垃圾分类:政府政策

合集下载
  1. 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性,平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
  2. 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
  3. 3、如文档侵犯您的权益,请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间:9:00-18:30)。

The two articles analysis policy issues from the perspective of the garbage can model and the new institutionalism. The article of sorting through the garbage can:under what conditions do government adopt policy programs use organizations choose garbage can model as the basic theoretical framework.,and at the same time, replenishing the institutions of administrative decision-making.Reveal the government agencies to play to the corresponding role of introducing policies.Through studying alcohol policy to analysis the conditions of policy process, including political stream, problem stream and institutional setting. Fritz Sager·Yvan Rielle use nine points conditions to detail explanation the policies procedures.Policy program adoption need two conditions. First condition is party political staffing of the key department for alcohol policy. Second condition is veto players and promotors. Institutional setting mainly includes six conditions,which is degree of centralization,degree of outsourcing of tasks,professional specialization,coordination,number of department involved and vertical and horizontal cooperation.Fritz Sager·Yvan Rielle analysis the result mainly involving two settings which is conditional settings for the program adoption and conditional settings for non-adoption of policy programs.From the study,we have investigated the causes for policy program adoption.Policy programs are operationalization of policies and program adoption unlike policy change or policy instruction choice therefore can be understood as administrative decisions rather than political ones. In the end,getting conclusion through quoting the garbage can classification cases that policies and procedures are the choice of administrative decision.The present study has its limitations which is why further lines of research ought to be discussed here. As for one, our study is limited to a single policy.Second, the two contradicting cases in our sample point to insufficient theoretical modelling and qualitative further investigation will help to find relevant causes missing in this study.

Bendor,Moe,and Shotts as storytellers and innovators in the article of garbage cans, new institutionalism,and the study of politic.When they are storytellers,they carefully analysis the ambitions and labels,the simulation.They explained the relation of garbage can model and the new institutionalism.When they foresee its future development direction, they study the styles of research,competing assumptions,actors and organized settings,change in political orders and so on.Bendor,Moe,and Shotts use the European Union as an obvious candidate to observe the logics of action,institutional,forms and functions,and processes of change.Although they are analysis the garbage can model and the new institutionalism, the comments are unlikely to improve our understanding of political organizations and institutions.They build on a narrow concept of what is valuable political science without substantive political content.They separation of politics from its institutional and historical content makes it difficult to discuss.Bendor,Moe,and Shotts indicate unpromising route and point research in the wrong direction.

相关文档
最新文档