庭前准备与庭审

查阅授权：注意代理人的权限是否存在
瑕疵。
利冲检索：检查是否存在需要披露或回
避的事项。
1.2 阅卷
阅读卷宗
关注： 当事人请求； 争议要点及当事人主 要事实及理由 ：双方 认可事实、双方分歧 点； 细读证据：证据是否 存在瑕疵、证据是否 完整、证据是否有关 联性。
制作阅卷笔录
事实部分：重点问题整 理 赔偿请求部分：数据整 理
But this Court is not a legislature. Whether same-sex marriage is a good idea should be of no concern to us. Under the Constitution, judges have power to say what the law is, not what it should be. The people who ratified the Constitution authorized courts to exercise “neither force nor will but merely judgment.” The fundamental right to marry does not include a right to make a State change its definition of marriage. And a State’s decision to maintain the meaning of marriage that has persisted in every culture throughout human history can hardly be called irrational. In short, our Constitution does not enact any one theory of marriage. The people of a State are free to expand marriage to include same-sex couples, or to retain the historic definition. The right it announces has no basis in the Constitution or this Court’s precedent. The majority expressly disclaims judicial “caution” and omits even a pretense of humility, openly relying on its desire to remake society according to its own “new insight” into the “nature of injustice.” As a result, the Court invalidates the marriage laws of more than half the States and orders the transformation of a social institution that has formed the basis of human society for millennia, for the Kalahari Bushmen and the Han Chinese, the Carthaginians and the Aztecs. Just who do we think we are?
Comment From the Economic - Posner
A change in public opinion was required to make the judicial creation of such a right acceptable. The change occurred. By 2011 a majority of Americans supported authorizing same-sex marriage.
法律和行业知 识准备
法律检索 行业背景知识准备
待办事项清单
需与秘书沟通安排的 事项
1.3 庭审提纲
争议要点总结
简要列明争议要点及待 证明的重要问题。
庭审时间表 及时间分配
各方当事人陈述、举证、 质证、证人作证、总结 陈词、调解时间分配。
庭审文件索引
重要文件、页码索引
指导庭审程序的开展 及实体文题的审理。
避免遗漏问题。
Biblioteka Baidu
确保庭审高效、有序进行。
第二 部分
第二部分 仲裁员的思维方式
思维方式
利益平衡
恰当救济
2.1 思维方式
A
法条主义
B
实用主义
C
政治分析
D
策略分析
E D 经济分析
司法决定来源于法条 结果导向，不受三段论 而不取决于法官的个 限制。司法决定更关注 人因素，如意识形态、 决定产生的效果，而不 性格和背景 是完全基于法条语言或 以法律的解释为准， 先例。 排除法官自身的因素 使用三段论方法：大 前提+小前提+结论
遵循先例？
The history of marriage is one of both continuity and change. Changes, such as the decline of arranged marriages and the abandonment of the law of coverture, have worked deep transformations in the structure of marriage, affecting aspects of marriage once viewed as essential. These new insights have strengthened, not weakened, the institution. Changed understandings of marriage are characteristic of a Nation where new dimensions of freedom become apparent to new generations. The right to marry is a fundamental right inherent in the liberty of the person, and under the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment couples of the same-sex may not be deprived of that right and that liberty. While the Constitution contemplates that democracy is the appropriate process for change, individuals who are harmed need not await legislative action before asserting a fundamental right.
法官，主要是联邦法官 （特别是最高法院法官） 的决定取决于其在案件 中所持有的政治偏好。 大部分研究试图证明法 官的政治偏好来源于任 命他们的总统背后的政 党。
此理论假设法官在做决 定时会受到周围的其他 法官、立法者和公众的 影响。 此理论与立场分析类似。
法官是一个理性的、寻 求自身利益最大化的个 体。会受到收入、时间、 权限、威望、声誉、自 身因素、工作内容和其 他因素的影响。
庭前准备与庭审
唐功远
第一部分 庭前准备工作概述 第二部分 仲裁员的思维方式 第三部分 国际仲裁程序和国内仲
裁程序比较
目录
第一 部分
第一部分 庭前准备工作概述
程序性工作
阅卷
庭审提纲
1.1 程序性工作
A
B C D
开庭提醒：笔记本记录或手机应用。 文件归档：制作电子文档；
按照秘书交寄的顺序，将程序性文件和实体 性申请书、答辩状、代理意见、证据等分类 归档； 准备材料目录及记录收取时间。