2020年1月18日大陆雅思AB卷大作文解析

2020年1月18日，大陆雅思AB卷大作文解析A卷原题：Nowadays, children have too much freedom. To what extent do you agree or disagree?这个题目真心不难，也是一季度正常要考察的项目。

孩子有没有更多自由可以从很多方面来看：比如家庭教育观念的转变，社会的进步，社会教育的变化。

自由的部分可以体现在家庭教育愿意孩子有更多的自由和成长的快乐，不自由也可以体现在学校教育的任务增加社会要求变多，孩子压力增大。

其实教育类别的很多题目其核心都是在讨论和对比家庭、学校、社会的教育方式和功能。

当然这个题目从孩子是不是需要更听话更加跟随家长或成人的意愿方面来讨论，如果有自主思考就更自由，如果不能自主思考就丧失自由。

B卷原题：Some experts think that for the countries which are already rich，additional economic growth of wealth will make citizens can not be happier. To what extent do you agree or disagree?这个是一个有一点难度的题目。

之前的考察是问国家贫富差距缩小是不是使社会更好。

从今天的这个题目来看其实就是这个题目的变体讨论。

假设社会已经富裕，那么额外的财富就是在增加社会经济总量和缩减贫富差距。

但是富裕的社会贫富差距的缩减并不一定是好事。

这里面在讨论一个非常内核的经济原理，当社会的经济总量充分是社会是会趋于满足的，社会加了财富，那就意味着会导致共同富裕，这样一来有可能会导致整个社会疲软，因为人们就丧失了竞争的动力以及提升的空间。

同时如果增加了更多的财富，就意味着肯定会有更多的工作，因为财富不会凭空增加，所以人们就会有更多的压力。

所以其实有很多人会朴素的认为，当社会的经济总量出现增长时，大家一定幸福。

这不一定是正确的，处于贫困当中的人一定是这样，但是有钱却往往不能够解决很多问题，反而有可能会带来更多的矛盾。

A卷题目参考范文：Between then and now, children have been given much freedom, so today's younger people do not pay enough attention to the older people's advice. It was then when the younger people were taught to be respectful of elders; and it is now when the younger generation appears to be exceedingly intelligent and impatient of restraint, increasingly ignoring the experience of the older generation. On balance, the two generations are making mistakes of different sorts in defining intelligence versus experience.On the one hand, the error of youth is to believe that intelligence is a substitute for experience. Gradually, in an environment of freedom, they tend to turn a deaf ear to what their parents have to say about experience in life. For one thing, young people are better educated, but much of education is ineffective in teaching disciplines that would inspire youth to respect age. As a result, the images of parents, partly as teachers and partly as preachers that used to be at home, are behind the times. Instead, coming into fashion is the "know-all" adviser 24/7--the Internet. Naturally, most working parents being busy most of the time, it is common among children to seek advice by Googling or exchange advice with peers by checking Facebook.On the other hand, the error of age is to believe that experience is a substitute for intelligence. It can be seen that sometimes parents unwisely try to give children undesirable pieces of advice like gift flowers, rather than teaching them to grow plants of experience on their own and in freedom. In fact, these days parents seldom give strict orders to children, knowing only too well that the declining parental authority is no match for children's rising freedom. A this point, hardly can parents force children to listen seriously to advice as if it were experience under disguise. So when children's freedom prevails, it implies that kissing parents are many and scolding parents are few.Now that the younger people have so much freedom that it is as easy for them to mistake intelligence for experience, as the older people mistake experience for intelligence. That is why the younger generation does not face the music by denying to pay attention to the older people's "authoritative" advice. After all, judging from the way how modern parents obey their children, there should be no mistake about who are the commanders-in-chief?B卷相似题目参考范文（1）：The gap between the rich and the poor is becoming wider, the rich richer, and the poor even poorer. What problems can the situation cause and give the solutions.The gap between the rich and the poor has widened over the last 20 years in nearly all the countries studied, even though trade and technological advances have spurred rapid growth in their economics. With job losses and home foreclosures skyrocketing and many of these countries now facing recession, policymakers must act quickly to prevent a surge in populist and protectionist sentiment as was seen following the Great Depression. This essay will focus on the reasons and the solutions as follows.The reasons for the gap enlarging are manifest. Firstly, rising inequality threatens social mobility -children doing better than their parents, the poor improving their lot through hard work - which i slower in countries like the U.S., China, Great Britain and Italy, where inequality is high, than countries with less inequality such as Denmark, Sweden and Australia. Secondly, wealthy households are not only widening the gap with the poor, but in countries such as the U.S., China and Germany, they arc also leaving middle-income earners further behind, with potentially ominous consequences if the global financial crisis sparks a long recession. The two decades covered in the study-1985-2005-saw the development of wider global trade and the Internet, and a period of overall strong economic growth.To deal with this situation, governments need to act to support employment as a response to widening inequality and faltering economics. If the government can take on the role of lender of last resort, then we should think about the government taking on the role of employer of last resort. Put bluntly, governments have to step up. Step up to the plate as Roosevelt did in the Great Depression. To address the “divisive” issue of growing inequality, governments should do more to educate the whole work force - and not just the elite - while helping people get job sand increasing incomes for working families, rather than relying on social benefits.All in all, greater income inequality stifles upward mobility between generations, harder for talented and hardworking people to get the rewards they deserve. It polarizes making societies; it divides regions within countries, and it carves up the world between the rich and the poor. If possible, we should stop it when we possibly can.B卷相似题目参考范文（2）：People in developing countries are happier than before while people in developed countries are no happier than they used to be. Why? What lesson can you learn from it?Financially speaking, people are supposed to be happier when their incomes exceed expenses, but the reverse seems to be happening to many people in some developed countries. In comparison, people in some developing countries with a much lower measure of per capita income appear to be happier in what they are actually able to buy within their earnings. The message seems clear enough: higher living standards do not necessarily add to happiness but excessive spending can certainly undermine it.It is hard to tell what does bring happiness when wealth may ironically fail as much as poverty. In countries full of comforts and luxuries, there are chances that people are beginning to count their troubles in the presence of rising living costs. This is very unlike people in developing countries who make positive sense of life by counting blessings and joys. Even in rich countries, life may become more stressful and less enjoyable under the pressure of increasingly higher living standards from time to time. What is worse, job security is already a major concern particularly among less skilled employees who are nervous about impending layoffs. Besides, the reality of financial crisis is spreading from one developed country to another, further complicating the difficult situation and fueling the anger of many less happy people.People in most developing countries have reasons to feel happier than before, probably because they live their lives forward. Being relatively poor, they are happier in knowing who they really are, then doing what they need to do in order to have what they want. To them happiness is more like a direction for motivation than a place for leisure. Also, they are more capable of recognizing and appreciating what they do have. In short, they feel happier exactly because they do not expect too much happiness. This mentality is different from people in developing countries who have large incomes but also large expenses, often resulting in negative balance sheets.In sum, the only way to avoid being unhappy in life, whether referring to a developed country or a developing country, is to have happy thoughts about living within their means and having something to hope for. Per capita income can no longer be the only measure for economic happiness, judging from the fact that people in developed countries are not as happy as they used to be. Without any doubt, the lesson about being happy is for an individual as well as for a country to perform a balancing act between incomes and expenses.。