广东中考语文总复习中考解读阅读理解第四章名著阅读第十部威尼斯商人人物形象分析素材
《威尼斯商人》中夏洛克人物形象分析 夏洛克是怎样的人
《威尼斯商人》中夏洛克人物形象分析夏洛克是怎样的人（最新版）编制人：__________________审核人：__________________审批人：__________________编制单位：__________________编制时间：____年____月____日序言下载提示：该文档是本店铺精心编制而成的，希望大家下载后，能够帮助大家解决实际问题。
文档下载后可定制修改，请根据实际需要进行调整和使用，谢谢!并且，本店铺为大家提供各种类型的经典范文，如诗歌散文、原文赏析、读书笔记、经典名著、古典文学、网络文学、经典语录、童话故事、心得体会、其他范文等等，想了解不同范文格式和写法，敬请关注!Download tips: This document is carefully compiled by this editor.I hope that after you download it, it can help you solve practical problems. The document can be customized and modified after downloading, please adjust and use it according to actual needs, thank you!In addition, this shop provides you with various types of classic sample essays, such as poetry and prose, original text appreciation, reading notes, classic works, classical literature, online literature, classic quotations, fairy tales, experience, other sample essays, etc. if you want to know the difference Please pay attention to the format andwriting of the sample essay!《威尼斯商人》中夏洛克人物形象分析夏洛克是怎样的人【导语】：夏洛克是《威尼斯商人》中的重要人物，是个著名的吝啬鬼的形象。
《威尼斯商人》中的人物分析
《威尼斯商人》中的人物分析作者：李贺来源：《神州·下旬刊》2019年第08期摘要：莎士比亚被尊称为人类艺术工程师，其作品带有丰富的现实主义精神，所描绘出的情节生动有趣，其众多作品被翻译成世界各种文字流传于世，《威尼斯商人》是莎士比亚于1596年，结合当时的社会背景所创造出的喜剧作品，在剧中成功的塑造出了众多具有个性的人物形象。
除了曲折的故事情节和一些优美、充满人生智慧的语言之外，让守财奴夏洛克、具有人文主义精神的鲍西娅、资产阶级商人安东尼奥等形象生动地展示在我们面前，本文主要对《威尼斯商人》中的人物形象进行了分析，并且探讨了鲍西娅这一人物形象的不同解读。
关键词：《威尼斯商人》;人物分析在进行《威尼斯商人》解读的过程中，我们可以将整个剧本分为大致三个内容，首先是，鲍西娅与巴萨尼奥之间的恋爱故事，其次是夏洛克和安东尼奥之间的金钱纠纷，还有一条隐线是夏洛克的女儿与基督教徒私奔，第三条线索并没有仔细地谈论，其中最扣人心悬的部分，就是夏洛克与安东尼奥之间的矛盾，我们在进行人物分析的过程中，鲍西娅和巴塞尼奥爱情故事可以作为鲍西娅角色分析的主要线索，与夏洛克和安东尼奥之间的矛盾纠纷互相交织铺垫，故事的结局是鲍西娅运用智慧在法庭上成功反转，令夏洛克不但不能实施自己的报复、同时还因为再三不接受鲍西娅给出的条件而导致最后自己的更大损失。
全剧以鲍西娅和巴萨尼奥、安东尼奥等人的大团圆式喜剧结尾，弱化了损失更多的犹太放贷者夏洛克在这场戏中悲剧命运。
在此我们对夏洛克、安东尼奥、鲍西娅和巴萨尼奥进行详细的人物分析。
一、《威尼斯商人》中的人物分析1、安东尼奥的人物形象分析。
从《威尼斯商人》的整体剧情看，安东尼奥是正面人物，其与夏洛克之间所造成的矛盾和利益关系，成为了贯穿于整部剧的主线，安东尼奥是当时所处的资产阶级社会环境中阶级商人的典型代表，其接受过良好的社会教育，并且有着较多的社会财产，在当时的社会背景下，具有较高的社会地位，并且珍视友谊，胸襟宽广。
[配套k12学习]广东中考语文总复习中考解读阅读理解第四章名著阅读第十部威尼斯商人人物形象分析素材
![[配套k12学习]广东中考语文总复习中考解读阅读理解第四章名著阅读第十部威尼斯商人人物形象分析素材](https://img.taocdn.com/s3/m/f98b78d981c758f5f61f6794.png)
且慢，还有别的话哩。这约上并没有允许你取他的一滴血，只是写明着“一磅肉”；所以你可以照约拿一磅肉去，可是在割肉的时候，要是流下一滴基督徒的血，你的土地财产，按照威尼斯的法律，就要全部充公。
善良仁慈。
慈悲不是出于勉强，它……人间的权力就和上帝的神力没有差别。
安东尼奥
慷慨大方、
见义勇为、重义轻财。
为了朋友，他甘愿冒险向对头夏洛克借钱。他即将受到可怕的刑罚，却始终“默忍”“迎受”，继而要求“爽爽快快”地就刑，为了友谊“从容就死”，“死而无怨”。
他是新兴的资产阶级商人。他珍重友情，为了朋友死而无怨；他宽宏大量，面对夏洛克的无耻阴谋，竟逆来顺受；面对死亡的威胁，他具有古罗马英雄那样临危不惧、视死如归的气概。
第四章名著阅读第十部《威尼斯商人》人物形象分析
人物பைடு நூலகம்
性格特征
相关情节
总体评价
夏洛克
巧舌如簧。
除非你能够把我这一张契约上的印章骂掉，否则像你这样拉开了喉咙直嚷，不过白白伤了你的肺，何苦来呢？
夏洛克是资本主义原始积累时期高利贷吸血鬼的典型。他具有贪婪、吝啬、残忍、固执、冷酷无情的本质。同时，他也是一个在基督教社会里受欺侮的犹太人。人们对夏洛克，既憎恨他的残酷，又同情他所受的种族压迫和屈辱。
老于世故。
您要是问我为什么不愿接受三千块钱，宁愿拿一块腐烂的臭肉，那我可没有什么理由可以回答您，我只能说我喜欢这样，这是不是一个回答？
唯利是图。
把我的生命连着财产一起拿了去吧，我不要你们的宽恕。你们拿掉了支撑房子的柱子，就是拆了我的房子；你们夺去了我的养家活命的根本，就是活活要了我的命。
冷酷狡诈。
从那破产的家伙身上割下那磅肉来；无论你说得多么婉转动听，都没有用。
《威尼斯商人》中的人物形象分析
《威尼斯商人》中的人物形象分析作者：王艺臻来源：《新教育时代·教师版》2018年第07期摘要：《威尼斯商人》是英国戏剧家莎士比亚创作的一部讽刺性的喜剧。
该作品以资本主义的社会为背景，描绘了夏洛克这一类自私自利的高利贷行业者与安东尼奥这一类心胸宽广的资本主义者们之间的矛盾。
并以此为我们塑造了许多鲜明的人物形象，人物形象鲜明、饱满，给读者留下了深刻的印象。
通过对作品人物分析，能够丰富自身文化素养。
文章突破固有的人物认知，从全新的角度解读《威尼斯商人》中的人物形象，希望能够为其他同学提供更有价值的参考。
关键词：威尼斯商人人物形象《威尼斯商人》创作于十六世纪，其中优美的文字、扣人心弦的故事情节吸引广大读者，尤其是作品中的人物形象，使其能够流传至今。
加强对作品中人物形象的分析，能够进一步深入作品当中，了解作品艺术内涵。
一、夏洛克读者阅读作品，能够了解到夏洛克是一个心胸狭隘、狠毒刻薄的人物。
但是从另一个角度来看，夏洛克并非彻底的卑鄙小人。
如当其与安东尼奥定下契约时，没有预知到安东尼奥商船会遇到海难，无法按交易时间交易，如果夏洛克想要报复，这是一个非常不错的机会，但其并没有愚蠢到将报复建立在未知事情上。
可见，夏洛克并非完全意义上的卑鄙小人。
另外，很多读者认为夏洛克视财如命，夏洛克的确爱钱超过自己，且不愿意将钱拿出来帮助他人。
针对该观点，更多的是要仁者见仁智者见智，夏洛克从事高利贷行业，且年龄越来越大，无力转行。
当时社会背景下，夏洛克如果不积累一些资本，难以面对未来的未知性。
基于此，对于夏洛克人物形象的认识要保持辩证态度，避免片面性。
二、鲍西娅鲍西娅是整部作品中，作者极力歌颂的对象，也是智慧、正义的象征。
但是戏剧中的鲍西娅并不完美，作者对其人物设定具有双面性。
人们往往看到的是鲍西娅在公堂上的英勇表现，却忽略了生活中她的刻薄和缺乏涵养。
如很多人前来向鲍西娅求婚，她的侍女问她的看法，她对很多人的评价非常尖酸、刻薄，她往往看到的是他人的缺点，并将其无限放大，在道德层面上并非完美。
《威尼斯商人》课文人物解读
《威尼斯商人》课文人物解读《威尼斯商人》课文人物解读人物分析：夏洛克的全面逆袭，解读反差很大，夏洛克要被看作是民族英雄了?文章还从夏洛克的性格入手解读他消极的，积极的性格以及悲剧的根源。
我的解读就是围绕着三个问题展开，然后谈谈我的思考：1.夏洛克究竟向谁复仇?2.夏洛克的信仰是什么?3.基督精神是否能拯救夏洛克?(一)夏洛克究竟该向谁复仇?“……我只能说我喜欢这样。
……除了因为我对于安东尼奥抱着久积的仇恨和深刻的反感，所以才会向他进行着一场对于我自己并没有好处的诉讼。
”“什么!你愿意被毒蛇咬两次吗?“”把夏洛克关键语言提取才出来，就会看到这些刺眼的字眼，不禁好奇。
这是多么大的仇恨啊?要这么处心积虑的“复仇”，这么刻骨铭心的仇恨的源起到底是什么?在剧本的第一幕第三场，巴萨尼奥带着安东尼奥在威尼斯广场找夏洛克借钱。
“……好多次您在交易所立骂我，说我盘剥取利，我总是忍气吞声，耸耸肩膀，没有和您争辩，忍受迫害本来是我们民族的特色……唾沫吐在我犹太长袍上……”(屈辱感源自这些词语)“只因为我用自己的钱博取几个利息……”(不这么做，我怎么生存?)啊!原来如此!只因为象一个顽皮的男孩子的对夏洛克谩骂，吐唾沫了，也许，事后，安东尼奥自己都忘了，可是夏洛夏洛克克却久久无法释怀,恨得咬牙切齿。
究竟是什么放大了他的疼痛，让他觉得如此屈辱，不杀不快!把安东尼奥和夏洛克放在时代背景下，宗教的背景下，价值观的背景下，民族的背景下，我们不难发现，这些矛盾由来已久，两个人都不自觉得被打上了烙印，贴上了标签。
所以夏洛克象一个塞满火药的火药桶，擦着火星就要引爆。
细读文本，不难发现。
以安东尼奥、巴萨尼奥为首的威尼斯商人包括公爵在内，都称夏洛克为异族人、异教徒轻蔑之情溢于言表，而夏洛克也是奋起“反击”。
夏洛克：“这些便是相信基督教的丈夫!我有一个女儿，我宁愿她嫁给强盗的子孙，不愿她嫁给一个基督徒。
别再浪费光阴了;请快些宣判吧。
”(民族的冲突，宗教信仰的冲突多么尖锐!更是一个弱势民族对于自己尊严的捍卫!) 从夏洛克的回应中，不难看出其也有自尊的一面，潜台词：你们看不起我，我还看不起你们呢!他对尊严越是捍卫，疼痛感和屈辱感就越强烈。
《威尼斯商人》中的人物形象分析
摘要众所周知，《威尼斯商人》是莎士比亚著名喜剧之一。
该剧的主题被定义为对善良、友谊和爱情的颂扬。
本剧不但反映了资本主义早期资产阶级同高利贷者间的矛盾冲突，也揭示了作者对资本主义社会金钱、法律和宗教信仰的人文主义观点。
本论文采用了个案分析法以及对比分析法对该剧的主要人物形象作了一一剖析，展示了资本主义萌芽时期人文主义的浓厚气息，表达了莎士比亚对社会、对人类生活的反思，并寄以自己的理想。
课题对封建旧势力的代表——夏洛克作了无情的批判，而对形象鲜明、富有光彩的鲍西娅则添上了浓厚的人文主义理想色彩。
文章彰显了女性个性解放，突显了文艺复兴时期伊丽莎白当权期，女性地位、意识的重大突破。
关键词：人物分析；人文主义思想；个性解放；女性意识AbstractAs we known that the merchant of V enice is one of Shakespeare‟s most important works. It is a comedy. The theme of this play is to extol kindheartedness, friendship and love. And also it reflects the conflicts between the capitalists and usurers at the beginning of the capitalist society. And it expresses the author‟s humanist idea on money, law and religion in capitalist society. This thesis analyzes the main figures in the play by using independent and contrast ways. It shows the heavily flavor of humanism at the beginning of capitalist society; and expresses some thoughts for society and human being. The thesis also makes a hard criticism to Shylock, who is a representative of feudalism, and puts a heavy humanism on Portia. It displays the thoughts of feudalism personality liberation, and stressing the great breakthrough of woman‟s status and feminine consciousness in Elizabethan era.Key Words：Character analyzing; humanism; personality liberation; women consciousnessIntroductionThe Merchant of Venice is one of the Shakespeare‟s famous comedies in his early time. It‟s theme is to extol kindness, friendship and love. It is the mirror of the contradiction between business bourgeois and usurer at the beginning of the Capitalist society. It‟s also expressed the author‟s humanism ideas on money, law and religion in this society. There, we mention Humanism--the main distinguishing feature of that period, also the brightness characteristic which is shown from the important role in this play.In this thesis, the author introduces the background of the play firstly. Reading the play, we can know that the social background in the play is according with the real society. We know at that time, the society was under the leadership of Elizabeth who was the symbol of power in England. Next the thesis gives an introduction of the main figures in the play. Antonio is rich and kindhearted. From him we can see the spirit of humanism. Portia plays the most important part in the play. The thesis talks about her character, her hobbies, and her attitude of love and the inner meaning-humanism of this figure. She is the center of all these figures the play refers to. Humanism is an ideological weapon for capitalism to fight the feudalism combat, and also it is the core idea of capitalism advanced-literature in Renaissance, and its combat refers to the ideal of Feudalism in Middle Age, especially the religion belief of Catholics. After that, the thesis gives more details about the information mentioned above. Then the thesis compares the figures to give a highlight of the humanism spirit.Ⅰ. Social Background of the Play the Merchant of VeniceAs is known, England is a developed country. Today, it also obtains very important status in the world. It is very necessary to talk about the history of the growth of capitalism in England, especially in 16th century.A. The Social Information in Elizabeth ThroneHenry VIII died in 1547 and his nine-year-old son succeeded him. The son was known in history, Edward Ⅵ. The boy-king‟s reign was a time of extreme Protestantism, for the Regency Council for him consisted almost entirely of the protestant faction. Edward Ⅵdied in 1553. only 15years old. Then his half-sister, Mary, a Catholic, became Queen. The new Queen came to the throne at the age of twenty-five. After the coronation, her parliament passed the necessary legislation to abolish the papal supremacy over the church, and gave Elizabeth all the powers over the church which her father had held, though with the more modest title of “Supreme Government” of the Church of England instead of “Supreme Head” Elizabeth died on 24 March, 1603 at the age of sixty-nine. Her forty-four-year reign had not only ensured the triumph of Protestantism in Britain and in Northern Europe, but had greatly increased the wealth, power and prestige of England. Her na vy triumphed over the great Armada of the king of Spain; her sailors‟ circum navigated the world, and established a colony on the North American continent which they named Virginia after their virgin queen. At home, the merchants were prosperous; the common people enjoyed a higher standard of living than in most other European countries, and her reign was also full of achievements in literature and other arts. After all, Elizabeth I was one of the most successful despots to govern England in English history. ①(李超, 邓兴义:34-37)B. Special Social Background Reflecting in the Merchant of VeniceThe Merchant of Venice is one of the famous comedy plays written by Shakespeare in his early time. The theme of this play is to extol kindness, friendship and love. It is the mirror of the contradiction between business bourgeois and usurer at the beginning of capitalist society. It‟s also expressed the author‟s humanism ideas on money, law and religion in this society. There, we mention Humanism--the main distinguishing feature of that period, also the brightness characteristic which is shown from the important roles in this play. But, what is “humanism”? Humanism is the ideological weapon of bourgeois to fight feudalism at Renaissance, is also the core idea of the bourgeois‟ advanced-literature in this time. Be directed against the world outlook of Medieval feudalism is the spearhead of struggle, especially the religion belief of Catholicism. Church refers to God as the centre of cosmos. At the heart of the Renaissance philosophy is the assertion of the greatness of man. And the elements of Humanism are to establish the central status of human, their dignity and value, to advocate the spirit of rationalism and science and to protest the supreme role of God admired in Middle Ages.Shakespeare was a man of the late Renaissance who gave the fullest expression to humanist ideas. The Merchant of Venice is one of the important works which finished in the First Flowering period of English Literature. In this play, heroes and heroines fight for their own ideas and mould their own life according to their own free will and bring us into happy and ideal world with singing, dancing, harmony with nature and freedom from the vices of the world.Ⅱ. Analyzing the Heroes in the PlayIn this play, Shakespeare portrays many roles. The proportion that male figures taking is much more notable than female‟s. So, it's necessary to narrate and displ ay their nature character and symbol.A. AntonioAlthough the play‟s title refers to him, Antonio is a rather lackluster character. He emerges in ActⅠ, sceneⅠas a hopeless depressive, someone who cannot name the source of his melancholy and who, throughout the course of the play, devolves into a self-pitying lump, unable to muster the energy required to defend himself against execution. Antonio never names the cause of his melancholy, but the evidence seems to point to his being in love, and the most likely object of his affection is Bassanio.Antonio has risked the entirety of his fortune on oversea trading ventures, yet he agrees to guarantee the potentially lethal loan Bassanio secures from Shylock. He is willing to offer up a pound of flesh, signifying a union that grotesquely alludes to the rite of marriage, where two partners become “one flesh”. Further evidence of the nature of Antonio‟s feelings for Bassanio appears later in the play, when Antonio‟s proclamat ions resonate with the hyperbole and self-satisfaction of a doomed lover‟s declaration: “pray God Bassanio come/ To see me pay his debt, and then I care not”②(Act Ⅲ, Scene III, 35-36) without a mate, he is indeed the “tainted wether”—or castrated ram—of the flock, and he will likely return to his favorite pastime of moping about the streets of Venice②(Act Ⅳ, Scene I, 113). After all, he has effectively disabled himself from pursuing hid hobby—abusing Shylock—by insisting that the Jew convert to Christianity. Although a 16th century audience might have seen this demand as merciful, as Shylock is saving himself from eternal damnation by converting, we are less likely to be convinced. Not only does Antonio‟s reputation as an anti-Semite precede him, but the only instance in the play when he breaks out of his doldrums in his “storm” against Shylock②(ActⅠ, Scene III, 132). In this play, Antonio proves his character is melancholy, cruelty and some seldom saying—homosexual.B. BassanioIt is said Middle Ages is th e most deathly stillness period in Europe. It also can be seemed it‟s the time that west Europe‟s culture and literature go to grave. As to the pillar of spirit, there is nothing except a total series of religious doctrine. In this environment, people used compliment and boast words to exchange their minds and thoughts. In that society, everyone remain under artificial mask wandered in different kinds of occasion. An absolutely undisguised money relationship makes the true human nature into ash during the masks scraped each other. Bassanio, a noble who is neatly dressed, whose speech and deportment is natural and graceful, gradually becomes a declining aristocrat by spending without restraint. He is a handsome and intelligent young man. But living in such a society, what his every day‟s schedule is to squander money on different meeting and use blandishment speech to talk with other aristocrat. His property is limitation. Once he runs behind his expenses, he will ask his best friend—the wealth merchant in Venice—Antonio for money. From the context, it seems he never returned what he borrowed. To be such a man who wants of lofty aspiration. Maybe the best method frees himself from poverty is to get a profitable marriage. And we mostly can make sure; to obtain money is more important than to marry Portia. This can be improved in later—he gives his bride‟s ring to the clerk. Although his lover has declared that if he loses her ring, she will never pardon him.C. ShylockShylock in this play is the antagonist. He is the model of usurer. Most people read him as a bogeyman, a clownish Jewish stereotype. He is selfish, curtly, avaricious and niggard. Once he hasthe chance to revenge his foe. He will try his best to make the other into deathtrap. In the court, he is clam and wisdom, even fights for several Christian‟s joint attack. But most of his speech is coarse, and sometimes “mean”. All of this makes people take unkindly to him. But with the several aspects sagacious with Antonio, it makes him be a mult-personality figure. Being a pagan who lives in Christian society he has strong emotion on racial constriction and the enthusiasm of raising Jewish people‟s status. Living in this soci ety, he suffers too much public humiliation and oppression as he says in the following:“He hath disgraced me, and hinder‟d me half a million; laught at my loss, mockt at my gains, scorn‟d my nation, thwarted my bargains, cooled my friends, heated mine enemies; and what‟s his reason? I am a Jew. Hath not a Jew eyes? Hath not a Jew hands, organs, dimensions, senses, affections, passions? Fed with the same food, hurt with the same weapons, subject to the same diseases, heal‟d by the same means, warm‟d and cool‟d by the same winter and summer, as a Christian is? If you prick us, do we not bleed? If you tickle us, do we not laught? If you porion us, do we not die? And if you wrong us, shall we not revenge?” ②(Act ⅢSceneⅠ50-63)His frequently mentions of the cruelty he has endured at Christian hands make it hard for us to label him a natural born monster. Shylock argues that Jews are humans and calls his quest for vengeance the product of lessons taught to him by the cruelty of Venice citizens. In such condition, his “malicious” is much more reasonable.Besides the facial of Shylock‟s malignance, actually, he is a person whose sense of decency has been fractured by the persecution he endures. Comparatively, those kindness and wisdom Christian, in fact, have another hideous feature. So, in my mind, Shylock is a man who is worth sympathizing.III. Analyzing the Central Character in the Novel--PortiaThe girl embodies the virtues that are typical for Shakespeare‟s heroines--it has no surprise that she emerges as the antidote to Shylock‟s malice. She is the pretty-witted aristocrat young girl. She is enthusiasm and graceful; resourceful and humorous; wealthy and beautiful. She is the perfect female who glitters the humanism ideal in her life. This is Portia.A. The Essential Nature of PortiaAt the beginning of the play, however, we do not see Portia‟s potential for initiative and resourcefulness, as she is a near prisoner, feeling herself absolutely bound to follow her father‟s dying wishes. This open appearance, however, proves to be a revealing introduction to Portia, who emerges as that rarest of combinations--a free spirit who abides rigidly by rules. When Bassanio asks Belmont to choose his chest, she proves herself to be highly resourceful, begging the man she lo ves to stay a while before picking a chest, and finding loophole in the will‟s provision that we never thought possible. Also, in her defeat of Shylock, she prevails by applying a more rigid standard than Shylock, agreeing that he can get a pound of flesh, but adding that it does not to allow for any loss of blood. Anybody can break the rules, but Portia‟s effectiveness comes from her ability to make the law work for her. After depriving Bassanio of his ring, she stops the prank before it goes far, and she even insinuates that she has been unfaithful. These entire can proves Portia‟s wit, resource, and humorB. The Humanism Spirit Shown by PortiaPortia is the main character in this play. She embodies the virtues that are typical for Shakespeare‟s heroines. Being a wealth young girl, she is beautiful, gentle and tender, and full ofstratagems. She lives in Belmont--a peaceful world, and recruits the newest ideological trends. So, her mind is equipped by humanism. She is a cute girl, even her father‟s behest; she would like to abide by. Humanism has several contents. One of them is the Rationalism object to Obscurantism. It advocates treasuring people intelligent. And it is said the most reason of people is dignity depending on the power of rational. Rational is human‟s nature, science is the source of joyful. So, when Bassanio arrives, Portia use her resourceful mind to call his attention to pick the correct chest.I pray you, tarry: pause a day or twoBefore you hazard; for, in choosing wrong,I lost your company: therefore, forbear a while. ②(Act ⅢSceneⅡ1-5)……Before you venture for me. I could teach youHow to choose right……The seeming truth which cunning times put onTo entrap the wisest. Therefore, thou gaudy gold,Hard food for Midas, I will none of thee;Nor none of thee, thou stale and common drudge,Tween man and man: but thou, thou meager lead,Which rather threatenest than dost promise aught,Thy paleness moves me more than eloquence;And here choose I: ---Joy be the consequence! ②(Act ⅢSceneⅡ100-107)This is the evidence that Portia never resigns herself to her fate. In order to peruse her own happiness and love, she makes use of her wisdom obeyed her father‟s will as well as marry with the Mr. Right. This is one aspect. The other one is that when she argued with Shylock to act defense as a means of attack on the court, and consolidate at every step. Shylock thought he encountered bosom friend at beginning. And later, suddenly he realized he has lost his preponderance. Portia‟s brilliance talent and Shylock‟s weakened defense, both make people cannot help laughing. Considered her attitude towards love and the performance she acts on court. There is no doubt that she is a remarkable humanist.C. Portia--a Self-conscious FemalePortia is a beautiful, dignity and wealth girl. And the most important thing is she obtains strongly female self-consciousness. She knows what is she needs, and try her best to pursue. She has an insight into the world which she exists—the code of ethics, the value…, she knows what‟s the role she plays. So, she can vacillate freely in the male society, gets her goal and not to go against the rules. In this play, it seems she just does two things: help her to choose a husband; help her husband to rescue Antonio. Both of them have fully demonstrated her intelligence, and reveal her anti-tradition figure. It‟s the time when she chooses her hus band to show her ability to suit male society. Portia not only has the female self-consciousness, but also understands thoroughly what is the status and role woman obtains in male society. She knows the method which keeps away from conflicts. To her husband, she is an angle: sheepish, tender and obedient. When Bassanio chooses the correct casket, she immediately says she is an “unwise, lack-education girl”. Is she really so humble? No. Portia knows very clearly that man dislikes woman is more sensibleand prior than men themselves. So she makes her modest on purpose. But at the same she would like to show her important role when she gives her ring to Bassanio, she says:Myself and what is mine to you and yoursIs now converted: but now I was the lordOf this fair mansion, master of my servants,Queen O‟er myself; and even now, but now,This house, these servants, and this same myself,Are yours, my lord: I give them with this ring;Which when you part from, lose, or give away,Let it persage the ruin of your love,And be my vantage to exclaim on you.②The aim to be said like that is to remind Bassanio she is the very one that‟s thereal master in her family. In other words, she is the protagonist in the play, and the male is the costar who stands on the pasive, subordinary rim, and they always do as one is told. This figure-portray denied the traditon gender relationship makes female go from “rim” to “center”, from “object” to “subject”. It’s to deny the traditio nal female conception. And on the other hand, all of those shows Portia is a personality liberation woman.D. An Explanation on Portia Masquerading as ManThe period when the Merchant of Venice was created was called Shakespeare‟s comedy period. During this period Shakespeare shaped humanities and the arts. British Queen Elizabeth I is in the heyday of the rule, monarchy solid and economic prosperity. Shakespeare in the social reality of the ideals of humanism will be achieved confidence, optimism works filled with forthright and bright colors. There is an idiom said “British is the paradise for woman, and the hell for steed” , which means British female enjoy more free than male, and usually male should adhere to their wife. And the fact related to this is woman benefited more education, especially humanism. Most of Shakespeare‟s heroines have been considered the model of Queen Elizabeth.③In the Merchant of Venice, Portia is a miss in a noble family. She is bored with spoon. Her nature is lovely, smart, and witty and evens some naughty. Her homeland is splendid and luxurious. Having some propriety status, Portia worries about nothing, and even late when she chooses her husband, she doesn‟t think it‟s necessary to choose someone who have the equal socioeconomic status. This is one reason why Portia would show her heart to Bassanio--a declining noble. Absorbing the latest ideology, her ideological level has been improved very high. She is intelligent and resourceful. When she has known her husband‟s best friend have been accused. In her mind, a good idea has been emerged prior to go to court and fight against Shylock.But there is the key problem--why does Portia masquerade as man? Wouldn‟t she go to the court with her own dress? Why should she disguise herself as a black-robed judge? These are the complicated questions in the context. In my opinion, there are three reasons to explain this phenomenon.It is the fact that woman‟s status has been improved a lot, especially at Elizabeth‟srealm. There is another important factor about Shakespeare‟s comedy is “heroes in dress” as one says: “British are the paradise for woman and the hell for steed”. In Shakespeare‟s comedy, female not only is the protagonist, but also holds the thread of details, and very erudite. Portia dresses in black robe, the first function is to pile comedy effect on, and throws the comedy atmosphere intosharp relief. The second function is the following: because humanism consists that the world they inhabit is not to despise but to question, explore, and enjoy. Thus, by emphasizing the dignity of human beings and the importance of the present life, they voice their beliefs that man does not only have the right to enjoy the beauty of this life, but has the ability to perfect himself and to perform wonders. And advocate that woman should be treated equal to man. Human is bored equal.④Shakespeare creates Portia, and gives her the endowment to dress up as man. And by using her unruly female speech, the function is to emphasize woman should be treated equally to man. Even sometimes woman is much more excellent than man. Maybe this is the Shakespeare‟s (as a humanist) expectation. The last but not the least function is: although woman‟s status has been promoted, and the humanism ideological wave is sticking strongly out at the feudalism. Males and females treated differently have deep roots in everybody‟s mind, including females themselves. Portia is clever enough. But she still is a people in the world. She also must obey the rules of convention. Some critics say:“When Elizabeth Ⅰ, ruled the realm, the majority of woman found their access to the public sphere decreasing, as the economic roles they played in the late medieval period contracted. Recurrent inflation, land shortages and poverty combined to create a …crisis of order‟, though it developed new, and in some cases quite subtle, tactics for enforcing the subordination of woman. Although the protestant belief in the spiritual equality of men and women according some women greater spiritual dignity and power, and fostered as well a more …companionate‟ and affectionate mode of marriage, th ese gains did not translate into economic, political, or social equality”⑤( Susan Amussen, 1988 and Merry E.Weisner, 1993)At the back of Portia‟s immortality, the play shows us the woman‟s bitter which they have beard so long. As an excellent girl, she ca n‟t enter court naturally, instead she masquerades as man. To establish the central status of human, their dignity and value; to advocate the love and equality; and of these are just to work for the expectation and demand of man, there is no business of woman. Above all, there is the plot that Portia masquerades as man in the play.IV. A Comparative Study of Characteristic DifferencesAs we know, this comedy is very light and joyful. Also its theme is very clean. But many criticisms have analyzed the figure s in different angles. So it‟s inevitable to make a comparison among the roles.A. Portia and JessicaBoth of them are the important roles in this play. And both have a wealth father. The basic difference is Portia living in Belmont, a peaceful, quiet place. And Jessica lives in Venice, which is a city full of pedal, bourgeoisie and smell of money. As we say…circumstance creates human‟ Portia is witty, brave, and humorous, and there is always a clever maid for company. They enjoy themselves and live a very happy life. By contrast, Jessica, a lonely girl, because of her father‟s niggard and heartless, she has no friend. What she does everyday is just stay at home where is a place called …gloomy jail‟. She can‟t go out to have a play; even can‟t open the windo w to have a breath. Her father always worry someone will steal their money and jewels. Shylock is the awful father to her. She never dears to say no to her father. So, when she encounters her love---a Christian young man, Lorenzo. She has nothing to do just packs some money and elopes with him: Jessica: Alack, what heinous sin is it in meTo be ashamed to be my father‟s child!But though I am a daughter to his blood.I am not to his manners. Oh, Lorenzo,If thou keep promise, I will end this strife,Become a Christian and thy loving wife!②( Act II ,Scene III, P64, 15-22)Here, we can say, the two girls have courage to pursue their own happiness. But Portia‟s happiness is hinge on her wit. Although she is bound to her dead father‟s will. She still helps Bass anio to choose the correct chest with her wit. To audience, it‟s more gratification to be accepted. And it‟s a pity for Jessica to choose the elopement for their love.B. Portia and ShylockPortia is a humanist and she is the embodiment of kind, clever, and bravery. She is the person who is leading the trend of society, also we call her “trend—setter”. By contrast, Shylock stands for usurer who is ignorant and backward. Absolutely, they are run in the opposite direction. This is the knot that they will conflict directly. The wonderful performance of their conflicts is shown on Scene Ⅳ—the struggle on court. The way that Portia crosses sword with Shylock is similar to Duke with he. Both persuade him first. The little difference is Duke has no alternative and Portia has a well-thought-out plan. She wins the case with her wit. We can‟t hold ourselves to think Shylock is defeated by a girl who is as old as his daughter. At that time, he has just lost his daughter. What a pity it is! And at last, Shylock loses all he has—wealth, daughter and religion. At that moment, Shylock‟s misfortunes tend to make him a more sympathetic figure than a comic one. “When you lost something, another one is retuning to you.” Maybe that is the true mighty of Shakespeare.C. Antonio and BassanioOne is the rich merchant of Venice. He is the representative figure of growing bourgeois. He is ostentatious and is generous in aiding needy people. He always lends his money to other without interest. So he obtains much good praise. The other one is a profligate son of the rich. He is the embodiment of powerful noble. Except Usurer and Feudalism, they are the dazzling figure in commercialized society. One obtains numerous money; the other has admirable class status. They are the bosom friend in reality. “Money” and “power” work quite well between their friendships. They are Antonio and Bassanio. We nearly can awaken there are some intimate relationship from their name. No matter if it‟s the planned on purp ose by author. Both they are very young and handsome. They always have some special smell scattered from their body that you can strike in their every breath. Is it purity kindness or bewitching eye light? Their friendship has been established firmly. Antonio helps Bassanio over his economic collapse. In turn, Bassanio usually listen to Antonio‟s innermost feeling and the hitch on business. Before Portia goes up to the stage, they just like a pairs of “sweet lover”. But they aren‟t lover, and not a combined community. Antonio is a merchant and he has worried so many affairs about his business. Maybe the only entertainment item is to scold every unmoral action acted by Shylock and to excoriate his curtness, selfishness, stinginess and berate. What these all would happen like that, the reason just because Shylock is Jew. They are the conflicts of two opposite ideas, identification, convention and religions.Bassanio although is a noble, actually he is a declining aristocrat. He has squandered his money at different meeting, gathering and on woman. Not to speak so tactful, he is a playboy who never plans to get a job or doing some business. Instead, he would like to life his head from a profitable marriage. When he borrows money from Antonio as chip to pursuing Portia. Antonio says:I pray you, good Bassanio, let me know it;。
莎士比亚戏剧《威尼斯商人》的人物形象分析
莎士比亚戏剧《威尼斯商人》的人物形象分析摘要：莎士比亚是英国著名的剧作家，他的戏剧蕴含着非常深刻的含义，他笔下的人物形象刻画的也非常的生动。
《威尼斯商人》是莎士比亚最为知名的讽刺喜剧之一，本文通过梳理剧中的人物形象，从个人的观剧角度出发，结合具体的社会状况，对剧中的主要人物形象以及剧情发展的方向进行解读。
关键词：莎士比亚、《威尼斯商人》、喜剧、人物形象威尼斯的一个落魄的贵族青年巴萨尼奥想要前往贝尔蒙向富家女鲍西娅求婚，可是因为他没有钱所以向他的朋友安东尼奥求助，但当下安东尼奥的所有的家产全部投在了远洋贸易上，现阶段他没有现钱借给巴萨尼奥。
于是，他为巴萨尼奥向自己的死对头犹太富商夏洛克借了钱。
安东尼奥和夏洛克因为宗教差异和种族歧视的问题一直存在着矛盾。
当听到安东尼奥的借钱请求后，他同意无利息借钱给安东尼奥，但是必须在双方约定的还款时间内把钱还给他，如果没有在约定的时间内把钱还上就要从安东尼奥身上割下一磅肉。
安东尼奥觉得自己的船队一定会顺利归来，他便签下了这个契约。
巴萨尼奥有了金钱的帮助，又成功的经过了求婚者品德的检验，终于娶到了鲍西娅。
而这个时候，安东尼奥和夏洛克约定还款的日期已经到了，但安东尼奥的船却一艘也没有回来，夏洛克起诉了安东尼奥。
而此时已成为富翁的巴萨尼奥携巨款赶到了庭审现场，提出加倍偿还欠款，夏洛克却断然拒绝，他一定要依据契约处置安东尼奥。
正在这个时候，鲍西娅假扮法官赶到了现场，鲍西娅对他们所签的契约做了字面意义的解释：一，夏洛克只能割安东尼奥的肉，却不能让他流血；二，所割肉的重量必须不多不少恰好一磅。
夏洛克承认自己无法做到这两点，只好认输。
此时鲍西娅告诉公爵，夏洛克企图谋害一位威尼斯公民的性命，依据威尼斯法律，公爵可以判处夏洛克死刑，同时将夏洛克的财产一半充公，另一半判给被谋害者安东尼奥，直到夏洛克死后再归还给其法定继承人。
公爵宽宏大度，免除了夏洛克的死刑，也放弃了夏洛克一半的财产，安东尼奥则表示，他愿意接收公爵的判决，条件是夏洛克必须皈依基督教。
《威尼斯商人》课文人物解读
《威尼斯商人》课文人物解读人物分析：夏洛克的全面逆袭，解读反差很大，夏洛克要被看作是民族英雄了?文章还从夏洛克的性格入手解读他消极的，积极的性格以及悲剧的根源。
我的解读就是围绕着三个问题展开，然后谈谈我的思考：1.夏洛克究竟向谁复仇?2.夏洛克的信仰是什么?3.基督精神是否能拯救夏洛克?(一)夏洛克究竟该向谁复仇?“……我只能说我喜欢这样。
……除了因为我对于安东尼奥抱着久积的仇恨和深刻的反感，所以才会向他进行着一场对于我自己并没有好处的诉讼。
”“什么!你愿意被毒蛇咬两次吗?“”“……好多次您在交易所立骂我，说我盘剥取利，我总是忍气吞声，耸耸肩膀，没有和您争辩，忍受迫害本来是我们民族的特色……唾沫吐在我犹太长袍上……”(屈辱感源自这些词语)“只因为我用自己的钱博取几个利息……”(不这么做，我怎么生存?)啊!原来如此!只因为象一个顽皮的男孩子的对夏洛克谩骂，吐唾沫了，也许，事后，安东尼奥自己都忘了，可是夏洛夏洛克克却久久无法释怀,恨得咬牙切齿。
究竟是什么放大了他的疼痛，让他觉得如此屈辱，不杀不快!把安东尼奥和夏洛克放在时代背景下，宗教的背景下，价值观的背景下，民族的背景下，我们不难发现，这些矛盾由来已久，两个人都不自觉得被打上了烙印，贴上了标签。
所以夏洛克象一个塞满火药的火药桶，擦着火星就要引爆。
细读文本，不难发现。
以安东尼奥、巴萨尼奥为首的威尼斯商人包括公爵在内，都称夏洛克为异族人、异教徒轻蔑之情溢于言表，而夏洛克也是奋起“反击”。
夏洛克：“这些便是相信基督教的丈夫!我有一个女儿，我宁愿她嫁给强盗的子孙，不愿她嫁给一个基督徒。
别再浪费光阴了;请快些宣判吧。
”(民族的冲突，宗教信仰的冲突多么尖锐!更是一个弱势民族对于自己尊严的捍卫!)从夏洛克的回应中，不难看出其也有自尊的一面，潜台词：你们看不起我，我还看不起你们呢!他对尊严越是捍卫，疼痛感和屈辱感就越强烈。
夏洛克：“忍受迫害本来是我们民族的特色……唾沫吐在我的犹太长袍上……只因为我用我自己的钱博取几个利息……”(我也要生存啊!)安东尼奥：“哪有朋友之间通融几个钱，也要斤斤计较的计算利息的道理……”(一磅肉又算得了什么?)安东尼奥和夏洛克牟利是方式不同的、金钱观价值观截然不同。
《威尼斯商人》中的人物形象分析
《威尼斯商人》中的人物形象分析作者：谢冬乐来源：《神州·下旬刊》2019年第01期摘要：《威尼斯商人》出自欧洲文艺复兴时期著名戏剧家莎士比亚之笔，诞生于16世纪末，是一部极具讽刺意味的喜剧。
本文以《威尼斯商人》这部戏剧作品的人物形象作为研究视角，集中分析了夏洛克、安东尼奥、鲍西亚的人物形象。
希望可以为广大高中生更好的理解《威尼斯商人》这部作品带去参考与借鉴。
关键词：《威尼斯商人》;任务形象;分析前言：《威尼斯商人》作为莎士比亚的代表作，故事围绕着三条线索展开：其一是鲍西亚与巴萨尼奥的爱情故事;其二是夏洛克与安东尼奥的债务纠纷;其三就是夏洛克的女儿私奔。
整部作品呈现出了喜剧的特点，但是故事情节却非常跌宕起伏，呈现出了极强的讽刺意蕴。
而若想深入的理解《威尼斯商人》，感知其中所蕴含的人性思考首先需要做的就是理解人物形象，进而理清人物关系与矛盾，最终才能分析出戏剧大师莎士比亚的戏剧特点，感受其内在的深刻道理。
一、夏洛克在拜读《威尼斯商人》的过程中，相信大部分同学都与我的感受是一样的，对夏洛克这一人物所产生的印象是最深的，的确在整部作品当中夏洛克是最惹人注目的人物，夏洛克可以用八个字来形容：贪婪、吝啬、冷酷、无情。
所以他与留希金、葛朗台、阿巴贡共同称之为“四大守财奴”。
夏洛克是一名犹太人，在他的生活中是吝啬贪婪的，并且处理事情的时候心胸十分狭隘，具有极强的报复心。
夏洛克在将钱借给安东尼奥的时候，自己首先提出了不要利息，但是在安东尼奥不能按时归还钱财的时候，他却提出了用安东尼奥的胸口肉偿还，可见夏洛克最开始的目的就是要将安东尼奥置于死地。
在夏洛克与安东尼奥走上公堂的时候，所表现出的是一种无人性的冷酷，即使在对簿公堂的过程中他败诉了，依然没有放弃追求三倍的赔偿，这足以体现在这个人物身上的贪婪性。
夏洛克对于金钱具有无限的热爱，他的生意就是放高利贷，但是安东尼奥却是一个善人，借给别人钱的时候是不收利息的，这无异于阻断了夏洛克获取财富的渠道[1]。
《威尼斯商人》中的人物形象分析
《威尼斯商人》中的人物形象分析《威尼斯商人》是英国戏剧家莎士比亚的经典作品之一，其中刻画了众多丰满、复杂的人物形象。
以下是对几位主要人物形象的分析：1.安东尼奥安东尼奥是《威尼斯商人》中的主要人物之一，他是一个充满矛盾和复杂性的角色。
一方面，他是一位慷慨大度、充满爱心和善良的人，愿意为朋友和爱人付出一切。
另一方面，他是一个过于感性、容易受到情感左右的人，常常因此而做出错误的决定。
在故事中，他为了帮助朋友巴萨尼奥，毫不犹豫地答应了犹太商人夏洛克的苛刻条件，结果导致自己陷入困境。
安东尼奥的矛盾和复杂性还表现在他的商业活动中。
他是一位成功的商人，拥有丰富的商业经验和智慧。
然而，他在商业活动中也表现出一些自私和短视的行为，这些行为给他带来了很多麻烦。
尽管如此，安东尼奥的善良和慷慨最终还是得到了回报，他的朋友巴萨尼奥在关键时刻救了他。
2.巴萨尼奥巴萨尼奥是《威尼斯商人》中的另一位主要人物，他是一个充满矛盾和复杂性的角色。
一方面，他是一位富有、英俊、有教养的绅士，受到很多人的尊敬和爱戴。
另一方面，他是一个自私、冷酷、不择手段的人，为了达到目的可以不惜伤害他人。
在故事中，他为了追求财富和地位，不惜背叛自己的爱人鲍西娅，与犹太商人夏洛克签订合约，最终导致自己陷入困境。
巴萨尼奥的矛盾和复杂性还表现在他对安东尼奥的态度上。
虽然他与安东尼奥是好朋友，但他还是为了自己的利益不择手段地利用安东尼奥。
在关键时刻，巴萨尼奥的自私和冷酷让他失去了自己的财富和地位，但他的爱情得到了回报，他最终与鲍西娅重逢并得到了她的原谅。
3.鲍西娅鲍西娅是《威尼斯商人》中的女主角，她是一个美丽、聪明、独立自主的女性。
她拥有着强烈的个性和自我意识，敢于追求自己的梦想和幸福。
在故事中，鲍西娅是一位富有的女继承人，但她并不满足于被动地接受命运安排的角色，而是主动追求自己的幸福。
她拒绝了众多求婚者，直到她遇到了穷贵族安东尼奥。
鲍西娅与安东尼奥相爱并结婚，但她却因此失去了自己的财产和地位。
威尼斯商人人物分析
前言本小组从故事的梗概、艺术特色、人物形象、主题四个方面来解读《威尼斯商人》，主要侧重于前三个，前三个中有突出人物形象的分析，人物分析中又引申出“表象后的本质”。
故事梗概年轻貌美的富家女子鲍西亚，按照她父亲的遗嘱，得到了金、银、铅三个盒子。
其中一个盒子里面装着她的画像，如果哪位先生选择了正确的盒子，那么她将嫁给那个男人。
于是，求婚者从世界的四面八方赶来……有一位名叫巴萨尼奥的年轻人，他下定决心要赢得鲍西亚。
但是，要想达成这个愿望，得准备一笔不小的费用。
于是，他向富有的威尼斯商人安东尼奥求助，希望这位好友能借给他3000块钱。
不巧，安东尼奥的钱都投入到了海上贸易，一时拿不出那么多钱。
但安东尼奥是位非常看重友情的基督徒。
他立定心志要成全朋友的美事，以自己的信用为担保，替朋友借债。
因此，高利贷夏洛克便成了安东尼奥的债主。
借债时双方约定：“三个月为期限，到期不还，由债权人在债务人身上割一磅肉作为处罚。
”结果，安东尼奥的海上贸易受阻，未能按期还款。
于是夏洛克要求法庭准许他按照契约约定割下安东尼奥身上的一磅肉。
高利贷夏洛克认为订立的契约就必须守约，谁也不能违背或改变。
因此，夏洛克一定要按照约定割一磅肉。
他在法庭上对法官说：“我的要求是合理的。
您要是拒绝了我，那么你们的法律就见鬼去吧！”对此，作为被告的威尼斯商人安东尼奥心里也清楚，法官不能变更法律的规定。
夏洛克的要求非常过分，但在场的所有人员也必须得承认：“在威尼斯谁也没有权力变更既成的法律。
”合同必须信守，安东尼奥必须履行自己的诺言。
契约虽然残忍，但是，在商贸非常发达威尼斯，社会成员都按契约办事，并不考虑其他非法律、非契约手段。
面对这一磅肉的事实，固守契约似乎违反了人情，如果尊重人情，似乎又蔑视了契约。
在人情和契约之间，法庭还是选择了契约。
到最后关头，夏洛克还是放下了屠刀。
让他改变主意的，并不是谁的哀求,也不是良心反悔，仍然是契约。
当初，安东尼奥和夏洛克签订契约时，只规定了一磅肉，只字未提因割肉而流出来的血。
广东中考语文总复习中考解读阅读理解第四章名著阅读第十部威尼斯商人主要内容素材
最新中小学教案、试题、试卷第四章名著阅读第十部《威尼斯商人》主要内容素材鲍西娅，一个富人的女儿，按照父亲的遗嘱，她得到了三个盒子：一个金盒，一个银盒，还有一个铅盒。
其中一个里面装着她的画像，如果哪个男人选对了盒子，那么她将嫁给那个男人。
于是，求婚者从世界各地云集到这儿，都希望能得到她。
鲍西娅对任何人都心怀戒心，唯独对有过一面之缘的巴萨尼奥情有独钟。
应征的人中，摩洛哥亲王选了金盒子，阿拉贡亲王选了银盒子，都没有选中。
镇上的年轻人巴萨尼奥，他下定决心要赢得鲍西娅。
但是，为了达成自己的愿望，他需要三千达克特，这可是一大笔钱。
于是，他向好友——富商安东尼奥求助，希望安东尼奥能借给他这笔钱。
然而，由于在海上投入的钱还没收回，安东尼奥暂时也无法拿出这么多钱，于是安东尼奥被迫向另外一个富有的犹太放债人——夏洛克借这笔钱。
安东尼奥和夏洛克都不喜欢对方：对于安东尼奥来说，他看不起放高利贷的，另一方面，还因为夏洛克是犹太人；对于夏洛克来说，安东尼奥借钱给人从不收利息，这样就损害了他的利益。
尽管如此，在这种情况下，夏洛克还是同意借钱给安东尼奥，而且也不收他的利息，但是夏洛克提出了一个奇怪的要求：如果安东尼奥不能如期还钱的话，他将会从安东尼奥身上割下一磅肉。
巴萨尼奥去了贝尔蒙特，他选择了正确的盒子——铅盒，也就是装有鲍西娅的画像的盒子，赢得了她。
与此同时，鲍西娅的女仆尼莉莎接受了葛莱西安诺的求婚；夏洛克的女儿杰西卡同自己的爱人克里斯汀·罗伦佐私奔了，并且偷走了她父亲的钱和珠宝。
而夏洛克也因为失去自己的女儿和钱财心情烦乱……当他得知安东尼奥在海上的投资全部丧失的消息之后，他决定向安东尼奥讨回借款。
在法庭上，夏洛克要求安东尼奥履行借约。
鲍西娅和尼莉莎假扮律师，为安东尼奥辩论。
鲍西娅同意夏洛克按照契约规定割下安东尼奥的一磅肉，但是割这一磅肉必须严格按照契约执行，就是不能多割也不能少割，而且不能流一滴血，也不能因此伤害安东尼奥的性命。
莎士比亚的《威尼斯商人》中的人物形象分析
102莎士比亚的《威尼斯商人》中的人物形象分析郭乃荣（河北大学 中央兰开夏传媒与创意学院，河北 保定 071000）摘 要：文艺复兴时期，莎士比亚集百家之大成，又善用修辞和比喻，创作出许多闻名世界的戏剧。
作为莎士比亚四大喜剧之一的《威尼斯商人》，反讽了当时金钱至上的社会，莎士比亚借而传达出他的人文主义思想。
故事由借高利贷展开，其中又有3条线索交错发展。
从故事创作的社会背景来看，17世纪的英国打败了西班牙，英国海上贸易发展迅猛，整个社会处于一种金钱至上的浮躁状态。
莎士比亚的人文主义思想与当时的社会现实存在矛盾，他借《威尼斯商人》传达自己的人文主义思想和对当时社会的讽刺。
关键词：莎士比亚；《威尼斯商人》；人物形象中图分类号：J805 文献标志码：A 文章编号：1674-8883（2020）01-0102-01一、故事结构分析莎士比亚创作的《威尼斯商人》这部戏剧，取材于民间故事和古典作品。
这部戏剧的故事情节是：威尼斯的绅士巴萨尼奥向贝尔蒙的富家姑娘鲍西娅求婚，由于缺乏钱财，巴萨尼奥向安东尼奥借钱，但安东尼奥资金也有些紧张，便向放高利贷的夏洛克借了3000块，夏洛克因与安东尼奥素来有恩怨，他便利用安东尼奥的情况危急迫使安东尼奥签了一个借约，借约中写道：“如果不能在规定的日期和地点还钱，就要在欠债人的胸前割下一磅肉。
”巴萨尼奥在朋友的帮助下历尽千辛万苦终于追求到了自己的幸福，可是意外的情况发生了，安东尼奥的商船发生事故，这导致安东尼奥不能到期履行债务。
夏洛克因为安东尼奥和他抢生意，自己挣不到钱，便想通过这次机会置安东尼奥于死地。
［1］在危难关头，鲍西亚扮成律师，在法庭上与夏洛克争辩，因为合同中写了一磅肉，便要求夏洛克在不能让安东尼奥流血的情况下取下一磅肉，夏洛克因为不能履行而没有得逞。
剧中的3条情节线索交错发展：第一条是安东尼奥和夏洛克围绕一磅肉的诉讼而发生的冲突；第二条是巴萨尼奥努力追求鲍西亚并最终获得幸福的爱情故事；第三条是夏洛克的女儿与安东尼奥的朋友碰撞出爱情的火花而私奔的事。
《威尼斯商人》中的人物形象分析
孟祥尧 白城师范学院外国语学院，吉林白城 137000
[摘要] 《威尼斯商人》是莎士比亚的著名戏剧作品，也是一部喜剧作品。 莎翁在《威尼斯商人》中塑造了夏洛克、安东尼 奥、鲍西娅等富有个性的人物形象，深受读者的喜爱。 本文对《威尼斯商人》中的主要人物形象进行了分析，并探讨了 《威尼斯商人》的人物形象塑造中存在的矛盾性。 [关键词] 人物形象；《威尼斯商人》；矛盾性
５４
尽管作者莎士比亚有意将夏洛克塑造为一个反面人物， 但是夏洛克本身也并非毫无优点。 在夏洛克与安东尼奥的交 往中可以看出，他是一个忠于自己的民族信仰、聪明机变的 人。 特别是面对法庭中众人的指责，夏洛克表现出异常的冷 静和超人的口才。
夏洛克身上的贪婪、吝啬、狠毒，都与其作为犹太商人的 身份有关。 维多利亚时代，在基督教的影响下，犹太人被视为 二等公民，不能拥有土地，也不能加入商会，无法从事正常的 商业和手工业，在社会交往中低人一等，也无法受到法律的保 护。 正是由于犹太人社会身份的低下，使夏洛克虽然积聚了一 定的金钱，却仍然无法从事正常的工业和商业活动，只能依靠 放贷为生，加之其逐渐年老，使其对金钱形成了极度的依赖。 从夏洛克的贪婪和吝啬中也可以看到夏洛克作为一个二等公 民的不安全感， 正是这种不安全感使夏洛克逐渐成为了一个 守财奴。 身为犹太人，夏洛克处处受人鄙视、欺辱，始终处于社 会的 底 层 ，但 是 他 仍 然 对 自 己 的 民 族 和 宗 教 怀 有 坚 定 的 信 仰 ， 对基督徒怀有深刻的仇恨。 正是这种不安全感和仇恨感，使夏 洛克千方百计地希望能够置安东尼奥于死地。
作为莎士比亚的一部重要喜剧作品，《威尼斯商人》除了 具有曲折的故事情节和优美的语言之外，还塑造了一批充满 个性的人物形象，例如守财奴夏洛克、具有人文主。
莎士比亚《威尼斯商人》中人物形象分析修改
莎士比亚《威尼斯商人》中人物形象分析摘要：英国著名作家、世界大文豪莎士比亚的戏剧作品《威尼斯商人》因其对善良、友情和爱情的歌颂而闻名世界，成为国际文坛著名的喜剧。
它以鲜明的时代特征与生动的人物形象而铸就了非凡的品质。
本文将对剧中的重要人物，通过另一个视角进行详细分析。
关键词：《威尼斯商人》；人物；形象莎士比亚是英国16——17世纪伟大的文学家，世界文学巨匠。
他是欧洲文艺复兴时期的代表人物，在戏剧、文学领域取得了辉煌成就，被后人称为人类历史上最伟大的文学天才，文学史上的宙斯，英国的戏剧之父。
他一生留下了许多闻名世界的文学作品，大多数被翻译成多种文字而流传于世，他的戏剧作品也被排演成多种形式，在全球各地上演。
虽然悲剧作品是这位艺术大师的拿手之作，但是他的喜剧同样令人赞赏，而他喜剧作品中最为经典的代表作就是《威尼斯商人》。
莎士比亚生活的时代正是欧洲资本主义兴起的时期，那时的英国发生了历史上有名的“圈地运动”，土地迅速集中到新兴资产阶级手中，大量的农民失去土地，沦为资本家工厂里的廉价劳动力，城市中资产阶级通过榨取剩余价值，大肆盘剥工人、手工业者与贫民，社会矛盾不断激化，阶级对立越来越明显。
再加上自然灾害盛行，农业受到严重打击，通货膨胀也越来越严重，社会上有一股反抗压迫与剥削的情绪在无产阶级中暗潮涌动。
在这种社会环境下，莎士比亚将人文主义理想与社会现实巧妙地结合在一起，完成了他文学生涯中数量不多但是经典非凡的几部喜剧作品，借以讽刺当时的政府及社会制度。
在所有这些作品中，《威尼斯商人》是最能体现莎士比亚讽刺意味的经典佳作。
莎士比亚将剧中的人物刻画得个性鲜明，栩栩如生，展现了文学大师的艺术魅力。
为了深入了解这部经典喜剧的艺术内涵，下文将对剧中主要人物一一评析。
一、夏洛克表面上看来，夏洛克只是剧中一个反面形象的代表，并不是主角，其实，从深层意义上将，这个沦为时代牺牲品的可怜的犹太人才是戏剧的核心人物，是读者乃至作者心中最具讽刺意味的主角。
_威尼斯商人_主要人物分析
《威尼斯商人》主要人物分析岑莉外国文学研究2010年第8期N O.8摘要：“英国戏剧之父”莎士比亚的作品按其思想和写作艺术的发展成熟可分为三个时期。
在第一时期，莎士比亚的创作以喜剧为主，其中讽刺性的喜剧《威尼斯商人》给大多数读者留下了深刻的印象。
本文通过对《威尼斯商人》主要人物的分析，力图从新的视角去尝试发觉人物的真实性和人性的多面性；进一步加深了对作品的理解深度和力度。
关键词：安东尼奥；夏洛克；巴萨尼奥；鲍西娅“文学巨匠”、“英国戏剧之父”莎士比亚的作品按其思想和写作艺术的发展成熟可分为三个时期。
第一时期从1590年到1600年。
在第一时期，莎士比亚的创作以喜剧为主，也包括历史剧和诗歌。
作品中充满了乐观精神。
其中讽刺性的喜剧《威尼斯商人》给大多数读者留下了深刻的印象。
《威尼斯商人》主要讲述：贫穷而出身高贵的威尼斯青年巴萨尼奥向其好友威尼斯商人安东尼奥借钱，以向美丽并富有的鲍西娅求婚。
但就在他即将成婚时，他收到了安东尼奥的一封告别信，明白了事情真相。
安东尼奥的钱都投资与海上贸易了，只好向犹太人夏洛克借钱以帮助巴萨尼奥。
谁知两人宿怨颇深，夏洛克提出若安东尼奥不能按时还钱，则割其身体一镑肉偿还。
天有不测风云，安东尼奥的船只失事，无法还钱，只好被迫走上法庭与夏洛克对质。
在威尼斯长老院，安东尼奥险些丧命；终因鲍西娅假扮律师出庭，由于她的聪明机智，舌战而胜，得以了结此案。
故事结尾皆大欢喜，有情人终成眷属。
《威尼斯商人》是莎士比亚喜剧的巅峰，但它也是喜剧中的悲剧，剧中多次提到金钱这一古老而又永不过时、永不衰退的话题。
以下具体分析剧中几个主要人物。
一、安东尼奥———慷慨、忠贞、鲁莽、愚蠢安东尼奥对待金钱和人情的态度或许值得我们借鉴。
金钱固然重要，可是在这个世界上有许多远远比金钱更重要的东西。
威尼斯商人安东尼奥慷慨仁厚，淡泊金钱。
例如：他经常无偿借钱给别人而不收取利息；他将意外获得的财产让给了夏洛克的女儿和女婿———罗伦佐，罗伦佐也是安东尼奥的朋友之一。
- 1、下载文档前请自行甄别文档内容的完整性，平台不提供额外的编辑、内容补充、找答案等附加服务。
- 2、"仅部分预览"的文档,不可在线预览部分如存在完整性等问题,可反馈申请退款(可完整预览的文档不适用该条件!)。
- 3、如文档侵犯您的权益，请联系客服反馈,我们会尽快为您处理(人工客服工作时间：9:00-18:30)。
我是羊群里一头不中用的病羊，死是我的应分；最软弱的果子最先落到地上，让我也就这样结束了我的一生吧。
巴萨尼奥
见义勇为、重情重义，但不懂得斗争策略，表现得较为软弱。
葛莱西安诺
疾恶如仇，易激动，嬉笑怒骂，敢于斗争，和安东尼奥形成鲜明对比。
老于世故。
您要是问我为什么不愿接受三千块钱，宁愿拿一块腐烂的臭肉，那我可没有什么理由可以回答您，我只能说我喜欢这样，这是不是一个回答？
唯利是图。
把我的生命连着财产一起拿了去吧，我不要你们的宽恕。你们拿掉了支撑房子的柱子，就是拆了我的房子；你们夺去了我的养家活命的根本，就是活活要了我的命。
冷酷狡诈。
从那破产的家伙身上割下那磅肉来；无论你说得多么婉转动听，都没有用。
鲍西娅
聪明机智。
那可不行，在威尼斯谁也没有权力变更既成的法律；要是开了这一个恶例，以后谁都可以借口有例可援，什么坏事情都可以干了。这是不行的。
鲍西娅是莎翁笔下人文主义女性的典型形象，她的性格在这场戏的矛盾斗争中得以充分展示。面对咄咄逼人的夏洛克，她机智勇敢、沉着稳重。她利用智慧、胆识、才华取得了法庭斗争的主动权，并一步步给夏洛克以致命的打击。
为了朋友，他甘愿冒险向对头夏洛克借钱。他即将受到可怕的刑罚，却始终“默忍”“迎受”，继而要求“爽爽快快”地就刑，为了友谊“从他珍重友情，为了朋友死而无怨；他宽宏大量，面对夏洛克的无耻阴谋，竟逆来顺受；面对死亡的威胁，他具有古罗马英雄那样临危不惧、视死如归的气概。
第四章名著阅读第十部《威尼斯商人》人物形象分析
人物
性格特征
相关情节
总体评价
夏洛克
巧舌如簧。
除非你能够把我这一张契约上的印章骂掉，否则像你这样拉开了喉咙直嚷，不过白白伤了你的肺，何苦来呢？
夏洛克是资本主义原始积累时期高利贷吸血鬼的典型。他具有贪婪、吝啬、残忍、固执、冷酷无情的本质。同时，他也是一个在基督教社会里受欺侮的犹太人。人们对夏洛克，既憎恨他的残酷，又同情他所受的种族压迫和屈辱。
行事沉稳。
且慢，还有别的话哩。这约上并没有允许你取他的一滴血，只是写明着“一磅肉”；所以你可以照约拿一磅肉去，可是在割肉的时候，要是流下一滴基督徒的血，你的土地财产，按照威尼斯的法律，就要全部充公。
善良仁慈。
慈悲不是出于勉强，它……人间的权力就和上帝的神力没有差别。
安东尼奥
慷慨大方、
见义勇为、重义轻财。