英语辩论-枪支

It is illegle to have huns

1，美国是世界上私人拥有枪支最多的国家，枪支泛滥造成了严重的社会问题。但是在美国，对于枪支问题的辩论，主要集中于如何管理，而不是禁止。在美国大约有4成左右的民众支持枪械管制，但是绝大多数反对禁枪。2004年特里竞选总统时播放的竞选广告是“抗枪打猎”，但特里其实是20年如一日投票支持管制的，但他从不说禁枪。

The United States is the largest privately owned firearms in the world, the proliferation of firearms, causing serious social problems. But in the United States, the debate on firearms issues, mainly concentrated on how to manage, rather than prohibited. In the United States, about 4 percent public

2，根据《中华人民共和国枪支管理法》枪支的所有权归属于个人，在我国是不允许的。According to"the people's Republic of China on guns",gun ownership for

personal,in our country is not allowed.

3, 一个真正民主、自由的国家，即便人人持枪，也不用担心会被颠覆，而一个专制、腐朽

的政权，即使公民买一把菜刀都需要实名制！如果中国允许公民持枪的话，那些官员们肯定

会惶惶不安，人人自危了！

A truly democratic,free country,even if everyone gun,also need not worry will

be subverted,and an autocratic,corrupt regime,even if citizens to buy a kitchen knife needs to the real name system!If Chinese allows citizens

toweapons,the officers will be on tenterhooks,everyone! So how could they serve the people?

4, 允许持有枪支不全是为了保护自己的财产，我觉得根本的原因是赋予了人民时刻都能推

翻政府的权力。

Allowing the possession of firearms is not all in order to protect their ownproperty,I think the reason is endowed with the people all the time to overthrow the government.

5, 枪支合法，那么火箭筒、坦克能不能合法呢？

If guns have ownership,and the bazooka,tank can legally?

6, 假如中国也要拥有枪支，我出门的次数会减少很多,因为我们要担心我们的人身安全和我们的财产安全。如果一个公民的人身安全和人身自由都得不到保障，那么我们的生活还有意义吗？我们的国家还可以给予我们权力吗？

If Chinese have guns,I think we will seldom go out ,because we will worry

about our safety and our property safety.If a citizen's personal security and liberty are not guaranteed,then would our lives have meaning?Can our country give us power?

欢迎您的下载，

资料仅供参考！

致力为企业和个人提供合同协议，策划案计划书，学习资料等等

打造全网一站式需求