论刑事证人出庭作证制度

西南交通大学

本科毕业论文

论刑事证人出庭作证制度

ON TESTIFYING IN CRIMINAL COURT

年级:2003 级

学号:********

**:***

专业:法学

****:***

2007 年 6 月

院系人文社会科学学院专业法学

年级 2003级姓名黄卓龄

题目论刑事证人出庭作证制度

指导教师

评语

指导教师（签章）

评阅人

评语

评阅人（签章）成绩

答辩委员会主任（签章）

年月日

毕业论文任务书

班级 2003级1班学生姓名黄卓龄学号 20032764 发题日期：2007 年 3 月 7 日完成日期： 6 月 10 日

题目论刑事证人出庭作证制度

1、本论文的目的、意义本论文通过对中国刑事证人出庭作证现状的总结，揭示出

中国现阶段刑事证人出庭作证制度存在的问题，反映出它的不完善；接着通过对现状

的原因分析，为完善我国刑事证人出庭作证制度指明了方向；通过中外刑事证人出庭

作证制度的比较分析，看到外国行之有效的制度，给完善我国刑事证人出庭作证制度

提供了借鉴；最后总结出完善我国刑事证人出庭作证制度的几点意见。

对此项制度的研究，有利于保护诉讼双方诉讼权利的有效行使，从而使我国改革

后的控辩式庭审模式得以有效推进，更有助于保障刑事诉讼基本原则，如法律面前人

人平等原则、程序正义和实体正义等原则的实现，进而为我国社会主义法治国家建设

打下坚实基础。

2、学生应完成的任务

①进行毕业论文创作所需要的相关资料的收集、整理工作

②撰写毕业论文提纲并进行修改

③完成中文摘要及关键词、绪论、正文、结论和致谢的写作

④标出毕业论文的注释，并附上资料索引

⑤整理、编排毕业论文参考文献

⑥完成中文摘要和关键词的英文翻译

⑦翻译出一万字符以上的相关外文资料

3、论文各部分内容及时间分配：（共 12 周）

第一部分绪论及中国刑事证人出庭作证现状 ( 2周) 第二部分中国刑事证人出庭作证现状的原因分析 ( 2周) 第三部分刑事证人出庭作证制度的比较研究 ( 2周) 第四部分中国刑事证人出庭作证制度的完善 ( 3周) 第五部分外文翻译( 2周) 评阅及答辩 ( 1周)

备注

指导教师：年月日

审批人：年月日

摘要

刑事证人出庭作证是刑事诉讼过程中极为重要的环节，它有利于保障权利平衡，实现程序和实体正义。1996年刑事诉讼法修改实施至今，我国刑事证人出庭作证制度在立法和实践运行中都显现出许多弊端和不足，给我们惩罚犯罪、保障人权造成了不小的阻碍，也使改革后的控辩式庭审模式难以运行。针对这些问题，笔者将结合中外法学学者的相关探讨，从中国实际国情出发，对中国的刑事证人出庭作证制度进行一个全面的剖析研究，力求促进其完善。

文章首先对我国刑事证人出庭作证的现状做一个系统的调查总结。接着进行原因分析，主要有三个方面的原因：中国现阶段刑事证人出庭作证制度立法不健全方面的原因，存在相关法律原则推行不到位、证人权利和义务规定失衡、法律规范前后矛盾和不严密、缺乏对无故不出庭证人的制裁性措施、证人保护制度不完善几个问题；司法人员方面的原因；社会历史文化方面的原因。在此基础上与美、英、法、德、日五个代表性国家的刑事证人出庭作证制度的法律规定及司法实践进行介绍和比较分析，希望通过借鉴对我们有所帮助。最后重点进行我国刑事证人出庭作证制度的完善探讨。笔者将从五个大的方面进行：一是健全公民法治观念，强化自觉出庭作证意识；二是关键性刑事证人义务出庭作证制度的构建，其中将进行刑事证人出庭作证的法律定位的理论分析；三是明确限定书面刑事证人证言使用的具体范围；四是规定关键性刑事证人无故不出庭作证的强制与处罚措施。此节将涉及到强制刑事证人出庭作证行为和刑事证人拒绝作证行为犯罪化的理论研究；五是完善对刑事证人出庭作证的保障制度。不仅限于对刑事证人己身的人身保障，还应保护刑事证人的财产权益及其亲属的人身、财产权益。不仅限于对这些权益的事后保护，更重要的是对它们的庭审前、庭审中的保护。

关键词：刑事证人出庭作证

Abstract

Testifying in criminal court is very important in criminal litigation. It’s profitable in keeping the balance of rights and achieving procedural or real justice. From 1996, modifying the criminal law and implementing, our testifying in criminal court presents many shortcomings and insufficiency in legislation and its judicial practice. It has resulted in some hindrance for us to punish the crimes and to protect human rights. It also made a big difficult in running the new trail pattern. In the light of these questions, the author will analyze it combining with our current national condition in order to consummate it by studying into some scho lar’s discussions both home and abroad.

The thesis firstly makes an investigation on the current situations of our testifying in criminal court. Then the author will make an analysis aiming at this phenomenon to find out its reasons. There are mainly three factors: the legislation of testifying in criminal court is not perfect nowadays. There are mainly several problems: regarding legal principle hasn’t been carried out well; the rights and duties of the witness being asymmetric; the stipulations are inconsistent and inaccurate; the shortage of sanction on witness's absence from court for no reason; the system of witness protects being imperfect; the personnel reason of judicial workers’; the factor about social, history, culture. Based on that, the author will introduce the foreign testifying in criminal court in legislation and practice. There are five countries involved: the UK, the US, France, Germany, Japan. By summarizing their advantages and shortcomings, then comparing them with the one of China, we can learn a lot. Finally the author will emphatically discuss how to consummate our testifying in criminal court. There are five aspects: one, to arouse citizen’s legal sense and to teach them to testify in court on their own initiative; two, to construct the system of crucial criminal witness to testify in court on duty. It concludes the theoretical analysis in the legal orientating of testifying in criminal court; three, bring the use of written testimony of criminal witness into concrete limit; four, to construct the forcing and the punishing measures on crucial criminal witness’ absence from court for no reason. It will mainly discuss the fundamental researches on the testifying of forced criminal witness in court and that criminal witness resisting to testify is of crime; five, to consummate the system of witness protects, not only for the safety of witness and his relatives, but also for their property rights; not only to protect them afterwards, but more importantly to protect them before hand.

Key words : Criminal witness appearing in court testify