英语作文范文-雅思写作高分范文：吃动物残忍吗-
动物被杀得太残忍英语作文
The issue of animal cruelty is a deeply distressing and complex subject that has been a focal point for ethical debates and public outcry for many years.The treatment of animals,particularly in the context of their slaughter for food,has raised significant concerns about the moral implications of human actions towards other living beings.This essay aims to explore the harsh realities of animal slaughter and the ethical considerations that arise from it.In many parts of the world,the process of animal slaughter is often carried out in a manner that is far from humane.The animals are subjected to extreme stress and fear,confined in cramped spaces,and transported over long distances without adequate food,water,or rest.Upon arrival at the slaughterhouse,they are met with a cacophony of noise and chaos,which only serves to exacerbate their distress.The methods used to kill the animals can be brutal and inhumane,with some animals experiencing prolonged suffering before they finally succumb to death.One of the most common methods of slaughter involves the use of a captive bolt gun,which is designed to stun the animal before it is killed. However,this method is not always effective,and there have been numerous instances where animals have been conscious and in pain during the process.In some cases,animals are still alive and struggling when they are bled out or dismembered,which is a horrifying thought for anyone who cares about animal welfare.The conditions in which animals are kept prior to slaughter can also be deplorable.They are often packed into pens or crates that are far too smallfor them to move comfortably,and they are subjected to extreme temperatures,poor ventilation,and unsanitary conditions.This not only causes physical discomfort but also contributes to the spread of disease and infection.The psychological impact of these conditions on the animals cannot be underestimated.They are social creatures that thrive on interaction and stimulation,and the isolation and confinement they experience in factory farms can lead to severe stress and behavioral problems.The fear and anxiety they feel in these environments can also have a detrimental impact on their physical health,making them more susceptible to illness and injury.Despite these grim realities,there are those who argue that the killing of animals for food is a necessary part of human survival and that it has been a part of our history for thousands of years.While it is true that humans have relied on animal products for sustenance,it is important to recognize that the scale and methods of animal agriculture have changed dramatically in recent times.The industrialization of farming has led to the mass production of meat,with little regard for the welfare of the animals involved.There are also those who believe that the suffering of animals is justified because they are less intelligent or capable of experiencing pain than humans.However,this argument is flawed and ignores the wealth of scientific evidence that demonstrates that animals have complex emotional lives and the capacity for suffering.They are sentient beings that deserveto be treated with respect and compassion.In light of these ethical concerns,there has been a growing movement towards more humane methods of animal slaughter.Some slaughterhouses have implemented changes such as using more effective stunning methods,providing better living conditions for animals,and employing skilled workers who are trained in humane killing techniques. While these improvements are commendable,they are often limited in scope and do not address the fundamental issue of the mass production of meat.Ultimately,the question of animal cruelty in slaughter is not just about the methods used to kill the animals,but also about the broader societal attitudes towards animal welfare and the environment.As consumers,we have the power to make choices that can reduce the demand for animal products and promote more ethical practices in the food industry.By choosing to consume less meat or opting for plantbased alternatives,we can help to create a more compassionate and sustainable world for all living beings.In conclusion,the issue of animal cruelty in slaughter is a deeply troubling one that raises important questions about our moral responsibilities towards other species.While there are some positive steps being taken to improve the welfare of animals,there is still much work to be done to ensure that they are treated with the dignity and respect they deserve.It is up to each of us to consider our own actions and choices in the face of thisissue,and to strive for a more humane and compassionate approach to the treatment of animals.。
虐待动物 Cruelty to Animals 英语作文
Cruelty to Animals>Cruelty to Animals Essay:Animal cruelty is the intended violence and miserliness towards animals. Animals being treated poorly with nonchalant nature is illegal in many countries and highly inhuman. The animal is also living organisms who deserve good living standards and protection from cruelty. Animals must not be treated badly whether or not they are domestic or not.Animal cruelty is carried out in many countries and organisations in the veil of experimentalstudies and research. It is also found that animals kept in sanctuaries and zoos are not being taken care of properly. These are certain ways how animals are subjected to cruelty.Long and Short Essays on Cruelty to Animals for Students and Kids in EnglishWe are providing a long essay on Cruelty to Animalsof 500 words and a short essay of 150 words on the same topic along with ten lines about the topic to help readers.Long Essay on Cruelty to Animals Essay 500 Words in EnglishLong Essay on Cruelty to Animals Essay is usually given to classes 7, 8, 9, and 10.Cruelty to animals has become an international issue concerning animal welfare. Animals are subjected to harsh treatments due to many human needs. This is a serious issue that needs to be addressed and stopped. Cruelty towards animals has led to many deaths, and it is gradually increasing as the world population is increasing.In some of the zoos, it can be seen that the animals are kept in a dirty cage with unhygienic methods of feeding. This treatment has to leadto unfortunate deaths of animals due to diseases and poor standards of treatment. The veiled ill-treatment of animals in the experiment laboratories can make one nauseous to look at. The animals in these laboratories are injected with trial medicines and often kept at freezing temperatures. These harsh actions on animals lead to their painful death.The textile industry uses animal skin and their body hairs to make exotic fabrics and accessories. The animals have to go through a painful process to bestow these elements for the human luxuries. Certain home décor elementsare made from animal skin, teeth, fur, horns, etc. which is major exploitation of animal welfare policies. We, as a human being, do not measure the pain animals go through because of such practices.The cosmetics industry contributes to animal cruelty by testing their products on these animals. These tests allow the researchers to apply and inject chemicals into the animal’s body. Chemicals are also injected in an animal’s eyes to test reaction to eyes. In this process, many animals died with pain and failed trials.This testing shows the immoral human actions upon innocent animals.You can now access more Essay Writing on this topicThe world has witnessed cruelty towards animals in many ways. Sometimes we see rural population and the urban as well treating animals harshly. The animals that fall prey to such actions are usually domesticated or lost. Recently we witnessed the inhuman activity of human feeding fireworks to an elephant in Kerala, India. Several incidents of raping animals are encountered in the country. Manymore such events that are shameful to address are reported taking place. Such activities are condemned by the government but never ceases to happen.Many animals and birds have gone extinct, and most of them are on the verge of extinction due to such cruelty towards them. The murder of animals on the luxurious ground must be stopped and condemned. This behaviour towards animals is an example of dominance and torturous attitude of humans upon the innocent.Some countries like Netherlands, Denmark, Switzerland, Hongkong, Sweden, Germany and Austria have strict animal welfare laws. Indian law condemns animal cruelty but with exclusion. Strict laws prohibit exploitation of animals for entertainment use, but they are allowed to be experimented on and feed upon. Rules and regulations are found to be insufficient to stop these nonchalant animal and bird abuse. It is the responsibility of the human civilization to maintain the harmony between creatures and save them from endangerment and extinction.Short Essay on Cruelty to Animals Essay 150 Words in EnglishShort Essay on Cruelty to Animals Essay is usually given to classes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6.Animal cruelty is the poor and violent treatment towards naïve organisms. Animal cruelty is carried out in many organizations under the veil of research and experimentation. It has been found that certain zoos and wildlife statuaries have poor living conditions for the animals. This has led to the endangerment and extinction of many animals.No law in the benevolent civilization allows cruelty towards animals of any kind. But in our day to day life, we encounter animal cruelty or products obtained from animal cruelty. The cosmetic industry uses animals to test their products, the medical industry uses animals to test their medicines, the textile industry uses animal skin and fur to create fabrics, and the food industry uses parts of animals to prepare delicacies. Every year millions of animals are murdered in order to bestow the human civilization.Animal cruelty is a punishable offence, however least steps and actions are taken to ensure the guilt-ridden are punished. Everyday cruelty to animals are done, and the human civilization steps down in the moral stairs.10 Lines on Cruelty to Animals Essay in English1. Cruelty to animals is the poor and violent treatment towards them.2. Animal cruelty often leads to painful life and painful death of the creatures.3. Animal cruelty is a punishable offence, but it is exclusive.4. Cruelty towards animals is carried out in veiled methods that lead to the killing of animals.5. We encounteranimal cruelty in our daily lives by the products we use. 6. Animals and birds are subjected to poor treatment for certain delicacies; the human civilizations love to have. 7. Medicine sciences, textile industries and lifestyle industries are significantly guilty of animal cruelty. 8. Every day around ten million animals are murdered to bestow human needs. 9. This killing of animals has led to endangerment and extinction of several species that existed in abundance. 10. Animal cruelty is inhuman, and steps must be taken towards its prohibition.FAQ’s on Cruelty to Animals EssayQuestion 1.How to avoid cruelty towards animals?Answer:Animals are self-sufficient creatures. Caging them and using it for serving human needs that leads to their painful death must be stopped.Question 2.Where is animal cruelty prohibited?Answer:Countries which have taken a positive step towards the prohibition of cruelty to animals are Austria, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, Germany, Hongkong, Netherlands, Sweden and Denmark.Question 3.Is cruelty to animal legal in India?Answer:Cruelty to animals is illegal in India with exclusions. Indian organizations are allowed to use animals for food and scientific purposes. Butusing an animal for public entertainment is strictly prohibited.Question 4.How many animals die of ill-treatment?Answer:Every year around ten million animals die of ill-treatment caused due to various human needs such as food, experimentation, textile and decors.。
对动物圆是否残忍英文作文
对动物圆是否残忍英文作文Here's an essay discussing the topic of whether zoos are cruel to animals in an informal and conversational English style, while adhering to the guidelines you provided:First off, let's talk about zoos. They're supposed to be places where people can go to see exotic animals, learn about them, and appreciate nature. But sometimes, I wonder if they're really doing the animals a favor. I mean, can you imagine being stuck in a tiny enclosure all day, every day?Animals in zoos, they don't have the freedom to roam and explore their natural habitats. Sure, some zoos try to create habitats that are as close to the real thing as possible, but it's still not the same. They're enclosed, limited in space, and probably not getting the same kind of stimulation they would in the wild.Plus, think about the social aspects. Animals in thewild form complex social structures and relationships. In zoos, they're often separated from their families and mates, which can lead to stress and behavioral issues. And let'snot forget about breeding programs. Sometimes, zoos breed animals just to keep their numbers up, which can be pretty unethical.On the other hand, though, zoos can be educational tools. They provide an opportunity for people to seeanimals they might never encounter in their daily lives.And with proper.。
别对动物太残忍的英语作文
别对动物太残忍的英语作文As human beings, we are responsible for taking care of the environment and all the creatures that live in it. Unfortunately, some people are not aware of this responsibility and treat animals cruelly. This is something that needs to change.Firstly, animals are living beings just like us. They have feelings and emotions, and they deserve to be treated with respect and kindness. It is not right to harm them or cause them unnecessary suffering. For example, many people enjoy watching bullfighting, but this is a cruel and inhumane sport that causes immense pain and suffering to the bulls involved. It is time to put an end to such practices.Secondly, animals are an important part of the ecosystem. They play a vital role in maintaining the balance of nature and keeping the environment healthy. When we mistreat animals, we are not only harming them but alsodamaging the environment as a whole. For instance, when we pollute the ocean with plastic, it not only harms marine life but also affects the entire ecosystem.Thirdly, animal cruelty is a sign of a lack of empathy and compassion. People who are cruel to animals are more likely to be cruel to other people as well. This is why it is important to teach children from a young age to be kind to animals and to treat them with respect.In conclusion, it is important to remember that animals are living beings that deserve to be treated with kindness and respect. We need to put an end to cruel practices such as bullfighting and animal testing, and we need to take care of the environment so that animals can thrive. By doing so, we can create a better world for ourselves andfor future generations.。
食用动物的危害英语作文
食用动物的危害英语作文Eating animals can pose various risks to our health. For example, consuming undercooked meat can lead to food poisoning, which can cause symptoms like nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea.In addition to health risks, the consumption of animal products can also have negative environmental impacts. The production of meat and dairy products requires a significant amount of resources, including water and land. This can lead to deforestation, water pollution, and habitat destruction.Furthermore, the mass production of animals for food can contribute to the spread of diseases. Overcrowded and unsanitary conditions in factory farms can create the perfect breeding ground for pathogens, increasing the risk of zoonotic diseases jumping from animals to humans.Another issue with eating animals is the ethicalconcern of animal welfare. Many animals raised for food are kept in confined and inhumane conditions, leading to unnecessary suffering. This raises questions about the morality of consuming products that come from animals that have been mistreated.Moreover, the consumption of animal products has been linked to various chronic health conditions, such as heart disease, diabetes, and certain types of cancer. High intake of red and processed meats has been associated with an increased risk of developing these conditions, highlighting the potential health hazards of consuming animal products.In conclusion, the consumption of animal products can pose a range of risks, including health concerns, environmental impacts, ethical issues, and potential links to chronic diseases. It is important to consider these factors when making dietary choices and to explore alternative options that are more sustainable and ethical.。
大肆捕杀动物英文作文
大肆捕杀动物英文作文"English:"The wanton killing of animals is not just a threat to biodiversity but also an ethical concern that we should address urgently. When we talk about animal slaughter, it's not just about hunting for food or managing populations;it's about the indiscriminate killing of creatures for trivial reasons like sport or superstition.Let's take the example of trophy hunting. Some people travel to distant lands to hunt down exotic animals just to hang their heads on a wall or display them as symbols of their prowess. This practice not only disrupts ecosystems but also leads to the decline of endangered species. For instance, the case of Cecil the lion in Zimbabwe sparked international outrage. Cecil was a beloved lion that was killed by a trophy hunter, leaving behind his pride and disrupting the delicate balance of the local ecosystem.Moreover, the illegal wildlife trade fuels the massacre of animals for their body parts, which are often used in traditional medicine or as status symbols. The demand for rhino horns, tiger bones, and elephant tusks has led to the decimation of populations, pushing many species to the brink of extinction. Despite efforts to combat poaching, the black market continues to thrive due to the highprofits involved.Furthermore, the destruction of habitats for agriculture, urbanization, and infrastructure projects contributes to the loss of countless animal lives. Deforestation, in particular, has devastating consequences for species like orangutans, whose habitats are razed to make way for palm oil plantations. The loss of these habitats not only endangers the animals themselves but also disrupts entire ecosystems, leading to cascading effects on other species and the environment as a whole."中文，"肆意捕杀动物不仅是对生物多样性的威胁，也是我们应该紧急解决的道德问题。
动物残忍捕食作文英语
动物残忍捕食作文英语As the saying goes, "survival of the fittest." This is especially true in the animal kingdom, where predators must hunt and kill their prey in order to survive. However, the methods used by some animals to catch their prey can bequite brutal and cruel.Take the example of the lion, known as the "king of the jungle." Lions are apex predators, which means they are at the top of the food chain and have no natural enemies. They hunt in groups, known as prides, and use their strength and speed to take down large prey such as zebras and buffalo. However, the way they kill their prey can be quite gruesome. Lions will often suffocate their prey by biting down ontheir throat, causing them to slowly choke to death.Another example of cruel animal predation is the waythat crocodiles hunt. Crocodiles are ambush predators,which means they lie in wait for their prey to come close before attacking. They have incredibly powerful jaws thatcan crush bones and tear flesh, and they often drown their prey by dragging them underwater. Crocodiles have been known to attack and kill humans, making them one of the most feared predators in the world.However, it's not just large predators that use cruel methods to catch their prey. Even small animals can be surprisingly vicious. Take the praying mantis, for example. These insects are known for their distinctive praying posture, but they are also skilled hunters. They use their powerful front legs to catch and hold their prey, which can include other insects, spiders, and even small lizards. Once they have their prey in their grasp, they will often eat them alive, starting with the head.While it's easy to be horrified by the cruel methods that some animals use to catch their prey, it's important to remember that this is simply a part of nature. Predators must hunt and kill in order to survive, and they have evolved to be incredibly efficient at doing so. Without predators, the balance of nature would be upset, leading to overpopulation and other problems.That being said, it's important for humans to respect and protect the animals that we share our planet with. We must work to preserve their habitats and ensure that they are not hunted to extinction. By doing so, we can help to ensure that the natural world remains in balance and that these incredible creatures continue to thrive for generations to come.。
吃野生动物的英语作文
吃野生动物的英语作文The Dangers of Consuming Wild Animals.In recent years, the trend of consuming wild animals has gained significant momentum, with some believing it to be a status symbol or a way to obtain unique nutritional benefits. However, this practice poses numerous risks and dangers that far outweigh any supposed benefits.Firstly, consuming wild animals can lead to the spread of diseases. Many wild animals carry viruses and bacteria that are not present in domesticated animals or human populations. When these animals are hunted and eaten, the diseases they carry can be transmitted to humans, potentially causing outbreaks that can be difficult to control. For example, the outbreak of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) in 2002-2003 was traced back to the consumption of wild animals, specifically civet cats. Similarly, the Ebola virus has been linked to the consumption of bushmeat in Africa.Secondly, consuming wild animals is environmentally irresponsible. Wild animals play crucial roles in ecosystems, serving as prey for other animals, helping to control predator populations, and contributing to the overall health and balance of their habitats. By hunting and consuming these animals, we disrupt these delicate systems, potentially leading to the extinction of species and the degradation of habitats. Additionally, the unregulated hunting of wild animals can lead to overexploitation, further threatening their survival.Moreover, consuming wild animals can have significant social and cultural impacts. For many cultures, wild animals are considered sacred or have deep cultural significance. The practice of consuming these animals can be seen as disrespectful and can lead to conflict and tension between different communities. Additionally, the commercialization of wild animals for consumption can lead to the exploitation of marginalized communities and the violation of their rights.Additionally, the nutritional benefits claimed by some proponents of consuming wild animals are often overstated. While some wild animals may contain higher levels ofcertain nutrients than domesticated animals, this does not justify their consumption. Domesticated animals can provide all the necessary nutrients required for a healthy diet, and consuming a balanced and diverse diet is far more important than relying on specific foods for nutrition.In conclusion, the consumption of wild animals is a highly dangerous and irresponsible practice that poses significant risks to human health, the environment, and social harmony. It is crucial that we recognize these risks and take steps to eliminate this practice. This includes promoting awareness and education about the dangers of consuming wild animals, regulating and enforcing hunting laws, and encouraging sustainable and environmentally friendly alternatives to meat consumption. Only by taking these actions can we ensure the protection of our planet and its inhabitants.。
不能猎杀小动物英语作文
不能猎杀小动物英语作文As human beings, we have a responsibility to protect and care for the animals that share this world with us. This means that we should not engage in the hunting of small animals for sport or pleasure.Hunting small animals, such as rabbits, squirrels, and birds, is a cruel and unnecessary practice. These animals are often killed for no reason other than the thrill of the hunt, and their deaths serve no practical purpose. Furthermore, hunting can disrupt the natural balance of ecosystems and lead to the extinction of certain species.Instead of hunting animals, we should focus on protecting and preserving their habitats. This means supporting conservation efforts and working to reduce pollution and other human activities that harm the environment. We can also support organizations that rescue and rehabilitate injured or orphaned animals, and promote responsible pet ownership.In addition, we can educate others about the importance of treating animals with kindness and respect. This means teaching children to appreciate and care for animals, and encouraging others to adopt humane practices in their daily lives.In conclusion, we must recognize that animals have a right to live free from unnecessary harm and suffering. By refraining from the hunting of small animals and working to protect their habitats, we can help ensure that they thrive in the wild for generations to come.。
不能吃动物英文作文
不能吃动物英文作文英文：I believe that we should not eat animals for several reasons. First of all, animals have the right to live just as we do. They have the ability to feel pain and suffer, just like humans. Therefore, it is morally wrong to kill them for food when there are plenty of other options available. 。
Secondly, the meat industry is a major contributor to environmental pollution and climate change. The production of meat requires a large amount of resources such as water, land, and energy. It also leads to deforestation and the release of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. By choosing not to eat animals, we can reduce our carbon footprint and help protect the planet.Furthermore, there are plenty of delicious and nutritious plant-based alternatives to meat. With theadvancements in food technology, we now have access to a wide variety of plant-based burgers, sausages, and other meat substitutes that taste just as good as the real thing. These options provide a cruelty-free and sustainable way to enjoy our meals without harming animals.In addition, consuming a plant-based diet has been shown to have numerous health benefits. Research has linked the overconsumption of animal products to various health issues such as heart disease, diabetes, and certain typesof cancer. By choosing a plant-based diet, we can improve our overall health and well-being.Overall, there are plenty of reasons why we should not eat animals. From ethical considerations to environmental and health concerns, choosing a plant-based diet is the way forward for a more compassionate and sustainable world.中文：我认为我们不应该吃动物有几个原因。
动物残忍捕食作文英文
动物残忍捕食作文英文1. The animal kingdom is a brutal place, where survival of the fittest is the only rule that matters. Predatorswill stop at nothing to catch their prey, using any means necessary to ensure their own survival.2. It's a harsh reality that animals must face every day, as they navigate the dangerous world around them. From the stealthy stalking of a lion to the lightning-faststrike of a snake, the brutality of nature is on full display.3. The cries of a wounded animal echo through the wilderness, a stark reminder of the unforgiving nature of the food chain. In the blink of an eye, a life can be snuffed out by a predator on the hunt.4. The struggle for survival is a constant battle, with no room for mercy or compassion. In the wild, it's kill or be killed, and only the strongest and most cunning willcome out on top.5. Despite the cruelty of nature, there is a certain beauty in the raw power and instinctual drive of animals. They are simply following their natural instincts, doing what they must to survive in a harsh and unforgiving world.6. So next time you witness a predator in action, remember that it's all part of the circle of life. While it may be brutal and unforgiving, it's a necessary part of the delicate balance that keeps the natural world in harmony.。
虐待动物英文作文
虐待动物英文作文I can't stand people who abuse animals. It's just cruel and heartless. Animals are innocent and they don't deserve to be treated badly. It makes me so angry when I hear about people mistreating their pets or using animals for cruel experiments.I mean, how could anyone be so cruel? Animals have feelings too, you know. They can feel pain and fear, just like we do. It's just not right to treat them like they're disposable or insignificant.I think people who abuse animals should be punished more severely. It's not enough to just give them a slap on the wrist. They need to understand that what they did is absolutely unacceptable and they need to face serious consequences for their actions.It's not just about punishing the abusers, though. We also need to do more to protect animals from abuse. We needbetter laws and regulations to ensure that animals are treated with the respect and compassion they deserve.I think education is also really important. We need to teach people from a young age to be kind and caring towards animals. If we can instill a sense of empathy and responsibility in people, maybe we can prevent some of the abuse from happening in the first place.。
捕杀动物的英文作文
捕杀动物的英文作文英文：Killing animals for various reasons has been a controversial topic for many years. Some people believethat it is necessary to kill animals for food, while others think it is cruel and unnecessary. As for me, I believethat killing animals for food is acceptable as long as it is done in a humane way.Firstly, humans have been consuming animals for thousands of years. It is a part of our culture and tradition. We need protein to survive, and meat is a good source of protein. However, it is important to make sure that the animals are treated well before they are killed. They should be raised in a humane way and killed quickly and painlessly.Secondly, killing animals for sport or entertainment is completely unacceptable. It is cruel and unnecessary.Hunting for food is one thing, but killing animals just for fun is another. It is important to respect the lives of animals and not take pleasure in their suffering.Lastly, it is important to consider the impact that killing animals has on the environment. Overfishing and hunting can lead to the extinction of certain species. Itis important to regulate hunting and fishing to ensure that it is sustainable and does not harm the environment.In conclusion, killing animals for food is acceptableas long as it is done in a humane way. However, killing animals for sport or entertainment is cruel and unnecessary. It is important to respect the lives of animals andconsider the impact that killing them has on the environment.中文：捕杀动物是一个多年来备受争议的话题。
人类应该为了食物而杀死动物吗的英语作文
人类应该为了食物而杀死动物吗的英语作文全文共3篇示例，供读者参考篇1Should humans kill animals for food?Eating meat has been a part of human diet for thousands of years. However, in recent times, the ethics of killing animals for food has come into question. Many people argue that it is unnecessary to kill animals for food when there are so many plant-based alternatives available. On the other hand, some argue that meat is an essential source of nutrition for humans and that killing animals for food is a natural part of the food chain.There are strong arguments on both sides of this debate. Those in favor of killing animals for food argue that it is a natural part of the food chain and that humans have been doing so for thousands of years. They argue that meat is an important source of protein and other essential nutrients that are difficult to obtain from plant-based sources alone. They also believe that animals are inferior to humans and that it is therefore acceptable to kill them for food.On the other hand, opponents of killing animals for food argue that it is unnecessary and unethical. They argue that animals are sentient beings who can experience pain, fear, and suffering, just like humans. They believe that killing animals for food is cruel and unnecessary when there are so manyplant-based alternatives available. They also argue that raising animals for food is harmful to the environment, contributing to deforestation, water pollution, and climate change.In my opinion, it is not necessary for humans to kill animals for food. There are plenty of plant-based alternatives available that can provide all the nutrients that humans need to stay healthy. Additionally, killing animals for food is cruel and unnecessary when there are so many other options available. I believe that it is important for humans to respect the lives of animals and to strive to minimize harm to other living beings.In conclusion, the question of whether humans should kill animals for food is a complex one with strong arguments on both sides. While it may be true that humans have been eating meat for thousands of years, it is important to consider the ethical implications of killing animals for food in the modern world. Ultimately, I believe that it is possible for humans to live healthy, fulfilling lives without having to kill animals for food.篇2Title: Should Humans Kill Animals for Food?Throughout history, humans have relied on animals as a source of food. Meat has been a staple in the diets of many cultures around the world, providing essential nutrients and sustenance. However, the question remains: should humans continue to kill animals for food in the modern age?On one hand, proponents of eating meat argue that it is a natural part of the food chain. They believe that as omnivores, humans are meant to consume both plants and animals for a balanced diet. Additionally, they argue that raising animals for food provides jobs and economic opportunities for many people in the agricultural industry.On the other hand, opponents of eating meat argue that killing animals for food is unethical and unnecessary in today's society. They believe that with advances in plant-based alternatives, humans can thrive on a vegetarian or vegan diet without the need to harm animals. Furthermore, they point to the environmental impact of animal agriculture, including deforestation, water pollution, and greenhouse gas emissions.While the debate over whether humans should kill animals for food is ongoing, it is important to consider the ethical, environmental, and health implications of our food choices. By supporting sustainable and ethical farming practices, choosing plant-based options, and reducing our meat consumption, we can move towards a more compassionate and sustainable food system. Ultimately, the decision to eat meat or not is a personal one, but it is essential to consider the impact of our choices on the planet and all living beings.篇3Should humans kill animals for food?The issue of whether or not humans should kill animals for food has been a highly debated topic for centuries. Some argue that it is necessary for survival, while others believe that there are alternative ways to obtain food without causing harm to animals. In this essay, we will explore both sides of the argument and weigh the ethical implications of killing animals for food.On one hand, there is a strong argument that humans have been hunting and eating animals for thousands of years as a way to survive. In many cultures, meat is a staple part of the diet and is considered essential for obtaining necessary nutrients such asprotein and iron. Without the consumption of animal products, some argue that humans would not be able to meet their nutritional needs and would suffer from deficiencies that could ultimately lead to serious health issues.Furthermore, proponents of killing animals for food argue that it is a natural part of the food chain and that humans have the right to consume other animals just as other predators do in the wild. They argue that as long as animals are killed humanely and in a way that minimizes suffering, there is no ethical issue with consuming meat.On the other hand, there is a growing movement of people who believe that killing animals for food is unnecessary and cruel. They argue that in today's society, there are plenty ofplant-based alternatives that can provide all the necessary nutrients for humans to thrive without the need for animal products. Additionally, they point out the environmental consequences of animal agriculture, such as deforestation, water pollution, and greenhouse gas emissions, that contribute to climate change.From an ethical standpoint, many argue that killing animals for food is unjustifiable, as animals are sentient beings that are capable of feeling pain and suffering. The act of taking ananimal's life for the sole purpose of satisfying human taste preferences is seen as morally wrong by many who believe in animal rights and welfare.In conclusion, the question of whether humans should kill animals for food is a complex and multifaceted issue that is not easily answered. While there are arguments to be made on both sides, it is ultimately up to each individual to decide what they believe is the right course of action. As society continues to evolve and awareness of animal welfare and environmental issues grows, it is likely that our attitudes towards the consumption of animal products will also change. Perhaps one day, killing animals for food will no longer be seen as a necessary evil, but as a practice that is no longer ethically justifiable.。
动物残忍捕食作文英文
动物残忍捕食作文英文英文：Animals can be quite cruel when it comes to hunting and preying on other animals. One example that comes to mind is the way a lion hunts and kills its prey. When a lion spots a herd of gazelles, it will stealthily approach them and then launch a sudden attack, often targeting a young or weak gazelle. The lion will then use its powerful jaws to suffocate the gazelle, causing a slow and painful death.Another example of cruel animal predation is the way a pack of wolves hunts down a lone caribou. The wolves will chase the caribou for miles, wearing it down until it can no longer run. Then, they will tear into its flesh while it is still alive, causing immense suffering before finally killing it.These examples illustrate the harsh reality of nature, where animals must kill to survive. However, it is stilldifficult to witness such brutality, especially when it involves young or defenseless animals.中文：动物在捕食其他动物时可能会非常残忍。
吃动物残忍吗英文作文
吃动物残忍吗英文作文下载温馨提示:该文档是我店铺精心编制而成，希望大家下载以后，能够帮助大家解决实际的问题。
文档下载后可定制随意修改，请根据实际需要进行相应的调整和使用，谢谢!并且，本店铺为大家提供各种各样类型的实用资料，如教育随笔、日记赏析、句子摘抄、古诗大全、经典美文、话题作文、工作总结、词语解析、文案摘录、其他资料等等，如想了解不同资料格式和写法，敬请关注!Download tips: This document is carefully compiled by theeditor. I hope that after you download them,they can help yousolve practical problems. The document can be customized andmodified after downloading,please adjust and use it according toactual needs, thank you!In addition, our shop provides you with various types ofpractical materials,such as educational essays, diaryappreciation,sentence excerpts,ancient poems,classic articles,topic composition,work summary,word parsing,copyexcerpts,other materials and so on,want to know different data formats andwriting methods,please pay attention!Some people think it's cruel to eat animals. They say animals have feelings and rights too.But on the other hand, humans have been eating animals for a long time. It's a part of our diet and culture.Then there are those who say we should only eat certain animals and treat them well before we eat them.Another view is that if we don't eat animals, what will we eat? There are not enough other food sources for everyone.And also, some animals are raised specifically for us to eat. It's an industry.But again, some people are against that industry and the way animals are treated in it.。
雅思写作高分范文赏析：AnimalCruelty
【导语】为了⼤家能够更好地备考雅思考试，今天特意为⼤家整理了雅思写作⾼分范⽂赏析：Animal Cruelty，希望对⼤家有帮助！ Animal Cruelty Jeff Albrecht Joseph Aimone Writing and Rhetoric 13 December 2000 AnimalCruelty One of the most touchy aspects of our relationship with animals is theuse of animals in laboratory sciences. Some manufactures of cosmetics andhousehold products still conduct painful and useless tests on live animals, eventhough no law requires them not to. Some people, called anti-vivisectionists,are at one extreme in their concern. They want an abolition of all experimentson live animals. At the other extreme there are those who say that it is quiteall right for us to do whatever we like to animals. They say that God gave ussuch a right, since it is written in the bible (Genesis 1:26) that man hasdominion over all creatures. If these tests give some educational value, adds toscientific knowledge, or can help improve human health, they argue that it isworth killing animals or subjecting them to painful experiments. I believe thatthe unnecessary testing of animals is inhumane and unethical when alternativemethods Albrecht 2 are available. The anti-vivisectionists say we should notallow experiments on animals and the animal utilitarians, or vivisectionists,claim that we can do anything to animals if it is for the ultimate good ofhumanity. Perhaps they are both wrong. Much can be learned from treating animalsthat are already sick or injured in testing new life-saving drugs and surgicaltechniques. Animals, as well as people benefit from new discoveries. But is itright to take perfectly healthy animals and harm them to find cures for humanillnesses, many of which we bring on ourselves by poisoning the environment,eating the wrong kinds of foods, and by not adopting a healthy activelife-style? Do people have the right to do what ever they like to perfectlyhealthy animals? Do we have the right to continue doing experiments over andover again in a needless repetition and a waste of animals if no new informationis going to be gained? Animals suffer unnecessarily and their lives arepointlessly wasted. If the issue were simple, animal experimentation might neverhave become so controversial. Each year in the United States an estimated 20-70Albrecht 3 million animals-from cats, dogs and primates, to rabbits, rats andmice-suffer and die in the name of research. Animal tests for the safety ofcosmetics, household products and chemicals are the least justifiable. Animalshave doses of shampoo, hair spray, and deodorant dripped into their eyes orapplied to bare skin in attempts to measure eye and skin irritancy levels. Otherare force-fed massive quantities of toxic materials such as bleach or soap, in ahit-and-miss attempt to measure levels of toxicity. Since 1938, The Food andDrug Administration (FDA) has required that each ingredient in a cosmetic beadequately substantiated for safety prior to being made available to theconsumer. However, neither the FDA nor the Consumer Product Safety Commission (a regulatory agency that oversees product safety, consumer complaints, etc.)requires firms to conduct animal testing of any cosmetic product. Cosmeticcompanies use animal tests to insure themselves against possible consumerlawsuits. If sued for liability, they can protect themselves by arguing that thecosmetic was adequately tested for safety with tests standard in the cosmeticindustry. How placing a piece of lipstick in the eye of a rabbit to determine ifit is safe Albrecht 4 for the consumer, boggles my mind. If someone placed apiece of lipstick in my eye, I do believe it would irritate my eye also. How inthe name of God does this test prove it is safe for the consumer? I don'tbelieve lipstick is gong to be used in the eye area, unless you are anilliterate that can抰 read directions. The Draize Eye-Irritancy Test was designedto assess a substance's potential harmfulness to human eyes based on its effectson rabbits' eyes. This test was developed in the early 1940s by the U.S. Foodand Drug Administration. This test is typically performed on six rabbits persubstance tested. Technicians restrain each rabbit and place a measured amountof the test substance in the lower lid of one eye. Usually no anesthetics aregiven. the rabbits eyes are than examined at different intervals. If severeinjury has resulted, the rabbits may be observed for signs of recovery for aslong as twenty-one days. Technicians record signs of damage, such as redness andswelling of the conjunctiva (the sac covering the eyeball), inflammation of theiris, and clouding of the cornea. Using a standardized scoring scheme, thedegrees of damage to the conjunctivia, iris, and cornea are compared to gradedAlbrecht 5 levels of irritations. Scores for each of these parameters are thantotaled. Based on the total Draize score and the symptoms' duration, the testchemical is classified by the degree of irritation it causes: none, mild,moderate, or severe. At best, the Draize test yields a crude measure of asubstance's irritancy; it is not designed to yield information about possibletreatments or antidotes. the Draize is inhumane. Substances such as ovencleaners and paint removers cause obvious pain and suffering. Also, becauseanimal and humans differ in medically important ways, results from the Draizetest do not necessarily apply to humans. Rabbit eyes differ significantly fromhuman eyes: rabbits possess a nictitating membrane (a third eyelid) and have aslower blink reflex, a less effective tearing mechanism and a thinner corneathan humans. These differences make rabbit eyes more sensitive than human eyesto some chemicals and less sensitive to others. The test is unreliable. Severallaboratories may perform the test on the same chemicals and report differentresults. Manufactures argue that they conduct the Draize test to protect thepublic from unsafe products. Since 1986 Albrecht 6 legislation has beenintroduced in several states to limit or ban the Draize test for particularproducts (especially cosmetics), but no bill has yet passed. Another test I liketo address is the Lethal Dose 50 Percent (L50) test. This test is a procedurethat exposed animals to a particular chemical in order to yield an estimate ofhow poisonous that chemical would be to human beings. Substances tested caninclude drugs, cosmetics, household products, industrial chemicals, pesticidesand the individual ingredients of any of these products. The test procedurerequires between 60 to 100 animals to determine what constitutes a lethal doseof a particular substance. The test spans a time period from two weeks to severyears, depending on the amount of toxic chemicals in the product being tested.The animals are observed daily. Since chemicals are bitter-tasting and have anunpleasant smell, animals refuse to swallow them. The animals are then forced toswallow the substances in the form of capsules or pellets. they are alsoforce-fed liquid chemicals by stomach tube, or through a hole cut in theanimal's throat. Some animals die from the sheer bulk of the dosage administeredor from the severe burns they Albrecht 7 receive in the throat and stomach fromthe chemicals used in products such as laundry bleach and detergents andcologne. There are variations to this test which include forcing the animal tobreathe the substance or applying the substance to the shaved skin of the animalor injecting the substance into the body, usually the abdomen. The animals arenot provided with painkillers because they may affect the test outcome. Millionsof rats, rabbits, mice and guinea pigs have been used in these tests, whichpurportedly assure the safety of cosmetics and household products. Many animalsare still suffering in these useless tests right now. These tests are crude,cruel, and unreliable. Animals injured in acute toxicity and eye irritancy testsare never treated. If the animals do not die from the effects of the experimentsitself, they are either killed or used for an autopsy, or, if they are not badlyinjured, recycled and used for additional tests. Since the animals are nottreated, these tests provide little useful knowledge for the treatment of humanswho are exposed to the harmful substances. Dr. Gil Langley, a scientificneuro-chemist, states that: Results (of animal tests) vary dramatically fromlaboratory to Albrecht 8 laboratory, between strains, sex, age, and species ofanimals, and extrapolation to humans in questionable.1 Animal tests have failedto provide the clear definition between harmful and harmless products that theywere originally intended to provide. Therefore, regardless of animal testing,the consumer always becomes the so-called guinea pig for any new product.Alternatives to animal tests are available on todays market. Many companies areworking in fierce competition and dozens of alternative are being developed.Newer and more sophisticated tests are gradua l l y r e p l a c i n g t h e D r a i z e t e s t . b r b d s f i d = " 1 9 0 " > T h e s e a l t e r n a t i v e s m o s t o f t e n u s e t e s t - t u b e , o r i n - v i t r o , m e t h o d s b a s e d o n t h e b r b d s f i d = " 1 9 1 " > i de a t h a t w h a t h a p p e n s i n t h e b o d y ' s i n d i v i d u a l c e l l s r ef l e c t s w h a t h a p p e n s i n b r b d s f i d = " 1 92 " > i n t a c t o r g a n s s u c h a s t h e e y e . H u m a n c e l l s c a n b e u s e d i n s u c h s t u d i e s . I n b r b d s f i d = " 1 93 " > a d d i t i o n t o i n - v i t r o m e t h o d s , o t h e r p o t e n t i a l a l t e r n a t i v e s t o t h e D r a i z e t e s t b r b d s f i d = " 1 94 " > i n c l u d e t e s t s t h a t u s e c o m p u t e r p r o g r a m s , m i c r o o r g a n i s m s a n d o t h e r o r g a n i s m s b r b d s f i d = " 1 95 " > t h a t c a n ' t e x p e r i e n c e p a i n , a n d c h e m i c a l m e t h o d s t o a n a l y z e u n t e s t e d s u b s t a n c e s . b r b d s f i d = " 1 96 " > S o m e o f t h e n e w t o o l s f o r a s s e s s i n g e y e i r r i t a n c y a r e : N e u t r a l R e d A s s a y - b r b d s f i d = " 1 97 " > I r r i t a n t s i m p a i r h e a l t h y c e l l s ' a b i l i t y t o t a k e u p n e u t r a l r e d d y e . A l b r e c h t 9 b r b d s f i d = " 1 98 " > T h i s t e s t m e a s u r e s t h e d e g r e e o f i m p a i r m e n t , y i e l d i n g a n i n d e x o f i r r i t a n c y . b r b d s f i d = " 19 9 " > A g a r o s e D i f f u s i o n - T i n y p a p e r d i s c s a r e c o a t e d w i t h a t e s t c h e m i c a l a n d p l a c e d o n b r b d s f i d = " 2 0 0 " > a l a y e r o f g e l a t i n . T h e c h e m i c a l d i f f u s e s t h r o u g h t h e g e l a t i n a n d r e a c h e s a n b r b d s f i d = " 2 0 1 " > u n d e r l a y e r o f h e a l t h y c e l l s . A r i n g o f d e a d c e l l s a r o u n d t h e d i s c s i n d i c a t e s b r b d s f i d = " 2 0 2 " > i r r i t a t i o n . E y t e x - I n t h i s t e s t k i t , a s p e c i a l l y f o r m u l a t e d c h e m i c a l m i x t u r e b r b d s f i d = " 2 0 3 " > t u r n s c l o u d y w h e n e x p o s e d t o i r r i t a n t s , m i m i c k i n g t h e r e s p o n s e o f t h e c o r n e a . b r b d s f i d = " 2 0 4 " > M i c r o t o x - T h i s t e s t k i t c o n t a i n s a b a c t e r i u m t h a t c a n e m i t l i g h t . S u b s t a n c e s b r b d s f i d = " 2 0 5 " > t h a t i n h i b i t t h i s p r o c e s s a r e i r r i t a n t s . T o p k a t - A c o m p u t e r p r o g r a m e s t i m a t e s e y e b r b d s f i d = " 2 0 6 " > i r r i t a n c y b y c o m p a r i n g u n t e s t e d c h e m i c a l s t o s i m i l a r c h e m i c a l s o f k n o w b r b d s f i d = " 2 0 7 " > i r r i t a n c y . M o s t o f t h e s e a l t e r n a t i v e s a r e b e i n g d e v e l o p e d o r i m p r o v e d a t b r b d s f i d = " 2 0 8 " > h i g h - t e c h n o l o g y c o m p a n i e s . E y t e x a t I n V i t r o I n t e r n a t i o n a l , N e u t r a l R e d U p t a k e b r b d s f i d = " 2 0 9 " > A s s a y a t C l o n e t i c s , M i c r o t o x a t M i c r o b i e s , a n d T o p k a t a t H e a l t h D e s i g n s . b r b d s f i d = " 2 1 0 " > T e c h n i c a l a d v a n c e s t o e l i m i n a t e L D 5 0 t e s t i n g a r e a l s o a v a i l a b l e . M o r e b r b d s f i d = " 2 1 1 " > S o p h i s t i c a t e d m e t h o d s , s u c h a s i n v i t r o t e c h n i q u e s , a r e t h e b e g i n n i n g o f t h e b r b d s f i d = " 2 1 2 " > m o v e i n t h e r i g h t d i r e c t i o n . I n c o n t r a s t t o i n v i t r o m e t h o d s w h i c h u s e t h e w h o l e b r b d s f i d = " 2 1 3 " > a n i m a l , i n v i t r o m e t h o d s u s e o n l y t h e c e l l s o r A l b r e c h t 1 0 t i s s u e o f a n i m a l s o r b r b d s f i d = " 21 4 " > h u m a n s . A n i m a l c e l l s c a n o f t e n b e m a d e t o g r o w a n d d i v i d e i n d e f i n i t e l y , t h u s b r b d s f id = " 2 1 5 " > s p a r i n g a n i m a l s l i ve s . W h e n h u m a n c e l l s a r e u s e d ( t h e y a r e c o m m o n l y o b t a i n e d b r b d sf i d = " 2 1 6 " > f r o m t i s s u e r o u t i n e l y d i s c a r d e d a f t e r s u rg e r y ) , i n v i t r o t e ch ni q u e s a r e b r b d s f i d = " 2 1 7 " > c o m p l e t e l y h u m a n e . T e s t s u s i n g h u m a n c e l l s a r e m o r e s c i e n t i f i c a l l y r e l e v a n t t h a n b r b d s f i d = " 2 1 8 " > t h o s e p r o c e d u r e s u s i n g w h o l e a n i m a l s o r a n i m a l c e l l s o r t i s s u e . O t h e r a p p r o a c h e s b r b d s f i d = " 2 1 9 " > a r e a l s o b e i n g d e v e l o p e d , t h e r e a r e c o m p u t e r p r o g r a m s t h a t e s t i m a t e t h e L D 5 0 b r b d s f i d = " 2 2 0 " > s c o r e o f a n u n t e s t e d s u b s t a n c e b y c o m p a r i n g i t s c h e m i c a l a n d s t r u c t u r a l b r b d s f i d = " 2 2 1 " > p r o p e r t i e s t o t h o s e o f s i m i l a r s u b s t a n c e s o f k n o w t o x i c i t y . C o m p a n i e s c a n a l s o b r b d s f i d = " 2 2 2 " > e m p l o y t h e s i m p l e m e t h o d o f s e l e c t i v e f o r m u l a t i o n t o a v o i d D 5 0 t e s t i n g w h i l e b r b d s f i d = " 2 2 3 " > m o r e s o p h i s t i c a t e d a l t e r n a t i v e s a r e b e i n g d e v e l o p e d . C o m p a n i e s e m p l o y i n g b r b d s f i d = " 2 2 4 " > s e l e c t i v e f o r m u l a t i o n u s e i n g r e d i e n t s w i t h s a f e t y p r o f i l e s t h a t h a v e a l r e a d y b r b d s f i d = " 2 2 5 " > b e e n e s t a b l i s h e d a n d t h e r e b y a v o i d t h e n e e d f o r a n y n e w t e s t i n g . C l e a r l y , a n i m a l b r b d s f i d = " 2 2 6 " > t e s t i n g i s a l m o s t a t h i n g o f t h e p a s t . B u t , u n t i l e v e r y a n i m a l i s f r e e f r o m b r b d s f i d = " 2 2 7 " > c o m m e r c i a l t e s t i n g , w e h a v e n o t i m e t o r e s t o n o u r l a u r e l s . M a n y c o m p a n i e s s t i l l b r b d s f i d = " 2 2 8 " > s a y t h a t a n i m a l t e s t s a r e t h e m o s t l i k e l y t o h o l d u p i n c o u r t i f a h u m a n i s b r b d s f i d = " 2 2 9 " > i nj u r e d b y a c o s m e t i c o r A l b r e c h t 1 1 h o u s e h o l d p r o d u c t a n d , f o r t h a t r e a s o n , b r b d s f i d = " 2 3 0 " > t h e y w i l l s t r u g g l e t o h o l d o n t o a n i m a l - b a s e d r e s e a r c h . W e n e e d t o c o n t i n u e t o b r b d s f i d = " 2 3 1 " > t o f i n d n e w a n d i m p r o v e d a l t e r n a t i v e s s o t h a t w e m a y p r e s e r v e t h e l i v e s a n d b r b d s f i d = " 2 3 2 " >d i g n i t y o f a n i m a l s , b u t c a n a l s oe n s u r e t h e c o n s u m e r of p r o d u c t s a f e t y . M a n y b r b d s f i d = " 2 33 " > m a n u f a c t u r e s s u c h a s A v o n , R e v l o n , a n d E s t e e L a u d e r h a v e c e a s e d a n i m a l t e s t s . b r b d s f i d = " 2 34 " > t h e f a c t t h a t c o m p a n i e s a r e s u p p o r t i n g a l t e r n a t i v e s a n d r e d u c e a n i m a l u s a g e i s a b r b d s f i d = " 2 35 " > g o o d s i g n b u t t h e f i g h t i s c l e a r l y n o t o v e r . T h i s p r o j e c t h a s e d u c a t e d m e t o b e b r b d s f i d = " 2 36 " > a m o r e c a r i n g c o n s u m e r a n d I w i l l u s e b u y i n g p o w e r t o p r e s s u r e c o m p a n i e s i n t o b r b d s f i d = " 2 37 " > b a n n i n g a n i m a l t e s t i n g w i t h i n t h e c o m m e r c i a l m a r k e t . I h a v e l e a r n e d t o w r i t e t o b r b d s f i d = " 2 38 " > c o m p a n i e s t h a t s t i l l t e s t p r o d u c t s o n a n i m a l s a n d l e t t h e m k n o w t h a t I w o u l d n o t b r b d s f i d = " 2 39 " > b e b u y i n g t h e i r p r o d u c t s a n d u r g e t h e m t o c h o o s e a l t e r n a t i v e i n s t e a d . W e m u s t b r b d s f i d = " 2 4 0 " > r e m e m b e r u n s e e n t h e y s u f f e r , u n h e a r d t h e y c r y , i n a g o n y t h e y l i n g e r , i n b r b d s f i d = " 2 4 1 " > l o n e l i n e s s t h e y d i e . Y o u c a n m a k e a d i f f e r e n c e , y o u c a n b e t h e i r v o i c e . / p > / d i v > d i v i d = " f l o a t _ b t n " c l a s s = " " b d s f i d = " 2 4 2 " > b u t t o n c l a s s = " f l o a t _ b t n l e f t _ b t n " i d = " c o p y _ b u t t o n " d a t a - c l i p b o a r d - a c t i o n = " c o p y " d a t a - c l i p b o a r d - t a r g e t = " # c o n t e n t - t x t " o n c l i c k = " d o _ c o p y ( ) ; " b d s f i d = " 2 4 3 " > e m c l a s s = " i c o n " b d s f i d = " 2 4 4 " >。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
英语作文范文
雅思写作高分范文：吃动物残忍吗?
Some people think that killing animals for food is cruel and unnecessary while others argue that animal meat is essential for people’s daily lives. Discuss this topic in both sides and give your opinion. -----------(Argumentation)-------------- 289 words in total -----------
Introduction:
When you visit a Macdonald fast-food restaurant, enjoying a Big Mac sandwiched with a piece of beef should be an inviting meal. However, many people may feel disgusted and cruel if a dog is killed for preparing hamburgers. (38 words) Body1 (99 words)
On the one hand, some animals can bring help and joy to humans .(topic sentence) It is very common to see some people play games with a dog or other kind of cute pets in a park. The laughter tells us how enjoyable and harmonious it is to raise a pet in the family. It is well known that a fierce cat
can keep mice away from the family and a well-trained dog can lead blind people to walk in the street without causing traffic accidents. For these reasons, these animals are our companions and killing them, say, pets, is quit unacceptable.
Body 2 ( 87 words)
On the other hand, many kinds of animals such as cattle and fowl are the source of food ( topic sentence).It is reported that without eating meat for a couple of months, one may suffer from deficiency diseases. Eating an appropriate amount of meat every day is essential for keeping us healthily alive. Moreover, meat-processed industry has enjoyed a boom for hundreds of years, and millions of people are engaged in the relevant occupations. Hence any acts against this industry may result in a considerable amount of lay-offs, destabilizing society. Conclusion ( 65 words) Finally, I will conclude this debatable topic with my own opinion . Man is the supreme living thing in the world. Humans have rights to take advantage of any kind of animals. Pets should not be killed because raising pets can offer a more enjoyable and helpful family life, and people should stick at eating traditional food like beef, poultry and pork owing to an essential need .。