sat考试写作模版和范文干货

今天为大家准备了“SAT写作高分模板”， 供各位备考SAT的考生们参考使用，来提高自己的英语考试成绩！

When asked about ______________ ( 主题), some people hold the idea

that_________________________ ( 观点A). As far as they are

concerned,_________________________ (展开观点A). But I could not agree with them in several points.

In my opinion, ______________________________ (观点B). The reasons for my choice are listed as follows.

In the first place, ___________________________ (支持观点B 的理由1).

In the second place, ______________________________ (支持观点B 的理由2).

In the third place,_______________________________ (支持观点B 的理由3).

For the reasons mentioned above, I firmly believe ____________ (重申观点B).

(2)模板二

Some people believe that __________________________ (观点A). For instance, they hold the idea that ______________________________ (支持观点A的例子). And

it may bring them _____________________________ (A 带给他们的好处).

In my opinion, I never think this reason can be the point.

For one thing,_____________________________ ( 我不同意的理由1).

For another,_____________________________ (我不同意的理由2).

As a matter of fact, there are some other reasons to explain my choice. For me, I agree tothe thought that ______________________________ (重申自己的观点).

以上就是这两个SAT写作经典模板的全部内容，按照写作的开头，主体和结尾三个部分进行的介绍，主体部分中论点和论证的关系是重点。大家在备考自己的SAT写作考试的时候，也需要把这一部分作为重点来练习。

这次考试的文章的行文比较清晰利落。如果将文章的脉络梳理下来，可考虑这样划分。Para1为比较常规的introduction部分：引入主题，谈论背景吸引注意力，表明态度。接下来，作者阐述本话题论证的必要性——Para2-4表明海洋面积大、得到保护有缺失、海洋对自然系统的重要性。倒数第二部分，画风一转，强调海洋目前得到的保护正在进步中，列举四项里程碑事件及保护区的成立。最后的一部分，进行升华和深化——一方面强调，这是世界范围内共同致力的事业，“great minds think alike”;另一方面，呼吁不该止步于此，虽然保护在进行，但是海洋生态环境受到威胁的可能性也并没有随之减弱。

范文：

Oceans, the world’s largest natural resource, cover much more areas than the land within theUnited States’ territories, but receive much less protection. Responding to the phenomenon, Laura Bush, the former First Lady of the country, writes a commentary in Wall Street Journal to call upon more preservation of “our waters and marine habitats.” Strong contrasting, abundant evidence and appeal to pathos facilitate her compelling argument that our duty is to conserve wild marine areas that remain when the sea frontiers are retreating.

In developing her claims for the need to protect the oceans, Bush has employed various kinds of evidence, including facts, examples and statistics,

to reason with the reader and explain the significance of the natural resource. Most readers might not realize severity of such protection since they are satisfied with great progress “made in protecting our environment over the past several decades.” To awaken them to the claim that the oceans lack protection, the author is at pains to provide some statistics to reveal what the country fails to do: “Less than one-half of 1% of the world's oceans” cannot be conserved in their primitive form, and “up to 90% of large fish” disappear in some parts of the oceans. These data would leave the readers greatly surprised. She further utilizes facts and personal anecdote to raise another claim that the ocean pollutions are killing marine lives. A “plastic garbage dump twice the size of Texas” presents a vivid image about how huge the dump is, and the readers would now feel shocked rather than just surprised. Her personal accounts that birds die because of plastic debris could also sadden the readers and stir their pity for the innocent wildlife. A third claim she made – people are “at risk of permanently losing vital marine resources and harming our quality of life” – is also backed up with cold, hard facts: the oceans “produce oxygen, reduce pollution, and remove carbon dioxide.” The readers are, again, reminded of the importance of the resource. These claims and their evidence are well-connected to serve as solid reasons to sway the readers into her position.