高考英语阅读理解之观点态度题习题+讲义

阅读理解之观点态度题

一．观点态度题常见的设题形式：

1.What is the author’s attitude towards/to ...?

2.Which word best describes the author’s attitude to ...?

3.How does the author feel about ...?

4.What is the author’s opinion on/about ...?

5.What does the author think of ...?

6.How does the author sound when telling the story?

二．常见有关作者情感态度的词语：

（1）表示支持或肯定：

Positive 积极乐观的；Supportive 支持的；Optimistic 乐观的；

Humorous 幽默的；Enthusiastic 热情的；Pleasant 愉快的

（2）表示中立：

Indifferent 不感兴趣的，莫不关心的；Uninterested 不感兴趣的；

Objective 客观的；Neutral 中立的；Not mentioned 未提及的

（3）表示反对或否定

Disgusted 憎恶的，厌恶的；Critical 批评的；至关重要的，有判断力的；Negative/ pessimistic 否定的，消极的

Suspicious/ skeptical/ doubtful 怀疑的

Disappointed 失望的；Disapproving 不赞成的；

Controversial 有争议的；Conservative 保守的；

态度题练习

If messages must happen outside of the set communication hours, such as for urgent or

time-sensitive issues, make employees phone or text only. This way people can comfortably close down all other communication channels like email, WeChat, WeCom, etc. The act of having to call or text someone is usually enough to give the sender a pause to think, "Do I really need this person now, or can the communication wait?" This allows everyone on your team to work whenever is appropriate for them, but not feel like they have to work all the time to accommodate everyone else's schedule. A word of "Thanks for being so responsive" to someone answering an email outside of the defined communication hours definitely brings empathy（同理心）, which smooths the urgency while also cultivating the trust and culture.

1．What is the author's attitude to the combination of "flex time" and "communication hours"?

A．Neutral. B．Supportive. C．Opposed. D．Indifferent.

I see people trapped in a pathological (病态的) relationship with time-sucking technology, where they serve technology more than technology serves them. I call this technology servitude. I am referring to a loss of personal freedom and independence because of uncontrolled consumption of many kinds of devices that eat up time and money.

2. What’s the author’s attitude towards the overusing of high-tech devices?

A. Neutral.

B. Skeptical.

C. Disapproving.

D. Sympathetic.

The shed craze makes that outcome more likely. A white-collar worker who has tried to work from the kitchen table for the past nine months might be keen (渴望的) to return to the office. A worker who has a beautiful garden shed with Wi-Fi will be less so. Joel Bird, who builds personalized sheds, is certain that his customers foresee a long-term change in their working habits. “They don’t consider it to be temporary,” he says. “They’re spending too much money.”

3. What is Joel Bird’s attitude to the return of post-COVID office jobs?

A. Enthusiastic.

B. Uncaring.

C. Optimistic.

D. Pessimistic.

Traditionally, improvements in energy efficiency have mostly focused on individual devices, which can be quite fruitful. But focusing on individual devices is like if Apple had spent effort inventing a better alarm clock, a better CD player, a better calendar, and a better camera. Now with an iPhone, we don’t need the standalone(独立运行的) devices at all, because it can function as all of them.

4. What does the author think of traditional practices in energy improvements?

A. Fruitless.

B. Out-of-date.

C. Adequate.

D. Perfect.

Not surprisingly, this great action has made Mary Hardison very famous and also earned her