lacking information about the number of…surveyed and the number of respondents, it is impossible to assess the validity of the results. /F or example, if…were surveyed but only…responded, the conclusion that…would be highly suspected. / Another problem is the representativeness of the respondents. Were they representative of all the…? Were…chosen for the survey chosen randomly or did they volunteer for the survey? …/ Lacking such evidence the author cannot draw any firm conclusion based on the study.三.结尾部分In summary, this argument is not persuasive as it stands. To make it more convincing, the arguer would have to provide more evidence concerning…/ provide evidence to rule out other possible causes of…To better evaluate the argument, we woul d need more information regarding…Issue模版第一段Determining whether something should or should not be done could be weighed in many aspects. Different people have different answers due to their respective points of view. On balance, my view is that the final judgment should depend on a case-by-case analysis of the two situations. / In my point of view, I agree with the speaker on the grounds that…/ At the first glance, this opinion seems to be somewhat appealing, but further reflection tells me thatI cannot agree with it for the following reasons.第二段**同意The first and foremost reason why I support / agree with above statement i s that…there is also a further more subtle point to consider.**反对Although at first glance these arguments sound reasonable and appealing, they are not born out by a careful consideration. The undeniable deficiency in above arguments is that they are negligent of the bare fact that...第三段In conclusion, it must be explained that these three reasons sometimes intertwine to form an organic whole, thus becoming more persuasive than anyone of them. So, any thinking person must believe that…6 "Most people would agree that buildings represent a valuable record of any society's past, but controversy arises when old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes. In such situations, modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings so that contemporary needs can be served."过去和现在之建筑物With the developments of human society, the controversy rose from the gap between the old building and the new one has attracted more and more attentions. Some persons argue that the land that has been taken for the historic building should be better used for modern purpose. While others insist that the old buildings have great meanings to human race and should also play a certain role in the progress of modern society. One of the best ways to solve this controversy is to construct a balance between the preservation of historic building and the development of modern world.Compared with the realistic use in the past, the historic architectures have been playing two important roles in the modern society. One is the research objects for the historians in order to reconstruct the scene of the past and find the truth about the old events. Some of the buildings in the past have played a crucial role in the events that may have profound effects on the evolution of human society. The other is the vivid historic text books that may help people, especially the descendents, to remind the lessons and experience that the ancestors have ever had. As the witness of the historic events, the old buildings have been viewed as the recorders of human history and can help human beings to maintain their civilization in the long run.The reasons above do not prevent the old building from losing its significant status in today's technological advanced society. With the advent of computer and other advanced technology, human beings have become more and more concerned about the efficiency, productivity and some other things pertaining to the practical interest. In order to earn as much money as possible, many gigantic buildings have been introduced in the great city and also more people prefer to enjoy the convenience of the urbanism, and in the end, induce more and more people moving into the cities. When most of the area has been dominated by various monstrous edifices, people begin to focus their attentions on the land which has been taken by the old buildings. Under this circumstance, the conflict between the old building and new one has been raised.In today's era of high efficiency and high productivity, which lead to increasing the living pace, the historic building also has its advantages. Some old architecture enable common persons to recall the tragic accidents easily, these buildings can help warn modern human beings to absorb the ancestors' lessons. Still some old buildings can help people to recognize the thriving world, which has come from the hard efforts of our forefathers and will eventually make the adolescents know the precious time they have possessed.Striking the balance between the preservation of old buildings and the development of our modern world is the primary problem that people should first to solve. On the one hand, fulfilling the improvements of the modern society does not mean it has been given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings, for the old buildings present the human history and we can not develop the world at the cost of losing the history. On the other hand, preserving all the historical architectures may also too wasteful. So just preserving some important buildings is one of the most provident ways to solving the controversy.In sum, the old buildings are playing significant roles, no matter in the past, in the modern time, or in the future. Can human civilization be lasting long only when we develop the new society and retain the historic buildings at the same time. Resuming the progress of the society and preserving the human history is the twin ideals of modern world.10 The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people's efficiency so that everyone has more leisure time. [15]What is the primary goal of technological advancement? Some may say that it is to provide people with more comfortable and convenient life. Then, what is the term "comfortable" means? Is one who has more leisure time due to the increasing of the efficiency enjoying the comfortable life? With the development of human society, the manifold goal of technology has become more and more manifest.(可以采用比较一般的开头，或者简化成一般的设问句，但是在最后要给出正面的肯定的观点~~）Technology emerged as soon as human race came into this world and began to fight for surviving. In the early stage, technology served as the implements for human beings to conquer the nature. In the process of struggling against all the menaces of the nature, our ancestors have generalized and accumulated all sorts of experiences, and also created a series of technology in order to help the descendents to adapt to the environment. This circumstance has been continued until the technology that accumulated by human race are powerful enough to overcome most of the threats of the nature. Then the twofold use of technology begins to appear. On the one hand, the technology has made the dominators possible to strive for convenient and luxurious life. On the other hand, the governors also use it to quash the rebellions and exploit their people, even sometime, to fight with other nations. With the advent of the Industrial Revolution, technology began to contribute to the majority of human beings. The great improvement of modern technology has eventually increased the efficiency of people’s life, and also makes i t possible for most individuals to possess a large amount of leisure time.In today's rapid changing society, it is hard to allege that the increasing of people's efficiency and hence enable most of people have more leisure time are the primary goal of technological advancement. As is so often pointed out, modern technology make the relationship between people become more impersonal and aloof. The early initiative handicraft has been replaced by assembly line of machinery, and the works' jobs are always unutterably boring. The bargaining between people also gives its ways to the high efficient trade in the supermarket. So, spectacles above are the primary goal of the modern technology, it bound to raise many persons' unsatisfactory.The two-edged effects of the technology which can be used equally for good or evil have become more manifest than ever. For one thing, the extraordinary progress in technology enhances persons’ capable of creating more convenient and enjoyable life and living environment. However, the influence of the development of industrial technology upon the nature has been completely neglected, and leads to some aspects of the technology has adversely affected the people's life, and in the end impede the entire progress of human society. For instance, the toxic gases, petrol fumes and polluted water that released from the factory are all greatly hampered the people's health. So, to the managers of the factory, making a profit, even at the cost of polluted the environment, serving as the primary goal for them to use the technology, and on the contrary, common people may regard providing the comfortable life as the primary goal of using the technology.The manifold goals of technology are, of course, the result of the evolution of human society. The circumstance that different groups in the society holds different expectation of technology will also continues.11 "Money spent on research is almost always a good investment, even when the results of that research are controversial."花在研究上的资金基本上都是不错的投资，即使研究的结果是有争议的。
gre满分作文汇总
gre满分作文汇总（经典版）编制人：__________________审核人：__________________审批人：__________________编制单位：__________________编制时间：____年____月____日序言下载提示：该文档是本店铺精心编制而成的，希望大家下载后，能够帮助大家解决实际问题。
文档下载后可定制修改，请根据实际需要进行调整和使用，谢谢!并且，本店铺为大家提供各种类型的经典范文，如演讲稿、总结报告、合同协议、方案大全、工作计划、学习计划、条据书信、致辞讲话、教学资料、作文大全、其他范文等等，想了解不同范文格式和写法，敬请关注!Download tips: This document is carefully compiled by this editor. I hope that after you download it, it can help you solve practical problems. The document can be customized and modified after downloading, please adjust and use it according to actual needs, thank you!In addition, this shop provides you with various types of classic sample essays, such as speech drafts, summary reports, contract agreements, project plans, work plans, study plans, letter letters, speeches, teaching materials, essays, other sample essays, etc. Want to know the format and writing of different sample essays, so stay tuned!gre满分作文汇总为了辅助大家更好地来备考GRE写作，为大家整理了GRE写作的满分范文，让大家参考学习。
GRE Argument Task范文5篇(中英双语)
GRE Argument Task范文5篇（中英双语）第一篇：GRE Argument Task Topic: Government Funding for the Arts | 艺术领域的政府资助英文版：Topic Statement:Government funding for the arts should be increased.Essay:Introduction:The question of whether government funding for the arts should be increased is a subject of ongoing debate. Proponents argue that such funding is essential to support cultural enrichment and creativity, while critics claim that it can lead to misuse of public resources. This essay will explore the reasons for increasing government funding for the arts and address potential concerns.Reasons for Increasing Government Funding for the Arts:Firstly, government support for the arts promotes cultural diversity and creativity. Artistic expression in all its forms—painting, music, theater, and literature—enriches society by reflecting its diverse perspectives and experiences. Increased funding allows for the creation of more art programs and exhibitions, fostering a vibrant cultural scene that benefits all citizens.Secondly, investing in the arts has economic benefits. The arts sector generates jobs, boosts tourism, and stimulates local economies. Museums, theaters, and galleries attract tourists and create employment opportunities, making it a sound investment for governments looking to promote both culture and economic growth.Addressing Concerns:Critics argue that government funding may lead to wasteful spending or biased cultural support. To address this concern, governments can establish rigorous oversight and accountability measures. Transparent allocation of funds, regular audits, and independent panels for evaluating art projects can ensure that taxpayer dollars are spent responsibly and fairly.In conclusion, increasing government funding for the arts is a prudent investment in cultural enrichment and economic growth. It promotes creativity, cultural diversity, and economic benefits while addressing concerns through proper oversight. Therefore, governments should consider increasing their support for the arts to nurture a more vibrant and culturally rich society.中文版：议题陈述：应该增加政府对艺术的资助。
gre英语考试作文范文汇总
gre英语考试作文范文汇总GRE写作想要在短时间内得到提升，大家可以多看一些满分范文，这有助于大家更好地了解写作高分的秘诀，店铺为大家整理了相关的范文，供大家参考学习。
希望对大家接下里的写作备考有更好的帮助。
GRE写作满分范文1The following appeared as a letter to the editor of a local newspaper."Five years ago, we residents of Morganton voted to keep the publicly owned piece of land known as Scott Woods in a natural, undeveloped state. Our thinking was that, if no shopping centers or houses were built there, Scott Woods would continue to benefit our community as a natural parkland. But now that our town planning committee wants to purchase the land and build a school there, we should reconsider this issue. If the land becomes a school site, no shopping centers or houses can be built there, and substantial acreage英亩数,面积would probably be devoted to athletic fields. There would be no better use of land in our community than this, since a large majority of our children participate in sports, and Scott Woods would continue to benefit our community as natural parkland."This letter to the editor begins by stating the reasons the residents of Morganton voted to keep Scott Woods in an undeveloped state. The letter states that the entire community could benefit from an undeveloped parkland. The residents of the town wanted to ensure that no shopping centers or houses would be built there. This, in turn, would provide everyone in the community with a valuable resource, a natural park.The letter then continues by addressing the issue of building a school on the land. The author reasons that this would alsobenefit the entire community as a natural parkland since much of the land would be devoted to athletic fields. The author of the letter comes to the conclusion that building a school on the land would be the best thing for everyone in the community.This letter is a one-sided argument about the best use of the land known as Scott Woods. The author may be a parent whose child would benefit from a new school, a teacher who thinks a school would boost the community, or just a resident of Morganton. Regardless of who the author is, there are many aspects of this plan that he or she has overlooked or chosen to ignore.Using a piece of land to build a school is not the same thing as using it for a natural parkland. While all the members of the community could potentially benefit from a parkland, only a percentage of the population would realistically benefit from a new school. The author fails to recognize people like the senior citizens of the community. What interest do they have in a new school? It only means higher taxes for them to pay. They will likely never to and utilize the school for anything. On the other hand, anyone can go to a park and enjoy the natural beauty and peacefulness. The use of the land for a school would destroy the benefit of a park for everyone. In turn, it would supply a school only to groups of people in exactly the right age range, not too young or too old, to reap the benefits.Another point the author stresses is that the use of the land for things like athletic fields somehow rationalizes the destruction of the park. What about children who don't play sports? Without the school, they could enjoy the land for anything. A playing field is a playing field. Children are not going to go out there unless they are into sports. There are manychildren in schools who are not interested in or are not able to play sports. This is yet another group who will be left out of the grand benefits of a school that the author talks about.The author's conclusion that "there would be no better use of land in our community than this...""is easily arguable. The destruction of Scott Woods for the purpose of building a school would not only affect the ambience of Morganton, it would affect who would and would not be able to utilize the space. If the residents as a whole voted to keep Scott Woods in an undeveloped state, this argument will not sway their decision. The use of the land for a school will probably benefit even less people than a shopping center would. The whole purpose of the vote was to keep the land as an asset for everyone. The only way to do this is to keep it in an undeveloped state. Using the land for a school does not accomplish this.Comments:This outstanding response begins somewhat hesitantly; the opening paragraphs summarize but do not immediately engage the argument. However, the subsequent paragraphs target the central flaws in the argument and analyze them in almost microscopic detail.The writer's main rebuttal points out that "using a piece of land to build a school is not the same thing as using it for natural parkland." Several subpoints develop this critique, offering perceptive reasons to counter the argument's unsubstantiated assumptions. This is linked to a related discussion that pointedly exposes another piece of faulty reasoning: that using land for athletic fields "rationalizes the destruction of the park."The extensively developed and organically organized analysis continues into a final paragraph that takes issue with theargument's conclusion that "there would be no better use of land in our community than this."Diction and syntax are varied and sophisticated, and the writer is fully in control of the standard conventions. While there may be stronger papers that merit a score of 6, this response demonstrates insightful analysis, cogent development, and mastery of writing. It clearly earns a 6.GRE写作满分范文2The following appeared as a letter to the editor of a local newspaper."Five years ago, we residents of Morganton voted to keep the publicly owned piece of land known as Scott Woods in a natural, undeveloped state. Our thinking was that, if no shopping centers or houses were built there, Scott Woods would continue to benefit our community as a natural parkland. But now that our town planning committee wants to purchase the land and build a school there, we should reconsider this issue. If the land becomes a school site, no shopping centers or houses can be built there, and substantial acreage would probably be devoted to athletic fields. There would be no better use of land in our community than this, since a large majority of our children participate in sports, and Scott Woods would continue to benefit our community as natural parkland."The author's argument is weak. Though he believes Scott Woods benefits the community as an undeveloped park, he also thinks a school should be built on it. Obviously the author is not aware of the development that comes with building a school besides the facilities devoted to learning or sports. He does not realize that parking lots will take up a substantial area of property, especially if the school proposed is a high school. We are notgiven this information, nor the size of the student body that will be attending, nor the population of the city itself, so it is unclear whether the damage will be great or marginal. For a better argument, the author should consider questions like what sort of natural resources are present on the land that will not remain once the school is built? Are there endangered species whose homes will be lost? And what about digging up the land for water lines? It is doubtful whether the integrity of Scott Woods as natural parkland can be maintained once the land has been developed. It is true that a school would probably not cause as much damage as a shopping center or housing development, but the author must consider whether the costs incurred in losing the park-like aspects of the property are worth developing it, when there could be another, more suitable site. He should also consider how the city will pay for the property, whether taxes will be raised to compensate for the expense or whether a shopping center will be built somewhere else to raise funds. He has not given any strong reasons for the idea of building a school, including what kind of land the property is, whether it is swampland that will have to be drained or an arid, scrubby lot that will need extensive maintenance to keep u p t h e a t h l e t i c g r e e n s . T h e a u t h o r s h o u l d a l s o c o n s i d e r t h e o p p o s i t i o n , s u c h a s t h e p e o p l e w i t h o u t c h i l d r e n w h o h a v e n o i n t e r e s t i n m o r e a t h l e t i c f i e l d s . H e m u s t d o a b e t t e r j o b o f p r e s e n t i n g h i s c a s e , a d d r e s s i n g e a c h p o i n t n a m e d a b o v e , f o r i f t h e l a n d i s a s m u c h a p o p u l a r c o m m u n i t y r e s o u r c e a s h e i m p l i e s , h e w i l l f a c e a t o u g h t i m e g a i n i n g a l l i e s t o c h a n g e a p a r k t o a s c h o o l . / p > p s t y l e = " t e x t - i n d e n t : 2 e m ; t e x t - a l i g n : l e f t ; " b ds f i d = " 9 6 " > C o m m e n t s : / p > p s t y l e = " t e x t - i n d e n t : 2 e m ; t e x t - a l i g n : l e f t ; " b d s f i d = " 9 7 " > A f t e r d e s c r i b i n g t h e a r g u m e n t a s " w e a k , " t h i s s t r o n g r e s p o n s e g o e s s t r a i g h t t o t h e h e a r t o f t h e m a t t e r : b u i l d i n g a s c h o o l i s n o t ( a s t h e a r g u m e n t s e e m s t o a s s u m e ) i n n o c u o u s ; r a t h e r , i t i n v o l v e s s u b s t a n t i a l d e v e l o p m e n t . T h e e s s a y i d e n t i f i e s s e v e r a l r e a s o n s t o s u p p o r t t h i s c r i t i q u e . T h e w r i t e r t h e n p o i n t s t o t h e i m p o r t a n t q u e s t i o n s t h a t m u s t b e a n s w e r e d b e f o r e a c c e p t i n g t h e p r o p o s a l . T h e s e a d d r e s s / p > p s t y l e = " t e x t - i n d e n t : 2 e m ; t e x t - a l i g n : l e f t ; " b d s f i d = " 9 8 " > - - t h e c o s t s v e r s u s t h e b e n e f i t s o f d e v e l o p i n g S c o t t W o o d s / p > p s t y l e = " t e x t - i n d e n t : 2 e m ; t e x t - a l i g n : l e f t ; " b d s f i d = " 9 9 " > - - t h e i m p a c t o f d e v e l o p m e n t o n S c o t t W o o d s / p > p s t y l e = " t e x t - i n d e n t : 2 e m ; t e x t - a l i g n : l e f t ; " b d s f i d = " 1 0 0 " > - - t h e p o s s i b i l i t y o f " a n o t h e r , m o r e s u i t a b l e s i t e " / p > p s t y l e = " t e x t - i n d e n t : 2 e m ; t e x t - a l i g n : l e f t ; " b d s f i d = " 1 0 1 " > T h e ge n e r a l l y t h o u g h tf u l a n a l y s i s n o t e s s t i l l m o r ef l a w s i n t h e a rg u m e n t : / p > p s t y l e = " t e x t - i n d e n t : 2 e m ; t e x t - a l i g n : l e f t ; " b d s f i d = " 1 0 2 " > - - wh e t h e r t h e s c h o o li s n e c e s s a r y / p > p s t y l e = " t e x t - i n d e n t : 2 e m ; t e x t - a l i g n : l e f t ; " b d s f i d = "1 0 3 " > - - w h e t h e r t h e s e l e c t e d s i t e i s a p p r o p ri a t e / p > p s t y l e = " t e x t - i n d e n t : 2 e m ; t e x t - a l i g n : l e f t ; " b d s f i d = " 1 0 4 " > - - w h e t h e r s o m e g r o u p s m i g h t o p p o s e t h e p l a n / p > p s t y l e = " t e x t - i n d e n t : 2 e m ; t e x t - a l i g n : l e f t ; " b d s f i d = " 1 0 5 " >A l t h o u g h d e t a i l e d a n d c o m p r e h e n s i v e , t h e w r i t e r ' s c r i t i q u e i s n e i t h e r a s f u l l y d e v e l o p e d n o r a s t i g h t l y o r g a n i z e d a s r e q u i r e d f o r a 6 e s s a y . T h e r e s p o n s e e x h i b i t s g o o d c o n t r o l o f l a n g u a g e , a l t h o u g h t h e r e i s s o m e a w k w a r d p h r a s i n g ( e . g . , " . ? ? r a i n i n g a l l i e s t o c h a n g e a p a r k t o a s c h o o l " ) . O v e r a l l , t h i s e s s a y w a r r a n t s a s c o r e o f 5 b e c a u s e i t i s w e l l d e v e l o p e d , c l e a r l y o r g a n i z e d , a n d s h o w s f a c i l i t y w i t h l a n g u a g e . / p > p s t y l e = " t e x t - i n d e n t : 2 e m ; t e x t - a l i g n : l e f t ; "b d s f i d = " 1 0 6 " >。
gre高分作文集锦
gre高分作文集锦（经典版）编制人：__________________审核人：__________________审批人：__________________编制单位：__________________编制时间：____年____月____日序言下载提示：该文档是本店铺精心编制而成的，希望大家下载后，能够帮助大家解决实际问题。
文档下载后可定制修改，请根据实际需要进行调整和使用，谢谢!并且，本店铺为大家提供各种类型的经典范文，如演讲稿、总结报告、合同协议、方案大全、工作计划、学习计划、条据书信、致辞讲话、教学资料、作文大全、其他范文等等，想了解不同范文格式和写法，敬请关注!Download tips: This document is carefully compiled by this editor. I hope that after you download it, it can help you solve practical problems. The document can be customized and modified after downloading, please adjust and use it according to actual needs, thank you!In addition, this shop provides you with various types of classic sample essays, such as speech drafts, summary reports, contract agreements, project plans, work plans, study plans, letter letters, speeches, teaching materials, essays, other sample essays, etc. Want to know the format and writing of different sample essays, so stay tuned!gre高分作文集锦提升GRE写作，自然离不开各种范文的学习和背诵。
GRE作文素材
GRE作文素材The Relationship between Technology and Human ConnectionTechnology plays a significant role in our daily lives, revolutionizing the way we communicate, travel, work, and live. It has connected people from all corners of the world and facilitated global collaboration. However, while technology brings about numerous benefits, it is also argued that it has strained human connections. In this essay, I will examine the relationship between technology and human connection.Firstly, technology has transformed the way we communicate with one another. Social media platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter have become an integral part of our social lives, allowing us to connect with people from different countries and cultures. These platforms provide an opportunity for individuals to interact, share experiences, and build relationships. Furthermore, instant messaging platforms such as WhatsApp and WeChat enable individuals to stay connected in real-time, irrespective of their physical location.Moreover, technology has facilitated global collaboration and brought people with similar interests together. Online platforms like Coursera and edX offer numerous free courses on a wide range of subjects. Students from all over the world can enroll in these courses and learn together, exchanging ideas and perspectives. Additionally, platforms like GitHub and Bitbucket allow programmers and software developers to collaborate on projects, irrespective of their geographical location. This has resulted in the creation of innovative software and applicationswith the contribution of individuals from different parts of the world.On the other hand, critics argue that technology has strained human connections. With the advent of smartphones and tablets, people are spending more time engaging with their devices rather than engaging with each other. Studies have shown that excessive use of technology can lead to feelings of isolation and loneliness. The constant need to check social media feeds and notifications can become addictive and hinder meaningful human interactions.Furthermore, the rise of online dating apps has changed the way people form romantic relationships. While these apps offer convenience and a broader pool of potential partners, they can also lead to superficial connections. Swiping left or right based on a person's photo or profile can reduce human interaction to an appearance-based judgment. This can hinder the development of deep, meaningful connections that are essential for long-lasting relationships.Another argument against technology is the impact it has on our ability to concentrate and engage fully in face-to-face conversations. The constant distractions of notifications and pop-up messages can disrupt our attention and make it difficult to focus on the person in front of us. This can hinder our ability to connect with others on a deeper level and understand their thoughts and emotions.In conclusion, technology has undoubtedly revolutionized the way we connect with one another and enabled global collaboration.However, it is also important to be mindful of the potential negative impacts of technology on human connections. Striking a balance between technology use and meaningful human interactions is key to ensuring that technology enhances rather than hinders human connection.Technology has undeniably transformed the way we connect and interact with one another. While it has brought about numerous benefits and opportunities, it is important to explore and understand the potential drawbacks and challenges that come with it. In this continued essay, I will delve deeper into the relationship between technology and human connection, discussing topics such as the impact of social media, the erosion of privacy, and the digital divide.Social media has become an integral part of our lives, allowing us to stay connected with friends and family, share our thoughts and experiences, and discover new communities. However, the constant exposure to curated and often idealized versions of other people's lives on platforms like Facebook and Instagram can lead to feelings of inadequacy and comparison. The pressure to present a perfect online image can create anxiety and hinder authentic human connections. Moreover, the superficiality of social media interactions, characterized by likes, comments, and emojis, can sometimes replace genuine, meaningful conversations and hinder the development of deep connections.Furthermore, the erosion of privacy that comes with technology poses a significant challenge to human connection. With the increasing amount of personal information we share online, from photos and locations to personal opinions and preferences, our privacy is compromised. This can lead to a sense of vulnerabilityand distrust, inhibiting genuine connections. Moreover, the monetization of personal data by technology companies raises concerns about the exploitation of our private lives for profit. The fear of surveillance and manipulation can hinder our willingness to connect and share openly.Additionally, the digital divide poses a challenge to equitable human connections. While technology has the potential to connect people from all corners of the world, not everyone has equal access or skills to make use of it. Socioeconomic disparities, geographic location, and educational opportunities can create barriers to accessing technology and participating fully in the digital world. This can further exacerbate existing inequalities, hindering the ability of marginalized communities to connect, collaborate, and share their voices.Moreover, the rise of online communication has impacted the quality of face-to-face interactions. The convenience of instant messaging and video calls can sometimes lead to the neglect of in-person connections. The ability to communicate through screens can create a sense of distance and detachment, hindering the depth and authenticity of human connections. It is important to recognize the value of face-to-face interactions, where nonverbal cues, emotions, and physical presence play a crucial role in building trust, empathy, and understanding.However, it is essential to note that technology also has the potential to enhance human connections. The globalization of communication through platforms like Skype and Zoom has allowed us to maintain relationships with loved ones acrosscontinents. It has facilitated long-distance collaborations and partnerships, enabling individuals with shared passions and goals to come together and work towards common objectives. Moreover, technology has empowered individuals to share diverse perspectives, amplify marginalized voices, and raise awareness about social issues. Online communities and platforms have become spaces for dialogue, support, and the formation of meaningful connections based on shared values and interests.To ensure that technology supports and enhances human connection, it is crucial to develop healthy and mindful technology habits. This includes setting boundaries on technology use, practicing digital detoxes, and prioritizing face-to-face interactions. It is essential to be intentional about the time and energy we invest in virtual connections and to seek a balance between online and offline interactions. Additionally, fostering digital literacy and skills can bridge the digital divide, enabling everyone to access and benefit from technology.In conclusion, technology has transformed the way we connect and interact with one another. While it brings numerous benefits, it also poses challenges to human connection. The impact of social media, erosion of privacy, digital divide, and changes in face-to-face interactions should be critically considered. By being mindful of these challenges and developing healthy technology habits, we can ensure that technology enhances, rather than hinders, human connection. Striking a balance is key to harnessing the potential of technology to build meaningful relationships, foster understanding, and promote collective well-being.。
GRE-Argument-满分范文5篇
ArgumentSample 1In this argument the author employs a variety of evidence about Paleans, including their geographical isolation and the discovery of a basket, to argue that Palean baskets could have been made by non-Palean cultures. We may accept part of the author’s claim regarding the Paleans, but in the absence of some critical evidence, we cannot accept the conclusion that the Paleans have no means of transporting one of their baskets to other region.In the first place, the author assumes that the Paleans could not have reached Lithos because no Palean boat has been found. However, the author is treating a lack of proof that the Paleans could have possessed some kind of boat as sufficient proof that they did not possess any such vehicles at all. From the passage we are only informed that Palean boats “were not found〞, but the mere fact that no boat found currently could not fully illustrate that the Paleans did not have boats. We need concrete evidence to show that the Paleans did not master the skill of shipbuilding.Granted that the Paleans did possess no boats, we still need evidence to prove that the basket could not have arrived in Lithos by other means. Although the Brim River is deep and broad at present, it might be shallower and narrower at Palean time, or at least some sections of the river were less deep and broad at that time. If so, the Paleans could have crossed the river without boat. Some archaeological and geological records or documents about the condition of the Brim River at ancient time might be useful for evaluating the argument.Assuming that the river was also deep and broad in ancient time and can be crossed only by boat, there is a possibility that some vehicles were in the possession of a second culture with whom the Palean people kept in contact. The second culture might have brought the discovered basket to Lithos during trading or other activities. Also possibly, the basket may have been brought to Lithos by some other people latterly after the disappearance of the Paleans, or may have drifted to the site due to geological accidents such as a flood. The author should provide evidence to show that Paleans had no significant contact with other cultures who possessed boats, and that the basket could not be carried to the site through other methods such as trading or some accidents. We still cannot rule out the possibility that the baskets were unique to Palean culture without such information.In sum, the conclusion is hastily reached. Before the claim that other cultures could have produced so-called Palean baskets is accepted, the author should provide concrete evidence to show that Paleans were never capable of building boats. The author also needs to rule out other possible ways by which the basket could travel to other places.In the argument the arguer points out that Crust Copper Company (CCC) has purchased a vast of land in West Fredonia and that mining here will inevitably lead to tremendous pollution. To avoid such environmental problems, the arguer suggests that boycott towards products produced by CCC will be an effective measure. Well-intentioned the arguer may be, several unwarranted assumptions may render the boycott unnecessary or ineffective.First, the underlying assumption that the deterioration of environment and disturbance to endangered animals will inevitably occur is open to doubt. Ten thousand square miles are, without any doubt, so large an area that almost make up the total territory of New York City, there is likelihood that only a very small proportion of the land is used for mining. Furthermore, with the advanced technology of waste disposal and environmental-friendly recycling, the pollution, if any, can be so insignificant that almost has no negative effect to the environment. Even if the exploration is heavy, the arguer does not inform us to what extent the mining areas and the habitat of endangered species overlap. If they locate far away from each other, the mining would have little effect to local animals. Without taking these factors into consideration, the arguer could not successfully convince us that CCC’s mining process will bring about horrible results, and the boycott would be totally unnecessary in this case.Second, the feasibility of the arguer’s pro posal can also be cast doubt on. The proposal could be smoothly carried out only if the consumers can reliably distinguish products that are made with CCC’s copper. We all know that only the brand of the final producer will be engraved to a product. For instance, if a copper lock is manufactured, consumers can only identify the brand of the lock company. It is unlikely that a nonprofessional consumer can tell the material supplier of a certain product. Even assuming that consumers can effectively recognize copper products made with CCC’s copper, and that the vast majority of such consumers can be gathered by certain means, whether all of them are willing to cooperate in the boycott is still not guaranteed. It is highly possible that most consumers care more about the quality and cost of a product while little about environmental problems. If the consumers cannot distinguish products using CCC’s copper, or they have no interest in the boycott, the proposal would be meaningless at all, let alone prevent environmental problems.In conclusion, the argument is unpersuasive and the arguer should provide additional information to demonstrate that CCC will cause a disastrous effect on the environment of West Fredonia once its mining plan is carried out. The arguer also needs to prove that the proposed boycott is not only practically feasible, but also sufficient and necessary for the arguer’s purpose.In this argument the manager suggests that Rialto must offer same features as Apex, a newly opened theater, to attract moviegoers. The manager describes many fancy functions featured by Apex and the dissatisfaction of moviegoers about the high price of new movies. However, merely these facts could not prove that the proposed action will guarantee Rialto’s share of the market.A foremost question is: whether Apex was really a great success? We are not informed about the actual profit and the number of moviegoers of Apex. It is possible that the costs of these fashionable features are so high that the ticket prices of Apex are higher than other theaters, which will further prevent moviegoers on a tight budget from going to it, or that the ticket income of Apex remains low although it had featured those functions.Granted that Apex has gained great profits, we may still ask that whether the success resulted from those new features. Many other factors would also influence people’s choice on a theater. For example, people would be concerned more about the distance of the theater from their houses. Meanwhile, whether the lack of these features has caused a decreased share of moviegoers for Rialto is open to doubt. Perhaps the total number of residents in down town area was decreasing recently, and therefore Rialto could not attract as many people as before.Another question that should be addressed is the comparability of the two theaters. As we know, many factors would make them quite different from each other: their locations, the types of movie they mainly feature, the ticket price, etc. Any one of these factors would make the measures less effective in Rialto as in Apex. The manager cannot convince us that Rialto could gain profits by simply copying the features of Apex.Furthermore, we may question the reliability of the survey. We could not be sure if the respondents of the survey are representative of the overall population of the city and constitute a large number of people. Besides, granted that the respondents’ opinion could represent that of our general residents, Rialto could take other actions as response, such as featuring some formerly-released movies with lower price.It is understandable that a theater should struggle for its survival. But before the manager could provide complete information about the actual profits of Apex, and show clear evidence that Apex has attracted many moviegoers because of its new features, we could not hastily conclude that providing these features at Rialto would secure its future prosper.Basing on the assumption that farmers are receiving excessive profits on increased supply of milk, the author recommends Batavia government to regulate retail milk prices. Admittedly, it is the responsibility of the government to ensure the stability of the market, however, several questions must be addressed before we could determine whether the regulation will be necessary and effective for lowering milk price.A critical assumption of the argument is that the farmers are receiving unreasonable profits, which is unwarranted before several factors have been considered. A foremost question is that whether the number of dairy farms could accurately reflect the supply of milk, for there is no necessary relationship between them. It is possible that the average milk supply of each single farm has dropped and therefore the total supply would not increase. It is also possible that a great proportion of milk produced has been processed to other dairy products or has been exported. The milk supply on market will decrease in these cases.Granted that the supply of milk did increase during the past decade, we may well ask that whether the prices of milk are increasing all over the country. The author provides only one sample----the Excello market to illustrate the variation of milk price, but many factors may render the situation at the market unrepresentative of the national trends. Perhaps the supply of milk in the region where the market locates was relatively lower than national average, or the milk production is much more costly here due to some geographic factors. Any one of these possibilities would make the higher milk price in Excllo totally a normal phenomenon.Even if the prices of milk were also doubled throughout the country, just as happened in Excello, the author overlooks a myriad of economic factors that would result in the increase. Consider, for example, the cost of milk production and transportation might have increased as well during the same period, or perhaps the supply of milk could not meet the demand in spite of an increased supply. The author also needs to inform us how much did the price of milk actually increase after adjustment for inflation. Without accounting for these factors, the author could not convince us that farmers have received excessive profits and that the regulation is indeed necessary.Finally, even if the author can successfully address all the questions foregoing, it is unjustifiable to conclude that the regulation of retail milk prices could ensure an adequate supply of milk and therefore, a fair price. It is likely that the regulation would reduce the profits of farmers; they might be less interested in producing milk, or will produce less milk as a response. If so, adopting the author’s recommend ation will actually lead to inadequate supply of milk rather than the optimistic result expected by the author.Undoubtedly, the author’s intention of keeping the market stable and ensuring fair price of milk is justified. But to convince us that the regulation is necessary to ensure a reasonable milk price and adequate supply, the author must substantiate the assumption that the profits received by farmers are undeserved and that the regulation is sufficient for ensuring lower price. Hastily carrying out such regulation would actually pose negative effects on the supply of milk.The fewer sick days and lower diagnosis of stress-related illness in Leeville may, to some extent, indicate better health status of residents. But the situation could also be explained by many other factors. It is too hasty for the Chamber of Commerce to conclude that it is the relaxed pace of life that brings those health benefits.First of all, the Chamber implies that Leeville residents are in satisfying health condition, which serves as a foremost premise of the argument. However, the number of sick days and the diagnosis of stress-related illness do not necessarily indicate the health condition of residents. The fewer sick days may result from strict restrictions on sick leaves at Leeville factories; or perhaps the workers will receive harsher punishment once they take too many sick leaves, thus they will be unable to take more sick leaves as a result. Another explanation is that the workers might be unwilling to be absent from work for certain reasons. Similarly, the fewer diagnosis of stress-related illness could also be explained by other reasons. It is possible that people in Leeville are not willing to visit doctors for these diseases, or maybe there are some differences in the diagnostic criteria of the disease in the two cities. If the criterion or definition of the disease is more rigorous in Leeville than in Masonton, then it is conceivable that the incidence of such disease in Masonton will be higher. In this case, the diagnosis of this illness could not accurately reflect the actual level of stress of residents, let alone their actual level health.Granted that Leeville residents are living healthier lives, physically and mentally, there are still many other factors, rather than the relaxed pace of life suggested by the Chamber, that could contribute to the situation. The myriad factors might include better environment and weather, healthier life style in Leeville, which will lead to good health condition and less illness. It is also possible that the working condition and work ethic in Leeville factories are better than those in Masonton, or Leeville has harmonious neighborhoods, which could explain the lower level of mental stress.As commonly known, a relaxed pa ce of life often promotes people’s health status, but we cannot conclude that the better health of Leeville residents is also the result of their pace of life. The Chamber should consider and rule out all other possibilities before we could be convinced that the relaxed lifestyle is the actual and only explanation for the health condition of Leeville residents.。
优秀新GRE写作素材大汇总
优秀新GRE写作素材大汇总1.科技与社会：-科技的快速发展对社会产生了巨大影响，带来了许多好处例如提高效率和便利性。
-然而，科技也带来了一系列问题，例如技术失业、隐私保护等。
-科技应该为社会服务，而不是主导社会的发展。
2.环境保护与可持续发展：-环保意识的提高，人们开始重视可持续发展，例如采用可再生能源、减少废物排放等。
-然而，环境保护面临许多挑战，例如资源短缺和气候变化。
-社会各方面都需要共同努力，采取行动来保护环境。
3.教育与就业：-教育是社会进步的基础，高质量的教育可以提高人们的就业机会和生活质量。
-然而，教育资源不均衡，使得一些地区、阶层的人们面临教育不公平问题。
-政府和社会应该加大教育投入，确保每个人都有平等的教育机会。
4.文化与传统：-传统文化是一个国家的瑰宝，代表着国家的历史和精神。
-然而，随着全球化的发展，传统文化面临着被边缘化的风险。
-保护和传承传统文化是每个人的责任。
5.健康与生活方式：-人们的健康与生活方式紧密相关，例如饮食习惯、运动等。
-然而，现代生活方式导致人们普遍缺乏运动，从而导致健康问题增加。
-政府和社会应该鼓励人们积极健康的生活方式。
6.社会公平与和谐：-社会公平是一个国家稳定和和谐发展的基础。
-然而，社会公平面临许多挑战，例如不平等的财富分配和歧视问题。
-政府和社会各方面都应该努力促进社会公平和和谐发展。
7.媒体与信息传播：-媒体在社会中起着重要作用，可以传播信息和培养公众意识。
-然而，媒体也面临着偏见和不实信息的问题，误导公众。
-社会应该加强对媒体的监督和教育，确保媒体的公正和客观。
8.城市化与乡村发展：-城市化是现代社会的一个趋势，可以提供更多的机会和便利。
-然而，城市化也导致了许多问题，例如城市贫困和资源紧张。
-政府和社会应该实行合理的城市规划，促进城乡协调发展。
GRE作文素材
GRE作文素材(一)(2007-10-29 11:07:35)标签：知识/探索一、一生不得志：Socrate（苏格拉底），我们对于他的认识是通过其学生Plato了解到的。
德国Germany著名哲学家Schopeha（舒本华）一生不得志，直到临终的几年，一些著作才被大众所接受。
奥地利(Austria)作曲家Schubert(舒伯特)例外：G.B.Shaw英国喜剧作家，活1925年Nobel Prize一生得志。
二、创新Uhlenbeek and Goudsmit提出Electron spin(电子自旋),在导师的鼓励下鼓足勇气将结论发表出去；Waston and Click提出DNA Double Helix Modle；三、经验重要Marie Curie and her husband (or Curie couple)经过常年累月、坚持不懈的经验积累，最终发现放射性物质；考古学archeology需要丰富的经验；四、时事造英雄比尔.盖茨Bill Gates创立微软Microsoft；邓小平领导中国人民实行改革开放；Franklin Roosecelt（罗斯福）再1929年stark market（股市）Great Crash（大崩盘）导致美国经济大萧条Great Depresson提出新经济政策New Deal（其核心是：Refor m,Recovery and Relief）,极大地拯救了美国；五、商业Pavid Packard的惠普Hewlett Packard的缔造者之一，其经营知道：(1)、对个人的充分尊重respect for individual；(2)、对质量和荣誉的追求in persut og quality and credit；(3)、对社会责任感的承诺acceptance of responsibility六、质疑"As long as the world last,there will be wrongs,and if no man rebelled,t hose wrongs would last forever."--Darrow；James Clerk Maxwell,dissatisfied with Aristotle's deeply ingrained unders tandings of nature,despised the prejudices and book learbing of Aristotle,putti ng his questions to nature instead of the ancients,fearlessly drawing his concl usions.尽管他被宗教religin courts残酷地迫害unmercifully persecuted,他从自己的很多实验结果中总结出了著名的distingushed重力定律Law of gravity。
GRE-Argument-满分范文5篇
ArgumentSample 1In this argument the author employs a variety of evidence about Paleans, including their geographical isolation and the discovery of a basket, to argue that Palean baskets could have been made by non-Palean cultures. We may accept part of the author’s claim regarding the Paleans, but in the absence of some critical evidence, we cannot accept the conclusion that the Paleans have no means of transporting one of their baskets to other region.In the first place, the author assumes that the Paleans could not have reached Lithos because no Palean boat has been found. However, the author is treating a lack of proof that the Paleans could have possessed some kind of boat as sufficient proof that they did not possess any such vehicles at all. From the passage we are only informed that Palean boats “were not found〞, but the mere fact that no boat found currently could not fully illustrate that the Paleans did not have boats. We need concrete evidence to show that the Paleans did not master the skill of shipbuilding.Granted that the Paleans did possess no boats, we still need evidence to prove that the basket could not have arrived in Lithos by other means. Although the Brim River is deep and broad at present, it might be shallower and narrower at Palean time, or at least some sections of the river were less deep and broad at that time. If so, the Paleans could have crossed the river without boat. Some archaeological and geological records or documents about the condition of the Brim River at ancient time might be useful for evaluating the argument.Assuming that the river was also deep and broad in ancient time and can be crossed only by boat, there is a possibility that some vehicles were in the possession of a second culture with whom the Palean people kept in contact. The second culture might have brought the discovered basket to Lithos during trading or other activities. Also possibly, the basket may have been brought to Lithos by some other people latterly after the disappearance of the Paleans, or may have drifted to the site due to geological accidents such as a flood. The author should provide evidence to show that Paleans had no significant contact with other cultures who possessed boats, and that the basket could not be carried to the site through other methods such as trading or some accidents. We still cannot rule out the possibility that the baskets were unique to Palean culture without such information.In sum, the conclusion is hastily reached. Before the claim that other cultures could have produced so-called Palean baskets is accepted, the author should provide concrete evidence to show that Paleans were never capable of building boats. The author also needs to rule out other possible ways by which the basket could travel to other places.In the argument the arguer points out that Crust Copper Company (CCC) has purchased a vast of land in West Fredonia and that mining here will inevitably lead to tremendous pollution. To avoid such environmental problems, the arguer suggests that boycott towards products produced by CCC will be an effective measure. Well-intentioned the arguer may be, several unwarranted assumptions may render the boycott unnecessary or ineffective.First, the underlying assumption that the deterioration of environment and disturbance to endangered animals will inevitably occur is open to doubt. Ten thousand square miles are, without any doubt, so large an area that almost make up the total territory of New York City, there is likelihood that only a very small proportion of the land is used for mining. Furthermore, with the advanced technology of waste disposal and environmental-friendly recycling, the pollution, if any, can be so insignificant that almost has no negative effect to the environment. Even if the exploration is heavy, the arguer does not inform us to what extent the mining areas and the habitat of endangered species overlap. If they locate far away from each other, the mining would have little effect to local animals. Without taking these factors into consideration, the arguer could not successfully convince us that CCC’s mining process will bring about horrible results, and the boycott would be totally unnecessary in this case.Second, the feasibility of the arguer’s pro posal can also be cast doubt on. The proposal could be smoothly carried out only if the consumers can reliably distinguish products that are made with CCC’s copper. We all know that only the brand of the final producer will be engraved to a product. For instance, if a copper lock is manufactured, consumers can only identify the brand of the lock company. It is unlikely that a nonprofessional consumer can tell the material supplier of a certain product. Even assuming that consumers can effectively recognize copper products made with CCC’s copper, and that the vast majority of such consumers can be gathered by certain means, whether all of them are willing to cooperate in the boycott is still not guaranteed. It is highly possible that most consumers care more about the quality and cost of a product while little about environmental problems. If the consumers cannot distinguish products using CCC’s copper, or they have no interest in the boycott, the proposal would be meaningless at all, let alone prevent environmental problems.In conclusion, the argument is unpersuasive and the arguer should provide additional information to demonstrate that CCC will cause a disastrous effect on the environment of West Fredonia once its mining plan is carried out. The arguer also needs to prove that the proposed boycott is not only practically feasible, but also sufficient and necessary for the arguer’s purpose.In this argument the manager suggests that Rialto must offer same features as Apex, a newly opened theater, to attract moviegoers. The manager describes many fancy functions featured by Apex and the dissatisfaction of moviegoers about the high price of new movies. However, merely these facts could not prove that the proposed action will guarantee Rialto’s share of the market.A foremost question is: whether Apex was really a great success? We are not informed about the actual profit and the number of moviegoers of Apex. It is possible that the costs of these fashionable features are so high that the ticket prices of Apex are higher than other theaters, which will further prevent moviegoers on a tight budget from going to it, or that the ticket income of Apex remains low although it had featured those functions.Granted that Apex has gained great profits, we may still ask that whether the success resulted from those new features. Many other factors would also influence people’s choice on a theater. For example, people would be concerned more about the distance of the theater from their houses. Meanwhile, whether the lack of these features has caused a decreased share of moviegoers for Rialto is open to doubt. Perhaps the total number of residents in down town area was decreasing recently, and therefore Rialto could not attract as many people as before.Another question that should be addressed is the comparability of the two theaters. As we know, many factors would make them quite different from each other: their locations, the types of movie they mainly feature, the ticket price, etc. Any one of these factors would make the measures less effective in Rialto as in Apex. The manager cannot convince us that Rialto could gain profits by simply copying the features of Apex.Furthermore, we may question the reliability of the survey. We could not be sure if the respondents of the survey are representative of the overall population of the city and constitute a large number of people. Besides, granted that the respondents’ opinion could represent that of our general residents, Rialto could take other actions as response, such as featuring some formerly-released movies with lower price.It is understandable that a theater should struggle for its survival. But before the manager could provide complete information about the actual profits of Apex, and show clear evidence that Apex has attracted many moviegoers because of its new features, we could not hastily conclude that providing these features at Rialto would secure its future prosper.Basing on the assumption that farmers are receiving excessive profits on increased supply of milk, the author recommends Batavia government to regulate retail milk prices. Admittedly, it is the responsibility of the government to ensure the stability of the market, however, several questions must be addressed before we could determine whether the regulation will be necessary and effective for lowering milk price.A critical assumption of the argument is that the farmers are receiving unreasonable profits, which is unwarranted before several factors have been considered. A foremost question is that whether the number of dairy farms could accurately reflect the supply of milk, for there is no necessary relationship between them. It is possible that the average milk supply of each single farm has dropped and therefore the total supply would not increase. It is also possible that a great proportion of milk produced has been processed to other dairy products or has been exported. The milk supply on market will decrease in these cases.Granted that the supply of milk did increase during the past decade, we may well ask that whether the prices of milk are increasing all over the country. The author provides only one sample----the Excello market to illustrate the variation of milk price, but many factors may render the situation at the market unrepresentative of the national trends. Perhaps the supply of milk in the region where the market locates was relatively lower than national average, or the milk production is much more costly here due to some geographic factors. Any one of these possibilities would make the higher milk price in Excllo totally a normal phenomenon.Even if the prices of milk were also doubled throughout the country, just as happened in Excello, the author overlooks a myriad of economic factors that would result in the increase. Consider, for example, the cost of milk production and transportation might have increased as well during the same period, or perhaps the supply of milk could not meet the demand in spite of an increased supply. The author also needs to inform us how much did the price of milk actually increase after adjustment for inflation. Without accounting for these factors, the author could not convince us that farmers have received excessive profits and that the regulation is indeed necessary.Finally, even if the author can successfully address all the questions foregoing, it is unjustifiable to conclude that the regulation of retail milk prices could ensure an adequate supply of milk and therefore, a fair price. It is likely that the regulation would reduce the profits of farmers; they might be less interested in producing milk, or will produce less milk as a response. If so, adopting the author’s recommend ation will actually lead to inadequate supply of milk rather than the optimistic result expected by the author.Undoubtedly, the author’s intention of keeping the market stable and ensuring fair price of milk is justified. But to convince us that the regulation is necessary to ensure a reasonable milk price and adequate supply, the author must substantiate the assumption that the profits received by farmers are undeserved and that the regulation is sufficient for ensuring lower price. Hastily carrying out such regulation would actually pose negative effects on the supply of milk.The fewer sick days and lower diagnosis of stress-related illness in Leeville may, to some extent, indicate better health status of residents. But the situation could also be explained by many other factors. It is too hasty for the Chamber of Commerce to conclude that it is the relaxed pace of life that brings those health benefits.First of all, the Chamber implies that Leeville residents are in satisfying health condition, which serves as a foremost premise of the argument. However, the number of sick days and the diagnosis of stress-related illness do not necessarily indicate the health condition of residents. The fewer sick days may result from strict restrictions on sick leaves at Leeville factories; or perhaps the workers will receive harsher punishment once they take too many sick leaves, thus they will be unable to take more sick leaves as a result. Another explanation is that the workers might be unwilling to be absent from work for certain reasons. Similarly, the fewer diagnosis of stress-related illness could also be explained by other reasons. It is possible that people in Leeville are not willing to visit doctors for these diseases, or maybe there are some differences in the diagnostic criteria of the disease in the two cities. If the criterion or definition of the disease is more rigorous in Leeville than in Masonton, then it is conceivable that the incidence of such disease in Masonton will be higher. In this case, the diagnosis of this illness could not accurately reflect the actual level of stress of residents, let alone their actual level health.Granted that Leeville residents are living healthier lives, physically and mentally, there are still many other factors, rather than the relaxed pace of life suggested by the Chamber, that could contribute to the situation. The myriad factors might include better environment and weather, healthier life style in Leeville, which will lead to good health condition and less illness. It is also possible that the working condition and work ethic in Leeville factories are better than those in Masonton, or Leeville has harmonious neighborhoods, which could explain the lower level of mental stress.As commonly known, a relaxed pa ce of life often promotes people’s health status, but we cannot conclude that the better health of Leeville residents is also the result of their pace of life. The Chamber should consider and rule out all other possibilities before we could be convinced that the relaxed lifestyle is the actual and only explanation for the health condition of Leeville residents.。
gre 作文素材
gre 作文素材1)教育类1.For instance,applicants with Computer Science degrees would not only be qualified for jobs in high-tech companies,they would also be well prepared for any job with computer skills as a prerequisite.2.A good education is supposed to include everything from languages to mathematics to science,etc.3.A well-rounded education leads to well-balanced people,which in turn leads to a tolerant,knowledgeable society.4.There are a great many children thinking the main purpose of education should be to afford them pleasure and enjoyment.(注意there be句型后的名词再加动词不能用原形。
)2)人的性格1.If you weep for the missing sunset,you would miss all the shining stars.3)成功&事业1.Jackie Chan once told that when he was still a teenager,he and his partners were required to practice more than 12 hoursa day;and it was said Jet Li was sent to be an apprentice when he was hardly four years old.2.Bill Gates,as we know,dropping out from university when he found the possibility of earning money in a new massive market-personal computer market.As a result,he succeeded.3.Steven Jobs found Apple company when he was young,and when his business reached the peak,he was fired by directors of board.However he never lost hope and didn't give up.Jobs set up a new company named Pixar and made several famous animation movies.Finally when Pixar was bought by Apple,Jobs returned to Apple.4)公共事业Increase employment opportunity create more jobs5)艺术类1.Confucius,greatest Chinese philosopher,commented,“Art helps a person gets a better life.6)万能例子"If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exchange these apples then you and I will still each have one apple.But if you have an idea and I have an idea and we exchange theseideas,then each of us will have two ideas."-George Bernard Shaw.。
gre英语作文
gre英语作文In the contemporary era, the role of technology in education has become increasingly significant. The integration of technological tools and platforms has transformed the way students learn and teachers teach. This essay will explore the positive and negative impacts of technology on education and consider the balance that needs to be struck to ensure a holistic educational experience.Positive Impacts1. Enhanced Access to Information: Technology has made vast amounts of information readily accessible. Students can now research topics from the comfort of their homes, using search engines, online databases, and educational platforms.2. Personalized Learning: Educational software can adapt to individual learning styles and paces, providing personalized learning experiences that cater to the unique needs of each student.3. Interactive Learning: The use of multimedia tools such as videos, simulations, and interactive games can make learning more engaging and interactive, thereby improving student engagement and retention.4. Collaboration: Technology facilitates collaboration among students, regardless of their geographical location. Toolslike online forums, group chats, and collaborative documents allow students to work together on projects and share ideas.5. Flexibility: Online courses and digital resources provide flexibility in terms of when and where students can learn, accommodating different schedules and learning preferences.Negative Impacts1. Distraction: The same devices that offer educational content can also be a source of distraction. Social media, games, and other non-academic content can divert students' attention from their studies.2. Digital Divide: Not all students have equal access to technology. The digital divide can exacerbate educational inequalities, as those without access to technology may be at a disadvantage.3. Overreliance on Technology: There is a risk that students may become overly dependent on technology for learning, potentially neglecting the development of critical thinking and problem-solving skills that are not always technology-dependent.4. Lack of Human Interaction: The shift to digital learning can sometimes lead to a reduction in face-to-face interaction between students and teachers, which is crucial for building a supportive learning community.5. Screen Time Concerns: Prolonged screen time can havenegative effects on physical health, such as eye strain and sedentary behavior, and can also impact mental well-being.Balancing the ImpactTo maximize the benefits of technology while mitigating its drawbacks, it is essential for educators to adopt a balanced approach. This includes setting clear guidelines for technology use, ensuring equitable access to digital resources, and integrating technology with traditional teaching methods to create a blended learning environment.In conclusion, technology has the potential to greatly enhance the educational experience when used thoughtfully and responsibly. By acknowledging both its strengths and weaknesses, we can work towards a future where technology supports rather than detracts from the educational journey of students.。
GRE作文考试素材参考：文摘二则
各位请注意：我们主要学习的是它的句子，非其晦涩难懂的深义也。
有哪位对其细节不太明白的请知会本人。
No Difficulty, No FunPossession for its own sake or in competition with the rest of the neighborhood would have been Thoreau's idea of the low levels. The active discipline of heightening one's perception of what is in nature would have been his idea of the high. What he saved from the low was time and effort he could spend one the high. Thoreau certainly disapproved of starvation, but he would put into feeding himself only as much effort as would keep him functioning for more important efforts.Effort is the gist of it. There is no happiness except as we take on life- engaging difficulties. Short of the impossible, as Yeats put it, the satisfaction we get from a lifetime depends on how high we choose out difficulties. Robert Frost was thinking something like the same terms when he spoke of“the pleasure of taking pains”. The mortal flaw in the advertised version of happiness is in the fact that it purports to be effortless.We demand difficulty even in our games. We demand it because without difficulty there can be no game. A game is a way of making something hard for the fun of it. The rules of the game are an arbitrary imposition of difficulty. When someone ruins the fun, he always does do by refusing to play by the rules. It is easier to win at chess if your are free, at your pleasure, to change the wholly arbitrary rules, but the fun is in winning within the rules. No difficulty, no fun.Winners & LosersThe word“winner”and“loser”have many meanings. When we refer to a person as a winner, we do not mean one who makes someone else lose. To us, a winner is one who respondsauthentically by being credible, trustworthy, responsive, and genuine, both as an individual and as a member of a society.Winners do not dedicate their lives to a concept of what they imagine they should be; rather, they are themselves and as such do not use their energy putting on a performance, maintaining pretence and manipulating others. They are aware that there is a difference between being loving and acting loving, between being stupid and acting stupid, between being knowledgeable and acting knowledgeable. Winners do not need to hide behind a mask.Winners are not afraid to do their own thinking and to use their own knowledge. They can separate facts from opinions and don't pretend to have all the answers. They listen to others; evaluate what they say, but come to their own conclusions. Although winners can admire and respect other people, they are not totally defined, demolished, bound or awed by them.Winners do not play“helpless”, nor do they play the blaming game. Instead, they assume responsibility for their own lives.特别说明：由于各方面情况的不断调整与变化，新浪所提供的所有考试信息仅供参考，敬请考生以权威部门公布的正式信息为准。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
The Pool of Issue Topics1. "We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own; disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning."通常，我们从与我们意见相同的人身上学到的要比从那些与我们意见相悖的人身上学的东西要多得多；（因为）意见不统一会带来压力并且阻碍学习。
（与我们）持相同意见者和持不同意见者对学习的作用------------------------------2. "Competition is ultimately more beneficial than detrimental to society."归根结底，竞争对于社会是利多弊少。
竞争对于社会的优点和缺点------------------------------3. "It is more important to allocate money for immediate, existing social problems than to spend it on long-term research that might help future generations."与其花钱进行可能有助于后代的长期性研究，还不如把钱花在迫在眉睫，已经存在的社会问题上。
当务之急和百年大计的关系------------------------------4. "No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study."在任何一个研究领域当中，除非有该领域之外的人引进他们的知识和经验，否则该领域就很难获得巨大的发展。
Outsider: a person does not belong to a particular group闭门造车，旁观者清------------------------------5. "A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college rather than allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academic courses to offer."一个国家应该要求所有的学生在进入大学之前都学习由国家统一制定的课程，而不是允许由国家不同地区的学校去决定课程的安排。
国家统一和地区单独安排课程------------------------------6. "The most effective way to understand contemporary culture is to analyze the trends of itsyouth."了解当代文明最有效的途径就是去分析当代年轻人的潮流。
文明潮流和年轻人潮流的关系。
------------------------------7. "The video camera provides such an accurate and convincing record of contemporary life that it has become a more important form of documentation than written records."摄像机可以通过如此精确而有力的记录手段来再现当代生活，因此它已经代替书面记录成为了一种更重要的记录手段。
记录手段：现代摄像机和印刷术------------------------------8. "It is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public."对于政治领导者来说，向人民大众隐瞒信息通常是必要的，甚至有益的。
少数和多数的关系之true lies, the truth is out there.------------------------------9. "Academic disciplines have become so specialized in recent years that scholars' ideas reach only a narrow audience. Until scholars can reach a wider audience, their ideas will have little use."近些年来，学科已经细化到了相当的程度以至于学者们的理念只影响小范围的人群。
除非学者们能拥有影响等大范围的人群，否则他们的理念将几乎毫无用处。
过分专业化问题overspecialization------------------------------10. "Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive, because it is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated."政府必须要确保主要城市发展所需的财政支持，因为一个国家的文化传统主要是在城市中得以保存和发展。
城市和国家的关系之文化传统11. "All nations should help support the development of a global university designed toengage students in the process of solving the world's most persistent social problems."所有的国家都应该支持发展一所全球性的大学，它的主要目的是要让学生们致力于解决世界上最难缠的社会问题。
全球化问题之全球解难大学------------------------------12. "People's attitudes are determined more by their immediate situation or surroundings than by any internal characteristic."人们的态度更多的是由临时的情况或者环境所决定，而非人们自身的特点。
心理问题之冲动和可预测------------------------------13. "Many of the world's lesser-known languages are being lost as fewer and fewer people speak them. The governments of countries in which these languages are spoken should act to prevent such languages from becoming extinct."世界上很多的小语种都快要消失了，因为越来越少的人在使用这些语言。
使用这些小语种的国家应该采取行动以防止这样的语言逐渐销声匿迹。
反全球化问题之小语种与政府保护------------------------------14. "It is necessary for everyone to read poetry, novels, mythology and other types of imaginative literature."每个人都应该阅读诗歌、小说、神话以及各种各样的想象文学。
想象文学与人------------------------------15. "The stability of a society depends on how it responds to the extremes of human behavior."一个社会的稳定取决于该社会对人们极端行为所作出的反应。
抽象型题目------------------------------16. "Although many people think that the luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life are entirely harmless, in fact, they actually prevent people from developing into truly strongand independent individuals."尽管许多人认为现代生活的奢华和便利是丝毫没有坏处的，但是这实际上让人们无法成为真正强大和独立的个体。
社会和个人之发展问题------------------------------17. "There are two types of laws: just and unjust. Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and, even more importantly, to disobey and resist unjust laws."有两种法律：公正的和不公正的。
每个社会成员都有责任遵守公正的法律，但是更重要的是，更应该不遵守和反抗不公正的法律。
社会和个人之法律公正么？------------------------------18. "Only by being forced to defend an idea against the doubts and contrasting views of others does one really discover the value of that idea."只有通过排除异议和对照其他的观点来捍卫一个理念，人们才能真正的发现该理念的价值所在。