六种方式造就你的领导力

  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

主题:职场精英:六种方式造就你的领导力

收藏本贴| 好友分享| 推广拿分

点击:1364 | 回复:6 | 标签:

优秀领导者所具备的六种能力

Leadership is a big, vague, amorphous topic. We can write about great leaders at great length. B tically speaking, how do you become one?

“领导力”是一个宏大、模糊而虚无的话题,我们可以为优秀的领导者写出连篇累牍的传记。但讲点实在的,怎样才能成为一名优秀的领导者呢?

A good start is to focus on leadership styles. Daniel Goleman, who popularized the notion of “em intelligence”,has described the following six different styles that leaders use to motivate others。

首先最好是关注领导方式。推广了“情商”概念的戈尔曼(Daniel Goleman),曾把领导者用以激励他人的方式面说到的六类。

Our view is these are not mutually exclusive. You don't need to adopt one and ignore the others. r, the best leaders move among these styles, using the one that meets the needs of the moment. Th hem all as part of your management repertoire。

我们的观点是,这些方式并非相互排斥。你不需要采用一种而忽略其他。相反,最优秀的领导者不会总是选种方式,而是哪种方式能满足当下的需要,就采用哪种方式。你要把这些方式当成自己整个管理艺术的一部分。

Visionary. This style is most appropriate when an organization needs a new direction. Its goal is t e people towards a new set of shared dreams. “Visionary leaders articulate wh ere a group is going, b how it will get there - setting people free to innovate, experiment, take calculated risks,” writes Golema 愿景式(Visionary)。当一个组织需要有新的方向时,这种方式最为合适。它的目的是鼓动人们朝着一系列新愿景而前进。戈尔曼写道,愿景式领导者为团队指明前进目标,而不是到达目标的方式,这让人们能够充分地创炼、承担可能的风险。

Coaching. This one-on-one style focuses on developing individuals, showing them how to improve erformance, and helping to connect their goals to the goals of the organization. Coaching works best mployees who show initiative and want more professional development. But it can backfire if it's perce s “micromanaging” an employee, and undermines his or her self-confidence。

辅导式(Coaching)。这种一对一的方式侧重的是人员的培养,教他们学会怎样提升绩效,并帮助他们把个人组织目标结合起来。在显示出主动性、希望在专业上进一步提升的员工身上,辅导发挥的作用最大。但如果被视婆婆妈妈的管理方式,可能会适得其反,并损伤员工的自信心。

Affiliative. This style emphasizes the importance of team work, and creates harmony in a group by ecting people to each other. It's particular valuable when you need to improve team harmony, increase e, and repair communication or repair broken trust in an organization. But it has its drawbacks. An ex emphasis on group praise can allow poor performance to go uncorrected, and lead employees to bel at mediocrity will be tolerated。

亲和式(Affiliative)。这种方式强调团队协作的重要性,并在人与人之间建立一种纽带,形成一个和谐的团体需要在组织中增进和谐、提高士气并修复沟通或受损的信任关系时,这种方式尤其有用。但它也有缺点。过分倚队的表扬,可能会放任低劣的绩效得不到改正,并让员工相信他们是可以碌碌无为的。

Democratic. This style draws on people's knowledge and skills, and creates a group commitment esulting goals. It works best when the direction the organization should take is unclear, and the leade s to tap the collective wisdom of the group. The consensus building approach can be disastrous in tim crisis, however, when urgent events demand quick decisions。

民主式(Democratic)。这种方式充分发挥团队的知识和技能,共同形成目标,并树立一种实现目标的共同意

相关文档
最新文档