雅思G类阅读误区

雅思G类阅读误区

雅思G类阅读与A类针对的人群不同，所以备考的方法自然也有些差异，除了备考资料有差异外，还要注意一些雅思G 类阅读备考误区。

雅思G类阅读误区4大备考误区一定要避免!

雅思G类阅读备考误区有哪些?其实G类阅读难度并不低，所以备考G类不能因为自己英语基础还可以就掉以轻心。但是G 类虽难，也没有难道很可怕的地步，所以只要认真备考就一定会有不错的提升。除此之外，还要在备考中用对资料，打好基础。

雅思G类阅读误区一阅读很简单根本不用备考

雅思G类阅读简单吗?相对来说，雅思G类阅读*的难度是要比A类的简单一些，但是这不代表雅思G类阅读不用备考。一些G类雅思考生感觉自己英语功底不错，将大量时间花在其他科目的备考上忽略了雅思G类阅读备考，结果到了考场上才发现题目根本做不完，但是悔之晚矣。G类阅读难点主要有两个，一是阅读本身对于大部分G类考生来说是有难度的，需要认真备考;二是G类阅读虽然比A类简单一些，但是得分却比较困难，相同的分值，G类阅读比A类要多对几个题才能达到，所以万不可自以为是，不认真备考。

雅思G类阅读误区二阅读太难备考也不会有提升

有的考生备考G类阅读的时候觉得难度太高提升无望，想要彻底放弃阅读方面的备考。G类阅读确实有一定的难度，我们在上文中也为大家分析了难点，但只要大家认真备考，肯定会有不错的提升。如果阅读基础较差，那就针对阅读先去提升词汇量，提升语法基础，然后再来做阅读题目练习。只要备考时间充足，按部就班备考，阅读一定会有提升的，所以不要轻言放弃。

雅思G类阅读误区三A类阅读资料都可以用来备考

雅思G类阅读备考是否可以用A类阅读的资料。如果大家用A类阅读来做泛读练习，倒也可行，但若是用来做习题练习，那就是浪费时间了。雅思G类阅读不论是*还是题目与A类都有很大差别，所以如果要做习题练习，建议大家选用G类阅读资料。目前质量最高的雅思G类阅读资料是剑雅真题，建议大家利用好，先做题，再纠错，然后再分析错题，把握*出题点。

雅思G类阅读误区四凭技巧就能考出高分

雅思G类阅读阅读做题技巧有没有用?当然有用。但是如果大家在备考中想要单凭阅读技巧考出高分，那几乎是不可能的。如果你的目标分值不高，只有4分或者5分，那可以在备考前突击学习阅读技巧，但如果想考到6分或6.5分以上，必需要打好基础，在良好的基础上再结合一些做题技巧才能考出高分。

雅思G类阅读备考4大误区如上，大家在备考G类阅读的时候一定要注意这几个方面，不能盲目自信，也不能对自己太没自信，其实雅思阅读只要认真备考都会有不错的提升。另外，备考资料建议选G类阅读的相关资料，备考中要将基础和技巧相结合。

雅思考试阅读模拟练习及答案

Selling Digital Music without Copy-protection Makes Sense

A.

It was uncharacteristically low-key for the ind ustry’s greatest showman. But the essay published this week by Steve Jobs, the boss of Apple, on his firm’s website under the unassuming title “Thoughts on Music” has nonetheless provoked a vigorous debate about the future of digital music, which Apple dominates with its iPod music-player and iTunes music-store. At issue is “digital rights management” (DRM)—the technology guarding downloaded music against theft. Since there is no common standard for DRM, it also has the side-effect that songs purchased for one type of

music-player may not work on another. Apple’s DRM system, called FairPlay, is the most widespread. So it came as a surprise when Mr. Jobs called for DRM for digital music to be abolished.

B.

This is a change of tack for Apple. It has come under fire from European regulators who claim that its refusal to license FairPlay to other firms has “locked in” customers. Since music from the iTunes store cannot be played on non-iPod music-players (at least not without a lot of fiddling), any iTunes buyer will be deterred from switching to a device made by a rival firm, such as Sony or Microsoft. When French lawmakers drafted a bill last year compelling Apple to open up FairPlay to rivals, the company warned of “state-sponsored piracy”. Only DRM, it imp lied, could keep the pirates at bay.

C.

This week Mr. Jobs gave another explanation for his former defence of DRM: the record companies made him do it. They would make their music available to the iTunes store only if Apple agreed to protect it using DRM. They can still withdraw their catalogues if the DRM system is compromised. Apple cannot license FairPlay to others, says Mr Jobs, because it would depend on them to produce security fixes promptly. All DRM does is restrict consumer choice and provide a barrier to entry, says Mr Jobs; without it there would be far more stores and players, and far more innovation. So, he