hnd大综合2 评价部分

Evaluation

1.How did we meet the original objects

In a word, our investigation has achieved the aims we desired. Pre-set large goals which are analysis the recession of Nokia and the prospect of cooperate with Microsoft were completed and got a satisfactory conclusion. In the process of setting goals, we designed some objects. One of the objects, analysis the company’s organisatoinal structure was given up, the reasons were: firstly, it’s difficult to collect data; then there is no much contact with big goals. So lack of this object will not affect the entire investigation. In addition, we have changed certain objects. Like analysis the sales volume of Nokia with WP7. Because we did not notice that the phone has not yet published, so we can not know the data. And this object has changed into another one which is compare wp7 with other operating system. We believe this one would be fit the theme better.

In the investigation, we originally want to receive the primary data from a telephone interview. But consider of the given time of the interviewee, we had to give up. As a result, we chose questionnaires. Compare this method with telephone interview, it can be more objective. And we can obtain the more quantitative data needed. But in the other side, it spends more time, which including produce, find the test target, collect and sort out. We chose the places which the fluidity of people is not so fast as our collecting sites such as dining room. This can save some time, and test people will be more patience. So the data would be more accurate.

2.An explanation of the effectiveness of the planning and

implementation stages

In the planning part, it just set the framework and direction of the investigation. This step is very critical, it just like the foundation of the house. Only when the foundation is stable, the house would be strong. As the same way, how is the accuracy of setting project objects and how comprehensive of the references both are affect the investigation. We think our planning is not good enough, because the objects we set sometimes are too wide and can not get the point. This is the question we found during the investigation. Fortunately, we correct this problem in time and so that would not off the topic.

In the investigation part, according to the intended target we carried out the project, steps by steps. We were totally satisfied with this part. Because the conclusion we wanted has came out. But this process, we have some shortcomings. For instance, in data collection we can not do very well. Firstly, the data we found are not so fresh; then the data are scattered, for example, we want to know the market share of Nokia from 2007 to 2010. But we can only found the information from 2008 to 2009. Thirdly, the date collect from written resources is too little. Most of the data are comes from internet.

3.An assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of the report

Strengths are as followed:

Firstly, the report very specific and the structure are very clear so that is convenient to read. Besides setting headings, we also create a number of subheadings, which is conducive to found the items we need.